Next Article in Journal
A Possible Natural and Inexpensive Substitute for Lapis Lazuli in the Frederick II Era: The Finding of Haüyne in Blue Lead-Tin Glazed Pottery from Melfi Castle (Italy)
Next Article in Special Issue
Quality Control and Authentication of Argan Oils: Application of Advanced Analytical Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Neurotrophic Properties and Structural Characterization of a New Polysaccharide LTC-1 from Pyrola corbieri Levl (Luticao)
Previous Article in Special Issue
μ-Raman Determination of Essential Oils’ Constituents from Distillates and Leaf Glands of Origanum Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Trifluoro-Acetate Derivatives for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS Quantification of Trace Amounts of Stera-3β,5α,6β-Triols (Tracers of Δ5-Sterol Autoxidation) in Environmental Samples

by
Claude Aubert
1 and
Jean-François Rontani
2,*
1
Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique et Toxicocinétique (Equipe Associée 3286), Faculté de Pharmacie, 13385 Marseille, France
2
CNRS/IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UM 110, Aix-Marseille University, Université de Toulon, 13288 Marseille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(4), 1547; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041547
Submission received: 7 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 6 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Feature Papers in Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Stera-3β,5α,6β-triols make useful tracers of the autoxidation of Δ5-sterols. These compounds are generally analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after silylation. Unfortunately, the 5α hydroxyl groups of these compounds, which are not derivatized by conventional silylation reagents, substantially alter the chromatographic properties of these derivatives, thus ruling out firm quantification of trace amounts. In this work, we developed a derivatization method (trifluoroacetylation) that enables derivatization of the three hydroxyl groups of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols. The derivatives thus formed present several advantages over silyl ethers: (i) better stability, (ii) shorter retention times, (iii) better chromatographic properties and (iv) mass spectra featuring specific ions or transitions that enable very low limits of detection in selected ion monitoring (SIM) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. This method, validated with cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol, was applied to several environmental samples (desert dusts, marine sediments and particulate matter) and was able to quantify trace amounts of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols corresponding to several sterols: not only classical monounsaturated sterols (e.g., cholesterol, campesterol and sitosterol) but also, and for the first time, di-unsaturated sterols (e.g., stigmasterol, dehydrocholesterol and brassicasterol).

1. Introduction

Autoxidation (free radical oxidation) of Δ5-sterols mainly affords 7α- and 7β-hydroperoxides and, to a lesser extent, 5α/β,6α/β-epoxysterols and 3β,5α,6β-trihydroxysterols [1]. The 7α- and 7β-hydroperoxides have been ruled out as possible markers of autoxidation processes in the environment due to their instability (fast degradation under environmental conditions) and lack of specificity (formation is also possible by allylic rearrangement of photochemically produced 5α-hydroperoxysterols) [2,3]. Unfortunately, the highly specific 5α/β,6α/β-epoxysterols have also been ruled out as they are too unstable under environmental conditions; they are quickly hydrolyzed to their corresponding triols by epoxide hydrolase [4] and under acidic conditions [5]. The 3β,5α,6β-trihydroxysterols, which are stable and only produced during autoxidation processes, have thus been proposed as specific tracers of sterol autoxidation in the environment [2,3].
Electron ionization (EI) provides more structural information than the soft ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI) or atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) employed in HPLC-MS analyses [6], and so quantification of Δ5-sterols and their oxidation products in environmental samples is most often performed using gas chromatography–electron ionization mass spectrometry (GC-EIMS). GC-EIMS analyses are generally carried out on a nonpolar silicone stationary phase after silylation [2,5,7,8,9]. Silylation of sterol involves the replacement of the hydrogen of the hydroxyl group with an alkylsilyl (often trimethylsilyl) group. Trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives are highly volatile, thermally stable and present outstanding gas chromatographic characteristics. Moreover, the EI mass spectra of these derivatives often exhibit a significant [M-15]+ ion formed by the loss of a silicon-bonded methyl group, which is very useful for determining molecular mass, and are also very informative for structural elucidations [10,11]. However, since TMS derivatives can lose easily trimethylsilanol molecules under the effect of moisture, a short delay between derivatization and injection is needed. Despite this drawback, silylation is a very popular derivatization method and is often employed during sterol quantification using GC-MS [12,13,14,15,16]. Unfortunately, steric hindrance makes complete silylation of 3β,5α,6β-trihydroxysterols difficult, and common silylation reagents (such as bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA)/pyridine) afford derivatives that are only silylated at C-3 and C-6 [17]. Trisilylated derivatives can be obtained after treatment with BSTFA/dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) [18], but conversion is still not complete (yields are close to 50%) and this treatment is still too complex to be applied for analysis of trace amounts in environmental samples. It is absolutely necessary to eliminate the DMSO before injection into the chromatographic column, and this operation (requiring: (i) addition of water, (ii) extraction with solvents and (iii) resilylation of 3β and 6β hydroxyl groups) cannot be carried out without significant losses of the lipidic material. The presence of a polar nonderivatized hydroxyl group at C-5 in the disilylated derivative strongly alters its chromatographic characteristics and leads to the formation of tailing peaks that substantially limit the sensitivity of the analyses [19].
Acetylation of steroids with acetic anhydride and trifluoroacetic anhydride is also very common [20,21,22,23]. However, it is generally considered that trimethylsilyl derivatives are more suitable for the GC-MS characterization and quantitation of sterols than acetate derivatives [16]. Acetylation involves replacement of the mobile hydrogen atoms of the hydroxyl groups of sterols with acyl or trifluoro acyl groups. Halogenated acyl groups enhance the electron affinity of the derivative and produce very specific fragmentation patterns in mass spectrometry [24]. It should be noted, however, that the use of fluorinated anhydrides requires the removal of any excess or byproducts prior to GC analysis to prevent deterioration of the column [25]. To our knowledge, trifluoroacetylation has not been used in the case of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols.
In this work, we set out to develop a trifluoroacetylation method able to derivatize the three hydroxyl groups of 3β,5α,6β-trihydroxysterols in order to reduce analyte adsorption in the GC system and improve detector response, peak separation and peak symmetry. We used trifluoroacetic anhydride, which is well known to be highly reactive in the case of steric hindrance [25]. This derivatization technique was then validated using environmental samples (desert dusts, marine sediments and particulate matter), where it allowed the detection of traces of several triols resulting from the oxidation of mono- and di-unsaturated sterols.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Formation and Characterization of Trifluoroacetate Derivative of Cholesta-3β,5α,6β-Triol

Reaction of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol with trifluoroacetic anhydride in tetrahydrofurane (THF) under the conditions described in Section 3.2 afforded a trifluoroacetate derivative at high yield (>95%). As expected, this derivative presented better chromatographic characteristics (shorter retention time and better peak shape) than the corresponding bis-trimethylsilyl ether (Figure 1). It is well known that the introduction of fluorine atoms strongly enhances analyte volatility and thus reduces analyte retention time [26]. Due to its high content of fluorine atoms (nine per molecule), the trifluoroacetate derivative of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol eluted 9 min faster than the corresponding disilylated derivative (Figure 1) and 1.5 min faster than cholesterol trifluoroacetate on the 30 m capillary column employed.
Although negative inductive effects of the fluorine atoms in a derivatized product may drive hydrolysis in the presence of moisture [27], here, the trifluoroacetate derivative of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol was found to be highly stable. Indeed, in contrast to the corresponding TMS derivative, which was hydrolyzed in a few days, it could be stored at 4 °C for several months without significant alteration.
The EI(TOF) mass spectrum of the cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative (Figure 2A) exhibited ions at m/z 594.3134 (b+•), 480.3209 (c+•) and 366.3273 (d+•) corresponding to the successive loss of one, two and three neutral molecules of trifluoroacetic acid by the molecular ion (a+•), respectively (Figure 3). Note that the abundance of the c+• ion resulted from the formation of a stable conjugated enol ester group. An ion at m/z 367.1876 (e+) resulting from the loss of two molecules of trifluoroacetic acid and the side-chain was also formed. The shift of ions b+•, c+• and d+• by 7 m/z units and the lack of shift of the e+ ion observed in the EI(TOF) mass spectrum of cholest-5-en-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative (Figure 2B) further supports these attributions. Unfortunately, due to its instability under electron impact, the molecular peak of the cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative was not observable in its EI(TOF) mass spectrum. We therefore used electron-capture negative ionization (ECNI), which is generally considered a soft ionization technique that yields a mass spectral pattern with less fragmentation than EI ionization [28]. The ECNI mass spectrum of the cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative (Figure 2C) appeared to be dominated by a peak at m/z 113 corresponding to the anion CF3-COO and a smaller molecular peak at m/z 708, attesting that the observed derivative was well triacetylated.
Based on its abundance (Figure 2A) and specificity, the c+• ion corresponding to [M—2CF3COOH]+• was selected as the target ion for selected ion monitoring (SIM)-based quantification of the main 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives present in environmental samples. Due to its high specificity, the less abundant b+• ion corresponding to [M—CF3COOH]+• constituted a useful qualifier allowing confirmation of the identifications. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) analyses (Figure 4) allowed selection of the efficient transition c+•f+ [M—3CF3COOH—CH3]+ corresponding to the loss of a neutral molecule of CF3COOH and a methyl radical by the c+• ion (Figure 3) for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analyses (Table 1).

2.2. Validation of the Derivatization Method

Validation of the derivatization method was carried out using the cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative. Results of linearity tests in SIM and MRM modes are presented in Table 2. In the concentration range tested here (0.2325–46.5 ng/mL), the coefficients of determination of the linear regression curves were better than 0.995 and the intercepts did not differ significantly from 0.
Table 3 reports the reproducibility of this derivatization technique. The precision (given by the standard deviation) and accuracy (defined as the difference between obtained concentration and expected concentration) were acceptable over the concentration range.
The limit of detection (LOD) (defined by a signal-to-noise ratio of 5) was about 25.8 and 0.78 pg injected in SIM and MRM modes, respectively. For comparison, the LOD obtained for the corresponding disilylated derivative was 0.62 ng in SIM mode with the target ion m/z 456 corresponding to [M—TMSOH—H2O]+•. Due to the higher specificity of their MRM transitions, trifluoroacetate derivatives are much more suitable for the analysis of trace amounts of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols in complex samples than silylated derivatives.

2.3. Application to Different Environmental Samples

In an application of the derivatization method, 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives originating from the autoxidation of common Δ5-sterols were quantified in total lipid extracts (TLEs) of several environmental samples (desert dusts, marine sediments and particulate matter). The results obtained are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5. This method allowed precise quantification of 3β,5α,6β-triols derived from classical monounsaturated Δ5-sterols: cholest-5-en-3β-ol (cholesterol), 24-methylcholest-5-en-3β-ol (campesterol) and 24-ethylcholest-5-en-3β-ol (sitosterol) (Table 4, Figure 5). The double peak observed in the case of the transition m/z 494 → m/z 365 (Figure 5) resulted from the well-known production of a mixture of 24-methylcholesterol epimers by eukaryotic organisms, wherein campesterol (24(R)-methylcholest-5-en-3β-ol) and dihydrobrassicasterol (24(S)-methylcholest-5-en-3β-ol) are found in variable proportions [29,30]. Due to their excellent chromatographic properties, diastereoisomeric 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives could be easily separated, while the corresponding disilylated derivatives coeluted and showed only a small tailing peak.
Interestingly, we also detected unsaturated triols deriving from 5,22-di-unsaturated sterols, i.e., cholesta-5,22(E)-dien-3β-ol (dehydrocholesterol), 24-methylcholesta-5,22(E)-dien-3β-ol (brassicasterol) and 24-ethylcholesta-5,22(E)-dien-3β-ol (stigmasterol) (Table 5, Figure 6), which have never previously been described in the literature. Note that the mass spectra of these derivatives (Figure 7) were similar to the mass spectra of monounsaturated sterols (Figure 2A).
Sterols are commonly used as tracers for specific classes of organisms in environmental samples [31,32,33]. Due to their relative stability, these compounds and their degradation products are also excellent biomarkers for tracing the diagenetic transformation of organic matter [2,3,34,35,36]. The quantification of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols (autoxidation tracers) [2,3] and their corresponding sterols in natural samples thus provides valuable information on the oxidation state (and thus alteration) of specific organisms (e.g., higher plants, seagrasses, phytoplankton, zooplankton and fungi). For example, the presence of the triol corresponding to brassicasterol (a sterol present in many species of phytoplankton [33,35]) in the sediments of the Baffin Sea (Table 5) attests to the intervention of autoxidative processes in these organisms. On the other hand, the detection of high proportions of the triol corresponding to sitosterol (a major sterol of higher plants [33,35]) in the analyzed samples (Table 4) is indicative of the presence of strongly oxidized higher-plant material. Due to the high specificity of some sterols [33,35], the corresponding 3β,5α,6β-steratriols could even give indications concerning the autoxidation of specific phyla of phytoplankton (e.g., diatoms, prymnesiophytes and chlorophytes).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

Trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA), cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol, sterols, cholest-5-en-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β-ol, meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, H2O2, N,O-bis(triméthylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and chemical reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The synthesis of standards of the stera-3β,5α,6β-triols corresponding to campesterol, sitosterol, brassicasterol, dehydrocholesterol and stigmasterol involved epoxidation with meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid in dry methylene chloride, and subsequent acid-catalyzed hydrolysis [37]. These compounds were purified subsequently using column chromatography as described below for the internal standard.
The internal standard used (cholesta-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β,5α,6β-triol) was synthesized by KI/H2O2 oxidation of the corresponding heptadeuterosterol [38]. Cholest-5-en-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β-ol (5 mg), KI (2.2 mg) and dioxane/water (0.9 mL, 2:1, v/v) were placed in a 20 mL flask, and then H2SO4 (98%, 5 µL) and H2O2 (30%, 10 µL) were added sequentially at room temperature under magnetic stirring. After stirring for 1 h at room temperature, the system was stirred for 3 h at 60 °C and the reaction mixture was then neutralized with anhydrous Na2CO3 (2.2 mg) and treated with a saturated solution of Na2SO3 (4 mL). The crude triol was extracted twice (4 mL) with ethyl acetate and the organic extracts were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen at 50 °C. The crude triol was then purified using column chromatography (silica, Kieselgel 60 with 55% water, 6 × 0.6 cm). The column was conditioned with CH2Cl2. After elimination of the residual sterol with CH2Cl2 (8 mL), the triol was eluted with CH3CN (6 mL).
The standard solutions of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol and internal standard were prepared by dissolving 10 mg measures of these compounds (weighted) in 10 mL of methanol. Dilutions were also carried out in methanol.

3.2. Environmental Samples

Detailed descriptions of the collection of samples of desert dusts, marine particulate matter and sediments used for validation of the proposed 3β,5α,6β-steratriol derivatization method can be found elsewhere [39,40,41,42]. Treatment of the whole material of the different samples involved reduction with excess NaBH4 in MeOH (25 mL; 30 min) to convert labile hydroperoxides (resulting from oxidation) to their corresponding alcohols, which are more amenable to analysis using GC-EIMS, GC-EIMS/MS and GC-QTOF. Water (25 mL) and KOH (2.8 g) were then added and the resulting mixture saponified by refluxing (2 h). After cooling, the mixture was acidified (HCl, 2 N) to pH 1 and extracted with dichloromethane (DCM; 3 × 20 mL). The combined DCM extracts were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated via rotary evaporation at 40 °C to give TLEs. All the solvents (pesticide/glass distilled grade) and reagents (Puriss grade) were obtained from Rathburn (Walkerburn, Scotland) and Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Quentin Fallavier, France), respectively. The different TLEs obtained were derivatized as described in the following section.

3.3. Trifluoroacetylation Method

In an effort to optimize the derivatization reaction, we tested several parameters, including the nature of the solvent (cyclohexane, tetrahydrofuran (THF), diethyl ether, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and 1,4-dioxane), reaction temperature (50–100 °C), heating time (1–24 h) and volume of TFAA (25–200 µL). Although this reaction could be also carried out with pentafluoropropionic anhydride, we selected TFAA as the derivatizing reagent since it allowed the formation of fluorinated derivatives with a better yield (>95%). The best reaction efficiency was obtained with the following conditions.
Samples to be derivatized (after evaporation to dryness under a stream of nitrogen at 50 °C) (2–100 ng), internal standard (66 ng), anhydrous THF (200 µL) and TFAA (100 µL) were put in glass vials (4 mL) with PTFE-lined screw caps, and the mixtures were maintained at 68–70 °C in a heating block for 24 h. After evaporation to dryness under a stream of nitrogen at 50 °C, the residues were dissolved in BSTFA to silylate the traces of trifluoroacetic acid formed during the reaction that could damage the GC column employed.

3.4. Silylation

3β,5α,6β-steratriols were silylated by dissolving them in 300 µL measures of a mixture of pyridine and BSTFA (2:1, v/v) and heating to 50 °C for 1 h. After evaporation to dryness under a stream of N2 at 50 °C, the derivatized residues were dissolved in BSTFA.

3.5. Gas Chromatography-Tandem Electron Ionization Mass Spectrometry (GC-EIMS/MS)

GC-EIMS and GC-EIMS/MS analyses were performed using an Agilent 7890A/7010A tandem quadrupole gas chromatograph system (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France) with a cross-linked 5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane capillary column (Agilent, Courtaboeuf, Les Ulis, France; HP-5MS ultra inert, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness). Analyses were performed with an injector operating in pulsed splitless mode (1.7 × 105 Pa for 0.5 min) set at 270 °C. Oven temperature was ramped from 70 °C to 130 °C at 20 °C min−1, then to 250° C at 5 °C min−1 and then to 300 °C at 3 °C min−1. The pressure of the carrier gas (He) was held at 0.76 × 105 Pa until the end of the temperature program. The mass spectrometer conditions were as follows: electron energy, 70 eV; source temperature, 230 °C; quadrupole 1 temperature, 150 °C; quadrupole 2 temperature, 150 °C; collision gas (N2) flow, 1.5 mL min−1; quench gas (He) flow, 2.25 mL min−1; mass range, m/z 50–700; cycle time, 313 ms. Steratriol derivatives were quantified in SIM and MRM modes. Target and precursor ions were selected from the most intense and specific fragmentations observed in the electron ionization (EI) mass spectra. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) was optimized using collision energies ranging from 0 to 20 eV. Quantification with Mass Hunter software (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France) involved peak integration and quantitative determination using calibration curves and ratios between areas of triol and internal standard (cholesta-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β,5α,6β-triol).
ECNI analyses were carried out on the same apparatus with methane as the reagent gas at 50 mA emission current and 195 eV electron energy. During the experiment, the temperature of the source was held at 150 °C and reactant gas flow was 0.5–0.7 mL min−1.

3.6. Gas Chromatography-EI Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (GC-QTOF)

Accurate mass measurements were carried out in full scan mode using an Agilent 7890B/7200 GC/QTOF system (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France) with a cross-linked 5% phenyl methylpolysiloxane capillary column (Agilent Technologies; HP-5MS Ultra inert, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness). Analyses were performed with an injector operating in pulsed splitless mode (1.7 × 105 Pa for 0.5 min) set at 270 °C. Oven temperature was ramped from 70 °C to 130 °C at 20 °C min−1 and then to 300 °C at 5 °C min−1. The pressure of the carrier gas (He) was held at 0.76 × 105 Pa until the end of the temperature program. Instrument temperatures were 300 °C for the transfer line and 230 °C for the ion source. Nitrogen (1.5 mL min−1) was used as the collision gas. Accurate mass spectra were recorded across the range of m/z 50–700 at 4 GHz with the collision gas opened. The QTOF-MS instrument provided a typical resolution ranging from 8009 to 12,252 from m/z 68.9955 to 501.9706. Perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) was used for daily MS calibration. Compounds were identified by comparing their EI(TOF) mass spectra, accurate masses and retention times against standards.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we developed a new method of derivatization of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols (trifluoroacetylation), allowing to considerably improve the quantification of these sterol oxidation products (used as tracers of autoxidation processes) in natural samples. Indeed, the trifluoroacetylated derivatives presented much better chromatographic characteristics (shorter retention times and finer peaks) and were much more stable than the corresponding trimethylsilyl derivatives most often used to quantify 3β,5α,6β-steratriols. This new derivatization method should therefore allow a much more accurate estimation of the oxidation state of sterols in environmental samples. It also allows the separation of diastereoisomeric steratriols, which is not possible with disilylated derivatives. Note that this method allowed the detection of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols derived from the oxidation of diunsaturated sterols that have never been described before in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A. and J.-F.R.; methodology, C.A.; validation, C.A.; investigation, C.A. and J.-F.R.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-F.R. and C.A.; writing—review and editing, J.-F.R. and C.A.; funding acquisition, J.-F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (LEFE-cyber, Atmosmer project) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Oceanomed project, No 1166-39417).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Amiraux R., Charriere B., Aubert D., Katra, I., Sun-Yong, H.; Jun-Oh and Belt S.T., who allowed us access to the different samples investigated in the present work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Some of the standard compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Smith, L.L. Cholesterol autoxidation 1981–1986. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1981, 44, 87–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Christodoulou, S.; Marty, J.-C.; Miquel, J.-C.; Volkman, J.K.; Rontani, J.-F. Use of lipids and their degradation products as biomarkers for carbon cycling in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Chem. 2009, 113, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Silvente-Poirot, S.; Poirot, M. Cholesterol epoxide hydrolase and cancer. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2012, 12, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poirot, M.; Silvente-Poirot, S. Cholesterol-5,6-epoxides: Chemistry, biochemistry, metabolic fate and cancer. Biochimie 2013, 95, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rontani, J.-F.; Zabeti, N.; Wakeham, S.G. The fate of marine lipids: Biotic vs. abiotic degradation of particulate sterols and alkenones in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Chem. 2009, 113, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koek, M.M.; Jellema, R.H.; van der Greef, J.; Tas, A.C.; Hankemeier, T. Quantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: Status and perspectives. Metabolomics 2011, 7, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, R.; Xue, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Qi, X.; Jiang, J.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Phytosterol contents of edible oils and their contributions to estimated phytosterol intake in the Chinese diet. Foods 2019, 8, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. dos Santos, M.A.Z.; Roehrs, M.; de Pereira, C.M.P.; Freitag, R.A.; de Bairros, A.V. Analysis of phytosterols in plants and derived products by gas chromatography—A short critical review. Austin Chromatogr. 2014, 1, 4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Benfenati, E.; Cools, E.; Fattore, E.; Fanelli, R. A GC-MS method for the analysis of fecal and plant sterols in sediment samples. Chemosphere 1994, 29, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goad, L.J.; Akihisa, T. Mass Spectrometry of Sterols. In Analysis of Sterols; Goad, L.J., Akihisa, T., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 1997; pp. 152–196. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harvey, D.J.; Vouros, P. Mass spectrometric fragmentation of trimethylsilyl and related alkylsilyl derivatives. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2020, 39, 105–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.; Hu, R.; Yue, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, L. Determination of fecal ster-12-ols by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with solid-phase extraction and injection-port derivatization. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balme, S.; Gülaçar, F.O. Rapid screening of phytosterols in orange juice by solid-phase microextraction on polyacrylate fibre derivatisation and gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Birk, J.J.; Dippold, M.; Wiesenberg, G.L.; Glaser, B. Combined quantification of faecal sterols, stanols, stanones and bile acids in soils and terrestrial sediments by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1242, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kloos, D.P.; Gay, E.; Lingeman, H.; Bracher, F.; Müller, C.; Mayboroda, O.A.; Deelder, A.M.; Neessen, W.M.A.; Giera, M. Comprehensive gas chromatography–electron ionisation mass spectrometric analysis of fatty acids and sterols using sequential one-pot silylation: Quantification and isotopologue analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 28, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Junker, J.; Chong, I.; Kamp, F.; Steiner, H.; Giera, M.; Müller, C.; Bracher, F. Comparison of strategies for the determination of sterol sulfates via GC-MS leading to a novel deconjugation-derivatization protocol. Molecules 2019, 24, 2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Park, P.S.W.; Addis, P.W. Derivatization of 5 -cholestane-3β,5,6β-triol into trimethylsilyl ether sterol for GC analysis. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1989, 66, 1632–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rontani, J.-F.; Aubert, C. Characterization of isomeric allylic diols resulting from chlorophyll phytyl side-chain photo- and autoxidation by electron ionization gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rontani, J.-F.; Charrière, B.; Sempéré, R.; Doxaran, D.; Vaultier, F.; Vonk, J.E.; Volkman, J.K. Degradation of sterols and terrigenous organic matter in waters of the Mackenzie Shelf, Canadian Arctic. Org. Geochem. 2014, 75, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Angelis, Y.S.; Kioussi, M.K.; Kiousi, P.; Brenna, J.T.; Georgakopoulos, C.G. Examination of the kinetic isotopic effect to the acetylation derivatization for the gas chromatographic-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometric doping control analysis of endogenous steroids. Drug Test. Anal. 2012, 4, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Choi, M.A.; Kim, J.Y.; Chung, B.C. Detection of anabolic steroids by GC/SIM/MS with trifluoroacetylation in equine plasma and urine. Anal. Lett. 1999, 32, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harnik, M.; Hürzeler, E.; Jensen, E.V. Acetylation and trifluoroacetylation of steroids at carbon 16. Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marcos, J.; Pozo, O.J. Derivatization of steroids in biological samples for GC–MS and LC–MS analyses. Bioanalysis 2015, 7, 2515–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Söderhölm, S.L.; Damm, M.; Kappe, C.O. Microwave-assisted derivatization procedures for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. Mol. Divers. 2010, 14, 869–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Orata, F. Derivatization reactions and reagents for gas chromatography analysis. Adv. Gas Chromatogr. Prog. Agric. Biomed. Ind. Appl. 2012, 91, 83–108. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tredget, E.E.; Falk, N.; Scott, P.G.; Hogg, A.M.; Burke, J.F. Determination of 4-hydroxyproline in collagen by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 1990, 190, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, D.L.; Wang, S.M.; Wu, C.H.; Chen, B.G.; Liu, R.H. Chemical derivatization for the analysis of drugs by GC-MS-A conceptual review. J. Food Drug Anal. 2008, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mellon, F.A. Mass spectrometry principles and applications. In Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2nd ed.; Caballero, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 3739–3749. [Google Scholar]
  29. Benveniste, P. Sterol biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1986, 37, 275–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nes, W.R. The biochemistry of plant sterols. Adv. Lipid Res. 1977, 15, 233–324. [Google Scholar]
  31. Atwood, A.R.; Volkman, J.K.; Sachs, J.P. Characterization of unusual sterols and long chain diols, triols, keto-ols and n-alkenols in El Junco Lake, Galápagos. Org. Geochem. 2014, 66, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rampen, S.W.; Abbas, B.A.; Schouten, S.; Sinninghe Damste, J.S. A comprehensive study of sterols in marine diatoms (Bacillariophyta): Implications for their use as tracers for diatom productivity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2010, 55, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Volkman, J.K. Sterols and other triterpenoids: Source specificity and evolution of biosynthetic pathways. Org. Geochem. 2005, 36, 139–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mackenzie, A.S.; Brassell, S.C.; Eglinton, G.; Maxwell, J.R. Chemical fossils: The geological fate of steroids. Science 1982, 217, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Volkman, J.K. A review of sterol markers for marine and terrigenous organic matter. Org. Geochem. 1986, 9, 83–99. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wakeham, S.G.; Beier, J.A. Fatty acid and sterol biomarkers as indicators of particulate matter source and alteration processes in the Black Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part A 1991, 38, S943–S968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ea, S.; Aubert, C.; Rontani, J.-F.; Teral, Y.; Campredon, M. Elucidation of electron ionization mass spectrometric fragmentation pathways of trimethylsilyl ether derivatives of vicinal diols deriving from haplamine by collision-induced dissociation gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and 18O labelling. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 28, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, T.; Li, C. Quantitative and stereospecific dihydroxylations of Δ5-steroids: A green synthesis of plant growth hormone intermediates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 12522–12530. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Aghnatios, C.; Losno, R.; Dulac, F. A fine fraction of soil used as an aerosol analogue during the DUNE experiment: Sequential solubility in water, decreasing pH step-by-step. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 4627–4633. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rontani, J.-F.; Amiraux, R.; Smik, L.; Wakeham, S.G.; Paulmier, A.; Vaultier, F.; Sun-Yong, H.; Jun-Oh, M.; Belt, S.T. Type II photosensitized oxidation in senescent microalgal cells at different latitudes: Does low under-ice irradiance in polar regions enhance efficiency? Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 779, 146363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rontani, J.-F.; Lalande, C.; Vilgrain, L.; Vaultier, F.; Amiraux, R. Control of the preservation of sympagic algal material in surficial sediments of central and eastern Baffin Bay by bactericidal hydroperoxides and free fatty acids. Mar. Chem. 2022, 247, 104177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rontani, J.-F.; Charriere, B.; Menniti, C.; Katra, I.; Aubert, D. Effects of dry and wet Negev dust deposition on the induction of autoxidation of dust lipid components in seawater. Water 2022, 14, 4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SIM chromatograms of the same amounts (46.5 ng) of trifluoroacetate (black) and trimethylsilyl (red) derivatives of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol (• = radical, +• = radical cation).
Figure 1. SIM chromatograms of the same amounts (46.5 ng) of trifluoroacetate (black) and trimethylsilyl (red) derivatives of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol (• = radical, +• = radical cation).
Molecules 28 01547 g001
Figure 2. EI(TOF) mass spectra of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol (A) and cholesta-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β,5α,6β-triol (B) trifluoroacetate derivatives and electron-capture negative ionization (ECNI) mass spectrum of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative (C) (• = radical, •− = radical anion).
Figure 2. EI(TOF) mass spectra of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol (A) and cholesta-25,26,26,26,27,27,27-d7-3β,5α,6β-triol (B) trifluoroacetate derivatives and electron-capture negative ionization (ECNI) mass spectrum of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative (C) (• = radical, •− = radical anion).
Molecules 28 01547 g002
Figure 3. Proposed fragmentation of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative. Note that another mechanism (not shown) involving initial loss of the 3β-acyl group is also possible (• = radical, +• = radical cation, + = cation, − = loss).
Figure 3. Proposed fragmentation of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative. Note that another mechanism (not shown) involving initial loss of the 3β-acyl group is also possible (• = radical, +• = radical cation, + = cation, − = loss).
Molecules 28 01547 g003
Figure 4. CID mass spectrum of the c+• ion at m/z 480 (collision energy: 14 eV) (+• = radical cation, + = cation, ⧫ = parent ion).
Figure 4. CID mass spectrum of the c+• ion at m/z 480 (collision energy: 14 eV) (+• = radical cation, + = cation, ⧫ = parent ion).
Molecules 28 01547 g004
Figure 5. MRM chromatograms showing the presence of 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives in a total lipid extract (TLE) of dusts collected in the Negev desert (Israel) (IS = internal standard).
Figure 5. MRM chromatograms showing the presence of 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives in a total lipid extract (TLE) of dusts collected in the Negev desert (Israel) (IS = internal standard).
Molecules 28 01547 g005
Figure 6. MRM chromatograms showing the presence of unsaturated 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives in TLE of suspended particulate matter collected in the Amundsen Sea (Antarctica) (IS = internal standard).
Figure 6. MRM chromatograms showing the presence of unsaturated 3β,5α,6β-steratriol trifluoroacetate derivatives in TLE of suspended particulate matter collected in the Amundsen Sea (Antarctica) (IS = internal standard).
Molecules 28 01547 g006
Figure 7. TOF mass spectrum of 24-methylcholest-22E-en3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative. • = radical, •+ = radical cation, + = cation.
Figure 7. TOF mass spectrum of 24-methylcholest-22E-en3β,5α,6β-triol trifluoroacetate derivative. • = radical, •+ = radical cation, + = cation.
Molecules 28 01547 g007
Table 1. MRM transitions employed for the quantification of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols originating from autoxidation of common Δ5-sterols (+• = radical cation, + = cation).
Table 1. MRM transitions employed for the quantification of 3β,5α,6β-steratriols originating from autoxidation of common Δ5-sterols (+• = radical cation, + = cation).
3β,5α,6β-Steratriolsc+• Parent Ion
[M—2CF3COOH]+•
f+ Product Ion
[M—2CF3COOH—CH3]+
CE *
(eV)
Cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol48035114
Cholest-22-en3β,5α,6β-triol47834914
24-Methylcholest-22-en3β,5α,6β-triol49236314
24-Methylcholest-24(28)-en3β,5α,6β-triol49236314
24-Methylcholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol49436514
24-Ethylcholest-22-en3β,5α,6β-triol50637714
24-Ethylcholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol50837914
* Collision energy.
Table 2. Linearity in SIM and MRM modes.
Table 2. Linearity in SIM and MRM modes.
ModeConcentration Range (ng/mL)Linear Regression EquationCoefficient of Determination (R2)
SIM
Ion m/z 4802.3–46.5 ay = 0.0315x − 0.02020.9952
Ion m/z 5942.3–46.5y = 0.0324x − 0.00290.9995
MRM
m/z 480 → m/z 3512.3–46.5y = 0.0358x − 0.01940.9974
a (2.325, 4.65, 9.3, 18.6, 23.25, 46.5).
Table 3. Reproducibility in SIM and MRM modes tested using different concentrations of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol (46.5, 18.6, 9.3, 2.325 ng) mixed with 66 ng of internal standard.
Table 3. Reproducibility in SIM and MRM modes tested using different concentrations of cholesta-3β,5α,6β-triol (46.5, 18.6, 9.3, 2.325 ng) mixed with 66 ng of internal standard.
ModeConcentration (ng/mL) Relative Standard Deviation * (%)Difference between Obtained and Expected Concentration (%)
ExpectedObtainedn
SIM
Ion m/z 48046.544.764.4−3.9
18.618.498.7−1.1
9.38.983.8−4.3
2.3252.61869.912.6
Ion m/z 59446.544.465.4−4.5
18.618.398.5−1.6
9.39.283.0−1.1
2.3252.69664.215.9
MRM
m/z 480 → m/z 35146.545.663.1−1.9
18.618.6394.10.2
9.39.083.7−3.2
2.3252.86364.210.2
* 95% confidence.
Table 4. Concentrations of saturated 3β,5α,6β-steratriols in several environmental samples, measured after trifluoroacetylation in SIM and MRM modes.
Table 4. Concentrations of saturated 3β,5α,6β-steratriols in several environmental samples, measured after trifluoroacetylation in SIM and MRM modes.
Cholesta-3β,5α,6β-Triol24-Methylcholesta-
3β,5α,6β-Triols d
24-Ethylcholesta-3β,5α,6β-Triol
SIM
m/z 480
MRM
m/z 480 → m/z 351
SIM
m/z 494
MRM
m/z 494 → m/z 365
SIM
m/z 508
MRM
m/z 508 → m/z 379
Negev loess sample 1 a0.210.210.090.060.240.17
Negev loess sample 2 a0.240.190.070.050.190.12
Negev loess sample 3 a0.230.220.120.090.350.25
Particles Antarctica st 4 b11.411.730.80nd c1.951.25
Particles Antarctica st 13 b7.118.100.851.002.001.25
Particles Antarctica st 28 b6.227.400.950.952.001.10
Particles Antarctica st 42 b6.086.451.00nd c1.700.90
Particles Antarctica st 46 b11.7311.881.051.001.851.15
Sediment Baffin Bay st 600 a 20.3021.055.634.7320.2717.91
Sediment Baffin Bay st 605 a22.9823.568.675.3337.6724.11
Sediment Baffin Bay st 615 a19.3219.324.113.4726.6817.21
Sediment Baffin Bay st 707 a45.6049.282.202.2037.6040.00
Sediment Baffin Bay st 719 a18.1917.875.003.2724.3313.5
a ng mg−1, b ng L−1, c Not detected, d Sum of diastereoisomers.
Table 5. Concentrations of unsaturated 3β,5α,6β-steratriols in several environmental samples, measured after trifluoroacetylation in SIM and MRM modes.
Table 5. Concentrations of unsaturated 3β,5α,6β-steratriols in several environmental samples, measured after trifluoroacetylation in SIM and MRM modes.
Cholest-22E-en-3β,5α,6β-Triol24-Ethylcholest-22E-en-3β,5α,6β-Triol24-Methylcholest-22E-en-3β,5α,6β-Triol
SIM
m/z 506
MRM
m/z 506 → m/z 377
SIM
m/z 478
MRM
m/z 478 → m/z 349
SIM
m/z 492
MRM
m/z 492 → m/z 363
Negev loess sample 1 a- d0.11nd c0.04nd c0.02
Negev loess sample 2 a- d0.02nd cnd cnd cnd c
Negev loess sample 3 a- d0.01nd cnd cnd cnd c
Particles Antarctica st 4 b- d1.421.11nd c1.111.80
Particles Antarctica st 13 b- d1.50nd cnd cnd c1.40
Particles Antarctica st 28 b- d1.60nd cnd cnd c3.70
Particles Antarctica st 42 b- d1.85nd cnd cnd c2.20
Particles Antarctica st 46 b- d1.95nd cnd cnd c1.70
Sediment Baffin Bay st 600 a- d4.093.801.451.641.63
Sediment Baffin Bay st 605 a- d6.224.671.781.781.78
Sediment Baffin Bay st 615 a- d2.68nd c1.261.841.84
Sediment Baffin Bay st 707 a- d6.20nd c3.40nd c5.40
Sediment Baffin Bay st 719 a- d1.07nd c1.071.401.40
a ng mg−1, b ng L−1, c Not detected,.d Quantification hindered by a strong coelution.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aubert, C.; Rontani, J.-F. Use of Trifluoro-Acetate Derivatives for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS Quantification of Trace Amounts of Stera-3β,5α,6β-Triols (Tracers of Δ5-Sterol Autoxidation) in Environmental Samples. Molecules 2023, 28, 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041547

AMA Style

Aubert C, Rontani J-F. Use of Trifluoro-Acetate Derivatives for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS Quantification of Trace Amounts of Stera-3β,5α,6β-Triols (Tracers of Δ5-Sterol Autoxidation) in Environmental Samples. Molecules. 2023; 28(4):1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041547

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aubert, Claude, and Jean-François Rontani. 2023. "Use of Trifluoro-Acetate Derivatives for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS Quantification of Trace Amounts of Stera-3β,5α,6β-Triols (Tracers of Δ5-Sterol Autoxidation) in Environmental Samples" Molecules 28, no. 4: 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041547

APA Style

Aubert, C., & Rontani, J. -F. (2023). Use of Trifluoro-Acetate Derivatives for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS Quantification of Trace Amounts of Stera-3β,5α,6β-Triols (Tracers of Δ5-Sterol Autoxidation) in Environmental Samples. Molecules, 28(4), 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041547

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop