Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MoleculesMolecules
  • Review
  • Open Access

30 December 2024

Carvacrol Essential Oil as a Neuroprotective Agent: A Review of the Study Designs and Recent Advances

,
,
,
and
Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Viale Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases were mostly perceived as diseases of ageing populations, but now-a-days, these diseases pose a threat to populations of all age groups despite significant improvements in quality of life. Almost all essential oils (EOs) have been reported to have some neuroprotective abilities and have been used as supplements for good mental health over the centuries. This review highlights the therapeutic potential of one such monoterpene phenolic EO, carvacrol (CV), that has the potential to be used as a main therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative disorders. Three libraries, Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, were explored for research studies related to the neuroprotective roles of CV. All the research articles from these libraries were sorted out, with the first article tracing back to 2009, and the latest article was published in 2024. The positive effects of CV in the treatment of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases, multiple sclerosis, ischemia, and behavioural disorders have been supported with evidence. This review not only focused on study designs and the pharmacological pathways taken by CV for neuroprotection but also focused on demographics, illustrating the trend of CV research studies in certain countries and the preferences for the use of in vitro or in vivo models in studies. Our review provides useful evidence about the neuroprotective potential of CV; however, a lack of studies was observed regarding CV encapsulation in proper dosage forms, in particular nanoparticles, which could be further explored for CV delivery to the central nervous system.

1. Introduction

Carvacrol (CV), or cymophenol (2-methyl-5-propan-2-ylphenol, Figure 1), is a monoterpene phenolic compound obtained from the essential oils (EOs) of members of the Labiatae family, including Origanum, Satureja, Thymbra, Thymus, and Corydothymus [1]. Its boiling point is 237–238 °C, and it melts at 1 °C. The density of CV ranges from 0.976 g/cm3 at 20 °C to 0.97  g/cm3 at 25 °C. It is not soluble in water but is highly soluble in ethanol, carbon tetrachloride, and diethyl ether. The biological activities of CV have been shown in different in vivo and in vitro studies including antioxidant, antiseptic, anticarcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial activity, antispasmodic, antibacterial, and growth promoter activities [2].
Figure 1. Chemical structure of carvacrol.
EOs have long been utilised in folk medicine. Known as ethereal or volatile oils, EOs are aromatic oily liquids derived from plant parts and utilised to flavour food. EOs are “essential” because they include the scent and botanical qualities. Antibacterial, antioxidant, antiviral, insecticidal, and other biological properties were found in these volatile oils. Some of these oils are utilised for cancer treatment, food preservation, aromatherapy, and perfumery. EOs’ antibacterial and antioxidant activities underpin many foods preservation and natural, pharmaceutical, and alternative medicine applications. An alternate wound healing method is aromatherapy, which uses EOs’ aromatic components [3]. Currently, there are around 3000 EOs that have been identified, with 300 of them being of commercial significance. These oils are particularly vital for industries such as pharmaceuticals, agriculture, food, hygiene, cosmetics, and perfumes. Certain EOs have been observed to possess specific therapeutic characteristics that are believed to prevent or potentially treat certain organ dysfunctions or systemic illnesses [4]. EOs are complex natural combinations of secondary plant metabolites with low-molecular-weight chemical components at varying quantities; terpenes, terpenoids, aromatic, and aliphatic derivatives predominate. Despite their historical benefits, plant derivatives are still gaining attention for their medicinal potential due to their natural source and vast range of pharmaceutical applications [5]. Many prosperous enterprises are currently engaged in the development of medications, nutraceutical products, and intermediate supplements using EOs as a key component. EOs are manufactured at a yearly rate of over 70,000 metric tonnes in several countries including the USA, Brazil, India, China, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, Thailand, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Egypt, Malaysia, France, Spain, Italy, Australia, Germany, and Russia. There are over three hundred EOs, including ajowan, anise, basil, camphor, celery sage, chamomile, clove, citronella, coriander, corn mint, cumin oils, dill, eucalyptus, fennel, lavender, lemon, orange oil, peppermint, thyme, tarragon, and others, that are classified based on their commercial and therapeutic worth. Certain specific EOs and their constituents are utilised as antiseptics, food preservatives, and dental root canal sealers due to their inherent antibacterial qualities. Additionally, several EOs are employed in agriculture for purposes such as biofertilisation, crop protection, natural pest control, germicidal activity, weed eradication, and more. EOs’ market worth is predominantly derived from its medicinal potential, as well as criteria such as quality and purity, resulting in an exceptionally high market value [6]. EOs have been the subject of study for almost 60 years, but in recent decades, there has been a surge of interest in them due to a desire to find natural therapies. For thousands of years, EOs have been recognised and utilised for their therapeutic powers in both medicinal and ritual practices, even dating back to prehistoric times [7]. EOs are increasingly used for recuperation and other beneficial effects. The global EOs’ market is expected to rise to USD 3226.2 million by 2025. The positive impact of aromatherapy treatments, combined with the trend of Generation X’s and Millennials’ interest in body health and awareness of natural medicine, drives high demand among therapists and spas, especially for EOs, which have a 70% market share [8].
Neurological diseases are characterised by the impairment and decline of neuronal cells, resulting in functional and sensory deficits. Multiple variables, including environmental influences, genetic predisposition, and oxidative toxicity, contribute to the development of these disorders. Oxidative stress plays a significant role in the development of dementia. The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) causes harm to biomolecules such as DNA, lipids, and proteins, leading to cellular dysfunction if left unaddressed with implications for neurological problems [9]. Furthermore, the United Nations reported that 1 in 11 people were over 65 in 2019, and by 2050, the number will virtually treble to 1 in 6. Neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) are rising as the global population ages. Note that dementia cases in developed countries are expected to climb from 13.5 million in 2000 to 21.2 million in 2025 and 36.7 million in 2050. AD now kills as many people as stroke, the third biggest cause of death worldwide. Unfortunately, we still do not have a complete understanding of AD and other neurodegenerative disorders’ pathogenesis, early diagnosis signs, or viable treatments. The worst part is that AD patients are frequently diagnosed 10–20 years after symptoms occur, making it nearly impossible to prevent or delay disease development. We also face comparable issues with PD, the second most common neurodegenerative illness after AD [10]. There is a need and a lot of opportunities to employ EOs in nanomedicine and to unlock their true potential in healing and curing central nervous system (CNS) diseases. The trend in exploring EOs is emerging among researchers in neurological disorders because of their unwavering positive outcomes [9]. This review article is focused on exploring the documented benefits of CV in neurological disorders.

2. Methodology

Only research articles in English related to disorders of the brain and spinal cord were considered for this review by using the keywords ‘brain’, ‘autoimmune’, ‘neuron’, ‘myelin’, ‘spinal’, ‘neuroprotection’, ‘CNS’, ‘multiple sclerosis’, ‘Alzheimer’, ‘Parkinson’, ‘anxiolytic’, and ‘antidepressant’ in relation to ‘Carvacrol’ and ‘5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenol’. The libraries explored were Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. All the articles were considered depending on the research relativity according to the main theme of this review. The first study related to CV activity analysis in brain or CNS disorders was published in 2009, and a total of 59 articles were available to date from the above-mentioned libraries which were selected for review.

3. Results

Among the 59 articles, 7 studies were in-vitro based, 49 studies were based on in vivo animal models, and 3 were a combination of both in vitro and in vivo methods. For PD, a total of 6 articles were found; five involved only in vivo studies, whereas one had a combination of both in vitro and in vivo studies (Table 1). Moreover, six studies were selected for the treatment of AD, among which two were in vitro based, three were in vivo based, and one was a combination of both (Table 2). For multiple sclerosis (MS), only three studies were recorded for CV activity and were related to in vivo models (Table 3). Seven articles were related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI); all were in vivo based except one which was based on an in vitro cell culture model (Table 4). Eight articles for epilepsy, migraine, and cerebrospinal ischemia were based on in vivo studies (Table 5). Table 6 represents 10 articles (2 in vitro; 8 in vivo) demonstrating the neuroprotective effect of CV against certain drugs and chemical toxins. Six in vivo studies were related to CV’s neuroprotective effects on anxiety, depression, and behavioural/cognitive problems and are summarised in Table 7. Four articles related to the attenuative effects of CV in LPS-challenged animal models are summarised in Table 8. Another nine related neuroprotective studies of CV are compiled in Table 9.
Table 1. Summary of study designs and effect of CV on Parkinson’s disease.
Table 2. Summary of study designs and effect of CV on Alzheimer’s disease.
Table 3. Summary of study designs and effect of CV on multiple sclerosis.
Table 4. Summary of study designs and effect of CV on traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury.
Table 5. Summary of study designs and effect of CV on epilepsy, migraine, and cerebral ischemia.
Table 6. Summary of study designs and neuroprotective effect of CV against drugs and toxic chemicals.
Table 7. Summary of study designs and effect of CV on anxiety, depression, and behavioural/cognitive problems.
Table 8. Summary of study designs and effect of CV against LPS-challenged animal models.
Table 9. Summary of study designs and neuroprotective potential of CV.

4. Discussion

Most of the publications in this review were found to be from Iran, China, and Brazil. This could be attributed to two aspects: a strong belief in traditional natural treatment remedies and the availability of source plants in these countries. Iran boasts a wealth of cultural heritage, encompassing a sophisticated traditional medical system that has deep historical roots dating back to the Assyrian and Babylonian civilisations. Contemporary ethnomedical practices are the result of the accumulated wisdom of indigenous communities who have passed down their knowledge of cures for various diseases through countless generations over thousands of years. Traditional medicine knowledge serves as a significant source of inspiration in the creation of new medications and therapeutic procedures [70]. The southern region of Iran is home to the endemic plants Satureja khuzistanica and Satureja rechingeri. These species are CV-rich and biologically active. This subshrub has a branching stem about 30 cm high, is densely leafy, and is widely ovaiate-orbicular with white hairs. It is utilised as a traditional medicine for its analgesic and antibacterial effects. S. khuzestanica EO (SKEO) contains CV, antioxidant, and anti-thyroid flavonoids [71,72]. On the other hand, Lippia origanoides, commonly referred to as “salva-do-Marajó” in the northern part of Brazil, is a fragrant plant utilised by local inhabitants as a culinary spice, serving as a substitute for oregano. Wild specimens of L. origanoides found in the Lower Amazon River region of Brazil have yielded EOs that are rich in CV and possess antibacterial properties against clinically significant human diseases [73]. Moreover, “Shennong’s Herbal” is an ancient medical book that originated from the Chinese tradition and dates to 2700 B.C. It provides detailed instructions on how to use 365 different herbs. China remains the foremost global producer of EOs [74]. In traditional Chinese medicine, herbs rich in CV have been used for topical treatments. CV is present in the EOs of various plants native to China, such as Mosla chinensis Maxim, Thymus vulgaris L, Piper nigrum L, and Mentha haplocalyx Briq [75,76].
Among the selected articles, it can be observed that there are two routes of administration prominently used for CV: the oral route and the intraperitoneal route. The oral route was often termed as ‘oral gavage’ and considered a standard method to deliver the test formulation directly into the stomach of rodents. On the other hand, the intraperitoneal (IP) injection route was used more than any other route of administration owing to its easy application with no requirement for highly trained or specialised personnel to perform it. The route of administration has a crucial role in determining the final pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity of pharmacological drugs. The primary methods of drug delivery in laboratory animals are the intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), IP, and oral routes. Each route has its own advantages and disadvantages, which vary based on the specific goals of the investigation. The IP route, often employed in rat investigations, involves the injection of a pharmacological substance into the peritoneal cavity. This technique is easily mastered and efficiently minimises stress for animals. The procedure entails positioning the mouse on its back, with its head lower than the rest of its body and inserting a needle into the lower section of the abdomen at an approximate angle of 10 degrees. Care must be taken to prevent unintentional puncture of the internal organs. This approach allows for the safe administration of significant quantities of solution (up to 10 mL/kg) to rodents, which can be beneficial for substances that have low solubility. This technique is particularly prevalent in chronic investigations that involve mice, where repeated IV access is difficult. Typically, IP administration is favoured over the oral route for biological medicines to prevent exposure to the gastrointestinal tract and probable degradation or alteration of biopharmaceuticals [77]. One often-used method for administering substances to mice in experiments is oral gavage, which entails inserting a feeding needle via the mouth and into the oesophagus. Oral gavage is the most direct method to accurately administer substances into the gastrointestinal tract of mice [78]. Oral gavage is the most used approach for precise oral dosing in rodent experiments. With a qualified operator, the process is fast and delivers a precise amount of a drug directly into the stomach for absorption. Gavage is useful when the substance cannot be fed or is unpleasant [79].
Overviewing the selected articles, it can be seen that CV was mostly emulsified with tween-80 and tween-20 as the surfactant and dissolved in a vehicle (saline, distilled water, and DMSO) and delivered to test subjects as a simple homogenous solution form. In two of the articles, peanut oil [64] and olive oil [52] were used as vehicles for CV. Test subjects were either rodents (mice, rats, or rabbits) or cell cultures. Only two studies encapsulated the CV in a specialised dosage form, i.e. ‘nanoemulsion’, and analysed the activity in different in vitro and in vivo models [19,61]. From the selected articles, it was observed that most of the studies employed the conventional in vivo analysis to evaluate or compare the effect of CV. Only a few studies utilised the cell cultures in vitro analysis for their studies. This trend can be attributed to numerous compelling reasons. Animals are more complete models to evaluate the effects of substances on CNS disorders. Among the most used animal models, mice share 80% of their genetic material in common with humans. Rodents, being highly analogous to people, are susceptible to diseases that bear resemblance to those affecting humans [80].

4.1. Neuroprotective Ability of CV

CV has been appraised in the literature for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic activity (Figure 2), not only in neurodegenerative diseases but also in other chronic pathological conditions like cancer.
Figure 2. Illustration of the role of CV in attenuating the damage caused by traumatic brain injury in a mouse model. TBI induces secondary damage through excitotoxicity, BBB disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, and excessive free radical production. Elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ levels from mitochondrial dysfunction lead to increased NO and ROS, causing oxidative stress and impairing antioxidants. BBB permeability also causes vasogenic oedema and infiltration of activated microglia, producing NO and peroxynitrite, which contribute to lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and protein oxidation. Carvacrol may mitigate these damaging processes by inhibiting ROS. Abbasloo et al. demonstrated that CV has an influence on reverting the oxidation, inflammatory, and apoptotic pathways in a TBI model, simultaneously [30].

4.1.1. Antioxidant Activity of CV

A loss of equilibrium between the production and accumulation of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RON) in neuronal cells followed by failure of cellular mechanisms to eliminate them is referred to as ‘oxidative stress’ [81]. Under normal circumstances, a ROS/RON imbalance triggers a cellular antioxidant defence system through enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways to scavenge the free radicals [82]. Among the enzymatic defence pathways against oxidative damage, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1), heme-oxygenase (HO-1), thioredoxin (Trx), and sulfiredoxins (Srx) scavenge and re-balance the cells’ internal homeostasis. On the other hand, vitamin C, vitamin E, β-carotene, uric acid, and a tripeptide glutathione (GSH) augmented with a thiol are notable antioxidant components of cells [83,84]. ROS is a collective term with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the superoxide anion radical (O2·−) as the main redox signalling agents [85]. CV has been regarded as a potent antioxidant EO attributed to the presence of a hydroxyl group (-OH) as well as methyl and isopropyl groups. CV presents a system of delocalised electrons due to these functional group substituents, making it an effective sensor for free radicals. Being a weak acid, CV donates hydrogen atoms to free electron pairs, neutralising a free radical species [86]. On the other hand, as an active redox agent, CV has been reported to donate electrons to scavenge free radicals as well [87]. These redox scavenging properties make it an efficient active substance that can be utilised as a food supplement as well as in pharmaceuticals.

4.1.2. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of CV

Neuroinflammation is a protective defence system of the brain against any insults or damage; however, it could turn into neurodegeneration in the case of chronic inflammatory conditions. The key regulators of the neuronal immune system are microglia and astrocytes (Figure 3). A balance between two distinctive phenotypes of these two glial cells determines the fate of neurons towards protection or destruction. The activation of the M1 phenotype of microglia and the A1 phenotype of astrocytes is associated with neurotoxicity, and M2 and A2 are related to neuroprotection [88,89].
Figure 3. Kwon and Koh illustrated the pathways in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases by the release of pathogenic proteins in the brain, focusing on the role of microglia and astrocytes. The release of aggregated pathogenic proteins like amyloid-β, tau, α-synuclein, mSOD1, and TDP-43 triggers microglia and astrocytes to adopt pro-inflammatory phenotypes. This promotes the release of pro-inflammatory factors, impairing synaptic function, blood–brain barrier integrity, and metabolic processes, driving neurodegenerative disease progression. A dotted line with a question mark indicates a potential relationship, where direct evidence for the association is lacking [90].
CV has been reported to suppress the expression of prostaglandins, especially PGE2, via the arachidonic acid pathway, with inhibition of cyclogeneses, COX1, and COX2, initiating robust anti-inflammatory activity [90]. Moreover, CV has a documented attenuation activity for LPS-induced inflammation by inhibiting ERIK-1/2 phosphorylation [91]. Moreover, CV was found to be associated with inhibiting the translocation of NF-kß (p65) from the nucleus to the cytoplasm but had no effect on p38. Among the inflammatory cytokines, matrix metalloprotease (MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13) production was also hindered by CV. On the other hand, the production of the neuroprotective cytokines IL-10 and TGFß was supported by CV, thus augmenting the neuronal anti-inflammatory innate defence system [92].

4.1.3. Anti-Apoptotic Activity of CV

Oxidative stress leading to inflammation often ends with apoptosis. Neuronal apoptosis is followed by intrinsic or extrinsic factors as shown in Figure 4. Intrinsic signalling of programmed cell death starts with the upregulated expression of BH3-only proteins. These proteins downregulate BcL2 expression, an anti-apoptotic protein [93], and upregulate the expression of Bax proteins. This leads to leaching of cytochrome c, which activates APAF-1 which starts activating the caspases via procaspase 9. On the other hand, extrinsic factors start by activating caspase 8. Both these pathways lead to caspase 3, also known as the ‘death executioner’ protein that results in the end of the cell [94,95]. CV plays an important role in neuronal apoptosis. CV has been reported to downregulate Bax and caspase 3 proteins and to upregulate BcL2 proteins, attenuating apoptosis in neuronal cells [31,44,50]. Moreover, CV has been reported in the limited literature as a neurotrophic substance that has the potential to initiate neurite outgrowth independent of nerve growth factor (NGF) [62].
Figure 4. Graphical representation of neuronal apoptosis by intrinsic factors and extrinsic factors. The intrinsic apoptotic pathway in neurons is triggered by stress signals, leading to mitochondrial cytochrome c release, caspase activation, and cell death. Moreover, the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in neurons is activated by death receptor signalling, leading to the activation of caspase-8 and downstream caspase cascades. This pathway contributes to neuronal cell death in response to external stimuli [96].

4.2. Need of Suitable Dosage Forms for CV

Only two studies in our literature survey optimised CV in a dosage form (nanoemulsions) and compared their neuroprotective efficacy against a conventional solution form or directly as an oil administered to mice models. In both articles, the authors reported that CV in a nanoemulsion had a notably increased efficacy and better stability as compared to a CV solution [19,61]. EOs are active ingredients, each having a diverse therapeutic profile, but their activity is limited due to low environmental stability, low solubility, unpredictable pharmacodynamics, high toxicity at higher doses, and low patient adherence due to their taste or odour as a pure oil [97,98,99]. Encapsulating an EO protects it from harsh environment, saves it from volatility, and provides a controlled/sustained/targeted release of the EO for an efficient therapeutic efficacy. Apart from the taste masking of EOs in a proper dosage form via either a micro or nano vehicle, EOs can be administered at high doses with minimised toxic effects [100,101]. Souza et al. [102] compiled a literature review about the available nano dosage forms encapsulating CV for antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and some biological activities. He emphasised that nanotechnology can be used as a tool to enhance the therapeutic potential of CV, and the limitations associated with EOs can be eliminated by using an appropriate nano vehicle, as illustrated in Figure 5 [102]. Most of the essential oils face challenges in crossing the BBB due to their large molecular weight [103]. However, CV is a small molecule weighing only 150 Da, so permeability is apparently of no concern. The focus for CV formulation is to control the release of CV across the BBB to avoid any toxicity. Furthermore, there is still room for investigation regarding the interactions between CV and different moieties in the blood, epithelium, and body fluids that could hinder the efficacy of CV’s therapeutic action at the target site (brain). A nano formulation can be the answer to these challenges as it provides a safe passage for CV across the systemic circulation to the BBB where it can cross and exerts its neuroprotective action.
Figure 5. An illustration of nano-carriers for carvacrol.
Moreover, to date, there is a research gap in exploring the true neuroprotective potential of CV encapsulated in a nano/micro dosage form. We are positive that giving a proper vehicle to this EO can turn the tables when it comes to neuroprotection against notorious brain diseases.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this review highlighted the therapeutic potential of CV EO in neurodegenerative disorders. CV does not rely on a single mechanism to initiate neuroprotection; rather, it works simultaneously on multiple pathways working as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic agent. Moreover, a few studies reported on the gene modulation ability of CV as well. However, more systematic studies are needed to fully understand the therapeutic potential of CV encapsulated in a pharmaceutical dosage form. Dosage of CV was also deemed a contradictory point among the reviewed studies as some studies reported a higher dose as beneficial and some reported a lower dose as more effective. In summary, it is evident from the current review study that CV can provide neuroprotection, and future studies should focus on integrating pharmaceutical nanotechnology in CV formulation designs. In particular, intranasal drug delivery is a widely explored administration route for the delivery to the CNS and could be explored to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of CV at low doses to avoid toxicity and to achieve faster effect.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, F.K.T., M.S. and M.C.B.; methodology, F.K.T., L.C. and S.P.; validation, M.S., L.C., S.P. and M.C.B.; investigation, F.K.T.; writing—original draft preparation, F.K.T.; writing—review and editing, F.K.T., M.S., L.C., S.P. and M.C.B.; supervision, L.C. and S.P.; project administration, M.S. and M.C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The graphical abstract and Figure 1 and Figure 5 were created with BioRender.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Asadi, S.; Nayeri-Fasaei, B.; Zahraei-Salehi, T.; Yahya-Rayat, R.; Shams, N.; Sharifi, A. Antibacterial and Anti-Biofilm Properties of Carvacrol Alone and in Combination with Cefixime against Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Imran, M.; Aslam, M.; Alsagaby, S.A.; Saeed, F.; Ahmad, I.; Afzaal, M.; Arshad, M.U.; Abdelgawad, M.A.; El-Ghorab, A.H.; Khames, A.; et al. Therapeutic Application of Carvacrol: A Comprehensive Review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 3544–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Irshad, M.; Subhani, M.A.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A.; Irshad, M.; Subhani, M.A.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A. Biological Importance of Essential Oils; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-1-78984-641-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baptista-Silva, S.; Borges, S.; Ramos, O.L.; Pintado, M.; Sarmento, B. The Progress of Essential Oils as Potential Therapeutic Agents: A Review. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2020, 32, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chaachouay, N.; Zidane, L. Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Source for Drug Discovery and Development. Drugs Drug Candidates 2024, 3, 184–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Swain, S.S.; Paidesetty, S.K.; Padhy, R.N.; Hussain, T. Nano-Technology Platforms to Increase the Antibacterial Drug Suitability of Essential Oils: A Drug Prospective Assessment. OpenNano 2023, 9, 100115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cimino, C.; Maurel, O.M.; Musumeci, T.; Bonaccorso, A.; Drago, F.; Souto, E.M.B.; Pignatello, R.; Carbone, C. Essential Oils: Pharmaceutical Applications and Encapsulation Strategies into Lipid-Based Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yan, M.R.; Wang, C.H.; Flores, N.J.C.; Su, Y.Y. Targeting Open Market with Strategic Business Innovations: A Case Study of Growth Dynamics in Essential Oil and Aromatherapy Industry. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernandes, L.C.B.; Costa, I.M.; Freire, M.A.M.; Lima, F.O.V.; Neta, F.I.; Lucena, E.E.d.S.; Alves, R.D.; Cavalcanti, J.R.L.P.; Pinheiro, F.I.; de Azevedo, E.P.; et al. Essential Oils in Experimental Models of Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2021, 19, 1738–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, J.C.; Chen, S. Translational Neurodegeneration in the Era of Fast Growing International Brain Research. Transl. Neurodegener. 2022, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dati, L.M.; Ulrich, H.; Real, C.C.; Feng, Z.P.; Sun, H.S.; Britto, L.R. Carvacrol Promotes Neuroprotection in the Mouse Hemiparkinsonian Model. Neuroscience 2017, 356, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lins, L.C.R.F.; Souza, M.F.; Bispo, J.M.M.; Gois, A.M.; Melo, T.C.S.; Andrade, R.A.S.; Quintans-Junior, L.J.; Ribeiro, A.M.; Silva, R.H.; Santos, J.R.; et al. Carvacrol Prevents Impairments in Motor and Neurochemical Parameters in a Model of Progressive Parkinsonism Induced by Reserpine. Brain Res. Bull. 2018, 139, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hamzehloei, L.; Rezvani, M.E.; Rajaei, Z. Effects of Carvacrol and Physical Exercise on Motor and Memory Impairments Associated with Parkinson’s Disease. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2019, 77, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Akan, T.; Aydın, Y.; Korkmaz, O.T.; Ulupınar, E.; Saydam, F. The Effects of Carvacrol on Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels in an Animal Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Neurotox. Res. 2023, 41, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shah, S.; Pushpa Tryphena, K.; Singh, G.; Kulkarni, A.; Pinjala, P.; Kumar Khatri, D. Neuroprotective Role of Carvacrol via Nrf2/HO-1/NLRP3 Axis in Rotenone-Induced PD Mice Model. Brain Res. 2024, 1836, 148954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Manouchehrabadi, M.; Farhadi, M.; Azizi, Z.; Torkaman-Boutorabi, A. Carvacrol Protects Against 6-Hydroxydopamine-Induced Neurotoxicity in In Vivo and In Vitro Models of Parkinson’s Disease. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 37, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Azizi, Z.; Salimi, M.; Amanzadeh, A.; Majelssi, N.; Naghdi, N. Carvacrol and Thymol Attenuate Cytotoxicity Induced by Amyloid Β25-35 via Activating Protein Kinase C and Inhibiting Oxidative Stress in PC12 Cells. Iran. Biomed. J. 2020, 24, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Caputo, L.; Amato, G.; De Martino, L.; De Feo, V.; Nazzaro, F. Anti-Cholinesterase and Anti-α-Amylase Activities and Neuroprotective Effects of Carvacrol and p-Cymene and Their Effects on Hydrogen Peroxide Induced Stress in SH-SY5Y Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Medhat, D.; El-mezayen, H.A.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Farrag, A.R.; Abdelgawad, M.E.; Hussein, J.; Kamal, M.H. Evaluation of Urinary 8-Hydroxy-2-Deoxyguanosine Level in Experimental Alzheimer’s Disease: Impact of Carvacrol Nanoparticles. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 4517–4527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Azizi, Z.; Choopani, S.; Salimi, M.; Majlessi, N.; Naghdi, N. Protein Kinase C Involvement in Neuroprotective Effects of Thymol and Carvacrol Against Toxicity Induced by Amyloid-β in Rat Hippocampal Neurons. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2022, 13, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kazemi, S.; Safari, S.; Komaki, S.; Karimi, S.A.; Golipoor, Z.; Komaki, A. The Effects of Carvacrol and P-Cymene on Aβ1-42-Induced Long-Term Potentiation Deficit in Male Rats. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024, 30, e14459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Celik Topkara, K.; Kilinc, E.; Cetinkaya, A.; Saylan, A.; Demir, S. Therapeutic Effects of Carvacrol on Beta-Amyloid-Induced Impairments in in Vitro and in Vivo Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2022, 56, 5714–5726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mahmoodi, M.; Amiri, H.; Ayoobi, F.; Rahmani, M.; Taghipour, Z.; Ghavamabadi, R.T.; Jafarzadeh, A.; Sankian, M. Carvacrol Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis through Modulating Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines. Life Sci. 2019, 219, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ahmadi, M.; Eidi, A.; Khaksarian, M.; Ahmadvand, H.; Sotoodehnejadnematalahi, F. Effect of Carvacrol on Inflammatory Factors and Myelin Repair in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis on Female Lewis Rats. Res. Sq. 2021; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmadi, M.; Eidi, A.; Ahmadvand, H.; Khaksarian, M.; Sotoodehnejadnematalahi, F. Effect of Carvacrol on Histological Analysis and Expression of Genes Involved in an Animal Model of Multiple Sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2023, 70, 104471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, W.T.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhou, Y.F.; Zhang, B.F.; Liang, Z.Q.; Liu, Y.H.; Wei, Y.; Li, C.K.; Meng, X.J.; Xia, M.; et al. Carvacrol Attenuates Traumatic Neuronal Injury through Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry-Independent Regulation of Intracellular Ca2+ Homeostasis. Neurochem. Int. 2015, 90, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peters, M.; Trembovler, V.; Alexandrovich, A.; Parnas, M.; Birnbaumer, L.; Minke, B.; Shohami, E. Carvacrol Together with TRPC1 Elimination Improve Functional Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. J. Neurotrauma 2011, 29, 2831–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, M.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, S.; Choi, B.Y.; Suh, S.W. Carvacrol Inhibits Expression of Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 7 Channels and Alleviates Zinc Neurotoxicity Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Abbasloo, E.; Amiresmaili, S.; Shirazpour, S.; Khaksari, M.; Kobeissy, F.; Thomas, T.C. Satureja khuzistanica Jamzad Essential Oil and Pure Carvacrol Attenuate TBI-Induced Inflammation and Apoptosis via NF-ΚB and Caspase-3 Regulation in the Male Rat Brain. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Abbasloo, E.; Khaksari, M.; Sanjari, M.; Kobeissy, F.; Thomas, T.C. Carvacrol Decreases Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability Post-Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jiang, Z.S.; Pu, Z.C.; Hao, Z.H. Carvacrol Protects against Spinal Cord Injury in Rats via Suppressing Oxidative Stress and the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 5349–5354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sol Park, C.; Youn Lee, J.; Young Choi, H.; Gun Ju, B.; Young Yune, T.; Hee, K. Suppression of TRPM7 by Carvacrol Protects against Injured Spinal Cord by Inhibiting Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier Disruption. J. Neurotrauma 2021, 39, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khalil, A.; Kovac, S.; Morris, G.; Walker, M.C. Carvacrol after Status Epilepticus (SE) Prevents Recurrent SE, Early Seizures, Cell Death, and Cognitive Decline. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sadegh, M.; Sakhaie, M.H. Carvacrol Mitigates Proconvulsive Effects of Lipopolysaccharide, Possibly through the Hippocampal Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition. Metab. Brain Dis. 2018, 33, 2045–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Anwar, S.; Khan, A.-u.; Irshad, N. Pharmacological Evaluation of Carvacrol Anti-Migraine Potential. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2023, 396, 1309–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Z.; Hua, C.; Pan, X.; Fu, X.; Wu, W. Carvacrol Exerts Neuroprotective Effects Via Suppression of the Inflammatory Response in Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Rats. Inflammation 2016, 39, 1566–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hong, D.K.; Choi, B.Y.; Kho, A.R.; Lee, S.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Kang, B.S.; Kang, D.H.; Park, K.H.; Suh, S.W. Carvacrol Attenuates Hippocampal Neuronal Death after Global Cerebral Ischemia via Inhibition of Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 7. Cells 2018, 7, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Guan, X.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Yan, J.; Shi, P.; Ba, L.; Cao, Y.; Wang, P. The Neuroprotective Effects of Carvacrol on Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Hippocampal Neuronal Impairment by Ferroptosis Mitigation. Life Sci. 2019, 235, 116795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Çetinkaya, A.; Çamsari, Ç. Effects of Carvacrol Administration on Motor Function Following Spinal Ischemia Andreperfusion. Turk. J. Zool. 2020, 44, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shahrokhi Raeini, A.; Hafizibarjin, Z.; Rezvani, M.E.; Safari, F.; Afkhami Aghda, F.; Zare Mehrjerdi, F. Carvacrol Suppresses Learning and Memory Dysfunction and Hippocampal Damages Caused by Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2020, 393, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chenet, A.L.; Duarte, A.R.; de Almeida, F.J.S.; Andrade, C.M.B.; de Oliveira, M.R. Carvacrol Depends on Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) to Exert Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Mitochondria-Related Protection in the Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells Line Exposed to Hydrogen Peroxide. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 884–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yılmaz, A.; Hacımüftüoğlu, A.; Çiçek, B.; Isık, M.; Necip, A.; tgzd Tgzd, A. Carvacrol Protect Hippocampal Neurons Against Hydroxychloroquine-Induced Damage: In Vitro Study. Recent Trends Pharmacol. 2023, 1, 16–26. [Google Scholar]
  43. Celik, F.; Gocmez, C.; Bozkurt, M.; Kaplan, I.; Kamasak, K.; Akil, E.; Dogan, E.; Guzel, A.; Uzar, E. Neuroprotective Effects of Carvacrol and Pomegranate against Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity in Rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 2988–2993. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, P.; Luo, Q.; Qiao, H.; Ding, H.; Cao, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, H.; Qu, L. The Neuroprotective Effects of Carvacrol on Ethanol-Induced Hippocampal Neurons Impairment via the Antioxidative and Antiapoptotic Pathways. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 4079425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mohebbati, R.; Jalili-Nik, M.; Paseban, M.; Shafei, M.N.; Rad, A.K. Effects of Zataria Multiflora Extract and Carvacrol on Doxorubicin-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rat Brain. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 24, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Noshy, P.A.; Elhady, M.A.; Khalaf, A.A.A.; Kamel, M.M.; Hassanen, E.I. Ameliorative Effect of Carvacrol against Propiconazole-Induced Neurobehavioral Toxicity in Rats. Neurotoxicology 2018, 67, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. El-Far, A.H.; Mohamed, H.H.; Elsabagh, D.A.; Mohamed, S.A.; Noreldin, A.E.; Al Jaouni, S.K.; Alsenosy, A.A. Eugenol and Carvacrol Attenuate Brain D-Galactose-Induced Aging-Related Oxidative Alterations in Rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 47436–47447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yıldız, M.O.; Çelik, H.; Caglayan, C.; Genç, A.; Doğan, T.; Satıcı, E. Neuroprotective Effects of Carvacrol against Cadmium-Induced Neurotoxicity in Rats: Role of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Apoptosis. Metab. Brain Dis. 2022, 37, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Durmus, H.; Burak, A.M.; Goktug, S.; Aysegul, B. Metabolomic Modelling and Neuroprotective Effects of Carvacrol against Acrylamide Toxicity in Rat’s Brain and Sciatic Nerve. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2024, 51, e13841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Babak, F.; Sadegh, M.; Jalali-Mashayekhi, F.; Sakhaie, M.H. Effects of Carvacrol on Cognitive Function and Apoptotic Gene Expression in Trimethyltin- Induced Hippocampal Injury in Rats. Cell J. (Yakhteh) 2024, 26, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Melo, F.H.C.; Venâncio, E.T.; De Sousa, D.P.; De França Fonteles, M.M.; De Vasconcelos, S.M.M.; Viana, G.S.B.; De Sousa, F.C.F. Anxiolytic-like Effect of Carvacrol (5-Isopropyl-2-Methylphenol) in Mice: Involvement with GABAergic Transmission. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 24, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vilmosh, N.; Delev, D.; Kostadinov, I.; Zlatanova, H.; Kotetarova, M.; Kandilarov, I.; Kostadinova, I. Anxiolytic Effect of Satureja Montana Dry Extract and Its Active Compounds Rosmarinic Acid and Carvacrol in Acute Stress Experimental Model. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2022, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Melo, F.H.C.; Moura, B.A.; de Sousa, D.P.; de Vasconcelos, S.M.M.; Macedo, D.S.; Fonteles, M.M.d.F.; Viana, G.S.d.B.; de Sousa, F.C.F. Antidepressant-like Effect of Carvacrol (5-Isopropyl-2-Methylphenol) in Mice: Involvement of Dopaminergic System. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011, 25, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Samarghandian, S.; Farkhondeh, T.; Samini, F.; Borji, A. Protective Effects of Carvacrol against Oxidative Stress Induced by Chronic Stress in Rat’s Brain, Liver, and Kidney. Biochem. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 2645237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elhady, M.A.; Khalaf, A.A.A.; Kamel, M.M.; Noshy, P.A. Carvacrol Ameliorates Behavioral Disturbances and DNA Damage in the Brain of Rats Exposed to Propiconazole. Neurotoxicology 2019, 70, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bayraktar, D.; Ertas, B.; Aydın, Y.; Sener, G. Carvacrol Improves Cognitive Dysfunction by Decreasing Amyloid-ß Accumulation and Regulating Neuroinflammation in Ovariectomized Renovascular Hypertensive Rats. 2023. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4361585 (accessed on 20 August 2024).
  57. Hakimi, Z.; Salmani, H.; Marefati, N.; Arab, Z.; Gholamnezhad, Z.; Beheshti, F.; Shafei, M.N.; Hosseini, M. Protective Effects of Carvacrol on Brain Tissue Inflammation and Oxidative Stress as Well as Learning and Memory in Lipopolysaccharide-Challenged Rats. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 37, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, B.; Yeom, M.; Shim, I.; Lee, H.; Hahm, D.H. Inhibitory Effect of Carvacrol on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Memory Impairment in Rats. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2020, 24, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Salmani, H.; Hakimi, Z.; Arab, Z.; Marefati, N.; Mahdinezhad, M.R.; RezaeiGolestan, A.; Beheshti, F.; Soukhtanloo, M.; Mahnia, A.A.; Hosseini, M. Carvacrol Attenuated Neuroinflammation, Oxidative Stress and Depression and Anxiety like Behaviors in Lipopolysaccharide-Challenged Rats. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2022, 12, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amooheydari, Z.; Rajaei, Z.; Alaei, H.; Esmaeil, N. Supplementation of Carvacrol Attenuates Hippocampal Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Level, Oxidative Stress, and Learning and Memory Dysfunction in Lipopolysaccharide-Exposed Rats. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2022, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gabrielle, A.; Dantas, B.; Limongi De Souza, R.; Rodrigues De Almeida, A.; Humberto, F.; Júnior, X.; Galdino Da Rocha Pitta, M.; Barreto, J.; Rêgo, M.; Oliveira, E.E.; et al. Development, Characterization, and Immunomodulatory Evaluation of Carvacrol-Loaded Nanoemulsion. Molecules 2021, 26, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sisti, F.M.; dos Santos, N.A.G.; do Amaral, L.; dos Santos, A.C. The Neurotrophic-Like Effect of Carvacrol: Perspective for Axonal and Synaptic Regeneration. Neurotox. Res. 2021, 39, 886–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yu, H.; Zhang, Z.L.; Chen, J.; Pei, A.; Hua, F.; Qian, X.; He, J.; Liu, C.F.; Xu, X. Carvacrol, a Food-Additive, Provides Neuroprotection on Focal Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zotti, M.; Colaianna, M.; Morgese, M.G.; Tucci, P.; Schiavone, S.; Avato, P.; Trabace, L. Carvacrol: From Ancient Flavoring to Neuromodulatory Agent. Molecules 2013, 18, 6161–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhong, Z.; Wang, B.; Dai, M.; Sun, Y.; Sun, Q.; Yang, G.; Bian, L. Carvacrol Alleviates Cerebral Edema by Modulating AQP4 Expression after Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 555, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chun, Y.L.; Kim, M.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, N.; Yang, H.; Park, C.; Huh, Y.; Jung, J. Carvacrol Effectively Protects Demyelination by Suppressing Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 7 (TRPM7) in Schwann Cells. Anat. Sci. Int. 2020, 95, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zare Mehrjerdi, F.; Niknazar, S.; Yadegari, M.; Akbari, F.A.; Pirmoradi, Z.; Khaksari, M. Carvacrol Reduces Hippocampal Cell Death and Improves Learning and Memory Deficits Following Lead-Induced Neurotoxicity via Antioxidant Activity. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2020, 393, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Forqani, M.A.; Akbarian, M.; Amirahmadi, S.; Soukhtanloo, M.; Hosseini, M.; Forouzanfar, F. Carvacrol Improved Learning and Memory and Attenuated the Brain Tissue Oxidative Damage in Aged Male Rats. Int. J. Neurosci. 2023, 134, 1242–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chen, W.; Xu, B.; Xiao, A.; Liu, L.; Fang, X.; Liu, R.; Turlova, E.; Barszczyk, A.; Zhong, X.; Sun, C.L.F.; et al. TRPM7 Inhibitor Carvacrol Protects Brain from Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury. Mol. Brain 2015, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Buso, P.; Manfredini, S.; Ahmadi-Ashtiani, H.R.; Sciabica, S.; Buzzi, R.; Vertuani, S.; Baldisserotto, A. Iranian Medicinal Plants: From Ethnomedicine to Actual Studies. Medicina 2020, 56, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nooshkam, A.; Mumivand, H.; Hadian, J.; Alemardan, A.; Morshedloo, M.R. Drug Yield and Essential Oil and Carvacrol Contents of Two Species of Satureja (S. khuzistanica Jamzad and S. rechingeri Jamzad) Cultivated in Two Different Locations. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2017, 6, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Assaei, R.; Mostafavi-Pour, Z.; Pajouhi, N.; Hossein, G.; Omrani, R.; Sepehrimanesh, M.; Zal, F.; Mostafavi, Z. Effects of Essential Oil of Satureja Khuzestanica on the Oxidative Stress in Experimental Hyperthyroid Male Rat. Vet. Res. Forum 2015, 6, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Sarrazin, S.L.F.; Da Silva, L.A.; Oliveira, R.B.; Raposo, J.D.A.; Da Silva, J.K.R.; Salimena, F.R.G.; Maia, J.G.S.; Mourão, R.H.V. Antibacterial Action against Food-Borne Microorganisms and Antioxidant Activity of Carvacrol-Rich Oil from Lippia origanoides Kunth. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, L. The Shennong’s Herbal Canon for Health Management of Herbal Foods. Nat. Anthropol. 2024, 3, 10019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, S.; He, L.; Shang, J.; Chen, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Jiao, Q.; Jin, S.; Hu, X.; et al. Carvacrol Suppresses Human Osteosarcoma Cells via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zheng, K.; Wu, S.Z.; Lv, Y.W.; Pang, P.; Deng, L.; Xu, H.C.; Shi, Y.C.; Chen, X.Y. Carvacrol Inhibits the Excessive Immune Response Induced by Influenza Virus A via Suppressing Viral Replication and TLR/RLR Pattern Recognition. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 268, 113555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Al Shoyaib, A.; Archie, S.R.; Karamyan, V.T. Intraperitoneal Route of Drug Administration: Should It Be Used in Experimental Animal Studies? Pharm. Res. 2020, 37, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jones, C.P.; Boyd, K.L.; Wallace, J.M. Evaluation of Mice Undergoing Serial Oral Gavage While Awake or Anesthetized. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2016, 55, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Larcombe, A.N.; Wang, K.C.W.; Phan, J.A.; Berry, L.J.; Noble, P.B. Confounding Effects of Gavage in Mice: Impaired Respiratory Structure and Function. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 61, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bédard, P.; Gauvin, S.; Ferland, K.; Caneparo, C.; Pellerin, È.; Chabaud, S.; Bolduc, S. Innovative Human Three-Dimensional Tissue-Engineered Models as an Alternative to Animal Testing. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Olufunmilayo, E.O.; Gerke-Duncan, M.B.; Holsinger, R.M.D. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. De Almeida, A.J.P.O.; De Oliveira, J.C.P.L.; Da Silva Pontes, L.V.; De Souza Júnior, J.F.; Gonçalves, T.A.F.; Dantas, S.H.; De Almeida Feitosa, M.S.; Silva, A.O.; De Medeiros, I.A. ROS: Basic Concepts, Sources, Cellular Signaling, and Its Implications in Aging Pathways. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2022, 2022, 1225578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kumar, S.; Saxena, J.; Srivastava, V.K.; Kaushik, S.; Singh, H.; Abo-EL-Sooud, K.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Jyoti, A.; Saluja, R. The Interplay of Oxidative Stress and ROS Scavenging: Antioxidants as a Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jena, A.B.; Samal, R.R.; Bhol, N.K.; Duttaroy, A.K. Cellular Red-Ox System in Health and Disease: The Latest Update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 162, 114606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sies, H.; Jones, D.P. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) as Pleiotropic Physiological Signalling Agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 363–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Guimarães, A.G.; Oliveira, G.F.; Melo, M.S.; Cavalcanti, S.C.H.; Antoniolli, A.R.; Bonjardim, L.R.; Silva, F.A.; Santos, J.P.A.; Rocha, R.F.; Moreira, J.C.F.; et al. Bioassay-Guided Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antinociceptive Activities of Carvacrol. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 107, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ali, T.; Majeed, S.T.; Majeed, R.; Bashir, R.; Mir, S.A.; Jan, I.; Bader, G.N.; Andrabi, K.I. Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Properties and Molecular Mechanisms of Carvacrol. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2024, 34, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gąssowska-Dobrowolska, M.; Chlubek, M.; Kolasa, A.; Tomasiak, P.; Korbecki, J.; Skowrońska, K.; Tarnowski, M.; Masztalewicz, M.; Baranowska-Bosiacka, I. Microglia and Astroglia—The Potential Role in Neuroinflammation Induced by Pre- and Neonatal Exposure to Lead (Pb). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.H. Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Roles of Microglia and Astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener. 2020, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cicalău, G.I.P.; Babes, P.A.; Calniceanu, H.; Popa, A.; Ciavoi, G.; Iova, G.M.; Ganea, M.; Scrobotă, I. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties of Carvacrol and Magnolol, in Periodontal Disease and Diabetes Mellitus. Molecules 2021, 26, 6899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Somensi, N.; Rabelo, T.K.; Guimarães, A.G.; Quintans-Junior, L.J.; de Souza Araújo, A.A.; Moreira, J.C.F.; Gelain, D.P. Carvacrol Suppresses LPS-Induced pro-Inflammatory Activation in RAW 264.7 Macrophages through ERK1/2 and NF-KB Pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 75, 105743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Avola, R.; Furnari, A.G.; Graziano, A.C.E.; Russo, A.; Cardile, V. Management of the Brain: Essential Oils as Promising Neuroinflammation Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nguyen, T.T.M.; Gillet, G.; Popgeorgiev, N. Caspases in the Developing Central Nervous System: Apoptosis and Beyond. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 702404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fricker, M.; Tolkovsky, A.M.; Borutaite, V.; Coleman, M.; Brown, G.C. Neuronal Cell Death. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 813–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, H.; Li, N.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, L. The Involvement of Caspases in Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Apoptosis in Chronic Pain and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 898574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qin, C.; Bai, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, K. The Functional Mechanism of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Animal Models with Alzheimer’s Disease: Crosstalk between Autophagy and Apoptosis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Trinetta, V.; Morgan, M.T.; Coupland, J.N.; Yucel, U. Essential Oils Against Pathogen and Spoilage Microorganisms of Fruit Juices: Use of Versatile Antimicrobial Delivery Systems. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Majeed, H.; Bian, Y.-Y.; Ali, B.; Jamil, A.; Majeed, U.; Khan, Q.F.; Iqbal, K.J.; Shoemaker, C.F.; Fang, Z. Essential Oil Encapsulations: Uses, Procedures, and Trends. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 58449–58463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liao, W.; Badri, W.; Dumas, E.; Ghnimi, S.; Elaissari, A.; Saurel, R.; Gharsallaoui, A. Nanoencapsulation of Essential Oils as Natural Food Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sousa, V.I.; Parente, J.F.; Marques, J.F.; Forte, M.A.; Tavares, C.J. Microencapsulation of Essential Oils: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Yammine, J.; Chihib, N.E.; Gharsallaoui, A.; Ismail, A.; Karam, L. Advances in Essential Oils Encapsulation: Development, Characterization and Release Mechanisms. Polym. Bull. 2023, 81, 3837–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. de Souza, R.L.; Dantas, A.G.B.; Melo, C.d.O.; Felício, I.M.; Oliveira, E.E. Nanotechnology as a Tool to Improve the Biological Activity of Carvacrol: A Review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 76, 103834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bellettato, C.M.; Scarpa, M. Possible Strategies to Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2018, 44, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.