Next Article in Journal
Regulation of Interface Compatibility and Performance in Soft Magnetic Composites with Inorganic Insulation Layers by FePO4 Intermediate Transition Layer
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Sturge–Weber Syndrome Brain Involvement, Cannabidiol Treatment and Molecular Pathways
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Biotransformation of Icariin to Baohuoside I Using Two Novel GH1 β-Glucosidases

1
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
3
Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(22), 5280; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225280
Submission received: 15 October 2024 / Revised: 31 October 2024 / Accepted: 6 November 2024 / Published: 8 November 2024

Abstract

:
Epimedium Folium (EF) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine, and its primary bioactive ingredients, such as icariin, are flavonoid glycosides. A rare EF flavonoid, baohuoside I, exhibits superior bioactivities and enhanced bioavailability compared to its metabolic precursor icariin. The biotransformation of icariin to baohuoside I can be effectively and specifically achieved by β-glucosidases. In this study, 33 candidate full-length β-glucosidase genes were screened from a previously built carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZyme) gene dataset derived from cow fecal microbiota. Thirteen of them exhibited β-glucosidase activity, with DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 showing relatively high expression levels and β-glucosidase activity. The maximum β-glucosidase activity of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 was achieved at 45 °C and pH 6.0, with DCF-bgl-26 demonstrating better thermostability and pH tolerance compared to DCF-bgl-27. The activities of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were 123.2 U/mg protein and 157.9 U/mg protein, respectively, both of which are higher than those of many bacterial β-glucosidases. Structure analysis suggested that both β-glucosidases possess canonical (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure of GH1 family β-glucosidases. Thin-layer chromatography results showed that both enzymes could efficiently convert icariin to baohuoside I in 30 min, indicating they have potential application in the production of high value rare baohuoside I.

1. Introduction

Epimedium Folium (EF), known as Yin-Yang-Huo in Chinese, is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine with over 2000 years of use in China and other Asian countries. EF is often prescribed alone or in combination with other herbs to treat various diseases, including kidney-Yang deficiency syndrome [1], osteoporosim [2], rheumatoid arthritis [3], and asthma [4]. It is also frequently used in healthy products, with over 501 healthy foods containing EF currently available on the market [5]. The primary bioactive substances of EF are flavonoid glycosides, including epimedin A, epimedin B, epimedin C, icariin, icariside I, baohuoside I (icariside II), and icaritin [6]. These compounds are formed by varying degrees of glycosylation of the C-3 and C-7 positions of aglycone icaritin [7]. Among these, icariin is one of the most abundant flavonoids in most EF samples (about 1%) [6,8] and is recognized as a quality control standard for EF herbs [9].
Baohuoside I, the direct and main metabolite of icariin [10,11], exhibits multiple bioactivities more potent than icariin [6,12]. It displayed superior efficacy in osteoclastogenesis inhibition and bone resorption suppression in vivo compared to icariin [13]. Additionally, baohuoside I (IC50 = 9.2 μM) presented stronger anti-cancer activity against cervical cancer than icariin (IC50 > 120 μM) [14]. Furthermore, baohuoside I exhibited higher bioavailability than icariin, due to its lower polarity, which facilitated better absorption by intestinal epithelial cells [15]. However, the content of baohuoside I in EF is very low, about 0.09% in the 30 analyzed EF samples [16]. Due to the attractive pharmaceutical activities and high bioavailability of baohuoside I, efficient production of the rare flavonol glycoside baohuoside I is of significant interest.
Currently, baohuoside I is mainly produced via acid hydrolysis, column chromatography, and microbial transformation. However, these methods have some limitations, including low efficiency, undesirable byproducts, time-consuming, and environmental pollution [17,18]. Alternatively, enzymatic transformation offers unique advantages, including high efficiency, high selectivity, and mild reaction conditions [19], for the direct production of baohuoside I from icariin [12,17,18]. Given that icariin contains an additional glucose group at the C-7 position compared with baohuoside I, the conversion of icariin to baohuoside I can be effectively achieved by using β-glucosidases with high efficiency and specificity to remove the glucose moiety.
β-Glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) are a class of glycoside hydrolases (GH), which can hydrolyze the β-glycosidic bond in the non-reducing terminal residue of β-D-glucoside, resulting in the release of glucose [20]. Depending on the sequences of amino acid and structural similarities, β-glucosidases are mainly distributed in the GH1 family and GH3 family [21,22]. The GH1 family includes most of the β-glucosidases that have been identified and characterized so far, and GH1 β-glucosidases are known to be more tolerant to glucose compared to GH3 β-glucosidases [21,23]. Comparative structural analysis suggested a clear correlation between the shape and electrostatic properties of the active site entrance of GH1 β-glucosidases and their glucose tolerance [21,23]. The GH1 family presents a typical (α/β)8 TIM-barrel structure and a pocket-like catalytic channel [20,21].
GH1 β-glucosidases have been applied in various fields, including food and beverage production, the textile industry, and trace active compounds transformation [21,22]. However, there are only a few β-glucosidases that have been used to transform icariin to baohuoside I. A thermostable GH1 β-glucosidase IagBgl1 of Ignisphaera aggregans exhibited maximum activity at 95 °C and pH 6.5 and could transform icariin into baohuoside I with a molar conversion of 99.48% [12]. Additionally, a GH3 family β-glucosidase Tpebgl3 from Thermomotoga petrophila DSM 13,995 was immobilized on Na-Y zeolite, which could hydrolyze icariin to produce baohuoside I, and the molar conversion rate reached to 97.6% at 75 °C and pH 5.0 [24]. Furthermore, a β-glucosidase from Trichoderma viride can generate baohuoside I from icariin with optimal efficiency at 41 °C and pH 4.0 [25]. The metagenomic approach has been applied for the discovery of diverse glycoside hydrolases from environments like biogas digester, termite hindgut, and cow rumen, including xylanase [26], β-glucuronidase [27], and pectinolytic enzyme [28]. Considering the excellent glucose tolerance of GH1 β-glucosidase, screening β-glucosidases using metagenome provides a feasible and efficient strategy to obtain novel GH1 β-glucosidases with the desired properties for the transformation of icariin to baohuoside I.
In this study, β-glucosidase genes from previously established metagenomic data of the dairy cows’ fecal microbiota were screened [29]. A total of 33 full-length β-glucosidase genes were identified and expressed in Escherichia coli, and their catalytic activity was investigated. Then, the structures of certain bioactive β-glucosidases were analyzed, and their ability of transforming icariin to baohuoside I was evaluated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Screening of 13 Active β-Glucosidases from Metagenomic Data

A comprehensive dataset comprising over 280,000 carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) genes had been built from the metagenome of dairy cows’ fecal microbiota [29]. A total of 82 full-length GH1 family genes (Genbank accession numbers from PQ155168 to PQ155249) were identified from the CAZyme gene dataset. After comparing these genes with known β-glucosidase genes in GenBank, 33 genes were identified as potential β-glucosidase genes. The full length of these 33 candidate β-glucosidase genes ranged from 963 to 2328 bp, with protein sequence identities of 68.15–99.78% to known genes in NCBI (Table 1).
Some of the 33 selected genes showed high sequence similarity with known but uncharacterized β-glucosidase genes from the ruminant gastrointestinal microbiota, suggesting these genes are likely essential in lignocellulose degradation and conserved in ruminant animals. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 33 candidate GH1 β-glucosidase genes formed several distinct clusters, differing from the 16 known β-glucosidases in the CAZy database (Figure 1). In particular, the cluster composed of DCF-bgl-11, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 30, 31, and other sequences in GenBank, was obviously different from the 16 known characterized β-glucosidases, indicating that novel β-glucosidases were available in the selected 33 β-glucosidase genes.
The crude activity of the 33 candidate β-glucosidase was tested, and 13 of them (39.40%) displayed β-glucosidase activity (Figure S1). Further β-glucosidase activity detection with pNPG as substrate revealed that 2 of the 13 candidate β-glucosidases, DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27, exhibited the two highest activities (Figure 2a). Thus, DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were selected for enzymatic characterization.

2.2. Purification and Enzymatic Characterization of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27

The recombinant β-glucosidases DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with 6-histidine tag at the C-terminus were successfully overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). The theoretical molecular weights of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 recombinant protein were 52.97 kDa and 52.68 kDa, respectively. The SDS-PAGE analysis showed that both enzymes were highly purified, with their bands appearing around 55 kDa (Figure 2b,c).
The optimal temperature and pH of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were 45 °C and pH 6.0 (Figure 3). Their optimal conditions are consistent with the typical feature of GH1 family β-glucosidases, which generally exhibit optimal temperatures at ~50 °C and pH ≥ 6.0 [21]. For temperature stability, DCF-bgl-26 could maintain over 70% activity after incubation at 20 °C to 40 °C for 1 h (Figure 4a), while DCF-bgl-27 could maintain over 50% of its activity after incubation at 20 °C to 40 °C for 1 h (Figure 4c). For pH tolerance, DCF-bgl-26 could keep over 70% of its activity from pH 5.0 to pH 8.0 after 1 h incubation (Figure 4b), while DCF-bgl-27 could keep over 50% of its activity from pH 5.0 to pH 8.0 after 1 h incubation (Figure 4d). They were similar to certain β-glucosidases from bacteria, which were observed to have high activity and stability at a neutral pH range [30].
The activity of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 for pNPG hydrolysis at 45 °C and pH 6.0 were 123.2 U/mg protein and 157.9 U/mg protein, respectively. Their hydrolytic activity on pNPG were higher than that of certain bacterial-derived β-glucosidases, such as BglD5 (39.48 U/mg) from Jeotgalibacillus malaysiensis [31], BGLA (59 U/mg) from Alteromonas sp. L82 [30], and AsBG1 (50 U/mg) from Alicyclobacillus sp. A4 [32]. In summary, both DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were acidic β-glucosidases with mild optimum temperature and high hydrolysis efficiency. Although DCF-bgl-27 exhibited slightly higher activity than DCF-bgl-26, the latter showed better thermostability and pH tolerance.

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27

Both DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 consist of 453 amino acids and share a protein sequence identity of 87.2%. They exhibited the highest sequence identity with the GH1 β-glucosidase Br2 (PDB ID: 8J3M) from bovine rumen metagenome (Figure 5c) [33]. DCF-bgl-26 showed 49.55% sequence identity to Br2, and DCF-bgl-27 showed 51.58% sequence identity to Br2. The theoretical pI of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were 5.23 and 4.99, respectively. There was no signal peptide in the two β-glucosidases predicted by Signal 6.0.
The structures of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were predicted with AlphaFold2 (Figure 5a,b). The structural alignment with Br2 suggested that the three enzymes had a similar structure (Figure 5d), exhibiting the canonical (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure of GH1 family β-glucosidases (Figure 5a,b). Comparison of the sequences of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with another 4 known GH1 family β-glucosidases indicated that these two new β-glucosidases had a series of conserved amino acid residues in the substrate binding site (Figure S2). These included two special strictly conserved motifs of NEP (residues 161–163) and TENG (residues 357–360) [23,33]. Among the motif, E162 (acid/base catalyst) and E358 (nucleophile) overlapped well with the catalytic residues E163 and E350 of Br2 (Figure 5d). These results suggested that DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were GH1 family β-glucosidases.

2.4. Enzymatic Transformation of Icariin into Baohuoside I by DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27

Baohuoside I and icariin share the same flavonoid skeleton, except icariin has one extra glucose group at the C-7 position [7]. Icariin is one of the major flavonoids in EF herbs; however, baohuoside I is a rare component of EF [8,16], though it has attractive pharmaceutical activities and higher bioavailability [6,15]. Therefore, icariin was employed as a potential substrate for producing baohuoside I using β-glucosidase (Figure 6a). Both DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 were able to efficiently convert icariin to baohuoside I in 30 min under optimal temperature and pH conditions, with icariin being almost completely converted to baohuoside I (Figure 6b,c). This indicated that DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 had excellent icariin biotransformation ability. It is noted that the hydrolysis activity of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 to the standard substrate pNPG were higher than IagBgl1 (92.47 U/mg) and Tpebgl3 (95.7 U/mg) [12,24], which have been used to transform icariin to baohuoside I with a high conversion rate. The optimal reaction conditions for DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 (45 °C and pH 6.0) differ from those of the three reported β-glucosidases used for icariin biotransformation [12,24,25]. This offers excellent new β-glucosidase options for the conversion of icariin to baohuoside I. However, further evaluation is needed to accurately assess the biotransformation efficiency of their application in flavonoid glycosides biotransformation. Both enzymes were recovered using a metagenomic approach, which demonstrated its potential application for identifying other industrially valuable or useful enzymes.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Strains, Plasmids, and Reagents

E. coli strains TOP10 and BL21(DE3) were purchased from Tolo Biotech Co., Ltd. (Hefei, China). The pET-28a (+) vector was bought from GeneCreate Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The 4-Nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) was purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Icariin and baohuoside I were bought from Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Aescin was bought from Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ferric citrate was purchased from Maclean Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). FastPure Gel DNA Extraction Mini Kit, FastPure Plasmid Mini Kit, and ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit were obtained from Vazyme Biotechnology Co. (Nanjing, China).

3.2. Screening of Novel β-Glucosidase Genes from Metagenomic Data of Cow Fecal Microbiota

The carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZyme) gene dataset has been built from the metagenomic sequencing data of dairy cows’ fecal microbiota, which was fed with multiple traditional Chinese herbs (Henan Muyi Animal Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Kaifeng, China) [29]. The GH1 family predicted to be full-length were screened. Homology analysis of these genes was carried out with the BlastX program on the NCBI website (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 10 April 2023). Then, the genes with more than 40% similarity to known β-glucosidase genes were selected.
The phylogenetic relationships of the candidate genes were assessed in comparison with 31 similar known genes in GenBank and 16 known β-glucosidases in the CAZy database. Protein sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction for these 80 genes were performed by MEGA 11 software with default parameters. The visualization and customization of the obtained phylogenetic tree were carried out using the Chiplot website (https://www.chiplot.online/, accessed on 24 July 2024).

3.3. Gene Expression and Catalytic Activity Determination of Candidate β-Glucosidase Genes

A total of 33 primer pairs (Table S1) were used to amplify the 33 predicted β-glucosidase genes. The obtained gene fragments were inserted into the pET-28a (+) vector. These 33 recombinant plasmids were then individually transformed into E. coli TOP10 strain, and gene sequence verification was carried out by DNA sequencing. The correct recombinant plasmids were subsequently transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain for protein expression. LB-esculin-agar was used to detect the crude catalytic activity of each candidate β-glucosidase [34]. When E. coli BL21(DE3) containing one recombinant plasmid was coated on LB-esculin-agar and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h, if the plate turned black, this suggested that the corresponding expressed protein exhibited glucosidase activity.

3.4. Expression and Purification of Active β-Glucosidases

The E. coli BL21 (DE3) strains harboring the recombinant active β-glucosidases were inoculated into 100 mL LB medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin in a 500 mL shake flask at a 1/100 volume ratio. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C, 200 rpm until the OD600 reached 0.6–0.8, then 0.2 M IPTG was added. Following cultivation at 20 °C and 180 rpm for 16 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000× g rpm for 10 min. The harvested cells were washed 3 times with PBS buffer (pH 7.4) and then resuspended in 50 mL lysis buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, protease inhibitor).
Cell disruption was performed using an ultrasonic crusher (Xiaomei ultrasonic instrument company, Kunsan, China) on ice at 150 W for 10 min, with 3 s crushing and 5 s interval in lysis buffer (Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 20 mM, NaCl 300 mM, imidazole 5 mM, at pH 7.4). The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 4 °C and 12,000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and purified using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Smart-Lifesciences Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China). After the supernatant was added to Ni-NTA column for protein adsorption, wash buffer 1, 2, and 3 (Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 20 mM, NaCl 300 mM, at pH 7.4, with imidazole 20, 50, or 100 mM, respectively) were used to wash away unabsorbed proteins. Then, elution buffer 1 and 2 (Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 20 mM, NaCl 300 mM, at pH 7.4, with imidazole 300 or 500 mM, respectively) were used to elute target protein in the sequence. The high-purity protein samples were concentrated with 10 kDa ultrafiltration tubes (Merck, Millipore, MA, USA). The protein purity was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
The relative activity of the purified β-glucosidases was evaluated by measuring their ability to hydrolyze the standard substrate pNPG [35]. The reaction mixture consisted of 20 μL pNPG (5.0 mM), 170 μL phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and 10 μL appropriately diluted β-glucosidase sample, and was incubated at 45 °C for 5 min. The reaction was then terminated by adding 50 μL Na2CO3 (0.5 M). The OD405 value was measured using Spectra MR spectrophotometer (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA) to determine the concentration of produced p-nitrophenol (pNP). The β-glucosidase activity was calculated using the prepared standard curve. One unit (U) of β-glucosidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μM of pNP per min under the assay conditions.

3.5. Effects of Temperature and pH on DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 Activity

To determine the optimal temperature of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27, a 200 µL reaction mixture consisting of 170 μL phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 μL 5 mM pNPG, and 10 μL appropriately diluted enzyme solution was prepared. The reaction system was incubated at 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, 40 °C, 45 °C, 50 °C, 55 °C, 60 °C, 65 °C, and 70 °C for 5 min, respectively, and then the reaction was ended by adding 50 μL 0.5 M Na2CO3 immediately. The OD405 value of sample was measured, and the temperature with the highest OD405 value was considered as the optimal temperature for the respective enzyme.
To determine the optimal pH of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27, the reaction temperature was fixed at 45 °C, which was identified as the optimal temperature for the two enzymes. Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 4.0–6.0, 0.2 M) and Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 (pH 6.0–8.0, 0.1 M) were used for the pH test. The reaction system, reaction time, and β-glucosidase activity detection method (pNPG method) were the same as the optimal temperature determination experiment.
The thermostability of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 was measured separately by incubating enzymes at 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, 40 °C, 45 °C, 50 °C, 55 °C, 60 °C, 65 °C, and 70 °C for 1 h under pH 6.0 (the measured optimal pH for the two β-glucosidases) using 0.1 M Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer. Then, the residual activity of two enzymes was measured at pH 6.0 and 45 °C. The highest β-glucosidase activity without temperature pre-treatment was defined as 100%.
The pH stability was examined by pre-incubation of each enzyme at room temperature for 1 h in a pH range from 4.0 to 8.0, and then the residue activity of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with pH pre-treatment was measured at 45 °C and their corresponding pH was determined. The 100% activity was referred to samples without pH pre-treatment. All experiments were repeated three times.

3.6. Enzymatic Transformation of Icariin into Baohuoside I

The hydrolytic abilities of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 on icariin were detected by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) assay. The 100 μL reaction system included 40 μL icariin (0.4 mg/mL), 20 μL purified enzyme (appropriately diluted concentration), and 40 μL phosphate buffer. The reaction was carried out at the optimal temperature and pH for 30 min. Then, 20 μL ethyl acetate was added to extract the products and terminate the reaction, followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g rpm for 5 min.
The supernatant was spotted on silica gel plate GF254 (Qingdao Ocean Chemical Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) in the spread solvent of ethyl acetate:chloroform:formic acid:water (10:1:1:1, by volume). A mixture of icariin and baohuoside I was used as the marker, while the hydrolysates of inactivated enzyme reaction with icariin were used as the control. After the samples spread completely, the developed TLC plate was dried at room temperature and sprayed with 10% ethanol sulfate for coloration. The TLC plate was further heated in an oven at 100 °C for 10 min until brown spots appeared.

3.7. Bioinformatics Analyses of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27

The SignalP-6.0 server was used to predict the signal peptide of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. AlphaFold2 was employed to predict the 3D structures of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with default parameters, and PyMOL2.5 was used to visualize and compare the predicted DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 structures with similar known β-glucosidases structures.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we screened 82 full-length potential GH1 β-glucosidase genes from a previously established metagenomic dataset of dairy cows’ fecal microbiota. A total of 33 β-glucosidase genes were further identified, cloned, and expressed, of which 13 exhibited β-glucosidase activity, and DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 exhibited the top two activities. Both enzymes were acidic β-glucosidases, displayed identical optimal temperature and pH, and showed high efficiency to transform icariin to baohuoside I. Structure predication indicated that they had the canonical (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure of GH1 family β-glucosidase. Our study highlighted the effectiveness of the metagenomic strategy in recovering novel glycoside hydrolases and provided two novel efficient β-glucosidases for the conversion of icariin to produce rare baohuoside I. Based on this, β-glucosidases can be used to construct engineered bacteria, especially engineered probiotics, which could ferment EF efficiently, offering a promising direction for the full utilization of EF in the near future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29225280/s1, Figure S1: Screening of 13 putative β-glucosidases by LB-esculin-agar; Figure S2: Sequence comparison of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with another four GH1 family β-glucosidases; Table S1: The primers of 33 predicted β-glucosidase genes used for gene expression.

Author Contributions

Y.W. (Yongjun Wei) conceived and supervised the study. X.Z. and Y.W. (Yitong Wang) performed experiments, drafted the manuscript, and prepared the figures and tables. T.Z. helped to organize the references. Y.W. (Yongjun Wei), X.Z. and Z.Y. revised and polished the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32101003), the Science and Technology Project of Henan Province (No. 242102311170), and the State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Integrated Utilization Funding (CBIU2023ZZ06 and CBIU2023ZZ09).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sun, X.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Liang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Pang, X.; Ding, Q.; Song, J.; et al. Bioactive metabolites reveal the therapeutic consistency of Epimedii folium from multi-plant sources for the treatment of kidney-yang deficiency. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 319, 117215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shi, S.; Wang, F.; Huang, Y.; Chen, B.; Pei, C.; Huang, D.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Kou, S.; Li, W.; et al. Epimedium for osteoporosis based on western and eastern medicine: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 782096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, L.B.; Yan, Y.; He, J.; Wang, P.P.; Chen, X.; Lan, T.Y.; Guo, Y.X.; Wang, J.P.; Luo, J.; Yan, Z.R.; et al. Epimedii herba: An ancient Chinese herbal medicine in the prevention and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1023779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qian, H.Q.; Wu, D.C.; Li, C.Y.; Liu, X.R.; Han, X.K.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, B.Y.; Zhao, Y. A systematic review of traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicity of Epimedium koreanum Nakai. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 318, 116957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.M.; Liu, S.S.; Xiong, Y.Z.; Shen, Z.B.; Wang, X.; Qi, Z.C.; Zhan, H.S.; Du, G.Q. Formulation rules and main health functions of health products containing Epimedii Folium based on data mining and network pharmacology. Chin. Tradit. Herb Drugs 2024, 55, 2027–2039. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, X.; Tang, B.; Wen, S.; Wang, Y.; Pan, C.; Qu, L.; Yin, Y.; Wei, Y. Advancements in the biotransformation and biosynthesis of the primary active flavonoids derived from Epimedium. Molecules 2022, 28, 7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, Y.; Chen, W.W.; Ding, B.; Guo, M.; Liang, M.; Pang, H.; Wei, Y.T.; Huang, R.B.; Du, L.Q. Highly efficient bioconversion of icariin to icaritin by whole-cell catalysis. Microb. Cell Factories 2023, 22, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sun, X.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, W.; Pang, X.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.G.; Zhang, J.; et al. Comprehensive analysis and quality assessment of Herba Epimedii from multiple botanical origins based on ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and photodiode array detector. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 149, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China; China Medical Science Press: Beijing, China, 2020; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deng, L.; Ouyang, B.; Shi, H.; Yang, F.; Li, S.; Xie, C.; Du, W.; Hu, L.; Wei, Y.; Dong, J. Icariside II attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by modulating macrophage polarization. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 317, 116810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, H.; Kim, M.; Han, J. Icariin metabolism by human intestinal microflora. Molecules 2016, 21, 1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, J.; Xu, H.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, N.; Yang, J.; Zhao, J.; Wei, M. Characterization of a novel thermostable glucose-tolerant GH1 β-glucosidase from the hyperthermophile Ignisphaera aggregans and its application in the efficient production of baohuoside I from icariin and total Epimedium flavonoids. Bioorganic Chem. 2020, 104, 104296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, M.; Fan, A.Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, L.Q.; Huang, J.M.; Pang, Z.Y.; Yin, F. Baohuoside I inhibits osteoclastogenesis and protects against ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 874952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, Y.S.; Thakur, K.; Hu, F.; Zhang, J.G.; Wei, Z.J. Icariside II inhibits tumorigenesis via inhibiting AKT/Cyclin E/CDK 2 pathway and activating mitochondria-dependent pathway. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 152, 104616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cheng, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Lu, L.; Ding, Y.; Zhao, Y. Comparative pharmacokinetics study of icariin and icariside II in rats. Molecules 2015, 20, 21274–21286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, X.J.; Ji, H.; Zhang, Q.W.; Tu, P.F.; Wang, Y.T.; Guo, B.L.; Li, S.P. A rapid method for simultaneous determination of 15 flavonoids in Epimedium using pressurized liquid extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2008, 46, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, Y.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y.; Xu, L.; Yin, H.; Tam, J.P.; Yang, H.; Jia, X.B. Construction of a novel catalysis system for clean and efficient preparation of baohuoside I from icariin based on biphase enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 170, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, L.; Wu, M.; Xia, G.; Tam, J.P.; Yu, J.; Teng, X.; et al. Eco-efficient biphasic enzymatic hydrolysis for the green production of rare baohuoside I. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2019, 131, 109431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Miao, Q.; Pan, C.; Yin, J.; Wang, L.; Qu, L.; Yin, Y.; Wei, Y. Research advances in probiotic fermentation of Chinese herbal medicines. iMeta 2023, 2, e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ouyang, B.; Wang, G.; Zhang, N.; Zuo, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, X. Recent advances in β-glucosidase sequence and structure engineering: A brief review. Molecules 2023, 28, 4990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Erkanli, M.E.; El-Halabi, K.; Kim, J.R. Exploring the diversity of β-glucosidase: Classification, catalytic mechanism, molecular characteristics, kinetic models, and applications. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2014, 173, 110363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, W.; Su, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; Jing, H.; Meng, J.; Zhang, G.; Huang, L.; Guo, L.; Wang, J.; et al. Microbial production and applications of β-glucosidase-a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 127915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. de Giuseppe, P.O.; Souza, T.d.A.; Souza, F.H.; Zanphorlin, L.M.; Machado, C.B.; Ward, R.J.; Jorge, J.A.; Furriel, R.d.P.; Murakami, M.T. Structural basis for glucose tolerance in GH1 β-glucosidases. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2014, 70, 1631–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lu, S.; Zou, K.; Guo, B.; Pei, J.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, W.; Zhao, L. One-step purification and immobilization of thermostable β-glucosidase on Na-Y zeolite based on the linker and its application in the efficient production of baohuoside I from icariin. Bioorganic Chem. 2022, 121, 105690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cheng, T.; Yang, J.; Zhang, T.; Yang, Y.S.; Ding, Y. Optimized biotransformation of icariin into icariside II by β-glucosidase from Trichoderma viride using central composite design method. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 5936947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Liang, J.; Li, Y.; Tian, L.; Wei, Y. Characterization of efficient xylanases from industrial-scale pulp and paper wastewater treatment microbiota. AMB Express 2021, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Neun, S.; Brear, P.; Campbell, E.; Tryfona, T.; El Omari, K.; Wagner, A.; Dupree, P.; Hyvönen, M.; Hollfelder, F. Functional metagenomic screening identifies an unexpected β-glucuronidase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2022, 18, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Tian, L.; Qu, L.; Wei, Y. Characterization of novel pectinolytic enzymes derived from the efficient lignocellulose degradation microbiota. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.; Miao, Q.; Tang, B.; Mijakovic, I.; Ji, X.J.; Qu, L.; Wei, Y. Discovery of novel alkaline-tolerant xylanases from fecal microbiota of dairy cows. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2023, 16, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, J.; Wang, W.; Ying, Y.; Hao, J. A novel glucose-tolerant GH1 β-glucosidase and improvement of its glucose tolerance using site-directed mutation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 192, 999–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liew, K.J.; Lim, L.; Woo, H.Y.; Chan, K.G.; Shamsir, M.S.; Goh, K.M. Purification and characterization of a novel GH1 beta-glucosidase from Jeotgalibacillus malaysiensis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 1094–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, P.; Ma, R.; Yang, H.; Xia, W.; Cui, Y.; Luo, H.; Bai, Y.; Yao, B. A highly glucose-tolerant GH1 β-glucosidase with greater conversion rate of soybean isoflavones in monogastric animals. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 45, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaenying, W.; Tagami, T.; Suwan, E.; Pitsanuwong, C.; Chomngam, S.; Okuyama, M.; Kongsaeree, P.; Kimura, A.; Kongsaeree, P.T. Structural and mutational analysis of glycoside hydrolase family 1 Br2 β-glucosidase derived from bovine rumen metagenome. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Renchinkhand, G.; Magsar, U.; Bae, H.C.; Choi, S.H.; Nam, M.S. Identification of β-glucosidase activity of Lentilactobacillus buchneri URN103L and its potential to convert ginsenoside Rb1 from Panax ginseng. Foods 2022, 11, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, Z.; Long, L.; Liang, M.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, M.; Ni, H.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Y. Characterization of a glucose-stimulated β-glucosidase from Microbulbifer sp. ALW1. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 251, 126840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of the 33 predicted β-glucosidases and other β-glucosidase protein sequences. The 33 predicted β-glucosidases were colored with red, the 31 known sequences with high sequence identity from NCBI were colored in green, and the 16 known active β-glucosidases from the CAZy database were colored with blue. The 13 expressed proteins that displayed β-glucosidase activity were marked with stars, and the two that showed high β-glucosidase activity, DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27, were marked with red stars.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of the 33 predicted β-glucosidases and other β-glucosidase protein sequences. The 33 predicted β-glucosidases were colored with red, the 31 known sequences with high sequence identity from NCBI were colored in green, and the 16 known active β-glucosidases from the CAZy database were colored with blue. The 13 expressed proteins that displayed β-glucosidase activity were marked with stars, and the two that showed high β-glucosidase activity, DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27, were marked with red stars.
Molecules 29 05280 g001
Figure 2. The catalytic activity of the 13 β-glucosidases and SDS-PAGE of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The relative activity of the 13 β-glucosidases. (b) M: protein markers; Lane 1: the protein supernatant of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed empty plasmid as a negative control; Lane 2: the total supernatant protein mixture of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-26; Lane 3: the precipitated protein mixture of E.coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-26; Lane 4: Ni column flow-through solution after protein absorption; Lane 5: protein sample washed with 20 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 6: protein sample washed with 50 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 7: protein sample washed with 100 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 8: protein sample washed with 300 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 9: protein sample washed with 500 mM imidazole buffer. (c) M: protein markers; Lane 1: the protein supernatant of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed empty plasmid as a negative control; Lane 2: the total supernatant protein mixture of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-27; Lane 3: the precipitated protein mixture of E.coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-27; Lane 4: Ni column flow-through solution after protein absorption; Lane 5: protein sample washed with 20 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 6: protein sample washed with 50 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 7: protein sample washed with 100 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 8: protein sample washed with 300 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 9: protein sample washed with 500 mM imidazole buffer.
Figure 2. The catalytic activity of the 13 β-glucosidases and SDS-PAGE of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The relative activity of the 13 β-glucosidases. (b) M: protein markers; Lane 1: the protein supernatant of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed empty plasmid as a negative control; Lane 2: the total supernatant protein mixture of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-26; Lane 3: the precipitated protein mixture of E.coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-26; Lane 4: Ni column flow-through solution after protein absorption; Lane 5: protein sample washed with 20 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 6: protein sample washed with 50 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 7: protein sample washed with 100 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 8: protein sample washed with 300 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 9: protein sample washed with 500 mM imidazole buffer. (c) M: protein markers; Lane 1: the protein supernatant of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed empty plasmid as a negative control; Lane 2: the total supernatant protein mixture of E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-27; Lane 3: the precipitated protein mixture of E.coli BL21 (DE3) expressed DCF-bgl-27; Lane 4: Ni column flow-through solution after protein absorption; Lane 5: protein sample washed with 20 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 6: protein sample washed with 50 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 7: protein sample washed with 100 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 8: protein sample washed with 300 mM imidazole buffer; Lane 9: protein sample washed with 500 mM imidazole buffer.
Molecules 29 05280 g002
Figure 3. The enzymatic characteristics of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The optimal temperature of DCF-bgl-26; (b) the optimal pH of DCF-bgl-26; (c) the optimal temperature of DCF-bgl-27; (d) the optimal pH of DCF-bgl-27. These activities were displayed as relative values, and the error bars represented the standard deviation of triplicates.
Figure 3. The enzymatic characteristics of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The optimal temperature of DCF-bgl-26; (b) the optimal pH of DCF-bgl-26; (c) the optimal temperature of DCF-bgl-27; (d) the optimal pH of DCF-bgl-27. These activities were displayed as relative values, and the error bars represented the standard deviation of triplicates.
Molecules 29 05280 g003
Figure 4. The thermal stability and pH tolerance of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The thermal stability of DCF-bgl-26; (b) the pH tolerance of DCF-bgl-26; (c) the thermal stability of DCF-bgl-27; (d) the pH tolerance of DCF-bgl-27. The values represented the mean values of triplicates, and the error bars indicated the standard deviation.
Figure 4. The thermal stability and pH tolerance of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The thermal stability of DCF-bgl-26; (b) the pH tolerance of DCF-bgl-26; (c) the thermal stability of DCF-bgl-27; (d) the pH tolerance of DCF-bgl-27. The values represented the mean values of triplicates, and the error bars indicated the standard deviation.
Molecules 29 05280 g004
Figure 5. The predicted structures and structure comparisons of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The predicted cartoon structure of DCF-bgl-26. It exhibited the canonical (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure and had two catalytic residues, E162 and E358, and the C atoms were colored with orange. (b) The predicted cartoon structure of DCF-bgl-27. It had the (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure and two catalytic residues, E162 and E358, and the C atoms were colored with blue. (c) The cartoon structure of Br2 β-glucosidase (PDB: 8J3M), a known GH1 family β-glucosidase. It had the (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure and two catalytic residues, E163 and E350, and C atoms were colored with yellow. (d) The superimposition of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with Br2, the three structures and the two catalytic residues were overlapped very well.
Figure 5. The predicted structures and structure comparisons of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The predicted cartoon structure of DCF-bgl-26. It exhibited the canonical (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure and had two catalytic residues, E162 and E358, and the C atoms were colored with orange. (b) The predicted cartoon structure of DCF-bgl-27. It had the (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure and two catalytic residues, E162 and E358, and the C atoms were colored with blue. (c) The cartoon structure of Br2 β-glucosidase (PDB: 8J3M), a known GH1 family β-glucosidase. It had the (β/α)8-TIM barrel fold structure and two catalytic residues, E163 and E350, and C atoms were colored with yellow. (d) The superimposition of DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27 with Br2, the three structures and the two catalytic residues were overlapped very well.
Molecules 29 05280 g005
Figure 6. The hydrolysates of icariin catalyzed by DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The catalytic mechanism of β-glucosidase for the conversion of icariin to baohuoside I. (b) Line a: the icariin and baohuoside I standard marker; Line b: the hydrolysates of icariin by inactivated DCF-bgl-26 (negative control); Line c: the hydrolysis products of icariin by DCF-bgl-26. (c) Line a: icariin and baohuoside I (standard marker); Line b: the hydrolysates of icariin by inactivated DCF-bgl-27 (negative control); Line c: the hydrolysis products of icariin by DCF-bgl-27.
Figure 6. The hydrolysates of icariin catalyzed by DCF-bgl-26 and DCF-bgl-27. (a) The catalytic mechanism of β-glucosidase for the conversion of icariin to baohuoside I. (b) Line a: the icariin and baohuoside I standard marker; Line b: the hydrolysates of icariin by inactivated DCF-bgl-26 (negative control); Line c: the hydrolysis products of icariin by DCF-bgl-26. (c) Line a: icariin and baohuoside I (standard marker); Line b: the hydrolysates of icariin by inactivated DCF-bgl-27 (negative control); Line c: the hydrolysis products of icariin by DCF-bgl-27.
Molecules 29 05280 g006
Table 1. The 33 predicted β-glucosidase genes and their most closely related sequences in GenBank.
Table 1. The 33 predicted β-glucosidase genes and their most closely related sequences in GenBank.
33 Candidate
β-Glucosidase Genes
Blast Alignment ResultsThe Alignment
Sequence ID
Identity
DCF-bgl-1Beta-glucosidase [Treponema sp.]MBO5118277.195.31%
DCF-bgl-2Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Clostridia bacterium]MBR5144157.185.47%
DCF-bgl-3Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Clostridia bacterium]MBO5199890.169.72%
DCF-bgl-5Beta-glucosidase [Oscillospiraceae bacterium]MBO5129153.174.28%
DCF-bgl-4Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ9780681.184.24%
DCF-bgl-6Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Lentisphaeria bacterium]MBR1999354.199.54%
DCF-bgl-7Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Clostridia bacterium]MBR6574904.193.49%
DCF-bgl-8Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Lentisphaeria bacterium]MBO5681597.175.52%
DCF-bgl-9Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ8689522.180.05%
DCF-bgl-10Glycosyl hydrolase family protein [Clostridiales bacterium]MBE7090053.194.04%
DCF-bgl-11Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBO5758315.196.82%
DCF-bgl-12Glycosyl hydrolase family protein [Clostridiales bacterium]MBE7081073.194.56%
DCF-bgl-13Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBR5124729.193.20%
DCF-bgl-14Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBP3571607.193.03%
DCF-bgl-15Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ7909166.191.46%
DCF-bgl-16Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBR1974365.187.39%
DCF-bgl-17GH1 family beta-glucosidase [Psychrobacillus psychrotoler]WP_093537721.199.55%
DCF-bgl-18Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ3125168.188.14%
DCF-bgl-19Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ1272506.168.23%
DCF-bgl-20Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ4323209.198.37%
DCF-bgl-21Beta-glucosidase [Clostridia bacterium]MBO7345591.168.15%
DCF-bgl-22Beta-glucosidase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ8740605.172.28%
DCF-bgl-23Beta-glucosidase [Oscillospiraceae bacterium]MBR3978613.172.22%
DCF-bgl-24Beta-glucosidase [Oscillospiraceae bacterium]MBR3978613.171.78%
DCF-bgl-25Beta-glucosidase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ9846934.199.78%
DCF-bgl-26Beta-glucosidase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ1284466.199.78%
DCF-bgl-27Beta-glucosidase [Clostridia bacterium]MBQ9846934.197.57%
DCF-bgl-28Beta-glucosidase [Enterococcus casseliflavus]VTT36984.175.32%
DCF-bgl-29Glycoside hydrolase family 1 protein [Turicibacter sp.]MBQ1787025.199.57%
DCF-bgl-30GH1 family beta-glucosidase [Sarcina sp. DSM 11001]WP_092994021.199.35%
DCF-bgl-31Family 1 glycosyl hydrolase [Lachnospiraceae bacterium]MBR3186943.186.30%
DCF-bgl-32Beta-glucosidase [Oscillospiraceae bacterium]MBE6980119.177.17%
DCF-bgl-33Beta-glucosidase [Roseburia sp.]HAT88334.174.84%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Yuan, Z.; Wei, Y. Efficient Biotransformation of Icariin to Baohuoside I Using Two Novel GH1 β-Glucosidases. Molecules 2024, 29, 5280. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225280

AMA Style

Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhang T, Yuan Z, Wei Y. Efficient Biotransformation of Icariin to Baohuoside I Using Two Novel GH1 β-Glucosidases. Molecules. 2024; 29(22):5280. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoling, Yitong Wang, Tiantian Zhang, Ziqiao Yuan, and Yongjun Wei. 2024. "Efficient Biotransformation of Icariin to Baohuoside I Using Two Novel GH1 β-Glucosidases" Molecules 29, no. 22: 5280. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225280

APA Style

Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Yuan, Z., & Wei, Y. (2024). Efficient Biotransformation of Icariin to Baohuoside I Using Two Novel GH1 β-Glucosidases. Molecules, 29(22), 5280. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225280

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop