Next Article in Journal
Effect of Different Parts (Leaf, Stem and Stalk) and Seasons (Summer and Winter) on the Chemical Compositions and Antioxidant Activity of Moringa oleifera
Next Article in Special Issue
Far from Equilibrium Percolation, Stochastic and Shape Resonances in the Physics of Life
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of In Situ Polymerization and Solution-Dispersion Techniques in the Preparation of Polyimide/Montmorillonite (MMT) Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Basis for Chiral Selection in RNA Aminoacylation
Article

Academic Aspects of Lunar Water Resources and Their Relevance to Lunar Protolife

Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12(9), 6051-6076; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12096051
Received: 4 August 2011 / Accepted: 31 August 2011 / Published: 19 September 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Origin of Life 2011)

Abstract

Water ice has been discovered on the moon by radar backscatter at the North Pole and by spectrometry at the South Pole in the Cabeus crater with an extrapolated volume for both poles of conservatively 109 metric tons. Various exogenic and endogenic sources of this water have been proposed. This paper focuses on endogenic water sources by fumaroles and hot springs in shadowed polar craters. A survey of theoretical and morphological details supports a volcanic model. Release of water and other constituents by defluidization over geological time was intensified in the Hadean Eon (c.a. 4600 to 4000 My). Intensification factors include higher heat flow by now-extinct radionuclides, tidal flexing and higher core temperatures. Lesser gravity would promote deeper bubble nucleation in lunar magmas, slower rise rates of gases and enhanced subsidence of lunar caldera floors. Hadean volcanism would likely have been more intense and regional in nature as opposed to suture-controlled location of calderas in Phanerozoic Benioff-style subduction environments. Seventy-seven morphological, remote sensing and return sample features were categorized into five categories ranging from a volcano-tectonic origin only to impact origin only. Scores for the most logical scenario were 69 to eight in favor of lunar volcanism. Ingredients in the Cabeus plume analysis showed many volcanic fluids and their derivatives plus a large amount of mercury. Mercury-rich fumaroles are well documented on Earth and are virtually absent in cometary gases and solids. There are no mercury anomalies in terrestrial impact craters. Volcanic fluids and their derivatives in lunar shadow can theoretically evolve into protolife. Energy for this evolution can be provided by vent flow charging intensified in the lunar Hadean and by charge separation on freezing fumarolic fluids in shadow. Fischer-Tropsch reactions on hydrothermal clays can yield lipids, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and amino acids. Soluble polyphosphates are available in volcanic fluids as well as vital catalysts such as tungsten. We conclude that the high volume of polar water resources supports the likelihood of lunar volcanism and that lunar volcanism supports the likelihood of protolife.
Keywords: fumaroles; lunar water; protolife; lunar volcanism fumaroles; lunar water; protolife; lunar volcanism

1. Introduction, Water Sources and Defluidization

We choose to emphasize the two most important discoveries of water on the moon while acknowledging those of Prospector and Clementine. The first major discovery was by the Chandrayaan 1–mini-SAR mission from mid-February to mid-April, 2009 was based on backscattered radar signals from the north lunar pole, mid-February to mid-April, 2009 (Spudis et al.) [1]. Based on information in the Spudis et al. article as reported by NASA in March 2010 the volume of water discovered in the lunar north pole using radar backscatter of circular polarization ratios was estimated to be 600 million metric tons of water ice. Circular polarization ratio is defined as the ratio of the power of the received radar signal in the same sense (same sense circular) to that of the opposite sense as transmitted (SS/OS) during the LCROSS mission to the south lunar pole, spectroscopic analysis of the impact plume from the Cabeus crater showed 155 kg of water and other constituents. The LCROSS reference is a lengthy multi-authored section in science, vol. 330, 22 October 2009 listing some 75 authors or co-authors. We extrapolate the total lunar water in inventory of both the north and south poles to be 109 metric tons of water ice. This may be a conservative estimate because the total area of shadowed polar craters of the moon is 1000 square kilometers exclusive of an unknown volume of hydrothermally altered rocks at depth. What is the origin of this water? We believe the water was delivered to the lunar poles by defluidization processes (Rubey) [2] and not by comets. Defluidization is defined as the release of fluids from the interior of a cosmic body to the exterior. In order to elaborate on the fundamental process of defluidization, a crater similar to Cabeus on the Moon is a similar crater Erebus that exists at the south pole of the Earth in Antarctica. A fumarole is a volcanic gas or fluid vent. Low temperature fumaroles may grade into hot springs (LeMasurier and Wade) [3]. The Erebus caldera in Antarctica produced multiple eruptions of the associated fumarole field building up fumarolic spires or towers some 3 meters tall (Figure 1). The ice in these towers would logically consist of isotopically lighter constituents because of multiple cycles of evaporation and precipitation of these lighter constituents. However, carbon dioxide gases emanate from these fumaroles. Wardell et al. [4] have analyzed carbon dioxide gases from within the ice towers. The isotopic composition of CO2 from these towers measures −2.1 to −4.7 parts per mil and leads to the identification of a magmatic origin of the CO2 or a present-day miniature defluidization system. From a larger viewpoint, volcanism is the “skin” effect of defluidization. Was the water delivered to the lunar poles by the impact of meteorites or comets? Water is required for volcanic processes. Water is also required for life processes. The second objective of this article is to show how water would be integral in the evolution of protolife in lunar shadow zones. We define protolife as the evolution of fumarolic fluids into organic molecules via lipids, biofilms, clay/pyrite templates, catalysts such as tungsto-enzymes, and soluble volcanic polyphosphates into pre-RNA molecules, to RNA to self-replicating DNA. These transitions were operative possibly in the Hadean Eon 4.6 to 4 billion years ago, the duration of which closely approximates the entire Phanerozoic Eon on Earth.
Realizing that water is required in all volcanic processes, we examine the following five lines of evidence for lunar volcanism:
  • Theoretical: Tidal and gravity forces intensifying lunar volcanism;
  • Statistical: Distribution of large lunar craters;
  • Chemical: Fugacity and reflectivity of lunar “fire fountain” spheres;
  • Morphological: Endogenic for 77 features of large lunar craters;
  • Geochemical: Concentration of mercury in fumaroles and volcanic plumes.

1.1. Theoretical—Tidal and Gravity Forces Intensifying Lunar Volcanism

We elect not to review Green [5] on tidal and gravity processes intensifying lunar volcanism. Tidal and gravity forces may have played a major role intensifying both terrestrial and lunar volcanism during the Hadean Eon as it may today in Io. Realizing the 81.3 to 1 mass ratio of the Earth to the moon, the moon appears to be more rigid than the Earth. The vertical component of the Love number (as a vector pointing to the Earth) shows that the moon is more rigid than the Earth with a K2 number of 0.35 Dickman [6]. Thus, body tides on the moon are as low as 10 centimeters compared with the Earth’s gravitational distortion of some 50 centimeters. However, what is often overlooked is the gravitative pull on fluids. Ocean tides on Earth, for example, greatly exceed 50 centimeters. Likewise, terrestrial gravitative forces on the moon could have mobilized lunar magmas and other fluids which may possibly account for more than 1000 transients of reported changes on the moon (Figure 2). We are aware that most lunar transient data are unreliable because of the hundreds of untrained observers, the multitude of telescope types, and varying weather conditions, eye fatigue and absence of confirmation, except for those which have been spectroscopically verified. In the discussion of lunar transients, the transients may represent release of gases along fractures or fissures. Cyanogen, radon, and argon and carbon dioxide have been spectroscopically recorded. Possibly heavy volatized elements such as mercury could be brought to the lunar surface. In support of this possibility is the high concentration of mercury in the shadowed areas behind lunar rocks where colder temperatures would promote precipitation (von Gunten et al.) [7]. This author suggests the mercury is a phenomenon of defluidization possibly associated with transient phenomena over millions of years concentrating in low temperature shadows. Not to be overlooked is the importance of lesser gravity on lunar magma chambers. Figure 3 shows that under lunar gravity, bubble rise rates should be one half of terrestrial rise rates. Further, the slower rise rates of lunar bubbles in lunar magmas may have resulted in enhanced subsidence of lunar Hadean Eon caldera floors creating larger and deeper lunar calderas than on the Earth. We subscribe to the classical definition of a caldera as follows: A caldera is a more or less circular volcanic basin, the diameter of which is greater than the included vents. What is singularly important is that Hadean Eon lunar calderas were regional in distribution as opposed to suture-controlled distribution of volcanic features on the Earth following post Hadean Eon Benioff-style tectonics at convergent and divergent plates as well as at hot spots. The understanding of the difference in Hadean and post Hadean Eon volcanic styles is critical in understanding lunar volcanic mechanisms as they relate to lunar water resources and the possibility of lunar protolife in permanently shadowed regions of the moon, Green [8].
There are two important considerations relative to the slower rise rates of bubbles in lunar magmatic and fumarolic systems. First, there would be enhanced subsidence of lunar craters producing larger and deeper calderas on the moon relative to calderas on Earth. Subsequent eruptions on the floors of lunar calderas in the form of domes and volcanoes would result in these features being lower than the rims of the host caldera on the Earth. The elevations of the internal features on caldera floors on Earth may sometimes be higher than the host caldera rims. Secondly, in a longer bubble-entrained magma or fumarolic column, mixing and convection would be increased favoring reactivity of profolife constituents. Fluidization conditions would also be favored promoting reactivity.
Continuing with the thesis that water is essential for volcanic processes and that water is essential for protolife, we briefly consider a theory on the origin of the moon by Galimov and Krivstov [10]. Their arguments minimize the requirement of an asteroid impacting the Earth to create the moon. Instead, they argue for an asymmetrical dust binary that evolved into the Earth and moon. Positive aspects of the Galimov and Krivstov model are that it accounts for the (1) low iron content of the moon and (2) the integrity of the isotopic ratios of chromium of the Earth and the moon. Their model also documents the volatilization of lunar rock-making elements such as sodium and potassium as well as possible partitioning of a cooler condensing phase in the evolution of the proto-Earth and moon. An important aspect of the Galimov and Krivstov hypothesis is that if an asteroid did impact the Earth to make the moon, it would likely volatilize the lunar water content. The concept of an asteroid creating the moon appears invalid.

1.2. Statistical—Distribution of Large Lunar Craters

We turn to item 2 invoking lunar volcanism, namely, statistical. Ronca (1968) [11] has made a statistical evaluation of the distribution of 908 large (greater than 25 kilometers in diameter) lunar craters on the visible side of the moon. He gridded the face of the moon facing the Earth into 172 blocks, each measuring 7.9 × 103 km2. Ronca’s results show that the large lunar craters on the Earth-facing hemisphere of the moon based on high confidence limits are not randomly distributed and therefore endogenic (volcanic) in origin. Impact cratering would produce a statistically random distribution but the non-random distribution strongly suggests a volcanic origin of large lunar craters that Ronca included in his determinations.

1.3. Chemical—Fugacity and Reflectivity of Lunar Fire Fountain Spheres

The third line of evidence supporting lunar volcanism deals with physio-chemical evidence from the returned “fire-fountain” spheres from the Apollo missions. The spheres clearly contain halogen elements typical of volcanic emanations such as sulfur, chlorine, fluorine and even traces of water. The fire fountain spheres are apparently volcanic vent-related and going back to the first principles in volcanology should be “wetter” than distal vents. A measure of how hydrous magma can be is related to its fugacity or simplistically, oxygen content. Lunar rocks have historically been assigned a fugacity of 10−13 atmospheres. Can the spectral reflectance of the lunar spheres be calibrated in terms of fugacity? A portion of the publication by Green 2009 [8] pages 2693–2694 is given below indicating that the fugacities of the Apollo orange and green fire fountain samples can be as high as terrestrial fire fountain spheres of 10−9 atmospheres.
Arguments against volcanic or endogenic water are that the majority of large lunar craters are not calderas and that the fugacity or partial pressure of oxygen in lunar melts is too low to permit hydrous environments. Most publications on lunar magmas assume that the oxygen fugacity of terrestrial magmas is 10−9 atmospheres. Since oxygen is related to how hydrous a melt might become, the low fugacity of lunar rocks has been a powerful argument against the possibility of “wet” rocks on the moon and hence a water resource. The basis for the claim that lunar rocks are dry is the measurement of fugacity of the returned samples and not of lunar rocks collected at volcanic vent sites. Volcanic rocks at vent sites on Earth are invariably more hydrothermally altered and “wetter” than distal lavas or ash flows. Are all lunar rocks low in oxygen fugacity? Mao et al. (1973) [12] performed optical absorbance studies of orange and green glass spherules from the Apollo 17 landing site. Optical absorbance is caused by crystal field and charge transfer processes in iron and titanium in these glasses. When these absorbance data are calibrated by structural parameters based on Fe57 Mossbauer resonance measurements, optical absorbance can be used to establish a scale of oxidation or fugacity. Optical absorbance data of synthetic glasses for which the fugacity is known are shown by Mao et al. The fugacities of these presumed volcanic vent (fire fountain) spherules are equal to or even greater than most terrestrial volcanic rocks.

1.4. Morphological—Endogenic Origin of Morphologic Features

The next to last criterion evaluating the role of lunar volcanism is morphological (4). Appendix 1 tabulates 77 criteria in the following categories:
  • General
  • Non-mare areas
  • Mare areas
  • Ray areas
  • Remote sensing data
  • Returned samples
  • Mensuration
  • Surface features (<1 km dia.)
In turn, these 77 criteria were scored as follows:
  • Volcano-tectonic explanation only;
  • Unreasonable by impact;
  • Plausible by impact or volcanic processes;
  • Unreasonable by volcanic mechanisms;
  • Impact explanation only.
Three tabulations are given in Appendix 1.
Where in tabulation A all “c” categories are volcanic,
Where in tabulation B all “c” categories are impact,
In tabulation C (Shown below), we assume that half of the “c” category are volcanic.
Tabulation Ca plus bc
I10
II374
III161
IV82
V20
VI31
VII20
Sum698
In Appendix 1 three tabulations are given with tabulation C incorporated into the text. (See legend to appendix) The purpose of these tabulations in Appendix 1 is to assess the importance of volcanic processes on the moon. The tabulations show that volcanism appears to be the dominant surface–shaping mechanism, at least for large craters and vocanotectonic structures. Tabulation A assumes all criteria are volcanic and is considered untenable because it does not include meteorite impact mechanisms. Tabulation B assumes all “C” scores are impact. Tabulation C assumes half of the category are impact and provides a more balanced conclusion to the importance of volcanic processes being the dominant surface-shaping processes on the moon. The term, “apparent dip” under non-mare areas 39 is a geological term referring to the change in tilt angle (dip) as a function of view direction of the tilted strata. References for the 77 entries in Appendix 1 are judgment calls based on 50 years of visiting volcanic provinces around the world and the study of lunar literature. Category I is among the most important categories because it is commonly overlooked. The category is concerned with geological associations; it deals with field relationships. For example, craters associated with internal central volcanoes, domes, ridging, polygonism and, in turn, their relationships with the tectonic environment. What are the relationships of craters with rim craters, lava provinces, and sector grabens? Associations are given an “a” rating.
Explanation of Figure 4 further highlights the significance of associations in Appendix 1. The Mývatn area in northern Iceland is a classical region of lunar-terrestrial analogs. A 100 km portion of the mid-Atlantic ridge fissures is well exposed east of Lake Mývatn which has localized pyroclastic cone craters along a 35 km long segment between the pyroclastic cone of Hverfjall and to the southeast Lùdent crater. These two pyroclastic cones are associated with mid-Atlantic ridge fissures. There are alignments of small basaltic scoria cones as a result of fissure eruptions of 1724 to 1729. Hverfjall, to the northeast of Lùdent, is a 2,500 year old tephra ring with a crater diameter of 1.0 km. The crater is similar to many lunar craters which have central mountains. The hill in Lùdent is 42 meters high. The outward dip of tephra beds varies between 20–42 degrees. Some beds along the southeast interior dip inward.
Lùdent crater is also a pyroclastic cone with a diameter of a kilometer with its rim some 315 meters above its floor. The average dip of the outwardly dipping beds is 21 degrees. The rim is littered with large lava rocks as large as 2 meters. Two rim craterlets exist which do not deform the rim of the parent crater and which are part of 2 crater chains as shown in Figure 4.
Consider the Icelandic pyroclastic cones Lùdent (Figure 4) and the nearby Hverfjall crater. Both Lùdent and Hverfjall are associated with fractures on the mid-Atlantic ridge which define divergent tectonic plates. Both volcanic cones are a few thousand years old and evolved from gas-rich magmas. Lùdent clearly shows felsic lava flows issuing from the northern base of Lùdent. This clear and significant association has been observed by the author in many terrestrial volcanic provinces. First, a subjacent gas-charged magma produces a pyroclastic or cinder cone followed by gas-depleted lava as flows often issuing from the base of the highly vesiculated cone. In the case of the Pisgah cinder cone, California, pahoehoe lava later partially filled the craterlet on the summit of Pisgah crater. Returning to Lùdent crater, there are two rim craters. Both of these rim craters appear to be on partial crater chains. Most significant to lunar analogs is the fact that these rim craters are in sharp contact with the original rim of the parent crater. Cichus crater, a lunar analog of Lùdent crater is 40 km in diameter with a rim crater about 9.6 km wide. Yet, the contact of the rim crater of Cichus with the parent crater is sharp. An impacting meteorite would have destroyed the parent crater rim at its contact with the rim crater. Craters with sharp intersections with the parent crater suggest a volcanic association. Many dozens can be found in lunar craters and are coded “a” in Appendix 1. Cichus is listed in Appendix 2.

1.5. Geochemical—Concentration of Mercury in the Cabeus Plume

The last category of interest in lunar volcanic processes that may account for lunar water resources is (5) Geochemical—a product unexpected in the Cabeus plume was a large quantity of mercury, namely 122 kilograms as reported by Gladstone et al. 2010 [13]. Many tens of presumed impact craters have been reported on Earth. No references to high mercury concentrations have been described as present in these craters. Furthermore, the amount of mercury in meteorites is in parts per million with carbonaceous chondrites up to 10 ppm, [14] or slightly more. The amount of mercury in comets including Wild-2 has not been recorded, and is presumably less than 1 ppm. However, mercury is relatively abundant in fumaroles as well documented for Japanese fumarole fields according to Nakagawa [15], who measured the mercury concentrations in the fumarolic gases of twelve geothermal activity areas in Japan. The annual mercury output from these geothermal fumarolic sources in Japan is estimated at 1.4 tons. In 1999, the Masaya caldera in Nicaragua has had a long history of volcanic eruptions (Figure 5). Witt et al. [16] measured the mercury output from selected vents in Masaya using Lumex 915+ portable mercury vapor analyzer. The principle of operation of the analyzer is based on the resonance absorption of the 254-nm radiation by mercury atoms vs. a Zeeman correction for nonselective absorption. Particulate mercury was also collected which was 5% of the total gaseous mercury (TGM). The total annual mercury from certain vents in the Masaya caldera is seven tons per year according to Witt et al. Another mercury emitter is the La Solfatara fumarole in the Phlegrian fields near Naples, Italy. La Solfatara produces 7 kilograms of mercury per year. Recall that we have previously mentioned there are high concentrations of mercury in the shadow of lunar rocks as reported by von Gunten [7].
The most important conclusion to be drawn from the Witt et al. publication is that the mercury found in Cabeus on the moon is most likely of an endogenic or volcanic origin. This concludes part 1 of this paper.

2. Part Two—Water Resources and Protolife

As water is essential for volcanic processes, we emphasize that the moon is differentiated and water is required for differentiation, according to O’Hara [17]. Water is also the necessary ingredient for the origin of protolife. Stressed by the author in previous publications are some thought-provoking “coincidences” which may occur in lunar fumaroles given the abundant water that exists there as ices in the permanently polar shadow zones. First, volcanism can provide fumaroles with soluble polyphosphates critical in the evolution of prebiotic organic molecules such as pre-RNA, RNA and DNA. Second, fumarolic activity can provide inorganic templates in the form of hydrothermal products such as pyrite or clay. In addition, not only clay types including fluctuating clay types, some homionic can occur in fumarolic environments. Third, simple combinations of fumarolic gases can create biofilms. Biofilms, consisting of colloidal iron sulfide films on bubbles, would provide both a positively charged energy source. Colloidal iron sulfide as FeS2 may increase the production of carbon dioxide by the oxidation of methane. These sulfides as biofilms can also activate amino acids to peptides even after long storage and frigid conditions Heinen [18]. Fourth, the temperature range of hot springs and fumaroles ranging from above 100 degrees centigrade to 50 degrees centigrade is amenable to the survival of protolife. Fifth, sulphur in the Cabeus plume, very abundant in volcanic fluids would be critical in the early evolution of primitive forms of protolife. Sixth, tungsten is more abundant in fumarolic fluids much more so than in Darwin’s “warm little pond” and as tungsto-enzymes Kletzin [19] which are critical catalysts in the evolution of protolife. Seventh, fumarolic environments can broadcast spattered droplets containing concentrated enzymes and catalysts to clay covered distal areas on which the droplets will land. Finally, fumaroles can provide a significant range of hydrous variables within distances of meters from the vent outwards such as temperature, pH, and clay types. This environment, including clay surfaces, is conducive to Fischer-Tropsch reactions capable of yielding lipids, amino acids and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Common fumarolic fluids may include water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur (S), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dichloride (SCl2), methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), carbonyl sulfide (COS), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), ammonia (NH3), cyanogen (CN), and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) that are of major importance. HCN is fundamental in polymerization reaction creating peptides, polypeptides and nucleosides and in the synthesis of protein ancestors. Matthews and Minard [20] have published on HCN polymerization as a preferred cosmochemical pathway. Other derivative fumarolic fluids can also form when electrically energized; only nano currents may be necessary.
A simple combination of methane and ammonia, for example, produces a critical prebiotic fluid formaldehyde (HCHO) and methanol (CH4O). The latter compound was spectroscopically identified in the Cabeus plume. Other combinations of fumarolic fluids may yield ammonium thyocyanate (NH4SCN), ammonium cyanide (NH4CN), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), acetylene (C2H2), and ethylene (C2H4). Isobutene (C4H8), furane (C4H4O), benzene (C6H6) and thiophene (C4H4S) were measured in fumaroles of the Lascar volcano in Chile.
Of the many primary and derivative fumarolic compounds, many can combine with adequate energy inputs, electrical, shock, etc. to form important prebiotic constituents. For example, (1) ammonia and carbon disulfide can form ammonium thiocyanate; (2) Methane plus ammonia can form HCN (hydrogen cyanide). Eutectic freezing of HCN in lunar shadow can concentrate HCN to synthesize nucleic acid bases as well as purines and pyrimidines. Polypeptides can be formed directly from earlier formed HCN; (3) Formaldehyde is an important prebiotic agent and can be formed “in the spark” or by shock waves in a gaseous mixture of water, methane, ammonia, hydrogen and carbon monoxide; (4) Formic acid, a key prebiotic player (HCOOH) is a precursor of lipids in thermocatalytic reactions. Formic acid was the most abundant product in the original Miller experiments; it can also be formed by reacting troilite, the most abundant lunar iron sulfide with hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, the reaction has a negative Gibbs free energy of −11.7 kJ mol−1. Another important prebiotic agent is (5), ferrocyanide which can ideally be formed by reacting hydrogen cyanide with ferrous iron to give FE(CN6)4−. Acetic acid, another prebiotic agent can be formed by reacting methylthiols (CH3SH) with CO plus H2O to yield CH3COOH (Acetic acid), plus H2S. Note that clay-armored bubbles of H2S occur in the fumaroles of the Uzon caldera in Kamchatka as biofilms which are of significance in the study of the origin of protolife.
There are many stimuli for the origin of lunar protolife in Hadean Eon and later fumaroles. From the vent outwards we see: (1) environmental changes and zonation over distances of meters (eH, pH, freeze/thaw, and fluctuating clay environments including homionic montmorillonite); (2) possible proflavin (PAH) for nucleotide assembly into RNA; (3) flash evaporation; and (4) lower surface pressures. Lower surface pressures would greatly reduce the boiling points of fumarolic fluids and produce larger bubbles extending the vapor phase range of lunar protolife compounds and enhancing reactivity. Reactivity would also be increased by convection and fluidization in fumarolic vents. One of the most interesting stimuli for Precambrian lunar protolife is fumarolic spatter and wet/dry cycles (Green, 2009) [8].
Fumarolic reactions, many of which occur at negative free energy assure the viability of these chemical reactions. Regarding these reactions, we need to look no further than the Hadean Eon environment which was surely beset with storms of impressive proportions. Lightning is well illustrated in volcanic eruptions today (Figure 6). Volcanic eruptions today produce shock waves which in themselves can create amino acids and possibly peptides in fumarolic fluids. Surface self potentials can also be created pending volcanic eruptions that can conceivably be invoked to mobilize and distribute ash deposits. In permanently shadowed zones at the lunar poles, flow charging potentials can result by freezing volcanic gases. Clathrate structures could possibly result in lunar shadow.

2.1. Protolife Evolving

We cite here a presumptuous accounting of steps in the evolution of protolife from fumarolic fluids. In shadow at 40 K, no photodissociation would occur preserving methane and ammonia. Most of the fluids would freeze and be preserved over geologically-long time periods because of their low vapor pressures.
The first evolutionary compounds could include ferrocyanides and soluble polyphosphates. Energy sources in the Hadean Eon such as heat, lightning, sonic shock, electrical potentials produced by charge separation on freezing, could form formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide. Only microcurrents and nano concentrations are required to form hydroxyl amino acids, the purine bases of the nucleic acid and the pyrimidines bases of the nucleic acids. A second evolutionary stage could episodically concentrate compounds by Fischer-Tropsch catalysis involving hyrodrothermal clays yielding racemic basic and aromatic amino acids and ribose stabilized by boron compounds. Concentration could be increased by freezing fumarolic reflux products and by evaporation and desiccation and by fumarolic spatter. Concentration can also be increased by catalysts and enzymes. A third evolutionary stage might involve polymerization and continued condensation that relate to directed molecular selfassembly on a nanoscale. Organic molecules could be oriented in water monolayers in ice silicate interfaces. Adenine could react with ribose to form adenosine. The latter joining volcanic polyphosphates could produce early forms of adenosine triphosphate or ATP—a metabolic energy source. Then hydrothermal clay templates could assist in the polymerization of amino acids to proteins via peptides and in the creation of bilipid cell membranes of possibly clay-armored vesicles which could withstand the turbulence of fumarolic environments. Iron-sulfur clusters could form in this phase as well as iron sulfide biofilms.
Biofilms consisting of colloidal iron sulfide films on bubbles would provide both a positively charged energy source and a platform to which polar organic molecules could attach and receive energy. Such films are used in present-day flotation operations to separate ore minerals. Colloidal iron sulfide as FeS2 may increase the production of carbon dioxide by the oxidation of methane. The sulfides as biofilms can also activate amino acids to peptides. The preceding discussion on protolife evolving is discussed in Green 2009 [8] rigorously substantiated by 146 bibliographic references.
Two new emphases have been published recently relevant to lunar protolife. The first is an increasing role of clay in performing the role of lipids to provide reaction chambers for prebiotic reactions to take place minimizing the dilution from an outside hydrous medium. The second emphasis is on the role of ice itself as the host for prebiotic reactions.

2.2. Clay Armored Vesicles

Subramanian et al. [21] have described plate-like flakes of montmorillonite collecting on bubbles underwater compartmentalizing organic molecules when clay bubbles come in contact with simple organic liquids such as ethanol and methanol. Both fumarolic fluids are found in fumaroles and some in Cabeus. The organic molecules have a lower surface tension than the water outside resulting in a robust clay armor around the vesicle. The cell is robust enough to withstand the turbulence of fumarolic environments permitting smaller chemical compounds to enter the vesicles but restricting larger structures from leaving.
The clay vesicles are covered with small pores exhibiting selective permeability which allows spontaneous compartmentalization of self-assembling molecules in aqueous environments. Figure 7 compares fatty acid liposome compartmentalization within a clay-armored vesicle compared with a non-clay vesicle. In short, clay armored bubbles may have formed the first protocells. The robustness of the vesicles combined with the catalytic properties of montmorillonite may well have had played a role in the creation of protolife in the hydrothermal clay environments of fumaroles. Thus, small fatty acid lipids can enter the clay vesicles and self-assemble into larger structures which then cannot exit. These clay-armored vesicles are semi-permeable. A major highlight of the clay armored vesicles is their robustness to withstand the turbulence of fumarolic environments (Figure 7) (Tessera) [22].
Continuing the discussion of clay-armored vesicles, the montmorillonite collects on the outer surface of air or “fumarolic” (quotes by author) bubbles which may contain simple organic molecules reported in the Cabeus plume. The inner surface also has a lower surface tension than water, the liquid wets the overlying plates of montmorillonite which have catalytic properties and the inner surface of the clay shell becomes wet, the disturbed gas bubble inside would tend to dissolve. The resulting clay vesicle according to Subramaniam is a strong spherical shell that creates a physical boundary that is strong enough to protect their reacting contents from the turbulent environment of fumaroles. The montmorillonite would serve as a catalyst encouraging the enclosed lipids to form membranes of single nucleotides to join into strands of possibly methylated RNA because liposomes and RNA are essential to primordial protolife. Subramaniam and his co-authors suggest that the pores in the clay vesicles could do double duty as both selective entry points and catalytic sites. The most important conclusion drawn (by this author) is the possibility that clay vesicles may be able to evolve by virtue of the catalytic properties of montmorillonite obviating the problem highlighted by Tessera [20]. Because conventional lipid vesicles cannot evolve, clay coated vesicles may possibly evolve more effectively into protolife up to replicating DNA. See Figure 7A.

2.3. Ice as a Medium for RNA Evolution

A new study has been published by Attwater et al. [23] indicating that protolife may have originated in ice. Water can take on forms near freezing that are loose enough to provide space for the accumulation of unfrozen water and chemical reactants including salts, water and molecules that make up RNA in particular ribozymes, the organic catalyst of RNA. Even at near freezing temperatures, the ribozyme continued to function constructing longer strands of RNA than were constructed at warmer temperatures. However, full strands of RNA were not constructed in Attwater’s test tube experiments. What Attwater et al. have shown is that protolife reaction can take place in an ice matrix although Monnard et al. [24] has previously shown that biological reactions can take place in ice matrices. Attwater et al. argue that ice is a better environment for RNA development than others that have been proposed. RNA is fragile. Its molecular/chemical properties make it relatively easy to disrupt and are probably formed in protected space which Attwater et al. believe can be provided for in ice pockets. It is clear that the lunar surface is ideal in affording freezing environments in permanently shadowed zones or intermittently in shadow. This paper strongly suggests that impact exploration of ice deposits on the moon is undesirable and should ideally be made by a properly equipped geologist.

2.4. Protolife Overview

The final paragraphs of this paper describe two simple and volumetrically abundant features of fumaroles in lunar shadowed environments: clay and ice. This could be construed simplistically as a consequence of Occam’s Razor, namely that simple products, clay and ice may hold many of the answers in the search for lunar protolife. William of Ockham (1285–1347) originated a principle which gives precedence of simplicity of competing theories: “Entities need not be multiplied beyond necessity.”
We conclude this paper with the obvious—that life on the Earth or protolife on the moon must have had many dead ends during the Hadean Eon. There were many compelling scenes in the Disney movie, Fantasia, set to Stravinsky’s “The Rite of Spring” where early life on Earth was destroyed by submarine eruptions several times. Likewise, lunar fumaroles could have erupted periodically especially if blowpiping occurred. Blowpiping can be observed in fumaroles where burning of combustible gases impelled by expanding gases produce blowpiping gases exceeding 400 °C effectively destroying any organic molecule. Dr. R.M. Hazen [25] of the Carnegie Institution compared the multiple destructions of life on Earth to a defective flickering fluorescent lamp.

3. Conclusions

Water is necessary for the origins of life. The significance of lunar protolife lies in our ability to prove it. The moon is but a long weekend away. We have developed an array of remote sensors to detect biomarkers. The search for life on Mars, Titan, Europa and Enceladus is clearly beyond on-site human exploration, and the cost of this exploration beyond Mars is orders of magnitude greater than lunar exploration for protolife. The holy grail of science in the search for life may be at our doorstep.
The premise that lunar protolife may have been blown to Earth to trigger life on the Earth is speculative, and which the author deems unlikely. Dynamic lift curves clearly show that volcanic initial ejecta velocities are far lower than the 2.38-kilometers-per-second escape velocity of the moon. Also, it is highly unlikely for hypervelocity ejecta to survive ablation on the journey through Earth’s atmosphere or impact on the Earth. Probably most fragments would be captured in the Lagrangian gravity wells in the moon’s orbit.
Finally, the author presumes with other authorities that the Hadean Eon lunar atmosphere was anoxic. The presumption of lunar protolife is only carried to self-replicating DNA. No oxygen was present to poison protolife evolution. The Earth, however, billions of years later would have evolved to where photosynthesis could have enriched the Earth’s atmosphere with oxygen, a condition not likely in the Hadean Eon on the moon.
Considerable emphasis has been placed on water being integral in volcanic processes reinforced by theoretical aspects of tidal and gravity parameters intensifying lunar volcanisms. We highlight the regional aspects of Hadean Eon volcanism as opposed to suture-controlled volcanism of the post-Hadean Eon. We have touched upon the unlikely aspect of a moon created by asteroid impact of the Earth which would possibly have volatilized the water that now exists on the moon. Statistical treatment of large lunar craters strongly suggests that large craters on the side of the moon facing the Earth are non-randomly distributed reinforcing a volcanogenic origin. The reflectivity of “fire fountain” spheres calibrated into fugacity values suggest the possibility of higher magmatic water concentrations. The moon as a differentiated body would have required water for differentiation. A careful analysis of 77 predominantly morphological features endorses a volcanic origin for large lunar craters, volcanotectonic basins and rayed craters. The impact source of mercury in Cabeus appears unlikely in view of abundant mercury in terrestrial fumaroles, especially in Japan, and the Sulfur Bank Sulfur Mine area, Lake County, California, the Phlegrian Fields, and Masaya. The evolution of protolife was briefly reviewed emphasizing the remarkable coincidences of availability of soluble polyphosphates, biofilms, templates of clay and pyrite, and catalysts. New data on robust clay vesicles and ice pockets were discussed.
Of the main implications of lunar water resources is that water is integral in volcanic processes. As is well known, water will reduce the viscosity of lunar magmas. This fact, low viscosity melts, when coupled with deeper nucleation of bubbles in magmatic melts as a consequence of lesser lunar gravity, would produce a longer bubble-entrained magma column relatively more fluidized than a “drier” melt where reflux and mixing would enhance prebiotic reactions in protolife constituents. We highlight the regional aspects of the distribution of Hadean Eon calderas as opposed to post-Hadean Eon suture-controlled Benoif-style distribution of volcanic structures at plate boundaries and hot spots. We touch upon the unlikely aspects of a moon created by asteroidal impact of the Earth or of a magma ocean which would likely have volatilized the abundant water that now exists on the moon.
Statistical analysis of large lunar craters on the front side of the moon strongly suggests these craters are non-randomly distributed reinforcing their non-impact and hence, volcanic origin. The fugacity of lunar “fire” fountain spheres calibrated into fugacity values yield values of 10−8 to 10−9 suggest the possibility of higher magmatic water concentrations. A careful analysis of 77 predominantly morphological features endorses a volcanic origin for large lunar craters and volcanotectonic basins including Imbrium, Serenitatis, Orientale and Aitkin and rayed craters. The high amounts of mercury in Cabeus delivered by meteors or comets appears unlikely in view in the mercury deposits in the Phlegrian fields near Naples, Italy, at Mount Etna in Sicily, the fumaroles fields in Japan, at La Soufrière in Guadalupe and in the Masaya caldera in Nicaragua and the relative absence of mercury in terrestrial impact craters and low abundances of mercury in meteorites and in comets.
Armored clay vesicles may have provided the ideal containers providing the compartmentalization of complex organic molecules such as fatty acid liposomes and RNA fragments. However, non-clay armored lipid vesicles cannot evolve. Tessera [22] looks at the possibility of evolving lipid vesicles as a key to the origin of life on Earth. If the clay armor is montmorillionite, the catalytic properties of this clay could permit evolutionary processes to take place leading to the origin of protolife. The montmorillonite armor would be semi-permeable as a catalyst encouraging lipids to form membranes and simple nucleotides to join into strands of RNA. Clay-armored vesicles are robust and can withstand fumarolic turbulence and moreover may have a catalytic montmorillonistic shell. A recent paper deals with a cold start of life with ice as a procellular medium for RNA replication. Previous work had shown that crevices within ice could provide a safe place for the construction of an RNA molecule. As ice forms, pure water becomes crystallized, while salts and other bits of debris accumulate in the watery pockets. These impurities lower the water’s freezing point and the little pockets may remain unfrozen within an otherwise solid chunk. The premise is based on the fact that ice has minute crevices for the construction of RNA molecule ribosomes. According to Attwater et al. [21], “a crucial transition in the origin of life is the emergence of a polymer capable of self-repllication and its compartmentalization within protocellular structures. Ice not only promotes the activity of an RNA polymerase ribozyme but also protects it from hydrolytic degradation, enabling the synthesis of exceptionally long replication products. Ice provides quasicellular compartmentalization within the intricate microstructure of the eutectic phase. Eutectic ice phases had been shown to promote the synthesis of nucleotide precursors, as well as the condensation of activated nucleotides into random RNA oligomers. Ice promotes all the steps from prebiotic synthesis to the emergence of RNA self-replication.”
Finally, it is unprecedented to have had a tsuami of ground-breaking new lunar data in the last five years by many scientists in a variety of institutions and governments. We recognize the order that exists in variety, but what of the motivation? Motivation as expressed by Albert Einstein was simply “I want to know.” We have not conclusively explored the moon. The author has in mind some two dozen possible hydrothermal alteration sites that could conceivably contain biomarkers. For example, the interior of the breached central mountain in Copernicus or the summit pits of the dark mounds in Alphonsus at fracture intersections. Lunar exploration has just begun for those “who want to know.” The author had deliberately avoided the practical aspects of lunar water resources such as an international lunar base. There is sizable literature on lunar cement or hydroponics, for example. It does not take a rocket scientist to know how to make fuel from water. We do not have to look too hard to find the L5 Lagrangian Point, or review a tutorial on the Stanford Torus. Recall that the higher the technological level of a program (space or energy), the higher the economical multiplication factor. A lunar exploration/exploitation program should be our goal because we have not yet reached Camelot.

Acknowledgments

My sincere thanks to the nursing staff, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists and physicians at the Long Beach Memorial Rehabilitation Unit for their patience and assistance in making it possible for me to complete this paper.

Appendix I Morphological and Related Features of the Moon

The purpose of this compilation is to evaluate generally operative processes that have shaped the lunar surface: impact of meteorites or volcanism. The scoring of criteria is coded as follows:
Volcano-tectonic explanation onlya
Unreasonable by impactb
Plausible by impact or volcanic processesc
Unreasonable by volcanic mechanismsd
Impact explanation onlye
The following judgmental codes have been assigned to lunar morphological features. Code a is to a volcanic-only origin because no impact mechanism appears impossible. Code b pertains to morphological features that are highly unlikely to be formed by meteoric impact based on studies of terrestrial analogs by the author and interpretations of Clementine orbital and telescopic imagery. Code c includes features that could be formed conceivably by either volcanic or impact processes. The author is aware of tangential ray-like patterns that can be formed by hypervelocity impact as well as similar patterns from volcanic processes. Code d is included for processes deemed unreasonable for volcanic mechanisms. Code e is reserved for impact-only mechanisms.
Eight categories of lunar features are considered:
  • General
  • Non-mare Areas
  • Mare Areas
  • Rays
  • Remote Sensing Data
  • Returned Samples
  • Mensuration
  • Surface features (<km dia.)

I. General

AssociationsRegional
The category deals with field relationships: Craters associated with internal central mountains, ridging, terracing. In turn, their relationship to a tectonically controlled environment. Interrelationships of craters with rim craters, domes, lava provinces, ash distribution, sector grabens.

II. Non-Mare Areas

1. Small internally featureless cup-shaped craters within larger cratersLyotc
2. Polygonality of craters including
 (Rectangular and hexagonal)
Ptolemaeus
Nicolai area
Purbach
Barbier
Chacornak
a
3. Fault control of crater boundariesPlatoa
4. Craters perfectly concentric within craters (doubly concentric)Lavoisier
Hesiodus
Cassini
a
5. Concentric or partially concentric inner circular mountain ranges within cratersHertsprung
Schrödinger
a
6. Central medial ridges in cratersAlphonsusa
7. Internal terracingBullialdusc
8. Internal terracing of different ages within cratersCopernicusa
9. (if not apparent dip) Near horizontal strata on crater walls (apparent dip refers to the change of dip angle where dip is the angle of tilt of layering as a function of view angle. For example, a steeply dipping lava flow might appear nearly horizontal depending on the direction of view.)Copernicusa
10. Dark floors of cratersPlato
Macrobius
Boscovich
b
11. Fractured crater floorsLavoisier Ha
12. On-ridge or on-fault cratersBohnenbergera
13. Leveed sinuous channels or flows leading to crater floors1Copernicusa
14. Lava-like terrain on crater floorsTycho
Dawes
c
15. Invaded craters on mare “shores”Fracastoriusb
16. Sector grabens in cratersD’Arresta
17. “Pancake” lava flow patterns in cratersMessala border (Orbiter II)b
18. Rim overturning of craters2None seen by authora
19. Dark haloed craters many with summit pits within cratersWithin Alphonsus
Within Dionysius
a
20. Sharp undisturbed overlap of secondary craters on rims of primary or coalesced craters3Cyrillus on Theophilus
Harvey on Mach
Bordering Cichus
Bordering Orontius
Bordering Licetus
Bordering Barocus
Bordering Kozyrev
a
21. Serially overlapping cratersThebita
22. Fused elongate segmented cratersVogel
Torricelli
b
23. Major elongate segmented cratersSchillerc
24. Tangential alignmentsMüller
Abulfeda
Aristoteles
a
25. Crater chains, some aligned within valleys or grabens and some radial to circular mariaMairan
Sharp
Bianchus
Condamine
Vallis Rheita
Vallis Snellius
Rima Hyginus
Rimae Herigonius
a
26. Curved crater chainsAround Tychoa
27. Central or near-central mountains within craters1/3 of all major cratersc
28. Multiple central mountainsCopernicusb
29. Volcano-like features with summit pits within major craters4Regimantanus
Schrödinger
Albategnius
Lambert
a
30. Central or off-central raised plateaus within cratersSabine
Posidonius
c
31. Central mountains within small craters on or near rims of major craters that lack central mountainsClavius
Mandel’schtam R
a
32. Breached central mountainCopernicusa
33. Central craterlet on flat floor within craterTimocharisc
34. Major crater-capped domes north of GruithuisenCaroline Herschela
35. Doming of entire crater floorWurzelbauera
36. Nested domes within cratersCopernicusb
37. Dome clusters within cratersAitken
Near NE rim of Gagarin
a
38. Arcuate dome distribution within cratersZucchiusa
39. Ridged/grooved features on crater floorsSW of Mandel’schtamb
40. Hummocky terrain surrounding cratersAristillus
Eudoxus
c
41. Outer rim concentric fracturesArchimedesb
42. Deformed or ruined north and/or south crater margins some with chevron fracture patterns10Arzachel
Capella
Aristarchus
Tycho

III. Mare Areas

1. Serial age differences of craters bordering basinal scarps to circular mare “shores”5Rupes Altai to Mare Nectarisa
2. Antipodal disturbances to circumare basins (Aitken, Orientale, Imbrium)None seen by authora
3. Major basaltic dome provinces on crater flanksSE flank of Copernicusa
4. Curved valleys (rilles)Rima Hadleya
5. Grid fracture patternGeneralb
6. Radial and subradial fractures to circular maria controlling alignment of major exterior craters many with central mountains and some with central mountains with central mountain summit pitsMare Orientalea
7. Major interior circumferential featuresMare Orientale
Mare Nectaris
c
8. Isolated domes with summit pits (outside of major craters)North of Hortensius
“Schlumberger domes”
Near Milchius
Near Arago
a
9. Mare ridges localizing cratersCaroline Herschela
10. MasconsMare Imbriumb
11. Inward facing scarps within circular mariaMare Orientale (Rook mountains)a
12. Flow patterns bordering circular mariaMare Orientaleb
13. Circular maria6Mare Crisium
Mare Orientale
Mare Imbrium
c
14. Lava tubes and “skylights”Near Marius Hillsa
15. Pressure ridges on mariaSerpentine Ridgeb
16. Valleys some with offsetsVallis Alpine
Vallis Triesnecker
a
17. “Ghost” craters within mariaJansen Ra

IV. Rays

1. Topographic control of apron-type ray patterns around cratersKeplerb
2. Loop ray patterns on crater flanksCopernicusa
3. Tangential raysTychoc
4. Radial raysGeneralc
5. On-ray cratersBesselc
6. Elongate craters on rays with axes parallel to regional tectonic grid patternSE Copernicusa
7. Minor craters at ray intersectionsHortensiusb
8. Rays emanating from small rim craterlets or from craterlets exterior to major craters7Copernicus
Bergius
Sirsalis
b
9. En eschalon structures within raysN of Copernicusc
10. “Swirl” ray patterns associated with magnetic anomaliesMare Ingenii
Reiner Gamma
Descartes C
Gerasimovich D
a

V. Remote Sensing Data

1. Spectroscopically verified transientsAlphonsus
Aristarchus
a
2. Forsteritic (vs. fayalitic) olivine typical of spinifex structures of komatitic lavas on central mountains and terraces8Copernicusa

VI. Returned Samples

1. Vesiculated basaltGeneralc
2. High fugacity of glass spheres some equivalent to terrestrial fire fountain glass spheresApollo 11, 15, 16 and 17 samplesa
3. Halogens in glass spheres similar to terrestrial fire fountain spheresApollo 11, 15, 16 and 17 samplesa
4. BrecciasGeneralc

VII. Mensuration

1. Non-random distribution of large lunar craters9Generalb
2. Diameter to central mountain elevation in large lunar cratersGenerala

VIII. Surface Features Less Than 1 km in Diameter (This category is not included in scoring)

1. Craters produced by primary meteorite impact, by secondary meteorite impact, by volcanic bomb and block impact, by localized regolith sinks, by maar cratering, by ebullition cratering. See 2009, 2010 and 2011 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) imagery.Generala to e
1For II 13 we credit Haffner (1969) for the earliest interpretation of leveed flows in Copernicus as being of volcanic origin.
2For II 18 a diagnostic criterion for hypervelocity impact, well documented in laboratory experiments, is the creation of overturned strata on impact crater rims. The author has sought but not found ideal examples of crater rim flaps on the moon. Claims for rim overturning on the north and west rims of Aristarchus, in Montes Rook or in Montes Cordillera in Mare Orientalis appear to be unsubstantiated.
3Relative to II 20, superposed lunar craters are very common. Their coalescing crater rims have sharp contacts as at Parry and Bonpland. Successive overlapping meteorite impacts would destroy or obliterate their intersections. Clementine imagery illustrates such coalescence at a crater called Kozyrev named after a Soviet astronomer who passed away on February 27, 1983. The crater was designated by the International Astronomical Union in 1987 as an impact crater. We disagree. Dr. Nikolay A. Kozyrev was the “dean” of lunar volcanism with his pioneering spectroscopic studies of the endogenic origin of Alphonsus and Aristarchus on the moon. Dr. Kozyrev would be pleased to know and can rest assured that his namesake on the moon is a likely caldera.
4For II 29, Steinberg (1968) provides detailed descriptions of the Krasheninikov caldera complex and the summit vent on an interior volcano.
5For III 1, Chabakov (1949) has detailed the slow tectonic evolutionary origin of Mare Nectaris as opposed to its impact origin.
6Relative to III 13, In the 2010 41st proceedings of the lunar and planetary conference, there was no mention of circular mare formed by volcanotectonic processes nor reference to classical papers dealing with endogenic origins
7Entry IV 8 deals with radial ray patterns on the moon. The dogmatic treatment of radial rays as splash effects from an impact should be tempered with a sizeable literature on electrostatic and other mobilization mechanisms of lunar rays which are not impact related.
8For V2, spectral analysis of internal features in Copernicus are claimed to document rebound by meteorite impact of subjacent dunite. Olivine in dunite is usually fayalitic. However, the recorded spectra shows forsteritic olivine typical of near surface spinifex structure of komatitic lavas.
9For VII 1, see Ronca (1968).
10For II 42, Green (1965), discussion of possible early Precambrian rotational dynamic effects producing many observed lunar crater marginal distortions is beyond scope of paper.
Tabulation A—Volcanic Model (assuming all “c” categories are volcanic)
a plus bc
I10
II410
III170
IV100
V20
VI40
VII20

770
Tabulation B—Impact Model (assuming all “c” categories are impact)
a plus bc
I10
II338
III152
IV64
V20
VI22
VII20

6116
Tabulation C—Modified Model (assuming half all “c” categories are impact) See Text.

Appendix II Key to Craters

NameLocation on MoonDiameter or Length in kmNameLocation on MoonDiameter or Length in km
1. Aitken16.9S173.4E13561. Licetus47.1S6.7E74
2. Aitken Basin56S180E250062. Linné27.7N11.8E2.4
3. Abulfeda13.8S13.9E6563. Lyot49.8S84.5E132
4. Albategnius11.7S4.3E11464. Mach18.5N149.3W180
5. Alphonsus13.7S3.2W10865. Macrobius21.3N46.0E64
6. Anaxagorus73.4N10.1W5066. Mairan41.6N43.4W40
7. Arago6.2N21.4E2667. Mandel’shtam5.4N162.4E197
8. Achimedes29.7N4.0W8268. Mandel’shtam R4.5N159.8E57
9. Aristarchus23.7N47.4W4569. Mare Crisium17.0N59.1E555
10. Aristillus33.9N1.2E5570. Mare Imbrium32.8N15.6W1145
11. Aristoteles50.2N17.4E8771. Mare Nectaris15.2S35.5E333
12. Arzachel18.2S1.9W9672. Mare Nubium21.3S16.6W715
13. Barbier23.8S157.9E6673. Mare Orientale19.4S92.8W900
14. Barocius44.9S16.8E8274. Mare Tranquillitis8.5N31.4E873
15. Bessel21.8N17.9E1675. Marius Hills14N56W14
16. Bianchini48.7N34.3W3876. Maurolycus42.0S14.0E114
17. Bohnenberger13.2N40.0E3377. Messala39.2N60.5E125
18. Bonpland8.3S17.4W6078. Milichius10.0N30.2W13
19. Boscovich9.8N11.1E4679. Montes Cordillera17.5S81.6W945
20. Bollialdus20.7S22.2W6080. Montes Rook17.5S81.6W791
21. Byrgius24.7S65.3W8781. Müller7.6S2.1E24
22. Cabeus84.9S35.5W9882. Nicolai42.4S25.9E42
23. Caroline Herschel34.5N31.2W1383. Orontius40.6S4.6W105
24. Cassini40.2N4.6E5684. Parry7.9S15.8W48
25. Catena Davy11.8S8.1W3485. Piccolomini29.7S32.2E87
26. Catharina18.1S23.4E10486. Pitatis29.9S13.5W106
27. Chacornac29.8N31.7E5187. Plato51.6S9.4W109
28. Cichus33.3S21.1W4088. Posidonius31.8N29.9E95
29. Clavius58.8S14.1W24589. Ptolemaeus9.3S1.9W164
30. Copernicus9.7N30.1W9390. Purbach25.5S2.3W115
31. Cyrillus13.2S24.0E9891. Pytheas20.5N20.6W20
32. D’Arrest2.3N14.7E3092. Regiomontanus A28.0S0.6W6
33. Dionysius2.8N17.3E1893. Reiner Gamma7.5N59.0W70
34. Eratosthenes14.5N11.3W5894. Reinhold3.3N22.8W48
35. Eudoxus44.3N16.3E6795. Rhaeticus0.0N4.9E1.6
36. Fernelius38.1S4.9E6596. Rima Hadley2.5N3E80 *
37. Flamsteed4.5S44.3W2197. Rima Hygenus7.4N7.8E219 *
38. Fracastorius21.5S33.2E11298. Rima Sirsalis15.7S61.7W426 *
39. Gargarin20.2S149.2E26599. Rima Triesnecker4.3N4.6E215 *
40. Goddard A14.8N89.0E89100. Rimae Herigonius13.0S37.0W100*
41. Guericke11.5S14.1W63101. Rupes Altai24.3S22.6E427 *
42. Harvey19.5N146.5W60102. Rupes Recta22.1S7.8W110 *
43. Hercules46.7N39.1E69103. Sabine1.4N20.1E30
44. Herodotus23.2N49.7W35104. Schiller51.9S39.0W180 *
45. Hertzsprung2.6N129.2W591105. Schrödinger75.0S132.4E312
46. Hesiodus A30.1S17.0W15106. Serpentine Ridge25N25E500
47. Hippalus A23.8S32.8W8107. Sharp45.7N40.2W40
48. Hortensius6.5N28.0E15108. Sirsalis12.5S60.4W42
49. Jansen R15.2N28.8E25109. Sommering0.1N7.5W28
50. Janssen44.9S41.5E190110. Thebit22.0S4.0W56
51. Kepler8.1N38.0W32111. Theophilis11.4S26.4E110
52. Kozyrev46.8S129.3E65112. Timocharis26.7N13.1W34
53. Loa Condamine53.4N28.2W37113. Torricelli4.6S28.5E23
54. Lacroix37.9S59.0W38114. Tycho43.4S11.1W102
55. Lambert25.8N21.0W30115. Vallis Alpes48.5N3.2E166 *
56. Langrenus8.9S61.1E127116. Vallis Rheita42.5S51.5E450 *
57. Lassell15.5S7.9W23117. Vallis Schroteri26.2N50.8W168 *
58. Lavoisier38.2N81.2W70118. Vallis Snellius31.1S56.0E592 *
59. Lavoisier C35.5N76.7W35119. Vogel15.1S5.9E27
60. Lavoisier T36.5N76.6W19120. Wood’s Spot26.4N50.4W230
121. Wurzelbauer33.9S15.9W88
122. Zucchius61.4S50.3W64
Diameter of Ring
*Length

References

  1. Spudis, PD; Bussey, DBJ; Baloga, SM; Butler, BJ; Carl, D; Carter, LM; Chakraborty, M; Elphic, RC; GillisDavis, JJ; Goswami, JN; et al. Initial results for the North Pole of the Moon from Mini SAR, Chandrayaan 1 Mission. Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37, L06204. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rubey, WW. Development of the hydrosphere and atmosphere with special reference to probable composition of the early atmosphere. In Crust of the Earth; Poldervaart, A, Ed.; Geological Society of America: New York, NY, USA, 1955; Volume Special Paper 62, pp. 631–650. [Google Scholar]
  3. LeMasurier, WE; Wade, FA. Fumarolic activity in marie byrd land, antarctica. Science 1968, 16, 352. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wardell, LJ; Campbell, AR. Carbon dioxide emissions from fumarolic ice towers, mount erebus volcano, Antarctica, Part III, field investigations of degassing volcanoes. Geol Soc 2003, 213, 231–246. [Google Scholar]
  5. Green, J. Tidal and gravity effects intensifying lunar defluidization and volcanism. Ann NY Acad Sci 1965, 123, 403–469. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickman, SR. Rotationally consistent love numbers. Geophys J Int 2005, 161, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  7. von Gunten, HR; Wegmüller, F; Krähenbühl, U. Low temperature volatilization on the moon. J Geophys Res 1982, 87, A279–A282. [Google Scholar]
  8. Green, J. Precambrian lunar volcanic protolife. Int J Mol Sci 2009, 10, 2681–2721. [Google Scholar]
  9. Usiskin, CM; Siegel, R. An experimental study of boiling in reduced and zero gravity fields. J Heat Transf 1961, C83, 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galimov, EM; Krivstov, AM. Origin of the earth-moon system. J Earth Syst Sci 2005, 114, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ronca, LB. On the distribution of large lunar craters. Icarus 1968, 9, 197–211. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mao, HK; Vergo, D; Bell, PM. Analytical study of orange lunar soil returned by the Apollo 17 Astronauts. In Annual Report of the Director; Geophysical Laboratory 1972–1973; Carnegie Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 1973; pp. 631–638. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gladstone, GR; Hurley, DM; Retherford, KD; Feldman, PD; Pyror, WR; Chaufray, JY; Versteeg, M; Greathouse, TK; Steffl, AJ; Throop, H; et al. LRO-LAMP observations of the LCROSS impact plume. Science 2010, 330, 472–476. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ehmann, WD; Lovering, JF. The abundance of mercury in meteorites and rock by neutron activation analysis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1967, 31, 357–376. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakagawa, R. Estimation of mercury emissions from geothermal activity in Japan. Chemosphere 1999, 38, 1867–1871. [Google Scholar]
  16. Witt, MLI; Mather, TA; Pyle, DM; Aiuppa, A; Bagnato, E; Tsanev, VI. Mercury and halogens emissions from masaya and telica volcanoes, Nicaragua. J Geophys Res 2008, 113, B06203. [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Hara, MJ. Flood basalts, basalt floods or topless bushvelds? Lunar petrogenesis revisited. J Petrol 2000, 41, 1545–1651. [Google Scholar]
  18. Heinen, W; Lauwers, AM. Organic sulfur compounds resulting from the interaction of iron sulfide, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in an anaerobic aqueous environment. Orig Life Evol Biosph 1996, 26, 131–150. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kletzin, A; Adams, MWW. Tungsten in biological systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1996, 18, 5–63. [Google Scholar]
  20. Matthews, CN; Minard, RD. Hydrogen cyanide polymers, comets and the origin of life. Faraday Discuss 2006, 133, 393–401. [Google Scholar]
  21. Subramaniam, AB; Wan, J; Gopinath, A; Stone, HA. Semi-permeable vesicles composed of natural clay. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 2600–2612. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tessera, M. Life began when evolution began: A lipidic vesicle-based scenario. Orig Life Evol Biosph 2009, 39, 559–564. [Google Scholar]
  23. Attwater, J; Wochner, A; Pinheiro, VB; Coulson, A; Holliger, P. Ice as a protocellular medium for RNA replication. Nat Commun 2010, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Monnard, P-A; Kanavarioti, A; Deamer, DW. Non-enzymatic RNA polymerization in eutectic phases of ice (abstract). Orig Life Evol Biosph 2002, 32, 64–65. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hazen, RM. Pragmatic emergence: Complexity theory as a guide to origin-of-life experiments (abstract). Int J Astrobiol 2002, 1, 150. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Ice Towers over Fumaroles at the Erebus Caldera, Antarctica. Some spires are over 2 meters high, consisting of ice derived from mostly recycled non-magmatic surface or subsurface waters. Fumarolic activity at Erebus is continuous and intensified during periods of volcanic eruptions (1841, 1900 (?), 1908, 1911, 1912, 1915, 1947, 1955, 1963, and 1972–1984). These dates as shown in the literature have been verified. Photo courtesy of Dr. E. Stump, Arizona State University.
Figure 1. Ice Towers over Fumaroles at the Erebus Caldera, Antarctica. Some spires are over 2 meters high, consisting of ice derived from mostly recycled non-magmatic surface or subsurface waters. Fumarolic activity at Erebus is continuous and intensified during periods of volcanic eruptions (1841, 1900 (?), 1908, 1911, 1912, 1915, 1947, 1955, 1963, and 1972–1984). These dates as shown in the literature have been verified. Photo courtesy of Dr. E. Stump, Arizona State University.
Ijms 12 06051f1
Figure 2. Lunar Transient Sites. Some 2254 changes on the surface of the moon have been reported over the last 500 years. The figure shows the location of some of the transients. Many appear to cluster at the margins of maria. The author believes transients may represent defluidization sites along fractures possibly intensified by tidal flexing. Most reports of transients are in Aristarchus 23.7N, 47.4W. Radon and argon have been reported in fractures associated with Aristarchus which has been interpreted as a “dawn” effect. Cyanogen has been spectroscopically verified at Aristarchus as a transient phenomenon.
Figure 2. Lunar Transient Sites. Some 2254 changes on the surface of the moon have been reported over the last 500 years. The figure shows the location of some of the transients. Many appear to cluster at the margins of maria. The author believes transients may represent defluidization sites along fractures possibly intensified by tidal flexing. Most reports of transients are in Aristarchus 23.7N, 47.4W. Radon and argon have been reported in fractures associated with Aristarchus which has been interpreted as a “dawn” effect. Cyanogen has been spectroscopically verified at Aristarchus as a transient phenomenon.
Ijms 12 06051f2
Figure 3. Bubble Rise Rates. Slower rise rate of bubbles under low gravity modified after Usiskin and Siegel [9]. Under lunar gravity, the rise rate of bubbles, all other factors held constant, will be about one half the rise rate of bubbles under Earth gravity. Bubble diameters would also be about 1.7 times larger holding pressure constant.
Figure 3. Bubble Rise Rates. Slower rise rate of bubbles under low gravity modified after Usiskin and Siegel [9]. Under lunar gravity, the rise rate of bubbles, all other factors held constant, will be about one half the rise rate of bubbles under Earth gravity. Bubble diameters would also be about 1.7 times larger holding pressure constant.
Ijms 12 06051f3
Figure 4. Lùdent and Hverfjall Craters. Area east of Lake Mývatn, north Iceland showing Hverfjall and Lùdent craters and portion of rift region. See text. Image of Lùdent crater courtesy of Landmaelingar Islands.
Figure 4. Lùdent and Hverfjall Craters. Area east of Lake Mývatn, north Iceland showing Hverfjall and Lùdent craters and portion of rift region. See text. Image of Lùdent crater courtesy of Landmaelingar Islands.
Ijms 12 06051f4
Figure 5. (A) 2 March 2010 Eruption of Masaya Caldera, 2N, 86.1W. 11 km diameter multiple vents on the caldera floor on a circular fissure. 4 kilometers in diameter, some of these specific vents may be mercury-rich and the source of much of the mercury cited by Witt et al. (B) Masaya Caldera, 2N, 86.1W. Multiple vents on the caldera floor sited on a circular fissure, some of which are mercury-rich and the source of much of the mercury cited by Witt et al. [14].
Figure 5. (A) 2 March 2010 Eruption of Masaya Caldera, 2N, 86.1W. 11 km diameter multiple vents on the caldera floor on a circular fissure. 4 kilometers in diameter, some of these specific vents may be mercury-rich and the source of much of the mercury cited by Witt et al. (B) Masaya Caldera, 2N, 86.1W. Multiple vents on the caldera floor sited on a circular fissure, some of which are mercury-rich and the source of much of the mercury cited by Witt et al. [14].
Ijms 12 06051f5
Figure 6. May 2, 2008. Lightning Associated with an Eruption of the El Chaitén Caldera, Chile, 42°50′S 72°39′0. Eruption cloud contains highly charged particles of pumice. (Rhyolitic ash cloud rose to 30,000 meters) Volcanic lightning could have been maximized in the Hadean Eon providing energy for the origin of primary and derivative fumarolic protolife species and other protolife products including cyanogen. Photo credit Carlos Gutierrez, UPI/Digital Railroad.
Figure 6. May 2, 2008. Lightning Associated with an Eruption of the El Chaitén Caldera, Chile, 42°50′S 72°39′0. Eruption cloud contains highly charged particles of pumice. (Rhyolitic ash cloud rose to 30,000 meters) Volcanic lightning could have been maximized in the Hadean Eon providing energy for the origin of primary and derivative fumarolic protolife species and other protolife products including cyanogen. Photo credit Carlos Gutierrez, UPI/Digital Railroad.
Ijms 12 06051f6
Figure 7. Comparison of a Clay-Armored Vesicle (A) with a Lipid Vesicle (B). (A) Fatty acid liposomes inside a clay-armored vesicle, 100 microns in diameter Photo courtesy of Dr. Amand Abala Subramaniam, Harvard School Engineering and Applied Sciences. (B) Red-tagged RNA molecule bound to montmorillonite encapsulated in a non-armored vesicle with a diameter of five microns. Photo courtesy of Dr. M. Hanczyc, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Mass. General Hospital, Boston, Mass. Tessera [20] traces the emergence of vesicles with bilayer membranes composed of a mixture of amphiphilic and hydrophobic molecules and their possible evolution. Bar scale is one micron.
Figure 7. Comparison of a Clay-Armored Vesicle (A) with a Lipid Vesicle (B). (A) Fatty acid liposomes inside a clay-armored vesicle, 100 microns in diameter Photo courtesy of Dr. Amand Abala Subramaniam, Harvard School Engineering and Applied Sciences. (B) Red-tagged RNA molecule bound to montmorillonite encapsulated in a non-armored vesicle with a diameter of five microns. Photo courtesy of Dr. M. Hanczyc, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Mass. General Hospital, Boston, Mass. Tessera [20] traces the emergence of vesicles with bilayer membranes composed of a mixture of amphiphilic and hydrophobic molecules and their possible evolution. Bar scale is one micron.
Ijms 12 06051f7
Back to TopTop