1. Introduction
Skin aging is a biological phenomenon that the body inevitably undergoes during the natural physiological process. As we age, the ability of keratinocytes to synthesize moisturizing factors such as amino acids and urea diminishes, preventing the intercellular spaces of the stratum corneum from being adequately filled. This leads to a loosening of the barrier structure, directly resulting in a continuous increase in transepidermal water loss (TEWL): Individuals under 20 years old generally exhibit lower TEWL values, with most falling within the range of 8–10 g/(m
2·h). Even when TEWL temporarily rises to around 12 g/(m
2·h) due to brief stressors (such as staying up late or mild sunburn), the skin can rapidly activate metabolic mechanisms to repair barrier damage and return to normal levels within a short period. As age increases from 20 to 40 years old, TEWL values gradually rise from 10 g/(m
2·h) to 20 g/(m
2·h). Compared to earlier ages, TEWL values nearly double in individuals over 40 years old. Persistently elevated TEWL levels disrupt cellular metabolism, leading to a significant increase in free radicals produced by mitochondria. Excessive free radicals attack collagen, elastic fibers, and cellular DNA [
1]. When this damage exceeds the body’s repair capacity, it can lead to skin pigmentation or spots [
2]. When aging skin is injured, it can result in the formation of a wound that may remain unhealed for months or even years [
3]. At the same time, it is often accompanied by issues such as bacterial infections. The most common pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, not only produces multiple toxins that destroy skin tissue but also resists phagocytic clearance, exacerbating wound inflammation, suppuration, and even triggering systemic infections. Additionally, wounds may harbor mixed infections involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and other pathogens. Therefore, it is an extremely important method in the medical aesthetics industry to artificially replenish skin moisture and delay skin aging. Currently, the main material used for filling and hydration in the medical aesthetics industry is hyaluronic acid, also known as hyaluronan. As a hydrating material injected into the dermal layer, it has good biocompatibility and plasticity. However, its high cost, short duration, unstable filling strength, and potential for causing allergies limit its use [
4].
Gamma-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA) is a homogeneous polypeptide formed by the polymerization of left- and right-handed optically active glutamic acid monomers through amide bonds at the gamma position [
5]. It has many advantages, such as good biocompatibility, biodegradability, moisturizing properties, and antibacterial properties [
6]. Therefore, γ-PGA, as a biosynthetic polymer material with many advantages, has shown great potential in various fields, including agriculture [
7,
8], clinical medicine [
9], drug delivery [
10], food industry [
11], environmental remediation [
12], and cosmetics [
13]. Especially, due to its rich carboxyl groups and modifiability, it has shown outstanding results in skin repair and beauty applications to combine γ-PGA with sodium hyaluronate (HA) to prepare injectable hydrogels [
14]. Dou et al. introduced a physically crosslinked gelatin network into a covalently crosslinked γ-PGA network. The γ-PGA-GEL double network hydrogel exhibited good compressive strength (38 MPa) and tensile strength (0.27 MPa). In animal experiments, the wound healing rate was 18% higher than that of the control group [
15]. Baines et al. demonstrated that γ-PGA can significantly improve the swelling potential of hydrogels. Interestingly, they found that whey protein isolate (WPI) and γ-PGA formed a spherical morphology under some unknown interactions. Therefore, they proposed that if spherical aggregates could continuously induce and establish self-assembly mechanisms, it might be able to further encapsulate drugs [
16]. The carboxymethyl chitosan/γ-PGA/tannic acid/carbazole hydrogel, prepared by Mirzamani et al., represents a hydrogel formulation system for the sustained release of carbamazepine. They studied the drug release mechanism through a kinetic model and determined that it is through reducing bacterial colonization in tissues and regulating the inflammatory phase that hydrogels accelerate the healing of MRSA-infected wounds [
17].
The wide range of applications for γ-PGA hydrogels has led to the emergence of various preparation methods, such as radiation crosslinking and chemical crosslinking [
18,
19]. In 1937, Lvanovic first discovered γ-PGA in the capsule of
Bacillus anthracis. In 1942, Bovarnick extracted γ-PGA from the fermentation broth of
Bacillus subtilis—the first time γ-PGA was obtained through microbial fermentation. In the 1950s, Record et al. began to study the chemical composition, physical properties, and main functions [
20]. Soon after, Hungarian scholars synthesized γ-PGA via peptide synthesis by linking precursor glutamic acid fragments. Researchers have also discovered γ-PGA in Japanese natto, Korean cheonggukjang mucilage,
Bacillus licheniformis,
Bacillus subtilis and other sources [
21]. Among them,
Bacillus licheniformis and
Bacillus subtilis are widely used in related research and industrial fermentation production due to their non-pathogenicity and strong γ-PGA production capacity [
22]. There are three methods for γ-PGA production: synthetic methods, enzymatic conversion, and microbial fermentation. The first two have limitations (low yield, impure products, cumbersome operation, and high waste), so microbial fermentation is currently the primary method. However, there are still some issues to be used as a medical aesthetic product or antimicrobial material [
16]. Wooyoung Kim et al. used positively charged biomaterials (such as chitosan) that can interact electrostatically with γ-PGA as additives to prepare a γ-PGA-based thermosensitive injectable hydrogel formulation, which changes its state in response to changes in human body temperature. This is undoubtedly an excellent drug delivery method. But micelles formed through non-covalent bonds (such as hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions) are likely to be less stable than those formed through chemical cross-linking to form covalent bonds. They may disassemble more quickly in the body, affecting the stability of the material [
23]. To address the issues of insufficient crosslinking and stability, some researchers often adopt a dual crosslinking strategy to prepare injectable hydrogels with adjustable crosslinking degrees. However, the introduction of ultraviolet cross-linking may damage bioactive molecules in hydrogels, such as proteins and active peptides, severely affecting their function, and may also cause damage to normal cells and tissues [
24,
25]. Chemical cross-linking processes may result in residual cross-linking agents, which can cause cytotoxic reactions and greatly limit the promotion and application of materials. In addition, endotoxins are also a safety issue that cannot be ignored in γ-PGA-based materials [
26]. Since γ-PGA is a biopolymer produced by microbial fermentation, even low concentrations of endotoxins can trigger severe inflammatory reactions, leading to serious consequences such as fever, shock, and even multiple organ failure. Therefore, endotoxin levels must be strictly controlled. Based on internationally accepted standards, the endotoxin threshold for injectable solutions is typically 0.5 EU/mL [
27].
Single γ-PGA micelles serve as promising medical aesthetic materials, though their antimicrobial efficacy remains limited. Increasing their concentration significantly enhances antibacterial activity. Ajayeoba Titilayo A et al. investigated γ-PGA produced by Bacillus species, revealing that composite γPGA polymers exhibit superior bactericidal activity compared to individual γPGA molecules. Moreover, the vast majority of γPGA polymers demonstrated ACE properties [
28]. Eman M. Elsayed et al. validated γ-PGA’s inhibitory effects on Gram-positive bacteria (
Staphylococcus aureus and
Streptococcus pyogenes) and Gram-negative bacteria (
Klebsiella pneumoniae and
Escherichia coli) through in vivo and in vitro experiments. Notably, γ-PGA exhibited stronger inhibitory effects against Gram-positive bacteria [
29]. Research indicates that bacterial cell growth can significantly reduce material hydrophilicity and anionic properties [
30]. This occurs because carboxyl groups on γ-PGA molecular chains adsorb metal ions like Ca
2+ and Mg
2+, impairing bacterial cell membrane stability and enzyme activation, thereby weakening γ-PGA’s antimicrobial efficacy. Given γ-PGA’s water retention and antimicrobial properties, its application in hydrogel dressings is highly suitable, addressing issues such as insufficient moisture retention in wound dressings [
31]. Currently, in the antimicrobial application of hydrogel materials, Choi et al. have reported that ultra-high molecular weight γ-PGA hydrogels promote wound healing [
32]. Xu et al. also developed electrospun fiber scaffolds based on γ-PGA for preventing hypertrophic scars [
33]. Although γ-PGA materials exhibit certain antimicrobial properties, their antibacterial effects are often transient in practical applications due to the absence of antimicrobial drugs [
34]. Yang Qu et al. combined γ-PGA with antimicrobial silver nanoparticles, achieving over 90% antibacterial efficacy against
Staphylococcus aureus and
Escherichia coli. However, the selection of antimicrobial agents and their loading quantities require further optimization to ensure long-term antibacterial efficacy and biosafety [
35].
Therefore, this study developed two γ-PGA-based products (
Figure 1): a novel injectable micelle, HA/γ-PGA/tyramine hydrochloride (Tyr·HCl) that can replace hyaluronic acid and a dressing with antibacterial effects. HA/γ-PGA/Tyr·HCl injectable micelles can ensure both stability and safety: Chemical modification of Tyr·HCl to introduce additional cross-linking points increases the cross-linking density of the hydrogel, thereby improving its mechanical stability and durability. HA can regulate material viscosity to suit different needs, and can also adsorb large amounts of water molecules on polysaccharide chains to form a stable hydration layer, thereby increasing the stability and anti-aggregation ability of micelles. HA and γ-PGA, two natural substances, can form stable covalent bonds under the action of EDC/NHS chemical crosslinking agents, and ultimately crosslink with Tyr·HCl to form a triple network structure. These effectively solve the problem of poor micelle stability. At the same time, ultrafiltration redissolution is used to remove endotoxins and residual cross-linking agents, ensuring particle purity and material safety and avoiding cytotoxic reactions. Furthermore, the material can exist in the form of freeze-dried powder after ultrafiltration, which is easier to store [
35]. Another product is wound dressing prepared by loading antimicrobial drugs such as penicillin or benzalkonium chloride onto γ-PGA: Its antibacterial efficacy is approximately three times that of existing commercial medical dressings. Therefore, it has a significant competitive advantage in the market.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials
The polyglutamic acid is provided as raw material and subsequently polymer-ized/cross-linked by Jilin Folialux Bio-tech Company Limited (Changchun, China) [
36]. Tyramine hydrochloride was purchased from Shanghai McLean Biochemistry and Technology Company Limited (Shanghai, China). Ethyldimethylaminopropyl Carbodiimide was purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Science and Technology Company Limite (Shanghai, China). N-Hydroxysuccinimide was purchased from Shanghai McLean Biochemistry and Technology Company Limited (Shanghai, China). Sodium hyaluronate was purchased from Huaxi Biotech Company Limited (Jinan, China), specifically classified as medical device hyaluronic acid sodium-HA-EP2. Amicon
® Ultra-15 ultrafiltration centrifuge tubes were purchased from Millipore Company Limited (Hangzhou, China). H&E staining and Masson’s trichrome staining reagents were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Biotechnology Company Limited (Beijing, China).
3.2. Preparation of Injectable Micelles
At room temperature, 3–9 parts by weight of γ-polyglutamic acid and 2–7 parts by weight of tyramine hydrochloride were dissolved in 40–60 parts by weight of distilled water. After they were completely dissolved, 1–5 parts by weight of 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) was added. The mixture was stirred thoroughly to form the first solution. Next, an equal amount of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) was added to the first solution (
Figure S1A). This step helped obtain the second solution. Subsequently, 0.1–0.5 parts by weight of a viscosity modifier (sodium hyaluronate) was incorporated into the second solution. The mixture was stirred at 37 °C. A magnetic stirrer or water bath was used for stirring. The stirring continued until the modifier was completely dissolved and uniformly dispersed. The resulting solution formed an improved hydrogel with a triple-crosslinked structure (
Figure S1B). Thereafter, the triple-crosslinked hydrogel solution was transferred to an ultrafiltration centrifuge tube (
Figure S2). It was then subjected to ultrafiltration and centrifugation. Finally, the ultrafiltered solute was redissolved in water. This formed an injectable γ-polyglutamic acid-based hydrocapsule (
Figure S1C).
3.3. Preparation of Freeze-Dried Powder
Impurities were removed from the solution through filtration or centrifugation, a process intended to purify the system. Next, the solution concentration underwent adjustment via evaporation or dilution, a step designed to facilitate subsequent freeze-drying. A shaping agent was incorporated, with the mixture thoroughly stirred before transfer to appropriate containers. The solution underwent rapid freezing at low temperatures, a treatment aimed at promoting the formation of small ice crystals—initial freezing occurred at −80 °C overnight. Test tube caps were opened and covered with hole-punched aluminum foil prior to being returned to the freezer. Samples were prepared in a freeze-dryer, with the resulting powder collected in a sterile, dry environment to prevent contamination or moisture absorption. Finally, the powder was sealed in moisture-proof, light-resistant packaging, which was then stored in a cool, dry environment; temperature and humidity fluctuations were avoided to maintain product stability.
3.4. Preparation of Antimicrobial Dressings
Next, 100 mg of γ-PGA and an appropriate amount of alanine were dissolved in 15 mL of 1 × 10−5 mol/L NaOH solution (pH 9.0), with stirring at 45 °C and 550 rpm for 30 min to ensure full dissolution. Then, 300 mg of chitosan (CS) was then added to the solution, followed by stirring at 550 rpm for 5 min—a step to achieve uniform distribution. Next, 5 mL of 4% glacial acetic acid solution was added dropwise at 10 drops per minute to the CS/γ-PGA mixture, with continuous stirring at 550 rpm and 45 °C for 45 min to promote reaction. The precursor slurry, ready for shaping, was slowly poured into a 9 cm diameter Petri dish and heat-dried overnight at 45 °C, a process forming the precursor hydrogel. Immersion in 15 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution for 2 h was followed by rinsing with deionized water until the eluate’s pH remained constant, a treatment to neutralize excess acid. Finally, the hydrogel was placed at 45 °C until constant weight, completing the preparation of the hydrogel material.
A 1% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) solution was prepared first. The hydrogel dressing was immersed in this solution, with BAC loading controlled to 1–3% of the hydrogel’s weight. Soaking proceeded at room temperature for 2 h, a duration ensuring uniform distribution of BAC throughout the hydrogel. Post-soaking, the hydrogel surface was gently rinsed with deionized water to remove any unadsorbed BAC. Finally, the hydrogel was left to air dry at room temperature.
3.5. Test of Viscosity
The viscosity of HA/γ-PGA/Tyr·HCl precursor solution was tested using NDJ-79 Rotational Viscometer (Shanghai Genggeng Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)). The test liquid (the second solution) was slowly poured into Test Vessel II Until the liquid covered the edge of the plate. Rotor II corresponds to the flat plate measurement system, with a diameter of approximately 24 mm. The rotational speed is set to 7.5 rpm, corresponding to a shear rate of approximately 1.5–15 s−1 (refer to the rotor constant table for specifics). With the rotor fully immersed in the liquid, the test vessel was placed on the instrument’s support bracket, while the rotor was simultaneously suspended on the instrument’s coupling—ensuring complete submersion of the rotor at this stage. The motor was then started. Rotor rotation, which may be accompanied by wobbling, required adjustment: the test container was moved back and forth or side to side on the bracket to achieve concentric alignment with the rotor, a maneuver stabilizing the pointer for accurate reading.
3.6. Test of Cytotoxicity
L929 cells were cultivated in medium containing 10% serum until reaching 80–90% confluence. Trypsin was used for cell detachment, after which the cell suspension was diluted and 100 μL aliquots were added to each well of a 96-well plate. The plate was incubated at 37 °C in a cell culture incubator for 24 h, a period allowing for cell attachment. Predetermined drug concentrations were then added to each well, with incubation continued at 37 °C for another 24 h. Post-treatment, 10 μL of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37 °C for an additional 12 h. Finally, absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader, with subsequent data analysis and calculation.
3.7. Test of Hemolysis Rate
First, blood samples were collected by selecting suitable animals (such as mice) as blood donors and obtaining fresh blood. A red blood cell suspension was prepared through centrifugation and washing of the blood, with centrifugation and washing repeated to ensure thorough cleaning.
Next, the experimental setup was prepared, including a positive control group, a negative control group, and experimental groups. In the experimental groups, micelle material was brought into direct contact with the red blood cell suspension at predetermined concentration and volume ratios. The test material, once mixed with the red blood cell suspension, was incubated at 37 °C for a specified duration. Following incubation, hemolysis was observed via centrifugation. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted by measuring absorbance at a specific wavelength (e.g., 545 nm) using a spectrophotometer, with absorbance (OD value) determined in the supernatant and calculated using the following formula:
3.8. Test of Endotoxin
Given the large molecular weight of endotoxins, an ultrafiltration tube with a 100,000 molecular weight cutoff was selected. The prepared HA-γ-PGA micelle pre-solution was added to the ultrafiltration centrifuge tube, which—after capping—was placed into the centrifuge rotor and balanced. Centrifugation was conducted using a swing-bucket rotor at an appropriate centrifugal force for 15 to 60 min. For recovery of the concentrated product, a pipette (tip) was inserted into the inner tube of the ultrafiltration centrifuge tube, with the tip moved back and forth to aspirate the sample, a technique ensuring complete recovery. The filtrate remained storable in the centrifuge outer tube.
3.9. Test of Endotoxin Interference
Solutions A, B, C, and D were prepared according to
Table 1, with the test solution selected as one free of detectable endotoxins and not exceeding the maximum valid dilution (MVD).
Procedures outlined under the Limulus Reagent Sensitivity Verification Test were as follows:
The test is valid only when all parallel tubes of solution A and negative control solution D yield negative results, and results for series solution C fall within the sensitivity verification range of the horseshoe crab reagent. The geometric mean of the endpoint concentrations for series solutions C and B (Es and Et) was calculated as follows:
In the equation, Es and Et denote the logarithmic endpoint concentrations (lg) of Series Solution C and Solution B, respectively. The test substance exhibits no interference at the concentration in question when Es falls within the range of 0.5λ–2λ (inclusive) and Et lies within 0.5 Es–2 Es (inclusive). Should interference occur at a dilution factor below the MVD, the test substance solution is further diluted to a factor not exceeding the MVD, with the interference test repeated thereafter.
3.10. Test of Gel Limit
Solutions A, B, C, and D were prepared according to
Table S1, with solutions A and B formulated using the test solution at the MVD factor—confirmed to be free of interference. Procedures outlined under the Limulus Reagent Sensitivity Verification Test were followed.
Result Interpretation: Observations were made after 60 ± 2 min of incubation. (1) The test is valid if both parallel tubes of negative control solution D show negative results, both parallel tubes of positive control solution B yield positive results, and both parallel tubes of positive control solution C return positive results. (2) The test sample is deemed compliant when both parallel tubes of Solution A are negative; it is deemed noncompliant if both parallel tubes of Solution A are positive. In cases where one parallel tube of Solution A is positive and the other is negative, a retest is required. For the retest, four parallel tubes of Solution A are prepared: the test sample is considered compliant if all parallel tubes are negative, otherwise noncompliant.
3.11. Test of Subcutaneous Injection in Mice
12 Kunming mice were prepared and acclimated pre-experiment to ensure good health. The 12 mice were divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 6 mice in each group. The experiment was repeated three times to ensure statistical significance. All animal procedures were performed under inhalation anesthesia. The experiment was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Jilin University and strictly conducted in accordance with national regulations for laboratory animal management.
The prepared micelles were diluted to the appropriate concentration according to the predetermined dosage. In a biosafety cabinet, the micelle solution was drawn up with a sterile syringe; after restraining the mouse, subcutaneous injection was administered into its back at a steady rate, a technique to avoid micelle rupture. Post-injection, the mice were observed, with any abnormal reactions recorded. Regular monitoring of the mice was conducted to track behavioral changes, weight fluctuations, and physiological responses. For assessment of subcutaneous effects, selected mice underwent necropsy to observe in vivo micelle distribution.
Histological study methods: Skin from the injection site and major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys) were collected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (4 μm thick), and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson’s trichrome staining. Staining reagents were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and staining procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
3.12. Statistical Analysis
Microsoft Excel 2021 was used for data collection. Origin 2024 was used for the analysis of material properties. Microsoft PPT 2021 was used for graphical representation. SPSS 26.0 software was used to perform statistical analysis on all data. ImageJ1.54f was used for image analysis, and Microsoft PPT 2021 was used for image assembly. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined using the t-test and one-way ANOVA. Between-group variance was tested for significance, with statistical thresholds set at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001.