Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most invasive central nervous system tumors, with rising global incidence. Therapy resistance and poor prognosis highlight the urgent need for new anticancer drugs. Plant alkaloids, a largely unexplored yet promising class of compounds, have previously contributed to oncology treatments. While past reviews provided selective insights, this review aims to collectively compare data from the last decade on (1) plant alkaloid-based anticancer drugs, (2) alkaloid transport across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in vitro and in vivo, (3) alkaloid mechanisms of action in glioblastoma models (in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, and in silico), and (4) cytotoxicity and safety profiles. Additionally, innovative drug delivery systems (e.g., nanoparticles and liposomes) are discussed. Focusing on preclinical studies of single plant alkaloids, this review includes 22 botanical families and 28 alkaloids that demonstrated anti-GBM activity. Most alkaloids act in a concentration-dependent manner by (1) reducing glioma cell viability, (2) suppressing proliferation, (3) inhibiting migration and invasion, (4) inducing cell death, (5) downregulating Bcl-2 and key signaling pathways, (6) exhibiting antiangiogenic effects, (7) reducing tumor weight, and (8) improving survival rates. The toxic and adverse effect analysis suggests that alkaloids such as noscapine, lycorine, capsaicin, chelerythrine, caffeine, boldine, and colchicine show favorable therapeutic potential. However, tetrandrine, nitidine, harmine, harmaline, cyclopamine, cocaine, and brucine may pose greater risks than benefits. Piperine’s toxicity and berberine’s poor bioavailability suggest the need for novel drug formulations. Several alkaloids (kukoamine A, cyclovirobuxine D, α-solanine, oxymatrine, rutaecarpine, and evodiamine) require further pharmacological and toxicological evaluation. Overall, while plant alkaloids show promise in glioblastoma therapy, progress in assessing their BBB penetration remains limited. More comprehensive studies integrating glioma research and advanced drug delivery technologies are needed.
1. Introduction
1.1. Description of Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor, accounting for 77–81% of all primary malignant tumors of the CNS [1]. This cancer subtype includes high-grade GBM and low-grade gliomas such as astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma [2,3]. GBM is one of the most invasive CNS tumors, characterized by high malignancy and poor prognosis [4,5]. Its global incidence is rising, with survival rates averaging only 15 months due to high recurrence and resistance to current treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy [6]. The therapy resistance and poor prognosis highlight the urgent need for new anticancer drugs.
According to the GLOBOCAN 2020 program, there were 19.3 million new cancer cases worldwide and 10 million cancer-related deaths [2]. Predictions indicate that by 2040, the number of cancer cases will rise to 28.4 million [7]. Between 1990 and 2016, the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) cancer increased by 17.3%, with East Asia reporting the highest number of cases in both sexes, followed by Western Europe. Additionally, China, the USA, and India had the highest numbers of CNS tumor cases, both malignant and non-malignant [2]. In 2020, an estimated 308,102 cases of nervous system cancers were reported [8].
In recent years, anticancer drug discovery strategies have evolved significantly, driven by advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms of neoplastic transformation. Progress in drug discovery, development, and patient care has been fueled by insights into cancer biology, including glioblastoma [9], and detailed genomic data from resources like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [10]. Oncology practice has also advanced, with treatments emerging for previously fatal cancers. However, major challenges persist, including drug toxicity, resistance, and the heterogeneous nature of cancer. Additionally, the narrow therapeutic index of anticancer drugs, adverse side effects, and limitations in drug delivery systems remain significant obstacles to effective treatment [11,12].
1.2. Review of Alkaloids (Group of Plant Metabolites and Group of Chemical Compounds Classified According to Chemical Structure)
Current knowledge of plant secondary metabolites allows us to state that a large group of alkaloids (organic chemical compounds containing nitrogen atoms in a heterocyclic ring structure) includes diverse categories of chemical molecules in plants. These alkaloids regulate plant growth and protect them against herbivores (e.g., nematodes and insects) [13,14,15] and various pathogens by reducing bacterial and fungal infestation, functioning as “botanical herbicides” [16,17,18]. Approximately 12,000 different alkaloids have been identified, primarily in higher plants [14,15]. Alkaloids are widely distributed in plants, fungi, bacteria, amphibians, insects, and marine animals. According to Pereira [19,20], more than 27,000 alkaloids have been characterized. These alkaloids belong to four major chemical groups:
- I.
- Alkaloids with nitrogen heterocycles (true alkaloids)—six classes.
- II.
- Protoalkaloids (alkaloids with nitrogen in the side chain)—two classes.
- III.
- Pseudoalkaloids—one class of chemical compounds.
- IV.
- Polyamines alkaloids.
The chemical diversity of alkaloids leads to a broad spectrum of biological and pharmacological activities in humans. These include antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial properties, as well as anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antihypertensive, and anti-diabetic effects. Additionally, alkaloids function as sedatives, painkillers, anti-neurodegenerative agents, and anticancer drugs [17,19,21,22]. Many alkaloids possess psychoactive properties, such as cocaine (from Erythroxylum coca) [23], nicotine (from Nicotiana tabacum) [24], atropine, scopolamine, hyoscyamine (from Datura stramonium, Atropa belladonna, Mandragora officinarum), cathine (from Catha edulis), reserpine (from Rauwolfia serpentina), mitragynine (from Mitragyna speciosa), octopamine (from Ophiopogon japonicas), arecoline (from Areca catechu), dimethyltryptamine, beta-carbolines, N-methyltryptamine (from Psychotria viridis), ibogaine (from Tabernanthe iboga), mescaline (from Lophophora williamsii) [25,26], and opium alkaloids, i.e., codeine and morphine (from Papaver somniferum) [23,27]. These psychoactive properties should be carefully considered in future studies on the design of alkaloid-based drugs for treating glioblastoma patients.
In current studies, 22 botanical families have been identified as sources of plant species containing alkaloids in publications focusing on anti-glioblastoma activities. These families and their representative species include the following:
- Apocynaceae (Catharanthus roseus);
- Aquifoliaceae (Ilex paraguariensis—yerba mate);
- Amaryllidaceae (Clivia miniata, Lycoris radiata, Crinum americanum);
- Berberidaceae (Berberis aquifolium, B. vulgaris, B. aristata);
- Buxaceae (Buxus sinica);
- Colchicaceae (Colchicum autumnale);
- Erythroxylaceae (Erythroxylum coca);
- Fabaceae (Sophora flavescens);
- Lauraceae (Litsea glutinosa, Neolitsea konishii);
- Loganiaceae (Strychnos nux-vomica);
- Malvaceae (Theobroma cacao);
- Melanthiaceae (Veratrum californicum);
- Monimiaceae (Peumus boldus);
- Nitrariaceae (Peganum harmala);
- Papaveraceae (Chelidonium majus, Papaver somniferum);
- Piperaceae (Piper nigrum, P. longum, P. sarmentosum);
- Ranunculaceae (Coptis chinensis, Hydrastis canadensis);
- Rubiaceae (Coffea arabica—Arabica coffee, Uncaria tomentosa);
- Rutaceae (Evodia rutaecarpa, Zanthoxylum simulans, Z. ailanthoides, Z. stelligerum, Z. nitidum);
- Sapindaceae (Paullinia cupana—guarana);
- Solanaceae (Capsicum annuum, Lycium chinense, Solanum lycocarpum, S. nigrum);
- Menispermaceae (Stephania tetrandra).
In the same vein, the following chemical groups of alkaloids have been studied in glioblastoma models in vitro and in vivo as single chemical compounds (n = 30): amide alkaloid (piperine = bioperine) [15,16], aporphine alkaloid (boldine) [28], benzophenanthridine alkaloids (chelerythine, dihydrochelerythine, nitidine) [29,30,31,32], beta-carboline alkaloids (harmine, harmaline) [33,34,35], bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloid (tetrandrine) [36,37,38], glycoalkaloids (solamargine, α-solanine, solasonine) [17,39,40], indolopyridoquinazoline alkaloid (rutaecarpine) [41,42], isoquinoline alkaloid (berberine) [20,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50], methylxanthine alkaloid (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine, caffeine) [51,52,53,54,55,56,57], non-narcotic opium alkaloid (papaverine) [58,59], oxindole alkaloids (pentacyclic and tetracyclic alkaloids) [60], phthalide-isoquinoline alkaloid (noscapine) [9], protoalkaloid (capsaicin) [61,62,63], pyrrolo-phenanthridine alkaloid (lycorine = narcissine) [64,65,66], quinazolinocarboline alkaloid (evodiamine) [41,67,68,69], quinolizidine alkaloid (oxymatrine) [70,71], spermine alkaloid (kukoamine A) [72], steroidal alkaloids (cyclopamine, cyclovirobuxine D) [73,74], tricyclic alkaloid (colchicine) [22,75,76,77], tropane alkaloid (cocaine) [78,79], and Vinca alkaloids (vinblastine and vincristine) [22,80,81,82].
1.3. The Use of Alkaloids in Potential Anticancer Therapies and Prognoses for Improving the Effectiveness of These Therapies
Recently, the number of scientific articles has increased, emphasizing the potential of alkaloids—a large group of plant secondary metabolites—to support oncological therapy. Alkaloids have been tested as anti-glioma drugs in glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines [83,84,85], as well as in retinoblastoma and neuroblastoma cells [86]. Some alkaloids, such as piperine and lycorine, have shown a synergistic effect with temozolomide in temozolomide-resistant human glioma cell lines by blocking the NF-κB pathway [87,88,89]. Additionally, alkaloids may act synergistically with radiation (e.g., piperine), increasing the radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma cells [90]. An increasing number of clinical studies are focusing on combining alkaloids (e.g., vinblastine) with carboplatin [91] or nilotinib [92], or using metronomic maintenance with vinblastine to prevent early relapse of pediatric low-grade glioma after treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan [93]. Some alkaloids, such as evodiamine, are considered potential anticancer drugs [94].
However, many questions and doubts remain regarding the bioavailability of alkaloids, including their ability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and potential toxicity. These issues need to be investigated, explained, and discussed not only at the scientific level but also in practical oncological therapy. Consideration must be given to the different age groups and genders of glioblastoma patients and the various medications they take (including painkillers, anticancer drugs, and antiemetics). The systematic review shows that, among the large group of alkaloids, more than 30 alkaloids (including Vinca alkaloids: vinblastine and vincristine) have been studied over the past ten years. Available scientific publications (from the PubMed database) demonstrate that 13 alkaloids, including cyclopamine (n = 25), colchicine (n = 23), berberine (n = 17), caffeine (n = 14), capsaicin (n = 10), evodiamine (n = 8), piperine (n = 7), lycorine (n = 5), tetrandrine (n = 4), nitidine (n = 4), noscapine (n = 4), and alkaloids registered as chemotherapeutics (vincristine (n = 74) and vinblastine (n = 11)), are the most investigated in glioblastoma models.
Only studies focusing on the preclinical efficacy of single plant alkaloids, without combining them with other anticancer compounds (e.g., temozolomide), were selected for the original bibliographic analysis. This review summarizes the ten-year state of knowledge on the anti-glioma activity of alkaloids using in vitro, in vivo, and in silico methods. Similar research models employing glioblastoma cell lines and xenograft models in animals allow for the comparison of the activities, cellular and molecular mechanisms, and potential of different alkaloids.
In this current review, the focus is on bioavailability, which provides insight into the possible penetration of alkaloids through the blood–brain barrier. Attention is also given to new biopharmaceutical methods, including nanotechnology, which may find wider application in developing new and more effective anti-glioblastoma drugs based on plant alkaloids. Moreover, this review emphasizes not only the preclinical studies of alkaloids in pharmacological models of glioblastoma but also highlights the safety profile of alkaloids with cytotoxic activity. For this reason, the presented review stands out from others that focus primarily on biological activity and interactions with anticancer drugs.
This systematic review includes articles retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline Complete databases, as well as The Cochrane Library, published from 2015 to 2024. To effectively search for publications, the following keywords were used: “glioblastoma and alkaloid”, “glioblastoma and natural therapy”, or the name of a single alkaloid combined with “glioblastoma.” Predatory journals listed on the website https://predatoryjournals.org/the-list (accessed on 31 January 2025) were excluded. The number of publications identified per year is as follows: 2024 = 26, 2023 = 21, 2022 = 32, 2021 = 39, 2020 = 28, 2019 = 29, 2018 = 41, 2017 = 29, 2016 = 42, and 2015 = 46, resulting in a total of 307 collected publications.
This review includes in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, and in silico studies and review articles. For the original bibliographic analysis, only studies focusing on the preclinical efficacy of single plant alkaloids, without combining them with other anticancer compounds (e.g., temozolomide), were selected. Synergistic interactions between alkaloids (and other groups of phytocompounds) and temozolomide are discussed in another review [13].
In this review, 22 botanical families containing the most popular plant species with alkaloids are included. In summary, the anti-glioblastoma activity of 28 plant alkaloids was demonstrated and compared.
2. Current Status in Medicinal Products Based on Plant Alkaloids as Anticancer Drugs in Various Groups of Cancers
In the last 30 years, the FDA has approved only four drugs for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), including lomustine (e.g., Gleostine™), carmustine (e.g., BiCNU®), temozolomide (Temodal), and bevacizumab [95]. Lomustine, carmustine, and temozolomide are classified as simple alkylating agents (antineoplastic agents) with partial penetration to the brain. In contrast, bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and prevents the activation of VEGF receptors on capillary endothelial cells [95]. However, these drugs have numerous side effects. Lomustine and carmustine can cause pulmonary toxicity (e.g., pulmonary fibrosis), hematologic toxicity (e.g., myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and bone marrow dysplasia), gastrointestinal toxicity (e.g., nausea and vomiting), hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and others [96]. Long-term therapy with temozolomide may lead to adverse events such as thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, pancytopenia, anemia, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and myelosuppression [97,98]. An analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized clinical trials of bevacizumab showed adverse reactions, including nasal septum perforation, necrotizing fasciitis, and hypertensive encephalopathy [99].
The use of plant chemical matrices containing biologically active compounds, such as alkaloids, is justified in the development of new, safer, more effective, and potentially selective anticancer drugs to address the global oncological crisis [100,101]. Plant chemical matrices can be considered a chemical space in plants; metabolites biosynthesized in these plants can serve as a source for new drugs or precursors that can be optimized for developing potential analogs by applying modern principles of drug development based on plant-derived natural products.
Currently, plant-based medicines are a major source of anticancer therapies [101,102]. Many authors have long indicated that alkaloids and their semisynthetic and synthetic derivatives are important sources of anticancer drugs [13,100,101,102,103,104,105]. However, other chemical groups of plant secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, lactones, taxanes, and epipodophyllotoxins, have also demonstrated interesting anticancer effects [102]. Plant alkaloids have garnered significant interest as natural sources and continue to play a promising role in future drug discovery [102,103,104,105,106].
Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy and safety of many well-known plant alkaloids in oncological therapy. Several alkaloids have been registered by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as pharmaceutical drug substances or chemotherapeutic agents for anticancer treatment (Figure 1, Table 1), including (1) vinblastine and vincristine: these Vinca alkaloids are natural alkaloids from the Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus, Apocynaceae) [107,108]; (2) vindesine and vinorelbine: these are semi-synthetic derivatives of vinblastine extracted from C. roseus [107,108]; (3) topotecan, irinotecan, and belotecan: these are semi-synthetic derivatives of camptothecin (a quinoline alkaloid) extracted from the bark of the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata [84,109,110,111,112]; (4) homoharringtonine: this alkaloid is from Cephalotaxus fortunei (Taxaceae) [109,110,111,112]. In fact, only irinotecan and vincristine are considered for anti-glioblastoma therapy [111].
Figure 1.
Mechanisms of pharmacological activities of the anticancer drugs based on plant alkaloids against cancer cells [figure presents one cancer cell and various targets to therapy]. Created using the BioRender.com.
Table 1.
Medicinal products based on plant alkaloids as anticancer drugs.
In addition to these alkaloids, other plant-derived chemical compounds recognized as pharmaceutical substances or chemotherapeutic drugs approved by the FDA include (1) Etoposide and Teniposide, which are semisynthetic derivatives of podophyllotoxin from the rhizome of Podophyllum peltatum [108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115] and (2) taxanes, which are diterpenes, mainly paclitaxel (Taxol), derived from the bark of the Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) [108,116].
On the other hand, according to updated safety information, camptothecin, vincristine, and vinblastine have exhibited severe toxic effects, including neurotoxicity and abdominal problems [85]. For this reason, continued research is warranted to develop new and safer anti-glioblastoma drugs, including other alkaloid substances.
3. Penetration/Transport of Selected Alkaloids Across the Blood–Brain Barrier—In Vitro and In Vivo Studies (Progress in Basic Research)
The human brain is an exceptionally complex organ that has developed an effective protection system to prevent the toxic effects of pathogens and neurotoxins. Consequently, designing new drugs capable of overcoming this protective system and achieving optimal concentrations at the desired therapeutic target in the brain is a significant challenge for medicinal chemists [117]. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a biological structure composed of microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes, pericytes, and tight junctions, which collectively maintain the internal environment of the central nervous system (CNS) [118]. As a highly selective barrier, the BBB regulates the exchange of chemical substances between the bloodstream and the brain’s interstitial fluid, preventing the entry of potentially harmful compounds [119,120,121]. From a therapeutic perspective, the BBB presents a major obstacle for anticancer drugs with large molecular masses, as their ability to penetrate the barrier depends on several factors. These include the perfusion rate (e.g., cerebral blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid circulation), the paracellular and transcellular diffusion rate (determined by the drug’s physicochemical properties), and the concentration of the free (non-protein-bound) form of the anticancer drug in plasma [122]. The efficacy of drug transport into the brain is primarily influenced by transporters (mediating transporter-mediated transcytosis, mainly via P-glycoprotein), efflux pumps (energy-dependent mechanisms), and receptors (involved in receptor-mediated transcytosis) [122,123]. It is well known that anticancer compounds must possess dual molecular characteristics, appropriate solubility and molecular weight, to effectively cross the BBB [124,125]. Specifically, small lipid-soluble molecules can generally penetrate the BBB if their molecular mass is below 400 Da, and they form fewer than eight hydrogen bonds. Furthermore, the BBB effectively excludes approximately 100% of large-molecule compounds and over 98% of all small-molecule drugs [124,125]. One feasible approach to improving BBB permeability is increasing the lipophilicity of anticancer compounds. Currently, advanced drug delivery strategies, such as nanotechnology (nanomedicine), are being explored to enhance brain drug penetration [123,126]. However, in the case of alkaloids, the exact mechanisms and pathways influencing their BBB permeability remain incompletely understood. Since lipophilicity and molecular weight are key physicochemical properties affecting BBB penetration, each alkaloid should be studied individually to assess its potential for effective brain delivery.
In the search for new anticancer substances, including drugs for glioblastoma treatment, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) remains a major challenge in delivering chemotherapeutic agents to the brain [127]. According to Nooran and de la Rosa [121], improving the effectiveness of glioblastoma treatment requires enabling anticancer drugs to penetrate the BBB and reach the tumor directly to eliminate cancer cells.
The unsatisfactory efficiency of anti-glioblastoma therapy is not only due to the restrictive nature of the BBB but also to additional factors such as the blood–tumor barrier (BTB), the development of multidrug resistance (MDR) mediated by P-glycoprotein (P-gp, also known as MDR1 or ABCB1), and the formation of vasculogenic mimicry [127,128,129]. P-gp-mediated drug efflux is a key mechanism contributing to the poor bioavailability of xenobiotics [130,131]. Since P-gp, an efflux transporter protein, is expressed in cerebral microvascular endothelial cells in both the BBB and BTB, it presents a promising target for anticancer alkaloids [132,133,134]. Additionally, other natural compounds, such as resveratrol, have been explored as alternative P-gp inhibitors [135,136,137,138]. Currently, pharmacological approaches used in glioblastoma treatment have not yielded satisfactory results in clinical practice. According to Wang [120] remodeling the BBB represents a promising strategy for improving anti-glioblastoma therapy. Similarly, Wu [139] suggests that nanotechnology has emerged as a promising platform in this regard. Poorly bioavailable phytochemicals, including several alkaloids that cannot cross the BBB, should be encapsulated in nanoparticles to enhance absorption, transport, and stability [140]. Advanced nanoparticle delivery systems, such as liposomes, microspheres, and polymeric nanoparticles, should be further investigated to improve therapeutic efficiency [131]. According to recent studies, nanoformulations containing topotecan offer significant advantages in enhancing anticancer activity. Research indicates that topotecan-loaded nanocarrier systems exhibit superior pharmacokinetic properties, biocompatibility, tumor-targeting capabilities, and stability compared to native topotecan [141]. However, despite these emerging therapeutic strategies, they have not yet been widely adopted in clinical oncology practice [139].
To date, no systematic comparative studies using nanosystems have been conducted on alkaloids that inhibit glioma development at both the in vitro and in vivo levels. Furthermore, the correlation between the cytotoxic effects of alkaloids on glioblastoma cells and their ability to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is not always observed within the same experimental timeframe. However, the permeability of several alkaloids through the BBB has been assessed using various experimental models beyond nanosystems and glioblastoma models, primarily among alkaloids containing nitrogen heterocycles.
Several alkaloids have been studied for their transport across the BBB, including isoquinoline alkaloids: berberine, papaverine [58,59], noscapine [83,142,143], and tetrandrine [127,128,130,144]; indole derivatives: brucine [145], rutaecarpine [16,130], evodiamine [69,146], harmine [34,147], harmaline [148,149], vinblastine [150,151], and vincristine [127]; purine-like alkaloid: caffeine [51,152]; piperidine alkaloid: piperine [153,154]; and protoalkaloids: capsaicin and colchicine [127,150,151,155], The molecular weights (MWs) of the studied alkaloids, based on PubChem data, indicate their potential for BBB penetration (generally < 400 Da): caffeine (194.19 g/mol) < harmine (212.25 g/mol) < harmaline (214.26 g/mol) < piperine (285.34 g/mol) < rutaecarpine (287.3 g/mol) < evodiamine (303.4 g/mol) < capsaicin (305.4 g/mol) < berberine (336.4 g/mol) < papaverine (339.4 g/mol) < brucine (394.5 g/mol) < Uncaria alkaloids [hirsuteine (366.5 g/mol), hirsutine (368.5 g/mol), isocorynoxeine (382.5 g/mol), cnoxeine (382.5 g/mol), isorhynchophylline (384.5 g/mol)] < colchicine (399.4 g/mol) < cyclopamine (411.6 g/mol) < noscapine (413.4 g/mol) < tetrandrine (622.7 g/mol) < vinblastine (811 g/mol). All of these alkaloids satisfy the condition of having fewer than eight hydroxyl groups in their chemical structure, which is another key factor influencing BBB permeability (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Predicted alkaloids crossing the blood brain-barrier after taking into account their molecular weight and the results of in vitro studies. Figure presents a scheme of a cross-section of a fragment of the blood–brain barrier with endothelial cells, astrocytes, and neuronal cells. There are two ways to cross the BBB: passive diffusion or active transport. Passive diffusion is a route preferred by most chemical compounds when provided they are lipid-soluble, have a molecular weight less than 650 g/mol and a logP value between 1.5 and 3.0, and are not too polar [156]. Created using the BioRender.com.
It is important to highlight that the central nervous system multiparameter optimization (CNS MPO) desirability composite score was developed by Pfizer as an assessment tool during drug discovery to predict BBB permeability [157]. The CNS MPO score is obtained by summarizing individual components associated with six key physicochemical descriptors: molecular weight (MW), calculated logarithm of partition coefficient (ClogP), calculated logarithm of distribution coefficient at pH 7.4 (ClogD7.4), topological polar surface area (TPSA), number of hydrogen bond donors (HBDs), and the pKa of the most basic atom [158]. Additionally, several in silico BBB permeability prediction models are currently being developed and optimized [158].
Beyond computational methods, the importance of in vitro models has been increasingly recognized. These models can be classified into two-dimensional (2D) systems, such as monolayer and transwell models (both monoculture and co-culture), and three-dimensional (3D) models [159]. These in vitro systems should be employed to study alkaloid transport across the BBB more comprehensively while considering the limitations outlined by Ureña-Vacas [159]. In this context, piperine has already been investigated using these models [153,154]. Furthermore, the role of the BBB in limiting drug delivery and treatment efficacy remains a topic of discussion and ongoing controversy, particularly in the pathogenesis of high-grade brain tumors such as glioblastoma [95].
3.1. Caffeine
The results of the current meta-analysis indicate that higher coffee consumption is associated with a lower risk of glioma [160]. It is well known that the hydrophobic properties of caffeine enable it to cross biological membranes via simple diffusion [160]. Previous studies have demonstrated that caffeine can readily penetrate the BBB [135,136,137]. However, according to Lin [51], its precise effect on BBB permeability remains unclear, and its influence on glioblastoma cells has not been fully investigated [136]. Despite the well-established fact that caffeine crosses the BBB, key kinetic parameters governing its transport across the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier have not yet been determined [161], This gap in knowledge may be relevant for the potential use of caffeine in adjuvant glioma therapy. Similarly, theobromine, another methylxanthine alkaloid, has been shown to traverse the BBB in various experimental models [162,163,164,165]. Moreover, preliminary in vitro studies suggest that theobromine may exhibit anti-glioblastoma activity, including the inhibition of glioblastoma cell proliferation in culture [163].
3.2. Harmine and Harmaline
The indole alkaloid harmine has been shown to penetrate the BBB, suggesting its potential therapeutic effects in various brain disorders [166]. Additionally, harmine can rapidly enter the brain parenchyma following oral administration in mice [166]. In contrast, harmaline crosses the BBB, likely through the ATP-dependent efflux transporter BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein) [148]. Zetler et al. [149] reported that harmaline is taken up into the brain at a slower rate compared to harmine.
3.3. Piperine
Recent in silico studies indicate that piperine (1-piperoyl piperidine) can effectively cross the BBB [167]. Piperine and its analog SCT-64 demonstrated the highest BBB permeation potential via passive diffusion in various in vitro BBB models, including immortalized human BBB cells, human brain-like endothelial cells, and primary bovine endothelial/rat astrocyte co-cultures. In silico models further suggested that these alkaloids are unlikely to be substrates for active efflux transporters. Another study confirmed that piperine exhibits high BBB penetration potential without interactions with efflux transporters [168]. It showed a strong affinity for brain tissue (98.4–98.5%) and was detected in multiple brain regions, including the cortex, striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, midbrain, and brainstem. After oral administration in rats, piperine had a brain volume distribution of 36.32 ± 1.40 mL/g, with pharmacokinetic parameters of T(max) = 4 h, C(max) = 1395.53 ng/mL, and t1/2 = 2.39 h [145]. These findings suggest that piperine has strong brain tissue affinity and significant BBB penetration potential [168]. However, its precise transport mechanisms across the BBB remain unknown. Previously, piperine has been shown to enhance the bioavailability of various drugs, including diazepam, flunitrazepam, propranolol, warfarin, and salicylic acid [167,169]. Notably, piperine can synergistically enhance the anticancer effects of temozolomide against temozolomide-resistant glioma cell lines (U251MG, T98G) [87]. Additionally, it acts as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor [154].
3.4. Evodiamine and Rutaecarpine
Evodiamine has demonstrated the ability to penetrate the BBB [69]. Previously, Zhang et al. [130] observed that rutaecarpine also exhibits high BBB permeability. Using an MDCK-pHaMDR cell monolayer model, this alkaloid was shown to effectively cross the BBB [41].
3.5. Capsaicin
Capsaicin can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [170,171]. Pharmacological studies have shown that, following intravenous administration in rats, capsaicin accumulates in the brain and spinal cord at concentrations five times higher than in the blood [172,173,174]. After subcutaneous administration, its distribution follows the order: brain > spinal cord > blood > skin [173]. According to Donnerer et al. [175], approximately 50% of capsaicin was detected in the rat brain within three minutes after an intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg and ninety minutes after a subcutaneous dose of 50 mg/kg.
Recent studies using nanotechnology have demonstrated that capsaicin, when formulated as nanoparticles with methoxy polyethylene glycol-poly(caprolactone) (mPEG-PCL), efficiently crosses the BBB. Human glioblastoma U251 cells cultured with fluorescein-loaded nanoparticles showed nanoparticle uptake via endocytosis [174]. Additionally, neurochemical studies suggest that dihydrocapsaicin may help reduce BBB disruption [176].
3.6. Berberine and Derivatives
Recently, Wang [177] observed that a glucose-coated berberine nanodrug enhanced the transport of berberine across the blood–brain tumor barrier in a mouse model. These results opened new possibilities for therapy since berberine cannot be administered orally and has low bioavailability when injected intravenously due to its insolubility and poor stability. In vitro studies using wild-type and P-gp-knockout mice showed that the substrates of P-gp included berberrubine, thalifendine, demethyleneberberine, jatrorrhizine, and columbamine, which are natural protoberberine alkaloids. An in vivo transport test using a Caco-2 monolayer demonstrated that the efflux capacity ranked as follows: berberrubine > berberine > columbamine ~ jatrorrhizine > thalifendine > demethyleneberberine. In silico studies also indicated that these alkaloids have an affinity for binding to P-gp [130].
3.7. Papaverine
Bhattacharjee et al. [178] revealed that intracarotid infusion of 0.1–0.2% papaverine in rats caused disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and increased the transport of sucrose into various brain regions. This effect was observed in a dose-dependent manner for the parietal cortex and brain stem. However, at a concentration of 0.15% papaverine, there was a significant increase in sucrose concentration in the frontal cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, and contralateral fronto-parietal cortex.
3.8. Brucine and Strychnine
Brucine and strychnine, two major alkaloids of Bi Qi capsules (BQCs), possess the ability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) effectively. Brucine acts as a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), whereas strychnine may function as an inhibitor of P-gp in the rat brain, as demonstrated using the microdialysis technique [145]. It was also observed that free strychnine and brucine were transported across the BBB into the brain. However, the high permeability of these alkaloids across the BBB was noted only at medium and high doses, which can induce neurotoxic effects (particularly for strychnine). Previous studies [179] have shown that P-gp participates in the transport process of brucine at the BBB, and it was observed that when brucine was used in conjunction with P-gp inhibitors, the concentration of brucine in the rat brain increased.
3.9. Uncaria Alkaloids
Alkaloids are the primary secondary metabolites found in the genus Uncaria, with over 100 alkaloids identified in these pantropical plants. Among the eight tested alkaloids from Uncaria (i.e., Uncaria rhynchophylla and U. hirsuta), hirsuteine and hirsutine (at 10 μM) significantly reduced the levels and function of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in MCF-7/ADR cells. Furthermore, isocorynoxeine, corynoxeine, and isorhynchophylline suppressed P-gp mRNA levels in MCF-7/ADR cells [133]. In tests using the MDCK-pHaMDR cell monolayer model as an in vitro surrogate for the blood–brain barrier (BBB), isorhynchophylline, isocorynoxeine, hirsutine, and hirsuteine exhibited high permeability. These chemical compounds demonstrated time- and concentration-dependent effects and passive diffusion during their passage through the BBB [38].
3.10. Colchicine
The study revealed that P-glycoprotein (P-gp) limits the uptake of colchicine. Moreover, it was observed that vinblastine can inhibit its own transport across the blood–brain barrier in rats [150]. The results from other tests using the in situ rat brain perfusion technique showed that the volumes of distribution of colchicine and vinblastine did not differ among the eight gray matter areas of the brain. However, the distribution volumes of these alkaloids remained small. It is known that both colchicine and vinblastine are substrates of P-glycoprotein, but it can be assumed that P-gp is not the only barrier for these two chemical compounds [151].
3.11. Noscapine
Another isoquinoline alkaloid, noscapine, along with its analogs, demonstrated high penetration through the blood–brain barrier [9]. In an in vitro experimental model, noscapine crossed the simulated blood–brain barrier at a rate 31.8% more efficiently than morphine [143].
3.12. Tertrandrine (with Borneol, Vinorelbine, Vincristine)
Estimates of the safety, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetic parameters of tetrandrine are still very limited in animal models, mainly in clinical trials [131]. Recently, it was found that tetrandrine has the potential to improve drug penetration through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-tumor barrier (BTB). Tetrandrine, in combination with borneol (a terpene derivative), reduced the integrity of the BBB in in vivo brain metastasis models. Moreover, tetrandrine (10 mg/kg/day), administered alone and with borneol (300 mg/kg/day) for five consecutive days to mice, inhibited the function of the P-gp efflux pump [128]. Another study showed that liposomes constructed with a tripeptide (Arg-Gly-Asp), tetrandrine, vinorelbine (an indole alkaloid anticancer drug), and DSPE-PEG2000 significantly enhanced transport across the BBB using glioma C6 cells, resistant C6 cells, and glioma-bearing mice [144]. Changes in pharmacokinetic parameters were identified, such as prolonged elimination half-life and increased AUC0-24h. It was observed that the liposomes acted through cellular and molecular mechanisms, including transporting/penetrating across the BBB, enhancing cellular uptake, downregulating P-gp, and inducing apoptosis via active substances in the liposomes. The following rank of inhibitory effects on both cancer cells after crossing the BBB was observed: RGD-modified vinorelbine plus tetrandrine liposomes > RGD-modified vinorelbine liposomes > vinorelbine plus tetrandrine liposomes > vinorelbine liposomes [144].
Furthermore, Song et al. [127] revealed that liposomes containing tetrandrine and vincristine (an indole alkaloid) modified with DSPE-PEG2000-NHS-transferrin (TF) accumulated at brain tumor sites in glioma-bearing mice due to improved physicochemical parameters for permeability and retention. This liposomal formulation exhibited the strongest cytotoxic effects on C6 cells and C6/ADR cells at various dose levels, with the following ranking of efficacy: liposomes with TF, tetrandrine, and vincristine > liposomes with tetrandrine and vincristine > liposomes with vincristine on C6 cells; and liposomes with TF, tetrandrine, and vincristine > liposomes with tetrandrine and vincristine > liposomes with TF and vincristine > liposomes with vincristine on C6/ADR cells. Moreover, liposomes with TF, tetrandrine, and vincristine crossed the BBB in vitro more effectively than other formulations. The activity of P-gp in various cell lines was reduced. Mice treated with liposomes containing TF, tetrandrine, and vincristine showed significantly longer survival times, along with blocking effects on cancer cell invasion and stronger induction of apoptosis in vitro via the upregulation of caspases [127].
4. Progress in Studies of Plant Alkaloids in Glioblastoma Models with Indication of Mechanism of Actions
A detailed analysis of the results showed that several mechanisms are similar for most of the alkaloids tested in a concentration-dependent manner, including the following effects observed in cell lines (in vitro model):
- (1)
- Decreasing the viability of glioma cells;
- (2)
- Suppressing cell proliferation;
- (3)
- Inhibiting migration and invasion of glioma cells;
- (4)
- Inducing apoptosis (increasing the percentage of apoptotic glioma cells);
- (5)
- Decreasing the expression of Bcl-2 (an antiapoptotic marker) and other genes, as well as key signaling pathways.
Similarly, the following effects are observed in animal models (in vivo):
- (1)
- Antiangiogenic effects;
- (2)
- Decreasing tumor weight;
- (3)
- Improving the survival rate of animals (Table 2).
Progress in biological and pharmacological research has been presented for groups of alkaloids with similar chemical structures (shown in Table 2).
4.1. Boldine, Berberine and Papaverine
Boldine (isoquinoline alkaloid; from aporphine alkaloid group) is widely distributed in several plants and is the main chemical compound biosynthesized in Peumus boldus (leaves and bark), the Chilean Boldo tree [180]. In addition to boldine, berberine and papaverine also belong to alkaloids with nitrogen heterocycles (true alkaloids). The current study showed that boldine treatment can reduce the proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the subventricular zone by inhibiting pannexin 1 hemichannels. Additionally, boldine can inhibit cell growth in all three tested GBM cell lines. It was observed that the U87-MG cell line was less sensitive to this alkaloid compared to the GBM59 and GBM96 cell lines [28]. Moreover, Noureini [181] revealed that boldine inhibits telomerase at sub-cytotoxic concentrations, suggesting that boldine may be a valuable candidate for telomerase-targeted cancer therapy. According to Pennisi et al. [182], future strategies may include anti-telomerase chemical compounds, which could lead to more effective anticancer treatments and improved outcomes for patients with glioblastoma. However, studies discussing this area remain limited.
Berberine (isoquinoline alkaloid; from protoperberine group) is commonly found in Berberis vulgaris, Chelidonium majus, and Hydrastis canadensis and is a popular alkaloid found in dietary supplements, potentially affecting immune system activity. In vitro studies have shown that berberine induces apoptosis in glioma cells by reducing Bcl-2 protein expression [46]. It also inhibits several signaling pathways, including TGF-β1/SMAD2/3 [50], and the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and the ERK [44,47], while decreasing the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway. Additionally, berberine alters cell cycle progression, increasing the percentage of glioblastoma cells in the sub-G1 phase [45], and induces cell cycle arrest [47]. Another mechanism of action of berberine is the inhibition of glioma cell migration and invasion by suppressing the TGF-β1/COL11A1 pathway [183]. Moreover, berberine can inhibit glioblastoma cell proliferation in vitro by activating wild-type p53 or inhibiting mutant p53 activity [184].
Papaverine (isoquinoline alkaloid) is a non-narcotic opium alkaloid derived from Papaver somniferum, which has demonstrated anticancer activity in various in vitro models, including prostate carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, breast carcinoma, fibrosarcoma, and hepatocarcinoma [142]. This alkaloid suppresses cancer cell migration (T98G cell line) and inhibits cell proliferation (U87MG and T98G cell lines) by inhibiting HMGB1 (high-mobility group box 1 protein, which is involved in cell migration and tumor metastasis) and RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products, which plays a role in tumor cell growth, migration, and invasion). Additionally, papaverine inhibits RAGE-dependent nuclear factor-κB activation [142]. According to Inada et al. [58] these findings suggest that papaverine may be effective against human glioblastoma.
4.2. Chelerythrine, Dihydrochelerythrine and Nitidine
Chelerythrine belongs to derivatives of benzophenanthridine, similar to dihydrochelerythrine and nitidine. Chelerythrine has been found in Chelidonium majus, Macleaya cordata, Sanguinaria canadensis, and Zanthoxylum asiaticum. It exerts numerous biological and pharmacological effects, including antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, antifungal, anti-parasitic, and anticancer activities [69,185]. The anticancer activity of chelerythrine has been demonstrated in various in vitro experiments involving leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, and renal cancer [185]. Recently, it was shown that chelerythrine reduces the protein expression of p-ERK1/2 and p-Smad2/3 and inhibits the TGF-β1-ERK1/2/Smad2/3-Snail/ZEB1 signaling pathway, thereby decreasing glioblastoma progression in U251 and T98G cell lines [29]. SMAD2, SNAIL, and ZEB1 are transcription factors involved in TGF-β signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, which enhance the invasive phenotype of GBM cells, promoting glioma cell invasion and migration [186]. Therefore, further research is needed to explore other aspects of chelerythrine’s role in glioblastoma biology. On the other hand, Wang et al. [32] found that chelerythrine can induce glioma cell death, and this effect is associated with RIP1/RIP3-dependent necroptosis rather than apoptotic cell death in glioma cells at an early stage. The authors emphasized that chelerythrine should be considered a novel therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma treatment.
Dihydrochelerythrine has been found in Corydalis yanhusuo, Macleaya microcarpa, Bocconia arborea, Zanthoxylum simulans, Z. ailanthoides, and Z. stelligerum. It is a well-known antifungal compound that activates the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. A recent study conducted on various glioblastoma cell lines (U251, GL-15, C6) showed that dihydrochelerythrine increased the levels of NF-κB and β-catenin in the cytoplasmic fraction [30]. Moreover, this alkaloid significantly elevated IL-6 levels and upregulated the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) in the U251 cell line. Fu et al. [187] highlighted that the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis and progression of several malignancies, including glioblastoma. The inhibition of STAT3 has been proposed as a promising therapeutic approach for GBM patients, as previously described by Luwor et al. [188]. According to Wang et al. [178], STAT3 inhibition can promote glioblastoma cell apoptosis.
Nitidine, derived from the root of Zanthoxylum nitidum (Rutaceae), similarly to dihydrochelerythrine, inhibits the JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Through this mechanism, nitidine suppresses glioma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion while promoting glioma cell apoptosis [31].
4.3. Lycorine
Lycorine is a derivative of pyrrolo-phenanthridine (Amarylis alkaloids) and is found in Clivia miniata, Lycoris radiata, and Crinum americanum; it exhibits several biological activities, including antiviral, antibacterial, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects, including anti-glioblastoma properties [64,65,66,189]. Dong et al. [64] demonstrated that lycorine inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-3 (PDK3) expression in vitro and in vivo, suppressing the growth of chemoresistant glioblastoma cells. PDK3 has been associated with poor prognosis and negative oncological outcomes in various cancer types [190,191]. As an oncogene in glioblastoma, PDK3 promotes glioblastoma cell progression [192]. Another study showed that lycorine blocks the phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and reduces the mRNA expression levels of EGF, EGFR, Bcl-xL, and Ki-67, leading to alterations in the expression of cell survival, death regulators, and the metastasis-related MMP9 protein [65]. Moreover, lycorine upregulates the NF-κB inhibitor protein IκB; downregulates NF-κB phosphorylation protein p-p65 [66,88]; decreases EGF, EGFR, Bcl-xL, and Ki-67 mRNA and protein levels [65]; and inhibits PDK3 expression [82]. Additionally, lycorine may induce apoptosis in glioblastoma cells through an EGFR-mediated mechanism. The authors of this study concluded that lycorine could be a promising candidate for glioblastoma therapy by inhibiting cell migration, proliferation, and colony formation. Lycorine may be considered a next-generation anticancer drug and could contribute to the development of novel biological strategies for treating various cancer types [193].
4.4. Noscapine
Noscapine (from phthalidisoquinoline group), an alkaloid derived from Papaver somniferum, selectively blocks well-established inflammatory transcription factors such as NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells), which plays a key role in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, colorectal cancer, and glioblastoma [83,183,194,195,196]. Numerous studies have shown that the NF-κB signaling pathway is a crucial factor in gene induction, promoting cell survival and proliferation [197]. Altinoz et al. [9] summarized that noscapine, by modulating the NF-κB signaling pathway, can reduce tumor cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis. Additionally, noscapine binds to β-tubulin at a site distinct from that of taxanes, colchicine, and vincristine (a drug used in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma) [142,198]. Compared to other antineoplastic agents, noscapine exhibits strong anti-inflammatory effects [83], adding another pharmacological advantage in anti-glioblastoma treatment. Given its promising molecular mechanisms, noscapine should be further investigated as a novel therapeutic candidate for glioblastoma.
4.5. Tetrandrine
Tetrandrine (a derivative of bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids), an alkaloid isolated from Stephania tetrandra, a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, has demonstrated anti-tumor activity against various cancers, including breast, liver, pancreatic, leukemia, lung, prostate, gastric, and colorectal cancer [36]. In an in vitro glioblastoma model, tetrandrine reduces the protein levels of c-FLIP, MCL-1, and XIAP [36]; inhibits key metastasis-related proteins (p-EGFR(Tyr1068), SOS-1, GRB2, Ras, p-AKT(Ser473), p-AKT(Thr308), NF-κB-p65, Snail, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, NF-κB, MMP-2, and MMP-9) [44]; and suppresses the neural stem cell properties of glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSLCs) by upregulating GSK3β and β-catenin [38]. Furthermore, tetrandrine exhibits pro-apoptotic activity in various glioblastoma cell lines (U87, U251, and GBM 8401/luc2) by increasing the active forms of caspase-3, -8, and -9 [36,38], upregulating Bax, inducing PARP cleavage, and downregulating Bcl-2 [38]. Cell death induced by this alkaloid has been shown to reduce tumor volume and size in GBM 8401/luc2-cell xenografted animals [36]. In animal models, tetrandrine effectively suppresses tumor growth and glioma angiogenesis in rats [199]. In GBM 8401-cell xenografted mice, tetrandrine decreases the expression of c-FLIP, MCL-1, and XIAP in tumor tissues [36]. Another key molecular mechanism of tetrandrine is its ability to reduce the nuclear translocation and expression of β-catenin, a marker of proliferating endothelial cells in glioblastoma [38,200].
4.6. Brucine, Uncaria Alkaloids, Tetradium Alkaloids, Rutaecarpine, Derivatives of β-Carboline
Brucine belongs to monoterpenoid indole alkaloids and it is a characteristic alkaloid found in the seeds of Strychnos nux-vomica (Loganiaceae), a tree native to Sri Lanka, India, and Australia. This tree is also a natural source of the highly toxic alkaloid strychnine [201]. Brucine has been shown to upregulate activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3), leading to apoptosis in glioblastoma cell lines [42]. It was observed that increased BAX expression resulted in a reduced survival rate of glioma cells (U251) and inhibited tumor growth in a xenograft animal model. Additionally, Liu et al. [41] demonstrated that brucine can induce ferroptosis by increasing iron levels, H2O2 production, and lipid peroxidation in vivo.
To date, more than 200 compounds have been isolated from plants of the Uncaria genus. Several Uncaria alkaloids from the indole group have shown anticancer and neuroprotective effects [133]. While pentacyclic oxindole alkaloids are known to promote apoptosis, the precise mechanisms underlying their anti-glioblastoma activity remain largely unknown.
Evodiamine is a quinazolinocarboline alkaloid belonging to indole alkaloids, derived from the fruits of Evodia rutaecarpa, and promotes apoptosis in glioblastoma cells in a concentration-dependent manner. It induces chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, and apoptotic body formation by suppressing the PI3K/AKT pathway and activating the MAPK pathway (Table 3) [67]. Current research indicates that the PI3K/AKT pathway is frequently dysregulated in various cancers, playing a key role in cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and differentiation [67]. The main mechanism underlying the anti-glioblastoma activity of evodiamine has been described in cell lines such as U251 and LN229 (the latter isolated from the right frontal parieto-occipital cortex of a glioblastoma patient).
Rutaecarpine, another alkaloid from Evodia rutaecarpa, has been shown to inhibit U87 glioblastoma cell migration by activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling pathway. Researchers concluded that rutaecarpine may be considered a potent AhR activator, leading to the suppression of glioblastoma cell migration [147].
Harmine and harmaline were isolated from the seeds of Peganum harmala. Recent studies have demonstrated that harmine exhibits promising anti-glioblastoma effects through various mechanisms, including the inhibition of glioblastoma cell proliferation and migration, as well as the blockade of EGF-mediated phosphorylation of FAK/AKT. Additionally, harmine has been shown to inhibit apoptosis in glioblastoma cells [33,34]. Similarly, harmaline also exerts anti-glioblastoma effects by suppressing the proliferation and migration of U87 cells. It induces apoptotic cell death by triggering sub-G1 cell cycle arrest and upregulating cell cycle-related genes, including p21, p53, and the pro-apoptotic Bax (at 208 µM). Furthermore, harmaline decreases the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9, which are associated with tumor invasion and metastasis [35].
4.7. Piperine
Piperine (from the piperidine alkaloid group) has been isolated from Piper nigrum, P. longum (fruits), and P. sarmentosum (roots) of the Piperaceae family. These plants are among the most widely used species worldwide [86]. Piperine exhibits various pharmacological activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antidepressant effects, and anticancer potential in colorectal, breast, promyelocytic leukemia, prostate, rectal, lung, and ovarian cancer cells [86,87]. Interestingly, a Piper nigrum extract devoid of piperine but contains other alkaloids also demonstrated anti-proliferative effects in vitro against breast, colorectal, lung, and neuroblastoma cancer cell lines [86]. A recent study showed that piperine increases the radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma cells, mainly through synergistic effects in combination with radiation. Additionally, piperine inhibited the growth of human glioblastoma T98G cells at concentrations ranging from 25 µM to 200 µM [90]. Jeong et al. [87] observed that piperine enhances the effect of temozolomide against temozolomide-resistant human glioma cell lines. Piperine has also been reported to increase apoptosis (both apoptotic and necrotic cells) and reduce colony-forming potential [89]. Senrung et al. [202] demonstrated that piperine can suppress neoangiogenesis induced by malignant glioma cells (U87) by interfering with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway, leading to a reduction in VEGFR-2 transcript levels and a decrease in VEGF-A expression. Another study tested a nanogel formulation loaded with curcumin and piperine against U-251 MG glioblastoma cells [203]. This formulation was found to penetrate cells via endocytic pathways and induce caspase-3-related apoptosis in glioblastoma cells.
4.8. Colchicine
Colchicine belongs to protoalkaloids (alkaloids with nitrogen in the side chain), which has been isolated from Colchicum autumnale and Gloriosa superba and has long been used as a medicinal product for the treatment of gout [75]. It is well known that colchicine, as an antimitotic drug, disrupts the cellular cytoskeleton by inhibiting microtubule polymerization in glioma cells [22,34,75,76]. Currently, microtubules are considered critical targets for microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs), which are clinically used to eliminate various cancer cells. These include vinca alkaloids (vincristine and vinblastine) and taxanes [76,77]. Microtubule-targeting agents have shown promising activity against glioblastoma cells, including colchicine-site binder molecules, which are generally smaller than other natural compounds such as vinca alkaloids and taxanes [77]. According to Zottel [76], the involvement of the cytoskeleton in key cellular processes makes it an attractive therapeutic target for glioblastoma multiforme. Other researchers [204] have also highlighted microtubules as an important and beneficial research target for developing new chemotherapeutic agents, particularly potent tubulin inhibitors. Moreover, Xia [205] classified ten categories of tubulin inhibitors, including colchicine derivatives, indole hybrids, podophyllotoxin derivatives, and lignans. Colchicine has been shown to inhibit cell division and proliferation. It has previously been revealed to exert cytotoxic activity against colon and breast cancer [75].
The most popular groups of plant alkaloids tested in glioblastoma models are presented in Figure 3 and Table 2.
Figure 3.
The most popular groups of plant alkaloids tested in glioblastoma models during the last ten years (2015–2024). Created using the BioRender.com.
Table 2.
Plant alkaloids tested in glioblastoma models during the last ten years (2015–2024).
Table 2.
Plant alkaloids tested in glioblastoma models during the last ten years (2015–2024).
| I. Alkaloids with nitrogen heterocycles (true alkaloids) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Class: Isoquinoline alkaloids 1.1. Major group: Aporphine alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Lauraceae, Monimiaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref |
| 1 | Boldine | Peumus boldus (Monimiaceae), Litsea glutinosa (Lauraceae), Neolitsea konishii (Lauraceae) | glioma cell lines (GBM59, GBM96, U87-MG) |
| [28] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C19H21NO4 MW = 327.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: (6aS)-1,10-dimethoxy-6-methyl-5,6,6a,7-tetrahydro-4H-dibenzo[de,g]quinoline-2,9-diol | ||||
| 1.2. Major group: Protoperberines | |||||
| Family name: Berberidaceae, Ranunculaceae | |||||
| 2 | Berberine - isoquinoline alkaloid | Hydrastis canadensis (Ranunculaceae), Coptis chinensis (Ranunculaceae), Berberis aquifolium, Berberis vulgaris, Berberis aristata (Berberidaceae) | glioma cell lines (U-87 and LN229) |
| [43] |
| Berberine | glioma cell lines (U87MG) |
| [20] | ||
| Berberine | ectopic and orthotopic xenograft models in BALB/c nude mice |
| [44] | ||
| Berberine | (1) glioblastoma cell lines (U87 and U251) (2) the ectopic tumor xenograft mouse model | In vitro
| [44] | ||
| Berberine | glioma cell lines (U87 and U251) | In vitro
| [46] | ||
| Berberine | glioma cell line (U343) |
| |||
| Berberine | glioma cell lines (U87 and U251) |
| [46] | ||
| Berberine | Berberine chloride | (1) glioma cell lines (U-87 MG, U251 MG, U-118 MG, and SHG-44) (2) U87 cells inoculated into the right striatum of mouse brains - berberine (50 and 100 mg/kg body weight) daily for 5 weeks. | In vitro:
| [47] | |
Chemical structure:![]() | C20H18NO4+ MW = 336.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: 16,17-dimethoxy-5,7-dioxa-13-azoniapentacyclo[11.8.0.02,10.04,8.015,20]henicosa-1(13),2,4(8),9,14,16,18,20-octaene | ||||
| 1.3. Major group: Derivatives of 1- and 2-benzyl-izoquinolines | |||||
| Family name: Papaveraceae | |||||
| 3 | Papaverine (non-narcotic opium alkaloid) | Papaver somniferum | (1) human GBM U87MG, T98G cells (2) U87MG xenograft mouse model |
EC50 = 40 μM (T98G cells) Suppressing the tumor cell growth in a U87MG xenograft mouse model and reducing the tumor volume by 63% with papaverine treatment in comparison with the vehicle control (on day 47) | [59] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C20H21NO4 MW = 339.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: 1-[(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methyl]-6,7-dimethoxyisoquinoline | ||||
| 1.4. Major group: Derivatives of benzophenanthridine | |||||
| Family name: Papaveraceae | |||||
| 4 | Chelerythrine | Chelidonium maius | glioblastoma cell lines (U251 and T98G); BALB/c nude mice |
| [29] |
| Chelerythrine | (1) glioma cell lines (rat C6 and human U87), (2) U87 xenograft animal model |
| [32] | ||
Chemical structure:![]() | C21H18NO4+ MW = 348.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: 1,2-dimethoxy-12-methyl-[1,3]benzodioxolo[5,6-c]phenanthridin-12-ium | ||||
| Family name: Rutaceae | |||||
| 5 | Dihydrochelerythrine (DHC) | Zanthoxylum simulans, Z. ailanthoides, Z. stelligerum | human glioblastoma cells (U251, GL-15), murine glioblastoma cells (C6) |
| [30] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C21H19NO4 MW = 349.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: 1,2-dimethoxy-12-methyl-13H-[1,3]benzodioxolo[5,6-c]phenanthridine | ||||
| 6 | Nitidine chloride | Zanthoxylum nitidum (root) | human glioblastoma cell lines U87 and LN18 |
| [31] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C21H18NO4+ MW = 348.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: 2,3-dimethoxy-12-methyl-[1,3]benzodioxolo[5,6-c]phenanthridin-12-ium;chloride | ||||
| 1.5. Major group: Derivatives of pyrrolo-phenanthridine (Amarylis alkaloids) | |||||
| Family name: Amaryllidaceae | |||||
| 7 | Lycorine (narcissine) | Clivia miniata, Lycoris radiata, Crinum americanum | (1) glioblastoma cell line (U-87); (2) the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network (the STRING online database) | In vitro:
| [66,88] |
| Lycorine (narcissine) | (1) molecular docking modeling assay (2) 10 cell lines (i.e., U87, LN229, U251, A172, Gli36vIII, GBM6) (3) In vitro EGFR kinase assay (4) xenograft models |
| [65] | ||
| Lycorine hydrochloride | (1) human GBM cells (temozolomide-resistant LN229 and U251 cells = 251R, 229R cells) (2) 229R xenograft mouse model |
| [64] | ||
Chemical structure:![]() | C16H17NO4 MW = 287.3 g/mol IUPAC Name: (1S,17S,18S,19S)-5,7-dioxa-12-azapentacyclo[10.6.1.02,10.04,8.015,19]nonadeca-2,4(8),9,15-tetraene-17,18-diol | ||||
| 1.6. Major group: Phthalidisoquinolines | |||||
| Family name: Papaveraceae | |||||
| 8 | Noscapine | Papaver somniferum | various glioblastoma cell lines |
| [83] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C22H23NO7 MW = 413.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: (3S)-6,7-dimethoxy-3-[(5R)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-7,8-dihydro-5H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinolin-5-yl]-3H-2-benzofuran-1-one | ||||
| 1.7. Major group: Derivatives of bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Menispermaceae | |||||
| 9 | Tetrandrine | Stephania tetrandra (root) | (1) GBM 8401/luc2 human glioblastoma cells (2) xenografted nude mice | In vitro:
| [36] |
| Tetrandrine | GBM 8401 cells |
| [37,44] | ||
| Tetrandrine | glioma stem-like cells (GSLCs) from the human glioblastoma cell lines U87 and U251 |
| [38] | ||
Chemical structure:![]() | C38H42N2O6 MW = 622.7 g/mol IUPAC Name: (1S,14S)-9,20,21,25-tetramethoxy-15,30-dimethyl-7,23-dioxa-15,30-diazaheptacyclo[22.6.2.23,6.18,12.114,18.027,31.022,33]hexatriaconta-3(36),4,6(35),8,10,12(34),18,20,22(33),24,26,31-dodecaene | ||||
| 2. Class: Indole derivatives | |||||
| 2.1. Group: Monoterpenoid indole alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Loganiaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | Brucine | glioblastoma lines (U118, U87, U251, and A172) |
| [42] | |
Chemical structure:![]() | C23H26N2O4 MW = 394.5 g/mol IUPAC Name: (4aR,5aS,8aR,13aS,15aS,15bR)-10,11-dimethoxy-4a,5,5a,7,8,13a,15,15a,15b,16-decahydro-2H-4,6-methanoindolo[3,2,1-ij]oxepino[2,3,4-de]pyrrolo[2,3-h]quinolin-14-one | ||||
| 2.2. Group: Uncaria alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Rubiaceae | |||||
| 2 | Oxindole alkaloids-pentacyclic alkaloids | Uncaria tomentosa (stem bark and leaves) | human glioblastoma cell line-U-251-MG |
SI = 0.10–0.19 for chemotype I SI = 0.21–0.57 for chemotype III Hirsuteine (MW = 366.5 g/mol), hirsutine (MW = 368.5 g/mol), isocorynoxeine (MW = 382.5 g/mol), corynoxeine (MW = 382.5 g/mol), and isorhynchophylline (MW = 384.5 g/mol) | [60] |
| 2.3. Group: Tetradium alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Rutaceae | |||||
| 3 | Evodiamine (quinazolinocar-boline alkaloid) | Evodia rutaecarpa = Tetradium ruticarpum | human GBM cell lines U251 and LN229 |
| [67] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C19H17N3O MW = 303.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: (1S)-21-methyl-3,13,21-triazapentacyclo[11.8.0.02,10.04,9.015,20]henicosa-2(10),4,6,8,15,17,19-heptaen-14-one | ||||
| 4 | Rutaecarpine (indolopyridoquinazoline alkaloids) (in comparison with other main alkaloids: evodiamine, dehydroarutaecar-pine) | Evodia rutaecarpa | U87 human glioblastoma cells |
| [41] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C18H13N3O MW = 287.3 g/mol IUPAC Name: 3,13,21-triazapentacyclo[11.8.0.02,10.04,9.015,20]henicosa-1(21),2(10),4,6,8,15,17,19-octaen-14-one | ||||
| 2.4. Group: Non-isoprene indole alkaloids—Derivatives of β-carboline | |||||
| Family name: Nitrariaceae | |||||
| 5 | Harmine | Peganum harmala (the seeds) | glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines (U251-MG and U373-MG cells) |
| [33,34] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C13H12N2O MW = 212.3 g/mol IUPAC Name: 7-methoxy-1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole | ||||
| 6 | Harmaline | Peganum harmala (the seeds) | human malignant glioblastoma cell line (U-87) |
| [35] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C13H14N2O MW = 214.3 g/mol IUPAC Name: 7-methoxy-1-methyl-4,9-dihydro-3H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole | ||||
| 3. Class: Purine-like alkaloids | |||||
| 3.1. Group: Methylxanthine alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Aquifoliaceae, Malvaceae, Rubiaceae, Sapindaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) | Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae), Paulinia cumana (Sapindaceae), Ilex paraguariensis (Aquifoliaceae), Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae) | glioblastoma line: U87-MG (with or without temozolomid (500 μM TMZ) |
| [51] |
| Caffeine | glioblastoma cell lines (U-87MG and LN229) |
| [52] | ||
| Caffeine | glioblastoma lines (C6 and U87MG) |
| [53] | ||
Chemical structure:![]() | C8H10N4O2 MW = 194.2 g/mol IUPAC Name: 1,3,7-trimethylpurine-2,6-dione | ||||
| 4. Class: Tropane alkaloid | |||||
| 4.1. Group:Cocaine group | |||||
| Family name: Erythroxylaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid/class of alkaloids | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | Cocaine | Erythroxylum coca | C6 glioblastoma cells |
| [79] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C17H21NO4 MW = 303.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: methyl (1R,2R,3S,5S)-3-benzoyloxy-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate | ||||
| 5. Class: Quinolizidine alkaloids | |||||
| 5.1. Group: Matrine group | |||||
| Family name: Fabaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid/class of alkaloids | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | Oxymatrine | Sophora flavescens | U251MG human malignant glioma cells |
| [70] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C15H24N2O2 MW = 264.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: (1R,2R,9S,17S)-13-oxido-7-aza-13-azoniatetracyclo[7.7.1.02,7.013,17]heptadecan-6-one | ||||
| 6. Class: Piperidine alkaloids (amide alkaloids) | |||||
| Family name: Piperaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid/class of alkaloids | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | Piperine (bioperine; 1-piperoylpiperidine) | Piper nigrum, P. longum (fruits), P. sarmentosum (roots) | human cells T98G |
| [90] |
| Piperine (bioperine; 1-piperoylpiperidine) | (1) human GBM U87 cells; (2) GBM cancer stem cells (GSCs); (3) in silico; the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database |
| [89] | ||
Chemical structure:![]() | C17H19NO3 MW = 285.3 g/mol IUPAC Name: (2E,4E)-5-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-piperidin-1-ylpenta-2,4-dien-1-one | ||||
| II. Protoalkaloids–alkaloids with nitrogen in the side chain | |||||
| 1. Class: Benzylamine | |||||
| Family name: Solanaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid/class of alkaloids | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | Capsaicin (N-vanillyl-8-methyl-alpha-nonenamide) -a lipophilic protoalkaloid | Capsicum genus i.e., Capsicum annuum | glioblastoma cell line (LN-18) |
| [61] |
| Capsaicin | glioblastoma cell lines (U87-MG and U251) |
| [62] | ||
| Capsaicin and methoxy polyethylene glycol-poly(caprolactone) (mPEG-PCL) in nanoparticles | human glioblastoma cells (U251) |
| [175] | ||
Chemical structure:![]() | C18H27NO3 MW = 305.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: (E)-N-[(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)methyl]-8-methylnon-6-enamide | ||||
| 2. Class: Colchicine | |||||
| Family name: Colchicaceae | |||||
| 2 | Colchicine derivative (tricyclic alkaloid) | Colchicum autumnale | (1) glioblkastoma cell lines (U87MG and U373MG) (2) rat glioma animal model |
| [75] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C22H25NO6 MW = 399.4 g/mol IUPAC Name: N-[(7S)-1,2,3,10-tetramethoxy-9-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5H-benzo[a]heptalen-7-yl]acetamide | ||||
| III. Pseudoalkaloids | |||||
| 1. Class: steroidal alkaloids | |||||
| Family name: Solanaceae | |||||
| No | Name of alkaloid/class of alkaloids | Natural source/derivative | Pharmacological model | Effect/IC50 | Ref. |
| 1 | α-Solanine (glycoalkaloid) | Solanum nigrum and Solanum tuberosum, and Solanum aculeastrum | (1) glioma cells (2) Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database (3) GeneCards, networks (STRING online database) |
| [39] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C45H73NO16 MW = 868.1 g/mol IUPAC Name: 2-[5-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2-[(10,14,16,20-tetramethyl-22-azahexacyclo[12.10.0.02,11.05,10.015,23.017,22]tetracos-4-en-7-yl)oxy]-4-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-6-methyloxane-3,4,5-triol | ||||
| Family name: Melanthiaceae | |||||
| 1 | Cyclopamine (steroidal alkaloid), cyclopamine glucuronide prodrug | in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo: - glioma stem cells (GSCs) - C6 rat GBM cells |
| [73] | |
Chemical structure:![]() | C27H41NO2 MW = 411.6 g/mol IUPAC Name: (3S,3′R,3′aS,6′S,6aS,6bS,7′aR,9R,11aS,11bR)-3′,6′,10,11b-tetramethylspiro[2,3,4,6,6a,6b,7,8,11,11a-decahydro-1H-benzo[a]fluorene-9,2′-3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-3H-furo[3,2-b]pyridine]-3-ol | ||||
| Family name: Buxaceae | |||||
| 5 | Cyclovirobuxine D (CVBD) | Buxus sinica (Buxaceae) | glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines (T98G, U251) |
| [73] |
Chemical structure:![]() | C26H46N2O MW = 402.7 g/mol IUPAC Name: (1S,3R,6S,8R,11S,12S,14R,15S,16R)-7,7,12,16-tetramethyl-6-(methylamino)-15-[(1S)-1-(methylamino)ethyl]pentacyclo[9.7.0.01,3.03,8.012,16]octadecan-14-ol | ||||
| IV. Polyamines alkaloids | |||||
| Kukoamine A | Lycium chinense, potatoes, and tomatoes | human GBM cells (U251and WJ1) |
| [72] | |
Chemical structure:![]() | C28H42N4O6 MW = 530.7 g/mol IUPAC Name: 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-N-[3-[4-[3-[3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propanoylamino]propylamino]butylamino]propyl]propanamide | ||||
5. Comparison of Cytotoxicity and Safety Profile of Selected Alkaloids
Toxicology plays a crucial role throughout the drug discovery and development process [206]. A proper scientific approach to developing new anti-glioblastoma drugs requires a thorough evaluation of potential toxicity and an assessment of the benefit–risk ratio for patient groups [207]. This screening process can help exclude certain alkaloids as drug candidates for further development. Additionally, artificial intelligence may play a promising role in predicting toxicity and optimizing drug safety [208]. A review of bibliographic data from the past ten years allows for the classification of alkaloids into three categories:
- High-toxicity alkaloids (where risks outweigh benefits);
- Limited-toxicity alkaloids (where benefits exceed risks);
- Alkaloids under investigation in liposomal and nanoformulations (to mitigate toxicity concerns).
Among the alkaloids with greater therapeutic benefits than risks and potential as novel drug candidates, the following have been identified: noscapine (exerting negligible toxicity and non-addictive activity), lycorine (low toxicity), capsaicin (nanoparticles with capsaicin may reduce adverse effects and improve efficacy), chelerythrine (liposomal formulations modified with polyethylene glycol can reduce toxicity and enhance its anti-glioblastoma activity), caffeine (inhibiting proliferation and reducing the invasion of glioma cells), boldine (good safety profile but low cytotoxic activity against glioblastoma cells), and colchicine (a microtubule-targeting agent but with incomplete eradication of glioblastoma cells).
Furthermore, this systematic review revealed that, despite their observed cytotoxic activity against glioblastoma cells, some alkaloids may pose greater risks than potential therapeutic benefits. From this perspective, an analysis of toxicological data on tetrandrine has shown that this alkaloid can cause liver and lung damage in animals, along with several toxic side effects in humans; therefore, its use as an anti-glioblastoma drug can be excluded. Similarly, nitidine has demonstrated toxicity in the liver, kidneys, and heart, along with cardiotoxic effects in animal models. Harmine and harmaline exhibit hallucinogenic effects and interfere with serotonin activity in the brain. Cyclopamine has shown teratogenic potential in animals. Cocaine exerts toxic effects on multiple organs and has addictive properties. Additionally, the serious toxicity of brucine may limit its clinical applications.
Piperine remains controversial due to its toxic effects on the reproductive system and its association with hemorrhagic ulceration in the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, due to unfavorable pharmacokinetic parameters (i.e., poor bioavailability), novel pharmaceutical formulations using nanotechnology are needed for berberine.
For several alkaloids, the validity of further clinical research in drug development cannot yet be assessed due to the limited availability of pharmacological and toxicological data. Taken together, kukoamine A, cyclovirobuxine D, α-solanine, oxymatrine, rutaecarpine, and evodiamine should be further investigated in the context of toxicity evaluation. A summary of the detailed toxicological profiles of selected alkaloids, along with an assessment of the need for further studies, is presented in Table 3. Selected alkaloids considered as new drug candidates are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Table 3.
Comparison of efficacy (cytotoxicity expressed by values of the IC50) and safety profile of alkaloids in various pharmacological models, highlighting the future perspectives for anti-glioblastoma therapies.
Figure 4.
Selected alkaloids considered as new drug candidates based on a review that allows for the consideration of greater pharmacological benefits than observed toxicity and side effects. Created using the BioRender.com.
6. Conclusions
New compounds with potential anti-glioblastoma activity should meet the following criteria: appropriate physicochemical properties (lipophilicity, molecular mass < 400 Da, <8 hydrogen bonds) and optimized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. These include selective cytotoxicity against glioblastoma cells, blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability, P-glycoprotein efflux liability, dose optimization, and maximum tolerated dose assessment. Additionally, safety, toxicity, adverse drug reactions, and potential drug–drug interactions must be evaluated during preclinical and clinical development [232]. Preclinical studies face methodological inconsistencies, making comparisons difficult. Standardized protocols are needed, especially in cell line studies, incorporating functional assays such as morphological analysis, proliferation assays (MTT), apoptosis assays, and migration studies. Cytotoxicity should also be evaluated alongside standard glioblastoma treatments under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions.
There is a lack of systematic in silico studies, including computational assessments (e.g., CNS MPO score), and comparative research on BBB and blood–cancer barrier penetration. A comprehensive understanding of alkaloid pharmacokinetics (oral bioavailability, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) remains limited. Current BBB transport models may not directly reflect glioblastoma patient outcomes, necessitating further research into pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics correlations. Additionally, alkaloid toxicity on neural tissue, particularly glial cells, requires systematic evaluation.
Several alkaloids show potential as glioblastoma treatments: noscapine, lycorine, capsaicin, chelerythrine, caffeine, boldine, and colchicine. However, some alkaloids, despite cytotoxic activity, pose high risks, including tetrandrine, nitidine, harmine, harmaline, cyclopamine, cocaine, and brucine. Piperine remains controversial due to reproductive toxicity and gastrointestinal hemorrhagic ulceration. Additionally, berberine’s poor bioavailability necessitates nanotechnology-based formulations. Further investigation is needed for kukoamine A, cyclovirobuxine D, α-solanine, oxymatrine, rutaecarpine, and evodiamine.
This review highlights significant progress in alkaloid research for glioblastoma treatment, yet major gaps remain, particularly in BBB penetration studies and targeted drug delivery systems. More comprehensive preclinical and translational research is essential to advance these compounds toward clinical applications.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.O. and T.M.K.; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, M.O. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O., T.M.K., B.C. and A.S.-M.; writing—review and editing, M.O.; visualization, M.O. and T.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Ostrom, Q.T.; Bauchet, L.; Davis, F.G.; Deltour, I.; Fisher, J.L.; Langer, C.E.; Pekmezci, M.; Schwartzbaum, J.A.; Turner, M.C.; Walsh, K.M.; et al. The Epidemiology of Glioma in Adults: A “State of the Science” Review. Neuro Oncol. 2014, 16, 896–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, A.P.; Fisher, J.L.; Nichols, E.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdela, J.; Abdelalim, A.; Abraha, H.N.; Agius, D.; Alahdab, F.; Alam, T.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Brain and Other CNS Cancer, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 376–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grech, N.; Dalli, T.; Mizzi, S.; Meilak, L.; Calleja, N.; Zrinzo, A. Rising Incidence of Glioblastoma Multiforme in a Well-Defined Population. Cureus 2020, 12, e8195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubelt, C.; Hattermann, K.; Sebens, S.; Mehdorn, H.M.; Held-Feindt, J. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Paired Human Primary and Recurrent Glioblastomas. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 2515–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rong, L.; Li, N.; Zhang, Z. Emerging Therapies for Glioblastoma: Current State and Future Directions. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanderi, T.; Munakomi, S.; Gupta, V. Glioblastoma Multiforme. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Deo, S.V.S.; Sharma, J.; Kumar, S. GLOBOCAN 2020 Report on Global Cancer Burden: Challenges and Opportunities for Surgical Oncologists. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 29, 6497–6500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. Glioblastoma: An Update in Pathology, Molecular Mechanisms and Biomarkers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Gekas, C.; Verduzco, D.; Petiwala, S.; Jeffries, C.; Lu, C.; Murphy, E.; Anton, T.; Vo, A.H.; Xiao, Z.; et al. Building a Translational Cancer Dependency Map for The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nat. Cancer 2024, 5, 1176–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General Principles of Cancer Chemotherapy. Available online: https://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1810§ionid=124496835 (accessed on 28 December 2024).
- Bousbaa, H. Novel Anticancer Strategies. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuura, H.N.; Fett-Neto, A.G. Plant Alkaloids: Main Features, Toxicity, and Mechanisms of Action. In Plant Toxins; Gopalakrishnakone, P., Carlini, C.R., Ligabue-Braun, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1–15. ISBN 978-94-007-6728-7. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, A.H.; Abdelrahman, M.; El-Sayed, M.A. Alkaloid Role in Plant Defense Response to Growth and Stress. In Bioactive Molecules in Plant Defense; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 145–158. ISBN 978-3-030-27165-7. [Google Scholar]
- Olofinsan, K.; Abrahamse, H.; George, B.P. Therapeutic Role of Alkaloids and Alkaloid Derivatives in Cancer Management. Molecules 2023, 28, 5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Fang, H.; Yi, L.; Li, M. Indispensable Biomolecules for Plant Defense against Pathogens: NBS-LRR and “Nitrogen Pool” Alkaloids. Plant Sci. 2023, 334, 111752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adamski, Z.; Blythe, L.L.; Milella, L.; Bufo, S.A. Biological Activities of Alkaloids: From Toxicology to Pharmacology. Toxins 2020, 12, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpiński, T.M.; Ożarowski, M.; Seremak-Mrozikiewicz, A.; Wolski, H.; Adamczak, A. Plant Preparations and Compounds with Activities against Biofilms Formed by Candida Spp. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, A.G.; Cassani, L.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Otero, P.; Mansoor, S.; Echave, J.; Xiao, J.; Simal-Gándara, J.; Prieto, M.A. Plant Alkaloids: Production, Extraction, and Potential Therapeutic Properties. In Natural Secondary Metabolites: From Nature, Through Science, to Industry; Carocho, M., Heleno, S.A., Barros, L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 157–200. ISBN 978-3-031-18587-8. [Google Scholar]
- Palma, T.V.; Lenz, L.S.; Bottari, N.B.; Pereira, A.; Schetinger, M.R.C.; Morsch, V.M.; Ulrich, H.; Pillat, M.M.; de Andrade, C.M. Berberine Induces Apoptosis in Glioblastoma Multiforme U87MG Cells via Oxidative Stress and Independent of AMPK Activity. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 4393–4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajput, A.; Sharma, R.; Bharti, R. Pharmacological Activities and Toxicities of Alkaloids on Human Health. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 48, 1407–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aalinezhad, S.; Dabaghian, F.; Namdari, A.; Akaberi, M.; Emami, S.A. Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Alkaloids from Papaver Spp.: A Structure–Activity Based Study. Phytochem. Rev. 2024, 24, 585–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, L.Y.; Battulga, A.; Han, E.; Chung, H.; Li, J.H. New psychoactive substances of natural origin: A brief review. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benowitz, N.L. Pharmacology of nicotine: Addiction, smoking-induced disease, and therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 49, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinrich, M.; Mah, J.; Amirkia, V. Alkaloids Used as Medicines: Structural Phytochemistry Meets Biodiversity-An Update and Forward Look. Molecules 2021, 26, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, J.; Luís, Â.; Gallardo, E.; Duarte, A.P. Psychoactive Substances of Natural Origin: Toxicological Aspects, Therapeutic Properties and Analysis in Biological Samples. Molecules 2021, 26, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devereaux, A.L.; Mercer, S.L.; Cunningham, C.W. DARK Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Morphine. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 2395–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiménez-Madrona, E.; Morado-Díaz, C.J.; Talaverón, R.; Tabernero, A.; Pastor, A.M.; Sáez, J.C.; Matarredona, E.R. Antiproliferative Effect of Boldine on Neural Progenitor Cells and on Glioblastoma Cells. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1211467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, M.; Niu, J.; Jiang, J.; Dong, T.; Chen, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, P. Chelerythrine Inhibits the Progression of Glioblastoma by Suppressing the TGFB1-ERK1/2/Smad2/3-Snail/ZEB1 Signaling Pathway. Life Sci. 2022, 293, 120358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, T.C.C.; de Faria Lopes, G.P.; Menezes-Filho, N.d.J.; de Oliveira, D.M.; Pereira, E.; Pitanga, B.P.S.; Dos Santos Costa, R.; da Silva Velozo, E.; Freire, S.M.; Clarêncio, J.; et al. Specific Cytostatic and Cytotoxic Effect of Dihydrochelerythrine in Glioblastoma Cells: Role of NF-κB/β-Catenin and STAT3/IL-6 Pathways. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1386–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jia, M.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yu, P.; Sun, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhao, L. Nitidine Chloride Suppresses Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Stem Cell-like Properties in Glioblastoma by Regulating JAK2/STAT3 Signaling. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 3113–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, P.; Zheng, S.-Y.; Jiang, R.-L.; Wu, H.-D.; Li, Y.-A.; Lu, J.-L.; Xiong, Y.; Han, B.; Lin, L. Necroptosis Signaling and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Cross-Talking Facilitate Cell Death Mediated by Chelerythrine in Glioma. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2023, 202, 76–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.-H.; Wang, Q.-Z.; Liu, T.; Bai, R.; Ma, M.-M.; Liu, Q.-L.; Zhou, H.-G.; Liu, J.; Wang, M. Enhanced Glioblastoma Selectivity of Harmine via the Albumin Carrier. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2022, 18, 1052–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.-G.; Lv, Y.-X.; Guo, C.-Y.; Xiao, Z.-M.; Jiang, Q.-G.; Kuang, H.; Zhang, W.-H.; Hu, P. Harmine Inhibits the Proliferation and Migration of Glioblastoma Cells via the FAK/AKT Pathway. Life Sci. 2021, 270, 119112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vahedi, M.M.; Shahini, A.; Mottahedi, M.; Garousi, S.; Shariat Razavi, S.A.; Pouyamanesh, G.; Afshari, A.R.; Ferns, G.A.; Bahrami, A. Harmaline Exerts Potentially Anti-Cancer Effects on U-87 Human Malignant Glioblastoma Cells in Vitro. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 4357–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, C.-L.; Ma, Y.-S.; Hsia, T.-C.; Chou, Y.-C.; Lien, J.-C.; Peng, S.-F.; Kuo, C.-L.; Hsu, F.-T. Tetrandrine Suppresses Human Brain Glioblastoma GBM 8401/Luc2 Cell-Xenografted Subcutaneous Tumors in Nude Mice In Vivo. Molecules 2021, 26, 7105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.-W.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Kuo, C.-L.; Way, T.-D.; Lien, J.-C.; Chueh, F.-S.; Lin, Y.-L.; Chung, J.-G. Tetrandrine Inhibits Human Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme GBM 8401 Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion in Vitro. Environ. Toxicol. 2019, 34, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Wen, Y.-L.; Ma, J.-W.; Ye, J.-C.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.-X.; Meng, C.-Y.; Xu, X.-Z.; Wang, S.-X.; Zhong, X.-Y. Tetrandrine Inhibits Glioma Stem-like Cells by Repressing β-Catenin Expression. Int. J. Oncol. 2017, 50, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Guo, S. Network Pharmacology-Based Strategy to Investigate the Effect and Mechanism of α-Solanine against Glioma. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2023, 23, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zou, S.; Lan, Y.-L.; Xing, J.-S.; Lan, X.-Q.; Zhang, B. Solasonine Inhibits Glioma Growth through Anti-Inflammatory Pathways. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 3977–3989. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, R.; Xu, L.; Xie, H.Q.; Zhao, B. Rutaecarpine Inhibits U87 Glioblastoma Cell Migration by Activating the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Pathway. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 765712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Lv, C.; Liu, Z.; Gao, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, G. Brucine Inhibits Proliferation of Glioblastoma Cells by Targeting the G-Quadruplexes in the c-Myb Promoter. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 1990–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pan, Y.; Shen, W. Berberine Suppressed the Progression of Human Glioma Cells by Inhibiting the TGF-Β1/SMAD2/3 Signaling Pathway. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2022, 21, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, F.; Xie, T.; Huang, X.; Zhao, X. Berberine Inhibits Angiogenesis in Glioblastoma Xenografts by Targeting the VEGFR2/ERK Pathway. Pharm. Biol. 2018, 56, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agnarelli, A.; Natali, M.; Garcia-Gil, M.; Pesi, R.; Tozzi, M.G.; Ippolito, C.; Bernardini, N.; Vignali, R.; Batistoni, R.; Bianucci, A.M.; et al. Cell-Specific Pattern of Berberine Pleiotropic Effects on Different Human Cell Lines. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Qi, Q.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Huang, B.; Chen, A.; Prestegarden, L.; Li, X.; Wang, J. Berberine Induces Autophagy in Glioblastoma by Targeting the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1-Pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 66944–66958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Xu, X.; Zhao, M.; Wei, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Gong, Y.; Shao, C. Berberine Induces Senescence of Human Glioblastoma Cells by Downregulating the EGFR-MEK-ERK Signaling Pathway. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibak, B.; Shakeri, F.; Keshavarzi, Z.; Mollazadeh, H.; Javid, H.; Jalili-Nik, M.; Sathyapalan, T.; Afshari, A.R.; Sahebkar, A. Anticancer Mechanisms of Berberine: A Good Choice for Glioblastoma Multiforme Therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 4507–4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Och, A.; Podgórski, R.; Nowak, R. Biological Activity of Berberine—A Summary Update. Toxins 2020, 12, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauf, A.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Khalil, A.A.; Imran, M.; Shah, Z.A.; Emran, T.B.; Mitra, S.; Khan, Z.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Aljohani, A.S.M.; et al. Berberine as a Potential Anticancer Agent: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 7368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Zhang, P.; Kiang, K.M.Y.; Cheng, Y.S.; Leung, G.K.K. Caffeine Sensitizes U87-MG Human Glioblastoma Cells to Temozolomide through Mitotic Catastrophe by Impeding G2 Arrest. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 5364973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.-C.; Ding, Y.-M.; Hueng, D.-Y.; Chen, J.-Y.; Chen, Y. Caffeine Suppresses the Progression of Human Glioblastoma via Cathepsin B and MAPK Signaling Pathway. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 33, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.-D.; Song, L.-J.; Yan, D.-J.; Feng, Y.-Y.; Zang, Y.-G.; Yang, Y. Caffeine Inhibits the Growth of Glioblastomas through Activating the Caspase-3 Signaling Pathway in Vitro. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 19, 3080–3088. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J.; Lan, Y.-Q.; Zhang, T.; Yu, M.; Liu, X.-Y.; Li, L.-H.; Chen, X.-P. The in Vitro Effects of Caffeine on Viability, Cycle Cycle Profiles, Proliferation, and Apoptosis of Glioblastomas. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 19, 3201–3207. [Google Scholar]
- Bonafé, G.A.; Boschiero, M.N.; Sodré, A.R.; Ziegler, J.V.; Rocha, T.; Ortega, M.M. Natural Plant Compounds: Does Caffeine, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizinate, Curcumin, and Euphol Play Roles as Antitumoral Compounds in Glioblastoma Cell Lines? Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 784330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Pérez, D.; Reyes-Vidal, I.; Chávez-Cortez, E.G.; Sotelo, J.; Magaña-Maldonado, R. Methylxanthines: Potential Therapeutic Agents for Glioblastoma. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, F.; Han, D.-F.; Cao, B.-Q.; Wang, B.; Dong, N.; Jiang, D.-H. Caffeine-Induced Nuclear Translocation of FoxO1 Triggers Bim-Mediated Apoptosis in Human Glioblastoma Cells. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 3417–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inada, M.; Sato, A.; Shindo, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Akasaki, Y.; Ichimura, K.; Tanuma, S.-I. Anticancer Non-Narcotic Opium Alkaloid Papaverine Suppresses Human Glioblastoma Cell Growth. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 6743–6750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inada, M.; Shindo, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Sato, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Akasaki, Y.; Ichimura, K.; Tanuma, S.-I. Anticancer Effects of a Non-Narcotic Opium Alkaloid Medicine, Papaverine, in Human Glioblastoma Cells. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, S.; Carvalho, Â.R.; Pittol, V.; Dietrich, F.; Manica, F.; Machado, M.M.; de Oliveira, L.F.S.; Oliveira Battastini, A.M.; Ortega, G.G. Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity of Oxindole Alkaloids from Uncaria Tomentosa (Cat’s Claw): Chemotype Relevance. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 189, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szoka, L.; Palka, J. Capsaicin Up-Regulates pro-Apoptotic Activity of Thiazolidinediones in Glioblastoma Cell Line. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 132, 110741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hacioglu, C.; Kar, F. Capsaicin Induces Redox Imbalance and Ferroptosis through ACSL4/GPx4 Signaling Pathways in U87-MG and U251 Glioblastoma Cells. Metab. Brain Dis. 2023, 38, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Vidal, T.; Armenta-Pérez, V.P.; Rosales-Rivera, L.C.; Basulto-Padilla, G.C.; Martínez-Pérez, R.B.; Mateos-Díaz, J.C.; Gutiérrez-Mercado, Y.K.; Canales-Aguirre, A.A.; Rodríguez, J.A. Long Chain Capsaicin Analogues Synthetized by CALB-CLEAs Show Cytotoxicity on Glioblastoma Cell Lines. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Q.; Niu, W.; Mu, M.; Ye, C.; Wu, P.; Hu, S.; Niu, C. Lycorine Hydrochloride Interferes with Energy Metabolism to Inhibit Chemoresistant Glioblastoma Multiforme Cell Growth through Suppressing PDK3. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2024, 480, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, N.; Wang, H.; Lin, L.; Wang, Z.; Yi, H.; Hu, M. Lycorine Inhibits Glioblastoma Multiforme Growth through EGFR Suppression. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Huo, M.; Xu, F.; Ding, L. Molecular Mechanism of Lycorine in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2024, 397, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Deng, D.; Shao, N.; Xu, Y.; Xue, L.; Peng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhi, F. Evodiamine Activates Cellular Apoptosis through Suppressing PI3K/AKT and Activating MAPK in Glioma. Onco Targets Ther. 2018, 11, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.; Bi, Y.; Qazi, J.I.; Fan, L.; Gao, H. Evodiamine Sensitizes U87 Glioblastoma Cells to TRAIL via the Death Receptor Pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.-S.; Chien, C.-C.; Liu, K.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chiu, W.-T. Evodiamine Prevents Glioma Growth, Induces Glioblastoma Cell Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest through JNK Activation. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2017, 45, 879–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, W.; Bhardwaj, S.S.; Ye, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, S. Oxymatrine Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis and Suppresses the Invasion of Human Glioblastoma Cells through the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway and STAT3. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Ling, X.; Li, Q.; Meng, W.; Ma, J. Oxymatrine Inhibits Proliferation and Migration While Inducing Apoptosis in Human Glioblastoma Cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1784161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Sun, Z.; Dong, L.; Gao, L.; Liu, C.; Wang, X. Kukoamine A Inhibits Human Glioblastoma Cell Growth and Migration through Apoptosis Induction and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Attenuation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bensalma, S.; Chadeneau, C.; Legigan, T.; Renoux, B.; Gaillard, A.; de Boisvilliers, M.; Pinet-Charvet, C.; Papot, S.; Muller, J.M. Evaluation of Cytotoxic Properties of a Cyclopamine Glucuronide Prodrug in Rat Glioblastoma Cells and Tumors. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 55, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Fu, R.; Duan, D.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Ming, Y.; Li, L.; Ni, R.; Chen, J. Cyclovirobuxine D Induces Apoptosis and Mitochondrial Damage in Glioblastoma Cells Through ROS-Mediated Mitochondrial Translocation of Cofilin. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 656184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, K.-M.; Liu, J.-J.; Li, C.-C.; Cheng, C.-C.; Hsieh, Y.-T.; Chai, K.M.; Lien, Y.-A.; Tzeng, S.-F. Colchicine Derivative as a Potential Anti-Glioma Compound. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2015, 124, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zottel, A.; Jovčevska, I.; Šamec, N.; Komel, R. Cytoskeletal Proteins as Glioblastoma Biomarkers and Targets for Therapy: A Systematic Review. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2021, 160, 103283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbassi, R.H.; Recasens, A.; Indurthi, D.C.; Johns, T.G.; Stringer, B.W.; Day, B.W.; Munoz, L. Lower Tubulin Expression in Glioblastoma Stem Cells Attenuates Efficacy of Microtubule-Targeting Agents. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2019, 2, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carone, C.; Genedani, S.; Leo, G.; Filaferro, M.; Fuxe, K.; Agnati, L.F. In Vitro Effects of Cocaine on Tunneling Nanotube Formation and Extracellular Vesicle Release in Glioblastoma Cell Cultures. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 55, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steinmetz, A.; Steffens, L.; Morás, A.M.; Prezzi, F.; Braganhol, E.; Saffi, J.; Ortiz, R.S.; Barros, H.M.T.; Moura, D.J. In Vitro Model to Study Cocaine and Its Contaminants. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 285, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, K.-J.; Yu, M.O.; Park, D.-H.; Park, J.-Y.; Chung, Y.-G.; Kang, S.-H. Role of Vincristine in the Inhibition of Angiogenesis in Glioblastoma. Neurol. Res. 2016, 38, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Fan, Y.; Lv, S.; Xiao, B.; Ye, M.; Zhu, X. Vincristine and Temozolomide Combined Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Glioma: A Comparison of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Dual Drugs Delivery. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 2720–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filippi-Chiela, E.C.; Vargas, J.E.; Bueno, E.; Silva, M.M.; Thomé, M.P.; Lenz, G. Vincristine Promotes Differential Levels of Apoptosis, Mitotic Catastrophe, and Senescence Depending on the Genetic Background of Glioblastoma Cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2022, 85, 105472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altinoz, M.A.; Topcu, G.; Hacimuftuoglu, A.; Ozpinar, A.; Ozpinar, A.; Hacker, E.; Elmaci, İ. Noscapine, a Non-Addictive Opioid and Microtubule-Inhibitor in Potential Treatment of Glioblastoma. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 1796–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhuang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Yao, L. The Recent Developments of Camptothecin and Its Derivatives as Potential Anti-Tumor Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 260, 115710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, A.; Gandhi, A.; Fimognari, C.; Atanasov, A.G.; Bishayee, A. Alkaloids for Cancer Prevention and Therapy: Current Progress and Future Perspectives. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 858, 172472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turrini, E.; Sestili, P.; Fimognari, C. Overview of the Anticancer Potential of the “King of Spices” Piper Nigrum and Its Main Constituent Piperine. Toxins 2020, 12, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, S.; Jung, S.; Park, G.-S.; Shin, J.; Oh, J.-W. Piperine Synergistically Enhances the Effect of Temozolomide against Temozolomide-Resistant Human Glioma Cell Lines. Bioengineered 2020, 11, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, J.; Yin, W.; Huo, M.; Yao, Q.; Ding, L. Induction of Apoptosis in Glioma Cells by Lycorine via Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Regulation of NF-κB Pathways. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2023, 396, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warrier, N.M.; Krishnan, R.K.; Prabhu, V.; Hariharapura, R.C.; Agarwal, P.; Kumar, P. Survivin Inhibition by Piperine Sensitizes Glioblastoma Cancer Stem Cells and Leads to Better Drug Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diehl, S.; Hildebrandt, G.; Manda, K. Pepper Alkaloid Piperine Increases Radiation Sensitivity of Cancer Cells from Glioblastoma and Hypopharynx In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nellan, A.; Wright, E.; Campbell, K.; Davies, K.D.; Donson, A.M.; Amani, V.; Judd, A.; Hemenway, M.S.; Raybin, J.; Foreman, N.K.; et al. Retrospective Analysis of Combination Carboplatin and Vinblastine for Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2020, 148, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vairy, S.; Le Teuff, G.; Bautista, F.; De Carli, E.; Bertozzi, A.-I.; Pagnier, A.; Fouyssac, F.; Nysom, K.; Aerts, I.; Leblond, P.; et al. Phase I Study of Vinblastine in Combination with Nilotinib in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Refractory or Recurrent Low-Grade Glioma. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2020, 2, vdaa075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roux, C.; Revon-Rivière, G.; Gentet, J.C.; Verschuur, A.; Scavarda, D.; Saultier, P.; Appay, R.; Padovani, L.; André, N. Metronomic Maintenance With Weekly Vinblastine After Induction With Bevacizumab-Irinotecan in Children With Low-Grade Glioma Prevents Early Relapse. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 43, e630–e634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, C.; Ai, J.; Ren, E.; Li, J.; Feng, C.; Li, X.; Luo, X. Research Progress on Evodiamine, a Bioactive Alkaloid of Evodiae Fructus: Focus on Its Anti-Cancer Activity and Bioavailability (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkaria, J.N.; Hu, L.S.; Parney, I.F.; Pafundi, D.H.; Brinkmann, D.H.; Laack, N.N.; Giannini, C.; Burns, T.C.; Kizilbash, S.H.; Laramy, J.K.; et al. Is the Blood-Brain Barrier Really Disrupted in All Glioblastomas? A Critical Assessment of Existing Clinical Data. Neuro-Oncology 2018, 20, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmustine Medac (Previously Carmustine Obvius)|European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/carmustine-medac (accessed on 28 December 2024).
- Temodal|European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/temodal (accessed on 28 December 2024).
- Zhou, Y.; Jia, P.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Gong, Y.; Fan, T.; Yin, J. Comprehensive Understanding of the Adverse Effects Associated with Temozolomide: A Disproportionate Analysis Based on the FAERS Database. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1437436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Fei, Y.; Qu, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Fan, G. Five Years of Safety Profile of Bevacizumab: An Analysis of Real-World Pharmacovigilance and Randomized Clinical Trials. J. Pharm. Health Care Sci. 2024, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majchrzak-Celińska, A.; Studzińska-Sroka, E. New Avenues and Major Achievements in Phytocompounds Research for Glioblastoma Therapy. Molecules 2024, 29, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dey, P.; Kundu, A.; Chakraborty, H.J.; Kar, B.; Choi, W.S.; Lee, B.M.; Bhakta, T.; Atanasov, A.G.; Kim, H.S. Therapeutic Value of Steroidal Alkaloids in Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 1731–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tilaoui, M.; Ait Mouse, H.; Zyad, A. Update and New Insights on Future Cancer Drug Candidates From Plant-Based Alkaloids. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 719694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Antineoplastic Agents from Natural Sources: Achievements and Future Directions. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2000, 9, 2783–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varela, C.; Silva, F.; Costa, G.; Cabral, C. Chapter 1—Alkaloids: Their Relevance in Cancer Treatment. In New Insights into Glioblastoma; Vitorino, C., Balaña, C., Cabral, C., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 361–401. ISBN 978-0-323-99873-4. [Google Scholar]
- Zishan, M.; Saidurrahman, S.; Anayatullah, A.; Azeemuddin, A.; Ahmad, Z.; Hussain, M.W. Natural Products Used as Anti-Cancer Agents. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2017, 7, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ferreira, M.-J.U. Alkaloids in Future Drug Discovery. Molecules 2022, 27, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhyani, P.; Quispe, C.; Sharma, E.; Bahukhandi, A.; Sati, P.; Attri, D.C.; Szopa, A.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Docea, A.O.; Mardare, I.; et al. Anticancer Potential of Alkaloids: A Key Emphasis to Colchicine, Vinblastine, Vincristine, Vindesine, Vinorelbine and Vincamine. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gach-Janczak, K.; Drogosz-Stachowicz, J.; Janecka, A.; Wtorek, K.; Mirowski, M. Historical Perspective and Current Trends in Anticancer Drug Development. Cancers 2024, 16, 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, C.; Mitchell, E.P.; Hoff, P.M. Irinotecan in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2006, 32, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.H.; Kim, S.-W.; Suh, C.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.-J.; Ryoo, B.Y.; Park, K.; Kim, J.S.; Heo, D.S.; et al. Belotecan, New Camptothecin Analogue, Is Active in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Early Phase II Study. Ann. Oncol. 2008, 19, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McBain, C.; Lawrie, T.A.; Rogozińska, E.; Kernohan, A.; Robinson, T.; Jefferies, S. Treatment Options for Progression or Recurrence of Glioblastoma: A Network Meta-Analysis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 5, CD013579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Upadhyayula, P.S.; Spinazzi, E.F.; Argenziano, M.G.; Canoll, P.; Bruce, J.N. Convection Enhanced Delivery of Topotecan for Gliomas: A Single-Center Experience. Pharmaceutics 2020, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves Irinotecan Liposome for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma; Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2024.
- O’Brien, S.; Kantarjian, H.; Keating, M.; Beran, M.; Koller, C.; Robertson, L.E.; Hester, J.; Rios, M.B.; Andreeff, M.; Talpaz, M. Homoharringtonine Therapy Induces Responses in Patients with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Late Chronic Phase. Blood 1995, 86, 3322–3326. [Google Scholar]
- Leonard, A.; Wolff, J.E. Etoposide Improves Survival in High-Grade Glioma: A Meta-Analysis. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 3307–3315. [Google Scholar]
- Mosca, L.; Ilari, A.; Fazi, F.; Assaraf, Y.G.; Colotti, G. Taxanes in Cancer Treatment: Activity, Chemoresistance and Its Overcoming. Drug Resist. Updates 2021, 54, 100742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rankovic, Z. CNS Drug Design: Balancing Physicochemical Properties for Optimal Brain Exposure. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 2584–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, J.A.; Hartz, A.M.S.; Bauer, B. ABCB1 and ABCG2 Regulation at the Blood-Brain Barrier: Potential New Targets to Improve Brain Drug Delivery. Pharmacol. Rev. 2023, 75, 815–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, N.J.; Patabendige, A.A.K.; Dolman, D.E.M.; Yusof, S.R.; Begley, D.J. Structure and Function of the Blood-Brain Barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 37, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xiong, N.; Xu, H.; Chai, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, X.; Fu, P.; et al. Remodelling and Treatment of the Blood-Brain Barrier in Glioma. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 4217–4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noorani, I.; de la Rosa, J. Breaking Barriers for Glioblastoma with a Path to Enhanced Drug Delivery. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, M.; Blaney, S.; Balis, F.M. Pharmacokinetics of drug delivery to the central nervous system. In A Clinician’s Guide to Chemotherapy Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics; Grochow, L.B., Ames, M.M., Eds.; Williams & Wilkins, a Waverly Company: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, D.; Chen, Q.; Chen, X.; Han, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y. The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation, and drug delivery. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pardridge, W.M. The blood-brain barrier: Bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx 2005, 2, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pardridge, W.M. Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2012, 32, 1959–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mulvihill, J.J.; Cunnane, E.M.; Ross, A.M.; Duskey, J.T.; Tosi, G.; Grabrucker, A.M. Drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier: Recent advances in the use of nanocarriers. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.-L.; Liu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Gu, L.-Y.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, X.; Cheng, L.; Li, X.-T. Targeting Vincristine plus Tetrandrine Liposomes Modified with DSPE-PEG2000-Transferrin in Treatment of Brain Glioma. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.-F.; Liu, Y.-S.; Huang, Y.-C.; Chi, C.-W.; Tsai, C.-C.; Tsai, T.-H.; Chen, Y.-J. Borneol and Tetrandrine Modulate the Blood-Brain Barrier and Blood-Tumor Barrier to Improve the Therapeutic Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil in Brain Metastasis. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2022, 21, 15347354221077682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seelig, A. P-Glycoprotein: One Mechanism, Many Tasks and the Consequences for Pharmacotherapy of Cancers. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 576559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.-N.; Yang, Y.-F.; Yang, X.-W. Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability and Neuroprotective Effects of Three Main Alkaloids from the Fruits of Euodia Rutaecarpa with MDCK-pHaMDR Cell Monolayer and PC12 Cell Line. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018, 98, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luan, F.; He, X.; Zeng, N. Tetrandrine: A Review of Its Anticancer Potentials, Clinical Settings, Pharmacokinetics and Drug Delivery Systems. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 1491–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iqbal, S.; Flux, C.; Briggs, D.A.; Deplazes, E.; Long, J.; Skrzypek, R.; Rothnie, A.; Kerr, I.D.; Callaghan, R. Vinca Alkaloid Binding to P-Glycoprotein Occurs in a Processive Manner. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Biomembr. 2022, 1864, 184005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gai, Y.; Yang, N.; Chen, J. Inhibitory Activity of 8 Alkaloids on P-Gp and Their Distribution in Chinese Uncaria Species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X20973506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, P.; Vishwakarma, R.A.; Bharate, S.B. Natural Alkaloids as P-Gp Inhibitors for Multidrug Resistance Reversal in Cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 138, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shah, D.; Ajazuddin; Bhattacharya, S. Role of Natural P-Gp Inhibitor in the Effective Delivery for Chemotherapeutic Agents. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 149, 367–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Readi, M.Z.; Eid, S.; Abdelghany, A.A.; Al-Amoudi, H.S.; Efferth, T.; Wink, M. Resveratrol Mediated Cancer Cell Apoptosis, and Modulation of Multidrug Resistance Proteins and Metabolic Enzymes. Phytomedicine 2019, 55, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewanjee, S.; Dua, T.K.; Bhattacharjee, N.; Das, A.; Gangopadhyay, M.; Khanra, R.; Joardar, S.; Riaz, M.; Feo, V.D.; Zia-Ul-Haq, M. Natural Products as Alternative Choices for P-Glycoprotein (P-Gp) Inhibition. Molecules 2017, 22, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravikumar Reddy, D.; Khurana, A.; Bale, S.; Ravirala, R.; Samba Siva Reddy, V.; Mohankumar, M.; Godugu, C. Natural Flavonoids Silymarin and Quercetin Improve the Brain Distribution of Co-Administered P-Gp Substrate Drugs. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Liu, Z. Progress in the Management of Acute Colchicine Poisoning in Adults. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2022, 17, 2069–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehan, S.; Arora, N.; Bhalla, S.; Khan, A.; Rehman, M.U.; Alghamdi, B.S.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Ashraf, G.M. Involvement of Phytochemical-Encapsulated Nanoparticles’ Interaction with Cellular Signalling in the Amelioration of Benign and Malignant Brain Tumours. Molecules 2022, 27, 3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshammari, M.K.; Alghazwni, M.K.; Alharbi, A.S.; Alqurashi, G.G.; Kamal, M.; Alnufaie, S.R.; Alshammari, S.S.; Alshehri, B.A.; Tayeb, R.H.; Bougeis, R.J.M.; et al. Nanoplatform for the Delivery of Topotecan in the Cancer Milieu: An Appraisal of Its Therapeutic Efficacy. Cancers 2022, 15, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hiser, L.; Herrington, B.; Lobert, S. Effect of Noscapine and Vincristine Combination on Demyelination and Cell Proliferation in Vitro. Leuk. Lymphoma 2008, 49, 1603–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landen, J.W.; Hau, V.; Wang, M.; Davis, T.; Ciliax, B.; Wainer, B.H.; Van Meir, E.G.; Glass, J.D.; Joshi, H.C.; Archer, D.R. Noscapine Crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and Inhibits Glioblastoma Growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 5187–5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.-T.; Tang, W.; Xie, H.-J.; Liu, S.; Song, X.-L.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, X.; Cheng, L.; Chen, G.-R. The Efficacy of RGD Modified Liposomes Loaded with Vinorelbine plus Tetrandrine in Treating Resistant Brain Glioma. J. Liposome Res. 2019, 29, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, T.; Li, M.; Zheng, H.; Liu, W.; Zhang, J. Microdialysis Combined with RRLC-MS/MS for the Pharmacokinetics of Two Major Alkaloids of Bi Qi Capsule and the Potential Roles of P-Gp and BCRP on Their Penetration. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2018, 1092, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, L.; Cui, L. Pretreatment by Evodiamine Is Neuroprotective in Cerebral Ischemia: Up-Regulated pAkt, pGSK3β, Down-Regulated NF-κB Expression, and Ameliorated BBB Permeability. Neurochem. Res. 2014, 39, 1612–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Yu, X.; Yang, L.; Xue, G.; Wei, Q.; Han, Z.; Chen, H. Research Progress on the Antitumor Effects of Harmine. Front. Oncol. 2024, 14, 1382142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miciaccia, M.; Rizzo, F.; Centonze, A.; Cavallaro, G.; Contino, M.; Armenise, D.; Baldelli, O.M.; Solidoro, R.; Ferorelli, S.; Scarcia, P.; et al. Harmaline to Human Mitochondrial Caseinolytic Serine Protease Activation for Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Treatment. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zetler, G.; Back, G.; Iven, H. Pharmacokinetics in the Rat of the Hallucinogenic Alkaloids Harmine and Harmaline. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1974, 285, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cisternino, S.; Rousselle, C.; Debray, M.; Scherrmann, J.-M. In Vivo Saturation of the Transport of Vinblastine and Colchicine by P-Glycoprotein at the Rat Blood-Brain Barrier. Pharm. Res. 2003, 20, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drion, N.; Lemaire, M.; Lefauconnier, J.M.; Scherrmann, J.M. Role of P-Glycoprotein in the Blood-Brain Transport of Colchicine and Vinblastine. J. Neurochem. 1996, 67, 1688–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pranata, R.; Feraldho, A.; Lim, M.A.; Henrina, J.; Vania, R.; Golden, N.; July, J. Coffee and Tea Consumption and the Risk of Glioma: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Nutr. 2022, 127, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eigenmann, D.E.; Dürig, C.; Jähne, E.A.; Smieško, M.; Culot, M.; Gosselet, F.; Cecchelli, R.; Helms, H.C.C.; Brodin, B.; Wimmer, L.; et al. In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Predictions for GABAA Receptor Modulating Piperine Analogs. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 103, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, Y.; Chin Tan, T.M.; Lim, L.-Y. In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of the Effects of Piperine on P-Gp Function and Expression. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 230, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Luo, Z.; Li, J. Effect of Capsaicin-Loading Nanoparticles on Gliomas. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 9834–9839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weaver, T.; Nogrady, D.F. Medicinal chemistry. In A Molecular and Biochemical Approach; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Talevi, A. Central Nervous System Multiparameter Optimization Desirability. In The ADME Encyclopedia; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stéen, E.J.L.; Vugts, D.J.; Windhorst, A.D. The Application of in silico Methods for Prediction of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability of Small Molecule PET Tracers. Front. Nucl. Med. 2022, 2, 853475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isabel, U.-V.; de la Belén, A.; Riera, M.; Serrano Dolores, R.; Elena, G.-B. A new frontier in neuropharmacology: Recent progress in natural products research for blood–brain barrier crossing. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2024, 8, 100235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsabri Sami, G.; Mari Walid, O.; Sara, Y.; Alsadawi Murad, A.; Oroszi Terry, L. Kinetic and Dynamic Description of Caffeine. J. Caffeine Adenosine Res. 2018, 8, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikeda-Murakami, K.; Tani, N.; Ikeda, T.; Aoki, Y.; Ishikawa, T. Central Nervous System Stimulants Limit Caffeine Transport at the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Jia, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, R.; Xu, S.; Mei, Y. Health Benefits and Mechanisms of Theobromine. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 115, 106126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugimoto, N.; Katakura, M.; Matsuzaki, K.; Ohno-Shosaku, T.; Yachie, A.; Shido, O. Theobromine, the Primary Methylxanthine Found in Theobroma Cacao, Can Pass through the Blood-Brain Barrier in Mice. FASEB J. 2016, 30, lb635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugimoto, N.; Miwa, S.; Hitomi, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Tsuchiya, H.; Yachie, A. Theobromine, the Primary Methylxanthine Found in Theobroma Cacao, Prevents Malignant Glioblastoma Proliferation by Negatively Regulating Phosphodiesterase-4, Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase, Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Kinase, and Nuclear Factor-Kappa, B. Nutr. Cancer 2014, 66, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Judelson, D.A.; Preston, A.G.; Miller, D.L.; Muñoz, C.X.; Kellogg, M.D.; Lieberman, H.R. Effects of Theobromine and Caffeine on Mood and Vigilance. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2013, 33, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Wu, H.; Wei, Y.; Liu, W.; Huang, F.; Shi, H.; Zhang, B.; Wu, X.; Wang, C. Effects of Harmine, an Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor, on Spatial Learning and Memory of APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice and Scopolamine-Induced Memory Impairment Mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 768, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, K. Black Pepper and Its Pungent Principle-Piperine: A Review of Diverse Physiological Effects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 47, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tripathi, A.K.; Ray, A.K.; Mishra, S.K. Molecular and Pharmacological Aspects of Piperine as a Potential Molecule for Disease Prevention and Management: Evidence from Clinical Trials. Beni. Suef. Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, R.K.; Leeners, B.; Imthurn, B.; Merki-Feld, G.S.; Rosselli, M. Piperine Decreases Binding of Drugs to Human Plasma and Increases Uptake by Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Phytother. Res. 2017, 31, 1868–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thornton, T.; Mills, D.; Bliss, E. Capsaicin: A Potential Treatment to Improve Cerebrovascular Function and Cognition in Obesity and Ageing. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inyang, D.; Saumtally, T.; Nnadi, C.N.; Devi, S.; So, P.-W. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Capsaicin on Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saria, A.; Skofitsch, G.; Lembeck, F. Distribution of Capsaicin in Rat Tissues after Systemic Administration. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1982, 34, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 173 O’Neill, J.; Brock, C.; Olesen, A.E.; Andresen, T.; Nilsson, M.; Dickenson, A.H. Unravelling the Mystery of Capsaicin: A Tool to Understand and Treat Pain. Pharmacol. Rev. 2012, 64, 939–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pasierski, M.; Szulczyk, B. Beneficial Effects of Capsaicin in Disorders of the Central Nervous System. Molecules 2022, 27, 2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donnerer, J.; Amann, R.; Schuligoi, R.; Lembeck, F. Absorption and Metabolism of Capsaicinoids Following Intragastric Administration in Rats. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1990, 342, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Salam, O.M.E.; Mózsik, G. Capsaicin, The Vanilloid Receptor TRPV1 Agonist in Neuroprotection: Mechanisms Involved and Significance. Neurochem. Res. 2023, 48, 3296–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Tao, Z.; Feng, M.; Li, X.; Deng, Z.; Zhao, G.; Yin, H.; Pan, T.; Chen, G.; Feng, Z.; et al. Dual PLK1 and STAT3 Inhibition Promotes Glioblastoma Cells Apoptosis through MYC. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 533, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhattacharjee, A.K.; Kondoh, T.; Nagashima, T.; Ikeda, M.; Ehara, K.; Tamaki, N. Quantitative Analysis of Papaverine-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 289, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.-H.; Yan, M.; Li, H.-D.; Fang, P.-F.; Liu, Y.-W. Influence of P-Glycoprotein on Brucine Transport at the in Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 690, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres-Vega, J.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; Pérez-Navarro, J.; Pastene-Navarrete, E. Green Extraction of Alkaloids and Polyphenols from Peumus Boldus Leaves with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Profiling by HPLC-PDA-IT-MS/MS and HPLC-QTOF-MS/MS. Plants 2020, 9, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi Noureini, S.; Tanavar, F. Boldine, a Natural Aporphine Alkaloid, Inhibits Telomerase at Non-Toxic Concentrations. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2015, 231, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pennisi, G.; Bruzzaniti, P.; Burattini, B.; Piaser Guerrato, G.; Della Pepa, G.M.; Sturiale, C.L.; Lapolla, P.; Familiari, P.; La Pira, B.; D’Andrea, G.; et al. Advancements in Telomerase-Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhan, Z.; Gao, H.; Zhang, C.; Lai, J.; Cao, J.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z. Berberine Inhibits Glioma Cell Migration and Invasion by Suppressing TGF-Β1/COL11A1 Pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 625, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Gao, H.; Xu, W.; Zhang, C.; Lai, J.; Liu, X.; Sun, Y.; Huang, H. Berberine Inhibits Cell Proliferation by Interfering with Wild-Type and Mutant P53 in Human Glioma Cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 12151–12162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, N.; Qi, Y.; Ma, X.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Q.; Xia, T.; Xiang, J.; Zeng, J.; Tang, J. Rediscovery of Traditional Plant Medicine: An Underestimated Anticancer Drug of Chelerythrine. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 906301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golán-Cancela, I.; Caja, L. The TGF-β Family in Glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, W.; Hou, X.; Dong, L.; Hou, W. Roles of STAT3 in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Glioblastoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1098482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luwor, R.B.; Stylli, S.S.; Kaye, A.H. The Role of Stat3 in Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 20, 907–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Yang, P.; Zhou, Q. Multiple Biological Functions and Pharmacological Effects of Lycorine. Sci. China Chem. 2013, 56, 1382–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuo, Y.-H.; Chan, T.-C.; Lai, H.-Y.; Chen, T.-J.; Wu, L.-C.; Hsing, C.-H.; Li, C.-F. Overexpression of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase-3 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Urothelial Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 749142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Li, L.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhan, S.; Luo, Z.; Li, Y.; Long, H.; Cai, J.; et al. PDK3 Drives Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Immune Evasion and Is a Therapeutic Target for Boosting Immunotherapy. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2024, 14, 3117–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Zeng, A.; Shi, Y.; Tang, Y. The lncRNA-DLEU2/miR-186-5p/PDK3 Axis Promotes the Progress of Glioma Cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 4922–4934. [Google Scholar]
- Roy, M.; Liang, L.; Xiao, X.; Feng, P.; Ye, M.; Liu, J. Lycorine: A Prospective Natural Lead for Anticancer Drug Discovery. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 107, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soleimani, A.; Rahmani, F.; Ferns, G.A.; Ryzhikov, M.; Avan, A.; Hassanian, S.M. Role of the NF-κB Signaling Pathway in the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer. Gene 2020, 726, 144132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahukari, R.; Punabaka, J.; Bhasha, S.; Ganjikunta, V.S.; Ramudu, S.K.; Kesireddy, S.R. Plant Compounds for the Treatment of Diabetes, a Metabolic Disorder: NF-κB as a Therapeutic Target. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 4955–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khabibov, M.; Garifullin, A.; Boumber, Y.; Khaddour, K.; Fernandez, M.; Khamitov, F.; Khalikova, L.; Kuznetsova, N.; Kit, O.; Kharin, L. Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Approaches in Glioblastoma Multiforme (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2022, 60, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ji, J.; Ding, K.; Luo, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, A.; Zhang, D.; Li, G.; Thorsen, F.; Huang, B.; Li, X.; et al. TRIM22 Activates NF-κB Signaling in Glioblastoma by Accelerating the Degradation of IκBα. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parasramka, S.; Talari, G.; Rosenfeld, M.; Guo, J.; Villano, J.L. Procarbazine, Lomustine and Vincristine for Recurrent High-Grade Glioma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 7, CD011773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, J.-C.; Tseng, S.-H. Tetrandrine Suppresses Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis of Gliomas in Rats. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 2260–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manoranjan, B.; Provias, J.P. β-Catenin Marks Proliferating Endothelial Cells in Glioblastoma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2022, 98, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, R.; Wang, T.; Zhou, G.; Xu, M.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Sui, F.; Li, C.; Tang, L.; Wang, Z. Botany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicity of Strychnos Nux-Vomica L.: A Review. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2018, 46, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senrung, A.; Tripathi, T.; Yadav, J.; Janjua, D.; Chaudhary, A.; Chhokar, A.; Aggarwal, N.; Joshi, U.; Goswami, N.; Bharti, A.C. In Vivo Antiangiogenic Effect of Nimbolide, Trans-Chalcone and Piperine for Use against Glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2023, 23, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javed, B.; Zhao, X.; Cui, D.; Curtin, J.; Tian, F. Enhanced Anticancer Response of Curcumin- and Piperine-Loaded Lignin-g-p (NIPAM-Co-DMAEMA) Gold Nanogels against U-251 MG Glioblastoma Multiforme. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, L.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Yang, R.; Wang, Z.-C.; Lu, Y.-D.; Wang, B.-Z.; Zhu, H.-L. Tubulin Inhibitors Binding to Colchicine-Site: A Review from 2015 to 2019. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 27, 6787–6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nandre, R.M.; Terse, P.S. An overview of immunotoxicity in drug discovery and development. Toxicol. Lett. 2025, 403, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.; Vayer, P.; Tanwar, S.; Poyet, J.-L.; Tsaioun, K.; Villoutreix, B.O. Drug discovery and development: Introduction to the general public and patient groups. Front. Drug. Discov. 2023, 3, 1201419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, D.; Sanap, G.; Shenoy, S.; Kalyane, D.; Kalia, K.; Tekade, R.K. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, N.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Q. Efficacy and Safety of Berberine Alone for Several Metabolic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 653887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, Q.; Li, M.; Huang, C.; Yuan, Y.; Liang, Q.; Ma, X.; Qiu, T.; Li, J. The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Berberine in the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lau, Y.S.; Ling, W.C.; Murugan, D.; Mustafa, M.R. Boldine Ameliorates Vascular Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Dysfunction: Therapeutic Implication for Hypertension and Diabetes. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2015, 65, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behl, T.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Zahoor, I.; Albarrati, A.; Albratty, M.; Meraya, A.M.; Najmi, A.; Bungau, S. Expatiating the Pharmacological and Nanotechnological Aspects of the Alkaloidal Drug Berberine: Current and Future Trends. Molecules 2022, 27, 3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruijun, W.; Wenbin, M.; Yumin, W.; Ruijian, Z.; Puweizhong, H.; Yulin, L. Inhibition of Glioblastoma Cell Growth In Vitro and In Vivo by Brucine, a Component of Chinese Medicine. Oncol. Res. 2014, 22, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Huang, R.; Wu, Y.; Jin, J.-M.; Chen, H.-Z.; Zhang, L.-J.; Luan, X. Brucine: A Review of Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Sharma, M.; Dave, A.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.-S.; Radhakrishnan, R. The Antifibrotic and the Anticarcinogenic Activity of Capsaicin in Hot Chili Pepper in Relation to Oral Submucous Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 888280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, J.; Feng, Z.; Song, X. Pharmacological Activity of Capsaicin: Mechanisms and Controversies (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2024, 29, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yue, W.W.S.; Yuan, L.; Braz, J.M.; Basbaum, A.I.; Julius, D. TRPV1 Drugs Alter Core Body Temperature via Central Projections of Primary Afferent Sensory Neurons. Elife 2022, 11, e80139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kosina, P.; Walterová, D.; Ulrichová, J.; Lichnovský, V.; Stiborová, M.; Rýdlová, H.; Vicar, J.; Krecman, V.; Brabec, M.J.; Simánek, V. Sanguinarine and Chelerythrine: Assessment of Safety on Pigs in Ninety Days Feeding Experiment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2004, 42, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roque Bravo, R.; Faria, A.C.; Brito-da-Costa, A.M.; Carmo, H.; Mladěnka, P.; Dias da Silva, D.; Remião, F.; On Behalf of the Oemonom Researchers. Cocaine: An Updated Overview on Chemistry, Detection, Biokinetics, and Pharmacotoxicological Aspects Including Abuse Pattern. Toxins 2022, 14, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhao, D.; Wang, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, K.; Yue, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Melatonin Protects Against Cocaine-Induced Blood−Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment by Regulating miR-320a-Dependent GLUT1 Expression. J. Pineal Res. 2024, 76, e70002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipinski, R.J.; Hutson, P.R.; Hannam, P.W.; Nydza, R.J.; Washington, I.M.; Moore, R.W.; Girdaukas, G.G.; Peterson, R.E.; Bushman, W. Dose- and Route-Dependent Teratogenicity, Toxicity, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of the Hedgehog Signaling Antagonist Cyclopamine in the Mouse. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 104, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.T.; Welch, K.D.; Panter, K.E.; Gardner, D.R.; Garrossian, M.; Chang, C.-W.T. Cyclopamine: From Cyclops Lambs to Cancer Treatment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7355–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Yu, S. Pharmacological Effects of Harmine and Its Derivatives: A Review. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2020, 43, 1259–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ables, J.L.; Israel, L.; Wood, O.; Govindarajulu, U.; Fremont, R.T.; Banerjee, R.; Liu, H.; Cohen, J.; Wang, P.; Kumar, K.; et al. A Phase 1 Single Ascending Dose Study of Pure Oral Harmine in Healthy Volunteers. J. Psychopharmacol. 2024, 38, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Butts, C.A.; Hedderley, D.I.; Martell, S.; Dinnan, H.; Middlemiss-Kraak, S.; Bunn, B.J.; McGhie, T.K.; Lill, R.E. Influence of Oral Administration of Kukoamine A on Blood Pressure in a Rat Hypertension Model. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Luo, S.; Shi, Z.; Yu, M.; Guo, W.; Li, C. Nitidine Chloride, a Benzophenanthridine Alkaloid from Zanthoxylum Nitidum (Roxb.) DC., Exerts Multiple Beneficial Properties, Especially in Tumors and Inflammation-Related Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1046402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daware, M.B.; Mujumdar, A.M.; Ghaskadbi, S. Reproductive Toxicity of Piperine in Swiss Albino Mice. Planta Med. 2000, 66, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malini, T.; Manimaran, R.R.; Arunakaran, J.; Aruldhas, M.M.; Govindarajulu, P. Effects of Piperine on Testis of Albino Rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 64, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, X.; Yuan, Z.; Qu, B.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z.; Xie, Y. Piperine Enhances the Bioavailability of Silybin via Inhibition of Efflux Transporters BCRP and MRP2. Phytomedicine 2019, 54, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Z.-L.; Tay, V.; Guo, S.-Z.; Ren, J.; Shu, M.-G. Silibinin Induced Human Glioblastoma Cell Apoptosis Concomitant with Autophagy through Simultaneous Inhibition of mTOR and YAP. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 6165192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Liu, X.; Li, W. Tetrandrine, a Chinese Plant-Derived Alkaloid, Is a Potential Candidate for Cancer Chemotherapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 40800–40815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schütz, R.; Müller, M.; Geisslinger, F.; Vollmar, A.; Bartel, K.; Bracher, F. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Toxicity of Novel Tetrandrine Analogues. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 207, 112810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the Clinical Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products; EMA/CHMP/205/95; European Medicines Agency: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 1–43.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).































