Nano-CaO2-Modified Biochar for Enhancing Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: A Review of Risk Mitigation and Resource Recovery Strategies
Abstract
1. Introduction
Literature Search Approach
2. Interdisciplinary Theories of Risk Management and Environmental Engineering
2.1. Core Theory Integration for TWW Treatment
2.2. Risk Identification Framework for TWW Treatment
3. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: Process Fundamentals and Risk Characterization
3.1. Physicochemical Properties of Tofu Wastewater as Risk Determinants
3.2. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion Process: Mechanisms and Risk Amplification
4. Assessment of Biochar as a Risk-Control Substrate
4.1. Physicochemical Properties of Biochar: Foundations for Risk Mitigation
4.2. Modification of Biochar with Calcium Peroxide: Engineering for Multi-Risk Control
4.3. Physicochemical Properties of Nano-CaO2/BC: Engineered for Comprehensive Risk Mitigation
4.4. pH and Functional Groups: Acidification Risk Control
4.5. Porosity and Surface Area: Adsorption and Habitat Enhancement
5. Roles of Nano-CaO2/BC in Enhancing Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: A Quantitative Risk-Mitigation Analysis
5.1. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: Semi-Quantitative Projection of Risk Reduction
5.2. Mechanistic Analysis of Risk-Mitigation Pathways
5.3. Sulfur, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Risk-Control Pathways
5.4. Comparison with Alternative Enhancement Strategies
6. Economic Feasibility Considerations
7. Challenges, Future Perspectives, and Risk-Management Optimization
- Feedstock: Soybean stover or peanut shells, selected for (i) high surface-area development at 700 °C (420–448 m2/g), (ii) alignment with circular economy by valorizing tofu production residues, and (iii) favorable ash composition supporting alkaline functionality.
- Pyrolysis temperature: 700 °C, to maximize surface area (>400 m2/g target), ensure structural stability under thermophilic conditions, and develop alkaline pH (>10.5).
- Nano-CaO2 loading: 10–20% w/w via post-pyrolysis impregnation, providing sufficient reactive capacity for pH buffering and ROS generation while preserving BC pore structure.
- Key performance indicators (KPIs): Specific surface area >400 m2/g (BET), calcium content 10–20% w/w, alkaline buffering capacity >5 meq/g, and H2O2 release rate 0.5–2.0 mM/day at 55 °C.
- Phase 1: Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Assays. Batch assays at 55 °C using synthetic TWW (formulated based on Table 1 and Table 2) with nano-CaO2/BC dosages of 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, and 15.0 g/L. Primary endpoints: cumulative methane yield (mL CH4/g COD), VFA profiles, pH stability, NH3-N and H2S concentrations. Duration: 30 days, triplicate reactors.
- Phase 2: Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Operation. Pilot-scale CSTR (100–500 L working volume) operated at 55 °C, HRT 10–15 days, organic loading rate 2–5 kg COD/m3/day, with nano-CaO2/BC at optimized dosage from Phase 1. Primary endpoints: steady-state methane productivity (m3 CH4/m3 reactor/day), COD removal efficiency, process stability indicators (pH, VFA/alkalinity ratio), and microbial community analysis via 16S rRNA sequencing. Duration: minimum 3 HRT cycles after steady-state achievement.
- Phase 3: Digestate Quality Assessment. Comprehensive characterization of digestate from Phase 2 including nutrient speciation (N, P, K), heavy metal content, pathogen indicators (fecal coliforms, Salmonella, helminth ova), and phytotoxicity (seed germination index). Soil incubation studies to assess nitrogen mineralization rates and phosphorus availability.
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Feng, H.; Jin, L.; Chen, Y.; Ji, J.; Gong, Z.; Hu, W.; Ying, C.; Liang, Y.; Li, J. Tofu wastewater as a carbon source flowing into municipal wastewater treatment plants for reductions of costs and greenhouse gas emissions. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hardyanti, N.; Susanto, H.; Budihardjo, M.A.; Saputra, A.T. Characteristics of Tofu Wastewater From Different Soybeans and Wastewater at Each Stage of Tofu Production. Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2023, 24, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Faisal, M.; Gani, A.; Mulana, F.; Daimon, H. Treatment and utilization of industrial tofu waste in Indonesia. Asian J. Chem. 2016, 28, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mulana, F.; Alam, P.N.; Daimon, H. Wastewater Characteristics from Tofu Processing Facilities in Banda Aceh; Syiah Kuala University Press: Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 2014; pp. 22–25. [Google Scholar]
- Nilawati, D.; Matsuura, N.; Honda, R.; Hara, H.; Neni, Y. Methane recovery from acidic tofu wastewater using an anaerobic fixed—bed reactor with bamboo as the biofilm carrier. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2021, 23, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Overview, M.; Tan, S.; Lee, M.; Wong, K.; Lim, B.; Goh, R.; Ng, J.; Tan, L.; Koh, S.; Chan, K.; et al. Global Tofu Competitive Landscape Professional Research Report 2025; DIResearch: Dallas, TX, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Widyaningrum, W.; Widyastuti, M. Effects of Liquid Wastes from Tofu Industries on Water Quality in Parangan River, Magelang District, Central Java-Indonesia. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 325, 03003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bi, S.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, Y. Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focusing on methanogenic performance and pathogens removal. Renew. Energy 2024, 233, 121184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sintawardani, N.; Muchlis; Hamidah, U.; Nilawati, D.; Wulan, D.R.; Janetasari, S.A.; Putra, H.E. Performance analysis and stability of tofu whey treatment in a 120 m3 Six-Stage up-flow anaerobic Fixed-Bed reactor during Start-Up. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2025, 78, 104346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, Y.; McAdam, E.; Zhang, Y.; Heaven, S.; Banks, C.; Longhurst, P. Ammonia inhibition and toxicity in anaerobic digestion: A critical review. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 32, 100899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Syaichurrozi, I.; Nurulshani, S.; Pramudita, A.A. Biogas generation from anaerobic co-digestion of tofu liquid waste and tapioca flour liquid waste at various initial pHs. J. Ecol. Eng. 2025, 26, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, L.; Lim, E.Y.; Loh, K.C.; Ok, Y.S.; Lee, J.T.E.; Shen, Y.; Wang, C.H.; Dai, Y.; Tong, Y.W. Biochar enhanced thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focusing on biochar particle size, microbial community analysis and pilot-scale application. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 209, 112654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, F.; Wang, B.; Hu, Q.; Tang, Y.; Luo, T.; Wu, T. Enhanced phosphate removal from aqueous solution using resourceable nano-CaO2/BC composite: Behaviors and mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 709, 136123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cai, D.; Li, D.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Ping, Q.; Li, Y. Innovative application of CaO2 in two-phase anaerobic digestion to enhance methane production from waste activated sludge: Condition optimization and mechanistic insights. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 504, 158911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barati Rashvanlou, R.; Rezaee, A.; Farzadkia, M.; Gholami, M.; Kermani, M. Effect of micro-aerobic process on improvement of anaerobic digestion sewage sludge treatment: Flow cytometry and ATP assessment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 35718–35728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nguyen, D.; Khanal, S.K. A little breath of fresh air into an anaerobic system: How microaeration facilitates anaerobic digestion process. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1971–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Koyama, M.; Nagao, N.; Syukri, F.; Yusoff, F.M.; Toda, T.; Quyen, T.N.M.; Nakasaki, K. Effect of Ca(OH)(2) dosing on thermophilic composting of anaerobic sludge to improve the NH(3) recovery. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gai, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhai, L.; Liu, S.; Ren, T.; Liu, H. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, Y.; Fu, Q.; Wang, W.; Yang, F.; Li, X.; Song, F.; Qing, Y.; Lin, Z.; Long, W.; Wang, D. Performance and mechanism of calcium peroxide reducing H2S production from sludge anaerobic fermentation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 144816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, J.; Lu, C.; Liu, J.; Han, Y.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Xu, H.; Gao, J.; Li, A.; et al. Mechanistic insights and application of SS/MS/C/CaO2 composite for the simultaneous removal of ammonia nitrogen and multiple antibiotics. Water Res. 2026, 289, 124797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tang, S.; Yan, F.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, Z. Novel Calcium Oxide-Enhancement Phosphorus Recycling Technique through Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 9167–9177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, Y.; Liao, H.; Zhang, J.; Lu, H.; He, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Lu, M. A Novel Ca-Modified Biochar for Efficient Recovery of Phosphorus from Aqueous Solution and Its Application as a Phosphorus Biofertilizer. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tušer, I.; Oulehlová, A. Risk assessment and sustainability of wastewater treatment plant operation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Trubetskaya, A.; Horan, W.; Conheady, P.; Stockil, K.; Merritt, S.; Moore, S. A methodology for assessing and monitoring risk in the industrial wastewater sector. Water Resour. Ind. 2021, 25, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adar, E.; Ince, M.; Karatop, B.; Bilgili, M.S. The risk analysis by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy-FMEA of supercritical water gasification system used in the sewage sludge treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moerland, M.J.; Castañares Pérez, L.; Ruiz Velasco Sobrino, M.E.; Chatzopoulos, P.; Meulman, B.; de Wilde, V.; Zeeman, G.; Buisman, C.J.N.; van Eekert, M.H.A. Thermophilic (55 °C) and hyper-thermophilic (70 °C) anaerobic digestion as novel treatment technologies for concentrated black water. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.I.; Oh, J.S.; Yoo, S.C.; Jho, E.H.; Lee, C.G.; Park, S.J. Removal of phosphorus from water using calcium-rich organic waste and its potential as a fertilizer for rice growth. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Paz, A.M.; Amezketa, E.; Canfora, L.; Castanheira, N.; Falsone, G.; Gonçalves, M.C.; Gould, I.; Hristov, B.; Mastrorilli, M.; Ramos, T.; et al. Salt-affected soils: Field-scale strategies for prevention, mitigation, and adaptation to salt accumulation. Ital. J. Agron. 2023, 18, 2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, S.; Li, D.; Zhang, K.; Ma, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, Z.; Gao, X.; Gao, W.; Du, L. Effects of initial volatile fatty acid concentrations on process characteristics, microbial communities, and metabolic pathways on solid-state anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, Y.; Shen, C. Thermophilic-mesophilic temperature phase anaerobic co-digestion compared with single phase co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- McGenity, T.J.; Sorokin, D.Y. Methanogens and Methanogenesis in Hypersaline Environments; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bandung, P.N.; Engineering, B. Evaluation and Kinetics of Tofu Wastewater Bioreactor with Addition of Water Hyacinth. IIUM Eng. J. 2024, 25, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- You, A.; Be, M.; In, I. The Evaluation of Seeding Process of Tofu Wastewater Treatment in Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2024; p. 030002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seruga, P.; Krzywonos, M.; Paluszak, Z.; Urbanowska, A.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Niedźwiecki, Ł.; Pińkowska, H. Pathogen reduction potential in anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste. Molecules 2020, 25, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Guo, B.; Mou, A.; Li, R.; Liu, Y. Blackwater biomethane recovery using a thermophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor: Impacts of effluent recirculation on reactor performance. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 274, 111157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Al-Sulaimi, I.; Nayak, J.K.; Al-Mamun, A.; Sana, A. Effective removal of Helminths Ova from wastewater and its inactivation from sewage sludge using thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2023, 20, 100793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fan, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, X.; Yang, H.; Deng, P.; Zhao, Z. Alleviation of volatile fatty acids inhibition in anaerobic digestion of swine manure with nano-bubble water supplementation. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 411, 131304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mutegoa, E.; Sahini, M.G. Approaches to mitigation of hydrogen sulfide during anaerobic digestion process—A review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmad, M.; Lee, S.S.; Dou, X.; Mohan, D.; Sung, J.K.; Yang, J.E.; Ok, Y.S. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Giwa, A.S. Effectiveness of Torrefaction By-Products as Additive in Vacuum Blackwater under Anaerobic Digestion and Economic Significance. Processes 2023, 11, 3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, X.; Gholizadeh, M. Biomass pyrolysis: A review of the process development and challenges from initial researches up to the commercialisation stage. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 39, 109–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jayakumar, M.; Siraj, A.; Deso, L.; Jifara, B.; Venkatesa, S.; Rangaraju, M.; Jabesa, A.; Periyasamy, S.; Suresh, S.; Baskar, G. Comprehensive review on lignocellulosic biomass derived biochar production, characterization, utilization and applications. Chemosphere 2023, 345, 140515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chiappero, M.; Norouzi, O.; Hu, M.; Demichelis, F.; Berruti, F.; Di Maria, F.; Mašek, O.; Fiore, S. Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 131, 110037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, T.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Cheng, X. Characterization of Magnesium-Iron Modified Biochar to Alleviate Ammonia Inhibition and Enhance Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure. Waste Biomass Valorization 2025, 16, 4333–4351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chiang, P.F.; Zhang, T.L.; Giwa, A.S.; Maurice, N.J.; Claire, M.J.; Ali, N.; Shafique, E.; Vakili, M. Effects of Calcium-Oxide-Modified Biochar on the Anaerobic Digestion of Vacuum Blackwater. Molecules 2025, 30, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, G.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Angelidaki, I.; Miao, H. Mechanistic insights into Fe3O4-modified biochar relieving inhibition from erythromycin on anaerobic digestion. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 344, 118459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wei, W.; Shi, X.; Wu, L.; Liu, X.; Ni, B.J. Calcium peroxide pre-treatment improved the anaerobic digestion of primary sludge and its co-digestion with waste activated sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 828, 154404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Junoh, H.; Yip, C.H.; Kumaran, P. Effect on Ca(OH)2 pretreatment to enhance biogas production of organic food waste. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 32, 12013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rastinfard, A.; Nazarpak, M.H.; Moztarzadeh, F. Controlled chemical synthesis of CaO2 particles coated with polyethylene glycol: Characterization of crystallite size and oxygen release kinetics. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Sun, S.; Wang, Z.; Cui, D. Effect of CaO on Pyrolysis Products and Reaction Mechanisms of a Corn Stover. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10276–10287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, J.; Zou, H.; Gao, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J. In Situ Tar Removal in Biomass Gasification Using Ni-Perovskite-Based Oxygen Carriers. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 12569–12580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guo, J.; Cheng, S.; Cheng, Z.; Xin, L. Thermodynamics for precipitation of CaS bearing inclusion and their deformation during rolling process for Al-killed Ca-treated steel. Steel Res. Int. 2013, 84, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, A.; Liu, Y. Rapid Oxidation of Ammonia Nitrogen to Nitrogen Gas by UV-Activated Persulfate with Calcium Oxide. ACS ES T Eng. 2024, 4, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, F.; Bai, L.; Li, P.; Li, Q.; Luo, L.; Li, W. Improved methane production and sulfate removal by anaerobic co-digestion corn stalk and levulinic acid wastewater pretreated by calcium hydroxide. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 691, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, G.; Jin, K.; Eraky, M.; Peng, J.; Li, Q.; Meng, L.; Zhang, H.; Ai, P. Positive effect of Ca addition on the risk of Cu and Zn in digestate as biofertilizer. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tang, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Si, B. The Role of Biochar to Enhance Anaerobic Digestion: A Review. J. Renew. Mater. 2020, 8, 1033–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khor, W.C.; Rabaey, K.; Vervaeren, H. Low temperature calcium hydroxide treatment enhances anaerobic methane production from (extruded) biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 176, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.C.; Liu, L.; Liu, N. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 828–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Perwitasari, D.S.; Muryanto, S.; Jamari, J.; Bayuseno, A.P. Crystallization of struvite in the presence of calcium ions: Change in reaction rate, morphology and chemical composition. Cogent Eng. 2022, 9, 2049962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, R.; Kumar, N.; Parameswaran, P.; Simmons, B.A.; Sale, K.; Sun, N. Volatile fatty acid extraction from fermentation broth using a hydrophobic ionic liquid and in situ enzymatic esterification. RSC Sustain. 2024, 3, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; He, L.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Gu, L.; Li, J.; Liu, S.; He, Q. Different regulation strategies of anaerobic digestion by AC/CaO2 and Fe3O4/CaO2: Reactive oxygen species induction, methanogenic performance, and microbial response. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 406, 130977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, A.; Ghufran, R.; Wahid, Z.A. Role of calcium oxide in sludge granulation and methanogenesis for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent using UASB reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 198, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ji, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; He, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, G.; Chen, C. Impact of co-pretreatment of calcium hydroxide and steam explosion on anaerobic digestion efficiency with corn stover. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 1465–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Diaz-Uribe, C.; Monterrosa, F.; Simons, V.; Duran, F.; Florian, V.; Vallejo, W.; Castellanos, K.; Diosa, J.E.; Mosquera-Vargas, E. Phosphorus Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Biochar Derived from Cyanobacterial Biomass. Water 2025, 17, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Facchin, V.; Cavinato, C.; Pavan, P.; Bolzonella, D. Batch and continuous mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Effect of trace elements supplementation. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2013, 32, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ramírez, J.; Deago, E.; James Rivas, A.M.C. Effect of Biochar on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Untreated Sewage Sludge with Municipal Organic Waste under Mesophilic Conditions. Energies 2024, 17, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Q.H.; Sun, H.Y.; Yang, Z.M. Role of KOH-activated biochar on promoting anaerobic digestion of biomass from Pennisetum gianteum. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 353, 120165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lim, E.Y.; Lee, J.T.E.; Zhang, L.; Tian, H.; Ong, K.C.; Tio, Z.K.; Zhang, J.; Tong, Y.W. Potential of biogas residue biochar modified by ferric chloride for the enhancement of anaerobic digestion of food waste. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 817, 152968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Deng, Y.; Yang, X.; Shi, D.; Liu, X.; Xia, J.; Xu, J. Multimetallic biochar as an ecosystem engineer: Orchestrating synergistic IHT-DIET pathways via spatial niche partitioning for enhanced anaerobic digestion. J. Biotechnol. 2026, 416, 012013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wen, X.; Mazarji, M.; Chen, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, S.; Feng, L.; Li, G.; Zhou, H.; et al. Advancing anaerobic digestion with MnO2-modified biochar: Insights into performance and mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 954, 176303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmed, M.B.; Zhou, J.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W. Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 84, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Li, T.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Qin, C. Properties of calcium peroxide for release of hydrogen peroxide and oxygen: A kinetics study. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sia, C.J.; Kooh, M.R.R.; Lim, L.H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar: Influence of thermochemical parameters and analytical considerations. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2025, 192, 107296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Union. Regulation (Eu) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and repealing Regula. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, 170, 114. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R1009 (accessed on 14 March 2026).
- USEPA. A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. Epa-832/R-93/003. 1994; p. 175. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/documents/plain-english-guide-part503-biosolids-rule.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2026).




| Substrate | TSS (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | BOD (mg/L) | NH3-N (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red seed | 392 | 4516.67 | 2375.63 | 8.79 |
| Pati seed | 218 | 4016.67 | 2254.74 | 8.61 |
| Wonogiri seed | 444 | 4583.33 | 3481.00 | 13.86 |
| Green seed | 344 | 4500.00 | 2976.06 | 8.73 |
| Processing Facility | pH | MLSS (mg/L) | BOD (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | NH3-N (mg/L) | PO4-P (mg/L) | Turbidity (NTU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meurah Jaya | 5.08 | 1600 | 4520.50 | 6400 | 64.00 | 2.56 | 921 |
| Tahu Sumedang | 5.50 | 3130 | 3810.20 | 5000 | 129.30 | 95.50 | 730 |
| Tahu MKS | 4.82 | 1050 | 4390.50 | 7300 | 39.90 | 1.57 | 902 |
| Tahu Lampaseh Aceh | 4.90 | 1177 | 3575.50 | 6500 | 36.10 | 1.81 | 387 |
| Tahu Solo | 4.85 | 1150 | 4415.50 | 8500 | 33.50 | 0.97 | 841 |
| Feedstock | Temperature (°C) | Yield (%) | pH | Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Surface Area (m2/g) | C (%) | N (%) | O (%) | H (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat straw | 700 | 22.80 | 9.20 | 0.058 | 107.00 | 73.90 | 1.20 | 14.60 | 1.30 |
| Soybean stover | 300 | 37.03 | 7.27 | — | 5.61 | 68.81 | 1.88 | 24.99 | 4.29 |
| Corn straw | 500 | 29.30 | 10.40 | 0.012 | 6.00 | 58.00 | 2.30 | 21.50 | 2.70 |
| Peanut shells | 600 | 28.50 | 9.60 | 0.110 | 185.00 | 71.90 | 1.60 | 15.00 | 2.00 |
| Soybean stover | 700 | 21.59 | 11.32 | 0.19 | 420.30 | 81.98 | 1.30 | 15.45 | 1.27 |
| Corn straw | 400 | 35.50 | 10.20 | 0.008 | 4.00 | 56.10 | 2.40 | 22.00 | 4.30 |
| Peanut shells | 700 | 21.89 | 10.57 | 0.20 | 448.20 | 83.76 | 1.14 | 13.34 | 1.75 |
| Wheat straw | 500 | 27.60 | 8.30 | 0.090 | 111.00 | 70.30 | 1.40 | 17.70 | 2.90 |
| Peanut shells | 400 | 36.80 | 9.30 | 0.007 | 5.00 | 58.40 | 1.80 | 21.00 | 3.50 |
| Corn straw | 600 | 26.70 | 10.40 | 0.012 | 7.00 | 58.60 | 2.00 | 18.70 | 2.00 |
| Peanut shells | 300 | 36.91 | 7.76 | — | 3.14 | 68.27 | 1.91 | 25.89 | 3.85 |
| Wheat straw | 400 | 32.40 | 8.20 | 0.012 | 10.00 | 57.80 | 1.50 | 21.60 | 3.20 |
| Reaction Name | Chemical Equation | ΔG at 700 °C (kJ/mol) | Risk-Mitigation Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaO2 decomposition | 2CaO2 + Heat → 2CaO + O2 | −296.8 | Oxygen release for tar cracking and pore formation |
| Biomass volatiles + O2 | CxHᵧO2 + O2 → CO + CO2 + H2O + hydrocarbons | −450 to −550 | Tar reduction, syngas quality improvement |
| Primary water gas | C (from biochar) + H2O + Heat → CO + H2 | +135.0 | Hydrogen-rich syngas generation |
| Secondary water gas shift | CO + H2O ⇌ CO2 + H2 | −28.6 | H2/CO ratio adjustment |
| Steam Reforming of Tar | Tar (e.g., C6H6) + 6H2O → 6CO + 9H2 | +356.2 (endothermic) | Tar elimination, enhanced biochar purity |
| Oxidative cracking | Tar + O2 → CO + CO2 + H2O | −550 (exothermic) | Complementary tar removal pathway |
| Carbonation | CaO + CO2 → CaCO3 + Heat | −130.4 | CO2 sequestration, CaCO3 formation for sustained alkalinity |
| Failure Mode | Severity (S) | Occurrence (O) | Detection (D) | RPN | Risk Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acidification failure | 9 | 8 | 7 | 504 | High probability, high impact |
| Ammonia inhibition | 8 | 6 | 8 | 384 | Medium probability, high impact |
| H2S toxicity | 7 | 5 | 9 | 315 | Medium probability, high impact |
| VFA accumulation | 8 | 7 | 6 | 336 | High probability, medium impact |
| Pathogen survival | 6 | 2 | 5 | 60 | Low probability, medium impact |
| Heavy metal mobilization | 5 | 3 | 7 | 105 | Low probability, medium impact |
| Failure Mode | Severity (S) | Occurrence (O) | Detection (D) | RPN | Projected RPN Reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acidification failure | 9 → 9 | 8 → 2 | 7 → 4 | 504 → 72 | 85.7 |
| NH3 inhibition | 8 → 5 | 6 → 2 | 8 → 5 | 384 → 50 | 87.0 |
| H2S toxicity | 7 → 4 | 5 → 2 | 9 → 4 | 315 → 32 | 89.8 |
| VFA accumulation | 8 → 5 | 7 → 3 | 6 → 4 | 336 → 60 | 82.1 |
| Pathogen survival | 6 → 4 | 2 → 1 | 5 → 4 | 60 → 16 | 73.3 |
| Heavy metal mobilization | 5 → 3 | 3 → 2 | 7 → 5 | 105 → 30 | 71.4 |
| Strategy | Key Mechanism(s) | Reported Methane Enhancement | Ammonia Nitrogen (NH4+-N) Control | Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Control | pH Buffering | Nutrient Recovery | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca(OH)2 pretreatment | - Alkaline hydrolysis of lignocellulosic matrix - Partial solubilization of organic matter | 15–25% (or up to 31% for food waste) | None | None | Limited to transient alkalinity consumption | None | [49,64] |
| Conventional alkaline (Ca(OH)2) | - Alkaline disruption of lignocellulosic biomass - Accelerated VFA conversion - Partial NH4+-N stripping via pH elevation to >10 (transient) | 20–84% (range depending on substrate and duration) | Not quantified; possible stripping effect at high pH | Not reported | Consumption of alkalinity during VFA accumulation | Ca2+/PO43− precipitation as Ca5(PO4)3(OH) | [22,58] |
| Trace element supplementation | - Provision of essential enzyme cofactors (metallocofactors) - Enhances F420, MCR, hydrogenase activity - Critical for VFA metabolism (Co, Ni, Mo, Se, W) | 30–40% (Mo, Se); 45–65% (mixed Co, Mo, Ni, Se, W) for low-background inocula | None directly (NH3 toxicity may be indirectly alleviated by improved metabolism) | None directly | Indirect via lower VFA accumulation | Not reported | [66] |
| Pristine biochar | - Physical adsorption of inhibitors (phenols, NH4+) - Conductive support matrix enabling DIET via electron tunneling - pH buffering via surface functional groups (-COOH, -OH) | 18–37% | Moderate (via physical adsorption of NH4+; limited capacity ~10 mg/g) | Moderate (physical trapping; H2S oxidation by redox-active groups) | Mild (carboxyl/phenolic groups accept H+) | Low (surface groups bind K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) | [12,67] |
| Fe3O4-modified biochar | - Enhanced DIET due to Fe2+/Fe3+ redox cycling - Magnetic biochar facilitates conductivity without chemical or osmotic stress - Ferric iron (Fe3+) serves as an alternate electron acceptor | 25–56% (or 62.6% under high-NH4+ stress for nano-Fe3O4) | Moderate (surface Fe3+ can bind NH4+) | No direct effect | No (Fe3O4 neutral); but mild effect if Fe3+ consumed | None reported | [47] |
| Mg/Fe-modified biochar | - Highly porous Mg-Fe oxide layer (lamellar double hydroxide, LDH) on biochar surface - Strong chemisorption of NH4+ via Mg2+ sites and interlayer exchange - High Fe3+/Fe2+ conductivity for DIET | 116–229% (chicken manure at 2–5% additive) | High (87.83 mg NH4+-N/g) via LDH ion-exchange capacity | Low | No (neutral to slightly basic) | High (Mg2+ and PO43- struvite precipitation potential) | [45] |
| KOH-activated biochar | - Alkaline activation creates ultra-high surface area, micropore volume, and graphitic degree - Boosted electron transfer (low resistance; high specific capacitance) - Promotes DIET between fermenters (Smithella) and methanogens (Methanosaeta) | 52% increase in methane production rate [rate, not final yield] (Pennisetum giganteum) | Indirect: higher microbial activity improves NH4+ consumption | Not reported | No (process stability via reduced VFA lag) | Not assessed | [68] |
| FeCl3-impregnated biochar | - Fe3+ loading onto biochar surface enhances DIET via Fe2+/Fe3+ cycling - Promotes more diverse methanogenic pathways (methanol, dimethylamine, methylamine) - Enhances direct interspecies electron transfer | 22.5% and 12.8% cumulative methane yield relative to control | Not quantified | Not quantified | No (Fe3+ slightly acidic) | No (Fe3+/Fe2+ redox) | [69] |
| Metal-engineered biochar | - Multi-metal (Fe, Ni, Co, Mn)-loaded via mechanochemistry: • Metal-carbon redox-active interfaces • Mesoporous structure enhances cell colonization - Spatial niche partitioning: BC phase drives DIET via Methanosarcina; sludge phase retains IHT (hydrogenotrophic pathway) - Fe-Ni cofactor activates key metalloenzymes (e.g., MCR) | cCH4 224.7 NmL/g.VS Lag phase shortened from 22.3 days → 3.7 days | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | [70] |
| Nano zero-valent iron/biochar (nZVI/BC) | - nZVI undergoes corrosion (Fe0 → Fe2+ → Fe3+) generating reactive oxygen species + H2 (micro-aeration) - H2 promotes hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis - Fe2+/Fe3+ for direct DIET - Biochar support prevents nZVI agglomeration and toxicity | 29.2–46.7% (vs. nZVI alone: 24–30%) | Not quantified | Very high: H2S concentration reduced from 8.32 mL to 0.22 mL (J) via precipitation of FeS (insoluble) | Not quantified | No (Fe2+/Fe3+ cycles) | [69] |
| MnO2-modified biochar | - MnO2 (Mn4+/Mn2+) redox capability enhances biochar capacitance → facilitates extracellular electron transfer - Promotes syntrophic fatty acid oxidation (Syntrophomonas) and methanogenesis (Methanosaetaceae) | 24.3% (food waste); 12.7% (high NH4+-N, 2 g/L); 9.4% (high organic load, 30 g/L) | Moderate: 12.7% improvement under high NH4+ stress | Not quantified | Not directly (MnO2 neutral) | Not reported | [71] |
| Nano-CaO2/BC (projected) | - CaO2 → slow hydrolysis (H2O2) → oxidative stress and partial hydrolysis of recalcitrant polymers - OH− released during CaO2 decomposition provides sustained pH buffering - Ca2+ precipitates excess PO43− → Ca5(PO4)3(OH) and possibly MgNH4PO4·6H2O - Biochar matrix facilitates adsorption, microbial colonization, and electron transfer | Estimated 30–50% (based on synergistic effects) | High (adsorption + oxidation + pH shift) not yet quantified | High (oxidation + precipitation of metal sulfides) projected | Sustained (slow hydrolysis of CaO2 over 2–4 weeks) | High-PO43− recovered as Ca5(PO4)3(OH) and possibly Mg-NH4-PO4 from additional Mg | Projected based on [13,14,17,19,20,54,60,62]; this review |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zheng, X.; Maurice, N.J.; Giwa, H.N.; Giwa, A.S. Nano-CaO2-Modified Biochar for Enhancing Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: A Review of Risk Mitigation and Resource Recovery Strategies. Molecules 2026, 31, 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111882
Zheng X, Maurice NJ, Giwa HN, Giwa AS. Nano-CaO2-Modified Biochar for Enhancing Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: A Review of Risk Mitigation and Resource Recovery Strategies. Molecules. 2026; 31(11):1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111882
Chicago/Turabian StyleZheng, Xingzhong, Ndungutse Jean Maurice, Halima Niyilolawa Giwa, and Abdulmoseen Segun Giwa. 2026. "Nano-CaO2-Modified Biochar for Enhancing Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: A Review of Risk Mitigation and Resource Recovery Strategies" Molecules 31, no. 11: 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111882
APA StyleZheng, X., Maurice, N. J., Giwa, H. N., & Giwa, A. S. (2026). Nano-CaO2-Modified Biochar for Enhancing Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Tofu Wastewater: A Review of Risk Mitigation and Resource Recovery Strategies. Molecules, 31(11), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111882

