Next Article in Journal
The Asymmetric Total Synthesis of the Female-Produced Sex Pheromone of the Tea Tussock Moth
Previous Article in Journal
Diverse Methods with Stereoselective Induction in the Asymmetric Biginelli Reaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Removal of Pb(Ⅱ) by Highly Porous Polymeric Sponges Self-Assembled from a Poly(Amic Acid)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 16
10.3390/molecules29163865
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitrosyl and Thionitrosyl Complexes of Technetium and Rhenium and Their Reactions with Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates

by
Till Erik Sawallisch
,
Abdullah Abdulkader
,
Domenik Nowak
,
Adelheid Hagenbach
and
Ulrich Abram
*
Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 34/36, 14195 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(16), 3865; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163865
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 9 August 2024 / Accepted: 12 August 2024 / Published: 15 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Ions in Supramolecular Chemistry: A Themed Issue in Honor of Professor Luigi Fabbrizzi)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The very limited number of structurally known thionitrosyl complexes of technetium was increased by the synthesis of [TcII(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) and [TcII(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4) and their reaction products with hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates, {HB(pzR)3}−. Similar reactions were conducted with [TcI(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)] and related rhenium thionitrosyls. Remarkably, most such reactions result in a rapid cleavage of the boron–nitrogen bonds of the ligands and the formation of pyrazole complexes of the two group 7 metals. Only one compound with an intact {HB(pzR)3}− ligand could be isolated: the technetium(I) complex [TcI(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2). Other products show the coordination of one or four neutral pyrazole ligand(s) in the coordination spheres of technetium generated by thermal decomposition of the pyrazolylborates [TcI(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) and [TcI(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]+ (5). Reactions with the corresponding thionitrosylrhenium complex [ReII(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] require higher temperatures and only compounds with one pyrazole ligand, [ReI(NS)Cl2(PPh3)(pzHR)] (6a–6c), were isolated. The products were studied spectroscopically and by X-ray diffraction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates, {HB(pzR)3}−, belong to the remarkable family of scorpionates, where these tripodal ligands are accompanied by tris(pyrazolyl)methanes, {HC(pzR)3}, hydrotris(mercaptoimidazolyl)borates, {HB(imzR)3}−, (η5-cyclopentadienyl)tris(dialkyl phosphito-P)cobaltates(III), {LOR}− (Figure 1), and related ligand systems such as nitrogen crown ethers or thiacrown ethers. Such compounds commonly coordinate metal ions in a facial manner. They are isolobal with Cp− ligands and have found wide recognition in various fields of coordination chemistry [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Technetium complexes with {HB(pzR)3}− ligands are rare and mainly concern trioxido complexes of technetium(VII) or carbonyltechnetium(I) compounds [9,10,11,12,13], while the coordination chemistry of rhenium with scorpionates is more diverse [8,10,14,15,16,17,18,19]. There are also reports about potential applications of scorpionate complexes of technetium and rhenium complexes in nuclear medical procedures on the basis of tricarbonyl compounds [19,20,21,22]. Comparable compounds with nitrosyl or thionitrosyl units are not yet known.
In general, the chemistry of nitrosyls of the radioactive element technetium [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45] is not as thoroughly described as that of the stable rhenium [25,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Less is known about the corresponding thionitrosyl complexes of both elements [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. This is most probably due to the lack of a readily available monomeric nitrogen sulfide. Although some NS+ salts have been isolated [74,75,76,77], their synthesis is still a challenge. Only occasionally have they been used as starting materials for the synthesis of thionitrosyl complexes [54,76,77]. Other suitable routes for the formation of NS+ or NSCl+ ligands have been established starting from cyclic tetrasulfur tetranitride, S4N4, or trithiazyltrichloride, (NSCl)3. Such reactions, however, sometimes give unpredictable products. A more or less convenient access to low-valent thionitrosyl compounds, however, is given by the addition of sulfur atoms to nitrido ligands whenever corresponding high-valent nitrido complexes are available. Such reactions proceed with a variety of sulfur sources, but the use of S2Cl2 usually gives the best and most reproduceable results. It has also been used for the synthesis of some rhenium and technetium thionitrosyls with the metals in their “+1” to “+3” oxidation states [66,67,69,70,71,73,78].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Nitrosyl Complexes of Technetium

Recently, the syntheses of stable nitrosyltechnetium complexes with some of the tripodal ligands shown in Figure 1 were reported [30,43], and in particular, the Cp− derivative [Tc(NO)Cl(Cp)(PPh3)] shows an extended ligand exchange chemistry. During such reactions, the robust {Tc(NO)(Cp)(PPh3)}+ core is essentially retained, while a variety of interesting reactions were observed at the vacant sixth coordination position [30,31,32,79]. Products of similar stability with a “fixed” {Tc(NO)(PPh3)(LOMe)}+,2+ core were obtained when common nitrosyltechnetium complexes such as [TcI(NO)Cl2(PPh3)(CH3CN)] or [TcII(NO)Cl4(MeOH)]− were exposed to the “Kläui-type” ligand {LOMe}− [39,43]. The ready availability of the mentioned scorpionate complexes stimulated us to perform similar reactions with the classical Trofimenko ligand {HB(pz)3}− (Scheme 1).
The starting material [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)(CH3CN)] is only sparingly soluble, but subsequently dissolves during ligand exchange procedures under formation of the products. Such reactions are commonly performed under elevated temperatures to increase the reaction rate. Heating was also required for the attempted reaction of [TcI(NO)Cl2(PPh3)(CH3CN)] with K{HB(pzH)3}, since at room temperature no consumption of the starting complex was observed irrespective of the solvents used. Upon heating in acetonitrile, however, a red solution was rapidly formed and a non-radioactive, colorless solid precipitated. After filtration, a red solid could be isolated (compound 1), the IR spectrum of which showed a νNO band at 1708 cm−1. The frequency range of this absorption is a clear indicator of the formation of a nitrosyltechnetium(I) complex, since the νNO signals of Tc(II) complexes appear at markedly higher wavenumbers due to the lower extent of back-donation in anti-bonding MOs of the nitrosyl ligands in such compounds. The diamagnetism of the product is confirmed by the detection of resolved 1H NMR spectra with narrow lines and the detection of a 99Tc NMR signal at 1217 ppm relative to TcO4− (Figure 2). This chemical shift is within the range that has been previously found for nitrosyltechnetium(I) compounds [27]. An analysis of the 1H spectrum indicates that it was not a simple ligand exchange reaction with the insertion of an intact {HB(pz)3}− ligand that took place. This assumption was confirmed by the results of an X-ray diffraction study (vide infra). The 31P NMR spectrum of the product is characterized by a very broad line at about 35 ppm, which is accompanied by a narrow signal at 20 ppm (most probably a minor impurity of OPPh3). The broadening of 31P NMR lines is frequently observed in phosphine complexes of technetium when the local symmetry around the metal atom is low. A common explanation is given by scalar couplings with the large quadrupole moment of 99Tc (Q = –0.19 Å·10−28 m2) [80,81]. Such interactions can cause extreme line-broadenings, which frequently make the resolution of 31P signals impossible [82,83,84].
Red single crystals of compound 1 were obtained from a CH2Cl2/MeOH mixture. A representation of the molecular structure is shown in Figure 3a. It clearly confirms the information derived from the NMR spectra: that the potentially tripodal hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate ligand decomposed under the elevated temperatures used during the reaction and/or under the influence of the transition metal. The product contains only one of the formed pyrazole molecules, which is coordinated in the equatorial coordination sphere of the resulting complex [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) in trans position to a chlorido ligand. Linear coordination is observed for the nitrosyl ligand, which is in agreement with all hitherto structurally studied NO complexes of technetium and supports treatment as a NO+ unit. Remarkably, the Tc–Cl bonds have almost the same lengths, which suggests that the structural trans influences induced by NO+ and pyrazole ligands are similar.
Cleavage of the boron–nitrogen bonds in hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates and related compounds is not without precedence. It has also been observed during reactions with other metal ions, and the released pyrazoles are commonly found as ligands in the products [85,86,87,88,89]. Such ligand decompositions are frequently observed at elevated temperatures, as in the attempted reaction with [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)]. Since all attempts at reactions of K{HB(pz)3} with this almost insoluble starting material at room temperature failed, we used the newly prepared pyrazol complex 1 as a precursor. [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) readily dissolves in a CH2Cl2/MeOH mixture and reacts at room temperature with K{HB(pz)3} causing formation of the desired scorpionate complex [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2). Compound 2 precipitated as an orange-brown solid directly from the reaction mixture. Single crystals of the product suitable for X-ray diffraction were grown from the same solvents.
The structural analysis of 2 confirmed that an intact scorpionate ligand is coordinated to technetium in the expected tripodal mode (Figure 3b). Selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 1 and compared with corresponding values in the pyrazole complex 1. In the IR spectrum of 2, the νNO stretch appears at 1718 cm−1, which is close to the value obtained for 1 and clearly confirms the “+1” oxidation state of technetium in the product. The diamagnetism of the d6 system allows the recording of NMR spectra. Figure 3 contains the 99Tc spectrum at 1019 ppm, which is close to the signal of the nitrosyl complex 1. Both signals are relatively broad with line-widths between 3000 and 4000 Hz. Such line-widths, however, are not unusual for technetium complexes with low local symmetry and are explained by the large quadruole moment of 99Tc [80]. Extremely narrow signals are usually only obtained for corresponding compounds with highly symmetric coordination spheres, such as in octahedral [TcI(L)6]+ cations or in the tetrahedral TcVIIO4− anion [81].

2.2. Thionitrosyl Complexes of Technetium

In contrast to the, to some extent, well-known nitrosyl chemistry of technetium [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], thionitrosyl compounds of this element are rare. The general synthetic route for the preparation of thionitrosyls, the addition of sulfur atoms to coordinated nitrido ligands, also works for technetium. S2Cl2 is a suitable sulfur source for this approach, but reactions with other sulfur-containing compounds such as SOCl2 [66], dithionite [72] or SCN− [62] have also been reported for the (mostly unintended) synthesis of Tc thionitrosyls. Reactions of (NBu4)2[TcCl6] with (NSCl)3 give the Tc(II) anion [Tc(NS)Cl4]− in good yields. The product, however, is not stable in solution and gradually decomposes leading to the formation of [TcVINCl4]− and elemental sulfur [73]. Since nitridotechnetium complexes with {HB(pz)3}− ligands were not available, we decided to prepare PPh3 complexes as starting materials. Corresponding procedures for the rhenium analogs have recently been reported [78], and the general synthetic route can also be applied for technetium (Scheme 2).
[TcNCl2(PPh3)2] is a sparingly soluble technetium(V) complex that found widespread application in the synthesis of other nitrido compounds [90,91]. Reactions of this complex with an excess of disulfur dichloride in CH2Cl2 at room temperature proceed with a rapid dissolution of the starting material and the formation of a green solution, when performed in an inert atmosphere. Similar observations can be made during corresponding reactions in air: the nitrido complex readily dissolves and an initially green solution is formed, indicating the formation of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3). Under aerobic conditions, however, the reaction does not stop at this stage, but proceeds with the gradual formation of the red oxidation product [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4). As a solid, complex 3 is stable and can be stored for several months. Solutions of compound 3, however, are sensitive to oxidation and the mixed phosphine/phosphine oxide complex 4 can also be prepared from isolated [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3). Conversely, the addition of PPh3 to solutions of 4 and heating re-forms compound 3 in good yields.
The course of such reactions can be estimated by the color of the reaction mixtures (green to red or reverse). A more indicative monitor is the measurement of successive EPR spectra of the reaction mixtures. As 4d5 “low-spin” complexes, compounds 3 and 4 are S = ½ systems with one unpaired electron. This allows the measurement of resolved solution EPR spectra. Representative spectra of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] are depicted in Figure 4a,b together with their simulations. A frozen-solution spectrum of compound 4 is shown as the final product of the reaction sequence in Figure 4c.
Interactions of the unpaired electron with the nuclear spin of 99Tc (I = 9/2) result in the formation of ten-line patterns in the room temperature spectra (Figure 4a), while the spectra of frozen solutions indicate essentially axial symmetry with well-resolved 99Tc hyperfine lines in the parallel and perpendicular parts. The assignment of the individual lines is indicated in Figure 4b. In contrast to the spectra of corresponding rhenium complexes [60,78], a marked g value anisotropy is observed and no significant rhombic distortion of the tensor components is detected. This may be attributed to the significantly different spin orbit coupling constants of the respective central ions ( λ T c 2 + = 950 cm−1, λ R e 2 + = 2100 cm−1) [92]. Couplings due to interactions with the 31P nuclei of the coordinated phosphines are not resolved for the PPh3 complexes in this study. Interestingly, corresponding line-splittings are characteristic of the parallel part lines of the frozen-solution spectra of similar nitrosyl- and thionitrosyltechnetium(II) complexes with dimethylphenylphosphine (PMe2Ph) ligands, where they cause doublet or triplet structures [67,70,93]. The absence of such splitting in the EPR spectra of 3 and 4 may be caused by the somewhat broader 99Tc hyperfine lines, but may also due to a lower extent of delocalization of the unpaired electron into ligand orbitals of PPh3, which is indicated by the clearly larger 99Tc hyperfine couplings ATc for 3 and 4 compared with the values obtained for corresponding PMe2Ph complexes. Table 2 contains a summary of the EPR parameters derived for the thionitrosyl complexes of the present study, together with the values for [Tc(NS)Cl3(PMe2Ph)2], [Tc(NS)Cl3(PMe2Ph)(OPMe2Ph)] and [Tc(NO)Cl3(PMe2Ph)2].
The differences in the g values and 99Tc coupling constants between [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] and [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] allow for ready differentiation of signals of the two compounds in the respective spectra, particularly in their parallel parts, and qualitative (and even semiquantitative) estimations do not require full spectral analyses. Thus, the course of the gradual oxidation of one of the PPh3 ligands of 3, which is accompanied by the conversion of 3 into 4, can be readily estimated on the basis of the clearly separated low-field lines of the parallel parts of the spectra. This is illustrated in Figure 4c. The presence of the EPR signals of (only) two different paramagnetic compounds (3 and 4) in the course of the reaction is apparent, and after two hours practically all 3 is consumed during formation of 4.
The spectral parameters discussed above reflect the structural changes that are related to the oxidation of one PPh3 ligand. The newly formed OPP3 ligand is directed into trans position of the NS+ ligand, while the two PPh3 ligands in 3 are coordinated trans to each other in the equatorial coordination sphere. Such behavior is not unusual for complexes with multiply bonded ligands, where the ligands with ‘hard’ donor atoms are arranged in the trans position of, e.g., metal–nitrogen multiple bonds [25,29,35,43,49,67]. The structures of the two complexes are shown in Figure 5 and selected bond lengths and angles are summarized in Table 3.
Having in mind the results of the reaction of the nitrosyl complex [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)] with hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate, which proceeded with B–N bond cleavages and the formation of a product with one pyrazole ligand (Scheme 1), it appeared interesting to perform a similar reaction with the related thionitrosyl complex 3 as well. Unlike the nitrosyl starting material, 3 is sufficiently soluble in common solvents and, thus, the reaction can be performed at room temperature. A potential thermal decomposition of the ligand should be avoided in this way.
Treatment of a solution of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] in CH2Cl2 with a methanolic solution containing an excess of K{HB(pzMe2)3} resulted in an immediate color change from red to brown. From this solution, the unusual product [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4}) could be isolated; see Scheme 3. An EPR and 99Tc NMR monitoring of the reaction mixture confirms rapid consumption of the paramagnetic starting material, while several NMR signals appeared. After prolonged stirring at room temperature, a 99Tc NMR signal at 566 ppm dominated. It belongs to cation 5, as could be confirmed by a single crystal X-ray analysis of the pale blue crystals isolated from the reaction mixture in moderate yields. Solutions of these crystals show the same 99Tc chemical shift together with a minor amount of a second compound in the same spectral region (see Figure 2c), which indicates some dynamic processes in the solution. The second species might be assigned to [Tc(NS)(pzHMe2)4]2+ or [Tc(NS)(OPPh3)(pzHMe2)4]2+ cations, since one equivalent of co-crystallized triphenylphosphine oxide was found in the respective crystals. The downfield shift of the signal of the thionitrosyl complex, compared with those of the nitrosyl compounds shown in Figure 2, is remarkable. It is, to the best of our knowledge, only the second 99Tc chemical shift reported for a technetium thionitrosyl complex and it appears close to the signal found for the only other compound: [Tc(NS)Cl2(PMe2Ph)3] (645 ppm) [71]. The difference of several hundred ppm between the values found for the nitrosyl and thionitrosyl complexes of the present study should not be overestimated, given the fact that the 99Tc chemical shifts observed for different nitrosyltechnetium(I) complexes also span a range of almost 3500 ppm from +2000 to −1500 ppm, depending on the π-acceptor properties of the other ligands [27].
Figure 6 depicts the solid-state structure of 5{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3, in which [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]+ cations and {Cl(pzHMe2)4}− anions form a hydrogen-bonded network with Cl2…H distances between 2.439 and 2.678 Å in the anion, while Cl1…H contacts between 2.687 and 2.904 Å are established. Details of this network are shown in Figure 6d and the individual atomic distances are listed in Table 4. The experimentally observed arrangement of the four dimethylpyrazole molecules around the chloride anion justifies treatment as a complex anionic {Cl(pzHMe2)4}− unit. The co-crystallized triphenylphosphine oxide does not establish bonding interactions to the complex cation or the {Cl(pzHMe2)4}− anions, as is clearly visible in Figure 6a. The bonding situation in the [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]+ cation is not exceptional, with the technetium atom in an only slightly distorted octahedral coordination environment. As in the other thionitrosyl complexes in this study, the Tc–N–S bond confirms the presence of a linear unit and justifies its treatment as an NS+ ligand.
The ready cleavage of the boron–nitrogen bonds of {HB(pzR)3}− ligands during reactions with technetium complexes, even at room temperature, makes it interesting to study similar reactions with analogous rhenium compounds. The synthesis of a corresponding thionitrosylrhenium(II) complex, [Re(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] [78], as a potential starting material has recently been reported and gives an opportunity to compare the reactivity of the two group 7 elements.

2.3. Thionitrosyl Complexes of Rhenium

[Re(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] is a dark red complex that is sufficiently soluble in CH2Cl2 to conduct reactions at room temperature. The treatment of a solution of the complex in this solvent with K{HB(pz)3} at room temperature results in a color change and an orange-brown solution is formed, from which a colorless solid (KCl) precipitates. After filtration and chromatography over a silica column, a green and a pale purple fraction can be isolated. The solids isolated from both fractions show identical IR spectra and solutions of the purple compound gradually change in color to green, which indicates a rapid conversion into this stable product of the reaction. It is formed as the sole product when the reaction mixture is heated under reflux. Finally, grayish green single crystals are obtained from such solutions. They have the composition [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a), and similar products were obtained when substituted hydrotris(pyrazole)borates were used (Scheme 4).
No evidence was found for an ongoing ligand exchange or the formation of rhenium complexes with more than one pyrazole ligand. This is a clear difference to reactions of corresponding technetium compounds, where the corresponding 1:1 ligand exchange product was obtained for the nitrosyl complex, while the entire equatorial coordination sphere was occupied by pyrazole ligands in the thionitrosyl complex 5. Lower reaction rates and consequently the isolation of products with “incomplete ligand exchange” is not unusual for couples of structurally equivalent 4d and 5d transition metal complexes and have also been observed for series of rhenium and technetium complexes, e.g., during the replacement of carbonyl ligands with isocyanides [94,95].
The formation of rhenium(I) complexes is not completely unexpected and is in line with the reduction of the [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] starting material during the reaction with {HB(pzMe2)3}. The nature of the reducing agent, however, is not completely clear for both reactions. Most probably, it is related to the degradation of the tripodal ligand, but the oxidation of PPh3 also cannot be completely ruled out.
Figure 7 depicts the structures of the [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHR)] complexes. Selected bond lengths and angles are summarized in Table 5. The main structural features of the rhenium compounds are very similar and close to the bonding situation in the technetium complex 1. The thionitrosyl units are essentially linear, as is expected for NS+ ligands. The rhenium atoms possess only slightly distorted octahedral coordination spheres with the chlorido ligands in trans positions to the thionitrosyl and the pyrazole ligands. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds are established between the heterocyles and the chlorido ligand trans to the NS+ group.

3. Materials and Methods

Unless otherwise stated, reagent-grade starting materials were purchased from commercial sources and either used as received or purified following standard procedures. Solvents were dried and distilled prior to use. [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)] and [Re(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] were prepared as described in the literature [26,78].

3.1. Radiation Precaution

All synthetic work with the long-lived isotope 99Tc was performed in a laboratory approved for the handling of radioactive material. The glass walls of the flasks provide appropriate protection from the primary beta emission of 99Tc. Secondary X-rays (bremsstrahlung) become important only when larger amounts of the compounds are handled as solids. All personnel working in this project were permanently monitored for potential contamination.

3.2. Syntheses

[Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1). [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)] (50 mg, 0.065 mmol) was suspended in 4 mL acetonitrile and solid K{HB(pz)3} (20 mg, 0.08 mmol) was added. The mixture was heated under reflux for 1 h. During this time, the sparingly soluble starting materials dissolved. The resulting red solution was filtered and the solvent was removed in vacuum. Red crystals were obtained by slow diffusion of MeOH into a CH2Cl2 solution of the product. Yield: 25 mg, 45%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3315(w), 3055(w), 2918(w), 2851(w) 1708(vs, NO), 1481(w), 1435(m), 1259(w), 1130(w), 1091(m), 1053(w), 744(m), 694(s), 514(s). 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 10.69 (br, 1H, NH), 7.43–7.38 (m, 12H, PPh3), 7.18–7.13 (m, 6H, PPh3), 7.09–7.05 (m, 12H, PPh3), 6.68 (d, 1H, pz), 6.54 (s, 1H, pz), 5.65 (s, 1H, pz). 99Tc NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 1217 (ν1/2 = 4000 Hz).
[Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3)(HB(pz)3}] (2). [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (25 mg, 0.03 mmol) was dissolved in 2 mL MeOH. K{HB(pz)3} and 5 drops of CH2Cl2 were added. The mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature under an argon atmosphere. An orange-brown solid deposited from this solution upon standing overnight in a refrigerator. This precipitate was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and overlayered with MeOH. Orange-brown crystals formed upon slow diffusion of the solvents. Yield: 14 mg, 75%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3429(br), 3055(w), 2920(w), 2486(w), 2372(w), 1718(vs, NO), 1627(w), 1506(w), 1481(w), 1433(w), 1404(m), 1309(m), 1274(w), 1213(m), 1116(m), 1093(w), 1051(s), 989(w), 752(m), 696(m), 619(w), 526(m), 503(w). 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 7.78 (d, 1H, pz), 7.68 (d, 1H, pz), 7.56 (d, 2H, pz), 7.39–7.26 (m, 15H, PPh3), 6.91 (d, 1H, pz), 6.27 (d, 1H, pz), 6.20 (t, 1H, pz), 5.89 (t, 1H, pz), 5.78 (t, 1H, pz). 99Tc NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 1019 (ν1/2 = 3400 Hz).
[Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3). (a) [TcNCl2(PPh3)2] (71 mg, 0.1 mmol) was suspended in 25 mL of dry CH2Cl2 under an atmosphere of dry argon. S2Cl2 (0.3 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. The color of the mixture turned from orange-red to green. All volatiles were removed in vacuum and the resulting green residue was carefully washed with n-hexane and diethyl ether. The product was dissolved in CH2Cl2 under an atmosphere of dry argon and overlayered with n-pentane. Keeping this mixture in a refrigerator gave green crystals after diffusion of the solvents. Yield: 51 mg, 65%. (b) [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (39 mg, 0.05 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL CH2Cl2 under an atmosphere of dry argon and PPh3 (130 mg, 0.5 mmol) was added. The mixture was heated under reflux for 30 min. The color of the solution changed from red to green. After concentration of the solution and addition of 100 mL cold diethyl ether, a green precipitate was formed. Filtration and crystallization from CH2Cl2/n-hexane gave green crystals. Yield: 33 mg, 85%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 2970(w), 2922(w), 2857(w), 1630(m) 1474(m), 1429(s), 1387(vs, NS), 1227(w), 1186(w), 1163(w), 1088(m), 1051(w), 988(w), 972(w), 914(w), 881(w), 810(w), 743(m), 692 (s), 605(w), 513(s), 455(w). EPR (RT, CH2Cl2) g0 = 2.011; a0Tc = 164 × 10−4 cm−1. EPR (77 K, CH2Cl2): g‖ = 1.955, g⊥ = 2.0455; A‖Tc = 270 × 10−4 cm−1, A⊥Tc = 128 × 10−4 cm−1.
[Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4). (a) [TcNCl2(PPh3)2] (50 mg, 0.07 mmol) was suspended in 15 mL CH2Cl2 and an excess of S2Cl2 (0.3 mL) was added. The mixture was heated under reflux in air. The sparingly soluble starting material gradually dissolved and the initially green solution changed its color to red. The progress of the reaction could be monitored by subsequent recording of EPR spectra. After the disappearance of the signals of compound 3, which was normally observed after 30 min., all volatiles were removed in vacuum and the red residue was carefully washed with n-hexane and diethyl ether. Crystallization from CH2Cl2/n-hexane gave red crystals. Yield: 42 mg, 76%. (b) [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (39 mg, 0.05 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and heated in air for approximately 30 min. The progress of the reaction could be monitored by EPR and red crystals of the product could be obtained as described above. Yield: 36 mg, 90%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 2053(w), 2968(m), 2922(m), 1630(m), 1578(w), 1476(m), 1433(s), 1393(m), 1315(w), 1244(s, NS), 1146 (vs, PO), 1126(vs), 1082(s), 933(w), 922(w), 880(w), 752(m), 721(s), 691(s), 536(vs). EPR (RT, CH2Cl2) g0 = 2.009; a0Re = 166 × 10−4 cm−1. EPR (77 K, CH2Cl2): g‖ = 1.978, g⊥ = 1.999; A‖Tc = 290 × 10−4 cm−1, A⊥Tc = 134 × 10−4 cm−1.
[Tc(NS)Cl(pzH)4]{Cl(pzH)4} (5{Cl(pzH)4}). [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (50 mg, 0.06 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL CH2Cl2 and a solution of K{HB(pzHMe2)3} (143 mg, 0.12 mmol) in 3 mL MeOH was added. The color of the mixture immediately changed from red to brown. After stirring for 6 h at room temperature, all volatiles were removed in vacuum and the residue was washed with n-hexane and extracted with 5 mL CH2Cl2. N-hexane (5 mL) was added and pale blue single crystals were obtained after storing the mixture in a refrigerator. Yield: 24 mg, 38%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3171(m), 3127(m), 3063(m), 3022(m), 3953(s), 2922(s), 2772(s), 2713(s), 2658(s), 2583(m), 2529(s), 2372(m), 2284(m), 1647(w), 1599(vs), 1558(s), 1518(w), 1468(w), 1410(vs), 1371(w), 1290 (vs, NS), 1161(vs), 1119(s), 1024(s), 986(m), 849(vs), 806(m), 758(w), 723(s), 689(s), 586(s), 536(vs), 482(w). 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 10.53 (s, 8H, NH), 6.10 (s, 4H, CH complex), 5.95 (s, 4H, CH anion), 2.40 (s, 12H, CH3 complex), 1.91 (s, 12H, CH3 anion). 99Tc NMR (CDCl3, ppm): +566 (ν1/2 = 1860 Hz).
[Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a). [Re(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (100 mg, 0.12 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL CH2Cl2 and a suspension of K{HB(pz)3} in 20 mL CH2Cl2 was added. The mixture was heated under reflux for 1 h. The color of the solution changed to greenish yellow and a colorless solid precipitated. After filtration, the volume of the reaction mixture was reduced to 10 mL and the same amount of n-hexane was added. A pale green solid formed upon slow concentration of this solution. The crude product was purified by chromatography via a silica column with a CH2Cl2/n-hexane mixture (9:1, v/v) as mobile phase. The major product was first eluted as a green fraction, followed by a pale purple fraction. Concentration of the green fraction gave a microcrystalline product. Yield: 85 mg, 61%. Elemental analysis: Calcd. for C39H34Cl2N3P2ReS: C, 52.3; H, 3.8; N, 4.7; S, 3.6%. Found: C 53.0; H, 4.9; N, 4.9; S, 3.1%. IR (ATR, cm−1): 3273(w), 1481(m), 1432(s), 1339(m), 1259(s, NS), 1171(vs), 1154(m), 1128(s), 1090(s), 1046(s), 997(w), 913(w), 767(w), 741(s), 691(vs), 617(w), 598(m), 589(w). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): 10.73 (s, 1H, NH); 7.61–7.22 (m, 30H, PPh3); 7.03 (t, 1H, pz); 6.98 (t, 1H, pz); 5.44 (dd, 1H, pz). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): –1.6 (s). ESI+ MS: m/z = 918.095 [M+Na]+ (calcd. 918.077), 934.067 [M+K]+ (calcd. 934.052).
[Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b). The compound was prepared and purified as described for complex 6a with K{HB(pzMe2)3}. Grey-green needles. Yield: 35 mg, 33%. Elemental analysis: Calcd. for C41H38Cl2N3P2ReS: C, 53.3; H, 4.2; N, 4.6; S, 4.6%. Found: C 53.2; H, 3.9; N, 4.4; S, 4.3%. IR (ATR, cm−1): 3280(w), 1570(w), 1481(w), 1433(m), 1273(m, NS), 1174(s), 1093(m), 1028(w), 1020(w), 918(w), 815(m), 748(m), 692(vs). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): 10.45 (s, 1H, NH); 7.63–7.60 (m, 12H, PPh3); 7.29–7.25 (m, 18H, PPh3); 1.87 (s, 3H, CH3); 1.84 (s, 3H, CH3). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): −3.4 (s). ESI+ MS: m/z = 923.119 [M]+ (calcd. 923.120), 946.109 [M+Na]+ (ber.: 946.108), 962.089 [M+K]+ (calcd. 962.082), 1869.229 [2M+Na]+ (calcd. 1869.223), 1885.204 [2M+K]+ (calcd. 1885.197).
[Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c). The compound was prepared as described for compound 6a with K{HB(pzPh)3}. The workup was performed without column chromatography via crystallization from CHCl3. Pale green crystals. Yield: 82 mg, 73%. Elemental analysis: Calcd. for C45H38Cl2N3P2ReS: C, 55.6; H, 3.9; N, 4.3; S, 4.3%. Found: C 55.3; H, 3.8; N, 4.2; S, 3.9%. IR (ATR, cm−1): 3276(w), 3061(w), 1586(w), 1574(w), 1558(w), 1481(m), 1435(s), 1349(w), 1267(w, NS), 1182(m), 1170(s) 1126(m), 1091(s), 1027(w), 998(w), 959 (w), 919(m), 849(w), 801(m), 469(m), 741(s), 690(vs), 658(s), 617(m). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): 11.01 (s, 1H, NH), 7.63–7.71 (m, 12H, Ph(PPh3)), 7.28–7.37 (m, 3H, Ph(pz)), 7.22–7.30 (m, 18H, Ph(PPh3)), 6.94–7.01 (m, 2+1H, Ph(pz), CH), 6.00 (s, 1H, CH). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): –2.3 (s). ESI+ MS: m/z = 971.145 [M]+ (calcd. 971.119), 994.136 [M+Na]+ (calcd. 994.108), 1010.112 [M+K]+ (calcd. 1010.082).

3.3. Spectroscopic and Analytical Methods

IR spectra were measured as KBr pellets on a Shimadzu IR Affinity-1 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) (technetium compounds) or with a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10 ATR spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) (rhenium complexes). The NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL 400 MHz spectrometers (JEOL, Kyoto, Japan). An aqueous solution of KTcO4 was used as reference for the 99Tc spectra. ESI mass spectra were measured with an Agilent 6210 ESI-TOF (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) mass spectrometer. All MS results are given in the form of m/z assignment. Elemental analysis of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur were determined using a Heraeus vario EL elemental analyzer (Elementar, Langensebold, Germany). Combustion analyses could not be conducted for the radioactive technetium compounds for radiation protection reasons.

3.4. X-ray Crystallography

The intensities for the X-ray determinations were collected on a STOE IPDS-2T (STOE, Darmstadt, Germany) with Mo/Kα radiation. Numerical absorption corrections were carried out by X-RED32 [96]. Structure solution and refinement were performed with the SHELX programs [97,98] included in the WinGX [99] program package or OLEX2 [100]. Hydrogen atoms were calculated for the idealized positions and treated with the ‘riding model’ option of SHELXL. Since some of the compounds crystallized together with disordered solvent molecules (partially close to special positions), refinements of such structures were undertaken with the removal of disordered solvent molecules using the solvent mask option of OLEX2. Details are given in the Supplementary Materials. The representation of molecular structures was prepared using the program MERCURY [101].

4. Conclusions

Most of the conducted reactions of common nitrosyl and thionitrosyl complexes of technetium and rhenium with hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate ligands result in B–N bond cleavage and the formation of pyrazole complexes. The number of pyrazole ligands in the products is variable and ranges from one (in most of the studied cases) to four in the thionitrosyl cation [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]+. In only one exceptional case, the reaction of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] with K{HB(pz)3} at room temperature, was the coordination of an intact hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borato ligand observed. Generally, it can be concluded that any thermal stress to such reaction mixtures results in degradation of the respective ligand systems. The decomposition is most probably metal-driven or at least metal-supported, since the uncoordinated ligands, e.g., K{HB(pz)3} or K{HB(pzMe2)3}, are synthesized in melts at temperatures >200 °C [102,103].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29163865/s1: Table S1.1: Crystallographic data and data collection parameters. Figure S1.1. Ellipsoid representation of the structure of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1)·CH2Cl2. The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Table S1.2. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1). Figure S1.2. Ellipsoid representation of the molecular structure of [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2) including the positional disorder between the Tc–Cl and Tc–N–O bonds. The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Table S1.3. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2). Figure S1.3. Ellipsoid representation of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3). The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Table S1.4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3). Figure S1.4. Ellipsoid representation of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4) including the positional disorder between the Tc–N–S and Tc–Cl bonds. The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Table S1.5. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4). Figure S1.5. Ellipsoid representation of [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4})⋅(OPPh3). The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Table S1.6. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4})·(OPPh3). Figure S1.6. Ellipsoid representation of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a)·0.5(CH2Cl2) including positional disorder for the NO and Cl3 ligands of the central molecular axis. The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Table S1.7. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a)·0.5(CH2Cl2). Figure S1.7. Ellipsoid representation of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b). The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Table S1.8. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b). Figure S1.8. Ellipsoid representation of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c) including positional disorder between the NS and the Cl1 atom ligands. The thermal ellipsoids are set at a 50% probability level. Table S1.9. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c). Figure S2.1: IR (KBr) spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1). Figure S2.2: 1H NMR spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) in CDCl3. Figure S2.3: 31P NMR spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) in CDCl3. Figure S2.3: 99Tc NMR spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) in CDCl3. Figure S2.4: IR (KBr) spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2). Figure S2.5: 1H NMR spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2) in CDCl3. Figure S2.6: 31P NMR spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2) in CDCl3. Figure S2.7: 99Tc NMR spectrum of [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2) in CDCl3. Figure S2.8: IR (KBr) spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3). Figure S2.9: Solution EPR spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature. Figure S2.10: Solution EPR spectra of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) in CH2Cl2 at T = 77 K. Figure S2.11: IR (KBr) spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4). Figure S2.12: Solution EPR spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature. Figure S2.13: Solution EPR spectra of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4) in CH2Cl2 at T = 77 K. Figure S2.14: IR (KBr) spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4})·(OPPh3). Figure S2.15: 1H NMR spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4})·(OPPh3) in CDCl3. Figure S2.16: 99Tc NMR spectrum of [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4})·(OPPh3) in CDCl3. Figure S2.17: IR (ATR) spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a). Figure S2.18: 1H NMR spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a) in CD2Cl2. Figure S2.19: 31P NMR spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a) in CD2Cl2. Figure S2.20: ESI+ mass spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a). Figure S2.21: IR (ATR) spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b). Figure S2.22: 1H NMR spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b) in CD2Cl2. Figure S2.23: 31P NMR spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b) in CD2Cl2. Figure S2.24: ESI+ mass spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b). Figure S2.25: IR (ATR) spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c). Figure S2.26: 1H NMR spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c) in CD2Cl2. Figure S2.27: 31P NMR spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c) in CD2Cl2. Figure S2.28: ESI+ mass spectrum of [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., D.N. and U.A.; Data curation, A.A., A.H., T.E.S. and D.N.; Formal analysis, A.A., T.E.S., D.N. and A.H.; Funding acquisition, U.A.; Investigation, A.A., T.E.S., D.N., A.H. and U.A.; Methodology, A.A., D.N., A.H. and U.A.; Project administration, U.A.; Resources, U.A.; Supervision, U.A., D.N. and A.A.; Validation, A.A., A.H., D.N. and T.E.S.; Visualization, U.A.; Writing—original draft, U.A.; Writing—review and editing, T.E.S., A.A., A.H., D.N. and U.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the DFG (BIOSUPRAMOL) and Freie Universität Berlin.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trofimenko, S. Boron-Pyrazole Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 1842–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Trofimenko, S. Scorpionates: The Coordination Chemistry of Polypyrazolyl-Borates Ligands; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 1999; ISBN 978-1-86094-1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pettinari, C. Scorpionates II: Chelating Borate Ligands; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2008; ISBN 978-1-86094-877-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pettinari, C.; Pettinari, R.; Marchetti, F. Golden jubilee for scorpionates: Recent advances in organometallic chemistry and their role in catalysis. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 65, 175–260. [Google Scholar]
  5. Paulo, A.; Correia, J.D.G.; Campello, M.P.C.; Santos, I. A short ride on scorpionates: From d- to f-elements. Polyhedron 2004, 23, 331–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Spicer, M.D.; Reglinski, J. Soft scorpionate ligands based on imidazole-2-thione donors. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 40, 1553–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Steel, G.; Rajasekharan-Nair, R.; Stepek, I.A.; Kennedy, A.R.; Reglinski, J.; Spicer, M.D. Observations on the steric impact of N- and S-donor scorpionate ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 2409–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lail, M.; Pittard, K.A.; Gunnoe, T.B. Chemistry surrounding group 7 complexes that possess poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 56, 95–153. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomas, J.A.; Davison, A. High oxidation state technetium and rhenium complexes of hydrotris(1-pyrazolyl)borate. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1991, 190, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abrams, M.J.; Davison, A. The Synthesis and Characterization of Hydrotris(1-pyrazolyl)borate Complexes of Technetium(III) and Rhenium(V) and (III). Inorg. Chim. Acta 1984, 82, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alberto, R.; Herrmann, W.A.; Kiprof, P.; Baumgärtner, F. Multiple bonds between main group elements and transition metals. Synthesis and reactivity of TcCl(CO)3[P(C6H5)3]2: Novel technetium complexes of 1,4,7-triazacyclononane and hydridotris(pyrazolyl)borate. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joachim, J.E.; Apostolidis, C.; Kanellakopoulos, B.; Maier, R.; Marques, N.; Meyer, D.; de Matos, A.P.; Nuber, B.; Rebizant, J.; Ziegler, M.L. Metallorganische Chemie des Technetiums. VIII. Technetium(I)-carbonyl-Komplexe mit Polypyrazol-1-yl-borato-Liganden im Vergleich mit seinen Mn- und Re-Homologen. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 448, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Joachim, J.E.; Apostolidis, C.; Kanellakopoulos, B.; Meyer, D.; Nuber, B.; Raptis, K.; Rebizant, J.; Ziegler, M.L. Metallorganische Chemie des Technetiums XII. Photolytische CO-substitutionsreaktionen von Technetiumtricarbonylverbindungen. Synthesen und Röntgenstrukturanalysen von (C5H5)Tc(CO)3(PPh3), (C5Me5)Tc(CO)2(PPh3) und [HB(3,5-Me2Pz)3Tc(CO)2[P(OMe)3] im Vergleich mit seinen Homologen. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 492, 199–210. [Google Scholar]
  14. Domingos, A.; Marcalo, J.; Paulo, A.; de Matos, A.P.; Santos, I. Synthesis and characterization of rhenium complexes with the stabilizing ligand tetrakis(pyrazol-1-yl)borate. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 5114–5118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. You, F.; Friedman, L.A.; Bassett, K.C.; Lin, Y.; Sabat, M.; Harman, D. Rhenium(I) η2-Coordinated Furan Complexes:  Converting Furan into a 1,3-Carbon Dipole. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2903–2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meiere, S.H.; Brooks, B.C.; Gunnoe, T.B.; Carrig, E.H.; Sabat, M.; Harman, W.D. Dihapto Coordination of Aromatic Molecules by the Asymmetric π-Bases {TpRe(CO)(L)} (Tp = hydridotris(pyrazolyl)borate; L = tBuNC, PMe3, pyridine, 1-methylimidazole, or NH3). Organometallics 2001, 20, 3661–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McNeil, W.S.; DuMez, D.D.; Matano, Y.; Lovell, S.; Mayer, J.M. Synthesis and Reactivity of Aryl- and Alkyl-Rhenium(V) Imido−Triflate Compounds:  An Unusual Mechanism for Triflate Substitution. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3715–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Faller, J.W.; Lavoie, A.R. Diastereoselective Synthesis and Electronic Asymmetry of Chiral Nonracemic Rhenium(V) Oxo Complexes Containing the Hydrotris(1-pyrazolyl)borate Ligand. Organometallics 2000, 19, 3957–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maria, L.; Paulo, A.; Santos, I.C.; Santos, I.; Kurz, P.; Spingler, B.; Alberto, R. Very Small and Soft Scorpionates:  Water Stable Technetium Tricarbonyl Complexes Combining a Bis-agostic (κ3-H, H, S) Binding Motif with Pendant and Integrated Bioactive Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14590–14598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Garcia, R.; Paulo, A.; Santos, I. Rhenium and technetium complexes with anionic or neutral scorpionates: An overview of their relevance in biomedical applications. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 4315–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martini, P.; Pasquali, M.; Boschi, A.; Uccelli, L.; Giganti, M.; Duatti, A. Technetium Complexes and Radiopharmaceuticals with Scorpionate Ligands. Molecules 2018, 23, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sidorenko, G.V.; Miroslavov, A.E.; Tyupina, M.Y. Technetium(I) carbonyl complexes for nuclear medicine: Coordination-chemical aspect. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 476, 214911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Armstrong, A.; Taube, H. Chemistry of trans-Aquonitrosyltetramminetechnetium(I) and Related Studies. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 1904–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, G.A.; Heitzmann, W.; Ford, L.A.; Benson, W.R. ESR Studies of Technetium Complexes: Trans-Aquonitrosyltetramminetechnetium(II) and Nitrosylpentachlorotechnetium(II). Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 3242–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nicholson, T.; Chun, E.; Mahmood, A.; Mueller, P.; Davison, A.; Jones, A.G. Synthesis, spectroscopy and structural analysis of Technetium and Rhenium nitrosyl complexes. Commun. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 3, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  26. Blanchard, S.S.; Nicholson, T.; Davison, A.; Davis, W.; Jones, A.G. The synthesis, characterization and substitution reactions of the mixed technetium(I) nitrosyl complex trans-trans-[(NO)(NCCH3)Cl2(PPh3)2Tc]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 244, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balasekaran, S.M.; Hagenbach, A.; Drees, M.; Abram, U. [TcII(NO)(trifluoroacetate)4F]2−—Synthesis and reactions. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 13544–13552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Linder, K.E.; Davison, A.; Dewan, J.C.; Costello, C.E.; Melaknia, S. Nitrosyl complexes of technetium: Synthesis and characterization of [TcI(NO)(CNCMe3)5](PF6)2 and Tc(NO)Br2(CNCMe3)3 and the crystal structure of Tc(NO)Br2(CNCMe3)3. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 2085–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ackermann, J.; Noufele, C.N.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. Nitrosyltechnetium(I) Complexes with 2-(Diphenylphosphanyl)aniline. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2019, 645, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ackermann, J.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. {Tc(NO)(Cp)(PPh3)}+—A novel technetium(I) core. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10285–10288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ackermann, J.; Abdulkader, A.; Scholtysik, C.; Jungfer, M.R.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. [TcI(NO)X(Cp)(PPh3)] Complexes (X− = I−, I3−, SCN−, CF3SO3−, or CF3COO−) and Their Reactions. Organometallics 2019, 38, 4471–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdulkader, A.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. [Tc(NO)Cl(Cp)(PPh3)]—A Technetium(I) Compound with an Unexpected Synthetic Potential. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 2021, 3812–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schibli, R.; Marti, N.; Maurer, P.; Spingler, B.; Lehaire, M.-L.; Gramlich, V.; Barnes, C.L. Syntheses and Characterization of Dicarbonyl−Nitrosyl Complexes of Technetium(I) and Rhenium(I) in Aqueous Media:  Spectroscopic, Structural, and DFT Analyses. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brown, D.S.; Newman, J.L.; Thornback, J.R.; Davison, A. Structure of the tetra-n-butylammonium salt of tetrachloro(methanol)nitrosyltechnetium(II) anion. Acta Cryst. 1987, C43, 1692–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brown, D.S.; Newman, J.L.; Thornback, J.R.; Pearlstein, R.M.; Davison, A.; Lawson, A. The synthesis and characterisation of the trichloronitrosyl(acetylacetonato)technetium(II) anion, a novel technetium(II) complex. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1988, 150, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nicholson, T.; Hirsch-Kuchma, M.; Freiberg, E.; Davison, A.; Jones, A.G. The reaction chemistry of a technetium(I) nitrosyl complex with potentially chelating organohydrazines: The X-ray crystal structure of [TcCl2(NO)(HNNC5H4N)(PPh3)]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 279, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Vries, N.; Cook, J.; Davison, A.; Nicholson, T.; Jones, A.G. Synthesis and characterization of a technetium(III) nitrosyl compound: Tc(NO)(Cl)(SC10H13)3. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 1062–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nicholson, T.; Mahmood, A.; Limpa-Amara, N.; Salvarese, N.; Takase, M.K.; Müller, P.; Akgun, Z.; Jones, A.G. Reactions of the tridentate and tetradentate amine ligands di-(2-picolyl)(N-ethyl)amine and 2,5-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)-2,5 diazohexane with technetium nitrosyl complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 373, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roca Jungfer, M.; Ernst, M.J.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. [{TcI(NO)(LOMe)(PPh3)Cl}2Ag](PF6) and [TcII(NO)(LOMe)(PPh3)Cl](PF6): Two Unusual Technetium Complexes with a “Kläui-type” Ligand. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2022, 648, e202100316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nicholson, T.L.; Mahmood, A.; Muller, P.; Davison, A.; Storm-Blanchard, S.; Jones, A.G. The synthesis and structural characterization of the technetium nitrosyl complexes [TcCl(NO)(SC5H4N)(PPh3)2] and [Tc(NO)(SC5H4N)2(PPh3)]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 365, 484–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Balasekaran, S.M.; Spandl, J.; Hagenbach, A.; Köhler, K.; Drees, M.; Abram, U. Fluoridonitrosyl Complexes of Technetium(I) and Technetium(II). Synthesis, Characterization, Reactions, and DFT Calculations. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 5117–5128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nicholson, T.; Hirsch-Kuchma, M.; Shellenbarger-Jones, A.; Davison, A.; Jones, A.G. The synthesis and characterization of a technetium nitrosyl complex with cis-{2-pyridyl,diphenylphosphine} coligands. The X-ray crystal structure of [TcCl2(NO)(pyPPh2-P,N) (pyPPh2-P)]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 267, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grunwald, A.C.; Scholtysik, C.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. One Ligand, One Metal, Seven Oxidation States: Stable Technetium Complexes with the “Kläui Ligand”. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 9396–9405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nicholson, T.L.; Mahmood, A.; Refosco, F.; Tisato, F.; Müller, P.; Jones, A.G. The synthesis and X-ray structural characterization of mer and fac isomers of the technetium(I) nitrosyl complex [TcCl2(NO)(PNPpr)]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 3637–3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nicholson, T.; Müller, P.; Davison, A.; Jones, A.G. The synthesis and characterization of a cationic technetium nitrosyl complex: The X-ray crystal structure of [TcCl(NO)(DPPE)2](PF6) · CH2Cl2. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2006, 359, 1296–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Machura, B. Structural and spectroscopic properties of rhenium nitrosyl complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 2277–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dilworth, J.R. Rhenium chemistry—Then and Now. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 436, 213822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mahmood, A.; Akgun, Z.; Peng, Y.; Mueller, P.; Jiang, Y.; Berke, H.; Jones, A.G.; Nicholson, T. The synthesis and characterization of rhenium nitrosyl complexes. The X-ray crystal structures of [ReBr2(NO)(NCMe)3], [Re(NO)(N5)](BPh4)2] and [ReBr2(NO)(NCMe){py-CH2-NHCH2CH2-N(CH2-py)2}]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2013, 405, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abram, U.; Ortner, K.; Hübener, R.; Voigt, A.; Caballho, R.; Vazquez-Lopez, E. Darstellung, Strukturen und EPR-Spektren der Rhenium(II)-Nitrosylkomplexe [Re(NO)Cl2(PPh3)(OPPh3)(OReO3)], [Re(NO)Cl2(OPPh3)2(OReO3)] und [Re(NO)Cl2(PPh3)3] [ReO4]. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1998, 624, 1662–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Agbossou, F.; O’Connor, E.J.; Garner, C.M.; Quiros Mendez, N.; Fernandez, J.M.; Patton, A.T.; Ramsden, J.A.; Gladysz, J.A. Cyclopentadienyl Rhenium Complexes. Inorg. Synth. 1992, 29, 211–225. [Google Scholar]
  51. Seidel, S.N.; Prommesberger, M.; Eichenseher, S.; Meyer, O.; Hampel, F.; Gladysz, J.A. Syntheses and structural analyses of chiral rhenium containing amines of the formula (η5-C5H5)Re(NO)(PPh3)((CH2)nNRR′) (n = 0, 1). Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 533–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bernasconi, C.F.; Bhattacharya, S.; Wenzel, P.J.; Olmstead, M.M. Kinetic and Thermodynamic Acidity of [Cp(NO)(PPh3)Re(2,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)carbene]+. Transition State Imbalance and Intrinsic Barriers. Organometallics 2006, 25, 4322–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dilsky, S.; Schenk, W.A. Diastereomeric Halfsandwich Rhenium Complexes Containing Hemilabile Phosphane Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 2004, 4859–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pandey, K.K. Coordination Chemistry of Thionitrosyl (NS), Thiazate (NSO−), Disulfidothionitrate (S,N−), Sulfur Monoxide (SO), and Disulfur Monoxide (S,O) Ligands. Progr. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 40, 445–502. [Google Scholar]
  55. Døsing, A. The electronic structure and photochemistry of transition metal thionitrosyl complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 306, 544–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Anhaus, J.; Siddiqi, Z.A.; Roesky, H.W. Reaction of Tetrasulfurtetranitride with Rhenium(VII)-chloronitride. The Crystal Structure of [Ph4As+]2[Cl4Re(NS)(NSCl)2−] · CH2Cl2. Z. Naturforsch. 1985, 40b, 740–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dirican, D.; Pfister, N.; Wozniak, M.; Braun, T. Reactivity of Binary and Ternary Sulfur Halides towards Transition-Metal Compounds. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 31, 6945–6963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dietrich, A.; Neumüller, B.; Dehnicke, K. (PPh4)2[(SN)ReCl3(μ-N)(μ-NSN)ReCl3(THF)]—Ein Nitrido-Thionitrosyl-Dinitridosulfato-Komplex des Rheniums. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2000, 626, 1268–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Reinel, M.; Höcher, T.; Abram, U.; Kirmse, R. Ein Beitrag zu Rhenium(II)-, Osmium(II)- und Technetium(II)-Thionitrosylkomplexe vom Typ [M(NS)Cl4py] : Darstellung, Strukturen und EPR-Spektren. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2003, 629, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Voigt, A.; Abram, U.; Kirmse, R. Darstellung, Strukturen und EPR-Spektren der Rhenium(II)-Thionitrosylkomplexe trans-[Re(NS)Cl3(MePh2P)2] und trans-[Re(NS)Br3(Me2PhP)2]. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1999, 625, 1658–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hauck, H.-G.; Willing, W.; Müller, U.; Dehnicke, K. [ReCl2(NS)(NSCl)(Pyridin)2], ein Thionitrosyl-chlorthionitrenkomplex des Rheniums. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1986, 534, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hübener, R.; Abram, U.; Strähle, J. Isothiocyanato complexes of rhenium II. Synthesis, characterization and structures of ReN(NCS)2(Me2PhP)3 and Re(NS)(NCS)2(Me2PhP)3. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 216, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ritter, S.; Abram, U. Gemischtligand-Komplexe des Rheniums. VI. Darstellung und Strukturen der Rhenium Thionitrosyl-Komplexe mer-[Re(NS)Cl2(Me2PhP)3] · CH2Cl2 und trans-[Re(NS)Cl3(Me2PhP)2]. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1994, 620, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ritter, S.; Abram, U. Gemischtligandkomplexe des Rheniums. IX. Reaktionen am Nitridoliganden von [ReN(Me2PhP)(Et2dtc)2]. Synthese, Charakterisierung und Kristallstrukturen von [Re(NBCl3)(Me2PhP)(Et2dtc)2], [Re(NGaCl3)(Me2PhP)(Et2dtc)2] und [Re(NS)Cl(Me2PhP)2(Et2dtc)]. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1995, 622, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ruf, C.; Behrens, U.; Lork, E.; Mews, R. Reactions of halides with trans-[Re(CO)4(MeCN)(NS)][AsF6]2: Syntheses and structure of trans-[Re(CO)4(Cl)(NS)][AsF6] and [(OC)5ReNS–NS–N[Re(CO)5]S{N–SNRe(CO)5}–CH2–CH2][AsF6]2, an unusual trinuclear bis(thiazyl)rhenium complex. Chem. Commun. 1996, 939–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Baldas, J.; Bonnyman, J.; Mackay, M.F.; Williams, G.A. Structural studies of technetium complexes. V. The preparation and crystal structure of Dichlorobis(diethyldithiocarbamato)thionitrosyltechnetium(III). Austr. J. Chem. 1984, 37, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaden, L.; Lorenz, B.; Kirmse, R.; Stach, J.; Behm, H.; Beurskens, P.T.; Abram, U. Synthesis, characterization and x-ray molecular and crystal structure of Tc(NS)Cl3(Me2PhP)(Me2PhPO)-a first example of mixed phosphine/phosphine oxide coordination. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1990, 169, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baldas, J.; Colmanet, S.F.; Williams, G.A. Preparation and Structure of Dibromobis(N,N-diethyldithiocarbamato)-thionitrosyltechnetium(III). Austr. J. Chem. 1991, 44, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lu, J.; Clarke, M.J. Modulation of Tc–NX (X = O or S) bonds by π-acceptor ligands. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1992, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abram, U.; Schulz Lang, E.; Abram, S.; Wegmann, J.; Dilworth, J.R.; Kirmse, R.; Woolins, J.D. Technetium(V) and rhenium(V) nitrido complexes with bis(diphenyl-thiophosphoryl)amide, N(SPPh2)2−. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1997, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hiller, W.; Hübener, R.; Lorenz, B.; Kaden, L.; Findeisen, M.; Stach, J.; Abram, U. Structural and spectroscopic studies on mer-dichlorotris(dimethylphenylphosphine)(thionitrosyl)technetium(I), mer-[Tc(NS)Cl2(Me2PhP)3]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1991, 181, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lu, J.; Clarke, M.J. Sulfur atom transfer with reduction of a [TcVI≡N]3+ core to a [TcI-N≡S]2+ core. Crystal structure of mer-dichlorotris(4-picoline)(thionitrosyl)technetium. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 4123–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abram, U.; Hübener, R.; Wollert, R.; Kirmse, R.; Hiller, W. Synthesis, characterization and reactions of [Tc(NS)X4]− complexes (X = Cl, Br, NCS). Inorg. Chim. Acta 1993, 206, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dressler, K. Ultraviolett- und Schumannspektren der neutralen und ionisierten Moleküle PO, PS, NS, P2. Helv. Phys. Acta 1955, 28, 563–590. [Google Scholar]
  75. O’Hare, P.A.G. Dissociation Energies, Enthalpies of Formation, Ionization Potentials, and Dipole Moments of NS and NS+. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 2992–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mews, R. The Thionitrosyl Cation NS+ as a Synthetic Reagent. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 691–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Clegg, W.; Glemser, O.; Harms, K.; Hartmann, G.; Mews, R.; Noltemeyer, M.; Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structures of thionitrosyl hexafluoroantimonate(V) and thionitrosyl undecafluorodiantimonate(V) at 293 K and of thionitrosyl undecafluorodiantimonate(V) at 121.5 K: The effect of thermal motion on the apparent NS bond length. Acta Cryst. 1981, 37b, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nowak, D.; Sawallisch, T.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. Thionitrosyl Complexes of Rhenium and Technetium with PPh3 and Chelating Ligands—Synthesis and Reactivity. Inorganics 2024, 12, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ernst, M.J.; Abdulkader, A.; Hagenbach, A.; Claude, G.; Roca Jungfer, M.; Abram, U. [Tc(NO)(Cp)(PPh3)Cl] and [Tc(NO)(Cp)(PPh3)(NCCH3)](PF6), and Their Reactions with Pyridine and Chalcogen Donors. Molecules 2024, 29, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wendlandt, D.; Bauche, J.; Luc, P. Hyperfine structure in Tc I: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys. 1977, 10, 1989–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mikhalev, V.A. 99Tc NMR Spectroscopy. Radiochemistry 2005, 47, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abram, U.; Lorenz, L.; Kaden, L.; Scheller, D. Nitrido Complexes of Technetium with Tertiary Phosphines and Arsines. Polyhedron 1988, 7, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. O’Connell, L.A.; Pearlstein, R.M.; Davison, A.; Thornback, J.R.; Kronauge, J.F.; Jones, A.G. Technetium-99 NMR spectroscopy: Chemical shift trends and long range coupling effects. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1989, 161, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Roca Jungfer, M.; Elsholz, L.; Abram, U. Technetium Hydrides Revisited: Syntheses, Structures, and Reactions of [TcH3(PPh3)4] and [TcH(CO)3(PPh3)2]. Organometallics 2021, 40, 3095–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Trofimenko, S. Recent Advances in Poly(pyrazolyl)borate (Scorpionate) Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 943–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khan, M.M.T.; Roy, P.S.; Venkatasubramanian, K.; Khan, N.H. An unexpected cleavage of the boron-nitrogen bond in the coordinated dihydrobis(1-pyrazolyl)borate: Synthesis and crystal structure of [RuII(pz)2(pzH)3(DMSO)] and synthesis of [RuIICl2(pzH)2(DMSO)2]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1990, 176, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kharbani, D.; Deb, D.K.; Mawnai, I.L.; Kurbah, S.D.; Sarkar, B.; Rymmai, E.K. Pyrazole cleavage of tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate with Ruthenium(II) complexes: Synthesis, structural characterization and DFT studies. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1133, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhao, Q.; Dou, T.; Guan, X.-T.; Xu, T.; Chen, M.-J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X. B–N Cleavage in (9-BBN)bis(pyrazolyl)borate NiII Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 3724–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kückmann, T.I.; Abram, U. Oxorhenium(V) and Tricarbonylrhenium(I) Complexes with Substituted Pyrazoles as Products of the Degradation of Hydrotrispyrazolylborates. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004, 630, 783–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Baldas, J. The chemistry of technetium nitrido complexes. In Technetium and Rhenium Their Chemistry and Its Applications; Yoshihara, K., Omori, T., Eds.; Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp. 37–76. [Google Scholar]
  91. Bolzati, C.; Dolmella, A. Nitrido Technetium-99m Core in Radiopharmaceutical Applications: Four Decades of Research. Inorganics 2020, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Weil, J.A.; Bolton, J.R.; Wertz, J.E. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance—Elementary Theory and Practical Applications; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1994; Appendix G; p. 533. [Google Scholar]
  93. Abram, U.; Kirmse, R.; Köhler, K.; Lorenz, B.; Kaden, L. Tc(NX)Y3(Me2PhP)2 Complexes (X = O or S.; Y = Cl or Br). Preparation, Characterization and EPR Studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1987, 129, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Claude, G.; Weh, D.; Hagenbach, A.; Figueroa, J.S.; Abram, U. Rhenium Complexes with p-Fluorophenylisocyanide. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2023, 649, e202200320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Claude, G.; Genz, J.; Weh, D.; Roca Jungfer, M.; Hagenbach, A.; Gembicky, M.; Figueroa, J.S.; Abram, U. Mixed-Isocyanide Complexes of Technetium under Steric and Electronic Control. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 16163–16176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Coppens, P. The Evaluation of Absorption and Extinction in Single-Crystal Structure Analysis. In Crystallographic Computing; Muksgaard: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  97. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Farrugia, L.J. WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: An update. J. Appl. Cryst. 2012, 45, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Macrae, C.F.; Sovago, I.; Cottrell, S.J.; Galek, P.T.A.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Platings, M.; Shields, G.P.; Stevens, J.S.; Towler, M.; et al. Mercury 4.0: From visualization to analysis, design and prediction. J. Appl. Cryst. 2020, 53, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Trofimenko, S. Boron-Pyrazole Chemistry. II. Poly(1-pyrazolyl borates). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 3170–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Thomas, S.; Young, C.G.; Broce, B.; Templeton, J.L. Potassium Tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)hydroborate, KTp*. Inorg. Synth. 2002, 33, 219–221. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 29 03865 g001
Figure 1. Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates, {HB(pzR)3}−, used in the present paper and related isolobal ligands.
Figure 1. Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates, {HB(pzR)3}−, used in the present paper and related isolobal ligands.
Molecules 29 03865 g001
Molecules 29 03865 sch001
Scheme 1. Subsequent reactions of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)] and [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] with K{HB(pz)3).
Scheme 1. Subsequent reactions of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(CH3CN)] and [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] with K{HB(pz)3).
Molecules 29 03865 sch001
Molecules 29 03865 g002
Figure 2. 99Tc NMR spectra of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1), [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2) and [Tc(NS)Cl(pzH)4]Cl (5Cl) (* indicates a small amount of [Tc(NS)(pzH)4]2+).
Figure 2. 99Tc NMR spectra of [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1), [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2) and [Tc(NS)Cl(pzH)4]Cl (5Cl) (* indicates a small amount of [Tc(NS)(pzH)4]2+).
Molecules 29 03865 g002
Molecules 29 03865 g003
Figure 3. Molecular structures of (a) [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) and (b) [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2). Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Figure 3. Molecular structures of (a) [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) and (b) [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2). Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Molecules 29 03865 g003
Molecules 29 03865 sch002
Scheme 2. Synthesis of thionitrosyltechnetium(II) complexes with PPh3 ligands.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of thionitrosyltechnetium(II) complexes with PPh3 ligands.
Molecules 29 03865 sch002
Molecules 29 03865 g004
Figure 4. Solution EPR spectra of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) in CH2Cl2 (a) at room temperature and (b) at T = 77 K (assignment of the 99Tc lines to the parallel (‖) and perpendicular (⊥) parts of the spectrum is indicated). (c) Frozen solution EPR spectra of a reaction sequence of 3 in CH2Cl2 under aerobic conditions, indicating the gradual conversion of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] into [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)].
Figure 4. Solution EPR spectra of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) in CH2Cl2 (a) at room temperature and (b) at T = 77 K (assignment of the 99Tc lines to the parallel (‖) and perpendicular (⊥) parts of the spectrum is indicated). (c) Frozen solution EPR spectra of a reaction sequence of 3 in CH2Cl2 under aerobic conditions, indicating the gradual conversion of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] into [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)].
Molecules 29 03865 g004
Molecules 29 03865 g005
Figure 5. Molecular structures of (a) [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) and (b) [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4). Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Figure 5. Molecular structures of (a) [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) and (b) [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4). Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Molecules 29 03865 g005
Molecules 29 03865 sch003
Scheme 3. Reaction of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] with K{HB(pzMe2)3}.
Scheme 3. Reaction of [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] with K{HB(pzMe2)3}.
Molecules 29 03865 sch003
Molecules 29 03865 g006
Figure 6. Solid state structure of 5{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3 showing (a) the content of the triclinic unit cell, (b) the [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]+ cation, (c) the·{Cl(pzHMe2)4}− anion and (d) the H bond network within the [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} unit. Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Figure 6. Solid state structure of 5{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3 showing (a) the content of the triclinic unit cell, (b) the [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]+ cation, (c) the·{Cl(pzHMe2)4}− anion and (d) the H bond network within the [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4} unit. Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Molecules 29 03865 g006
Molecules 29 03865 sch004
Scheme 4. Reactions of [Re(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] with hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates and their products.
Scheme 4. Reactions of [Re(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] with hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates and their products.
Molecules 29 03865 sch004
Molecules 29 03865 g007
Figure 7. Molecular structures of (a) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a), (b) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b) and (c) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c). Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Figure 7. Molecular structures of (a) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a), (b) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b) and (c) [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c). Thermal ellipsoids show 50 per cent probability.
Molecules 29 03865 g007
Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) and [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2).
Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in [Tc(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (1) and [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh3){HB(pz)3}] (2).
Tc1–N10N10–O10Tc1–Cl1Tc1–Cl2Tc1–P1Tc1–P2Tc1–N1Tc1–N3Tc1–N5Tc1–N10–O10
11.816(4)0.946(4)2.447(1)2.443(2)2.474(2)2.473(1)2.4149(4)--178.4(5)
21.764(7)1.13(1)2.425(2)-2.4417(5)-2.152(2)2.172(1)2.135(2)174.3(5)
Table 2. EPR parameters of 3 and 4 together with the values for some other nitrosyl and thionitrosyl complexes of Tc(II). Coupling constants are given in 10−4 cm−1.
Table 2. EPR parameters of 3 and 4 together with the values for some other nitrosyl and thionitrosyl complexes of Tc(II). Coupling constants are given in 10−4 cm−1.
g0a0Tcg‖g⊥A‖TcA⊥TcA‖PReference
[Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3)2.0111641.9552.0455270128-This work
[Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4)2.0091661.9781.999290134-This work
[Tc(NS)Cl3(PMe2Ph)2]2.0451332.0272.03821910119 (a)[70]
[Tc(NS)Cl3(PMe2Ph)(OPMe2Ph)]2.0321492.0272.03923710624 (b)[67]
[Tc(NO)Cl3(PMe2Ph)2]2.0451252.0342.0532158819 (a)[93]
(a) Triplet, (b) Doublet.
Table 3. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) and [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4).
Table 3. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)2] (3) and [Tc(NS)Cl3(PPh3)(OPPh3)] (4).
Tc1–N10N10–S10Tc1–Cl1Tc1–Cl2Tc1–Cl3Tc1–P1/P2Tc1–O1P1–O1Tc1–O1–P1Tc1–N10–S10
31.78(1)1.51(1)2.443(3)2.357(2)-2.570(2)---180
41.68(2)1.55(2)2.346(6)2.368(6)2.356(6)2.552(7)2.09(1)1.50(1)154.4(9)174(2)
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in the solid state structure of [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3 (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3).
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in the solid state structure of [Tc(NS)Cl(pzHMe2)4]{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3 (5{Cl(pzHMe2)4}·OPPh3).
Tc1–N10N10–S10Tc1–Cl1Tc1–N1Tc1–N3Tc1–N5Tc1–N7Tc1–N10–S10N10–Tc1–Cl1
1.733(2)1.572(2)2.4252(6)2.134(2)2.135(2)2.147(2)2.137(2)179.4(2)179.66(8)
Hydrogen Bonds
H10–Cl1H12–Cl1H14–Cl1H16–Cl1H2–Cl1H4–Cl1H6–Cl1H8–Cl1
2.8512.6872.8512.9042.8672.8642.8682.825
H10–Cl2H12–Cl2H14–Cl2H16–Cl2
2.5072.6782.4782.439
Table 5. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a), [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b) and [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c).
Table 5. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles in [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzH)] (6a), [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHMe2)] (6b) and [Re(NS)Cl2(PPh3)2(pzHPh)] (6c).
Re–N10N10–S10Re1–Cl1Re1–Cl2Re1–N1Cl2…H2Re1–N10–S10N10–Re1–Cl2N2–H2…Cl2
6a1.738(8)1.558(7)2.438(2)2.488(4)2.142(5)2.536178.3(3)174.8(2)118.9
6b1.737(5)1.578(5)2.445(2)2.468(1)2.158(4)2.396173.0(3)176.6(2)125.5
6c1.98(2)1.36(2)2.441(8)2.449(4)2.18(2)2.501175(2)171(1)124.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sawallisch, T.E.; Abdulkader, A.; Nowak, D.; Hagenbach, A.; Abram, U. Nitrosyl and Thionitrosyl Complexes of Technetium and Rhenium and Their Reactions with Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates. Molecules 2024, 29, 3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163865

AMA Style

Sawallisch TE, Abdulkader A, Nowak D, Hagenbach A, Abram U. Nitrosyl and Thionitrosyl Complexes of Technetium and Rhenium and Their Reactions with Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates. Molecules. 2024; 29(16):3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163865

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sawallisch, Till Erik, Abdullah Abdulkader, Domenik Nowak, Adelheid Hagenbach, and Ulrich Abram. 2024. "Nitrosyl and Thionitrosyl Complexes of Technetium and Rhenium and Their Reactions with Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates" Molecules 29, no. 16: 3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163865

APA Style

Sawallisch, T. E., Abdulkader, A., Nowak, D., Hagenbach, A., & Abram, U. (2024). Nitrosyl and Thionitrosyl Complexes of Technetium and Rhenium and Their Reactions with Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borates. Molecules, 29(16), 3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163865

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop