Next Article in Journal
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Graphene Oxide Surface-Modified ADN-Based PBX Double-Shell Structure
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Electronic and Optical Properties on the Kinetic Photocatalytic Model of Methyl Blue Degradation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eugenol-Based Epoxy Vitrimers: Caffeine and Zinc Acetate as Potential Alternative Catalysts in Curing Kinetics and Dynamic Network Properties

by
Angela Y. Becerra-Lovera
1,
Javier Mauricio Anaya-Mancipe
2,
Rubén D. Díaz-Martin
3,
Marcos Lopes Dias
1,* and
Diego de Holanda Saboya Souza
1,*
1
Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, RJ, Brazil
2
Programa de Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—PEMM/COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-599, RJ, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Genômicas e Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília 71966-700, DF, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(5), 783; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050783
Submission received: 27 December 2025 / Revised: 20 February 2026 / Accepted: 23 February 2026 / Published: 26 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Characterization and Applications of Vitrimers)

Abstract

The development of sustainable vitrimers from bio-based sources addresses the need for high-performance recyclable materials. This research describes eugenol-derived epoxy vitrimers cross-linked with adipic acid as a curing agent, focusing on comparative effects of caffeine and zinc acetate as transesterification catalysts at 5 and 10% concentrations versus a non-catalyzed control. Both catalysts acted as curing accelerators, confirmed by FTIR and DSC analyses, revealing polyhydroxyester network formation through associative ester exchange enabling topological reorganization. Zinc acetate at 10% proved most efficient, achieving the lowest apparent activation energy (116.0 kJ/mol), highest crosslinking density (νe = 3.42 × 10−3 mol/cm3), improved thermal stability with unimodal degradation profile, and substantially reduced topology freezing transition temperature (Tv = 132 °C), confirming enhanced dynamic properties. Caffeine demonstrated catalytic activity, reducing apparent activation energy to 124.4 kJ/mol at 10% and promoting rapid epoxide conversion during initial curing at moderate temperatures. Although its catalytic efficiency is moderate compared to zinc acetate, its bio-based origin and non-toxic nature make it a promising green alternative for sustainable vitrimer applications. Results demonstrate that catalyst selection is crucial for tailoring curing kinetics, network structure, and final vitrimeric properties, providing key guidelines for designing advanced circular materials from bio-based precursors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The development of sustainable, high-performance materials has become increasingly critical in the face of global environmental challenges and the demand for innovative solutions across various industries [1,2,3]. Among these materials, epoxy resins have garnered considerable interest due to their beneficial characteristics, including superior structural integrity, resistance to chemical attack, and stable thermal behavior [4,5]. However, traditional epoxy formulations are constrained by their inability to be recycled and their vulnerability to heat-induced breakdown, potentially limiting their suitability for extended-use applications [6,7,8,9]. To address these challenges, vitrimer technology has emerged as a groundbreaking material class that merges the durability of cross-linked polymers with the reformability of meltable plastics. This innovation, pioneered by Leibler et al. [10] in 2011, relies on integrating reversible covalent linkages, particularly those formed through transesterification processes in epoxy-carboxylic acid networks [11,12]. These bonds enable the topological reorganization of the network in response to stimuli such as thermal changes, facilitating the exchange of polymer chains and allowing the material to flow, which in turn enables remodeling, self-repair, and recyclability without loss of effective cross-linking, aligning these materials with the principles of the circular economy [13,14,15].
The synthesis of epoxy vitrimers from renewable resources represents a booming line of research aimed at developing sustainable materials with reprocessing capabilities [16,17,18,19]. Among the most promising precursors is eugenol, a naturally occurring phenolic compound extracted from clove oil [20,21,22,23], whose suitability as a monomer is based on its high availability, low toxicity, and versatile chemical structure, which facilitates its functionalization into glycidyl ethers [24,25]. This structural versatility has enabled the development of eugenol vitrimers reported in the literature, where, after epoxidation and subsequent curing with zinc-catalyzed succinic anhydride, dynamic networks with self-repairing, shape memory, and physical and chemical recycling capabilities are obtained [26]. Likewise, variants with renewable carbon contents exceeding 75% have been achieved, balancing robust thermomechanical performance with efficient reprocessability [27]. Taken together, these findings establish eugenol as an essential building block for designing advanced and sustainable epoxy materials.
The curing reaction between epoxy groups and carboxylic acids generates a polymer network through the formation of β-hydroxy esters, which contrasts with the more traditional curing with amines or anhydrides [28,29,30,31,32,33]. The presence of a catalyst is critical not only for achieving efficient curing that imparts high Tg and thermal stability but also for activating the network dynamics characteristic of vitrimer materials [34,35]. In this context, the selection and dosing of the catalyst emerge as a fundamental challenge for optimizing the final properties. This study contrasts two catalysts of distinct nature: zinc acetate, a Lewis acid that operates through metal coordination mechanisms [36,37,38], and caffeine, a mild organic base capable of deprotonating the carboxylic acid to facilitate the opening of the epoxy ring, representing an innovative and sustainable alternative in the synthesis of dynamic materials due to its advantages as a non-toxic, naturally derived, low-cost compound with documented environmental biodegradability [39,40,41].
Although each has shown catalytic effectiveness, there are still knowledge deficiencies regarding how their molecular characteristics and dosage levels similarly influence the polymerization rate, cross-linking architecture, and final vitrimer characteristics, particularly with respect to caffeine. Therefore, the present work aimed to synthesize and characterize epoxy vitrimer materials derived from eugenol, cured with adipic acid, to evaluate the effect of zinc acetate and caffeine used as catalysts at two concentrations (5 and 10 mol% of COOH groups) in promoting dynamic transesterification reactions (DTERs), compared to a control system without catalysts. Thus, the study integrates the principles of vitrimer chemistry and the use of renewable raw materials in a unified polymeric system, contributing to laying the foundations for the development of next-generation functional and sustainable vitrimeric materials.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Eugenol Epoxy Monomer (Eu-Epx)

The first step involved a Williamson ether reaction (Scheme 1a) between dibromoethane and eugenol, yielding a diene intermediate (Eu-Di) with two allyl groups. In the FTIR spectrum of Eu-Di (Figure 1a), the absorption band corresponding to the O-H stretching vibrations of the hydroxyl groups of eugenol, located at approximately 3522 cm−1 [42,43], disappeared completely. In contrast, the C=C stretching vibration at 1638 cm−1 [44] remained unchanged, confirming the successful synthesis of the eugenol-derived diene, specifically through the modification of the phenolic hydroxyl group. In addition, the spectrum showed bands at 1472 cm−1 attributed to CH2 bending vibrations [45,46], bands in the regions of 1220 cm−1 and 1235 cm−1 associated with C-O stretching [47], and a band at 965 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching of the C-O-C bond of the ester group [48,49]. 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy further confirmed the structure of Eu-Di. In the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure 1b), the characteristic peak of the phenolic hydroxyl (Ar–OH) of eugenol, located between 5.65 and 5.63 ppm [50], disappeared and was replaced by a new peak between 4.39 and 4.37 ppm, which corresponded to the protons of OCH2CH2O [51]. Likewise, the characteristic signals of the allyl groups were detected between 5.03–5.12 ppm (CH2=CH–CH2) [52], 5.90–6.06 ppm (CH2=CH–CH2) [53], and 3.36–3.31 ppm (CH2=CH–CH2–) [53]. The structure was also verified by 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figure S2). These results demonstrate the successful synthesis of Eu-Di.
In the second stage, Eu-Epx was prepared by epoxidation of Eu-Di (Scheme 1b). The reaction was carried out at room temperature in a two-phase ethyl acetate/water system, using Oxone® (potassium peroxymonosulfate) as the epoxidizing agent. This method was chosen due to its economic and ecological advantages over conventional epoxidation with m-chloroperbenzoic acid, as Oxone® simplifies the separation and purification processes and utilizes non-toxic organic compounds [42,43]. The successful formation of epoxy groups was verified through multiple analytical techniques. FTIR spectroscopy (Figure 1a) provided initial confirmation by showing the elimination of the C=C stretching vibration at 1642 cm−1 [44] and the out-of-plane =C-H bending vibration at 960 cm−1 [54], while simultaneously revealing a new characteristic symmetric C-O-C stretching vibration of the epoxide ring at 842 cm−1 [55]. Analysis by 1H NMR (Figure 1c) showed the disappearance of the peaks corresponding to the diene in the ranges of 5.03–5.12 ppm, 5.90–6.02 ppm, and 3.31–3.36 ppm [52,53].
Instead, new peaks attributable to the epoxy group appeared between 2.74–2.83 ppm (–CH–CH2–O), 2.50–2.56 ppm (Ar–CH2– and –CH–CH2–O) and 3.08–3.17 ppm (–CH–CH2–O) [56]. The structure of Eu-Epx was also confirmed by 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figure S3). Finally, the epoxide equivalent weight (EEW) of Eu-Epx was determined to be 192.10 g/equiv, which is close to the theoretical value (193.21 g/equiv). The slight deviation observed could be related to a secondary epoxide ring-opening reaction, which could have led to the formation of hydroxyl groups [44,46]. Furthermore, DSC analysis revealed a sharp melting point at 130 °C for the Eu-Epx monomer (Figure S5).

2.2. Study of the Curing Process

Figure 2 shows the FTIR-ATR spectra of the eugenol-based epoxy system (Eu-Epx/AA) with 5% wt of caffeine, 5% wt of Zn(OAc)2 or no catalyst, at three stages of the curing process: (i) uncured (initial mixture before heat treatment), (ii) cured (after heat treatment at 150 °C for 60 min), and (iii) post-cured (after additional treatment at 190 °C for 120 min). All spectra were normalized with respect to the aromatic ring vibration band at 1580 cm−1, allowing a comparative evaluation of the evolution of the functional groups.
The broad band at ~3460 cm−1, corresponding to the O–H stretching vibration [42], progressively decreases during heat treatment in all formulations. This decrease reflects the consumption of hydroxyl groups from carboxylic acids during the epoxide opening reaction. The reduction is more pronounced in the presence of catalysts, particularly with Zn(OAc)2, suggesting greater conversion efficiency. In contrast, the formulation without catalyst shows a less pronounced reduction, especially between curing and post-curing, indicating incomplete conversion.
The C=O stretching band at 1722 cm−1 [57] increases in intensity due to the formation of ester bonds. This increase is more pronounced and progressive in the formulation with Zn(OAc)2, while with caffeine it stabilizes after curing. In the sample without catalyst, the intensity remains similar between the uncured and cured mixtures, increasing significantly only during post-curing, indicating a slower and less efficient curing process.
The bands associated with C–O vibrations in the regions of 1256, 1138, and 1028 cm−1 [58] show different behaviors depending on the formulation. The band at 1138 cm−1 (steric C–O–C) intensifies more clearly in formulations with catalysts, reflecting greater ester bond formation. The band at 1028 cm−1 increases substantially during post-curing in all formulations, indicating densification of the network in the final stage of the thermal process.
The characteristic band of the epoxy ring at 946 cm−1 (C–O–C stretching) [59] shows different behaviors depending on the catalyst. In the formulation with caffeine, this band decreases markedly from the uncured mixture to the cured mixture, remaining constant during post-curing, indicating rapid and complete conversion of the epoxy group in the curing stage. In the Zn(OAc)2 formulation, the band maintains similar intensity at all stages, suggesting that this catalyst does not significantly affect the conversion of the epoxy group under FTIR analysis conditions. In the sample without catalyst, the decrease is more gradual and continuous throughout the three stages, with residual signals persisting even after darkening, evidencing incomplete conversion.
Comparing the curing (150 °C/60 min) and post-curing (190 °C/120 min) stages, it can be observed that in the formulation with caffeine, most of the structural transformations occur during curing, while post-curing generates only minor adjustments, indicating early and efficient conversion. The Zn(OAc)2 formulation shows continuous spectral changes between both stages, particularly in the ester bands (C=O, 1722 cm−1 and C–O, 1138 cm−1) [57,58], suggesting a more progressive curing process [60]. In contrast, in the sample without catalyst, the most significant changes, particularly in the ester formation bands (C=O, 1722 cm−1), occur mainly during post-curing, evidencing slower kinetics and limited reactivity at 150 °C [61].
Comparative analysis reveals that both catalysts improve the efficiency of the reaction compared to the uncatalyzed system, but act differently. Caffeine promotes early conversion of epoxide groups and rapid formation of ester bonds during curing, with stabilization in post-curing. Zinc acetate induces a more progressive formation of ester bonds, with continuous spectral changes even during post-curing, suggesting a more sustained catalytic effect that favors a denser polymer network.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was employed to investigate the thermal behavior and curing characteristics of the formulations. Dynamic DSC experiments were conducted at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min over the temperature range of 25–230 °C. Figure 3 shows representative thermograms at 10 °C/min, while Figure S7 (Supplementary Materials) presents the complete set of curves for all heating rates.
The thermograms exhibit two sequential thermal events: an endothermic peak corresponding to the melting of unreacted components (eugenol-based epoxy and adipic acid), followed by a broad exothermic peak corresponding to the curing reactions (epoxy-acid ring-opening and esterification). These events are partially overlapping, with the extent of overlap varying systematically with heating rate (Figure S7), which has important implications for quantitative analysis. At 10 °C/min (Figure 3), the melting peak appears at 117–129 °C depending on the formulation, while the curing exotherm spans approximately 80–90 °C from onset to completion, indicating a complex multi-step process consistent with epoxy-acid chemistry [62,63].
The melting temperature (Tm) increases with heating rate for all formulations (Figure S7, Table 1), rising by approximately 5–6 °C from 5 to 20 °C/min. This behavior is consistent with thermal lag effects typical of physical phase transitions and does not depend on catalyst type or concentration [64].
The degree of separation between melting and curing events changes systematically with heating rate (Figure S7). At lower heating rates (5 °C/min), greater temporal overlap is observed, with the curing exotherm beginning during the latter stages of melting. At higher heating rates (20 °C/min), the events become more clearly separated. This improved separation occurs because the curing reaction is displaced to higher temperatures more than the melting transition, resulting in a more distinct baseline between events [65].
The apparent curing enthalpy (ΔHc) increases systematically with heating rate for all formulations (Table 1), suggesting that the measured values are influenced by kinetic and experimental factors rather than reflecting solely the intrinsic reaction energy. Two main effects explain this behavior.
First, signal overlap: At lower heating rates, the endothermic melting signal partially compensates the exothermic curing heat flow, resulting in underestimation of the net enthalpy. At higher heating rates, improved temporal separation between events reduces this interference, yielding higher apparent ΔHc values [66]. Second, volatilization losses: Slower heating prolongs exposure to intermediate temperatures, potentially causing volatilization of low-molecular-weight species (e.g., adipic acid), which reduces reactive stoichiometry and measured enthalpy [67]. Faster heating minimizes these losses.
Therefore, the observed increase in ΔHc with heating rate likely reflects improved thermal resolution and reduced experimental artifacts rather than genuine thermodynamic differences. For this reason, a heating rate of 10 °C/min was selected for comparative analysis to balance event separation, minimize artifacts, and align with standard practice in the literature for epoxy-based systems [68]. All subsequent ΔHc comparisons are made at this fixed heating rate.
The peak curing temperature (Tp) increases with heating rate for all formulations (Figure 4, Table 1), rising by approximately 13–19 °C from 5 to 20 °C/min. This systematic increase is consistent with Arrhenius-type temperature dependence typical of kinetically controlled reactions, confirming that the curing process is governed by reaction kinetics [69]. The peak curing temperature (Tp) serves as an indicator of catalytic activity [70], representing the temperature at which the reaction rate is maximum (Figure 3, Table 1). All catalyst-containing formulations show Tp values lower than those of the uncatalyzed system (157.1 °C at 10 °C/min), indicating that both zinc acetate and caffeine accelerate the curing reactions under non-isothermal conditions.
Zn(OAc)2 5% exhibits the strongest catalytic effect, with Tp approximately 11 °C lower than that of the uncatalyzed system (146.3 °C vs. 157.1 °C at 10 °C/min). This reduction is consistent with the established catalytic activity of metal acetates in epoxy-acid reactions, where zinc species facilitate ring-opening and esterification through coordination and activation of reactive groups [11].
Caffeine-containing formulations show Tp values 3.9–4.5 °C lower than those of the uncatalyzed system (152.6–153.2 °C vs. 157.1 °C at 10 °C/min). While more modest than the Zn(OAc)2 5% effect, this reduction represents measurable acceleration of the curing reactions, suggesting that caffeine facilitates the curing process through a mechanism distinct from that of the metal catalyst [71,72]. The similar Tp values for both caffeine concentrations (5% and 10%) suggest that the catalytic effect may approach saturation at the lower loading, or that other factors (e.g., solubility or distribution) limit the impact of increased concentration under dynamic heating conditions [73].
Interestingly, increasing Zn(OAc)2 concentration from 5% to 10% substantially reduces the catalytic effect (Tp = 153.8 °C, only 3.3 °C lower than uncatalyzed). This non-monotonic behavior suggests possible catalyst deactivation, aggregation, or interference with the reaction mechanism at higher zinc concentrations [74,75].
All formulations complete curing in a similar temperature range, with final temperatures (Tf) at 10 °C/min ranging from 212.2 °C to 220.9 °C (Table 1), independent of catalyst type or concentration. The similarity in Tf despite significant differences in Tp indicates that the catalysts primarily affect reaction kinetics rather than the thermodynamic feasibility or ultimate extent of curing [76].
Comparing apparent curing enthalpies (ΔHc) at 10 °C/min (Table 1), caffeine-containing systems show moderately lower values than the uncatalyzed system (168–170 mJ/mg vs. 178 mJ/mg, representing 5–6% reduction). In contrast, zinc acetate systems show substantially lower ΔHc values, with a clear concentration-dependent trend: Zn(OAc)2 5% shows 158 mJ/mg (11% reduction) and Zn(OAc)2 10% shows 141 mJ/mg (21% reduction) relative to the uncatalyzed system.
These reductions in apparent ΔHc for Zn(OAc)2 systems may reflect differences in reaction mechanisms or pathways facilitated by the catalyst [36]. A lower ΔHc at constant heating rate can indicate faster conversion over a narrower temperature range or alternative, less energy-intensive reaction routes [77]. The caffeine systems, showing ΔHc values closer to the uncatalyzed reference, appear to have less pronounced effects on overall reaction energetics. However, given the potential for signal overlap and baseline distortions discussed above, these observations must be interpreted as apparent thermodynamic differences rather than definitive mechanistic conclusions. The primary evidence for catalyst effects comes from the more robust Tp parameter, which is less affected by experimental artifacts.
Peak temperatures (Tp) for each heating rate were determined by deconvolution of the overlapping melting and curing events using OriginPro2025 software. Gaussian peak fitting was applied to separate the endothermic melting signal from the exothermic curing peak, enabling accurate determination of Tp for the curing reaction.
The activation energy (Ea) of the curing process was determined using the Kissinger method (Equation (1)) [78].
ln β T p 2 = E a R T p + ln AR E a
where β is the heating rate, Tp is the peak curing temperature, R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1), A is the pre-exponential factor, and Ea is the activation energy. The value of Ea is derived from the slope of the linear plot of ln(β/Tp2) versus 1/Tp, as shown in Figure 5. The detailed linear fits for all formulations are presented in Table 2, with correlation coefficients (R2) > 0.99 indicating good linearity.
It should be noted that the Kissinger method assumes a single-step reaction and yields an apparent activation energy for the overall curing process [79]. Given the complexity of the epoxy-acid system (involving ring-opening, esterification, and partial overlap with melting), the Ea values obtained represent the energy barrier for the composite process rather than individual elementary reactions. Nevertheless, these values provide a useful comparative measure of the catalytic effect on the overall curing kinetics.
The activation energy for the non-catalyzed reference system was determined to be 135.7 kJ/mol, which is consistent with values reported in the literature for epoxy-acid curing reactions relying on thermal energy alone [80]. The incorporation of both catalysts reduced the energy barrier for the reaction.
In the caffeine-containing system, increasing the caffeine concentration from 5% to 10% resulted in a decrease in Ea from 133.1 to 124.4 kJ/mol. This concentration-dependent reduction indicates that caffeine acts as a kinetic facilitator for the curing reaction, with its accelerating effect becoming more pronounced at higher concentrations [70,81].
Zinc acetate showed a greater reduction in Ea compared to caffeine at equivalent concentrations. At 5% concentration, Zn(OAc)2 (Ea = 122.6 kJ/mol) achieved a larger reduction compared to 5% caffeine (133.1 kJ/mol). This effect was more pronounced at 10% concentration, with Zn(OAc)2 reaching the lowest Ea in the study (116.0 kJ/mol), compared to 124.4 kJ/mol for caffeine 10%.
Based on the activation energies, the following order of catalytic effectiveness can be established (from highest to lowest reduction in Ea): Zn(OAc)2 10% > Zn(OAc)2 5% > caffeine 10% > caffeine 5% > non-catalyzed system.
It is noteworthy that while Zn(OAc)2 10% exhibits the lowest activation energy, this formulation showed a higher peak temperature (Tp) compared to Zn(OAc)2 5% in the DSC analysis, indicating non-monotonic behavior. This suggests that the catalytic mechanism at higher zinc concentrations may involve additional factors (e.g., aggregation or coordination effects) that influence the overall reaction kinetics in a complex manner [11,74].

2.3. Influence of the Catalyst on the Structure of Eu-Epx/AA Vitrimers

Figure 6 shows the comparative analysis of the FTIR-ATR spectra of polymeric materials cured without catalyst and in the presence of different catalysts (5% caffeine, 5% Zn(OAc)2), in order to evaluate the resulting structural transformations. All spectra were normalized at 1580 cm−1 (aromatic ring vibrations) [82], allowing for a quantitative comparison of the functional groups present after the complete curing process.
The broad absorption at ~3430 cm−1 [42] is consistent with the presence of hydroxyl groups, which may originate from both unreacted carboxylic acid and β-hydroxyester formation following epoxy ring opening [76,77].
The broad absorption at ~3430 cm−1 is consistent with the presence of hydroxyl groups, which may originate from both unreacted carboxylic acid and β-hydroxyester formation following epoxy ring opening [76,77]. The higher intensity of this band in the sample without catalyst, compared to the catalyzed samples, suggests incomplete conversion, with higher concentrations of unreacted carboxylic acid groups. Conversely, the reduced intensity in the catalyzed samples indicates more complete curing reactions, with greater conversion of epoxy and carboxylic acid groups. It should be noted that the hydroxyl groups present in the β-hydroxyester bonds formed during curing are essential for the transesterification exchange reactions that enable vitrimer behavior [78].
The C=O stretching vibration at 1722 cm−1 [57], corresponding to both ester and carboxylic acid groups, shows higher relative intensity in the uncatalyzed sample compared to the catalyzed samples. Given the persistence of epoxide bands (926 cm−1, discussed below) in the uncatalyzed sample, this higher C=O intensity likely reflects the coexistence of formed esters and unreacted carboxylic groups, indicating incomplete conversion. A distinctive band at 1540 cm−1, attributed to the asymmetric COO stretching vibration [83], was detected exclusively in the sample with Zn(OAc)2, indicating the formation of zinc-carboxylate coordination complexes. This suggests that zinc acetate may catalyze the reaction through coordination with carboxylic acid groups [79,80].
The transformation of the epoxide units was corroborated by the substantial reduction or absence of characteristic vibrations typically associated with epoxide rings at 1470, 1329, and 1296 cm−1 [58] in the cured samples, accompanied by the appearance of a C–O–C stretching vibration at 1160 cm−1 confirming the formation of ester bonds [81].
Finally, the nearly complete disappearance of the epoxide ring C-O-C stretching vibration at 926 cm−1 (as well as the bands at 843 and 741 cm−1) [58] in the catalyzed samples, in contrast to its residual presence in the uncatalyzed material, indicates that the catalysts promote higher degrees of epoxide conversion and more complete curing reactions [82,83].
These results indicate a clear correlation between catalyst presence and curing efficiency, with catalyzed samples showing higher degrees of epoxide conversion and more complete transformation of reactive groups compared to the uncatalyzed system.

2.4. Thermal Stability and Glass Transition

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) evaluated the influence of the catalyst on the thermal stability of the polymer systems. TGA curves (Figure 7) showed a multistage degradation characteristic of cured epoxies. The control sample, without catalyst, showed the lowest thermal stability (Tonset 350.3 °C) and two degradation peaks at 357.6 and 396.3 °C (Table 3), indicative of an imperfect network containing segments more susceptible to thermal degradation with stepwise decomposition associated with limited crosslinking efficiency [29,84,85].
The incorporation of catalysts improved thermal stability. Both caffeine and zinc acetate increased Tonset, reaching the maximum value (364.2 °C) with 10% caffeine, consistent with a denser and more stable network resulting from more efficient curing [86,87].
The degradation profiles varied depending on the catalyst: the formulations with caffeine maintained two degradation events, while 10% Zn(OAc)2 showed a single sharp peak at 392.5 °C. This unimodal degradation profile suggests that zinc acetate at higher concentrations promotes a more homogeneous network, where degradation of the main structure occurs in a narrower temperature range and at a higher temperature [86,88].
These results indicate that catalysis not only increases thermal stability but also influences the homogeneity of the polymer network [84].
The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the Eu-Epx/AA polymer networks was determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). As shown in Figure 8, the control sample without catalyst exhibited a Tg of 41.7 ± 1.5 °C. The addition of both catalysts, caffeine and zinc acetate (Zn(OAc)2), at concentrations of 5% and 10%, resulted in slightly higher Tg values ranging from 43.7 to 44.9 °C. These Tg values are remarkably similar across all formulations (within ~2 °C), suggesting that the presence and concentration of catalyst have a minimal effect on the glass transition temperature [89]. This behavior is consistent with the fact that all formulations share the same chemical composition and curing conditions, leading to polymer networks with comparable structural characteristics [89].
In crosslinked polymer networks, the glass transition temperature is primarily influenced by the chemical structure of the network segments, the crosslink density, and the free volume [90]. Since all formulations are based on the same epoxy–acid system, the similar Tg values observed are expected. The Tg values obtained in this study (41–45 °C) are consistent with those commonly reported for epoxy–carboxylic acid networks derived from aliphatic dicarboxylic acids [89,91], supporting the reliability of the thermal analysis.
These results indicate the effectiveness of caffeine and zinc acetate as catalysts for the curing reaction between epoxy and carboxyl groups. The catalysts, especially at higher concentrations, promote the formation of more thermally stable networks, as indicated by higher onset degradation temperatures (Tonset). Additionally, zinc acetate at 10% promotes a more homogeneous network structure, as evidenced by the transition from bimodal to unimodal degradation profiles [92,93,94].

2.5. Swelling Behavior and Gel Content

Table 4 presents the results of the analysis of the swelling ratio and gel content using solvents of varying polarity (THF and DCM) to evaluate the degree of cross-linking and network formation in epoxy vitrimers synthesized from eugenol [27,95].
The swelling ratio results reveal a consistent trend across all formulations: catalyst incorporation reduces the degree of swelling, indicating increased crosslinking density. The uncatalyzed formulation exhibited the highest swelling ratios (Q = 3.85 ± 0.18 in THF; Q = 4.25 ± 0.20 in DCM), reflecting lower crosslinking density and greater polymer-solvent interaction. This is consistent with a less densely crosslinked and more heterogeneous structure, as supported by its bimodal thermal degradation profile and lower thermal stability [96,97,98,99].
In contrast, all catalyzed samples showed lower swelling ratios, with values decreasing as catalyst concentration increased. The formulation containing 10% Zn(OAc)2 presented the lowest swelling values (Q = 1.95 ± 0.09 in THF; Q = 2.21 ± 0.11 in DCM), corresponding to reductions of 49.4% and 48.0%, respectively, compared to the uncatalyzed system. This reduction is consistent with the formation of a dense, well-developed polymer network that restricts solvent diffusion and polymer chain expansion [100,101,102,103].
The gel content analysis complements the swelling data by quantifying the fraction of insoluble, crosslinked material. The uncatalyzed control exhibited a gel content of 78.3 ± 2.1%, implying that over 21% of the material remains extractable, consistent with lower crosslinking efficiency [104,105,106]. In contrast, the catalyzed formulations showed significant increases in gel content, ranging from 91.2% to 95.1%, depending on catalyst type and concentration.
The highest gel content was achieved with 10% Zn(OAc)2 (95.1 ± 1.1%), indicating the formation of a tightly crosslinked and highly integrated network. These results support the effectiveness of both caffeine and zinc acetate as catalysts, with the latter showing greater efficiency across all parameters. Using the Flory-Rehner Equation (2) [107], crosslinking density (νe) was estimated from the swelling data in THF:
v e = ln 1 φ + φ + χ φ 2 V 1 φ 1 / 3 φ / 2
where φ is the volume fraction of the polymer in the swollen gel, χ is the Flory-Huggins polymer-solvent interaction parameter, and V1 is the molar volume of the solvent.
The results, shown in Table 5, demonstrate 52% to 81% increases in network density with catalyst incorporation, reaching a maximum of 3.42 × 10−3 mol/cm3 for Zn(OAc)2 at 10%.
The highest value (νe = 3.42 × 10−3 mol/cm3) was again obtained for the 10% Zn(OAc)2 system, in agreement with its minimal swelling and maximal gel content. These results support a clear structure-property relationship: enhanced crosslinking yields more robust and solvent-resistant networks, confirming the catalytic role of caffeine and zinc acetate in promoting efficient network formation [94,108,109].

2.6. Influence of the Catalyst on Thermomechanical Behavior

Figure 9 shows the thermal expansion curves of the Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers, comparing the material without a catalyst to those containing zinc and caffeine catalysts at various concentrations. The Topology Freezing Transition Temperature (Tv) was determined from these curves according to methods reported in the literature [38,110], identified as the temperature at which the height of the sample began to decrease following the initial thermal expansion. This behavior indicates the onset of macroscopic flow due to the dynamic exchange of covalent bonds, allowing for the topological rearrangement of the network [10].
The results of this analysis, summarized in Table 6, show a clear dependence of Tv on both the type of catalyst used and its concentration. The sample without catalyst exhibited the highest Tv at 235 °C, consistent with limited bond exchange activity in the absence of a catalyst [13]. In contrast, the incorporation of catalysts significantly reduced Tv, with zinc acetate (Zn(OAc)2) showing greater effectiveness than caffeine. Specifically, increasing the concentration of Zn(OAc)2 from 5% to 10% resulted in a reduction in Tv from 189 °C to 132 °C, representing a decrease of 57 °C. This confirms that zinc acetate acts as an effective catalyst for transesterification, accelerating the kinetics of dynamic exchange and reducing the temperature required for network rearrangement. This trend aligns with literature findings, which indicate that higher concentrations of catalyst accelerate the kinetics of dynamic transesterification, thereby lowering the temperature necessary for network rearrangement [37,111,112].
Caffeine also induced a concentration-dependent reduction in Tv, from 210 °C (5%) to 198 °C (10%), compared to 235 °C for the non-catalyzed system. This confirms that caffeine catalyzes the dynamic transesterification responsible for the vitrimeric behavior. However, this reduction is smaller than the 103 °C decrease achieved with 10% zinc acetate, highlighting a clear difference in catalytic efficiency between the two systems under these conditions [13,113,114].
The coefficient of thermal expansion in the glassy state (CTE1) was calculated from the initial linear region of the TMA curve (35 °C to Tv). The values ranged from 1.79 × 10−4 to 2.75 × 10−4 °C−1, typical of crosslinked epoxy systems [113]. The highest CTE1 was observed in the sample with 10% Zn(OAc)2 (2.75 × 10−4 °C−1), while the uncatalyzed sample exhibited the lowest value (1.79 × 10−4 °C−1). The correlation between higher CTE1 and lower Tv suggests increased segmental mobility in the glassy state for catalyzed systems [111]. These results highlight the role of catalyst selection and concentration in determining Tv.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Eugenol (Eu, CAS 97-53-0) ≥ 98%, 1,2-dibromoethane (CAS 106-93-4) 98%, Oxone® (potassium peroxomonosulfate, CAS 70693-62-8), Zinc acetate (Zn(OAc)2, CAS 5970-45-6) ≥ 98%, Triethylbenzylammonium chloride (TEBAC, CAS 56-37-1) 99%, caffeine (CAS 58-08-2) 99%, Potassium carbonate (CAS 584-08-7) ≥ 99.8%, adipic acid (AA, CAS 124-04-9) ≥ 99.5%, acetone (CAS 67-64-1) ≥ 99.5%, and ethyl acetate (CAS 141-78-6) ≥ 99.8% were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Sodium chloride (NaCl, CAS 7647-14-5) ≥ 98%, sodium sulfite (Na2SO3, CAS 7757-83-7) ≥ 98%, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, CAS 144-55-8) ≥ 98%, and anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4, CAS 7487-88-9) ≥ 98% were purchased from LABSYNTH (Diadema, SP, Brazil). Potassium iodide (KI, CAS 7681-11-0) ≥ 98%, Tetrahydrofuran (THF, CAS 109-99-9), Dichloromethane (DCM, CAS 75-09-2) and absolute ethanol (CAS 64-17-5) > 99.9% were purchased from NEON (Suzano, SP, Brazil).

3.2. Synthesis of Eugenol Diene Compound (Eu-Di)

The eugenol diene compound Eu-Di was synthesized following the methodology proposed by Liu et al. [26] by reacting eugenol with 1,2-dibromoethane, as illustrated in Scheme 1. Eugenol (32.8 g, 0.20 mol), anhydrous potassium carbonate (K2CO3, 27.6 g, 0.20 mol), potassium iodide (KI, 1.28 g, 0.008 mol), and absolute ethanol (200 mL) were introduced into a 500 mL three-neck flask and stirred magnetically. The mixture was then heated at 70 °C. When the solution turned dark green, 1,2-dibromoethane (15.03 g, 0.08 mol) dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol was slowly added using a constant pressure funnel. The reaction was maintained at 70 °C for 12 h, after which it was allowed to cool to room temperature and left for an additional 16 h to promote crystallization. The crude product was recovered by filtration, washed with hot water, recrystallized using ethanol, and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 8 h. The white solid obtained was designated as Eu-Di, with a yield of 91%. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 6.92–6.87 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 6.74–6.66 (d, 4H, Ar–H), 6.06–5.90 (ddt, 2H, CH=CH–CH2), 5.12–5.03 (m, 4H, CH2=CH–), 4.39–4.37 (s, 4H, OCH2CH2O), 3.88–3.77 (s, 6H, ArOCH3), 3.36–3.31 (dt, 4H, CH2–CH=CH–). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ):149.83, 146.72, 137.72, 133.70, 120.75, 115.78, 114.63, 112.84, 67.99, 56.13, 39.96.

3.3. Synthesis of Epoxy Derived from Eugenol (Eu-Epx)

Eu-Di (1 g) was dissolved in a mixture of acetone (60 mL) and ethyl acetate (50 mL) in a 500 mL three-neck flask equipped with magnetic stirring, a thermometer, and a pressure funnel. To this solution, 0.6 g (0.8 mmol) of tetrabutylammonium bromide (TEBAC) and 5.80 g of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) were added. The flask was kept at 5–8 °C, and then 3.5 g of Oxone® (equivalent to 9.89 mmol of KHSO5) dissolved in 20 mL of H2O was added dropwise while maintaining vigorous stirring and low temperature. The mixture was then maintained at room temperature for 72 h. The organic layer was separated and washed with a saturated aqueous solution of Na2SO3. The crude product was recrystallized from ethyl acetate to obtain the final product as a light-yellow powder, with a yield of 60%. The purity of the Eu-Epx monomer was evaluated by quantitative 1H NMR using eugenol as an internal standard. Spectra were recorded in CDCl3 with TMS, integrating the epoxide signals (δ ≈ 2.90–3.24 ppm) and the aromatic protons of eugenol (δ ≈ 6.50–7.25 ppm). The monomer purity was determined to be approximately 90%, with minor deviations attributed to residual or partially converted species.
The equivalent epoxide weight (EEW) of Eu-Epx was estimated by combining Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and 1H-NMR analyses, following the method of Garea et al. [115]. GPC was performed using chloroform as the eluent and polystyrene standards to determine the molecular weight distribution. 1H-NMR spectra (in CDCl3) were used to integrate the epoxide and aromatic proton signals. The EEW was calculated by correlating the average molecular weight obtained by GPC (Figure S4) with the epoxide proton content determined by NMR. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 6.97–6.88 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 6.81–6.74 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 4.41–4.32 (s, 2H, Ar–OCH2–=), 3.89–3.84 (s, 6H, Ar–OCH3), 3.08–3.17 (s, 2H, –CH–CH2–O), 2.74–2.83 (m, 2H, –CH–CH2–O), 2.50–2.56 ppm (s, 4H, Ar–CH2– and –CH–CH2–O). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 150.01, 147.31, 131.02, 121.30, 114.95, 113.50, 68.18, 56.24, 52.60, 46.85, 38.47.

3.4. Preparation of the Epoxy Acid Curing System

Epoxy-acid networks were prepared through a curing process involving the reaction between Eu-Epx and adipic acid (AA) in a 1:1 molar ratio. Zn(OAc)2 and caffeine were used as catalysts (Scheme 2). The catalyst concentrations of 5 and 10 mol% (relative to COOH groups) were selected based on literature precedents for transesterification-based vitrimers [31,33,35] and preliminary optimization studies. The 5% level represents a commonly reported threshold for achieving dynamic exchange activity, while the 10% concentration allows the assessment of enhanced catalytic performance without causing issues like excessive catalyst aggregation or plasticization of the polymer network, which can occur at very high loadings. This systematic comparison enables the optimization of catalyst dosage with respect to curing kinetics, network conversion, and thermal properties. A control sample was prepared without adding any catalysts to evaluate the effect of the catalytic agents on the curing process. The components were mixed with mortar to ensure homogeneous distribution and prevent premature curing [21,34,36,38].
Thermal curing protocol: The curing conditions were determined based on preliminary DSC analysis (10 °C/min), which indicated that the curing reaction initiates at 130 °C, peaks at 150 °C, and completes by 190 °C. A three-stage thermal protocol was implemented (Table 7):
The curing temperatures were selected based on preliminary DSC analysis (10 °C/min, see Supplementary Materials Figure S6), which showed that the curing reaction initiates at 130 °C, reaches maximum rate at 150 °C (Tp), and completes by 190 °C. The three-stage protocol ensures controlled gelation (Stage 1), network densification at peak reaction rate (Stage 2), and complete conversion with network equilibration (Stage 3). All formulations were subjected to the identical protocol to enable valid comparative analysis. Samples were analyzed after each stage to verify curing progression.

3.5. Characterization Techniques

The chemical structures of Eu-DI and Eu-Epx were characterized using proton (1H) and carbon-13 (13C) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The NMR spectra were recorded on a Mercury VX 300 (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) spectrometer operating at a frequency of 300 MHz, using deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) as the solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Analyses were performed at a constant temperature of 25 °C. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis was conducted using an LC-20AD system (Shimadzu, Nakagyo-ku, Japan) equipped with a CTO-20A oven, DGU-20A3R degasser, and RID-20A refractive index detector. Separation was performed using two Phenogel columns in series: 5 μm, 50 Å (300 × 7.8 mm) and 5 μm, 100 Å (300 × 7.8 mm). Chloroform was used as the eluent at 1.0 mL/min, with a column temperature of 30 °C and injection volume of 20 μL. Calibration was based on a 0.2% w/v polystyrene standard mixture.
Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was employed to analyze the monomers, study the curing reaction, and characterize the chemical structure of the final materials. The measurements were conducted using a Frontier FT-IR/FIR (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) instrument over a wavelength range of 500 to 4000 cm−1, with a resolution of 4 cm−1, and 60 scans per sample. The FTIR spectra were processed using PerkinElmer Spectrum 10.4 software to apply the ATR correction.
The curing behavior and glass transition temperature (Tg) of the materials were assessed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with a DSC7000 (Hitachi, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) instrument. Samples weighing 8–10 mg were analyzed in a nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. Before performing the experiments, the DSC equipment was calibrated for both temperature and enthalpy using a high-purity indium standard to ensure accurate measurement. Dynamic curing studies were conducted by heating the samples from 30 to 260 °C at various rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min). The total heat of reaction was determined by calculating the area under the exothermic peak in the DSC thermograms using Hitachi TA7000 software. To verify the reliability of the peak curing temperature (Tp) values, a deconvolution analysis was performed on representative DSC thermograms using OriginPro2025 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) software. Gaussian peak shapes were assumed, and an excellent fit was achieved (R2 > 0.99). The Tp values obtained from the deconvoluted curves were consistent with those derived from the original composite peaks, within the expected instrumental precision. The Tg was subsequently determined using a constant heating and cooling rate of 10 °C/min for both cycles.
The thermal stability of the cured samples was evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with a Q-500 analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Samples were heated to a temperature range from room temperature to 700 °C under a constant nitrogen flow of 50 mL/min, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
To quantitatively assess the crosslinking density and network integrity of the eugenol-based epoxy vitrimers, swelling ratio and gel content measurements were performed. Cured samples from each formulation, with approximate dimensions of 5 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm and an initial mass (W0) of approximately 50 mg, were used. The samples were immersed in 5 mL of solvent at room temperature (23 ± 1 °C). To ensure a comprehensive characterization, two solvents with different polarities were employed, Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and Dichloromethane (DCM). The immersion time was 72 h to reach swelling equilibrium. After this period, the samples were carefully removed, the surface solvent was blotted with filter paper, and the swollen mass (Ws) was immediately recorded. Subsequently, the samples were dried under vacuum at 60 °C until a constant weight was achieved to determine the final dry mass (W). The swelling ratio (Q) and the gel content (%) were calculated using Equation (3) and Equation (4), respectively. All measurements were performed in triplicate, and the results are reported as the mean ± standard deviation.
Q = W s W d
G e l   C o n t e n t = W d W 0 × 100 %
The topology-freezing transition temperature (Tv) was determined using a TMA-60 (Shimadzu, Japan) thermomechanical analyzer. The measurements were performed in compression mode using a glass probe, applying a constant force of 0.5 N while maintaining a nitrogen flow of 50 mL/min. Before the measurements, a conditioning cycle was performed, which involved heating the samples from 25 to 80 °C and subsequently cooling them to 30–35 °C to eliminate any internal stresses, as reported in the literature [40]. Following this conditioning, a heating ramp was executed from 35 to 260 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, adhering to an emerging and increasingly supported method for Tv identification [116].

4. Conclusions

This work reports the synthesis and comprehensive characterization of epoxy vitrimers derived from renewable eugenol cured with adipic acid, demonstrating that catalyst type and concentration are crucial for controlling curing kinetics, network structure, and dynamic properties. Both caffeine and zinc acetate acted as effective curing accelerators, enhancing the epoxy-acid reaction compared to the non-catalyzed system. Multi-technique characterization (FTIR, DSC, TGA, swelling analysis, and TMA) revealed that the catalysts promote the formation of a polyhydroxyester network with enhanced crosslinking efficiency and vitrimer behavior. Zinc acetate, particularly at 10% concentration, proved to be the most efficient catalyst, achieving the lowest apparent activation energy (116.0 kJ/mol, 14.5% reduction from uncatalyzed) and producing the densest network (crosslinking density νe = 3.42 × 10−3 mol/cm3, 81% increase). This formulation exhibited a unique unimodal thermal degradation profile, indicating superior network homogeneity, and showed the lowest topology freezing transition temperature (Tv = 132 °C, 44% reduction), confirming effectiveness in catalyzing transesterification reactions. However, the non-monotonic behavior observed at 10% concentration (higher peak curing temperature despite lower activation energy) suggests complex catalytic mechanisms that warrant further investigation. Caffeine demonstrated catalytic activity, notably in the initial curing stage at moderate temperatures (150 °C). It reduced the activation energy to 124.4 kJ/mol at 10% (8.3% reduction from uncatalyzed) while promoting rapid epoxide conversion. Although its catalytic efficiency is moderate compared to zinc acetate, its bio-based origin and non-toxic nature make it a promising green alternative for designing vitrimers with lower environmental impact. Further mechanistic studies would be valuable to fully elucidate its catalytic pathways and optimize its application in vitrimer systems. The presence of catalysts directly influenced crosslinking density and vitrimer behavior. Swelling and gel content analyses confirmed superior network integrity in catalyzed systems, with gel content increasing from 78.3% (uncatalyzed) to 95.1% (10% Zn(OAc)2). Thermal expansion experiments revealed distinct topology freezing transitions in all catalyzed materials, confirming their vitrimer nature and potential for reprocessing and recycling applications. This study validates the use of bio-based precursors for vitrimer synthesis and provides key guidelines for catalyst selection: zinc acetate for maximum crosslinking density and lowest Tv, and caffeine as a promising greener alternative offering a favorable balance between catalytic efficiency and sustainability. These findings contribute to the development of advanced circular materials that combine the performance advantages of thermosets with the recyclability of thermoplastics, addressing critical challenges in sustainable polymer science.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31050783/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of Eugenol; Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of EuDi; Figure S3: 13C NMR spectrum of Eu-Epx; Figure S4: GPC chromatogram of the synthesized eugenol-based epoxy monomer (Eu-Epx); Figure S5: Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermogram of epoxidized eugenol monomer heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere; Table S1: Parameter of GPC chromatogram; Figure S6: Stage-wise DSC verification of curing protocol. DSC thermograms (10 °C/min) showing residual exothermic enthalpy after each curing stage for formulations with (a) 5% caffeine, (b) 5% Zn(OAc)2, and (c) no catalyst; Figure S7: Dynamic DSC thermograms recorded at different heating rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min) for the Eu Epx/AA system with different catalysts: (a) 5% caffeine, (b) 10% caffeine, (c) 5% Zn(OAc)2, (d) 10% Zn(OAc)2, and (e) uncatalyzed system.

Author Contributions

Investigation and formal analysis, A.Y.B.-L., M.L.D. and D.d.H.S.S.; Manuscript writing, revising, and editing: A.Y.B.-L., J.M.A.-M., R.D.D.-M., M.L.D. and D.d.H.S.S.; Data curation, manuscript review: A.Y.B.-L., J.M.A.-M., R.D.D.-M., M.L.D. and D.d.H.S.S.; Work conceptualization, and supervision: D.d.H.S.S. and M.L.D.; funding acquisition, M.L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), grant number 140156/2021-6 and 140106/2025-1. Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and institutional support from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). The authors also thank the Laboratório de Análises Térmicas e Calorimetria do Instituto de Pesquisa da Marinha for technical support.. During the preparation of this manuscript, language assistance and writing enhancement tools were used to optimize the clarity, cohesion, and fluency of the English text. Specifically, the following were used: SciSpace (web-based AI writing tool, available at https://scispace.com/pt-br/ai-writer, accessed on 23 December 2025) for terminology verification and scientific content structuring. Grammarly (Grammarly Inc., web-based application, accessed December 2025) for grammar correction, syntax improvement, and language consistency. These tools were used solely for editing and language enhancement purposes, without generating scientific content, interpreting data, or contributing to the methodological design or conclusions of the research. The authors critically reviewed and approved all final content of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AAAdipic Acid
ATRAttenuated Total Reflection
CANCovalent Adaptable Network
CDCl3Deuterated Chloroform
CTECoefficient of Thermal Expansion
DCMDichloromethane
DSCDifferential Scanning Calorimetry
DTERDynamic Transesterification Reactions
EEWEpoxide Equivalent Weight
EaActivation Energy
EuEugenol
Eu-DiEugenol Diene Intermediate
Eu-EpxEpoxidized Eugenol Derivative
FTIRFourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
FWOFlynn-Wall-Ozawa (method)
GPCGel Permeation Chromatography
NMRNuclear Magnetic Resonance
TEBACTriethylbenzylammonium Chloride
TGAThermogravimetric Analysis
TgGlass Transition Temperature
THFTetrahydrofuran
TMAThermomechanical Analysis
TMSTetramethylsilane
TvTopology Freezing Transition Temperature
Zn(OAc)2Zinc Acetate
Tonsetonset temperature
Tppeak temperature
Tfend temperature

References

  1. Firoozi, A.A.; Firoozi, A.A.; Oyejobi, D.O.; Avudaiappan, S.; Flores, E.S. Emerging trends in sustainable building materials: Technological innovations, enhanced performance, and future directions. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 103521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Popescu, C.; Dissanayake, H.; Mansi, E.; Stancu, A. Eco Breakthroughs: Sustainable Materials Transforming the Future of Our Planet. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pascault, J.P.; Williams, R.J.J. Chapter 1: Overview of thermosets: Present and future. In Thermosets: Structure, Properties, and Applications, 2nd ed.; Guo, Q., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiang, Q.; Xiao, F. Applications of epoxy materials in pavement engineering. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, S.; Chevali, V.S.; Xu, Z.; Hui, D.; Wang, H. A review of extending performance of epoxy resins using carbon nanomaterials. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 136, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kloxin, C.J.; Scott, T.F.; Adzima, B.J.; Bowman, C.N. Covalent Adaptable Networks (CANs): A Unique Paradigm in Crosslinked Polymers. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 2643–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arkema France SA. Composition for Manufacturing Vitrimer Resins of Epoxy/Anhydride Type Comprising a Polyol. U.S. Patent US20170044361A1, 16 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Huang, X.; Huang, G.; Wu, J. Weldable, malleable and programmable epoxy vitrimers with high mechanical properties and water insensitivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 368, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wan, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J.; Hu, D.; Jin, P.; Wang, D.Y. Epoxy thermosets and materials derived from bio-based monomeric phenols: Transformations and performances. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 108, 101287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montarnal, D.; Capelot, M.; Tournilhac, F.; Leibler, L. Silica-Like Malleable Materials from Permanent Organic Networks. Science 2011, 334, 965–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Demongeot, A.; Mougnier, S.J.; Okada, S.; Soulié-Ziakovic, C.; Tournilhac, F. Coordination and catalysis of Zn2+ in epoxy-based vitrimers. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4486–4493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Altuna, F.I.; Pettarin, V.; Williams, R.J.J. Self-healable polymer networks based on the cross-linking of epoxidised soybean oil by an aqueous citric acid solution. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 3360–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Capelot, M.; Unterlass, M.M.; Tournilhac, F.; Leibler, L. Catalytic control of the vitrimer glass transition. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jurowska, A.; Jurowski, K. Vitrimers—The miracle polymer materials combining the properties of glass and plastic? Chemik 2015, 69, 389–394. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arkema France SA. Composition for Manufacturing Epoxy/Anhydride Vitrimer Resins Including an Organic Catalyst. PCT Internet Patent WO2015162352A1, 9 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lucherelli, M.A.; Duval, A.; Avérous, L. Biobased vitrimers: Towards sustainable and adaptable performing polymer materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022, 127, 101515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, A.; Connal, L.A. Biobased Transesterification Vitrimers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2023, 44, 2200892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sangermano, M.; Bergoglio, M.; Schögl, S. Biobased Vitrimeric Epoxy Networks. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2024, 309, 2300371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, F.; Gao, F.; Zhong, J.; Shen, L.; Lin, Y. Fusion of biobased vinylogous urethane vitrimers with distinct mechanical properties. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 2723–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Faye, I.; Decostanzi, M.; Ecochard, Y.; Caillol, S. Eugenol bio-based epoxy thermosets: From cloves to applied materials. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5236–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Zhai, M.; Ma, F.; Li, Y.; Lyu, B.; Liu, T.; Gao, Z.; Wang, L.; Vincent, D.; Kessler, M.R. Fully eugenol-based epoxy thermosets: Synthesis, curing, and properties. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022, 307, 2100833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kouznetsov, V.V.; Vargas Méndez, L.Y. Synthesis of eugenol-based monomers for sustainable epoxy thermoplastic polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 52237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Caillol, S.; Boutevin, B.; Auvergne, R. Eugenol, a developing asset in biobased epoxy resins. Polymer 2021, 223, 123663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ocando, C.; Ecochard, Y.; Decostanzi, M.; Caillol, S.; Avérous, L. Dynamic network based on eugenol-derived epoxy as promising sustainable thermoset materials. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 135, 109860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Molina-Gutiérrez, S.; Manseri, A.; Ladmiral, V.; Bongiovanni, R.; Caillol, S.; Lacroix-Desmazes, P. Eugenol: A Promising Building Block for Synthesis of Radically Polymerizable Monomers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1900179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, T.; Hao, C.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; Xin, J.; Zhang, J. Eugenol-Derived Biobased Epoxy: Shape Memory, Repairing, and Recyclability. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 8588–8597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dai, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, F.; Ji, T.; Zhang, L.; Lyu, B. Eugenol-Based Epoxy Materials with High Biobased Carbon Content and Their Structure–Property Relationships. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2025, 7, 1062–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bouyahyi, M.; Duchateau, R. Metal-Based Catalysts for Controlled Ring-Opening Polymerization of Macrolactones: High Molecular Weight and Well-Defined Copolymer Architectures. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Altuna, F.I.; Hoppe, C.E.; Williams, R.J.J. Epoxy Vitrimers: The Effect of Transesterification Reactions on the Network Structure. Polymers 2018, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Berne, D.; Cuminet, F.; Lemouzy, S.; Joly-Duhamel, C.; Poli, R.; Caillol, S.; Leclerc, E.; Ladmiral, V. Catalyst-Free Epoxy Vitrimers Based on Transesterification Internally Activated by an α–CF3 Group. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 1669–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, S.; Samal, S.K.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.K. Recent Development of Biobased Epoxy Resins: A Review. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2018, 57, 133–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ranpara, P.; Bhalerao, P.N. Curing of Epoxy Resin by Using Commercial Amine/hydrazine and Its Effect on Ultra Violet Spectrum. In Advances in Chemical, Bio and Environmental Engineering: CHEMBIOEN 2021; Ratan, J.K., Sahu, D., Pandhare, N.N., Bhavanam, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, C.; Luo, T.; Wu, Z.; Li, S. Investigation on the Curing and Thermal Properties of Epoxy/Amine/Phthalonitrile Blend. Materials 2024, 17, 4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tangthana-Umrung, K.; Poutrel, Q.A.; Gresil, M. Epoxy Homopolymerization as a Tool to Tune the Thermo-Mechanical Properties and Fracture Toughness of Vitrimers. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 8393–8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Montarnal, D.; Tournilhac, F.; Hidalgo, M.; Leibler, L. Epoxy-based networks combining chemical and supramolecular hydrogen-bonding crosslinks. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fang, M.; Liu, X.; Feng, Y.; Lu, B.; Huang, M.; Liu, C.; Shen, C. Influence of Zn2+ catalyst stoichiometry on curing dynamics and stress relaxation of polyester-based epoxy vitrimer. Polymer 2023, 278, 126010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Niu, X.; Wang, F.; Li, X.; Zhang, R.; Wu, Q.; Sun, P. Using Zn2+ ionomer to catalyze transesterification reaction in epoxy vitrimer. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 5698–5706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palmieri, B.; Cilento, F.; Amendola, E.; Valente, T.; Dello Iacono, S.; Giordano, M.; Martone, A. An Investigation of the Healing Efficiency of Epoxy Vitrimer Composites Based on Zn2+ Catalyst. Polymers 2023, 15, 3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chaudhary, A.; Mathur, D.; Gaba, R.; Pasricha, R.; Sharma, K. Greening up organic reactions with caffeine: Applications, recent developments, and future directions. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 8932–8962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klingler, A.; Reisinger, D.; Schlögl, S.; Wetzel, B.; Breuer, U.; Krüger, J.K. Vitrimer Transition Phenomena from the Perspective of Thermal Volume Expansion and Shape (In)stability. Macromolecules 2024, 57, 4246–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, W.; D’Amatoa, A.R.; Wang, Y. Caffeine-catalyzed synthesis of photopolymers for digital light processing. Green Chem. 2025, 27, 8319–8332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Crupi, V.; Maisano, G.; Majolino, D.; Migliardo, P.; Venuti, V. Anharmonic Effects and Vibrational Dynamics in H-Bonded Liquids by Attenuated Total Reflectance FT-IR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 3933–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yadav, R.K.; Yadav, B.; Yadav, R.A. Spectroscopic, structural and conformational investigations of the major constituent of the clove oil: Eugenol. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2023, 1228, 114264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Biniak, S.; Trykowski, G.; Walczyk, M.; Richert, M. Thermo-chemical modification of low-dimensional carbons: An infrared study. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2016, 83, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marikhin, V.A.; Radovanova, E.I.; Ivan’kova, E.M.; Myasnikova, L.P.; Volchek, B.Z.; Medvedeva, D.A.; Vlasova, E.N. IR spectra of long-chain α,ω-alkanediols: 1,22-docosanediol and 1,44-tetratetracontanediol. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2008, 50, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kortyna, A.; Doney, K.; Nesbitt, D.J. High-resolution infrared spectroscopy of jet cooled CH2Br radicals: The symmetric CH stretch manifold and absence of nuclear spin cooling. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 134305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Foreman, M.M.; Stanton, J.F.; Weber, J.M. Relation between bond angle and carbon–oxygen stretching frequencies in CO2-containing compounds. J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127, 9717–9722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ahluwalia, V.K. Infrared spectroscopy. In Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmad, A.; Ayub, H. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) technique for food analysis and authentication. In Nondestructive Quality Assessment Techniques for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables; Pathare, P.B., Rahman, M.S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mari, S.H.; Varras, P.C.; Atia-tul-Wahab; Choudhary, I.M.; Siskos, M.G.; Gerothanassis, I.P. Solvent-dependent structures of natural products based on the combined use of DFT calculations and 1H-NMR chemical shifts. Molecules 2019, 24, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Anelli, P.L.; Banfi, S.; Montanari, F.; Quici, S. Oxidation of diols with alkali hypochlorites catalyzed by oxammonium salts under two-phase conditions. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2970–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Castellano, S.; Sun, C. Effect of substituents on the proton–proton coupling constants of monosubstituted benzenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 4741–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Silverstein, R.M.; Webster, F.X.; Kiemle, D.J.; Bryce, D.L. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; 464p. [Google Scholar]
  54. Saeed, M.M.; Mehmood, M.S.; Muddassar, M. Fractional Order ATR-FTIR Differential Spectroscopy for Detection of Weak Bands and Assessing the Radiation Modifications in Gamma Sterilized UHMWPE. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0286030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Scherzer, T.; Strehmel, V.; Tänzer, W.; Wartewig, S. FTIR spectroscopy studies on epoxy networks. In Physics of Polymer Networks; Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science; Steinkopff: Darmstadt, Germany, 1992; Volume 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sienkiewicz, A.; Czub, P. Application of MALDI-TOF, 1H NMR and 13C NMR to follow the progress of the synthesis of high molecular weight epoxies from hydroxylated soybean oil and bisphenol A based epoxy resin. Polym. Test. 2019, 73, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. da Costa e Silva, P.E.; Paulo, A.J.; de Barros, M.P.S.; Alves, A.d.A.; Nascimento, M.H.D.; Neves, A.G.D.; Lins, L.F.; Houllou, L.M.; Bezerra, R.P.; Porto, A.L.F. Obtaining polyhydroxyalkanoate and plastic film formation from the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris under light stress and nitrogen deficiency. Res. Soc. Dev. 2024, 13, e106131247730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. González González, M.; Cabanelas, J.C.; Baselga, J. Applications of FTIR on epoxy resins—Identification, monitoring the curing process, phase separation and water uptake. In Infrared Spectroscopy: Materials Science, Engineering and Technology; Theophanides, T., Ed.; BoD—Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2012; pp. 261–284. [Google Scholar]
  59. Şengül, B.; Tüzün, F.N. Investigation and assessment of epoxy resin adhesives using Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry. Materialwiss. Werkstofftech. 2023, 54, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, H.; Wang, D. Comparing surface and bulk curing processes of an epoxy vitrimer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 15479–15486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lascano, D.; Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Torres-Giner, S.; Boronat, T.; Montanes, N. Optimization of the Curing and Post-Curing Conditions for the Manufacturing of Partially Bio-Based Epoxy Resins with Improved Toughness. Polymers 2019, 11, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lascano, D.; Lerma-Canto, A.; Fombuena, V.; Balart, R.; Montanes, N.; Quiles-Carrillo, L. Kinetic Analysis of the Curing Process of Biobased Epoxy Resin from Epoxidized Linseed Oil by Dynamic Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Polymers 2021, 13, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Barros, A.; Nepomuceno, N.; Nicácio, P.; Souza, M.; Silva, I.; Luna, C.; Fook, M.; Araújo, E.; Wellen, R. Enhancement of biobased epoxy through the curing and thermal stability control with carboxylic acids. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 2431–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Toda, A. Heating rate dependence of melting peak temperature examined by DSC of heat flux type. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2016, 123, 1795–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, J.; Guo, Q.; Fox, B.L. Study on thermoplastic-modified multifunctional epoxies: Influence of heating rate on cure behaviour and phase separation. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Blackman, M.A.; Shofner, M.L.; Chatham, C.A. Investigating fast scanning calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry as screening tools for thermoset polymer material compatibility with laser-based powder bed fusion. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2025, 7, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, W.; Yu, Y.; Mo, S.; Luan, Y.; Wang, R.; Chen, C.; Zhou, H.; Zuo, X.; Zhou, H. Cure-dependent volatile release and its influence on porosity of carbon fibre reinforced bismaleimide composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2024, 59, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thanki, J.D.; Parsania, P.H. Dynamic DSC curing kinetics and thermogravimetric study of epoxy resin of 9,9′-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)anthrone-10. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 130, 2145–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sheng, J.; Guo, Y.; Pang, X.; Ma, W.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Song, S. Study on the Impact of Diluent Dosages on the Epoxy–Polythiol Self-Healing System. Polymers 2025, 17, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, Y.; Xi, Z.; Zhao, L. Curing kinetics of bio-based epoxy resin based on epoxidized soybean oil and green curing agent. AIChE J. 2017, 63, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, J.; Guo, P.; Kong, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, F.; Du, B. Curing kinetics and dielectric properties of anhydride cured epoxy resin with different accelerator contents. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2023, 30, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ehlers, J.-E.; Rondan, N.G.; Huynh, L.K.; Pham, H.; Marks, M.; Truong, T.N. Theoretical study on mechanisms of the epoxy–amine curing reaction. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4370–4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Silva, I.D.S.; Moerbitz, P.; Bretz, I.; Barreto, J.V.; Ries, A.; Luna, C.B.B.; Araújo, E.M.; Wellen, R.M.R. Curing kinetics of biobased resins based on soybean oil and isosorbide catalyzed by Al(OTf)3. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2025, 142, e56908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Palmieri, B.; Cilento, F.; Amendola, E.; Valente, T.; Dello Iacono, S.; Giordano, M.; Martone, A. Influence of Catalyst Content and Epoxy/Carboxylate Ratio on Isothermal Creep of Epoxy Vitrimers. Polymers 2023, 15, 3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, M.; Dai, B. The catalytic recycle and deactivation kinetics of Zn/CMK-3 catalyst for acetylene acetoxylation. Mol. Catal. 2023, 549, 113502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ly, U.Q.; Pham, M.-P.; Marks, M.J.; Truong, T.N. Density functional theory study of mechanism of epoxy-carboxylic acid curing reaction. J. Comput. Chem. 2017, 38, 1093–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Karami, Z.; Ganjali, M.R.; Zarghami Dehaghani, M.; Aghazadeh, M.; Jouyandeh, M.; Esmaeili, A.; Habibzadeh, S.; Mohaddespour, A.; Inamuddin; Formela, K.; et al. Kinetics of Cross-Linking Reaction of Epoxy Resin with Hydroxyapatite-Functionalized Layered Double Hydroxides. Polymers 2020, 12, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kissinger, H.E. Reaction Kinetics in Differential Thermal Analysis. Anal. Chem. 1957, 29, 1702–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vyazovkin, S. Kissinger Method in Kinetics of Materials: Things to Beware and Be Aware of. Molecules 2020, 25, 2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Leena, K.; Soumyamol, P.B.; Baby, M.; Suraj, S.; Rajeev, R.; Mohan, D.S. Non-isothermal cure and decomposition kinetics of epoxy–imidazole systems. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 130, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lv, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Shao, Y.; Zhu, J. Exploring the properties and performance of Lewis base organocatalysts in epoxy/polyester hybrid low-cure powder coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 200, 109053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chawananon, S.; Pirali, O.; Goubet, M.; Asselin, P. Characterizing centrosymmetric two-ring PAHs using jet-cooled high resolution mid-infrared laser spectroscopy and anharmonic quantum chemical calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 064301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Saito, K.; Xu, T.; Ishikita, H. Correlation between C=O stretching vibrational frequency and pKa shift of carboxylic acids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 4999–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yang, S.; Zhang, F.; Luo, F.; Li, H.; Xiao, F. Curing and thermal degradation behavior of epoxy-based vitrimers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141, e55057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chen, L.; Ning, N.; Zhou, G.; Li, Y.; Feng, S.; Guo, Z.; Wei, Y. Bio-Based and Solvent-Free Epoxy Vitrimers Based on Dynamic Imine Bonds with High Mechanical Performance. Polymers 2025, 17, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gao, L.; Wang, H.; Yao, X.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Jing, X.; Wu, J. High-performance epoxy vitrimer from commercial epoxy-anhydride with reprocessable and chemical degradable properties. Front. Mater. 2025, 12, 1552713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zeng, R.T.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.D.; Wang, M.; Zeng, J.B. Curing behavior of epoxidized soybean oil with biobased dicarboxylic acids. Polym. Test. 2017, 57, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Favero, D.; Marcon, V.R.R.; Barcellos, T.; Gómez, C.M.; Sanchis, M.J.; Carsí, M.; Figueroa, C.A.; Bianchi, O. Renewable polyol obtained by microwave-assisted alcoholysis of epoxidized soybean oil: Preparation, thermal properties and relaxation process. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 285, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shen, S.; Thakur, V.K.; Skordos, A.A. Influence of monomer structure and catalyst concentration on topological transition and dynamic properties of dicarboxylic acid–epoxy vitrimers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141, e56028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mei, B.; Lin, T.-W.; Sheridan, G.S.; Evans, C.M.; Sing, C.E.; Schweizer, K.S. Structural relaxation and vitrification in dense cross-linked polymer networks: Simulation, theory, and experiment. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 4159–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dai, C.; Shi, Y.; Li, Z.; Hu, T.; Wang, X.; Ding, Y.; Yan, L.; Liang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wang, P. The design, synthesis, and characterization of epoxy vitrimers with enhanced glass transition temperatures. Polymers 2023, 15, 4346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Trott, G.; Garden, J.A.; Williams, C.K. Heterodinuclear zinc and magnesium catalysts for epoxide/CO2 ring opening copolymerizations. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 4618–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ramspoth, T.F.; Flapper, J.; van den Berg, K.J.; Feringa, B.L.; Harutyunyan, S.R. A highly efficient and sustainable catalyst system for terminal epoxy-carboxylic acid ring opening reactions. Green Chem. 2024, 26, 3346–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Abel, B.A.; Lidston, C.A.L.; Coates, G.W. Mechanism-Inspired Design of Bifunctional Catalysts for the Alternating Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12760–12769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tannert, R.; Taubert, A.; Weber, J. Biobased Epoxy Eugenol Vitrimers: Influence of Impurities of Technical Grade Monomers on the Network Characteristics. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2024, 309, 2300236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Metze, F.K.; Sant, S.; Meng, Z.; Klok, H.A.; Kaur, K. Swelling-Activated, Soft Mechanochemistry in Polymer Materials. Langmuir 2023, 39, 3546–3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tang, J.; Chen, Q. Understanding elasticity and swellability of polymer gels from a perspective of polymer/solvent interaction. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 75, 101872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tsioptsias, C.; Fardis, D.; Ntampou, X.; Tsivintzelis, I.; Panayiotou, C. Thermal Behavior of Poly(vinyl alcohol) in the Form of Physically Crosslinked Film. Polymers 2023, 15, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Barra, G.; Guadagno, L.; Raimondo, M.; Santonicola, M.G.; Toto, E.; Vecchio Ciprioti, S. A Comprehensive Review on the Thermal Stability Assessment of Polymers and Composites for Aeronautics and Space Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Papp, V.; Vadkerti, B.; Bányai, I.; Kéki, S.; Kéri, M. Structure and Swelling Properties of Biodegradable Cross-Linked Polyurethanes by Means of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Phys. Chem. B 2025, 129, 5607–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Killi, N.; Rumpke, K.; Kuckling, D. Synthesis of curcumin derivatives via Knoevenagel reaction within a continuously driven microfluidic reactor using polymeric networks containing piperidine as a catalyst. Gels 2025, 11, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Marefat Seyedlar, R.; Imani, M.; Mirabedini, S.M. Curing of polyfurfuryl alcohol resin catalyzed by a homologous series of dicarboxylic acid catalysts. II. Swelling behavior and thermal properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Delahaye, M.; Winne, J.M.; Du Prez, F.E. Internal Catalysis in Covalent Adaptable Networks: Phthalate Monoester Transesterification As a Versatile Dynamic Cross-Linking Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 15277–15287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Farhan, M.; Rudolph, T.; Nöchel, U.; Kratz, K.; Lendlein, A. Extractable Free Polymer Chains Enhance Actuation Performance of Crystallizable Poly(ε-caprolactone) Networks and Enable Self-Healing. Polymers 2018, 10, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Szczepanski, C.R.; Stansbury, J.W. Modification of linear prepolymers to tailor heterogeneous network formation through photo-initiated polymerization-induced phase separation. Polymer 2015, 70, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Danielsen, S.P.O.; Semenov, A.N.; Rubinstein, M. Phase Separation and Gelation in Solutions and Blends of Heteroassociative Polymers. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 5661–5677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Flory, P.J.; Rehner, J. Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II. Swelling. J. Chem. Phys. 1943, 11, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Memon, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, C. Correlating the thermomechanical properties of a novel bio-based epoxy vitrimer with its crosslink density. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 29, 102814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhu, L.; Xu, L.; Jie, S.; Li, B. Polybutadiene Vitrimers with Tunable Epoxy Ratios: Preparation and Properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Berne, D.; Laviéville, S.; Leclerc, E.; Caillol, S.; Ladmiral, V.; Bakkali-Hassani, C. How to Characterize Covalent Adaptable Networks: A User Guide. ACS Polym. Au 2025, 5, 214–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Lorenz, N.; Dyer, W.E.; Kumru, B. Exploring the Cure State Dependence of Relaxation and the Vitrimer Transition Phenomena of a Disulfide-Based Epoxy Vitrimer. J. Polym. Sci. 2025, 63, 3739–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ji, Y.; Wei, Y. Functional epoxy vitrimers and composites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 120, 100710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kaiser, S.; Novak, P.; Giebler, M.; Gschwandl, M.; Novak, P.; Pilz, G.; Morak, M.; Schlögl, S. The crucial role of external force in the estimation of the topology freezing transition temperature of vitrimers by elongational creep measurements. Polymer 2020, 204, 122804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rodrigues, J.G.P.; Arias, S.; Pacheco, J.G.A.; Dias, M.L. Structure and thermal behavior of biobased vitrimer of lactic acid and epoxidized canola oil. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 33613–33624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Garea, S.A.; Corbu, A.C.; Deleanu, C.; Iovu, H. Determination of the epoxide equivalent weight (EEW) of epoxy resins with different chemical structure and functionality using GPC and 1H-NMR. Polym. Test. 2006, 25, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hubbard, A.M.; Ren, Y.; Sarvestani, A.; Picu, C.R.; Varshney, V.; Nepal, D. Thermomechanical analysis (TMA) of vitrimers. Polym. Test. 2023, 118, 107877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Two-Step Synthesis of Epoxidized Eugenol Derivative (Eu-Epx): (a) Alkylation of Eugenol with 1,2-Dibromoethane to Form Diene Intermediate (Eu-Di), and (b) Epoxidation to Form Eu-Epx.
Scheme 1. Two-Step Synthesis of Epoxidized Eugenol Derivative (Eu-Epx): (a) Alkylation of Eugenol with 1,2-Dibromoethane to Form Diene Intermediate (Eu-Di), and (b) Epoxidation to Form Eu-Epx.
Molecules 31 00783 sch001
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) 1H NMR spectrum of Eu-Di, and (c) 1H NMR spectrum of Eu-Epx.
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) 1H NMR spectrum of Eu-Di, and (c) 1H NMR spectrum of Eu-Epx.
Molecules 31 00783 g001
Figure 2. FTIR-ATR spectra monitoring the evolution of the curing reaction for different vitrimer formulations: (a) with 5% caffeine, (b) with 5% Zn(OAc)2, and (c) without a catalyst. For each system, spectra corresponding to the uncured (initial mixture), cured (150 °C for 60 min), and post-cured (190 °C for 120 min) states are shown.
Figure 2. FTIR-ATR spectra monitoring the evolution of the curing reaction for different vitrimer formulations: (a) with 5% caffeine, (b) with 5% Zn(OAc)2, and (c) without a catalyst. For each system, spectra corresponding to the uncured (initial mixture), cured (150 °C for 60 min), and post-cured (190 °C for 120 min) states are shown.
Molecules 31 00783 g002
Figure 3. DSC thermograms of the investigated formulations of eugenol epoxy/adipic acid at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Figure 3. DSC thermograms of the investigated formulations of eugenol epoxy/adipic acid at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Molecules 31 00783 g003
Figure 4. Dynamic DSC curing scans at different heating rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min) for the Eu-Epx/AA system with different catalysts: (a) 5% caffeine, (b) 10% caffeine, (c) 5% zinc acetate, (d) 10% zinc acetate, and (e) control without catalyst.
Figure 4. Dynamic DSC curing scans at different heating rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min) for the Eu-Epx/AA system with different catalysts: (a) 5% caffeine, (b) 10% caffeine, (c) 5% zinc acetate, (d) 10% zinc acetate, and (e) control without catalyst.
Molecules 31 00783 g004
Figure 5. Curing kinetics analysis of the Eu-Epx/AA system with different catalysts and concentrations, Kissinger plot of ln(β/Tp2) versus 1000/Tp.
Figure 5. Curing kinetics analysis of the Eu-Epx/AA system with different catalysts and concentrations, Kissinger plot of ln(β/Tp2) versus 1000/Tp.
Molecules 31 00783 g005
Figure 6. FTIR-ATR spectra of eugenol-derived epoxy resin (uncured) and cured samples obtained with adipic acid in the absence of catalyst and in the presence of 5% caffeine or 5% Zn(OAc)2.
Figure 6. FTIR-ATR spectra of eugenol-derived epoxy resin (uncured) and cured samples obtained with adipic acid in the absence of catalyst and in the presence of 5% caffeine or 5% Zn(OAc)2.
Molecules 31 00783 g006
Figure 7. (a) Thermogravimetric analyses and (b) DTG curves for Eugenol epoxy vitrimers without a catalyst and with zinc-based catalysts at different concentrations.
Figure 7. (a) Thermogravimetric analyses and (b) DTG curves for Eugenol epoxy vitrimers without a catalyst and with zinc-based catalysts at different concentrations.
Molecules 31 00783 g007
Figure 8. DSC curves (second heating) showing the glass transition (Tg) of Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers.
Figure 8. DSC curves (second heating) showing the glass transition (Tg) of Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers.
Molecules 31 00783 g008
Figure 9. Thermal expansion curves of Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers cured without catalyst and in the presence of Zn and caffeine catalysts at different concentrations.
Figure 9. Thermal expansion curves of Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers cured without catalyst and in the presence of Zn and caffeine catalysts at different concentrations.
Molecules 31 00783 g009
Scheme 2. Curing mechanism and network formation. (a) Epoxy-acid ring-opening reaction; (b) Network formation through crosslinking; (c) Ester exchange reactions allowing potential network rearrangement.
Scheme 2. Curing mechanism and network formation. (a) Epoxy-acid ring-opening reaction; (b) Network formation through crosslinking; (c) Ester exchange reactions allowing potential network rearrangement.
Molecules 31 00783 sch002
Table 1. Curing data were obtained from the dynamic DSC thermograms recorded at 5, 10, 15, 20 °C/min heating rates for all formulations.
Table 1. Curing data were obtained from the dynamic DSC thermograms recorded at 5, 10, 15, 20 °C/min heating rates for all formulations.
Sampleβ (°C/min)Ti (°C)Tp (°C)Tf (°C)ΔHc (mJ/mg)
Caffeine 5%5130.3148.0198.7157.1
10134.4153.6212.2169.2
15138.0157.2220.0191.1
20142.1162.2219.9201.9
Caffeine 10%5128.7146.5204.8113.1
10130.5153.2218.1169.9
15137.8158.9218.8208.2
20138.8163.4219.2238.1
Zn(OAc)2 5%5125.8137.6204.2149.2
10128.1146.2220.9157.8
15130.7150.5224.1226.0
20135.7154.7227.0293.2
Zn(OAc)2 10%5130.6149.6209.5117.1
10134.9153.8213.1141.2
15141.2159.4219.7209.1
20144.8164.0229.6216.9
Without catalyst5129.2150.2200.9106.2
10135.3158.1218.1172.2
15140.1158.3218.2220.9
20145.2160.6218.9254.1
β = heating rate; Ti = onset temperature; Tp = peak temperature; Tf = end temperature; ΔHc = reaction enthalpy.
Table 2. Kinetic parameters calculated using the Kissinger method for the curing reaction of epoxy vitrimer.
Table 2. Kinetic parameters calculated using the Kissinger method for the curing reaction of epoxy vitrimer.
Sample A (min−1)Ea (kJ/mol)R2
Caffeine 5%9.1585 × 1014133.14870.9944
Caffeine 10%7.9974 × 1013124.37740.9936
Zn(OAc)2 5%9.1625 × 1013122.64810.9995
Zn(OAc)2 10%6.6266 × 1012116.01360.9913
Without catalyst1.92483 × 1015135.66790.9914
Table 3. Thermogravimetric analysis results for Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers.
Table 3. Thermogravimetric analysis results for Eu-Epx/AA vitrimers.
SampleTonset (°C)Tmax 1 (°C) Tmax 2 (°C)Char (%)Degradation Profile
Caffeine 5%357.11373.9400.6719.96Bimodal
Caffeine 10%364.21380.3404.621.21Bimodal
Zn(OAc)2 5%359.4378.5404.2523.56Bimodal
Zn(OAc)2 10%354.37392.5-23.61Unimodal
Without catalyst350.28357.61396.2827.14Bimodal
Tonset: Onset degradation temperature (5% weight loss); Tmax 1: Temperature of maximum degradation rate (first peak); Tmax 2: Temperature of maximum degradation rate (second peak, if present); Char: Residual mass at 700 °C.
Table 4. Gel Content and Swelling Ratio Analysis of Cured Vitrimer Formulations.
Table 4. Gel Content and Swelling Ratio Analysis of Cured Vitrimer Formulations.
FormulationGel Content (%, THF)Swelling Ratio (Q, THF)Swelling Ratio (Q, DCM)
No catalyst78.3 ± 2.13.85 ± 0.184.25 ± 0.20
Caffeine 5%91.2 ± 1.52.42 ± 0.122.75 ± 0.14
Caffeine 10%93.8 ± 1.82.18 ± 0.102.49 ± 0.12
Zn(OAc)2 5%92.5 ± 1.32.35 ± 0.112.62 ± 0.13
Zn(OAc)2 10%95.1 ± 1.11.95 ± 0.092.21 ± 0.11
Table 5. Estimated Crosslinking Density from Swelling Analysis.
Table 5. Estimated Crosslinking Density from Swelling Analysis.
FormulationPolymer Volume Fraction (φ)Crosslinking Density (νe, mol/cm3)Relative Increase
No catalyst0.2061.89 × 10−3-
Caffeine 5%0.2932.87 × 10−3+51.9%
Caffeine 10%0.3143.14 × 10−3+66.1%
Zn(OAc)2 5%0.2982.95 × 10−3+56.1%
Zn(OAc)2 10%0.3393.42 × 10−3+80.9%
Table 6. TMA results for epoxy vitrimers with different catalysts and concentrations.
Table 6. TMA results for epoxy vitrimers with different catalysts and concentrations.
SampleTv (°C)ΔTMA (μm)CTE1 (°C−1)
Caffeine 5%210411.985 × 10−4
Caffeine 10%198442.188 × 10−4
Zn(OAc)2 5%189522.176 × 10−4
Zn(OAc)2 10%132472.745 × 10−4
Without catalyst235551.787 × 10−4
Table 7. Thermal curing protocol for all formulations.
Table 7. Thermal curing protocol for all formulations.
StageTemperature (°C)Time (Min)Purpose
1. Initial curing13060Gelation and network formation
2. Intermediate curing15060Network densification
3. Post-curing190120Network completion and equilibration
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Becerra-Lovera, A.Y.; Anaya-Mancipe, J.M.; Díaz-Martin, R.D.; Dias, M.L.; Souza, D.d.H.S. Eugenol-Based Epoxy Vitrimers: Caffeine and Zinc Acetate as Potential Alternative Catalysts in Curing Kinetics and Dynamic Network Properties. Molecules 2026, 31, 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050783

AMA Style

Becerra-Lovera AY, Anaya-Mancipe JM, Díaz-Martin RD, Dias ML, Souza DdHS. Eugenol-Based Epoxy Vitrimers: Caffeine and Zinc Acetate as Potential Alternative Catalysts in Curing Kinetics and Dynamic Network Properties. Molecules. 2026; 31(5):783. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050783

Chicago/Turabian Style

Becerra-Lovera, Angela Y., Javier Mauricio Anaya-Mancipe, Rubén D. Díaz-Martin, Marcos Lopes Dias, and Diego de Holanda Saboya Souza. 2026. "Eugenol-Based Epoxy Vitrimers: Caffeine and Zinc Acetate as Potential Alternative Catalysts in Curing Kinetics and Dynamic Network Properties" Molecules 31, no. 5: 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050783

APA Style

Becerra-Lovera, A. Y., Anaya-Mancipe, J. M., Díaz-Martin, R. D., Dias, M. L., & Souza, D. d. H. S. (2026). Eugenol-Based Epoxy Vitrimers: Caffeine and Zinc Acetate as Potential Alternative Catalysts in Curing Kinetics and Dynamic Network Properties. Molecules, 31(5), 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050783

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop