Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Profiling and Physiological Analysis of Haloxylon ammodendron in Response to Osmotic Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Fibrocytes: A Novel Stromal Cells to Regulate Resistance to Anti-Angiogenic Therapy and Cancer Progression
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated MicroRNA–mRNA Analysis Reveals miR-204 Inhibits Cell Proliferation in Gastric Cancer by Targeting CKS1B, CXCL1 and GPRC5A
Previous Article in Special Issue
Major Challenges and Potential Microenvironment-Targeted Therapies in Glioblastoma
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010089

Review
The Dark Side of IFN-γ: Its Role in Promoting Cancer Immunoevasion
1
Division of Pathogenic Biochemistry, Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Sugitani 2630, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
2
Division of Cell Biology, Biomedical Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
3
Department of Biofunctional Microbiota, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 December 2017 / Accepted: 26 December 2017 / Published: 28 December 2017

Abstract

:
Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is a pleiotropic cytokine that has long been praised as an important effector molecule of anti-tumor immunity, capable of suppressing tumor growth through various mechanisms. On the contrary to such a bright side of IFN-γ, it has also been involved in promoting an outgrowth of tumor cells with immunoevasive phenotype suggesting an existence of a dark “tumor-promoting” side effect of IFN-γ. In this review, we will summarize this multi-functional role of IFN-γ in tumor context, how it promotes changes in tumor phenotype towards increased fitness for growth in immunocompetent host. Furthermore, we summarize how IFN-γ is involved in homeostatic or cancer-triggered mechanisms to establish an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
Keywords:
IFN-γ; tumorigenesis; tumor immunogenicity; immune suppression

1. Background

Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is a pluripotent cytokine discovered as part of a larger family of factors—interferons, named after their ability to interfere with the growth of live viruses [1]. It is a lone member of type II interferons that is produced by several innate and adaptive immune cells in response to dangerous stimuli. Thus, it is indispensable for physiological processes primarily related to immune regulation and anti-microbial/anti-viral host defense. Moreover, diverse biological actions of IFN-γ are also implicated in pregnancy, obesity, allergies, autoimmune diseases, as well as in cancer [2,3,4,5,6].
In cancer biology, results from early studies established IFN-γ as a prototypical antitumor cytokine. However, findings that endogenous IFN-γ not only controls tumor initiation and progression but also shapes tumor immunogenicity and promotes the outgrowth of tumor cells with immunoevasive properties [7,8,9] revealed that this cytokine can have a dual role in shaping cancer’s outcome. Here, we will review recent findings that unveil complex aspects of IFN-γ in its tumor-promoting effects.

2. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) Producers in Tumor Microenvironment

In a tumor microenvironment, numerous cells of innate and adaptive immunity produce IFN-γ. Two main producers of IFN-γ are natural killer (NK) cells, providing signals from their activating receptors that prevail over signals stemming from inhibitory receptors, and tumor-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTLs) following antigen stimulation of T cell receptor (TCR) or in TCR-independent way that involves synergistic stimulation with cytokines IL-12 and IL-18 [10,11]. Th1 polarized CD4+ T helper cells, known for their ability to help in the promotion and maintenance of anti-tumor CTL responses, also secrete IFN-γ that recruits various cells of innate and adaptive immunity to tumor sites and promote their activation [12]. Immune cells that belong to a blurred distinction between innate and adaptive immunity also produce significant amounts of IFN-γ in tumor microenvironment. Such cells are natural killer T cells (NKT), which express αβ TCR and NK cell receptors, and innate-like γδ T cells, whose antigen recognition by γδ TCR- is not restricted to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules [13,14]. Th22 IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells, macrophages, IFN-producing killer dendritic cells (IKDC) and group 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILC1) are some of the recently discovered immune cells found to infiltrate tumors and to produce IFN-γ [15,16,17,18]. With revived scientific interest for studying immune components of tumor microenvironments, the list of IFN-γ producers is expected to be further expanded.

3. IFN-γ Signaling Pathways

IFN-γ mediates its diverse biological effect by binding to IFN-γ receptor (IFNGR), expressed on the surface of nearly all types of cells. In canonical IFN-γ signaling, binding of IFN-γ to its receptor causes oligomerisation of receptor’s subunits IFNγR1 and IFNγR2 and activation of downstream receptor-associated Janus kinases, JAK1 and JAK2. If not inhibited by physiological negative regulator suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), JAK1/2 phosphorylate and activate signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) in most cells and STAT3 in some cells. Activated homodimers, also known as γ interferon-activated factor (GAF), accumulate in the nucleus and act as transcription factors binding to γ interferon-activated sequence (GAS) elements present in promoters of most IFN-γ-inducible genes. A major primary response gene, trans-activated by canonical IFN-γ signaling, encode the interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1), a transcription factor that further activates a large number of secondary response genes. Co-operating with canonical the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, or acting parallel with it, other pathways that include MAP kinase, PI3K, JNK, CaMKII and NF-κB regulate many aspects of IFN-γ biological actions [19,20,21,22].

4. IFN-γ-Mediated Anti-Tumor Responses

Early studies of IFN-γ effects on various cancer types revealed its extensive anti-tumor potential. Among them, the best known IFN-γ-mediated effect is augmentation of cytotoxic function of NK cell and CTLs as potent effectors of anti-tumor responses [23]. It is also very well known that IFN-γ enhances antigenicity of tumor cells via up-regulation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ia membrane expression. As tumor cells express antigens that differ from their non-transformed counterparts, e.g., neo-antigens resulting from gene mutations, overexpressed cellular antigens or viral antigens [24], IFN-γ stimulates expression of tumor antigen-presenting MHC molecules to increase immunogenicity of tumor cells and makes them more susceptible to immune recognition and destruction [25,26,27]. IFN-γ also displays direct anticancer activity via inhibition of cell proliferation, e.g., by upregulation of p21 and p27 molecules to arrest the cell cycle, or through mediation of apoptotic cell death [28,29,30]. Moreover, by targeting non-transformed cells present in the tumor microenvironment, IFN-γ displays its indirect anti-tumor actions, acting as an antiangiogenic factor to inhibit tumor angiogenesis and/or to promote destruction of established tumor-associated blood vessels [31,32,33,34].
In past key studies, IFN-γ has been shown to play a central role for sketching the outlines of immunoediting concept. This concept frames the transition of the immune system’s role from being tumor restrictive to tumor permissive through three sequential phases: elimination, equilibrium and the escape phase. During these phases, tumors are sculpted to be fit to grow in immunocompetent host [35]. In the absence of IFN-γ signaling, the initiation and progression of chemically induced, transplanted or spontaneously arising tumors in mice were facilitated [8]. Moreover, the importance of IFN-γ for immune destruction of tumors during the elimination phase and for maintenance of the equilibrium phase where occult tumor outgrowth is controlled by immunity has also been studied extensively [8,9,36,37]. Those series of studies in mice models that were either IFN-γ deficient or had endogenous IFN-γ blocked with monoclonal antibody clearly indicate the anti-tumor role of IFN-γ. Collectively, IFN-γ was shown to exert its potent anti-tumor effect through modulating immune cells, tumor cells and/or non-immune stromal cells in tumor microenvironment.

5. IFN-γ in Clinical Settings

Because of its potent anti-tumor activity, IFN-γ has been regarded as a promising cancer immunotherapy agent. Although IFN-γ was rarely tested as a single agent, most of earlier clinical trials examined the antitumor potential of recombinant IFN-γ (IFN-γ1b) as an adjuvant to surgery or conventional chemotherapy [38]. Overall, those clinical trials of IFN-γ had mixed success, often reporting conflicting outcomes in patients with the same tumor type. Promising results were obtained in a study where prophylactic treatment with IFN-γ prevented recurrence of bladder tumor after transurethral tumor resection [39]. Equally promising results IFN-γ1b used for treatment of patients with adult T cell leukemia have been reported capable of inducing lasting remissions [40], while administration of adenovirus vectors that express IFN-γ cDNA showed a clinical benefit for patients with cutaneous T and B cell lymphomas [41,42]. IFN-γ treatments led to upregulated human leukocyte antigen-D related (HLA-DR) expression, a human MHC class II molecule, and improved prognosis of colorectal patients [43]. However, another clinical study in which IFN-γ was used as an adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of colon cancer showed no therapeutic benefit [44]. Early clinical trials of IFN-γ treatment of melanoma went rather inconclusive in its efficacy, as a small number of patients was involved. Other trials of IFN-γ in melanoma as an adjuvant to conventional treatment had to be prematurely terminated, as patients that received IFN-γ had worse clinical outcomes than the IFN-γ-untreated patients [45,46,47,48,49]. In ovarian cancer, clinical trials of IFN-γ shared a similar fate to melanoma. Initial studies showed quite promising results and IFN-γ was used as a single agent in second-line treatment or included in the first-line platinum-based treatment and resulted in improved progression free survival of those patients [50,51]. In contrast, it is also reported that ovarian cancer patients treated with IFN-γ suffered from severe adverse effects and showed shorter overall survival rates [52]. Despite such inconsistent results of previous clinical studies, IFN-γ is still tested as a treatment for HER-2 positive breast cancer, ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer and soft tissue sarcoma (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03112590, NCT02948426 and NCT03056599). Contrary to such inconsistent outcome of the clinical use of IFN-γ, it certainly plays an important role in the success of a new generation of immunotherapy, which has proved to be superior to other means of cancer management. A reinvigoration of anti-tumor immune responses by treating with immune checkpoint inhibitors is strongly accompanied with the increased serum levels of IFN-γ and the IFN-γ-induced chemokines (CXCL-9 and CXCL-10) together with increased numbers of IFN-γ-producing T cells in both peripheral blood and tumor tissues [53]. In fact, there is an ongoing clinical trial that is testing if addition of IFN-γ treatment to PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab immunotherapy of patients with advanced solid tumors will be well-tolerated and have additional beneficial effects (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02614456). Similar to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of cancer, IFN-γ is also a determinant of efficacy of adoptively transferred T cell therapies [54,55].

6. Initial Discovery of Tumor Promoting Features of IFN-γ

About the same time when IFN-γ was galloping toward fame as a multitasking anti-tumor agent, first reports of its tumor promoting actions started to appear. Taniguchi et al. showed that IFN-γ pre-treatment potentiated lung colonization of intravenously inoculated B16 melanoma due to upregulation of MHC class I molecules H-2Kb and H-2Db on tumor cells and decreased sensitivity to NK cells [56]. Greater metastatic potential in vivo, also attributed to increased resistance to NK cells, was observed in IFN-γ-gene-transfected TS/A mammary adenocarcinoma cells [57]. Another study reported that IFN-γ treatment of human melanoma cells in vitro resulted in favorable growth inhibition, but also increased expression of several markers expressed in advanced melanomas (e.g., HLA-DR and -DQ, ICAM-1 and A.1.43), suggesting the potential of IFN-γ to promote the development of more aggressive phenotypes in cancer cells [58]. These first clues from pre-clinical research of pro-tumorigenic features of IFN-γ, coupled with occasional reports from clinical studies of tumor pro-growth effects of recombinant IFN-γ, strongly suggested the existence of a double-sided role of IFN-γ in tumor control. As a result of extensive studies over the past three decades, it is now evident that first, IFN-γ can facilitate tumor initiation and, subsequently, promote changes in tumor cell phenotype towards increased fitness for growth in immunocompetent host; and second, that it is intimately involved in several homeostatic or cancer-triggered mechanisms that promote establishment of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (Figure 1).

7. Role of IFN-γ in Promotion of Tumor Growth

Chronic inflammation is known to contribute to all stages of tumorigenesis, from tumor initiation and promotion to progression. Many cytokines produced in chronic inflammation, such as TNF-α and IL1-β, are already reported to fuel cancer growth and progression toward more malignant phenotypes through multiple mechanisms including an induction of DNA damage response, angiogenesis, and activation of signaling pathways that promote cancer cell survival and/or proliferation [59,60]. Several studies have outlined the role of chronic IFN-γ in tumorigenesis. Yoshida et al. showed that development of carcinogen-induced hepatocellular carcinomas is enhanced in mice with a heterozygous deletion of the SOCS1 gene [61]. Besides being a negative regulator of IFN-γ signaling, SOCS1 is known to inhibit cytokine signaling mediated by JAK-STAT pathways (e.g., IL-4 and IL-6) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling [62]. Thus, contribution of factors other than IFN-γ in the SOSC1−/− tumorigenesis model cannot be excluded. Using SOCS1−/− transgenic (Tg) mice, in which exogenous SOCS1 expression was restored only in T and B cells on a SOCS1−/− background, Hanada et al. found that constitutive IFN-γ-dependent STAT1 signaling is necessary for spontaneous development of colon cancer, which can be prevented with anti-IFN-γ antibody treatment [63]. Recently, Zou et al. showed that excessive and chronic IFN-γ production by CD4+ T cells, caused by T cell intrinsic deficiency for deubiquitinase USP15, increases incidence of methylcholantrene (MCA)-induced fibrosarcomas. Contrary to the role of chronic IFN-γ in MCA-induced carcinogenesis, the growth of the transplantable B16 tumor was significantly suppressed by IFN-γ in the same animal model, and these discrepancies could be attributed to the variations in duration of IFN-γ exposure (acute versus chronic), and quite possibly to the differences in tumor types [64]. In other in vivo transplantable cancer models, chronic exposure to low levels of IFN-γ has been reported to promote growth of H22 hepatoma, MA782/5S mammary adenocarcinoma and B16 melanoma [65]. Moreover, Zaidi et al. showed that IFN-γ signaling can trigger initiation, survival and/or outgrowth of UVB-induced melanoma cells [18]. IFN-γ secreted from adoptively transferred CTLs was found to promote proliferation of leukemia stem cells (LSC) and leukemia progenitor cells in a mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia. Interestingly, LSC expansion in this model was observed only when high amounts of IFN-γ were secreted [66]. Collectively, chronic exposure to IFN-γ can promote tumorigenesis, however, there might be an undefined threshold in the level of IFN-γ exposure to regulate this process and/or it could vary depending on the tumor cell type.
It has been widely recognized that tumors induced by MCA in mice deficient in the IFN-γ pathway or treated with anti-IFN-γ antibody show higher immunogenicity compared to those inimmunocompetent mice [36,37]. From those evidences, IFN-γ selects tumor cells capable of evading immune responses possibly through a constant selective immune pressure. Such immune-evaded tumor cells are frequently found to lose their tumor antigen expression, which can be a result of reduced expression levels of tumor antigens, loss of MHC class I expression, or impaired antigen processing machinery in tumor cells [67,68]. It was reported that IFN-γ exposure led to downregulation of endogenous tumor antigen expression in M14 melanoma and CT26 colon cancer cell lines [69,70]. It is also reported that human melanoma cell lines treated with IFN-γ for prolonged periods lost melan-A and gp100 processing and subsequently evaded CTL recognition [71]. In addition to classical MHC class I regulation, IFN-γ induced expression of non-cognate MHC-I molecules on mouse melanoma cells, which in turn limited tumor-antigen specific T-cell activation and effector functions [72].

8. Role of IFN-γ in Altering Immune Resistance of Tumor

In its simplest definition, tumor immunogenicity is the ability of a tumor to induce an immune response that can prevent its growth [73]. It is accepted that highly immunogenic tumors are the ones that express and present adequate levels of tumor-unique antigens, in a form that activates anti-tumor immunity instead of immune tolerance [73]. Aside from that earlier mentioned selection of poorly immunogenic tumor cell variants by IFN-γ-dependent immune responses, we recently reported that IFN-γ also induces genetic instability of tumor cells that corresponds to immune escape (Figure 1). As a result of in vivo exposure of tumors expressing immunogenic antigens to IFN-γ producing CTLs, we observed copy-number alterations (CNA) associated with DNA damage response and modulation of DNA editing/repair gene expression, which was not only attributable to the tumor-antigen loss but also accumulated during immunological selection thereby contributing to intra-tumor heterogeneity [74]. In addition to tumor-specific antigen loss, IFN-γ-induced genomic instability could result in an acquisition of beneficial phenotype alteration for tumor cells such as acquiring growth advantage, increasing metastatic potential and/or therapeutic resistance [75].
In addition to the reduction of their immunogenicity, tumor cells can evade IFN-γ-dependent immune responses by altering their IFN-γ signaling pathway (e.g., via downregulation or loss of IFN-γ receptor/downstream signaling molecules or through amplification of IFN-γ pathway inhibitors). First indication of such possibility came from the study of the MCA-induced tumorigenesis model in which IFN-γ receptor deficient mice developed tumors more rapidly and with higher incidence than those of IFN-γ-responsive counterparts [8]. Loss of the IFN-γ receptor was found to predict poor prognosis in ovarian cancer and was also seen as an underlying reason for the limited success in the therapeutic use of IFN-γ in ovarian cancer trials [76]. Recently, two independent reports indicated the importance of IFN-γ responsiveness and/or signaling for acquiring tumor cell resistance against immunotherapy [77,78]. In addition, Patel et al. also found that loss of expression of genes that have key roles in IFN-γ signaling, as well as in antigen presentation, serve as a main mechanisms of tumor immune evasion and are underlying causes for cancer resistance/non-responsiveness to immunotherapies by using “two cell type” (2CT)-CRISPR assay [78]. Importantly, the clinical analysis of tumors in patients who relapsed or did not respond at the first place to immune checkpoint inhibitors revealed genomic alterations resulting in loss of IFN-γ signaling-related genes (IFNGR1, IRF1, JAK1, JAK2, IFNGR2) and amplification of IFN-γ pathway suppressor genes (e.g., SOCS1, PIAS4) [79,80,81]. Thus, responsiveness to IFN-γ can be a critical determinant for the fate of cancer cells in response to anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy.

9. Role of IFN-γ in Promoting Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment

IFN-γ has also been known to induce many homeostatic pathways that limit tissue destructions and facilitate recoveries upon resolution of inflammation. There is mounting evidence that malignant tumor cells are taking advantage of such homeostatic features of IFN-γ to attenuate antitumor immunity and boost their own progression. Amongst more than 200 genes induced by IFN-γ [82], many of those genes are the molecules involved in cancer cell immune evasion, such as PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, CIITA, non-classical MHC class Ib antigens, IDO1, CXCL12 etc. [18,19,83]. IFN-γ promotes expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 not only in tumor cells, but also in other stromal cells including immune infiltrating cells, and suppresses the effector function of tumor-specific T cells or NK cells through an interaction with an immune inhibitory receptor, PD-1 [84,85,86]. IFN-γ induced PD-L1/2 expression has also been referred to as a mechanism of adaptive immune resistance to immune checkpoint therapy [87]. Moreover, Benci et al. showed that prolonged IFN-γ signaling in tumor cells triggers STAT-1-dependent epigenetic and transcriptional changes of tumor cells. As a consequence of those changes, expression of multiple ligands for T cell inhibitory receptors are induced in tumor cells which in turn promotes their PD-L1-independent resistance to immune checkpoint therapy [88]. In addition to the role of PD-1/PD-1ligands in downregulation of immune responses (Figure 1), tumor cell intrinsic PD-L1 was found to support tumor-initiating cells that are known to be resistant to conventional anti-tumor drugs and to cause a relapse of tumor [89]. In addition to the PD-1molecule, CTLA-4 is a rather classic inhibitory receptor that functions as an immune checkpoint molecule facilitating immune evasion through induction of tolerance to cognate antigens. Mo et al. recently reported that IFN-γ enhances CTLA-4 expression on melanoma cells which causes immune evasion [90]. MHC class I and IFN-γ also upregulate the expression of MHC class II trans-activator CIITA in melanoma cells leading to the upregulation of MHC class II antigen presentation that is associated with malignant progression and resistance to apoptosis [91,92,93,94]. Non-classical MHC class Ib molecules, e.g., HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G, are known to promote tumor escape from CTL and NK cell immune surveillance by binding to their inhibitory receptors (Figure 1). Indeed, Derre et al. showed that IFN-γ increased surface expression and shedding of soluble HLA-E molecules in melanoma cell lines, resulting in decreased susceptibility of tumor cells to CTL lysis [95].
Besides the induction of ligands for negative receptors of anti-tumor immunity, tumor cells often produce immunosuppressive molecules and/or can induce stromal cells with immune-suppressive character (Figure 1). The immunoregulatory tryptophan-metabolizing enzymes indoleamin-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) 1 and 2, are known to induce CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), which is a key player of suppressing anti-tumor immune responses [96]. It was shown that IFN-γ promotes the expression of IDO in tumor cells, which consequently inhibits CTL-mediated anti-tumor response through Treg-dependent immune suppression [86,97]. Increased IDO1 expression was also found in hypermutated colorectal cancers, but not in non-hypermutated cancers, suggesting its role in blunting immune responses elicited against neoepitopes in these tumors [98]. Another potent suppressor of antitumor immune response is myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). MDSCs are known to produce immunosuppressive cytokines, metabolically obstruct CTL responses by sequestering arginine, tryptophan and cysteine, and promote Treg induction and infiltration to tumor microenvironments [99]. The presence of MDSCs within tumors was shown to be IFN-γ-dependent to suppress anti-tumor effector T cell responses [99]. It has been reported that the IDO expression by tumors mediates expansion, recruitment, and activation of MDSCs in a Treg-dependent manner [100]. Moreover, excessive IFN-γ production by USP15-deficient CD4+ T cells promoted the expression of CXCL12 leading to an accumulation of T-bet+ Treg cells and CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSC, therefore promoting MCA-induced tumorigenesis [64]. Dendritic cells (DC) are important for shifting polarization of T cell-mediated immune responses, as they can prime both tumor-specific CTLs and suppressor regulatory T cells [101], thus regulating a homeostatic balance between immune responses and protective tolerance induction. Interestingly, IFN-γ promotes conversion of immunogenic DCs into IDO+ tolerogenic DCs by inducing IDO1 expression, thus limiting the extent of anti-tumor immunity [102,103]. In addition, it was recently reported that IFN-γ plays an important role to induce homeostatic gene programs in different mononuclear phagocytes including dendritic cells, monocytes and macrophages [104]. IFN-γ promoted self-tolerance during differentiation and migration of phagocytes into and/or from peripheral tissue, and the same IFN-γ-dependent-programs were enriched in the myeloid compartment of primary human tumors [104].

10. Concluding Remarks

Success in recent immunotherapies of cancer, autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)/chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) adoptive transfer or re-invigoration of anti-tumor immunity with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, is largely attributable to IFN-γ-dependent anti-tumor effects. However, a large proportion of patients show primary resistance to those treatments, and further immunotherapy relapsing cases are starting to emerge. Within immunogenic or inflammatory tumor microenvironments, a chronic presence of IFN-γ fails to contribute to tumor cell eradication by its “bright side” function, and instead, can induce a selection and/or generation of tumor clones with more malignant phenotype by its “dark side” function. Genetic screening of tumor cells recently revealed a pivotal role of tumor IFN-γ response for sensitivity to immunotherapies [77,78]. Besides, this pathway will also lead to an acquired resistance character against immunotherapies. Therefore, we have not averted our eyes from the “dark side” and confront this crafty trap. Several studies propose IFN-γ blockade as an approach for disruption of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments or for suppression of IFN-γ-induced epigenomic and transcriptomic changes in tumor cells that provide a molecular basis for their immune escape [64,88]. Nevertheless, this approach may require further optimization as premature IFN-γ blocking might interfere to generate an effective anti-tumor response. Extensive future work will be needed to understand such complex roles of IFN-γ in tumor microenvironments and the full context of either pro- or anti-tumor features of IFN-γ. By enhancing its beneficial anti-tumor effects along with limiting pro-tumor actions, IFN-γ could contribute in establishing promising immunotherapy of cancer, and further reduce risks of tumors acquiring resistance to anti-tumor immunity and/or developing a progressive character.

Author Contributions

Marija Mojic, Kazuyoshi Takeda and Yoshihiro Hayakawa wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Isaacs, A.; Lindenmann, J. Virus interference. I. The interferon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1957, 147, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lees, J.R. Interferon-γ in autoimmunity: A complicated player on a complex stage. Cytokine 2015, 74, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Murphy, S.P.; Tayade, C.; Ashkar, A.A.; Hatta, K.; Zhang, J.; Croy, B.A. Interferon-γ in successful pregnancies. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 80, 848–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rocha, V.Z.; Folco, E.J.; Sukhova, G.; Shimizu, K.; Gotsman, I.; Vernon, A.H.; Libby, P. Interferon-γ, a Th1 cytokine, regulates fat inflammation: A role for adaptive immunity in obesity. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shtrichman, R.; Samuel, C.E. The role of γ interferon in antimicrobial immunity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2001, 4, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Teixeira, L.K.; Fonseca, B.P.; Barboza, B.A.; Viola, J.P. The role of interferon-γ on immune and allergic responses. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2005, 100, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dighe, A.S.; Richards, E.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. Enhanced in vivo growth and resistance to rejection of tumor cells expressing dominant negative IFN-γ receptors. Immunity 1994, 1, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaplan, D.H.; Shankaran, V.; Dighe, A.S.; Stockert, E.; Aguet, M.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. Demonstration of an interferon-γ-dependent tumor surveillance system in immunocompetent mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7556–7561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Street, S.E.; Cretney, E.; Smyth, M.J. Perforin and interferon-γ activities independently control tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis. Blood 2001, 97, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ikeda, H.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. The roles of IFN-γ in protection against tumor development and cancer immunoediting. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pahl, J.; Cerwenka, A. Tricking the balance: NK cells in anti-cancer immunity. Immunobiology 2017, 222, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kennedy, R.; Celis, E. Multiple roles for CD4+ T cells in anti-tumor immune responses. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 222, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gao, Y.; Yang, W.; Pan, M.; Scully, E.; Girardi, M.; Augenlicht, L.H.; Craft, J.; Yin, Z. γδ T cells provide an early source of interferon-γ in tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Terabe, M.; Berzofsky, J.A. The role of NKT cells in tumor immunity. Adv. Cancer Res. 2008, 101, 277–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cortez, V.S.; Robinette, M.L.; Colonna, M. Innate lymphoid cells: New insights into function and development. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2015, 32, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Niccolai, E.; Taddei, A.; Ricci, F.; Rolla, S.; D’Elios, M.M.; Benagiano, M.; Bechi, P.; Bencini, L.; Ringressi, M.N.; Pini, A.; et al. Intra-tumoral IFN-γ-producing Th22 cells correlate with TNM staging and the worst outcomes in pancreatic cancer. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Taieb, J.; Chaput, N.; Menard, C.; Apetoh, L.; Ullrich, E.; Bonmort, M.; Pequignot, M.; Casares, N.; Terme, M.; Flament, C.; et al. A novel dendritic cell subset involved in tumor immunosurveillance. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zaidi, M.R.; Davis, S.; Noonan, F.P.; Graff-Cherry, C.; Hawley, T.S.; Walker, R.L.; Feigenbaum, L.; Fuchs, E.; Lyakh, L.; Young, H.A.; et al. Interferon-γ links ultraviolet radiation to melanomagenesis in mice. Nature 2011, 469, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Garcia-Diaz, A.; Shin, D.S.; Moreno, B.H.; Saco, J.; Escuin-Ordinas, H.; Rodriguez, G.A.; Zaretsky, J.M.; Sun, L.; Hugo, W.; Wang, X.; et al. Interferon Receptor Signaling Pathways Regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 1189–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gough, D.J.; Levy, D.E.; Johnstone, R.W.; Clarke, C.J. IFN-γ signaling—Does it mean JAK-STAT? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008, 19, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Chen, C.; Qu, C.; Jin, Y.; Shi, S. IFN-γ and TNF-α synergistically induce mesenchymal stem cell impairment and tumorigenesis via NFκB signaling. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zaidi, M.R.; Merlino, G. The two faces of interferon-γ in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 6118–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Young, H.A.; Hardy, K.J. Role of interferon-γ in immune cell regulation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1995, 58, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Vigneron, N. Human Tumor Antigens and Cancer Immunotherapy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 948501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cornetta, K.; Berebitsky, D.; Behnia, M.; Traycoff, C.; Srour, E.F.; Sledge, G.W. A retroviral vector expressing human interferon-γ upregulates MHC antigen expression in human breast cancer and leukemia cell lines. Cancer Gene Ther. 1994, 1, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Martini, M.; Testi, M.G.; Pasetto, M.; Picchio, M.C.; Innamorati, G.; Mazzocco, M.; Ugel, S.; Cingarlini, S.; Bronte, V.; Zanovello, P.; et al. IFN-γ-mediated upmodulation of MHC class I expression activates tumor-specific immune response in a mouse model of prostate cancer. Vaccine 2010, 28, 3548–3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Street, D.; Kaufmann, A.M.; Vaughan, A.; Fisher, S.G.; Hunter, M.; Schreckenberger, C.; Potkul, R.K.; Gissmann, L.; Qiao, L. Interferon-γ enhances susceptibility of cervical cancer cells to lysis by tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells. Gynecol. Oncol. 1997, 65, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chawla-Sarkar, M.; Lindner, D.J.; Liu, Y.F.; Williams, B.R.; Sen, G.C.; Silverman, R.H.; Borden, E.C. Apoptosis and interferons: Role of interferon-stimulated genes as mediators of apoptosis. Apoptosis 2003, 8, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chin, Y.E.; Kitagawa, M.; Su, W.C.; You, Z.H.; Iwamoto, Y.; Fu, X.Y. Cell growth arrest and induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 WAF1/CIP1 mediated by STAT1. Science 1996, 272, 719–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Harvat, B.L.; Seth, P.; Jetten, A.M. The role of p27Kip1 in γ interferon-mediated growth arrest of mammary epithelial cells and related defects in mammary carcinoma cells. Oncogene 1997, 14, 2111–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Coughlin, C.M.; Salhany, K.E.; Gee, M.S.; LaTemple, D.C.; Kotenko, S.; Ma, X.; Gri, G.; Wysocka, M.; Kim, J.E.; Liu, L.; et al. Tumor cell responses to IFNγ affect tumorigenicity and response to IL-12 therapy and antiangiogenesis. Immunity 1998, 9, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ibe, S.; Qin, Z.; Schuler, T.; Preiss, S.; Blankenstein, T. Tumor rejection by disturbing tumor stroma cell interactions. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Qin, Z.; Schwartzkopff, J.; Pradera, F.; Kammertoens, T.; Seliger, B.; Pircher, H.; Blankenstein, T. A critical requirement of interferon-γ-mediated angiostasis for tumor rejection by CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 4095–4100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Ruegg, C.; Yilmaz, A.; Bieler, G.; Bamat, J.; Chaubert, P.; Lejeune, F.J. Evidence for the involvement of endothelial cell integrin αVβ3 in the disruption of the tumor vasculature induced by TNF and IFN-γ. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schreiber, R.D.; Old, L.J.; Smyth, M.J. Cancer immunoediting: Integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science 2011, 331, 1565–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Koebel, C.M.; Vermi, W.; Swann, J.B.; Zerafa, N.; Rodig, S.J.; Old, L.J.; Smyth, M.J.; Schreiber, R.D. Adaptive immunity maintains occult cancer in an equilibrium state. Nature 2007, 450, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shankaran, V.; Ikeda, H.; Bruce, A.T.; White, J.M.; Swanson, P.E.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. IFNγ and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity. Nature 2001, 410, 1107–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Miller, C.H.; Maher, S.G.; Young, H.A. Clinical Use of Interferon-γ. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1182, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Giannopoulos, A.; Constantinides, C.; Fokaeas, E.; Stravodimos, C.; Giannopoulou, M.; Kyroudi, A.; Gounaris, A. The immunomodulating effect of interferon-γ intravesical instillations in preventing bladder cancer recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 5550–5558. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Tamura, K.; Makino, S.; Araki, Y.; Imamura, T.; Seita, M. Recombinant interferon β and γ in the treatment of adult T-cell leukemia. Cancer 1987, 59, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Accart, N.; Urosevic-Maiwald, M.; Dummer, R.; Bataille, V.; Kehrer, N.; Niculescu, C.; Limacher, J.M.; Chenard, M.P.; Bonnefoy, J.Y.; Rooke, R. Lymphocytic infiltration in the cutaneous lymphoma microenvironment after injection of TG1042. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  42. Dreno, B.; Urosevic-Maiwald, M.; Kim, Y.; Guitart, J.; Duvic, M.; Dereure, O.; Khammari, A.; Knol, A.C.; Derbij, A.; Lusky, M.; et al. TG1042 (Adenovirus-interferon-γ) in primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas: A phase II clinical trial. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e83670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Matsushita, K.; Takenouchi, T.; Shimada, H.; Tomonaga, T.; Hayashi, H.; Shioya, A.; Komatsu, A.; Matsubara, H.; Ochiai, T. Strong HLA-DR antigen expression on cancer cells relates to better prognosis of colorectal cancer patients: Possible involvement of c-myc suppression by interferon-γ in situ. Cancer Sci. 2006, 97, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wiesenfeld, M.; O’Connell, M.J.; Wieand, H.S.; Gonchoroff, N.J.; Donohue, J.H.; Fitzgibbons, R.J., Jr.; Krook, J.E.; Mailliard, J.A.; Gerstner, J.B.; Pazdur, R. Controlled clinical trial of interferon-γ as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1995, 13, 2324–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Creagan, E.T.; Ahmann, D.L.; Long, H.J.; Frytak, S.; Sherwin, S.A.; Chang, M.N. Phase II study of recombinant interferon-γ in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1987, 71, 843–844. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Ernstoff, M.S.; Trautman, T.; Davis, C.A.; Reich, S.D.; Witman, P.; Balser, J.; Rudnick, S.; Kirkwood, J.M. A randomized phase I/II study of continuous versus intermittent intravenous interferon-γ in patients with metastatic melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 1987, 5, 1804–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Meyskens, F.L., Jr.; Kopecky, K.; Samson, M.; Hersh, E.; Macdonald, J.; Jaffe, H.; Crowley, J.; Coltman, C. Recombinant human interferon-γ: Adverse effects in high-risk stage I and II cutaneous malignant melanoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Meyskens, F.L., Jr.; Kopecky, K.J.; Taylor, C.W.; Noyes, R.D.; Tuthill, R.J.; Hersh, E.M.; Feun, L.G.; Doroshow, J.H.; Flaherty, L.E.; Sondak, V.K. Randomized trial of adjuvant human interferon-γ versus observation in high-risk cutaneous melanoma: A Southwest Oncology Group study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995, 87, 1710–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Schiller, J.H.; Pugh, M.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Karp, D.; Larson, M.; Borden, E. Eastern cooperative group trial of interferon-γ in metastatic melanoma: An innovative study design. Clin. Cancer Res. 1996, 2, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Marth, C.; Windbichler, G.H.; Hausmaninger, H.; Petru, E.; Estermann, K.; Pelzer, A.; Mueller-Holzner, E. Interferon-γ in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as a safe and effective first-line treatment option for advanced ovarian cancer: Results of a phase I/II study. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2006, 16, 1522–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pujade-Lauraine, E.; Guastalla, J.P.; Colombo, N.; Devillier, P.; Francois, E.; Fumoleau, P.; Monnier, A.; Nooy, M.; Mignot, L.; Bugat, R.; et al. Intraperitoneal recombinant interferon-γ in ovarian cancer patients with residual disease at second-look laparotomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 1996, 14, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Alberts, D.S.; Marth, C.; Alvarez, R.D.; Johnson, G.; Bidzinski, M.; Kardatzke, D.R.; Bradford, W.Z.; Loutit, J.; Kirn, D.H.; Clouser, M.C.; et al. Randomized phase 3 trial of interferon-γ-1b plus standard carboplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel alone for first-line treatment of advanced ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinomas: Results from a prospectively designed analysis of progression-free survival. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008, 109, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Granier, C.; de Guillebon, E.; Blanc, C.; Roussel, H.; Badoual, C.; Colin, E.; Saldmann, A.; Gey, A.; Oudard, S.; Tartour, E. Mechanisms of action and rationale for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. ESMO Open 2017, 2, e000213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Spear, P.; Barber, A.; Rynda-Apple, A.; Sentman, C.L. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells shape myeloid cell function within the tumor microenvironment through IFN-γ and GM-CSF. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 6389–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Textor, A.; Listopad, J.J.; Wuhrmann, L.L.; Perez, C.; Kruschinski, A.; Chmielewski, M.; Abken, H.; Blankenstein, T.; Charo, J. Efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in large tumors relies upon stromal targeting by IFNγ. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 6796–6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Taniguchi, K.; Petersson, M.; Hoglund, P.; Kiessling, R.; Klein, G.; Karre, K. Interferon-γ induces lung colonization by intravenously inoculated B16 melanoma cells in parallel with enhanced expression of class I major histocompatibility complex antigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 3405–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lollini, P.L.; Bosco, M.C.; Cavallo, F.; de Giovanni, C.; Giovarelli, M.; Landuzzi, L.; Musiani, P.; Modesti, A.; Nicoletti, G.; Palmieri, G.; et al. Inhibition of tumor growth and enhancement of metastasis after transfection of the γ-interferon gene. Int. J. Cancer 1993, 55, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Garbe, C.; Krasagakis, K.; Zouboulis, C.C.; Schroder, K.; Kruger, S.; Stadler, R.; Orfanos, C.E. Antitumor activities of interferon α, β, and γ and their combinations on human melanoma cells in vitro: Changes of proliferation, melanin synthesis, and immunophenotype. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1990, 95, 231S–237S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Balkwill, F.; Mantovani, A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet 2001, 357, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Coussens, L.M.; Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002, 420, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yoshida, T.; Ogata, H.; Kamio, M.; Joo, A.; Shiraishi, H.; Tokunaga, Y.; Sata, M.; Nagai, H.; Yoshimura, A. SOCS1 is a suppressor of liver fibrosis and hepatitis-induced carcinogenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 1701–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Inagaki-Ohara, K.; Kondo, T.; Ito, M.; Yoshimura, A. SOCS, inflammation, and cancer. JAK-STAT 2013, 2, e24053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hanada, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Chinen, T.; Saeki, K.; Takaki, H.; Koga, K.; Minoda, Y.; Sanada, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Mimata, H.; et al. IFNγ-dependent, spontaneous development of colorectal carcinomas in SOCS1-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1391–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zou, Q.; Jin, J.; Xiao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Hu, H.; Cheng, X.; Kazimi, N.; Ullrich, S.E.; Sun, S.C. T Cell Intrinsic USP15 Deficiency Promotes Excessive IFN-γ Production and an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment in MCA-Induced Fibrosarcoma. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 2470–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. He, Y.F.; Wang, X.H.; Zhang, G.M.; Chen, H.T.; Zhang, H.; Feng, Z.H. Sustained low-level expression of interferon-γ promotes tumor development: Potential insights in tumor prevention and tumor immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2005, 54, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Schurch, C.; Riether, C.; Amrein, M.A.; Ochsenbein, A.F. Cytotoxic T cells induce proliferation of chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells by secreting interferon-γ. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 605–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Algarra, I.; Garcia-Lora, A.; Cabrera, T.; Ruiz-Cabello, F.; Garrido, F. The selection of tumor variants with altered expression of classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules: Implications for tumor immune escape. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2004, 53, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Maeurer, M.J.; Gollin, S.M.; Martin, D.; Swaney, W.; Bryant, J.; Castelli, C.; Robbins, P.; Parmiani, G.; Storkus, W.J.; Lotze, M.T. Tumor escape from immune recognition: Lethal recurrent melanoma in a patient associated with downregulation of the peptide transporter protein TAP-1 and loss of expression of the immunodominant MART-1/Melan-A antigen. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Beatty, G.L.; Paterson, Y. IFN-γ can promote tumor evasion of the immune system in vivo by down-regulating cellular levels of an endogenous tumor antigen. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 5502–5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Le Poole, I.C.; Riker, A.I.; Quevedo, M.E.; Stennett, L.S.; Wang, E.; Marincola, F.M.; Kast, W.M.; Robinson, J.K.; Nickoloff, B.J. Interferon-γ reduces melanosomal antigen expression and recognition of melanoma cells by cytotoxic T cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 160, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Morel, S.; Levy, F.; Burlet-Schiltz, O.; Brasseur, F.; Probst-Kepper, M.; Peitrequin, A.L.; Monsarrat, B.; van Velthoven, R.; Cerottini, J.C.; Boon, T.; et al. Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 2000, 12, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cho, H.I.; Lee, Y.R.; Celis, E. Interferon-γ limits the effectiveness of melanoma peptide vaccines. Blood 2011, 117, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Blankenstein, T.; Coulie, P.G.; Gilboa, E.; Jaffee, E.M. The determinants of tumour immunogenicity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Takeda, K.; Nakayama, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Kojima, Y.; Ikeda, H.; Imai, N.; Ogasawara, K.; Okumura, K.; Thomas, D.M.; Smyth, M.J. IFN-γ is required for cytotoxic T cell-dependent cancer genome immunoediting. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. McFadden, D.G.; Papagiannakopoulos, T.; Taylor-Weiner, A.; Stewart, C.; Carter, S.L.; Cibulskis, K.; Bhutkar, A.; McKenna, A.; Dooley, A.; Vernon, A.; et al. Genetic and clonal dissection of murine small cell lung carcinoma progression by genome sequencing. Cell 2014, 156, 1298–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Duncan, T.J.; Rolland, P.; Deen, S.; Scott, I.V.; Liu, D.T.; Spendlove, I.; Durrant, L.G. Loss of IFN γ receptor is an independent prognostic factor in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 4139–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Manguso, R.T.; Pope, H.W.; Zimmer, M.D.; Brown, F.D.; Yates, K.B.; Miller, B.C.; Collins, N.B.; Bi, K.; LaFleur, M.W.; Juneja, V.R.; et al. In vivo CRISPR screening identifies Ptpn2 as a cancer immunotherapy target. Nature 2017, 547, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Patel, S.J.; Sanjana, N.E.; Kishton, R.J.; Eidizadeh, A.; Vodnala, S.K.; Cam, M.; Gartner, J.J.; Jia, L.; Steinberg, S.M.; Yamamoto, T.N.; et al. Identification of essential genes for cancer immunotherapy. Nature 2017, 548, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gao, J.; Shi, L.Z.; Zhao, H.; Chen, J.; Xiong, L.; He, Q.; Chen, T.; Roszik, J.; Bernatchez, C.; Woodman, S.E.; et al. Loss of IFN-γ Pathway Genes in Tumor Cells as a Mechanism of Resistance to Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy. Cell 2016, 167, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Shin, D.S.; Zaretsky, J.M.; Escuin-Ordinas, H.; Garcia-Diaz, A.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Kalbasi, A.; Grasso, C.S.; Hugo, W.; Sandoval, S.; Torrejon, D.Y.; et al. Primary Resistance to PD-1 Blockade Mediated by JAK1/2 Mutations. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zaretsky, J.M.; Garcia-Diaz, A.; Shin, D.S.; Escuin-Ordinas, H.; Hugo, W.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Torrejon, D.Y.; Abril-Rodriguez, G.; Sandoval, S.; Barthly, L.; et al. Mutations Associated with Acquired Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Boehm, U.; Klamp, T.; Groot, M.; Howard, J.C. Cellular responses to interferon-γ. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 1997, 15, 749–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ayers, M.; Lunceford, J.; Nebozhyn, M.; Murphy, E.; Loboda, A.; Kaufman, D.R.; Albright, A.; Cheng, J.D.; Kang, S.P.; Shankaran, V.; et al. IFN-γ-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 2930–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Abiko, K.; Matsumura, N.; Hamanishi, J.; Horikawa, N.; Murakami, R.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Baba, T.; Konishi, I.; Mandai, M. IFN-γ from lymphocytes induces PD-L1 expression and promotes progression of ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  85. Bellucci, R.; Martin, A.; Bommarito, D.; Wang, K.; Hansen, S.H.; Freeman, G.J.; Ritz, J. Interferon-γ-induced activation of JAK1 and JAK2 suppresses tumor cell susceptibility to NK cells through upregulation of PD-L1 expression. Oncoimmunology 2015, 4, e1008824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Spranger, S.; Spaapen, R.M.; Zha, Y.; Williams, J.; Meng, Y.; Ha, T.T.; Gajewski, T.F. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and Tregs in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8+ T cells. Sci. Trans. Med. 2013, 5, 200ra116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sharma, P.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Wargo, J.A.; Ribas, A. Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell 2017, 168, 707–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Benci, J.L.; Xu, B.; Qiu, Y.; Wu, T.J.; Dada, H.; Twyman-Saint Victor, C.; Cucolo, L.; Lee, D.S.; Pauken, K.E.; Huang, A.C.; et al. Tumor Interferon Signaling Regulates a Multigenic Resistance Program to Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cell 2016, 167, 1540–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gupta, H.B.; Clark, C.A.; Yuan, B.; Sareddy, G.; Pandeswara, S.; Padron, A.S.; Hurez, V.; Conejo-Garcia, J.; Vadlamudi, R.; Li, R.; et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1 promotes tumor-initiating cell generation and functions in melanoma and ovarian cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2016, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mo, X.; Zhang, H.; Preston, S.; Martin, K.; Zhou, B.; Vadalia, N.; Gamero, A.M.; Soboloff, J.; Tempera, I.; Zaidi, M.R. Interferon-γ signaling in melanocytes and melanoma cells regulates expression of CTLA-4. Cancer Res. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Goldberg, M.V.; Drake, C.G. LAG-3 in Cancer Immunotherapy. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2011, 344, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hemon, P.; Jean-Louis, F.; Ramgolam, K.; Brignone, C.; Viguier, M.; Bachelez, H.; Triebel, F.; Charron, D.; Aoudjit, F.; Al-Daccak, R.; et al. MHC class II engagement by its ligand LAG-3 (CD223) contributes to melanoma resistance to apoptosis. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5173–5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Herlyn, M.; Guerry, D.; Koprowski, H. Recombinant γ-interferon induces changes in expression and shedding of antigens associated with normal human melanocytes, nevus cells, and primary and metastatic melanoma cells. J. Immunol. 1985, 134, 4226–4230. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Tsujisaki, M.; Igarashi, M.; Sakaguchi, K.; Eisinger, M.; Herlyn, M.; Ferrone, S. Immunochemical and functional analysis of HLA class II antigens induced by recombinant immune interferon on normal epidermal melanocytes. J. Immunol. 1987, 138, 1310–1316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Derre, L.; Corvaisier, M.; Charreau, B.; Moreau, A.; Godefroy, E.; Moreau-Aubry, A.; Jotereau, F.; Gervois, N. Expression and release of HLA-E by melanoma cells and melanocytes: Potential impact on the response of cytotoxic effector cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 3100–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Takeuchi, Y.; Nishikawa, H. Roles of regulatory T cells in cancer immunity. Int. Immunol. 2016, 28, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Brody, J.R.; Costantino, C.L.; Berger, A.C.; Sato, T.; Lisanti, M.P.; Yeo, C.J.; Emmons, R.V.; Witkiewicz, A.K. Expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in metastatic malignant melanoma recruits regulatory T cells to avoid immune detection and affects survival. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1930–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Angelova, M.; Charoentong, P.; Hackl, H.; Fischer, M.L.; Snajder, R.; Krogsdam, A.M.; Waldner, M.J.; Bindea, G.; Mlecnik, B.; Galon, J.; et al. Characterization of the immunophenotypes and antigenomes of colorectal cancers reveals distinct tumor escape mechanisms and novel targets for immunotherapy. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  99. Ostrand-Rosenberg, S.; Sinha, P. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: Linking inflammation and cancer. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4499–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Holmgaard, R.B.; Zamarin, D.; Li, Y.; Gasmi, B.; Munn, D.H.; Allison, J.P.; Merghoub, T.; Wolchok, J.D. Tumor-Expressed IDO Recruits and Activates MDSCs in a Treg-Dependent Manner. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Steinman, R.M. Dendritic cells: Understanding immunogenicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37 (Suppl. S1), S53–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Harden, J.L.; Gu, T.; Kilinc, M.O.; Rowswell-Turner, R.B.; Virtuoso, L.P.; Egilmez, N.K. Dichotomous effects of IFN-γ on dendritic cell function determine the extent of IL-12-driven antitumor T cell immunity. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Jurgens, B.; Hainz, U.; Fuchs, D.; Felzmann, T.; Heitger, A. Interferon-γ-triggered indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase competence in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells induces regulatory activity in allogeneic T cells. Blood 2009, 114, 3235–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Nirschl, C.J.; Suarez-Farinas, M.; Izar, B.; Prakadan, S.; Dannenfelser, R.; Tirosh, I.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Devi, K.S.P.; Carroll, S.L.; et al. IFNγ-Dependent Tissue-Immune Homeostasis Is Co-opted in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cell 2017, 170, 127–141.e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. IFN-γ in promoting tumor immunoevasion. In response to immunogenic cancer, cells of anti-tumor immunity secrete IFN-γ (orange cells), which in turn induces genomic instability (e.g., copy number alterations, CNA) and/or immunoevasive gene expression signature in cancer cells (PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, non-classical MHC class Ib antigens, IDO1 etc.), sculpting tumor cell phenotype towards increased fitness for growth in immunocompetent host. In parallel, IFN-γ establishes immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by triggering homeostatic response to limit inflammation, promoting tumor cells to produce immunosuppressive molecules (e.g., IDO1 that causes local depletion of amino acid tryptophan suppressing CTL and NK cells and activating Tregs and MDSC), or recruiting immunosuppressive cells (blue cells). CTL, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells; NK, natural killer cells; γδ, γδ T cells; NKT, natural killer T cells; Th1, Th1 polarized CD4+ T helper cells; ILC1, group 1 innate lymphoid cells; IKDC, IFN-producing killer dendritic cells; tDC, tolerogenic dendritic cells; Treg, regulatory T cells; MDSC, myeloid derived suppressor cells; MHC-I, major histocompatibility complex molecule class I; MHC-II, major histocompatibility complex molecule class II; CNA, copy-number alterations; IDO1, indoleamin-2,3-dioxygenase 1, a tryptophan-metabolizing enzyme.
Figure 1. IFN-γ in promoting tumor immunoevasion. In response to immunogenic cancer, cells of anti-tumor immunity secrete IFN-γ (orange cells), which in turn induces genomic instability (e.g., copy number alterations, CNA) and/or immunoevasive gene expression signature in cancer cells (PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, non-classical MHC class Ib antigens, IDO1 etc.), sculpting tumor cell phenotype towards increased fitness for growth in immunocompetent host. In parallel, IFN-γ establishes immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by triggering homeostatic response to limit inflammation, promoting tumor cells to produce immunosuppressive molecules (e.g., IDO1 that causes local depletion of amino acid tryptophan suppressing CTL and NK cells and activating Tregs and MDSC), or recruiting immunosuppressive cells (blue cells). CTL, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells; NK, natural killer cells; γδ, γδ T cells; NKT, natural killer T cells; Th1, Th1 polarized CD4+ T helper cells; ILC1, group 1 innate lymphoid cells; IKDC, IFN-producing killer dendritic cells; tDC, tolerogenic dendritic cells; Treg, regulatory T cells; MDSC, myeloid derived suppressor cells; MHC-I, major histocompatibility complex molecule class I; MHC-II, major histocompatibility complex molecule class II; CNA, copy-number alterations; IDO1, indoleamin-2,3-dioxygenase 1, a tryptophan-metabolizing enzyme.
Ijms 19 00089 g001

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top