1. Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally [
1,
2,
3]. It is a highly heterogeneous disease with distinct subtypes that differ in their genetics, clinical characteristics, and responses to therapy [
1,
4]. Molecular classification of breast cancer is based on the expression of three primary protein markers: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [
1]. Luminal A (ER+/PR+/HER2− is the most frequent subtype of the approximately 50–70% of all cases of BC, characterized by slow growth, high sensitivity to hormone therapy, and the best overall prognosis [
4]. Luminal B (ER+/PR+/HER2+ or −) is characterized by lower levels of hormone receptors and higher expression of proliferation markers like Ki67, resulting in a more aggressive illness than Luminal A [
4]. HER2-enriched (ER−/PR−/HER2+) BC comprises 15–20% of cases. These tumors grow rapidly but are susceptible to HER2-targeted antibodies such as trastuzumab [
2,
4]. Finally, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) lacks all three receptors (ER−/PR−/HER2−) and accounts for 10–30% of human breast tumors [
1,
2]. TNBC is the most aggressive subtype, associated with high metastatic potential and poor short-term prognosis due to a lack of effective targeted therapies [
1,
2].
Tamoxifen (T) has been the drug of choice for endocrine therapy of patients with ER-positive breast cancer for more than a five decades [
3,
5,
6]. As a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen acts as a prodrug, undergoing hepatic metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes to form several active metabolites, such are 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and 4,4′-dihydroxytamoxifen (4,4′-diOHT) [
3,
7,
8]. The primary target of these metabolites is estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), a ligand-dependent nuclear transcription factor [
9,
10]. In the presence of estradiol, activated ERα binds to specific DNA regulatory sequences, estrogen response elements (ERE), promoting the expression of genes that code for growth and proliferation factors [
9]. Tamoxifen metabolites competitively inhibit this process by binding to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ERα, blocking the recruitment of co-activators, and thereby blocking estrogen-mediated proliferation [
2,
3,
11]. Beyond its primary role as a modulator of the classical ERα, tamoxifen interacts with several alternative receptors and cellular pathways [
12,
13]. Specifically, it acts as an agonist on the ERα36 variant to promote cancer stemness, and binds to G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER) to mechanically reprogram the tumor microenvironment by downregulating hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1A) [
13,
14]. Furthermore, it serves as an inverse agonist for cannabinoid receptors (CB1-R and CB2-R) and inhibits various enzymes, including protein kinase C (PKC) and matrix metalloproteinases [
12,
15,
16]. It induces oxidative stress, and interferes with calcium homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Tamoxifen also affects multidrug resistance transporters like P-glycoprotein and can potentiate innate immunity by activating the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2n (NRF2) and Caspase-1 pathways in macrophages. These ER-independent actions have prompted the investigation of tamoxifen in ER-negative conditions, including its potential to act against breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) [
12,
16].
Despite the clinical success of tamoxifen, approximately 40% of patients initially responding to therapy develop acquired resistance [
3], while up to 30% of ER-positive tumors display intrinsic resistance at diagnosis [
17]. This phenomenon is driven by downregulation or loss of ERα, activation of compensatory signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK, and expression of the ERα36 isoform, which promotes estrogen-independent growth. Consequently, tamoxifen resistance represents one of the major unresolved challenges in endocrine therapy [
9,
18]. These resistance mechanisms not only limit the long-term efficacy of hormone-based treatments but also emphasize the need for therapeutics that act through non-canonical, receptor-independent mechanisms—an area in which metal-based anticancer agents offer distinct and largely unexplored advantages [
1,
5,
9,
18,
19,
20,
21]. Metal complexes are still a cornerstone of modern cancer therapy owing that to their unique chemical features—including redox activity, diverse coordination geometries, and tunable ligand-exchange kinetics—that are rarely achievable with conventional organic drugs. Although metal-based agents are employed across a broad spectrum of solid tumors, their importance is particularly pronounced in the treatment of aggressive malignancies such as TNBC, which lacks actionable molecular targets [
1,
5,
22,
23].
Platinum-based complexes, principally cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, remain foundational cytotoxic agents in contemporary treatment protocols for solid malignancies. These Pt(II) coordination complexes are among the most extensively used chemotherapeutic drugs worldwide and are incorporated into guideline-driven regimens for a range of solid tumors, including ovarian, testicular, lung, head and neck cancers, and others, often as backbone components of combination therapy with radiotherapy, targeted agents, or immune checkpoint inhibitors [
11,
20]. Rather than serving as universal monotherapies in all settings, current practice emphasizes their use within multimodal strategies designed to enhance efficacy while mitigating intrinsic and acquired resistance and dose-limiting toxicities. Namely, their potent anticancer activity arises primarily, though not exclusively, from their ability to enter the cell nucleus and form intra- and interstrand cross-links with genomic DNA, thereby disrupting DNA replication and transcription and ultimately triggering programmed cell death [
24]. However, this mechanism of action, and lack of selectivity toward malignant phenotype, is tightly associated with severe systemic toxicities, most notably nephrotoxicity, as well as with the rapid emergence of acquired drug resistance [
1,
11,
20,
21,
25]. Consequently, one of the major contemporary strategies in anticancer drug design focuses on improving the pharmacological profile of platinum-based agents through replacement or modification of ligand and/or the metal center within the active core. Although replacement of the platinum center represents an important tactic for improving the pharmacological profile of metal-based anticancer agents, platinum itself remains a relevant reference scaffold in the design of novel coordination compounds. Palladium (Pd) is often considered an alternative to platinum, sharing similar coordination chemistry but possessing significantly faster ligand exchange rates, which often results in decreased potency compared to cisplatin counterparts. [
26,
27]. However, appropriate design of the ligands for Pd complexes can enhance the activity against chemotherapy-resistant tumors and lower off-target toxicity [
1,
20]. Copper (Cu), an endogenous essential trace metal, is integrated into multiple physiological processes, including redox regulation, mitochondrial function, and enzymatic antioxidant defense. In contrast to non-essential heavy metals such as platinum, copper homeostasis is tightly controlled by dedicated transporters and chaperones, leading to the hypothesis that copper-based anticancer complexes may display reduced toxicity toward normal cells while retaining antitumor efficacy [
20,
21,
28]. In addition, malignant cells often exhibit copper addiction, characterized by increased uptake and utilization of copper to support proliferation, angiogenesis, and oxidative stress adaptation, similar to the well-established iron dependence of cancer cells [
29]. This supports the rationale for exploiting copper homeostasis and copper-based complexes as selective therapeutic targets in cancer. Importantly, copper complexes are particularly effective at exploiting the hypoxic environment of tumors. In these conditions, Cu(II) is reduced to Cu(I), which catalyzes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to induce lethal oxidative stress and DNA damage [
20,
21,
28].
Following the concept of a combination therapy with the aim to surmount the limitations of the above-mentioned conventional treatment and improving therapeutic efficacy, hybrid metallodrugs, which combine the targeting vector of a known ERα inhibitor–tamoxifen, with the potent cytotoxic properties of bioactive transition metals, were developed [
5,
6,
30,
31]. Compared to the classical combination therapy, where two or more agents (therapies) are administrated separately, hybrid molecules offer the advantage of simultaneous and stoichiometrically define delivery of two pharmacophores releasing dual (multi-) therapeutic activity. This structural combination enables a coordinated and potentially synergistic biological activity of the therapeutics at the target site. Consequently, hybrid metallodrugs are expected to enhance therapeutic efficacy in breast cancer treatment through the complementary action of the ER inhibitor and the transition metal component, while potentially delaying resistance development. Previously, inspired by 4-OHT and 4,4′-diOHT structural motifs we have combined tamoxifen vector with 2,2′-bypiridine resulting in 4-[1,1-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)but-1-en-2-yl]-2,2-bipyridine (L) [
5,
6,
32]. This combination enabled incorporation of platinum-[PtCl
2(L-κ
2N,
N′)] (PtL), palladium-[PdCl
2(L-κ
2N,
N′)] (PdL), or copper dichloride-[CuCl(μ-Cl)(L-κ
2N,
N′)]
2 (CuL) in L structure (
Scheme 1) [
5,
6].
These tamoxifen-based metallodrugs integrate two pharmacologically active domains within a single chemical entity: (i) the tamoxifen scaffold, responsible for selective estrogen receptor modulation, and (ii) the metal center, which contributes additional biological activity through distinct mechanisms such as redox modulation or coordination-driven interactions. This dual-functional design is consistent with the definition of hybrid molecules as compounds combining two pharmacophores with complementary or synergistic biological functions. According to their chemical features and cellular physiology, created compounds inside of the cells probably undergo stepwise ligand exchange, redox transformations, and interactions with biological nucleophiles such as glutathione, proteins, and other donor molecules, generating a range of transient and potentially bioactive species. Therefore, their effects probably arise not only from the dual biological activity of hybrid structure, but also from its intracellularly transformed intermediates and, possibly, from partial ligand release over time. The activity of designed drugs was tested on various human cancer cell lines expressing ERα [
5,
6]. Building upon the initially perceived unexpectedly high sensitivity of ERα MDA-MB-231 to tested drugs, it was intriguing to examine how universal this phenomenon is for both, TNBC and cell lines derived from tumor types that are not inherently associated with hormonal activity. This approach is in line with drug repurposing concept as a highly valuable in the development of new therapeutic strategies. Concordantly, even that tamoxifen is not a drug of choice for TNBC, it exhibits properties that point to activities not directly related to ERα inhibition.
Given the discrepancy between in vitro cultures and the complexity of living systems, for the first time, the effectiveness of such hybrid molecules has been tested in an in vivo environment using a BALB/c syngeneic orthotopic mouse breast cancer model. The obtained data highlight the potential superiority of subtle chemical interventions over cytotoxic drug-designed paradigms, emphasizing the importance of targeting the tumor microenvironmental network as an integrated system and demonstrating the therapeutic advantage of modulatory, rather than purely cytotoxic activity.
3. Discussion
Reported “tamoxifen effects” in TNBC mainly arose from preclinical studies describing ER-independent or off-target mechanisms, e.g., mitochondrial stress, ROS induction, modulation of alternative receptors such as GPER1, and perturbation of sphingolipid metabolism and membrane-associated signaling nodes, with downstream consequences for cellular stress responses and survival pathways [
19,
35,
36]. However, these findings have not translated into consistent clinical benefit, and tamoxifen is not considered an effective therapy for ER-negative TNBC patients.
Paradoxically, tumor heterogeneity and tamoxifen’s off-target activities keep this molecule relevant as a conceptual reference for designing hybrid compounds or discussing polypharmacology in TNBC therapy [
37]. In this context, tamoxifen was mainly employed as a structural scaffold appropriate for delivering an additional cytotoxic moiety such as redox-active metal-based, or epigenetic component with well-defined antitumor potential against advanced forms of the disease rather than the drug per se. Tamoxifen has been combined with transition metals such as rhenium, ruthenium, titanium, osmium, and platinum. Scalcon et al. showed that two tamoxifen-derived pharmacophores, ‘hybrid’ metallo-drugs of Au(III) (AuTAML) and Cu(II) (CuTAML), synergized the anticancer activity of the metal center and the organic ligand against both ER-sensitive and triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Ferrocenyl tamoxifen derivatives showed strong antiproliferative activity in TNBC cell lines (commonly MDA-MB-231) and, loaded into lipid nanocapsules, tested in a TNBC xenograft model significantly lowered tumor volume compared to the untreated group [
5,
6,
38]. In addition, a well-known hybrid drug links a tamoxifen motif to an HDAC inhibitor, giving multi-target molecules that show enhanced activity against TNBC cells in vitro, again MDA-MB-231. Applying the well-known concept for anticancer drug design, a 2,2′-bipyridine-modified tamoxifen derivative was created by Schwarze, Kazimir, and colleagues and used for the design of hybrid molecules in which the tamoxifen served as a vector for molybdacarboranes [
32], and later Pt(II), Pd(II), and Cu(II) [
5,
6], resulting in coordination complexes with significant antitumor potential against both, ER+ and TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231. This approach represents a polypharmacological strategy, where the tamoxifen scaffold acts not only as a drug but also as a lipophilic “carrier” inside hybrids, serving as a biologically validated anchor to generate additional antitumor mechanisms [
39]. The final product should allow the simultaneous interplay between tamoxifen and metal center antitumor activity. The mechanisms of action of designed tamoxifen metal conjugates included combined cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, with inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of programmed cell death of types 1 (apoptosis) and 2 (autophagic cell death) [
5,
6]. The choice of metal was found to be essential for the redox response of the different breast cancer cells to the treatment, which varied from scavenging potential observed for tamoxifen carrier and complex with Pd, to oxidative burst observed for compounds based on Pt.
Recent reviews highlight that next-generation metallodrugs based on Ru, Au, Cu, and other transition metals show diverse anticancer activities and are considered promising alternatives to platinum drugs with broader mechanisms of action [
20], distinct redox-mediated mechanisms compared to platinum drugs, and increased selectivity toward tumor tissue, alongside potentially reduced systemic toxicity [
40]. Given the molecular heterogeneity, metabolic plasticity, and frequent DNA repair deficiencies characteristic of TNBC, metal-based therapeutics provide a mechanistically rational approach that extends beyond specific receptor dependency. However, the same features make them critically toxic for healthy tissues while tumor cells, far more adaptable than healthy cells due to their plasticity, become resistant to the cytotoxic effects of these drugs.
This study demonstrated that the hybrid molecules integrating 2,2′-bipyridine-modified tamoxifen derivative and metal subunit into one drug, exert antitumor activity in TNBC and with the same efficacy abrogate cell viability in cell lines belonging to other tumor types considered irrelevant for hormonal therapy. The previously observed sensitivity of human MDA-MB-231 cells to tamoxifen–metal derivatives has now gained a more general confirmation [
5,
6]. Moreover, a tendency toward a better response was noted in poorly differentiated cell lines, suggesting the possibility of targeting stemness and, consequently, more aggressive disease forms, i.e., potentially higher-grade tumors.
All tested tamoxifen–metal complexes exhibited cytotoxicity against tested cell lines in the low micromolar range, following the potency trend: CuL > PtL > PdL > L > T. The active tamoxifen metabolite used as an in vitro reference compound was at least 10 times less effective than newly designed hybrid drugs. Finally, subtle structural modification of tamoxifen with 2,2′-bipyridine (2,2′-bpy) chelating unit without metal incorporation resulted in remarkable enhancement of its ERα-independent cytotoxic action in comparison to the active tamoxifen metabolite, but was less efficient in comparison to hybrids in vitro, as expected.
Mechanistic analyses revealed distinct differences in the dynamics and magnitude of apoptosis induction among the tested compounds. The Pt-based tamoxifen hybrid induced a rapid and transient apoptotic response characterized by early caspase activation. However, caspase signaling subsequently declined, suggesting fast exhaustion of the apoptotic machinery. Surviving cells regained proliferative capacity, indicating the rapid emergence of drug-resistant clones. Intracellularly, this effect strongly correlated with an early and intense oxidative burst, characterized by predominant nitric oxide (NO) involvement within the first 24 h. This was followed by a subsequent decline in NO but also cumulative ROS/RNS production, suggesting a shift toward a scavenging profile compared to control, as reflected by the mean fluorescence intensity of DAF-FM and DHR-123 staining, respectively. Superoxide anion content showed a certain delay in comparison to NO, reaching the peak at the 48 h of the treatment, with a similar drop in an additional 12 h, manifested by DHE mean of fluorescence remarkably lower than in control cells. In contrast, Cu- and Pd-based hybrids, as well as the tamoxifen vector alone, triggered delayed but sustained caspase-dependent apoptotic response with a well-synchronized redox profile and dominance of NO and cumulative ROS/RNS production even after 60 h of incubation time. Light microscopy of 4T1 cultures clearly illustrated these divergent temporal patterns, with evident colony-forming units observed exclusively in cultures treated with the Pt-based hybrid. These findings are consistent with reports that substitution of platinum with other transition metals can significantly alter the mode of antitumor action and potentially mitigate resistance development. Finally, overall cytotoxicity was modulated by activation of autophagy, likely representing a cellular attempt to counteract drug-induced damage. Cytoprotective autophagy is a well-documented adaptive response that can attenuate the intracellular effects of anticancer agents and frequently contributes to therapeutic failure [
18,
20,
21,
32]. Although the compounds investigated in this study are assumed to share a broadly unified mechanism of action, the obtained data clearly demonstrate that the dynamics of intracellular events differ substantially depending on the metal coordinated to the ligand, and these differences are ultimately reflected in the treatment outcome in cell culture.
Translation of the in vitro findings into an in vivo context using a syngeneic orthotopic breast cancer model revealed a substantially altered therapeutic landscape once the tumor evolved within its native microenvironment with corresponding immune network involvement. In this setting, tumor progression is shaped not only by intrinsic cancer cell sensitivity but also by stromal interactions, vascularization, metabolic constraints, and both local and systemic immune surveillance [
1,
3,
19,
29,
41]. Under these biologically relevant conditions, neither the Pt-based tamoxifen hybrid nor tamoxifen alone produced significant tumor growth inhibition throughout the experimental period. In concordance with in vitro observed rapid but transient apoptotic response and tumor cell renewal, the lack of in vivo efficacy observed with the Pt-hybrid may be additionally ascribed to multiple microenvironment-driven resistance mechanisms.
In contrast, the Cu–tamoxifen hybrid induced sustained but statistically insignificant tumor growth suppression, indicating a more robust and durable antitumor mechanism in vivo. Given the known redox activity of copper complexes, it is plausible that persistent oxidative stress and prolonged apoptotic signaling limited tumor recovery and clonal adaptation within the microenvironment [
42]. Such dynamics in the induction of cell death and the pronounced cytotoxic potential observed in vitro can indicate the immunogenicity of the treatment within the tumor microenvironment. Appearance of lymphocytic germ follicles in peritumoral tissue, and immune cell infiltration visualized on tumor sections, strongly supported this hypothesis as a valuable sign of treatment-induced immune activation. Metal replacement by Pd decreased this capacity and underlined different modes of Pd action which are under investigation and refer to different types of cell death or senescence induction. The discrepancy between tumor growth reduction and the preservation of tissue architecture is a hallmark of non-immunogenic, regulated cell death [
43,
44]. Our in vitro data confirms that the Pd-complex triggers cytoprotective autophagy and caspase-dependent apoptosis. We may assume that autophagy delays the transition to cell death, ensuring that, when the cell finally undergoes apoptosis, the process is done without the release of pro-inflammatory DAMPs (Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns) [
44,
45]. This secures apoptosis as a gradual, morphologically “silent” process, unlike necrosis, which involves membrane rupture and the massive release of intracellular constituents [
43]. Also, palladium complexes have been reported to exert anti-angiogenic and anti-invasive effects, potentially leading to a slow starvation of the tumor [
46]. Low-level nutrient deprivation typically results in steady, individual cell loss through apoptosis rather than mass tissue death through necrosis [
47]. Furthermore, the high affinity of palladium, similarly to Cu, for thiol groups (such as glutathione and thioredoxin reductase) may induce ferroptotic or cuproptotic-like metabolic stress [
43,
45,
46,
48]. This biochemical failure can lead to cell death through internal systems failure without disrupting the macroscopic tissue architecture [
44,
47]. However, restricted immunological visibility might be responsible for limited tumor reducing potential of Pd-based hybrids. The most striking and conceptually important observation was obtained with the subtly structurally modified tamoxifen used as a ligand when it was applied alone. Although its early antitumor effect was modest, a pronounced reduction in tumor mass emerged during the final days of the experiment. Histological examination revealed extensive immune cell infiltration with dominance of lymphocytes, exclusively in tumors isolated from ligand-treated animals. This pattern strongly indicates that the ligand did not primarily act through direct cytotoxicity, but rather through modulation of the tumor microenvironment and restoration of efficient immune-mediated tumor control. It is well documented that in certain cancer models, the regression of tumor mass was not just the consequence of drug’s direct toxicity, but was mediated by infiltration of inflammatory immune cells in response to intratumoral changes provoked by the treatment. Without this immunogenicity, the long-term efficacy of the applied therapy was significantly reduced [
49,
50]. Because the immune cells must physically migrate and expand within the tumor stroma in response to immunogenic stimuli, the measurable decrease in tumor burden often lags behind the start of treatment [
51,
52]. Overall, such delayed tumor regression accompanied by immune infiltration is compatible with mechanisms involving immunogenic stress, alteration of cytokine signaling, or reprogramming of suppressive components within the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, therapy-induced senescence (TIS) like that observed upon the treatment with ligand in cell culture visualised by the presence of large nuclei and flattened cell morphology, in vivo may contribute to the pronounced lymphocytic infiltration observed in treated TNBC tumors by establishing a pro-inflammatory, immune-recruiting secretory program (SASP). In an orthotopic 4T1 TNBC model, induction of tumor senescence together with SASP reprogramming increased intratumoral CD8
+ T cells and NK cells, enhanced cytotoxic activity (e.g., degranulation/granzyme B), and shifted the local cytokine milieu toward a more immunostimulatory state, consistent with strengthened local immune surveillance [
53]. Collectively, these findings suggest that while metal-based hybrids predominantly exert direct cytotoxic pressure which leads to immunogenic death in Cu-based drugs, the tamoxifen ligand alone may function as an immunomodulatory trigger capable of reactivating endogenous antitumor immunity.
This distinction highlights an important therapeutic concept: durable tumor control in vivo may depend less on the magnitude of acute cytotoxicity and more on the ability to reshape the tumor–immune equilibrium. In addition to histopathological analyses, which indicated moderate structural deficiencies in liver and kidneys in animals exposed to the Cu-, Pd-, and tamoxifen ligand alone, continuous clinical observation of the animals indicated clear signs of systemic toxicity associated only with the Cu–tamoxifen hybrid. This adverse effect was manifested by visible signs of physiological distress, suggesting that despite its antitumor efficacy, the therapeutic window of the Cu-based complex may be limited.
Design of hybrid tamoxifen–metal conjugates was believed to be a promising strategy for the treatment of TNBC, a malignancy characterized by the absence of actionable molecular targets and frequent therapeutic resistance. The modular incorporation of bioactive metal centers enables diversification of mechanisms of action resulting in improved drug features such as prolonged efficacy and lack or delay in resistance establishment in vitro. Since the promising in vitro activity was not properly maintained in the complex setting of the tumor microenvironment and the intact organism, the translational relevance of these findings remains uncertain, but highly informative in terms of further interventions that can amplify their in vivo performance like additional chemical interventions and/or targeted delivery using nanotechnology.
However, practically and fundamentally valuable outcome of the study is the discovery that delicate structural modification of tamoxifen by 2,2′-bipyridine (2,2′-bpy) chelating unit addition can substantially enhance its therapeutic performance without the necessary incorporation of a metal subunit. Notably, this improvement appears to arise not only from direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells but also from indirect modulation of the tumor microenvironment, potentially leading to improved antitumor efficacy with reduced systemic toxicity. Having in mind that on the list of tamoxifen off-targets, cannabidiol receptors take an important place, together with the fact that the same receptors are expressed in multiple cell compartments within the tumor microenvironment, including TNBC cells as well as immune cells [
15], one of the directions that should be addressed in the future is whether modified tamoxifen, as well as its hybrid metal-based variants, cooperate with the aforementioned receptors and how these interactions can influence the tumor microenvironment with an accent on cancer-immune-stromal cells crosstalk.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Reagents and Cell Culture
The following reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA): dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), crystal violet (CV), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), propidium iodide (PI), carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), and acridine orange (AO). Paraformaldehyde (PFA) was obtained from SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany), while 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was sourced from AppliChem (Darmstadt, Germany). Cell culture medium (HEPES-buffered RPMI-1640) and fetal calf serum (FCS) were provided by Capricorn Scientific GmbH (Ebsdorfergrund, Germany). Penicillin-streptomycin solution was acquired from Biological Industries (Cromwell, CT, USA). Annexin V-FITC (AnnV) was purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA), and the ApoStat probe was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR 123) and dihydroethidium (DHE) were sourced from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The manufacturer of diaminofluorescein (DAF)-FM diacetate is Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY, USA). Additional supplies were procured from Bio-Optica Milano S.p.A, Milano, Italy.
The murine cell lines used in this study—4T1 (triple-negative breast cancer), B16, and B16F10 (melanoma)—were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in HEPES-buffered RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.01% sodium pyruvate, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified environment with 5% CO2.
4.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Complexes
The synthetic procedures, compound stability, and detailed structural characterization of the reported complexes (NMR, X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV–Vis, and IR spectroscopy) have been described comprehensively in our previous publications [
5,
6].
4.3. Preparation of Compounds and Experimental Design
Stock solutions of tamoxifen derivatives were prepared in DMSO at a concentration of 20 mM, 4,4′-dihydroxytamoxifen at a concentration of 20 mM, and stored at −20 °C. Working concentrations were freshly prepared in culture media prior to each experiment. For viability assays, 4T1 (3 × 103 cells/well), B16 (4 × 103 cells/well), and B16F10 (3 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates. For flow cytometry and light microscopy, 4T1 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates.
4.4. Viability Assays
Cell viability was evaluated 72 h post-exposure to varying doses of T, L, PtL, PdL, CuL using MTT and CV assays.
MTT Assay: Following treatment, the supernatant was removed, and cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/mL MTT solution for approximately 30 min at 37 °C. The resulting formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO.
CV Assay: Cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min at room temperature, then stained with 0.02% CV solution for 15 min. After washing with tap water and air-drying, the dye was solubilized in 33% acetic acid.
For both assays, absorbance was measured at 540 nm and 670 nm using an automated microplate reader. Results are expressed as a percentage relative to untreated controls (which represent 100% viability). IC50 values were determined using a four-parameter logistic function and represent the mean of three independent experiments.
4.5. Microscopy
Light microscopy: In order to detect and identify morphological and intracellular changes at the microscopic level, 4T1 cells were seeded and treated in the absence or presence of the IC50 values of the tested compounds. After 24, 48 and 72 h, cells were observed without prior staining.
Fluorescence microscopy: 4T1 cells were exposed to the IC50 concentrations of tested compounds for a duration of 72 h. Following the incubation period, the cells were fixed using a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature and subsequently stained by propidium iodide (PI 50 μg/mL, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, and RNase 85 μg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) for a duration of 2 min.
The prepared cells were digitally photographed on a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Software used for image editing was ImageJ 1.54g.
4.6. Flow Cytometric Analyses
All flow cytometric data were acquired using a CytoFLEX® Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) while the analysis of the obtained results was performed using the FlowJo™ software program (Version 10).
Proliferation (CFSE): 4T1 cells were labeled with 1 µM CFSE for 10 min at 37 °C. After washing, cells were seeded, treated with IC50 doses of experimental substances for 72 h, and subsequently harvested in PBS for further analysis.
Apoptosis (Ann V/PI, ApoStat) and Autophagy (AO): Following treatment with IC50 doses T, L, PtL, PdL, and CuL for 24, 48, and 60 h, cells were harvested and washed. Apoptosis was assessed via Ann V/PI dual staining (PI at 15 µg/mL) for 15 min at room temperature. Caspase activity was detected using the ApoStat pan-caspase inhibitor (30-min incubation at 37 °C). Autophagic vacuoles were identified by staining with 10 µM acridine orange for 15 min at 37 °C.
ROS/RNS production (DHR-123): Reactive species generation was measured using 1 µM DHR 123. Cells were pre-stained with DHR 123 for 20 min at 37 °C before treatment with IC50 dose of the tested agents for 24, 48, and 60 h. Post-treatment, cells were washed, trypsinized, and analyzed.
NO production (DAF-FM diacetate): Cells were pre-incubated with a 5 µM working solution of DAF-FM diacetate in phenol red-free RPMI 1640 medium (“white medium”) supplemented with 10% FCS for 1 h at 37 °C. Following staining, cells were washed twice with PBS and further incubated in FCS-free white medium for 15 min at 37 °C to facilitate complete de-esterification of intracellular diacetates. After washing and detachment via trypsinization, cells were harvested in white medium with 10% FCS and centrifuged at 750 g for 3 min. The resulting pellets were washed, resuspended in 1 mL of PBS, and maintained on ice until flow cytometric analysis.
Superoxide Anion detection (DHE): Following treatment, the culture medium was discarded, and cells were washed with PBS before being detached by trypsinization. The reaction was neutralized with cell culture medium containing 10% FCS, and cells were harvested into FACS tubes and centrifuged at 750× g for 3 min. Pellets were then resuspended in 0.1 mL of a 10 µM working DHE solution and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30–45 min. After staining, cells were washed twice with PBS via centrifugation (750× g for 3 min), resuspended in 1 mL of PBS, and kept on ice for immediate analysis.
4.7. In Vivo Study
Animals used in this study were female inbred BALB/c mice, 8 weeks old, from the Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, National Institute of Republic of Serbia (IBISS). Animals were kept in standard pathogen-free laboratory conditions, with ad libitum regime of food and water intake. The study protocol as well as the handling of animals were in concordance with the national regulations established by the Law on Animal Welfare of the Republic of Serbia (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 41/2009) and European Ethical Normative (Directive 2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. The national licensing committee at the Department of Animal Welfare, Veterinary Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of Republic of Serbia granted approval for the experimental protocols (permission No. 323-07-05657/2022-05).
Female BALB/c mice were orthotopically inoculated with 4T1 cells (2 × 10
4 cells/50 µL PBS) in the fat pad region of the fourth mammary gland. The treatment of animals started on the fifth day following cell implantation, when tumors became palpable. The animals were randomly divided into six groups, with the number of mice per group being 8–10. The administration regime consisted of five consecutively i.p. applications of the appropriate agent, after which two-day treatment-free period was applied. Used doses of each substance were: Tamoxifen 10 mg/kg, PtL 18.4 mg/kg, PdL 16 mg/kg, CuL 5 mg/kg, and L 11.4 mg/kg, all administered in 2% DMSO/PBS. The doses of experimental drugs were established on an equimolar basis relative to tamoxifen, whose 10 mg/kg dose is well documented as a therapeutic concentration in murine breast cancer studies [
54,
55], except for the Cu-based compound, whose dose was determined based on the results of a preliminary pilot experiment and corresponded to other compounds according to its dimeric structure. Mice in the control group were receiving 2% DMSO/PBS as vehicle. Tumor growth was monitored every third day, and mice were sacrificed on the 24th day after cell implementation. Tumor tissues, livers and kidneys were collected from all groups for further histological analysis. Upon extraction, tumors’ three dimensions were measured and the tumor volume (mm
3) was calculated according to formula: length × width
2 × 0.52. During the whole experiment, changes in the animals’ body weight, the overall state as well as behavioral changes were observed.
Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tissue Preparation and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) Staining Protocol
Following sacrifice, the tumors, livers, and kidneys of the experimental animals were subjected to gross examination and subsequently fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) at a fixative-to-tissue ratio of 10:1 for 24 h. Tissues were then sectioned along their largest axis and returned to fixative for an additional 24-h period to ensure optimal preservation. Tissue processing was performed using an automated tissue processor (LOGOS ONE, Milestone SRL, Bergamo, Italy), and paraffin embedding was carried out with an embedding station (Tissue-Tek TEC 5, SAKURA, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 4 μm thickness using a microtome (RM2245, LEICA, Nussloch, Germany), and the sections were mounted onto glass slides. Slides were incubated at 60 °C for 15 min, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated through a graded ethanol series.
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on an automated stainer (SS-30H, MYREVA, Tarragona, Spain). Slides were stained with hematoxylin for 5 min, rinsed in water, differentiated in acid alcohol, and blued using either tap water or a blueing reagent. Counterstaining with eosin was performed for 2 min, followed by dehydration in ethanol, clearing in xylene, and coverslipping.
Histopathological evaluation was conducted using an Olympus BX43 light microscope (OLYMPUS EUROPA HOLDING GMBH, Hamburg, Germany).
4.8. Statistical Analysis
Experimental data are presented as the mean +/− standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent biological replicates. Differences between treatments in the in vitro studies were analyzed using Student’s t-test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis in the in vivo study. Data analysis software Statistica (version 12), was used for the statistical calculation.