Next Article in Journal
Targeting Immune Cell Checkpoints during Sepsis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Lung Microbiome in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Promising Approach for Targeted Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
High Expression of STAT3 in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Associates with Cardiovascular Risk in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polydeoxyribonucleotide Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Lung Injury by Inhibiting Apoptotic Cell Death in Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Environmental Burkholderia cenocepacia Strain Enhances Fitness by Serial Passages during Long-Term Chronic Airways Infection in Mice

1
Infections and Cystic Fibrosis Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
3
Territorial and Production Systems Sustainability Department, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, 00123 Rome, Italy
4
Biology and Biotechnology Department “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(11), 2417; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112417
Submission received: 11 October 2017 / Revised: 8 November 2017 / Accepted: 10 November 2017 / Published: 14 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lung Diseases: Chronic Respiratory Infections)

Abstract

:
Burkholderia cenocepacia is an important opportunistic pathogen in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, and has also been isolated from natural environments. In previous work, we explored the virulence and pathogenic potential of environmental B. cenocepacia strains and demonstrated that they do not differ from clinical strains in some pathogenic traits. Here, we investigated the ability of the environmental B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain, isolated from the maize rhizosphere, to persist and increase its virulence after serial passages in a mouse model of chronic infection. B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain, belonging to the recA lineage IIIA, was embedded in agar beads and challenged into the lung of C57Bl/6 mice. The mice were sacrificed after 28 days from infection and their lungs were tested for bacterial loads. Agar beads containing the pool of B. cenocepacia colonies from the four sequential passages were used to infect the mice. The environmental B. cenocepacia strain showed a low incidence of chronic infection after the first passage; after the second, third and fourth passages in mice, its ability to establish chronic infection increased significantly and progressively up to 100%. Colonial morphology analysis and genetic profiling of the Mex1-derived clones recovered after the fourth passage from infected mice revealed that they were indistinguishable from the challenged strain both at phenotypic and genetic level. By testing the virulence of single clones in the Galleria mellonella infection model, we found that two Mex1-derived clones significantly increased their pathogenicity compared to the parental Mex1 strain and behaved similarly to the clinical and epidemic B. cenocepacia LMG16656T. Our findings suggest that serial passages of the environmental B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain in mice resulted in an increased ability to determine chronic lung infection and the appearance of clonal variants with increased virulence in non-vertebrate hosts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common lethal autosomal recessive disease in Caucasians, with an incidence of approximately 1 in 2500 live births and a prevalence of approximately 100,000 CF patients worldwide [1]. The disease is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, that encodes a chloride channel localized in both secretory and absorbing epithelia. CFTR dysfunction results in abnormal transport of sodium and chloride ions across epithelia affecting the composition of secretions in the lung, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, liver and other secretory glands. In the airways, CFTR mutations result in a dehydrated viscous mucus that compromises mucociliary clearance and predisposes CF patients to chronic bacterial infections and airway inflammation [2,3]. Life expectancy in CF has improved dramatically in the last few decades, with the median predicted survival age of people born between 2012 and 2016 now 43 years [4]; however, pulmonary infections remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality in people with CF [5].
The CF respiratory tract is a highly diverse and complex ecosystem with a high heterogeneity due to the various environmental conditions [6]. As suggested by Conrad and colleagues [7], resources are limited in the CF lung, and ecologically diverse populations can evolve. Typically, after a period of intermittent colonization of the lung, bacterial infections in CF rapidly become chronic with bacteria persisting until the end of the disease. It is thought that bacterial strain(s) adapt to the CF niche by changing their phenotype(s) and genotype(s) [8,9]; in particular, the persisting pathogens can adapt to disease−specific environmental factors such as anaerobic mucus layers [2], the pressure of the innate immune defence system of the immunocompetent host [3], and aggressive antibiotic therapies administered during the chronic phase of the infection [10]. In accordance with this hypothesis, when newly acquired bacterial strains from the environment are re-isolated after a period of infection in CF lungs, their virulence and pathogenicity differ, as demonstrated for Pseudomonas aeruginosa [11]. The adaptation process aims to increase the fitness/survival of bacteria in CF lungs and is generated by the activation of a specific genetic program that can guarantee bacterial genetic variability in stressful conditions [12]. This process ultimately results in therapy resistance, a trait that contributes to the progression of the lung disease, the major cause of morbidity and mortality in CF. To date, bacterial adaptation in CF has been widely described for P. aeruginosa; this bacterium appears to undergo a characteristic adaptation process resulting in the production of genetically and phenotypically diverse strains [13]. In this context, there is alarming evidence of an increase in transmissible epidemic strains in major European centers with transmission observed between unrelated CF patients [14,15]. Transmission between patients has been widely documented for B. cenocepacia [16], however, our knowledge on the generation of transmissible strains is still lacking. Among the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) species, B. cenocepacia is especially problematic in CF patients [16,17,18]. Colonization of the lungs of CF patients by these bacteria is associated with a decrease in long-term survival and, occasionally in a minority of patients, the development of the so-called “cepacia syndrome”, that leads to a frequently fatal acute clinical decline [17]. Several studies have revealed that B. cenocepacia is widespread in natural habitats such as the rhizosphere of several crop plants, where it represents one of the predominant Bcc species [19,20,21]. Additionally, it has been reported that B. cenocepacia from natural environments are indistinguishable from clinical isolates [22,23] suggesting that humans may acquire Bcc directly from natural environments [21,24]. In support of this hypothesis, candidate determinants related to virulence and transmissibility are not confined solely to clinical B. cenocepacia isolates but are also spread among environmental B. cenocepacia isolates [25,26,27]. However, understanding of the adaptation process of environmental B. cenocepacia strains to the CF airways is still poor [28]; and whether and how B. cenocepacia environmental strains adapt to the airways of CF airways remains to be clarified. No data are available on the ability of environmental B. cenocepacia strains to adapt to the CF host. Several years ago, Chung and colleagues [29] showed that B. cenocepacia strains convert from a nonpersistent to a persistent phenotype in a mouse model of pulmonary infection. In previous work, we explored the virulence and pathogenic potential of environmental B. cenocepacia strains and demonstrated that they do not differ from clinical strains in some pathogenic traits showing a similar capacity to maintain a chronic respiratory infection due to the production of similar virulent factors [26]. Furthermore, although environmental strains appear to be less invasive than the clinical ones in polarized CF epithelial cells, they similarly affect epithelia integrity by modulating the presence and distribution of the tight junction protein ZO-1 [27].
In this work, we investigated the host’s role on B. cenocepacia adaptation and pathogenicity. We focused our attention on the environmental strain Mex1, belonging to B. cenocepacia IIIA. It was collected from the rhizosphere of maize cultivated in a field in Mexico and had previously been characterized for its pathogenicity in vitro and in vivo [26,27]. Notably, in a mouse model of chronic infection, the Mex1 strain caused an extensive inflammatory cell infiltrate in the lung tissues, and has shown a similar capacity to maintain a chronic respiratory infection as the clinical strain LMG16656T, probably due to production of similar virulent factors in strains of different origin [26]. In view of the fact that B. cenocepacia IIIA, among the Bcc species as well as the other recA lineages of B. cenocepacia species, is particularly problematic for CF patients, we set up a mouse model of chronic infection to investigate the microbe–host interaction of the environmental strain IIIA. Thus, we carried out serial passages of the environmental B. cenocepacia Mex1 in mice, with each round of infection lasting 28 days. Next, we evaluated the ability of the rescued bacteria to adapt to the murine lung tissues and to establish new chronic lung infections. Phenotypic analysis, genetic profiling and virulence of the Mex1-derived clones were also investigated.

2. Results

2.1. Characteristics of B. cenocepacia Mex1 Strain

The environmental strain Mex1, belonging to B. cenocepacia IIIA, was collected from the rhizosphere of maize cultivated in a field in Mexico [26]. Its main characteristics are reported in Table 1. The environmental strain has already shown pathogenic potential in both in vitro and in vivo models [26], a dramatic effect on tight junction integrity and on the presence and distribution of the tight junction protein ZO-1 in CF epithelial monolayers [27]. B. cenocepacia Mex 1 strain is also able to form biofilms in nutrient-rich media and can adhere to an abiotic surface as the clinical LMG16656T strain [30,31].

2.2. Serial Passages of the Environmental B. cenocepacia Mex1 in Mice

We established sequential chronic infection in C57Bl/6 mice with B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain embedded in agar beads. The schedule of experiments is reported in Figure 1. As previously reported, the agar beads mimic the microaerobic/anaerobic environment that allows bacteria to grow in the form of microcolonies and in the mucus of CF patients [2,32]. Sequential infections were established in two groups of C57Bl/6NCrlBR mice challenged with 1.5 × 107 colony-forming units (CFU)/lung and the infection was followed for almost one month (P1) (Figure 1).
At 28 days from the first challenge (P1), the incidence of chronic B. cenocepacia colonization was 30% in the first group of mice and 41.67% in the second group, with no significant difference between the two groups of mice, confirming previous findings [26,30] (Figure 2A). No mortality was observed and the median value of CFU recovered after 28 days was 7.12 × 105 and 1.06 × 105, in the first and second group of mice, respectively (Figure 2B). For the second passage (P2), 192 single colonies recovered from two infected mice (96 colonies for each mice) were re-grown in vitro separately in a 96-well plate. All 96 colonies were pulled for two different agar bead preparations and injected in two groups of mice, respectively. The same procedure for colony isolation and agar beads preparation was followed for the third and the fourth passages of chronic infection (P3 and P4) (Figure 1).
At the second serial passage in mice (P2), the percentage of infected mice increased significantly to 89% in one group and 75% in the second group (Fisher exact test: p = 0.0083 P1 vs. P2). Then, the third and fourth passages (P3 and P4) carried out as described above led to an increase in the percentage of infected mice of between 89% and 100%, respectively (Chi-square Test: p = 0.0002 P1 vs. P3; p = 0.0001 P1 vs. P3 and P4) (Figure 2A). There was no significant difference between the median value of CFU recovered from the first to the fourth passages in the sub-group of mice maintaining the infection and ranging between 1.14 × 105 and 1.32 × 106 CFU/lung (p value = 0.446 P1 vs. P4) (Figure 2B).

2.3. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Mex1 Adapted to Murine Lungs

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of bacterial isolates recovered after the fourth passage in mice was carried out, in order to determine whether phenotypic or genetic adaptation occurred. We examined the persistent variants isolated from two groups of eight and nine chronically infected mice after the fourth sequential passages when the percentage of infected mice increased to 100%. Growth on Burkholderia cepacia selective agar (BCSA) and genetic profiling by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis confirmed that the bacteria recovered were genetically indistinguishable from the initially challenged Mex1 strain (Figure 3).
B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain and its derivatives were finally tested by PCR for the presence of the cable pilin subunit gene (cblA), encoding the cable pilus. Both the parent and the Mex1 derivative strains were negative for cblA gene, while only the clinical B. cenocepacia strain LMG 16656 was found positive (data not shown). No differences in biofilm formation (Figure 4) or colonial morphology (Figure 5) between the parental Mex1 and Mex1-derived clones were observed. Indeed, the mucoid colonial morphology, as assessed on yeast extract mannitol (YEM) agar plates, that correlates with higher levels of EPS production, appeared to be a distinct feature of the Mex1 strains as well as their derivative clones.

2.4. Survival and Relative Bacterial Loads of Mex1 and Its Derivative Clones in Infected G. mellonella Larvae

The G. mellonella model is a valuable experimental system for determining the virulence properties of B. cepacia complex genetic mutants [33]. Thus, Mex1 and its derivatives recovered after the fourth passage in mice were screened for their ability to kill G. mellonella wax moth larvae. The resulting data were analyzed by determining the percentage survival of the infected larvae (Figure 6) and by the Kaplan–Maier method (Figure 7). As expected, the environmental Mex1 strain was significantly less virulent than LMG16656 as assessed by the log-rank test (p = 0.0106), demonstrating that the G. mellonella assays were suitable to identify differences in the virulence of B. cenocepacia strains. Overall, most of the Mex1-derived clones were not significantly different from the parental Mex1 strain, with two exceptions—strains 41803 and 41818—that appeared to be more virulent than Mex1 (Figure 6B).
Accordingly, the Kaplan–Meier survival and the log-rank test showed a significantly higher virulence of these two strains respect to Mex1, with p = 0.0156 and p = 0.0087 for 41803 and 41818, respectively, while comparison with LMG16656 revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05) (Figure 7). Subsequently, the 50% lethal dose (LD50) causing 50% death of infected larvae was determined. Results indicated that the two reference strains, Mex1 and LMG16656, showed LD50 values equal to 250 and 166, respectively. The Mex1-derivatives were more variable with LD50 ranging from 25 (41821) to 500 (41819). The clones 41803 and 41818 were characterized by low LD50 values, 59 and 38 respectively.
Overall, we have demonstrated that the Mex1 derivative clones showed a different degree of virulence in comparison with the parental strain. In particular, strains 41803 and 41818 were both significantly more virulent than the parental Mex1 strains, with a virulence degree comparable to that of the clinical LMG16656T strain.

3. Discussion

B. cenocepacia strains occur naturally in a wide range of environments and are able to persist in human hosts, suggesting that the virulence factors needed to colonize animals and other habitats are similar [34]. Among the natural environments, the rhizosphere is a huge reservoir for bacterial species and a source of human pathogens, due to the enhanced biomass and microbial activity as a result of exudation compounds from the roots [35]. In particular, the maize rhizosphere has a strong influence on the specific host—B. cenocepacia interactions, and represents a privileged environment of BCC strains [36,37]. It can also be considered as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria [24]. Interactions with plant roots might pave the way for bacterial adaptation to mammalian and human cells [35]. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the rhizosphere B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain, that showed a low level of virulence in vivo [26], can increase its fitness in mice establishing niche adaptation through serial passages in a murine model.
Among the genetic lineages of B. cenocepacia species, recA lineage IIIA appears to have global distribution, predominantly among patients with CF, with high transmissibility and a high mortality rate [23,38,39]. Mex1 constitutes a rare environmental B. cenocepacia IIIA strain, isolated from the maize rhizosphere in Mexico [26,27]. Mex1 has a unique sequence type (ST), the ST 423, but genetically it is closely related to internationally spread clones as it belongs to the clonal complex 31, the largest clonal complex of all STs reported in the Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) B. cepacia complex database [16]. Until now, the adaptation process of B. cenocepacia to the host environment has been investigated for clinical isolates only [40] and, despite the description of several virulent factors, understanding is still poor [41]. Considering environmental B. cenocepacia strains, increased fitness of the B. cenocepacia HI2424 strain, belonging to the recA lineage IIIB, has been shown suggesting the adaptation of a soil isolate to the onion model [42]. In this case, B. cenocepacia adaptation was associated with reduced virulence and a loss of pathogenicity to the nematode C. elegans. The large, multireplicon genome and the presence of insertion sequences confer genome plasticity that could explain the versatility of B. cenocepacia bacteria and their ability to rapidly adapt to new niches [28]. Environmental strains have defense mechanisms that confer to them a survival advantage in this niche and they have been shown to infect various hosts, including mammals, nematodes and plants [43].
This study revealed that the rhizosphere B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain, with a low virulence in mice, increased its ability to cause a chronic lung infection following serial passages in mice that adapt to “local environmental” conditions in the murine lung tissues and establish chronic infections in almost all the infected mice. Our results suggest that chemical–physical characteristics of the host play a role in the selection of virulent bacteria. The phenotypic and genotypic tests we performed did not reveal any differences between strains. Colonial morphology revealed that the phenotype of the Mex1-derived clones recovered from infected mice were indistinguishable from the challenge strain. Our findings suggest that the Mex1 strain and its derivative clones were mucoid, in agreement with results obtained by Zlosnik and colleagues [44], who suggested that the capacity to elaborate EPS may be critical for survival in the environment, the natural niche of B. cepacia complex bacteria. Serial passages in mice did not determine any phenotypic switching from to nonmucoid to mucoid forms, as that of clinical and virulent B. cenocepacia strains. Also, no differences were observed in the genetic fingerprinting of the parental and the Mex1-derived clones. At any rate, RAPD analysis does not exclude the possibility that point mutations, such as SNPs or other point mutations, may have occurred [45].
When we evaluated the virulence of Mex1-derived clones in the G. mellonella larvae infection model, two Mex1-derived clones with a virulence degree more similar to that of the clinical and epidemic LMG16656 strain were found, suggesting adaptation to mice and the acquisition or differential expression of virulence factors. G. mellonella is an excellent model for assessing the virulence for a range of microorganisms and provides a rapid and cost-effective alternative for screening a large number of bacteria [46]. The wax moth larvae infection model has recently gained popularity in Burkholderia research and has been employed to compare virulence among different BCC species [33]. Recently, it was used to assess the efficacy of the combination therapy (tobramycin with econazole or miconazole) for B. cenocepacia [47]. From our results, we can speculate that the ability of B. cenocepacia to survive and replicate in various growth niches is due to the high genomic plasticity of this bacterial species and to the expression of host specific virulence factors. When properly regulated, this may help it to compete for survival in different settings [41]. As also suggested by Koskiniemi and colleagues [48], following growth inside a host selection can benefit bacterial mutants through an altered expression of virulence genes that better suit the environment of the host.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacteria and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strain used in this study and its properties are shown in Table 1.

4.2. Ethical Statement

Animal studies adhered strictly to the Italian Ministry of Health guidelines for the use and care of experimental animals. This study was conducted according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol #369 of 28 July 2008) of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Milan, Italy).

4.3. Sequential Infection in Mice

Mex1 was included in the agar beads prepared according to the previously described method [26]. Briefly, bacteria were cultured overnight in nutrient broth (NB) at 37 °C to the stationary phase. For agar beads preparation in P2–P4, bacteria isolated from plates were grown in NB broth in a 96-well plate at 37 °C overnight, pooled and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended in 1 mL of PBS (PH 7.4). Bacteria were added to 9 mL of 1.5% NA and subsequently pipetted forcefully into 150 mL of heavy mineral oil, which was kept at 50 °C for bead preparation. The size of the beads was verified microscopically and only those preparations containing beads of 100 µm to 200 µm in diameter were used. The number of B. cenocepacia CFU in the beads was determined by plating serial dilutions of the homogenized bacteria-bead suspension on NA plates. The two groups of 8 and 12 C57Bl/6 male mice (Charles River), 6–8 weeks old (20–22 g) were injected with 1.5–2.0 × 107 CFU/lung and the infection was followed for 28 days. Before infection, mice were anesthetized as previously described [30]. After infection, mice were monitored daily for the following clinical signs: coat quality, posture, ambulation, hydration status, and body weight. After 4 weeks, mice were sacrificed, and the lungs were homogenized. Serially diluted lung homogenate samples were plated on NA and the viable cell counts of B. cenocepacia were evaluated. Bacterial strains were recovered and the percentage of infected mice was evaluated. Recovery of >1000 CFU from lung cultures was indicative of chronic infection. Next, for the second passage, 192 single colonies recovered after 28 days, from two groups of infected mice were re-grown separately in 96 well plates. Then, they were pooled for two different agar bead preparations and injected in two groups of mice (n = 8–9, respectively). Thereafter, third and fourth passages in mice were carried out as described above.

4.4. Molecular Characterization of Mex1-Derived Clones

4.4.1. Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Fingerprinting

The environmental B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain and its persisting derivatives recovered from infected mice were genetically typed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, as previously described [49]. Each strain was tested in triplicate, and the entire experiment was repeated three times to verify the RAPD reproducibility. The generated fingerprints were analyzed using the Quantity One software package (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Milan, Italy) and Phoretix 1D PRO software (Phoretix International, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). The Dice coefficient index was used as similarity measure. The dendrogram was created within Phoretix 1D Pro software by using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) method.

4.4.2. PCR Amplification of cblA Gene

The 664-bp cblA DNA coding for the cable pilus was amplified with the primers CBL1 and CBL2, according to the procedure described by Clode and colleagues [50].

4.5. Biofilm Formation

Biofilm formation was assessed using the 96-well plate assay and staining the sessile and adherent cells with crystal violet (CV) as described previously [51], with minor modifications [28]. B. cenocepacia strains (Mex 1, Mex1-derived clones and the clinical LMG16656T) were inoculated from pure cultures grown in M9 minimal medium to mid-exponential (OD600 ~ 0.5) phase into at least 6 wells of flat-bottomed 96-well polyvinyl chloride microtiter plates (Greiner Bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany). Biofilm biomass was quantified by crystal violet staining. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a Victor3 multilabel counter (Perkin-Elmer, Milan, Italy). Each strain was tested in triplicate, and the entire experiment was repeated three times.

4.6. Growth on YEM Yeast Extract-Mannitol (YEM) Agar

Overnight cultures of bacteria were harvested, standardized to an OD590 of 1.0 in PBS, and adjusted to approximately 5 × 106 CFU·mL−1. This bacterial suspension was used to inoculate (via a sterile pipette tip) yeast extract medium (YEM; 0.5 g of yeast extract L−1 and 4 g of mannitol L−1 supplemented with 15 g of agar L−1) agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h prior to measuring the capacities of isolates to elaborate EPS.

4.7. Screening of Mex1-Derived Clones in the G. mellonella Model

The G. mellonella infection assay was carried out as described by Uehlinger and colleagues [52] with minor modifications. Overnight bacterial cultures were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth, diluted 1:100 in the same medium and grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4. Cultures were pelleted, resuspended in 10 mM MgSO4 plus 1.2 mg/mL ampicillin and adjusted to OD600 = 1. A 5-μL aliquot (approximately 1 × 106 CFU/mL) was injected into the hindmost left proleg. For 50% lethal dose (LD50) experiments, a series of 10-fold serial dilutions containing from 106 to 0 bacteria were injected into G. mellonella larvae. Ten to fifteen healthy larvae were injected for each strain and incubated in Petri dishes at 30 °C in the dark. The number of live and dead larvae was scored 24, 48 and 72 h after infection; dead larvae were those that did not move in response to touch. All the tests were performed in triplicate. Control larvae were injected with 5 μL of buffer only.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

In vivo data were statistically analyzed by using GraphPad Prism. Data analysis was performed using a non-parametric two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test for single comparison for CFU counts. Incidences of chronic colonization were compared using Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p values < 0.05.
Biofilm data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA (Prism GraphPad version 6.0 Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), considering p < 0.05 as the limit of statistical significance.
The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the survival of groups of larvae injected with the B. cenocepacia strains. Differences in survival were calculated by using the log-rank test. LD50 (CFU) value of each strain was calculated by fitting a linear regression. Survival and LD50 were performed using Prism GraphPad version 6.0. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

The present study evaluated the ability of the environmental B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain, isolated from maize-rhizosphere, to persist and increase its virulence by serial passages during long-term chronic airways infection in mice. In conclusion, we found that the environmental B. cenocepacia strain increased its capacity to cause a chronic lung infection after serial passages in mice, adapting to the local environmental conditions of murine lung tissues and establishing chronic infection. However, how environmental bacteria adapt in the complex and variable environment of the host is still largely unknown. Clonal variants with increased virulence in non-vertebrate hosts were found. However, in-depth characterization of Mex1 derivative clones by whole-genome sequencing and comparative bioinformatics analysis is necessary to understand whether intraclonal diversification occurred; this could lead to new targets for future anti-B. cenocepacia treatment strategies. Understanding the mechanisms of niche specialization of environmental strains and identifying the common targets of adaptation to the lung environment will allow us to evaluate the potential risk of infection with opportunistic pathogens.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation (FFC) (http://www.fibrosicisticaricerca.it/) to Annamaria Bevivino: grant FFC#7/2006 with the contribution of “Delegazione FFC di Latina” and grant FFC#7/2008 with the contribution of “Lega Italiana Fibrosi Cistica, Associazione Siciliana FC”. We have dedicated the present article to the memory of Jesús Caballero-Mellado (Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico) who passed away on 16 October 2010, at Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. Jesús was Leader of the Soil Microbiology in Mexico and a great expert on the plant-associated Burkholderia species. With Jesus’s death, we lost an excellent scientist, a loyal and generous friend, a marvelous speaker, a charming person of the highest sensitivity and nobility. We also acknowledge the Italian CF Foundation for its support and administrative tasks.

Author Contributions

Alessandra Bragonzi, Fiorentina Ascenzioni and Annamaria Bevivino conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents, materials and analysis tools, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Moira Paroni, Luisa Pirone and Ivan Coladarci performed the mouse experiments, molecular characterization and G. mellonella infection, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. Ratjen, F.; Döring, G. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2003, 361, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Worlitzsch, D.; Tarran, R.; Ulrich, M.; Schwab, U.; Cekici, A.; Meyer, K.C.; Birrer, P.; Bellon, G.; Berger, J.; Weiss, T.; et al. Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 109, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Döring, G.; Gulbins, E. Cystic fibrosis and innate immunity: How chloride channel mutations provoke lung disease. Cell. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Annual Data Report. 2015. Available online: https://www.cff.org/Our-Research/CF-Patient-Registry/2015-Patient-Registry-Annual-Data-Report.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2017).
  5. Lyczak, J.B.; Cannon, C.L.; Pier, G.B. Lung infections associated with cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 194–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bhagirath, A.Y.; Li, Y.; Somayajula, D.; Dadashi, M.; Badr, S.; Duan, K. Cystic fibrosis lung environment and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. BMC Pulm. Med. 2016, 16, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Conrad, D.; Haynes, M.; Salamon, P.; Rainey, P.B.; Youle, M.; Rohwer, F. Cystic fibrosis therapy: A community ecology perspective. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 48, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Folkesson, A.; Jelsbak, L.; Yang, L.; Johansen, H.K.; Ciofu, O.; Høiby, N.; Molin, S. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: An evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lorè, N.I.; Cigana, C.; De Fino, I.; Riva, C.; Juhas, M.; Schwager, S.; Eberl, L.; Bragonzi, A. Cystic fibrosis-niche adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduces virulence in multiple infection hosts. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Döring, G.; Conway, S.P.; Heijerman, H.G.; Hodson, M.E.; Hoiby, N.; Smyth, A.; Touw, D.J. Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: A European consensus. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 16, 749–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Smith, E.E.; Buckley, D.G.; Wu, Z.; Saenphimmachak, C.; Hoffman, L.R.; D’Argenio, D.A.; Miller, S.I.; Ramsey, B.W.; Speert, D.P.; Moskowitz, S.M.; et al. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 8487–8492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chicurel, M. Can organisms speed their own evolution? Science 2001, 292, 1824–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Winstanley, C.; O’Brien, S.; Brockhurst, M.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa evolutionary adaptation and diversification in cystic fibrosis chronic lung infections. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fothergill, J.L.; Walshaw, M.J.; Winstanley, C. Transmissible strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infections. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 40, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Parkins, M.D.; Glezerson, B.A.; Sibley, C.D.; Sibley, K.A.; Duong, J.; Purighalla, S.; Mody, C.H.; Workentine, M.L.; Storey, D.G.; Surette, M.G.; et al. Twenty-five-year outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infecting individuals with cystic fibrosis: Identification of the prairie epidemic strain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1127–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Drevinek, P.; Mahenthiralingam, E. Burkholderia cenocepacia in cystic fibrosis: Epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mahenthiralingam, E.; Baldwin, A.; Dowson, C.G. Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: Opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 1539–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Courtney, J.M.; Dunbar, K.E.; McDowell, A.; Moore, J.E.; Warke, T.J.; Stevenson, M.; Elborn, J.S. Clinical outcome of Burkholderia cepacia complex infection in cystic fibrosis adults. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2004, 3, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tabacchioni, S.; Bevivino, A.; Dalmastri, C.; Chiarini, L. Burkholderia cepacia complex in the rhizosphere: A minireview. Ann. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 103–117. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pirone, L.; Chiarini, L.; Dalmastri, C.; Bevivino, A.; Tabacchioni, S. Detection of cultured and uncultured Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria naturally occurring in the maize rhizosphere. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1734–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chiarini, L.; Bevivino, A.; Dalmastri, C.; Tabacchioni, S.; Visca, P. Burkholderia cepacia complex species: Health hazards and biotechnological potential. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. LiPuma, J.J.; Spilker, T.; Coenye, T.; Gonzalez, C.F. An epidemic Burkholderia cepacia complex strain identified in soil. Lancet 2002, 359, 2002–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Baldwin, A.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Drevinek, P.; Vandamme, P.; Govan, J.R.; Waine, D.J.; LiPuma, J.J.; Chiarini, L.; Dalmastri, C.; Henry, D.A.; et al. Environmental Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates in human infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Berg, G.; Alavi, M.; Schmid, M.; Hartmann, A. The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. In Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere, 1st ed.; de Bruijn Frans, J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Somerset, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 1209–1216. ISBN 9781118296172. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bevivino, A.; Dalmastri, C.; Tabacchioni, S.; Chiarini, L.; Belli, M.L.; Piana, S.; Materazzo, A.; Vandamme, P.; Manno, G. Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria from clinical and environmental sources in Italy: Genomovar status and distribution of traits related to virulence and transmissibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pirone, L.; Bragonzi, A.; Farcomeni, A.; Paroni, M.; Auriche, C.; Conese, M.; Chiarini, L.; Dalmastri, C.; Bevivino, A.; Ascenzioni, F. Burkholderia cenocepacia strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients are apparently more invasive and more virulent than rhizosphere strains. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2773–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bevivino, A.; Pirone, L.; Pilkington, R.; Cifani, N.; Dalmastri, C.; Callaghan, M.; Ascenzioni, F.; McClean, S. Interaction of environmental Burkholderia cenocepacia strains with cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. Microbiology 2012, 158, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vial, L.; Chapalain, A.; Groleau, M.C.; Déziel, E. The various lifestyles of the Burkholderia cepacia complex species: A tribute to adaptation. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chung, J.W.; Altman, E.; Beveridge, T.J.; Speert, D.P. Colonial morphology of Burkholderia cepacia complex genomovar III: Implications in exopolysaccharide production, pilus expression, and persistence in the mouse. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bragonzi, A.; Farulla, I.; Paroni, M.; Twomey, K.B.; Pirone, L.; Lorè, N.I.; Bianconi, I.; Dalmastri, C.; Ryan, R.P.; Bevivino, A. Modelling co-infection of the cystic fibrosis lung by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cenocepacia reveals influences on biofilm formation and host response. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pirone, L. Pathogenicity of Clinical and Environmental Burkholderia cenocepacia Strains: Influence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis Host. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bragonzi, A.; Worlitzsch, D.; Pier, G.B.; Timpert, P.; Ulrich, M.; Hentzer, M.; Andersen, J.B.; Givskov, M.; Conese, M.; Döring, G. Nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa expresses alginate in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis and in a mouse model. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Seed, K.D.; Dennis, J.J. Development of Galleria mellonella as an alternative infection model for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P. Diversity and significance of Burkholderia species occupying diverse ecological niches. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aujoulat, F.; Roger, F.; Bourdier, A.; Lotthé, A.; Lamy, B.; Marchandin, H.; Jumas-Bilak, E. From environment to man: Genome evolution and adaptation of human opportunistic bacterial pathogens. Genes 2012, 3, 191–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fiore, A.; Laevens, S.; Bevivino, A.; Dalmastri, C.; Tabacchioni, S.; Vandamme, P.; Chiarini, L. Burkholderia cepacia complex: Distribution of genomovars among isolates from the maize rhizosphere in Italy. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dalmastri, C.; Baldwin, A.; Tabacchioni, S.; Bevivino, A.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Chiarini, L.; Dowson, C. Investigating Burkholderia cepacia complex populations recovered from Italian maize rhizosphere by multilocus sequence typing. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 1632–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Manno, G.; Dalmastri, C.; Tabacchioni, S.; Vandamme, P.; Lorini, R.; Minicucci, L.; Romano, L.; Giannattasio, A.; Chiarini, L.; Bevivino, A. Epidemiology and clinical course of Burkholderia cepacia complex infections, particularly those caused by different Burkholderia cenocepacia strains, among patients attending an Italian cystic fibrosis center. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cunha, M.V.; Leitão, J.H.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Vandamme, P.; Lito, L.; Barreto, C.; Salgado, M.J.; Sá-Correia, I. Molecular analysis of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from a Portuguese cystic fibrosis center: A 7-year study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 4113–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. O’Grady, E.P.; Sokol, P.A. Burkholderia cenocepacia differential gene expression during host–pathogen interactions and adaptation to the host environment. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2011, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sousa, S.; Feliciano, J.; Pita, T.; Guerreiro, S.; Leitão, J.H. Burkholderia cepacia complex regulation of virulence gene expression: A review. Genes 2017, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ellis, C.N.; Cooper, V.S. Experimental adaptation of Burkholderia cenocepacia to onion medium reduces host range. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2387–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sokol, P.A. Burkholderia: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics. In Burkholderia: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics; Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., Eds.; Horizon Bioscience; Taylor and Francis, Inc.: Wymondham, UK, 2007; pp. 229–250. ISBN 1904933289. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zlosnik, J.E.A.; Hird, T.J.; Fraenkel, M.C.; Moreira, L.M.; Henry, D.A.; Speert, D.P. Differential mucoid exopolysaccharide production by members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1470–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bryant, J.; Chewapreecha, C.; Bentley, S.D. Developing insights into the mechanisms of evolution of bacterial pathogens from whole-genome sequences. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tsai, C.J.-Y.; Loh, J.M.S.; Proft, T. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence 2016, 7, 214–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Van den Driessche, F.; Vanhoutte, B.; Brackman, G.; Crabbé, A.; Rigole, P.; Vercruysse, J.; Verstraete, G.; Cappoen, D.; Vervaet, C.; Cos, P.; et al. Evaluation of combination therapy for Burkholderia cenocepacia lung infection in different in vitro and in vivo models. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Koskiniemi, S.; Gibbons, H.S.; Sandegren, L.; Anwar, N.; Ouellette, G.; Broomall, S.; Karavis, M.; McGregor, P.; Liem, A.; Fochler, E.; et al. Pathoadaptive mutations in Salmonella enterica isolated after serial passage in mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mahenthiralingam, E.; Simpson, D.A.; Speert, D.P. Identification and characterization of a novel DNA marker associated with epidemic Burkholderia cepacia strains recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Clode, F.E.; Kaufmann, M.E.; Malnick, H.; Pitt, T.L. Distribution of genes encoding putative transmissibility factors among epidemic and nonepidemic strains of Burkholderia cepacia from cystic fibrosis patients in the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1763–1766. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Burmølle, M.; Webb, J.S.; Rao, D.; Hansen, L.H.; Sørensen, S.J.; Kjelleberg, S. Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 3916–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Uehlinger, S.; Schwager, S.; Bernier, S.P.; Riedel, K.; Nguyen, D.T.; Sokol, P.A.; Eberl, L. Identification of specific and universal virulence factors in Burkholderia cenocepacia strains by using multiple infection hosts. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 4102–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schedule of sequential chronic B. cenocepacia lung infection in mice. Two groups of C57Bl/6NCrlBR mice (n = 8–12) were inoculated with 1.5 × 107 CFU/lung of B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain embedded in agar beads for 28 days (P1). After 28 days, single colonies were recovered from two groups of infected mice and were re-grown separately; then, they were pulled for two different agar bead preparations and injected in two groups of mice (n = 8–9) (P2). The third and the fourth passages in mice (n = 8–9) (P3 and P4) were carried out as P2 for 28 days each.
Figure 1. Schedule of sequential chronic B. cenocepacia lung infection in mice. Two groups of C57Bl/6NCrlBR mice (n = 8–12) were inoculated with 1.5 × 107 CFU/lung of B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain embedded in agar beads for 28 days (P1). After 28 days, single colonies were recovered from two groups of infected mice and were re-grown separately; then, they were pulled for two different agar bead preparations and injected in two groups of mice (n = 8–9) (P2). The third and the fourth passages in mice (n = 8–9) (P3 and P4) were carried out as P2 for 28 days each.
Ijms 18 02417 g001
Figure 2. Virulence of B. cenocepacia Mex1 after sequential passages in mice. C57Bl/6 mice were infected for four sequential passages by bacteria collected from each passage of 28 days. At each passage mice were sacrificed and evaluated for CFU and percentage of infected mice. (A) The percentage of chronically infected mice at different passages. (B) The number of CFU of B. cenocepacia per lung at different passages. Dots represent individual mice measurements and horizontal lines represent the median values. Two groups of 8–12 mice were analyzed for each passage. Statistical significance is indicated: ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Virulence of B. cenocepacia Mex1 after sequential passages in mice. C57Bl/6 mice were infected for four sequential passages by bacteria collected from each passage of 28 days. At each passage mice were sacrificed and evaluated for CFU and percentage of infected mice. (A) The percentage of chronically infected mice at different passages. (B) The number of CFU of B. cenocepacia per lung at different passages. Dots represent individual mice measurements and horizontal lines represent the median values. Two groups of 8–12 mice were analyzed for each passage. Statistical significance is indicated: ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 18 02417 g002
Figure 3. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints of the B. cenocepacia Mex1 challenge and some of its persisting colonies isolated from infected mice. (A) The polymorphisms were generated using RAPD primer 270. From left to right: L123, 123-bp molecular size marker ladder; Mex1 strain; clone 410801; clone 410807; clone 410808; negative control. (B) The dendrogram showing the clonal relatedness of some persisting colonies, performed with the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) by using mathematic averages algorithm programs integral to the Phoretix 1D Pro software. Lanes 2–5: Mex1 strain; clone 410801; clone 410807; clone 41080.
Figure 3. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints of the B. cenocepacia Mex1 challenge and some of its persisting colonies isolated from infected mice. (A) The polymorphisms were generated using RAPD primer 270. From left to right: L123, 123-bp molecular size marker ladder; Mex1 strain; clone 410801; clone 410807; clone 410808; negative control. (B) The dendrogram showing the clonal relatedness of some persisting colonies, performed with the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) by using mathematic averages algorithm programs integral to the Phoretix 1D Pro software. Lanes 2–5: Mex1 strain; clone 410801; clone 410807; clone 41080.
Ijms 18 02417 g003
Figure 4. Biofilm formation of Mex1 and some of its derivatives in microtiter plate assay. No significant difference among Mex1 and its derivative clones was found (p > 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The clinical LMG16656T formed a higher biofilm in comparison with Mex1 (p = 0.0311, Student’s t-test). The amount of biofilm was quantified by Crystal Violet staining. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm.
Figure 4. Biofilm formation of Mex1 and some of its derivatives in microtiter plate assay. No significant difference among Mex1 and its derivative clones was found (p > 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The clinical LMG16656T formed a higher biofilm in comparison with Mex1 (p = 0.0311, Student’s t-test). The amount of biofilm was quantified by Crystal Violet staining. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm.
Ijms 18 02417 g004
Figure 5. Colonial morphology of Mex1, its derivative (41818 clone as an example) and the clinical B. cenocepacia LMG16656T on YEM agar. Strains were grown at 37 °C for 48 h.
Figure 5. Colonial morphology of Mex1, its derivative (41818 clone as an example) and the clinical B. cenocepacia LMG16656T on YEM agar. Strains were grown at 37 °C for 48 h.
Ijms 18 02417 g005
Figure 6. Percent survival of G. mellonella following inoculation with Mex1, Mex1-mouse persistent derivatives and the clinical LMG16656T. The B. cenocepacia strains are indicated on the right: Mex1, thick dashed line; LMG16656, thick dotted line. Y-axis, percent survival of larvae infected with the indicated bacterial strains; X-axis, time post infection (days). Mex1-mouse persistent derivatives were recovered from two groups of eight and 9 C57Bl/6 male mice, and coded as 40 (A) and 41 (B), respectively.
Figure 6. Percent survival of G. mellonella following inoculation with Mex1, Mex1-mouse persistent derivatives and the clinical LMG16656T. The B. cenocepacia strains are indicated on the right: Mex1, thick dashed line; LMG16656, thick dotted line. Y-axis, percent survival of larvae infected with the indicated bacterial strains; X-axis, time post infection (days). Mex1-mouse persistent derivatives were recovered from two groups of eight and 9 C57Bl/6 male mice, and coded as 40 (A) and 41 (B), respectively.
Ijms 18 02417 g006
Figure 7. Kaplan-Meier survival plots of larvae injected with the indicated strains. (A) The killing ability of Mex1 compared with that of 41803 and 41818 Mex1-derived clones. (B) The killing ability of LMG16656 compared with that of 41803 and 41818 Mex1-derived clones. Y-axis, percent survival of larvae; X-axis, time (days) post infection. Statistical analysis was performed by log-rank test.
Figure 7. Kaplan-Meier survival plots of larvae injected with the indicated strains. (A) The killing ability of Mex1 compared with that of 41803 and 41818 Mex1-derived clones. (B) The killing ability of LMG16656 compared with that of 41803 and 41818 Mex1-derived clones. Y-axis, percent survival of larvae; X-axis, time (days) post infection. Statistical analysis was performed by log-rank test.
Ijms 18 02417 g007
Table 1. Characteristics of B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain.
Table 1. Characteristics of B. cenocepacia Mex1 strain.
Isolate
Name
OriginSequence Type (ST)Cci-Encoded GenesCF and Non-CF Epithelial CellsTransepithelial Resistance (TER)References
Mex1maize rhizosphere
(Mexico)
423positivelow-level
invasion
strong disruption of
tight junction integrity
[26,27]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bragonzi, A.; Paroni, M.; Pirone, L.; Coladarci, I.; Ascenzioni, F.; Bevivino, A. Environmental Burkholderia cenocepacia Strain Enhances Fitness by Serial Passages during Long-Term Chronic Airways Infection in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112417

AMA Style

Bragonzi A, Paroni M, Pirone L, Coladarci I, Ascenzioni F, Bevivino A. Environmental Burkholderia cenocepacia Strain Enhances Fitness by Serial Passages during Long-Term Chronic Airways Infection in Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(11):2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bragonzi, Alessandra, Moira Paroni, Luisa Pirone, Ivan Coladarci, Fiorentina Ascenzioni, and Annamaria Bevivino. 2017. "Environmental Burkholderia cenocepacia Strain Enhances Fitness by Serial Passages during Long-Term Chronic Airways Infection in Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 11: 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop