Next Article in Journal
hCG: Biological Functions and Clinical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Combined Virtual and Experimental Screening for CK1 Inhibitors Identifies a Modulator of p53 and Reveals Important Aspects of in Silico Screening Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Licochalcone A Prevents the Loss of Dopaminergic Neurons by Inhibiting Microglial Activation in Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Induced Parkinson’s Disease Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome Instability and γH2AX
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(10), 2036;

Proteome Stability as a Key Factor of Genome Integrity

Department of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 15784 Athens, Greece
Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 July 2017 / Revised: 11 September 2017 / Accepted: 19 September 2017 / Published: 22 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms Leading to Genomic Instability)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1540 KB, uploaded 22 September 2017]   |  


DNA damage is constantly produced by both endogenous and exogenous factors; DNA lesions then trigger the so-called DNA damaged response (DDR). This is a highly synchronized pathway that involves recognition, signaling and repair of the damage. Failure to eliminate DNA lesions is associated with genome instability, a driving force in tumorigenesis. Proteins carry out the vast majority of cellular functions and thus proteome quality control (PQC) is critical for the maintenance of cellular functionality. PQC is assured by the proteostasis network (PN), which under conditions of proteome instability address the triage decision of protein fold, hold, or degrade. Key components of the PN are the protein synthesis modules, the molecular chaperones and the two main degradation machineries, namely the autophagy-lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathways; also, part of the PN are a number of stress-responsive cellular sensors including (among others) heat shock factor 1 (Hsf1) and the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Nevertheless, the lifestyle- and/or ageing-associated gradual accumulation of stressors results in increasingly damaged and unstable proteome due to accumulation of misfolded proteins and/or protein aggregates. This outcome may then increase genomic instability due to reduced fidelity in processes like DNA replication or repair leading to various age-related diseases including cancer. Herein, we review the role of proteostatic machineries in nuclear genome integrity and stability, as well as on DDR responses. View Full-Text
Keywords: aggregates; autophagy; DNA damage response; genome instability; Nrf2; oxidative stress; proteostasis; proteasome aggregates; autophagy; DNA damage response; genome instability; Nrf2; oxidative stress; proteostasis; proteasome

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gumeni, S.; Evangelakou, Z.; Gorgoulis, V.G.; Trougakos, I.P. Proteome Stability as a Key Factor of Genome Integrity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2036.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top