Next Article in Journal
Botany, Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities of Acmella oleracea: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
From PEGylation to Next-Generation Polymers: Overcoming Biological Barriers—A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
A DFT Study on Ben(n = 10–12) Clusters with Hydrogen Storage Capacity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advancing the Frontiers: Contemporary Achievements and Future Directions in Density Functional Theory Calculations

by
Aleksandr S. Kazachenko
1,2,3,4,* and
Noureddine Issaoui
5
1
Institute of Chemical Technologies, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Markovskogo St. 57, 660049 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
2
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center” Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok St. 50/24, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
3
School of Non-Ferrous Metals and and Material Science, Siberian Federal University, Pr. Svobodnyy 79, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
4
Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, St. Partizan Zheleznyak, Bld. 1, 660022 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
5
Laboratory of Quantum and Statistical Physics (LR18ES18), Faculty of Sciences, University of Monastir, Avenue de l’Environnement, Monastir 5019, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(4), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040676
Submission received: 11 February 2026 / Accepted: 13 February 2026 / Published: 15 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculation)
Density Functional Theory (DFT) has been a cornerstone of computational chemistry and physics for several decades [1,2,3,4]. Its unique combination of relative computational efficiency and reasonable accuracy has made it an indispensable tool for probing the atomic and electronic structure of materials [5,6,7], molecules [8,9,10], and surfaces [11,12,13,14]. The collection of articles presented in this Special Issue vividly illustrate the incredible breadth of DFT’s applications—from geochemistry and catalysis to pharmaceuticals and materials science. This editorial aims not only to summarize the key trends showcased in the issue but also to outline the new frontiers contemporary DFT is approaching and to discuss the persistent challenges that accompany its evolution.
The diversity of applications showcased here underscores DFT’s remarkable versatility in bridging scales from the atom to complex macroscopic systems. Modern research demonstrates that the scope of DFT is continuously expanding to encompass increasingly complex phenomena. In the field of reactivity and catalysis, a classical domain for DFT, studies on the thermal decomposition of triazolones and their thione analogs [15], and the hydrogenation of CO2 on doped copper surfaces [16], exemplify how DFT elucidates not only the sequence of elementary steps, but also enables the rational selection of functionals for different compound classes. This includes accounting for the higher polarizability of sulfur-containing systems or better modeling dispersion interactions in those that are oxygen-containing [17,18,19]. Furthermore, DFT identifies key activity descriptors, such as the dramatic reduction in oxygen vacancy formation energy in samaria-doped ceria, a process central to its catalytic function [20]. The method successfully transcends molecular systems to tackle complex materials and nanostructures. Investigations into the diffusion of ionic liquids within metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [21,22,23], the stability of pharmaceutical hydrate forms like thiamine hydrochloride [24], and the interaction of boron oxide nanoflakes with the antiviral drug favipiravir [25] demonstrate how periodic calculations and cluster models provide atomistic insight into the properties of composites, polymorphs, and nanocarriers. This capability extends to fundamental questions in geochemistry and environmental science. The study of protolysis reactions on pyrophyllite surfaces [26] and the photolysis of β-butyrolactone in the atmosphere [27] are prime examples of DFT offering an atom-scale understanding of mineral dissolution and organic pollutant degradation processes that are often inaccessible through experiment alone [28,29]. Moreover, DFT is making significant inroads into biochemistry and pharmacology. The use of conceptual DFT (CDFT) and pharmacokinetic property assessment for screening saxitoxin derivatives as potential pharmaceutical candidates [30] represents an increasingly promising direction that marries quantum–chemical calculations with bioinformatic approaches, opening new avenues for drug discovery [31,32].
A critical dimension reinforced by several studies in this collection is the synergy between DFT calculations and experimental validation, which is paramount for transforming theoretical predictions into reliable knowledge [33,34]. The work on the electronic spectroscopy of β-butyrolactone [27] stands as a direct example, where time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations are employed to assign features in a novel vacuum ultraviolet absorption spectrum. Similarly, the comprehensive analysis of the histaminium bis(trioxonitrate) compound [35] and N-Butyl-1H-benzimidazole [36] meticulously compares calculated structural parameters, vibrational spectra, and UV–Vis transitions with experimental data from X-ray diffraction, FTIR, and spectrofluorimetry. This iterative dialog between computation and experiment not only validates the theoretical models and chosen levels of theory, but also provides a deeper, mechanistic interpretation of the raw experimental data [37,38,39]. In materials science, this synergy is equally vital. The DFT study of gold–ligand interactions [40,41,42] provides the electronic structure rationale for the empirically observed stability series of gold complexes, thereby informing the design of new leaching agents. This back-and-forth is the engine of modern molecular and materials design, where DFT screens promising candidates and experiments confirm their real-world properties, closing the discovery loop [43,44,45]. The detailed study of binary systems, such as the ammonium sulfamate–urea system [46] and the sulfamic acid–urea system [47], further highlights how combined theoretical and experimental techniques (FTIR, XRD, TGA/DSC, DFT, QTAIM) are essential for understanding the thermal stability and physicochemical behavior of complex mixtures.
However, progress in these exciting applications inevitably encounters methodological limitations, and simultaneously stimulates the development of novel approaches, pointing toward new horizons for the theory [48,49]. One of the central themes, highlighted in the work on triazolone decomposition [15], is the critical dependence of results, particularly activation energies, on the choice of the exchange–correlation functional. The future lies with the systematic use of modern, robust, hybrid, and dispersion-corrected functionals (e.g., those from the r2SCAN or ωB97 families) and, increasingly [50,51,52], with the integration of machine learning (ML) [53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. ML is poised to revolutionize DFT by creating accurate and transferable interatomic potentials, predicting material properties across vast chemical spaces, and even guiding the development of new functionals themselves, forming a new paradigm for computational discovery [60,61,62,63]. Another frontier involves the modeling of “soft matter” and dynamic processes in condensed phases. The investigation of ionic liquid diffusion in flexible ZIF-8 [21] underscores the complexity of simulating dynamics within pliable porous frameworks. Advances in DFT-based molecular dynamics coupled with enhanced sampling techniques are crucial for studying rare events, phase transitions, and solvation effects, thereby bridging the gap between static zero-Kelvin calculations and real-world experimental conditions [64,65,66,67,68,69]. Furthermore, the accurate description of excited states and non-adiabatic processes remains a vibrant area of development. The work on β-butyrolactone using TD-DFT [27] exemplifies the growing interest in photochemistry and excited-state dynamics. The development of methods for accurately describing conical intersections, charge transfer states, and multielectron excitations—often using higher-level wavefunction methods as benchmarks for TD-DFT—is critical for progress in photovoltaics, optoelectronics, and spectroscopy [70,71,72,73,74,75]. The importance of including exact Hartree–Fock exchange for correctly describing vibronic structure in electronic spectra, as discussed in foundational studies [76,77,78], continues to influence modern functional development for excited-state properties.
Looking ahead, the next wave of DFT applications will likely be dominated by the quest to understand and design functional materials under operating conditions and to tackle ever-larger and more disordered systems [79,80]. This includes the explicit simulation of electrochemical interfaces [81] for green energy technologies, where the interplay of electrode potential, solvation [82,83], and reaction kinetics poses a formidable challenge [84,85,86]. A pertinent example is the DFT-driven discovery of hollow spherical beryllium clusters as ultra-high-capacity, potentially reversible hydrogen storage materials, highlighting the theory’s direct role in advancing clean energy solutions [87,88,89,90,91]. Furthermore, the prediction of novel quantum materials with correlated electronic states or topological properties pushes standard DFT formulations to their limits, necessitating close collaboration with many-body perturbation theory (GW) [92,93] or dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) [94,95,96]. The study of two-dimensional ice I and its anti-icing potential [97] hints at the fascinating interface of low-dimensional materials and phase behavior, a vast playground for DFT exploration. In the life sciences, the integration of DFT with classical molecular mechanics in QM/MM schemes will become more routine, enabling the study of enzyme catalysis and metalloprotein function with quantum-mechanical accuracy for the active site [98,99,100]. The ultimate challenge lies in moving from mere understanding to true inverse design: using algorithms to navigate the immense space of possible molecules and materials towards those that meet a specific set of target properties, with DFT serving as the essential scoring function [101]. The re-investigation of fundamental principles like Sabatier’s principle using free energy diagrams derived from DFT, especially in electrocatalysis [84], underscores the theory’s role in refining our most basic conceptual frameworks for activity prediction [102,103,104,105].
The future trajectory of DFT lies in its deep integration with complementary methods and experimental data. It is becoming the core engine of multiscale modeling frameworks, where quantum–chemical insights provide parameters for mesoscopic and macroscopic simulations. An important trend is the creation of “digital twins” for chemical processes—comprehensive computational models that integrate DFT-derived reaction pathways, microkinetic modeling, and real-time data analysis. DFT’s role is expanding from a tool for explanation to a platform for prediction and autonomous discovery. The articles compiled in this Special Issue provide compelling evidence that DFT remains a vital and dynamically evolving field. It continues to address fundamental questions in chemical physics while simultaneously becoming a key enabling technology for solving applied challenges in catalysis, materials design, drug development, and environmental science. By overcoming current methodological constraints through the development of next-generation functionals, integration with machine learning, and robust multiscale modeling, DFT is paving the way for a new era of predictive computational science. In this era, in silico modeling will be an indispensable and integral part of the discovery and innovation cycle, seamlessly connecting the quantum world to macroscopic properties and functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.K. and N.I.; formal analysis, A.S.K. and N.I.; investigation, A.S.K. and N.I.; data curation, A.S.K. and N.I.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.K. and N.I.; writing—review and editing, A.S.K. and N.I.; supervision, A.S.K.; project administration, A.S.K. and N.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The guest editors wish to thank all the authors for their contributions to this Special Issue, all the reviewers for their work in evaluating the submitted articles, and the editorial staff of Molecules for their kind assistance. This study was carried out within the budget project FWES-2026-0011 for the Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Federal Research Center, Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zois, K.P.; Tzeli, D. A Critical Look at Density Functional Theory in Chemistry: Untangling Its Strengths and Weaknesses. Atoms 2024, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cohen, A.J.; Mori-Sánchez, P.; Yang, W. Challenges for Density Functional Theory. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 289–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F.; Langenaeker, W. Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1793–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Argaman, N.; Makov, G. Density functional theory: An introduction. Am. J. Phys. 2000, 68, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kohn, W.; Becke, A.D.; Parr, R.G. Density Functional Theory of Electronic Structure. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12974–12980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fredrickson, D.C. DFT-Chemical Pressure Analysis: Visualizing the Role of Atomic Size in Shaping the Structures of Inorganic Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5991–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hui, S.; Deng, L.; Zhang, L.; Shen, H.; Chen, Q.; Wu, H. Integrated AI and DFT: A Revolutionary Computational Breakthrough for Microwave-Absorbing Materials Design. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e13098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guan, H.; Sun, H.; Zhao, X. Application of Density Functional Theory to Molecular Engineering of Pharmaceutical Formulations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Demerdash, S.H.; Halim, S.A.; El-Nahas, A.M.; El-Meligy, A.B. A density functional theory study of the molecular structure, reactivity, and spectroscopic properties of 2-(2-mercaptophenyl)-1-azaazulene tautomers and rotamers. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feride, A.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Issaoui, N. DFT Calculations of Some Important Radicals Used in the Nitroxide-Mediated Polymerization and Their HOMO–LUMO, Natural Bond Orbital, and Molecular Electrostatic Potential Comparative Analysis. Polym. Sci. Ser. B 2022, 64, 765–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Obot, I.B.; Macdonald, D.D.; Gasem, Z.M. Density functional theory (DFT) as a powerful tool for designing new organic corrosion inhibitors. Part 1: An overview. Corros. Sci. 2015, 99, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ou, S.; Heimann, J.E.; Bennett, J.W. A Density Functional Theory (DFT) Investigation of Sulfur-Based Adsorbate Interactions on Alumina and Calcite Surfaces. Clays Clay Miner. 2022, 70, 370–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gerrits, N.; Smeets, E.W.F.; Vuckovic, S.; Powell, A.D.; Doblhoff-Dier, K.; Kroes, G.-J. Density Functional Theory for Molecule–Metal Surface Reactions: When Does the Generalized Gradient Approximation Get It Right, and What to Do If It Does Not. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 10552–10560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abbaspour-Tamijani, A.; Bennett, J.W.; Jones, D.T.; Cartagena-Gonzalez, N.; Jones, Z.R.; Laudadio, E.D.; Hamers, R.J.; Santana, J.A.; Mason, S.E. DFT and thermodynamics calculations of surface cation release in LiCoO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 515, 145865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ipanaque-Chávez, R.; Loroño, M.; Cordova-Sintjago, T.; Paz, J.L. Substituent Effects in the Thermal Decomposition of 1,2,4-Triazol-3(2H)-Ones and Their Thione Analogues: A DFT Study with Functional Performance. Molecules 2026, 31, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Yu, M.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Gong, C.; Cao, X.; Ju, Z.; Peng, Y. Density Functional Theory Study of CO2 Hydrogenation on Transition-Metal-Doped Cu(211) Surfaces. Molecules 2023, 28, 2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Aeberhard, P.C.; Arey, J.S.; Lin, I.C.; Rothlisberger, U. Accurate DFT Descriptions for Weak Interactions of Molecules Containing Sulfur. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vuong, V.-Q.; Cui, Q. Reparameterization of the chemical-potential equalization model with DFTB3: A practical balance between accuracy and transferability. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158, 064111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Xu, S.; Ren, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, F.; Sun, Q.; Wennersten, R.; Yang, L. The Effect of Nitrogen- and Oxygen-Containing Functional Groups on C2H6/SO2/NO Adsorption: A Density Functional Theory Study. Energies 2023, 16, 7537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Keyhanian, M.; Koleva, I.Z.; Aleksandrov, H.A. Impact of Sm3+ Ions on Oxygen Vacancy Formation in Ceria Systems. Molecules 2025, 30, 4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, L.; Jiang, K.; Chen, Q.; Liu, L. On the Diffusion of Ionic Liquids in ILs@ZIF-8 Composite Materials: A Density Functional Theory Study. Molecules 2024, 29, 1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Majid, M.F.; Mohd Zaid, H.F.; Abd Shukur, M.F.; Ahmad, A.; Jumbri, K. Physicochemical properties and density functional theory calculation of octahedral UiO-66 with Bis(Trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide ionic liquids. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thomas, A.; Maiyelvaganan, K.R.; Kamalakannan, S.; Prakash, M. Density Functional Theory Studies on Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 and Ionic Liquid-Based Composite Materials. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 22655–22666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Napiórkowska, E.; Szeleszczuk, Ł.; Milcarz, K.; Pisklak, D.M. Density Functional Theory and Density Functional Tight Binding Studies of Thiamine Hydrochloride Hydrates. Molecules 2023, 28, 7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zahid, M.N.; Kosar, N.; Sajid, H.; Ibrahim, K.E.; Gatasheh, M.K.; Mahmood, T. Unveiling the Potential of B3O3 Nanoflake as Effective Transporter for the Antiviral Drug Favipiravir: Density Functional Theory Analysis. Molecules 2023, 28, 8092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bentabol, M.; Pérez del Valle, C.; Hernández-Laguna, A.; Huertas, F.J. Protolysis Reaction on Pyrophyllite Surface Molecular Models: A DFT Study. Molecules 2025, 30, 4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Randi, P.A.S.; Bettega, M.H.F.; Jones, N.C.; Hoffmann, S.V.; Śmiałek, M.A.; Limão-Vieira, P. Ring Opening upon Valence Shell Excitation in β-Butyrolactone: Experimental and Theoretical Methods. Molecules 2025, 30, 3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Balasooriya, H.; Li, C.; Wang, F. Understanding Steel Corrosion: Surface Chemistry and Defects Explored Through DFT Modelling—A Review. Processes 2025, 13, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, O.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ni, Z.; Liu, X.; Jia, H. Oxalic Acid-Promoted Pollutant Attenuation by Hematite via Hydrogen Radical Generation under Aerobic Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 25344–25355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Flores-Holguín, N.; Salas-Leiva, J.S.; Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Glossman-Mitnik, D. Marine Toxins as Pharmaceutical Treasure Troves: A Focus on Saxitoxin Derivatives from a Computational Point of View. Molecules 2024, 29, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, F. Chapter 9—Exploring the role of hydrogen bonding in biomolecules and drugs: Insights from DFT calculations. In Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Kuznetsov, A.E., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 263–290. [Google Scholar]
  32. Saeed, F.; Idrees, N.; Imran, M. DFT based structural modeling of chemotherapy drugs via topological indices and curvilinear regression. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 33755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, M.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Y.; He, Q. Recent Applications of Theoretical Calculations and Artificial Intelligence in Solid-State Electrolyte Research: A Review. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alosious, S.; Jiang, M.; Luo, T. Computation and machine learning for materials: Past, present, and future perspectives. MRS Bull. 2025, 50, 1212–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jmai, M.; Gatfaoui, S.; Issaoui, N.; Roisnel, T.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Al-Dossary, O.; Marouani, H.; Kazachenko, A.S. Synthesis, Empirical and Theoretical Investigations on New Histaminium Bis(Trioxonitrate) Compound. Molecules 2023, 28, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kazachenko, A.S.; Tanış, E.; Akman, F.; Medimagh, M.; Issaoui, N.; Al-Dossary, O.; Bousiakou, L.G.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Zimonin, D.; Skripnikov, A.M. A Comprehensive Study of N-Butyl-1H-Benzimidazole. Molecules 2022, 27, 7864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Armstrong, G.S.J.; Khokhlova, M.A.; Labeye, M.; Maxwell, A.S.; Pisanty, E.; Ruberti, M. Dialogue on analytical and ab initio methods in attoscience. Eur. Phys. J. D 2021, 75, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. van Cranenburgh, S.; Wang, S.; Vij, A.; Pereira, F.; Walker, J. Choice modelling in the age of machine learning—Discussion paper. J. Choice Model. 2022, 42, 100340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, H.; Murray, J.S.; Shreeve, J.n.M. A Computational Renaissance in High-Energy Density Materials (HEDMs) Research. Chem. Rev. 2025, 125, 10342–10456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, N.; Kou, J.; Sun, C. Investigation on Gold–Ligand Interaction for Complexes from Gold Leaching: A DFT Study. Molecules 2023, 28, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koppen, J.V.; Hapka, M.; Modrzejewski, M.; Szczęśniak, M.M.; Chałasiński, G. Density functional theory approach to gold-ligand interactions: Separating true effects from artifacts. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 244313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hu, H.; Reven, L.; Rey, A.D. DFT Study of Gold Surfaces–Ligand Interactions: Alkanethiols versus Halides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 11909–11913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pan, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, C.; He, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Peng, P.; Wang, J. Convergence of Computational Materials Science and AI for Next-Generation Energy Storage Materials. J. Electron. Mater. 2026, 55, 45–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schleder, G.R.; Padilha, A.C.M.; Acosta, C.M.; Costa, M.; Fazzio, A. From DFT to machine learning: Recent approaches to materials science–a review. J. Phys. Mater. 2019, 2, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hong, S.; Liow, C.H.; Yuk, J.M.; Byon, H.R.; Yang, Y.; Cho, E.; Yeom, J.; Park, G.; Kang, H.; Kim, S.; et al. Reducing Time to Discovery: Materials and Molecular Modeling, Imaging, Informatics, and Integration. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 3971–3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kazachenko, A.S.; Issaoui, N.; Fetisova, O.Y.; Berezhnaya, Y.D.; Al-Dossary, O.M.; Akman, F.; Kumar, N.; Bousiakou, L.G.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Ionin, V.A.; et al. Comprehensive Study of the Ammonium Sulfamate–Urea Binary System. Molecules 2023, 28, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kazachenko, A.S.; Issaoui, N.; Medimagh, M.; Yu Fetisova, O.; Berezhnaya, Y.D.; Elsuf’ev, E.V.; Al-Dossary, O.M.; Wojcik, M.J.; Xiang, Z.; Bousiakou, L.G. Experimental and theoretical study of the sulfamic acid-urea deep eutectic solvent. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 363, 119859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hoffmann, G.; Guégan, F.; Labet, V.; Joubert, L.; Chermette, H.; Morell, C.; Tognetti, V. Expanding horizons in conceptual density functional theory: Novel ensembles and descriptors to decipher reactivity patterns. J. Comput. Chem. 2024, 45, 1716–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vuckovic, S.; Song, S.; Kozlowski, J.; Sim, E.; Burke, K. Density Functional Analysis: The Theory of Density-Corrected DFT. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6636–6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Santra, G.; Calinsky, R.; Martin, J.M.L. Benefits of Range-Separated Hybrid and Double-Hybrid Functionals for a Large and Diverse Data Set of Reaction Energies and Barrier Heights. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 5492–5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bursch, M.; Neugebauer, H.; Ehlert, S.; Grimme, S. Dispersion corrected r2SCAN based global hybrid functionals: R2SCANh, r2SCAN0, and r2SCAN50. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 134105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shil, S.; Bhattacharya, D. The performance and efficiency of twelve range-separated hybrid DFT functionals for calculation of the magnetic exchange coupling constants of di-nuclear first row transition metal complexes. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2024, 1235, 114541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Simak, S.I.; Delczeg-Czirjak, E.K.; Eriksson, O. Machine learning for improved density functional theory thermodynamics. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 17212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ruth, M.; Gerbig, D.; Schreiner, P.R. Machine Learning for Bridging the Gap between Density Functional Theory and Coupled Cluster Energies. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 4912–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zheng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Yam, C.; Chen, Z.-H.; An, Z.; Zheng, X.; Hu, Z.; Chen, G. Machine-learning-enhanced density functional theory calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 163, 184103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nyangiwe, N.N. Applications of density functional theory and machine learning in nanomaterials: A review. Next Mater. 2025, 8, 100683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chowdhury, C.; Karthikraja, E.; Subramanian, V. DFT and machine learning guided investigation into the design of new dual-atom catalysts based on α-2 graphyne. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024, 26, 25143–25155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. del Rio, B.G.; Phan, B.; Ramprasad, R. A deep learning framework to emulate density functional theory. npj Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Domínguez-Castro, A. DFT and machine learning for predicting hydrogen adsorption energies on rocksalt complex oxides. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2024, 143, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schmidt, J.; Marques, M.R.G.; Botti, S.; Marques, M.A.L. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kulichenko, M.; Nebgen, B.; Lubbers, N.; Smith, J.S.; Barros, K.; Allen, A.E.A.; Habib, A.; Shinkle, E.; Fedik, N.; Li, Y.W.; et al. Data Generation for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 13681–13714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Westermayr, J.; Gastegger, M.; Schütt, K.T.; Maurer, R.J. Perspective on integrating machine learning into computational chemistry and materials science. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 230903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, K.S. Machine Learning for Accelerating Energy Materials Discovery: Bridging Quantum Accuracy with Computational Efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2026, 16, e03356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. VandeVondele, J.; Borštnik, U.; Hutter, J. Linear Scaling Self-Consistent Field Calculations with Millions of Atoms in the Condensed Phase. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3565–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stavrogiannis, C.; Sofos, F.; Karakasidis, T.E. Machine Learning-Enhanced Molecular Dynamics: Current State, Challenges and Perspectives. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bucher, D.; Pierce, L.C.T.; McCammon, J.A.; Markwick, P.R.L. On the Use of Accelerated Molecular Dynamics to Enhance Configurational Sampling in Ab Initio Simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. de Haas, T.; Calvani, D.; Zaaruolo, A.; de Jong, T.; Rutgers, J.; Kreupeling, B.; de Groot, H.J.M.; Buda, F. Hybrid-DFT Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Photocatalytic Water Oxidation in a [Ru-bda]–Dye Complex. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 20093–20103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rahimi, R.; Solimannejad, M. A study combining DFT and molecular dynamics simulations into the performance of B6N6 nanosheets for CO2 capture and separation. Appl. Phys. A 2023, 130, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Firaha, D.; Liu, Y.M.; van de Streek, J.; Sasikumar, K.; Dietrich, H.; Helfferich, J.; Aerts, L.; Braun, D.E.; Broo, A.; DiPasquale, A.G.; et al. Predicting crystal form stability under real-world conditions. Nature 2023, 623, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jacquemin, D.; Duchemin, I.; Blase, X. 0–0 Energies Using Hybrid Schemes: Benchmarks of TD-DFT, CIS(D), ADC(2), CC2, and BSE/GW formalisms for 80 Real-Life Compounds. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 5340–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mester, D.; Kállay, M. Charge-Transfer Excitations within Density Functional Theory: How Accurate Are the Most Recommended Approaches? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 1646–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Prlj, A.; Curchod, B.F.E.; Fabrizio, A.; Floryan, L.; Corminboeuf, C. Qualitatively Incorrect Features in the TDDFT Spectrum of Thiophene-Based Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Duque-Prata, A.; Serpa, C.; Caridade, P.J.S.B. Chapter 7—Properties of charge-transfer states based on (TD-)DFT: Defying accuracy. In Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Kuznetsov, A.E., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 193–238. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hedegård, E.D.; Heiden, F.; Knecht, S.; Fromager, E.; Jensen, H.J.A. Assessment of charge-transfer excitations with time-dependent, range-separated density functional theory based on long-range MP2 and multiconfigurational self-consistent field wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 184308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mei, Y.; Yang, W. Charge transfer excitation energies from ground state density functional theory calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 144109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dierksen, M.; Grimme, S. The Vibronic Structure of Electronic Absorption Spectra of Large Molecules:  A Time-Dependent Density Functional Study on the Influence of “Exact” Hartree−Fock Exchange. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 10225–10237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Provasi, P.F.; Modesto-Costa, L.; Sampaio, F.; Silva, T.; da Cunha, A.R.; Andrade-Filho, T.; Gester, R. The Importance of the Density Functional Theory Exchange–Correlation Hartree–Fock Term in Magnetic Resonance: Application to an Aqueous Environment. J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fabian, J.; Herzog, K. Post–Hartree–Fock MP2 and density functional theory derived structure and vibrations of 1,2-dithiole-2-thione and 1,2-dithiole-3-one. Vib. Spectrosc. 1998, 16, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cui, X.-Y.; Ringer, S.P. On the nexus between atom probe microscopy and density functional theory simulations. Mater. Charact. 2018, 146, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Teale, A.M.; Helgaker, T.; Savin, A.; Adamo, C.; Aradi, B.; Arbuznikov, A.V.; Ayers, P.W.; Baerends, E.J.; Barone, V.; Calaminici, P.; et al. DFT exchange: Sharing perspectives on the workhorse of quantum chemistry and materials science. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 28700–28781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hussein, U.A.-R.; Hammad, A.K.; Saydaxmetova, S.; Yaseen, B.M.; Albadr, R.J.; Taher, W.M.; Alwan, M.; Akbar, M.; Bhutto, J.K.; Islam, S. A DFT study for evaluation of the electrochemical performance of hydrogen boride monolayer as anode for Mg-ion battery. J. Energy Storage 2025, 133, 118084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, S.-C.; Zhu, X.-R.; Liu, D.-Y.; Fang, D.-C. DFT calculations in solution systems: Solvation energy, dispersion energy and entropy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 913–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bensberg, M.; Türtscher, P.L.; Unsleber, J.P.; Reiher, M.; Neugebauer, J. Solvation Free Energies in Subsystem Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 723–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Exner, K.S. Is Thermodynamics a Good Descriptor for the Activity? Re-Investigation of Sabatier’s Principle by the Free Energy Diagram in Electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 5320–5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Verma, A.M.; Kishore, N. Kinetics of Decomposition Reactions of Acetic Acid Using DFT Approach. Open Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 12, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  86. Tankov, I.; Yankova, R. DFT analysis, reaction kinetics and mechanism of esterification using pyridinium nitrate as a green catalyst. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 277, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yao, C.; Shi, S.; Duan, Z.; Liu, X.; Diao, K.; Hu, J.; Chen, D. A DFT Study on Ben(n = 10–12) Clusters with Hydrogen Storage Capacity. Molecules 2026, 31, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Naderizadeh, A.; Baizaee, S.M.; Kahnouji, H. Density functional theory study of reversible hydrogen storage in monolayer beryllium hydride by decoration with boron and lithium. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 7400–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Abyaz, B.; Mahdavifar, Z.; Schreckenbach, G.; Gao, Y. Prediction of beryllium clusters (Ben; n = 3–25) from first principles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 19716–19728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, L.; Xu, Y.; Cheung, N.-H.; Wong, K.-Y. Practical approach for beryllium atomic clusters: TD-DFT potential energy surfaces from equilibrium to dissociation for excited states of 2s → 2p. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2018, 137, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jinlan, W.; Guanghou, W.; Jijun, Z. Density functional study of beryllium clusters, with gradient correction. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2001, 13, L753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Großmann, M.; Thieme, M.; Grunert, M.; Runge, E. Many-body perturbation theory vs. density functional theory: A systematic benchmark for band gaps of solids. npj Comput. Mater. 2026, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Orlando, R.; Romaniello, P.; Loos, P.-F. The three channels of many-body perturbation theory: GW, particle–particle, and electron–hole T-matrix self-energies. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 159, 184113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zgid, D.; Chan, G.K.-L. Dynamical mean-field theory from a quantum chemical perspective. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 094115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, J.-M.; Wang, J.-X.; He, R.-Q.; Huang, L.; Lu, Z.-Y. Ab initio dynamical mean field theory with natural orbitals renormalization group impurity solver. npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qu, X.; Xu, P.; Li, R.; Li, G.; He, L.; Ren, X. Density Functional Theory Plus Dynamical Mean Field Theory within the Framework of Linear Combination of Numerical Atomic Orbitals: Formulation and Benchmarks. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 5589–5606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, Q.; Yu, X.; Yin, Y.; Jing, H.; Zhang, P. Theoretical Prediction of the Anti-Icing Activity of Two-Dimensional Ice I. Molecules 2023, 28, 6145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Dumont, E.; Monari, A. Chapter 4—In silico biochemistry through a DFT and QM/MM-based computational microscope. In Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Kuznetsov, A.E., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 113–142. [Google Scholar]
  99. Tzeliou, C.E.; Mermigki, M.A.; Tzeli, D. Review on the QM/MM Methodologies and Their Application to Metalloproteins. Molecules 2022, 27, 2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yu, T.; Guo, H. Understanding Enzyme Catalysis Mechanism Using QM/MM Simulation Methods. In Mechanistic Enzymology: Bridging Structure and Function; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; pp. 121–137. [Google Scholar]
  101. Jain, A.; Ong, S.P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W.D.; Dacek, S.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Skinner, D.; Ceder, G.; et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013, 1, 011002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ooka, H.; Huang, J.; Exner, K.S. The Sabatier Principle in Electrocatalysis: Basics, Limitations, and Extensions. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 654460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yeh, K.-Y.; Janik, M.J. Density Functional Theory Methods for Electrocatalysis. In Computational Catalysis; Asthagiri, A., Janik, M.J., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 116–156. [Google Scholar]
  104. Huang, B.; Gu, Q.; Tang, X.; Lützenkirchen-Hecht, D.; Yuan, K.; Chen, Y. Experimentally validating sabatier plot by molecular level microenvironment customization for oxygen electroreduction. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Castro-Ocampo, O.; Díaz-Rodríguez, T.G.; Pascoe-Sussoni, J.E.; Delesma, C.; Celaya, C.A.; Muñiz, J. Chapter 16—DFT on the material design and understanding for energy conversion and storage: Present state and further perspectives. In Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Kuznetsov, A.E., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 391–412. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kazachenko, A.S.; Issaoui, N. Advancing the Frontiers: Contemporary Achievements and Future Directions in Density Functional Theory Calculations. Molecules 2026, 31, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040676

AMA Style

Kazachenko AS, Issaoui N. Advancing the Frontiers: Contemporary Achievements and Future Directions in Density Functional Theory Calculations. Molecules. 2026; 31(4):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kazachenko, Aleksandr S., and Noureddine Issaoui. 2026. "Advancing the Frontiers: Contemporary Achievements and Future Directions in Density Functional Theory Calculations" Molecules 31, no. 4: 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040676

APA Style

Kazachenko, A. S., & Issaoui, N. (2026). Advancing the Frontiers: Contemporary Achievements and Future Directions in Density Functional Theory Calculations. Molecules, 31(4), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040676

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop