Next Article in Journal
Fast, Simple and Accurate Method for Simultaneous Determination of α-Lipoic Acid and Selected Thiols in Human Saliva by Capillary Electrophoresis with UV Detection and pH-Mediated Sample Stacking
Previous Article in Journal
A Turn-On Fluorescence Sensor Based on Guest-Induced Luminescence Ru(bpy)32+@UiO-66 for the Detection of Organophosphorus Pesticides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kinetic and Mechanistic Analysis of Phenol Adsorption on Activated Carbons from Kenaf
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanochemical Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons

1
Institute of Chemistry, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry & Advanced Materials and Liquid Crystal Institute, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(15), 3125; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153125
Submission received: 27 June 2025 / Revised: 22 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Porous Materials in Adsorption and Catalysis)

Abstract

Conventional methods for the synthesis of porous carbons are typically time- and energy-consuming and often contribute to the excessive accumulation of waste solvents. An alternative approach is to employ environmentally friendly procedures, such as mechanochemical synthesis, which holds great potential for large-scale production of advanced carbon-based materials in coming years. This review covers mechanochemical syntheses of highly porous carbons, with a particular focus on new adsorbents and catalysts that can be obtained from biomass. Mechanochemically assisted methods are well suited for producing highly porous carbons (e.g., ordered mesoporous carbons, hierarchical porous carbons, porous carbon fibers, and carbon–metal composites) from tannins, lignin, cellulose, coconut shells, nutshells, bamboo waste, dried flowers, and many other low-cost biomass wastes. Most mechanochemically prepared porous carbons are proposed for applications related to adsorption, catalysis, and energy storage. This review aims to offer researchers insights into the potential utilization of biowastes, facilitating the development of cost-effective strategies for the production of porous carbons that meet industrial demands.

1. Introduction

Mechanical energy can be used to induce changes in the structure and physicochemical properties of condensed matter (typically solids), leading to chemical transformations (Figure 1a) [1]. According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), a mechanochemical reaction is one that is triggered by absorption of mechanical energy [2]. Recently, mechanochemistry has re-emerged as an interesting field of chemical synthesis because it enables efficient and fast synthesis of inorganic and organic materials under solvent-free or low-solvent conditions [3]. Therefore, mechanochemistry can be considered as an environmentally friendly method. Moreover, using mechanochemistry may result in new reaction pathways and/or mechanisms that differ from conventional chemical processes [4]. Mechanochemistry may complement conventional activation methods, namely through heat, radiation, or electrochemistry [5]. Since 2005, the number of publications on ball milling synthesis has significantly increased (Figure 1b). Simultaneously, a large variety of commercially available milling devices has emerged (Figure 1c–e).
Mechanochemistry is closely related to tribochemistry, where chemical reactions take place at the interfaces between different environments. Although interest in mechanochemistry has recently grown, it still seems to be much less studied and understood compared to conventional methods of energy delivery. We believe that mechanochemistry may become a more widely adopted technique in the future for two main reasons. First, there is growing evidence that mechanochemistry can be both effective and advantageous across various areas of synthesis and manufacturing. Second, our current reliance on solvents is unsustainable, as it contributes to the generation of liquid waste, much of which is derived from fossil resources. For instance, solvents account for about 85% of the chemicals used in the pharmaceutical industry. Even with typical recovery rates of 50–80%, the environmental impact remains significant [4]. Consequently, the use of various solvents can pose significant hazards and be energy-consuming in terms of production, purification, and recycling. In mechanochemistry, solvents are either not used or are used in negligible amounts.
At present, the majority of chemicals, fuels, and materials utilized by humans are derived from non-renewable fossil resources such as petroleum, natural gas, and coal. While the global demand for energy, chemicals, and materials continues to rise, accessible fossil fuel reserves are steadily diminishing. The reliance on fossil resources not only contributes to severe environmental pollution and global climate change but also introduces economic instability due to fluctuations in petroleum-based fuel prices, which hinder sustainable development. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify renewable alternatives for the production of chemicals, fuels, and materials [6].
Porous carbons have emerged as highly valuable materials in various energy and environmental applications, including catalysis, electrochemical energy storage, and gas adsorption and separation [7,8]. In recent years, nanoporous carbons have become highly attractive materials for electrodes in supercapacitors or hybrid devices [9]. High-performance energy storage has become possible thanks to novel nanocarbons such as graphene, carbon onions or carbon nanotubes, etc. [10]. Although these materials show promising performance in future devices, their synthesis is often energy- and time-consuming and currently not feasible at ton production levels. In the industry, activated carbons are currently the most widely used porous materials. They possess high specific surface areas due to the presence of micro- and mesopores; however, they often fall short in delivering the superior energy storage performance exhibited by more advanced nanoporous carbons, such as graphene-based materials or ordered mesoporous/macroporous carbons [11,12].
Biomass is the most abundant renewable resource on the planet, with an estimated global production of approximately 130 billion tons per year [13]. Through biochemical and/or thermochemical processes, biomass can be transformed into sustainable chemicals, fuels, and materials [14]. According to the International Energy Agency, biomass could contribute up to 10% of global energy needs by 2035, and by 2050, it may supply as much as 27% of transportation fuels [15]. Biomass-based energy is considered environmentally friendly due to its carbon neutrality and minimal ecological impact. Furthermore, waste biomass can be converted into biochar, a sustainable and ecological material suitable for applications such as chemical synthesis, wastewater treatment, and energy-related technologies [16]. The use of mechanochemical methods to produce functional porous carbons from bio-organic precursors seems to be a sustainable and attractive approach. Therefore, researchers seeking new materials and optimal synthesis conditions have explored mechanochemical techniques for the preparation of valuable porous carbons from biomass and have proposed their applications in adsorption, separation, catalysis, electrocatalysis, and electrochemistry, among others [6,11]. Compared to conventional solution-based methods (e.g., sol–gel, self-assembly, hydrothermal synthesis), the mechanochemical method has the advantage of solvent-less and operationally simple processing, involving fewer synthesis steps. Therefore, mechanochemical approaches, such as ball milling, offer a promising and scalable route for the production of porous carbons. This review highlights the synthesis of porous carbonaceous materials via ball milling from biomass-based (waste) precursors and their versatile applications. It briefly discusses general aspects of mechanochemical synthesis of biomass-derived carbons, their physicochemical properties and applications in adsorption, catalysis, electrochemical, and energy-related applications. Finally, the opportunities and challenges of the mechanochemical synthesis of porous carbons from biomass are also discussed.

2. Mechanochemical Synthesis

In mechanochemistry, researchers explore chemical transformations driven by mechanical actions such as compression, shearing, or friction. In these processes, the energy needed to initiate reactions is provided through mechanical force, analogous to how heat, light, and electrical potential serve as energy sources in thermochemistry, photochemistry, and electrochemistry, respectively. Mechanochemistry has a long-standing history and remains highly relevant due to its ability to efficiently and quantitatively promote solid-state reactions, often without the use of solvents or with only minimal solvent involvement, as seen in wet milling and liquid-assisted grinding. In more conventional chemical synthesis, solvents play a crucial role in dispersing energy, dissolving/solvating and transporting chemicals. Therefore, using insufficient amounts of solvents may result in hindered mass and energy transport. Despite advances in reducing solvent usage in mechanochemical synthesis, they are still usually needed in the post-synthesis process of isolating products in a satisfactorily pure form.

2.1. History of Mechanochemistry

Apparently, the history of mechanochemistry can be traced for nearly 25 centuries [17]. According to Takacs et al. [18], the earliest documented mechanochemical reaction was the grinding of cinnabar (HgS). Theophrastus of Eresus (371–286 B.C.), wrote in his book “De Lapidibus” (“On Stones”) that “Native cinnabar was rubbed with vinegar in a copper mortar with a copper pestle yielding the liquid metal.” This represents a prominent example of a mechanochemical process. It is unknown why the mechanochemical synthesis of mercury from sulfide was forgotten in the Middle Ages. However, the medieval literature also contains other mechanochemical processes, described between 300 B.C. and the 18th century. Agricola et al. [19] documented several examples of chemical reactions induced by mechanochemical action related to mining and metallurgy. Interestingly, in the 17th century, Bacon and Rawley mentioned four treatments that remain among the most important procedures for preparing active solid substances, one of which was grinding [20]. From an interesting history of mechanochemistry [17], a few facts are worth mentioning. Faraday described the reduction of silver chloride by grinding it in a mortar with zinc, tin, iron, or copper in 1820. He referred to this process as the “dry way” of inducing chemical reactions. According to his observations, the reaction between silver chloride and zinc was rapid and highly exothermic, suggesting a self-sustaining mechanochemically induced process. However, the first documented experiment explicitly combining mechanical action with a chemical reaction is attributed to Lea in 1866. In his research, mercury and silver chlorides decomposed during mortar grinding, despite typically melting or subliming without decomposition when heated. This was a foundational moment in the formal study of mechanochemical reactions.
In modern mechanochemistry, the launch of the “International Conference on Mechanochemistry and Mechanical Alloying (INCOME)” marked a significant milestone. The first INCOME conference took place in Košice in 1993. The conference was organized by the International Mechanochemistry Association (IMA), an associate member of IUPAC; the IMA was founded in 1988 in Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia.

2.2. Fundamentals of Mechanochemistry

The term mechanochemistry is often broadly defined and includes any chemical reaction initiated by mechanical energy, such as grinding, and it is also used in this review in this sense. However, Kaupp [21] argues that this broad usage is inaccurate. He suggests that the term should be reserved for cases where mechanical energy directly breaks strong chemical bonds, such as in polymers or single molecules, leading to the formation of reactive centers (often radicals) that undergo further reactions. Under this narrower definition, grinding-induced reactions—primarily driven by increased surface contact and mixing—would not qualify as true mechanochemical processes. IUPAC defines a mechanochemical reaction (with a hyphen) as “a chemical reaction induced by direct absorption of mechanical energy,” [21]. Although the note provides guidelines for its use in the context of polymers, the fundamental definition is broader and does not include any restrictions related to the atomic-scale mechanisms involved. Therefore, the common usage of the term appears justified. It is also worth noting that most authors write the term mechanochemical without a hyphen.
Grinding usually refers to a mechanical action that reduces particle size using manual (e.g., mortar and pestle) or automated methods, like ball milling or extrusion. While often associated with solvent-free conditions, mechanochemistry can involve small amounts of liquid. Even a minimal solvent amount can significantly enhance or enable reactions, a process now commonly termed “liquid-assisted grinding” (LAG). LAG improves reaction efficiency compared to dry milling and is considered a suitable modern method equivalent to “kneading” [17].
There may be some misunderstanding about the expression “solvent-free.” This indicates that no solvent was intentionally introduced into the reaction, highlighting the practical advantage of this approach. However, solvents can be introduced with solid starting reactants, e.g., using hydrated metal salts, molecular solvates, or moisture. Therefore, although the use of the term “solvent-free” is often accurate in a practical sense, caution is needed, especially in proposing mechanochemical reaction mechanisms. The solvent-free reaction in the general context does not necessarily correspond to a completely solvent-free process.

2.3. The Importance of Controlling the Mechanochemical Process

It is essential to understand and control the parameters of mechanochemical reactions [5]. Three key parameters influence mechanochemical reactions: the kinetic energy of the balls before collision, the way this energy is transferred to the reactants, and the collision frequency. The kinetic energy determines the maximum energy available for transfer during ball milling. These distinct modes of energy transfer can lead to different reaction outcomes [22].
The mechanochemical process can be controlled by adjusting the parameters related to the device and accessories used, as well as their various settings. For instance, the most significant parameters affecting the efficiency of the ball milling process are milling speed and time, reaction atmosphere, the mass ratio of balls to the milled sample, and the type of device (mill). The degree of vessel-filling influences the trajectories of the balls and thus the transfer and delivery of energy to the milled substances. The effect of the degree of fill of the milling vessel with balls was studied in a Knoevenagel condensation reaction of vanillin with barbituric acid [23]. In this experiment, it was observed that the optimal filling of the milling vessel with balls was about 25% of the total vessel volume. However, it is important to emphasize that this may not necessarily apply to other reactions or other types of mills. Milling accessories (balls and vessels) are made from various materials, including Teflon, aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, stainless steel, and tungsten carbide.
Mass transfer is rarely a problem on a small scale, and it can be more easily controlled in solution by stirring compared to milling. Parameters that are commonly varied during the optimization of reaction conditions, such as stoichiometry, reaction time, and temperature, are critically important in mechanochemical processes. Among these, temperature is particularly challenging to control during ball milling, especially in typical automatic devices. The reaction vessel heats up because of collisions of milling balls, and the temperature rise depends on the degree of fill of the vessel with milling balls and reactants, the type of sample, the size of the vessel, and the rotation speed (oscillation frequency). As an exception, in the case of cryogenic mills, liquid nitrogen automatically cools the vessel, but these are not commonly used in chemical processes [24].
Recent advances in ball mill design have focused on maximizing energy transfer, with high-energy mills now reaching speeds up to 2000 rpm and featuring improved vessel designs [25]. These instruments are usually equipped with water cooling systems, where the energy released during milling is dissipated through cooling, preventing the sample from overheating. Milling speed directly affects the kinetic energy of the balls—higher speeds result in greater energy input into the reaction system.

2.4. Scalability of a Mechanochemical Process

Any synthesis processes, in order to be useful in industry, such as those involving the decomposition or creation of molecules, must be scalable. In mechanochemistry, each type of milling device should allow the process to be carried out at different scales. For instance, in typical mills, gram-scale processes can be performed, which are suitable for laboratory research. For larger quantities of products, larger planetary mills, for example, are available in various sizes and configurations, whereas very large, stirred mills are available for pilot and production scales. For instance, the Metso HIGmill™ stirred mill has a capacity of 50,000 L and can process materials weighing over 1000 kg [25]. Stolle et al. [26] presented a scalable mechanochemical Knoevenagel condensation reaction between vanillin and barbituric acid using a planetary mill, increasing the scale from 20 to 300 mmol. This enabled the production of about 80 g of product in a short time with good reaction efficiency. Another approach to scaling up involves converting a batch process into a continuous one, e.g., by using extruders instead of mills. Extruders push material through confined spaces using shear and compressive forces. For example, James et al. [27] synthesized MOFs at a rate of several kilograms per hour using twin-screw extruders. Thus, it can be confidently stated that significant progress has been made in developing specialized equipment for mechanochemical processes. Readers are encouraged to see the recent reviews in [28,29,30], which compare various mechanochemical synthesis methods in the context of biomass processing, including aspects such as efficiency, energy consumption, scalability, and limitations.

3. Biomass

Biomass is a readily available, renewable, and relatively inexpensive organic substrate, making it an extremely important and inexhaustible resource for designing and manufacturing sustainable functional materials. Recent studies on biomass-derived carbons have shown that our strong dependence on non-renewable carbon precursors can be significantly mitigated by utilizing biomass [31,32]. Biomass is the second-oldest energy source after the sun.
Global biomass totals about 550 gigatons of carbon, with 80% from plants and 15% from bacteria; other organisms make up less than 10% (Figure 2) [11,33]. Around 60% of biomass is on the Earth’s surface [34]. Biomass is a major carbon reservoir, including forest and agricultural wastes, industrial and household biowastes, and marine waste, offering diverse carbon sources with varied composition and structure [35]. However, direct carbonization of biomass, such as wood, agricultural waste, and animal waste, usually leads to carbons with a low specific surface area and heterogeneous pores in terms of size and shape [36]. The improvement towards porosity development and pore accessibility of biomass-derived carbons is usually achieved through an additional activation process.

3.1. Main Types of Biomass

This section covers common biopolymers, their extraction, and their applications. Tannins—redox-active polyphenols found widely in plants—are easily extracted from wood waste at room temperature and biodegrade naturally [37,38,39,40]. They are classified into hydrolyzable tannins (gallotannins, ellagitannins, complex tannins) and condensed tannins (proanthocyanidins), with (+)-catechin and tannic acid as key examples (Figure 3).
Lignin acts as a binder in plant cell walls, constituting about 10–25% by weight of lignocellulosic biomass [41]. It is a complex mixture of cross-linked amorphous copolymers derived from p-coumaryl, coniferyl, and sinapyl alcohols, which differ in their methoxy group content (Figure 4). Recently, lignin has attracted significant attention as potential biomass for various applications, e.g., to obtain advanced carbon-based materials. Moreover, it is one of the renewable biopolymers characterized by a high degree of aromaticity and thus can be regarded as a good source of value-added aromatic chemicals.
Lignin’s monomer units are linked primarily by β-O-4 glycosidic bonds and contain various functional groups, including methyl ethers, phenols, carbonyl groups, carboxyl groups, and hydroxyl groups. Consequently, it serves as an interesting alternative for obtaining a wide range of low-molecular-weight products and materials based on their arenes. The significant complexity of lignin’s structure also poses a major challenge to its processing. Since the interest in lignin’s structure and utilization is vast, we encourage readers to see other reviews that cover more detail on this topic [42,43]. The value of lignin as a biorefinery raw material depends on how easily it can be extracted and its chemical structure, which allows for further processing [44]. Many studies cover isolating lignin from lignocellulosic biomass and depolymerizing lignin to produce biofuels and chemicals [44,45]. Due to the intrinsic chemical structure of lignin, the obtained carbons show good performance in energy storage, catalysis, and pollution removal.
The composition of biomass varies significantly. Lignocellulose typically constitutes the largest portion of the biomass and is composed of cellulose (C6H12O6)n (38–50%), hemicellulose (C5H8O4)n (20–35%), lignin [C9H10O3(OCH3)]n (15–25%), and mineralized inorganic substances [45]. Lignocellulose is a raw material to produce biochemicals, bioethanol, and biofuels.
Cellulose, the most abundant natural biopolymer, is produced by plants at a rate of about 75 billion tons annually [44]. It forms structural microfibrils in plant cell walls, composed of linear β-(1,4)-D-glucose chains with crystalline and amorphous regions linked by hydrogen bonds. Nanocellulose, derived from cellulose via chemical or mechanical processes, has recently attracted significant interest [46]. Nanocellulose exhibits distinctive properties such as high tensile strength (10 GPa), high stiffness (up to 220 GPa modulus of elasticity), a high Young’s modulus (~150 GPa), low density (1.6 g/cm3), modifiable surface chemistry, transparency, flexibility, and a low thermal expansion coefficient [47]. These attractive characteristics make NC an ideal material for different applications, such as in biomedical devices, solar panels, filtration membranes, food packaging, paints, and coatings [48,49]. As one of the main polymers in the biosphere, cellulose is a non-toxic, renewable, and cost-effective source for producing sustainable carbon materials. Depending on its origin, cellulosic biomass exhibits slight variations in its chemical composition, leading to different reactions during pyrolysis, which result in the formation of the carbon skeleton of biochar.
Hemicellulose is a heteropolysaccharide that constitutes about 20–35% of lignocellulose and surrounds cellulose in plant cell walls. It forms covalent, hydrogen, and ionic bonds with other components. Composed of short, branched chains of various sugars (pentoses, hexoses, hexuronic acids, and deoxyhexoses), it binds to cellulose microfibrils via hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces [50]. By cross-linking with lignin, hemicellulose provides structural support to the cell wall and acts as a “glue” within individual fibers. Compared to cellulose, hemicellulose has lower thermal and chemical stability because of its lack of crystallinity and lower degree of polymerization. As a result, hemicellulose can be easily hydrolyzed, yielding glucose, xylose, galactose, mannose, arabinose, glucuronic acid, and mannuronic acid. Unlike cellulose, the structure of hemicellulose is highly variable and lacks uniform repetition. Properties of hemicellulose depend on its chemical composition [28]. The chemical hydrolysis and decomposition of hemicellulose have been extensively studied for various applications, including the production of ethanol as a renewable fuel additive, as valuable chemicals for food additives, and applications in the pharmaceutical and mining industries [51,52,53].
Starch is a plant-based polysaccharide that serves as a key energy reserve and is abundant in staple crops like corn, potatoes, rice, tapioca, and legumes (e.g., peas, lentils, and fava beans). Starch extracted directly from plants is known as “native starch”, while “modified starch” refers to those altered through biological, chemical, or physical processes to enhance specific properties. Structurally, starch granules (2–100 μm) consist of concentric growth rings (120–500 nm), made up of blocklets (20–50 nm) formed from amorphous and crystalline lamellae (9 nm). These contain amylose and amylopectin chains (0.1–1 nm). Overall, starch is insoluble in cold water and has a density of 1.5 g/cm3. Its general formula is (C6H10O5)n, composed of glucose monomers, which can be organized to form two distinct macromolecules: amylose and amylopectin [54].

3.2. Biomass Pretreatment

Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant biomass on Earth. Its conversion into chemicals and fuels is very difficult because of its complex structure. Pretreatment is therefore essential to break down and remove lignin from biomass, disrupt cellulose crystallinity, and improve access to cellulose and hemicellulose for hydrolysis. Many studies have shown various pretreatment methods for different biomass types [55,56].
Diluted acids and alkalis are the most used solvents for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass, but their use generates large volumes of waste. Currently, ball milling is considered as an efficient and environmentally friendly method for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass [6]. Ball milling-based pretreatment can significantly reduce biomass particle size by altering its crystalline structure, decreasing the degree of cellulose polymerization, and loosening chemical bonds. Ball milling can be used as a standalone pretreatment method or in combination with other techniques (such as microwave treatment or ozonolysis), as illustrated in Figure 5.
Mechanical milling is widely used in the pretreatment processes of biomass to convert it into valuable products [56,57,58,59]. Ball milling as a physical method eliminates the use of harmful chemical reagents. It has been observed that ball milling pretreatment significantly impacts biomass conversion. For instance, Zakaria et al. [58] utilized oil palm biomass to produce glucose and xylose through enzymatic hydrolysis. In this study, after dry ball milling of an empty fruit bunch (EFB) precursor in a planetary ball mill for 60 min at 250 rpm, the biomass was directly hydrolyzed with Acremonium cellulase. The maximum glucose and xylose yields reached 67.5% and 80.1%, respectively, which were much higher than those from the untreated EFB (15.9% and 5.4%, respectively). Zhang et al. [60] reported that ball milling pretreatment of pre-fermented rice straw led to their highest ethanol yield compared to other methods, including microwave-assisted and ultrasound-assisted alkali pretreatments of the biomass. Jiang et al. [61] compared the effects of pretreatment with ionic liquid and ball milling on glucose yield from cellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis. The glucose yield from untreated cellulose was only 20.9%, whereas from ball-milled cellulose, it was about 84.5%, and from ionic liquid-treated cellulose, it was 78.0%. Cellulose subjected to either ball milling or ionic liquid pretreatment exhibited a much higher susceptibility to enzymatic hydrolysis. Moreover, it was highlighted that ball milling pretreatment is more environmentally friendly and operationally straightforward. Pre-milled samples can be further processed without the need for washing and filtration steps. For example, conventional pretreatment methods of rice straw using sodium hydroxide and aqueous ammonia resulted in material losses of 34.2% and 14.8%, respectively. In contrast, no biomass loss was observed in the case of ball milling pretreatment [59]. Furthermore, ball milling pretreatment does not generate any by-products, whereas chemical pretreatments produce phenolic and heterocyclic compounds that may inhibit subsequent processes (e.g., fermentation) [62]. The high efficiency of lignocellulosic biomass conversion via ball milling results from the breakdown of its rigid structure by mechanical forces like impact, compression, shearing, and friction [63]. This enhances enzyme or catalyst accessibility to cellulose and hemicellulose. Ball milling induces key structural changes, including reductions in crystallinity index, polymerization degree, particle size, and thermal stability while increasing porosity [57,64,65]. Planetary ball milling has been shown to significantly alter the morphology and structure of cellulose, as confirmed by wide-angle X-ray diffraction analysis [64]. The material of the milling balls and bowls plays a crucial role in ball milling efficiency. Studies show that using alumina, zirconia, or steel balls effectively reduces particle size and crystallinity of corn stover during pretreatment [65]. Steel balls were the most effective at pulverizing the biomass. Therefore, milling balls with a high density are considered more suitable for biomass pretreatment prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. Recently, a comprehensive review covering mechanochemical processing of starch was reported [66]. Ball milling was shown as an effective method to reduce the starch particles to a nano size, enhance water percolation into its molecules (swelling), incorporate oxygen functional groups, and/or convert hydroxyl groups into carbonyl and carboxyl groups (oxidative effect). Ball milling can also be used to modify starch properties such as viscosity, gelatinization temperature, retrogradation, stability, solubility, etc.
Compared to other lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment methods, ball milling offers key advantages, including its simple operation, reduced solvent use, and minimal post-treatment requirements. Performing reactions under solvent-free conditions may enhance reaction rates and lower energy consumption. Additionally, the mechanical energy generated during ball milling can trigger chemical reactions, making mechanochemical depolymerization a promising starting step for biorefinery applications. This strategy is particularly advantageous for solid catalysts, as it helps overcome the mass transfer barrier between solid–solid interfaces. For instance, weakly acidic solid catalysts (functionalized with -COOH or -OH groups) can effectively convert waste biomass into chemicals through ball milling, thus eliminating the need for the use of corrosive concentrated H2SO4. Parameters such as milling time, rotation speed, size and material of the balls, and milling mode significantly influence the efficiency of this process, including selectivity of product formation [66].

4. Conversion of Biomass Waste into Porous Carbons

The porosity and, hence, functionality of porous carbons are usually assessed through adsorption–desorption isotherms of nitrogen at −196 °C or argon at –186 °C. These isotherms, preceded by vacuum degassing at an elevated temperature, allow for the calculation of the specific surface area (SSA) using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory within the relative pressure range of 0.05 < p/p0 < 0.2. The value of the SSA can also be determined from adsorption isotherms using the density functional theory (DFT) method [67]. The total pore volume is calculated from the adsorbed gas volume at p/p0 = 0.99, assuming that micro- and mesopores are filled with liquid adsorbate [68]. According to IUPAC, porous materials are categorized as follows: (i) microporous materials (pores of 0–2 nm), (ii) mesoporous materials (pores of 2–50 nm), and (iii) macroporous materials (pores > 50 nm). Nanoporous materials, a subset of porous materials, typically exhibit high porosity, with pore sizes in the range of 1–100 nm.
Numerous organic materials classified as biomass have been used over several decades to produce a variety of carbon materials. Waste products containing biomass-derived matter can be generally classified as waste biomass, which serves as a readily available source for porous carbon materials [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. For instance, activated carbons were prepared from almond shells through a two-step thermal treatment, carbonization, and carbon dioxide activation [69]. The activation process led to the development of micropores and a substantial increase in the SSA in the resulting carbon material. Two biologically similar by-products from the food industry, namely plum and peach stones, were used as precursors for the preparation of activated carbons [70]. The carbons produced via carbonization followed by CO2 activation were compared with those produced through a single-step CO2 activation process. The porosity of the obtained activated carbons was analyzed based on the following adsorption measurements: N2 (at −196 °C), CO2 (at 0 °C), i-butane (at 0 °C), and para-nitrophenol and methylene blue (both in aqueous solution at 25 °C). Peach stone-derived activated carbons exhibited a molecular sieve effect for i-butane, indicating the presence of narrow micropores in their structure. In contrast, activated carbons derived from plum stones showed significantly more developed microporosity and macroporosity, particularly when single-step CO2 activation was applied. Elsewhere, activated carbons were prepared from carbonized olive stones using either carbon dioxide or steam as the activating agent [71]. The pore structure of the resulting carbons was analyzed using nitrogen adsorption, carbon dioxide adsorption, and mercury porosimetry. The results indicated that carbon dioxide facilitated the opening and subsequent widening of narrow micropores. In contrast, steam activation led to carbons with expanded micropores and a lower overall micropore volume. In another study, five carbon samples were prepared from olive pomace biomass using KOH activation [72]. The microstructure of the carbon materials was tailored by varying the KOH-to-precursor weight ratio from 1:1 to 5:1. Detailed structural and morphological characterization (N2 and CO2 adsorption, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy) revealed that as the proportion of the activator increased, the resulting carbons transitioned from predominantly microporous to micro–mesoporous structures. The increased SSA in the activated carbons resulted in higher hydrogen adsorption at high hydrogen pressures, reaching hydrogen storage capacities under 200 bar up to 6 wt.% and 1.22 wt.% at −196 °C and 25 °C, respectively. These findings suggest that carbons derived from olive pomace may be promising materials for hydrogen storage. Highly porous granular activated carbons were prepared from the dried endocarp of coconut shells via both CO2 physical activation and chemical activation with H3PO4 or ZnCl2 [73]. The results indicate that the physical activation process allowed a more precise control of pore size distribution, while chemical activation resulted in a lower mass loss, higher mechanical strength, and higher volume of mesopores in the resulting carbon materials. Microporous carbons can also be prepared from coconut shells via a one-step CO2 carbonization and activation process [74]. Applying different time lengths of CO2 activation, the SSA and micropore volume of the obtained carbons varied in the ranges of 686–1327 m2/g and 0.31–0.65 cm3/g, respectively. These carbons reached CO2 adsorption capacities of 3.9 and 5.6 mmol/g at 760 mmHg and at 25 °C and 0 °C, respectively. These values of CO2 adsorption are typical for plant-derived carbons. In [75], the potential use of cork as a biosorbent and sustainable precursor for activated carbon was explored. Activation was carried out by impregnation with phosphoric acid followed by pyrolysis in a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting materials were used for the removal of sunflower oil emulsified in water. Activated carbons with higher SSAs and fewer acidic surface groups exhibited an enhanced capacity for sunflower oil adsorption. Other microporous carbons were obtained from African palm shells [76]. Their preparation involved carbonization in a nitrogen atmosphere followed by activation with KOH. The micropore volumes (and SSAs) of the resulting carbons ranged from 0.16 cm3/g (365 m2/g) to 0.82 cm3/g (1890 m2/g), depending on the KOH-to-carbon ratio used in the activation process. These carbons exhibited high CO2 adsorption capacities at 1 bar. The study described in [77] aimed to produce activated carbons from empty fruit bunches (EFBs) from Malaysia and investigate their hydrogen storage capacity. The precursor was activated using physical or chemical processes. The SSAs and microporosity of the produced activated carbons ranged from 305 to 687 m2/g and up to 94%, respectively. Hydrogen storage capacity was examined at –196 °C and under pressures ranging from ambient pressure to 100 bar. Among the carbons studied, the EFB activated with 2 M KOH showed a maximum hydrogen adsorption capacity of 2.14 wt.% at 20 bar. Low-cost activated carbons with a high microporosity were obtained from walnut shells via a simple, one-step carbonization process combined with chemical activation using KOH [78]. Carbon activated at 800 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere exhibited a highly developed porosity (SSA of 1868 m2/g) and a large micropore volume of 0.94 cm3/g. Its CO2 adsorption capacity at 1 bar was as high as 9.54, 5.17, and 4.33 mmol/g at 0 °C, 25 °C, and 40 °C, respectively. The results showed that their CO2 adsorption capacity mainly depended on their internal microporous structure. In another work [79], it was shown that a direct carbonization of dried bread at 900 °C for 3 h in an inert atmosphere led to porous carbon with an SSA of about 1020 m2/g. Furthermore, the carbon could be activated using 1 M KOH solution at 600 °C for 1 h, yielding activated carbon with a higher SSA of 1370 m2/g.
Carbons with high porosity and a fibrous microstructure may be attractive for some applications. However, achieving a controlled porous microstructure in carbon fibers is challenging and often requires complex and time-consuming synthesis methods. In [80], the synthesis of nanoporous carbon fibers with high porosity relied on the activation of spider silk (a natural biomaterial) with potassium hydroxide. The resulting carbon fiber had a high SSA of 2730 m2/g and a large pore volume of 1.56 cm3/g, respectively. It showed exceptional CO2 adsorption capacities, capturing 23.6 mmol/g and 15.4 mmol/g of CO2 at 0 °C and 25 °C under 25 bar, respectively. Additionally, the adsorbent exhibited a high CH4 adsorption capacity of 8.6 mmol/g at 0 °C under 25 bar and H2 adsorption of 4.1 wt.% at −196 °C under 25 bar. The material also demonstrated an excellent regeneration ability and stability. These results highlight the potential of spider silk-derived porous carbons for energy and environmental applications. The cited examples clearly demonstrate that various biomass wastes can be successfully utilized to produce a range of porous carbons with exceptional properties, including high porosity and superior adsorption capacities.

5. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Biomass-Derived Carbons

Biomass is considered a promising and sustainable precursor for the preparation of advanced carbon materials due to its high carbon content of about 45–50 wt.% [81]. Carbon materials can be obtained from biomass via various methods, including pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonization, ionothermal carbonization, and ball milling-assisted synthesis [81,82]. Mechanochemistry can also be used to enhance the functionality of carbon-containing materials or improve production efficiency [63]. During the high-energy grinding or milling process, mechanochemical energy reduces particle size, increasing the total surface area of the sample. Additionally, the defects created may become reactive sites, determining specific surface properties of the milled product.

5.1. Tannin-Derived Porous Carbons

Plant-derived polyphenols, including hydrolysable tannins (e.g., gallic, digallic, and ellagic acid) and condensed tannins (e.g., mimosa tannin) are highly suitable for the preparation of ordered mesoporous carbons (OMCs) [83]. A typical mechanochemical synthesis of OMCs involves milling a soft template, such as the triblock copolymer F127, with tannins in a ball mill to form a mesostructured polymeric composite [84]. Metal salts, e.g., Zn(OAc)2, Ni(OAc)2, Mg(OAc)2, and Co(OAc)2, can be added as agents facilitating crosslinking and/or generating metal-containing OMCs. OMC is obtained after removing the soft template during subsequent carbonization in an inert atmosphere. In this process, metal nanoparticles can be reduced in situ and trapped in its pores. The resulting metal-doped OMCs are suitable for use as catalysts, adsorbents, or supercapacitor electrodes. Tannins are rich in polyphenolic compounds, which undergo reactions analogous to those of phenol or resorcinol during the copolymer-assisted self-assembly process [85]. The beneficial difference in comparison to these organic compounds is that the synthesis of tannin-derived OMCs can be performed in the absence of aldehyde under acidic or neutral conditions (e.g., 1 mol/L HCl) [86,87,88]. For instance, OMCs were successfully prepared using a soft templating method at the pH of natural tannins (pH = 4.2, without pH adjustment using an acid catalyst) [87]. It was demonstrated that a pH of 4.2 or lower during self-assembly had no significant effect on the structure and properties of the resulting OMCs. Solid-state synthesis of OMCs via the mechanochemical method is beneficial because of the reduced time needed for self-assembly and polymerization. Moreover, highly ordered mesoporous carbons can be obtained by ball milling of tannins and Pluronic-type copolymers with or without crosslinking agents [87,88,89].
Dai et al. [84] presented a simple mechanochemical synthesis of OMCs and Ni-decorated OMCs. The obtained carbons featured homogeneous and tunable mesopores ranging from ~4 to 10 nm. In this approach, the mesopore sizes could be adjusted by varying the synthesis conditions. The OMCs were characterized by large pore volumes (up to 0.96 cm3/g) and high SSAs up to about 1000 m2/g. The synthesis involved mechanochemical mixing of tannins with a PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymer (Pluronic F88, F87, F68, F38, P123, P103, P85, or P65) or nonionic surfactants (PEO-based Triton X-100 and Brij-78), along with the nickel precursor (salt). Table 1 presents the pore structure parameters of the OMCs and Ni-OMCs obtained with different triblock copolymers and carbonization temperatures, as determined from N2 adsorption isotherms. Small nickel nanoparticles of about 5.4 nm were embedded within cylindrical mesopores and exhibited high thermal stability even at 600 °C. Furthermore, Ni-OMC demonstrated high activity in the hydrogenation of large molecules [84].
More recently, Castro-Gutiérrez et al. [89] prepared highly ordered mesoporous carbons through the mechanochemical self-assembly of tannins using the triblock copolymer Pluronic F127 (PEO99–PPO65–PEO99) in the presence of a small amount of water, followed by carbonization at 900 °C for 3 h. By selecting an optimal ratio of components, i.e., tannin–Pluronic–water in a 2:1:2 ratio, a highly ordered mesoporous carbon with an SSA of 510 m2/g and mesopore volume of 0.24 cm3/g was obtained. Its two-dimensional hexagonal pore structure remained intact after thermal treatment at 1500 °C in an inert atmosphere. The authors demonstrated that the SSA of OMC could be successfully increased to ~1900 m2/g after its activation with CO2 for 75 min at 900 °C. The CO2 adsorption capacity of this carbon increased to 5.6 mmol/g after activation with potassium acetate at 800 °C for 1 h in a nitrogen flow. In [90], a fast milling-based strategy was implemented for the synthesis of Ru-OMC. The key chemical aspects of this synthesis were the use of mechanical force, which induced the coordination polymerization of a tannin–metal (Zn2+ and Ru3+), and hydrogen bonding interactions between the block copolymer (F127) and tannin. In the synthesis, Zn2+ ions diluted Ru3+ ions and prevented the sintering of Ru species, resulting in the formation of Ru nanoparticles no larger than 1.4–1.7 nm during carbonization (800 °C). The Ru-OMC catalyst showed good activity in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde using molecular oxygen. Elsewhere, in [91], the synthesis of metal oxide-doped mesoporous carbons involved ball milling of tannins and in situ thermal stabilization of the formed polymer with alkali metal oxides (e.g., MgO, CaO). The resulting porous carbons achieved surface areas of up to 520 m2/g and pore volumes of 0.65 cm3/g. In the work by Dai et al. [92], a solid-state synthesis of nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbons (N-MC) was proposed via mechanochemical mixing of tannins, a soft template, and an additional nitrogen source, e.g., amino acids, urea, melamine, or guanine (Figure 6). The nitrogen sources formed strong hydrogen bonds with the tannins, enabling effective nitrogen incorporation into the carbon framework during high-energy ball milling. The solvent-free synthesis makes this method a sustainable route for producing nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon adsorbents. In this study, CO2 and light hydrocarbon adsorption performance of N-doped MCs was assessed via static adsorption experiments.
In another study, tannic acid and urea, both low-cost and eco-friendly precursors, were used to synthesize nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanospheres via ball milling [93]. By adjusting the urea-to-tannic acid ratio and using a salt-templating method (NaCl/ZnCl2), researchers achieved tunable pore structures and a high nitrogen content (up to 8.83%) in the resulting carbons. Elsewhere, the mechanochemical salt-templating method was extended for the synthesis of highly porous activated carbons by adding mild chemical activators to the milling system [94]. The chemical activation with potassium oxalate and ZnCl2 produced highly porous carbons with surface areas up to 3060 m2/g and pore volumes of 3.07 cm3/g. These materials showed excellent gas adsorption capacities, making them promising for applications in adsorption and catalysis. For instance, the best sample exhibited high H2 (13.2 mmol/g at −196 °C) and CO2 (4.7 mmol/g at 0 °C) adsorption capacities under 1 bar (Figure 7).
Elsewhere, a coordination compound of tannic acid–Fe was synthesized by a simple mechanochemical method [95]. This compound was used as a precursor for the preparation of porous carbon for CO2 capture. Szczęśniak et al. [96] reported a facile mechanochemical synthesis of mesoporous carbons with uniform bimodal mesoporosity via a combined hard and soft templating strategy. Carbons synthesized by ball milling of tannins with Pluronic F127 and silica colloids, followed by thermal treatment at 750 °C and silica etching, achieved a high surface area (1218 m2/g) and bimodal mesoporosity with pore sizes of 13.8 and 24.8 nm (Figure 8a). The resulting material exhibited a large total pore volume of 4.75 cm3/g and a record-high benzene adsorption capacity of 48.0 mmol/g at 20 °C, corresponding to 375 wt% of benzene adsorbed on the carbon (Figure 8b). It was also shown that the total pore volume is a determining factor for benzene adsorption on different porous sorbents [97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. Ball milling can also be used in the facile and sustainable synthesis of graphitized mesoporous carbons [109]. This was achieved by the addition of iron(III) chloride to the milling system of a tannin and triblock copolymer Pluronic F127. This salt additive acted as a graphitizing catalyst during the subsequent direct carbonization process. In this work, it was shown that using a simple synthesis method, one can obtain carbons with a high degree of graphitization (up to 75%) and simultaneously have high SSAs of 360 m2/g and volumes of mesopores of about 0.40 cm3/g at a relatively low carbonization temperature of 750 °C. Interestingly, the resulting carbon was in the form of short nanotubes and spherical carbon nanocapsules. It was also demonstrated that the synthesis procedure of mesoporous graphitized carbons based on ball milling can be further used to obtain micro–mesoporous carbons with SSAs reaching 1100 m2/g by addition of potassium oxalate to the milling mixture in a ratio to tannin of 1:2 [109]. The resulting micro–mesoporous activated carbons effectively adsorbed about 4 mmol/g CO2 at 25 °C and 1 bar. Apparently, the iron salt plays a dual role in the synthesis of activated carbons, namely as a catalyst for graphitization and an additional micropore-generating agent (activator). It was experimentally determined that about 30% of the volume of ultramicropores in the obtained carbon originated from the activation with FeCl3, which under appropriate conditions acts similarly to the well-known activator ZnCl2. This study confirms a close relationship between effective CO2 adsorption and the volume of ultramicropores in the structure of the carbon adsorbent. This mechanochemical synthesis can be used to produce carbons with tunable porosity and suitable physicochemical properties.

5.2. Lignocellulosic Biomass-Derived Carbons

Lignin and cellulose are the most abundant renewable biomass sources, making them important renewable sources of carbon [110]. Moreover, lignin is a waste product from the paper industry. As mentioned above, lignin is a highly cross-linked, heterogeneous natural polymer with limited industrial use due to the lack of cost-effective methods for its depolymerization. This restricts its potential as a main source of valuable chemicals and carbon-based materials. However, there are many reports on the use of lignin to obtain activated carbons, lignin–silica composites, and related materials [111,112,113]. Direct carbonization of lignin followed by KOH or CO2 activation typically yields microporous carbons with little to moderate mesoporosity [114,115]. It has been frequently reported that post-synthesis activation is an effective method for developing microporosity in lignin-based carbons [111,115].
Nitrogen-doped nanoporous carbons derived from lignin were synthesized via solvent-free, mechanically induced synthesis [116]. This simple approach involved mechanochemical treatment and carbonization of a mixture of three solid materials: lignin, urea, and potassium carbonate. The resulting nitrogen-doped porous carbons exhibited very high SSAs up to 3000 m2/g and large pore volumes up to 2 cm3/g. The nitrogen-doped carbons were well suited for electrochemical energy storage as supercapacitor electrodes, exhibiting a high specific capacitance. This mechanochemical route seems to be scalable, time-efficient, and effective in the synthesis of highly porous carbons from lignin. The development of innovative methods for converting lignin into sustainable chemicals and functional materials is a key path to high-value utilization of lignocellulosic biomass. Carbon materials derived from lignin are highly promising for applications in energy and chemical engineering, catalysis, and environmental remediation. However, there are few reports on mechanochemical-assisted methods for converting lignin into carbon materials. For instance, the review in [113] summarizes the latest advancements in the controlled synthesis of lignin-derived carbon materials, including the mechanochemical approach. This study covers future research directions aimed at enhancing the usability of lignin-derived carbons for commercial applications. We believe that mechanochemistry may play a key role in the future processing of lignin.
Cellulose is the primary component of biomass, and it is well suited for the cost-effective production of carbon materials. Over the past decade, cellulose-based carbons have been widely proposed for their use in energy storage systems [117,118,119]. The most commonly employed form of cellulose has been nanocellulose, including cellulose nanocrystals, nanofibrils, and bacterial nanocellulose [120,121]. In contrast, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), a readily available commercial product, has been less extensively studied. However, in recent years, MCC has gained recognition as a promising precursor, particularly for the preparation of carbon electrodes in supercapacitors, owing to its cost-effectiveness and sustainability [117,118,122]. In [118], a mechanochemical process for producing modified hard carbon (BHC-CO2) from cellulose in the presence of dry ice was reported. The resulting material demonstrated a high oxygen content of 19.33 at.% with dominant carboxyl groups (Figure 9). This study demonstrated that oxygen-containing groups in carbon play a key role in sodium-ion storage. The BHC-CO2-based anode exhibited a high reversible capacity of 294 mAh/g at 0.05 A/g, which was twice that of the oxygen-deficient carbon (BHC-CO2-H2) anode. These results indicate the importance of surface functional groups in this application. The BHC-CO2 anode also showed excellent cycling stability, retaining 80 mAh/g after 2000 cycles at 1 A/g. Qualitative analyses revealed that the carboxyl groups introduced during the mechanochemical process facilitated Na+ adsorption on the carbon surface, significantly enhancing the overall capacity of the carbon electrode.
Huang et al. [123] used ball milling to incorporate oxygen-containing functional groups to the surface of cellulose nanofibers. They successively dispersed native cellulose by milling it with succinic anhydride in DMSO. The resulting succinylated nanofibers could be afterward dispersed in water by solvent exchange. Elsewhere, in [118], using the mechanochemical ball milling of carbonized microcrystalline cellulose with dry ice, it was possible to obtain hard carbon with an exceptionally high oxygen content (19.33 at.%) and a predominant amount of carboxyl groups on the carbon surface. Jaroniec et al. [124] described a mechanochemical process for the synthesis of highly porous carbons through a simple and environmentally friendly treatment of a cellulose-based precursor, followed by carbonization and mild activation processes (Figure 10). Potassium citrate was used as a mild chemical activator. The obtained chemically activated carbon exhibited a large ultramicropore volume (0.37 cm3/g) and a high CO2 adsorption capacity of 4.2 mmol/g at 25 °C under 1 bar. Their article highlights the possibility of mechanochemical treatment of cellulose-based materials as a potential method for easy production of sustainable carbons with enhanced porosity, particularly an increased volume of the smallest micropores (ultramicropores). The production of highly microporous carbons from selected precursors, such as cellulose- and tannin-based precursors, may involve a simple and environmentally friendly mechanochemical process followed by physical or chemical activation.

5.3. Biomass Waste-Derived Carbons

In [125], an interesting mechanochemical strategy for producing highly porous carbons (HSACs) is reported. HSACs were obtained from coconut shells, walnut shells, and bamboo waste via mechanochemical grinding followed by carbonization at 800–1000 °C under nitrogen for 3–18 h, and they exhibited SSAs up to 1771 m2/g and pore volumes up to 1.88 cm3/g. The core of the process was high-energy ball milling, which created numerous surface and internal defects in the material. The overall synthesis process is shown in Figure 11. This strategy offers several significant advantages, including cost-effectiveness and sustainability. Importantly, low-value agricultural by-products, such as coconut shells, nutshells, and bamboo waste, can be successfully converted into porous carbons. Moreover, the prepared carbon products are in the form of micro/nanoscale powder, which is advantageous for applications such as electrode materials for supercapacitors and lithium–sulfur batteries. The micro/nanoscale structure ensures better binding on current collectors and easier electrolyte access during charge–discharge cycles.
Elsewhere, hierarchical porous carbons (HPCs) were synthesized from clean, dried Magnolia denudate flowers through a solvent-free ball-milling method combined with potassium bicarbonate activation [126]. By varying the mass ratio of KHCO3 to biochar, the resulting HPCs featured high SSAs ranging from about 1640 m2/g to about 2150 m2/g and hierarchical pore structures, including micro-, meso-, and macropores. This method holds promise for the eco-friendly conversion of other biomass waste into valuable carbon materials.
Adeniran and Mokaya [7] described a method for obtaining biochar from wood sawdust using mechanical compaction prior to thermochemical activation. Very high values of pore structure parameters were obtained for these carbons, i.e., SSA close to 4000 m2/g and total pore volume close to 2.5 cm3/g. Elsewhere, ball milling was shown as an effective method to reduce the particle size of sago pith waste-derived activated carbon treated with KOH and KMnO4 as activating agents [127]. For instance, the high-energy ball milling of KOH-activated carbon at 500 rpm for 150 min enhanced its SSA from 170 to 497 m2/g. Highly porous carbons with an SSA up to 1293 m2/g and pore volume up to 1.4 cm3/g were obtained from waste tobacco straw using nano-ZnO as both a template and activator via ball milling, followed by a carbonization–activation step at 800 °C [128]. In brief, after cleaning the tobacco straws, they were crushed into powdered form and next mixed with nano-ZnO in a weight ratio of 1:1 by ball milling at 350 rpm for 2 h. During the subsequent high-temperature thermal treatment, the added ZnO served as an activator, reacting with carbon atoms (ZnO + C = Zn + CO), and simultaneously as a hard template (site-occupying effect), leading to well-developed micro–mesoporous carbon structures. Interestingly, N-doped porous carbons were synthesized from a traditional Chinese food called yuba, which is the soybean protein–lipid film of heated soybean milk [129]. Yuba contains more protein (wt. 53%) than that of most high-protein biomass, such as soybean or egg white. The authors investigated the effect of pre-carbonization ball-milling of yuba powder and the post-synthesis ball milling effect on the resulting carbon and its oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) performance. They observed that carbonization–activation of yuba powder and a ZnCl2 mixture at 850 °C led to porous carbon (SSA of 832 m2/g) with a high nitrogen content (4.29%) and superior ORR activity, comparable with that of a commercial 20% Pt/C catalyst. It was demonstrated that pre-ball-milling (up to 18 h) of the precursor is beneficial for the electrochemical application of the resulting carbon because of its increased surface area and large number of active sites. Therefore, the limiting diffusion current density of the sample was improved. In contrast, the post-milling process produced small particles of carbon, which tended to aggregate; thus, the obtained samples showed a reduction in the surface area and the number of active sites. Elsewhere, ball milling was used in the two-step process of an easy conversion of protein-rich enoki mushroom biomass into nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanomaterials containing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [130]. The precursor with the addition of CNTs (mass ratio of 2:1) was milled at 400 rpm for 5 h and subjected to carbonization at 900 °C. The ball milling of the fungi led to small carbon particles of 2.8 μm with irregular morphology. Moreover, the addition of CNTs restricted the agglomeration of the particles. The resulting porous carbon material exhibited an SSA of 305 m2/g and showed excellent performance as a metal-free ORR catalyst. The ORR half-wave potential measured on the final composite material was around 0.81 V in alkaline medium, only slightly lower than that on the 20 wt% Pt/C catalyst (0.86 V).
Nanobiochar is a nanostructured biochar that might exhibit superior properties and find applications in diverse modern technologies. It can be obtained from bulk biochar using techniques such as ball milling, centrifugation, sonication, and hydrothermal synthesis [16]. Moreover, “technological nanobiochars”, or biochar nanocomposites with improved functionalities, can be obtained by various modifications of nanobiochars. Compared to bulk biochars, nanobiochars offer significantly higher surface areas (0.4–97 times), pore sizes (0.1–5.3 times), total pore volumes (0.5–48.5 times), and surface functionalities, leading to, for example, enhanced adsorption properties for pollutant removal from air or water [131,132]. Additionally, nanobiochars exhibit promising catalytic properties and may be used in sensors, fillers, drug delivery systems, enzyme immobilization, and polymer production. A comprehensive review [16] discusses the advantages and limitations of nanobiochars compared to bulk biochars, detailing their synthesis processes, pollutant adsorption mechanisms, and future directions. It was demonstrated that mechanochemistry is particularly effective for producing nanobiochars; they can be obtained from various feedstocks (i.e., rice husk, bagasse, wheat straw, okra stem, wood, etc.). For instance, Naghdi et al. [131] obtained nanobiochar from pine wood-derived biochar by a ball milling-assisted method with carbonization. They studied how different ball milling parameters, such as rotational speed, milling time, ball type, and ball-to-powder mass ratio, affected the inherent characteristics of the final nanobiochars. After optimizing the parameters (time of 1.6 h, speed of 575 rpm, and 4.5 g/g ball-to-powder ratio) and other factors, porous nanobiochar with an average particle size of 60 nm and an enlarged SSA (47 m2/g) in comparison to biochar (3 m2/g) was obtained via an energy-efficient process that involved a low temperature and low energy consumption. It was demonstrated that the prepared nanobiochar had a higher adsorption capacity for the removal of carbamazepine from water compared to raw biochar.

6. Applications of Biomass-Derived Carbons

Over the more than two decades of the 21st century, porous carbons derived from biomass have gained significant importance in various applications related to energy production and storage, as well as environmental protection [116]. They are used in gas adsorption/separation, catalysis, and electrochemical energy storage, and are attractive electrode materials for supercapacitors and various hybrid devices [2,9,133]. Table 2 presents examples of biomass-derived raw materials, the resulting carbon materials, their specific surface areas (SSAs), and their proposed practical application [133,134,135,136,137].

6.1. Gas Adsorption on Mechanochemically Synthesized Carbons

The porosity of adsorbents plays a crucial role in CO2 adsorption, especially the presence of micropores ranging from 0.34 to 0.70 nm, which significantly contribute to the CO2 adsorption capacity of porous carbon materials under ambient conditions (1 bar, room temperature) [151]. Various methods (e.g., templating, activation, mild pyrolysis) have been developed to synthesize porous carbon adsorbents with a high volume of micropores. For instance, a mechanochemical method used to produce porous carbon from tannic acid and iron chloride (FeCl3·6H2O) through carbonization, iron extraction, and KOH activation led to efficient CO2 adsorbents [95]. This carbon showed high CO2 adsorption of 5.8 mmol/g at 0 °C and 3.4 mmol/g at 25 °C under 1 bar pressure. Moreover, the initial isosteric heat of adsorption and selectivity for CO2/N2 were as high as 63.16 kJ/mol and 22.7 (0 °C), respectively. The adsorbent could be reused, indicating great potential for practical applications. Elsewhere, in [134], mechanochemical activation generated biomass-derived carbons with a very high CO2 storage capacity due to their highly developed microporosity compared to analogous conventional activated carbons with similar pore sizes. This mechanochemical activation, also known as the densification process, involves compressing a mixture of an activating agent (e.g., KOH) and biomass hydrochar into pellets/disks under 740 MPa pressure before thermal activation. Despite the increase in SSA and pore volume by 25% to 75% compared to conventional activated carbons, nearly all porosity in mechanochemically activated biomass-derived carbons (from sawdust and lignin) comes from ultramicropores (0.58–0.65 nm), resulting in a great increase in their CO2 adsorption capacity at 25 °C and low pressure (≤1 bar). Apparently, sawdust-derived carbon afforded a record CO2 adsorption at 25 °C of 5.8 mmol/g under 1 bar and 11.6 mmol/g under 20 bar (Figure 12). They are thus good candidates for pressure swing adsorption and vacuum swing adsorption processes. Their excellent volumetric CO2 adsorption properties result from high packing density and high contribution of the smallest pores in their structure.
Mesoporous carbons, including OMCs, exhibit CO2 adsorption capacity of about 1.5–2.5 mmol/g at 20/25 °C (3.0–3.5 mmol/g at 0 °C) under 1 bar due to the relatively low contribution of micropores in their structures [92,152,153]. Higher values from the range show mesoporous carbons doped with nitrogen. Nitrogen can be quite easily incorporated into the carbon structure in the stage of mechanochemical synthesis via addition of a nitrogen source to the milling system or by a post-synthesis treatment (e.g., with ammonia) [92,152]. Comparable CO2 adsorption properties showed porous carbons derived from chestnut tannins activated with potassium citrate and zinc chloride [154]. A higher adsorption capacity of about 4.7 mmol g−1 of CO2 at 0 °C under 1 bar was observed for mechanically synthesized carbons from tannic acid using potassium oxalate as an activating agent [94]. A combination of activation using potassium oxalate and salt templating may lead to enhanced porosity of carbons, providing a high H2 adsorption capacity (e.g., 13.2 mmol g−1 at −196 °C under 1 bar) [94].

6.2. Catalysis

Many studies highlight the suitability of biomass-derived carbons for catalytic applications [155]. These carbons can serve as catalysts or supports for other catalysts, e.g., metal nanoparticles. The catalytic efficiency of heterogeneous systems is strongly influenced by the raw materials used in their synthesis [156]. An ideal catalyst support should provide strong metal–support interactions, resist sintering and aggregation of catalyst nanoparticles, minimize catalyst loss during reactions, and assure efficient mass transport. In this regard, ordered mesoporous carbons (OMCs) and their composites have gained attention due to their high surface area, tunable pore sizes, large pore volumes, and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups that facilitate the dispersion of metal catalysts. Their ordered mesopores enhance the transport of large molecules to active sites, like narrow pores. As a result, OMCs have been widely explored as supports in acid-catalyzed reactions, photocatalysis, and other catalytic processes [90,136,157,158]. For instance, OMCs with highly dispersed Ni particles (Ni-OMCs) synthesized via a ball milling-assisted method showed high efficiency for the selective hydrogenation of bulk molecules (~2 nm) [136], achieving a 98% yield for cyclohexane and 96% for 1-octadecane, significantly outperforming Ni-decorated activated carbon (97% and 65%, respectively). This improved performance is attributed to the synergistic effect arising from the OMC structure (large, uniform pores and high surface area) and the catalytic properties of well-dispersed Ni nanoparticles. Additionally, these catalysts can be magnetically recovered and reused at least five times without significant loss of activity. In a study conducted by Wang et al. [90], their synthesized Ru-OMC exhibited good catalytic activity in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde (dehydrogenation process). The oxidation process performed without the catalysts or in the presence of bare OMC did not lead to the desired product. In contrast, using Ru-OMC, they observed moderate conversions (11.3–13.6%) and good selectivity towards benzaldehyde. Cu- or Fe-decorated mesoporous carbons derived from mimosa tannins were used as heterogeneous catalysts for the conversion of trans-ferulic acid into vanillin [158]. OMCs and disordered mesoporous carbons (DMCs) containing 0.5 wt.% iron or copper were prepared using a simple and fast mechanochemical synthesis approach (Figure 13). The highest selectivity towards vanillin (47–50%) stability upon repeated measurements was achieved for Cu-decorated OMC calcined at 500 °C.
In the work reported by Qui et al. [159], an efficient solid carbon acid catalyst containing –Cl and –SO3H groups was synthesized by solvent-free carbonization of sucralose and p-toluenesulfonic acid, followed by mechanical mixing with cellulose for 4 h. Subsequently, a rapid hydrolysis of cellulose in water was performed, as shown in Figure 14. This simple and effective method enabled high glucose yields in a short time. Additionally, the influence of the catalyst used and pretreatment via ball milling on the hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose was investigated. It was demonstrated that the catalyst exhibited satisfactory catalytic activity, leading to a high yield of glucose obtained from the hydrolysis of cellulose in aqueous reaction systems.
In mechanochemical synthesis, the composition of the biomass used, particularly its ash content, inorganic constituents, moisture, and heteroatoms, plays an important role in determining the structure and properties of the final materials, including catalysts. Biomass ash, composed of various inorganic oxides, can either catalyze or interfere with target reactions, while moisture affects milling efficiency and the formation of specific phases. Ash composition varies significantly depending on the biomass source, which in turn can lead to major differences in material performance. For instance, oxides such as silica (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3) can influence the development of specific crystal phases. In some synthetic mechanisms, ash content can be advantageous, i.e., it can promote porosity in activated carbon, while in others, high ash levels may reduce surface area or introduce impurities that lower the material’s quality. Heteroatoms present in the biomass can also be incorporated into the product’s structure or modify its functional characteristics. Overall, ash and other heteroatom-based components can influence reactivity and porosity, and may introduce unwanted impurities into the catalyst structure [6,28].

6.3. Electrochemical and Energy-Related Applications

Carbons derived from biomass hold great potential for applications in electrochemical energy storage and conversion systems, e.g., supercapacitors and fuel cells, owing to their hierarchical pore structure, high specific surface area, and strong ability to support active materials. For instance, the kinetics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are often limited by the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode, which can be improved using highly efficient electrocatalysts supported on porous carbons with hierarchical structures. Similarly, improving the performance of supercapacitors requires hierarchical porous carbon electrodes with high surface areas capable of storing large amounts of charge. Hierarchical porous carbons (HPCs) synthesized from fallen flowers via solvent-free ball milling combined with potassium bicarbonate activation showed high specific capacitances of 302.7 F/g at a current density of 0.5 A/g in 6 M of a KOH electrolyte [126]. A symmetric supercapacitor comprising these HPC electrodes demonstrated excellent stability, retaining 100% capacitance after 5,000 charge/discharge cycles and 90.5% after 12,000 cycles. Additionally, nitrogen-doped HPCs showed superior electrocatalytic activity and methanol tolerance in ORR compared to commercial Pt/C catalysts. Apparently, this method of producing HPCs could be extended for the eco-friendly processing of various other types of biomass waste into useful carbon materials.
Willow catkins are an easy and accessible source to produce hierarchically porous carbon microtubes after carbonization and activation with KOH [160]. The resulting materials retained the natural tubular morphology of willow catkins and exhibited a well-developed hierarchical porous structure, with a significant amount of nitrogen preserved from the biomass. When tested as an electrode in a three-electrode system using 6 M aqueous KOH, the carbon material demonstrated a high gravimetric capacitance of 292 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g, along with a strong rate capability, maintaining 83.5% capacitance at 10 A/g. Additionally, nitrogen-doped nanoporous carbons were synthesized via a solvent-free, mechanically induced synthesis from lignin, urea, and potassium carbonate, and they showed excellent performance for electrochemical energy storage as supercapacitor electrodes [116]. The carbon-based electrodes exhibited high specific capacitances in 1 M aqueous Li2SO4 electrolyte (177 F/g) and ionic liquid (192 F/g). Elsewhere, in [161], porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanoparticles were prepared from mechanically ground pine nut shells, a source of abundant biomass waste. These were subsequently activated with KOH and melamine. The activation process resulted in the formation of porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets. In a two-electrode configuration, supercapacitors with electrode materials prepared from the synthesized carbon nanosheets exhibited an excellent specific capacitance of 324 F/g at 0.05 A/g, exceptional performance of 258 F/g at 20 A/g, and remarkable cycle stability of 94.6% after 10,000 cycles at 2 A/g in a 6 M aqueous KOH electrolyte. Zhang et al. [162] produced a low-cost SiO2-x/C composite from needle coke via a simple mechanochemical method. This process minimized energy utilization by harnessing the heat generated during ball milling to fuse nanoparticles into a 3D porous structure. The SiO2-x/C composite was employed as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Uniform carbon distribution within the composite provides good electrical conductivity, significantly enhancing its cycling stability. The anode delivered a high reversible capacity of about 550 mAh/g after 180 cycles. Even at a current density of 800 mA/g, it maintained a discharge capacity of 390 mAh/g. Considering the low cost of raw materials and the simplicity of the synthesis method, the composite presents a promising candidate for lithium-ion battery anodes. Table 3 presents porous carbons derived from biomass obtained using various activation methods for applications in supercapacitors, along with their SSA, pore volume, and maximum specific capacitance.

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

Renewable biomass can serve as an alternative to limited fossil fuel resources for producing chemicals and porous materials. However, challenges persist regarding the efficiency and environmental sustainability of biomass conversion. Green chemistry, also known as sustainable chemistry, focuses on designing processes and products that minimize the generation of harmful substances. Mechanochemistry aligns closely with green chemistry principles as it simplifies technological procedures, eliminates laborious processes involving gases and reagents, and may serve as a key technology in waste biomass processing [195]. Thus, mechanochemistry appears to be an eco-friendly and cost-effective method for producing carbon materials from various biomass sources. Diverse cost-effective methods for the synthesis and modification of biochars, such as metal impregnation and physical activation, have been recently proposed to enhance their specific properties and applicational performance. This review presents recent advances in the synthesis of porous carbon materials through the ball milling of biomass and biomass wastes. It covers the physicochemical properties of the resulting carbons, with a particular focus on their adsorption, catalytic, and electrochemical properties. The mechanochemical synthesis of porous carbons offers several advantages over conventional solution-based methods. This approach enables faster biomass conversion while eliminating steps such as solid–liquid separation and drying. The abundance of renewable biomass makes it a sustainable carbon source, suitable to produce adsorbents and supports for metallic or metal-free catalysts. Moreover, this technique allows for the easy functionalization of the resulting materials, including incorporation of heteroatoms, functional groups, metal nanoparticles, and surface defects that enhance the reactivity of the milled sample [196].
Future market demand emphasizes highly efficient, selective, and cost-effective adsorbents and catalysts produced using facile, economical, and ecological methods. Mechanochemistry offers an environmentally friendly approach for developing and producing functional nanoporous materials. Given their wide range of applications, this method is particularly well suited for synthesizing such materials using inexpensive and sustainable resources [30]. The significant reduction in solvent consumption associated with ball milling contributes to its lower costs and reduced environmental impacts [197]. However, post-synthesis purification is usually required, similar to solution-based methods. Moreover, mechanochemical devices such as ball mills and extruders face several challenges that limit their scalability and industrial applicability. These include issues with temperature control, contamination, and energy efficiency, all of which affect the economic viability of large-scale mechanochemical processes. The quantities of mechanochemically synthesized functional materials currently range from a few grams to hundreds of kilograms. Mechanochemical synthesis conditions can be easily adjusted, enabling the production of materials on a larger scale. However, as synthesis scales increase, challenges such as uneven mass and heat transfer effects can degrade the structure and properties of the final products. Moreover, heat generated during milling can cause unwanted side reactions or phase changes, which limit options for precise control. Careful optimization of screw design and temperature profiles in extruder setups are more complex than in ball mills. Despite the potential for scale-up, further production increases may also be hindered by technical difficulties associated with the construction of safe-operating high-speed mills or extruders with a high production capacity; the throughput may be especially limited for low-density materials like plant-based feedstocks. Moreover, the high energy consumption of mechanochemical processes presents a barrier to large-scale processing. Combining mechanical milling with other technologies could help reduce energy consumption. However, one should note that high-energy milling generates significant vibrations, requiring robust infrastructure and potentially complicated integration into existing processes. Another important issue is contamination; the wear of milling accessories can introduce impurities, especially when reactive materials are involved, posing challenges for high-purity applications.
This article provides a critical review of the current state of knowledge on milling technologies for biomass processing. For instance, mechanical milling can be applied for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass, achieving yields comparable to traditional acid or base pretreatment methods while maintaining the simplicity of solvent-free mechanochemical processes. Ball milling pretreatment enhances biomass conversion efficiency by influencing crystallinity, polymerization degree, surface area, thermal stability, and particle size. Mechanochemistry also opens new avenues for the design and synthesis of biomass-derived materials, particularly ordered mesoporous carbons, hierarchical porous carbons, and metal–carbon composites. This method has enabled the production of diverse, highly porous carbons from tannins, cellulose-based biomass, dried flowers, coconut shells, nutshells, bamboo waste, sawdust, and other natural sources. Mechanochemical synthesis usually involves preliminary precursor preparation and processing, including reactions with other additives, mixing with activating agents, conversion, incorporation of functional additives, etc., prior to undergoing thermal treatment (carbonization). The mechanochemical processing of biomass facilitates intimate mixing and enhances reactivity, often under solvent-free conditions. However, in most cases, the milled mixture must undergo thermal treatment to achieve the desired structural and functional properties in the final material. Fundamental research on mechanochemical synthesis of nanoporous carbon materials is crucial for further advancement of nanomaterials. Many questions remain, such as how biomass structure changes under mechanochemical treatment. We hope that soon, novel carbon-based adsorbents, carbon-supported catalysts, and other nanocomposite materials derived from inexpensive biomass wastes, as well as practical large-scale mechanochemical technologies, will emerge.

Author Contributions

J.C.: Writing—original draft, visualization, investigation, and conceptualization; B.S.: writing—original draft, investigation, supervision, and conceptualization; M.J.: writing—review and editing, supervision, and conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant number 2024/55/D/ST5/00127.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kubota, K.; Ito, H. Mechanochemical Cross-Coupling Reactions. Trends Chem. 2020, 2, 1066–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, L.-Y.; Dong, X.-L.; Lu, A.-H. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Porous Carbons and Their Applications in Catalysis. Chempluschem 2020, 85, 866–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amrute, A.P.; Łodziana, Z.; Schreyer, H.; Weidenthaler, C.; Schüth, F. High-Surface-Area Corundum by Mechanochemically Induced Phase Transformation of Boehmite. Science 2019, 366, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. James, S.L.; Adams, C.J.; Bolm, C.; Braga, D.; Collier, P.; Friščić, T.; Grepioni, F.; Harris, K.D.M.; Hyett, G.; Jones, W.; et al. Mechanochemistry: Opportunities for New and Cleaner Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 413–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Howard, J.L.; Cao, Q.; Browne, D.L. Mechanochemistry as an Emerging Tool for Molecular Synthesis: What Can It Offer? Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3080–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shen, F.; Xiong, X.; Fu, J.; Yang, J.; Qiu, M.; Qi, X.; Tsang, D.C.W. Recent Advances in Mechanochemical Production of Chemicals and Carbon Materials from Sustainable Biomass Resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 130, 109944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sevilla, M.; Mokaya, R. Energy Storage Applications of Activated Carbons: Supercapacitors and Hydrogen Storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1250–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pavlenko, V.; Khosravi H, S.; Żółtowska, S.; Haruna, A.B.; Zahid, M.; Mansurov, Z.; Supiyeva, Z.; Galal, A.; Ozoemena, K.I.; Abbas, Q.; et al. A Comprehensive Review of Template-Assisted Porous Carbons: Modern Preparation Methods and Advanced Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2022, 149, 100682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Béguin, F.; Presser, V.; Balducci, A.; Frackowiak, E. Carbons and Electrolytes for Advanced Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2219–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jastrzębski, K.; Kula, P. Emerging Technology for a Green, Sustainable Energy-Promising Materials for Hydrogen Storage, from Nanotubes to Graphene—A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szczęśniak, B.; Phuriragpitikhon, J.; Jaroniec, M. Recent Advances in the Development and Applications of Biomass-Derived Carbons with Uniform Porosity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 18464–18491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, B.; Wan, L.; Du, C.; Ye, H.; Tian, Z.; Xie, M. Reduced Graphene Composited N-Containing Polymer Engineered by Ball Milling as Electrode for High-Volumetric-Performance Supercapacitor. J. Energy Storage 2024, 99, 113259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sheldon, R.A. Green and Sustainable Manufacture of Chemicals from Biomass: State of the Art. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 950–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adams, P.; Bridgwater, T.; Lea-Langton, A.; Ross, A.; Watson, I. Chapter 8—Biomass Conversion Technologies. In Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems; Thornley, P., Adams, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 107–139. ISBN 978-0-08-101036-5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, S.; Dai, G.; Yang, H.; Luo, Z. Lignocellulosic Biomass Pyrolysis Mechanism: A State-of-the-Art Review. Prog. Energy Combust Sci. 2017, 62, 33–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chaubey, A.K.; Pratap, T.; Preetiva, B.; Patel, M.; Singsit, J.S.; Pittman, C.U., Jr.; Mohan, D. Definitive Review of Nanobiochar. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 12331–12379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, C.; De, S.; Balu, A.M.; Ojeda, M.; Luque, R. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Advanced Nanomaterials for Catalytic Applications. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6698–6713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takacs, L. The Historical Development of Mechanochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7649–7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Agricola, G. De Re Metallica; Hoover, H.C.; Hoover, L.H., Translators; Dover Publications, Inc.: Garden City, NY, USA, 1912. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bacon, F.; Rawley, W. Opuscula Varia Posthuma, Philosophica, Civilia, et Theologica (1663); Daniel, E.R., Pulleyn, I.O., Eds.; Apud Johannem Ravesteinium: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  21. Horie, K.; Máximo, B.; Fox, R.B.; He, J.; Hess, M.; Kahovec, J.; Kitayama, T.; Kubisa, P.; Maréchal, E.; Mormann, W.; et al. Definitions of terms relating to reactions of polymers and to functional polymeric materials (IUPAC Recommendations 2003). Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 889–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Michalchuk, A.A.L.; Tumanov, I.A.; Drebushchak, V.A.; Boldyreva, E. V Advances in Elucidating Mechanochemical Complexities via Implementation of a Simple Organic System. Faraday Discuss. 2014, 170, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Noorduin, W.L.; Izumi, T.; Millemaggi, A.; Leeman, M.; Meekes, H.; Van Enckevort, W.J.P.; Kellogg, R.M.; Kaptein, B.; Vlieg, E.; Blackmond, D.G. Emergence of a Single Solid Chiral State from a Nearly Racemic Amino Acid Derivative. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1158–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, N.; Biswas, K. Fabrication of Novel Cryomill for Synthesis of High Purity Metallic Nanoparticles. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015, 86, 083903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Baláž, P.; Achimovičová, M.; Baláž, M.; Billik, P.; Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.; Criado, J.M.; Delogu, F.; Dutková, E.; Gaffet, E.; Gotor, F.J.; et al. Hallmarks of Mechanochemistry: From Nanoparticles to Technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7571–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stolle, A.; Schmidt, R.; Jacob, K. Scale-up of Organic Reactions in Ball Mills: Process Intensification with Regard to Energy Efficiency and Economy of Scale. Faraday Discuss. 2014, 170, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Crawford, D.E.; Miskimmin, C.K.G.; Albadarin, A.B.; Walker, G.; James, S.L. Organic Synthesis by Twin Screw Extrusion (TSE): Continuous, Scalable and Solvent-Free. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1507–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hajiali, F.; Jin, T.; Yang, G.; Santos, M.; Lam, E.; Moores, A. Mechanochemical Transformations of Biomass into Functional Materials. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202102535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lomovskiy, I.; Bychkov, A.; Lomovsky, O.; Skripkina, T. Mechanochemical and Size Reduction Machines for Biorefining. Molecules 2020, 25, 5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuga, S.; Wu, M. Mechanochemistry of Cellulose. Cellulose 2019, 26, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tursi, A. A Review on Biomass: Importance, Chemistry, Classification, and Conversion. Biofuel Res. J. 2019, 6, 962–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Shen, T.; Wang, X.; Xia, X.; Tu, J. Natural Biomass-Derived Carbons for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 88, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Song, N.; Li, X. Biomass-Derived Renewable Carbon Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Mater. Res. Lett. 2017, 5, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bar-On, Y.M.; Phillips, R.; Milo, R. The Biomass Distribution on Earth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6506–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hu, B.; Yu, S.-H.; Wang, K.; Liu, L.; Xu, X.-W. Functional Carbonaceous Materials from Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass: An Effective Chemical Process. Dalton Trans. 2008, 40, 5414–5423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. De, S.; Balu, A.M.; van der Waal, J.C.; Luque, R. Biomass-Derived Porous Carbon Materials: Synthesis and Catalytic Applications. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 1608–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hemingway, R.W. Practical Polyphenolics: From Structure to Molecular Recognition and Physiological Action By Edwin Haslam (University of Sheffield). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 1998. Xv + 422 Pp. 17 × 24.5 Cm. $100.00. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1454–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Jiao, Y.; Katahira, R.; Ciesielski, P.N.; Himmel, M.; Zhu, H. Heavy Metal-Free Tannin from Bark for Sustainable Energy Storage. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 7897–7907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kraus, T.E.C.; Dahlgren, R.A.; Zasoski, R.J. Tannins in Nutrient Dynamics of Forest Ecosystems—A Review. Plant Soil 2003, 256, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lemieux, J.; Bélanger, D.; Santato, C. Toward Biosourced Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage: The Case of Tannins. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 6079–6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shen, X.; Xin, Y.; Liu, H.; Han, B. Product-Oriented Direct Cleavage of Chemical Linkages in Lignin. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 4367–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zakzeski, J.; Bruijnincx, P.C.A.; Jongerius, A.L.; Weckhuysen, B.M. The Catalytic Valorization of Lignin for the Production of Renewable Chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3552–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, C.; Arancon, R.A.D.; Labidi, J.; Luque, R. Lignin Depolymerisation Strategies: Towards Valuable Chemicals and Fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7485–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F.; Davison, B.H.; Dixon, R.A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M.; et al. Lignin Valorization: Improving Lignin Processing in the Biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Calcio Gaudino, E.; Cravotto, G.; Manzoli, M.; Tabasso, S. Sono- and Mechanochemical Technologies in the Catalytic Conversion of Biomass. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 1785–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ali, W.A.; Richards, S.E.; Alzard, R.H. Unlocking the Potential of Ball Milling for Nanomaterial Synthesis: An Overview. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2025, 149, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thomas, B.; Raj, M.C.; Athira, K.B.; Rubiyah, M.H.; Joy, J.; Moores, A.; Drisko, G.L.; Sanchez, C. Nanocellulose, a Versatile Green Platform: From Biosources to Materials and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11575–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Subhedar, A.; Bhadauria, S.; Ahankari, S.; Kargarzadeh, H. Nanocellulose in Biomedical and Biosensing Applications: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lasrado, D.; Ahankari, S.; Kar, K. Nanocellulose-Based Polymer Composites for Energy Applications—A Review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Scheller, H.V.; Ulvskov, P. Hemicelluloses. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2010, 61, 263–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, A.; Rapoport, A.; Kunze, G.; Kumar, S.; Singh, D.; Singh, B. Multifarious Pretreatment Strategies for the Lignocellulosic Substrates for the Generation of Renewable and Sustainable Biofuels: A Review. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1228–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, G.; Yu, W. Effect of Hemicellulose from Rice Bran on Low Fat Meatballs Chemical and Functional Properties. Food Chem. 2015, 186, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rath, S.S.; Sahoo, H. A Review on the Application of Starch as Depressant in Iron Ore Flotation. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2022, 43, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Le Corre, D.; Bras, J.; Dufresne, A. Starch Nanoparticles: A Review. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1139–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alvira, P.; Tomás-Pejó, E.; Ballesteros, M.; Negro, M.J. Pretreatment Technologies for an Efficient Bioethanol Production Process Based on Enzymatic Hydrolysis: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4851–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Putro, J.N.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Lin, S.-Y.; Ju, Y.-H.; Ismadji, S. Pretreatment and Conversion of Lignocellulose Biomass into Valuable Chemicals. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 46834–46852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Barakat, A.; Monlau, F.; Solhy, A.; Carrere, H. Mechanical Dissociation and Fragmentation of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Effect of Initial Moisture, Biochemical and Structural Proprieties on Energy Requirement. Appl. Energy 2015, 142, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zakaria, M.R.; Fujimoto, S.; Hirata, S.; Hassan, M.A. Ball Milling Pretreatment of Oil Palm Biomass for Enhancing Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 1778–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Mitchell, R.J.; Lee, J.H. Environmentally Friendly Pretreatment of Plant Biomass by Planetary and Attrition Milling. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 144, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, H.; Zhang, P.; Ye, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Fang, W.; Xu, D.; Wang, B.; Yan, L.; Zeng, G. Comparison of Various Pretreatments for Ethanol Production Enhancement from Solid Residue after Rumen Fluid Digestion of Rice Straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jiang, L.; Zheng, A.; Meng, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Li, H. A Comparative Investigation of Fast Pyrolysis with Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Fermentable Sugars Production from Cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 274, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Buaban, B.; Inoue, H.; Yano, S.; Tanapongpipat, S.; Ruanglek, V.; Champreda, V.; Pichyangkura, R.; Rengpipat, S.; Eurwilaichitr, L. Bioethanol Production from Ball Milled Bagasse Using an On-Site Produced Fungal Enzyme Cocktail and Xylose-Fermenting Pichia Stipitis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010, 110, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Real Pérez, C.; Alcalá González, M.D.; Romero Sarria, F.; Hidalgo López, M.d.C.; Córdoba Gallego, J.M. Investigating the Room- and Cryo-Milling Impact in Lignocellulosic Biomass and Its Consequence over Pyrolysis and Oxidative Treatments. J. Clean Prod. 2024, 437, 140761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Avolio, R.; Bonadies, I.; Capitani, D.; Errico, M.E.; Gentile, G.; Avella, M. A Multitechnique Approach to Assess the Effect of Ball Milling on Cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, J.H.; Kwon, J.H.; Kim, T.H.; Choi, W. Il Impact of Planetary Ball Mills on Corn Stover Characteristics and Enzymatic Digestibility Depending on Grinding Ball Properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 241, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bangar, S.P.; Singh, A.; Ashogbon, A.O.; Bobade, H. Ball-Milling: A Sustainable and Green Approach for Starch Modification. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 237, 124069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Monson, P.A. Understanding Adsorption/Desorption Hysteresis for Fluids in Mesoporous Materials Using Simple Molecular Models and Classical Density Functional Theory. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 160, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Balzer, C.; Waag, A.M.; Gehret, S.; Reichenauer, G.; Putz, F.; Hüsing, N.; Paris, O.; Bernstein, N.; Gor, G.Y.; Neimark, A. V Adsorption-Induced Deformation of Hierarchically Structured Mesoporous Silica—Effect of Pore-Level Anisotropy. Langmuir 2017, 33, 5592–5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Lopez-Gonzalez, J.D.D.; Berenguer, C. Activated Carbons from Almond Shells—I: Preparation and Characterization by Nitrogen Adsorption. Carbon 1982, 20, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.; Martín-Martínez, J.M.; Molina-Sabio, M.; Pérez-Lledó, I.; Prado-Burguete, C. A Comparison of the Porous Texture of Two CO2 Activated Botanic Materials. Carbon 1985, 23, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.; Molina-Sabio, M.; González, M.T. The Use of Steam and CO2 as Activating Agents in the Preparation of Activated Carbons. Carbon 1995, 33, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bader, N.; Ouederni, A. Optimization of Biomass-Based Carbon Materials for Hydrogen Storage. J. Energy Storage 2016, 5, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Prauchner, M.J.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. Chemical versus Physical Activation of Coconut Shell: A Comparative Study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 152, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ello, A.S.; de Souza, L.K.C.; Trokourey, A.; Jaroniec, M. Coconut Shell-Based Microporous Carbons for CO2 Capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 180, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Saini, V.K.; Pinto, M.; Pires, J. Natural Clay Binder Based Extrudates of Mesoporous Materials: Improved Materials for Selective Adsorption of Natural and Biogas Components. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1251–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ello, A.S.; de Souza, L.K.C.; Trokourey, A.; Jaroniec, M. Development of Microporous Carbons for CO2 Capture by KOH Activation of African Palm Shells. J. CO2 Util. 2013, 2, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Md Arshad, S.H.; Ngadi, N.; Aziz, A.A.; Amin, N.S.; Jusoh, M.; Wong, S. Preparation of Activated Carbon from Empty Fruit Bunch for Hydrogen Storage. J. Energy Storage 2016, 8, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Serafin, J.; Dziejarski, B.; Cruz Junior, O.F.; Sreńscek-Nazzal, J. Design of Highly Microporous Activated Carbons Based on Walnut Shell Biomass for H2 and CO2 Storage. Carbon 2023, 201, 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, H.; Lin, L.; Kong, W.; Yin, H.; Hu, W.; Bi, X.; Yang, Z.; Chen, W.; Hu, N. Hierarchically Bread-Derived Carbon Foam Decorated with Defect Engineering in Reduced Graphene Oxide/Carbon Particle Nanocomposites as Electrode Materials for Solid-State Supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2023, 68, 107616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Muhammad, R.; Nah, Y.-C.; Oh, H. Spider Silk-Derived Nanoporous Activated Carbon Fiber for CO2 Capture and CH4 and H2 Storage. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 69, 102401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Deng, J.; Li, M.; Wang, Y. Biomass-Derived Carbon: Synthesis and Applications in Energy Storage and Conversion. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4824–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Y.; Huang, B.; Lin, X.; Xie, Z. Biomass-Derived Hierarchical Porous Carbons: Boosting the Energy Density of Supercapacitors via an Ionothermal Approach. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 13009–13018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Szczesniak, B.; Borysiuk, S.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Highly Porous Materials. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 1457–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, P.; Wang, L.; Yang, S.; Schott, J.A.; Liu, X.; Mahurin, S.M.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Fulvio, P.F.; Chisholm, M.F.; et al. Solid-State Synthesis of Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Catalysts via a Mechanochemical Assembly through Coordination Cross-Linking. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sanchez-Sanchez, A.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Medjahdi, G.; Ghanbaja, J.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V. Ordered Mesoporous Carbons Obtained by Soft-Templating of Tannin in Mild Conditions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 270, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Schlienger, S.; Graff, A.-L.; Celzard, A.; Parmentier, J. Direct Synthesis of Ordered Mesoporous Polymer and Carbon Materials by a Biosourced Precursor. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Braghiroli, F.L.; Fierro, V.; Parmentier, J.; Pasc, A.; Celzard, A. Easy and Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Ordered Mesoporous Carbons by Self-Assembly of Tannin with a Block Copolymer. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3265–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Szczęśniak, B.; Głowniak, S.; Woźniak, J.; Popiel, S.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Ordered Mesoporous Carbons with Well-Dispersed Nickel or Platinum Nanoparticles for Room Temperature Hydrogen Adsorption. Molecules 2023, 28, 6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Castro-Gutiérrez, J.; Sanchez-Sanchez, A.; Ghanbaja, J.; Díez, N.; Sevilla, M.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V. Synthesis of Perfectly Ordered Mesoporous Carbons by Water-Assisted Mechanochemical Self-Assembly of Tannin. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 5123–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, P.; Yang, S.; Zhan, W.; Dai, S. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Ruthenium Cluster@Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Catalysts by Synergetic Dual Templates. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 8494–8498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shan, W.; Zhang, P.; Yang, S.; Zhu, H.; Wu, P.; Xing, H.; Dai, S. Sustainable Synthesis of Alkaline Metal Oxide-Mesoporous Carbons via Mechanochemical Coordination Self-Assembly. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 23446–23452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhao, J.; Shan, W.; Zhang, P.; Dai, S. Solvent-Free and Mechanochemical Synthesis of N-Doped Mesoporous Carbon from Tannin and Related Gas Sorption Property. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tiruye, G.A.; Muñoz-Torrero, D.; Berthold, T.; Palma, J.; Antonietti, M.; Fechler, N.; Marcilla, R. Functional Porous Carbon Nanospheres from Sustainable Precursors for High Performance Supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16263–16272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Głowniak, S.; Szczęśniak, B.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Highly Porous Carbons Synthesized from Tannic Acid via a Combined Mechanochemical Salt-Templating and Mild Activation Strategy. Molecules 2021, 26, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cai, C.; Fu, N.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, M.; Yang, Z.; Liu, R. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Tannic Acid-Fe Coordination Compound and Its Derived Porous Carbon for CO2 Adsorption. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 10779–10785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Szczęśniak, B.; Osuchowski, Ł.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Record-High Benzene Adsorption Capacity of Colloid-Imprinted Mesoporous Carbons Synthesized from Biomass by Ball Milling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 360, 131097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Su, F.; Lu, C.; Hu, S. Adsorption of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and p-Xylene by NaOCl-Oxidized Carbon Nanotubes. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 353, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wibowo, N.; Setyadhi, L.; Wibowo, D.; Setiawan, J.; Ismadji, S. Adsorption of Benzene and Toluene from Aqueous Solutions onto Activated Carbon and Its Acid and Heat Treated Forms: Influence of Surface Chemistry on Adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wang, G.; Dou, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Hao, Z. Adsorption of Benzene, Cyclohexane and Hexane on Ordered Mesoporous Carbon. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 30, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mohammed, J.; Nasri, N.S.; Ahmad Zaini, M.A.; Hamza, U.D.; Ani, F.N. Adsorption of Benzene and Toluene onto KOH Activated Coconut Shell Based Carbon Treated with NH3. Int. Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2015, 102, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Khan, A.; Szulejko, J.E.; Samaddar, P.; Kim, K.-H.; Liu, B.; Maitlo, H.A.; Yang, X.; Ok, Y.S. The Potential of Biochar as Sorptive Media for Removal of Hazardous Benzene in Air. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Szczęśniak, B.; Osuchowski, Ł.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Highly Porous Carbons Obtained by Activation of Polypyrrole/Reduced Graphene Oxide as Effective Adsorbents for CO2, H2 and C6H6. J. Porous Mater. 2018, 25, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Osuchowski, Ł.; Szczęśniak, B.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. High Benzene Adsorption Capacity of Micro-Mesoporous Carbon Spheres Prepared from XAD-4 Resin Beads with Pores Protected Effectively by Silica. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 13892–13900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shen, X.; Ou, R.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, A.; Liu, J.; Gu, J.; Hu, X.; Yang, Z.; Yang, F. Record-High Capture of Volatile Benzene and Toluene Enabled by Activator Implant-Optimized Banana Peel-Derived Engineering Carbonaceous Adsorbents. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, C.; Yin, H.; Tian, P.; Sun, X.; Pan, X.; Chen, K.; Chen, W.-J.; Wu, Q.-H.; Luo, S. Remarkable Adsorption Performance of MOF-199 Derived Porous Carbons for Benzene Vapor. Environ. Res. 2020, 184, 109323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Gwardiak, S.; Szczęśniak, B.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Benzene Adsorption on Synthesized and Commercial Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Porous Mater. 2019, 26, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Szczęśniak, B.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Ultrahigh Benzene Adsorption Capacity of Graphene-MOF Composite Fabricated via MOF Crystallization in 3D Mesoporous Graphene. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 279, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Moroni, M.; Roldan-Molina, E.; Vismara, R.; Galli, S.; Navarro, J.A.R. Impact of Pore Flexibility in Imine-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks on Benzene and Cyclohexane Adsorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 40890–40901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Szczęśniak, B.; Choma, J.; Jaroniec, M. Sustainable Mechanochemical Synthesis of Catalytically Graphitized Mesoporous Carbons. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2024, 372, 113117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ohta, Y.; Nishi, S.; Haga, T.; Tsubouchi, T.; Hasegawa, R.; Konishi, M.; Nagano, Y.; Tsuruwaka, Y.; Shimane, Y.; Mori, K.; et al. Screening and Phylogenetic Analysis of Deep-Sea Bacteria Capable of Metabolizing Lignin-Derived Aromatic Compounds. Open J. Mar. Sci. 2012, 2, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Babeł, K.; Jurewicz, K. KOH Activated Lignin Based Nanostructured Carbon Exhibiting High Hydrogen Electrosorption. Carbon 2008, 46, 1948–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gao, S.; Chen, Y.; Fan, H.; Wei, X.; Hu, C.; Luo, H.; Qu, L. Large Scale Production of Biomass-Derived N-Doped Porous Carbon Spheres for Oxygen Reduction and Supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3317–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, W.; Qiu, X.; Wang, C.; Zhong, L.; Fu, F.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, Y.; Yang, D.; Xu, C.C. Lignin Derived Carbon Materials: Current Status and Future Trends. Carbon Res. 2022, 1, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, J.; Yu, L.; Wang, Z.; Tian, Y.; Qu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, H. Spherical Microporous/Mesoporous Activated Carbon from Pulping Black Liquor. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86, 1177–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rodriguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T.; Rodriguez, J.J. Activated Carbons from Carbon Dioxide Partial Gasification of Eucalyptus Kraft Lignin. Energy Fuels 1993, 7, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Schneidermann, C.; Jäckel, N.; Oswald, S.; Giebeler, L.; Presser, V.; Borchardt, L. Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Nanoporous Carbon for Electrochemical Energy Storage. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 2416–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lu, H.; Sun, X.; Gaddam, R.R.; Kumar, N.A.; Zhao, X.S. Electrocapacitive Properties of Nitrogen-Containing Porous Carbon Derived from Cellulose. J. Power Sources 2017, 360, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, H.; Sun, F.; Qu, Z.; Wang, K.; Wang, L.; Pi, X.; Gao, J.; Zhao, G. Oxygen Functional Group Modification of Cellulose-Derived Hard Carbon for Enhanced Sodium Ion Storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 18554–18565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wei, L.; Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A.B.; Mokaya, R.; Yushin, G. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Abundant Renewable Natural Organic Chemicals for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gui, Z.; Zhu, H.; Gillette, E.; Han, X.; Rubloff, G.W.; Hu, L.; Lee, S.B. Natural Cellulose Fiber as Substrate for Supercapacitor. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6037–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Wu, X.; Tang, J.; Duan, Y.; Yu, A.; Berry, R.M.; Tam, K.C. Conductive Cellulose Nanocrystals with High Cycling Stability for Supercapacitor Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 19268–19274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Lu, H.; Li, H.; Zhao, X.S. Cellulose-Derived Hierarchical Porous Carbon for High-Performance Flexible Supercapacitors. Carbon 2018, 140, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Huang, P.; Wu, M.; Kuga, S.; Wang, D.; Wu, D.; Huang, Y. One-Step Dispersion of Cellulose Nanofibers by Mechanochemical Esterification in an Organic Solvent. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 2319–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Onsri, P.; Dubadi, R.; Chuenchom, L.; Dechtrirat, D.; Jaroniec, M. Highly Porous Carbons Prepared via Water-Assisted Mechanochemical Treatment of Cellulose-Based Materials Followed by Carbonization and Mild Activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2024, 364, 112869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lin, X.; Liang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Lou, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Zheng, B.; Liu, R.; Fu, R.; Wu, D. Mechanochemistry: A Green, Activation-Free and Top-Down Strategy to High-Surface-Area Carbon Materials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8535–8540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Qi, J.; Zhang, W.; Xu, L. Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Preparation of Hierarchically Porous Carbon for Supercapacitor and Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 18097–18105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Qanytah; Syamsu, K.; Fahma, F.; Pari, G. Characterization of Ball-Milled Sago Pith Waste-Based Activated Carbon Treated with KOH and KMnO4 as Activating Agent. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 935, 012043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jiang, B.; Cao, L.; Yuan, Q.; Ma, Z.; Huang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, P. Biomass Straw-Derived Porous Carbon Synthesized for Supercapacitor by Ball Milling. Mater. 2022, 15, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Guo, L.; Sun, X.; Huang, N. Ball-Milling Effect on Biomass-Derived Nanocarbon Catalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 6019–6028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Guo, C.; Liao, W.; Li, Z.; Sun, L.; Chen, C. Easy Conversion of Protein-Rich Enoki Mushroom Biomass to a Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanomaterial as a Promising Metal-Free Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 15990–15998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Naghdi, M.; Taheran, M.; Brar, S.K.; Rouissi, T.; Verma, M.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Valero, J.R. A Green Method for Production of Nanobiochar by Ball Milling- Optimization and Characterization. J. Clean Prod. 2017, 164, 1394–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, X.; Miao, X.; Xiang, W.; Zhang, J.; Cao, C.; Wang, H.; Hu, X.; Gao, B. Ball Milling Biochar with Ammonia Hydroxide or Hydrogen Peroxide Enhances Its Adsorption of Phenyl Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Lesbayev, B.; Auyelkhankyzy, M.; Ustayeva, G.; Yeleuov, M.; Rakhymzhan, N.; Maltay, A.; Maral, Y. Recent Advances: Biomass-Derived Porous Carbon Materials. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 43, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Balahmar, N.; Mitchell, A.C.; Mokaya, R. Generalized Mechanochemical Synthesis of Biomass-Derived Sustainable Carbons for High Performance CO2 Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Liu, D.; Shao, L.; Zhan, P.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.; Wang, J.; Ma, X.; Huang, J. Insights into Mechanochemical Assisted Preparation of Lignin-Based N-Doped Porous Carbon with Tunable Porosity and Ultrahigh Surface Oxygen Content for Efficient CO2 Capture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 347, 127657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Rajendiran, R.; Nallal, M.; Park, K.H.; Li, O.L.; Kim, H.-J.; Prabakar, K. Mechanochemical Assisted Synthesis of Heteroatoms Inherited Highly Porous Carbon from Biomass for Electrochemical Capacitor and Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysis. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 317, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yue, M.; Lu, H.; Liu, H. Study on the Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbon and Enhanced Carbon Capture Performance via MOF-Assisted Granulation. Langmuir 2025, 41, 12078–12088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zou, R.; Wang, B.; Zhu, L.; Yan, L.; Shi, F.; Sun, Y.; Shao, B.; Zhang, S.; Sun, W. Biomass derived porous carbon supported nano-Co3O4 composite for high-performance supercapacitors. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 126, 109060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Cai, T.; Wang, H.; Jin, C.; Sun, Q.; Nie, Y. Fabrication of nitrogen-doped porous electrically conductive carbon aerogel from waste cabbage for supercapacitors and oil/water separation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 4334–4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zang, L.; Bu, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y. Hollow carbon fiber sponges from crude catkins: An ultralow cost absorbent for oils and organic solvents. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48715–48719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhao, J.; Lu, S.; Fu, Y.; Ma, W.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, H. Experimental study on thermal runaway behaviors of 18650 li-ion battery under enclosed and ventilated conditions. Fire Saf. J. 2021, 125, 103417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yang, H.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, Q.; Xia, S. Preparation of hydrophobic carbon aerogel using cellulose extracted from luffa sponge for adsorption of diesel oil. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 33827–33834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Lei, E.; Sun, J.; Gan, W.; Wu, Z.; Xu, Z.; Xu, L.; Ma, C.; Li, W.; Liu, S. N-doped cellulose-based carbon aerogels with a honeycomb-like structure for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2021, 38, 102414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, C.; Sun, F.; Lin, Y. Refining cocoon to prepare (N, S, and Fe) ternary-doped porous carbon aerogel as efficient catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline medium. J. Power Sour. 2018, 384, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, F.; You, L.; Shen, X.; Li, S. Removal of organic solvents/oils using carbon aerogels derived from waste durian shell. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 78, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X. Cotton derived carbonaceous aerogels for the efficient removal of organic pollutants and heavy metal ions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6073–6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhu, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; You, L.; Shen, X.; Li, S. An environmentally friendly carbon aerogels derived from waste pomelo peels for the removal of organic pollutants/oils. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 241, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, Y.-Q.; Samad, Y.A.; Polychronopoulou, K.; Liao, K. Lightweight and highly conductive aerogel-like carbon from sugarcane with superior mechanical and EMI shielding properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chen, Z.; Zhuo, H.; Hu, Y.; Lai, H.; Liu, L.; Zhong, L.; Peng, X. Wood-derived lightweight and elastic carbon aerogel for pressure sensing and energy storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Vazhayal, L.; Wilson, P.; Prabhakaran, K. Waste to wealth: Lightweight, mechanically strong and conductive carbon aerogels from waste tissue paper for electromagnetic shielding and CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. . Foorginezhad, S.; Weiland, F.; Chen, Y.; Hussain, S.; Ji, X. Review and analysis of porous adsorbents for effective CO2 capture. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 215, 115589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Nelson, K.M.; Mahurin, S.M.; Mayes, R.T.; Williamson, B.; Teague, C.M.; Binder, A.J.; Baggetto, L.; Veith, G.M.; Dai, S. Preparation and CO2 Adsorption Properties of Soft-Templated Mesoporous Carbons Derived from Chestnut Tannin Precursors. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 222, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Dubadi, R.; Jaroniec, M. One-Pot Mechanochemical Synthesis of Carbons with High Microporosity and Ordered Mesopores for CO2 Uptake at Ambient Conditions. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Saning, A.; Dubadi, R.; Chuenchom, L.; Dechtrirat, D.; Jaroniec, M. Microporous Carbons Obtained via Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Processing, Carbonization and Activation with Potassium Citrate and Zinc Chloride for CO2 Adsorption. Separations 2023, 10, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Xing, H.; Zhiyuan, L.; Kai, W.; Yi, L. Fabrication of Three Dimensional Interconnected Porous Carbons from Branched Anodic Aluminum Oxide Template. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Sun, M.; Ma, W.; Dong, Y.; Xie, Z.; Kong, L.; Zhao, Z. Scaled and Green Production of C-Doped BN Derived from Biomass Waste for Highly Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene. Renew. Energy 2025, 243, 122553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, J.; Xie, L.; Wang, Z.; Mao, S.; Gong, Y.; Wang, Y. Biomass-Derived Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Nano-Ellipsoid Encapsulated Metal Nanoparticles inside: Ideal Nanoreactors for Shape-Selective Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Lázaro, N.; Castro-Gutiérrez, J.; Ramírez-Vidal, P.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V.; AlGarni, T.S.; Pineda, A.; Luque, R. Mechanochemical Functionalization of Mesoporous Carbons for the Catalytic Transformation of Trans-Ferulic Acid into Vanillin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 4704–4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Qiu, M.; Bai, C.; Yan, L.; Shen, F.; Qi, X. Efficient Mechanochemical-Assisted Production of Glucose from Cellulose in Aqueous Solutions by Carbonaceous Solid Acid Catalysts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 13826–13833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.; Li, H.; Cao, Q.; Jin, L.; Li, P. Porous Graphitic Carbon Microtubes Derived from Willow Catkins as a Substrate of MnO2 for Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2017, 344, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Guan, L.; Pan, L.; Peng, T.; Gao, C.; Zhao, W.; Yang, Z.; Hu, H.; Wu, M. Synthesis of Biomass-Derived Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Nanosheests for High-Performance Supercapacitors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 8405–8412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zhang, B.; Wang, H.; Liu, C.; Li, D.; Kim, H.-K.; Harris, C.; Lao, C.; Abdelkader, A.; Xi, K. Facile Mechanochemical Synthesis of Non-Stoichiometric Silica-Carbon Composite for Enhanced Lithium Storage Properties. J. Alloys Compd 2019, 801, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tian, W.; Gao, Q.; Tan, Y.; Yang, K.; Zhu, L.; Yang, C.; Zhang, H. Bio-inspired beehive-like hierarchical nanoporous carbon derived from bamboobased industrial by-product as a high performance supercapacitor electrode material. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 5656–5664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wang, R.; Wang, P.; Yan, X.; Lang, J.; Peng, C.; Xue, Q. Promising porous carbon derived from celtuce leaves with outstanding supercapacitance and CO2 capture performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2012, 4, 5800–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Olivares-Marin, M.; Fernandez, J.A.; Lazaro, M.J.; Fernández-González, C.; Macías-García, A.; Gómez-Serrano, V.; Stoeckli, F.; Centeno, T.A. Cherry stones as precursor of activated carbons for supercapacitors. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 114, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Valente Nabais, J.M.; Teixeira, J.G.; Almeida, I. Development of easy made low cost bindless monolithic electrodes from biomass with controlled properties to be used as electrochemical capacitors. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2781–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Bhattacharjya, D.; Yu, J.S. Activated carbon made from cow dung as electrode material for electrochemical double layer capacitor. J. Power Sources 2014, 262, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zhao, L.; Fan, L.Z.; Zhou, M.Q.; Guan, H.; Qiao, S.; Antonietti, M.; Titirici, M.M. Nitrogen-containing hydrothermal carbons with superior performance in supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 5202–5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Li, Y.T.; Pi, Y.T.; Lu, L.M.; Xu, S.H.; Ren, T.Z. Hierarchical porous active carbon from fallen leaves by synergy of K2CO3 and their supercapacitor performance. J. Power Sources 2015, 299, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wu, F.C.; Tseng, R.L.; Hu, C.C.; Wang, C.C. Effects of pore structure and electrolyte onthe capacitive characteristicsof steamand KOH-activated carbons for supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2005, 144, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Chen, W.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, W. A fish scale based hierarchical lamellar porous carbon material obtained using a natural template for high performance electrochemical capacitors. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 4773–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Yang, F.; Yang, X. Promising carbons for supercapacitors derived from fungi. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2745–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Long, C.; Chen, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhi, L.; Fan, Z. Porous layer-stacking carbon derived from in-built template in biomass for high volumetric performance supercapacitors. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Jiang, L.; Yan, J.; Hao, L.; Rong Xue, R.; Sun, G.; Yi, B. High rate performance activated carbons prepared from ginkgo shells for electrochemical supercapacitors. Carbon 2013, 56, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Falco, C.; Sieben, J.M.; Brun, N.; Sevilla, M.; van der Mauelen, T.; Morallón, E.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Titirici, M.M. Hydrothermal carbons from hemicellulose-derived aqueous hydrolysis products as electrode materials for supercapacitors. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wang, H.; Xu, Z.; Kohandehghan, A.; Zhi Li, Z.; Cui, K.; Tan, X.; Stephenson, T.J.; Cecil, K.; King’ondu, C.K.; Holt, C.M.B.; et al. Interconnected carbon nanosheets derived from hemp for ultrafast supercapacitors with high energy. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5131–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Qian, W.; Sun, F.; Xu, Y.; Qiu, L.; Liu, C.; Wang, S.; Yan, F. Human hair-derived carbon flakes for electrochemical supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Sevilla, M.; Gu, W.; Falco, C.; Titirici, M.M.; Fuertes, A.B.; Yushin, G. Hydrothermal synthesis of microalgae-derived microporous carbons for electrochemical capacitors. J. Power Sources 2014, 267, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Farma, R.; Deraman, M.; Awitdrus, A.; Talib, I.A.; Taer, E.; Basri, N.H.; Manjunatha, J.G.; Ishak, M.M.; Dollah, B.N.M.; Hashmi, S.A. Preparation of highly porous binderless activated carbon electrodes from fibres of oil palm empty fruit bunches for application in supercapacitors. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 132, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Tak, J.K.; Holt, C.M.B.; Tan, X.; Xu, Z.; Shalchi Amirkhiz, B.; Harfield, D.; Anyia, A.; Stephenson, T.; et al. Supercapacitors based on carbons with tuned porosity derived from paper pulp mill sludge biowaste. Carbon 2013, 57, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. He, X.; Ling, P.; Qiu, J.; Yu, M.; Zhang, X.; Yu, C.; Zheng, M. Efficient preparation of biomass-based mesoporous carbons for supercapacitors with both high energy density and high power density. J. Power Sources 2013, 240, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Huang, W.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, W.; Wei, S. Hierarchical porous carbon obtained from animal bone and evaluation in electric double-layer capacitors. Carbon 2011, 49, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Karthikeyan, K.; Amaresh, S.; Lee, S.N.; Sun, X.; Aravindan, V.; Lee, Y.G.; Lee, Y.S. Construction of high-energy-density supercapacitors from pine-cone-derived high-surface-area carbons. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. He, X.; Ling, P.; Yu, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, M. Rice husk-derived porous carbons with high capacitance by ZnCl2 activation for supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta 2013, 105, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Taer, E.; Deraman, M.; Talib, I.A.; Awitdrus, A.; Hashmi, S.A.; Umar, A.A. Preparation of a highly porous binderless activated carbon monolith from rubber wood sawdust by a multi-step activation process for application in supercapacitors. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 3301–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Feng, H.; Zheng, M.; Dong, H.; Xiao, Y.; Hu, H.; Sun, Z.; Long, C.; Yijin Cai, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, H.; et al. Three-dimensional honeycomb-like hierarchically structured carbon for high-performance supercapacitors derived from highash-content sewage sludge. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 15225–15234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Hou, J.; Cao, C.; Idrees, F.; Ma, X. Hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets derived fromsilk for ultrahigh-capacity battery anodes and supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2556–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Li, X.; Xing, W.; Zhuo, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, F.; Qiao, S.Z.; Lu, G.Q. Preparation of capacitor’s electrode from sunflower seed shell. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Kalpana, D.; Cho, S.H.; Lee, S.B.; Lee, Y.S.; Misra, R.; Renganathan, N.G. Recycled waste paper – a new source of raw material for electric double-layer capacitors. J. Power Sources 2009, 190, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Peng, C.; Yan, X.B.; Wang, R.T.; Lang, J.W.; Ou, Y.J.; Xue, Q.J. Promising activated carbons derived from waste tea-leaves and their application in high performance supercapacitors electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 87, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Li, J.; Wu, Q. Water bamboo-derived porous carbons as electrode materials for supercapacitors. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 3859–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Wu, X.L.; Wen, T.; Guo, H.L.; Yang, S.; Wang, X.; Xu, A.W. Biomass-derived sponge-like carbonaceous hydrogels and aerogels for supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3589–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wang, K.; Zhao, N.; Lei, S.; Yan, R.; Tian, X.; Wang, J.; Song, Y.; Xu, D.; Guo, Q.; Liu, L. Promising biomass-based activated carbons derived from willow catkins for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 166, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Sun, H.; He, W.; Zong, C.; Lu, L. Template-free synthesis of renewable macroporous carbon via yeast cells for high-performance supercapacitor electrode materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2013, 5, 2261–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Arfelis, S.; Martín-Perales, A.I.; Nguyen, R.; Pérez, A.; Cherubin, I.; Len, C.; Malpartida, I.; Bala, A.; Fullana-i-Palmer, P. Linking Mechanochemistry with the Green Chemistry Principles: Review Article. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zeng, L.; Li, X.; Chen, N.; Bai, S.; He, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, C. A Review on Mechanochemistry: Approaching Advanced Energy Materials with Greener Force. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2108327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Cuccu, F.; De Luca, L.; Delogu, F.; Colacino, E.; Solin, N.; Mocci, R.; Porcheddu, A. Mechanochemistry: New Tools to Navigate the Uncharted Territory of “Impossible” Reactions. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202200362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of mechanochemical reaction via ball milling. (b) Number of publications on ball milling synthesis in recent years (data from Web of Science). A set of milling devices, including schematics of the motion of the milling media. These vary from (c) the small-scale mixer mill (<10 g scale) to (d) the medium-scale planetary mill (<100 g scale) and (e) the production-scale rolling mill (kg scale). Adapted with permission from Ref. [1]. Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Inc.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of mechanochemical reaction via ball milling. (b) Number of publications on ball milling synthesis in recent years (data from Web of Science). A set of milling devices, including schematics of the motion of the milling media. These vary from (c) the small-scale mixer mill (<10 g scale) to (d) the medium-scale planetary mill (<100 g scale) and (e) the production-scale rolling mill (kg scale). Adapted with permission from Ref. [1]. Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Inc.
Molecules 30 03125 g001
Figure 2. (a) Graphical illustration of the global biomass distribution. Values in the graph are expressed in gigatons of carbon of biomass [11]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [11]. Copyright © 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Various microstructures from biomaterials in nature. (c) Overview of biological templates, placed on a length scale according to their critical dimensions. On the left-hand side are the original biological structures, whereas on the right-hand side are the corresponding synthesized templated structures [33]. (b,c) Reproduced from Ref. [33], and licensed under CC-BY.
Figure 2. (a) Graphical illustration of the global biomass distribution. Values in the graph are expressed in gigatons of carbon of biomass [11]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [11]. Copyright © 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Various microstructures from biomaterials in nature. (c) Overview of biological templates, placed on a length scale according to their critical dimensions. On the left-hand side are the original biological structures, whereas on the right-hand side are the corresponding synthesized templated structures [33]. (b,c) Reproduced from Ref. [33], and licensed under CC-BY.
Molecules 30 03125 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of (a) tannic acid—glucose center in red, intermediate esterified gallic acid unit in yellow, and esterified gallic acid end group in blue [40]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright © 2021, American Chemical Society. (b) Tannins are widely distributed in the bark of trees. (c) Tannin powder is prepared by vacuum drying after purification, following their initial extraction from bark using an aqueous solvent [38]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright © 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. Molecular structure of (a) tannic acid—glucose center in red, intermediate esterified gallic acid unit in yellow, and esterified gallic acid end group in blue [40]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright © 2021, American Chemical Society. (b) Tannins are widely distributed in the bark of trees. (c) Tannin powder is prepared by vacuum drying after purification, following their initial extraction from bark using an aqueous solvent [38]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright © 2017, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 30 03125 g003
Figure 4. (a) Structures of monolignols, the primary building blocks of lignin; (b) a softwood lignin model; (c) a hardwood lignin model [41]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright © 2020, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 4. (a) Structures of monolignols, the primary building blocks of lignin; (b) a softwood lignin model; (c) a hardwood lignin model [41]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright © 2020, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Molecules 30 03125 g004
Figure 5. Biomass pretreatment solely with mechanical milling or in the presence of assistants [6]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 5. Biomass pretreatment solely with mechanical milling or in the presence of assistants [6]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Molecules 30 03125 g005
Figure 6. The schematic illustration of typical synthesis process of N-doped mesoporous carbon via one-pot mechanochemical synthesis using tannin as a carbon source [92]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright © 2019, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 6. The schematic illustration of typical synthesis process of N-doped mesoporous carbon via one-pot mechanochemical synthesis using tannin as a carbon source [92]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright © 2019, Elsevier B.V.
Molecules 30 03125 g006
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of tannic acid-derived activated carbons. (B) SEM images of (I) C-pox, (II) C-ZN-pox, and (III, IV) C-ZN. The as-prepared carbons were denoted as C-ZN-pox, where ZN refers to the eutectic salt and pox represents the activator used—potassium oxalate, K2C2O4. Additionally, C-pox was obtained using the same recipe as C-ZN-pox, except for the addition of ZN. (C) CO2 adsorption isotherms measured for the selected carbons at 0 °C; (D) H2 adsorption isotherms measured for the selected carbons at −196 °C [94]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [94] and licensed under CC-BY.
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of tannic acid-derived activated carbons. (B) SEM images of (I) C-pox, (II) C-ZN-pox, and (III, IV) C-ZN. The as-prepared carbons were denoted as C-ZN-pox, where ZN refers to the eutectic salt and pox represents the activator used—potassium oxalate, K2C2O4. Additionally, C-pox was obtained using the same recipe as C-ZN-pox, except for the addition of ZN. (C) CO2 adsorption isotherms measured for the selected carbons at 0 °C; (D) H2 adsorption isotherms measured for the selected carbons at −196 °C [94]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [94] and licensed under CC-BY.
Molecules 30 03125 g007
Figure 8. (a) SEM images of tannin-derived highly mesoporous carbons synthesized using ball milling-involved hard and soft templating methods (denoted as CL10-P1 and CL10-P.125, prepared with different amounts of soft template). (b) Benzene adsorption on CL10-P1 carbon with bimodal mesoporosity at 20 °C and the relationship between the adsorption capacity of different sorbents and their total pore volume; adsorption data from Refs. [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 8. (a) SEM images of tannin-derived highly mesoporous carbons synthesized using ball milling-involved hard and soft templating methods (denoted as CL10-P1 and CL10-P.125, prepared with different amounts of soft template). (b) Benzene adsorption on CL10-P1 carbon with bimodal mesoporosity at 20 °C and the relationship between the adsorption capacity of different sorbents and their total pore volume; adsorption data from Refs. [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Molecules 30 03125 g008
Figure 9. Preparation and microstructure of hard carbon (HC), the carboxyl group-modified hard carbon BHC-CO2, and the oxygen-scarce hard carbon (BHC-CO2-H2). (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation process from HC to BHC-CO2 and BHC-CO2-H2. SEM images of (b) HC, (c) BHC-CO2, and (d) BHC-CO2-H2. TEM images of (e) HC, (f) BHC-CO2, and (g) BHC-CO2-H2, including insets of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) patterns [118]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright © 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Preparation and microstructure of hard carbon (HC), the carboxyl group-modified hard carbon BHC-CO2, and the oxygen-scarce hard carbon (BHC-CO2-H2). (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation process from HC to BHC-CO2 and BHC-CO2-H2. SEM images of (b) HC, (c) BHC-CO2, and (d) BHC-CO2-H2. TEM images of (e) HC, (f) BHC-CO2, and (g) BHC-CO2-H2, including insets of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) patterns [118]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright © 2019, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 30 03125 g009
Figure 10. The schematic illustration of typical synthesis process of highly porous carbon materials using hydroxyethylcellulose as a carbon source [124]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [124]. Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Inc.
Figure 10. The schematic illustration of typical synthesis process of highly porous carbon materials using hydroxyethylcellulose as a carbon source [124]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [124]. Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Inc.
Molecules 30 03125 g010
Figure 11. (a) Preparation of conventional carbon materials with low surface areas by carbonization of agricultural wastes. Physical or chemical activation is required to increase their porosity. (b) Preparation of high-surface-area carbon materials (HSACs) via mechanochemical treatment and subsequent carbonization. Upon the ball milling process, the monolithic agricultural wastes are smashed into tiny microparticles with a higher surface area and abundant bulk defects. This approach leads to highly porous carbons after subsequent carbonization [125]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [125]. Copyright © 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 11. (a) Preparation of conventional carbon materials with low surface areas by carbonization of agricultural wastes. Physical or chemical activation is required to increase their porosity. (b) Preparation of high-surface-area carbon materials (HSACs) via mechanochemical treatment and subsequent carbonization. Upon the ball milling process, the monolithic agricultural wastes are smashed into tiny microparticles with a higher surface area and abundant bulk defects. This approach leads to highly porous carbons after subsequent carbonization [125]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [125]. Copyright © 2017, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 30 03125 g011
Figure 12. (a) Nitrogen adsorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution (PSD) curves of sawdust-derived mechanochemically activated (SD2 x P) and conventionally activated (SD2 x) carbons prepared at x = 600 or 650 °C and a KOH/carbon ratio of 2. (c) Nitrogen adsorption isotherms and (d) corresponding pore size distribution curves of lignin-derived conventionally activated (L2600) and mechanochemically activated (L2600P) carbons prepared at 600 °C using a KOH/carbon ratio of 2. The PSD curve of the L2600P is offset (y-axis) by 0.18 cm3/g. (e) CO2 adsorption isotherms at 25 °C and pressure range 0–20 bar for sawdust-derived mechanochemically activated (SD2 x P) and conventionally activated (SD2 x) carbons prepared at x = 600 or 650 °C and a KOH/carbon ratio of 2 [134]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [134]. Copyright © 2015, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 12. (a) Nitrogen adsorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution (PSD) curves of sawdust-derived mechanochemically activated (SD2 x P) and conventionally activated (SD2 x) carbons prepared at x = 600 or 650 °C and a KOH/carbon ratio of 2. (c) Nitrogen adsorption isotherms and (d) corresponding pore size distribution curves of lignin-derived conventionally activated (L2600) and mechanochemically activated (L2600P) carbons prepared at 600 °C using a KOH/carbon ratio of 2. The PSD curve of the L2600P is offset (y-axis) by 0.18 cm3/g. (e) CO2 adsorption isotherms at 25 °C and pressure range 0–20 bar for sawdust-derived mechanochemically activated (SD2 x P) and conventionally activated (SD2 x) carbons prepared at x = 600 or 650 °C and a KOH/carbon ratio of 2 [134]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [134]. Copyright © 2015, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Molecules 30 03125 g012
Figure 13. Mechanochemical functionalization of the mesoporous carbons and conversion of trans-ferulic acid into vanillin via formation of 4-vinylguaiacol as an intermediate [158]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [158]. Copyright © 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 13. Mechanochemical functionalization of the mesoporous carbons and conversion of trans-ferulic acid into vanillin via formation of 4-vinylguaiacol as an intermediate [158]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [158]. Copyright © 2021, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 30 03125 g013
Figure 14. Scheme of synthesis of the carbonaceous solid acid catalyst and cellulose hydrolysis in aqueous solutions [159]. Reproduced with permission from [159]. Copyright © 2018, American Chemical Society.
Figure 14. Scheme of synthesis of the carbonaceous solid acid catalyst and cellulose hydrolysis in aqueous solutions [159]. Reproduced with permission from [159]. Copyright © 2018, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 30 03125 g014
Table 1. Calculated adsorption parameters for various tannin-based materials obtained with or without metal salt, using different triblock copolymers as templates, and under various carbonization temperatures [84].
Table 1. Calculated adsorption parameters for various tannin-based materials obtained with or without metal salt, using different triblock copolymers as templates, and under various carbonization temperatures [84].
SampleVSP
(cm3g1) *
SBET
(m2g1)
Vmi
(cm3g1) ǂ
Smi
(m2g1) §
wKJS
(nm) #
C@Tannin-Zn0.235140.20469
C@Tannin-F1270.363950.11245
OMC@F1270.4-8000.597730.194757.3
OMC@F1270.6-8000.7610570.246017.8
OMC@F1270.8-8000.586210.122936.9
OMC@F1271.0-4500.665470.081808.6
OMC@F1271.0-6000.678690.174128.2
OMC@F1271.0-8000.697340.163907.8
Ni-OMC@F1270.8-4500.969960.194646.9
Ni-OMC@F1270.8-6000.737690.153567.8
Ni-OMC@F1270.8-8000.525580.143559.2
OMC@F380.8-8000.497220.163815.3
OMC@F680.8-8000.587700.153505.3
OMC@F870.8-8000.627650.174125.9
OMC@F880.8-8000.617330.133165.7
OMC@P650.8-8000.608510.153404.2
OMC@P850.8-8000.667700.174056.6
OMC@P1030.8-8000.768250.194667.5
OMC@P1230.8-8000.738110.133105.4
OMC@Bj781-8000.896950.1638217
OMC@TritonX1000.8-8000.507820.174075.0
OMC@(F127 + Ph3P)0.8-8000.574960.1024410.4
Notation: * Single point pore volume at relative pressure of 0.98. Specific surface area calculated using the BET equation in the relative pressure range of 0.02–0.05. ǂ Micropore volume. § Micropore surface area calculated using the carbon black STSA t-plot equation within the thickness range of 0.354–0.500 nm. # Pore width from the distribution maxima calculated according to the Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari (KJS) method using carbon black as reference.
Table 2. Comparison of SSA and application area of porous carbons from different biomass precursors synthesized using different methods.
Table 2. Comparison of SSA and application area of porous carbons from different biomass precursors synthesized using different methods.
No.Raw MaterialType of Carbon MaterialSSA,
m2 g−1
ApplicationRef.
1.Abundant radishN-O-P co-doped carbon aerogel1649For high-performance supercapacitors [138]
2.Cabbage leaf wasteCarbon aerogels536For supercapacitors and oil/water separation [139]
3.CatkinsHollow carbon fiber sponge438Absorbent for oils and organic solvents [140]
4.CelluloseA N-doped carbon aerogel1196For high-performance supercapacitors [141]
5.CelluloseCarbon aerogels-For adsorption of diesel oil [142]
6.ChitosanN self-doped carbon aerogel1480For high-performance supercapacitors [143]
7.CocoonCarbon aerogels714As efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline medium [144]
8.Durian shellCarbon aerogels735For removal of organic pollutants [145]
9.Natural cotton wasteCarbon aerogels1160Adsorbents for wastewater clean-up [146]
10.Pomelo peelCarbon aerogels760Absorbent for removal of organic pollutants/oils [147]
11.SugarcaneAerogel-like carbon 390Sensor, energy conversion and storage, and EMI shielding [148]
12.WoodCarbon aerogels1124For pressure sensing and energy storage [149]
13.Waste tissue paperCarbon aerogels1384Adsorbent, catalyst supports, and energy storage devices [150]
Mechanochemically prepared carbons
14Enoki mushroomN-doped porous carbon containing nanotubes305For oxygen reduction reaction [130]
15FlowersHierarchical porous carbon2148For supercapacitors [126]
16LigninPorous carbon2224For CO2 capture [134]
17LigninN-doped porous carbon2030For CO2 capture [135]
18Lotus rootsPorous carbon1400For electrochemical capacitor and oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysis [136]
19Pine woodNanobiochar47For removal of organic pollutants [131]
20Rice strawN-doped porous carbon1026For CO2 capture [137]
21Sago pithPorous carbon497For methylene blue adsorption[127]
22SawdustPorous carbon1313For efficient CO2 capture [134]
23Tannic acidPorous carbon1801For CO2 capture [95]
24Tannic acidHighly porous carbon3060For efficient H2 and CO2 adsorption [94]
25TanninsHighly mesoporous carbon1218For efficient benzene adsorption [96]
26TanninsOrdered mesoporous carbon1000For hydrogenation of bulk molecules [84]
27Tobacco strawPorous carbon1293For supercapacitors [128]
28YubaPorous carbon832For oxygen reduction reaction [129]
Table 3. Summary of various biomass-derived carbon materials synthesized using different methods for supercapacitor application as well as their specific surface area, pore volume, and specific capacitance.
Table 3. Summary of various biomass-derived carbon materials synthesized using different methods for supercapacitor application as well as their specific surface area, pore volume, and specific capacitance.
Biomass ResourcesActivation MethodSpecific Surface Area (cm2 g−1)Pore Volume (cm3 g−1)ElectrolyteHighest Specific Capacitance (F g−1)Ref.
Bamboo wasteHTC/KOH activation1472KOH (6 M)301[163]
Celtuce leavesKOH activation34041.88KOH (2 M)421[164]
Cherry stoneKOH activation1300H2SO4 (2 M)230[165]
Coffee endocarpPhysical activation10500.5H2SO4 (1 M)176[166]
Cow dungKOH activation19840.91Organic124[167]
D-glucosamineHTC5980.34H2SO4 (1 M)300[168]
Fallen flowersKHCO3 activation2148KOH (6 M)303[126]
Fallen leavesKOH/K2CO3 activation28691.598KOH (6 M)242[169]
FirwoodsPhysical activation10160.747NaNO3 (1 M)105[170]
Fish scaleKOH activation22732.74KOH (7 M)168[171]
FungiHTC80.080.496KOH (6 M)196[172]
FungusHTC/KOH activation11030.54KOH (6 M)360[173]
Ginkgo shellsKOH activation1775KOH (6 M)178[174]
HemicelluloseHTC/KOH activation2300∼1H2SO4 (0.5 M)300[175]
HempHTC/KOH activation22871.45Liquid ionic142[176]
Human hairKOH activation13060.9KOH (6 M)340[177]
LigninK2CO3 activation30412.13Liquid ionic192[116]
LigninK2CO3 activation30412.13Li2SO4 (1 M)177[116]
Lotus rootsK2CO3 activation14000.81K2CO3273[136]
MicroalgaeHTC/KOH activation21900.94LiCl (6 M)200[178]
Oil palmPhysical activation17040.89150[179]
Paper pulpHTC/KOH activation29801.75Organic166[180]
Peanut shellMicrowave/ZnCl2 activation16341.39KOH (6 M)245[181]
Pine nut shellsKOH activation20931.05KOH (6 M)324[161]
Pig boneKOH activation21570.77KOH (7 M)185[182]
PineconeKOH activation39502.395Organic198[183]
Pistachio shellPhysical activation10090.667NaNO3 (1 M)80[170]
Rice huskMicrowave/ZnCl2 activation14420.71KOH (6 M)243[184]
Rubber wood sawdustPhysical activation9130.61H2SO4 (1 M)138[185]
Sewage sludgeKOH activation28392.65Na2SO4 (1 M)379[186]
SilkKOH activation24942.28Liquid ionic242[187]
Sunflower seedKOH activation25851.4130 wt.% KOH311[188]
Tobacco strawZnO activation12931.43KOH (6 M)221[128]
Waste paperKOH activation4160.225KOH (6 M)160[189]
Waste tea leavesKOH activation28411.366KOH (2 M)330[190]
Water bambooKOH activation23521.11KOH (6 M)268[191]
WatermelonHTCKOH (6 M)333[192]
Willow catkinsKOH activation15860.78KOH (6 M)253[193]
Wood saw dustHTC/KOH activation29671.35TEABF4 (1 M)236[119]
Yeast cellKOH activationKOH (1 M)330[194]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choma, J.; Szczęśniak, B.; Jaroniec, M. Mechanochemical Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons. Molecules 2025, 30, 3125. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153125

AMA Style

Choma J, Szczęśniak B, Jaroniec M. Mechanochemical Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons. Molecules. 2025; 30(15):3125. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choma, Jerzy, Barbara Szczęśniak, and Mietek Jaroniec. 2025. "Mechanochemical Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons" Molecules 30, no. 15: 3125. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153125

APA Style

Choma, J., Szczęśniak, B., & Jaroniec, M. (2025). Mechanochemical Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons. Molecules, 30(15), 3125. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153125

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop