Next Article in Journal
Kinetic Study and Reaction Mechanism of the Gas-Phase Thermolysis Reaction of Methyl Derivatives of 1,2,4,5-Tetroxane
Previous Article in Journal
Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids as Hazardous Toxins in Natural Products: Current Analytical Methods and Latest Legal Regulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Enhanced Performance of NiCuOOH/NiCu(OH)2 Electrode Using Pre-Conversion Treatment for the Electrochemical Oxidation of Ammonia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Transformation of Water Vapor into Hydrogen by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Loaded with Bamboo Carbon Bed Structured by Fibrous Material

1
Institute of Environmental Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
2
Shanghai Institute for Design & Research on Environmental Engineering, Shanghai 200232, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(14), 3273; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143273
Submission received: 10 May 2024 / Revised: 2 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 July 2024 / Published: 11 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Water Electrolysis Technology)

Abstract

:
A new method of efficiently transforming water vapor into hydrogen was investigated by dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) loaded with bamboo carbon bed structured by fibrous material in an argon medium. Hydrogen productivity was measured in three different reactors: a non-loaded DBD (N-DBD), a bamboo carbon (BC) bed DBD (BC-DBD), and a quartz wool (QW)-loaded BC DBD (QC-DBD). The effects of the quality ratio of BC to QW and relative humidity on hydrogen productivity were also investigated in QC-DBD at various flow rates. The reaction process and mechanism were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, N2 physisorption experiments, infrared spectroscopy, and optical emission spectroscopy. A new reaction pathway was developed by loading BC into the fibrous structured material to activate the reaction molecules and capture the O-containing groups in the DBD reactor. A hydrogen productivity of 17.3 g/kWh was achieved at an applied voltage of 5 kV, flow rate of 4 L/min, and 100% relative humidity (RH) in the QC-DBD with a quality ratio of BC to QW of 3.0.

1. Introduction

Traditional fossil energy sources are non-renewable, and their combustion products are polluting. Hydrogen is considered to play an important role in providing carbon-free energy [1], and efficient hydrogen energy systems could reduce the dependence on functional fossil fuels for heating, transportation, industry, and electricity [2,3]. Existing technologies for hydrogen generation include water electrolysis [4,5], ultraviolet (UV) light [6,7], biomass pyrolysis [8], and ionizing radiation [9]. Among the above methods, water electrolysis has attracted much attention and is considered to be the most promising method for hydrogen production [10]. Despite the significant advantages of electrochemical water decomposition, most efficient hydrogen production methods still require durable precious metal catalysts to facilitate reaction kinetics [11]. However, low precious metal reserves and high costs have limited the industrial application of precious metal catalysts in electrochemical water decomposition [12]. Alkaline electrolysis systems do not require the use of precious metal catalysts, but they need to be operated at high efficiency, low current density, and low operating pressure [13], which increases the size of the system and makes them unsuitable for frequent startups and variable power inputs [14]. The catalytic low-cost and easy-to-operate electrochemical decomposition of water for hydrogen production deserves further exploration.
Because the electrochemical decomposition of water for hydrogen production by dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) has high energy density at atmospheric pressure and room temperature [15], it can generate a lot of energy in a small space, which is advantageous for compact energy storage or conversion systems. Hydrogen production by DBD is potentially viable, especially in portable mobile scenarios. Owing to its simplicity, rapidity, and cleanliness, the transformation of water vapor into hydrogen using a DBD reactor is considered a promising green method for hydrogen production with easy access, simple geometry, and instantaneous production [16,17].
Varne et al. [16] evaluated the optimal conditions for hydrogen production from an argon–water dielectric barrier discharge. Muhammad et al. [18] used an optimized corona–DBD hybrid plasma microreactor to produce hydrogen from water vapor. However, the impact of oxidizing atmospheres enriched with O and H2O2 consequently affects the production of H atoms as precursors to H2 under pure argon–water discharge conditions [19]. Given the significant influence of O functional groups on hydrogen production, it is imperative to establish an oxygen-free environment. Carbonaceous materials have a high surface area [20], and due to the high affinity of carbon for oxygen, carbon reacts with elemental oxygen, contributing to the positive water-to-hydrogen reaction [21,22]. Non-thermal plasma-enhanced carbon excitation can lead to a synergistic effect that induces the reaction to occur [23,24]. Since bamboo carbon (BC) is the simplest and most readily available reducing substances, by using bamboo carbon, it might be possible to achieve the desired reaction rates with less material, thus reducing the overall amount of catalyst required for the process. Combining DBD and BC to create an oxygen-free atmosphere can be considered a good concept for hydrogen production through water. Relevant studies and mechanistic investigations have not been reported.
In this study, an innovative approach was investigated for the conversion of water vapor into high-yield hydrogen at ambient temperatures and pressures by a DBD loaded with a bamboo carbon bed structured with fibrous materials. Activated carbon atoms were utilized as trapping agents for oxidizing substances. H2 productivity in three different reactors with no loaded DBD (N-DBD), bamboo carbon (BC)-packed bed DBD (BC-DBD), and quartz wool (QW)-loaded BC DBD (QC-DBD) were examined. The effects of different discharge voltages, vapor flow rates, quality ratios of BC to QW, and relative humidities on hydrogen yields were also explored. The packed materials were characterized in detail, both physically and chemically, before and after use in the DBD reactor to reveal the reaction process and mechanism.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. The Characterization of the Packed Materials in QC-DBD

2.1.1. Morphology

Figure 1 presents the SEM images of the BC loaded on the QW, showing that the BC was wrapped by a large number of QW filaments. The introduction of QW led to the adsorption of charged particles, which in turn facilitated the generation of hydrogen on the BC within the QC-DBD framework. From the EDS elemental mapping results of BC-Used, a certain amount of Ar atoms was observed on the surface of the BC. The observed phenomenon provides evidence of electron transfer between the excited Ar atoms and the BC substrate. Simultaneously, the significant amounts of oxygen attached to the BC surface indicated the successful capture of oxygen-containing functional groups from water by the activated carbon atoms.

2.1.2. BET Results

The N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (PSD) curves of BC were analyzed, and the textural properties of BC are discussed. Figure 2 shows that BC has characteristic Type IV isotherms of the Bruno–Demin–Taylor classification [25], indicating the presence of mesoporous/microporous structures. According to the PSD curves, the pore sizes of the two catalysts are similar, mainly containing small mesopores (<10 nm) and micropores (<2 nm). The pore size distribution of BC was calculated using the N2 adsorption isotherm and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) adsorption branch. The persistence of the natural BC structure after plasma excitation was evidenced by the presence of a similar hysteresis loop. Compared with BC-Before, BC after plasma excitation exhibited a higher degree of mesoporous structures. These newly created pores contribute to an increase in the specific surface area (SBET), as shown in Table 1.

2.1.3. XPS Characterization

Table 1 lists the surface chemical states of BC as determined by XPS. The surface oxygen content of BC-Used was significantly higher than that of BC-Before. Figure 3a presents the C 1s spectrum of the BC, which can be assigned to the following bands: 284.8 eV for C-C, 286.1 eV for the carbon bound to oxygen alone (i.e., C-OH) in phenol and ether, 287.5 eV for the carbon doubly bound to oxygen in ketone and quinone (i.e., C=O), and 288.7 for the carbon bound to both oxygen (i.e., -COO) in carboxylic anhydride and ester eV [26]. The generation of a greater number of C-based functional groups in BC-Used provides clear evidence for the participation of BC in water vapor conversion reactions. The O1s XPS spectrum of the sample is shown in Figure 3b. All O1s spectra can be assigned here: C=O at 531.2 eV, C-O at 533.2 eV, and -COO at 534.8 [27,28]. The surface-bound oxygen species, including C-O and OH groups, were prone to instability during the reaction process. Hydrogenation led to an increase in the number of reactive oxygen species on the BC surface.

2.1.4. FT-IR Analysis

As shown in Figure 4, FT-IR spectroscopy was used to characterize the functional groups in the BC. For the BC-Before surface, no obvious bands were observed in the spectra, suggesting that the functional groups on the BC surface were formed by the intra-DBD reaction after use. For BC-Used, a strong band at ~1096 cm−1, along with those at ~ 752, 804, 874, 1557, and 3452 cm−1, was observed. The bands at ca. 3450 and 1557 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching and bending vibrations of the O-H bond, respectively [29]. The bands from ca. 1700 to 1760 cm−1 correspond to C=O stretching vibrations in carboxylic acids, and those at 1096 cm−1 correspond to the epoxy (C-O-C) and alkoxy (C-OH) groups on the BC surface, respectively [30]. Owing to the addition of QW in the DBD reaction, Si-O also existed around ca. 1100 cm−1, and the peak at around ca. 700–900 cm−1 may indicate the existence of Si-C. The above characterization of BC-Used provides a potential explanation for the ability of BC to facilitate hydrogen production by capturing oxygen-containing functional groups from water.

2.1.5. Optical Emission Spectroscopy

The plasma environment provides high-energy electrons, ions, excited species from background gas molecules, and free radicals from reactants [31]. From the spectra shown in Figure 5a, the emission spectra of OH, O, Hα, Hβ, and Ar generated by these background gasses are detected in N-DBD. QC-DBD, as shown in Figure 5b, exhibited more obvious excitation spectra of C atoms, while the intensity of O was reduced, and the emission spectra of CO and CO2+ were observed. Moreover, the intensities of OH and H were much stronger than those in the reaction without the addition of BC, which explains the enhanced H2 production.

2.2. Experimental Results and Analysis

2.2.1. Effects of Discharge Voltage on H2 Productivity in Different DBD Reactors

In Figure 6, the H2 productivity in different DBD reactors is presented at applied voltages varying from 1 to 5 kV. The results showed that while the H2 productivity increased with the applied voltage, an obvious enhancement occurred in the QC-DBD, and the productivity remained almost steady in the N-DBD. The best H2 productivity in QC-DBD reached 17.3 g/kWh at the voltage of 5 kV, while it was only 7.3 g/kWh and 3.3 g/kWh in BC-DBD and N-DBD, respectively.
Furthermore, H2 productivity was higher in BC-DBD and QC-DBD than in N-DBD at similar voltages. The main reason for this is that even at ambient temperature and pressure, the carbon atoms excited by high-energy electrons may lead to the reaction C + H2O → CO + CO2 + H2. The presence of activated carbon atoms is conducive to creating a reducing atmosphere for the system by capturing oxygen-containing functional groups and promoting the reaction process with an increase in the micro-discharge process. Meanwhile, the discharge pattern varied from a simple filament discharge to a complex discharge involving micro-discharge among the carbon particles [32].
In QC-DBD, the structural properties of the fibrous material lead to changes in the electric field structure, contributing to increased electronic activity. During the diffusion of the reactants to the QC surface, some H2O and carbon atoms are activated by the discharge plasma and enter the reactive vibrational excited state or even the dissociated state. Then, the fibrous material is more likely to gather a large amount of charge at the tip of the fiber, leading to a higher probability of electron collision, which is beneficial for the transformation of water vapor into hydrogen. Meanwhile, the temperature in QC-DBD was significantly lower than that in BC-DBD, mainly because the aggregation of BC caused thermal accumulation [23], which hindered heat dissipation as the voltage increased. While the discharge space among the BC particles was expanded by loading on the fibrous material, there was better heat dissipation and enhanced micro-discharge capability.
The transformation of water vapor into hydrogen in QC-DBD was compared with previously published results. As displayed in Table 2, a hydrogen productivity of 17.3 g/kWh was achieved in this work at a flow rate of 4 L/min and an applied voltage of 5 kV, which was significantly higher than that in other studies, except that it was relatively lower than the electrolysis of water. This comparison demonstrates the excellent hydrogen productivity in the QC-DBD reactor.

2.2.2. Effects of the BC: QW Quality Ratios on H2 Productivity in QC-DBD

Another factor affecting the discharge is the particle gap. For a packed bed composed of BC particles and quartz wool (QW), the particle gap can be adjusted indirectly by changing the quality ratio of BC to QW in QC-DBD. Figure 7 shows the effect of different BC-to-QW quality ratios on hydrogen productivity at various vapor flow rates. At a certain flow rate, a quality ratio of BC to QW of 3.0 demonstrated the most favorable effect on hydrogen productivity.
According to Parson’s law, the breakdown voltage vs in a uniform electric field is a function of the product of the gas pressure P and discharge gap d [23]. When the mass of BC increased, the d between the activated carbon particles tended to decrease, and the breakdown voltage vs was larger at this time, thus blocking the discharge phenomenon. Additionally, because BC has more filamentous fibers or tubular structures, most of the electrons enter the BC structure through the channel and are gradually dissipated; electrons are rarely reflected on the sidewalls of the channel [40], leading to poor discharge performance when the quality ratio of BC to QW is high. Conversely, when the BC: QW quality ratio was low, the gap between the BC particles increased. The probability of electron collisions between carbon atoms decreases with a diminished ability to capture oxygen-containing functional groups, which affects hydrogen productivity. At a BC-to-QW quality ratio of 3.0, the most suitable particle gap in the QC-DBD resulted in the best discharge state and a reducing atmosphere.
In addition, a higher flow rate was conducive to higher hydrogen productivity, owing to the increase in water vapor per unit time and the higher probability of electron collisions. It can be concluded that the reactor exhibited an excellent ability to convert water into hydrogen with an instantaneous response.

2.2.3. Effects of Relative Humidity on H2 Productivity in N-DBD and QC-DBD

The H2 productivity curve of QC-DBD with varying relative humidity exhibited a trend opposite to that of N-DBD, as depicted in Figure 8. These results suggest that the addition of QW improved the humidity tolerance of the QC-DBD reaction system because the gas breakdown voltage threshold may not be the limiting factor affecting H2 productivity, although it was altered by water vapor. Additionally, BC with large pores and wrinkled surfaces has a high water absorption capacity when irradiated, which would be beneficial for higher intensity, making the electron movement more intense [41]. Simultaneously, the accumulation of charges on the surface of the QW generates alternating electric fields owing to the fiber structure adsorbing charged particles in the DBD. During the discharge process, these charges undergo repeated aggregation and emission, interacting with the BC to consume a large amount of water vapor to generate hydrogen gas. However, in N-DBD, the highest hydrogen productivity was attained at 25% RH without water vapor buffering by the packing material because of the increase in the gas breakdown voltage threshold with increasing water vapor [16].

2.2.4. Production of CO, CO2 and CH4 in QC-DBD

In Figure 9, as the voltage increases, the by-products are also increased; among them, the production of CO2 is the highest. When the voltage is higher, slight levels of CH4 and CO are achieved with no more than 30 ppm and 70 ppm, respectively. There is a yield of CO2, CO, and CH4 when mixed with H2, which can be used as combustible gases in conjunction with H2 or purified through subsequent separation processes.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Packed Materials Preparation and Characterization

Bamboo carbon and quartz wool were purchased from Heatton Environmental Technology, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The bamboo carbon samples were ground and mechanically sieved to obtain particles with a size distribution of 1.0–1.5 mm (30–45 mesh), and then washed thrice using deionized water to remove impurities and dried at 100 °C for 12 h. To prepare the quartz-wool-loaded bamboo carbon powder reductant, different quality ratios of bamboo carbon to quartz wool were mixed with 10 mL of ethanol solution in five beakers. The beakers were placed in an oven at 100 °C for 12 h until the ethanol solution completely evaporated.
BET surface area measurements were conducted on a 4-station fully automated specific surface area analyzer: Micromeritics APSP Model 2460 (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Prior to the BET measurements, 0.1 g of catalyst was placed in a U-reactor and purged with flowing helium at 110 °C.
Surface microstructure analysis was performed using an FEI-NOVA NANOSEM 230 (EDS X-MAX50) (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) SEM at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV to examine the surface characteristics of the three samples. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was employed to examine the content and distribution of surface elements.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, East Grinstead, UK) with Al K-alpha radiation and penetration energies of 20–40 eV. To account for the effect of the surface charge, the binding energy was corrected with reference to C 1s (284.8 eV).
Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was performed using an IR-Tracer-100 instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with KBr as the reference material.
Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) was used to observe the emission spectra of the DBD reactor, which was purchased from AVANTES (Shanghai, China).
Gas chromatographs (GC-9860E, Linghua Instrument, Shanghai, China) were utilized to detect hydrogen production and CO, CH4, and CO2 content in the outlet gas. The setup utilized a TDX-01 packed column (Jingke Rui Da, Beijing, China), with a TCD (Thermal Conductivity Detector) as the detector, nitrogen as the carrier gas, a filament current of 80 mA, a column temperature set to 70 °C, a detector temperature of 80 °C, and an injector temperature of 90 °C.

3.2. Experimental Setup

The device used for the hydrogen production reaction is depicted in Figure 10 and consists of a continuous-flow gas generation system, a reaction system, and outlet gas analysis. Ar gas (99.99% purity) was directed into two separate paths using a three-way pipe. One branch was directly connected to the DBD reactor, while the other facilitated the passage of argon gas through three sealed flasks filled with distilled water to obtain saturated argon water. A Horiba Stec-4400 mass flow controller (HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan) was utilized for independent control of the inlet flow rate on both branches, enabling the adjustment of different percentages of water vapor in the argon gas and the gas flow rate before entering the DBD reactor. Prior to entering the DBD reactor, the humidity levels were measured using a psychrometer (Testo 605-H1, Testo SE & Co. KGaA, Titisee-Neustadt, Germany). The DBD reactor was connected to high-voltage AC power. The power was analyzed using a digital oscilloscope (TDS2024B, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA). AC was placed in the DBD reactor, including an inner tube (quartz glass, 11 mm outer diameter, 275 mm tube length, 1 mm wall thickness), an outer tube (quartz glass, 21 mm inner diameter), an inner electrode (stainless steel sheet wrapping the inner wall of the inner tube, 0.3 mm thickness, 165 mm length), and an outer electrode (copper sheet, 20 mm wide). The temperature outside the reaction zone walls was monitored and recorded using an infrared thermometer (Testo 830-T1, Testo SE & Co. KGaA, Germany).
The formula for the hydrogen productivity is shown in Equation (1).
H 2 productivity   ( g / kWh )   = ( C × 2 / 22.4 ) × ( Q × 60 / 10 6 ) / ( D 2 × π / Q / 1000 × 60 ) / 3600 / P 2 × 1000
where C is utilized to denote the concentration of a substance in parts per million in ppm, Q is the total flow rate in mL/min (gas volume was measured at room temperature, ∼25 °C), D is the radius of the discharge zone in cm, and P 2 is the true discharge power in w.

4. Reaction Mechanism

In QC-DBD, BC loading onto the fibrous-structured material prevents the reformation of H2O in the reaction and promotes H2 production by capturing O-containing groups. Peaks of C-OH and C=O were found in the FT-IR spectrum of BC-Used, indicating that O and OH bind to the excited C atoms. Combined with the above BC-Used characterization and OES results, the various reactions occurring in QC-DBD responsible for H2 formation are as follows:
Carrier Ar plasma discharge generates Ar*, Ar+, etc.
e + Ar   Ar * + e   Ar + + 2 e
Packed-bed BC plasma discharge generates C*, etc.
e + C   C * + e
Ar * + C   C * + Ar
These interact with water vapor through reactions (5)–(7).
Ar * + H 2 O   H 2 O * + Ar
e + H 2 O   H 2 O * + e
H 2 O *   H .   + O . H
The O-containing groups are captured by C*.
O   . H + C *   C   . OH   CO + CO 2 + CH 4
C   . OH + e   C   . O + C   . OO + C   . H   CO + CO 2 + H 2
H. dimerizes to H2
H . + H .   H 2
Compared with the final products in N-DBD, there was no H2O2 or O3 in QC-DBD. These results indicate that the addition of BC to the packed bed of DBD creates a well-reducing atmosphere and promotes the reaction process of H2 production.
A fraction of the by-products is consumed through reactions (11) and (12).
H . + C *   C   . H   CH 4
CH 4 + CO 2   CO + H 2
The main reactions for H2 production in N-DBD and QC-DBD are shown in Figure 11.

5. Conclusions

Hydrogen productivity was investigated at various discharge voltages in three different reactors of N-DBD, BC-DBD, and QC-DBD. QC-DBD was found to be the most efficient hydrogen generator. This study revealed that a specific quality ratio of BC (bamboo carbon) to QW (quartz wool), precisely 3.0, exerted the most advantageous impact on the hydrogen productivity within the QC-DBD reactor. The fibrous nature of the material within the reactor was observed to accumulate a substantial charge, thereby enhancing the likelihood of electron collisions. A noteworthy aspect of the QC-DBD reactor is its exceptional resistance to water; even at a relative humidity of 100%, the reactor sustained high yields of H2. The promotion of H2 production was suggested to be BC loading onto the fibrous-structured material to activate the reaction molecules and capture O-containing groups in the QC-DBD reactor. A hydrogen productivity of 17.3 g/kWh was achieved at 100% RH, a 4 L/min flow rate, and an applied voltage of 5 kV in the 3.0 QC-DBD. This achievement underscores the potential of the QC-DBD system for efficient and sustainable hydrogen production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.; methodology, R.S. (Ruchen Shu); software, L.S.; validation, R.Z. (Ruina Zhang); formal analysis, C.O.; investigation, M.X.; resources, J.H.; data curation, R.S. (Ran Sun); writing—original draft preparation, H.X.; writing—review and editing, Y.T.; visualization, X.Z. and Y.Y.; supervision, R.Z. (Renxi Zhang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shanghai SASAC Enterprise Innovation Development and Energy Level Improvement Project (No. 2022028).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the Institute of Environmental Science, Fudan University, for providing the experimental platform.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yusuf, M.; Farooqi, A.S.; Ying, Y.X.; Keong, L.K.; Alam, M.A.; Hellgardt, K.; Abdullah, B. Syngas Production Employing Nickel on Alumina-Magnesia Supported Catalyst via Dry Methane Reforming. Materialwissenschaft Und Werkstofftechnik 2021, 52, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ball, M.; Weeda, M. The Hydrogen Economy—Vision or Reality? Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 7903–7919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Samsatli, S.; Staffell, I.; Samsatli, N.J. Optimal Design and Operation of Integrated Wind-Hydrogen-Electricity Networks for Decarbonising the Domestic Transport Sector in Great Britain. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 447–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vincent, I.; Bessarabov, D. Low Cost Hydrogen Production by Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis: A Review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1690–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Service, R.F. MATERIALS SCIENCE New Electrolyzer Splits Water on the Cheap. Science 2020, 367, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fakeeha, A.H.; Fakeeha, R.; El Hassan, N.; Al-Zahrani, S.A.; Al-Awadi, A.S.; Frusteri, L.; Bayahia, H.; Alharth, A.I.; Al-Fatesh, A.S.; Kumar, R. Holmium Promoted Yttria-Zirconia Supported Ni Catalyst for H2 Production via Dry Reforming of Methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 38242–38257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kunthakudee, N.; Puangpetch, T.; Ramakul, P.; Serivalsatit, K.; Hunsom, M. Light-Assisted Synthesis of Au/TiO2 Nanoparticles for H2 Production by Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 23570–23582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bozieva, A.M.; Khasimov, M.K.; Voloshin, R.A.; Sinetova, M.A.; Kupriyanova, E.V.; Zharmukhamedov, S.K.; Dunikov, D.O.; Tsygankov, A.A.; Tomo, T.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. New Cyanobacterial Strains for Biohydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 7569–7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yin, Y.; Wang, J. Enhanced Sewage Sludge Disintegration and Hydrogen Production by Ionizing Radiation Pretreatment in the Presence of Fe2+. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15548–15557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qureshi, F.; Yusuf, M.; Arham Khan, M.; Ibrahim, H.; Ekeoma, B.C.; Kamyab, H.; Rahman, M.M.; Nadda, A.K.; Chelliapan, S. A State-of-The-Art Review on the Latest Trends in Hydrogen Production, Storage, and Transportation Techniques. Fuel 2023, 340, 127574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aricò, A.S.; Siracusano, S.; Briguglio, N.; Baglio, V.; Di Blasi, A.; Antonucci, V. Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolysis: Status of Technologies and Potential Applications in Combination with Renewable Power Sources. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2013, 43, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gong, Y. Perspective of Hydrogen Energy and Recent Progress in Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 43, 282–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, K.; Zhang, D. Recent Progress in Alkaline Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production and Applications. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 307–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shiva Kumar, S.; Ramakrishna, S.U.B.; Krishna, S.V.; Srilatha, K.; Devi, B.R.; Himabindu, V. Synthesis of Titanium (IV) Oxide Composite Membrane for Hydrogen Production through Alkaline Water Electrolysis. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 25, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hammer, T.; Kappes, T.; Baldauf, M. Plasma Catalytic Hybrid Processes: Gas Discharge Initiation and Plasma Activation of Catalytic Processes. Catal. Today 2004, 89, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Varne, M. Evaluation of Optimum Conditions for Hydrogen Generation in Argon-Water Vapor Dielectric Barrier Discharge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 22769–22774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rehman, F.; Abdul Majeed, W.S.; Zimmerman, W.B. Hydrogen Production from Water Vapor Plasmolysis Using DBD-Corona Hybrid Reactor. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 2748–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Younas, M.; Shafique, S.; Faisal, A.; Hafeez, A.; Javed, F.; Mustafa, M.; Rehman, F. Hydrogen Production through Water Vapors Using Optimized Corona-DBD Hybrid Plasma Micro-Reactor. Fuel 2023, 331, 125838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dey, G.R.; Das, T.N. Yields of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Peroxide from Argon–Water Vapor in Dielectric Barrier Discharge. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 2016, 36, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gholami, Z.; Luo, G.; Gholami, F.; Yang, F. Recent Advances in Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by Carbon Monoxide for Flue Gas Cleaning Process: A Review. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 2021, 63, 68–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, W.-H.; Chen, C.-Y. Water Gas Shift Reaction for Hydrogen Production and Carbon Dioxide Capture: A Review. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Obermajer, J.; Dvorák, B. Catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction. Chem. Listy 2002, 96, 685–692. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, F. Promotion of Microwave Discharge over Carbon Catalysts for CO2 Reforming of CH4 to Syngas. Fuel 2023, 331, 125914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, F.; Jin, X.; Wang, G.; Sun, L.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, W.; Hou, J.; Zhang, R. Removal of NO by Carbon-Based Catalytic Reduction Bed Loaded with Mn Induced by Dielectric Barrier Discharge at Low Temperature. Environ. Eng. Res. 2023, 28, 210500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sing, K.S.W. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, B.; Murad, L.; Laffir, F.; Dickinson, C.; Dempsey, E. Pt Based Nanocomposites (Mono/Bi/Tri-Metallic) Decorated Using Different Carbon Supports for Methanol Electro-Oxidation in Acidic and Basic Media. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3334–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kundu, S.; Wang, Y.; Xia, W.; Muhler, M. Thermal Stability and Reducibility of Oxygen-Containing Functional Groups on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Surfaces: A Quantitative High-Resolution XPS and TPD/TPR Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 16869–16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wagner, C.D.; Zatko, D.A.; Raymond, R.H. Use of the Oxygen KLL Auger Lines in Identification of Surface Chemical States by Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis. Anal. Chem. 1980, 52, 1445–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ramesh Kumar, C.; Rambabu, N.; Maheria, K.C.; Dalai, A.K.; Lingaiah, N. Iron Exchanged Tungstophosphoric Acid Supported on Activated Carbon Derived from Pinecone Biomass: Evaluation of Catalysts Efficiency for Liquid Phase Benzylation of Anisole with Benzyl Alcohol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 485, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tryba, B.; Toyoda, M.; Morawski, A.W.; Inagaki, M. Modification of Carbon-Coated TiO2 by Iron to Increase Adsorptivity and Photoactivity for Phenol. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saud, S.; Nguyen, D.; Kim, S.-G.; Matyakubov, N.; Nguyen, V.T.; Mok, Y.S. Influence of Background Gas for Plasma-Assisted Catalytic Removal of Ethylene in a Modified Dielectric Barrier Discharge-Reactor. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol 2022, 2, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, L.; Jiang, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Li, X.; Huo, J.; Wang, S.; Dai, L. Plasma-Engraved Co3O4 Nanosheets with Oxygen Vacancies and High Surface Area for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5277–5281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tao, M.; Azzolini, J.A.; Stechel, E.B.; Ayers, K.E.; Valdez, T. Review-Engineering Challenges in Green Hydrogen Production Systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 054503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Qiu, F.; Han, Z.; Peterson, J.J.; Odoi, M.Y.; Sowers, K.L.; Krauss, T.D. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation by CdSe/CdS Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5347–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burlica, R.; Shih, K.-Y.; Locke, B.R. Formation of H2 and H2O2 in a Water-Spray Gliding Arc Nonthermal Plasma Reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 6342–6349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kirkpatrick, M.J.; Locke, B.R. Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Hydrogen Peroxide Formation in Aqueous Phase Pulsed Corona Electrical Discharge. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 4243–4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hrycak, B.; Czylkowski, D.; Miotk, R.; Dors, M.; Jasinski, M.; Mizeraczyk, J. Hydrogen Production from Ethanol in Nitrogen Microwave Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure. Open Chem. 2015, 13, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sarmiento, B.; Brey, J.J.; Viera, I.G.; González-Elipe, A.R.; Cotrino, J.; Rico, V.J. Hydrogen Production by Reforming of Hydrocarbons and Alcohols in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge. J. Power Sources 2007, 169, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Andersen, J.A.; Christensen, J.M.; Østberg, M.; Bogaerts, A.; Jensen, A.D. Plasma-Catalytic Ammonia Decomposition Using a Packed-Bed Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 32081–32091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xi, J.; Zhou, E.; Liu, Y.; Gao, W.; Ying, J.; Chen, Z.; Gao, C. Wood-Based Straightway Channel Structure for High Performance Microwave Absorption. Carbon 2017, 124, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, H.; Yeow Seow, J.Z.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, Z.J.; Ji, G. Green Synthesis of Hierarchically Porous Carbons with Tunable Dielectric Response for Microwave Absorption. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 15447–15455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM-EDS images of BC-Used in QC-DBD.
Figure 1. SEM-EDS images of BC-Used in QC-DBD.
Molecules 29 03273 g001
Figure 2. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves (inset) of (a) BC-Before and (b) BC-Used.
Figure 2. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves (inset) of (a) BC-Before and (b) BC-Used.
Molecules 29 03273 g002
Figure 3. C 1s and O 1s XPS signals of (a) BC-Before and (b) BC-Used.
Figure 3. C 1s and O 1s XPS signals of (a) BC-Before and (b) BC-Used.
Molecules 29 03273 g003
Figure 4. Fourier transform infrared spectra of BC-Before and BC-Used.
Figure 4. Fourier transform infrared spectra of BC-Before and BC-Used.
Molecules 29 03273 g004
Figure 5. OES spectrum observed in (a) N-DBD and (b) QC-DBD (reaction conditions: 100% RH; BC: QW quality ratios: 3.0; flow rate: 0.5 L/min; discharge voltage: 5 kV).
Figure 5. OES spectrum observed in (a) N-DBD and (b) QC-DBD (reaction conditions: 100% RH; BC: QW quality ratios: 3.0; flow rate: 0.5 L/min; discharge voltage: 5 kV).
Molecules 29 03273 g005
Figure 6. H2 productivity under different DBD reactors at various discharge voltages (reaction conditions: 100% RH; flow rate: 4 L/min; mass of BC: 0.15 g in BC/QC-DBD).
Figure 6. H2 productivity under different DBD reactors at various discharge voltages (reaction conditions: 100% RH; flow rate: 4 L/min; mass of BC: 0.15 g in BC/QC-DBD).
Molecules 29 03273 g006
Figure 7. H2 productivity under different BC: QW quality ratios in QC-DBD at various vapor flow rates (reaction conditions: 100% RH, discharge voltage: 5 kV).
Figure 7. H2 productivity under different BC: QW quality ratios in QC-DBD at various vapor flow rates (reaction conditions: 100% RH, discharge voltage: 5 kV).
Molecules 29 03273 g007
Figure 8. H2 productivity under different relative humidity in N-DBD and QC-DBD (reaction conditions: BC: QW quality ratios: 3.0; flow rate: 4 L/min; discharge voltage: 5 kV).
Figure 8. H2 productivity under different relative humidity in N-DBD and QC-DBD (reaction conditions: BC: QW quality ratios: 3.0; flow rate: 4 L/min; discharge voltage: 5 kV).
Molecules 29 03273 g008
Figure 9. Production of CO, CO2, and CH4 in QC-DBD (reaction conditions: BC: QW quality ratios: 3.0; flow rate: 0.2 L/min and 2 L/min; 100% RH).
Figure 9. Production of CO, CO2, and CH4 in QC-DBD (reaction conditions: BC: QW quality ratios: 3.0; flow rate: 0.2 L/min and 2 L/min; 100% RH).
Molecules 29 03273 g009
Figure 10. Diagram of the experimental arrangement.
Figure 10. Diagram of the experimental arrangement.
Molecules 29 03273 g010
Figure 11. Reaction mechanisms in (a) N-DBD-, (b) QC-DBD-, and (c) QC-DBD-assisted water splitting.
Figure 11. Reaction mechanisms in (a) N-DBD-, (b) QC-DBD-, and (c) QC-DBD-assisted water splitting.
Molecules 29 03273 g011aMolecules 29 03273 g011b
Table 1. Surface properties of BC.
Table 1. Surface properties of BC.
BCSBET (m2/g)dp (nm)Vp (cm3/g)O 1s (%)C 1s (%)
Before160.702.060.0811.488.6
Used206.792.090.1127.972.1
Table 2. Comparison of the energy yields for different hydrogen production methods.
Table 2. Comparison of the energy yields for different hydrogen production methods.
Production MethodHydrogen Production GasEnergy Yield, g(H2)/kWhReference
ElectrolysisH2O>20[33]
PhotocatalysisH2O0.01[34]
AC gliding arcH2O1.3[35]
CoronaH2O2.0[36]
Microwave (2.45 MHz)C2H5OH + H2O14.8[37]
DBDCH3OH + H2O3.3[38]
NH34.1[39]
H2O5.5[16]
DBD coupled BCH2O17.3Present work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, H.; Sun, R.; Tan, Y.; Pei, C.; Shu, R.; Song, L.; Zhang, R.; Ouyang, C.; Xia, M.; Hou, J.; et al. Efficient Transformation of Water Vapor into Hydrogen by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Loaded with Bamboo Carbon Bed Structured by Fibrous Material. Molecules 2024, 29, 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143273

AMA Style

Xu H, Sun R, Tan Y, Pei C, Shu R, Song L, Zhang R, Ouyang C, Xia M, Hou J, et al. Efficient Transformation of Water Vapor into Hydrogen by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Loaded with Bamboo Carbon Bed Structured by Fibrous Material. Molecules. 2024; 29(14):3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Hui, Ran Sun, Yujie Tan, Chenxiao Pei, Ruchen Shu, Lijie Song, Ruina Zhang, Chuang Ouyang, Min Xia, Jianyuan Hou, and et al. 2024. "Efficient Transformation of Water Vapor into Hydrogen by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Loaded with Bamboo Carbon Bed Structured by Fibrous Material" Molecules 29, no. 14: 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143273

APA Style

Xu, H., Sun, R., Tan, Y., Pei, C., Shu, R., Song, L., Zhang, R., Ouyang, C., Xia, M., Hou, J., Zhang, X., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, R. (2024). Efficient Transformation of Water Vapor into Hydrogen by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Loaded with Bamboo Carbon Bed Structured by Fibrous Material. Molecules, 29(14), 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143273

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop