Next Article in Journal
Sulphur vs NH Group: Effects on the CO2 Electroreduction Capability of Phenylenediamine-Cp Cobalt Complexes
Next Article in Special Issue
Phytochemical Analysis and Profiling of Antioxidants and Anticancer Compounds from Tephrosia purpurea (L.) subsp. apollinea Family Fabaceae
Previous Article in Journal
Engineered Graphene Quantum Dots as a Magnetic Resonance Signal Amplifier for Biomedical Imaging
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules28052365
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of the Plant Stabilisation Method on the Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Elderflower (Sambucus nigra L.) Extract

by
Małgorzata Tabaszewska
1,* and
Elżbieta Sikora
2
1
Department of Plant Product Technology and Nutrition Hygiene, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(5), 2365; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052365
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 4 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Bioactive Compounds from Edible and Inedible Parts of Plants)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Elderflower extracts are known to be a source of valuable substances that show a wide spectrum of biological activity, including antibacterial and antiviral properties, which demonstrate a degree of effectiveness against SARS CoV-2. In this work, the influence of fresh inflorescence stabilisation methods (freezing, air drying, and lyophilisation) and extraction parameters on the composition and antioxidant properties of the extracts were studied. Wild elderflower plants growing in the Małopolska Region of Poland were studied. Antioxidant activities were evaluated by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical-scavenging ability and ferric-reducing antioxidant power assays. The total phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method and the phytochemical profile of the extracts was analysed using HPLC. The obtained results showed that the best method for the stabilisation of elderflower was lyophilisation, and the determined optimal maceration parameters were 60% methanol as a solvent and a process time of 1–2 days.

1. Introduction

In recent years, there has been a growing demand on the market for natural, plant based raw materials that are environmentally friendly and safe for humans. These raw materials can be used in food, supplements, and cosmetics [1]. Plants are a source of natural components, such as glycosides, alkaloids, and essential oils, which demonstrate various influence on physiological processes in human and animal organisms [2].
Among others, black elder (Sambucus nigra L.), also known as elderberry, has attracted attention due to its easy cultivation and high content of bioactive compounds. The plant belongs to the honeysuckle family (Caprifoliaceae). The Sambucus genus includes over 20 species of bushes and small trees that can be found in wet areas exposed to the sun in the majority of countries in Europe, Asia, Northern Africa, and North America [3,4]. Black elder can grow up to ten metres tall. It has an alternating arrangement of imparipinnate elliptical leaves that are 3–9 cm long. The bark is grey or brown-grey and the branches are grey or green-grey with a white core. The cream-coloured flowers, which are ca. 5 mm in diameter, have five stamens, and form a flat, umbel inflorescence with a diameter of 10–20 cm. The plant produces fleshy, dark purple or black berries with three to six seeds [2,5].
In the case of Sambucus nigra L., all parts of the plant (flowers, bark, leaves, and fruits) are rich sources of phytochemicals, although the elderflowers contain more bioactive compounds than the other parts of the plant [6]. Among other substances, there are flavonoids (mainly kaempferol, quercetin, isoquercetin, rutin, astragalin, and hyperoside), multiple phenolic acids (including caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and chlorogenic acids) [7], organic acids, tannins, vitamins (B, C), and mineral salts. Moreover, the flowers also contain lipophilic active substances, e.g., triterpenes (mainly β-amyrin, α-amyrin, lupeol, cycloartenol, ursolic acid, etc.), as well as phytosterols (e.g., β-sitosterol, stigmasterol), and choline [8,9,10]. Additionally, there is 0.03–0.14% of essential oil in the elderflower [11]. Analysis of elderflowers revealed the presence of sixteen amino acids, including those that are most important for the human body: valine, threonine, methionine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, histidine, and phenylalanine. The total content of amino acids in the flowers was 8.96% [12,13]. It should be emphasised that in contrast to bark, leaves, seeds and raw or unripe fruits, elderflowers do not contain the cyanogenic glycoside sambunigrin, which is potentially toxic because it can release cyanide [14].
The elderflower extracts are characterised by a flowery, pleasant odour and sweet, fruity, and honey-like taste, which make them a suitable aroma additive to many products [15,16]. Apart from their favourable sensory qualities, the extracts show a wide spectrum of nutritional and healing properties. They are characterised by their expectorant and diuretic properties, as well as their ability to strengthen the human immune system. Moreover, the extracts of elderflowers protect and strengthen the mucous membrane of the airways and show diaphoretic, purifying, cooling, and analgesic properties [17]. Additionally, extracts of Sambucus nigra L. inflorescences as well as the fruit extracts of the plant, exhibit a broad antiviral and anti-inflammatory effect which can be applied to fight against different types of viruses, including influenza and SARS CoV-2 [10,18,19,20,21,22].
Furthermore, elderflower extracts protect against strokes, alleviate headaches, and support sugar use in diabetes. When used externally, the extracts alleviate skin inflammation [23]. As a source of antioxidant active compounds, they can be applied to protect the human organism against the negative impact of free radicals [24,25].
For years, the black elderflower extracts have been used in natural medicine. Currently, the extracts are applied as components of dietary supplements [26] and as multifunctional raw materials of cosmetic products [27]. When used in cosmetic formulations, in addition to their antioxidant and moisturising effects on the skin, they influence the quality of the cosmetic products, enabling a reduction or even the elimination of synthetic preservatives [28].
Moreover, due to the rich content of bioactive substances, elderflower extracts are used as ingredients in regional food and beverages, such as teas, tinctures, and syrups [26].
It is generally known that the growth environment and methods of production significantly affect the composition and properties of the plant extracts [29,30,31,32]. In our work, the extracts obtained from the elderberry flower (Sambucus nigra L.) growing in the natural habitat in the Małopolska Region of Poland were prepared. The extraction procedures included maceration, a method convenient and very suitable for thermolabile plant material. The influence of stabilisation methods for fresh flowers and the conditions of the extraction process (extraction time, type, and concentration of the applied eluent) on the properties of the extracts were studied.

2. Results and Discussion

The elder inflorescences are raw materials that are rich in bioactive compounds. Unfortunately, they are seasonal raw materials, not durable, and only have a short harvest period. To maintain the availability of the active compounds throughout the whole year, the raw material of fresh plants have to be preserved (stabilised) during storage and before performing the extraction processes [32].
The influence of fresh flower stabilisation methods and the parameters of the extraction process on the composition and antioxidant properties of methanol and ethanol Sambucus nigra flowers extracts were studied. The total phenolic content was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The DPPH radical-scavenging ability and ferric-reducing antioxidant power assays were used to determine the antioxidant properties of the extracts. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 present the obtained results.
The obtained results indicated that the method of stabilisation of the fresh plant material affects the quality of the obtained elderflower extracts.
The data presented in Table 1 shows that out of all the studied methods of preserving fresh elder inflorescences, the best one was the freeze-drying process (lyophilisation). When comparing the total content of polyphenols in the extract from the fresh, frozen, air-flow dried, and lyophilised plant material, it is clear that the highest concentration of the active compounds was obtained in the case of the freeze-dried raw materials. It was even higher than in the case of the extract obtained from fresh inflorescences. Our results are in accordance with those obtained through other researches, in which the following observations were made: an increase of polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of extracts obtained from freeze-dried raw material, and an increase in the content of total polyphenols in freeze-dried material in the cases of blueberry (19–25%), raspberry (19–34%) [33], jujube (36%) [34], and papaya (to 3.2-fold) [35]. In the case of papaya, there were also increases indicated in the total flavonoid content (to 200%). Moreover, increases of antioxidant activity against the ABTS radical were observed for lyophilised blueberry (1–27%), raspberry (13–82%) [33], and guabiju (38%) [36]. By contrast, Shofian et al. [37] observed an increase in the ability of freeze-dried muskmelon and papaya to reduce iron ions (FRAP) of 40% and 80%, respectively [38].
Despite the above-mentioned, this is not a universal rule, as similar changes (the increase in the total polyphenol content) have been observed in the case of dried fruits obtained by air blowing. With regard to dried fruits obtained in such a manner, the polyphenol levels were 6–9% in apple [39], 80% in blueberry and raspberry [33], a 6 to 10-fold increase in fig [40], and 176% in papaya [35]. Moreover, in the case of raw materials obtained by the air blowing method, an increase in antioxidant activity was also observed in the dried materials obtained from blueberry (43%), unblanched raspberry (33%), blanched raspberry (43%) [33], guabiju (27%), red guava (66%) [36], and figs (two-fold) [40]. The air-dried figs also showed activity with regard to the inhibition of ABTS and DPPH radicals [38].
When discussing the influence of extraction process parameters on the quality of the fresh elderberry inflorescence extracts, it should be emphasised that the extraction time affects the properties of the macerates, but only during the first twenty-four hours of the process (Table 2).
The largest amounts of flavonoids and polyphenolic compounds, the important active neutralising free radicals, were obtained after the first day of the maceration process. An extension on the extraction time had no significant effect on the content of polyphenols in the extracts. The higher amount of the active compounds was extracted using methanol as an extracting agent (Table 3).
The alcohol concentration in the eluent solution influences the efficiency of the extraction process. The greatest antioxidant properties assessed by the FRAP method, and the total flavonoid and polyphenol content in the extract was found in the case of 60% solvent (Table 4).
The greatest scavenging capacity on the DPPH free radical was found in the case of the extract obtained with the use of a 70% alcohol solution.
The scavenging capacity on the DPPH free radical of the fresh inflorescences was on a similar level to that obtained in the research by Młynarczyk and Walkowiak-Tomczak [41], who studied the content of the bioactive compounds in 80% methanol extracts from the inflorescences of different elder varieties taken from several natural sites. Their research shows that the scavenging capacity on the DPPH free radical and the extraction efficiency of the total polyphenol content was lower after air-flow drying, in contrast to the performed study. However, the total polyphenol content was found to be at a similar level as that presented by Młynarczyk et al. [42]. In the case of water extracts from the elder inflorescences which were obtained through microwave extraction, FRAP in the range of 29–42 mMFe2+/100 g was obtained [43]. Slightly higher FRAP values were obtained in this study most likely because a different extraction method and extracting agents were used. The scavenging capacity on the DPPH free radical increased with the extraction time. The most important increase (ca. 60%) was observed between the first and second day of the self-extraction. Research by Diankov and Parlapanska [44] showed that for up to 90 min, the scavenging capacity on the DPPH free radical of the elder inflorescence extract initially increased and then stabilised, which is similar to what was found in this study (1–3 extraction days). As observed by Diankov and Parlapanska [44], similarly in this study, the amount of extracted total polyphenols and the dry extract increased with the extraction time (120 min), since the start of the experiment to its second day.
It should be emphasised that although methanol extracts were characterised by a better content of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity, taking into account the potential application of elderflower extracts (in the food or cosmetics industries where ethanol extracts are preferred), the next stage of the study involved carrying out a detailed analysis of the profiles of polyphenolic compounds in the extract, for the optimal ethanol extract obtained using freeze-dried elderberry inflorescences.
Figure 1 and Table 5 present the polyphenolic profile of the ethanol extract of elder inflorescences, analysed using HPLC. Mostly, rutin, kaempferol, and caffeic acid were identified among polyphenol compounds found in ethanol macerate from the freeze-dried elder inflorescence ethanol (Table 5). These results are similar to those obtained by Ferreira et al. [13], who identified these phenolic compounds in extracts of elderberry inflorescences [13].
In the study by Młynarczyk et al. [42], the results of the polyphenol profile determination using the HPLC-MS method were presented. Among others, the following polyphenols were identified in the elder inflorescence: chlorogenic, p-coumaric, caffeic acids, kaempferol (identified also in this study), quercetin, catechin, and epicatechin, among others. In the work of Sidor and Gramaza-Michałowska [9], myricetin and isorhamnetin, among others compounds, were also determined in the elder inflorescences.
Referring to the influence of the stabilisation method on the composition of the extract, the result of our studies showed that the extracts obtained from freeze-dried inflorescences contained a total content of polyphenols that was over 60% more than in the case of the extracts obtained from the air-flow dried inflorescences. A similar result, with regard to the high total content of polyphenol in the ethanol extracts prepared from daylily flowers, was obtained by Mao et al. [45]. Also, in a study performed by Chen and coworkers [46], the freeze-drying stabilisation methods of fresh plant material (E. purpurea flowers) produced extracts that were richer in polyphenol compounds [46].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

The inflorescences of elder (Smabucus nigra L.) were collected on a sunny day, in a natural site in Lesser Poland Voivodeship (49.8167° N, 20.5667° E), Poland. The plants were identified as Sambucus nigra L. by the morphological comparison of leaves, flowers, tree bark, and berries according to Rutkowski [47]. The collected fresh inflorescences were selected; fragments of plants that were unsuitable for processing were removed; and then the high-quality plant material was spread on filter paper for fourty-five minutes at a room temperature of 21–22 °C.

3.2. Methods of Elderflower Stabilisation

Next, the prepared flowers were divided into four samples in order to perform the stabilisation process of the fresh flower, using various methods. In the case of the first sample, the fresh flowers were directly analysed without pretreatment. The second sample of the flower material was frozen at T = −40 °C (single-door freezer, RoHS, Poland) and stored in the freezer until the analysis. The third sample was dried in an air-flow dryer at 35 °C, with forced-air circulation (SLW 115 STD air dryer, Pol-Eko-Aparatura Sp. J., Poland). The fourth elderflower sample was frozen at −40 °C and then freeze-dried using a freeze dryer (Gamma 1–16 LSC, Christ, Germany). In this case, the freeze-dried process consisted of two stages: first, the initial drying process was performed (the temperature of the raw material was −30 °C, the temperature of the condenser was −52 °C, and the shelf temperature was kept at +20 °C), and the further drying step was then conducted for approximately six hours at a shelf temperature of +30 °C.

3.3. Parameters of the Elderflower Extraction

Maceration was chosen as the extraction method. All comparative samples were macerated in water solutions of ethanol or methanol. Water solutions of the alcohol were used as the eluents at concentrations of 50, 60, 70, and 90% (v/v). The weighed stabilised flowers were homogenised with the alcohol solution of adequate concentrations for 90 s, with a mixing speed of 12,000× g, using a DI 25 basic homogeniser (Ika Warke, Düsseldorf, Germany). In all cases, the ratio of fresh plant material to eluent were 1:125. Next, after the specified period of time, the inflorescences were separated from the liquid extract using a paper filter (medium thickness). The first sample (“0”) was separated and analysed directly after the homogenisation process was stopped. The rest of the extract samples were covered with a parafilm and stored in the refrigeration cabinet at temperature T = 4 °C, for self-extraction for one, two, and three days.

3.4. Analysis of the Properties of the Elderflower Extracts

The phytochemical profiles of the elderflower extracts were analysed by chromatographic methods, using HPLC Dionex UltiMate 3000 system which consisted of a DAD Thermo Scientific detector (Germering, Germany). The antioxidant properties of the extracts were evaluated using a DPPH radical scavenging capacity assay, and the FRAP method. The total phenolic content was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. In all cases, the spectrophotometric analysis was performed using HITACHI U-2900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Europe Ltd., Stoke Poges, UK).

3.4.1. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

Ferric-ion-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) was determined with a spectrophotometric method [48]. A mixture of a standard solution of 10 mmol/L TPTZ (ferrum-2,4,6-tripyridyl-S-triazine) solution in 40 mmol/L HCl: 20 mmol ferric chloride: 300 mmol sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.6) at an amount of 1:1:10 and an appropriate amount of the extract was vortexed using a Labnet vortexer (270× g; 20 s; Edison, NJ, USA), and subsequently placed in an incubator (T = 37 °C) (Heraeus instrument T12, Hanau, Germany) for 10 min. It was then centrifuged with an MPW-260R centrifuge (Warsaw, Poland) for 2 min (1600× g) and the absorbance of the separate solution was measured at a wavelength of 595 nm and compared to the blank test. The value of antioxidant activity was read from a calibration curve and expressed in µmol Fe2+.

3.4.2. DPPH Radical Scavenging Capacity Assay

Antioxidant activity was also determined with a spectrophotometric method using DPPH free radical (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), as described by Brand-Williams et al. [49]. Briefly, 1 mL of elderflower extract and 3 mL 0.06 mmol/L ethanol DPPH solution were vigorously mixed and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance of the mixtures was measured at a wavelength of 516 nm. The antioxidant activity was expressed in μmol of Trolox [49].

3.4.3. Total Flavonoid Content Determination

The total flavonoid content was determined according to the method described by Ardestani et al. [50,51]. The mixture of the extract consisting of 2 mL 15% (w/v) sodium nitrite (0.15 mL), 10% (w/v) aluminium chloride (0.15 mL), 4% (w/v) sodium hydroxide (2 mL), and 0.2 mL distilled water, was vortexed using a Labnet vortex mixer (270× g; 20 s; Edison, NJ, USA) and stored in a dark place for 15 min (21–22 °C; room temperatures). After the incubation time had elapsed, the absorbance of the samples was measured at a wavelength of 510 nm. The total flavonoids content was expressed as (+)- catechin concentration.

3.4.4. Total Polyphenol Content Determination

The total polyphenol content was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteau method [52]. The Folin-Ciocalteau reagent (0.125 mL) and 25% (w/v) sodium carbonate (0.25 mL) was added to an adequate amount of the extract (estimated to obtain a 0.3–0.8 range of the absorbance reading), and then the whole solution was mixed using the vortex mixer (Edison, NJ, USA). The samples were left in a dark place for 60 min (at room temperature). The absorbance was then measured at a wavelength of 675 nm using the UV-vis spectrophotometer. The total polyphenol content was read from the calibration curve for (+)- catechin.

3.4.5. HPLC Analysis of the Polyphenols Profile

The samples for the HPLC polyphenols determination were prepared according to the modified method of Klimczak et al. [53]. Sodium hydroxide (2 mol) at an amount of 1:1 (v/v) was added to the extract which was obtained from the lyophilised inflorescences according to the description above for the ethanol extracts with the “0” extraction time. The sample was mixed with the help of a Labnet vortex mixer (Edison, NJ, USA) and left in a dark place for 4 h (21–22 °C; room temperature). The hydrochloric acid water solution (2 mol) was added to the samples in order to obtain the pH value of 2.1–2.6 (Metrohm pH-meter, Herisau, Switzerland) and moved to a volumetric flask with 1% (w/v) L-ascorbic acid dissolved in HPLC-grade methanol. Before the chromatographic analysis, the samples were centrifuged (18,000× g; 20 min; 4 °C) with an MPW—260R centrifuge (Warsaw, Poland), and filtered through a PTFE-L filter with a 22 µm mesh. The samples were then kept at 4 °C before they were dosed into the HPLC column. The XBridge C18 250 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm, column together with the XBridge TM C18 20 × 4.6, 3.5 µm pre-column by Waters (Wexford, Ireland) were used. The mobile phase consisted of two eluents: A—2% (v/v) water solution of acetic acid; and B—100% acetonitrile. The eluents’ flow rate was 0.8 mL ·min−1. The chromatographic analysis lasted for 80 min: Eluent A—15 min, 14%; 20 min, 18%; 30 min, 25%; 55 min, 55%; and 62 min, 100%.

3.5. Dry Extract Content Determination

The content of the dry extracts was determined according to the method described by Tabaszewska [27]. The elderflower alcohol extracts were condensed using a 4000 Heidolph laboratory vacuum evaporator (Schwabach, Germany) with a water bath at 40 °C, and at 22 rpm of the flask with the extract. The remaining part of the liquid was freeze-dried (Gamma 1–16 LSC freeze dryer, Christ, Germany) and the dry extracts were then weighed.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

A multiple factor analysis of variance was performed using the STATISTICA 13.1 software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). All of the analyses were performed in three repetitions (n = 3) and were expressed as a mean average ± standard error. The significance between the mean values was determined using a post-hoc Tukey test at p < 0.05.

4. Conclusions

The elder inflorescences are rich sources of numerous active compounds and show a wide spectrum of nutritional and healing properties, including strong antioxidant activity. Several extracting methods were used to obtain elderflower extracts. Maceration is one of the most convenient methods that are especially suitable for thermolabile plant material, such as elder inflorescences. The flowers are seasonal raw material, and therefore, to maintain availability of the active compounds during storage throughout the whole year, the fresh plant needs to be preserved (stabilised). Both the stabilisation methods and extraction process parameters influence the quality of the extract.
The obtained results showed that the best method for preserving the fresh elder inflorescences is the lyophilisation process. The comparison of the extracts from the fresh, frozen, air-flow drying, and lyophilised plants indicated that the highest concentration of polyphenols, and consequently the highest antioxidant efficiency, were obtained in the case of the freeze-dried raw material. The elderflower extract obtained from lyophilised plant material contained from 96% to over 500% more polyphenols when compared with those derived from other methods of raw-material stabilisation. In addition, the same extract is characterised by over 50% to 90% higher ferric-ion reduction capacity and over five times higher antioxidant activity against the DPPH radical, compared with the extract from elderflower stabilised by freezing or using the air-drying method. The optimal extraction was performed with 60% methanol, for 1–2 days, by self-extraction from the inflorescences preserved with the freeze-drying method. However, considering the potential applications of elderflower extracts (in the food and cosmetics industries), ethanol extracts are preferred.

5. Patents

Tabaszewska, M. Method for obtaining lyophilised plant extract as the active component of products, preferably cosmetic products. 2021, Patent No. 240152.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T. and E.S.; methodology, M.T.; software, M.T.; validation, E.S.; formal analysis, M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, E.S.; visualization, M.T. and E.S.; supervision, M.T.; funding acquisition, M.T. and E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Brągiel, E.; Ślusarczyk, B. Tendencje na europejskim rynku żywności ekologicznej. (Trends on the European organic food market. In Polish). Sci. J. WULS Probl. World Agric. 2017, 17, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Senderski, M.E. (Ed.) Prawie Wszystko o Ziołach; Wydawnictwo: Warszawa, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ulbricht, C.; Basch, E.; Cheung, L.; Goldberg, H.; Hammerness, P.; Isaac, R.; Singh Khalsa, K.P.; Romm, A.; Rychlik, I.; Varghese, M.; et al. An evidence-based systematic review of elderberry and elderflower (Sambucus nigra) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. J. Diet Suppl. 2014, 11, 80–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Veberic, R.; Jakopic, J.; Stampar, F.; Schmitzer, V. European elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) rich in sugars, organic acids, anthocyanins and selected polyphenols. Food Chem. 2009, 144, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Atkinson, M.D.; Atkinson, E. Sambucus nigra L. Biological flora of the British Isles. J. Ecol. 2002, 90, 895–923. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3072258 (accessed on 12 March 2022). [CrossRef]
  6. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Staniek, H.; Kidoń, M.; Łysiak, G.P. The content of selected minerals, bioactive compounds, and the antioxidant properties of the flowers and fruit of selected cultivars and wildly growing plants of Sambucus nigra L. Molecules 2020, 25, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Bhattacharya, S.; Christensen, K.B.; Olsen, L.C.; Christensen, L.P.; Grevsen, K.; Færgeman, N.J.; Kristiansen, K.; Young, J.F.; Oksbjerg, N. Bioactive components from flowers of Sambucus nigra L. increase glucose uptake in primary porcine myotube cultures and reduce fat accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11033–11040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stoilova, I.; Wilker, M.; Stoyanova, A.; Krastanov, A.; Stanchev, V. Antioxidant activity of extract from elder flower (Sambucus nigra L.). Herba. Polonica. 2007, 53, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sidor, A.; Gramza-Michałowska, A. Advanced research on the antioxidant and health benefit of elderberry (Sambucus nigra) in food—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 941–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bartak, M.; Lange, A.; Słońska, A.; Cymerys, J. Antiviral and healing potential of Sambucus nigra extracts. Rev. Bionatura. 2020, 5, 1264–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Domokos, J.; Sipos, B.; Bela, Z.; Kiss, B. Black stimulus (Sambucus nigra L.) and cosmetics. Kozmetika 2001, 50, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kislichenko, V.S.; Vel’ma, V.V. Aminoacid composition of flowers, leaves and extract of Sambucus nigra flowers. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2006, 42, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ferreira, S.S.; Silva, A.M.; Nunes, F.M. Sambucus nigra L. fruits and flowers: Chemical composition and related bioactivities. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 1237–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Senica, M.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. The higher the better? Differences in phenolics and cyanogenic glycosides in Sambucus nigra leaves, flowers and berries from different altitudes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 2623–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaack, K.; Christensen, L.; Hughes, M.; Eder, R. Relationship between sensory, quality and volatile compounds of elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) extracts. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 223, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaack, K. Aroma composition and sensory quality of fruit juices processed from cultivars of elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeitlhofler, A. Wildobst fur den Haus—Garten. Cadmos Verlag GmbH: München, Germany, 2008; ISBN 13: 9783704023063. [Google Scholar]
  18. Torabian, G.; Valtchev, P.; Adil, Q.; Dehghani, F. Anti-influenza activity of elderberry (Sambucus nigra). J. Funct. Foods 2019, 54, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Srivastava, A.K.; Chaurasia, J.P.; Khan, R.; Dhand, C.; Verma, S. Role of medicinal plants of traditional use in recuperating devastating COVID-19 situation. Med. Aromat. Plants (Los Angel) 2020, 9, 2167-0412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brendler, T.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Bauer, R.; Gafner, S.; Hardy, M.L.; Heinrich, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H.; Izzo, A.A.; Michaelis, M.; Nassiri Asl, M.; et al. Botanical drugs and supplements affecting the immune response in the time of COVID-19: Implications for research and clinical practice. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 3013–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schön, C.; Mödinger, Y.; Krüger, F.; Dobies, C.; Pischel, I.; Bonnländer, B. A new high-quality elderberry plant extract exerts antiviral and immunomodulatory effects in vitro and ex vivo. Food Agric. Immunol. 2021, 32, 650–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mocanu, M.L.; Amariei, S. Elderberries—A source of bioactive compounds with antiviral action. Plants 2022, 11, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heidbohmer, E. Heilpflanze Holunder; GmbH: Twist, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, J.; Finn, C. Antocyanins and other polyphenolics in American elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) and European elderberry (Sambucus nigra) cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 2665–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Jabłońska-Ryś, E.; Zalewska-Korona, M.; Kalbarczyk, J. Antioxidant capacity, ascorbic acid and phenolics content in wild edible fruits. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2009, 17, 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  26. Uhl, K.R.; Mitchell, A.E. Headspace volatile organic and phenolic compounds in elderflowers and elderflower teas of blue elderberry (Sambucus nigra ssp. cerulea). ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 1535–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tabaszewska, M. Method for Obtaining Lyophilized Plant Extract as the Active Component of Products, Preferably Cosmetic Products. Patent No 240152, 18 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dweck, A.C. Formulating Natural Cosmetics; Allured Books: Du Page County, IL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Barizza, E.; Guzzo, F.; Fanton, P.; Lucchini, G.; Sacchi, A.G.; Lo Schiavo, F.; Nascimbene, J. Nutritional profile and productivity of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in different habitats of a protected area of the Eastern Italian Alps. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, C673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jaakkola, M.; Korpelainen, V.; Hoppulab, K.; Virtanena, V. Chemical composition of ripe fruits of Rubus chamaemorus L. grown in different habitats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1324–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tabaszewska, M.; Rutkowska, J.; Skoczylas, Ł.; Słupski, J.; Antoniewska, A.; Smoleń, S.; Łukasiewicz, M.; Baranowski, D.; Duda, I.; Pietsch, J. Red arils of Taxus baccata L.—A new source of valuable fatty acids and nutrients. Molecules 2021, 26, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, Y.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A. Berry drying: Mechanism, pretreatment, drying technology, nutrient preservation, and mathematical models. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sablani, S.S.; Andrews, P.K.; Davies, N.M.; Walters, T.; Saez, H.; Bastarrachea, L. Effects of air and freeze drying on phytochemical content of conventional and organic berries. Drying Technol. 2011, 29, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gao, Q.H.; Wu, C.S.; Wang, M.; Xu, B.N.; Du, L.J. Effect of drying of jujubes (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) on the contents of sugars, organic acids, a-tocopherol, b-carotene, and phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 9642–9648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Annegowda, H.V.; Bhat, R.; Yeong, K.J.; Liong, M.T.; Karim, A.A.; Mansor, S.M. Influence of drying treatments on polyphenolic contents and antioxidant properties of raw and ripe papaya (Carica papaya L.). Int. J. Food Prop. 2014, 17, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nora, C.D.; Muller, C.D.R.; de Bona, G.S.; Rios, A.D.O.; Hertz, P.F.; de Jong Jablonski, A.; Flores, S.H. Effect of processing on the stability of bioactive compounds from red guava (Psidium cattleyanum Sabine) and guabiju (Myrcianthes pungens). J. Food Composit. Anal. 2014, 34, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shofian, N.M.; Hamid, A.A.; Osman, A.; Saari, N.; Anwar, F.; Pak Dek, M.S.; Hairuddin, M.R. Effect of freeze-drying on the antioxidant compounds and antioxidant activity of selected tropical fruits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 4678–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Kamiloglu, S.; Toydemir, G.; Boyacioglu, D.; Beekwilder, J.; Hall, R.D.; Capanoglu, E. A review on the effect of drying on antioxidant potential of fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, S110–S129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Joshi, A.P.K.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V.; Khanizadeh, S. Impact of drying processes on bioactive phenolics, vitamin C and antioxidant capacity of red-fleshed apple slices. J. Food Process Preserv. 2011, 35, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Slatnar, A.; Klancar, U.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. Effect of drying of figs (Ficus carica L.) on the contents of sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 11696–11702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D. Bioactive properties of elderflowers (Sambucus nigra L.). World Sci. N 2017, 2, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  42. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Łysiak, G.P. Bioactive properties of Sambucus nigra L. as a functional ingredient for food and pharmaceutical industry. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kołodziej, B.; Drożdżal, K. Właściwości przeciwutleniające kwiatów i owoców bzu czarnego pozyskiwanego ze stanu naturalnego. (Antioxidant properties of black elder flowers and berries harvested from the wild). Żywność Nauka Technol. Jakość 2011, 4, 36–44. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  44. Diankov, S.; Parlapanska, K. Extraction from elderberry flowers. Examination of antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content of the extracts. J. Chem. Technol. Metall. 2013, 48, 479–482. [Google Scholar]
  45. Mao, L.C.; Pan, X.; Que, F.; Fang, X.H. Antioxidant properties of water and ethanol extracts from hot air-dried and freeze-dried daylily flowers. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 222, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, Y.L.; Sung, J.M.; Lin, S.D. Effect of extraction methods on the active compounds and antioxidant properties of ethanolic extracts of Echinacea purpurea flower. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Rutkowski, L. Klucz do Oznaczania Roślin Naczyniowych Polski Niżowej; Wydawn Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  48. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelie, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ardestani, A.; Yazdanparast, R. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of Achillea santolina extracts. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1041–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology. Oxid. Antioxid. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Klimczak, I.; Małecka, M.; Szlachta, M.; Gliszczyńska-Świgło, A. Effect of storage on the kontent of polyphenols, vitamin C and the antioxidant activity of orange juices. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2007, 20, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 02365 g001 550
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of polyphenolic compounds in the ethanol extract of elder inflorescences (Peaks: 1—caffeic acid; 2—p-coumaric acid; 3—rutin; 4—ferulic acid; 5—chlorogenic acid; 6—t-cinnamic acid; and 7—kaempferol).
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of polyphenolic compounds in the ethanol extract of elder inflorescences (Peaks: 1—caffeic acid; 2—p-coumaric acid; 3—rutin; 4—ferulic acid; 5—chlorogenic acid; 6—t-cinnamic acid; and 7—kaempferol).
Molecules 28 02365 g001
Table
Table 1. The influence of the stabilisation methods of raw material on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents of flavonoids and polyphenols, and the content of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 96).
Table 1. The influence of the stabilisation methods of raw material on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents of flavonoids and polyphenols, and the content of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 96).
FRAP [µmol Fe2+]DPPH [µmol TE]Flavonoids [mg(+)Catechin]Total Polyphenols [mg(+)Catechin]Dry Extract
[g]
Stabilisation method
Fresh473.60 ± 14.9 b567.96 ± 17.0 a511.58 ± 23.2 b2072.50 ± 76.1 b0.257 ± 0.005 d
Frozen77.40 ± 2.5 a243.55 ± 29.8 a81.40 ± 4.0 a619.04 ± 22.9 a0.189 ± 0.004 b
Air-flow drying685.59 ± 45.1 c1029.43 ± 221.8 b767.56 ± 41.2 d2813.32 ± 179.7 c0.234 ± 0.014 c
Freeze-drying777.67 ± 30.1 d5131.51 ± 505.9 c575.16 ± 25.4 c4070.35 ± 106.5 d0.185 ± 0.004 a
The data are the mean value of the smallest square. The same letters in the column indicate no significant statistical differences at p < 0.05; TE—Trolox equivalents.
Table
Table 2. The influence of the extraction time on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents of flavonoids and polyphenols, and the content of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 96).
Table 2. The influence of the extraction time on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents of flavonoids and polyphenols, and the content of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 96).
FRAP [µmol Fe2+]DPPH [µmol TE]Flavonoids [mg(+)Catechin]Total Polyphenols [mg(+)Catechin]Dry Extract [g]
Extraction time [days]
0283.84 ± 28.1 a1909.31 ± 400.7 a298.70 ± 17.5 a1598.03 ± 163.0 a0.141 ± 0.009 a
1632.77 ± 47.9 d3050.42 ± 541.5 b559.39 ± 41.74 b2611.04 ± 176.1 b0.240 ± 0.006 b
2586.42 ± 43.3 c3446.94 ± 664.4 b548.79 ± 39.34 b2752.89 ± 182.4 c0.244 ± 0.007 c
3511.21 ± 40.9 b3481.96 ± 672.8 b539.48 ± 47.0 b2613.27 ± 211.1 b0.240 ± 0.007 b
The data are the mean value of the smallest square. The same letters in the column indicate no significant statistical differences at p < 0.05; TE—Trolox equivalents.
Table
Table 3. The influence of the kind of solvent used on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents of flavonoids and polyphenols, and the contents of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 192).
Table 3. The influence of the kind of solvent used on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents of flavonoids and polyphenols, and the contents of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 192).
FRAP [µmol Fe2+]DPPH [µmol TE]Flavonoids [mg(+)Catechin]Total Polyphenols [mg(+)Catechin]Dry Extract
[g]
Extracting agent (solvent) type
Ethanol479.86 ± 29.2 a2747.51 ± 382.9 a482.38 ± 28.6 a2347.58 ± 130.4 a0.210 ± 0.007 a
Methanol527.26 ± 32.7 b3157.79 ± 432.4 b488.08 ± 27.9 a2440.02 ± 141.2 b0.222 ± 0.006 b
The data are the mean value of the smallest square. The same letters in the column indicate no significant statistical differences at p < 0.05; TE—Trolox equivalents.
Table
Table 4. The influence of the concentration of the solvent used on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents flavonoids and polyphenols, and content of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 96).
Table 4. The influence of the concentration of the solvent used on the antioxidant properties of the elderflower extracts (FRAP, DPPH), the total contents flavonoids and polyphenols, and content of the dry extract in grams (SE ±, n = 96).
FRAP [µmol Fe2+]DPPH [µmol TE]Flavonoids [mg(+)Catechin]Total Polyphenols [mg(+)Catechin]Dry Extract [g]
Extracting agent concentration [%]
50451.00 ± 38.4 a2372.29 ± 460.9 a463.88 ± 38.6 a2353.21 ± 180.6 b0.211 ± 0.009 a
60532.13 ± 44.5 c3274.97 ± 605.6 b530.02 ± 43.7 b2565.85 ± 192.9 d0.220 ± 0.009 b
70526.87 ± 47.0 c3454.42 ± 656.5 b485.67 ± 40.9 a2433.06 ± 211.1 c0.223 ± 0.009 b
90504.25 ± 45.2 b2721.55 ± 575.1 a461.83 ± 36.5 a2223.10 ± 183.2 a0.211 ± 0.009 a
The data are the mean value of the smallest square. The same letters in the column indicate no significant statistical differences at p < 0.05; TE—Trolox equivalents.
Table
Table 5. Content of the polyphenols identified in the 70% ethanol extract obtained from freeze-dried elder inflorescences (SE ±, n = 4).
Table 5. Content of the polyphenols identified in the 70% ethanol extract obtained from freeze-dried elder inflorescences (SE ±, n = 4).
Name of Active Componentmg in 100 mL
Caffeic acid10.96 ± 0.008
p-coumaric acid1.82 ± 0.003
Rutin38.32 ± 0.097
t-cinnamic acid0.67 ± 0.002
Kaempferol14.30 ± 0.020
Chlorogenic acid5.14 ± 0.015
Ferulic acid0.59 ± 0.000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tabaszewska, M.; Sikora, E. The Effect of the Plant Stabilisation Method on the Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Elderflower (Sambucus nigra L.) Extract. Molecules 2023, 28, 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052365

AMA Style

Tabaszewska M, Sikora E. The Effect of the Plant Stabilisation Method on the Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Elderflower (Sambucus nigra L.) Extract. Molecules. 2023; 28(5):2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tabaszewska, Małgorzata, and Elżbieta Sikora. 2023. "The Effect of the Plant Stabilisation Method on the Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Elderflower (Sambucus nigra L.) Extract" Molecules 28, no. 5: 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052365

APA Style

Tabaszewska, M., & Sikora, E. (2023). The Effect of the Plant Stabilisation Method on the Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Elderflower (Sambucus nigra L.) Extract. Molecules, 28(5), 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052365

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop