Next Article in Journal
New Cytotoxic 24-Homoscalarane Sesterterpenoids from the Sponge Ircinia felix
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface-Deacetylated Chitin Nano-Fiber/Hyaluronic Acid Composites as Potential Antioxidative Compounds for Use in Extended-Release Matrix Tablets
Previous Article in Journal
Ghrelin Attenuates Liver Fibrosis through Regulation of TGF-β1 Expression and Autophagy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Chitosan-Coated Near-Infrared (NIR) Layered Double Hydroxide-Indocyanine Green Nanocomposites for Potential Applications in Photodynamic Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms160921931
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Oral Administration of Chitin Nanofiber on Plasma Metabolites and Gut Microorganisms

by
Kazuo Azuma
1,*,
Ryotaro Izumi
2,
Mari Kawata
2,
Tomone Nagae
2,
Tomohiro Osaki
1,
Yusuke Murahata
1,
Takeshi Tsuka
1,
Tomohiro Imagawa
1,
Norihiko Ito
1,
Yoshiharu Okamoto
1,
Minoru Morimoto
3,
Hironori Izawa
2,
Hiroyuki Saimoto
2 and
Shinsuke Ifuku
2,*
1
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8533, Japan
2
Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8552, Japan
3
Division of Instrumental Analysis, Research Center for Bioscience and Technology, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8550, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(9), 21931-21949; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160921931
Submission received: 25 August 2015 / Revised: 5 September 2015 / Accepted: 7 September 2015 / Published: 10 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chitins 2015)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of oral administration of chitin nanofibers (CNFs) and surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs on plasma metabolites using metabolome analysis. Furthermore, we determined the changes in gut microbiota and fecal organic acid concentrations following oral administrations of CNFs and SDACNFs. Healthy female mice (six-week-old) were fed a normal diet and administered tap water with 0.1% (v/v) CNFs or SDACNFs for 28 days. Oral administration of CNFs increased plasma levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). Oral administration of SDACNFs affected the metabolisms of acyl-carnitines and fatty acids. The fecal organic level analysis indicated that oral administration of CNFs stimulated and activated the functions of microbiota. These results indicate that oral administration of CNFs increases plasma levels of ATP and 5-HT via activation of gut microbiota.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chitin (β-(1-4)-poly-N-acetyl-d-glucosamine) is widely distributed in nature and is the second most abundant polysaccharide after cellulose [1]. It occurs in nature as ordered macrofibrils and is the major structural component of the exoskeleton of crab and shrimp shells and the cell wall of fungi and yeast [2]. Recently, simple methods for the preparation of chitin nanofibers (CNFs) were reported [3,4,5]. In addition, the preparation of surface-deacetylated CNFs (SDACNFs) has been reported by Isogai et al. [6]. This study showed that while the nanofiber surface was transformed into chitosan by deacetylation, the core was maintained as chitin crystal. The cationic electrostatic repulsive force facilitated the easy disintegration of the deacetylated chitin into nanofibers, and the SDACNFs were homogeneously dispersed in water. These nanofibers are considered to have great potential for various applications because they have several useful properties such as high specific surface area and high porosity [2].
Previously, CNFs and SDACNFs were reported to have numerous bioactivities [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. For example, CNFs suppressed clinical symptoms and colon inflammation in an experimental colitis model [7,8,9]. SDACNFs suppressed increases in body weight and serum leptin level in a model of obesity induced by a high-fat diet [2] and decreased serum levels of cholesterol in a rat model of hypercholesterolemia [10]. These results indicate that CNFs and SDACNFs are potential potent functional foods for various diseases.
Metabolome analysis is used to evaluate the characteristics and interactions of low molecular weight metabolites under a specific set of conditions such as, a particular developmental stage or under certain environmental conditions [15]. The metabolome mainly represents the endpoint of the omics cascade and is the closest point to the phenotype in the cascade. Changes in metabolite levels can also be induced by exogenous factors, such as environmental and dietary factors while genomic information is not basically affected. Therefore, metabolite profiles are considered a summary of other upstream omics profiles and metabolome analysis might be able to detect subtle changes in metabolic pathways and deviations from homeostasis before phenotypic changes occur [16,17].
The gut microbiome (the collective genomes of gut microbes) encodes 3.3 million non-redundant genes, which is 150 times larger than the human gene complement [18]. This genetic richness enables the gut microbiota to perform diverse and active metabolic activities that are not encoded in the human genome, such as processing dietary polysaccharides [19,20]. In addition, the gut microbiota exchange metabolites with the host and interact with host signaling pathways to modulate functions such as host bile acid, lipid, and amino acid metabolism as well as host gene expression [21,22,23,24].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to reveal novel bioactivities of orally administered CNFs and SDACNFs. In addition, we evaluated the effects of oral administration of CNFs and SDACNFs on plasma metabolites using metabolome and gut microorganism analysis.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effects of Oral Administration of CNFs and SDACNFs on Plasma Metabolites

In this study, capillary electrophoresis-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS) revealed 224 peaks (129 cations and 95 anions). Liquid chromatography (LC)-TOFMS detected 90 peaks (49 positive and 41 negative). The results of the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) are shown in Figure 1. Relative areas of metabolites after oral administration of CNFs, SDACNFs, chitin, and cellulose nanofibers (CLNFs) were compared with those of the control group. All p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. The ratios of the metabolite concentrations to that of the control group are shown in Table 1.
Ijms 16 21931 g001 1024
Figure 1. Results of hierarchical cluster analysis of plasma metabolites. An ordinate and an abscissa indicate peaks and names of experimental groups, respectively. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed for peaks, and distance between peaks are shown as tree diagrams. Denser green and red indicate shorter and longer distances than those of the control group, respectively. CNF, chitin nanofiber; SDACNF, surface-deacetylated CNF; CLNF, cellulose nanofiber.
Figure 1. Results of hierarchical cluster analysis of plasma metabolites. An ordinate and an abscissa indicate peaks and names of experimental groups, respectively. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed for peaks, and distance between peaks are shown as tree diagrams. Denser green and red indicate shorter and longer distances than those of the control group, respectively. CNF, chitin nanofiber; SDACNF, surface-deacetylated CNF; CLNF, cellulose nanofiber.
Ijms 16 21931 g001
Table
Table 1. Ratios of relative areas of nanofiber metabolites to control group.
Table 1. Ratios of relative areas of nanofiber metabolites to control group.
CompoundComparative Analysis
CNF/ControlSDACNF/ControlChitin/ControlCLNF/Control
Ratiop-ValueRatiop-ValueRatiop-ValueRatiop-Value
ATP2.90.0031.20.5161.50.0701.50.122
2,3-Diphosphoglyceric acid2.70.0031.10.8051.50.2381.50.277
ADP2.20.0031.10.6781.40.2011.30.346
5-Hydroxytryptophan2.00.0031.80.1512.10.0652.00.051
ADP-ribose1.80.0031.20.4291.10.6891.30.447
UTP1.70.0281.20.1611.00.9861.4N.A.
Cystine1.70.0031.60.0093.41.1 × 10−62.35.2 × 10−4
Serotonin1.60.0141.40.2381.60.0561.30.240
Urocanic acid1.60.0580.80.0131.00.7501.20.202
2,6-Diaminopimelic acid1.50.0431.1N.A.1.70.0402.40.253
1-Methylhistamine1.50.0311.10.3011.00.7641.20.610
2-Aminoisobutyric acid1.40.0230.90.4701.00.7231.30.041
2-Hydroxyisobutyric acid1.40.0171.00.6181.10.2081.20.353
N5-Ethylglutamine1.30.0410.90.5660.80.1040.70.080
Thiamine1.30.0181.00.9500.70.0950.90.617
Putrescine1.20.0021.00.7071.10.4691.30.305
Trimethylamine N-oxide1.10.6961.60.0131.40.2382.20.109
N-Acetylglycine1.10.3240.90.0401.00.7211.20.054
FA(17:1)0.90.5440.70.0220.70.0130.90.253
Cystathionine0.90.2230.80.0281.10.4850.90.633
Stearic acid0.90.3490.80.0330.80.0160.90.353
Glycolic acid0.80.0261.00.8641.00.8261.00.934
Glu0.80.0380.80.1010.80.0310.80.042
Betaine0.80.0460.90.2201.10.3720.90.184
Argininosuccinic acid0.70.0270.70.0240.60.0050.80.429
AC(18:0)0.70.0070.60.0020.54.9 × 10−40.80.140
Palmitoylcarnitine0.70.1380.40.0190.40.0200.70.221
AC(18:1)0.60.0800.40.0190.50.0290.80.525
AC(18:2)0.50.0150.40.0080.50.0130.80.431
Taurodeoxycholic acid0.40.0280.40.0250.50.0560.50.083
20α-Hydroxyprogesterone0.40.0130.70.1760.80.3750.90.734
Taurocholic acid0.30.0280.90.8720.40.0420.60.122
All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. CNF, chitin nanofiber; SDACNF, surface-deacetylated CNF; CLNF, cellulose nanofiber; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; UTP, uridine triphosphate; Glu, glucose; N.A., not available.
The results of the determination of metabolite concentrations are shown in Table 2. The results of relative areas are shown in Table 3. In the CNFs group, plasma levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were significantly higher than they were in the control group. On the other hand, no increase in plasma levels of ATP and ADP were observed in the SDACNF, chitin, and CLNF groups. ATP is the source of energy in living cells and acts as an allosteric effector of numerous cell processes such as active transport, nucleic acid synthesis, muscle activity, and movement [25,26,27,28,29]. Endogenous ATP and ADP can be released into the extracellular milieu as a consequence of several mechanisms including cell lysis, opening channel-like pathways, and exocytosis of secretory vesicles [30,31]. In addition to their roles as intracellular energy transporters, the purine nucleotides ATP and ADP are important extracellular signaling molecules [32]. Figure 2 shows the results of plasma metabolite levels related to the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle. Although there was no significant difference, plasma levels of metabolites related the TCA cycle were higher in the treated groups than they were in the control group. These results might indicate that oral administration of CNFs increase plasma ATP level by affecting the TCA cycle. The results revealed that only the CNF group showed plasma serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) levels that were significantly higher than those of the control group (Table 1). Tryptophan is converted to 5-HT via 5-HTP [33]. It is well known that 5-HT act as a brain neurotransmitter. Moreover, it is an important regulatory factor in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and other organ systems. More than 90% of the body’s 5-HT is synthesized in the gut [34]. More recently, it was reported that some gut microbiota synthesize 5-HT [35] while some others secrete ATP [29]. The results of the present study might indicate that CNFs stimulate the functions of gut microbiota.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the effects of oral administration of CNFs and SDACNFs on plasma acyl-carnitine (AC) and fatty acid (FA) levels. The SDACNFs group showed plasma levels of FA(17:1), FA(22:4), AC(18:0), AC(18:1), and AC(18:2) that were significantly lower than those of the control group (Table 1). In particular, long-chain ACs perform important carrier functions during FA β-oxidation. First, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I) catalyzes the transfer of acyl groups from acyl-coenzyme A to free carnitine to form ACs outside the mitochondrial membrane. Next, the ACs are transported to the mitochondrial matrix where the acyl groups are transferred to coenzyme A to form acyl-coenzyme A, which can participate in β-oxidation to supply energy [36]. When incomplete β-oxidation of fatty acids occurs within the mitochondria, ACs accumulate in the plasma [36]. Plasma AC concentrations have been shown to be elevated in individuals who are obese with either impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes [37,38]. Some reports described that intake of high fat diet increase blood AC levels in both experimental animals and humans [39,40,41]. It is indicated that plasma free FA levels are elevated in obese individuals [42], most likely due to increased free FA release associated with an expansion in fat mass [43,44]. In this study, significant decreases of plasma levels of FA(17:1), FA(22:4), AC(18:0), AC(18:1), and AC(18:2) were observed. The results of the present study indicate that one possible mechanism of the anti-obesity effects of orally administered SDACNFs might involve the tuning of lipid metabolism. To the best of our knowledge, there are few reports that describe the relationship between oral administration of chitin derivatives and changes in plasma ACs or FAs. Further study must be perform to this point.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the effects of oral administration of CNFs and SDACNFs on plasma acyl-carnitine (AC) and fatty acid (FA) levels. The SDACNFs group showed plasma levels of FA(17:1), FA(22:4), AC(18:0), AC(18:1), and AC(18:2) that were significantly lower than those of the control group (Table 1). In particular, long-chain ACs perform important carrier functions during FA β-oxidation. First, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I) catalyzes the transfer of acyl groups from acyl-coenzyme A to free carnitine to form ACs outside the mitochondrial membrane. Next, the ACs are transported to the mitochondrial matrix where the acyl groups are transferred to coenzyme A to form acyl-coenzyme A, which can participate in β-oxidation to supply energy [36]. When incomplete β-oxidation of fatty acids occurs within the mitochondria, ACs accumulate in the plasma [36]. Plasma AC concentrations have been shown to be elevated in individuals who are obese with either impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes [37,38]. Some reports described that intake of high fat diet increase blood AC levels in both experimental animals and humans [39,40,41]. It is indicated that plasma free FA levels are elevated in obese individuals [42], most likely due to increased free FA release associated with an expansion in fat mass [43,44]. In this study, significant decreases of plasma levels of FA(17:1), FA(22:4), AC(18:0), AC(18:1), and AC(18:2) were observed. The results of the present study indicate that one possible mechanism of the anti-obesity effects of orally administered SDACNFs might involve the tuning of lipid metabolism. To the best of our knowledge, there are few reports that describe the relationship between oral administration of chitin derivatives and changes in plasma ACs or FAs. Further study must be perform to this point.
Table
Table 2. Relative areas of plasma metabolite among experimental groups.
Table 2. Relative areas of plasma metabolite among experimental groups.
Compound NameControlCNFSDACNFChitinCLNF
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
ATP8.0 × 10−43.1 × 10−42.3 × 10−37.5 × 10−49.6 × 10−44.3 × 10−41.2 × 10−33.0 × 10−41.2 × 10−34.5 × 10−4
2,3-Diphosphoglyceric acid6.4 × 10−41.5 × 10−41.7 × 10−35.2 × 10−46.7 × 10−42.6 × 10−49.6 × 10−45.2 × 10−49.8 × 10−45.9 × 10−4
ADP7.8 × 10−43.0 × 10−41.7 × 10−34.4 × 10−48.8 × 10−44.3 × 10−41.1 × 10−33.5 × 10−41.1 × 10−35.1 × 10−4
5-Hydroxytryptophan8.4 × 10−61.9 × 10−61.7 × 10−54.0 × 10−61.5 × 10−56.9 × 10−61.8 × 10−58.5 × 10−61.7 × 10−55.6 × 10−6
ADP-ribose1.2 × 10−44.0 × 10−52.2 × 10−43.6 × 10−51.5 × 10−45.9 × 10−51.3 × 10−42.9 × 10−51.7 × 10−41.1 × 10−4
UTP9.4 × 10−51.8 × 10−51.6 × 10−45.3 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.5 × 10−69.4 × 10−52.1 × 10−51.3 × 10−4N.A.
Cystine7.4 × 10−42.1× 10−41.2 × 10−41.2 × 10−41.2 × 10−41.4 × 10−42.5 × 10−32.1 × 10−41.7 × 10−32.9 × 10−4
Serotonin1.3 × 10−44.7 × 10−52.1 × 10−43.1 × 10−51.8 × 10−47.5 × 10−52.1 × 10−46.3 × 10−51.7 × 10−45.2 × 10−5
Urocanic acid2.1 × 10−42.3 × 10−53.3 × 10−41.2 × 10−41.7 × 10−41.7 × 10−52.1 × 10−43.4 × 10−52.5 × 10−46.5 × 10−5
32,6-Diaminopimelic acid5.8 × 10−58.4 × 10−68.6 × 10−51.2 × 10−56.6 × 10−5N.A.9.8 × 10−58.2 × 10−61.4 × 10−48.6 × 10−5
1-Methylhistamine1.2 × 10−41.1 × 10−51.8 × 10−44.8 × 10−51.4 × 10−42.4 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.6 × 10−51.4 × 10−47.8 × 10−5
2-Aminoisobutyric acid2.4 × 10−35.2 × 10−43.4 × 10−36.7 × 10−42.2 × 10−34.5 × 10−42.3 × 10−33.2 × 10−43.2 × 10−34.8 × 10−4
2-Hydroxyisobutyric acid5.2 × 10−49.8 × 10−57.3 × 10−41.3 × 10−45.0 × 10−45.0 × 10−46.0 × 10−47.4 × 10−56.0 × 10−41.5 × 10−4
N5-Ethylglutamine1.3 × 10−33.4 × 10−41.7 × 10−32.2 × 10−41.2 × 10−32.1 × 10−49.8 × 10−41.2 × 10−49.4 × 10−41.7 × 10−4
Thiamine1.2 × 10−42.1 × 10−51.6 × 10−41.6 × 10−51.3 × 10−47.9 × 10−59.3 × 10−52.9 × 10−51.2 × 10−42.9 × 10−5
Putrescine1.5 × 10−41.1 × 10−51.8 × 10−41.0 × 10−51.5 × 10−42.4 × 10−51.6 × 10−41.8 × 10−51.9 × 10−47.5 × 10−5
Trimethylamine N-oxide4.6 × 10−37.7 × 10−45.0 × 10−32.6 × 10−37.4 × 10−31.6 × 10−36.6 × 10−33.2 × 10−39.9 × 10−35.8 × 10−3
N-Acetylglycine1.7 × 10−41.5 × 10−51.8 × 10−41.7 × 10−51.5 × 10−41.5 × 10−51.7 × 10−42.7 × 10−52.2 × 10−43.5 × 10−5
FA(17:1)3.2 × 10−54.6 × 10−63.0 × 10−57.8 × 10−62.3 × 10−55.1 × 10−62.2 × 10−55.2 × 10−62.8 × 10−55.4 × 10−6
Ser4.3 × 10−29.7 × 10−34.0 × 10−25.6 × 10−34.0 × 10−24.3 × 10−33.7 × 10−24.6 × 10−33.7 × 10−26.1 × 10−3
Cytidine5.9 × 10−41.1 × 10−45.4 × 10−41.6 × 10−45.4 × 10−49.3 × 10−56.2 × 10−45.3 × 10−57.0 × 10−41.3 × 10−4
Cystathionine2.6 × 10−42.1 × 10−52.4 × 10−42.7 × 10−52.2 × 10−42.6 × 10−42.8 × 10−45.7 × 10−52.5 × 10−44.0 × 10−5
Stearic acid1.1 × 10−31.2 × 10−49.7 × 10−42.0 × 10−48.7 × 10−41.2 × 10−48.1 × 10−41.4 × 10−49.7 × 10−41.9 × 10−4
Glyoxylic acid1.4 × 10−44.0 × 10−41.3 × 10−42.0 × 10−51.4 × 10−42.4 × 10−41.4 × 10−42.2 × 10−51.9 × 10−45.8 × 10−5
Glu1.4 × 10−22.4 × 10−31.1 × 10−28.0 × 10−41.1 × 10−22.3 × 10−31.1 × 10−21.1 × 10−31.1 × 10−29.1 × 10−4
Betaine5.1 × 10−29.3 × 10−33.9 × 10−25.9 × 10−34.4 × 10−24.7 × 10−35.6 × 10−21.0 × 10−24.4 × 10−24.5 × 10−3
Argininosuccinic acid1.7 × 10−32.9 × 10−51.3 × 10−42.5 × 10−51.3 × 10−42.7 × 10−51.1 × 10−42.6 × 10−51.4 × 10−47.5 × 10−5
AC(18:0)5.3 × 10−57.2 × 10−63.7 × 10−58.0 × 10−63.2 × 10−52.8 × 10−62.8 × 10−57.0 × 10−64.3 × 10−51.1 × 10−5
Palmitoylcarnitine3.5 × 10−41.3 × 10−42.4 × 10−48.7 × 10−51.3 × 10−41.9 × 10−51.5 × 10−44.7 × 10−52.4 × 10−41.2 × 10−4
AC(18:1)2.6 × 10−49.7 × 10−51.6 × 10−45.5 × 10−59.8 × 10−51.9 × 10−51.2 × 10−45.4 × 10−52.2 × 10−41.2 × 10−4
AC(18:2)1.2 × 10−43.5 × 10−56.3 × 10−52.1 × 10−55.0 × 10−51.1 × 10−55.9 × 10−52.7 × 10−59.9 × 10−55.5 × 10−5
Taurodeoxycholic acid6.2 × 10−52.5 × 10−52.5 × 10−56.2 × 10−62.5 × 10−59.1 × 10−63.1 × 10−51.7 × 10−53.4 × 10−51.9 × 10−5
20α-Hydroxyprogesterone1.3 × 10−54.8 × 10−54.9 × 10−52.2 × 10−59.6 × 10−52.9 × 10−51.1 × 10−43.1 × 10−51.2 × 10−48.6 × 10−5
Taurocholic acid4.0 × 10−41.8 × 10−41.4 × 10−43.1 × 10−53.7 × 10−43.3 × 10−41.7 × 10−41.1 × 10−42.4 × 10−47.6 × 10−5
CNF, chitin nanofiber; SDACNF, surface-deacetylated CNF; CLNF, cellulose nanofiber; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; UTP, uridine triphosphate; Glu, glucose; N.A., not available.
Ijms 16 21931 g002 1024
Figure 2. Levels of plasma metabolites related to tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, nucleotides sugars, and pentose phosphate pathways. Each bar indicates median ± standard deviation (SD) of metabolite in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences in metabolite concentrations compared to the control group. All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. (blue, control; red, CNFs; green, SDACNFs; orange, chitin; navy, cellulose nanofiber (CLNF); G3P, d-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; 3-PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; 2-PG, 2-phosphoglycerate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; 3-HBA, 3-hydroxybenzoate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NADPH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; Ala, alanine; Asp, aspartate; AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; Arg, arginine; SucCoA, succinyl coenzyme A; Glu, glucose; 2-OG, 2-oleoylglycerol).
Figure 2. Levels of plasma metabolites related to tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, nucleotides sugars, and pentose phosphate pathways. Each bar indicates median ± standard deviation (SD) of metabolite in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences in metabolite concentrations compared to the control group. All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. (blue, control; red, CNFs; green, SDACNFs; orange, chitin; navy, cellulose nanofiber (CLNF); G3P, d-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; 3-PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; 2-PG, 2-phosphoglycerate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; 3-HBA, 3-hydroxybenzoate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NADPH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; Ala, alanine; Asp, aspartate; AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; Arg, arginine; SucCoA, succinyl coenzyme A; Glu, glucose; 2-OG, 2-oleoylglycerol).
Ijms 16 21931 g002
Ijms 16 21931 g003 1024
Figure 3. Plasma acyl-carnitine (AC) levels. Each bar represents median ± standard deviation (SD) of metabolite in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences in metabolite concentrations compared to the control group. All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. (blue, control; red, chitin nanofibers (CNFs); green, surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs; orange, chitin; navy, cellulose nanofiber (CLNF); N.D.: not detected).
Figure 3. Plasma acyl-carnitine (AC) levels. Each bar represents median ± standard deviation (SD) of metabolite in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences in metabolite concentrations compared to the control group. All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. (blue, control; red, chitin nanofibers (CNFs); green, surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs; orange, chitin; navy, cellulose nanofiber (CLNF); N.D.: not detected).
Ijms 16 21931 g003
Ijms 16 21931 g004 1024
Figure 4. Plasma fatty acid (FA) levels. Each bar represents median ± standard deviation (SD) of metabolite in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences in metabolite concentrations compared to the control group. All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. (blue, the control; red, chitin nanofibers (CNFs); green, surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs; orange, chitin; navy, cellulose nanofiber (CLNF); N.D., not detected).
Figure 4. Plasma fatty acid (FA) levels. Each bar represents median ± standard deviation (SD) of metabolite in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences in metabolite concentrations compared to the control group. All the p-values were determined using Welch’s t-test. (blue, the control; red, chitin nanofibers (CNFs); green, surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs; orange, chitin; navy, cellulose nanofiber (CLNF); N.D., not detected).
Ijms 16 21931 g004

2.2. Effects of Oral Administrations of CNFs and SDACNFs on Gut Microbiota and Fecal Organic Acid Levels

The results of the gut microbiota analysis are shown in Table 3. The SDACNF group showed a more significant increase in the content of Bacteroidales than the control group did. On the other hand, no change in gut microbiota was observed in the control, CNF, chitin, and CLNF groups. The results of the determination of fecal short-chain FAs (SCFA) content are shown in Table 4. The level of fecal lactic acid was significantly increased in the CNF group compared with that of the control group. Furthermore, the level of fecal acetic acid in the CNF group was significantly higher than that of the control group was. In the SDACNF group, the level of fecal propionic acid was significantly higher than that of the control group.
Previously, it was demonstrated that gut microbiota are involved in the maturation and regulation of host immunity and gut functions [45]. The capsular antigen of the human commensal Bacteroidales fragilis triggers T cell-dependent immune responses that can affect both the development and homeostasis of the host immune system [46,47,48]. Some reports indicate that gut Bacteroidales is associated with numerous diseases including inflammatory bowel disease [49,50], rheumatoid arthritis [51], and obesity [52]. The results of this study suggest that the anti-obesity effects of orally administered SDACNFs may be induced by changes in the population of gut Bacteroidales.
The main products of intestinal bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber are SCFAs such as lactic acid, acetate, and propionate [53]. SCFAs can be used for de novo synthesis of lipids and glucose, which are the main energy sources of the host [54,55]. Previous reports indicate that some microbiota promote 5-HT biosynthesis from colonic enterochromaffin (EC) cells, which supply 5-HT to the mucosa, lumen, and circulating platelets [35]. Importantly, microbiota-dependent effects on gut 5-HT significantly affect the host physiology by modulating GIT motility and platelet functions. Reigsted et al. [56] in particular, reported that SCFAs promoted tryptophan hydroxylase 1 transcription in a human EC cell model [56]. Furthermore, their results indicate that the actions of the gut microbiota mediated by SCFAs, are an important determinant of enteric 5-HT production and homeostasis. The results of the present study strongly indicate that the increase in plasma 5-HT level might be induced by the activation of gut microbiota functions by oral administration of CNFs.
Table
Table 3. Effects of oral administrations of chitin nanofibers (CNFs) and surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs on gut microbiota.
Table 3. Effects of oral administrations of chitin nanofibers (CNFs) and surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs on gut microbiota.
% Peak AreaControlCNFSDACNFChitinCLNF
Bacteroidales36.8 ± 3.538.1 ± 6.552.0 ± 6.6 *42.3 ± 3.441.1 ± 5.2
Lactobacillus28.9 ± 14.227.6 ± 5.218.1 ± 12.927.7 ± 2.821.4 ± 6.6
Clostridiales18.5 ± 12.414.0 ± 3.915.4 ± 12.615.1 ± 7.021.4 ± 6.1
Erysipelotrichaceae1.5 ± 0.71.6 ± 0.41.0 ± 0.32.1 ± 0.72.1 ± 0.5
Akkermansia0.3 ± 0.60.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.20.0 ± 0.0
Anaeroplasma0.3 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.70.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.0
Corinebacteriales0.6 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.2
Mucispirillum2.5 ± 1.71.7 ± 0.21.4 ± 1.22.4 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.4
Parasutterella2.1 ± 1.54.1 ± 1.31.9 ± 1.02.0 ± 0.83.2 ± 1.2
Data are mean ± standard deviation (SD), * p < 0.05 compared to control group.
Table
Table 4. Effects of oral administrations of chitin nanofibers (CNFs) and surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs on fecal short chain fatty acid (FA) levels.
Table 4. Effects of oral administrations of chitin nanofibers (CNFs) and surface-deacetylated (SDA) CNFs on fecal short chain fatty acid (FA) levels.
mg/gControlCNFSDACNFChitinCLNF
Lactic acid2.1 ± 0.84.2 ± 1.2 *1.6 ± 1.31.6 ± 0.52.3 ± 0.6
Acetic acid3.3 ± 0.74.1 ± 0.7 †3.8 ± 0.83.3 ± 0.42.7 ± 0.3
Propionic acid0.3 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.2 *0.5 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.1
n-Butyric acid0.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
Data are mean ± standard deviation (SD), * p < 0.05 and † p < 0.05 compared to control and cellulose nanofiber (CLNF) groups, respectively.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Animals and Reagents

Female BALB/c mice (five-week-old) were purchased from CLEA Japan (Osaka, Japan). The animals were maintained under standard conditions and allowed to acclimate for seven days before being used in the experiments. The experiments involving the mice including the procedures performed, were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Tottori University (Tottori, Japan). All experiments were performed as per ethical guidelines of Tottori University (Tottori, Japan).
Chitin powder from crab shells (chitin TC-L) was purchased from Koyo Chemical. Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). The CLNF (biomass nanofiber, BiNFi-s cellulose, WMa-10002) was purchased from Sugino Macine Co., Ltd. (Uodu, Japan). Concentrations of all samples used in this study were at 1.0 wt %.

3.2. Preparations of CNF, SDACNF, and CLNF

CNFs were prepared following a previously reported procedure [3]. Chitin (2.0 g) was dispersed in 200 mL of distilled water and roughly crushed with a grinder (MKCA6-2, Masuko Sanyo Co., Ltd., Kawaguchi, Japan) at clearance: −1.5 (−1.5 mm), rotating speed: 1500 rpm. The crushed dispersion was passed through a Star Burst Mini system (HJP-25001S, Sugino Machine Co., Ltd., Uodu, Japan) equipped with a ball collision chamber. The slurry was ejected through a small nozzle with a diameter of 100 μm under a high pressure of 200 MPa and allowed to collide with a ceramic ball with a diameter of 12.7 mm. Then, the suspension passed through 30 mechanical treatments. Commercial chitin powder and the nanofibers obtained here have a few amino groups at the C2 position with approximately 5% deacetylation. The average width of the nanofibers calculated from SPM images was 6.0 nm.
The SDACNFs were prepared using a previously reported procedure with modifications [6]. Chitin powder (40.0 g) was treated with 20% (w/w) sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 3.0 L) for 6 h under reflux and an argon atmosphere. After deacetylation, the supernatant was decanted, and the precipitate was thoroughly washed with distilled water and 0.5 wt % aqueous acetic acid by centrifugation to remove the water-soluble products of NaOH, AcONa, and alkaline hydrolyzed chitin. For mechanical disintegration, the deacetylated chitin was dispersed in 4.0 L aqueous acetic acid and then passed through a grinder (MKCA6-2) at clearance: −1.5 (−1.5 mm), rotating speed: 1500 rpm. The concentration, yield, and degree of deacetylation of the SDACNFs were 0.71, 74, and 20 wt %, respectively.

3.3. Study Design

The mice were randomized into five groups and administered tap water (control) and CNFs, SDACNFs, chitin, and CLNF each at a concentration of 0.1% dissolved in tap water. All the mice were fed a normal diet (CE-2; Japan CLEA, Osaka, Japan) for 28 days (from day 0–28). After a 12-h fast, blood samples were collected on day 29 in tubes on ice. The final concentration was 0.13% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dipotassium salt dihydrate (EDTA-2K), and the tubes were centrifuged at 1700× g at 4 °C for 10 min. Then, the supernatants were collected as plasma and stored in other tubes at −80 °C until the metabolome analysis.

3.4. Measurement of Metabolites

3.4.1. CE-TOFMS Measurement

The CE-TOFMS measurements were carried out at a facility service at the Human Metabolome Technology Inc. (Tsuruoka, Japan). The plasma samples (50 μL) were added to 450 μL of methanol containing internal standards (IS, solution ID: H3304-1002, Human Metabolome Technologies, Tsuruoka, Japan) at 0 °C to inactivate the enzymes. The extract solution was then thoroughly mixed with 500 and 200 μL of chloroform and Milli-Q water, respectively and centrifuged at 2300× g and 4 °C for 5 min. The 350-μL upper aqueous layer was centrifugally filtered through a Millipore 5-kDa cutoff filter to remove the proteins, centrifugally concentrated, and then resuspended in 50 μL of Milli-Q water for the CE-MS analysis.
The CE-TOFMS measurement was carried out using an Agilent CE Capillary Electrophoresis System equipped with an Agilent 6210 Time of Flight mass spectrometer, Agilent 1100 isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump, Agilent G1603A CE-MS adapter kit, and Agilent G1607A CE-ESI-MS sprayer kit (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The systems were controlled using the Agilent G2201AA ChemStation software version B.03.01 for CE (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The metabolites were analyzed using a fused silica capillary (50 μm i.d. × 80 cm total length) with commercial electrophoresis buffers (solution IDs: H3301-1001 and H3302-1021 for cation and anion analysis, respectively, Human Metabolome Technologies, Tsuruoka, Japan) as the electrolyte. The samples were injected at a pressure of 50 mbar for 10 and 25 s (approximately 10 and 25 nL) for cation and anion analysis, respectively. The spectrometer was scanned from m/z 50 to 1000, and other conditions were as described previously [57,58,59].

3.4.2. LC-TOFMS Measurement

The metabolome measurements were carried out at using the facility service at the Human Metabolome Technology Inc., (Tsuruoka, Japan). The plasma (or serum) samples (500 μL) were added to 1500 μL of 1% formic acid/acetonitrile containing the IS solution (solution ID: H3304-1002, Human Metabolome Technologies, Tsuruoka, Japan) at 0 °C to inactivate the enzymes. The solution was thoroughly mixed and centrifuged at 2300× g at 4 °C for 5 min, and the supernatant was filtrated using a Hybrid SPE phospholipid 55261-U (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) to remove phospholipids. The filtrate was then desiccated and dissolved in 100 μL of isopropanol/Milli-Q water for the LC-MS analysis.
The LC-TOFMS measurement was carried out using an Agilent LC System (Agilent 1200 series RRLC system SL) equipped with an Agilent 6230 Time of Flight mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The systems were controlled using the Agilent G2201AA ChemStation software version B.03.01 for CE (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The cationic and anionic compounds were measured using ODS column (2 × 50 mm, 2 μm) according to methods described previously [60].
Peaks were extracted using an automatic integration software MasterHands (Keio University, Tsuruoka, Japan) to obtain peak information including m/z; migration time (MT) and retention time (RT) for the CE-TOFMS and LC-TOFMS measurements, respectively; and peak area [61]. Signal peaks corresponding to isotopomers, adduct ions, and other product ions of known metabolites were excluded, and the remaining peaks were annotated with putative metabolites from the HMT metabolite database based on their MTs/RTs and m/z values determined by the TOFMS. The tolerance range for the peak annotation was configured at ±0.5 min for MT and ±10 ppm for m/z. In addition, peak areas were normalized to those of the IS, and then the resultant relative area values were further normalized by sample amount. The HCA was performed using our proprietary software, PeakStat and SampleStat. Detected metabolites were plotted on metabolic pathway maps using the visualization and analysis of networks containing experimental data (VANTED) software [62].

3.5. Measurement of Gut Microbiota

The measurements of the gut microbiota were conducted using a facility service at the Central Institute for Experimental Animals (Kawasaki, Japan). The microbiota were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. DNA was isolated from the cecal contents as follows [63]. The cecal contents were suspended in a solution containing 4 M guanidium thiocyanate, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), and 40 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), and then lysed in Lysing Matrix E (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) using a FastPrep-24 (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) homogenizer. Then, DNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method and purified with the Gel/PCRTM DNA isolation system (Viogene, New Taipei City, Taiwan). Purified DNA was amplified using a TaKaRa PCR Thermal Cycler Dice (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) and a set of universal primers including 5′6-FAM-labeled 341f (5′-CCTACGGGWGGCAGCAG-3′) corresponding to nucleotides 340–356 and 516r (5′-ATMACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′) corresponding to nucleotides 517–533 of the 16S rRNA gene of Escherichia coli (accession No. J01859). The PCR was performed in a reaction mixture containing 1× Taq buffer, 200 μM dNTPs, 3 mM magnesium chloride (MgCl2), 0.2 μM each of the forward and reverse primers, 10 ng purified DNA, and 1 U HotStar Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). PCR amplification program included preheating at 94 °C for 15 min, followed by 25 cycles consisting of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplified DNA was verified using 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were purified using the Gel/PCRTM DNA isolation system (Viogene). The T-RFLP analysis was performed as previously described [64,65] with some modifications. Purified PCR products were digested with HpyCH4III (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) at 37 °C for 1 h. The lengths of the terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) were determined using the standard size marker 1200 LIZ using an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer and GeneScan software all from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The lengths of the T-RFs were treated as an operational taxonomic unit (OTU) based on the 16S rDNA sequences obtained from microbiota from the rat gut. A peak OTU area was identified from the peaks detected to calculate the area under each peak. The OTU was then used to estimate the phylogenetic group using the database of the rat gut microbiota.

3.6. Measurements of Fecal SCFAs

The measurements of fecal SCFAs were carried out using a facility service at the Central Institute for Experimental Animals (Kawasaki, Japan). The fecal extracts were analyzed using an organic acids analysis system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with the following conditions: column, Shim-pack SCR-102 (H) 300 mm × 8 mm (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan); elution, 5 mmol/L p-toluenesulfonic acid; reaction solution, 5 mmol/L p-toluenesulfonic acid with 100 μmol/L EDTA and 20 mmol/L bis-Tris; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; oven temperature, 45 °C; analysis time, 60 min; and detection, CCD-10A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

3.7. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using the Welch’s t-test. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, we demonstrated that oral administration of CNFs increased plasma levels of ATP, ADP, and 5-HT while oral administrations of SDACNFs affected the metabolism of ACs and FAs. Furthermore, the analysis of the fecal organic levels indicated that oral administration of CNFs stimulated and activated the functions of the gut microbiota. These results indicate that oral administration of CNF increases the plasma levels of ATP and 5-HT by activating the gut microbiota.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Creating Start-ups from Advanced Research and Technology (START) project of the JST and KAKENHI (26708026) of JSPS. The authors thank Skylight Biotech (Akita, Japan) for their assistance in the analysis of serum cholesterol content.

Author Contributions

Kazuo Azuma and Shinsuke Ifuku planned the experiments; Kazuo Azuma, Ryotaro Izumi, Mari Kawata, and Tomone Nagae performed the experiments; Kazuo Azuma and Shinsuke Ifuku wrote the paper; Hironori Izawa, Minoru Morimoto, Yusuke Murahata, Takeshi Tsuka, Tomohiro Osaki, Tomohiro Imagawa, Norihiko Ito, Yoshiharu Okamoto, and Hiroyuki Saimoto revised the manuscript; and Shinsuke Ifuku supervised the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Muzzarelli, R.A.A. Chitin nanostructures in living organisms. In Chitin: Formation and Diagenesis; Gupta, N., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Dutch, 2011; Volume 34, pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  2. Azuma, K.; Ifuku, S.; Osaki, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Minami, S. Preparation and biomedical applications of chitin and chitosan nanofibers. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 10, 2891–2920. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ifuku, S.; Nogi, M.; Abe, K.; Yoshioka, M.; Morimoto, M.; Saimoto, H.; Yano, H. Preparation of chitin nanofibers with a uniform width as α-chitin from crab shells. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 1584–1588. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H. Chitin nanofibers: Preparations, modifications, and applications. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3308–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ifuku, S. Chitin and chitosan nanofibers: Preparation and chemical modifications. Molecules 2014, 19, 18367–18380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fan, Y.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Individual chitin nano-whiskers prepared from partially deacetylated α-chitin by fibril surface cationization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Azuma, K.; Osaki, T.; Wakuda, T.; Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H.; Tsuka, T.; Imagawa, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Minami, S. Beneficial and preventive effect of chitin nanofibrils in a dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute ulcerative colitis model. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 1399–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Azuma, K.; Osaki, T.; Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H.; Tsuka, T.; Imagawa, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Minami, S. α-Chitin nanofibrils improve inflammatory and fibrosis responses in mice with inflammatory bowel disease. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Azuma, K.; Osaki, T.; Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H.; Tsuka, T.; Imagawa, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Minami, S. A comparative study analysis of α-chitin and β-chitin nanofibrils by using an inflammatory-bowel disease mouse model. J. Chitin Chitosan Sci. 2013, 1, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Azuma, K.; Nagae, T.; Nagai, T.; Izawa, H.; Morimoto, M.; Murahata, Y.; Osaki, T.; Tsuka, T.; Imagawa, T.; Ito, N.; et al. Effects of surface-deacetylated chitin nanofibers in an experimental model of hypercholesterolemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 17445–17455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ito, I.; Osaki, T.; Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H.; Takamori, Y.; Kurozumi, S.; Imagawa, T.; Azuma, K.; Tsuka, T.; Okamoto, Y.; et al. Evaluation of the effects of chitin nanofibrils on skin function using skin models. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ito, I.; Osaki, T.; Tokuda, K.; Asami, T.; Takamori, Y.; Kurozumi, S.; Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H.; Imagawa, T.; Azuma, K.; et al. Effect of chitin nanofibril combined in rayon animal bedding on hairless mouse skin and on a three dimensional culture human skin model. J. Chitin Chitosan Sci. 2014, 2, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Izumi, R.; Komada, S.; Ochi, K.; Karasawa, L.; Osaki, T.; Murahata, Y.; Tsuka, T.; Imagawa, T.; Itoh, N.; Okamoto, Y.; et al. Favorable effects of superficially deacetylated chitin nanofibrils on the wound healing process. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 123, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Azuma, K.; Nishihara, M.; Shimizu, H.; Itoh, Y.; Takashima, O.; Osaki, T.; Itoh, N.; Imagawa, T.; Murahata, Y.; Tsuka, T.; et al. Biological adhesive based on carboxymethyl chitin derivatives and chitin nanofibers. Biomaterials 2015, 42, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nishiumi, S.; Suzuki, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Matsubara, A.; Azuma, T.; Yoshida, M. Metabolomics for biomarker discovery in gastroenterological cancer. Metabolites 2014, 4, 547–571. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Nambiar, P.R.; Gupta, R.R.; Misra, V. An “Omics” based survey of human colon cancer. Mutat. Res. 2010, 693, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rochfort, S. Metabolomics reviewed: A new “Omics” platform technology for systems biology and implications for natural products research. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 1813–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Gill, S.R.; Pop, M.; Deboy, R.T.; Eckburg, P.B.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Samuel, B.S.; Gordon, J.I.; Relman, D.A.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Nelson, K.E. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 2006, 312, 1355–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhao, L. Genomics: The tale of our other genome. Nature 2010, 465, 879–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Claus, S.P.; Tsang, T.M.; Wang, Y.; Cloarec, O.; Skordi, E.; Martin, F.P.; Rezzi, S.; Ross, A.; Kochhar, S.; Holmes, E.; et al. Systemic multicompartmental effects of the gut microbiome on mouse metabolic phenotypes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Martin, F.P.; Dumas, M.E.; Wang, Y.; Legido-Quigley, C.; Yap, I.K.; Tang, H.; Zirah, S.; Murphy, G.M.; Cloarec, O.; Lindon, J.C.; et al. A top-down systems biology view of microbiome-mammalian metabolic interactions in a mouse model. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Velagapudi, V.R.; Hezaveh, R.; Reigstad, C.S.; Gopalacharyulu, P.; Yetukuri, L.; Islam, S.; Felin, J.; Perkins, R.; Boren, J.; Oresic, M.; et al. The gut microbiota modulates host energy and lipid metabolism in mice. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 1101–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wikoff, W.R.; Anfora, A.T.; Liu, J.; Schultz, P.G.; Lesley, S.A.; Peters, E.C.; Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3698–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brown, G.C. Control of respiration and ATP synthesis in mammalian mitochondria and cells. Biochem. J. 1992, 284, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  26. Burnstock, G.; Campbell, G.; Satchell, D.; Smythe, A. Evidence that adenosine triphosphate or a related nucleotide is the transmitter substance released by non-adrenergic inhibitory nerves in the gut. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1970, 40, 668–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jouaville, L.S.; Pinton, P.; Bastianutto, C.; Rutter, G.A.; Rizzuto, R. Regulation of mitochondrial ATP synthesis by calcium: Evidence for a long-term metabolic priming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 13807–13812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lundin, A.; Thore, A. Comparison of methods for extract of bacterial adenine nucleotides determined by firefly assay. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 30, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Perriman, R.; Barta, I.; Voeltz, G.K.; Abelson, J.; Ares, M., Jr. ATP requirement for Prp5p function is determined by Cus2p and the structure of U2 small nuclear RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13857–13862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zimmermann, H. Biochemistry, localization and functional roles of ecto-nucleotidases in the nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 1996, 49, 589–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Helenius, M.; Jalkanen, S.; Yegutkin, G. Enzyme-coupled assays for simultaneous detection of nanomolar ATP, ADP, AMP, adenosine, inosine and pyrophosphate concentrations in extracellular fluids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823, 1967–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Burnstock, G. Purinergic nerves. Pharmacol. Rev. 1972, 24, 509–581. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. O’Mahony, S.M.; Clarke, G.; Borre, Y.E.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 15, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gershon, M.D.; Tack, J. The serotonin signaling system: From basic understanding to drug development for functional GI disorders. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 397–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yano, J.M.; Yu, K.; Donaldson, G.P.; Shastri, G.G.; Ann, P.; Ma, L.; Nagler, C.R.; Ismagilov, R.F.; Mazmanian, S.K.; Hsiao, E.Y. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 2015, 9, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Houten, S.; Wanders, R. A general introduction to the biochemistry of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2010, 33, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Adams, S.H.; Hoppel, C.L.; Lok, K.H.; Zhao, L.; Wong, S.W.; Minkler, P.E.; Hwang, D.W.; Newman, J.W.; Garvey, W.T. Plasma acylcarnitine profiles suggest incomplete long-chain fatty acid beta-oxidation and altered tricarboxylic acid cycle activity in type 2 diabetic African-American women. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Newgard, C.B.; An, J.; Bain, J.R.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Stevens, R.D.; Lien, L.F.; Haqq, A.M.; Shah, S.H.; Arlotto, M.; Slentz, C.A.; et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pearson, D.J.; Tubbs, P.K. Carnitine and derivatives in rat tissues. Biochem. J. 1967, 105, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Murakami, R.; Tanaka, A.; Nakamura, H. The effect of starvation on brain carnitine concentration in neonatal rats. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1997, 25, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Costa, C.C.G.; de Almeida, I.T.; Jakobs, C.; Poll-The, B.T.; Duran, M. Dynamic changes of plasma acylcarnitine levels induced by fasting and sunflower oil challenge test in children. Pediatr. Res. 1999, 46, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gordon, E.S. Non-esterified fatty acids in blood of obese and lean subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1960, 8, 740–747. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jensen, M.D.; Haymond, M.W.; Rizza, R.A.; Cryer, P.E.; Miles, J.M. Influence of body fat distribution on free fatty acid metabolism in obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 1989, 83, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Björntorp, P.; Bergman, H.; Varnauskas, E. Plasma free fatty acid turnover rate in obesity. Acta Med. Scand. 1969, 185, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, Y.K. Effects of diet on gut microbiota profile and the implication for health and disease. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2003, 32, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mazmanian, S.K.; Liu, C.H.; Tzianabos, A.O.; Kasper, D.L. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 2005, 122, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mazmanian, S.K.; Round, J.L.; Kasper, D.L. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature 2008, 453, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Troy, E.B.; Kasper, D.L. Beneficial effects of Bacteroides fragilis polysaccharides on the immune system. Front. Biosci. 2010, 15, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fava, F.; Danese, S. Intestinal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: Friend of foe? World J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 17, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Willing, B.; Halfvarson, J.; Dicksved, J.; Rosenquist, M.; Jarnerot, G.; Engstrand, L.; Tysk, C.; Jansson, J.K. Twin studies reveal specific imbalances in the mucosa associated microbiota of patients with ileal Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009, 15, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Vaahtovuo, J.; Munukka, E.; Korkeamaki, M.; Luukkainen, R.; Toivanen, P. Fecal microbiota in early rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 1500–1505. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Kalliomäki, M.; Collado, M.C.; Salminen, S.; Isolauri, E. Early differences in fecal microbiota composition in children may predict overweight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Flint, H.J.; Bayer, E.A.; Rincon, M.T.; Lamed, R.; White, B.A. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: Potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wolever, T.M.; Brighenti, F.; Royall, D.; Jenkins, A.L.; Jenkins, D.J. Effect of rectal infusion of short chain fatty acids in human subjects. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1989, 84, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Kasubuchi, M.; Hasegawa, S.; Hiramatsu, T.; Ichimura, A.; Kimura, I. Dietary gut microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, and host metabolic regulation. Nutrients 2015, 14, 2839–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Reigstad, C.S.; Salmonson, C.E.; Rainey, J.F., III; Szurszewski, J.H.; Linden, D.R.; Sonnenburg, J.L.; Farrugia, G.; Kashyap, P.C. Gut microbes promote colonic serotonin production through an effect of short-chain fatty acids on enterochromaffin cells. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 1395–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Soga, T.; Heiger, D.N. Amino acid analysis by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 1236–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Soga, T.; Ueno, Y.; Naraoka, H.; Ohashi, Y.; Tomita, M.; Nishioka, T. Simultaneous determination of anionic intermediates for Bacillus subtilis metabolic pathways by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 2233–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Soga, T.; Ohashi, Y.; Ueno, Y.; Naraoka, H.; Tomita, M.; Nishioka, T. Quantitative metabolome analysis using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ooga, T.; Sato, H.; Nagashima, A.; Sasaki, K.; Tomita, M.; Soga, T.; Ohashi, Y. Metabolomic anatomy of an animal model revealing homeostatic imbalances in dyslipidaemia. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 1217–1223. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sugimoto, M.; Wong, D.T.; Hirayama, A.; Soga, T.; Tomita, M. Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry-based saliva metabolomics identified oral, breast and pancreatic cancer-specific profiles. Metabolomics 2009, 6, 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Junker, B.H.; Klukas, C.; Schreiber, F. VANTED: A system for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of biological networks. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Goto, K.; Kuwayama, E.; Nozu, R.; Ueno, M.; Hashimoto, N. Effect of hypochlorous acid solution on the eradication and prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, serum biochemical variables, and cecum microbiota in rats. Exp. Anim. 2015, 64, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Kibe, R.; Sakamoto, M.; Hayashi, H.; Yokota, H.; Benno, Y. Maturation of the murine cecal microbiota as revealed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 235, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nagashima, K.; Hisada, T.; Sato, M.; Mochizuki, J. Application of new primer-enzyme combinations to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling of bacterial populations in human feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azuma, K.; Izumi, R.; Kawata, M.; Nagae, T.; Osaki, T.; Murahata, Y.; Tsuka, T.; Imagawa, T.; Ito, N.; Okamoto, Y.; et al. Effects of Oral Administration of Chitin Nanofiber on Plasma Metabolites and Gut Microorganisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 21931-21949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160921931

AMA Style

Azuma K, Izumi R, Kawata M, Nagae T, Osaki T, Murahata Y, Tsuka T, Imagawa T, Ito N, Okamoto Y, et al. Effects of Oral Administration of Chitin Nanofiber on Plasma Metabolites and Gut Microorganisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(9):21931-21949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160921931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azuma, Kazuo, Ryotaro Izumi, Mari Kawata, Tomone Nagae, Tomohiro Osaki, Yusuke Murahata, Takeshi Tsuka, Tomohiro Imagawa, Norihiko Ito, Yoshiharu Okamoto, and et al. 2015. "Effects of Oral Administration of Chitin Nanofiber on Plasma Metabolites and Gut Microorganisms" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 9: 21931-21949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160921931

APA Style

Azuma, K., Izumi, R., Kawata, M., Nagae, T., Osaki, T., Murahata, Y., Tsuka, T., Imagawa, T., Ito, N., Okamoto, Y., Morimoto, M., Izawa, H., Saimoto, H., & Ifuku, S. (2015). Effects of Oral Administration of Chitin Nanofiber on Plasma Metabolites and Gut Microorganisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(9), 21931-21949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160921931

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop