Next Article in Journal
β-Galactosidase- and Photo-Activatable Fluorescent Probes for Protein Labeling and Super-Resolution STED Microscopy in Living Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Cannabis sativa as an Herbal Ingredient: Problems and Prospects
Previous Article in Journal
The Mediterranean Species Calendula officinalis and Foeniculum vulgare as Valuable Source of Bioactive Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Mechanism of Ruta graveolens Essential Oil: A Colombian Traditional Alternative against Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 15
10.3390/molecules29153595
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna Fruit Extracts

by
Gabriela Paun
*,
Elena Neagu
,
Camelia Albu
,
Andreia Alecu
,
Ana-Maria Seciu-Grama
and
Gabriel Lucian Radu
*
National Institute for Research-Development of Biological Sciences, Centre of Bioanalysis, 296 Spl. Independentei, P.O. Box 17-16, 060031 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(15), 3595; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29153595
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 24 July 2024 / Accepted: 26 July 2024 / Published: 30 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Bioactive Compounds in Pharmaceuticals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present study evaluated three green extraction methods, accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and laser irradiation extraction (LE), for the polyphenolic compounds and vitamin C extraction of Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna fruit extracts. The polyphenols and vitamin C of extracts were quantified using HPLC-DAD, and the total phenolic content, flavonoid content, antioxidant activity (DPPH and reducing power), and antidiabetic activity were also studied. The antidiabetic activity was examined by the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase, and in vitro on a beta TC cell line (β-TC-6). The results showed significant differentiation in the extraction yield between the methods used, with the ASE and LE presenting the highest values. The C. mas fruit extract obtained by ASE exhibited the best antioxidant activity, reaching an IC50 value of 31.82 ± 0.10 µg/mL in the DPPH assay and 33.95 ± 0.20 µg/mL in the reducing power assay. The C. mas fruit extracts obtained by ASE and LE also have the highest inhibitory activity on enzymes associated with metabolic disorders: α-amylase (IC50 = 0.44 ± 0.02 µg/mL for the extract obtained by ASE, and 0.11 ± 0.01 µg/mL for the extract obtained by LE at combined wavelengths of 1270 + 1550 nm) and α-glucosidase (IC50 of 77.1 ± 3.1 µg/mL for the extract obtained by ASE, and 98.2 ± 4.7 µg/mL for the extract obtained by LE at combined wavelengths of 1270 + 1550 nm). The evaluation of in vitro antidiabetic activity demonstrated that the treatment with C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts obtained using ASE stimulated the insulin secretion of β-TC-6 cells, both under normal conditions and hyperglycemic conditions, as well. All results suggest that C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts are good sources of bioactive molecules with antioxidant and antidiabetic activity.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, there has been increased interest in the traditional use of medicinal plants in the prevention of many diseases and associated complications. The most important criteria justifying these trends are safety, effectiveness, economic feasibility, and accessibility [1]. The secondary metabolites present in medicinal plants, fruits, and vegetables, especially from the class of polyphenols, contribute significantly to the therapeutic effectiveness of medicinal plants [2]. Numerous studies demonstrated their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities and their ability to modulate critical cellular enzyme functions [3,4,5].
Diabetes is a major health due to its increasing prevalence, also being a significant factor in both mortality and morbidity worldwide. One way to treat diabetes is by inhibiting the digestive enzymes α-amylase and α-glucosidase involved in the degradation of carbohydrates [6]. Classic antidiabetic drugs such as metformin and acarbose have side-effects such as nausea, weakness, and bloating [7]; others such as sulphonylureas increase the risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases [8]. That is why natural alternatives are sought, such as biologically active compounds from medicinal plants, with antidiabetic effects and less negative impacts on health [9]. These bioactive compounds have scarce side effects compared to synthetic drugs, and recent research demonstrated the importance of the synergistic effect of bioactive compounds in a natural intermixture.
Oxidative stress, resulting from an inequality between reactive oxygen species production and antioxidant defense, contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications [10]. Antioxidants from natural sources have shown promise in reducing oxidative stress and antidiabetic potential. Numerous researchers have pointed out that bioactive compounds with antioxidant activity can inhibit the enzymes involved in carbohydrate hydrolysis and could be beneficial in managing diabetes mellitus [11].
Research has demonstrated a good choice of extraction method, and solvents influence the content of target bioactive compounds in the extract, leading to increased product effectiveness. There is a high interest in green and sustainable extraction technologies due to their advantages, such as a shorter extraction time, higher selectivity, lower organic solvent, and the preservation of valuable bioactive compounds [12,13,14,15]. Among these technologies, ultrasound-assisted (UAE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) have gained more attention in recent years [13,14,15,16,17]. Recently, laser irradiation extraction (LE) has aroused researchers’ interest, demonstrating the ability of selective extraction for certain polyphenolic compounds [18,19]. UAE and ASE techniques are green and economically viable approaches for extracting natural products. Recent studies demonstrated that UAE and ASE have a high efficiency in extracting bioactive compounds, leading to high yields of biologically active compounds with low or minimal damage to their biological properties, as well as the production of little waste in the extraction process. Novel and efficient laser extraction technology is based on the destruction of vegetal tissues caused by the intensive vapor which is formed via the laser energy absorbed by water contained in the biological matrix [20]. Compared with ASE, a major advantage of laser-assisted extraction lies in the shorter processing time for processing the same extract volume.
Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna are two species that are very widespread in Romania, but they have been exploited very little. In addition, we studied them together based both on their high content of vitamin C and anthocyanin compounds, as well as previous studies that highlighted their antidiabetic activity in vivo. Cornus mas L. (Cornelian cherry) belongs to the Cornaceae family and grows in Europe and Southwest Asia [21,22]. The fruits have been used for decades in many European and Asian countries both in traditional cuisine and in folk medicine. Recently, studies showed that C. mas fruits have anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidant, antidiabetic, antiproliferative, antiparasitic, antihyperlipidemic, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective effects [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The fruits contain high levels of anthocyanins, iridoids, polyphenols, vitamin C, minerals, tannins, sugars, pectin, and organic acids, while the leaves contain significant amounts of phenolic acids [29].
Crataegus monogyna (hawthorn) is a valuable medicinal plant that is part of the Rosaceae family. Making part of the European flora, hawthorn is widely spread [30]. The plant is used in traditional medicine to treat digestive, microbial, and cardiac problems, due to its antispasmodic, cardiotonic, antiatherosclerotic, and hypotensive properties and diabetes disorders [31]. C. monogyna is a source of bioactive compounds, mainly polyphenols, like epicatechin, procyanidins, isoquercitrin, vitexin, and chlorogenic acid, but also triterpenic acids, such as ursolic acid and oleanolic acid, carboxylic acids, and minerals [9,32,33]. Among these compounds, epicatechin, the most abundant component in hawthorn fruits, has been found to elevate insulin sensitivity and lower insulin resistance [34].
Despite some data on the in vivo antidiabetic effects of C. mas and C. monogyna fruits related to the reduction in blood glucose levels and the increase in insulin levels in diabetic rats, there are very few studies related to the inhibition of enzymes related to metabolic diseases [30,35,36].
Accordingly, the main goal of the current research was to evaluate three green extraction methods (accelerated solvent extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, and laser irradiation extraction), determine the content of selected phytochemicals (polyphenolic compounds and vitamin C) in C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts, and examine the antioxidant and antidiabetic activities by α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition of these fruit extracts. An in vitro antidiabetic study for the most effective extracts in terms of inhibiting carbohydrate-digesting enzymes was carried out, but also on a murine insulinoma cell line (β-TC-6).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Influence of Extraction Technique on Bioactive Compounds Content

First, we obtained the extracts of C. mas and C. monogyna fruits using three green extraction techniques, ASE, UAE, and LE, and then compared the content of polyphenolic compounds to obtain the maximum yield of bioactive compounds (Table 1).
ASE was shown as the most effective green extraction method to extract the targeted compounds from C. mas (103.94 ± 2.6 mg/g chlorogenic acid equivalent for total polyphenols and 2.27 ± 0.02 mg/g rutin equivalent for flavonoid content) and from C. monogyna (84.89 ± 0.6 mg/g chlorogenic acid equivalent for total polyphenols and 3.02 ± 0.03 mg/g rutin equivalent for flavonoid content) compared to the other techniques. As noticeable, UAE showed the lowest yield %, while for ASE, the highest yield values were obtained. At the same time, LE at combined wavelengths (1550 nm and 1270 nm) demonstrated a higher efficiency compared to UAE for extracting the target compounds. Another study proved significant increases in total phenolics from extracts by laser irradiation at 785 nm (+15.50), while at lengths lower than 550 nm, the extraction was inefficient [18]. Although it is a very new method, its effectiveness was shown in a previous study by the same team of researchers [19].
ASE, involving using solvents at high pressure and temperature, accelerates the kinetics of the extraction process, leading to fast and safe extractions. The high performance of ASE depends on several parameters such as solvent, temperature, the number of extraction cycles, and the static time. Some conditions such as heat and extraction time can degrade polyphenolic compounds and bioactivity. This is why the extraction was carried out in three cycles at 80 °C. Another research study demonstrated that the optimal ASE parameters for polyphenol extraction were 110 °C, 3 extraction cycles, and 10 min of static time [37].
In UAE, the solvent extracts components from plants using sound energy as the primary driving mechanism representing an efficient, environmentally friendly method [38]. Several parameters, such as frequency, temperature, time, type of solvent, and solid–liquid ratio, also influence the extraction. For a better comparison of the effectiveness of the three methods approached, the following parameters were kept constant: the same solvent (50% (v/v) hydroalcoholic solution), extraction time of 30 min, extraction temperature of 80 °C, and solid–liquid ratio of 1:0.9. The use of a hydroethanolic solution was chosen because there are differences in the solubility of the extracted polyphenolic compounds, where some have a higher solubility in water, while others are extracted with a higher yield in ethanol.
The main mechanism of LE can be a photochemical process, thermal process, or a combination of both. Thermal effects result in the conversion of light into heat, followed by heat transfer into the irradiated tissue leading to melting or liquid vaporization in vegetal plants, thus leading to the extraction of compounds from the vegetal matrix. The photochemical effects depend on the wavelength used (nm), and the chemical bonds of molecules present in the substrate are broken by absorbing the high photon energy, leading to a series of chemical reactions, like reactive (oxygen) species formation [18,20]. In the specific case of vegetal extraction, laser irradiation is used to intensify biochemical reactions and biomass accumulation in the medium, intensifying heat and mass-exchange processes in the medium and increasing the amount of specific compounds in the final extract. LE can perform selective processing due to the absorption difference in laser energy for different compounds.
HPLC-DAD quantified phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and vitamin C for each extract. The extraction method’s influence on each analyte’s content was determined (Table 2 and Table 3), and the performance characteristics of the HPLC-DAD method are presented in Table 4. The chromatograms for C. mas and C. monogyna extracts obtained by ASE are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
The results proved that laser irradiation is an effective extraction technique for target compounds, and ASE ensures efficient extraction of the desired compounds. LE is a very new extraction method, which demonstrated the efficiency in the extraction of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and isoflavonoids from plants at 552 nm, 660 nm, 785 nm, and at a combined 1270 and 1550 nm [18,19]. Laser extraction is very poorly studied, but the present study demonstrates effectiveness in the extraction, especially of anthocyanidins and flavonoids.
Several research studies have indicated that C. mas fruit is a rich source of vitamin C and anthocyanins. Martinović and Cavoski [39] reported 48–108 mg/100 g vitamin C and 158–591 mg GAE/100 g total polyphenol. In research performed by Moldovan et al. [40], the main polyphenols were ellagic acid (187.91 mg/100 g), followed by chlorogenic (32.76 mg/100 g) and caffeic acid (27.12 mg/100 g). In our study, the most abundant phenolic acids were caffeic acid (701.63–1020.56 µg/g), followed by chlorogenic acid (362.09–504.72 µg/g). At the same time, rutin was the main flavonoid compound and cyanidin-3-glucopyranoside was the main anthocyanin compound. Among anthocyanins, in our extracts, cyanidin-3-glucopyranoside was found in the largest amount, while Moldovan et al. [40] found pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside as the anthocyanin with the highest concentration.
However, the results obtained in this research differ from those obtained by the studies mentioned above, which are most likely related to the extraction method, region of the cultivar, abiotic factors, stages of maturity, and other influences.
The HPLC–DAD analysis of C. monogyna fruit extracts showed a significant catechin and epicatechin content. Some recent studies have highlighted the presence of isoquercitrin, vitexin, quercetin, rutin, quercetin-3-glucoside, caffeic acid, (−)- epicatechin, and vitamin C in berries of all hawthorn species, inclusive in C. monogyna species [30,41]. Our data confirmed those of previously published studies reporting significant amounts of rutin, (+)-catechin, epicatechin, and vitamin C. To our knowledge, delphinidin-3-glucopyranoside and delphinidin were not reported previously in C. monogyna fruit extracts.
The results indicate that the fruits of C. mas and C. monogyna are a rich source of total polyphenols, anthocyanins, and vitamin C, exhibiting various biological effects. This is the first comparative study of obtaining extracts from C. mas and C. monogyna through the ASE and LE methods and obtaining extracts enriched in polyphenols and vitamin C.

2.2. Total Antioxidant Activity

Due to the complex activity of the phytoconstituents, the antioxidant activity of plant extracts cannot be assessed by a single method, and it is advisable to use several methods, as each technique provides complementary information. In this regard, the antioxidant activity of the C. mas and C. monogyna extracts was determined by the DPPH radical scavenging activity and reducing power assays. Our results of the values of the IC50 parameter are presented in Table 5. The inhibition curves for DPPH inhibition are presented in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
As shown, the C. mas fruit extract obtained by ASE exhibited the best antioxidant activity, reaching an IC50 value of 31.82 ± 0.1 µg/mL in the DPPH assay and 33.95 ± 0.2 µg/mL in the reducing power assay. The IC50 values related to the DPPH and reducing power assays for all C. mas fruit extracts lower than vitamin C showed high antioxidant activity. At the same time, all extracts obtained by laser irradiation presented a higher antioxidant activity than those obtained by UAE. The main antioxidant components of the studied fruit extracts are phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and vitamin C, and their total content is proportional to the antioxidant activity.
Blagojević et al. [42] studied the antioxidant activity of C. mas hydroalcoholic extracts and the results showed that the extracts presented a high DPPH inhibition (IC50 in the range of 1.76–3.59 mg/mL) and ferric-reducing power (7.83–23.95 mg/g). In our study, the extracts had a significantly higher antioxidant capacity (IC50 = 31.82 ± 0.1 ÷ 54.70 ± 0.4 µg/mL in the DPPH assay), with the explanation being the efficiency of the applied extraction methods [42].
The inhibition of free radicals may be the result of the action of various phenolic acids detected in the studied extracts, and in higher content in C. mas extracts such as gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, and coumaric acid, but also other polyphenolic compounds not quantified in the studied extracts. The literature data indicate that polyphenols can inhibit cell destruction by free radicals and suppress enzymes involved in intracellular ROS overproduction [43,44].
The antioxidant effect of the studied extracts is also related to vitamin C, the well-known antioxidant compound that manifests its antioxidant properties in living cells by directly scavenging free radicals, activating intracellular antioxidant systems, or supporting the action of other exogenous antioxidants [44].

2.3. Antidiabetic Activity

  • α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition
The inhibitory effects of C. mas and C. monogyna extract on α-amylase and α-glucosidase took place in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 values of all extracts against these enzymes are presented in Table 6. The inhibition curves for α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition tests are presented in Supplementary Materials Figures S2 and S3.
The inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase slows down the hydrolysis of α-1,4-glucan polysaccharides such as starch, which helps reduce the levels of glucose in the blood. The α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors could be used for new drug developments in treating type 2 diabetes. The C. mas fruit extracts obtained by ASE and laser irradiation (LE) have a higher inhibitory activity on both enzymes—α-amylase (IC50 = 0.44 ± 0.02 µg/mL for the extract obtained by ASE, and 0.11 ± 0.01 µg/mL for the extract obtained by LE at combined wavelengths of 1270 + 1550 nm) and α-glucosidase (IC50 of 77.1 ± 3.1 µg/mL for the extract obtained by ASE, and 98.2 ± 4.7 µg/mL for the extract obtained by LE at combined wavelengths of 1270 + 1550 nm)—being lower than on acarbose, used as the standard compound. This is in agreement with previous studies which showed a high inhibitory effect of C. mas fruit extract [45].
The C. monogyna extracts obtained by ASE and LE also significantly inhibited α-amylase with IC50 = 0.53 ± 0.01 µg/mL for the extract obtained by ASE, and 1.26 ± 0.1 µg/mL for the extract obtained by LE at combined wavelengths of 1270 + 1550 nm, compared to acarbose with IC50 values of 8.12 ± 0.6 µg/mL. The data obtained showed a good inhibition of C. monogyna ASE and LE extracts on α-glucosidase, also.
However, the amount of this phenolic compound present in the ASE may be partially responsible for the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Hydroxyl (-OH) groups are essential for the inhibitory activity of polyphenolic compounds against α-amylase, as the inhibition is linked to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the -OH groups of phenolics and amino acids residues at the active site of α-amylase [46]. Phenolic acids with a greater number of -OH groups presented a higher inhibition effect against both enzymes [47]. The inhibitory effects of phenolic acids are linked to the number of -OH groups, and chlorogenic and gallic acid have a higher inhibition effect against both enzymes [48]. Other flavonoids and anthocyanins, such as quercitrin, quercetin, myricetin, cyanidin-3-glucopyranoside, and petunidin-3-glucoside present in the extracts from the present study, have been previously reported to have a hypoglycemic effect and stronger inhibitory effect on α-glucosidase [49,50,51].
  • Insulin secretion assay
In this study, we investigated in vitro the complementary antidiabetic activity of C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts obtained by ASE, demonstrating the highest inhibitory activities on carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes. The extract concentrations were tested (250 and 500 μg/mL) on a murine insulinoma cell line (β-TC-6).
All tested extracts increased insulin concentrations compared to the control, both in normal conditions (5.6 mM) and in hyperglycemic conditions (16.7 mM) (Figure 3).
In normal glycemic conditions, the highest concentration of secreted insulin was obtained after treatment with a concentration of 500 µg/mL, both in the case of C. mas extract (121 µU/mL) and in the case of C. monogyna extract (134 μU/mL).
In hyperglycemic conditions at 500 μg/mL, both extracts elicited a marked increase in insulin secretion in the β-TC-6 cells, 352 µU/mL for C. monogyna extract and 364.86 µU/mL for C. mas extract, while for the untreated control, the concentration of secreted insulin was 143 μU/mL.
Correlated with the results obtained for the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes, the in vitro studies on the β-TC-6 cell lines demonstrate that both extracts presented a strong stimulatory effect of insulin secretion in the in vitro β-TC-6 pancreatic cell stimulation model, similar to alanine used as a positive control.
These extracts were tested for their hypoglycemic effects especially in diabetic rat models (in vivo). However, this is the first study on the impact of various concentrations of C. mas and C. monogyna on the insulin section in the β-TC-6 pancreatic cell line.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All chemicals used in this study were analytical-grade reagents. Chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, luteolin, (+)-catechin, quercetin 3-glucoside, kaempferol, quercitrin, isorhamnetin, quercetin, rutin, cyanidin, vitamin C (all >96% purity, HPLC), acetic acid (100%), formic acid (>95%), and sodium 1-heptane-sulfonate were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ellagic acid (>95%, HPLC), (−)-epicatechin (>96%, HPLC), gallic acid (≥98%, HPLC), and myricetin (>96%, HPLC) were acquired from Fluka (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Schnelldorf, Germany). PhytoLab (PhytoLab GmbH & Co., Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany) provided delphinidin (>90%, HPLC) and petunidin-3-glucoside (>95%, HPLC). Delphinidin-3-glucoside (>97%) and cyanidin-3-glucoside (>97%) were procured from Polyphenols AS (Sandnes, Norway). 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); potassium ferricyanide (>99%); sodium carbonate (≥99.5%, Na2CO3); 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid, 98% (DNS); α-amylase from hog pancreas; α-glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae; acarbose (≥95%, HPLC); and 4-nitrophenyl α-d-glucopyranoside (NPG) were acquired from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The other used substances, methyl alcohol (Riedel-de Haen, Honeywell Riedel-de Haën, Seelzer, Germany) and ethyl alcohol (analytical reagent, Chemical Company, Iasi, Romania), were of chromatographic or analytical purity. The Mouse Insulin ELISA kit, DMEM culture media, alanine, and glucose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The Penicillin–Streptomycin–Neomycin (PSN) Antibiotic Mixture and fetal bovine serum were acquired from Gibco (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); CO2 (99.98% purity) was purchased from Auto Gri SRL, Romania. Double-distilled water was obtained using the distillation apparatus from Evoqua Water Technologies (Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
Fresh ripe fruits of C. mas and C. monogyna were harvested from the Breaza area, in Prahova County, Romania (45°11′14″ N, 25°39′44″ E), in September 2023. Fruits were washed with double-distilled water, dried and ground, and subjected to extraction. Drying was performed in an oven at 40 °C (Pol-Eko Aparatura, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland). The dried plant material of each species was finely ground into a powder using a Grindomix GM100 machine (Retsch, Haan, Germany).

3.2. Extract Preparation

Three green extraction technologies were applied to investigate their influence on the bioactive compound’s extraction: accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and laser irradiation extraction (LE). The applied extraction parameters for each technique were chosen based on the results obtained in previous research [19].

3.2.1. ASE

The accelerated solvent extraction of C. mas and C. monogyna fruits was performed using a Dionex ASE 350 System (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The extraction parameters were controlled automatically through a control panel. The stainless-steel cells (100 mL) in which a cellulose filter was placed were uploaded with 15 g of each type of fruit that was dried and ground and diatomaceous earth, and the ASE conditions were set as follows—solvent: ethanol solution (50%, v/v); temperature: 80 °C; static time: 10 min; and number of cycles: 3. The extracts were collected in 250 mL glass vials and stored at 4 °C. According to the ASE extracts’ volume, the extracts’ concentration was 9% (w/v).

3.2.2. UAE

The UAE process was performed using an ultrasonic bath (Transsonic model T460 H, Elma, Germany) at a working frequency of 35 kHz. Ground plant material was mixed with 50% (v/v) aqueous ethanol solutions and immersed in the ultrasonic bath for 30 min at 80 °C. The herbal’s mass concentration in the solvent was similar to that of ASE extract: 9% (w/v).

3.2.3. LE

LE was carried out in similar conditions with ASE: dry and ground fruits were mixed with ethanol solution (50%, v/v) at an extract concentration of 9% (w/v) and extracted for 30 min in an extractor with laser radiation at 1550 nm and combined wavelengths of 1270 and 1550 nm, respectively. The LE steel extractor was provided by the Apel Laser S.R.L. (Mogoșoaia, Romania) (Figure 4).
After extraction, the extracts were microfiltrated through a Millipore membrane (0.2 µm pores) and kept in a freezer at −20 °C for further analysis.

3.3. Quantification of Polyphenolic Compounds

3.3.1. Spectrophotometric Assay for Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids

Total polyphenols were quantified using the Folin–Ciocalteu method [52]. Briefly, 3 mL of extract and 3 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were mixed and filtered; 0.5 mL of the filtrate was mixed with 9.5 mL of sodium carbonate, and absorbance was read at 760 nm. The results are expressed as chlorogenic acid equivalent (CAE) calculated using a calibration curve (y = 0.0016x + 0.013; R2 = 0.9945).
Total flavonoid content was measured as described earlier [53]. An amount of 2 mL of extract was mixed with 3 mL of methanol and filtrated. An amount of 1 mL of filtrate was mixed with 1 mL of sodium acetate solution (1 mL), aluminum chloride solution (0.6 mL), and methanol (2.4 mL). The absorbance was measured at 430 nm and the flavonoid content was calculated based on a rutin calibration curve (y = 0.0073x − 0.0357; R2 = 0.9977).
The yield of extraction was calculated using the following formula:
yield (%) = m1/m2 × 100, where m1 is the mass of dry extract and m2 is the mass of the sample.

3.3.2. HPLC-DAD Analysis

HPLC was performed using a Shimadzu system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with two LC-20AD pumps, a DGU-20A degassing unit, a SIL-20AC autosampler, a CTO-20A column oven, and an SPDM20A photodiode array detector (PDA). PDA detector absorbance values were recorded in the 200–600 nm range, and peak wavelengths were selectively chosen depending on the maximum absorption of each analyte of interest.
The identification and quantification of vitamin C were performed using the wavelength where vitamin C presents maximum absorption: 243 nm; a Kromasil 100-10-C18 4.6 × 250 mm column; an isocratic elution of mobile phase, 30:70 (5 mmol L-1 sodium 1-heptane-sulfonate in methanol, solvent A; and acetic acid (1%), solvent B); and a flow rate of 1 mL min−1.
The analysis of polyphenolic compounds was accomplished on a C18 column, Luna Phenomenex, 100-10, 4.6 × 250 mm, with a mobile phase consisting of water with formic acid and MeCN/methanol (50:50) with formic acid. An elution (0–5 min for 5% solvent B, 5–25 min for 5–30% solvent B, 25–30 min for 30–25% solvent B, 30–38 min for 25% solvent B, 38.01–40 min for 30% solvent B, 40.01–57 min for 40–50% solvent B, 57–58 min for 50% solvent B, 58–60 min for 50–5% solvent B and 60–70 min 5% solvent B) and a flow rate gradient (0–5 min for 1 mL min−1, 5–15 min for 1.5 mL min−1, 15–35 min for 1 mL min−1, 35–40 min for 1–1.5 mL min−1, 40–45 min for 1.5 mL min−1, 45–47 min for 1 mL min−1, 47–50 min for 0.75 mL min−1 and 50–70 min for 1.5 mL min−1) of the mobile phase were used.
The quantification of anthocyanins and anthocyanidins was achieved through a C18 Kromasil column, 100-10 4.6 × 250 mm, with a mobile phase composed of 5% formic acid in water and 5% formic acid in methanol. An elution (0–15 min for 6–10% solvent B, 15–35 min for 10–50% solvent B, 35–36 min for 50–6% solvent B, 36–45 min for 6% solvent B) and a flow rate gradient (0–29 min for 1 mL min−1, 29–33 min for 0.75 mL min−1, 33–45 min for 1 mL min−1) of the mobile phase was used.

3.4. Antioxidant Assays

3.4.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging

The DPPH method was carried out according to Bondet et al. [54] with some modifications. Briefly, in 1.9 mL of methanol, 0.1 mL of extract was added with various concentrations and 1000 µL of DPPH (0.25 mM), and the absorbance was read at 517 nm. The results are presented as inhibition in IC50 (μg/mL). Ascorbic acid was used as the standard.

3.4.2. Reducing Power Assay

The reducing power is based on the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and was accomplished by a method outlined by Berker [55]. The sample extracts (0.1 mL with varying concentrations) were mixed with 2.5 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (0.2 M) and 2.5 mL of potassium ferricyanide (1%) and incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. Afterward, 2.5 mL of trichloroacetic acid was added to the mixture. An aliquot of 2.5 mL of the mixture was combined with 2.5 mL of water and 0.5 mL of iron chloride solution and the absorbance was read at 700 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as the standard. The increase in absorbance of the reaction mixture indicates an increase in reducing power.

3.5. Antidiabetic Assay

3.5.1. α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities

The α-amylase inhibitory effect was evaluated according to our previous study [56]. Sample extracts of 100 μL were mixed with 250 μL of α-amylase from hog pancreas (EC 3.2.1.1) solution in phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) and maintained at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, 250 μL of starch solution (1% w/v) was introduced and reincubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Subsequently, 500 μL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid reagent was added to stop the reaction, the mixture was heated at 90 °C for 5 min and then cooled at room temperature, and 5 mL of distilled water was added. The absorbance was read at 540 nm.
The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was estimated as described by Ranilla et al. with some modification [57]. Equal volumes (100 μL) of samples at different concentrations and the yeast α-glucosidase solution (1 U/mL) were mixed with 650 μL of phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.9) at 37 °C for 15 min. After that, 100 μL of NPG substrate solution (5 mM) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Finally, 1000 μL of 0.2 M sodium carbonate solution was added to the mixture to finish the reaction, and the absorbance was recorded at 405 nm. Acarbose was used as the standard drug.

3.5.2. Insulin Secretion Assay

In vitro, the investigation of antidiabetic activity was realized on a murine insulinoma cell line (β-TC-6). β-TC-6 pancreatic beta cells were cultured in normal (5.6 mM) and hyperglycemic (16.7 mM) conditions in the presence of plant extracts, and the effect of stimulating insulin secretion of these extracts was then analyzed. β-TC-6 cells were cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic mixture at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
β-TC-6 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL. A period of 24 h after seeding, β-TC-6 cells were stimulated with 5.6 mM (normal condition) and 16.7 mM glucose (hyperglycemic condition) in the presence or absence of the samples of interest (at a concentration of 250 and 500 μg/mL) for 1 h at 37 °C. A Mouse Ins1/Insulin-1 ELISA Kit was used to quantitatively measure insulin secretion [58]. L-alanine (10 mM) was the reference stimulant of insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells [59].

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Three independent experiments were carried out and the obtained data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). The sample pair of interest was analyzed using the paired Student’s t-test (Microsoft Excel 2018 software). Significant statistical differences were considered as p < 0.05. The obtained data were processed using statistical procedures to highlight any significant relationship between the chemical composition of the extracts and biological activities.

4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the impact of green extraction methods on the bioactive compounds and biological activities in C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts. The ASE and laser irradiation method were efficient in the case of polyphenols and vitamin C compounds from C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts. All samples of C. mas fruit extracts had the highest values for antioxidant activity (DPPH and reducing power methods). However, using ASE and LE at combined wavelengths of 1270 and 1550 nm leads to extracts with the highest antiradical (DPPH) and iron-reducing power as well as the highest enzyme inhibition activity against tested enzymes. The extracts obtained by ASE and LE presented a considerable α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition, correlated with their polyphenols (phenolic acids, flavonoids, and anthocyanins) and high vitamin C contents. Furthermore, the results from this study pointed out that the extracts obtained by ASE stimulate insulin secretion in vitro. Both extracts showed a strong stimulatory effect of insulin secretion in the in vitro β-TC-6 pancreatic beta cell stimulation model. This study provides data for the efficiency of green extraction methods and also for the effects of C. mas and C. monogyna fruit extracts and suggests future in vivo studies for obtaining new drugs for the prevention and/or treatment of metabolic disorders.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29153595/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P.; investigation, G.P., E.N., C.A., A.-M.S.-G. and A.A.; supervision, G.L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P.; writing—review and editing, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number Core-Program, project PN 7N/23-02-0101/2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Apel Laser S.R.L. for providing the laser extractor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bencheikh, N.; Radi, F.Z.; Fakchich, J.; Elbouzidi, A.; Ouahhoud, S.; Ouasti, M.; Bouhrim, M.; Ouasti, I.; Hano, C.; Elachouri, M. Ethnobotanical, Phytochemical, Toxicological, and Pharmacological Properties of Ziziphus lotus (L.) Lam.: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yuan, H.; Ma, Q.; Ye, L.; Piao, G. The Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine from Natural Products. Molecules 2016, 21, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Friedman, M. Overview of antibacterial, antitoxin, antiviral, and antifungal activities of tea flavonoids and teas. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cushnie, T.P.; Lamb, A.J. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vitale, D.C.; Piazza, C.; Melilli, B.; Drago, F.; Salomone, S. Isoflavones: Estrogenic Activity, Biological Effect and Bioavailability. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2013, 38, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, S.; Li, D.; Huang, B.; Chen, Y.; Lu, X.; Wang, Y. Inhibition of pancreatic lipase, α-glucosidase, α-amylase, and hypolipidemic effects of the total flavonoids from Nelumbo nucifera leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 149, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Haq, F.; Siraj, A.; Ameer, M.; Hamid, T.; Rahman, M.; Khan, S.; Khan, S.; Masud, S. Comparative Review of Drugs Used in Diabetes Mellitus—New and Old. J. Diabetes Mellit. 2021, 11, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, T.T.L.; Hui, J.M.H.; Lee, Y.H.A.; Satti, D.I.; Shum, Y.K.L.; Kiu, P.T.H.; Wai, A.K.C.; Liu, T.; Wong, W.T.; Chan, J.S.K.; et al. Sulfonylurea Is Associated with Higher Risks of Ventricular Arrhythmia or Sudden Cardiac Death Compared with Metformin: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e026289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zahrae Radi, F.; Bencheikh, N.; Anarghou, H.; Bouhrim, M.; Alqahtani, A.S.; Hawwal, M.F.; Noman, O.M.; Bnouham, M.; Zair, T. Quality control, phytochemical profile, and biological activities of Crataegus monogyna Jacq. and Crataegus laciniata Ucria fruits aqueous extracts. Saudi Pharm J. 2023, 31, 101753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Krawczyk, M.; Burzynska-Pedziwiatr, I.; Wozniak, L.A.; Bukowiecka-Matusiak, M. Impact of Polyphenols on Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Factors in Diabetes Mellitus: Nutritional Antioxidants and Their Application in Improving Antidiabetic Therapy. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Alam, S.; Sarker, M.M.R.; Sultana, T.N.; Chowdhury, M.N.R.; Rashid, M.A.; Chaity, N.I.; Zhao, C.; Xiao, J.; Hafez, E.E.; Khan, S.A.; et al. Antidiabetic phytochemicals from medicinal plants: Prospective candidates for new drug discovery and development. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 800714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Khongthaw, B.; Chauhan, P.K.; Dulta, K.; Kumar, V.; Ighalo, J.O. A comparison of conventional and novel phytonutrient extraction techniques from various sources and their potential applications. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 1317–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Garcia-Vaquero, M.; Ravindran, R.; Walsh, O.; O’Doherty, J.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Tiwari, B.K.; Rajauria, G. Evaluation of Ultrasound, Microwave, Ultrasound–Microwave, Hydrothermal and High Pressure Assisted Extraction Technologies for the Recovery of Phytochemicals and Antioxidants from Brown Macroalgae. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pereira, D.T.V.; Zabot, G.L.; Reyes, F.G.R.; Iglesias, A.H.; Martínez, J. Integration of pressurized liquids and ultrasound in the extraction of bioactive compounds from passion fruit rinds: Impact on phenolic yield, extraction kinetics and technical-economic evaluation. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 67, 102549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Belwal, T.; Ezzat, S.M.; Rastrelli, L.; Bhatt, I.D.; Daglia, M.; Baldi, A.; Devkota, H.P.; Orhan, I.E.; Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; et al. A critical analysis of extraction techniques used for botanicals: Trends, priorities, industrial uses and optimization strategies. Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 100, 82–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carabias-Martínez, R.; Rodríguez-Gonzalo, E.; Revilla-Ruiz, P.; Hernández-Méndez, J. Pressurized liquid extraction in the analysis of food and biological samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1089, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nieto, A.; Borrull, F.; Pocurull, E.; Marcé, R.M. Pressurized liquid extraction: A useful technique to extract pharmaceuticals and personal-care products from sewage sludge. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 752–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pirvu, L.C.; Nita, S.; Rusu, N.; Bazdoaca, C.; Neagu, G.; Bubueanu, C.; Udrea, M.; Udrea, R.; Enache, A. Effects of laser irradiation at 488, 514, 532, 552, 660, and 785 nm on the aqueous extracts of Plantago lanceolata L.: A comparison on chemical content, antioxidant activity and caco-2 viability. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paun, G.; Neagu, E.; Alecu, A.; Albu, C.; Seciu-Grama, A.-M.; Radu, G.L. Evaluating the Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Properties of Medicago sativa and Solidago virgaurea Polyphenolic-Rich Extracts. Molecules 2024, 29, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Teng, X.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S. Potential application of laser technology in food processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aurori, M.; Niculae, M.; Hanganu, D.; Pall, E.; Cenariu, M.; Vodnar, D.C.; Bunea, A.; Fiţ, N.; Andrei, S. Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Cytoprotective Effects of Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) Fruit Extracts. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bayram, H.M.; Arda Ozturkcan, S. Bioactive components and biological properties of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.): A comprehensive review. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 75, 104252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Klymenko, S.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Sokół-Łętowska, A.; Piórecki, N.; Przybylska, D.; Grygorieva, O. Iridoids, Flavonoids, and Antioxidant Capacity of Cornus mas, C. officinalis, and C. mas × C. officinalis Fruits. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wójciak, M.; Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Ziemlewska, A.; Furman-Toczek, D.; Szczepanek, D.; Sowa, I. In Vitro Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory and Protective Potential of an Extract from Cornus mas L. Fruit against H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress in Human Skin Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dzydzan, O.; Bila, I.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Brodyak, I.; Sybirna, N. Antidiabetic effects of extracts of red and yellow fruits of cornelian cherries (Cornus mas L.) on rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 6459–6472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lewandowski, Ł.; Bednarz-Misa, I.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Kubiak, A.; Kasprzyk, P.; Sozański, T.; Przybylska, D.; Piórecki, N.; Krzystek-Korpacka, M. Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) Extracts Exert Cytotoxicity in Two Selected Melanoma Cell Lines—A Factorial Analysis of Time-Dependent Alterations in Values Obtained with SRB and MTT Assays. Molecules 2022, 27, 4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mesgari Abbasi, M.; Hassanalilou, T.; Khordadmehr, M.; Mohammadzadeh Vardin, A.; Behroozi Kohlan, A.; Khalili, L. Effects of Cornus mas Fruit Hydro-Methanolic Extract on Liver Antioxidants and Histopathologic Changes Induced by Cisplatin in Rats. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2020, 35, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Darbandi, N.; Hashemi, A.; Noori, M.; Momeni, H.R. Effect of Cornus mas fruit flavonoids on memory retention, level of plasma glucose and lipids in an intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced experimental Alzheimer’s disease model in Wistar rats. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2016, 14, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cosmulescu, S.; Cornescu, F. Variability in physical and chemical characteristics of Cornelian cherry fruits (Cornus mas L.) from Romanian Oltenia region’s spontaneous flora and role of the climatic conditions. Braz. J. Bot. 2020, 43, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martinelli, F.; Perrone, A.; Yousefi, S.; Papini, A.; Castiglione, S.; Guarino, F.; Cicatelli, A.; Aelaei, M.; Arad, N.; Gholami, M.; et al. Botanical, Phytochemical, Anti-Microbial and Pharmaceutical Characteristics of Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.), Rosaceae. Molecules 2021, 26, 7266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Fakchich, J.; Elachouri, M. An overview on ethnobotanico-pharmacological studies carried out in Morocco, from 1991 to 2015: Systematic review (part 1). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 267, 113200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Edwards, J.E.; Brown, P.N.; Talent, N.; Dickinson, T.A.; Shipley, P.R. A review of the chemistry of the genus Crataegus. Phytochemistry 2012, 79, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nabavi, S.F.; Habtemariam, S.; Ahmed, T.; Sureda, A.; Daglia, M.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Nabavi, S.M. Polyphenolic composition of crataegus monogyna jacq: From chemistry to medical applications. Nutrients 2015, 7, 7708–7728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cremonini, E.; Bettaieb, A.; Haj, F.G.; Fraga, C.G.; Oteiza, P.I. (-)-Epicatechin improves insulin sensitivity in high fat diet-fed mice. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 599, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jayaprakasam, B.; Olson, L.K.; Schutzki, R.E.; Tai, M.-H.; Nair, M.G. Amelioration of obesity and glucose intolerance in high-fat-fed C57BL/6 mice by anthocyanins and ursolic acid in cornelian cherry (Cornus mas). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tenuta, M.C.; Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; Dugay, A.; Bouzidi, C.; Marie, A.; Acquaviva, R.; Cappello, A.R.; Deguin, B. Iridoid- and flavonoid-enriched fractions of Cornus sanguinea and Cornus mas exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and inhibit key enzymes in the treatment of metabolic disorders. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 8838–8853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Repajić, M.; Cegledi, E.; Kruk, V.; Pedisić, S.; Çınar, F.; Bursać Kovačević, D.; Žutić, I.; Dragović-Uzelac, V. Accelerated Solvent Extraction as a Green Tool for the Recovery of Polyphenols and Pigments from Wild Nettle Leaves. Processes 2020, 8, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, K.; Srivastav, S.; Sharanagat, V.S. Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable processing by-products: A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 70, 105325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Martinović, A.; Cavoski, I. The exploitation of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) cultivars and genotypes from Montenegro as a source of natural bioactive compounds. Food Chem. 2020, 318, 126549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Moldovan, B.; Filip, A.; Clichici, S.; Suharoschi, R.; Bolfa, P.; David, L. Antioxidant activity of Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) fruits extract and the in vivo evaluation of its anti-inflammatory effects. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 26, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gundogdu, M.; Ozrenk, K.; Ercisli, S.; Kan, T.; Kodad, O.; Hegedus, A. Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C content and some pomological characteristics of eleven hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from Turkey. Biol. Res. 2014, 47, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Blagojević, B.; Agić, D.; Serra, A.T.; Matić, S.; Matovina, M.; Bijelić, S.; Popović, B.M. An in vitro and in silico evaluation of bioactive potential of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) extracts rich in polyphenols and iridoids. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pomianek, T.; Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Skóra, B.; Ziemlewska, A.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Wójciak, M.; Sowa, I.; Szychowski, K.A. Comparison of the Antioxidant and Cytoprotective Properties of Extracts from Different Cultivars of Cornus mas L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gęgotek, A.; Skrzydlewska, E. Ascorbic Acid as Antioxidant. Vitam. Horm. 2023, 121, 247–270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Świerczewska, A.; Buchholz, T.; Melzig, M.F.; Czerwińska, M.E. In vitro α-amylase and pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity of Cornus mas L. and Cornus alba L. fruit extracts. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lo Piparo, E.; Scheib, H.; Frei, N.; Williamson, G.; Grigorov, M.; Chou, C.J. Flavonoids for Controlling Starch Digestion: Structural Requirements for Inhibiting Human α-Amylase. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 3555–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Aleixandre, A.; Gil, J.V.; Sineiro, J.; Rosell, C.M. Understanding phenolic acids inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase and influence of reaction conditions. Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xiao, J.; Ni, X.; Kai, G.; Chen, X. A Review on Structure-Activity Relationship of Dietary Polyphenols Inhibiting α-amylase. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hanhineva, K.; Törrönen, R.; Bondia-Pons, I.; Pekkinen, J.; Kolehmainen, M.; Mykkänen, H.; Poutanen, K. Impact of Dietary Polyphenols on Carbohydrate Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1365–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Oliveira, H.; Fernandes, A.; Brás, N.F.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V.; Fernandes, I. Anthocyanins as Antidiabetic Agents—In Vitro and In Silico Approaches of Preventive and Therapeutic Effects. Molecules 2020, 25, 3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Akkarachiyasit, S.; Charoenlertkul, P.; Yibchok-Anun, S.; Adisakwattana, S. Inhibitory activities of cyanidin and its glycosides and synergistic effect with acarbose against intestinal α-glucosidase and pancreatic α-amylase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 3387–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999; Volume 299, pp. 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, J.-Y.; Tang, C.-Y. Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents in selected fruits and vegetables, as well as their stimulatory effects on mouse splenocyte proliferation. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bondet, V.; Brand-Williams, W.; Berset, C. Kinetics and mechanism of antioxidant activity using the DPPH free radical method. Leb. Wiss Technol. 1997, 30, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Berker, K.; Güçlü, K.; Tor, I.; Apak, R. Comparative evaluation of Fe (III) reducing power-based antioxidant capacity assays in the presence of phenanthroline, batho-phenanthroline, tripyridyltriazine (FRAP) and ferricyanide reagents. Talanta 2007, 72, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Neagu, E.; Paun, G.; Albu, C.; Eremia, S.A.-M.V.; Radu, G.L. Artemisia abrotnum and Symphytum officinale Polyphenolic Compounds-Rich Extracts with Potential Application in Diabetes Management. Metabolites 2023, 13, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ranilla, L.G.; Kwon, Y.I.; Apostolidis, E.; Shetty, K. Phenolic compounds antioxidant activity and in vitro inhibitory potential against key enzymes relevant for hyperglycemia and hypertension of commonly used medicinal plants, herbs and spices in Latin America. Biores. Technol. 2010, 101, 4676–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Suparto, I.; Arfianti, N.; Septiawati, T.; Triwahyuni, W.; Iskandriati, D. Ethanol extract of Mahkota Dewa (Phaleria macrocarpa (Scheff,) Boerl.) fruit with in-vitro antidiabetic activities. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Chemistry, Jatinangor, Indonesia, 30–31 October 2008; pp. 285–288. [Google Scholar]
  59. Newsholme, P.; Cruzat, V.; Arfuso, F.; Keane, K. Nutrient regulation of insulin secretion and action. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 221, R105–R120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 29 03595 g001
Figure 1. Chromatograms for C. mas extract obtained by ASE: (A) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of polyphenolic compounds at 324 nm; (B) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of anthocyanins at 526 nm; (C) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of vitamin C at 248 nm.
Figure 1. Chromatograms for C. mas extract obtained by ASE: (A) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of polyphenolic compounds at 324 nm; (B) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of anthocyanins at 526 nm; (C) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of vitamin C at 248 nm.
Molecules 29 03595 g001
Molecules 29 03595 g002
Figure 2. Chromatograms for C. monogyna extract obtained by ASE: (A) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of polyphenolic compounds at 324 nm; (B) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of anthocyanins at 526 nm; (C) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of vitamin C at 248 nm).
Figure 2. Chromatograms for C. monogyna extract obtained by ASE: (A) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of polyphenolic compounds at 324 nm; (B) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of anthocyanins at 526 nm; (C) the chromatogram obtained for the analysis of vitamin C at 248 nm).
Molecules 29 03595 g002
Molecules 29 03595 g003
Figure 3. Quantification of insulin secreted by β-TC-6 pancreatic cells following their stimulation and treatment with the samples of interest (ELISA method), in both normal and hyperglycemic conditions. Control—untreated cells. p < 0.05, compared to the untreated cells.
Figure 3. Quantification of insulin secreted by β-TC-6 pancreatic cells following their stimulation and treatment with the samples of interest (ELISA method), in both normal and hyperglycemic conditions. Control—untreated cells. p < 0.05, compared to the untreated cells.
Molecules 29 03595 g003
Molecules 29 03595 g004
Figure 4. Laser-assisted extraction installation.
Figure 4. Laser-assisted extraction installation.
Molecules 29 03595 g004
Table 1. The active biological compound content (polyphenols, flavonoids) and yield of the extracts of C. mas and C. monogyna prepared using different extraction methods.
Table 1. The active biological compound content (polyphenols, flavonoids) and yield of the extracts of C. mas and C. monogyna prepared using different extraction methods.
SampleExtraction MethodPolyphenols
(mg CAE/g Dry Extract)		Flavonoids
(mg RE/g Dry Extract)		Yield (%)
C. masASE103.94 ± 2.602.57 ± 0.0236.1 ± 1.60
UAE79.46 ± 0.200.95 ± 0.0121.8 ± 0.90
LE155081.38 ± 0.600.92 ± 0.0130.6 ± 1.60
LEcomb.85.33 ± 0.401.44 ± 0.0131.8 ± 1.40
C. monogynaASE84.89 ± 0.603.02 ± 0.0348.4 ± 2.20
UAE54.87 ± 0.402.04 ± 0.0218.2 ± 0.70
LE155057.31 ± 0.501.98 ± 0.0119.5 ± 0.80
LEcomb.76.59 ± 0.602.25 ± 0.0220.2 ± 1.10
CAE—chlorogenic acid equivalent; RE—rutin equivalent; LE1550—laser irradiation at 1550 nm; LEcomb—laser irradiation at 1550 + 1270 nm. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Table 2. Contents of target compounds in the C. mas extracts (µg/g dry extract).
Table 2. Contents of target compounds in the C. mas extracts (µg/g dry extract).
CompoundASEUAELE1550LEcomb.
Gallic acid76.11 ± 3.8074.83 ± 2.6073.37 ± 3.2074.90 ± 4.30
Chlorogenic acid504.72 ± 11.20415.70 ± 9.20362.09 ± 11.30430.19 ± 12.70
Caffeic acid1020.56 ± 14.90710.07 ± 11.40701.63 ± 15.80781.76 ± 17.10
Coumaric acid39.44 ± 1.8032.89 ± 1.2033.76 ± 1.9038.93 ± 1.50
Rutin957.22 ± 12.60528.52 ± 12.30533.01 ± 11.70635.85 ± 10.40
Ellagic acid118.18 ± 4.5097.80 ± 4.30105.90 ± 3.70130.20 ± 5.20
Quercetin 3-β-D-glucoside80.00 ± 3.1027.18 ± 0.9018.82 ± 0.8020.69 ± 1.20
Quercitrin183.89 ± 9.5060.74 ± 1.6026.47 ± 1.9071.38 ± 4.80
Myricetin45.28 ± 2.4015.10 ± 0.8018.11 ± 0.9022.89 ± 1.60
Quercetin18.33 ± 1.1014.43 ± 0.5012.89 ± 0.6016.67 ± 0.90
Luteolin20.00 ± 1.704.70 ± 0.304.63 ± 0.305.57 ± 0.30
Kaempferol7.78 ± 0.60nd1.76 ± 0.101.82 ± 0.10
Isorahmentinndnd5.88 ± 0.205.90 ± 0.20
Delphinidin-3-glucopyranoside33.06 ± 1.3032.21 ± 1.2033.27 ± 2.4036.33 ± 1.90
Cyanidin-3-glucopyranoside566.94 ± 11.50248.32 ± 3.80405.88 ± 4.60433.32 ± 8.20
Petunidin-3-glucoside237.78 ± 4.90110.74 ± 2.70170.59 ± 5.30182.70 ± 4.40
Delphinidin12.22 ± 0.9011.74 ± 0.8011.76 ± 0.8011.01 ± 1.10
Cyanidin11.67 ± 0.7011.07 ± 0.6011.11 ± 0.5010.69 ± 0.90
Vitamin C22,379.17 ± 16.4018,819.46 ± 15.3015,778.43 ± 14.1018,655.35 ± 16.20
LE1550—laser irradiation at 1550 nm; LEcomb—laser irradiation at 1550 + 1270 nm; nd—not detected.
Table 3. Contents of target compounds in the C. monogyna extracts (µg/g dry extract).
Table 3. Contents of target compounds in the C. monogyna extracts (µg/g dry extract).
CompoundASEUAELE1550LEcomb.
Gallic acid59.13 ± 3.5052.20 ± 3.2050.26 ± 2.9052.97 ± 4.10
(+)-Catechin3262.81 ± 14.203192.31 ± 13.704012.82 ± 14.504276.73 ± 15.20
Chlorogenic acid492.77 ± 8.30489.56 ± 7.50507.18 ± 8.10533.66 ± 8.30
Caffeic acid28.39 ± 1.4026.37 ± 1.2027.69 ± 1.4030.30 ± 2.60
(−)-Epicatechin3841.94 ± 15.803679.67 ± 16.103750.26 ± 16.704234.16 ± 15.90
p-Coumaric acid12.50 ± 0.9014.84 ± 1.1011.33 ± 0.8013.88 ± 0.90
Rutin2614.88 ± 14.602312.09 ± 13.202720.00 ± 14.602927.23 ± 15.80
Ellagic acid518.18 ± 10.50497.80 ± 9.30495.90 ± 8.70530.20 ± 11.20
Quercetin 3-β-D-glucoside40.08 ± 3.1031.87 ± 2.8028.21 ± 2.3028.29 ± 2.50
Quercitrin489.63 ± 9.20421.98 ± 8.40432.31 ± 8.10504.46 ± 9.70
Myricetin27.98 ± 1.8025.27 ± 1.2020.00 ± 1.1020.79 ± 0.90
Quercetin50.01 ± 4.3046.15 ± 2.9068.72 ± 4.6066.83 ± 3.30
Luteolin13.43 ± 0.707.14 ± 0.509.74 ± 0.705.45 ± 0.20
Kaempferol15.99 ± 1.1015.38 ± 1.2014.87 ± 0.9015.36 ± 1.40
Isorahmentin3.51 ± 0.20ndnd4.95 ± 0.30
Delphinidin-3-glucopyranoside18.60 ± 1.4012.86 ± 0.70nd19.20 ± 1.80
Cyanidin-3-glucopyranoside232.15 ± 3.90203.85 ± 3.50203.08 ± 3.70231.19 ± 4.10
Delphinidin17.23 ± 1.1019.78 ± 1.8018.46 ± 1.4017.82 ± 1.20
Cyanidin19.71 ± 1.6016.78 ± 0.9018.46 ± 1.2017.82 ± 1.30
Vitamin C2593.80 ± 14.801732.97 ± 12.701594.36 ± 12.301521.78 ± 11.90
ASE—accelerated solvent extraction; UAE—ultrasound-assisted extraction; LE1550—laser irradiation at 1550 nm; LEcomb—laser irradiation at 1550 + 1270 nm; nd—not detected.
Table 4. Some performance characteristics of HPLC-DAD methods for phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and vitamin C analysis.
Table 4. Some performance characteristics of HPLC-DAD methods for phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and vitamin C analysis.
Compoundλmax
(nm)		tR
(min)		The Linear Regression EquationsRLinearity Range of Response
(µg mL−1)		LoD
(µg mL−1)		LoQ
(µg mL−1)
Gallic acid2718.2A = 22,548.51XC − 16,730.640.99940.5–500.110.23
(+)-Catechin27919.3A = 8300.645XC − 4379.8330.99980.5–500.450.47
Chlorogenic acid32720.6A = 62,237.79XC − 17,377.630.99980.5–500.130.36
Caffeic acid32422.7A = 117,248.9XC − 27,352.260.99990.5–500.10.9
(-)-Epicatechin27923.9A = 10,134.4XC − 1638.9310.9970.5–500.160.30
p-Coumaric acid31028.4A = 174,370.4XC − 39,107.040.99930.5–500.150.42
Rutin35432.3A = 31,257.94XC − 4695.00.99980.5–500.240.48
Ellagic acid36733.8A =30,052.11XC − 34,356.480.99970.5–500.230.34
Quercetin 3-β-D-glucoside35435.1A = 38,616.38XC − 7273.7730.99960.5–500.180.42
Quercitrin34942.7A = 28,998.06XC − 9131.2780.99980.5–500.330.45
Myricetin37243.3A= 46,639.07XC − 10,691.480.99980.5–500.110.38
Quercetin37249.3A = 111,657.0XC − 44,094.220.99980.5–500.320.48
Luteolin34950.1A = 102,976.7XC − 2735.9350.99960.5–500.260.46
Kaempherol36756.7A = 86,346.8XC − 23,246.120.99980.5–500.150.48
Isorahmentin37257.8A = 74,331.04XC − 5962.0920.99990.5–500.190.47
Delphinidin-3-glucoside52625.5A = 19,024.87XC − 13,742.130.99900.5–500.220.41
Cyanidin-3-glucoside52027.4A = 22,562.61XC − 74,68.7270.99970.5–500.230.38
Petunidin-3-glucoside52628.4A = 32,168.98XC − 7199.8060.99980.5–500.190.29
Delphinidin53131.2A = 76,198.99XC − 24,569.970.99940.5–500.110.30
Cyanidin52634.1A = 55,174.78XC − 17,679.810.99930.5–500.350.38
Vitamin C2482.7A= 53,840.48C − 47,183.380.99991–2500.20.5
Table 5. Antioxidant activity of analyzed extracts.
Table 5. Antioxidant activity of analyzed extracts.
SampleExtraction MethodDPPHFe(III) Reducing Power
IC50 (μg/mL)
C. masASE31.82 ± 0.1 **33.95 ± 0.2 **
UAE54.70 ± 0.4 **53.55 ± 0.5 *
LE155036.77 ± 0.2 **52.63 ± 0.3 **
LEcomb.39.38 ± 0.3 **35.33 ± 0.1 **
C. monogynaASE522.64 ± 8.4 **73.04 ± 0.6 **
UAE573.91 ± 6.9 *224.32 ± 2.4 **
LE1550493.19 ± 7.2 **369.72 ± 3.1 *
LEcomb.469.44 ± 4.8 **163.26 ± 1.8 **
Ascorbic acid 59.38 ± 0.5149.48 ± 2.6
ASE—accelerated solvent extraction; UAE—ultrasound-assisted extraction; LE1550—laser irradiation at 1550 nm; LEcomb—laser irradiation at 1550 + 1270 nm. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); ** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05 compared with the positive controls.
Table 6. α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzyme inhibition of analyzed extracts.
Table 6. α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzyme inhibition of analyzed extracts.
SampleExtraction Methodα-Amylase Inhibitionα-Glucosidase Nhibition
IC50 (μg/mL)
C. masASE0.44 ± 0.02 **77.1 ± 3.10 **
UAE96.99 ± 2.70 *134.5 ± 6.20 *
LE15508.51 ± 0.40 *129.8 ± 5.80 *
LEcomb.0.11 ± 0.01 *98.2 ± 4.70 *
C. monogynaASE0.53 ± 0.01 **108.4 ± 9.40 *
UAE7.67 ± 0.90 *1157.6 ± 10.40 **
LE155019.70 ± 1.20 *181.3 ± 5.30 *
LEcomb.1.26 ± 0.01 *129.1 ± 3.10 *
Acarbose 8.12 ± 0.60168.4 ± 6.90
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001; the α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition activity compared with polyphenols and flavonoid contents.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paun, G.; Neagu, E.; Albu, C.; Alecu, A.; Seciu-Grama, A.-M.; Radu, G.L. Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna Fruit Extracts. Molecules 2024, 29, 3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29153595

AMA Style

Paun G, Neagu E, Albu C, Alecu A, Seciu-Grama A-M, Radu GL. Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna Fruit Extracts. Molecules. 2024; 29(15):3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29153595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paun, Gabriela, Elena Neagu, Camelia Albu, Andreia Alecu, Ana-Maria Seciu-Grama, and Gabriel Lucian Radu. 2024. "Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna Fruit Extracts" Molecules 29, no. 15: 3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29153595

APA Style

Paun, G., Neagu, E., Albu, C., Alecu, A., Seciu-Grama, A. -M., & Radu, G. L. (2024). Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Cornus mas L. and Crataegus monogyna Fruit Extracts. Molecules, 29(15), 3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29153595

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop