Next Article in Journal
Study on Water Wash Pretreatment and Al-Si Additives to Relieve the Sintering Behavior of Fungus Bran Combustion Ash
Previous Article in Journal
Defense Molecules of the Invasive Plant Species Ageratum conyzoides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Creation of Metal-Complex-Integrated Tensegrity Triangle DNA Crystals

by
Katsuhiko Abe
1,
Haruhiko Eki
1,
Yuki Hirose
1,
Soyoung Park
2,3,
Shanmugavel Chinnathambi
2,
Ganesh Pandian Namasivayam
2,
Kazuki Takeda
1,
Hiroshi Sugiyama
2 and
Masayuki Endo
2,4,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Kyoto, Japan
2
Department Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (WPI-iCeMS), Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Kyoto, Japan
3
Immunology Frontier Research Center (IFReC), Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
4
Research Development Division, Kansai University, Suita 565-8680, Osaka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(19), 4674; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194674
Submission received: 7 August 2024 / Revised: 26 September 2024 / Accepted: 29 September 2024 / Published: 1 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Macromolecular Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Structural DNA nanotechnology is an emerging field and is expected to be used for various applications in materials science. In this study, we designed a DNA tensegrity triangle to accommodate the bipyridine complexes with metal ions (Ni2+ and Fe2+) at the center of the space within the triangle. A metal–bipyridine-incorporated DNA tensegrity triangle was crystalized, and the presence of metals within it was confirmed through X-ray crystal structure analysis. A signal of the anomalous dispersion effect derived from metal was observed in the center of the DNA triangle.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The field of nanotechnology is rapidly expanding, and nanometer-scale structures are being constructed from various biomolecules such as nucleic acids [1,2,3], peptide [4], and lipids [5,6]. These biomolecule-based nanostructures are used to create functional nanomaterials and nanodevices [1,2,3,4] and used for biological applications such as drug delivery [5,6]. Nanostructures made of nucleic acids, especially DNA, are attracting attention due to their ability to be designed based on accurate base pairing system for formation of specific shapes and sizes [1,2,3]. In recent years, complex DNA structures such as DNA origami [7,8,9,10,11] and DNA nanomachines [12,13] have been reported. Despite the use of these molecules, it remains unattainable to construct millimeter-scale DNA nanostructures applicable for the functional materials.
In the field of materials science, porous materials such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been developed, which have designed nanospace for functionalization used for reaction catalysis, gas storage, molecule and ion separation, and drug delivery [14]. DNA crystals also have a nanometer-scale reaction space for the possible incorporation of various molecules inside like porous materials [15,16,17,18]. The tensegrity triangle is a three-fold rotational symmetric DNA motif, consisting of three DNA duplexes arranged in a regular triangle shape [15,16,17,18]. The three double strands are connected by three four-arm branch junctions and have six sticky ends (Figure 1). This sticky end complements the sticky ends of other triangles, allowing for the connection and formation of a 3D periodic lattice or crystal ranging in size from hundreds of µm to mm. Using this structure, it was possible to examine how crystallization susceptibility changed through altering the type and length of the sticky end bases [19]. To construct crystals with a strong system against heat, physical force, and low-concentration salt, DNA strands were covalently connected to each other at the sticky ends using DNA ligase [20]. We previously reported the observation of the real-time assembly of the tensegrity triangle in growing crystals using fast-scanning AFM [21]. In addition, DNA tensegrity triangle crystals allow for the incorporation of functional molecules such as fluorescence dyes [22,23] and redox active materials [24]. From these studies, the tensegrity triangle structure has been utilized to accumulate guest molecules into target positions in the DNA crystals for further application.
Metal complexes exhibiting electrochemical and photochemical properties are incorporated into the DNA strands to express unique functions [25,26]. Ta three-way branched dsDNA structure was used for the introduction of metal complex with three bpy ligands into the center of the junction [27]. Therefore, the nanometer-scale space consisting of three DNA helices can be used to coordinate the metal ion with three ligands for metal complex formation.
In this study, we designed a DNA tensegrity triangle to accommodate the metal–bipyridine complex, [Ni(bpy)3]2+ and [Fe(bpy)3]2+, in the center space of the triangle (Figure 1) [21]. The formation of the metal complex in the tensegrity triangle was confirmed via UV/vis spectroscopy measurement, and the stability was examined via melting temperature measurement. The crystal structure and position of the metal ion in the crystal were verified using X-ray crystal structure analysis. We also discussed the validity of structural analysis using in silico molecular modeling.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Formation of the Metal Complex in the DNA Tensegrity Triangle

As a guest molecule, we introduced a nickel–bipyridine complex [Ni(bpy)3]2+ into the center of the triangular space. We incorporated the bpy ligand into the DNA strand with appropriate linker length to form a rigid complex with metal ions (Figure 1). First, the bipyridine derivative was incorporated to the amino linker at the 5-position of thymine base in the DNA strand (A(TNH2)) using bipyridine N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Scheme S1) [28]. After the reaction, the produced strand A(Tbpy) was purified by HPLC (Figure S1), verified using mass spectrometry, and characterized via UV-vis spectra (Figure S2). The tensegrity triangle structure was assembled from three DNA strands according to the previous studies [27]. DNA strands A(Tbpy), B, and C and Ni2+ ion were annealed to form the tensegrity triangle with nickel–bipyridine complex. Formation of the metal complex [Ni(bpy)3]2+ was confirmed via measurement of the UV-Vis spectra of the solution. When the tensegrity triangle solution contains strand A(T bpy) with Ni2+ ion (10 equivalent), a noticeable spectral change at the 315 nm was observed (Figure 2). However, the spectral change was not observed when using the tensegrity triangle with A(T NH2) in the presence of Ni2+ ion. The results indicate that this change is caused by the metal complex formation between the bpy ligands in the strand A(Tbpy) and Ni2+ ion. The spectral change observed is consistent with that of a previous study [24], indicating that the nickel–bipyridine complex was formed in the tensegrity triangle in solution. The stability of the bpy-tensegrity triangle in the presence and absence of Ni2+ ion was examined via melting temperature (Tm) measurement (Figure S3). The Tm of the bpy tensegrity triangle in the absence and presence of Ni2+ ion was 39.0 °C and 42.1 °C, respectively, indicating that the formation of the nickel–bipyridine complex clearly stabilized the structure. From these results, the position of the bpy ligand connected to the linker at the 5-position of the thymine base is sufficient for the immobilization of the [Ni(bpy)3]2+ complex in the tensegrity triangle structure.

2.2. Crystallization of the Metal-Complex-Incorporated DNA Tensegrity Triangle

We next prepared a tensegrity triangle crystal with the metal–bipyridine complex. We used Ni2+ and Fe2+ ions for complex formation. The procedure to form the DNA crystals followed that reported previously [21]. First, we used three strands, A(Tbpy), B, and C, without metal ion for crystallization. After annealing, crystallization was performed via a sitting drop vapor diffusion method. Cubic crystals around 50 µm in length appeared within several days, indicating that the bpy ligand modification in strand A did not prevent the crystallization (Figure 3A). Next, DNA crystals with the nickel–bipyridine complex or iron–bipyridine complex were prepared. Using the same procedure in the presence of Ni2+ and Fe2+, crystals containing nickel–bipyridine and iron–bipyridine complexes formed within a day, and sufficiently large crystals (around 50 µm in length) were obtained after several days (Figure 3B,C). In the presence of the Ni2+ ion, the crystal formed cubic and rectangular shapes (Figure 3B). When the Fe2+ ion was introduced, red-colored cubic crystals caused by Fe2+ ion chelation to bpy ligands were obtained (Figure 3C). These DNA crystals with the metal complex were not grown into larger size—as compared to the crystals using unmodified DNA strands (up to 500 µm) [21]—probably because of the modification and some structural stress caused by metal complex formation in the tensegrity triangle crystal. Although the crystal size is small, we successfully obtained enough sizes of the DNA crystals for the next X-ray crystal structure analysis.

2.3. Analysis of the DNA Tensegrity Triangle Crystals with Metal Complexes

To determine the chelation of the metal ions in the tensegrity triangle crystals, we conducted an X-ray irradiation experiment for the structural analysis of the crystal with the Ni2+-bpy and the Fe2+-bpy complexes. The diffraction data of the DNA crystal containing iron–bipyridine complex were collected using the beamline BL41XU of SPring-8 (Harima, Japan). Diffraction measurement was performed using X-rays with a wavelength of 1.74 Å. As a result of the analysis, the same space group H3, as in the previous study, was obtained. In the case of the Ni2+-bpy complex in the tensegrity triangle crystal, the resolution obtained was as low as 6.56 Å; however, the structure could be determined via the molecular replacement method. The electron density map corresponding to the lattice of the tensegrity triangle (blue mesh) and metal (green mech) in the middle of the triangle was confirmed (Figure S4). From this electron density map, atomic details of the structure of the Ni2+-bpy complex could not be determined.
Next, we carried out X-ray diffraction measurement of tensegrity triangle crystal with Fe2+-bpy complex. Analysis of the diffraction data of Fe2+-bpy complex in the tensegrity triangle crystal was performed. The resolution using Fe2+ ion was 4.93 Å, which was better than that using the Ni2+ ion because the anomalous dispersion effect of iron is large. The phase could be determined via the molecular replacement method (Figure 4A). The electron density map corresponding to the lattice of the tensegrity triangle (blue mesh) was confirmed; however, the atomic details of the structure of the Fe2+-bpy complex could not be determined. Due to the anomalous dispersion of iron, a signal corresponding to iron was observed at the center of the triangle with 6.1σ intensity (magenta mesh) (Figure 4B). From the side view, a blob of electron density of iron protruding slightly from the triangle was observed (Figure 4B right). These results show that the metal complexes have been successfully incorporated at the expected location in the tensegrity triangle crystals.

2.4. Modeling of the Metal Complex in the Tensegrity Triangle Based on the Crystal Structure

In this X-ray crystal structure analysis, it was not possible to obtain data with sufficient resolution to determine the metal complex structure. However, as mentioned above, a strong signal due to iron’s anomalous dispersion effect was observed in the anomalous difference Fourier map. Therefore, by assuming the structure of the metal complex part from existing structural data, we conducted in silico molecular modeling. In the modeling, the positions of the DNA and iron were fixed. The model structure is shown in Figure 5. In the model, bipyridine ligands in the tensegrity triangle crystal are spatially arranged in reasonable positions. This indicates that the length of the linker from the 5-position of the thymine base in strand A are suitable to position spatially and arrange the bipyridine ligands for coordination of the Fe2+ ion. From these modeling results, we confirmed that the [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex formed in the crystal spatially occupies the center of the tensegrity triangle in a reasonable manner, as designed.
In this study, we have successfully incorporated bipyridine ligands in the tensegrity triangle and precisely positioned the metal complex in the crystal space via self-assembly. It was confirmed that the target molecules were arranged as designed based on spectrum measurements and the X-ray crystallographic analysis. This results demonstrate that the transition metal complex can be incorporated into the target positions using the crystallization of the tensegrity triangle DNA. In the future, it will be possible to produce functional crystal materials that can catalyze reactions such as photochemical and redox-active systems, mimicking heme and cytochrome C by introducing the desired functional molecules. Also, catalytic nucleic acids such as DNA and RNA aptamers can be incorporated inside the DNA crystals to process biochemical reactions and sense small molecule analytes. By introducing stimuli-responsive molecules into the crystal, such as the molecule-responsive and photo-responsive system, it will be possible to utilize them for storing and releasing the desired molecules intensively. This DNA crystal system is expected to serve to create functional biomaterials for various applications in nanoscience, materials science, and medical science.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Material

Unmodified DNA strands were purchased from Eurofins Genomics (Tokyo, Japan), and modified DNA strands were purchased from Japan Bio Service (Saitama, Japan). DNA sequences are as follows:
  • Strand A(X): 5′-GAGGAGCCTGCXCGGACAGAG-3′ (X = TNH2 or Tbpy);
  • Strand B: 5′-TCCTCTGTGGCTCC-3′;
  • Strand C: 5′-AGCACCGAGCACCGAGCACCG-3′.

3.2. Synthesis, Purification, and the Identification of Strand A(Tbpy)

A total of 100 µL of 25% DMF/water (v/v) solution containing 200 µM DNA strand A(TNH2), 50 mM sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.0), and 1 mM 5-carboxybipyridine N-hydroxy succinimide ester1 was kept at 40 °C for 3 h (Scheme S1) [28]. The reaction mixture was passed through a spin column, and the product was purified via reversed-phase HPLC (JASCO) using a linear gradient of 2–40% acetonitrile (25min) with 20 mM ammonium formate. (Figure S1). The UV/vis spectra of the A(TNH2) and A(Tbpy) were obtained by NanoDrop One (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) (Figure S2A). The attachment of bpy was identified by MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) (Figure S2B). Analytical MALDI-TOF MS: m/z calcd. for A(Tbpy) [M+H]+: 6857, found; 6862.

3.3. Assembly of DNA Triangle and Measurement of UV Spectra

DNA strands A(X) (X = TNH2 and Tbpy), B, and C were mixed at a molar ratio of 3:3:1 in the buffer consisting of 500 mM lithium sulfate, 25 mM sodium cacodylate (pH 6.0), 125 mM magnesium acetate, and 1.5mM lithium chloride (or without lithium chloride). DNA concentration was 5 µM in total. This solution was annealed from 60 °C to 20 °C in 1 h. After annealing, the UV/vis spectrum of each solution was measured by NanoDrop One (ThermoFisher).

3.4. Crystallization of DNA via Sitting Drop Vapor Diffusion Method

DNA strands A(X) (X = TNH2 and Tbpy), B, and C were mixed at a molar ratio of 3:3:1 in the buffer, same as above, and 1 mM nickel(Ⅱ) chloride or 1 mM iron(Ⅱ) chloride was added. DNA concentration was 5 µM, and the drop amount was 10 µL in total. After annealing, the drops were incubated against 0.5 mL of 1.7 M ammonium sulfate aqueous solution at 20 °C for several days using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method.

3.5. Data Collection and Crystal Structure Analysis

The diffraction data of the DNA crystal containing iron–bipyridine complex were collected using X-rays with a wavelength of 1.74 Å at the beamline BL41XU of SPring-8 (Harima, Japan). Diffraction images were integrated with the XDS program [29]. The crystallographic statistics are listed in Table S1. The phase was determined by the molecular replacement method using the reported structure data (PDB ID: 3GBI) by Phenix [30]. Iron in the DNA crystal was detected on the anomalous difference Fourier map. The Rwork and Rfree values after rigid-body and group B-factor refinement were 12.97% and 14.95%, respectively. Creating figures was conducted with PyMOL.

3.6. In Silico Molecular Modeling of Fe–Bipyridine Complex

The molecular modeling study was performed with Discovery Studio (BIOVIA) using a CHARMm force field. The initial structure was built based on the crystal structure. The bond orders of several bonds in the linker and bipyridine moieties were manually modified, and finally, the structure of these moieties was modified to obtain a reasonable structure using the clean geometry function. The structure was solvated in cubic water with 10 mM magnesium chloride. Throughout the energy minimization calculations, fixed constraints were applied to the Fe2+ ion and the DNA triangle, except for the linkers, the bipyridine moieties, and the modified dTMPs. The structure was pre-minimized with distance restraints between the nitrogen atoms at bipyridine rings and the Fe2+ ion. The structure was finally minimized to the stage where the RMS was less than 0.001 kcal/mol·Å via a conjugate gradient algorithm with no restraint at the linkers, the bipyridine moieties, and the modified dTMPs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29194674/s1: Scheme S1: Synthesis of DNA strand A(Tbpy); Figure S1: HPLC profiles for the DNA strand A(TX) before (left) and after (right) the reaction with bpy-succinimide ester; Figure S2: Identification of bpy-modified DNA strand A(Tbpy); Table S1: Data collection and structure refinement statics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.; analysis, K.A., K.T. and M.E.; investigation, K.A., H.E., Y.H., S.P., K.T. and M.E.; data curation, K.A., Y.H., K.T. and M.E.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A. and M.E.; writing—review and editing, S.C., G.P.N., K.T. and H.S.; supervision, H.S. and M.E.; funding acquisition, K.A., H.S. and M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI grant nos. 21H02057 and 23K17867) to ME. Financial support from JSPS KAKENHI (JP21J22721, Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows) to KA is here acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Detailed data is available from the authors.

Acknowledgments

For in silico molecular modeling studies, computation time was provided by the Supercomputer System, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University. We also thank Satomi Niwa (Kyoto University) and the beamline staff at BL41XU of SPring-8 for their help with the diffraction experiments (proposal nos. 2021B2533 and 2022A2533 to KT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Seeman, N.C. Nanomaterials based on DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hong, F.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H. DNA origami: Scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12584–12640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ge, Z.; Gu, H.; Li, Q.; Fan, C. Concept and development of framework nucleic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17808–17819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kuan, S.L.; Bergamini, F.R.G.; Weil, T. Functional protein nanostructures: A chemical toolbox. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 9069–9105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hou, X.; Zaks, T.; Langer, R.; Dong, Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 1078–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Assefi, M.; Ataeinaeini, M.; Nazari, A.; Gholipour, A.; Vertiz-Osores, J.J.; Calla-Vásquez, K.M.; Al-Naqeeb, B.Z.T.; Jassim, K.H.; Kalajahi, H.G.; Yasamineh, S.; et al. A state-of-the-art review on solid lipid nanoparticles as a nanovaccines delivery system. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 86, 104623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rothemund, P.W.K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 2006, 440, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, F.; Nangreave, J.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H. Structural DNA nanotechnology: State of the art and future perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11198–11211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Endo, M.; Sugiyama, H. Single-molecule imaging of dynamic motions of biomolecules in DNA origami nanostructures using high-speed atomic force microscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1645–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Krissanaprasit, A.; Key, C.M.; Pontula, S.; Labean, T.H. Self-assembling nucleic acid nanostructures functionalized with aptamers. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 13797–13868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rossi-Gendron, C.; El Fakih, F.; Bourdon, L.; Nakazawa, K.; Finkel, J.; Triomphe, N.; Chocron, L.; Endo, M.; Sugiyama, H.; Bellot, G.; et al. Isothermal self-assembly of multicomponent and evolutive DNA nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2023, 18, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Douglas, S.M.; Bachelet, I.; Church, G.M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 2012, 335, 831–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, S.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Song, C.; Wang, J.; Zou, Y.; Jerson, G.; Han, J.Y.; et al. A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Q.; Astruc, D. State of the art and prospects in metal–organic framework (MOF)-based and MOF-derived nanocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 1438–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, D.; Wang, M.; Deng, Z.; Walulu, R.; Mao, C. Tensegrity: Construction of rigid DNA triangles with flexible four-arm DNA junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2324–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, J.; Birktoft, J.J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, T.; Sha, R.; Constantinou, P.E.; Ginell, S.L.; Mao, C.; Seeman, N.C. From molecular to macroscopic via the rational design of a self-assembled 3D DNA crystal. Nature 2009, 461, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lu, B.; Vecchioni, S.; Ohayon, Y.P.; Sha, R.; Woloszyn, K.; Yang, B.; Mao, C.; Seeman, N.C. 3D hexagonal arrangement of DNA tensegrity triangles. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 16788–16793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, B.; Woloszyn, K.; Ohayon, Y.P.; Yang, B.; Zhang, C.; Mao, C.; Seeman, N.C.; Vecchioni, S.; Sha, R. Programmable 3D Hexagonal Geometry of DNA Tensegrity Triangles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202213451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ohayon, Y.P.; Hernandez, C.; Chandrasekaran, A.R.; Wang, X.; Abdallah, H.O.; Jong, M.A.; Mohsen, M.G.; Sha, R.; Birktoft, J.J.; Lukeman, P.S.; et al. Designing higher resolution self-assembled 3D DNA crystals via strand terminus modifications. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 7957–7965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Liu, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, J.; Seeman, N.C.; Mao, C. Making engineered 3D DNA crystals robust. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 15850–15855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eki, H.; Abe, K.; Sugiyama, H.; Endo, M. Nanoscopic observation of a DNA crystal surface and its dynamic formation and degradation using atomic force microscopy. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 1651–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hao, Y.; Kristiansen, M.; Sha, R.; Birktoft, J.J.; Hernandez, C.; Mao, C.; Seeman, N.C. A device that operates within a self-assembled 3D DNA crystal. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 824–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stahl, E.; Praetorius, F.; de Oliveira Mann, C.C.; Hopfner, K.P.; Dietz, H. Impact of heterogeneity and lattice bond strength on DNA triangle crystal growth. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9156–9164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Sha, R.; Kristiansen, M.; Hernandez, C.; Hao, Y.; Mao, C.; Canary, J.W.; Seeman, N.C. An Organic Semiconductor Organized into 3D DNA Arrays by “Bottom-up” Rational Design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6445–6448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stulz, E. Nanoarchitectonics with porphyrin functionalized DNA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vecchioni, S.; Lu, B.; Livernois, W.; Ohayon, Y.P.; Yoder, J.B.; Yang, C.; Woloszyn, K.; Bernfeld, W.; Anantram, M.P.; Canary, J.W.; et al. Metal-Mediated DNA Nanotechnology in 3D: Structural Library by Templated Diffraction. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2210938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Duprey, J.-L.H.A.; Takezawa, Y.; Shionoya, M. Metal-locked DNA three-way junction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1212–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, J.; Qin, B.; Fang, Z. Nickel Bipyridine (Ni(bpy)3Cl2) Complex Used as Molecular Catalyst for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kabsch, W. xds. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Afonine, P.V.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; Echols, N.; Headd, J.J.; Moriarty, N.W.; Mustyakimov, M.; Terwilliger, T.C.; Urzhumtsev, A.; Zwart, P.H.; Adams, P.D. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix. Refine. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2012, 68, 352–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of tensegrity triangle structure and the modification: (A) A schematic illustration of the tensegrity triangle and bipyridine–metal complex [M(bpy)3]. Arrows (5’ to 3’) show strand A (green), strand B (red) and strand C (blue). X indicates modified T with amino (TNH2) and bipyridyl (Tbpy) group. (B) Chemical structures of the TNH2 and Tbpy incorporated to the strand A(X) [A(TNH2) and A(Tbpy)] and their sequences.
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of tensegrity triangle structure and the modification: (A) A schematic illustration of the tensegrity triangle and bipyridine–metal complex [M(bpy)3]. Arrows (5’ to 3’) show strand A (green), strand B (red) and strand C (blue). X indicates modified T with amino (TNH2) and bipyridyl (Tbpy) group. (B) Chemical structures of the TNH2 and Tbpy incorporated to the strand A(X) [A(TNH2) and A(Tbpy)] and their sequences.
Molecules 29 04674 g001
Figure 2. UV/vis spectra of tensegrity triangle with/without bipyridine and Ni2+ ion in solution. Inset: Expansion of spectra for the absorption of the bpy ligand part. Spectral change was observed in the solution with the bipyridine triangle in the presence of Ni2+ ion (black and red lines).
Figure 2. UV/vis spectra of tensegrity triangle with/without bipyridine and Ni2+ ion in solution. Inset: Expansion of spectra for the absorption of the bpy ligand part. Spectral change was observed in the solution with the bipyridine triangle in the presence of Ni2+ ion (black and red lines).
Molecules 29 04674 g002
Figure 3. Crystallization of tensegrity triangle with Ni2+- or Fe2+–bipyridine complex. Microscope images of the DNA crystals: (A) the crystals of the tensegrity triangle without the metal ion; (B) the crystals of the tensegrity triangle with the Ni2+-bpy complex; (C) the crystals of the tensegrity triangle with the Fe2+-bpy complex.
Figure 3. Crystallization of tensegrity triangle with Ni2+- or Fe2+–bipyridine complex. Microscope images of the DNA crystals: (A) the crystals of the tensegrity triangle without the metal ion; (B) the crystals of the tensegrity triangle with the Ni2+-bpy complex; (C) the crystals of the tensegrity triangle with the Fe2+-bpy complex.
Molecules 29 04674 g003
Figure 4. The 2Fo-Fc electron density maps of Fe2+-bpy tensegrity triangle and anomalous dispersion effects: (A) the 2F0-Fc map (blue mesh) obtained via the molecular replacement method using the initial structure (PDB ID: 3GBI) is shown at 1σ level; (B) the superimposition of the 2Fo-Fc map (1σ) (blue mesh) and the anomalous difference Fourier map (3σ) (magenta mesh) are shown.
Figure 4. The 2Fo-Fc electron density maps of Fe2+-bpy tensegrity triangle and anomalous dispersion effects: (A) the 2F0-Fc map (blue mesh) obtained via the molecular replacement method using the initial structure (PDB ID: 3GBI) is shown at 1σ level; (B) the superimposition of the 2Fo-Fc map (1σ) (blue mesh) and the anomalous difference Fourier map (3σ) (magenta mesh) are shown.
Molecules 29 04674 g004
Figure 5. The model structure of tensegrity triangle crystal with the [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex based on in silico molecular modeling and a map of the anomalous dispersion effect at the 3σ level (purple mesh). Fe2+ ion is located in the center of three bpy ligands and purple mesh.
Figure 5. The model structure of tensegrity triangle crystal with the [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex based on in silico molecular modeling and a map of the anomalous dispersion effect at the 3σ level (purple mesh). Fe2+ ion is located in the center of three bpy ligands and purple mesh.
Molecules 29 04674 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abe, K.; Eki, H.; Hirose, Y.; Park, S.; Chinnathambi, S.; Namasivayam, G.P.; Takeda, K.; Sugiyama, H.; Endo, M. Creation of Metal-Complex-Integrated Tensegrity Triangle DNA Crystals. Molecules 2024, 29, 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194674

AMA Style

Abe K, Eki H, Hirose Y, Park S, Chinnathambi S, Namasivayam GP, Takeda K, Sugiyama H, Endo M. Creation of Metal-Complex-Integrated Tensegrity Triangle DNA Crystals. Molecules. 2024; 29(19):4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abe, Katsuhiko, Haruhiko Eki, Yuki Hirose, Soyoung Park, Shanmugavel Chinnathambi, Ganesh Pandian Namasivayam, Kazuki Takeda, Hiroshi Sugiyama, and Masayuki Endo. 2024. "Creation of Metal-Complex-Integrated Tensegrity Triangle DNA Crystals" Molecules 29, no. 19: 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194674

APA Style

Abe, K., Eki, H., Hirose, Y., Park, S., Chinnathambi, S., Namasivayam, G. P., Takeda, K., Sugiyama, H., & Endo, M. (2024). Creation of Metal-Complex-Integrated Tensegrity Triangle DNA Crystals. Molecules, 29(19), 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194674

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop