Next Article in Journal
Implementation of Biopolymeric Nanomaterials to Reduce the Negative Impacts of Salinity on Tomato Quantity and Quality
Previous Article in Journal
On-Site Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules28041599
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oxidative Stability of Cottonseed Butter Products under Accelerated Storage Conditions

by
Zhongqi He
*,
Sunghyun Nam
and
K. Thomas Klasson
USDA-ARS, Southern Regional Research Center, 1100 Allen Toussaint Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(4), 1599; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041599
Submission received: 12 January 2023 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 3 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cottonseed is a natural product of cotton (Gossypium spp.) crops. This work evaluated the oxidative stability of cottonseed butters through accelerated autoxidation by storage at 60 °C for 25 days. Three oxidative stability parameter values (peroxide value, p-anisidine value, and total oxidation value) were monitored over the storage time. These chemical measurements revealed that the storage stability of the butter products was dominated by primary oxidation of lipid (oil) components, while the secondary oxidation levels were relatively unchanged over the storage time. An analysis of the tocopherols (natural oxidants in cottonseed) suggested not only the protection function of the molecules against oxidation of the cottonseed butter during storage, but also the dynamic mechanism against the primary oxidation of lipid components. Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR–FTIR) data confirmed no changes in the major C functional groups of cottonseed butters over the storage time. On the other hand, characteristic minor peaks of conjugated dienes and trienes related to lipid oxidation were impacted by the accelerated storage. As each day of accelerated oxidation at 60 °C is equivalent to 16 days of storage at 20 °C, observations in this work should have reflected the oxidative stability behaviors of the cottonseed butters after about 13 months of shelf storage under ambient storage conditions. Thus, these data that were collected under the accelerated oxidation testing would be useful not only to create a better understanding of the autooxidation mechanism of lipid molecules in cottonseed butters, but also in developing or recommending appropriate storage conditions for cottonseed end products to prevent them from quality degradation.

1. Introduction

Cottonseed is a natural product of cotton (Gossypium spp.) crop. Traditional cottonseed is not suitable for human consumption because of the presence of a toxic ingredient (i.e., gossypol) in its pigment glands [1,2]. Glandless (Gl) cotton is a new variety with gossypol content in its cottonseed <450 mg kg−1 dry mass to meet the US FDA’s criteria of gossypol limit as human food [3,4]. Thus, exploration of these Gl cottonseeds as food products would greatly enhance the economic impacts of these new cotton lines [3,5,6]. In addition to rich oil and protein [7], Gl kernels contain some bioactive ingredients and antioxidant activities [8,9,10]. Thus, Gl cottonseeds are promising materials to be processed for the development of nutritional, functional, and bioactive cottonseed food products and/or additives [10,11,12].
In a previous work, Gl cottonseed kernels were formulated to produce a peanut-butter-like product, as plant-based (nut and seed) butters have steadily increased in consumer popularity [13]. Due to the presence of a high oil content, plant butter products are susceptible to autoxidation [14]. The lipid oxidation produces undesirable flavors and aromas and compromises the nutritional quality of fats and oils, leading to the production of toxic compounds [14]. Thus, the oxidative stability is one of the important parameters in consideration in plant-butter storage and improvement [15,16]. The oxidative stability can be evaluated by chemical indicators and spectroscopic analysis [17,18,19]. The peroxide value (PV) and p-anisidine values (AVs) [20] are common chemical indicators used to estimate primary and secondary oxidation products. Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR–FTIR) has been used to monitor the main structural changes as a consequence of the oxidative treatment in nut and seed products [21].
As a continuation of our effort to enhance the utilization of end-products of cotton as food products, this work monitored the changes in the oxidative stability parameters of cottonseed butter products under accelerated storage conditions (i.e., at 60 °C for 25 days). The objective of this work was to assess and compare the oxidative stability of two cottonseed butter products made from Gl kernels roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. Information derived from this work is useful in developing appropriate storage conditions of cottonseed end products to prevent them from degradative auto-oxidation.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Color Profile of Cottonseed Butter

A quantitative measurement of color changes over the storage period was presented in Table 1. The a* values (amount of red (+a*) or green (−a*)) for all samples were positive, ranging from 3.19 to 4.44 for B15 and 3.60 to 4.52 for B30. Compared to the day 0 sample, the hue parameters steadily increased during storage, but no apparent impact trend was observed with the storage time. The b* parameter (i.e., the amount of yellow (+b*) or blue tone (−b*)) was also positive, with greater values (24.68 to 26.73 for B15 and 25.08 to 27.14 for B30), meaning that there was a dominating yellow hue in these samples. Compared to the day 0 sample, the hue parameter decreased slightly during the early storage time (6–10 days); it then increased steadily and slowly with a longer storage time. On the other hand, the comprehensive lightness (L* values) decreased slightly over the storage time, with one exception (B30 day 20). The color-profile changes in the two cottonseed butter products were similar to those in pistachio paste and spreads during similar accelerated storage for 25 days at 60 °C [16]. The color-profile parameters of sesame paste products also fluctuated slightly during the whole storage process for 180 days, no matter the storage temperature, at 4 °C, room temperature (average 20.5 °C), or 40 °C [17].
The derived parameters of butter color, color saturation (C*), and color hue (h) were also impacted slightly by storage. Color saturation is a measure of color purity, while the color hue represents the degree of green color. As the set of color-purity data (C*) changed in the similar way to that of L* and b* in the storage butter samples, we could conclude that the accelerated storage did not dramatically impact the homogeneity and uniqueness of the cottonseed butter products regarding t0he coloration. The values of color hue (h) decreased with the longer storage, a reverse trend of the change of the a* parameter. This observation suggested some blanching effect with a longer storage time. In addition, it is noticeable that the L* values of B15 samples were higher than the corresponding B30 samples, while the C* values of the former were lower than the latter. This observation was apparently due to the darkening effect of the longer roasting time (30 min vs. 15 min) during the kernel roasting.

2.2. Impact of Accelerated Storage on the Oxidative Stability Parameters

Figure 1 shows the changes in the three sets of oxidative stability parameters measured in this work over the accelerated auto-oxidation experiment at 60 °C. Generally, the impact trends on the parameters were similar between B15 and B30, indicating the consistence of these observations in butter products with different roasting times. However, these values of B15 were slightly lower than B30 on day 0, but they gradually became higher than B30 samples with the same storage times. This result implied that the butter product with 30-min roasting was more resistant to autoxidation during storage, although the cottonseed kernels could have been subject to a little more lipid oxidation with the longer roasting.
The peroxide value is a measure of the concentration of peroxides and hydroperoxides formed in the initial stages of lipid oxidation so that it is one of the most widely used tests for the measurement of oxidative status in seed and nut products [15]. In this work, we observed that the value of both the B15 and B30 samples rapidly increased in the first 10 days of the storage at 60 °C and then decreased and slowly increased afterward. Generally, the longer the storage time, the higher the peroxide values [17,22]. Thus, the fluctuation we observed might reflect the fact that hydroperoxides in the cottonseed butter samples were unstable at a high temperature, and some of them started to decompose into carbonyl compounds, aldehydes, and other secondary oxidations [23,24]. Another fact was that the oil constituent in the cottonseed butter products was from the cottonseed kernels and the extra cottonseed oil added. The indigenous oil part might have been more tightly associated with other kernel components. Thus, this sort of inhomogeneity might also partially contribute to the fluctuation of peroxide value curves and other observations reported later in this work. In addition, it is assumed that naturally present oxidant tocopherol in pistachio spreads delayed lipid oxidation so that no substantial differences were observed between those spreads during storage for 25 days at 60 °C [16]. Generally, maximum peroxide values of 10–30 milliequivalents of peroxide per kg (meq kg−1) are acceptable dependent on a specific product. For example, 30 meq kg−1 was recommended as the limit of sunflower paste [15]. To our knowledge, there are no data on the peroxide values of cottonseed products for comparison. However, the values of B15 and B30 between 0.79 and 9.41 meq kg−1 were lower than those values (6–18 meq kg−1) of fresh produced sunflower butter from pan-roasted kernels during 60 days of storage [25]. It is reported that each day of accelerated oxidation at 60 °C is equivalent to 16 days of storage at 20 °C [24]. Thus, our data should have reflected the oxidative stability behaviors of the two cottonseed butter products with about 13 months of shelf storage under ambient storage conditions.
The p-anisidine value is another oxidative-stability parameter. It represents the decomposition of the hydroperoxides in oil products. The p-anisidine values of B15 and B30 were around 5.5 at the beginning of the storage experiment. The values were lower in the stored samples, but they seemed not to change much over the storage time. Lower and fluctuating p-anisidine values over storage were also observed with sunflower paste [15], sesame paste [17], and sunflower and olive oils at ambient temperatures [20]. While it is used as an empirical test for monitoring the secondary products of lipid oxidation [16], as a rule of thumb, this parameter should be less than 10 for a good-quality oil [26]. Thus, the p-anisidine values of both B15 and B30 met the quality requirement well.
Total oxidation (Totox), a combination of both peroxide values and p-anisidine value, is considered to be an overall assessment of the oil oxidation process, so that its value is used as an indication of the overall oxidative stability, including both primary and secondary oxidation products [22]. In other words, the Totox values reveal the past history of the oil oxidation (p-anisidine value) and its present status (peroxide value) [16]. The Totox change pattern of B15 and B30 over the accelerated storage was similar to that of the peroxide values, as the peroxide values were higher than the p-anisidine values in B15 and B30 samples. Therefore, the impacts of the storage on the lipid oxidation (deterioration) of the two cottonseed butter products seemed a more dynamic (present state) process than an accumulative (past history) process.

2.3. Tocopherol Contents in Cottonseed Butter and Impact of Storage Times

Since it is present in greater concentrations in cottonseed oil compared to other vegetable oils, tocopherol has been reported to be the main reason for oxidative stability and prolonged shelf life of cottonseed oil [27]. Under the current analysis conditions, the applied HPLC method detected quantitatively four types of tocopherols in the cottonseed butter samples (Table 2). The total tocopherol contents were between 45 to 107 mg kg−1. The tocopherol contents in the B15 series were generally lower than those in the corresponding B30 samples. This is because the low temperature and short roasting time are not always the most appropriate ways to obtain the best product in terms of total phenolic content, tocopherols, and volatile profile [28,29]. The contents of a- and γ-types ranged from 10 to 45 and 29 to 67 mg kg−1 in the B15 and B30 butter samples, respectively. The contents of the other two types, d- and b-tocopherol, were much lower, accounting for 0.8–3.5% of total tocopherol content in B15 and B30. Kouser, et al. [30] reported a-tocopherol (125–296 mg kg−1), γ-tocopherol (269–326 mg kg−1), and d-tocopherol (2.23–5.47 mg kg−1) among cottonseed oils from six varieties of cotton, while no data for b-tocopherol were reported. Considering only 43% of the butter samples as the oil content, our data were at similar levels to the literature data of tocopherol in cottonseed. Thus, the high tocopherol content benefited cottonseed butter’s prolonged shelf life [16] and promoted vitamin E activity [31]. Javidipour, et al. [32] also reported a-tocopherol content at the same level. However, the content of γ-tocopherol (42–73 mg kg−1 of oil) in their cottonseed oil was lower. The difference is probably due to the fact that the sample used by Javidipour, Tüfenk and Baştürk [32] was the commercial cottonseed oil product purchased from local supermarkets. Indeed, as high as 1000 mg kg−1 of tocopherols could be in unprocessed cottonseed oil, but up to one-third can be lost during processing (e.g., deodorization) [33]. In this work, part of tocopherol content of the butter samples should have been from the indigenous cottonseed kernels, and part from the external cottonseed oil. In this work, we observed a general decreasing trend of the total tocopherol content in the samples after storage at 60 °C; however, the differences were not statistically significant at p = 0.05. This phenomenon might reflect the protection function of the consuming tocopherol against oxidation of the cottonseed butter during storage. In addition, those high standard deviations with the poor parallelism may also reflect the fact that there were some minor differences in the treatment and analysis of these replicate samples, as they were susceptible to autoxidation under aerobic circumstances.
To gain more insight into these tocopherol contents and their roles in oxidative stability, a correlation analysis was performed to elucidate the quantitative correlation coefficients between those parameters (Table 3). Three types of tocopherols (i.e., a-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol), as well as total tocopherol content, were well correlated with each other, with p ≤ 0.01. However, β-tocopherol did not show any statistically significant (p > 0.05) correlation coefficient with other tocopherol contents or oxidative stability. While b-tocopherol showed no significant (p > 0.05) coefficient with oxidative stability, the other four tocopherol contents also showed statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.05) but negative correlation coefficients with two of the three oxidative stability parameters (i.e., the peroxide values and Totox values). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant (p < 0.05) coefficient between the p-anisidine value and any type of tocopherol content. A negative correlation between the peroxide value and total tocopherol content is also observed in roasted peanuts during accelerated storage [34]. Those outcomes confirmed not only the positive impact of the major types of tocopherols on the oxidative stability of the cottonseed butter during storage and processing [30], but also the dynamic mechanism against the primary oxidation (present state).

2.4. ATR–FTIR Observations

ATR–FTIR analysis has been used in cotton biomass characterization [35,36,37]. The ATR–FTIR spectra of the oil extracts of the cottonseed butters (Figure 2) were typical to those of cottonseed and other vegetable oil samples in the literature [7,35,38]. The four major peaks were found at 2924, 2854, 1744, and 1160 cm−1. The first two peaks could be assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of the C–H bond in the aliphatic –CH3 group. The third peak was due to the easter carbonyl functional group of triacylglycerides. The last peak and the flanking minor 1236 and 1099 cm−1 peaks could come from the stretching and rocking vibration of the –C–O ester group and –CH2– group. The overall appearance of the ATR–FTIR spectra of the oil extracts of 12 cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage for 25 days at 60 °C was very similar, implying that the backbone C-functional groups (i.e., the major components of oil fractions) did not change over the accelerated storage period. This observation was consistent with previous reports on FTIR investigations of oxidative stability of edible oil products [39,40,41].
The impacts of oxidative stability on FTIR features were found to be more on the characteristic minor peaks of conjugated dienes and trienes [41,42,43]. In this work, we selected the four peaks at 3009, 1655, 914, and 721 (labeled as I–IV in Figure 2) for our evaluation of the FTIR changes over the accelerated storage. The peak at 3009 cm−1 was associated with the stretching vibration of the CH cis-olefinic group (=C-H), and its intensity decreased with the increasing degrees of oxidation. The peaks at 1655, 914, and 723 cm−1 reflected the changes in double bonds (–HC=CH–) during the oxidation of oil samples. In other words, their absorbance corresponded to the oxidation products formed by polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as conjugated aldehydes and the conjugated double-bond system [40,41]. The relative changes in their absorbance ratios relative to the major peaks at 2924, 2854, or 1774 cm−1 are shown in Figure 3. At the beginning of the storage (day 0), the ratios of A3009/A2924, A3009/A2854, and A3009/A1744 were 0.125, 0.185, and 111 for B15 and 0.128, 0.189, and 0.109 for B30, respectively. These values were comparable but a little lower than the values (0.164, 0.211, and 0.137) of untreated sunflower oil samples in the literature [43]. The three ratios of B50 samples increased steadily with storage time, although the increasing percentages were small (3.35%, 3.43%, and 9.31%, respectively, at day 25). On the other hand, storage over 25 days at 60 °C did not change or slightly lower the three ratios of B30 samples, with the changes by −1.18%, −1.40%, and 0.67, respectively, at the end of storage. The changes in these ratios were much smaller compared to those (27–40% increases) of sunflower oil heated at 183 °C for 8 h [43]. While addition of antioxidant grape pomace extracts can inhibit the thermo-oxidative degradation of sunflowers [43], the indigenous antioxidants tocopherol (Table 2), peptides [10,44], and other bioactive compounds in cottonseed [29] should have reduced the auto-oxidation of cottonseed butter so that the smaller changes in the FTIR absorbance ratios were observed.
The change trends of A914/A1744 and A721/A1744) were similar to the three with A3009, as discussed above. Another ratio (A1655/A7144) showed greater changes. Compared to the other five ratios, its percentage change increased more in B15 samples after storage, with an average of 16.58%, and it also decreased more (−33.79%) in B30 samples. Previously, Rohman and Che-Man [42] observed that the peak intensities at 1655 and 967 cm−1 increased, but the peak intensities at 3008 and 722 cm−1 decreased during the thermal oxidation of vegetable oils. In a closely examined study, Wen et al. [41] reported that both peaks at 914 and 723 cm−1 of walnut oil samples exhibited a downward trend over the 7-day period of storage at 60 °C. However, the peak at 1654 cm−1 of these walnut oil samples initially decreased, then increased, and decreased again over storage. Wen et al. [41] attributed the complicated pattern to the continuous degradation of cis double bonds (olefinic group) at the initial oxidation stage. In the meantime, secondary oxidation products started to be produced with the deepening oxidation, reflecting the increasing absorbance at 1654 cm−1. Despite this, the degradation of the double bond kept playing great roles, reversing the A1654 change to a downward trend at the ending phase of the storage. This mechanism may be applicable to the different observations of these cottonseed samples, as the secondary oxidation parameter, p-anisidine value, was a little lower, but the primary oxidation parameter, peroxide value, was higher over the storage period at 60 °C (Figure 1). The FTIR difference between B15 and B30 implied the double functions of longer roasting time of speeding auto-oxidation and activating more antioxidant ability, including tocopherol (Table 2). However, the correlation analysis found only one significant correlation coefficient (0.721, p < 0.01) between A3009/A1744 and b-tocopherol. All other correlation coefficients between the six FTIR absorbance ratios and seven chemical measurements were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Therefore, more research is needed to better understand the changes in the FTIR features of cottonseed butter and other products during auto-oxidation and food stability.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Cottonseed Source and Peanut-Butter-like Product Making

The Gl cottonseed of NuMex series was provided by Cotton, Inc. (Cary, NC, USA) [5,45]. These seeds were dehulled mechanically by cracking with a 20.32 cm plate mill and then separated with a vibratory shaker. The kernel products were further cleaned by passing the material through a laboratory aspirator to remove the non-kernel material [7]. Cottonseed oil (Admiration Foods, Englewood, NJ, USA) was acquired from a local store.
The peanut-butter-like products were made based on the procedure reported previously [13]. Gl cottonseed kernels were used as the base material (75.0% of total product) to produce peanut-butter-like spread formulations. Additional cottonseed oil (16.8%), cane sugar (7.5%), and table salt (0.7%) were the other three ingredients used in the formulation. The basic composition of the formulation is listed in Table 4. For butter making, the Gl cottonseed kernels (240 g) in a metal tray were first roasted in a convection oven (Thermo Scientific Precision Com-pact Ovens, Waltham, MA, USA) at 150 °C for 15 or 30 min. After they were cooled down, the roasted kernels were ground with Waring Commercial Blender (Model WF2211214, Torrington, CT, USA) at a high speed for 3 min; they were then mixed thoroughly with the other three ingredients by a spatula. The mixture was then passed through a Smokehouse meat grinder with a 4 mm hole plate (Buchanan Dam, TX, USA). The two extrudants with kernels roasted for 15 and 30 min were taken as the peanut butter products (i.e., cottonseed butters), and named B15 and B30, respectively.

3.2. Accelerated Storage Experiment

This accelerated storage procedure was based on the literature on the evaluation of oxidative stability of plant butters [16,17]. The cottonseed butter samples (11.00 g each) were weighed into separate 50 mL centrifuge tubes. These were then capped and placed in a preheated (60 °C) forced-air convection oven (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for up to 25 days. The interior of the oven remained dark throughout the storage period. Triplicate tubes were removed after 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 days, respectively.

3.3. Cottonseed Color Determination

The color of the butter samples was analyzed with a Spectro2guide spectrophotometer with built-in calibration standard in the docking station (BYK-Gardner, Columbia, MD, USA) and recorded on the CIE L*a*b* color coordinates [46]. The axis L* evaluated a sample from black to white; the axis a* from green to red; and the axis b* from blue to yellow. In addition, two derived values, the color hue (h) and color saturation (C*) of the samples, were calculated from values of a* and b* [46,47].

3.4. Extraction of Oil Fractions from Butter Products

Oil fractions of the butter samples were extracted by petroleum ether via a Soxhlet distillation apparatus (ST 243 Soxtec solvent system, FOSS Analytics, Hillerod, Denmark) [17,48]. The extraction temperature and time parameters were 60 °C and 4.5 h, respectively. The extracted oil fractions were then placed under a fume hood overnight to let the solvent evaporate out. These oil samples were kept in a freezer (−20 °C) until analysis.

3.5. Oxidative Stability Measurement

Oxidative stability parameters were measured from the oil fractions of the cottonseed butter samples incubated over the accelerated autoxidation period [22]. Prior to analysis, the oil samples were removed from the freezer and allowed to equilibrate to room temperature [16]. The peroxide value (PV) was then determined per the protocol of AOCS Official Method Cd 8b-90 [49]. Data were expressed as milliequivalents of peroxide per kg of butter sample (meq kg−1) [50]. The p-anisidine value (p-AV) was determined according to the standard of AOCS Official Method Cd 18-90, using a spectrophotometer at 350 nm [51]. The total oxidation (TOTOX) value [22,52], as a useful measure of initial degradation in the oil that provides good information on both primary and secondary products of oxidation, was calculated as follows:
TOTOX value = 2PV + p-AV

3.6. HPLC Determination of Tocopherol

The analysis of tocopherol was conducted per the AOCS procedure Ce 8-89 [53]. Each oil extract (20 mg) was dissolved in 1.0 mL of hexane. The measurement was conducted with a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) model 2695 HPLC pumping system, a model 2475 fluorescence detector, and a Phenomenex Luna 5 μm Silica(2) column (150 mm × 4.6 mm). The mobile phase was 99% hexane and 1% isopropanol, with a pumping rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The injection volume was 20 µL. Tocopherols were detected at an excitation wavelength of 290 nm and an emission wavelength of 330 nm. Concentrations were determined by relating sample peak areas to standard curves and converted to mg kg−1 of butter sample.

3.7. ATR–FTIR Spectroscopy

The C functional group analysis of the oil fractions of the butter samples was conducted by a Vertex 70v FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), which was equipped with a MIRacle ATR accessory (Pike Technologies, Fitchburg, WI, USA) that incorporated a diamond crystal plate as the reflector. A few drops of the oil samples were placed on the ATR crystal surface and secured with a metal clamp to ensure a reproducible pressure, which was applied to the samples to achieve intimate contact with the ATR crystal. The spectra were collected over the range of 4000–600 cm−1, at a 4 cm−1 resolution and with 16 scans. After each measurement, the ATR plate was carefully cleaned by wiping it with analytical-grade acetone and dried with a soft tissue before it was filled with the next sample [39]. All spectra were normalized and presented in absorbance [36].

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Triplicate data of the color and chemical analysis are presented in the format of average ± standard deviation. These average values, if significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, are indicated by different letters in Table 1 and Table 2. The Correlation Analysis Tool under Data Analysis in Microsoft Excel 2016 was used to analyze correlation coefficients between the data sets of different parameters.

4. Conclusions

In this work, two cottonseed butter products (B15 and B30) were made from glandless cottonseed kernels roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. Their oxidative stability was evaluated by an accelerated storage experiment at 60 °C for 25 days. The colorimetric profile data indicated that the accelerated storage did not dramatically impact the color homogeneity and uniqueness of the cottonseed butter products, while there was a slight blanching effect with longer storage time. The measurements of three oxidative stability values revealed that the storage stability of the butter products was dominated by primary oxidation of lipid (oil) oxidation, while the secondary oxidation products were relatively unchanged over the storage time. High levels of antioxidant tocopherols detected in the cottonseed butter reflected the protection function of the tocopherol against oxidation of the cottonseed butter during storage. The ATR–FTIR data confirmed no changes in the major components of cottonseed butters over the storage time, but they indicated changes in double bonds related to lipid oxidation impacted by accelerated storage conditions. Overall, those data collected under the accelerated oxidation testing at 60 °C in 25 days should have reflected the oxidative stability behaviors of the cottonseed butter after about 13 months of shelf storage under ambient storage conditions. While these measured parameters of oxidative stability were critical in regard to food quality and flavors, the impacts of storage on other parameters (e.g., texture and physicochemical quality) should also be evaluated in future work for consumer acceptability of the cottonseed butter products [15,50].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.H.; data curation, Z.H., S.N. and K.T.K.; investigation, Z.H., S.N. and K.T.K.; methodology, Z.H., S.N. and K.T.K.; writing—original draft, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, S.N. and K.T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available wholly within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Stephen Rogers and Scott Pelitire for experimental assistance. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Any mention of trade names or commercial products was solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal-opportunity provider and employer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors are employed by the funding organization. However, the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; or in the writing of the manuscript, but they approved the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the butter products are available from the authors upon formal request and cooperative agreement.

References

  1. Risco, C.; Chase, C. Gossypol. In Handbook of Plant and Fungal Toxicants; D’Mello, J.P.F., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. He, Z.; Waldrip, H.M.; Wang, Y. Application of capillary electrophoresis in agricultural and soil chemistry research. In Capillary Electrophoresis: Fundamentals, Techniques and Applications; He, Z., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 131–151. [Google Scholar]
  3. He, Z.; Zhang, D.; Mattison, C.P. Quantitative comparison of the storage protein distribution in glandless and glanded cottonseeds. Agric. Environ. Lett. 2022, 7, e20076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gao, W.; Zhu, X.; Ding, L.; Xu, B.; Gao, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Dai, F.; Liu, B.; Si, Z.; Fang, L. Development of the engineered “glanded plant and glandless seed” cotton. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2022, 5, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. He, Z.; Mattison, C.P.; Zhang, D.; Grimm, C.C. Vicilin and legumin storage proteins are abundant in water and alkali soluble protein fractions of glandless cottonseed. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kumar, M.; Hasan, M.; Choyal, P.; Tomar, M.; Gupta, O.P.; Sasi, M.; Changan, S.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Singh, S.; Sampathrajan, V. Cottonseed feedstock as a source of plant-based protein and bioactive peptides: Evidence based on biofunctionalities and industrial applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 131, 107776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, Z.; Nam, S.; Zhang, H.; Olanya, O.M. Chemical composition and thermogravimetric behaviors of glanded and glandless cottonseed kernels. Molecules 2022, 27, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cao, H.; Sethumadhavan, K.; Bland, J.M. Isolation of cottonseed extracts that affect human cancer cell growth. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, H.; Sethumadhavan, K. Identification of bcl2 as a stably expressed qpcr reference gene for human colon cancer cells treated with cottonseed-derived gossypol and bioactive extracts and bacteria-derived lipopolysaccharides. Molecules 2022, 27, 7560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, Z.; Zhang, D.; Olanya, O.M. Antioxidant activities of the water-soluble fractions of glandless and glanded cottonseed protein. Food Chem. 2020, 325, 126907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Delgado, E.; Valverde-Quiroz, L.; Lopez, D.; Cooke, P.; Valles-Rosales, D.; Flores, N. Characterization of soluble glandless cottonseed meal proteins based on electrophoresis, functional properties, and microscopic structure. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 2820–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, L.; Ma, M.; Yu, Z.; Du, S.-k. Preparation and identification of antioxidant peptides from cottonseed proteins. Food Chem. 2021, 352, 129399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, Z.; Cheng, H.N.; He, J. Initial formulation of novel peanut butter-like products from glandless cottonseed. Foods 2023, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shakerardekani, A.; Karim, R.; Ghazali, H.M.; Chin, N.L. Textural, rheological and sensory properties and oxidative stability of nut spreads—a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 4223–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mureşan, V.; Danthine, S.; Bolboacă, S.D.; Racolţa, E.; Muste, S.; Socaciu, C.; Blecker, C. Roasted sunflower kernel paste (tahini) stability: Storage conditions and particle size influence. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2015, 92, 669–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shakerardekani, A.; Karim, R.; Ghazali, H.M.; Chin, N.L. Oxidative stability of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) paste and spreads. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2015, 92, 1015–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hou, L.; Li, C.; Wang, X. The colloidal and oxidative stability of the sesame pastes during storage. J. Oleo Sci. 2020, 69, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valdés García, A.; Beltrán, A.; Karabagias, I.; Badeka, A.; Kontominas, M.G.; Garrigós, M.C. Monitoring the oxidative stability and volatiles in blanched, roasted and fried almonds under normal and accelerated storage conditions by dsc, thermogravimetric analysis and atr-ftir. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 117, 1199–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wall, M.M. Functional lipid characteristics, oxidative stability, and antioxidant activity of macadamia nut (Macadamia integrifolia) cultivars. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Choe, E. Temperature dependence of the autoxidation and antioxidants of soybean, sunflower, and olive oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2007, 226, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Valdés García, A.; Beltrán Sanahuja, A.; Karabagias, I.K.; Badeka, A.; Kontominas, M.G.; Garrigós, M.C. Effect of frying and roasting processes on the oxidative stability of sunflower seeds (Helianthus annuus) under normal and accelerated storage conditions. Foods 2021, 10, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shafiei, G.; Ghorbani, M.; Hosseini, H.; Mahoonak, A.S.; Maghsoudlou, Y.; Jafari, S.M. Estimation of oxidative indices in the raw and roasted hazelnuts by accelerated shelf-life testing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2433–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vieira, T.M.; Regitano-d’Arce, M.A. Canola oil thermal oxidation during oven test and microwave heating. LWT 2001, 34, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xie, C.; Ma, Z.F.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Kong, L.; Yang, Z.; Xie, W. Storage quality of walnut oil containing lycopene during accelerated oxidation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Muttagi, G.C.; Joshi, N.; Shadakshari, Y.G.; Chandru, R. Storage stability of value added products from sunflower kernels. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1806–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Man, Y.B.C.; Liu, J.L.; Jamilah, B.; Rahman, R.A. Quality changes of refined-bleached-deodorized (rbd) palm olein, soybean oil and their blends during deep-fat frying. J. Food Lipids 1999, 6, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ye, Y.; Khushvakov, J.; Boboev, A.; Akramova, R.; Yunusov, O.; Dalimova, D.; Turdikulova, S.; Mirzaakhmedov, S.; Engelsen, S.B.; Khakimov, B. Effect of refinement and production technology on the molecular composition of edible cottonseed oils from a large industrial scale production. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 99, 105326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marzocchi, S.; Pasini, F.; Verardo, V.; Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz, H.; Caboni, M.F.; Romani, S. Effects of different roasting conditions on physical-chemical properties of polish hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L. Var. Kataloński). LWT 2017, 77, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, Z.; Liu, S.; Nam, S.; Klasson, K.T.; Cheng, H.N. Molecular level characterization of the effect of roasting on the extractable components of glandless cottonseed by fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2023, 403, 134404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kouser, S.; Mahmood, K.; Anwar, F. Variations in physicochemical attributes of seed oil among different varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pak. J. Bot. 2015, 47, 723–729. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharif, I.; Farooq, J.; Chohan, S.M.; Saleem, S.; Kainth, R.A.; Mahmood, A.; Sarwar, G. Strategies to enhance cottonseed oil contents and reshape fatty acid profile employing different breeding and genetic engineering approaches. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 2205–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Javidipour, I.; Tüfenk, R.; Baştürk, A. Effect of ascorbyl palmitate on oxidative stability of chemically interesterified cottonseed and olive oils. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Riaz, T.; Iqbal, M.W.; Mahmood, S.; Yasmin, I.; Leghari, A.A.; Rehman, A.; Mushtaq, A.; Ali, K.; Azam, M.; Bilal, M. Cottonseed oil: A review of extraction techniques, physicochemical, functional, and nutritional properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. McDaniel, K.A.; White, B.L.; Dean, L.L.; Sanders, T.H.; Davis, J.P. Compositional and mechanical properties of peanuts roasted to equivalent colors using different time/temperature combinations. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, C1293–C1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, Z.; Liu, Y. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis in applied cotton fiber and cottonseed research: A review. J. Cotton Sci. 2021, 25, 167–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, Z.; Liu, Y.; Kim, H.J.; Tewolde, H.; Zhang, H. Fourier transform infrared spectral features of plant biomass components during cotton organ development and their biological implications. J. Cotton Res. 2022, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; He, Z.; Shankle, M.; Tewolde, H. Compositional features of cotton plant biomass fractions characterized by attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 79, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arslan, F.N.; Akin, G.; Elmas, Ş.N.K.; Yilmaz, I.; Janssen, H.-G.; Kenar, A. Rapid detection of authenticity and adulteration of cold pressed black cumin seed oil: A comparative study of atr–ftir spectroscopy and synchronous fluorescence with multivariate data analysis. Food Control 2019, 98, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Beltrán Sanahuja, A.; Prats Moya, M.; Maestre Pérez, S.; Grané Teruel, N.; Martín Carratalá, M. Classification of four almond cultivars using oil degradation parameters based on ftir and gc data. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2009, 86, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guillén, M.D.; Cabo, N. Some of the most significant changes in the fourier transform infrared spectra of edible oils under oxidative conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 2028–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wen, Y.; Zhou, S.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Gao, Y.; Yu, X. New method for the determination of the induction period of walnut oil by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Food Anal. Met. 2022, 15, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rohman, A.; Che Man, Y. Application of ftir spectroscopy for monitoring the stabilities of selected vegetable oils during thermal oxidation. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013, 16, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Poiana, M.-A.; Moigradean, D.; Dumbrava, D.-G.; Radulov, I.; Raba, D.N.; Rivis, A. Exploring the potential of grape pomace extract to inhibit thermo-oxidative degradation of sunflower oil: From routine tests to atr-ftir spectroscopy. Foods 2022, 11, 3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, W.; Kong, X.; Hua, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity and in vitro digestion stability of cottonseed protein hydrolysates. LWT 2020, 118, 108724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J.; Wedegaertner, T.; Idowu, O.J.; Flynn, R.; Hughs, S.E.; Jones, D.C. Registration of ‘numex cot 15 gls’ glandless cotton. J. Plant Regist. 2016, 10, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nikolić, I.; Dokić, L.; Rakić, D.; Tomović, V.; Maravić, N.; Vidosavljević, S.; Šereš, Z.; Šoronja-Simović, D. The role of two types of continuous phases based on cellulose during textural, color, and sensory characterization of novel food spread with pumpkin seed flour. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wagener, E.A.; Kerr, W.L. Effects of oil content on the sensory, textural, and physical properties of pecan butter (Carya illinoinensis). J. Texture Stud. 2018, 49, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ben-Youssef, S.; Fakhfakh, J.; Breil, C.; Abert-Vian, M.; Chemat, F.; Allouche, N. Green extraction procedures of lipids from tunisian date palm seeds. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 108, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. AOCS. Peroxide value: Acetic acid-isooctane method. In AOCS Official Method Cd 80-90; AOCS: Urbana, IL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rozalli, N.H.M.; Chin, N.L.; Yusof, Y.A.; Mahyudin, N. Quality changes of stabilizer-free natural peanut butter during storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. AOCS. P-anisidine value. In AOCS Official Method Cd 18-90; AOCS: Urbana, IL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shahidi, F.; Wanasundara, U.N. Methods for evaluation of the oxidative stability of lipid-containing foods. Food Sci. Technol. Inter. 1996, 2, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. AOCS. Determination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in vegetable oils and fats by hplc. In AOCS Offical Method Ce 8-89; AOCS: Urbana, IL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 28 01599 g001 550
Figure 1. Changes in the oxidative stability values of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C. B15 and B30, butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. PV, peroxide value; pAV, p-anisidine value; Totox, total oxidation value. Data are present in the format of average ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 1. Changes in the oxidative stability values of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C. B15 and B30, butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. PV, peroxide value; pAV, p-anisidine value; Totox, total oxidation value. Data are present in the format of average ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Molecules 28 01599 g001
Molecules 28 01599 g002 550
Figure 2. ATR–FTIR spectra of oil extracts of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage for 25 days at 60 °C. (A) B15 and (B) B30 are butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively.
Figure 2. ATR–FTIR spectra of oil extracts of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage for 25 days at 60 °C. (A) B15 and (B) B30 are butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively.
Molecules 28 01599 g002
Molecules 28 01599 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative changes (%) of selected ATR–FTIR absorbance ratios over the accelerated oxidation storage for 60 days at 60 °C. (A) B15 and (B) B30 are butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively.
Figure 3. Relative changes (%) of selected ATR–FTIR absorbance ratios over the accelerated oxidation storage for 60 days at 60 °C. (A) B15 and (B) B30 are butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively.
Molecules 28 01599 g003
Table
Table 1. Changes in the colorimetric profile of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C. B15 and B30, butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. Data are present in the format of average ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate these values are statistically significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 1. Changes in the colorimetric profile of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C. B15 and B30, butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. Data are present in the format of average ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate these values are statistically significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
(A) B15
DayL*a*b*C*h
059.52 ± 0.01 a3.19 ± 0.02 f25.60 ± 0.04 d25.80 ± 0.04 e82.89 ± 0.05 a
655.21 ± 0.02 f4.08 ± 0.01 d24.68 ± 0.01 f25.01 ± 0.01 f80.61 ± 0.02 e
1055.30 ± 0.02 e4.44 ± 0.01 a25.40 ± 0.01 e25.87 ± 0.01 d80.11 ± 0.01 f
1557.67 ± 0.02 d4.21 ± 0.01 b26.42 ± 0.01 b26.75 ± 0.01 bc80.94 ± 0.01 d
2059.01 ± 0.01 b3.99 ± 0.01 e26.11 ± 0.01 c26.41 ± 0.01 c81.32 ± 0.01 b
2558.54 ± 0.00 c4.18 ± 0.00 c26.73 ± 0.00 a27.05 ± 0.01 a81.12 ± 0.01 c
(B) B30
DayL*a*b*C*h
056.58 ± 0.01 b3.60 ± 0.01 f26.15 ± 0.04 d26.41 ± 0.01 d82.16 ± 0.00 a
656.35 ± 0.01 d4.30 ± 0.01 d26.06 ± 0.00 e26.42 ± 0.01 d80.62 ± 0.00 e
1055.47 ± 0.05 e4.52 ± 0.01 a25.68 ± 0.01 f26.08 ± 0.00 e80.01 ± 0.02 f
1554.78 ± 0.01 f4.04 ± 0.01 e26.37± 0.01 c26.68± 0.01 cc81.28 ± 0.00 b
2057.77 ± 0.01 a4.46 ± 0.01 b27.14 ± 0.01 a27.51 ± 0.01 a80.66 ± 0.02 d
2556.45 ± 0.01 c4.34 ± 0.01 c26.78 ± 0.00 b27.13 ± 0.01 b80.79 ± 0.01 c
Table
Table 2. Changes in individual and total tocopherol content (mg kg−1 of butter sample) of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C. B15 and B30 are butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. Data are presented as average ± SD (n = 3). Same letters in the same column indicate that these values are not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table 2. Changes in individual and total tocopherol content (mg kg−1 of butter sample) of cottonseed butters over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C. B15 and B30 are butter products made from the cottonseed roasted at 150 °C for 15 and 30 min, respectively. Data are presented as average ± SD (n = 3). Same letters in the same column indicate that these values are not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05).
(A) B15
Daya-γ-δ-b-Total
023.30 ± 10.30 ab62.28 ± 15.12 a0.66 ± 0.05 a0.73 ± 0.27 c87.18 ± 15.14 a
614.23 ± 11.16 ab43.49 ± 16.81 ab0.52 ± 0.11 a1.24 ± 0.37 ab59.48 ± 28.41 a
109.68 ± 8.63 b34.30 ± 18.15 ab0.54 ± 0.06 a1.16 ± 0.29 abc49.70 ± 31.19 a
1531.01 ± 8.33 a61.97 ± 2.82 a0.69 ± 0.04 a1.10 ± 0.07 bc94.78 ± 10.89 a
2024.27 ± 8.84 ab52.30 ± 11.81 ab0.68 ± 0.13 a0.98 ± 0.27 bc78.22 ± 20.66
2515.09 ± 17.66 ab28.52 ± 27.32 b0.52 ± 0.15 a1.58 ± 0.21 a45.72 ± 44.87 a
(B) B30
Daya-γ-δ-b-Total
030.28 ± 17.24 b66.24 ± 1.43 a0.74 ± 0.06 b0.77 ± 0.07 bc98.03 ± 8.71 a
621.36 ± 3.39 c43.27 ± 4.54 b0.65 ± 0.09 bc0.80 ± 0.09 b66.09 ± 7.13 b
1014.06 ± 5.91 c29.70 ± 7.79 c0.57 ± 0.05 c0.68 ± 0.05 c45.01 ± 13.55 c
1545.45 ± 0.81 a66.85 ± 1.68 a0.92 ± 0.03 a1.07 ± 0.01 a114.29 ± 2.24 a
2045.33 ± 0.66 a64.63 ± 0.19 a0.97 ± 0.04 a1.10 ± 0.02 a112.03 ± 0.80 a
2541.25 ± 2.03 ab63.35 ± 0.35 a0.96 ± 0.04 a1.08 ± 0.03 a106.64 ± 2.25 a
Table
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between tocopherol contents and oxidative stability parameters collected from cottonseed butter samples B15 and B30 over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C (n = 12). PV, peroxide value; pAV, p-anisidine value; Totox, total oxidation value.
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between tocopherol contents and oxidative stability parameters collected from cottonseed butter samples B15 and B30 over the accelerated oxidation storage at 60 °C (n = 12). PV, peroxide value; pAV, p-anisidine value; Totox, total oxidation value.
TocopherolOxidative Stability
α-g-d-b-TotalPVpAV
Tocopherolg-0.851 ***
d-0.974 ***0.802 **
b-−0.069−0.275−0.129
Total0.957 ***0.967 ***0.916 ***−0.179
Oxidative stabilityPV−0.815 ***−0.873 ***−0.747 **0.163−0.880 ***
pAV−0.3160.059−0.314−0.543−0.123−0.121
Totox−0.881 ***−0.866 ***−0.812 **0.06−0.909 ***0.981 ***0.074
Symbols **, and *** indicate the coefficient values significant at p = 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table
Table 4. Basic composition of cottonseed butter. Values were calculated per the composition data of the cottonseed kernels [7] and percentages of four ingredients (i.e., cottonseed, cottonseed oil, cane sugar, and table salt) in the butter formulation. ADF, acid detergent fiber. ADL, acid detergent lignin.
Table 4. Basic composition of cottonseed butter. Values were calculated per the composition data of the cottonseed kernels [7] and percentages of four ingredients (i.e., cottonseed, cottonseed oil, cane sugar, and table salt) in the butter formulation. ADF, acid detergent fiber. ADL, acid detergent lignin.
Major Component (g kg−1)
ProteinOilSugarStarchADFADLGossypol
315.8430.575.0 112.581.850.90.0045
Macro Element (g kg−1)
PCaKMgNaSCl
8.6 1.79.64.63.23.74.2
1 For added sugar only.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Z.; Nam, S.; Klasson, K.T. Oxidative Stability of Cottonseed Butter Products under Accelerated Storage Conditions. Molecules 2023, 28, 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041599

AMA Style

He Z, Nam S, Klasson KT. Oxidative Stability of Cottonseed Butter Products under Accelerated Storage Conditions. Molecules. 2023; 28(4):1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041599

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Zhongqi, Sunghyun Nam, and K. Thomas Klasson. 2023. "Oxidative Stability of Cottonseed Butter Products under Accelerated Storage Conditions" Molecules 28, no. 4: 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041599

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop