Next Article in Journal
Valproate Attenuates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Induced Apoptosis in SH-SY5Y Cells via the AKT/GSK3β Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Sanghuangporus sanghuang Mycelium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treating the Synapse in Major Psychiatric Disorders: The Role of Postsynaptic Density Network in Dopamine-Glutamate Interplay and Psychopharmacologic Drugs Molecular Actions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 18
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms18020349
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Inhaled Loxapine in the Treatment of Acute Agitation in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: A Clinical Review

by
Domenico De Berardis
1,2,*,
Michele Fornaro
3,4,
Laura Orsolini
4,5,6,
Felice Iasevoli
7,
Carmine Tomasetti
7,
Andrea De Bartolomeis
7,
Nicola Serroni
2,
Alessandro Valchera
4,6,
Alessandro Carano
8,
Federica Vellante
2,4,
Stefano Marini
2,4,
Monica Piersanti
9,
Giampaolo Perna
10,11,12,
Giovanni Martinotti
2 and
Massimo Di Giannantonio
2
1
The National Health Service, Department of Mental Health, Psychiatric Service of Diagnosis and Treatment, Hospital “G. Mazzini”, ASL 4, 64100 Teramo, Italy
2
Department of Neurosciences and Imaging, Chair of Psychiatry, University “G. D’Annunzio”, 66013 Chieti, Italy
3
New York Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
4
Polyedra Research Group Association, 64100 Teramo, Italy
5
School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK
6
Villa S. Giuseppe Hospital, HermanasHospitalarias, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy
7
Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry and Psychopharmacotherapeutics, Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, University School of Medicine “Federico II”, 80133 Naples, Italy
8
The National Health Service, Department of Mental Health, Psychiatric Service of Diagnosis and Treatment, Hospital “Madonna Del Soccorso”, 63074 San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
9
Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital “G. Mazzini”, ASL 4, 64100 Teramo, Italy
10
Hermanas Hospitalarias, FoRiPsi, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Menni, Albese con Cassano, 22032 Como, Italy
11
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, University of Maastricht, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
12
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Leonard Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(2), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020349
Submission received: 11 December 2016 / Revised: 26 January 2017 / Accepted: 2 February 2017 / Published: 8 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antipsychotics)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Loxapine is a first generation antipsychotic, belonging to the dibenzoxazepine class. Recently, loxapine has been reformulated at a lower dose, producing an inhaled powder that can be directly administered to the lungs to treat the agitation associated with psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Thus, the aim of this narrative and clinical mini-review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of inhaled loxapine in the treatment of acute agitation in patients with psychiatric disorders. The efficacy of inhaled loxapine has been evaluated in one Phase II trial on patients with schizophrenia, and in two Phase III trials in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Moreover, there are two published case series on patients with borderline personality disorder and dual diagnosis patients. Inhaled loxapine has proven to be effective and generally well tolerated when administered to agitated patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Two case series have suggested that inhaled loxapine may also be useful to treat agitation in patients with borderline personality disorder and with dual diagnosis, but further studies are needed to clarify this point. However, the administration of inhaled loxapine requires at least some kind of patient collaboration, and is not recommended in the treatment of severe agitation in totally uncooperative patients. Moreover, the drug-related risk of bronchospasm must always be kept in mind when planning to use inhaled loxapine, leading to a careful patient assessment prior to, and after, administration. Also, the higher costs of inhaled loxapine, when compared to oral and intramuscular medications, should be taken into account when selecting it for the treatment of agitation.

1. Introduction

Being faced with an agitated or violent patient is a challenge for every psychiatrist and associated health care professional, working in the everyday “real world” clinical practice [1]. Even if agitation or violence are not common symptoms of all psychiatric disorders, and the majority of persons with such disorders are not violent [2], it is undoubtable that these manifestations may more often occur in some psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia or bipolar disorders) [3,4], when there are comorbid conditions (e.g., substance and alcohol abuse or dependence, some personality disorders) [5], or lack of medication compliance [6].
The presence of psychotic symptoms has long been thought to be associated with agitation or violence, and this has often influenced the public opinion of associated illnesses, resulting in an increasingly perceived “stigma” of psychiatric disorders in general [7]. Nevertheless, the relationship between psychotic symptoms and agitation/violence, is very complex [8]. In fact, agitation and violence may be mediated by some clinical characteristics associated with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (rather than schizophrenia or bipolar disorder per se), such as a heightened sensitivity to a perceived threat [9].
When considering the relationships between psychosis and agitation/violence, a pattern of personality traits related to psychosis (the so-called “threat/control-override”, TCO) [10,11], has received practical support as a likely explanatory variable for the psychosis-aggression association. As noted by Link and Stueve [10], only psychotic-like experiences that lead someone to fear a heightened perceived threat of harm (such as commanding auditory hallucinations, persecutory delusions, hypervigilance), while blocking internal constraints against violence (the “control-override” system), may precipitate agitation, aggression, and violent behaviours.
Furthermore, the agitation or violence associated with schizophrenia and mood disorders requires immediate treatment, to avoid injury to patients, nursing and medical staff, and others. The current guidelines for the management of severe agitation in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder recommend treatment with antipsychotic agents and/or BDZs, initiated as soon as possible after other conditions associated with agitation have been ruled out [11,12].
To date, there are some medications that are commonly used for the acute treatment of agitation/violence in psychiatric patients, and these include first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), and benzodiazepines (BDZs) [13]. There are three possible routes for the administration of such drugs: oral, intramuscular (IM), or intravenous [11,12]. Even if FGAs have been commonly used in clinical practice for many years, because several SGAs (such as olanzapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole) are available in immediate-release IM preparations, and have been approved for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, these are often the first-choice antipsychotics, together with BDZ, for the acute treatment of such patients [14] (Table 1).
Recently, a fourth route of administration (inhaled loxapine) has been made available for the treatment of agitation in psychiatric disorders [15]. In fact, loxapine, a FGA, has recently been reformulated at a lower dose, producing an inhaled powder that can be directly administered to the lungs [16,17].
Thus, the aim of this narrative and clinical review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of inhaled loxapine in the treatment of acute agitation in patients with psychiatric disorders.

2. Overview of Inhaled Loxapine

2.1. Mechanism of Action

Loxapine is a FGA belonging to the pharmacological class of dibenzoxazepines, and it is structurally related to clozapine, differing from it in the position of one of its chlorine atoms, as well as the replacement of the diazepine group of clozapine, with the oxazepine group of loxapine [18,19]. Early studies identified a peculiar receptor profile for loxapine, which demonstrates a medium-to-strong affinity to dopamine D1, D2, and D4 receptors, as well as to serotonin 5HT2 receptors, with negligible affinity to glutamate NMDA receptors [20]. Although it has traditionally been considered a FGA, a significant number of studies have reported on the “atypical” pharmacodynamic properties of loxapine (similar to those of SGAs). Indeed, early in vitro reports showed that loxapine’s affinity to 5HT2 receptors seemed to be higher than its affinity to dopamine D2 receptors [21,22]. Moreover, the affinity to dopamine D4 receptors has also been reported as being higher than the affinity to D2 receptors, and it seems even higher than clozapine’s D4 affinity [20].
However, in vitro findings have not been confirmed by in vivo studies, in which loxapine demonstrated a clear lowering of the 5HT2/D2 affinity ratio [23]. This result could depend on the fact that loxapine is extensively metabolized in humans, to form hydroxylated metabolites, such as the 7-hydroxyloxapine, which has been found to have a 5-fold higher affinity to dopamine D2 receptors, when compared to the original compound [24]. A more recent study by Kapur et al. further demonstrated that loxapine equipotently blocks 5HT2 and D2 receptors in humans [25], thus invalidating the hypothesis that this drug might be similar to clozapine, which conversely displays a higher affinity and occupancy of 5HT2 receptors, when compared to D2 receptors [26]. Loxapine also has a high affinity to hystaminergic H1 and adrenergic α-1/α-2 receptors, and a moderate affinity to cholinergic M1 receptors, which are supposedly responsible for the sedation [27].
To strengthen the relationship between loxapine and FGAs, some studies have revealed that loxapine may largely increase the expression of D2 and D3 receptors’ mRNA, similarly to haloperidol, with the only exception of D1 receptors’ mRNA, which is induced to a greater extent by loxapine, thereby suggesting a propensity to induce extrapyramidal symptoms, similar to FGAs [28]. Moreover, loxapine has been reported to promote synaptic responses in the hippocampus at a similar level to haloperidol, whereas clozapine has no effect [29]. Clozapine, as is the case with other SGAs, may facilitate prefrontal cortical NMDA- and AMPA-mediated responses, whereas loxapine and haloperidol depress excitatory responses [30]. Characteristically, loxapine, together with other FGAs liable for inducing EPS (e.g., haloperidol, chlorpromazine, fluphenazine), has been found to induce the expression of the early gene C-Fos, specifically in the dorsolateral region of the caudate-putamen, which is implicated in the control of motor functions. In contrast, SGAs like clozapine peculiarly induce Fos reactivity in the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, and lateral septal nucleus, all implicated in the management of behaviour and emotions [31,32].
Preclinical behavioural studies have demonstrated that loxapine may induce catalepsy in rats to the same extent as olanzapine, and these effects may be abolished by clozapine administration, but only when it is administered after the catalepsy is fully developed [33]. In discriminative stimulus comparisons, loxapine may only induce minimal generalization, similarly to haloperidol, whereas clozapine has been demonstrated to induce full dose-related generalization in the absence of response suppression [34]. However, the close structural relationship between clozapine and loxapine could be responsible for the clozapine-like side effects of loxapine, such as weight gain and metabolic syndrome. Indeed, an in vitro study has demonstrated that loxapine may reduce intracellular glucose uptake by inhibiting the glucose transport in a way which is very similar to clozapine [35].
In contrast to the other FGAs, loxapine may promote dopamine release in the cortex and nucleus accumbens that is comparable with SGAs, an effect that denotes loxapine as having a unique profile, when compared to its closer companion drugs [36]. Puzzlingly, it has been demonstrated in preclinical studies that the isomer of loxapine, isoloxapine, possess “atypical” properties (similar to SGAs), when compared to its progenitor, putatively due to the 5HT2 and alpha2-oriented affinity to the isomer [37]. Isoloxapine, when compared to loxapine, behaves as a SGA, by inhibiting a conditioned avoidance response that does not induce catalepsy and hyperprolactinemia, but that does induce slight c-Fos expression in the dorsolateral striatum. All of these effects are ones which researchers ascribe to the very high occupancy of D2 receptors by loxapine, that invalidates whichever 5HT2-related “atypical” property could be displayed by the compound [38].
Brain distribution studies have reported that loxapine-hydroxylated metabolites (7-hydroxyloxapine), but not the progenitor, can be localized above all of the others in the striatum, demonstrating consistency with the D2 affinity of the compound [39]. Moreover, the intranasal administration of loxapine tends to induce less extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than oral administration, which is compatible with the higher levels of 7-hydroxyloxapine reached in the striatum after oral administration [40]. Last, in anaesthetized animals, intranasal loxapine reaches a higher bioavailability than in conscious specimens, due to the liver metabolism suppression which is caused by anaesthesia [41].
Loxapine is available in oral and intramuscular formulations. In 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an inhalatory route of loxapine (Adasuve®) for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder in adult patients, with a 10 mg formulation (Table 1) [42,43]. However, inhaled loxapine is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis and is contraindicated in patients with active airways disease [22].

2.2. Inhaled Loxapine: The Staccato® System Delivery

The inhaled loxapine is administered through a hand-held, single-dosage, disposable breath-actuated tool (the Staccato® system), specifically designed to quickly administer drug dry powder into the alveoli, with IV-like pharmacokinetics leading to a rapid systemic effect [19]. With the Staccato® system, when the patient inhales through the device during a single normal breath, airflow is identified by a sensor that rapidly heats the loxapine-coated stainless steel heat source, vaporizing almost 90% of the loxapine stored in the device, usually in less than one second [44]. Then, the vapor cools quickly, condensing into >99.5% pure, excipient-free loxapine particles of 2 lm in diameter, suitable for alveolar deposition, which travel deep into the lungs through the inhaled airflow of the patient’s breath, ensuring a fast systemic absorption [45]. The entire process of drug delivery commonly happens in less than 1 s [24]. However, it is worth noting that some degree of patient co-operation is undoubtedly necessary [17].

2.3. Studies on Healthy Subjects and Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Loxapine

Several studies on healthy volunteers have been conducted in order to assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of inhaled loxapine [46,47,48,49,50] (Table 2). The administration of inhaled loxapine results in a rapid absorption, with a Tmax of two minutes, reaching a mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 257 ± 219 ng/mL [26,29]. Loxapine is rapidly removed from the plasma and distributed throughout the body. A total of 96.6% of the loxapine is protein-bound. Loxapine is metabolized in the liver after oral administration, through several metabolic pathways [22] (hydroxylation, N-oxidation, and de-methylation form 8-OH-loxapine [CYP1A2] and 7-OH-loxapine [CYP3A4/CYP2D6], loxapine N-oxide by flavonoid monoamine oxidases and amoxapine, respectively) [51]. Metabolic interactions should be minimal, due to extensive metabolism through various pathways. The conjugated metabolites of loxapine are eliminated through the kidneys and, to a lesser extent, unconjugated via the faeces. The drug’s half-life ranges from six to eight hours. No effect on cardiac repolarization, as measured by the QTc interval, emerged during the two studies on healthy subjects [27,28].

2.4. Clinical Trials of Inhaled Loxapine in the Treatment of Agitation in Psychiatric Disorders

The efficacy of inhaled loxapine has been evaluated in one Phase II trial and in two Phase III trials. Moreover, there are two published case series (Table 3).
Concerning psychiatric disorders, in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Allen et al. [52] evaluated, both before and after 2 h, 129 agitated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, who were randomized to receive a single inhalation of 5 or 10 mg of loxapine or a placebo, in a clinical or hospital setting. The inhaled loxapine produced a rapid improvement in the agitated patients, and statistically significant differences in efficacy were found for the 10-mg dose, when compared with the placebo, with results suggesting that 5 mg may also be effective. Lesem et al. [53] conducted a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study on 344 agitated patients with schizophrenia, who were administered two or three doses of inhaled loxapine (5 or 10 mg), or a placebo. They found that the inhaled loxapine was an effective treatment for agitation in schizophrenia, and that both the 5 and 10 mg doses resulted in significantly larger decreases in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale–Excited Component (PANSS–EC), during the 2 h period after the first dose. The last phase III, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group in the patient trial was conducted by Kwentus et al. [54], who evaluated 314 agitated patients with bipolar I disorder over 24 h (with manic or mixed episodes), randomizing them (1:1:1) for the inhalation of loxapine 5, 10 mg, or a placebo. The administration of both doses of inhaled loxapine significantly reduced agitation, when compared with the placebo, as was reflected in the PANSS-EC score, and this was manifested 10 min after dose 1, with both doses.
Moreover, two open label case series, on five agitated patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) [55] and 14 agitated patients with dual diagnosis [56], showed that inhaled loxapine 10 mg was rapid, effective, and well-accepted in both groups, without adverse effects (AEs).

2.5. Common Adverse Effects of Inhaled Loxapine in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders

Overall, in the Phase II trial and in two Phase III trials. As well as in the case series, inhaled loxapine was well-tolerated in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, with no excessive sedation. The majority of AEs were mild to moderate in intensity and did not require intervention: the most common AEs in patients receiving inhaled loxapine were dysgeusia, throat irritation, and sedation [23,24,25]. As reported by Citrome [57], the number needed to harm (NNH) for dysgeusia, for inhaled loxapine versus the placebo, was 16 (95% CI 10–58) for the 5 mg dose and 11 (95% CI 7–23) for the 10 mg dose, whereas the NNH for throat irritation was only statistically significant for the 10 mg dose (44; 95% CI 23–472). Moreover, the NNH for sedation/somnolence was not statistically significant for either the 5- or 10-mg dose of inhaled loxapine.
Concerning severe adverse effects (AEs), in the study of Allen et al. [24], no patients withdrew from the study due to AE. Only one episode of dystonic reaction was observed (jaw clenching), in a patient with a history of jaw clenching, secondary to antipsychotics. Interestingly, three serious adverse events, including one death, were reported as occurring at least six days after the administration of loxapine, but none were judged by the investigators to be related to treatment with loxapine. In the trial of Kwentus et al. [26], there was one severe AE in a loxapine-treated patient (sedation in a 10 mg patient), but inhaled loxapine was generally well-tolerated, and most AEs were judged to be of mild or moderate severity and were resolved without intervention. Moreover, one patient (5 mg group) experienced moderate akathisia, which was judged to probably be treatment-related, and which was resolved after benztropine treatment. Lesem et al. [25] reported severe AEs for three patients in the 10 mg group. In the 10 mg group, one patient developed neck dystonia and oculogyration that were judged treatment-related, and which required benztropine to be resolved. One patient showed a severe treatment-related sedation and one developed severe infectious gastroenteritis that was judged to be unrelated to treatment, requiring hospitalisation before being resolved.
No effects on the cardiovascular system (i.e., QTc prolongation or torsades de pointes) were observed with inhaled loxapine in all of the studies and this finding is in line with trials on healthy volunteers [20,21,22].

2.6. Pulmonary AEs of Inhaled Loxapine

As loxapine has been reformulated for direct inhalation into the lungs, where it enters the alveoli for rapid access to the arterial circulation, some concerns relating to its safety have been raised, regarding the onset of potential AEs, in the form of asthma, wheezing, and bronchospasms. In fact, patients with clinically significant acute or chronic pulmonary diseases were excluded from the phase II and III clinical trials. Interestingly, pulmonary AEs in all of the reviewed studies were rare and were mild to moderate, without severe complications or death. Wheezing and bronchospasms were reported in one randomized study [24] and required intervention (one patient resolved these AEs with albuterol, two puffs by a metered-dose inhaler).
Moreover, Gross et al. [58] conducted two separate, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled trials, comparing two administrations of inhaled loxapine (10 mg) and a placebo, 10 h apart, in 52 subjects with asthma and in 53 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Spirometry results, including the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC with FEV1, were considered the primary outcome measures. Spirometry tests were performed in the hour before the first dose of the study’s treatment, and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 10.25, 10.5, 11, 12, 14, 16, 24, and 34 h after that dose. The results showed that, in subjects with asthma and COPD, inhaled loxapine may cause an airway effect (FEV1 decline and bronchospasm) that is commonly reversible with a short-acting β-agonist bronchodilator (such as albuterol). However, the authors recommended that a brief pulmonary assessment (i.e., history and screening physical examination) should be performed, to select appropriate patients for undergoing treatment with inhaled loxapine. Moreover, they point out that a short-acting β-agonist bronchodilator should be readily available in real-world medical or psychiatric emergency settings, when choosing inhaled loxapine for the treatment of agitation.

3. A Clinical Perspective on the Role of Inhaled Loxapine in the Anti-Agitation Drugs Armamentarium: Pros and Cons

The formulation of inhaled loxapine may be a useful pharmacological tool in the treatment of acute agitation associated with psychiatric disorders [17,31,32,33]. In fact, inhaled loxapine quickly reduces acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, through a non-invasive route of administration with an onset of the effect within ten minutes [59]. Moreover, inhaled loxapine is generally well-tolerated, and the most common AEs are dysgeusia, throat irritation, and mild sedation [48,52,53,54], that do not usually require intervention.
Inhaled loxapine may have some advantages when compared to other drugs that are widely employed to treat acute agitation [60]. As patient preference is an issue that should always be considered in the choice of treatment of psychiatric disorders, especially during a crisis (such as an episode of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder), in order to establish a valid and healthy therapeutic relationship [61], the patient’s preference for treatment delivery options has been demonstrated. It revealed that inhalation was associated with a significant utility gain, when compared to injections or tablets, for controlling agitation episodes, and this may be particularly true for inhaled loxapine [62]. Moreover, the delivery of inhaled loxapine directly into the lung has several potential advantages. These include a rapid onset of the anti-agitation effect (within a couple of minutes, generally 10), and a less invasive and needle-free systemic delivery of drugs [48,52,53,54,55,56]. Furthermore, the inhaled formulation of loxapine avoids transit through the gastrointestinal system and, therefore, the hepatic first-pass metabolism achieves a bioavailability of 9.1 mg of the 10 mg dose [25].
Another great advantage of inhaled loxapine is the lack of the effect on cardiac repolarization. In fact, Cassella et al. [48] showed that two therapeutic doses of inhaled loxapine did not cause threshold QTc prolongation, thus confirming the previous results of Spyker et al. [47], who demonstrated that there was no apparent QT prolongation associated with the therapeutic dose of inhaled loxapine. Also, in clinical studies of agitated patients with psychiatric disorders, inhaled loxapine did not cause QTc prolongation or torsade de pointes [49,52,53,54,55].
However, there are some disadvantages that should be considered. Even if the delivery system is innovative for an antipsychotic drug, it presumes that some kind of patient collaboration is undoubtedly required [16,48,52,53,54,55,56,57]. This may be true for most cases of mild-to-moderate agitation, and also for some cases of severe agitation. Therefore, the use of inhaled loxapine is not the first-line treatment for severe agitation in totally uncooperative patients, and IM medication should be used.
Although the majority of users of mental health services are not uncooperative, it is clear that in an everyday clinical practice, a small yet significant minority is non-collaborative, in both inpatient settings and emergency services [63]. This may limit the usage of inhaled loxapine in most cases of severe agitation, even if, when using non-pharmacological strategies such as verbal de-escalation, patient collaboration may finally be obtained [64]. Moreover, in the severe agitation of totally uncooperative patients, an IM medication should be used when the patients are not willing to accept a medication that they need to take orally [63]. Inhaled loxapine should only be used in the case of agitated, but somewhat or partial collaborative patients, and in such cases, this drug may be as useful as IM SGAs, to obtain a more rapid tranquillisation than the oral administration [59]. Moreover, it frequently occurs that, in everyday clinical practice, the agitated patients may initially and apparently accept the oral medications (often to avoid involuntary admissions), but they may spit out the oral medications, or need a relatively long time to achieve tranquilisation after oral administration [1,2,3]. The use of inhaled loxapine may overcome these shortcomings, as the administration and the rapid onset of the anti-agitation effect are warranted [52,53,54,55].
However, the major concern is the drug-related risk of bronchospasm, which can lead to respiratory distress and respiratory arrest [65]. It is worth noting that inhaled loxapine is contraindicated in patients with a current diagnosis or history of asthma, COPD, or other lung diseases associated with bronchospasms, or those with acute respiratory symptoms or signs (such as wheezing) [22]. It is also contraindicated in patients taking medications used to treat airway diseases and those with a history of bronchospasms following inhaled loxapine treatment in the past [22]. Inhaled loxapine has a “Boxed Warning” and is only available through a restricted program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), called “ADASUVE REMS” [66]. Health care facilities using inhaled loxapine are required to have immediate, on-site access to equipment and personnel trained to manage acute bronchospasms, including advanced airway management (i.e., intubation and mechanical ventilation). These facilities must have a short-acting bronchodilator (e.g., albuterol), including a nebulizer and inhalation solution, for the immediate treatment of bronchospasms [67]. When choosing inhaled loxapine to treat agitation in psychiatric disorders, patients must be screened for a history or symptoms of asthma, COPD, or other pulmonary diseases, and monitored for signs or symptoms of bronchospasms following treatment [68].
Another concern may be the costs of inhaled loxapine. In the United States, the costs are relatively higher than those of the oral and IM medication currently employed to treat agitation in psychiatric disorders, and this should also be considered and taken into account when choosing inhaled loxapine [69].

4. Conclusions

In sum, it is always a good thing to have another drug for the treatment of agitation in psychiatric disorders, with an innovative delivery system. Inhaled loxapine has proven to be effective and generally well-tolerated when administered to agitated patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, with a relatively rapid onset of action. However, even if the delivery system is innovative for an antipsychotic drug, it presumes that some kind of patient collaboration is undoubtedly required. Two case series have suggested that inhaled loxapine may also be useful to treat agitation in patients with BPD and with dual diagnosis, but further studies are needed to support this. However, the administration of inhaled loxapine requires some kind or full patient collaboration, which may be achieved in most cases using verbal de-escalation techniques. Moreover, the drug-related risk of bronchospasm must always be kept in mind when planning to use inhaled loxapine, leading to a careful patient assessment prior to administration. Also, the higher costs of this innovative formulation should be taken into account when choosing inhaled loxapine for the treatment of agitation. Moreover, the use of inhaled loxapine is not recommended as a first-line treatment for severe agitation in totally uncooperative patients. On the basis of the present review, the proposed position of inhaled loxapine in the treatment of acute agitation is described in Figure 1 (adapted and modified from Schleifer [70]).

Acknowledgments

We further thank Roberta Polimanti for mother-tongue English revision of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Domenico de Berardis conceived and designed the review; Domenico de Berardis, Michele Fornaro, Laura Orsolini, Felice Iasevoli, Carmine Tomasetti, Andrea de Bartolomeis, Nicola Serroni, Alessandro Valchera, Alessandro Carano, Federica Vellante, Stefano Marini, Monica Piersanti, Giampaolo Perna, Giovanni Martinotti and Massimo Di Giannantonio collected and analyzed the articles reviewed. Domenico de Berardis, Michele Fornaro, Laura Orsolini and Carmine Tomasetti wrote the manuscript and all the authors revised the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hankin, C.S.; Bronstone, A.; Koran, L.M. Agitation in the inpatient psychiatric setting: A review of clinical presentation, burden, and treatment. J. Psychiatr. Pract. 2011, 17, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sachs, G.S. A review of agitation in mental illness: Burden of illness and underlying pathology. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2006, 67 (Suppl. 10), 5–12. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Rocca, P.; Villari, V.; Bogetto, F. Managing the aggressive and violent patient in the psychiatric emergency. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2006, 30, 586–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Látalová, K. Bipolar disorder and aggression. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2009, 63, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sands, N.; Elsom, S.; Gerdtz, M.; Khaw, D. Mental health-related risk factors for violence: Using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2012, 19, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schanda, H.; Taylor, P. Inpatient violence: Frequency, risk factors, preventive strategies. Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiatr. 2001, 69, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Glied, S.; Frank, R.G. Mental illness and violence: Lessons from the evidence. Am. J. Public Health 2014, 104, e5–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Swanson, J.; Estroff, S.; Swartz, M.; Borum, R.; Lachicotte, W.; Zimmer, C.; Wagner, R. Violence and severe mental disorder in clinical and community populations: The effects of psychotic symptoms, comorbidity, and lack of treatment. Psychiatry 1997, 60, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Elbogen, E.B.; Johnson, S.C. The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Link, B.G.; Stueve, A. Psychotic symptoms and the violent/illegal behavior of mental patients compared to community controls. In Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments in Risk Assessment; Monahan, J., Steadman, H.J., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  11. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia. Available online: http://www.psych.org (accessed on 4 January 2016).
  12. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Bipolar Disorder. Available online: http://www.psych.org (accessed on 4 January 2016).
  13. Zeller, S.L.; Citrome, L. Managing Agitation Associated with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder in the Emergency Setting. West. J. Emerg. Med. 2016, 17, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Citrome, L.; Volavka, J. The psychopharmacology of violence: Making sensible decisions. CNS Spectr. 2014, 19, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mazzola, C.D.; Miron, S.; Jenkins, A.J. Loxapine intoxication: Case report and literature review. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2000, 24, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Currier, G.W. Inhaled loxapine reduces acute agitation in people with schizophrenia compared with placebo. Evid. Based Ment. Health 2011, 14, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pollack, C.V. Inhaled loxapine for the urgent treatment of acute agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2016, 32, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schiele, B.C. Loxapine succinate: A controlled double-blind study in chronic schizophrenia. Dis. Nerv. Syst. 1975, 36, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Glazer, W.M. Does loxapine have “atypical” properties? Clinical evidence. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1999, 60, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Singh, A.N.; Barlas, C.; Singh, S.; Franks, P.; Mishra, R.K. A neurochemical basis for the antipsychotic activity of loxapine: Interactions with dopamine D1, D2, D4 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor subtypes. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 1996, 21, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leysen, J.E.; Janssen, P.M.; Schotte, A.; Luyten, W.H.; Megens, A.A. Interaction of antipsychotic drugs with neurotransmitter receptor sites in vitro and in vivo in relation to pharmacological and clinical effects: Role of 5HT2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 1993, 112 (Suppl. 1), S40–S54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Meltzer, H.Y.; Matsubara, S.; Lee, J.C. The ratios of serotonin2 and dopamine2 affinities differentiate atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 1989, 25, 390–392. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Stockmeier, C.A.; DiCarlo, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Thompson, P.; Meltzer, H.Y. Characterization of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs based on in vivo occupancy of serotonin2 and dopamine2 receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1993, 266, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Coupet, J.; Rauh, C.E. 3H-Spiroperidol binding to dopamine receptors in rat striatal membranes: Influence of loxapine and its hydroxylated metabolites. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1979, 55, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kapur, S.; Zipursky, R.; Remington, G.; Jones, C.; McKay, G.; Houle, S. PET evidence that loxapine is an equipotent blocker of 5-HT2 and D2 receptors: Implications for the therapeutics of schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 1997, 154, 1525–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nordstrom, A.L.; Farde, L.; Nyberg, S.; Karlsson, P.; Halldin, C.; Sedvall, G. D1, D2, and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy in relation to clozapine serum concentration: A PET study of schizophrenic patients. Am. J. Psychiatry 1995, 152, 1444–1449. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Popovic, D.; Nuss, P.; Vieta, E. Revisiting loxapine: A systematic review. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2015, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Buckland, P.R.; O’Donovan, M.C.; McGuffin, P. Changes in dopamine D1, D2 and D3 receptor mRNA levels in rat brain following antipsychotic treatment. Psychopharmacology 1992, 106, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Baskys, A.; Wang, S.; Remington, G.; Wojtowicz, J.M. Haloperidol and loxapine but not clozapine increase synaptic responses in the hippocampus. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 235, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ninan, I.; Jardemark, K.E.; Wang, R.Y. Differential effects of atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs on N-methyl-d-aspartate- and electrically evoked responses in the pyramidal cells of the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Synapse 2003, 48, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Robertson, G.S.; Matsumura, H.; Fibiger, H.C. Induction patterns of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the forebrain as predictors of atypical antipsychotic activity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1994, 271, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Deutch, A.Y.; Duman, R.S. The effects of antipsychotic drugs on Fos protein expression in the prefrontal cortex: Cellular localization and pharmacological characterization. Neuroscience 1996, 70, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalkman, H.O.; Neumann, V.; Tricklebank, M.D. Clozapine inhibits catalepsy induced by olanzapine and loxapine, but prolongs catalepsy induced by SCH 23390 in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1997, 355, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Goudie, A.; Taylor, A. Comparative characterisation of the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine and other antipsychotics in rats. Psychopharmacology 1998, 135, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ardizzone, T.D.; Bradley, R.J.; Freeman, A.M., 3rd; Dwyer, D.S. Inhibition of glucose transport in PC12 cells by the atypical antipsychotic drugs risperidone and clozapine, and structural analogs of clozapine. Brain Res. 2001, 923, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Z.; Ichikawa, J.; Meltzer, H.Y. A comparison of the effects of loxapine with ziprasidone and thioridazine on the release of dopamine and acetylcholine in the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 2003, 167, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kalkman, H.O.; Neumann, V.; Hoyer, D.; Tricklebank, M.D. The role of α2-adrenoceptor antagonism in the anti-cataleptic properties of the atypical neuroleptic agent, clozapine, in the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 124, 1550–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Natesan, S.; Vanderspek, S.; Nobrega, J.N.; McClelland, R.A.; Kapur, S. Contrasting loxapine to its isomer isoloxapine—The critical role of in vivo D2 blockade in determining atypicality. Schizophr. Res. 2005, 77, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wong, Y.C.; Wo, S.K.; Zuo, Z. Investigation of the disposition of loxapine, amoxapine and their hydroxylated metabolites in different brain regions, CSF and plasma of rat by LC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 58, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wong, Y.C.; Zuo, Z. Brain disposition and catalepsy after intranasal delivery of loxapine: Role of metabolism in PK/PD of intranasal CNS drugs. Pharm. Res. 2013, 30, 2368–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wong, Y.C.; Qian, S.; Zuo, Z. Pharmacokinetic comparison between the long-term anesthetized, short-term anesthetized and conscious rat models in nasal drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 2014, 31, 2107–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Adasuve Prescribing Information. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.: Horsham, PA, USA, 2013. Available online: http://www.adasuve.com/PDF/AdasuvePI.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2016).
  43. Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Adasuve (Loxapine Inhalation Powder) Package Insert; Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Mountain View, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dinh, K.; Myers, D.J.; Glazer, M.; Shmidt, T.; Devereaux, C.; Simis, K.; Noymer, P.D.; He, M.; Choosakul, C.; Chen, Q.; et al. In vitro aerosol characterization of Staccato loxapine. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 403, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dinh, K.V.; Myers, D.J.; Noymer, P.D.; Cassella, J.V. In vitro aerosol deposition in the oropharyngeal region for Staccato loxapine. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 2010, 23, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Spyker, D.A.; Munzar, P.; Cassella, J.V. Pharmacokinetics of loxapine following inhalation of a thermally generated aerosol in healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 50, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Spyker, D.A.; Voloshko, P.; Heyman, E.R.; Cassella, J.V. Loxapine delivered as a thermally generated aerosol does not prolong QTc in a thorough QT/QTc study in healthy subjects. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 54, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cassella, J.V.; Spyker, D.A.; Yeung, P.P. A randomized, placebo-controlled repeat-dose thorough QT study of inhaled loxapine in healthy volunteers. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 53, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Spyker, D.A.; Riesenberg, R.A.; Cassella, J.V. Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of inhaled loxapine in subjects on chronic, stable antipsychotic regimens. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 55, 985–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Spyker, D.A.; Cassella, J.V.; Stoltz, R.R.; Yeung, P.P. Inhaled loxapine and intramuscular lorazepam in healthy volunteers: A randomized placebo-controlled drug-drug interaction study. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2015, 3, e00194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Midha, K.K.; Hubbard, J.W.; McKay, G.; Hawes, E.M.; Hsia, D. The role of metabolites in a bioequivalence study 1: Loxapine, 7-hydroxyloxapine and 8-hydroxyloxapine. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 1993, 31, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Allen, M.H.; Feifel, D.; Lesem, M.D.; Zimbroff, D.L.; Ross, R.; Munzar, P.; Spyker, D.A.; Cassella, J.V. Efficacy and safety of loxapine for inhalation in the treatment of agitation in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2011, 72, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lesem, M.D.; Tran-Johnson, T.K.; Riesenberg, R.A.; Feifel, D.; Allen, M.H.; Fishman, R.; Spyker, D.A.; Kehne, J.H.; Cassella, J.V. Rapid acute treatment of agitation in individuals with schizophrenia: Multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study of inhaled loxapine. Br. J. Psychiatry 2011, 198, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kwentus, J.; Riesenberg, R.A.; Marandi, M.; Manning, R.A.; Allen, M.H.; Fishman, R.S.; Spyker, D.A.; Kehne, J.H.; Cassella, J.V. Rapid acute treatment of agitation in patients with bipolar I disorder: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with inhaled loxapine. Bipolar Disord. 2012, 14, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Krüger, T.H.; Wollmer, M.A.; Negt, P.; Frieling, H.; Jung, S.; Kahl, K.G. Inhaled loxapine for emergency treatment of agitated patients with borderline personality disorder : A series of five cases. Nervenarzt 2016, in press. [Google Scholar]
  56. Roncero, C.; Ros-Cucurull, E.; Grau-López, L.; Fadeuilhe, C.; Casas, M. Effectiveness of Inhaled Loxapine in Dual-Diagnosis Patients: A Case Series. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2016, 39, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Citrome, L. Addressing the need for rapid treatment of agitation in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Focus on inhaled loxapine as an alternative to injectable agents. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2013, 9, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gross, N.; Greos, L.S.; Meltzer, E.O.; Spangenthal, S.; Fishman, R.S.; Spyker, D.A.; Cassella, J.V. Safety and tolerability of inhaled loxapine in subjects with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—Two randomized controlled trials. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug. Deliv. 2014, 27, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Citrome, L. Aerosolised antipsychotic assuages agitation: Inhaled loxapine for agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2011, 65, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Siwek, M. Inhaled loxapine: A novel treatment for agitation in psychotic disorders. Psychiatr. Pol. 2014, 48, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kaminsky, B.M.; Bostwick, J.R.; Guthrie, S.K. Alternate Routes of Administration of Antidepressant and Antipsychotic Medications. Ann. Pharmacother. 2015, 49, 808–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jørgensen, T.R.; Emborg, C.; Dahlen, K.; Bøgelund, M.; Carlborg, A. The effect of the medicine administration route on health-related quality of life: Results from a time trade-off survey in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia in 2 Nordic countries. BMC Psychiatry 2016, 16, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Andrade, C. Rapid tranquillisation in emergency psychiatric settings. BMJ 2007, 335, 835–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Richmond, J.S.; Berlin, J.S.; Fishkind, A.B.; Holloman, G.H.; Zeller, S.L.; Wilson, M.P.; Rifai, M.A.; Ng, A.T. Verbal De-escalation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA De-escalation Workgroup. West. J. Emerg. Med. 2012, 13, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Inhaled loxapine (Adasuve) for acute agitation. Med. Lett. Drugs Ther. 2014, 56, 31–32.
  66. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Adasuve® (loxapine) Inhalation Powder: Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy. US Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2012. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/UCM333242.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2016). [Google Scholar]
  67. Anonymous. Loxapine (Adasuve) for inhalation. A dangerous gadget. Prescrire Int. 2015, 24, 118–119. [Google Scholar]
  68. Keating, G.M. Loxapine inhalation powder: A review of its use in the acute treatment of agitation in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. CNS Drugs 2013, 27, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Valdes, J.; Shipley, T.; Rey, J.A. Loxapine Inhalation Powder (Adasuve). A new and innovative formulation of an antipsychotic treatment for agitation. Pharm. Ther. 2014, 39, 621–623. [Google Scholar]
  70. Schleifer, J.J. Management of acute agitation in psychosis: An evidence-based approach in the USA. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 2011, 17, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 18 00349 g001 550
Figure 1. Management of acute agitation: the suggested position of intranasal FGA loxapine (adapted and modified from Schleifer [70].
Figure 1. Management of acute agitation: the suggested position of intranasal FGA loxapine (adapted and modified from Schleifer [70].
Ijms 18 00349 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of inhaled First Generation Antipsychotic (FGA) loxapine.
Table 1. Characteristics of inhaled First Generation Antipsychotic (FGA) loxapine.
Route of AdministrationInhalatory
Half Life6–8 h
Time to peak concentration2 min
Preparation instructionsInhalation powder. 10 mg unit in a single-use inhaler
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) IndicationsAcute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder in adults
Available Dosage10 mg
Maximum Dosage10 mg/24 h
Average dose for tranquillization10 mg/24 h
RecommendationsAdministration requires a somewhat, partial or fully cooperative patient. Contraindicated in patients with diagnosis or history of asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), other lung disease associated with bronchospasm or in patients with acute respiratory symptoms or signs and with current use of medications to treat airways disease. It is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis
Costs$174/dose in USA (EUR price not yet available)
Table
Table 2. Published studies on inhaled FGA loxapine in healthy subjects.
Table 2. Published studies on inhaled FGA loxapine in healthy subjects.
AuthorsYearStudy SampleStudy DesignNumber of SubjectStudy AimsDose (mg/Day)Main Findings
Spyker et al.2010Healthy subjectsRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study50To determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and tolerability of single doses of inhaled loxapine0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 mg of loxapine or placeboThe inhalation of loxapine represented a safe and well-tolerated route for rapidly achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations
Spyker et al.2014Healthy subjectsrandomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study48To evaluate effects of inhaled loxapine on the QTc intervalInhaled loxapine 10 mg or inhaled placeboNo QTc prolongation was observed with the therapeutic dose of inhaled loxapine
Cassella et al.2015Healthy subjectsrandomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, crossover, thorough QT study60To assessed the effect of two inhaled loxapine doses on cardiac repolarization as measured by QTc intervalinhaled loxapine (10 mg) 2 h apart+oral placebo, two doses of inhaled placebo+oral placebo, or two doses of inhaled placebo+oralmoxifloxacin (400 mg; positive control)The two therapeutic doses of inhaled loxapine did not cause threshold QTc prolongation
Spyker et al.2015Healthy subjectsRandomized, double-blind, crossover study22Pharmacodynamic effects and safety of single-dose inhaled loxapine and IM lorazepam in combination versus each agent alonelorazepam 1 mg IM, inhaled loxapine 10 mg, placebo IM (alone or combined)Concomitant administration of inhaled loxapine and lorazepam in healthy volunteers showed no difference in its effect on respiration rate or pulse oximetry (primary endpoints) versus either drug alone
Table
Table 3. Published studies on inhaled FGA loxapine in the treatment of agitation in psychiatric disorders.
Table 3. Published studies on inhaled FGA loxapine in the treatment of agitation in psychiatric disorders.
AuthorsYearStudy SampleStudy DesignNumber of SubjectStudy AimsDose (mg/Day)Main Findings
Allen et al.2011Agitated patients with schizophreniaPhase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study129To evaluate inhaled loxapine for acute treatment of agitation in schizophreniaSingle inhalation of 5 or 10 mg of loxapine or placeboInhaled loxapine was generally safe and well tolerated and produced rapid improvement in agitated patients with psychotic disorders
Lesem et al.2011Agitated patients with schizophreniaPhase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study344To evaluate inhaled loxapine for acute treatment of agitation in schizophreniaTwo or three doses of inhaled loxapine (5 or 10 mg) or placeboInhaled loxapine was a well-tolerated and effective treatment of agitation in schizophrenia
Kwentus et al.2012Agitated patients with bipolar I disorderPhase III, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group inpatient study314To evaluate inhaled loxapine for the acute treatment of agitation in patients with bipolar I disorderInhaled loxapine 5 mg or 10 mg or inhaled placeboInhaled loxapine provided a rapid, non-injection, well-tolerated acute treatment for agitation in patients with bipolar I disorder
Krüger et al.2015Agitated patients with borderline personality disorderCase series5To evaluate inhaled loxapine for emergency treatment of agitated patients with borderline personality disorderInhaled loxapine 10 mgInhaled loxapine was safe, well tolerated and produced rapid improvement in agitated patients with borderline personality disorder
Roncero et al.2016Patients with dual diagnosisRetrospective case Series14Efficacy of inhaled loxapine on episodes of psychotic agitation in patients with dual diagnosisInhaled loxapine 10 mgInhaled loxapine was rapid, effective, and well accepted in all dual-diagnosis patients presenting with acute agitation in the emergency setting

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Berardis, D.; Fornaro, M.; Orsolini, L.; Iasevoli, F.; Tomasetti, C.; De Bartolomeis, A.; Serroni, N.; Valchera, A.; Carano, A.; Vellante, F.; et al. The Role of Inhaled Loxapine in the Treatment of Acute Agitation in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: A Clinical Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020349

AMA Style

De Berardis D, Fornaro M, Orsolini L, Iasevoli F, Tomasetti C, De Bartolomeis A, Serroni N, Valchera A, Carano A, Vellante F, et al. The Role of Inhaled Loxapine in the Treatment of Acute Agitation in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: A Clinical Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(2):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020349

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Berardis, Domenico, Michele Fornaro, Laura Orsolini, Felice Iasevoli, Carmine Tomasetti, Andrea De Bartolomeis, Nicola Serroni, Alessandro Valchera, Alessandro Carano, Federica Vellante, and et al. 2017. "The Role of Inhaled Loxapine in the Treatment of Acute Agitation in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: A Clinical Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 2: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop