Next Article in Journal
Unique Use of Dibromo–L–Tyrosine Ligand in Building of Cu(II) Coordination Polymer—Experimental and Theoretical Investigations
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Rh Doping on Optical Absorption and Oxygen Evolution Reaction Activity on BaTiO3 (001) Surfaces
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules29112708
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Visible Light Enhancement of Biocarbon Quantum-Dot-Decorated TiO2 for Naphthalene Removal

by
Yunteng Chen
1,2,
Chunxian Hong
3,
Qiang Xu
4,
Haihong Zheng
5,
Chao Wang
4,
Hongshun Lu
4,
Shuai Zhang
4,
Mingming Du
3,* and
Ganning Zeng
2,*
1
Shaoxing Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd., Shaoxing 312099, China
2
College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
3
College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
4
China Construction Third Engineering Shanghai Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China
5
Hangzhou Construction Quality and Safety Supervision Station, Hangzhou 310012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(11), 2708; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112708
Submission received: 10 April 2024 / Revised: 25 May 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 6 June 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, carbon-quantum-dot (CQD)-decorated TiO2 was prepared using an ultrasonic doping method and applied in the photocatalytic degradation of naphthalene under sunlight irradiation. The CQDs were synthesized from a typical macroalgae via diluted sulfuric acid pretreatment and hydrothermal synthesis using an optimal design, i.e., 3 wt% and 200 °C, respectively. The CQD/TiO2 composite remarkably enhanced the photocatalytic activity. The degradation of naphthalene under a visible light environment indicated that there is a synergistic mechanism between the CQDs and TiO2, in which the generation of reactive oxygen species is significantly triggered; in addition, the N that originated from the macroalgae accelerated the photocatalytic efficiency. Kinetic analysis showed that the photocatalytic behavior of the CQD/TiO2 composite followed a pseudo-first-order equation. Consequently, our combined experimental approach not only provides a facile pretreatment process for bio-CQDs synthesis, but also delivers a suitable TiO2 photocatalyst for the visible environment along with critical insights into the development of harmful macroalgae resources.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have teratogenic, carcinogenic, and mutagenic effects that likely threaten human health via biocommunication or the amplification of the food chain [1]. Among the diverse remediation technologies that can be applied to aquatic PAHs, TiO2 photocatalysis has garnered attention in recent years due its good photochemical stability, high catalytic efficiency, and strong capacity for oxidation [2,3]. However, due to its wide band gap and high photo-generated electron–hole pair recombination rate [4], unmodified TiO2 is often less active in the visible region and exhibits low carrier utilization; these factors greatly limit its widespread application.
Many research endeavors have been dedicated to developing modified TiO2 photocatalyst systems in order to maximize the utilization of visible light [5]; these carbon doping technologies have been found to help overcome some of the intrinsic shortcomings of TiO2, such as its low absorption and utilization of light, and to easily recombine photogenerated electrons and photogenerated holes [6]. Compared with other technologies utilized for the doping of carbon materials, CQDs are particularly attractive in this field due to their capacity for electron transfer, good photoluminescence, up-conversion fluorescence performance, and facile tunability [7,8]. However, the top-down method utilized for the preparation of CQDs still has certain limitations; for example, the carbon precursors are usually limited to materials with a large area of sp2 hybridization. In comparison, the bottom-up synthesis method employed for the preparation of CQDs has been widely used due to its simplicity and practicability [9,10]. It is worth noting that the development of simple, low-consumption, and gentle synthetic methods for the preparation of fluorescent CQDs and the use of readily available, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly natural resources as green carbon precursors has become an active research area. Biomass, especially renewable biomass materials, has been widely used as a precursor for the preparation of CQDs, showing good photoluminescence properties, low toxicity, and good biocompatibility [11,12]. However, its practical application is hindered by its low yield, low fluorescence intensity, and controllability, which are affected by its complex biological composition. Therefore, the preparation of CQDs from biomass, especially waste biomass, has become a research hotspot in recent years. With this in mind, a fast-growing macroalgae, i.e., Sargassum horneri (S.H.), whose burst is defined as golden tide, [13] was used as a CQD precursor.
On the other hand, the synergistic effect of CQD/TiO2 has been proven to effectively inhibit the recombination of electrons and holes and improve photocatalytic efficiency [14]. In CQD/TiO2 composites, CQDs are bonded to TiO2 by Ti-O-C bonding, and some electrons migrate to TiO2; this results in Ti3+ defects in the TiO2 matrix and a positive charge on the surface of the CQDs. Consequently, the presence of Ti3+ promotes the adsorption of O2− on the photocatalyst surface [15]. Simultaneously, the excited electrons within the composites transfer from the valence band (VB) of the CQDs to the conduction band (CB) of TiO2 [16]. Sequentially, the electrons of CB in TiO2 react with O2 to form·O2−, and the holes on the surface of the CQDs further oxidize H2O or OH− to form ·OH free radicals [17]; these two free radicals play an important role in the degradation of contaminants. As an important electron reservoir, CQDs can collect and store photogenerated electrons from the CB of TiO2, thereby hindering the recombination of electron–hole pairs and further promoting photocatalytic activity. Regarding TiO2, its light response generally ranges within the ultraviolet light region, and it is excited with difficulty by light sources larger than 420 nm because of the wide band gap. Meanwhile, CQDs can effectively up-convert visible light that has a wavelength greater than 420 nm into ultraviolet and near-ultraviolet light with a range of 350–550 nm [18,19]. Under light irradiation, the photogenerated electrons trapped on CQDs can further reduce the absorbed O2 to reactive ·O2−, the generation of which may depend on the separation efficiency of the photogenerated carriers and the number of photogenerated electrons captured by the CQDs. In particular, due to their graphite-like electronic structure and functional groups, CQDs can promote the adsorption of organic compounds by the complex, improve the area of contact with the target contaminants, and further carry out the photodegradation process. It is worth mentioning that the measurement of the transport band gap of the CQDs and TiO2 is also crucial, as the optical properties, the separation, and the migration of electrons in photocatalysts are the key factors that determine the photocatalytic activity [20,21,22].
The surface of biomass CQDs is rich in oxygen-containing functional groups [23,24,25]; they are therefore able to combine with semiconductors such as TiO2 to form potential photocatalysts. In recent years, algae and their derived carbon materials have been found to act as co-catalysts when coupled with TiO2 [26,27,28]. However, CQD/TiO2 photocatalysts prepared using biomass are also affected by their complex biological compositions. A suitable pretreatment method would destroy the cellulose of the natural plant structure and increase the specific surface area and porosity of the raw materials; therefore, the economic and facile pretreatment of biomass for sequential composite synthesis is still crucial and challenging. In order to improve the yield of carbon quantum dots, dilute acid can be used in the pretreatment of biomass, showing the ability to perform cellulose hydrolysis under relatively wild reaction conditions [29,30]. Therefore, the steps of our reaction are defined as follows: pretreatment with dilute acid, the hydrothermal preparation of CQDs, and the synthesis of CQD/TiO2 via ultrasonic dipping. Furthermore, the potential of CQD/TiO2 as a photocatalyst was investigated in the aquatic degradation of naphthalene under visible light. The aims of this study were to build a facile pretreatment process for bio-CQDs synthesis, to obtain a suitable method for the bio-CQD-decorated TiO2 catalyst suitable for a visible environment, and to find a potential industrial application for macroalgae.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Dilute Sulfuric Acid Pretreatment on CQDs

The pretreatment with dilute acid was performed to hydrolyze and destroy the natural plant structure of the cellulose and simultaneously increase the specific surface area and porosity of the S.H. [31] as well as the yield of CQDs. This method is more convenient compared with both the traditional method using concentrated acid, from the viewpoint of contamination, or the method using ultra-low-dilute acid, from the viewpoint of energy demand; this is due to the high temperature and pressure that this method requires. Based on the results, an optimized design was chosen, i.e., 3.0% H2SO4 and a hydrothermal condition of 200 °C; with this, there was an almost 10-fold increase in the CQD yield, rising from 2.3% to 18.9% (Figures S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Materials). Regarding the synthesis of the CQD/TiO2 nanocomposite, 0.40 g of TiO2 and 1–10 mL of the CQDs(L) (liquid form, abbreviated as L), in which 1 mL of CQDs(L) corresponded to 0.012 g of CQDs(S), were dispersed into 30 mL of deionized water and processed using ultrasonic irradiation for 30 min. The suspension was dried at 60 °C for 24 h to achieve a CQD/TiO2 composite.

2.2. Characterization of CQDs and CQD/TiO2

TEM analysis indicated that the CQDs presented an approximately spherical nano-morphological distribution with a nanometer size. The CQDs had a good in-plane lattice with a spacing less than 0.3 nm (Figure 1a), which is close to the (101) plane of graphite. The CQD/TiO2 had a good crystal plane spacing that was similar to that of TiO2, and the diameter of the CQDs had no obvious effect on the morphology of the TiO2. This indicates that there was a good binding structure between the CQDs and TiO2. Meanwhile, after embedding CQDs into TiO2, the lattice spacing of the CQD/TiO2 composite was determined to be more than 0.3 nm (Figure 1b).

2.3. UV–Vis Analysis of CQD/TiO2

In the ultraviolet wave band, the light absorption of CQD/TiO2 is less than that of TiO2, but in the visible light region, the light absorption of the CQD/TiO2 composite material is greatly enhanced compared with that of TiO2 (Figure 2). Because the CQDs exhibit a higher LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) energy level than the TiO2, the electrons excited by visible light can be easily transferred from the LUMO energy level to the CB of TiO2, and the absorption intensity of the CQDTiO2 is much higher than that of TiO2 in the visible region [32]. The threshold wavelengths (λg) of the absorption spectra of simple TiO2 are obviously lower than those of the CQD/TiO2 composite, which is due to the near-infrared absorption characteristics of the CQDs [33] (Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials). The light absorption red-shift and range broadening significantly indicated the promotion of the photocatalytic performance [34]. Further calculations also showed that the binding energy of the CQD/TiO2 (3.00 eV) was lower than that of TiO2 (3.20 eV), which means that more excited electrons transferred from the VB to the CB; this led to the promotion of the photo-absorption of the composite. That is to say, the red-shift performance of CQDs and their tight combination with TiO2 can effectively promote the red-shift of the absorption wavelength and effectively inhibit the recombination of electrons and holes. The band gap of CQDs/TiO2 is reduced relative to that of pure TiO2, and the interfacial interaction between CQDs and TiO2 leads to the redistribution or rearrangement of electron energy levels [35]. Especially, the biomass origin of CQDs results in a significant number of surface traps for electrons or holes, influencing the band structure of the composites. Therefore, surface modifications may further be considered to adjust the band gap width.

2.4. FTIR Analysis of CQD/TiO2

The FTIR spectra of different materials are illustrated in Figure 3. In the FTIR spectra, the broad and strong absorption band peak at 3370 cm−1 is assigned to the -OH stretching vibration, and the absorption peaks at 2900 cm−1 and 1700 cm−1 are the stretching vibration peaks of C-H and C=O, respectively. The conjugate characteristic absorption peak produced by C=C appears near 1400 cm−1, and the absorption peak at 650–900 cm−1 may be the benzene ring hydrogen absorption peaks of in-plane, out-of-plane, and benzene ring skeleton-bending vibration. The FTIR analysis indicates that carbonaceous groups were introduced on the surface of the TiO2, thus confirming the formation of the CQD/TiO2 composite. Meanwhile, the combination of CQDs enhances the absorption intensity of the Ti-O bond at 1100 cm−1, and this peak is the characteristic absorption peak of the Ti-O bond. In addition, the CQD/TiO2 shows a strong capacity for absorption when the wave number is lower than 1000 cm−1, which may be related to the increased distance between atoms or lattices and the characteristic absorption peaks of Ti-O-C.

2.5. XPS Analysis of CQD/TiO2

To explore the surface chemical composition and related valence state of the CQD/TiO2, the XPS full spectrum is given in Figure 4. Figure 4a shows that the composite contains the elements Ti, O, C, S, and N. The Ti 2p spectrum exhibited two peaks at 454.72 eV and 460.53 eV, which corresponded to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2, respectively; these are assigned to Ti4+ 2p peaks [36,37]. The binding energy of Ti 2p is shifted from the standard value of TiO2, indicating that there is a new binding structure in the CQD/TiO2 composite. The binding energy of Ti 2p3/2 is lower than the standard value of 458.20 eV, indicating that the existence of CQDs makes the electron-binding energy smaller and increases the electron density of the TiO2. Figure 4c shows the C 1s spectrum. The peaks of the C 1s spectrum at 284.32 eV, 285.76 eV, and 288.21 eV are attributed to the C-C/C=C, C-O, and C=O bonds, respectively. Figure 4d shows that the absorption peaks of 529.35 eV, 530.72 eV, and 532.40 eV in the O 1s spectrum are the characteristic peaks of the Ti-O/·O2, C=O, and C-O groups, indicating the composition of the surface of the CQD/TiO2 composite material. The peak at 529.35 eV was attributed to the oxygen in the crystal lattice (Ti-O/O2), and the other two peaks at 530.72 eV and 532.40 eV were attributed to the C=O and C-O groups, indicating that a hybrid might have been formed in the CQD/TiO2 by a Ti-O-C bond. Figure 4e,f show the spectral lines of N 1s and S 2p. The absorption peaks of the N 1s spectrum at 396.50 eV and 398.00 eV are Ti-N and Ti-N-O bonds, respectively. The binding energies of S 2p 3/2 and S 2p1/2 are located at 165.3 eV and 166.8 eV, respectively, mainly due to the S-C-S bond. N and S originated from the biomass, and the latter also was enhanced by the inclusion of the dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment. The doping of N and S also promoted the performance, thus indicating the advantages of biomass self-assembly [38]. In summary, the XPS analysis confirmed the presence of CQDs and their TiO2 counterparts in the structure of the composites.

2.6. Photocatalytic Performance of CQD/TiO2 on Naphthalene Removal

In order to certify the photocatalytic intensification of CQDs and the dilute acid treatment, the degradation of naphthalene was performed using different materials, as shown in Figure 5. The initial environment parameters were as follows: the naphthalene concentration was 40 mg·L−1 and the volume was 500 mL; the CQD/TiO2 was synthesized using a mixture with a ratio of 10 mL of CQDs to 0.40 g of TiO2; and 0.03 g of solid material was used. It can be seen that the photocatalytic effect of CQD/TiO2 is the best among all the materials, indicating that the doping of CQDs is beneficial to the photocatalytic performance. The sulfuric acid pretreatment helps the CQDs to promote adsorption, thus leading to their tight combination with TiO2 and promoting the photocatalytic performance of CQD/TiO2.
It is worth mentioning that adsorption continued to play an important role regardless of whether the dark or light condition was used; this is because the CQDs continued to mix with biomass carbon. In particular, with the increase in the carbon content, the adsorption of biomass carbon becomes crucial to the composite; meanwhile, the increase in the proportion of TiO2 used makes the photocatalytic effect more obvious [31]. It could be found that the ratio of CQDs in the CQD/TiO2 composite leads to variations in the removal efficiency, and an overdose of CQDs in TiO2 may cause particle aggregation and pore blocking and thus reduce the photocatalytic efficiency (Figure 6a). When the loading amount of CQDs (L) is below 1 mL, the photocatalytic efficiency of CQDs/TiO2 in naphthalene solution increases with the decrease in CQDs. This could be due to CQDs obstructing some TiO2-indicated holes. As CQDs decrease, fewer holes are blocked, allowing TiO2 to dominate the solution’s photocatalytic efficiency. As the CQD content in the composites increased, the photocatalytic efficiency of the naphthalene solution initially rose, reaching 86.63% at a loading of 10 mL, before slightly declining with further CQD addition. The synergistic effect of CQDs and TiO2 on electron–hole pairs likely optimizes the photocatalytic efficiency of the composites for naphthalene solution. Further increasing CQD loading may lead to agglomeration and adherence to the titanium dioxide’s surface, impeding titanium dioxide’s light utilization and consequently diminishing the photocatalytic efficiency of the CQDs/TiO2 in naphthalene solution. This overdose effect was most obvious with the composite mass; the photocatalytic efficiency of the naphthalene solution was the best with the mass of CQD/TiO2 achieving 0.03 g (Figure 6b). Obviously, suitable content of the constituent components can always optimize the photocatalytic performance. As a matter of fact, three internal approaches, i.e., quantitative effect, compositional engineering, and size quantization, have been simultaneously yet unintentionally exerted in bio-CQDs doping TiO2 [39,40]. Regarding the pH effect, the composite catalyst had a good catalytic effect on naphthalene around pH = 6 (Figure 6c), which was greatly affected by TiO2; this increased the acid–basic balance to pHzpc ~6.39 [41,42]. When the pH value of the reaction system is less than pHzpc, the increase in H+ in the solution will cause Ti-OH2+ generation; this is suitable for attracting photogenerated electrons and thereby effectively reducing the recombination rate of photogenerated electrons and holes. The best dose of CQD/TiO2 could be a result of the balance between two aspects, i.e., the active sites involved in the reaction and the capacity of the receiving photons.

3. Discussion

3.1. Photocatalytic Mechanism Analysis of CQD/TiO2 on Naphthalene Removal

In this work, the results of FTIR, ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy showed that there were abundant functional groups on the surface of the CQD/TiO2 and that the absorption peaks at wavenumbers lower than 1000 cm−1 were the characteristic absorption peaks of Ti-O-C. The band gap of CQD/TiO2 was reduced compared with that of TiO2, and the absorption band shifted to visible light; meanwhile, the interfacial interaction between the CQDs and TiO2 may lead to the redistribution or rearrangement of electron energy levels [35]. Furthermore, the XPS results also indicated the variation in the surface elements of the composites, and the results showed that the electron density of the outer layer of Ti increased and the electron-binding energy decreased. In addition, the Ti 2p line showed that CQDs and TiO2 were bonded through Ti-O-C bonds. The mechanism is illustrated in Figure 7. The binding energy of TiO2 was given according to our determination, whereas the binding energy of the CQDs/TiO2 was found to be 3.0 eV. Herein, we refer to the binding energy of CQDs as being less than 3.0 eV, which aligns with the bio-CQD results published in [43]. The redox potentials of H2O/·OH and OH−/·OH are +2.28 V, +2.9 V, respectively, and the potential of O2/O2− is −0.33 V [44,45,46]. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that reactive species and their exact potentials may be affected by the local environment. The photo-induced electron transfer and redox properties of CQDs improve the separation time of electron–hole pairs of TiO2, preventing the recombination of electron holes. This provides more time for the contaminants to diffuse to the reactive site, which accelerates the photocatalytic efficiency. CQDs can be used as an electron reservoir during photocatalysis, and the excited electrons of CQD/TiO2 can be transferred from the valence band (VB) of the CQDs to the conduction band (CB) of the TiO2, thereby hindering the recombination of electron–hole pairs and further promoting the photocatalytic activity. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be triggered by low-power visible light irradiation [47]; i.e., the electrons of CB in TiO2 react with O2 to form ·O2−. The photogenerated electrons trapped on CQDs can further capture the absorbed O2 to reactive ·O2−, and the holes on the surface of CQDs oxidize H2O to form ·OH [48,49]. This provides more time for the contaminants to diffuse to the reactive site, which accelerates the photocatalytic efficiency. In addition, the N originating from the biomass makes TiO2 exhibit p-type conductive properties [50,51], which makes it easier for electrons to transfer to CQDs and improves the photocatalytic efficiency. In particular, the biomass origin of CQDs introduces a significant number of surface traps for electrons or holes, affecting the band structure of the composites. Consequently, further consideration of surface modifications may be necessary to fine-tune the band gap width.
Regarding the degradation of naphthalene, the existence of ·O2− and ·OH enable the breaking or cleaving of the ions trapped on the CQDs; this leads to the further capture of absorbed O2 and reactive ·O2− on the halobenzene ring structure. There are two types of hydrogen on the naphthalene structure, namely, α-H and β-H (Figure 8). Compared with β-H, α-H has a higher electron density and activity, which means that this site is more easily connected with free radicals. The surface of naphthalene molecules is positively charged, and the electrostatic attraction between atoms can promote the negatively charged ·OH attacks on H at the α position, causing the C at the α position to form hydroxyl derivatives and generate naphthol (products B and C). ·O2− further oxidizes naphthol to form C=O double bonds, forming naphthoquinone (product D). Naphthoquinone is further attacked by ·OH, leading to the cleavage of C–C bonds to form aldehyde compound E. Due to free radical attack at C1 and C4, the resulting aldehyde group is easily oxidized to a carboxyl group, leading to the formation of the product F. These intermediates are further oxidized into smaller molecules and are eventually fully mineralized.

3.2. Kinetic Model Analysis of Naphthalene Removal by CQD/TiO2

The pseudo-first-order kinetic model, the second-order kinetic model, and the double exponential kinetic model were used to fit the photocatalysis of CQD/TiO2. The relevant parameters of the kinetic model are shown in Table 1, and the fitting plots can be found in Figure S4 (Supplementary Materials). The results indicate that the pseudo-first-order rate equation provides the best interpretation of the photocatalysis of naphthalene when the CQD/TiO2 is used. Meanwhile, the double exponential model provides the best fit for the CQDs, indicating that both physical and chemical processes are involved in the degradation of naphthalene using CQDs and that a change was experienced after combination with TiO2. Thus, naphthalene can diffuse thoroughly toward the reaction active site, which accelerates the photocatalytic reaction.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

S.H. was collected from Wenzhou coastal area and washed with deionized water to remove salts and impurities on the surface before being dried in an electric blast oven for 24 h. The dried S.H. was then ground and sieved through an 80-mesh sieve. Reagents were acquired from commercial suppliers and used without any further processing or purification. Titanium dioxide (P25, Degussa, 99.5%) was procured from Sinopharm Chemical reagent Co., Ltd., and chromatographic pure naphthalene was purchased from Aladdin Reagent Company. Analytically pure acetic acid, sulfuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and dichloromethane were purchased from Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

4.2. Preparation of CQDs and CQD/TiO2

Sulfuric acid at concentrations of 1.5 wt%, 3.0 wt%, and 4.0 wt% was used for dipping with S.H. Dilute sulfuric acid was dissolved using 50 mL of de-ionized water in a 100 mL beaker, and the solution was transferred to a 100 mL stainless steel reactor; it was then placed in a drying oven at a predetermined temperature for 3 h. The 3.0 wt% concentration demonstrated a higher yield of CQDs and was thus selected for subsequent processes (Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials). The diluted acid pretreatment was implemented because it effectively decomposes hemicellulose and lignin from biomass, facilitating the synthesis of carbonaceous materials [52]. After the reaction, the CQD solution was cooled to room temperature. Then, centrifugation was performed 3 times at a speed of 10,000 rpm·min−1 to remove the large particles; this was followed by neutralization and separation using a 0.22 μm polyethersulfone membrane. Sequentially, the carbon quantum dot (CQD) solution was obtained and designated as CQDs(L) (L means liquid). The CQD solution was freeze-dried to obtain a solid powder of CQD; this was as designated as CQDs(S) (S means solid).

4.3. Characterization of CQDs and CQD/TiO2

The morphology, size, and crystal lattice of the materials were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy with a field emission gun (TEM, Tecnai G2 F30, FEI Company Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). In detail, the parameters were as follows: the excitation voltage was 300 kV, the line resolution was 0.1 nm, the point resolution was 0.2 nm, and the information resolution was 0.14 nm. A Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nicolet IS50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 to characterize the surface function groups of the composites. UV–Vis absorption measurements were carried out via UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectrophotometry (DRS) (CARY 300, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA), with scanning in the range of 200–800 nm. The obtained data were processed according to the Tauc plot method. The surface chemical composition and chemical status of the CQD/TiO2 were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos Axis-Ultra, Kratos, Manchester, UK). In this paper, Al/Mg was used as the radiation source. The test conditions were as follows: the excitation source was Al Kɑ (1487 eV), the target voltage was 15 kV, the current was 3 mA, the vacuum degree was 10−7 Pa, and the binding energy was corrected with C1s and a reference of 284.6 eV.

4.4. Photocatalytic Activity Measurements

The photocatalytic activity of the CQD/TiO2 composites was evaluated using naphthalene. The photodegradation experiments were performed by using a photochemical reactor (PhChem-III, Newbit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) equipped with a xenon arc lamp (500W, XE-JY500, Ushio, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to simulate sunlight irradiation (Figure S6 in the Supplementary Materials). The luminous power can be controlled by adjusting the resistance of the power supply. In this experiment, the luminous power was controlled at 300 watts. The catalysts were added to 10 mL of naphthalene solution (40 mg L−1) and stirred for 60 min under dark conditions to ensure that adsorption–desorption equilibrium was reached before photocatalysis was performed. During the photocatalysis process, the concentrations of naphthalene were determined using gas chromatography (GC-112A, Yidian Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and the relative removal rate (R) of naphthalene was calculated based on triplicate experiments in an air-conditioned room to prevent heat effects. The detection conditions were as follows: the column used was the Agilent DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm); the detector used was a hydrogen flame ionization detector; the detector temperature was 280 °C; the inlet temperature was 250 °C; the column temperature was programmed to be maintained at 60 °C for 1 min, 4 °C·min−1 to 130 °C for 5 min, and then 20 °C·min−1 to 280 °C; the carrier gas used was high-purity nitrogen, with a flow rate of 2.5 mL·min−1; the hydrogen flow rate was 40 mL·min−1; and the air flow rate was 400 mL·min−1. The gas chromatography results were presented using the internal standard–standard curve method. The determination of naphthalene and its degradation products was based on gas chromatography–mass spectrometry [53] (GC-MS, Agilent 7000D, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) by employing the DB-624 capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm, 1.8 μm) with helium as the carrier gas and a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. Under these conditions, comprehensive qualitative analysis was conducted using an electron ionization source, and quantitative analysis was performed via ion external standard method. The injector temperature was set at 150 °C utilizing split injection with a split ratio of 5:1. The programmed temperature conditions were set as follows: an initial temperature of 40 °C held for 1 min, then increased to 190 °C at a rate of 8 °C/min, further increased to 200 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, and held for 7 min. Afterwards, the total ion chromatogram (TIC) was generated and identified.

5. Conclusions

CQDs were prepared using a N,S-containing marine biomass and a facile hydrothermal method, and CQD/TiO2 composites were synthesized using an ultrasonic method. This work indicates that macroalgae can act as a good precursor for CQDs, whose adsorption and combination performance can be enhanced by dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment; this further enhances the synthesis of CQD/TiO2 and its photocatalytic capacity. The nanostructure of CQDs means that they compound well with TiO2, and thus the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 can be significantly promoted under this synergistic effect. Generally speaking, the red-shift performance of CQDs and their tight combination with TiO2 can be demonstrated by the red-shift of the threshold wavelength, a decrease in the binding energy, and the further promotion of electron transfer, which enable a better degradation capacity to be achieved under visible light. During the degradation process, CQDs can be used as electron reserves in photocatalysis, thereby promoting the separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs and further free radicals. They also possess the advantages engendered by biocarbon adsorption due to the intermolecular accumulation of π-π. Therefore, under simulated light irradiation, CQD/TiO2 exhibits an excellent photocatalytic performance, and the removal of naphthalene is significantly higher than that of simple TiO2. The photocatalytic efficiency of the composite material seems sensitive to pH, especially during direct recycle tests; however, weak acid treatments can maintain its stability (Figure S7 in the Supplementary Materials). The observed differences can be attributed to the CQDs’ solubility and their physical loss during the washing process. Additionally, alternations in the crystal change can also lead to a reduction in the crystal structure integrity, which indicates that a more meticulous acid modification should be involved in future work.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29112708/s1. Figure S1, Fluorescence spectra of S.H. CQDs with different hydrothermal temperature. Figure S2, Fluorescence spectra of S.H. CQDs with H2SO4 pretreatment after 200 °C hydrothermal treatment. Figure S3, CQDs (a) UV–Vis spectrum and (b) fluorescence response spectrum. Figure S4, Kinetic model fitting curves. Figure S5, (a) Sargassum Horneri; (b) Sargassum Horneri powder; (c) CQDs under natural light irradiation; (d) CQDs under ultraviolet light irradiation. Figure S6, The photocatalytic reactor apparatus. Figure S7, Effect of cycle times on photocatalysis of naphthalene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z. and M.D.; methodology, Y.C. and C.H.; validation, Q.X.; H.Z., and C.W.; formal analysis, H.L.; data curation, S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C. and C.H.; writing—review and editing, G.Z. and M.D.; supervision, G.Z.; project administration, M.D.; funding acquisition, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province (LY20B060008).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank for the supporting by the China Construction Third Engineering Shanghai Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yunteng Chen was employed by the company Shaoxing Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd. Authors Qiang Xu, Chao Wang, Hongshun Lu and Shuai Zhang were employed by the company China Construction Third Engineering Shanghai Co., Ltd., The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vijayanand, M.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Subramanian, R.; Issac, P.K.; Nasr, M.; Khoo, K.; Rajagopal, R.; Greff, B.; Wan, A.N.; Jeon, B.H.; et al. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the water environment: A review on toxicity, microbial biodegradation, systematic biological advancements, and environmental fate. Environ. Res. 2023, 227, 115716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zeng, G.; You, H.; Du, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Xu, C.; Liu, B.; Chen, B.; Pan, X. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by immobilization on activated carbon for degradation of aquatic naphthalene under sunlight irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Monteiro, F.C.; Guimaraes, I.D.L.; Rodrigues, P.D.A. Degradation of pahs using TiO2 as a semiconductor in the heterogeneous photocatalysis process: A systematic review. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2023, 437, 114497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Dawood, M.A.; Menanteau-Ledouble, S.; El-Matbouli, M. Environmental transformation of n-TiO2 in the aquatic systems and their ecotoxicity in bivalve mollusks: A systematic review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 200, 110776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lettieri, S.; Pavone, M.; Fioravanti, A.; Santamaria Amato, L.; Maddalena, P. Charge carrier processes and optical properties in TiO2 and TiO2-based heterojunction photocatalysts: A review. Materials 2021, 14, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, F.; Liu, G.; Liu, F.; Wu, J.; Yang, S. Synergetic effect of cqd and oxygen vacancy to TiO2 photocatalyst for boosting visible photocatalytic no removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yu, X.; Liu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zuo, S.; Li, B. Preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of carbon quantum dots/TiO2 nanosheet composites. Carbon 2014, 68, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. García de Arquer, F.P.; Talapin, D.V.; Klimov, V.I.; Arakawa, Y.; Bayer, M.; Sargent, E.H. Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future challenges. Science 2021, 373, eaaz8541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Zeng, H. Carbon quantum dots/ biponanocomposites with enhanced visible-light absorption and charge separation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 336, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pourreza, N.; Ghomi, M. Green synthesized carbon quantum dots from Prosopis juliflora leaves as a dual off-on fluorescence probe for sensing mercury (II) and chemet drug. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Das, G.S.; Shim, J.P.; Bhatnagar, A.; Tripathi, K.M.; Kim, T.Y. Biomass-derived carbon quantum dots for visible-light-induced photocatalysis and label-free detection of Fe(III) and ascorbic acid. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smetacek, V.; Adriana, Z. Green and golden seaweed tides on the rise. Nature 2013, 504, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, L.Y.; Han, Y.L.; Yang, J.J.; Deng, S.L.; Wang, B.Y. Construction and photocatalysis of carbon quantum dots/layered mesoporous titanium dioxide (cqds/lm-TiO2) composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 546, 149089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Piątkowska, A.; Janus, M.; Szymański, K.; Mozia, S. C-, N-and S-doped TiO2 photocatalysts: A review. Catalysts 2021, 11, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sajan, C.P.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Yu, J.; Cao, S. TiO2 nanosheets with exposed {001} facets for photocatalytic applications. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mei, A.; Xu, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Fan, J.; Shi, Q. Photocatalytic materials modified with carbon quantum dots for the degradation of organic pollutants under visible light: A review. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 114160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lim, S.Y.; Shen, W.; Gao, Z. Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 362–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yin, K.; Yan, Z.; Fang, N.; Yu, W.; Chu, Y.; Shu, S.; Xu, M. The synergistic effect of surface vacancies and heterojunctions for efficient photocatalysis: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 325, 124636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, M.E.; Mohammad, A.; Yoon, T. State-of-the-art developments in carbon quantum dots (CQDs): Photo-catalysis, bio-imaging, and bio-sensing applications. Chemosphere 2022, 302, 134815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marković, Z.M.; Labudová, M.; Danko, M.; Matijasević, D.; Mičušík, M.; Nádaždy, V.; Kováčová, M.; Kleinová, A.; Špitalský, Z.; Pavlović, V.; et al. Highly efficient antioxidant F- and Cl-doped carbon quantum dots for bioimaging. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 16327–16338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, F.J.; Hou, X.; Wang, K.F.; Jin, T.Z.; Feng, H. Facile synthesis of phosphorus and nitrogen co-doped carbon dots with excellent fluorescence emission towards cellular imaging. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 21088–21095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tajik, S.; Dourandish, Z.; Zhang, K.; Beitollahi, H.; Le, Q.V.; Jang, H.W.; Shokouhimehr, M. Carbon and graphene quantum dots: A review on syntheses, characterization, biological and sensing applications for neurotransmitter determination. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 15406–15429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Deb, A.; Chowdhury, D. Biogenic carbon quantum dots: Synthesis and applications. Curr. Med. Chem. 2024, 30, 37291790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. He, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, K.; Lan, M. Recent advances of solvent-engineered carbon dots: A review. Carbon 2023, 204, 76–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wareing, T.C.; Gentile, P.; Phan, A.N. Biomass-based carbon dots: Current development and future perspectives. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 15471–15501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pinna, M.; Binda, G.; Altomare, M.; Marelli, M.; Dossi, C.; Monticelli, D.; Spanu, D.; Recchia, S. Biochar nanoparticles over TiO2 nanotube arrays: A green co-catalyst to boost the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nu, T.T.V.; Tran, N.H.T.; Truong, P.L.; Phan, B.T.; Dinh, M.T.N.; Dinh, V.P.; Phan, T.S.; Go, S.; Chang, M.; Trinh, K.T.L.; et al. Green synthesis of microalgae-based carbon dots for decoration of TiO2 nanoparticles in enhancement of organic dye photodegradation. Environ. Res. 2022, 206, 112631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Guo, J.; Guo, X.; Yang, H.; Zhang, D.; Jiang, X. Construction of Bio-TiO2/Algae Complex and Synergetic Mechanism of the Acceleration of Phenol Biodegradation. Materials 2023, 16, 3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lai, C.; Yang, B.; He, J.; Huang, C.; Li, X.; Song, X.; Yong, Q. Enhanced enzymatic digestibility of mixed wood sawdust by lignin modification with naphthol derivatives during dilute acid pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ghatak, H.R. Biorefineries from the perspective of sustainability: Feedstocks, products, and processes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 4042–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zeng, G.; Hong, C.; Ma, Y.; Du, M.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H.; Chen, B.; Pan, X. Sargassum Horneri based carbon doped TiO2 and its aquatic naphthalene photo-degradation under sunlight irradiation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2022, 97, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bian, J.; Huang, C.; Wang, L.; Hung, T.F.; Daoud, W.A.; Zhang, R. Carbon dot loading and TiO2 nanorod length dependence of photoelectrochemical properties in carbon dot/TiO2 nanorod array nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 4883–4890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gao, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Cui, J.; Lu, Y.; Rong, X.; Gao, C. A review on mechanism, applications and influencing factors of carbon quantum dots based photocatalysis. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 35986–35999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Natarajan, S.; Bajaj, H.; Tayade, R. Recent advances based on the synergetic effect of adsorption for removal of dyes from waste water using photocatalytic process. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 30, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tsao, C.W.; Narra, S.; Kao, J.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Chin, Y.C.; Huang, Z.J.; Huang, W.H.; Huang, C.C.; Luo, C.W.; et al. Dual-plasmonic Au@ Cu7S4 yolk@ shell nanocrystals for photocatalytic hydrogen production across visible to near infrared spectral region. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, J.; Shu, J.; Anqi, Z.; Juyuan, H.; Yan, Z.; Chen, J. Synthesis of carbon quantum dots/TiO2 nanocomposite for photo-degradation of Rhodamine B and cefradine. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2016, 70, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, C.; Peng, L.; Lv, L.; Cao, Y.; Tu, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, K. In situ growth of carbon dots on TiO2 nanotube arrays for PEC enzyme biosensors with visible light response. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 15084–15091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Dong, S.; Zhou, X.; Dong, S. N-doped carbon quantum dots/tio2 hybrid composites with enhanced visible light driven photocatalytic activity toward dye wastewater degradation and mechanism insight. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2016, 325, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsao, C.W.; Fang, M.J.; Hsu, Y.J. Modulation of interfacial charge dynamics of semiconductor heterostructures for advanced photocatalytic applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 438, 213876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pirsaheb, M.; Asadi, A.; Sillanpää, M.; Farhadian, N. Application of carbon quantum dots to increase the activity of conventional photocatalysts: A systematic review. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 271, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peñas-Garzón, M.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Bedia, J.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Belver, C. Effect of activating agent on the properties of TiO2/activated carbon heterostructures for solar photocatalytic degradation of acetaminophen. Materials 2019, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Baruah, M.; Supong, A.; Bhomick, P.C.; Karmaker, R.; Pongener, C.; Sinha, D. Batch sorption-photodegradation of Alizarin Red S using synthesized TiO2/activated carbon nanocomposite: An experimental study and computer modelling. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2020, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. John, V.L.; Nair, Y.; Vinod, T.P. Doping and surface modification of carbon quantum dots for enhanced functionalities and related applications. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2021, 38, 2100170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chiu, Y.H.; Chang, T.F.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Sone, M.; Hsu, Y.J. Mechanistic insights into photodegradation of organic dyes using heterostructure photocatalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, B.; Dai, W.; Si, Y.; Yang, L.; Luo, S. Hierarchical Ag3PO4@ ZnIn2S4 nanoscoparium: An innovative Z-scheme photocatalyst for highly efficient and predictable tetracycline degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 586, 708–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yan, Z.; Yin, K.; Xu, M.; Fang, N.; Yu, W.; Chu, Y.; Shu, S. Photocatalysis for synergistic water remediation and H2 production: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 145066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Marković, Z.M.; Kováčová, M.; Jeremić, S.R.; Nagy, Š.; Milivojević, D.D.; Kubat, P.; Kleinová, A.; Budimir, M.D.; Mojsin, M.M.; Stevanović, M.J.; et al. Highly efficient antibacterial polymer composites based on hydrophobic riboflavin carbon polymerized dots. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, J.; Zhu, W.; Yu, S.; Yan, X. Three dimensional carbogenic dots/TiO2 nanoheterojunctions with enhanced visible light-driven photocatalytic activity. Carbon 2014, 79, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hu, C.; Mu, Y.; Li, M.; Qiu, J. Recent advances in the synthesis and applications of carbon dots. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 572–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sun, X.; Li, H.J.; Ou, N.; Lyu, B.; Gui, B.; Tian, S.; Qian, D.; Wang, X.; Yang, J. Visible-light driven TiO2 photocatalyst coated with graphene quantum dots of tunable nitrogen doping. Molecules 2019, 24, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chang, L.; Ahmad, N.; Zeng, G.; Ray, A.; Zhang, Y. N, S co-doped carbon quantum dots/TiO2 composite for visible-light-driven photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alvira, P.; Tomás-Pejó, E.; Ballesteros, M.; Negro, M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4851–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fabbri, D.; Adamiano, A.; Torri, C. Gc-ms determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons evolved from pyrolysis of biomass. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 29 02708 g001
Figure 1. TEM image of (a) CQDs and (b) CQD/TiO2.
Figure 1. TEM image of (a) CQDs and (b) CQD/TiO2.
Molecules 29 02708 g001
Molecules 29 02708 g002
Figure 2. UV–Vis DRS results of CQD/TiO2 composite and TiO2.
Figure 2. UV–Vis DRS results of CQD/TiO2 composite and TiO2.
Molecules 29 02708 g002
Molecules 29 02708 g003
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of different materials: (a) CQDs (b) TiO2 (c) CQD/TiO2.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of different materials: (a) CQDs (b) TiO2 (c) CQD/TiO2.
Molecules 29 02708 g003
Molecules 29 02708 g004
Figure 4. XPS spectra of CQD/TiO2 composite materials: (a) full spectrum; (b) Ti 2p spectrum; (c) C 1s spectrum; (d) O 1s spectrum; (e) N 1s spectrum; (f) S 2p spectrum; (g) Ti 2p spectrum of TiO2; (h) O 1s spectrum of TiO2.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of CQD/TiO2 composite materials: (a) full spectrum; (b) Ti 2p spectrum; (c) C 1s spectrum; (d) O 1s spectrum; (e) N 1s spectrum; (f) S 2p spectrum; (g) Ti 2p spectrum of TiO2; (h) O 1s spectrum of TiO2.
Molecules 29 02708 g004
Molecules 29 02708 g005
Figure 5. Effect of different materials on photocatalytic reaction of naphthalene. (N.P. means without pretreatment using dilute sulfuric acid).
Figure 5. Effect of different materials on photocatalytic reaction of naphthalene. (N.P. means without pretreatment using dilute sulfuric acid).
Molecules 29 02708 g005
Molecules 29 02708 g006
Figure 6. Effect of photocatalytic degradation of CQD/TiO2 on naphthalene. (a) CQDs; (b) mass of CQDS/TiO2; (c) pH.
Figure 6. Effect of photocatalytic degradation of CQD/TiO2 on naphthalene. (a) CQDs; (b) mass of CQDS/TiO2; (c) pH.
Molecules 29 02708 g006
Molecules 29 02708 g007
Figure 7. Synergy mechanism of CQD/TiO2.
Figure 7. Synergy mechanism of CQD/TiO2.
Molecules 29 02708 g007
Molecules 29 02708 g008
Figure 8. Degradation of naphthalene with CQD/TiO2: (a) the chemical structure of naphthalene; (b) electrostatic potential (ESP) distribution of naphthalene; (c) degradation pathway map of naphthalene, in which products A to F are Naphthalene, Hydroxyl derivatives, naphthol, naphthoquinone, aldehyde compound, Carboxyl compounds, respectively.
Figure 8. Degradation of naphthalene with CQD/TiO2: (a) the chemical structure of naphthalene; (b) electrostatic potential (ESP) distribution of naphthalene; (c) degradation pathway map of naphthalene, in which products A to F are Naphthalene, Hydroxyl derivatives, naphthol, naphthoquinone, aldehyde compound, Carboxyl compounds, respectively.
Molecules 29 02708 g008
Table 1. Kinetics parameters for the removal of naphthalene.
Table 1. Kinetics parameters for the removal of naphthalene.
Kinetic ModelParametersSamples
CQD/TiO2CQD/TiO2
(dark)		CQDs
Pseudo-first-orderk1 × 102/(min−1)0.6030.0080.104
R20.89680.86080.4932
Pseudo-second-orderk2 × 104/(L·mg−1·min−1)5.6420.4470.552
R20.77640.84800.5179
Double exponentialA1−41.89−29.56−28.14
A2−41.89−29.56−28.14
k30.05880.02140.1529
k40.05880.02140.1529
R2−0.44770.25310.9150
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Hong, C.; Xu, Q.; Zheng, H.; Wang, C.; Lu, H.; Zhang, S.; Du, M.; Zeng, G. Visible Light Enhancement of Biocarbon Quantum-Dot-Decorated TiO2 for Naphthalene Removal. Molecules 2024, 29, 2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112708

AMA Style

Chen Y, Hong C, Xu Q, Zheng H, Wang C, Lu H, Zhang S, Du M, Zeng G. Visible Light Enhancement of Biocarbon Quantum-Dot-Decorated TiO2 for Naphthalene Removal. Molecules. 2024; 29(11):2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yunteng, Chunxian Hong, Qiang Xu, Haihong Zheng, Chao Wang, Hongshun Lu, Shuai Zhang, Mingming Du, and Ganning Zeng. 2024. "Visible Light Enhancement of Biocarbon Quantum-Dot-Decorated TiO2 for Naphthalene Removal" Molecules 29, no. 11: 2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112708

APA Style

Chen, Y., Hong, C., Xu, Q., Zheng, H., Wang, C., Lu, H., Zhang, S., Du, M., & Zeng, G. (2024). Visible Light Enhancement of Biocarbon Quantum-Dot-Decorated TiO2 for Naphthalene Removal. Molecules, 29(11), 2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112708

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop