Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Phenolic and Essential Oil Constituents of Satureja boissieri Hausskn. ex Boiss and Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple Method for Isolating Fucoxanthin, Which Shows a Wide Range of Physiological Effects, from Microalga, Chaetoceros calcitrans
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition and Bioactivities of Turkish Leonurus Species (Lamiaceae) Extracts: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Potential

1
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Anadolu University, Eskişehir 26470, Türkiye
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar 03030, Türkiye
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Anadolu University, Eskişehir 26470, Türkiye
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Anadolu University, Eskişehir 26470, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(10), 1708; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101708
Submission received: 31 March 2026 / Revised: 5 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026

Abstract

The genus Leonurus L. is renowned for its diverse secondary metabolites with significant pharmacological value; however, the chemical biodiversity and biological potential of its indigenous members in Türkiye remain largely unexplored. This study investigates four species (L. cardiaca, L. quinquelobatus, L. glaucescens, and L. persicus) to elucidate their phytochemical architecture and therapeutic capacities. Characterization of the ethanol, methanol, and aqueous (5% infusion) extracts via HPLC-MS/MS identified verbascoside, genkwanin, and caffeoylquinic acids as the major representative bioactive constituents across the studied Leonurus species. The extracts exhibited measurable biological activity, with L. cardiaca displaying the highest antioxidant profile (EC50 0.117 ± 0.01 mg/mL for DPPH, 2.731 ± 0.01 mM/Trolox for ABTS), correlating with its phenolic content. Notably, the extracts demonstrated notable anticandidal activity (MIC 0.1–1 mg/mL) and negligible to moderate antibacterial effects, alongside varying levels of susceptibility against breast (MCF7) and glioma (C6) cancer cell lines. These effects showed differentiation in toxicity compared to lung (A549) cells. This investigation provides scientific evidence supporting the traditional medicinal use of Leonurus species while highlighting their potential as standardized sources for the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical sectors. Our results lay a robust foundation for future bioactivity-guided isolation studies to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind their differential biological effects.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Lamiaceae Martinov family is highly significant due to its aromatic, medicinal, and essential oil-producing species. While this family is distributed across the Mediterranean and subtropical regions worldwide, its members are predominantly found in southern Türkiye, especially in the hilly areas of the Mediterranean. The genus Leonurus L. has been recognized since ancient times for its medicinal properties; it acts as a regulator of the central nervous and cardiovascular systems, providing a sedative effect that helps manage heart and lung conditions [1]. The genus Leonurus L. is represented by 24–25 species worldwide according to the World Flora Online database; while native to Eurasia, it has become naturalized across the Americas, Africa, and the Pacific. Among these, L. cardiaca, L. japonicus, and L. sibiricus are the most prominent species used in traditional and modern medicine globally [2]. According to the Flora of Turkey [3], four species of the Leonurus genus are found in Türkiye: L. cardiaca L., L. glaucescens Bunge, L. persicus Boiss., and L. quinquelobatus Gilib. These species are geographically distributed across the Marmara, Thrace, and Eastern Anatolia regions, where they occur as part of the natural vegetation [4]. L. cardiaca, commonly known as “Motherwort, Lion’s Tail, lion grass, lion’s tail, aslankuyruğu,” has been extensively documented in the literature [4,5]. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommends both aqueous and ethanol extracts of L. cardiaca as medicinal preparations, which can be selectively enriched using different extraction techniques [6]. The species, traditionally used to treat nervous and functional cardiac disorders, is officially recognized in pharmacopeias for its sedative, hypotensive, and cardiotonic pharmacological effects [6,7,8]. L. glaucescens is a perennial plant with a purplish, densely hairy stem characterized by backward-curved hairs at its corners [3]. An ethnobotanical study conducted in Eastern Anatolia reported that the root of L. glaucescens, locally known as “Öküzguyruğu,” is used as a poultice for inflamed wounds and as an infusion for heart diseases [9]. L. quinquelobatus (five-lobed Motherwort) is used for increasing cardiac activity, for cardiac neurosis, gastrointestinal and nervous diseases, headaches, and cough, as well as for the treatment of rheumatism, weakness, asthma, and as a diuretic and menstrual cycle regulation tool [10]. Pharmacological studies have linked Leonurus species to various medicinal properties. Beyond their antioxidant potential, these species exhibit various pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antibacterial effects [11,12,13,14,15,16]. In particular, compounds such as quercetin, caffeic acid, lavandulifolioside, verbascoside, chlorogenic acid, rutin, and ursolic acid in L. cardiaca extracts contribute to its bioactivity. Angeloni et al. (2021) reported that L. cardiaca primarily contains phenolic acids (chlorogenic and caffeic acids), flavonoids (rutin and quercetin), phenylethanoid glycosides (verbascoside and lavandulifolioside), guanidine pseudoalkaloids (leonurin), as well as diterpenes and triterpenes [11].
The pharmaceutical potential of plants is determined by the wide range of biocompounds they synthesize as an adaptive approach to survive environmental stress. Consequently, Leonurus species growing in the specific ecological conditions of Türkiye may exhibit distinct chemical profiles and biological activities compared to those originating from different geographical locations. Despite the global ethnomedicinal use of Leonurus species for treating various ailments, existing literature primarily focuses on L. cardiaca from other regions, leaving the biological potential of the Turkish flora largely unexplored. Furthermore, scientific data regarding the bioactivities of species other than L. cardiaca remains remarkably scarce. Driven by this gap in knowledge and the chemical diversity of the genus, the present study was designed to investigate the biological activities of extracts obtained from the aerial parts of four Leonurus species indigenous to Türkiye. Our investigation encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of their free radical scavenging capacities, antimicrobial properties, and cytotoxic effects on various cancer cell lines. Additionally, to establish a link between the observed bioactivities and the phytochemical composition, the major constituents were characterized using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The main goal of this research is to describe the qualitative phytochemical profile of Leonurus species. This study establishes a basic baseline for the genus and its ensuing pharmacological assessments by mapping the structural diversity of its secondary metabolites. This study provides the first integrated report on the phytochemical and biological profiling of Leonurus species distributed in Türkiye. Our results demonstrated that L. cardiaca possesses the highest phenolic density and antioxidant capacity among the studied taxa, while all studied species showed differential sensitivities across the tested cell lines. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting the traditional uses of the genus and offer new insights into their potential as natural sources of bioactive compounds for the pharmaceutical industry.

2. Results

2.1. HPLC–MS/MS Analysis

To qualitatively identify the major constituents in the four Turkish Leonurus species, HPLC-MS/MS in negative ionization mode was employed (Table 1). By examining the chromatograms and spectra obtained from the qualitative analysis, the main compounds of Leonurus species were identified (Figure 1). As summarized in Table 1, the ethanol, methanol, and aqueous (5% infusion) extracts revealed a rich diversity of secondary metabolites, primarily consisting of phenylethanoid glycosides, hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, and flavonoids. A total of nine major compounds were identified based on their retention times (Rt), precursor ions ([M-H]), and characteristic MS2 fragmentation patterns. In addition to the major peaks identified, several minor peaks were observed at various retention times (e.g., 10.13, 10.19, 18.26, and 24.49 min). These minor phenolics were not tabulated as they exhibited low signal-to-noise ratios or inconsistent MS/MS fragmentation patterns that precluded definitive characterization. Significant variations in chemical biodiversity were observed across the studied species. The presence of verbascoside (m/z 622.4) and lavandulifolioside (m/z 754.4) was particularly noteworthy, as these phenylethanoid glycosides are chemotaxonomic markers for the Lamiaceae family (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). Rosmarinic acid (m/z 358.7) was uniquely identified in L. persicus, suggesting its potential use as a distinguishing marker for this species among the Turkish indigenous members. In contrast, caffeoylquinic acid derivatives (m/z 352.7) and quercetin rutinoside (m/z 608.4) were ubiquitously present across all four species, regardless of the extraction solvent. To evaluate the extraction efficiency, parallel extractions were performed using ethanol, methanol, and distilled water (5% infusion) independently. This approach explains the presence of major constituents such as verbascoside and caffeoylquinic acids across all extracts, albeit with varying relative abundances. The organic solvent extracts (ethanol and methanol) generally exhibited a broader phytochemical profile compared to infusions, particularly for the flavonoid genkwanin (m/z 282.7). Genkwanin, a methylated apigenin derivative, was prominently detected in L. cardiaca and L. quinquelobatus, which may correlate with the specialized biological activities of these species (Supplementary Figure S3).

2.2. Determination of Total Phenolic Contents (TPC), Flavonoid (TFC) Contents

Table 2 displays the findings of the quantitative phytochemical and antioxidant parameters of the investigated Leonurus species. The total phenolic contents (TPC), determined via the Folin–Ciocalteu assay and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE), exhibited variability ranging from 41.9 to 170.1 mg GAE/g extract. Notably, the ethanol extracts of L. cardiaca (LCE), L. persicus (LPE), and L. glaucescens (LGE) demonstrated the highest phenolic concentrations, yielding 170.1 ± 0.02, 148.1 ± 0.04, and 143.4 ± 0.03 mg GAE/g, respectively. Regarding flavonoid content, the European Pharmacopoeia establishes a minimum threshold of 0.2% flavonoids for Leonuri cardiacae herba. Our analysis confirmed that the investigated species comply with this pharmaceutical standard (Table 2). The flavonoid content in 1 g of plant material was determined to be 0.26% in L. quinquelobatus, 0.35% in L. glaucescens, 0.24% in L. cardiaca, and 0.31% in L. persicus. These results suggest that the Turkish Leonurus species align with the flavonoid content requirements defined in international standards.

2.3. Antioxidant Capacity: DPPH and ABTS Radical Scavenging Assays

The antioxidant capacity of the plants was assessed using DPPH and ABTS•+ scavenging tests. All extracts displayed dose-dependent antioxidant activity (Table 2). The DPPH scavenging assay revealed that LCE possessed the most potent antioxidant activity with the lowest EC50 value of 0.117 mg/mL. In addition, this significant performance was further corroborated by the ABTS assay results, where the highest TEAC (Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity) was recorded for LCE at 2.73 mM. High antioxidant capacities were also observed for LGE and LPE species and determined as 2.53 mM and 2.25 mM, respectively (Table 2).
To evaluate the contribution of phenolic constituents to the antioxidant potential, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. A strong positive correlation was observed between TPC and TEAC values (r = 0.8873, p < 0.001), indicating that phenolic compounds are the primary contributors to the ABTS radical scavenging activity. Furthermore, a moderate negative correlation (r = −0.5007) was found between TPC and DPPH EC50 values (Figure 2). This inverse relationship is consistent with the principle that higher phenolic content leads to lower EC50, values, suggesting that while phenolics generally enhance DPPH radical scavenging capacity, other secondary metabolites may also influence the specific response in this assay.

2.4. Determination of Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial potential of Leonurus extracts was evaluated using the broth microdilution method, with results summarized in Table 3 and Table 4. Overall, the investigated extracts exhibited limited antibacterial activity, with MIC values typically ranging from 1000 to ˃8000 µg/mL. Among the samples, the methanolic extract of L. quinquelobatus showed relatively lower MIC values against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis compared to other species. The observed efficacy followed the general order of methanol > ethanol > infusion, suggesting that the methanolic solvent may be slightly more effective in extracting constituents with inhibitory potential. Regarding anticandidal activity, the extracts demonstrated moderate inhibitory effects within a concentration range of 0.125 to 2 mg/mL. Notably, the methanol extracts of L. persicus exhibited activity against Candida utilis and C. krusei, both yielding a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of 0.125 mg/mL. These results indicate that while the extracts possess negligible antibacterial effects, they show a more discernible potential against Candida species.

2.5. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Potential

To evaluate the antiproliferative potential of the extracts, the MTT method was applied against A549 (human lung carcinoma cell line), MCF7 (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line), and C6 (Rat glioma cell line) cell lines. Doxorubicin (DOX), used as a positive control. The results demonstrated that the antiproliferative effects were highly dependent on both the plant species and the extraction solvent (Figure 3). The IC50 values of the extracts are summarized in Table 5. Overall, the methanol extracts exhibited the lowest IC50 values, indicating a higher antiproliferative potency compared to the ethanol and infusion extracts. Among all tested samples, the methanol extract of L. persicus showed noteworthy activity against the C6 glioma cell line (IC50 16.43 ± 0.17 µg/mL), which was comparable to or slightly more potent than the standard drug Doxorubicin (25.64 ± 1.11 µg/mL, p < 0.05) under the experimental conditions. Similarly, the methanol extracts of L. quinquelobatus and L. glaucescens demonstrated promising effects against MCF7 cells with IC50 values of 18.1 ± 0.45 µg/mL and 21.2 ± 0.93 µg/mL, respectively. Interestingly, most extracts showed limited efficacy (mostly >600 or >1000 µg/mL) against the A549 lung carcinoma line, suggesting a differential growth inhibitory profile. The MCF7 and C6 cells displayed higher sensitivity to the extracts compared to the A549 line. This differential response among different cancer phenotypes provides a preliminary basis for further investigation into the cell-specific mechanisms of Leonurus metabolites.

3. Discussion

HPLC-MS/MS analysis revealed that verbascoside, genkwanin, and caffeoylquinic acids (CQAs) are the predominant compounds in the studied extracts (Figure 1). Verbascoside, a prominent phenylethanoid glycoside, is well-documented for its multifaceted pharmacological profile, including significant anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, and antioxidant properties, as well as its potential in tumor chemoprevention [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Genkwanin, a flavonoid recognized as a chemotaxonomic marker for the Leonurus genus, may correlate with the observed biological activities in these species [24]. This is particularly significant as our study provides the first detailed phytochemical mapping of these markers in Leonurus taxa native to Türkiye, highlighting regional chemical variations. Furthermore, CQAs, which are considered beneficial for human health primarily due to their antioxidant capacity, were consistently detected across the species [25]. It was observed that phenylethanoid glycosides (e.g., verbascoside) consistently exhibited higher signal intensities in methanol and ethanol extracts compared to infusions. On the other hand, the presence of these CQAs across all species may correlate with their consistent biological activity, while the variation in flavonoid and phenylethanoid levels may account for the differences in potency observed among the species. These findings imply that although the main components are widely present, their concentrations vary depending on the solvent.
The TPC analysis indicated prominent phenolic levels across all four Leonurus species. Based on our HPLC-MS/MS results, it can be suggested that phenylethanoid glycosides, specifically verbascoside, are the primary contributors to the total phenolic content due to their high relative abundance and multiple hydroxyl groups. Additionally, the presence of caffeoylquinic acids across all solvent systems further enhances the phenolic profile. Notably, in L. persicus, the presence of rosmarinic acid, which was not detected in the other three species, likely provides an additional contribution to its specific phenolic yield and antioxidant potential. This is supported by their high relative peak intensities observed in the chromatograms and the presence of multiple phenolic hydroxyl groups in their chemical structures, which typically yield strong responses in the Folin–Ciocalteu assay. Our findings align with previous phytochemical reports on L. cardiaca, which typically highlight an abundance of phenolic acids (e.g., chlorogenic and caffeic acids), flavonoids (rutin, quercetin), and phenylethanoid glycosides [11,26,27]. While earlier studies on the aerial parts of L. glaucescens reported the isolation of leonosides A and B along with lavandulifolioside [28], our analysis revealed a notable variation: lavandulifolioside was identified in L. quinquelobatus, L. glaucescens, and L. cardiaca, but was conspicuously absent in L. persicus. These qualitative differences in phenylethanoid distribution underscore the chemical diversity within Turkish Leonurus species and are consistent with the known complexity of the genus’s secondary metabolite profile.
Correlating these phytochemical profiles with pharmacological results provides a molecular basis for the reported activities. The differential sensitivity against MCF7 and C6 cancer cell lines (comparable to doxorubicin) may be associated with the presence of f genkwanin and verbascoside. Previous studies indicate that these compounds interfere with cellular proliferation pathways, which aligns with our findings of low toxicity toward A549 lung carcinoma cells [13]. Specifically, the prominent presence of genkwanin in the methanolic extract of L. persicus appears to be one of the key factors contributing to its anticandidal and cytotoxic effects. This flavonoid is recognized for its diverse repertoire, encompassing potent antibacterial [29,30], free radical scavenging [31], and chemopreventive properties [32].
The heatmap analysis (Figure 2) illustrates the correlation between total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant potency. The finding that all studied Turkish species meet the 0.2% flavonoid threshold of the European Pharmacopoeia is a noteworthy result, as it supports the quality and potential standardization of these local populations for pharmaceutical applications. Consequently, L. cardiaca stands out as a promising candidate for the development of standardized herbal products. Additionally, the antioxidant activity observed in infusions (aqueous extracts) provides a preliminary scientific basis for the traditional consumption of these plants as herbal teas in the region.
While the antibacterial activities observed were modest compared to isolated constituents like ursolic acid [33], the alcoholic extracts of L. persicus demonstrated a remarkably robust anticandidal effect. This activity is likely associated with the synergistic effect of genkwanin and verbascoside, alongside other minor constituents typical of the genus. Furthermore, L. quinquelobatus showed notable inhibition against Gram-negative P. aeruginosa in its methanolic form, suggesting that specific polar metabolites may contribute to overcoming the intrinsic resistance mechanisms of Gram-negative pathogens.
The cytotoxic results (Figure 3) are consistent with literature reporting that L. sibiricus extracts rich in phenolic compounds exhibit dose-dependent cytotoxicity against various cancer lines while sparing A549 cells [13,34]. Our data demonstrate a differential sensitivity among the tested cell lines, where Turkish Leonurus species exhibit suppressive effects on the viability of C6 glioma and MCF7 breast cancer cells compared to the lung epithelial-like A549 line. The cytotoxic activity of L. persicus methanol extract against C6 cells yielded an IC50 value of 16.43 ± 0.17 µg/mL. According to the criteria established by the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI), crude extracts with an IC50 < 20 µg/mL following 48 to 72 h of incubation are categorized as having notable cytotoxic activity [35]. Furthermore, extracts with IC50 values ranging from 21 to 200 µg/mL are classified as mildly cytotoxic, while those between 201 and 500 µg/mL are considered weakly cytotoxic [36]. Based on this standardized classification, our results indicate that while the alcoholic extracts of L. persicus exhibit a more pronounced effect against certain lines, the aqueous extracts (infusions) generally fall within the mildly cytotoxic range. While the IC50 values indicate notable growth inhibitory effects for the crude extracts, particularly the L. persicus methanol extract, against C6 cells, these should be interpreted as preliminary biological signals rather than direct drug-development leads. Phenolic compounds are known to modulate crucial cellular processes, including growth, differentiation, and apoptosis [37,38]. Among the identified compounds, genkwanin emerges as a noteworthy candidate for further investigation into its role in suppressing tumor growth [39,40,41]. However, it is essential to acknowledge that other characteristic metabolites, such as guanidino compounds (e.g., leonurine) which were not the primary focus of our current HPLC-MS/MS method, may also contribute to the overall bioactivity of these Turkish taxa. In conclusion, this study reveals for the first time the comparative cytotoxic effects of four Leonurus species native to Türkiye against different cell lines, establishing a potential connection between their regional phytochemical diversity and their health-promoting bioactivities. By documenting these local chemotypes, this study provides an essential foundation for the quality control and pharmacological validation of the Turkish flora. Furthermore, these results offer a useful foundation for more mechanistic research into the species-specific anti-cancer potential, even though they only constitute a preliminary screening of the populations under study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Extraction Procedures

The aerial parts of four Leonurus species were collected from their natural habitats in the Bursa, Bolu, and Erzurum provinces of Türkiye. The botanical authentication of the species was performed by Prof. Dr. Yavuz Bülent Köse and Dr. Nagehan Saltan. Voucher specimens have been deposited at the Anadolu University Faculty of Pharmacy Herbarium (ESSE). The collection localities and herbarium numbers are: L. cardiaca: Bursa, 40°02′21″ N, 29°23′57″ E (ESSE 15775), L. quinquelobatus: Bolu, 40°35′32″ N, 31°00′42″ E (ESSE 15780), L. glaucescens: Erzurum, 39°44′35″ N, 41°23′16″ E (ESSE 15783), L. persicus: Erzurum, 39°42′01″ N, 41°26′55″ E (ESSE 15782).
To compare the solvent efficiency and prepare the extracts for both phytochemical characterization and biological activity assays, two separate portions of the powdered material were extracted independently with 70% methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 70% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), respectively. Maceration was performed at room temperature for a total of 24 h in three repetitive cycles (8 h each) to ensure maximum metabolite recovery. The resulting filtrates were concentrated to dryness under vacuum using a rotary evaporator at a temperature not exceeding 40 °C. Residual water in the ethanol extracts was further eliminated through lyophilization. The third portion was used to prepare a 5% (w/v) infusion by adding 5 g of the plant material to 100 mL of distilled water preheated to 80 °C. Following a cooling and filtration period, the aqueous extract was frozen and subsequently dried using a lyophilizer. All obtained crude extracts were stored in amber glass vials at −18 °C in a dark environment until their use in both HPLC-MS/MS analysis and biological activity assays.
The extraction efficiency for each species was determined gravimetrically and expressed as a percentage yield (w/w) relative to the initial dried plant material. The yield was calculated using the following equation:
Y i e l d   ( % ) = ( A ÷ A 1 ) × 100
A denotes the final mass of the dried extract obtained after solvent evaporation. A1 represents the initial mass of the pulverized plant material used in the extraction process.

4.2. Analysis of the Extracts by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Systems (HPLC)

The analysis was conducted using a Shimadzu 20A HPLC system (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) coupled to an Applied Biosystems 3200 Q-Trap MS/MS detector (3200 Q TRAP. Mundelein, IL, USA). Chromatographic separation was achieved on a 150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm ODS column at a column temperature of 40 °C, and detection was performed with a PDA detector. The ionization mode for the MS/MS detector was set to negative Electro Spray Ionization (ESI). The mobile phase consisted of solvent (A) methanol/water/formic acid 10:89:1, (v/v/v) and solvent (B) methanol/water/formic acid (89:10:1, v/v/v). A gradient was applied, increasing the concentration of solvent B from 10% to 100% over 40 min. The flow rate was maintained at 0.5 mL/min.
The qualitative identification of the secondary metabolites was performed by a systematic interpretation of the resulting chromatograms and mass spectra. The identification process was achieved by correlating high-resolution mass data with established literature reports. Characterization was performed through the analysis of diagnostic fragmentation ions and neutral losses. For each identified constituent, the retention time (Rt), precursor ion [M-H]-, and diagnostic MS2 fragmentation patterns, such as the neutral losses of caffeoyl, glucose, or rhamnose moieties, were analyzed to ensure robust structural characterization (Table 1). The structural assignments were cross-referenced with previously published phytochemical profiles of the Leonurus genus to validate the qualitative fingerprinting of the Turkish taxa.

4.3. Total Phenolic (TPC) and Flavonoid (TFC) Content Assay

The total phenolic content (TPC) of the Leonurus extracts was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (FCR) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the method described by Singleton et al. [42]. This assay provides a measure of the total reducing capacity of the samples. For the quantification, a calibration curve was constructed using gallic acid as the standard at concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 0.5 mg/mL. The reaction mixtures were incubated under standardized conditions, and the absorbance was measured at 760 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). TPC results were calculated from the linear regression equation derived from the standard curve and expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry extract (mg GAE/g extract). All measurements were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.
The total flavonoid content (TFC) was determined following the official spectrophotometric protocols established by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur. 7.0) [7]. To ensure the reliability of the compliance test and to account for experimental variability, all measurements were performed in triplicate. For each Leonurus species, stock, test, and control solutions were prepared in accordance with the specific pharmacopoeial monographs. After an incubation period of 30 min at room temperature, the absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 425 nm. Absorbance values were recorded at the specified wavelength, and the results were expressed as a percentage of flavonoids calculated as hyperoside or equivalent markers as defined by the Ph. Eur. standards. The percentage of total flavonoids, calculated as hyperoside equivalents, was determined using the following equation:
T F C ( % ) = A × 1.25 m
  • A: Absorbance at 425 nm;
  • m: Mass of the substance being analysed (in grams).

4.4. DPPH and ABTS•+ Scavenging Capacity Determination

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined according to the previously described method [43], using gallic acid as a positive control. After the incubation period, the absorbance of the reaction mixtures was measured at 517 nm. The percentage of radical scavenging activity was calculated using the following equation:
S c a v e n g i n g   e f f e c t ( % ) A c o n t r o l A s a m p l e A c o n t r o l × 100
where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control (containing all reagents except the test compound), and Asample is the absorbance of the test sample. The EC50 (Half-maximal effective concentration) values were derived from non-linear regression analysis using SigmaPlot software (version 13.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data are presented as mean values.
The ABTS•+ radical cation scavenging activity was determined according to the method described by Re et al. [44]. The ABTS•+ solution was prepared and diluted to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. Trolox was employed as the standard reference, with a calibration curve generated using concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 3 mM. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 30 min, after which the absorbance was measured at 734 nm. The scavenging capacity of the samples (tested at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL) was calculated using the linear regression equation derived from the Trolox standard curve. Results are expressed as Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) values. All measurements were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility, and the data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD).

4.5. Antimicrobial Activity

Six strains of invasive fungal infections caused by Candida and six strains of other pathogenic bacteria were employed as test microorganisms (Table 3). Antibacterial susceptibility was determined using the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M7-A7 guidelines [45]. Anticandidal activities were assessed following the adapted CLSI M27-A2 standard protocol [46]. Stock solutions of extracts and antimicrobial agents (Amphotericin-B, Ketoconazole, Chloramphenicol, Ampicillin) were dissolved in DMSO. The M27-A2 susceptibility testing of yeasts procedure employed C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 as quality control strains. The extracts were tested at concentrations ranging from 8 mg/mL to 0.001 mg/mL. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of the extract that prevented visible microbial growth compared to the control. The growth controls were microplates without antimicrobial standards. To validate sterility and the effects of the solvents, negative controls were used. DMSO-containing wells were used as negative controls to ensure sterility and evaluate solvent effects. All assays were performed in duplicate.

4.6. Antiproliferative Activity

The cytotoxic potential of the extracts was evaluated using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, as previously described [47], with Doxorubicin employed as the reference drug. Human lung carcinoma (A549), rat glioma (C6), and human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL and 100 µg/mL, respectively). Cells were collected and quantified using an automated cell counter. After cell adhesion, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 per well, and treated with varying concentrations of the extracts (7.81–1000 µg/mL). Following 24 h of incubation, MTT solution (5 mg/mL, prepared in PBS) was added to each well. After the formation of formazan crystals, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). To ensure the reliability of the results, cell-free control wells (extracts + MTT without cells) were utilized to monitor potential chemical interference; no significant background signal was detected. All samples were dissolved in DMSO, with 1% DMSO used as the negative control. The IC50 values were determined from dose–response curves (percentage of inhibition vs. log concentration) generated via non-linear regression analysis using Microsoft Excel 2013. The percentage of inhibition was determined using the formula previously described in the DPPH assay section.

4.7. Statistical Analysis and Data Visualization

All experimental measurements were conducted in triplicate, and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The normality of the data was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk test prior to ANOVA analysis. Statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between TPC and antioxidant assays (DPPH and TEAC). The heatmap and comparative bar charts were generated using Python (version 3.10) with Seaborn (v0.12) and Matplotlib (v3.5) libraries for high-resolution data visualization. For the heatmaps, data were normalized using Z-score transformation to ensure comparability across different biological assays.

5. Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive and pioneering characterization of four Leonurus species (L. cardiaca, L. quinquelobatus, L. glaucescens, and L. persicus) naturally occurring in Türkiye, marking the first detailed comparative report on their phytochemical profiles and biological capacities. Our findings reveal that the therapeutic potential of these species is intrinsically linked to their secondary metabolite composition, specifically the presence of verbascoside, genkwanin, and caffeoylquinic acids identified via HPLC-MS/MS.
The observed correlation between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant/antimicrobial activities, particularly in L. cardiaca, suggests the role of these polyphenols as key bioactive drivers. Furthermore, the extracts exhibited varying levels of susceptibility against MCF7 and C6 cell lines, while maintaining lower cytotoxicity toward A549 cells under the tested conditions. These preliminary results position these extracts as candidates for further research to explore their differential growth inhibitory effects compared to standard treatments.
In conclusion, this systematic investigation provides scientific evidence supporting the traditional medicinal use of Leonurus species and highlights their potential as standardized sources of bioactive compounds for the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical sectors. These results lay a robust foundation for future bioactivity-guided isolation studies to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind their differential biological properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31101708/s1. Figure S1: Verbascoside. Figure S2: Lavandulifolioside. Figure S3: Genkwanin. Figure S4: 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid. Figure S5: Caffeic acid. Figure S6: Rosmarinic acid. Figure S7: Quercetin rutinoside. Figure S8: Quercetin glucoside. Figure S9: HPLC-DAD (Diode Array Detector) chromatograms (recorded at 330 nm) of L. cardiaca. Figure S10: HPLC-DAD (Diode Array Detector) chromatograms (recorded at 330 nm) of L. glaucescens. Figure S11: HPLC-DAD (Diode Array Detector) chromatograms (recorded at 330 nm) of L. quinquelobatus. Figure S12: HPLC-DAD (Diode Array Detector) chromatograms (recorded at 330 nm) of L. persicus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S. and Y.B.K.; methodology, N.S., F.G., D.O. and G.İ.; formal analysis, N.S., F.G., D.O. and G.İ.; investigation, N.S.; resources, N.S., F.G., D.O. and G.İ.; data curation, N.S., F.G., D.O., G.İ. and Y.B.K.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.; writing—review and editing, N.S., F.G., D.O., G.İ. and Y.B.K.; supervision, Y.B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Anadolu University, grant number THD-2026-3363, ID: 3363.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Anadolu University Scientific Research Projects (No: THD-2026-3363, ID: 3363). The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ABTS2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
ATCCAmerican Type Culture Collection
DPPH2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
CLSIClinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
DMSODimethyl Sulfoxide
EtOHEthanol
TEACTrolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity
MeOHMethanol
mMMillimolar
Na2CO3Sodium Carbonate
EC50Half-maximal effective concentration
MICMinimum Inhibitory Concentration
TPCTotal Phenol Content
TFCTotal Flavonoid Content

References

  1. Sermukhamedova, O.V.; Sakipova, Z.B.; Ternynko, I.I.; Gemedzhieva, N.G. Representatives of motherwort genus (Leonurus spp.): Aspects of pharmacognostic features and relevance of new species application. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2017, 74, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. WFO. Leonurus L. World Flora Online. 2026. Available online: http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-4000021038 (accessed on 29 April 2026).
  3. Mill, R.R. Leonurus L. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands; Davis, P.H., Ed.; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1982; Volume 7, pp. 152–154. [Google Scholar]
  4. Güner, A.; Aslan, S.; Ekim, T.; Vural, M.; Babaç, M.T. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi: (Damarlı Bitkiler); Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını: İstanbul, Türkiye, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Culpeper, N. The Complete Herbal; BoD–Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller, K. Assessment Report on Leonurus cardiaca L. Herba; EMA/HMPC/127430; Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Council of Europe. Motherwort. In European Pharmacopoeia, 7th ed.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2011; pp. 1190–1191. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Altundag, E.; Ozturk, M. Ethnomedicinal studies on the plant resources of east Anatolia, Turkey. Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 19, 756–777. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811013103 (accessed on 1 April 2026). [CrossRef]
  10. Popescu, M.L.; Dinu, M.; Toth, O. Contributions to the pharmacognostical and phytobiological study on Leonurus cardiaca L. (Lamiaceae). Farmacia 2009, 57, 424–431. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242182950_Contributions_to_the_pharmacognostical_and_phytobiological_study_on_Leonurus_cardiaca_L_Lamiaceae (accessed on 30 March 2026).
  11. Angeloni, S.; Spinozzi, E.; Maggi, F.; Sagratini, G.; Caprioli, G.; Borsetta, G.; Ak, G.; Sinan, K.I.; Zengin, G.; Arpini, S.; et al. Phytochemical Profile and Biological Activities of Crude and Purified Leonurus cardiaca Extracts. Plants 2021, 10, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oliveira, A.S.; Cercato, L.M.; de Santana Souza, M.T.; Melo, A.J.O.; Lima, B.D.S.; Duarte, M.C.; Araujo, A.A.S.; de Oliveira, E.; Silva, A.M.; Camargo, E.A. The ethanol extract of Leonurus sibiricus L. induces antioxidant, antinociceptive and topical anti-inflammatory effects. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 206, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sitarek, P.; Skała, E.; Toma, M.; Wielanek, M.; Szemraj, J.; Skorski, T.; Białas, A.J.; Sakowicz, T.; Kowalczyk, T.; Radek, M.; et al. Transformed root extract of Leonurus sibiricus induces apoptosis through intrinsic and extrinsic pathways in various grades of human glioma cells. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2017, 23, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, W.; Ma, S.; Pan, W.; Tan, W. Combination of motherwort injection and oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med. 2016, 29, 2490–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rauwald, H.W.; Savtschenko, A.; Merten, A.; Rusch, C.; Appel, K.; Kuchta, K. GABAA receptor binding assays of standardized Leonurus cardiaca and Leonurus japonicus extracts as well as their isolated constituents. Planta Med. 2015, 81, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jafari, S.; Salaritabar, A.; Moradi, A.; Khanavi, M.; Samadi, M. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of extracts and fractions of cultivated Leonurus cardiaca L. Planta Med. 2010, 76, 376–381. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240232573_Antioxidant_activity_and_total_phenolic_content_of_extracts_and_fractions_of_cultivated_Leonurus_cardiaca_L (accessed on 30 March 2026). [CrossRef]
  17. Rudolf, E.; Andelova, H.; Cervinka, M. Polyphenolic compounds in chemoprevention of colon cancer-targets and signaling pathways. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Jin, Y.; Li, M.; Qu, C. Verbascoside alleviates atopic dermatitis-like symptoms in mice via its potent anti-inflammatory effect. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 175, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Moura Sperotto, N.D.; Steffens, L.; Veríssimo, R.M.; Henn, J.G.; Péres, V.F.; Vianna, P.; Chies, J.A.B.; Roehe, A.; Saffi, J.; Moura, D.J. Wound healing and anti-inflammatory activities induced by a Plantago australis hydroethanolic extract standardized in verbascoside. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 225, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Hecker, K.D.; Bonanome, A.; Coval, S.M.; Binkoski, A.E.; Hilpert, K.F.; Griel, A.E.; Etherton, T.D. Bioactive compounds in foods: Their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Am. J. Med. 2002, 113, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vertuani, S.; Beghelli, E.; Scalambra, E.; Malisardi, G.; Copetti, S.; Dal Toso, R.; Baldisserotto, A.; Manfredini, S. Activity and stability studies of verbascoside, a novel antioxidant, in dermo-cosmetic and pharmaceutical topical formulations. Molecules 2011, 16, 7068–7080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sgarbossa, A.; Dal Bosco, M.; Pressi, G.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Dal Toso, R.; Menegazzi, M. Phenylpropanoid glycosides from plant primary constituents cell cultures induce heme oxygenase 1 gene expression in a human keratinocyte cell line by affecting the balance of NRF2 and BACH1 transcription factors. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2012, 199, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alipieva, K.; Korkina, L.; Orhan, I.E.; Georgiev, M.I. Verbascoside—A review of its occurrence, (bio)synthesis and pharmacological significance. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tasdemir, D.; Calis, I.; Sticher, O. Labdane diterpenes from Leonurus persicus. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alcázar Magaña, A.; Kamimura, N.; Soumyanath, A.; Stevens, J.F.; Maier, C.S. Caffeoylquinic acids: Chemistry, biosynthesis, occurrence, analytical challenges, and bioactivity. Plant J. 2021, 107, 1299–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pitschmann, A.; Zehl, M.; Heiss, E.; Purevsuren, S.; Urban, E.; Dirsch, V.M.; Glasl, S. Quantitation of phenylpropanoids and iridoids in insulin-sensitising extracts of Leonurus sibiricus L. (Lamiaceae). Phytochem. Anal. 2016, 27, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuchta, K.; Ortwein, J.; Calis, I.; Volk, R.B.; Rauwald, H.W. Identification of cardioactive Leonurus and Leonotis drugs by quantitative HPLC determination and HPTLC detection of phenolic marker constituents. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Calis, I.; Ersoz, T.; Tasdemir, D.; Rüedi, P. Two phenylpropanoid glycosides from Leonurus glaucescens. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cottigli, F.; Loy, G.; Garau, D.; Floris, C.; Casu, M.; Pompei, R.; Bonsignore, L. Antimicrobial evaluation of coumarins and flavonoids from the stems of Daphne gnidium L. Phytomedicine 2001, 8, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Martini, N.; Katerere, D.R.; Eloff, J.N. Biological activity of five antibacterial flavonoids from Combretum erythrophyllum (Combretaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, A.R.; Zou, Y.N.; Park, T.H.; Shim, K.H.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, N.D.; Kim, J.D.; Bae, S.J.; Choi, J.S.; Chung, H.Y. Active components from Artemisia iwayomogi displaying ONOO− scavenging activity. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Suh, N.; Luyengi, L.; Fong, H.H.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Pezzuto, J.M. Discovery of natural product chemopreventive agents utilizing HL-60 cell differentiation as a model. Anticancer Res. 1995, 15, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  33. Micota, B.; Sadowska, B.; Podsedek, A.; Redzynia, M.; Rozalska, B. Leonurus cardiaca L. Herb—A derived extract and an ursolic acid as the factors affecting the adhesion capacity of Staphylococcus aureus in the context of infective endocarditis. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2014, 61, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sitarek, P.; Synowiec, E.; Kowalczyk, T.; Śliwiński, T.; Skała, E. An in vitro estimation of the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of root extract from Leonurus sibiricus L. overexpressing AtPAP1 against different cancer cell lines. Molecules 2018, 23, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Boik, J. Natural Compounds in Cancer Therapy; Oregon Medical Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  36. Srisawat, T.; Chumkaew, P.; Heed-Chim, W.; Sukpondma, Y.; Kanokwiroon, K. Phytochemical screening and cytotoxicity of crude extracts of Vatica diospyroides Symington type LS. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2013, 12, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chahar, M.K.; Sharma, N.; Dobhal, M.P.; Joshi, Y.C. Flavonoids: A versatile source of anticancer drugs. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2011, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Z.Y.; Pan, S.L.; Huo, K.K.; Wu, B.Y.; Chao, Z. Molecular Analysis of Leonurus Species in China Based on ITS and mat K Sequences. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2011, 39, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, M.A.; Kang, K.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, M.; Kim, C.Y.; Nho, C.W. Apigenin isolated from Daphne genkwa Siebold et Zucc. inhibits 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation through a modulation of mitotic clonal expansion. Life Sci. 2014, 101, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, E.R.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, Y.J.; Cho, S.G. The anti-apoptotic and anti-oxidant effect of eriodictyol on UV-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Song, Z.J.; He, X.; Zhang, R.Q.; Zhang, C.F.; Li, F.; Wang, C.Z.; Yuan, C.S. Antitumor and immunomodulatory activity of genkwanin on colorectal cancer in the APCMin/+ mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 29, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/bookseries/abs/pii/S0076687999990171 (accessed on 28 March 2026).
  43. Kumarasamy, Y.; Byres, M.; Cox, P.J.; Jaspars, M.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D. Screening seeds of some Scottish plants for free radical scavenging activity. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. NCCLS. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard-M7A7, 7th ed.; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  46. NCCLS. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard-M27A2; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. Osmaniye, D.; Levent, S.; Ardic, C.M.; Atli, O.; Ozkay, Y.; Kaplancikli, Z.A. Synthesis and anticancer activity of some novel benzothiazole-thiazolidine derivatives. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2018, 193, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. HPLC-DAD (Diode Array Detector) chromatograms (recorded at 330 nm) of Leonurus species: (a) L. cardiaca, (b) L. glaucescens, (c) L. quinquelobatus, and (d) L. persicus. Note: Minor peaks not listed in Table 1 represent unidentified compounds with low-intensity spectral data. The blue square symbol indicates the XWC of DAD spectral data at 330.0 nm.
Figure 1. HPLC-DAD (Diode Array Detector) chromatograms (recorded at 330 nm) of Leonurus species: (a) L. cardiaca, (b) L. glaucescens, (c) L. quinquelobatus, and (d) L. persicus. Note: Minor peaks not listed in Table 1 represent unidentified compounds with low-intensity spectral data. The blue square symbol indicates the XWC of DAD spectral data at 330.0 nm.
Molecules 31 01708 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap analysis of total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant capacities (DPPH and TEAC) of four Leonurus species. Color intensity reflects standardized Z-scores (relative potency based on 1/EC50 values), where darker blue indicates higher phytochemical concentration or stronger antioxidant activity. Numerical values represent raw data (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 2. Heatmap analysis of total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant capacities (DPPH and TEAC) of four Leonurus species. Color intensity reflects standardized Z-scores (relative potency based on 1/EC50 values), where darker blue indicates higher phytochemical concentration or stronger antioxidant activity. Numerical values represent raw data (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Molecules 31 01708 g002
Figure 3. IC50 values of Leonurus extracts against C6 and MCF7 cell lines. Abbreviations: LQE, LGE, LCE, LPE: Ethanol extracts; LQM, LGM, LCM, LPM: Methanol extracts; LQI, LGI, LCI, LPI: Infusions of L. quinquelobatus, L. glaucescens, L. cardiaca, and L. persicus, respectively. DOX: Doxorubicin. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). * p < 0.05 vs. Doxorubicin.
Figure 3. IC50 values of Leonurus extracts against C6 and MCF7 cell lines. Abbreviations: LQE, LGE, LCE, LPE: Ethanol extracts; LQM, LGM, LCM, LPM: Methanol extracts; LQI, LGI, LCI, LPI: Infusions of L. quinquelobatus, L. glaucescens, L. cardiaca, and L. persicus, respectively. DOX: Doxorubicin. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). * p < 0.05 vs. Doxorubicin.
Molecules 31 01708 g003
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of main bioactive compounds in Turkish Leonurus extracts via HPLC-MS/MS.
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of main bioactive compounds in Turkish Leonurus extracts via HPLC-MS/MS.
Rt (min)[M−H] (m/z)Main MS2 Fragments (m/z)CompoundL. persicusL. glaucescensL. quinquelobatusL. cardiaca
112.5352.7191, 179, 173Caffeoylquinic acidE, M, IE, IE, M, IE, M, I
212.8352.7191, 179, 1355-O-Caffeoylquinic acidE, M, IE, I
315.7178.8135Caffeic acidE, M, IE, IE, M, IE, M, I
416.1754.4623, 462, 305, 179, 161, 135LavandulifoliosideE, IE, M, IE, M, I
516.5622.4461, 161, 135VerbascosideE, M, IE, M, IE, ME, M
618.0358.7197, 179, 161Rosmarinic acidE, M, I
719.9608.4300, 271, 179, 151Quercetin rutinosideE, M, IE, M, IE, M, IE, M, I
820.2462.6300, 271, 255Quercetin glucosideE, ME, M, IE, M, I
932.2282.7268, 239, 211, 151, 117GenkwaninE, M, IEE, ME, M
[E] Ethanol extract. [M] Methanol Extract. [I] Infusion (Aqueous extract). Note: Only major compounds with confirmed MS/MS data and library match scores >90% are listed.
Table 2. Extraction yield, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities of Leonurus species extracts.
Table 2. Extraction yield, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities of Leonurus species extracts.
SamplesYield%TPC mg GAE/g Ext.DPPH˙(EC50 mg/mL)TEAC (mM/Trolox)
L. quinquelobatus
EtOH1181.15 ± 0.020.218 ± 0.111.535 ± 0.14
MeOH6.641.9 ± 0.010.552 ± 0.030.646 ± 0.04
Infusion7.878.8 ± 0.040.166 ± 0.021.179 ± 0.04
L. glaucescens
EtOH10143.4 ± 0.030.133 ± 0.012.53 ± 0.01
MeOH10.3107.8 ± 0.020.391 ± 0.100.778 ± 0.02
Infusion13.674 ± 0.010.155 ± 0.011.04 ± 0.02
L. cardiaca
EtOH9.3170.1 ± 0.020.117 ± 0.012.731 ± 0.01
MeOH13.348.4 ± 0.020.256 ± 0.020.992 ± 0.05
Infusion13.872 ± 0.020.200 ± 0.021.15 ± 0.04
L. persicus
EtOH10.6148.1 ± 0.040.182 ± 0.042.251 ± 0.05
MeOH10.570.2 ± 0.030.629 ± 0.030.633 ± 0.03
Infusion15.678 ± 0.010.232 ± 0.031.207 ± 0.02
GA (gallic acid) 0.003 ± 0.0012.926 ± 0.03
TFC (%)
SpeciesAbsorbance% Flavonoid
L. quinquelobatus0.2140.26 ± 0.05
L. glaucescens0.2840.35 ± 0.03
L. cardiaca0.1960.24 ± 0.02
L. persicus0.2550.31 ± 0.03
Values are means of triplicate determination (n = 3) ± standard deviation.
Table 3. Antibacterial activity of extracts (MIC, µg/mL).
Table 3. Antibacterial activity of extracts (MIC, µg/mL).
EcSaaSeeEfSePa
L. quinquelobatus
EtOH20002000200020002000>8000
MeOH200020002000100010004000
Inf2000>8000200020002000>8000
L. glaucescens
EtOH2000>8000200020002000>8000
MeOH20001000200010002000>8000
Inf20004000200020002000>8000
L. cardiaca
EtOH20004000200020002000>8000
MeOH20002000200010002000>8000
Inf20004000200020002000>8000
L. persicus
EtOH20002000200020002000>8000
MeOH20002000200020002000>8000
Inf20004000200020002000>8000
Ampicillin42244128
Chloramphenicol4444464
Ec: E. coli ATCC 8739, Saa: S. aureus subsp. aureus ATCC 6538, See: S. enterica subsp. enterica ATCC 14028, Ef: E. faecalis ATCC 29212, Se: S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, Pa: P. aeruginosa ATCC 7853, Inf: Infusion, MIC: Minimum inhibitor concentration.
Table 4. Anticandidal activity of extracts (MIC, µg/mL).
Table 4. Anticandidal activity of extracts (MIC, µg/mL).
ExtractsCa1CuCa2 CtCpCk
L. quinquelobatus
EtOH1000500100010001000500
MeOH10005001000500500250
Inf20001000200010001000500
L. glaucescens
EtOH1000500100010001000250
MeOH10005005001000500250
Inf1000100010002000500500
L. cardiaca
EtOH5002505001000500250
MeOH500250500500500500
Inf200010002000200020002000
L. persicus
EtOH500250500500125125
MeOH250125500250500125
Inf1000500100020001000500
Amphotericin-B0.250.1250.50.250.250.25
Ketoconazole0.060.030.030.030.030.06
Ca1: C. albicans ATCC 10231, Cu: C. utilis NRRL Y-900, Ca2: C. albicans ATCC 90028, Ct: C. tropicalis ATCC 750, Cp: C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, Ck: C. krusei ATCC 6258, Inf: Infusion, MIC: Minimum inhibitor concentration.
Table 5. Antiproliferative activity of Leonurus extracts against cancer cell lines (µg/mL).
Table 5. Antiproliferative activity of Leonurus extracts against cancer cell lines (µg/mL).
Cell Lines
Extracts/StandardA549C6MCF7
L. quinquelobatus
EtOH>100031.33 ± 1.3947.81 ± 2.08
MeOH>100021.14 ± 1.1518.19 ± 0.45
Inf>1000114.78 ± 1.39288.61 ± 2.65
L. glaucescens
EtOH>100031.22 ± 0.6039.26 ± 1.65
MeOH>100032.38 ± 0.2721.22 ± 0.93
Inf>1000121.76 ± 1.39495.87 ± 3.62
L. cardiaca
EtOH869.56 ± 10.550.12 ± 1.0980.65 ± 3.94
MeOH673.67 ± 9.8524.31 ± 1.0347.59 ± 1.38
Inf>1000113.64 ± 1.39165.91 ± 1.56
L. persicus
EtOH>100033.96 ± 0.3985.65 ± 3.71
MeOH601.86 ± 8.6616.43 ± 0.1751.79 ± 2.36
Inf>100058.93 ± 1.39122.27 ± 2.54
DOX10.76 ± 0.51325.64 ± 1.115.70 ± 0.22
DOX: Doxorubicin; Inf: Infusion. IC50 values are given as mean values ± SDs of three independent measures.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saltan, N.; Köse, Y.B.; Göger, F.; Osmaniye, D.; İşcan, G. Chemical Composition and Bioactivities of Turkish Leonurus Species (Lamiaceae) Extracts: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Potential. Molecules 2026, 31, 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101708

AMA Style

Saltan N, Köse YB, Göger F, Osmaniye D, İşcan G. Chemical Composition and Bioactivities of Turkish Leonurus Species (Lamiaceae) Extracts: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Potential. Molecules. 2026; 31(10):1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saltan, Nagehan, Yavuz Bülent Köse, Fatih Göger, Derya Osmaniye, and Gökalp İşcan. 2026. "Chemical Composition and Bioactivities of Turkish Leonurus Species (Lamiaceae) Extracts: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Potential" Molecules 31, no. 10: 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101708

APA Style

Saltan, N., Köse, Y. B., Göger, F., Osmaniye, D., & İşcan, G. (2026). Chemical Composition and Bioactivities of Turkish Leonurus Species (Lamiaceae) Extracts: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Potential. Molecules, 31(10), 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101708

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop