2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Eugenol Epoxy Monomer (Eu-Epx)
The first step involved a Williamson ether reaction (
Scheme 1a) between dibromoethane and eugenol, yielding a diene intermediate (Eu-Di) with two allyl groups. In the FTIR spectrum of Eu-Di (
Figure 1a), the absorption band corresponding to the O-H stretching vibrations of the hydroxyl groups of eugenol, located at approximately 3522 cm
−1 [
42,
43], disappeared completely. In contrast, the C=C stretching vibration at 1638 cm
−1 [
44] remained unchanged, confirming the successful synthesis of the eugenol-derived diene, specifically through the modification of the phenolic hydroxyl group. In addition, the spectrum showed bands at 1472 cm
−1 attributed to CH
2 bending vibrations [
45,
46], bands in the regions of 1220 cm
−1 and 1235 cm
−1 associated with C-O stretching [
47], and a band at 965 cm
−1 corresponding to the stretching of the C-O-C bond of the ester group [
48,
49].
1H and
13C NMR spectroscopy further confirmed the structure of Eu-Di. In the
1H NMR spectrum (
Figure 1b), the characteristic peak of the phenolic hydroxyl (Ar–OH) of eugenol, located between 5.65 and 5.63 ppm [
50], disappeared and was replaced by a new peak between 4.39 and 4.37 ppm, which corresponded to the protons of OCH
2CH
2O [
51]. Likewise, the characteristic signals of the allyl groups were detected between 5.03–5.12 ppm (CH
2=CH–CH
2) [
52], 5.90–6.06 ppm (CH
2=CH–CH
2) [
53], and 3.36–3.31 ppm (CH
2=CH–CH
2–) [
53]. The structure was also verified by
13C NMR spectroscopy (
Figure S2). These results demonstrate the successful synthesis of Eu-Di.
In the second stage, Eu-Epx was prepared by epoxidation of Eu-Di (
Scheme 1b). The reaction was carried out at room temperature in a two-phase ethyl acetate/water system, using Oxone
® (potassium peroxymonosulfate) as the epoxidizing agent. This method was chosen due to its economic and ecological advantages over conventional epoxidation with m-chloroperbenzoic acid, as Oxone
® simplifies the separation and purification processes and utilizes non-toxic organic compounds [
42,
43]. The successful formation of epoxy groups was verified through multiple analytical techniques. FTIR spectroscopy (
Figure 1a) provided initial confirmation by showing the elimination of the C=C stretching vibration at 1642 cm
−1 [
44] and the out-of-plane =C-H bending vibration at 960 cm
−1 [
54], while simultaneously revealing a new characteristic symmetric C-O-C stretching vibration of the epoxide ring at 842 cm
−1 [
55]. Analysis by
1H NMR (
Figure 1c) showed the disappearance of the peaks corresponding to the diene in the ranges of 5.03–5.12 ppm, 5.90–6.02 ppm, and 3.31–3.36 ppm [
52,
53].
Instead, new peaks attributable to the epoxy group appeared between 2.74–2.83 ppm (–CH–CH
2–O), 2.50–2.56 ppm (Ar–CH
2– and –CH–CH
2–O) and 3.08–3.17 ppm (–CH–CH
2–O) [
56]. The structure of Eu-Epx was also confirmed by
13C NMR spectroscopy (
Figure S3). Finally, the epoxide equivalent weight (EEW) of Eu-Epx was determined to be 192.10 g/equiv, which is close to the theoretical value (193.21 g/equiv). The slight deviation observed could be related to a secondary epoxide ring-opening reaction, which could have led to the formation of hydroxyl groups [
44,
46]. Furthermore, DSC analysis revealed a sharp melting point at 130 °C for the Eu-Epx monomer (
Figure S5).
2.2. Study of the Curing Process
Figure 2 shows the FTIR-ATR spectra of the eugenol-based epoxy system (Eu-Epx/AA) with 5% wt of caffeine, 5% wt of Zn(OAc)
2 or no catalyst, at three stages of the curing process: (i) uncured (initial mixture before heat treatment), (ii) cured (after heat treatment at 150 °C for 60 min), and (iii) post-cured (after additional treatment at 190 °C for 120 min). All spectra were normalized with respect to the aromatic ring vibration band at 1580 cm
−1, allowing a comparative evaluation of the evolution of the functional groups.
The broad band at ~3460 cm
−1, corresponding to the O–H stretching vibration [
42], progressively decreases during heat treatment in all formulations. This decrease reflects the consumption of hydroxyl groups from carboxylic acids during the epoxide opening reaction. The reduction is more pronounced in the presence of catalysts, particularly with Zn(OAc)
2, suggesting greater conversion efficiency. In contrast, the formulation without catalyst shows a less pronounced reduction, especially between curing and post-curing, indicating incomplete conversion.
The C=O stretching band at 1722 cm
−1 [
57] increases in intensity due to the formation of ester bonds. This increase is more pronounced and progressive in the formulation with Zn(OAc)
2, while with caffeine it stabilizes after curing. In the sample without catalyst, the intensity remains similar between the uncured and cured mixtures, increasing significantly only during post-curing, indicating a slower and less efficient curing process.
The bands associated with C–O vibrations in the regions of 1256, 1138, and 1028 cm
−1 [
58] show different behaviors depending on the formulation. The band at 1138 cm
−1 (steric C–O–C) intensifies more clearly in formulations with catalysts, reflecting greater ester bond formation. The band at 1028 cm
−1 increases substantially during post-curing in all formulations, indicating densification of the network in the final stage of the thermal process.
The characteristic band of the epoxy ring at 946 cm
−1 (C–O–C stretching) [
59] shows different behaviors depending on the catalyst. In the formulation with caffeine, this band decreases markedly from the uncured mixture to the cured mixture, remaining constant during post-curing, indicating rapid and complete conversion of the epoxy group in the curing stage. In the Zn(OAc)
2 formulation, the band maintains similar intensity at all stages, suggesting that this catalyst does not significantly affect the conversion of the epoxy group under FTIR analysis conditions. In the sample without catalyst, the decrease is more gradual and continuous throughout the three stages, with residual signals persisting even after darkening, evidencing incomplete conversion.
Comparing the curing (150 °C/60 min) and post-curing (190 °C/120 min) stages, it can be observed that in the formulation with caffeine, most of the structural transformations occur during curing, while post-curing generates only minor adjustments, indicating early and efficient conversion. The Zn(OAc)
2 formulation shows continuous spectral changes between both stages, particularly in the ester bands (C=O, 1722 cm
−1 and C–O, 1138 cm
−1) [
57,
58], suggesting a more progressive curing process [
60]. In contrast, in the sample without catalyst, the most significant changes, particularly in the ester formation bands (C=O, 1722 cm
−1), occur mainly during post-curing, evidencing slower kinetics and limited reactivity at 150 °C [
61].
Comparative analysis reveals that both catalysts improve the efficiency of the reaction compared to the uncatalyzed system, but act differently. Caffeine promotes early conversion of epoxide groups and rapid formation of ester bonds during curing, with stabilization in post-curing. Zinc acetate induces a more progressive formation of ester bonds, with continuous spectral changes even during post-curing, suggesting a more sustained catalytic effect that favors a denser polymer network.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was employed to investigate the thermal behavior and curing characteristics of the formulations. Dynamic DSC experiments were conducted at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min over the temperature range of 25–230 °C.
Figure 3 shows representative thermograms at 10 °C/min, while
Figure S7 (Supplementary Materials) presents the complete set of curves for all heating rates.
The thermograms exhibit two sequential thermal events: an endothermic peak corresponding to the melting of unreacted components (eugenol-based epoxy and adipic acid), followed by a broad exothermic peak corresponding to the curing reactions (epoxy-acid ring-opening and esterification). These events are partially overlapping, with the extent of overlap varying systematically with heating rate (
Figure S7), which has important implications for quantitative analysis. At 10 °C/min (
Figure 3), the melting peak appears at 117–129 °C depending on the formulation, while the curing exotherm spans approximately 80–90 °C from onset to completion, indicating a complex multi-step process consistent with epoxy-acid chemistry [
62,
63].
The melting temperature (T
m) increases with heating rate for all formulations (
Figure S7,
Table 1), rising by approximately 5–6 °C from 5 to 20 °C/min. This behavior is consistent with thermal lag effects typical of physical phase transitions and does not depend on catalyst type or concentration [
64].
The degree of separation between melting and curing events changes systematically with heating rate (
Figure S7). At lower heating rates (5 °C/min), greater temporal overlap is observed, with the curing exotherm beginning during the latter stages of melting. At higher heating rates (20 °C/min), the events become more clearly separated. This improved separation occurs because the curing reaction is displaced to higher temperatures more than the melting transition, resulting in a more distinct baseline between events [
65].
The apparent curing enthalpy (ΔH
c) increases systematically with heating rate for all formulations (
Table 1), suggesting that the measured values are influenced by kinetic and experimental factors rather than reflecting solely the intrinsic reaction energy. Two main effects explain this behavior.
First, signal overlap: At lower heating rates, the endothermic melting signal partially compensates the exothermic curing heat flow, resulting in underestimation of the net enthalpy. At higher heating rates, improved temporal separation between events reduces this interference, yielding higher apparent ΔH
c values [
66]. Second, volatilization losses: Slower heating prolongs exposure to intermediate temperatures, potentially causing volatilization of low-molecular-weight species (e.g., adipic acid), which reduces reactive stoichiometry and measured enthalpy [
67]. Faster heating minimizes these losses.
Therefore, the observed increase in ΔH
c with heating rate likely reflects improved thermal resolution and reduced experimental artifacts rather than genuine thermodynamic differences. For this reason, a heating rate of 10 °C/min was selected for comparative analysis to balance event separation, minimize artifacts, and align with standard practice in the literature for epoxy-based systems [
68]. All subsequent ΔH
c comparisons are made at this fixed heating rate.
The peak curing temperature (T
p) increases with heating rate for all formulations (
Figure 4,
Table 1), rising by approximately 13–19 °C from 5 to 20 °C/min. This systematic increase is consistent with Arrhenius-type temperature dependence typical of kinetically controlled reactions, confirming that the curing process is governed by reaction kinetics [
69]. The peak curing temperature (T
p) serves as an indicator of catalytic activity [
70], representing the temperature at which the reaction rate is maximum (
Figure 3,
Table 1). All catalyst-containing formulations show T
p values lower than those of the uncatalyzed system (157.1 °C at 10 °C/min), indicating that both zinc acetate and caffeine accelerate the curing reactions under non-isothermal conditions.
Zn(OAc)
2 5% exhibits the strongest catalytic effect, with T
p approximately 11 °C lower than that of the uncatalyzed system (146.3 °C vs. 157.1 °C at 10 °C/min). This reduction is consistent with the established catalytic activity of metal acetates in epoxy-acid reactions, where zinc species facilitate ring-opening and esterification through coordination and activation of reactive groups [
11].
Caffeine-containing formulations show T
p values 3.9–4.5 °C lower than those of the uncatalyzed system (152.6–153.2 °C vs. 157.1 °C at 10 °C/min). While more modest than the Zn(OAc)
2 5% effect, this reduction represents measurable acceleration of the curing reactions, suggesting that caffeine facilitates the curing process through a mechanism distinct from that of the metal catalyst [
71,
72]. The similar T
p values for both caffeine concentrations (5% and 10%) suggest that the catalytic effect may approach saturation at the lower loading, or that other factors (e.g., solubility or distribution) limit the impact of increased concentration under dynamic heating conditions [
73].
Interestingly, increasing Zn(OAc)
2 concentration from 5% to 10% substantially reduces the catalytic effect (T
p = 153.8 °C, only 3.3 °C lower than uncatalyzed). This non-monotonic behavior suggests possible catalyst deactivation, aggregation, or interference with the reaction mechanism at higher zinc concentrations [
74,
75].
All formulations complete curing in a similar temperature range, with final temperatures (T
f) at 10 °C/min ranging from 212.2 °C to 220.9 °C (
Table 1), independent of catalyst type or concentration. The similarity in T
f despite significant differences in T
p indicates that the catalysts primarily affect reaction kinetics rather than the thermodynamic feasibility or ultimate extent of curing [
76].
Comparing apparent curing enthalpies (ΔH
c) at 10 °C/min (
Table 1), caffeine-containing systems show moderately lower values than the uncatalyzed system (168–170 mJ/mg vs. 178 mJ/mg, representing 5–6% reduction). In contrast, zinc acetate systems show substantially lower ΔH
c values, with a clear concentration-dependent trend: Zn(OAc)
2 5% shows 158 mJ/mg (11% reduction) and Zn(OAc)
2 10% shows 141 mJ/mg (21% reduction) relative to the uncatalyzed system.
These reductions in apparent ΔH
c for Zn(OAc)
2 systems may reflect differences in reaction mechanisms or pathways facilitated by the catalyst [
36]. A lower ΔH
c at constant heating rate can indicate faster conversion over a narrower temperature range or alternative, less energy-intensive reaction routes [
77]. The caffeine systems, showing ΔH
c values closer to the uncatalyzed reference, appear to have less pronounced effects on overall reaction energetics. However, given the potential for signal overlap and baseline distortions discussed above, these observations must be interpreted as apparent thermodynamic differences rather than definitive mechanistic conclusions. The primary evidence for catalyst effects comes from the more robust T
p parameter, which is less affected by experimental artifacts.
Peak temperatures (Tp) for each heating rate were determined by deconvolution of the overlapping melting and curing events using OriginPro2025 software. Gaussian peak fitting was applied to separate the endothermic melting signal from the exothermic curing peak, enabling accurate determination of Tp for the curing reaction.
The activation energy (E
a) of the curing process was determined using the Kissinger method (Equation (1)) [
78].
where β is the heating rate, T
p is the peak curing temperature, R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol
−1 K
−1), A is the pre-exponential factor, and E
a is the activation energy. The value of E
a is derived from the slope of the linear plot of ln(β/T
p2) versus 1/T
p, as shown in
Figure 5. The detailed linear fits for all formulations are presented in
Table 2, with correlation coefficients (R
2) > 0.99 indicating good linearity.
It should be noted that the Kissinger method assumes a single-step reaction and yields an apparent activation energy for the overall curing process [
79]. Given the complexity of the epoxy-acid system (involving ring-opening, esterification, and partial overlap with melting), the E
a values obtained represent the energy barrier for the composite process rather than individual elementary reactions. Nevertheless, these values provide a useful comparative measure of the catalytic effect on the overall curing kinetics.
The activation energy for the non-catalyzed reference system was determined to be 135.7 kJ/mol, which is consistent with values reported in the literature for epoxy-acid curing reactions relying on thermal energy alone [
80]. The incorporation of both catalysts reduced the energy barrier for the reaction.
In the caffeine-containing system, increasing the caffeine concentration from 5% to 10% resulted in a decrease in Ea from 133.1 to 124.4 kJ/mol. This concentration-dependent reduction indicates that caffeine acts as a kinetic facilitator for the curing reaction, with its accelerating effect becoming more pronounced at higher concentrations [
70,
81].
Zinc acetate showed a greater reduction in Ea compared to caffeine at equivalent concentrations. At 5% concentration, Zn(OAc)2 (Ea = 122.6 kJ/mol) achieved a larger reduction compared to 5% caffeine (133.1 kJ/mol). This effect was more pronounced at 10% concentration, with Zn(OAc)2 reaching the lowest Ea in the study (116.0 kJ/mol), compared to 124.4 kJ/mol for caffeine 10%.
Based on the activation energies, the following order of catalytic effectiveness can be established (from highest to lowest reduction in Ea): Zn(OAc)2 10% > Zn(OAc)2 5% > caffeine 10% > caffeine 5% > non-catalyzed system.
It is noteworthy that while Zn(OAc)
2 10% exhibits the lowest activation energy, this formulation showed a higher peak temperature (T
p) compared to Zn(OAc)
2 5% in the DSC analysis, indicating non-monotonic behavior. This suggests that the catalytic mechanism at higher zinc concentrations may involve additional factors (e.g., aggregation or coordination effects) that influence the overall reaction kinetics in a complex manner [
11,
74].
2.3. Influence of the Catalyst on the Structure of Eu-Epx/AA Vitrimers
Figure 6 shows the comparative analysis of the FTIR-ATR spectra of polymeric materials cured without catalyst and in the presence of different catalysts (5% caffeine, 5% Zn(OAc)
2), in order to evaluate the resulting structural transformations. All spectra were normalized at 1580 cm
−1 (aromatic ring vibrations) [
82], allowing for a quantitative comparison of the functional groups present after the complete curing process.
The broad absorption at ~3430 cm
−1 [
42] is consistent with the presence of hydroxyl groups, which may originate from both unreacted carboxylic acid and β-hydroxyester formation following epoxy ring opening [
76,
77].
The broad absorption at ~3430 cm
−1 is consistent with the presence of hydroxyl groups, which may originate from both unreacted carboxylic acid and β-hydroxyester formation following epoxy ring opening [
76,
77]. The higher intensity of this band in the sample without catalyst, compared to the catalyzed samples, suggests incomplete conversion, with higher concentrations of unreacted carboxylic acid groups. Conversely, the reduced intensity in the catalyzed samples indicates more complete curing reactions, with greater conversion of epoxy and carboxylic acid groups. It should be noted that the hydroxyl groups present in the β-hydroxyester bonds formed during curing are essential for the transesterification exchange reactions that enable vitrimer behavior [
78].
The C=O stretching vibration at 1722 cm
−1 [
57], corresponding to both ester and carboxylic acid groups, shows higher relative intensity in the uncatalyzed sample compared to the catalyzed samples. Given the persistence of epoxide bands (926 cm
−1, discussed below) in the uncatalyzed sample, this higher C=O intensity likely reflects the coexistence of formed esters and unreacted carboxylic groups, indicating incomplete conversion. A distinctive band at 1540 cm
−1, attributed to the asymmetric COO
− stretching vibration [
83], was detected exclusively in the sample with Zn(OAc)
2, indicating the formation of zinc-carboxylate coordination complexes. This suggests that zinc acetate may catalyze the reaction through coordination with carboxylic acid groups [
79,
80].
The transformation of the epoxide units was corroborated by the substantial reduction or absence of characteristic vibrations typically associated with epoxide rings at 1470, 1329, and 1296 cm
−1 [
58] in the cured samples, accompanied by the appearance of a C–O–C stretching vibration at 1160 cm
−1 confirming the formation of ester bonds [
81].
Finally, the nearly complete disappearance of the epoxide ring C-O-C stretching vibration at 926 cm
−1 (as well as the bands at 843 and 741 cm
−1) [
58] in the catalyzed samples, in contrast to its residual presence in the uncatalyzed material, indicates that the catalysts promote higher degrees of epoxide conversion and more complete curing reactions [
82,
83].
These results indicate a clear correlation between catalyst presence and curing efficiency, with catalyzed samples showing higher degrees of epoxide conversion and more complete transformation of reactive groups compared to the uncatalyzed system.
2.4. Thermal Stability and Glass Transition
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) evaluated the influence of the catalyst on the thermal stability of the polymer systems. TGA curves (
Figure 7) showed a multistage degradation characteristic of cured epoxies. The control sample, without catalyst, showed the lowest thermal stability (T
onset 350.3 °C) and two degradation peaks at 357.6 and 396.3 °C (
Table 3), indicative of an imperfect network containing segments more susceptible to thermal degradation with stepwise decomposition associated with limited crosslinking efficiency [
29,
84,
85].
The incorporation of catalysts improved thermal stability. Both caffeine and zinc acetate increased T
onset, reaching the maximum value (364.2 °C) with 10% caffeine, consistent with a denser and more stable network resulting from more efficient curing [
86,
87].
The degradation profiles varied depending on the catalyst: the formulations with caffeine maintained two degradation events, while 10% Zn(OAc)
2 showed a single sharp peak at 392.5 °C. This unimodal degradation profile suggests that zinc acetate at higher concentrations promotes a more homogeneous network, where degradation of the main structure occurs in a narrower temperature range and at a higher temperature [
86,
88].
These results indicate that catalysis not only increases thermal stability but also influences the homogeneity of the polymer network [
84].
The glass transition temperature (T
g) of the Eu-Epx/AA polymer networks was determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). As shown in
Figure 8, the control sample without catalyst exhibited a T
g of 41.7 ± 1.5 °C. The addition of both catalysts, caffeine and zinc acetate (Zn(OAc)
2), at concentrations of 5% and 10%, resulted in slightly higher T
g values ranging from 43.7 to 44.9 °C. These T
g values are remarkably similar across all formulations (within ~2 °C), suggesting that the presence and concentration of catalyst have a minimal effect on the glass transition temperature [
89]. This behavior is consistent with the fact that all formulations share the same chemical composition and curing conditions, leading to polymer networks with comparable structural characteristics [
89].
In crosslinked polymer networks, the glass transition temperature is primarily influenced by the chemical structure of the network segments, the crosslink density, and the free volume [
90]. Since all formulations are based on the same epoxy–acid system, the similar T
g values observed are expected. The T
g values obtained in this study (41–45 °C) are consistent with those commonly reported for epoxy–carboxylic acid networks derived from aliphatic dicarboxylic acids [
89,
91], supporting the reliability of the thermal analysis.
These results indicate the effectiveness of caffeine and zinc acetate as catalysts for the curing reaction between epoxy and carboxyl groups. The catalysts, especially at higher concentrations, promote the formation of more thermally stable networks, as indicated by higher onset degradation temperatures (T
onset). Additionally, zinc acetate at 10% promotes a more homogeneous network structure, as evidenced by the transition from bimodal to unimodal degradation profiles [
92,
93,
94].