You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Changxing Li,
  • Dandan Sang* and
  • Shunhao Ge
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments:

- WS2 is N-type or p-type?

- What is the effect of N-type or p-type in optoelectronic applications?

- The disadvantages of WS2 and solutions for their overcome should be discussed in a new section.

- Synthesis methods of WS2 should be discussed.

- The effect of morphology on optoelectronic properties should be discussed.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Moderate editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Reviewer Comments:

The abstract must be improved, and more detail about the narration of the article must be added.

Why did the authors mention "latest 5 years" and cite 2016 refs?

It's crucial to include a section on the properties of WS2 before discussing its application. This will provide a solid foundation for the readers to understand the context and significance of the subsequent application.

Authors must include some of their own schemes for better understanding.

There is no table provided to compare the activity of WS2. When the authors describe sensors and other applications, they must provide tables with the recent reports on WS2 regarding the application.

Some of the keywords are not suitable.

The Intoduction is entirely unacceptable. No information about the material has been provided, and none of the recent achievements of the materials have been discussed.

Also, include a section about materials similar to WS2 for optoelectronic applications.

 

 

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Must be improved

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Accept in present form

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed all my comments well. This may be accepted after the editor's review.