Molecular Structure, Theoretical NBO Analysis, Vibrational Spectrum of CO2-Responsive Hydroxyamidine-Based Ionic Liquid: A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Molecular Geometry of Hydroxyamidines
2.2. Correlation of IR Spectra with the Structure of Amidines
2.2.1. O-H Bonds
2.2.2. C-H Bonds
2.2.3. C=N Bonds
2.2.4. C-O Bonds
2.2.5. Other Vibrations
2.3. Geometric Architecture of the Associates of Hydroxyamidine with CO2
2.3.1. NBO/NPA
2.3.2. Frontier Molecular Orbitals
2.3.3. Vibrational Analysis of Amidine Systems with CO2
2.3.4. Comparison of Chemical Shifts in the Spectra of the Tris-Hydroxyamidine Associate
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Synthesis Method for Di-Hydroxyamidine
3.2. Computational Details
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rathi, A.K.A.; Rathi, J.A. CO2 capture: A concise, comprehensive overview of recent research trends. Acad. Environ. Sci. Sustain. 2025, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Alessandro, D.M.; Smit, B.; Long, J.R. Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058–6082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubin, E.S.; Mantripragada, H.; Marks, A.; Versteeg, P.; Kitchin, J. The outlook for improved carbon capture technology. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 630–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.-H.; Huang, C.-H.; Tan, C.-S. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2012, 12, 745–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markewitz, P.; Kuckshinrichs, W.; Leitner, W.; Linssen, J.; Zapp, P.; Bongartz, R.; Schreiber, A.; Muller, T.E. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7281–7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenarsari, S.D.; Yang, D.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Russell, A.G.; Wei, Q.; Fan, M. Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 22739–22773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakerian, F.; Kim, K.-H.; Szulejko, J.E.; Park, J.-W. A comparative review between amines and ammonia as sorptive media for post-combustion CO2 capture. Appl. Energy 2015, 148, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makul, N. Towards Computational CO2 Capture and Storage Models: A Review. Glob. Environ. Eng. 2021, 8, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.-B.; He, N.; Song, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, X. Theoretical Investigation on the Different Reaction Mechanisms of Aqueous 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and Monoethanolamine with CO2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 3363–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iida, K.; Sato, H. Proton Transfer Step in the Carbon Dioxide Capture by Monoethanol Amine: A Theoretical Study at the Molecular Level. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 2244–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amirkhosrow, M.; Pérez-Calvo, J.-F.; Gazzani, M.; Mazzotti, M.; Lay, E.N. Rigorous rate-based model for CO2 capture via monoethanolamine-based solutions: Effect of kinetic models, masstransfer, and holdup correlations on prediction accuracy. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 1491–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutcher, B.; Fan, M.; Russell, A.G. Amine-based CO2 capture technology development from the beginning of 2013: A review. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2137–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, M.W.; Svendsen, H.F.; Fosbøl, P.L.; von Solms, N.; Thomsen, K. Equilibrium total pressure and CO2 solubility in binary and ternary aqueous solutions of 2-(diethylamino) ethanol (DEEA) and 3-(methylamino) propylamine (MAPA). J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 764–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, P. Experimental and theoretical evidence suggests carbamate intermediates play a key role in CO2 sequestration catalysed by sterically hindered amines. Struct. Chem. 2014, 25, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuzaki, Y.; Yamada, H.; Chowdhury, F.A.; Higashii, T.; Onoda, M. Ab initio study of CO2 capture mechanisms in aqueous monoethanolamine: Reaction pathways for the direct interconversion of carbamate and bicarbonate. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 9274–9281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bougie, F.; Iliuta, M.C. Sterically hindered amine-based absorbents for the removal of CO2 from gas streams. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2012, 57, 635–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Fang, M.; Lv, Z.; Wang, Z.; Luo, Z. Selection of blended solvents for CO2 absorption from coal-fired flue gas. Part 1: Monoethanolamine (MEA)-based solvents. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mindrup, E.M.; Schneider, W.F. Computational comparison of the reactions of substituted amines with CO2. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamada, H.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Higashii, T.; Kazama, S. Density Functional Theory Study on Carbon Dioxide Absorption into Aqueous Solutions of 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol Using a Continuum Solvation Model. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 3079–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.; Stowe, H.M.; Lee, K.H.; Hur, N.H.; Hwang, S.-J.; Paek, E.; Hwang, G.S. Understanding CO2 capture mechanisms in aqueous hydrazine via combined NMR and first-principles studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 24067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCann, N.; Phan, D.; Wang, X.; Conway, W.; Burns, R.; Attalla, M.; Puxty, G.; Maeder, M. Kinetics and mechanism of carbamate formation from CO2 (aq), carbonate species, and monoethanolamine in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 5022–5029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, C.; Pietrucci, F.; Andreoni, W. CO2 Capture and Release in Amine Solutions: To What Extent Can Molecular Simulations Help Understand the Trends? Molecules 2023, 28, 6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Furusho, Y.; Endo, T. Capture and release of CO2 by polyamidine. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 3404–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barkakaty, B.; Browning, K.; Sumpter, B.; Uhrig, D.M.; Karpisova, I.; Harman, K.; Ivanov, I.; Hensley, D.; Messman, J.M.; Kilbey, S.M.; et al. Amidinefunctionalized Poly(2-vinyl-4,4-dimethylazlactone) for selective and efficient CO2. Fixing Macromol. 2016, 49, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Yin, H.; Feng, Y. A CO2-switchable amidine monomer: Synthesis and characterization. Des. Monomers Polym. 2017, 20, 363–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barashkov, N.; Irgibayeva, I.; Zhapakova, A.; Eralinov, A.; Sakhno, T. FTIR and fluorescent control of interaction between hydroxy-containing amidines and carbon dioxide. In Proceedings of the ACS Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 20–24 March 2022; Available online: https://acs.digitellinc.com/acs/sessions/463141/view (accessed on 1 February 2026).
- Irgibaeva, I.; Barashkov, N.; Aldongarov, A.; Zhapakova, A.; Eralinov, A.; Sakhno, T.; Seralin, A.; Sakhno, Y. FTIR and NMR spectra of polymeric ionic liquids—Products of reaction between hydroxycontaining amidines and carbon dioxide. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 77, 102594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calva, V.; Játiva, N.; Ricaurte, M. CO2 Capture Using Amine-Based Solvents: Identification of Additives to Improve the Kinetics and Thermodynamics of CO2 Sorption at High-Pressure Conditions. Gases 2025, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Hu, H.-Y.; Wu, A.-G.; Terent’ev, A.O.; He, L.-N.; Li, H.-R. CO2 capture and in-situ conversion to organic molecules. J. CO2 Util. 2024, 82, 102753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.D.; Chen, X.; Sharma, R. Steering amine–CO2 chemistry: A molecular insight into the amino site relationship of carbamate and protonated amine. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 46648–46658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delibas, B.; Cotton, D.; Sudhakaran, K.P.; Dawlaty, J.M. Evaluation of Aliphatic Alcohols for CO2 Capture Using the Characteristic Carbonate Frequency. ChemSusChem 2025, 18, e202402288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plass, M.; Kolbe, A. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond Interaction in Selected Diols. Z. Phys. Chem. 2003, 217, 1085–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göller, A.; Grummt, U.-W. Torsional barriers in biphenyl, 2,2′-bipyridine and 2-phenylpyridine. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 321, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, A.P.; Radom, L. Harmonic vibrational frequencies: An evaluation of Hartree−Fock, Møller−Plesset, quadratic con-figuration interaction, density functional theory, and Semiempirical scale factors. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502–16513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irgibaeva, I.; Barashkov, N.; Tarikhov, F.; Aldongarov, A.; Salkeeva, L.; Dzhardimalieva, G.; Tashenov, Y. Methanol-Assisted CO2 Fixation by Hydroxyl-Containing Amidine Leading to Polymeric Ionic Liquid and Cross-Linked Network Formation. Polymers 2025, 17, 3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pretsch, E.; Buhlmann, P.; Affolter, C. Structure Determination of Organic Compounds, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000; p. 309. [Google Scholar]
- Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision A.03; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. Available online: https://gaussian.com/ (accessed on 10 January 2026).
- Grimme, S.; Hansen, A.; Brandenburg, J.G.; Bannwarth, C. Dispersion-Corrected Mean-Field Electronic Structure Methods. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5105–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reed, A.E.; Curtiss, L.A.; Weinhold, F. Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor view-point. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foster, J.P.; Weinhold, F. Natural hybrid orbitals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7211–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennington, R.D., II; Keith, T.A.; Millam, J.M. GaussView, Version 6.0; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. Available online: https://gaussian.com/gaussview6/ (accessed on 28 December 2025).
- Chemcraft—Graphical Software for Visualization of Quantum Chemistry Computations, Version 1.8, build 682. Available online: https://www.chemcraftprog.com/ (accessed on 15 January 2026).
- Lu, T. A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists, Multiwfn. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 161, 082503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Molecule | −Et, a.u. | E0, a.u. | −(Et + Eo), a.u. |
|---|---|---|---|
| MHA | 382.472334 | 0.175994 | 382.296340 |
| DHA | 497.034146 | 0.209152 | 496.824994 |
| THA1 | 611.535204 | 0.243583 | 611.291621 |
| THA2 | 611.530028 | 0.243116 | 611.286912 |
| Vibration Type | Monohydroxyamidine | Dihydroxyamidine | Tris-Hydroxyamidine | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calc. (ν), cm–1 | Exp. [27] (ν), cm–1 | I (calc.) | Calc. (ν), cm–1 | Exp. [This Work] (ν), cm–1 | I (calc.) | Calc. (ν), cm–1 | Exp. [27] (ν), cm–1 | I (calc.) | |
| ν(O-H) * | 3619 | 3294 | 13 | 3643 3619 | 3319 | 18 11 | 3650 3555 3544 (3471) ** | 3309 | 31 77 109 144 |
| νas,s(CH3, CH2, CH) (out of phase, in phase) | 2970 2941 2927 2913 2868 2862 2856 2853 2843 2809 | 2912 2827 | 22 45 35 42 46 76 89 49 74 75 | 2972 2951 2933 2918 2898 2888 2881 2858 2845 2786 | 2930 | 24 31 38 44 45 60 53 85 71 57 | 2975 2955 2938 2934 2921 2909 2881 2863 2858 (2856) 2848 | 2936 2828 | 16 30 34 8 36 52 42 53 128 113 69 |
| ν(C=N) | 1655 | 1645 | 515 | 1655 | 1629 | 562 | 1623 (1630) | 1629 (53) *** | 573 569 |
| δ(CH3), δ(CH2) | 1471–1407 | 1438 1406 | 8 14 | 1470–1408 | 1438 | 8 16 | 1472–1406 | - | 7 24 |
| ν(C-N), ρ(CH), δ(OH), δ(CH3), w(CH2), τ(CH2), δ(COH) | 1374 1337 1325 1266 1226 | 1380 1345 (76) 1264 (78) 1114 (69) | 30 62 78 28 38 | 1374 1344 1338 1292 1232 1184 1118 1094 | 1381 1259 | 17 22 83 27 34 43 23 34 | 1380 1361 1347 (1350) 1338 1299 1231 1166 1101 | 1384 (76) 1096 (66) | 106 64 117 107 19 6 24 19 77 |
| ν(C(CH3)-N), δ(CCC), ρ(CH), skeleton swing | 1075 | 1063 (66) | 76 | 1063 1041 1037 | 1096 | 73 9 10 | 1065 1049 (1059) 1036 | - | 31 69 127 6 |
| νas,s(C-O), skeleton swing | 1025 | 1030 (41) | 162 | 1031 1019 1004 | 1028 | 101 83 59 | 1028 1013 993 (992) | 1025 (38) | 145 118 92 103 |
| νs(C-N), δ(HCH), ρ(CH2), τ(CH), δ(OH), skeleton swing | 984 937 849 | 924 (83) 871 (78) | 18 8 | 930 889 858 820 | 936 | 2 22 3 4 | 983 932 859 841 | 937 (71) 869 (78) | 6 13 5 14 |
| ρ(OH), νs(C-C), ρ(OH), δ(NCN), skeleton swing | 770 | - | 2 | 619 518 | 794 630 573 | 4 22 | 734 660 642 (680) | 800 (74) | 4 77 152 143 |
| Parameter | r(N…O), Å | r(N…H), Å | r(O…H), Å | φ(N… H…O), ° |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA:CO2 | MHAH+–MHACOO− | |||
| 2:1 | 2.663 a | 1.061 | 1.614 | 168.94 |
| 3:2 | 2.702 | 1.055 | 1.648 | 175.88 |
| (2.619) b | (1.079) | (1.556) | (167.02) | |
| 4:3 | 2.674 | 1.057 | 1.630 | 168.46 |
| (2.619 | (1.073 | (1.562 | (166.98 | |
| 2.598) | 1.079) | 1.539) | 165.50) | |
| DHAH+–DHACOO− | ||||
| 2:1 | 2.662 | 1.069 | 1.594 | 176.85 |
| 3:2 | 2.669 | 1.066 | 1.604 | 176.43 |
| (2.659) | (1.070) | (1.590) | (175.82) | |
| 4:3 | 2.646 | 1.068 | 1.580 | 176.59 |
| (2.646 | (1.068 | (1.579 | (175.26 | |
| 2.636) | 1.071) | 1.581) | 167.01) | |
| THA1H+–THA1COO− | ||||
| 2:1 | 2.654 | 1.065 | 1.592 | 174.33 |
| Natural Atomic Charge | µ, D | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | H | O | HAH+ | HACOO− | ||
| HA:CO2 | MHAH+–MHACOO− | |||||
| - | −0.582 | 0.447 | −0.774 | +1 | −1 | 2.463 a (16.866) |
| 2:1 | −0.581 | 0.466 | −0.773 | 0.804 | −0.804 | 8.918 |
| 3:2 | −0.570 (−0.570) b | 0.470 (0.475) | −0.786 (−0.788) | 0.838 | −0.838 | 15.163 |
| 4:3 | −0.580 (−0.569, −0.568) | 0.466 (0.474, 0.474) | −0.766 (−0.774, −0.792) | 0.841 | −0.841 | 23.429 |
| DHAH+–DHACOO− | ||||||
| - | −0.584 | 0.455 | −0.807 | +1 | −1 | 5.878 (21.229) |
| 2:1 | −0.578 | 0.473 | −0.809 | 0.836 | −0.836 | 8.497 |
| 3:2 | −0.578 (−0.571) | 0.473 (0.473) | −0.808 (−0.807) | 0.837 | −0.837 | 11.963 |
| 4:3 | −0.580 (−0.574, −0.574) | 0.471 (0.471, 0.472) | −0.802 (−0.800, −0.786) | 0.839 | −0.839 | 12.639 |
| THA1H+–THA1COO− | ||||||
| - | −0.592 | 0.456 | −0.785 | +1 | −1 | 7.981 (17.558) |
| 2:1 | −0.588 | 0.470 | −0.799 | 0.845 | −0.845 | 6.418 |
| HA:CO2 | Delocalization | Energy, kJ/mol | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHAH+– MHACOO− | DHAH+– DHACOO− | THA1H+– THA1COO− | ||
| 2:1 | LP(2)O21 → σ*(H23…N30) | 37.52 | - | - |
| LP(2)O22 → σ*(O28-H29) | 15.44 | - | - | |
| LP(2)O25 → σ*(H27…N39) | - | 42.19 | - | |
| LP(2)O24 → σ*(H26…N38) | - | - | 42.45 | |
| 3:2 | LP(2)O21 → σ*(H23-N30) | 33.08 | - | - |
| LP(2)O22 → σ*(O28-H29) | 19.57 | - | - | |
| LP(2)O64 → σ*(N6…H66) | 49.87 | - | - | |
| LP(2)O25 → σ*(H27…N39) | - | 40.04 | - | |
| LP(2)O76 → σ*(N11…H78) | - | 44.23 | - | |
| 4:3 | LP(2)O21 → σ*(H23-N30) | 35.74 | - | - |
| LP(2)O22 → σ*(O28-H29) | 14.24 | - | - | |
| LP(2)O64 → σ*(N6…H66) | 47.96 | - | - | |
| LP(2)O87 → σ*(N49…H89) | 49.80 | - | - | |
| LP(2)O25 → σ*(H27…N39) | - | 41.08 | - | |
| LP(2)O76 → σ*(N11…H78) | - | 45.10 | - | |
| LP(2)O103 → σ*(N62…H105) | - | 42.08 | - | |
| Type of Vibrations | MHA-CO2 | DHA-CO2 | THA1-CO2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calc. (ν), cm–1 | Exp. [27] (ν), cm–1 | I (calc.), km/mol | Calc. (ν), cm–1 | Exp. [Present Work] (ν), cm–1 | I (calc.), km/mol | Calc. (ν), cm–1 | Exp. [27] (ν), cm–1 | I (calc.), km/mol | |
| ν(O-H) * | 3223 (3205 **, 3244) | 3241 | 1114 1345 1072 | - | 3240 | - | 3500 | 3242 | 323 |
| νas,s(CH3, CH2) (out of phase, in phase) | 2862 (2861, 2929) | 2859 | 121 129 100 | 2862 (2861, 2905) | 2928 | 149 151 72 | 2866 | 2927 | 144 |
| ν(N…H) | 2603 (2352, 2350) | - | 1941 2903 2944 | 2471 (2454, 2477) | - | 2726 2694 2497 | 2520 | - | 2487 |
| νas(CO2−) | 1595 (1608, 1621) | 1704 | 565 1014 721 | 1619 (1621, 1626) | 1698 | 1087 1028 1180 | 1677 | 1698 | 741 |
| ν(C=N), ν(C-N) | 1681 (1674, 1685) | 1647 | 930 916 1155 | 1629 (1629, 1676) | 1628 | 981 1021 1034 | 1637 1609 | 1627 | 899 789 |
| Mid frequencies | |||||||||
| δ(COH), τ(CH2), δ(HCH) | 1416 (1415, 1415) | 1497 1439 | 97 90 104 | 1541 (1542, 1529) | 1544 1500 1444 | 36 38 90 | 1544 1437 | 1505 1440 | 27 27 |
| ρ(CH), w(CH2) | 1355 (1354, 1354) | 1370 | 159 159 165 | 1351 (1350, 1369) | 1364 | 155 172 271 | 1342 | 1371 | 184 |
| ν(C(O2)-O), w(CH2), skeleton swing | 1292 1254 (1288 1244, 1292 1243) | 1290 1259 | 453 284 545 919 647 1182 | 1264 1234 (1241 1232, 1247 1236) | 1298 1258 | 248 921 994 784 1443 652 | 1240 | 1258 | 1022 |
| ν(C(H2)-O), δ(COH), ρ(CH2), skeleton swing | 1024 (1040, 1043) | 1137 1071 | 276 574 595 | 1023 (1029, 1047) | 1060 1032 | 330 540 290 | 1025 1007 | 1096 1026 | 429 514 |
| δ(OCO), ρ(CH2), δ(HCH), δ(NCN), skeleton swing | 870 (866, 867) | 865 822 | 169 212 247 | 902 (902, 901) | 935 793 | 163 191 173 | 890 | 935 799 | 322 |
| System | Chemical Shift δ, ppm | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1H(CH3) | 1H(CH2) | 1H(OH) | 1H(C=N) | 1H(N) | ||||||
| Exp. [27] | Calc. | Exp. [27] | Calc. | Exp. [27] | Exp. | Exp. [27] | Calc. | Exp. [27] | Calc. | |
| THA1 | 3.60 | 2.01 | 3.07 | 3.45 | 1.26 | 0.31 | 6.96 | 8.81 | - | - |
| 3.62 | 2.06 | 4.19 | 3.58 | 2.66 | ||||||
| 3.67 | 2.72 | 4.20 | 3.67 | 3.14 | ||||||
| 3.70 | 2.73 | 4.02 | ||||||||
| 3.73 | 3.07 | 4.04 | ||||||||
| 4.23 | 4.82 | |||||||||
| PIL | 3.28 | - | 3.48 | - | 4.06 | - | 6.86 | - | 5.20 | - |
| THA1H+- THA1COO− | 1.92 | 3.01 | 2.64 | 8.45 | 15.11 | |||||
| 2.12 | 3.26 | 3.03 | 8.75 | |||||||
| 2.34 | 3.43 | 3.77 | ||||||||
| 2.49 | 3.49 | 5.90 | ||||||||
| 2.70 | 3.52 | 6.47 | ||||||||
| 2.81 | 3.71 | |||||||||
| 3.00 | 3.80 | |||||||||
| 3.01 | 4.29 | |||||||||
| 3.017 | 4.53 | |||||||||
| 3.02 | 4.71 | |||||||||
| 4.31 | 5.05 | |||||||||
| 5.51 | 5.13 | |||||||||
| THA1H+- THA1COO− with implicit methanol solvation | 2.18 | 3.12 | 2.67 | 8.28 | 11.37 | |||||
| 2.33 | 3.38 | 2.77 | 8.70 | |||||||
| 2.63 | 3.51 | 3.77 | ||||||||
| 2.79 | 3.71 | 6.09 | ||||||||
| 2.82 | 3.729 | 6.92 | ||||||||
| 2.96 | 3.731 | |||||||||
| 3.04 | 3.82 | |||||||||
| 3.18 | 4.15 | |||||||||
| 3.22 | 4.50 | |||||||||
| 3.27 | 4.64 | |||||||||
| 3.75 | 4.66 | |||||||||
| 4.53 | 4.94 | |||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Abulyaissova, L.; Barashkov, N.; Irgibaeva, I.; Tashenov, Y. Molecular Structure, Theoretical NBO Analysis, Vibrational Spectrum of CO2-Responsive Hydroxyamidine-Based Ionic Liquid: A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach. Molecules 2026, 31, 1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31061055
Abulyaissova L, Barashkov N, Irgibaeva I, Tashenov Y. Molecular Structure, Theoretical NBO Analysis, Vibrational Spectrum of CO2-Responsive Hydroxyamidine-Based Ionic Liquid: A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach. Molecules. 2026; 31(6):1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31061055
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbulyaissova, Lyazzat, Nikolay Barashkov, Irina Irgibaeva, and Yerbolat Tashenov. 2026. "Molecular Structure, Theoretical NBO Analysis, Vibrational Spectrum of CO2-Responsive Hydroxyamidine-Based Ionic Liquid: A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach" Molecules 31, no. 6: 1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31061055
APA StyleAbulyaissova, L., Barashkov, N., Irgibaeva, I., & Tashenov, Y. (2026). Molecular Structure, Theoretical NBO Analysis, Vibrational Spectrum of CO2-Responsive Hydroxyamidine-Based Ionic Liquid: A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach. Molecules, 31(6), 1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31061055

