Next Article in Journal
Elucidation of the Neuroprotective Effects of Astaxanthin Against Amyloid β Toxicity in the SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Phosphomolybdates on Flame Retardancy and Smoke Suppression of PVC Matrix Flame Retardant Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Parametric Studies of Polyacrylamide Adsorption on Calcite Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials

by
Viorel Chihaia
1,* and
Godehard Sutmann
2,3,*
1
Institute of Physical Chemistry “Ilie Murgulescu” of the Romanian Academy, Splaiul Independentei 202, Sector 6, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany
3
Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulations (ICAMS), Ruhr Universität Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(21), 4270; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30214270
Submission received: 14 October 2025 / Accepted: 29 October 2025 / Published: 3 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials)
The accelerating demand for energy, coupled with the ongoing depletion of conventional energy resources and environmental problems, poses a critical challenge to the scientific community [1]. Addressing this challenge requires the development of innovative materials capable of generating, converting, storing, and utilizing energy in ways that are both sustainable and environmentally benign [2]. Understanding these complex systems—spanning diverse phenomena and interacting across multiple spatial (from atomic to macroscopic) and temporal (from femtoseconds to years) scales—demands an integrated scientific approach [3]. While experimental research remains essential in uncovering the behavior of energy materials, especially under harsh environmental conditions, many microscopic-scale mechanisms remain poorly understood [4]. This is where molecular-level computational simulations can play an important role. Advances in computer molecular sciences now offer powerful methods for probing the structure, dynamics, and reactivity of materials at the atomic and molecular levels, complementing experimental findings and offering predictive insights [5]. In particular, molecular simulations—encompassing static modeling, molecular dynamics, and Monte Carlo methods—enable the exploration of energy materials under various conditions [6]. These approaches can operate across quantum, classical, and coarse-grained frameworks, each providing valuable perspectives on intra- and intermolecular forces. Quantum mechanical methods reveal critical details of electronic structure, which underpin macroscopic properties and device performance [7], while atomistic and coarse-grained simulations offer scalable insights into larger systems and longer-time-scale processes [8]. To fully capture the multiscale nature of energy materials, there is a growing need to integrate particle-based methods with continuum models through multiresolution and multiscale approaches [9,10]. Such hybrid strategies promise to deepen our understanding of the fundamental phenomena governing the behavior of materials in real-world energy and environmental applications.
This Special Issue aims to highlight recent advances in atomic-scale simulation methods and their application to energy materials science. Contributions demonstrate how computational tools provide crucial insights into the design, characterization, and optimization of materials for a sustainable energy future. The main investigated properties and phenomena are summarized in Table 1.
Hydrogen production through solar-driven photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting represents one of the most promising pathways toward sustainable energy. However, traditional semiconductors such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) face key limitations, such as a wide bandgap and poor conductivity. In this context, Akbar et al. (contribution 1) employ density functional theory (DFT) to explore how doping TiO2 with transition metals (Ag, Fe, and Co) can improve its visible-light absorption and charge transport. Their comparative analysis of dopants, using GGA+U and hybrid functionals, illustrates how atomistic modifications influence electronic structure, optical response, and mechanical stability—ultimately guiding the rational design of efficient photocatalysts.
Alongside efforts in hydrogen production, the search for cost-effective electrocatalysts for fuel cells remains a critical area of research. Fe–N–C systems, especially FeN4-doped graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), have emerged as high-potential non-precious metal catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions (ORRs). Mineva et al. (contribution 2) present a DFT-based study on how dopant position, edge termination, and spin ordering affect the electronic and magnetic properties of FeN4-GNR systems. Their work provides insights into spin polarization control and its implications for catalytic activity, highlighting potential applications in spintronic devices and magneto-electronic catalysis.
Hydrogen separation technologies are equally crucial in advancing the hydrogen economy. Rosen and Sohlberg (contribution 3) investigate dual-phase perovskite materials (BaCe0.85Fe0.15O3−δ/BaCe0.15Fe0.85O3−δ) using DFT and first-principles thermodynamics. Their work focuses on surface reduction, vacancy formation, and thermodynamic stability under hydrogen-rich conditions. By constructing Gibbs free energy profiles and analyzing defect behavior, their study informs the design of stable, high-performance materials for applications such as proton-conducting membranes and hydrogen purification systems.
The importance of solvation effects in photophysics is explored by Manian et al. (contribution 4), who focus on xanthione—a sulfur-containing polycyclic aromatic compound known for its unusual anti-Kasha behavior and high solvent sensitivity. Through a hybrid approach combining quantum chemistry and MD simulations, the authors assess how different solvation models (implicit vs. explicit) impact the molecule’s excited-state dynamics. Their findings emphasize the necessity of explicit solvent modeling for accurately capturing the photophysical behavior of solvent-sensitive materials, with implications for quantum photonics, molecular electronics, and light-harvesting systems.
The intersection of quantum mechanics and energy storage is exemplified by Liu and Hanna (contribution 5), who explore quantum batteries—devices that utilize quantum coherence to store and transfer energy via excitonic mechanisms. Their simulation-based study introduces a symmetry-enabled open quantum network model, revealing how exchange symmetry and decoherence affect energy retention and transfer dynamics. This work opens new directions in quantum energy material research, bridging condensed matter physics and nanoscale energy design.
On the molecular scale, wettability and interfacial dynamics play a critical role in enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Ahmadi and Chen (contribution 6) use MD simulations to investigate how asphaltene concentration in oil droplets affects their adsorption on quartz surfaces, particularly under high-temperature conditions relevant to Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD). Their study uncovers the interplay between oil composition, temperature, and surface interactions, offering mechanistic insights into thermally induced wettability alteration and interfacial behavior in heavy oil reservoirs.
Subsurface challenges such as solid production in carbonate reservoirs can be addressed through atomistic modeling. Hue et al. (contribution 7) simulate the adsorption of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) on calcite surfaces using classical MD in isothermal–isobaric ensembles. Their results provide critical data for designing polymer-based additives to stabilize formation rock and prevent damage, optimizing EOR strategies under varying geochemical conditions.
Grenev and colleagues (contribution 8) conducted a computational screening study to identify metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and zeolites with high potential for helium/nitrogen (He/N2) separation—an increasingly important challenge in industrial gas purification. Given helium’s vital role in fields such as cryogenics and nuclear technology, along with its growing scarcity, there is an urgent need for efficient, selective, and cost-effective separation materials. This study highlights the power of high-throughput molecular simulations in accelerating the discovery of porous materials with optimized pore architectures and sorption properties tailored to specific gas separation tasks. By screening over 10,000 MOFs and 218 zeolites, Grenev and colleagues demonstrated the ability to identify materials with superior adsorption and membrane selectivity for helium/nitrogen separation. The computational approach not only pinpointed the top-performing frameworks but also established structure–performance relationships, such as optimal pore-limiting diameters and accessible surface areas, which are critical for efficient separation. This methodology exemplifies how computational tools can streamline the design and selection of materials for industrial applications, reducing reliance on costly and time-consuming experimental trials.
This Special Issue highlights how first-principles and molecular dynamics simulations are transforming energy research across scales—from electronic structure and spin dynamics to interfacial phenomena and bulk material performance. Each contribution demonstrates the value of atomistic insights in guiding experimental design, improving material functionality, and enabling innovation in sustainable energy technologies. As computational power and theoretical models continue to evolve, molecular simulation will remain a cornerstone of next-generation material science and molecular engineering.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DFTDensity Functional Theory
TDDFTTime-Dependent DFT
QCQuantum Chemical
CFFClassical Force-Field
GOGeometry Optimization
MCMonte Carlo
GCMCGrand Canonical Monte Carlo
MDMolecular Dynamics
SAGDSteam-Assisted Gravity Drainage
HPAMHydrolyzed Polyacrylamide
MOFMetal–Organic Frameworks

List of Contributions

References

  1. Chu, S.; Majumdar, A. Opportunities and Challenges for a Sustainable Energy Future. Nature 2012, 488, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Armaroli, N.; Balzani, V. Energy for a Sustainable World: From the Oil Age to a Sun-Powered Future; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schmauder, S.; Schäfer, I. (Eds.) Multiscale Materials Modeling: Approaches to Full Multiscaling; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jun, H.K.; Low, F.W. (Eds.) Materials for Energy Conversion and Storage; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Walsh, A.; Sokol, A.A.; Catlow, C.R.A. (Eds.) Computational Approaches to Energy Materials; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, L. (Ed.) Molecular Dynamics—Theoretical Developments and Applications in Nanotechnology and Energy; InTech: Vienna, Austria, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, J.; Zhang, X.; Wei, S.-H. Advances and challenges in DFT-based energy materials design. Chin. Phys. B 2022, 31, 107105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jin, J.; Pak, A.J.; Durumeric, A.E.P.; Loose, T.D.; Voth, G.A. Bottom-up Coarse-Graining: Principles and Perspectives. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 5759–5791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wehinger, G.D.; Ambrosetti, M.; Cheula, R.; Ding, Z.-B.; Isoz, M.; Kreitz, B.; Kuhlmann, K.; Kutscherauer, M.; Niyogi, K.; Poissonnier, J.; et al. Quo vadis multiscale modeling in reaction engineering?—A perspective. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 184, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fish, J.; Wagner, G.J.; Keten, S. Mesoscopic and multiscale modelling in materials. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. The properties, phenomena, and simulation methods involved in the articles of the present Special Issue dedicated to molecular simulations for energy materials.
Table 1. The properties, phenomena, and simulation methods involved in the articles of the present Special Issue dedicated to molecular simulations for energy materials.
ContributionTopicProperties StudiedPhenomenaSimulation Methods a
1Doped TiO2 (Ag, Fe, Co) for water splittingBand gap, elastic constants, mechanical stabilityDoping, water dissociation, light absorption, photoconductivityDFT calculations
2FeN4-doped graphene nanoribbonsSpin distribution, electronic structure, magnetismEffect of dopant position and edge termination on electronic/magnetic propertiesSpin-polarized DFT
3Mixed-metal oxide perovskites (BaCe–Fe–O)Thermodynamic stability, surface reduction energy, oxygen vacancy behaviorSurface dehydration, H2 interaction, defect formationDFT-based thermodynamics
4Xanthione in polar solventsElectronic transitions, solvent sensitivity, photostabilitySolvent effect on excited states, non-Kasha behaviorTDDFT, QC-MD, explicit and implicit solvent
5Quantum battery networkExciton population, energy retention, site energy influenceDark state storage, discharge dynamics, exciton transferOpen quantum network theory, quantum dynamics simulations
6SAGD process–bitumen/quartz interactionWettability, adsorption energy, surface affinityWetting alteration under high temperature, asphaltene adsorptionCFF-MD, with varying
conditions
7HPAM polymer on calciteAdsorption behavior, interaction strength, effect of ionic environmentPolymer adsorption, salt-bridging, charge screeningCFF-MD simulations
8MOFs and zeolites for He/N2 separationHenry’s constant, diffusion coefficients, selectivity, permeabilityGas adsorption, diffusion, and membrane-based separationGCMC,
Equilibrium CFF-MD
a see the short notations listed in the Abbreviations section.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chihaia, V.; Sutmann, G. Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials. Molecules 2025, 30, 4270. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30214270

AMA Style

Chihaia V, Sutmann G. Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials. Molecules. 2025; 30(21):4270. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30214270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chihaia, Viorel, and Godehard Sutmann. 2025. "Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials" Molecules 30, no. 21: 4270. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30214270

APA Style

Chihaia, V., & Sutmann, G. (2025). Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials. Molecules, 30(21), 4270. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30214270

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop