Next Article in Journal
SlBIR3 Negatively Regulates PAMP Responses and Cell Death in Tomato
Next Article in Special Issue
The Semi-Synthetic Peptide Lin-SB056-1 in Combination with EDTA Exerts Strong Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Conditions Mimicking Cystic Fibrosis Sputum
Previous Article in Journal
Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biofilm Producing Salmonella Typhi: Chronic Colonization and Development of Gallbladder Cancer
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(9), 1970;

Bacterial Biofilm Control by Perturbation of Bacterial Signaling Processes

Costerton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637551, Singapore
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 August 2017 / Revised: 6 September 2017 / Accepted: 7 September 2017 / Published: 13 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofilm Formation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [4240 KB, uploaded 13 September 2017]   |  


The development of effective strategies to combat biofilm infections by means of either mechanical or chemical approaches could dramatically change today’s treatment procedures for the benefit of thousands of patients. Remarkably, considering the increased focus on biofilms in general, there has still not been invented and/or developed any simple, efficient and reliable methods with which to “chemically” eradicate biofilm infections. This underlines the resilience of infective agents present as biofilms and it further emphasizes the insufficiency of today’s approaches used to combat chronic infections. A potential method for biofilm dismantling is chemical interception of regulatory processes that are specifically involved in the biofilm mode of life. In particular, bacterial cell to cell signaling called “Quorum Sensing” together with intracellular signaling by bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic-dimeric guanosine monophosphate (cyclic-di-GMP) have gained a lot of attention over the last two decades. More recently, regulatory processes governed by two component regulatory systems and small non-coding RNAs have been increasingly investigated. Here, we review novel findings and potentials of using small molecules to target and modulate these regulatory processes in the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa to decrease its pathogenic potential. View Full-Text
Keywords: quorum sensing; cyclic-di-GMP; anti-virulence; small RNAs; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; biofilm life-cycle; cell signaling quorum sensing; cyclic-di-GMP; anti-virulence; small RNAs; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; biofilm life-cycle; cell signaling

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jakobsen, T.H.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Givskov, M. Bacterial Biofilm Control by Perturbation of Bacterial Signaling Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1970.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top