Next Article in Journal
Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Tagetes erecta: Extract Characterization, Morphological Modification Using Structure Directing or Heterogeneous Nucleating Agents, and Antibacterial Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Roasting on the Health-Promoting Components of Nuts Determined on the Basis of Fatty Acids, Polyphenol Compounds, and Antioxidant Capacity
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Hydrolytic Depolymerization of Polyurethane Foam Wastes by Ionic Liquids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption of Imidazolium-Based ILs Combined on Activated Carbon Obtained from Grape Seeds

1
Chemical Engineering Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
2
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Group, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología (ESCET), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain
3
Institute for Advanced Research in Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(23), 4595; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234595 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 October 2025 / Revised: 25 November 2025 / Accepted: 26 November 2025 / Published: 29 November 2025

Abstract

In this work, the adsorption of imidazolium-based ionic liquids containing the bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide anion (NTf2) from aqueous phase was evaluated using different activated carbons (ACs). Three commercial Acs and two Acs prepared from grape seeds (one produced by pyrolysis and the other by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), both activated with potassium hydroxide) were tested, assessing the adsorption of both the cation and the anion. For commercial ACs, similar adsorption performances were observed, with maximum adsorption capacities ranging from 0.85 to 1.08 mmol g−1. These values increased under acidic conditions (pH 4), reaching 1.74 mmol g−1 for the 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium cation (Bmim+) and 1.87 mmol g−1 for NTf2. Among the prepared ACs, the HTC-derived AC showed slightly higher capacities than the commercial samples, while the pyrolysis-derived AC exhibited the highest adsorption capacity for BmimNTf2 (3.36 mmol g−1 at pH 4). In terms of reusability, the pyrolysis-derived AC maintained 84% of its initial adsorption capacity between the third and fifth regeneration cycles. These results highlight the high adsorption performance and recyclability of grape-seed-derived activated carbons, demonstrating their potential for the removal of ionic liquids from aqueous environments.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ionic liquids are salts with a melting point below 100 °C formed by an organic cation and an organic or inorganic anion [1]. In recent decades, ILs have been considered novel solvents due to their remarkable properties. Among them, their low vapor pressure and their chemical and thermal stability have allowed them to be considered as “green solvents” [2]. However, depending on the hydrophobicity of the combined cations and anions, some ILs can present relatively high solubility in water [3]. Consequently, they can appear in wastewater because of their synthesis procedure or due to their use. Several authors have evaluated the ecotoxicity and biodegradability of various IL families combined with different anions, questioning their consideration as “green solvents” [4,5,6,7]. Imidazolium, pyridinium, and pyrrolidinium families present relatively high toxicity with respect to ammonium or phosphonium ones, and present low biodegradability [8,9]. Moreover, the use of a fluorinated anion like the hexafluoroborate (PF6) or the bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) (NTf2) produces an increase in the IL toxicity respect to halides or organic acids due to the possible hydrolysis to hydrofluoric acid [10], and present low biodegradability being able to permeate on the cell membranes, making them a problem to the aquatic environmental [11]. Therefore, there is a need to assess new processes aimed at the removal of ionic liquids (ILs), especially those exhibiting higher ecotoxicity, such as imidazolium-based ILs and those with the NTf2 anion.
Different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been evaluated as destructive treatments for ILs wastewater [12]. Among them, photocatalysis [13,14], Fenton [15], catalytic wet peroxide oxidation [16], electrolysis [17,18], and electroFenton [19,20] have been tested satisfactorily, achieving high removal rates in terms of cation and mineralization. Regarding the behavior of the anion, Fenton reagent can degrade aromatic anions, such as tosylate [21], and electrolysis can degrade organic anions like acetate [22]. Specifically, the NTf2 anion is recognized as a refractory compound in various AOPs, since hydroxyl radicals are unable to break the C–S, S–N, and C–F bonds [23].
As an alternative to AOPs, the adsorption of ILs from the aqueous phase has emerged as a promising strategy for wastewater treatment. The main advantage of this approach lies in the possibility of recovering and reusing the ILs without altering their chemical structure. This is particularly relevant given the high economic value and versatility of ILs in various industrial applications [24,25]. Adsorption has been extensively studied as an effective method for the removal of various contaminants from aqueous media, with activated carbon consistently highlighted as the preferred adsorbent due to its high surface area and exceptional adsorption capacity. This widespread applicability is reflected in the global market trends: the activated carbon market was valued at USD 4.4 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 8.4 billion in 2030, according to a study published by Markets and Markets in 2024 [26]. Moreover, water treatment applications reached more than 40% of the global AC consumption in 2023, according to a study published by Grand View Research in 2024 [27]. Different raw materials have been used to obtain ACs, such as wood, peat, or petroleum pitch, among others. The large number of agricultural wastes generated poses a great challenge to produce carbon materials by means of pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) [28]. Pyrolysis of biomass wastes are carried out in two steps: drying of the raw material and carbonization under N2 atmosphere at high temperature. Nevertheless, HTC emerges as an alternative for obtaining a solid product called hydrochar, which presents higher carbon content than the raw material at relatively mild conditions in the presence of water compared with pyrolysis (180–300 °C and autogenous pressure) [29]. In general, an activation process is needed after pyrolysis and HTC processes to achieve a high surface area and pore volumes. Different reagents can be used in the chemical activation process, such as KOH or K2CO3 [30], phosphoric acid [31], or FeCl3 [32,33]. Different agricultural wastes have been used in this sense, such as olive [34,35,36], rice [37,38], or pomegranate waste [39]. Specifically, grape seeds represent up to 15% of the wine industry waste, and they have been used as precursors of different carbon materials by means of pyrolysis [31,40] or HTC [29,41], obtaining high adsorption capacities of herbicide and pharmaceutical pollutants.
Regarding the adsorption of ILs, Table 1 shows some results focused on the study of the IL composition to know the influence of the cation family, the cation alkyl side chain, the characteristics of the anion on the adsorption capacity, or the influence of operation conditions such as temperature or pH. Moreover, the use of different adsorbents has been evaluated, using different commercial ACs, with or without thermal or oxidation treatment. Furthermore, some studies evaluated the adsorption capacity of ACs synthesized by different biomass wastes, such as wood, artichokes, or peanut shells, among others. Table 1 also summarizes the properties of the activated carbon, such as the BET area, pHslurry/pHZPC, and micropore volume, which are evaluated to determine the best characteristic for a good IL adsorbent. In general, these works have related the hydrophobicity of the cations and anions with the cation adsorption capacity, obtaining better results when the temperature was reduced. Moreover, when the pH increased, the adsorption capacity increased, due to the high affinity between the cation and the negatively charged surface of the AC at high pHs. In terms of the ACs, the increase in the BET area and the micropore volume produces a higher cation adsorption capacity of the ILs. Although activated carbons present a high adsorption capacity for ILs, there is a lack of knowledge to ensure that the adsorption of the cation and the anion of the ILs follows the same pattern.
The main objective of this study is to explore the potential of novel activated carbons derived from agricultural waste, specifically grape seeds, as sustainable precursors. Two types of carbonaceous materials were synthesized via pyrolysis and HTC, followed by chemical activation with KOH. This approach seeks to valorize agro-industrial waste into high-performance porous materials for advanced environmental applications, particularly for the removal of ILs from aqueous media. Seven imidazolium-based ILs were selected to investigate the influence of both the anion type and the alkyl side-chain length on the adsorption behavior. The adsorption capacity of the prepared materials was evaluated separately for the cation and the anion and correlated with their chemical composition and textural properties. Furthermore, adsorption–desorption cycles were carried out to assess the reusability and stability of the most effective adsorbent in terms of adsorption capacity, with the ultimate goal of identifying an efficient and sustainable material for IL removal.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of the Activated Carbons

Table 2 shows the main properties of the commercial and prepared ACs. As shown, all the ACs exhibit BET surface areas between 800 and 1400 m2 g−1, with Chem and N2/KOH achieving the highest values. Regarding to the porosity, GXS and Chem stand out by a high mesoporosity, with mesopore volumes of 0.170 and 0.270 cm3 g–1, respectively (4–10 times higher than the other ACs), whereas the Merck AC and those synthetized from grape seeds are mainly microporous materials. Figure 1 presents the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (A) and the pore size distribution (B) of the materials synthesized in this study: pyrolysis (N2/KOH) and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC/KOH) of grape seeds, followed by KOH activation. Further details regarding the characterization of the commercial activated carbons are available in García-Delgado et al. (2018) [53]. Lemus et al. (2012) [24] evidenced that the adsorption of the IL OmimPF6 are clearly related to the volume of pores up to 8 nm (micropore and narrow mesopore). In this sense, Chem presents the highest amount of pore volumes up to 8 nm, followed by GXS and N2/KOH, with HTC/KOH being the material with the lowest accumulation of micro- and mesoporosity. Regarding the elemental analysis, it can be appreciated that commercial ACs present similar characteristics, with the carbon content between 84 and 90 wt. %. Moreover, GXS presents almost double the ashes content than Merk and Chem (8.4 wt. % against 4.7 and 4.8, respectively). The carbon content of AC synthesized from grape seeds is 15–20 wt. % higher than the raw material (between 70–75 wt. %), although lower than that exhibited by the commercial materials. Additionally, these ACs present a high number of ashes, around 15 wt. %, related to the residual ash derived from the grape seed precursor and/or from the KOH activation process. Concerning the commercial ACs pHslurry, Merck presented a pHslurry close to neutrality, and GXS and Chem had an acidic pHslurry, whereas the chemical activation with KOH produced basic activated carbons. Finally, the TPD results show that Chem presented the highest amount of SOG, while the treatment of the grape seed produced a generation of SOGs similar to that shown by the commercial ACs.

2.2. Adsorption of Bmim-Based ILs

Isotherm adsorption of the cation and anion of different Bmim-based ILs was evaluated to study, on one hand, if there is an influence of the type of anion on the adsorption, and on the other hand, to elucidate if the ILs’ adsorption is governed by the adsorption of the ion pair or the cation/anion separately. Figure 2 shows the results obtained in the adsorption experiments of BmimCl, BmimAc, BmimMeSO4, and BmimNTf2 using Merck. In all the cases, the Bmim+ adsorption isotherm is like its corresponding anion, making evident that the adsorption phenomenon takes place via an ion pair. In general, other authors have measured the cation concentration considering that the cation adsorption is similar to IL adsorption, and consequently, the anion adsorption [42,45,47,49,54]. By comparing the adsorption behavior of the different ILs with respect to their anionic constituent at comparable neutral pH values (see Table 3), a correlation can be established between this parameter and the hydrophobicity of the ILs. According to COSMO-RS calculations, the following trend was obtained based on the logarithm of the octanol–water partition coefficient (Log P): BmimCl (−2.92) < BmimMeSO4 (−2.07) < BmimAc (−0.040) < BmimNTf2 (3.44). BmimCl, being the most hydrophilic ionic liquid, exhibited the lowest adsorption capacity, whereas BmimNTf2 showed the highest adsorption capacity due to its pronounced hydrophobicity. Interestingly, at concentrations between 0.25 and 3 mM, the adsorption of BmimAc was lower than that of BmimMeSO4, despite the latter being less hydrophobic. However, as the IL concentration increased, BmimAc adsorption surpassed that of BmimMeSO4, whose adsorption remained nearly constant.
BmimNTf2 presents a higher ecotoxicity value than the other ILs [11,55], due to the high hydrophobicity of NTf2 compare with acetate or chloride as an anion, combined with a null biodegradability using an activated sludge [11]. Additionally, previous works established NTf2 as a recalcitrant compound in different advanced oxidation processes, such as electrolysis or catalytic wet peroxide oxidation, whereas the imidazolium cation or organic anions like acetate are degraded. For these reasons, the adsorption of ILs using NTf2 can be regarded as a promising alternative for their removal from water. Consequently, the subsequent research focused on investigating the adsorption of ILs with NTf2.
The adsorption of BmimNTf2, the most toxic ionic liquid studied and the one exhibiting the highest adsorption capacity (Figure 2), was investigated using other commercial ACs. As can be seen in the comparison between Figure 2 and Figure 3, the adsorption capacity of commercial ACs follows the following trend in the BmimNTf2 adsorption: Merck > Chem > GXS. The analysis of ACs characterization (Table 2) reveals that BmimNTf2 adsorption was neither related to the ABET nor the micropore volume nor to the amount of SOGs [51]. However, the pHslurry seems to have a relevant influence on the adsorption capacity. When the AC presents a lower pHslurry than the reaction medium, the material surface is negatively charged and favors the cation adsorption, whereas a higher pHslurry value favors the anion adsorption [56]. In these cases, the use of Merck, an AC with neutral pHslurry, produced high adsorption capacity, while when the pHslurry was reduced, the adsorption capacity was lower, as occurs with Chem or GXS. This fact indicates that the anion component had a key role in the adsorption of the BmimNTf2 due to NTf2 adsorption was favored in ACs with a neutral or positively charged surface, because of the electrostatic attraction forces. Moreover, comparing Chem and GXS, both present negatively charged surfaces at the experimental pH; therefore, the higher BET area and micropore volume of Chem appear to be the decisive factors explaining its higher adsorption capacity relative to GXS.
The influence of medium pH on the adsorption phenomenon has been studied using different ILs, such as BmimCl, OmimCl, OpyBr, or EmimBF4. In general, these hydrophilic ILs present a higher adsorption capacity at basic pH. This is related to the low affinity between the Bmim+ and the carbon material at acid pH, due to the repelling charges between the cation and the positively charged AC [43,47,49,52]. The role of pH was examined using the activated carbon that showed the highest adsorption capacity (Merck) and BmimNTf2 as the adsorbate. As can be seen in Figure 4, the BmimNTf2 maximum adsorption capacity took place at a pH value of 4, provoking an increase in the medium pH and a decrease in the adsorption. In this case, the NTf2 presents a high hydrophobic behavior and, because it is an anion, its adsorption can be favored by ACs with a positively charged surface. Due to Merck presenting a pHslurry of 7.7, using a pH of 4 in the adsorption medium, the material surface charged positively, favoring the anion adsorption. For that reason, the BmimNTf2 adsorption is higher at acidic conditions in contrast with other ILs with hydrophilic anions. However, when the medium pH was adjusted to 8, the adsorption capacity of the material was reduced because the Merck surface was slightly negatively charged, producing repelling electrostatic forces with NTf2.
Finally, the adsorption study of BmimNTf2 was extended to the ACs synthesized from grape seeds. As can be seen in Figure 5, cation and anion adsorption isotherms were quite similar, as occurs with the commercial ACs, making evident the adsorption of both components together. Comparing the adsorption capacity using the highest IL concentration, N2/KOH presented a value 1.96 times higher than HTC/KOH. This effect can be attributed to the higher BET area and micropore volume developed in N2/KOH. However, HTC/KOH presented a slightly higher adsorption capacity than Merck (1.23 mmol g−1 against 1.04 mmol g−1 for HTC/KOH and Merck, respectively). In this case, although both materials exhibited similar textural properties, the pHslurry of HTC/KOH caused the AC surface to become positively charged, favoring the NTf2 adsorption, and consequently, the IL adsorption. In contrast, Merck presented a pH slurry similar to an IL solution, showing that the material displayed a neutral surface. An additional experiment was carried out using the N2/KOH at an acidic pH. As can be seen, the adsorption capacity at acidic pH is 1.4 times superior to that obtained at neutral pH. This fact can be associated with the highly positively charged surface that this material presented at pH 4, favoring the anion interaction with the AC.
Once it was established that the activated carbon N2/KOH exhibited the highest adsorption capacity for BmimNTf2, the influence of the alkyl side chain on ionic liquid adsorption was evaluated. Other authors, such as Ushiki et al. (2017) [50] or Zhang et al. (2018a) [51], evidenced an increase in the adsorption capacity when the cation alkyl side chain increased. Both attributed this result to an increase in IL hydrophobicity when the alkyl side chain increased from 4 to 8 C atoms. Figure 6 shows the length of the cation influence in the IL adsorption at neutral pH with N2/KOH. Adsorption capacity follows the order OmimNTf2 > HmimNTf2 > BmimNTf2 > EmimNTf2, as was previously reported. When the alkyl side chain increased from two to eight carbon atoms, the hydrophobicity, and consequently the adsorption capacity onto the AC, increased.
Table 3 collects the results of the Langmuir parameters. Langmuir equation reproduces the experimental values well, with a determination coefficient (r2) superior to 0.946, except for the chloride anion in the BmimCl adsorption (r2 = 0.882). As can be seen, the parameter qL, which represents the maximum adsorption capacity, is similar for anion and cation adsorption in all the cases (qL cation/qL anion close to 1). Comparing these parameters with those obtained in the literature (Table 1), the maximum adsorption capacity of the ACs studied showed similar values to those previously obtained. Focusing on the ACs synthesized from grape seeds, N2/KOH is the material that presents the highest IL adsorption capacity, achieving the highest qL value of the studied (qL = 3.53 mmol g−1) in the BmimNTf2 adsorption at pH = 4. This value is similar to that obtained by Lemus et al. (2012) [24] in the OmimPF6 adsorption by the Capsuper commercial AC (qL = 3.5 mmol g−1) and that obtained by Zhang et al. (2018a) [51] in the DcmimCl adsorption using an ordered microporous carbon ZTC (qL = 3.4 mmol g−1). In these cases, the IL cation studied presents a longer alkyl side chain compared with the Bmim+, favoring the IL adsorption for the hydrophobicity associated with those cations. However, the anion studied in this work presents a higher hydrophobicity than the chloride, making the adsorption capacity similar in both cases. The activated carbon synthesized in this study exhibited a higher adsorption capacity than the commercial samples, clearly demonstrating the competitive performance of activated carbon produced from waste materials. The KOW coefficients of the ILs studied in this work were estimated using COSMO-RS. As shown in Table 3, the KOW values, and consequently the hydrophobicity, increased for the ILs containing the NTf2 anion. In fact, the KOW value of BmimNTf2 is more than 3000 times higher than that of BmimAc, and it further increases with the length of the alkyl side chain of the cation (approximately 250 times higher when the chain length increases from 2 to 10 carbon atoms). Figure 7 shows the KOW coefficients of the ILs containing the NTf2 anion. A clear correlation can be established between the KOW values and the adsorption capacities (qL), as expected.
Finally, the reusability of the N2/KOH has been evaluated in 5 cycles of adsorption–desorption of 1 mM of BmimNTf2 at neutral pH using acetone as regenerating agent. The high cost of ILs and the environmental risk associated with them make their recovery a critical point. Figure 8 shows the mean adsorption capacity of N2/KOH in each cycle. As can be seen, the Bmim+ adsorption capacity was reduced from 1.53 mmol g−1 to 1.29 mmol g−1 from the first to the third reuse cycle, and then it remained constant. The material reaches an adsorption capacity of 84% with respect to the initial one. This value is in concordance with others obtained in the literature. Lemus et al. (2012) [24] determined, using Merck and Capsuper commercial ACs and acetone as regenerating agent, that the adsorbent maintained a 90% of the initial adsorption capacity after three cycles, whereas Shi et al. (2016) [47] obtained a 82 and 88% of the initial adsorption capacity after 10 cycles of adsorption–desorption in a straw and wood based biochar, respectively, and a HCl solution (pH = 0.5) as regenerating agent. Therefore, the activated carbon synthesized from the pyrolysis of grape seeds presented high adsorption capacity and reusability in ILs adsorption.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Ionic Liquids

The ILs studied in the adsorption experiments were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Deutschland) and Iolitec (Heilbronn, Deutschland) and are presented in Table 4. Acetone (>99.5% purity) was provided by SCHARLAB (Barcelona, Spain), and potassium hydroxide (KOH, 85% purity) was provided by PanReac AppliChem (San Fernando de Henares, Spain).

3.2. Activated Carbon: Preparation and Characterization

Three commercial activated carbons (ACs) were used in adsorption experiments: Chemviron (Chem, supplied by Norit (Amersfoort, The Netherlands)), GXS (supplied by Norit), and Merck (supplied by Merck (Rahway, NJ, USA)). The ACs were crushed and sieved below 100 µm.
Moreover, grape seeds of red wine variety “Tinta de Toro” from Toro (Zamora, Spain) were used as precursor for two activated carbons. As pretreatment, the seeds were washed with Milli-Q water and dried overnight at 105 °C. Grape seeds are characterized by an absence of porosity and a relatively high carbon (≈55%) and low ash (close to3%) content. One of the ACs (N2/KOH) was obtained by pyrolysis of the grape seeds in a rotatory quartz furnace (CARBOLITE CB HTR 11/150P8) at 600 °C, reached at 10 °C min−1, for 2 h using a continuous flow of 1 NL min−1 of N2, whereas the AC (HTC/KOH) was obtained by HTC of 20 g of the dried grape seeds at 220 °C for 16 h in a 250 mL stainless steel reactor with a ratio water to grape seeds of 40 wt. %. Both materials were subjected to an activation process with KOH using a char: KOH mass ratio of 1:3. After that, the char and the KOH were crushed, mixed, and subjected to heating at 750 °C (ramping up 10 °C min−1) for 1 h under N2 atmosphere (100 mL N min−1) in a Nabertherm Series R tubular furnace. Before their use, the ACs were washed with a HCl solution (5 M) and progressively with Milli-Q water until constant pH. Finally, they were dried at 105 °C for 24 h and crushed and sieved below 100 µm.
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K were carried out to obtain the porous structure of adsorbents using a Micromeritics Tristar 3020 automated volumetric gas adsorption instrument (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Gwinnett County, Georgia). A Micromeritics VacPrep 061 degassing system was used previously to degasify under vacuum samples (0.15 g) at 150 °C for 7 h. The BET equation was used to obtain the surface area (ABET), and micropore volume was calculated using the t-method and total volume of mesopores (up to 8 nm) from the difference between N2 adsorbed at 0.95 relative pressure and the micropore volume [24]. Elemental analysis (C, H, N, and S) was quantified with a LECO CHNS–932 elemental analyzer. Ash content was determined according to ASTM D1506–99 method, and the oxygen content in mass was calculated by difference from 100%. The pHslurry was determined by measuring the pH of an aqueous suspension of carbon (1 g) in Milli-Q water (10 mL) [57]. Temperature-programmed desorption under N2 flow (1 mLN min−1) (TPD–N2) was used to analyze the amount of surface oxygen groups (SOG) presented in the carbon materials. A sample of 0.1 g was introduced in a vertical quartz reactor and heated from room temperature to 900 °C using a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The amount of CO and CO2 released was continuously measured by a Siemens Ultramat 23 NDIR analyzer (Siemens, Munich, Germany).

3.3. Adsorption–Desorption Experiments

Equilibrium adsorption tests were carried out in stoppered glass bottles (100 mL) placed in an orbital incubator (Comecta Orbital Shaking Incubator (Glassco Scientific & Analytical Company, Tikatuli, Bangladesh), model D–1102) at 200 rpm equivalent stirring rate and 20 °C. ILs solutions were prepared with concentrations from 0.25 to 5 mmol L−1 in Milli-Q water, except for OmimNTf2, whose concentration was between 0.1 and 1 mmol L–1 due to its low solubility. An amount of 25 mg of activated carbon was put in contact with 50 mL of IL solution, corresponding to an AC concentration of 0.5 g L−1. The equilibrium time was 24 h for all the samples. The reusability of the best adsorbent was evaluated in 5 consecutive cycles of IL adsorption–desorption. Desorption was carried out suspending the AC in acetone in a concentration of 500 mg L−1 under continuous stirring for 1.5 h. After that, the AC was separated by filtration, dried in an oven at 70 °C for 16 h, and used in the following experiment.
Imidazolium cation concentration was determined by means of a high-performance liquid chromatograph (Varian Prostar 240) with an UV–Vis detector (Varian Prostar 325 (SpectraLab Scientific Inc., Markham, ON, Canada)) operated at 218 nm. A Synergy 4mm Phenomenex Polar–RP 80 A column 15 cm long × 4.6 mm was used as stationary phase. A mixture of phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (from 95:5 to 60:40% v/v depending on the cation analyzed) was pumped at 0.75 mL min−1, and the injection volume used was 100 µL.
Chloride, acetate, and methylsulfate anions were analyzed by means of ion chromatograph with chemical suppression (DIONEX ICS–900) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a Dionex IonPac AS22 4 × 250 mm column. The mobile phase was a mixture of 1.4 mM NaHCO3 and 4.5 mM Na2CO3 at 1 mL min−1. TOC was determined with a Shimadzu TOC–VCSH TOC analyzer. NTf2 concentration was determined by difference from TOC total and TOC associated to the cation concentration.
The equilibrium data were fitted by the Langmuir isotherm equation, described as
q e = q L · k L · C e 1 + k L · C e
being qe the equilibrium concentration of adsorbate in solid phase (mmol g–1), Ce equilibrium concentration of adsorbate in fluid phase (mmol L–1) and qL (mmol g–1) and kL (L mmol–1) the empirical coefficients in Langmuir equation.

4. Conclusions

Activated carbons synthesized from grape seeds through pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization exhibited outstanding performance in the adsorption of imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs), surpassing even commercial activated carbons. This study demonstrates the high efficiency of these sustainable carbonaceous materials in removing toxic compounds, particularly imidazolium ILs containing the NTf2 anion, known for its environmental persistence and low biodegradability. The adsorption capacity reached 1.05 mmol NTf2 g−1 for BmimNTf2, compared with 0.97, 0.73, and 0.24 mmol g−1 for the acetate, methylsulfonate, and chloride anions, respectively.
The activated carbon produced via pyrolysis under a nitrogen atmosphere, followed by chemical activation with KOH, showed the highest adsorption performance, attributed to its large BET surface area, high pore volume, and positively charged surface at neutral pH. Among the ILs tested, OmimNTf2 achieved the greatest adsorption capacity (2.91–3.20 mmol g−1) due to its pronounced hydrophobicity and strong ion-pairing interactions. Furthermore, the activated carbon retained 84% of its initial adsorption capacity after five adsorption–desorption cycles, confirming its stability, reusability, and potential as a sustainable adsorbent for the removal of persistent ionic liquids from aqueous environments.

Author Contributions

I.F.M., investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft; E.D., validation, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing; J.P., validation, writing—review and editing; A.F.M., conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Spain’s MINECO (Project PID2019-108445RB-I00).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following IL abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ILAbbreviation
Bis–DdmimBrDodecane–diyl–bis(methylimidazolium bromide)
BmimBF41–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
BmimBr1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium bromide
BmimCl1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium chloride
BmimMeSO31–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium methylsulfonate
BmimNTf21–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide)
BmimOTf1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate
BmimPF61–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium hexafluoroborate
BmimTFA1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate
BmpyNTf21–Butyl–3–methylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide)
BmpyrrBr1–Butyl–1–methylpyrrolidinium bromide
BpyBr1–Butylpyridinium bromide
C2NH2Emim1–Aminoethyl–3–methylimidazolium
DdmimBF41–Dodecyl–3–methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
DdmimBr1–Dodecyl–3–methylimidazolium bromide
DdmimCl1–Dodecyl–3–methylimidazolium chloride
DdmimPF61–Dodecyl–3–methylimidazolium hexafluoroborate
DmimBF41–Decyl–3–methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
DmimCl1–Decyl–3–methylimidazolium chloride
DmimPF61–Decyl–3–methylimidazolium hexafluoroborate
EmimBF41–Ethyl–3–methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
EmimCl1–Ethyl–3–methylimidazolium chloride
EmimNTf21–Ethyl–3–methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide)
EmimPF61–Ethyl–3–methylimidazolium hexafluoroborate
HdmimCl1–Methyl–3–hexadecylimidazolium chloride
HmimBF41–Hexyl–3–methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
HmimCl1–Hexyl–3–methylimidazolium chloride
HmimNTf21–Hexyl–3–methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide)
HmimPF61–Hexyl–3–methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
HOEmim1–Hydroxyethyl–3–methylimidazolium
MmimCl1,3–Dimethylimidazolium chloride
OmimBF41–Methyl–3–octalimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
OmimBr1–Methyl–3–octalimidazolium bromide
OmimCl1–Methyl–3–octalimidazolium chloride
OmimPF61–Methyl–3–octalimidazolium hexafluoroborate
OmpyrrBr1–Octyl–1–methylpyrrolidinium bromide
OpyBr1–Octylpyridinium bromide
PmimBF41–Pentyl–3–methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
PrmimNTf21–Methyl–3–propilimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide)
TdmimCl1–Methyl–3–tetradecylimidazolium chloride

References

  1. Markiewicz, M.; Piszora, M.; Caicedo, N.; Jungnickel, C.; Stolte, S. Toxicity of Ionic Liquid Cations and Anions towards Activated Sewage Sludge Organisms from Different Sources-Consequences for Biodegradation Testing and Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation. Water Res. 2013, 47, 2921–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Siciliano, A.; Russo, D.; Spasiano, D.; Marotta, R.; Race, M.; Fabbricino, M.; Galdiero, E.; Guida, M. Chronic Toxicity of Treated and Untreated Aqueous Solutions Containing Imidazole-Based Ionic Liquids and Their Oxydized by-Products. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Quijano, G.; Couvert, A.; Amrane, A.; Darracq, G.; Couriol, C.; Le Cloirec, P.; Paquin, L.; Carrié, D. Toxicity and Biodegradability of Ionic Liquids: New Perspectives towards Whole-Cell Biotechnological Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 174, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amde, M.; Liu, J.; Pang, L. Environmental Application, Fate, Effects and Concerns of Ionic Liquids: A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12611–12627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Docherty, K.M.; Kulpa, C.F., Jr. Toxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquids. Green. Chem. 2005, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Neumann, J.; Pawlik, M.; Bryniok, D.; Thöming, J.; Stolte, S. Biodegradation Potential of Cyano-Based Ionic Liquid Anions in a Culture of Cupriavidus Spp. and Their in Vitro Enzymatic Hydrolysis by Nitrile Hydratase. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 9495–9505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stolte, S.; Steudte, S.; Areitioaurtena, O.; Pagano, F.; Thöming, J.; Stepnowski, P.; Igartua, A. Ionic Liquids as Lubricants or Lubrication Additives: An Ecotoxicity and Biodegradability Assessment. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Costa, S.P.F.; Pinto, P.C.A.G.; Saraiva, M.L.M.F.S.; Rocha, F.R.P.; Santos, J.R.P.; Monteiro, R.T.R. The Aquatic Impact of Ionic Liquids on Freshwater Organisms. Chemosphere 2015, 139, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jordan, A.; Gathergood, N. Biodegradation of Ionic Liquids—A Critical Review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8200–8237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Costa, S.P.F.; Pinto, P.C.A.G.; Lapa, R.A.S.; Saraiva, M.L.M.F.S. Toxicity Assessment of Ionic Liquids with Vibrio Fischeri: An Alternative Fully Automated Methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 284, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mena, I.F.; Diaz, E.; Palomar, J.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Mohedano, A.F. Cation and Anion Effect on the Biodegradability and Toxicity of Imidazolium e and Choline e Based Ionic Liquids. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mena, I.F.; Diaz, E.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Mohedano, A.F. An Overview of Ionic Liquid Degradation by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 2844–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. da Silva, W.L.; Leal, B.C.; Ziulkoski, A.L.; van Leeuwen, P.W.; dos Santos, J.H.Z.; Schrekker, H.S. Petrochemical Residue-Derived Silica-Supported Titania-Magnesium Catalysts for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids in Water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 218, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calza, P.; Fabbri, D.; Noè, G.; Santoro, V.; Medana, C. Assessment of the Photocatalytic Transformation of Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids in Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 341, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dominguez, C.M.; Munoz, M.; Quintanilla, A.; de Pedro, Z.M.; Ventura, S.P.M.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Casas, J.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Degradation of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids in Aqueous Solution by Fenton Oxidation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 1197–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Munoz, M.; Domínguez, C.M.; de Pedro, Z.M.; Quintanilla, A.; Casas, J.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Degradation of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids by Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation with Carbon and Magnetic Iron Catalysts. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 2882–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. de Oliveira Marcionilio, S.M.L.; Crisafulli, R.; Medeiros, G.A.; de Sousa Tonhá, M.; Garnier, J.; Neto, B.A.D.; Linares, J.J. Influence of Hydrodynamic Conditions on the Degradation of 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride Solutions on Boron-Doped Diamond Anodes. Chemosphere 2019, 224, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pieczyńska, A.; Ofiarska, A.; Borzyszkowska, A.F.; Białk-Bielińska, A.; Stepnowski, P.; Stolte, S.; Siedlecka, E.M. A Comparative Study of Electrochemical Degradation of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquids: A Reaction Pathway and Ecotoxicity Evaluation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 156, 522–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Poza-Nogueiras, V.; Arellano, M.; Rosales, E.; Pazos, M.; Sanromán, M.A.; González-Romero, E. Electroanalytical Techniques Applied to Monitoring the Electro-Fenton Degradation of Aromatic Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2018, 48, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bocos, E.; González-Romero, E.; Pazos, M.; Sanromán, M.A. Application of Electro-Fenton Treatment for the Elimination of 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Triflate from Polluted Water. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 318, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Munoz, M.; Domínguez, C.M.; De Pedro, Z.M.; Quintanilla, A.; Casas, J.A.; Ventura, S.P.M.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Role of the Chemical Structure of Ionic Liquids in Their Ecotoxicity and Reactivity towards Fenton Oxidation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 150, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mena, I.F.; Cotillas, S.; Díaz, E.; Sáez, C.; Mohedano, Á.F.; Rodrigo, M.A. Sono- and Photoelectrocatalytic Processes for the Removal of Ionic Liquids Based on the 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Cation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 372, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mena, I.F.; Cotillas, S.; Díaz, E.; Sáez, C.; Rodríguez, J.J.; Cañizares, P.; Mohedano, Á.F.; Rodrigo, M.A. Electrolysis with Diamond Anodes: Eventually, There Are Refractory Species! Chemosphere 2018, 195, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lemus, J.; Palomar, J.; Heras, F.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Developing Criteria for the Recovery of Ionic Liquids from Aqueous Phase by Adsorption with Activated Carbon. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 97, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guedidi, H.; Lakehal, I.; Reinert, L.; Lévêque, J.M.; Bellakhal, N.; Duclaux, L. Removal of Ionic Liquids and Ibuprofen by Adsorption on a Microporous Activated Carbon: Kinetics, Isotherms, and Pore Sites. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Markets and Markets. Activated Carbon Market by Type (Powdered Activated Carbon, Granular Activated Carbon), Application (Liquid Phase Application, and Gas Phase Application), End-Use Industry, Raw Material (Coal, Coconut, Wood, Peat), and Region—Global Forecast to 2030; Markets and Markets: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  27. Grand View Research. Activated Carbon Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Powdered, Granular), By Application (Liquid Phase, Gas Phase) By End-use (Water Treatment, Air Purification), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023–2030; Grand View Research: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ullah, S.; Shah, S.S.A.; Altaf, M.; Hossain, I.; El Sayed, M.E.; Kallel, M.; El-Bahy, Z.M.; Rehman, A.U.; Najam, T.; Nazir, M.A. Activated Carbon Derived from Biomass for Wastewater Treatment: Synthesis, Application and Future Challenges. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2024, 179, 106480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Diaz, E.; Manzano, F.J.; Villamil, J.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Mohedano, A.F. Low-Cost Activated Grape Seed-Derived Hydrochar through Hydrothermal Carbonization and Chemical Activation for Sulfamethoxazole Adsorption. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Okman, I.; Karagöz, S.; Tay, T.; Erdem, M. Activated Carbons from Grape Seeds by Chemical Activation with Potassium Carbonate and Potassium Hydroxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 293, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al Bahri, M.; Calvo, L.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Activated Carbon from Grape Seeds upon Chemical Activation with Phosphoric Acid: Application to the Adsorption of Diuron from Water. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 203, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, W.; Fan, M.; Sun, K.; Cheng, X.; Wu, F.; Zhang, S.; Hu, X. Chemical Activation of Willow with Co-Presence of FeCl3 Tailors Pore Structure of Activated Carbon for Enhanced Adsorption of Phenol and Tetracycline. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 975, 179302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kwiatkowski, M.; Belver, C.; Bedia, J. Effect of Synthesis Conditions on the Porous Texture of Activated Carbons Obtained from Tara Rubber by FeCl3 Activation. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Volpe, M.; Fiori, L. From Olive Waste to Solid Biofuel through Hydrothermal Carbonisation: The Role of Temperature and Solid Load on Secondary Char Formation and Hydrochar Energy Properties. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 124, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Encinar, J.M.; Beltrán, F.J.; Bernalte, A.; Ramiro, A.; González, J.F. Pyrolysis of Two Agricultural Residues: Olive and Grape Bagasse. Influence of Particle Size and Temperature. Biomass Bioenergy 1996, 11, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borrero-López, A.M.; Fierro, V.; Jeder, A.; Ouederni, A.; Masson, E.; Celzard, A. High Added-Value Products from the Hydrothermal Carbonisation of Olive Stones. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9859–9869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Touhami, D.; Zhu, Z.; Balan, W.S.; Janaun, J.; Haywood, S.; Zein, S. Characterization of Rice Husk-Based Catalyst Prepared via Conventional and Microwave Carbonisation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2388–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Biswas, B.; Pandey, N.; Bisht, Y.; Singh, R.; Kumar, J.; Bhaskar, T. Pyrolysis of Agricultural Biomass Residues: Comparative Study of Corn Cob, Wheat Straw, Rice Straw and Rice Husk. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 237, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Uçar, S.; Karagöz, S. The Slow Pyrolysis of Pomegranate Seeds: The Effect of Temperature on the Product Yields and Bio-Oil Properties. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2009, 84, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiménez-Cordero, D.; Heras, F.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Raymundo-Piñero, E. Grape Seed Carbons for Studying the Influence of Texture on Supercapacitor Behaviour in Aqueous Electrolytes. Carbon 2014, 71, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Purnomo, C.W.; Castello, D.; Fiori, L. Granular Activated Carbon from Grape Seeds Hydrothermal Char. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Palomar, J.; Lemus, J.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Adsorption of Ionic Liquids from Aqueous Effluents by Activated Carbon. Carbon 2009, 47, 1846–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Farooq, A.; Reinert, L.; Levêque, J.M.; Papaiconomou, N.; Irfan, N.; Duclaux, L. Adsorption of Ionic Liquids onto Activated Carbons: Effect of PH and Temperature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 158, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hassan, S.; Duclaux, L.; Lévêque, J.M.; Reinert, L.; Farooq, A.; Yasin, T. Effect of Cation Type, Alkyl Chain Length, Adsorbate Size on Adsorption Kinetics and Isotherms of Bromide Ionic Liquids from Aqueous Solutions onto Microporous Fabric and Granulated Activated Carbons. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 144, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Neves, C.M.S.S.; Lemus, J.; Freire, M.G.; Palomar, J.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Enhancing the Adsorption of Ionic Liquids onto Activated Carbon by the Addition of Inorganic Salts. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 252, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ren, Y.; Wang, H.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Geng, Y.; Wu, L.; Pu, X. Adsorption of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid on Sodium Bentonite and Its Effects on Rheological and Swelling Behaviors. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 182, 105248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shi, K.; Qiu, Y.; Ben, L.; Stenstrom, M.K. Effectiveness and Potential of Straw- and Wood-Based Biochars for Adsorption of Imidazolium-Type Ionic Liquids. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 130, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, F.; Sun, L.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, B.; Gao, W.; Bao, C.; Feng, C.; Li, Y. Biosorbents Based on Agricultural Wastes for Ionic Liquid Removal: An Approach to Agricultural Wastes Management. Chemosphere 2016, 165, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yu, F.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, B.; Qiao, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, E.; Pang, L.; Bao, C. Effective Removal of Ionic Liquid Using Modified Biochar and Its Biological Effects. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 67, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ushiki, I.; Tashiro, M.; Smith, R.L. Measurement and Modeling of Adsorption Equilibria of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids on Activated Carbon from Aqueous Solutions. Fluid. Phase Equilib. 2017, 441, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Wan, Y.; Zheng, S.; Xu, Z. Microporous Zeolite-Templated Carbon as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Long Alkyl-Chained Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid from Aqueous Media. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 260, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, L.; Cao, W.; Alvarez, P.J.J.; Qu, X.; Fu, H.; Zheng, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, D. Oxidized Template-Synthesized Mesoporous Carbon with PH-Dependent Adsorption Activity: A Promising Adsorbent for Removal of Hydrophilic Ionic Liquid. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. García-Delgado, C.; Fresno, T.; Rodríguez-Santamaría, J.J.; Diaz, E.; Mohedano, A.F.; Moreno-Jimenez, E. Co-Application of Activated Carbon and Compost to Contaminated Soils: Toxic Elements Mobility and PAH Degradation and Availability. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lemus, J.; Palomar, J.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. On the Kinetics of Ionic Liquid Adsorption onto Activated Carbons from Aqueous Solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 2969–2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Diaz, E.; Monsalvo, V.M.; Lopez, J.; Mena, I.F.; Palomar, J.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Mohedano, A.F. Assessment the Ecotoxicity and Inhibition of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids by Respiration Inhibition Assays. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 162, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bedia, J.; Peñas-Garzón, M.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Rodriguez, J.; Belver, C. A Review on the Synthesis and Characterization of Biomass-Derived Carbons for Adsorption of Emerging Contaminants from Water. C 2018, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zazo, J.A.; Fraile, A.F.; Rey, A.; Bahamonde, A.; Casas, J.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Optimizing Calcination Temperature of Fe/Activated Carbon Catalysts for CWPO. Catal. Today 2009, 143, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms (A) and pore size distribution (B) for the materials prepared by activation (N2/KOH) and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC/KOH).
Figure 1. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms (A) and pore size distribution (B) for the materials prepared by activation (N2/KOH) and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC/KOH).
Molecules 30 04595 g001
Figure 2. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and anion (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH (see Table 3). [Merck] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Figure 2. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and anion (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH (see Table 3). [Merck] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Molecules 30 04595 g002
Figure 3. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH (see Table 3) on different commercial activated carbons. [AC] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Figure 3. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH (see Table 3) on different commercial activated carbons. [AC] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Molecules 30 04595 g003
Figure 4. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C at different pH. [Merck] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Figure 4. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C at different pH. [Merck] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Molecules 30 04595 g004
Figure 5. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH (see Table 3) and pH = 4 using grape-seed-based ACs. [AC] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Figure 5. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Bmim+ (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH (see Table 3) and pH = 4 using grape-seed-based ACs. [AC] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM, 200 rpm.
Molecules 30 04595 g005
Figure 6. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Cation (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH of different imidazolium IL using N2/KOH. [N2/KOH] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM except for OmimNTf2 (0–1 mM), 200 rpm.
Figure 6. Experimental data (dots) and Langmuir fits (curves) for Cation (A) and NTf2 (B) adsorption equilibrium isotherms at 20 °C and neutral pH of different imidazolium IL using N2/KOH. [N2/KOH] = 0.5 g L−1, [IL] = 0.25–5 mM except for OmimNTf2 (0–1 mM), 200 rpm.
Molecules 30 04595 g006
Figure 7. KOW coefficient estimated by COSMO-RS and cation/anion adsorption capacity of EmimNTf2, BmimNTf2, HmimNTf2, and OmimNTf2. [N2/KOH] = 0.5 g L−1, T = 20 °C, 200 rpm, neutral pH.
Figure 7. KOW coefficient estimated by COSMO-RS and cation/anion adsorption capacity of EmimNTf2, BmimNTf2, HmimNTf2, and OmimNTf2. [N2/KOH] = 0.5 g L−1, T = 20 °C, 200 rpm, neutral pH.
Molecules 30 04595 g007
Figure 8. Bmim+ adsorption capacity along five consecutive cycles. [N2/KOH] = 0.5 g L−1, [BmimNTf2] = 1 mM, T = 20 °C, 200 rpm, neutral pH.
Figure 8. Bmim+ adsorption capacity along five consecutive cycles. [N2/KOH] = 0.5 g L−1, [BmimNTf2] = 1 mM, T = 20 °C, 200 rpm, neutral pH.
Molecules 30 04595 g008
Table 1. A compilation of ILs adsorption studies from aqueous phase.
Table 1. A compilation of ILs adsorption studies from aqueous phase.
ILsMaterialTreatmentAC CharacteristicsAdsorption TestsAdsorption Capacity (mmol g–1)Significant Results/
Best Operating Conditions
Ref.
BmimBF4
BmimCl
BmimMeSO3
BmimNTf2
BmimOTf
BmimPF6
EmimNTf2
HmimCl
HmimPF6
OmimBF4
OmimCl
OmimPF6
Commercial AC (Merck) No treatment,
Thermal treatment
(900 °C)
Nitric acid oxidation (900 °C)
Ammonium persulfate oxidations (900 °C)
ABET = 494–932 m2 g−1C0 = 0–5 mM
W = 250 mg L−1
T = 25–55 °C
Neutral pH
qL = 0.14–1.3qL = 1.32 mmolOmim+ g−1
IL: OmimPF6
T: 35 °C
AC: similar in all cases
Palomar et al., 2009 [42]
BmimCl
OmimCl
OpyBr
2 commercial ACs (China and Calgon) ArtichokesThe commercial carbons were washed and dried (110 °C)
Artichokes were activated using phosphoric acid
ABET = 984–2106 m2 g−1
pHPZC = 6–9.5
C0 = 0–20 mM
W = 1000–2000 mg L−1
T = 20–55 °C
pH = 2–9
qe = 0.4–2.3 qe = 2.3 mmolOmim+ g−1
IL: OmimCl
pH: 9
AC: Artichokes AC (pHPZC = 6; highest O content)
Farooq et al., 2012 [43]
EmimCl
BmimCl
HmimCl
OmimCl
DmimCl
DdmimCl
TdmimCl
HdmimCl
EmimBF4
BmimBF4
HmimBF4
OmimBF4
DmimBF4
DdmimBF4
EmimPF6
BmimPF6
HmimPF6
OmimPF6
DmimPF6
DdmimPF6
EmimNTf2
PrmimNTf2
BmimNTf2
HmimNTf2
BmimOTf
BmimTFA
BmimMeSO3
5 commercial ACs (CAPSUPER, SXPLUS, GXS, Merck and ENA250G), silica and aluminaNo treatment, thermal treatment (900 °C) and nitric acid oxidation.ABET = 79–1915 m2 g−1
pHSlurry= 3.3–8.1
C0 = 0–5 mM
W = 250 mg L−1
T = 35 °C
Neutral pH
qL = 0.05–3.5qL = 3.5 mmolOmim+ g−1
IL: OmimPF6
T: 35 °C
AC: CAPSUPER (highest ABET)
Lemus et al., 2012 [24]
BmimBr
OmimBr
DdmimBr
Bis–DdmimBr
BmpyrrBr
OmpyrrBr
BpyBr
OpyBr
2 commercial ACs (China and fabric AC (900-20 from Kuraray))Washed with HCl and Milli-Q water and dried (110 °C)ABET = 1044–1910 m2 g−1
pHPZC = 8–8.7
C0 = 0–10 mM
W = 2000 mg L−1
T = 25–55 °C
pH = 7
qL = 0.23–1.4qL = 1.4 mmolDdmim+ g−1
IL: OmimPF6
T: 35 °C
AC: fabric AC (highest ABET and micropore area)
Hassan et al., 2014 [44]
BmimCl
Bmim MeSO3
BmimOTf
BmimNTf2
BmpyNTf2
Commercial AC (Merck)No treatmentABET = 927 m2 g−1C0 = 100–500 mg L−1
W = 250 mg L−1
T = 35 °C
Neutral pH
Na2SO4 = 0–1.76 mM
qL = 0.13–1.41qL = 1.41 mmolBmpy+ g−1
IL: BmpyNTf2
T: 35 °C
AC: Merck
Neves et al., 2014 [45]
EmimCl
HmimCl
OmimCl
BmimTFA
BmimBF4
BmimOTf
BmimPF6
BmimNTf2
CelluloseHydrothermal carbonization (250 °C, 10 h) and KOH activation (400–800 °C)ABET = 289–838 m2 g−1C0 = 0–5 mM
W = 2500 mg L−1
T = 25 °C
Neutral pH
qL = 0.43–0.95qL = 0.95 mmolOmim+ g−1
IL: OmimCl
T: 25 °C
AC: Cellulose AC
Wang et al., 2015 [46]
EmimBF4
EmimPF6
EmimNTf2
BmimBF4
PmimBF4
Straw ashes
Wood
Straw ashes: washed with HCl and water
Wood: slow pyrolysis (700 °C, 6 h)
ABET = 465–1268 m2 g−1C0 = 0.5–3 mM
W = 4000 mg L−1
T = 25 °C
Neutral pH
qL = 0.15–0.40qL = 0.4 mmolPmim+ g−1
IL: PmimBF4
T: 25 °C
AC: Cellulose AC
Shi et al., 2016 [47]
BmimClPeanut shell
Corn stalk
Wheat straw
Pyrolysis (700 °C, 2 h), KOH activation (700 °C, 2 h) and washed with HCl and water. Oxidation with (NH4)2S2O8 at room temperatureABET = 1283–1347 m2 g−1C0 = 0–8 mM
W = 1200 mg L−1
T = 25 °C
pH: 4.0–10.0
qL = 0.61–0.85qL = 0.85 mmolBmim+ g−1
IL: BmimCl
T: 25 °C
AC: Peanut shell AC oxidized with (NH4)2S2O8
Yu et al., 2016a [48]
BmimClBambooPyrolysis (700 °C, 2 h), KOH activation (700 °C, 2 h) and washed with HCl and water. Oxidation with (NH4)2S2O8 at room temperatureABET = 1137–1195 m2 g−1C0 = 0–8 mM
W = 1200 mg L−1
T = 25 °C
pH: 4.0–10.0
qL = 0.51–0.56qL = 0.56 mmolBmim+ g−1
IL: BmimCl
T: 25 °C
AC: Bamboo Ac oxidized with (NH4)2S2O8
Yu et al., 2016b [49]
BmimCl
HmimCl
OmimCl
Cambridge filter Japan ACIntroduced in an adsorption columnABET = 1300 m2 g−1C0 = 2.74 mM
W = 1200 mg L−1
T = 30–50 °C
Neutral pH
qL = 0.40–0.70qL = 0.70 mmolOmim+ g−1
IL: OmimCl
T: 30 °C
AC: Cambridge filter Japan AC
Ushiki et al., 2017 [50]
BmimCl
OmimCl
HdmimCl
Ordered microporous carbon ZTC, ordered mesoporous carbon CMK–3 and 2 commercial AC (coconut-shell-derived activated carbon (HuaJing Co.), Filtrasorb-300 (Calgon Carbon Co.))Ordered microporous carbon: Y zeolite with chemical carbon deposition of acetylene (550 °C, 5 h) and pyrolysis (850 °C, 6 h).
Ordered mesoporous carbon: SBA-15 mixed with sucrose, pyrolysis (850 °C, 6 h). Both materials were washed with HF and water to remove the zeolite.
ABET = 631–1610 m2 g−1C0 = 0–1.25 mM
W = 250–750 mg L−1
T = 20 °C
pH: 3.5–10.0
qL = 0.18–3.40qL = 3.40 mmolHdmim+ g−1
IL: HdmimCl
T: 20 °C
AC: Ordered microporous carbon ZTC
Zhang et al., 2018a [51]
BmimClOrdered mesoporous carbon CMK–3 and AC (Filtrasorb-300, Calgon)Ordered mesoporous carbon: SBA-15 mixed with sucrose, pyrolysis (850 °C, 5 h) and washed with HF and water to remove the silica. Both materials were oxidized using HNO3 ABET = 762–1078 m2 g−1C0 = 0–0.98 mM
W = 250 mg L−1
T = 25–45 °C
pH: 2.0–10.0
qL = 0.23–0.87qL = 0.87 mmolBmim+ g−1
IL: BmimCl
T: 25 °C
AC: OMC oxidized with 6 M HNO3
Zhang et al., 2018b [52]
Table 2. Characterization of the activated carbons.
Table 2. Characterization of the activated carbons.
MaterialAdsorption-Desorption N2 IsothermElemental Analysis Ash (%)TPDpHslurry
ABET (m2/g)Vmeso (cm3/g)Vmicro (cm3/g)C (%)H (%)N (%)S
(%)
O * (%)CO (µmol/g)CO2 (µmol/g)
Merck8820.0400.36889.540.670.530.733.794.735443227.7
Chem13920.1700.54984.300.251.300.099.264.8011575426.2
GXS10650.2700.39186.701.000.580.782.538.417853505.0
N2/KOH13040.0290.60570.320.900.220.0312.9315.68674918.0
HTC/KOH8150.0250.35474.330.930.280.148.1616.37254419.0
* Oxygen content calculated by difference: O = 100 − %C − %H − %N − %S − %Ash.
Table 3. Langmuir parameters for ILs adsorption on the ACs.
Table 3. Langmuir parameters for ILs adsorption on the ACs.
ILACpHqL Cation (mmol g−1)kL Cation
(L mmol−1)
r2qL Anion (mmol g–1)kL Anion
(L mmol–1)
r2qL Cation/qL AnionKOW *
BmimClMerckNeutral (7.3)0.293 ± 0.0048.86 ± 0.890.9950.242 ± 0.0204.75 ± 2.100.8821.210.0012
BmimAcMerckNeutral (7.5)0.861 ± 0.0890.902 ± 0.2910.9460.973 ± 0.0690.597 ± 0.1100.9860.880.9126
BmimMeSO4MerckNeutral (7.5)0.707 ± 0.0352.97 ± 0.670.9630.725 ± 0.0261.64 ± 0.2300.9890.980.0085
BmimNTf2MerckNeutral (7.6)1.08 ± 0.03313.2 ± 2.790.9751.05 ± 0.0378.01 ± 1.720.9711.032754.2
BmimNTf2ChemNeutral (7.6)0.990 ± 0.0135.81 ± 0.430.9961.01 ± 0.023.03 ± 0.300.9930.98
BmimNTf2NoritNeutral (7.6)0.850 ± 0.0214.77 ± 0.620.9880.912 ± 0.0332.02 ± 0.300.9850.93
BmimNTf2Merck41.74 ± 0.092.57 ± 0.570.9711.87 ± 0.111.39 ± 0.290.9760.93
BmimNTf2Merck80.851 ± 0.02712.5 ± 2.520.9750.893 ± 0.0322.54 ± 0.400.9830.95
BmimNTf2HTC/KOHNeutral (7.6)1.31 ± 0.054.64 ± 1.020.9721.39 ± 0.0802.00 ± 0.460.9690.94
BmimNTf2N2/KOHNeutral (7.6)2.36 ± 0.0713.1 ± 2.70.0982.51 ± 0.054.08 ± 0.410.9930.94
BmimNTf2N2/KOH43.36 ± 0.186.13 ± 1.880.9663.53 ± 0.141.92 ± 0.280.9890.95
EmimNTf2N2/KOHNeutral (7.6)1.55 ± 0.02525.2 ± 2.860.9931.60 ± 0.057.88 ± 1.570.9770.97323.59
HmimNTf2N2/KOHNeutral (7.7)2.77 ± 0.145.34 ± 1.170.9612.89 ± 0.143.06 ± 0.600.9920.9616,762
OmimNTf2N2/KOHNeutral (7.7)3.20 ± 0.155.46 ± 0.600.9952.91 ± 0.377.28 ± 2.480.9621.10809,717
* Kow values have been estimated by COSMO-RS.
Table 4. ILs used in this study.
Table 4. ILs used in this study.
ILAbbreviationPurity (%)
1–Ethyl–3–methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imideEmimNTf299
1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium chlorideBmimCl98
1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium acetateBmimAc>95
1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium methylsulfateBmimMeSO4>95
1–Butyl–3–methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imideBmimNTf299
1–Hexyl–3–methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imideHmimNTf299
3–Methyl–1–octylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imideOmimNTf299
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

F. Mena, I.; Diaz, E.; Palomar, J.; F. Mohedano, A. Adsorption of Imidazolium-Based ILs Combined on Activated Carbon Obtained from Grape Seeds. Molecules 2025, 30, 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234595

AMA Style

F. Mena I, Diaz E, Palomar J, F. Mohedano A. Adsorption of Imidazolium-Based ILs Combined on Activated Carbon Obtained from Grape Seeds. Molecules. 2025; 30(23):4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234595

Chicago/Turabian Style

F. Mena, Ismael, Elena Diaz, Jose Palomar, and Angel F. Mohedano. 2025. "Adsorption of Imidazolium-Based ILs Combined on Activated Carbon Obtained from Grape Seeds" Molecules 30, no. 23: 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234595

APA Style

F. Mena, I., Diaz, E., Palomar, J., & F. Mohedano, A. (2025). Adsorption of Imidazolium-Based ILs Combined on Activated Carbon Obtained from Grape Seeds. Molecules, 30(23), 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234595

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop