Next Article in Journal
Direct Homogeneous Synthesis of Compounds with Two O Atoms and Long-Chain Hydrocarbons from CO and H2: Co–Ru/N-methylpyrrolidone Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Properties and Applications of Quaternary Ammonium Gemini Surfactant 12-6-12: An Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Host–Guest Interactions of Zirconium-Based Metal–Organic Framework with Ionic Liquid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 17
10.3390/molecules28176337
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Light Hydrocarbon Separation

by
Xiang Gao
,
Wen-Hui Yan
,
Bo-Yang Hu
,
Yu-Xin Huang
and
Shi-Mei Zheng
*
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(17), 6337; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176337
Submission received: 1 August 2023 / Revised: 17 August 2023 / Accepted: 28 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research of Metal-Organic Frameworks: Design, Synthesis and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The separation of light hydrocarbon compounds is an important process in the chemical industry. Currently, its separation methods mainly include distillation, membrane separation, and physical adsorption. However, these traditional methods or materials have some drawbacks and disadvantages, such as expensive equipment costs and high energy consumption, poor selectivity, low separation ratios, and separation efficiencies. Therefore, it is important to develop novel separation materials for light hydrocarbon separation. As a new type of organic–inorganic hybrid crystalline material, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising materials for light hydrocarbon separation due to their designability of structure and easy modulation of function. This review provides an overview of recent advances in the design, synthesis, and application of MOFs for light hydrocarbon separation in recent years, with a focus on the separation of alkane, alkene, and alkyne. We discuss strategies for improving the adsorption selectivity and capacity of MOFs, including pore size limitation, physical adsorption, and chemisorption. In addition, we discuss the advantages/disadvantages, challenges, and prospects of MOFs in the separation of light hydrocarbon.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Light hydrocarbon separation is one of the important processes in the chemical industry [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The separated and purified light hydrocarbon compounds are important energy fuels and chemical raw materials, which are widely used in the preparation of synthetic fibers, synthetic rubbers, synthetic plastics, and organic compounds. However, traditional light hydrocarbon separation materials and methods (physical adsorption, membrane separation, distillation, etc.) have some disadvantages. For example, traditional physical adsorption materials lack weak interaction sites with light hydrocarbon compounds and have a limited specific surface area, resulting in a limited selectivity and adsorption capacity for light hydrocarbons, which leads to poor separation. Membrane separation materials solve the shortcomings of physical adsorption materials to a certain extent, but their gas permeability is not good, which leads to the poor efficiency of the separation of light hydrocarbons. The distillation process is based on the different boiling points of different components in the mixture to realize the effective separation of light hydrocarbons, but its disadvantage lies in the need for expensive and bulky distillation equipment, as well as the problems of high energy consumption and high pollution. Therefore, to efficiently separate light hydrocarbons and utilize resources, reduce environmental pollution, and achieve sustainable development, it is urgent to develop new materials or methods for the separation of light hydrocarbons.
As a new type of organic–inorganic hybridized porous crystalline material, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), with the features of a designable structure and easily adjustable nature, have shown good application prospects in many fields such as gas storage and separation [7,8,9], optics [10,11,12], fluorescence sensing [13,14,15], catalysis [16,17,18], magnetism [19,20,21], biomedicine [22,23,24,25], etc. [26,27]. As materials with porous structures, MOFs show great potential in the field of light hydrocarbon separation [28,29,30,31,32,33]. MOFs are crystalline materials self-assembled by organic ligands and metal ions through coordination bonds, with a regular structure, a certain specific surface area, an adjustable pore size, and various methods of functionalization modification. These characteristics enable MOFs to optimize and enhance their ability regarding the separation of light hydrocarbons through pore size adjustment, increasing adsorption sites, and enhancing the interaction force with light hydrocarbon molecules. In addition, the diversity of MOFs species, the simplicity of the synthesis method, the mildness of the synthesis conditions, and the relative structural robustness of the MOFs further make them strong candidates for new light hydrocarbon separation materials (Figure 1).
In this review, the applications and progress of MOFs in light hydrocarbon separation are presented. First, the current research statuses of MOFs in the separation of light hydrocarbon-containing mixtures (such as the alkane-containing mixture, alkene-containing mixture, alkyne-containing mixture, C4 hydrocarbon mixture, and C6 isomers mixture) are introduced, which can help readers to understand the connection between MOFs and light hydrocarbon separation. Secondly, the mechanism of MOFs in the separation of light hydrocarbons is elucidated, the factors affecting the separation performance of MOFs are summarized, and the strategies for enhancing the separation performance of MOFs in the separation of light hydrocarbons are explored. Finally, the challenges faced by MOFs and the use of MOFs in the field of light hydrocarbon separation are summarized and prospected, respectively. This review can help the readers to construct the knowledge network of separating light hydrocarbon using MOFs.

2. Porous MOFs for Light Hydrocarbon Separation

The structural versatility, designability, and functional tunability of porous MOF materials allow them to be applied in the field of gas separation. Thanks to the efforts of researchers, MOFs have been widely used in the separation of light hydrocarbon mixtures. In the next section, we will summarize the research of MOF materials for the separation of CH4/CO2, CH4/N2, C2H2/C2H4, C2H2/CO2, C3H6/C3H8, C4 hydrocarbons, and C6 isomers mixtures (Table 1).

2.1. CH4/N2 and CH4/CO2 Separation

Methane (CH4) is a colorless, odorless gas, mainly composed of carbon and hydrogen. There are two main sources of CH4, one is underground natural gas, and CH4 is usually mixed with other hydrocarbons; the other is produced through the fermentation and decomposition process of microorganisms in biomass (e.g., sludge, biogas, compost, etc.). CH4 is an important energy fuel, which can not only be burned directly but can also be compressed and liquefied as a source of power for new energy vehicles. At the same time, CH4 is an important raw material in the chemical industry and can be converted into other chemical products [34,35,36]. In addition, CH4 has the advantages of high combustion efficiency and relatively harmless combustion products. However, unpurified CH4 often contains nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2), which greatly reduce the combustion heat value of CH4 and affect the preparation of CH4-based chemical products, so it is of great significance to separate CH4 from N2 and CO2. As a new type of separating material, MOFs show great potential in the field of CH4/N2 and CH4/CO2 separation.
The separation of CH4/N2 can be achieved more efficiently based on a thermodynamic–kinetic synergistic separation mechanism than on a single thermodynamic or kinetic separation mechanism. In 2022, Zhang et al. [37] chose aluminum nitrate and 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid (BTEC) as the main raw materials for the synthesis of MIL-120Al. MIL-120Al has rhombic 1D nonpolar pores formed by benzene rings (parallel to the channel direction), and its pore size (0.54 × 0.47 nm) is comparable to the kinetic diameter of methane molecules, which is capable of the synergistic thermodynamic–kinetic separation of the CH4/N2 mixture. The specific surface area of MIL-120Al is 529 m2/g. Single-component CH4 and N2 gas adsorption experiments show that the adsorption capacity of MIL-120Al for CH4 is 33.7 cm3/g (298 K, 1 bar), which is the highest among reported aluminum-based MOFs. IAST calculations show that the selectivity of MIL-120Al for an equimolar CH4/N2 mixture is 6.0 at 298 K and 1 bar, which is much higher than that of most reported MOFs (e.g., ZIF-8: 2.5, NU-1000: 2.5, MOF-177: 4.0, MIL-53-Al: 3.7, Uio-66-Br2: 5.1). The GCMC simulation results show that the pores of MIL-120Al are the preferential adsorption sites for CH4 and N2 and that the distribution probability of CH4 is much higher than that of N2. The breakthrough experiments further demonstrate that MIL-120Al can completely realize the separation of the CH4/N2 mixture, and the separation performance is not affected by the presence of H2O. Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process simulations show that MIL-120Al can enrich the original 50% methane to 86% for a mixed CH4/N2 (50/50, v/v) mixture.
The dense open-metal sites and exposed pyridine N-atom sites can generate weak non-bonding interactions with CO2 molecules, which contribute to the enhancement of the separation ability of MOFs for CH4/CO2. In 2022, a novel 2D Co-MOF based on a nicotinic acid-based organic ligand was synthesized by Qin et al. [38]. Single X-ray crystal diffraction shows that the 2D layers in the Co-MOF are interconnected through hydrogen bonding and pi–pi stacking to form a porous 3D framework with channels. Since hydrogen bonding and pi–pi stacking are weak interactions, these 2D layers have a certain sliding property under external stimulation, which makes the extended 3D framework have the characteristics of a dynamic MOF. Gas adsorption experiments show that the adsorption capacities of the activated Co-MOF on different gases are in the order of CO2 > C2H2 > CH4 > N2 > CO. Among them, the adsorption curve of CO2 shows a sharp increase at low pressures, which indicates that there is a strong interaction between the activated Co-MOF and CO2. The maximum uptake of activated Co-MOF for CO2 is 9.77 wt% (2.22 mmol/g) at 273 K and 1 bar. The mechanism is further investigated by in situ DRIFTS analysis. The typical asymmetric CO2 stretching vibration band is observed at 2200 ~ 2400 cm−1, and the bands at 1727 and 1587 cm−1 could be attributed to COOH or HCOO-. The results indicate that the adsorbed CO2 molecules are converted to COOH or HCOO- by the open-metal sites of CO2+. IAST calculations showed that the selectivity of the activated Co-MOF for CH4/CO2 (50/50, v/v) was 37.2 (298 K, 1 bar), which is comparable to that of reported 2D/3D MOFs. GCMC simulations and DFT calculations show that the appropriate pore size, thickness of the layer structure, dense pyridine N-atom in the inner wall of the channel, and open-metal sites are favorable for the selective capture of CO2.

2.2. C2H2/C2H4 Separation

Acetylene (C2H2) and ethylene (C2H4) are the simplest alkynes and olefins, which originate from the cleavage and recombination of higher hydrocarbons and usually exist in the form of mixtures. C2H2 and C2H4 play important roles in human daily life and industry [39,40,41]. C2H2 can be used as a high-temperature fuel, and it has a wide range of applications in the field of metal cutting and gas welding. C2H4 is the main raw material for the manufacture of polyethylene (PE), which is a common plastic used in the packaging and manufacturing industries. C2H2 and C2H4 are important chemical raw materials, which can be used for synthetic rubbers, synthetic fibers, and other polymers. C2H2 and C2H4 also play important roles in the field of bioregulation. C2H2 can be used as a plant growth regulator for the promotion of plant growth and the ripening of fruit, and C2H4 can be used for the preservation of fruits and vegetables. In addition, it is necessary to separate C2H2 and C2H4 because acetylene impurities within olefins can lead to the poisoning of catalysts used in olefin polymerization reactions, resulting in lower polymerization reaction efficiencies and yields. However, due to the similarity of C2H2 and C2H4 molecules in terms of their physicochemical properties (e.g., molecular volume, existential morphology, density, boiling point, and structure), it is difficult to achieve the efficient and selective separation of the two by existing methods and materials (e.g., adsorptive separation based on molecular sieve materials, membrane separation and separation by chemical reaction, etc.). Therefore, realizing the effective separation of C2H2 and C2H4 has become a very challenging research topic. Thanks to the characteristics of the structure and properties of porous MOF materials, they can realize the effective separation of C2H2 and C2H4 with a low energy consumption, high efficiency, and high selectivity.
Introducing open-metal sites into MOFs with narrow channels is an effective method for achieving a high C2H2/C2H4 separation ratio. In 2023, Pal et al. [42] used cadmium nitrate, thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylic acid (H2TDC), and 1,2-bis(1-(pyridin-3-yl)ethylidene)hydrazine as raw materials and constructed a 3D MOF (IITKGP-30) with 1D narrow pores. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment shows that in IITKGP-30, H2TDC ligands and cadmium ions formed two-dimensional layers, and the flexible ligands acted as pillars. IITKGP-30 has a rob-type topology, and the diameter of its internal 1D aperture is about 0.45 × 0.45 nm (in the direction of the crystallographic c-axis). The solvent-accessible void of IITKGP-30 is 19.7%, computed by the PLATON software. The IAST selectivity (295 K, 1 bar) of IITKGP-30 for C2H2/C2H4 (1:99, 50:50, v/v) was 3.3 and 6.2, respectively, which are greater than the values for NOTT-300 (2.17), Fe-MOF-74 (2.08), M’MOF-2a (1.93), and UiO-67(NH2)2 (2.1). Theoretical calculations suggest that the C2H2 molecules will preferentially interact with the exposed metal sites in IITKGP-30 via an end-to-end mode. Breakthrough experiments were carried out at 298 K; the results showed that the C2H2/C2H4 (1:99, v/v) mixture achieved complete separation with a penetration selectivity of 2.4. In addition, IITKGP-30 has superb water stability and can maintain its separation performance under a humid environment (relative humidity: 97%) after at least 15 days.
Apart from the open-metal sites, other weak interactions (e.g., hydrogen-bond interaction and pi interaction) can also facilitate the selective adsorption of C2H2 over C2H4. Recently, Huang et al. [43] used low-cost ligands and Ni salts as raw materials and synthesized a stable microporous Ni-MOF(TJE-1). TJE-1 has 1D channels with a pore size of 0.52 × 0.52 nm. The specific surface area of activated TJE-1 is 827 m2 g−1. At 298 K and 1 bar, the adsorption capacity of TJE-1 is 117 mL g−1 (5.27 mmol g−1) for C2H2 and 69 mL g−1 (3.08 mmol g−1) for C2H4. The adsorption capacity of TJE-1 for C2H2 is comparable to that of many well-known MOFs materials, such as NKMOF-1-Ni (2.72 mmol g−1), UTSA-100 (4.27 mmol g−1), NOTT-300 (6.34 mmol g−1), and Fe-MOF-74 (6.8 mmol g−1). The Qst values of TJE-1 for C2H2 and C2H4 were 35.5 and 29.9 kJ mol−1, indicating that TJE-1 has stronger adsorption for C2H2. In addition, TJE-1 has excellent stability and can maintain its crystalline structure when exposed to an acid/base solution, hot water, and common organic solvents. Breakthrough experiments show that TJE-1 has a separation factor of 2.25 for an equimolar C2H2/C2H4 mixture, realizing the efficient separation of C2H2/C2H4. Theoretical calculations showed that hydrogen bonds and pi interactions were formed between the TJE-1 framework and the C2H2 molecules. This study guides the development of next-generation MOF materials for industrial separation (green and economical raw materials, convenient preparation means, and good separation results), which is of great significance for industrial gas separation.

2.3. C2H2/CO2 Separation

The separation of C2H2/CO2 is more intractable than the separation of C2H2/C2H4. The CO2 component in C2H2 usually comes from the cracking reaction of C2H4, and the small number of CO2 impurities contained in the feed gas will be transmitted to the C2H2 product [44,45,46]. Compared with C2H2 and C2H4, C2H2 and CO2 have a higher similarity in physicochemical properties. They are both linear molecules with boiling points of 188.40 K and 216.55 K, critical temperatures of 308.3 K and 304.12 K, critical pressures of 61.14 bar and 73.74 bar, and molecular dynamics diameters of 0.33 nm. The dipole moments are both 0, and the polarizabilities are 33.3~39.3 × 1025/cm3 and 29.11 × 1025/cm3, respectively. The extreme similarity of the physicochemical properties creates difficulties in separating the gas mixture. How to realize the effective separation of C2H2/CO2 has become a major problem in front of researchers. With the deepening of the research on MOF materials, researchers have found that MOF materials can realize the low-energy and high-efficiency separation of C2H2/CO2, and MOF materials have shown the incomparable advantages of traditional methods/materials and the potential application in the separation of the C2H2/CO2 mixture.
The kind, quantity, and location of functional groups belonging to the organic ligand in the MOF structures play an important role in the improvement of the C2H2/CO2 gas separation performance. In 2021, Li et al. [47] constructed an MOF based on the classical double Cu-paddlewheel structure as secondary building units (SBUs) with di-isophthalic acid ligands (functional groups: -NH2 and -OCF3) for C2H2/CO2 separation. Single X-ray crystal diffraction analysis demonstrates the presence of three types of cages (cages A, B, and C) in Cu-MOF, which are connected to each other to form interspersed channels. The PLATON calculation result shows that the solvent-accessible volume of Cu-MOF is about 58.4%. Thermogravimetric analysis shows that the Cu-MOF can still maintain its original crystalline structure at 300 °C. The N2 adsorption and desorption curves show that the saturated adsorption capacity of the activated Cu-MOF for N2 is 430 cm3/g, and its BET surface area is 1617 m2/g. Gas adsorption experiments on C2H2 and CO2 show that the adsorption capacity of Cu-MOF for C2H2 is higher than that of CO2. The calculated Qst value of C2H2 is significantly higher than that of CO2, indicating that Cu-MOF has stronger adsorption for C2H2. The selectivity was calculated by ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST) at 298 K for the mixed C2H2/CO2 (50/50) fractions, which ranged from 3.68 to 10.03 (Figure 2).
In contrast to the traditional adsorption mechanism of guest molecules by MOFs, the novel gate-breathing (gate-opening and -closing) effect can reach unpredictable C2H2/CO2 separation results. Not long ago, Jiang et al. [48] used copper salt (copper perchlorate) and imidazole-derived dmpbi (1,1′-(2,5-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene)bis(1 H-imidazole)) as an organic ligand, successfully constructed a novel perchlorate-based microporous MOF(ZJU−194), and applied it to the separation of a C2H2/CO2 mixture. The inner wall of ZJU−194 pores is enriched with bare oxygen atoms, which can generate strong interaction forces with the guest molecules. ZJU−194 can retain its structure not only in water (submerged in water for a day) but also at high temperatures (below 305 °C), which exhibits a good chemical/thermal stability nature. Gas adsorption tests showed that the activated ZJU−194a exhibits a two-step door-opening effect for C2H2 and a blocking effect for CO2, i.e., ZJU−194a allows for the passage of C2H2 molecules but prevents the passage of CO2 molecules. The adsorption heat (Qst) values of ZJU−194a for C2H2 and CO2 are 58.1 kJ/mol and 34.4 kJ/mol, respectively. The selectivity of ZJU−194a for C2H2/CO2 (50/50, v/v) is as high as 22.4, which is much higher than that of most of the reported MOF materials (including MOFs with high-density open-metal sites). Dynamic breakthrough experiments show that ZJU−194a can realize the complete separation of C2H2/CO2, which further validates the excellent performance of ZJU−194a (Figure 3).

2.4. C3H6/C3H8 Separation

Propylene (C3H6) has an important role in the petrochemical field, not only for the production of a variety of high-value-added organic chemicals (acrylic acid, acrolein, etc.) but also as the main raw material for the preparation of organic polymers (polypropylene, synthetic rubber). Among them, polypropylene (PP) with a high strength, heat resistance and chemical stability, and other advantages is widely used in packaging materials, plastic products, automotive parts, and so on. Polypropylene synthetic rubber has excellent elasticity, abrasion resistance, and chemical resistance and is used in automobile tires and pipeline manufacturing, etc. As is well known, C3H6 is mainly produced through the cracking of propane (C3H8) or naphtha and is purified by utilizing distillation and membrane separation [49,50,51]. However, due to the similarity between C3H6 and C3H8 in terms of physicochemical properties (boiling point, polarity, molecular size, etc.), the above methods consume a large amount of energy in C3H6/C3H8 separation and cause large pollution to the environment, which is not in line with the concept of building a resource-saving and environment-friendly society. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a novel material or method for C3H6/C3H8 separation. Currently, porous MOFs have been demonstrated to be used for the efficient and economical separation of the C3H6/C3H8 mixture.
The pore size of MOFs can allow or prevent the passage of specific molecules (the sieving effect of MOF) [52]. Based on this property of MOFs, it is possible to apply it to the separation of gas mixtures and to obtain high-purity single-component gas. In 2021, Yu et al. [53] designed a Y-based MOF material, Y6(OH)8(eddi)3(DMA)2 (HIAM-301). HIAM-301 has an ftw-type topology with highly contracted and distorted cubic cages and pore diameters, which creates a peculiarly aberrant configuration. Due to the active diffusion caused by the narrow pore size, HIAM-301 exhibits a low adsorption of N2 at 77 K. The specific surface area of HIAM-301 was successfully obtained (579 m2/g) using CO2 as the probe molecule at 195 K. At 298 K and 1 bar, HIAM-301 exhibits an obvious pore-sieving effect on C3H6 and C3H8, with the C3H6 adsorption capacity of 3.16 mmol/g and molecular exclusion of C3H8 (<0.3 mmol/g) (Figure 4). IAST calculations show that the selectivity of HIAM-301 for the C3H6/C3H8 mixture is as high as 150. The Qst of HIAM-301 for C3H6 was about 27 kJ/mol, which is higher than that of JNU-3a (benchmark) and MOFs with open metal sites (KAUST-7, Y-abtc, and Co-gallate). The low Qst is favorable for the energy-saving desorption of C3H6 molecules by HIAM-301 in practical applications. The results of breakthrough experiments show that C3H8 is eluted at the beginning, while C3H6 can be retained in the column for a longer time (∼35 min/g). Notably, HIAM-301 can produce polymerization-grade C3H6 feedstocks (with a purity as high as 99.6%). In situ neutron powder diffraction and inelastic neutron scattering demonstrated the sites of C3H6 molecules in HIAM-301 and the molecular dynamics of host–guest interaction (strong hydrogen bond and pi–pi stacking interaction). This study provides a new benchmark for the separation of C3H6/C3H8 at that time.
The functional groups (e.g., -NH2, -COOH, and -F) and exposed Lewis basic sites (e.g., O, N) in the structure of porous MOFs are capable of forming multiple hydrogen bonds or van der Waals interactions with the guest molecules, and this synergistic mechanism can dramatically enhance the separation ability of MOFs for the C3H6/C3H8 mixture. In 2022, Xie et al. [54] used NbOFFIVE-1-Ni as a blueprint and prepared a stable oxyfluoride-based ultra-microporous MOF (UTSA−400) by replacing the anionic part (NbOF52−) in the original structure with WO2F42−. Single X-ray crystal diffraction shows that the pyrazine rings and WO2F42− part in the structure of UTSA−400 are disordered, which resulted in the shrinkage of the pore volume in UTSA-400 (Figure 5). Calculations show that the O- and F-atom sites of WO2F42− parts have a more negative molecular electrostatic potential compared to NbOF52−, implying that it can generate a stronger force with the guest molecule. UTSA−400 has a specific surface area of 226 m2/g with a high adsorption of 46.3 cm3·cm−3 for C3H6 at a low pressure (0.1 bar) and a high adsorption capacity of 92.1 cm3·cm−3 for C3H6 at 1 bar. Compared to NbOFFIVE-1-Ni, the C3H6 capacity of UTSA−400 is significantly improved by 544% and 69%, which is higher than that of the common zeolites and most of the reported C3H6/C3H8-separation MOFs. The IAST selectivity of UTSA−400 for an equimolar C3H6/C3H8 mixture fraction is more than 107 at 298 K and 1 bar, exceeding all other reported MOFs (including those with molecular screening effects), and the Qst of C3H6 to UTSA−400 is 60.5 kJ/mol. In situ infrared spectroscopy characterization demonstrated that the CH/CH2 group of C3H6 exhibits different states in NbOFFIVE-1-Ni and UTSA−400, which is related to the NbOF52− and WO2F42− anions. First-principles dispersion-corrected DFT (DFT-D) calculations show that not only does C3H6 form hydrogen-bonding interactions with the bare O- and F-atom sites belonging to the WO2F42− anions, but the vinyl group in C3H6 also forms C-H...pi van der Waals interactions with pyrazine rings.

2.5. C4 Hydrocarbon and C6 Isomers Separation

In recent years, the separation of C4 and C6 hydrocarbons has attracted increasing attention. Unlike the aforementioned C1/C2/C3 hydrocarbons separation, the separation of C4 and C6 hydrocarbons has focused more on the isomer’s separation. C4 hydrocarbons are not only a kind of clean fuel but also a raw material for the synthesis of other chemicals (e.g., polymers, synthetic rubbers, and resins) [55,56,57]. C4 hydrocarbons occupy a certain market size; thus, obtaining high-purity C4 hydrocarbons is of great importance. Currently, C4 hydrocarbons have been studied mainly for the separation of butane isomers (n-C4H10 and i-C4H10) and butene isomers (n-butene and i-butene, cis-2-butene, and trans-2-butene). The study of C6 hydrocarbons is mainly for the separation of hexane (C6H14) isomers. C6H14 has a variety of different molecular configurations (including chiral structures), and these isomers are extremely similar in terms of physical properties (e.g., boiling points, densities), which makes it difficult to achieve the effective separation of them by conventional physical separation methods (e.g., distillation, membrane separation) [58,59,60]. In addition, the minimal differences in chemical properties between the C6H14 isomers also make it difficult to selectively transform the isomers by chemical reactions. Obviously, the separation of C4 and C6 hydrocarbons is more complicated, and to obtain products with a higher market value, there is an urgent need to develop new materials or methods to realize the effective separation of these hydrocarbons. Fortunately, MOFs can solve this urgent problem to a certain extent.
Based on the size/shape-selective separation effect and van der Waals weak interaction, MOFs can accurately recognize the tiny differences between the C4 isomers at the atomic level and realize the effective separation of C4 isomers. In 2020, Chen et al. [61] constructed a series of isostructural MOFs (M-gallate, M = Ni, Mg, Co) under solvothermal conditions based on gallic acid with nickel, magnesium, and cobalt salts, respectively. Single X-ray crystal diffraction characterization proved that the M-gallate has elliptical pore channels (the pore size of Mg-gallate is 0.36 × 0.46 nm). Among the M-gallate, Mg-gallate shows the best separation performance for C4 hydrocarbon isomers due to the pore size obstruction, which prevented cis-2-butene from entering into the pore channels of Mg-gallate (Figure 6). Single-component adsorption curves show that the IAST selectivity of Mg-gallate for cis/trans-2-butene is 3.2 at 298 K and 1.0 bar, which surpassed the benchmarks of RUB- 41 (1.2), clinoptilolite (1.6), ZJNU-30a (1.1), and Fe-MOF-74 (1.0). DFT calculations show that strong C...H-O synergistic supramolecular interactions are formed between Mg-gallate and the C4 hydrocarbon isomer. Breakthrough experiments show that Mg-gallate could not only separate the two-component trans/cis-2-butene and 1-butene/iso-butene but also realize the effective separation of the three-component 1,3-butadiene/1-butene/iso-butene.
Compared to rigid MOFs, flexible MOFs exhibit a higher structural flexibility, tunability, and adaptability, which endows them with unpredictable properties and greater potential in the field of gas separation. In 2021, Velasco et al. [62] reported a novel flexible Zn-MOF (Zn-adtb) with a rare (4,8)-connected scu topology. Based on kinetic and molecular sieving mechanisms, Zn-adtb can realize efficient C6 isomers separation (i.e., the linear n-hexane, nHEX; single-branched 3-methylpentane, 3MP; dibranched 2,3 dimethylbutane, 23DMB). The activated Zn-adtb exhibited different adsorption behaviors for C6 isomers with different branched chains. Zn-adtb shows a high adsorption capacity for the linear isomer nHEX, while the adsorption of the single-branched isomer 3MP and the dibranched isomer 23DMB is almost negligible. Breakthrough experiments further demonstrated the ability of Zn-adtb to completely separate the linear C6 isomers from the branched isomers. The branched isomers 23DMB and 3MP are successively and rapidly eluted from the Zn-adtb-populated column, whereas the retention time of the linear isomer nHEX within the packed column is as high as 30 min (Figure 7). In addition, solid-state NMR (ssNMR), in situ FTIR analysis, and first-principles density functional theory calculations further revealed the mechanism of C6 isomers separation, and the results showed that the separation of nHEX/3MP and nHEX/23DMB belonged to different mechanisms; the former is a kinetic separation mechanism and the latter is a molecular sieving mechanism.

3. Mechanisms and Strategies for Improving the MOFs Separation Ability

From the above description, it can be summarized that there are several mechanisms for the separation of light hydrocarbons by MOFs:
(1)
Pore size/shape sieving by rigid MOFs. Based on the degree of match between the size/shape of the guest molecule and the pore size/shape of the MOFs, the guest molecule is selectively allowed to pass through.
(2)
Breathing effect (gate effect) of flexible MOFs. Under specific external stimuli (e.g., temperature, pressure, gas, etc.), the structure of MOFs changes to allow or prevent the passage of guest molecules.
(3)
Hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and exposed electron-rich sites. Hydrogen bonds (e.g., C-H...F, C-H...O, C-H...pi, etc.), van der Waals forces, and exposed electron-rich sites (N- or O-atom, etc.) play key roles in the gas separation process, and they endow the weak interactions between the MOF frameworks and the guest molecules
(4)
Open metal sites. Open metal sites can form strong non-bonding interactions with the guest molecules, and sometimes they can even break through the limit and form chemical bonds with the guest molecules.
To further enhance the selective separation performance of MOFs for light hydrocarbons, MOFs can be optimized in terms of the following aspects:
(1)
Selecting organic ligands with compact sizes as raw materials to obtain MOFs with microporous structures.
(2)
Designing, constructing, and optimizing the structure of MOFs based on secondary building blocks and topology. For example, introducing open metal sites/functional groups (e.g., -NH2, -OH, -CF3, etc.) into the structure of MOFs not only regulates the pore size/shape of MOFs but also increases the possibility of forming weak interactions between MOFs and guest molecules.
(3)
Maximizing the selectivity of MOFs for light hydrocarbons through the synergistic effect of multiple mechanisms.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

In recent decades, MOFs have been developed considerably, and many classical and well-known MOFs have been reported, such as MOF-5, ZIF-8, HKUST-1, UiO-66, MIL-101, MOF-177, IRMOF-1, and NU-1000. Based on the mechanisms of pore size sieving, breathing effects (gate effect), physical adsorption (non-bonding weak interactions), and chemical adsorption (guest molecule bonding and transformation), MOFs can realize the effective separation of mixed components of alkanes, olefins, and alkynes. The separation benchmarks of MOFs toward gas mixtures have been broken continuously, showing excellent separation performance and application prospects of MOFs in the field of light hydrocarbon separation. The advantages of MOFs (a regular structure, a certain, specific surface area, an adjustable pore size, various methods of functionalization modification, etc.) far outweigh those of conventional materials and methods, which indicates that MOFs can be used as a new type of material for the separation of light hydrocarbons. However, MOFs also have many problems to be improved and solved, such as reducing the cost of MOFs synthesis, the large-scale preparation of MOFs, improving the stability of MOFs, the reduced generation of pollutants during MOF synthesis, the preparation of environment-friendly MOFs, realizing the long-cycle recycling of MOFs, etc. It is believed that with the continuous efforts of researchers and the deepening research on MOFs, these problems will be solved, and it is foreseeable that the application of MOFs materials in the field of light hydrocarbon separation will be more diverse and extensive in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, X.G.; investigation, data curation, validation, W.-H.Y., B.-Y.H. and Y.-X.H.; supervision, project administration, writing—review and editing, S.-M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Azzouz, I.; Essoussi, A.; Fleury, J.; Haudebourg, R.; Thiebaut, D.; Vial, J. Feasibility of the preparation of silica monoliths for gas chromatography: Fast separation of light hydrocarbons. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1383, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, G.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z. Structural effects of microporous polymers on adsorption/separation of C1–C3 light hydrocarbons and CO2 in natural gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miao, G.; Ma, Y.; Yang, C.; Tong, B.; Li, G.; Xiao, J. The effective synthesis of heat-pump assisted distillation process with multiple columns for light hydrocarbon separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 269, 118449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pan, J.; Li, M.; Li, R.; Tang, L.; Bai, J. Design and analysis of LNG cold energy cascade utilization system integrating light hy-drocarbon separation, organic Rankine cycle and direct cooling. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 213, 118672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, S.; Liu, R.-S.; Zhang, M.-Y.; Lu, A.-H. Designed synthesis of porous carbons for the separation of light hydrocarbons. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 42, 130–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, R.; Wu, C.; Song, W.; Deng, C.; Yang, M. Energy integration of LNG light hydrocarbon recovery and air separation: Process design and technic-economic analysis. Energy 2020, 207, 118328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, H.; Li, L.; Lin, R.-B.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, S.; Chen, B. Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: Status and challenges. EnergyChem 2019, 1, 100006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, W.; Bhatt, P.M.; Shkurenko, A.; Adil, K.; Mouchaham, G.; Aggarwal, H.; Mallick, A.; Jamal, A.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Eddaoudi, M. A Tailor-Made Interpenetrated MOF with Exceptional Carbon-Capture Performance from Flue Gas. Chem 2019, 5, 950–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, R.-B.; Xiang, S.; Li, B.; Cui, Y.; Qian, G.; Zhou, W.; Chen, B. Our journey of developing multifunctional metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 384, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cui, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, H.; Qian, G. Photonic functional metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 5740–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, Z.; Huang, G.; Lustig, W.P.; Wang, F.; Wang, H.; Teat, S.J.; Banerjee, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, J. Achieving exceptionally high luminescence quantum efficiency by immobilizing an AIE molecular chromophore into a metal–organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3045–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pan, M.; Liao, W.M.; Yin, S.Y.; Sun, S.S.; Su, C.Y. Single-Phase White-Light-Emitting and Photoluminescent Color-Tuning Co-ordination Assemblies. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 8889–8935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Banerjee, D.; Hu, Z.; Li, J. Luminescent metal–organic frameworks as explosive sensors. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 10668–10685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, Y.; Chen, M.; Fu, Z.; Lu, R.; Gao, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, H.; Frans de Rooij, N.; Lee, Y.-K.; Wang, Y.; et al. Building porphyrin-based MOFs on MXenes for ppb-level NO sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 6966–6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, H.; Ni, J.; Zhang, J.J.; Liu, S.Q.; Sun, Y.J.; Zhou, H.; Li, Y.Q.; Duan, C.Y. A trichromatic MOF composite for multidimen-sional ratiometric luminescent sensing. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2918–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Levchenko, V.A.; Siah, H.-S.M.; Øien-Ødegaard, S.; Kaur, G.; Fiksdahl, A.; Tilset, M. Catalytic studies of cyclometalated gold(III) complexes and their related UiO-67 MOF. Mol. Catal. 2020, 492, 111009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xia, Q.; Li, Z.; Tan, C.; Liu, Y.; Gong, W.; Cui, Y. Multivariate Metal–Organic Frameworks as Multifunctional Heterogeneous Asymmetric Catalysts for Sequential Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8259–8266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, Y.Y.; Lan, G.; Fan, Y.; Veroneau, S.S.; Song, Y.; Micheroni, D.; Lin, W. Merging Photoredox and Organometallic Catalysts in a Metal–Organic Framework Significantly Boosts Photocatalytic Activities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 14090–14094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahamad, M.N.; Shahid, M.; Ahmad, M.; Sama, F. Cu(II) MOFs Based on Bipyridyls: Topology, Magnetism, and Exploring Sensing Ability toward Multiple Nitroaromatic Explosives. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 7738–7749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Field, B.; Schiffrin, A.; Medhekar, N.V. Correlation-induced magnetism in substrate-supported 2D metal-organic frameworks. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zorlu, Y.; Erbahar, D.; Cetinkaya, A.; Bulut, A.; Erkal, T.S.; Yazaydin, A.O.; Beckmann, J.; Yucesan, G. A cobalt arylphosphonate MOF–superior stability, sorption and magnetism. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3053–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. El-Bindary, M.A.; El-Desouky, M.G.; El-Bindary, A.A. Metal-organic frameworks encapsulated with an anticancer compound as drug delivery system: Synthesis, characterization, antioxidant, anticancer, antibacterial, and molecular docking investigation. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 36, e6660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Drout, R.J.; Robison, L.; Farha, O.K. Catalytic applications of enzymes encapsulated in metal–organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 381, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gui, R.; Jin, H.; Bu, X.; Fu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Q. Recent advances in dual-emission ratiometric fluorescence probes for chemo/biosensing and bioimaging of biomarkers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 383, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Cuan, J.; Gan, N. A lanthanide functionalized MOF hybrid for ratiometric luminescence detection of an anthrax biomarker. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 1264–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aljohani, M.M.; Al-Qahtani, S.D.; Alshareef, M.; El-Desouky, M.G.; El-Bindary, A.A.; El-Metwaly, N.M.; El-Bindary, M.A. Highly efficient adsorption and removal bio-staining dye from industrial wastewater onto mesoporous Ag-MOFs. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 172, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alrefaee, S.H.; Aljohani, M.; Alkhamis, K.; Shaaban, F.; El-Desouky, M.G.; El-Bindary, A.A.; El-Bindary, M.A. Adsorption and effective removal of organophosphorus pesticides from aqueous solution via novel metal-organic framework: Adsorption isotherms, kinetics, and optimization via Box-Behnken design. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 384, 122206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barnett, B.R.; Gonzalez, M.I.; Long, J.R. Recent Progress Towards Light Hydrocarbon Separations Using Metal–Organic Frameworks. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cui, W.; Hu, T.; Bu, X. Metal–Organic Framework Materials for the Separation and Purification of Light Hydrocarbons. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1806445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, D. Metal-Organic Framework Materials for Light Hydrocarbon Separation. ChemPlusChem 2021, 86, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, C.; Liu, J.; Sholl, D.S. High-Throughput Screening of Anion-Pillared Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Separation of Light Hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 20076–20086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. He, H.; Guo, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, W. Post-Synthetic Modification of Zirconium Metal-Organic Frameworks for Ad-sorption and Separation of Light Hydrocarbons. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 4882–4885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, J.; Pan, T.; Jiang, F.; Duan, J.; Jin, W. Polycrystalline Metal-Organic Framework Membranes for Separation of Light Hy-drocarbons. Chem. Eur. J. 2023, 29, e202301132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Altintas, C.; Avci, G.; Daglar, H.; Azar, A.N.V.; Erucar, I.; Velioglu, S.; Keskin, S. An extensive comparative analysis of two MOF databases: High-throughput screening of computation-ready MOFs for CH4 and H2 adsorption. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 9593–9608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. He, Y.; Zhou, W.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5657–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saha, D.; Grappe, H.A.; Chakraborty, A.; Orkoulas, G. Postextraction Separation, On-Board Storage, and Catalytic Conversion of Methane in Natural Gas: A Review. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 11436–11499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, F.; Shang, H.; Zhai, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Yang, J. Thermodynamic-kinetic synergistic separation of CH4/N2 on a robust aluminum-based metal-organic framework. AIChE J. 2023, 69, e18079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qin, L.; Li, Y.; Liang, F.; Li, L.; Lan, Y.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Yang, M.; Ma, D. A microporous 2D cobalt-based MOF with pyridyl sites and open metal sites for selective adsorption of CO2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 341, 112098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, C.; Hao, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Wei, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Ouyang, Y.; Guo, W.; Dai, F.; et al. Constructing C2H2 anchoring traps within MOF interpenetration nets as C2H2/CO2 and C2H2/C2H4 bifunctional separator. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 453, 139713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, X.; Cao, C.; Fan, Z.; Liu, J.; Pham, T.; Forrest, K.A.; Niu, Z. An aliphatic MOF with a molecular sieving effect for efficient C2H2/C2H4 separation. Dalton Trans. 2023. [CrossRef]
  41. Pal, S.C.; Ahmed, R.; Manna, A.K.; Das, M.C. Potential of a pH-Stable Microporous MOF for C2H2/C2H4 and C2H2/CO2 Gas Separations under Ambient Conditions. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 18293–18302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pal, A.; Chand Pal, S.; Cui, H.; Lin, R.-B.; Singha, D.; Kumar Rana, M.; Chen, B.; Das, M.C. A microporous water stable MOF for consistent and selective C2H2/C2H4 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 320, 124208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, H.; Gu, Y.; Wang, L.; Jia, T.; Kitagawa, S.; Li, F. A scalable stable porous coordination polymer synthesized from low-cost precursors for efficient C2H2/C2H4 separation. Green Chem. 2023. [CrossRef]
  44. Fu, X.P.; Wang, Y.L.; Liu, Q.Y. Metal-organic frameworks for C2H2/CO2 separation. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 16598–16607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Niu, Z.; Cui, X.; Pham, T.; Verma, G.; Lan, P.C.; Shan, C.; Xing, H.; Forrest, K.A.; Suepaul, S.; Space, B.; et al. MOF-based Ultra-Strong Acetylene Nano-trap for Highly Efficient C2H2/CO2 Separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 5283–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xie, X.-J.; Zeng, H.; Xie, M.; Chen, W.; Hua, G.-F.; Lu, W.; Li, D. A metal-organic framework for C2H2/CO2 separation under highly humid conditions: Balanced hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 132033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, H.; Ji, Z.; Chen, C.; Di, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wu, M. A Microporous Metal–Organic Framework for Efficient C2H2/CO2 and C2H6/CH4 Separation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 2277–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, K.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, P.; Lin, S.; Zhang, L. A new perchlorate-based hybrid ultramicroporous material with rich bare oxygen atoms for high C2H2/CO2 separation. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 108039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ding, Q.; Zhang, S. Recent Advances in the Development of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Propylene and Propane Separation. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 7337–7361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grande, C.A.; Rodrigues, A.E. Propane/Propylene Separation by Pressure Swing Adsorption Using Zeolite 4A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8815–8829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khalighi, M.; Chen, Y.F.; Farooq, S.; Karimi, I.A.; Jiang, J.W. Propylene/Propane Separation Using SiCHA. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 3877–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Macreadie, L.K.; Idrees, K.B.; Smoljan, C.S.; Farha, O.K. Expanding Linker Dimensionality in Metal-Organic Frameworks for sub-Ångstrom Pore Control for Separation Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202304094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yu, L.; Han, X.; Wang, H.; Ullah, S.; Xia, Q.; Li, W.; Li, J.; da Silva, I.; Manuel, P.; Rudić, S.; et al. Pore Distortion in a Metal–Organic Framework for Regulated Separation of Propane and Propylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 19300–19305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xie, Y.; Shi, Y.; Morales, E.M.C.; El Karch, A.; Wang, B.; Arman, H.; Tan, K.; Chen, B. Optimal Binding Affinity for Sieving Separation of Propylene from Propane in an Oxyfluoride Anion-Based Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 2386–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gehre, M.; Guo, Z.; Rothenberg, G.; Tanase, S. Sustainable Separations of C4 -Hydrocarbons by Using Microporous Materials. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 3947–3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Assen, A.H.; Virdis, T.; De Moor, W.; Moussa, A.; Eddaoudi, M.; Baron, G.; Denayer, J.F.; Belmabkhout, Y. Kinetic separation of C4 olefins using Y-fum-fcu-MOF with ultra-fine-tuned aperture size. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 413, 127388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, L.; Xue, W.; Zhu, H.; Guo, X.; Huang, H.; Zhong, C. Stepwise Engineering the Pore Aperture of a Cage-like MOF for the Efficient Separation of Isomeric C4 Paraffins under Humid Conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202218596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jansen, C.; Assahub, N.; Spiess, A.; Liang, J.; Schmitz, A.; Xing, S.; Gokpinar, S.; Janiak, C. The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C6 Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, n-Hexane) at Metal-Organic Frameworks. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, H.; Dong, X.; Lin, J.; Teat, S.J.; Jensen, S.; Cure, J.; Alexandrov, E.V.; Xia, Q.; Tan, K.; Wang, Q.; et al. Topologically guided tuning of Zr-MOF pore structures for highly selective separation of C6 alkane isomers. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Xie, F.; Yu, L.; Wang, H.; Li, J. Metal-Organic Frameworks for C6 Alkane Separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Guo, L.; Li, L.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Bao, Z.; Ren, Q. Adsorptive Separation of Geometric Isomers of 2-Butene on Gallate-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 9609–9616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Velasco, E.; Xian, S.; Wang, H.; Teat, S.J.; Olson, D.H.; Tan, K.; Ullah, S.; Popp, T.M.O.; Bernstein, A.D.; Oyekan, K.A.; et al. Flexible Zn-MOF with Rare Underlying scu Topology for Effective Separation of C6 Alkane Isomers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 51997–52005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 06337 g001
Figure 1. Graphical abstract of the metal–organic framework for gas separation.
Figure 1. Graphical abstract of the metal–organic framework for gas separation.
Molecules 28 06337 g001
Molecules 28 06337 g002
Figure 2. (a,b) Gas adsorption isotherms of Cu-MOF at 298/273 K. (c,d) The IAST selectivity of C2H2/CO2 (50/50, 298 K) and C2H6/CH4 (15/85, 298 K). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. (a,b) Gas adsorption isotherms of Cu-MOF at 298/273 K. (c,d) The IAST selectivity of C2H2/CO2 (50/50, 298 K) and C2H6/CH4 (15/85, 298 K). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 06337 g002
Molecules 28 06337 g003
Figure 3. The IAST selectivity (a,b), dynamic breakthrough curves (c,d), and isosteric heat (e) of ZJU−194a towards the C2H2/CO2 (50/50, v/v) gas mixture. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 3. The IAST selectivity (a,b), dynamic breakthrough curves (c,d), and isosteric heat (e) of ZJU−194a towards the C2H2/CO2 (50/50, v/v) gas mixture. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V.
Molecules 28 06337 g003
Molecules 28 06337 g004
Figure 4. (a) Adsorption isotherms of C3H6 and C3H8 (298 K, 308 K and 318 K) and (b) C3H6 and C3H8 selectivity comparison chart. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (a) Adsorption isotherms of C3H6 and C3H8 (298 K, 308 K and 318 K) and (b) C3H6 and C3H8 selectivity comparison chart. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 06337 g004
Molecules 28 06337 g005
Figure 5. (a−d) Structure, PXRD, molecular electrostatic potential, connolly surface (mapped with electrostatic potential) of UTSA−400, and (e) partial IR spectra of UTSA−400. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (a−d) Structure, PXRD, molecular electrostatic potential, connolly surface (mapped with electrostatic potential) of UTSA−400, and (e) partial IR spectra of UTSA−400. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 06337 g005
Molecules 28 06337 g006
Figure 6. (a–f) Structure of M-gallate and (g,h) schematic illustration of the shape-selective separation mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. (a–f) Structure of M-gallate and (g,h) schematic illustration of the shape-selective separation mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 06337 g006
Molecules 28 06337 g007
Figure 7. Breakthrough curves of nHEX/3MP/23DMB (equimolar ternary mixture) at 303.15 K. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. Breakthrough curves of nHEX/3MP/23DMB (equimolar ternary mixture) at 303.15 K. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 06337 g007
Table 1. Kinetic diameters of selected molecules.
Table 1. Kinetic diameters of selected molecules.
AdsorbateKinetic Diameter/nmAdsorbateKinetic Diameter/nm
N20.364–0.380n-C4H100.4687
CO20.33i-C4H100.5278
CH40.3751-Butene0.45
C2H20.33cis-2-butene0.423
C2H40.41631,3-Butadiene0.52
C3H60.4678n-C6H140.43
C3H80.43–0.5118
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, X.; Yan, W.-H.; Hu, B.-Y.; Huang, Y.-X.; Zheng, S.-M. Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Light Hydrocarbon Separation. Molecules 2023, 28, 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176337

AMA Style

Gao X, Yan W-H, Hu B-Y, Huang Y-X, Zheng S-M. Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Light Hydrocarbon Separation. Molecules. 2023; 28(17):6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Xiang, Wen-Hui Yan, Bo-Yang Hu, Yu-Xin Huang, and Shi-Mei Zheng. 2023. "Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Light Hydrocarbon Separation" Molecules 28, no. 17: 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176337

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop