Next Article in Journal
Effective Synthesis of 4-Quinolones by Reductive Cyclization of 2′-Nitrochalcones Using Formic Acid as a CO Surrogate
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant Activity, and Protective Effect against H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress of Carlina vulgaris Extract
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities against Various E. coli Strains of a Novel Hybrid Peptide—LENART01
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fungistatic Effect of Phthalide Lactones on Rhodotorula mucilaginosa

Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(14), 5423; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145423
Submission received: 2 June 2023 / Revised: 6 July 2023 / Accepted: 12 July 2023 / Published: 15 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents)

Abstract

:
Currently, there is an increasing number of cases of fungal infections caused by opportunistic strains of the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, mainly in immunocompromised patients during hospitalization. The excessive use of antibiotics and azole compounds increases the risk of resistance to microorganisms. A new alternative to these drugs may be synthetic phthalide lactones with a structure identical to or similar to the natural ones found in celery plants, which show low toxicity and relatively high fungistatic activity. In the present study, the fungistatic activity of seven phthalide lactones was determined against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459. We showed that 3-n-butylidenephthalide, the most potent compound selected in the microdilution test, caused a dose-dependent decrease in dry yeast biomass. Phthalide accumulated in yeast cells and contributed to an increase in reactive oxygen species content. The synergistic effect of fluconazole resulted in a reduction in the azole concentration required for yeast inhibition. We observed changes in the color of the yeast cultures; thus, we conducted experiments to prove that the carotenoid profile was altered. The addition of lactones also triggered a decline in fatty acid methyl esters.

1. Introduction

Rhodotorula mucilaginosa is a saprophytic eukaryote ubiquitous in the ecological environment. Numerous strains of R. mucilaginosa are being tested for their biotechnological importance in the production of carotenoids, lipids, enzymes, and other functional bioproducts, using cheap agricultural waste [1,2]. R. mucilaginosa can be isolated from food, mainly cheese, dairy products, sausages, and fruit juices [3,4]. There is a growing concern that food may be an underestimated source of environmental pathogens [5]. Moreover, for many years, we have observed some pathogenic strains that cause local mycosis of the skin in critically ill patients and those taking immunosuppressive medications [6]. There is a slow but alarming increase in the number of bloodstream infections associated with the use of central venous catheters. Rhodotorula infections of the eyes, meninges, prosthetic joints, and peritoneum occur less frequently. Many have no documented relationship with central venous catheter use or immunosuppression. These infections occur mainly in patients receiving corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, and broad-spectrum antibiotics [7,8,9,10].
R. mucilaginosa infections are treated similarly to other pathogenic yeast infections with drugs from the azole group (fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole), 5-fluorocytosine, and amphotericin. Several studies reported on the resistance of microorganisms to commonly used antibiotics. The so-called multidrug-resistant microorganisms include some Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus strains resistant to azole drugs, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [11,12].
In addition to the search for new drugs, one of the methods to tackle the problem of resistance is to use the synergistic effect. This phenomenon has been studied in various strains of Candida, including drug-resistant strains. In the case of C. albicans, a synergistic effect with fluconazole and 3-n-butylphthalide allowed for a 5–20-fold reduction in the doses [13,14,15]. The aforementioned 3-n-butylphthalide belongs to the group of phthalide lactones and is found in various celery plants: Angelica archangelica (angelica), A. sinensis (Chinese angelica), Apium graveolens (celery), Cnidium officinale, and Levisticum officinale (lovage) [16].
Phthalides have been studied for their antimicrobial properties against phytopathogens and species pathogenic to animals and humans [17]. For example, 3-n-butylidenephthalide is active against Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella flexneri, S. sonnei, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio harvei, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus. Some phthalides are active against Mycobacterium bovis and M. tuberculosis, which are the bacilli that cause tuberculosis in animals and humans, respectively [16,17,18].
Gong et al. showed that the fungistatic 3-n-butylphthalide inhibited genes responsible for the biosynthesis of CDR1 and CDR2 transport pumps in Candida albicans strains isolated from patients, contributing to the accumulation of both lactones and azole compounds inside the cell [13]. The presence of the phthalide in the cytosol led to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the mitochondria as demonstrated by measuring the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm). The accumulation of ROS resulted in the direct destruction of the mitochondrial cell membrane and the release of large amounts of ROS into the cytosol. The damaging effects of ROS include structural changes in DNA and RNA, peroxidation of membrane phospholipids (consisting of polyunsaturated fatty acids), and oxidation of proteins that perform numerous functions inside the cell. Figure 1 shows the mechanism of synergistic interactions between 3-n-butylphthalide and fluconazole. In our latest publication, we confirmed that this effect was shown not only by 3-n-butylphthalide but also by 3-n-butylidenephthalide and 3-n-butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide [15].
To the best of our knowledge, no studies have described the effect of phthalide lactones on Rhodotorula strains. The main goal of our work was to deepen our knowledge of the action of this synthetic phthalide lactone with structures identical to or similar to natural compounds on yeast cells. In this study, we selected a strain of R. mucilaginosa that can colonize food products and constitutes a potential opportunistic strain. We were interested in the fact that the cultures of this microorganism lost their characteristic orange-red color in the presence of phthalide. We tested seven lactones against this strain. Owing to their low toxicity and, for most of them, natural occurrence, they can be used as yeast growth-inhibitory agents. We analyzed the effect of 3-n-butylidenephthalide on synergism with fluconazole, ROS content, carotenoids, fatty acid composition, and ergosterol production.

2. Results and Discussion

In the first stage of this study, we synthesized and determined the fungistatic activities of seven lactones against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459. However, the main goal of this study was to explain the fungistatic effect of phthalide lactones. Figure 2 shows a diagram of the experiments conducted in this study.
In the next part of the study, we referred to the work of Gong et al. [13] and Krężel et al. [15] describing the effect of phthalide lactone on fluconazole-resistant C. albicans cells and compared it with the effect on R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 cells (Figure 2, orange).
Finally, we determined how 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) affects the quantity and quality of carotenoids, fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), and ergosterol. We also visualized the cells using confocal microscopy (Figure 2, green). Other experiments, such as synthesis, biotransformations, and in silico analysis, unrelated to the elucidation of the fungistatic effect of phthalide lactones, are highlighted in gray (Figure 2, gray).

2.1. Synthesis of Phthalide Lactones

The following compounds were used to test fungistatic activity: 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1), 3-n-butylphthalide (2), 3-n-propylidenephthalide (3), 3-n-propylphthalide (4), 3-n-butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (5), 3-n-butyl-hexahydrophthalide (6), and 3-n-butyl-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydrophthalide (7) (Figure 3). Lactones, except lactone 3, which was purchased, were obtained in two-stage syntheses with a yield of 40–60%, in which the intermediate product 3-butyl-3-hydroxylactone or 3-propyl-3-hydroxylactone formed from dialkylcadmium and the appropriate anhydride was subjected to reduction with NaBH4 or dehydration with p-toluenesulfonic acid (Figure 4) [16]. The structures of the compounds were confirmed using 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HR-ESI-MS/MS analyses performed using an ESI-Q-TOF mass spectrometer.

2.2. Fungistatic Activity against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 and Correlation with Structure and In Silico Data

IC50 values for phthalide lactones 17 and fluconazole (8) against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 were determined using the broth microdilution method (Table 1). As Rhodotorula spp. may grow in a broad range of temperatures from 5 to 35 °C, and the optimal value is species-dependent [19], microdilution tests were conducted in temperatures of both 25 °C and 30 °C.
Six of the seven lactones inhibited the mycelial growth of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 at concentrations ranging from 13 to 66 µg/mL. In contrast, fluconazole (8), most commonly used for yeast infections, reduced mycelial growth at a concentration of 199–207 µg/mL.
Data on absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) parameters are crucial for drug development [20]. Therefore, in silico ADME analysis was included in the study (Table 1). Among these parameters, lipophilicity, solubility, toxicity to rat cells, and inhibition of isoenzymes of P450 cytochrome, which are responsible for the biotransformation and detoxification of drugs, are frequently tested [20,21,22,23].
In addition to the analysis of the differences in the structure of compounds, we analyzed the influence of structure on biological activity. Lactones 14 are flat aromatic compounds, and cis lactones 57 with a cyclohexane or cyclohexene ring form conformations intermediate between the chair and boat forms, depending on the environment. With such minor differences in biological activity, it should be noted that lactones 1 and 3, with an aromatic ring and a double bond at the three-carbon atom, were the most active and three times less toxic than fluconazole (8). In contrast, lactones 2 and 47 were seven to nine times less toxic than fluconazole (8). Considering the experimental data, the studies on the toxicity of 3-n-butylphthalide (2) were conducted by Xue et al., 2011—the IC50 values for both primary rat and human hepatocytes were described as above 500 µM, which was the highest concentration tested. This phthalide has been accepted as the treatment of the brain ischemia after clinical studies [24,25].
Aromatic lactones 14 inhibited the enzyme CYP1A2, which means that they might prolong the metabolism of some classes of drugs, including analgesic, antipsychotic, anti-Parkinson, anti-Alzheimer, and anticancer drugs. In contrast, CYP1A2 inhibitors prevent the bioactivation of procarcinogens [26]. Lactones 2, 6, and 7 reduced the activity of CYP2C9 and therefore may influence the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors, antiepileptic agents, and antiplatelet agents [27]. In contrast to fluconazole (8), the lactones did not reduce CYP2C19 activity. CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 were not inhibited by any of the compounds tested.
The lowest fungistatic activity was observed for 3-n-propylphthalide (4). This compound has a low lipophilicity (LogP = 2.44) compared to the rest of the lactones (log P = 2.78–2.96), which is less soluble in fat than other lactones. All lactones 17 are poorly soluble in water, although lactones 34 with a three-carbon side chain differ slightly in this matter.

2.3. Determination of Fungistatic Activity for 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 In Vitro and in Food Matrices

The IC50 values of compounds 17 against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 were determined using the broth microdilution method. The main advantages of this method include the low amount of compounds required for testing and the low cost; nevertheless, some drawbacks related to inoculum viability and solvent-inhibiting properties occur [28]. Moreover, it has been stated that the incubation temperature, inoculum size, and culture medium may influence the inhibitory concentrations using the microdilution method [29,30].
In connection with the discussion on the advantages and limitations of the broth microdilution method for the most active compound, 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1), we determined the fungistatic activity based on the weight of the mycelia cultured in various lactone 1 concentrations. Moreover, we discussed the contribution of phthalide 1 to the inhibition of R. mucilaginosa using the plate count method and determined yeast growth in dairy food matrices.

2.3.1. Determination of Dry Yeast Biomass

To evaluate the effect of the addition of different concentrations of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) on the dry yeast biomass, we performed two experiments in 0.3 and 2 L flasks with 50 mL and 500 mL Sabouraud medium with inoculum 0.5% vol. and 10% vol., respectively.
The total dry biomass of the control samples were 0.238 and 3.254 g, respectively (Figure 5). In both experiments, a marked decrease in yeast biomass by almost half of the control value was noted for the lowest concentration of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1)—25 µg/mL. The use of higher concentrations resulted in subsequent but smaller decreases in dry matter values. Fluconazole (8) at a concentration of 50 µg/mL caused only a slight inhibition compared with the control—the amount of reduction of dry biomass was 0.031 and 0.025 g, depending on the inoculum volume (0.5% and 10% volume of the medium, correspondingly).

2.3.2. Plate Count Method In Vitro and in Food Matrices

The total number of yeasts (CFU/mL) depending on the concentration of compound 1 used for the two assays is shown in Figure 6.
The number of colonies in the control sample was 8.26 × 109 CFU/mL. We showed that 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) caused a notable reduction in this value at the lowest tested concentration of 6.25 µg/mL to the amount of 1.70 × 109 CFU/mL, which means that the 50% inhibition of CFU/mL is below this dose. Fluconazole (8), tested at a dose of 50 µg/mL, reduced the number of colonies up to 5.87 × 109 CFU/mL, i.e., by 20% (Figure 6a).
The antimicrobial activity of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 was evaluated in food matrices (Figure 6b). Following the promising results of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) in vitro tests, we decided to evaluate the functional antifungal properties of three commercially available yogurt types (1 and 2 are thick yogurts and 3 is a drinking yogurt). Because dairy-derived Lactobacillus spp. can affect yeast growth, the results were compared with those of the control [31]. No inhibition was observed using compound 1 at concentrations below 50 µg/mL in preliminary tests. Therefore, phthalide was tested at higher concentrations of 50–550 µg/mL.
The food matrices allowed Rhodotorula to grow from 1.12 × 106 CFU/mL for thick yogurt 2 to 1.51 × 105 CFU/mL for drinking yogurt 3. Lactone 1 at concentrations above 50 µg/mL caused a considerable decrease in yeast colonies compared with the control. Inhibition of CFU/mL by half occurred at a concentration of 220–250 µg/mL (1.2–1.3 mM) for thick yogurt. Lactone may serve as a promising alternative to sodium chloride, potassium sorbate, sodium acetate, sodium benzoate, and other preservatives used in dairy products [32].
The differences in activity between the in vitro assay and the assay that mimics the target conditions may be due to the uneven distribution of the antifungal agent in the food matrix. This corresponds to the relatively high lipophilicity of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) associated with its poor solubility in water [33]. Blanco-Padilla pointed out that a potential problem with natural antimicrobials could also be their stability and drew attention to nanocarriers to improve cell delivery [34]. However, the amount of 3-n-butylidenophthalide (1) used is still low, and considering its low toxicity, it can be recommended for use.

2.4. Microbial Transformation 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) by R. mucilaginosa

We examined whether the yeast R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 transformed 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1). Biotransformations were carried out for eight days. The cultures to which lactone 1 was added were centrifuged and separated from the mycelium and supernatant using ethyl acetate. We found that 90% of the lactone was accumulated in the yeast mycelium. A slight loss of substrate over time was observed. The above results indirectly indicate that 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) with log P 2.93 and log S −3.3, which is highly soluble in lipids, was accumulated in the cytosol.

2.5. The Influence of the 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) on ROS Level

Physiological ROS are necessary for proper cell functioning, including signaling pathways [35]. However, according to the research conducted by Gong et al., 3-n-butylphthalide (2) antifungal activity is likely associated with intracellular ROS overproduction, which leads to mitochondrial dysfunction [13]. The damaging effects of ROS inside cells and mitochondria include structural changes in DNA and RNA, peroxidation of membrane phospholipids (consisting of polyunsaturated fatty acids), and oxidation of cellular proteins that perform numerous functions inside the cell [36]. ROS values result from the xenobiotic effect and the well-known antioxidative properties exhibited by carotenoids, including α- and β-carotene and lycopene [37]. It has been stated that supplementation with some antioxidants, e.g., ascorbic acid, may reduce fluconazole-induced inhibition [38]. The 4 h treatment of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 cells with 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) or fluconazole (8) increased the level of intracellular ROS up to 53% compared with the control at a concentration of 75 µg/mL (Figure 7). Fluconazole (8) at 50 µg/mL also caused elevated levels of oxidative stress. An increase in ROS under the influence of fluconazole was observed in experiments using Candida tropicalis, C. albicans, and Cryptococcus neoformans [39].
We evaluated whether the effect of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) on yeast cells can be visualized using confocal microscopy with Calcofluor White staining. This dye was used previously by Dagher et al. [40] and Suchodolski et al. [41] for staining yeast cell walls as it binds with chitin. However, we did not observe a change in the fluorescence intensity between the control and tested samples (Figure 8).

2.6. Synergistic Effect of 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) and Fluconazole (8)

The checkerboard protocol previously described in the literature was used to determine the effects of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8) in combination [15,42].
Fractional inhibitory concentration values less than 0.5 indicated that phthalide 1 and fluconazole (8) showed a synergistic effect. The compounds inhibited the growth of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 by 90% when tested in combination at lower concentrations, e.g., 4 µg/mL of lactone 1 and 32 µg/mL of fluconazole (8), instead of doses of 32 µg/mL and 256 µg/mL for the compounds administered separately (Figure 9). This action greatly reduces drugs from the azole group, causing drug resistance [13,15].

2.7. The Influence of the 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) on the Production of Carotenoids

R. mucilaginosa is known to produce carotenoids [43]. As we observed changes in the color of the cultures depending on the compound 1 concentration used, we investigated the β-carotene content and overall carotenoid composition in those samples. The connection between carotenoid profiles and factors triggering oxidative stress has been reported in the literature [44].
Kot et al. noted that the pigments are deposited in lipid bodies; therefore, an appropriate cell disruption method is required before extraction [45]. Indeed, direct extraction of biomass using dimethyl sulfoxide with incubation at 50 °C and subsequent extraction using acetone was not sufficient, as some pigments remained in the cells. Therefore, we implemented ultrasonic disintegration of yeast cells, followed by centrifugation and vortexing with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and Folch solution until the biomass was colorless. The resulting solution was evaporated, dissolved in acetonitrile, and subjected to APCI-LC-HR-MS. The analysis was targeted to detect the selected pigments present in the Rhodotorula pathway, according to Kot et al. [45] and Moliné et al. [46]. Briefly, colorless phytoene, the first 40-carbon compound of this route, is converted to neurosporene by desaturase. Subsequently, transformations to lycopene or, on some occasions, β-zeacarotene occur, followed by a series of cyclization reactions to γ- and β-carotene. In parallel, β-carotene is converted to torulene, from which derivatives are formed by hydroxylation and oxidation, including torularhodin [45,46].
The APCI-LC-HR-MS results of the control sample indicated the presence of the precursors phytoene, neurosporene, lycopene, β-carotene, torulene, and torularhodin (Figure 10). β-zeacarotene was not detected. β-carotene and lycopene were additionally confirmed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-DAD based on a comparison with the retention time of the compound standards.
The differences in particular pigments between the samples were visualized using quantitative comparative analysis (Table 2). The relative quantity of the compounds was defined as 1 for the control sample, and the remaining samples were multiples of this number within each row.
Our results confirmed a change in pigment formation in cultures supplemented with 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1). Similarly, Moț et al. showed that antifungal naftifine caused dose-dependent depigmentation of cells. A possible mechanism of action involves compound-induced ROS formation, triggering the carotenoid defense response [47]. Another known inhibitor of carotenogenesis is diphenylamine, which inhibits the desaturation processes affecting phytoene synthase, leading to the accumulation of phytoene [46]. Additionally, the content of the carotenoid precursor in samples with the addition of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) increased up to 96 times when the inhibitor was tested at a concentration of 75 µg/mL. This result may indicate the same mechanism of action as for diphenylamine. The next carotenoid in the pathway, neurosporene, was detected in only one sample, in which the highest content of its precursor was also detected. The production of β-carotene and lycopene was over fourfold increased when a lower concentration of compound 1 was applied; however, it decreased along with the addition of a higher concentration of the inhibitor, leading to even five times less β-carotene production than the control sample. Torulene and torularhodin were formed in reduced quantities at all the 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) concentrations tested. At 100 µg/mL, only trace amounts of torulene were noted, whereas torularhodin was not detected.
According to the literature, ketoconazole at doses of 20–50 mg/L significantly increased the content of pigments, interpreted as overexpression of the HMG1 gene increasing the activity of HMG-CoA reductase, which results in enhancement of the pigment precursor [48]. We observed that the addition of fluconazole (8) also led to increased amounts of colored β-carotene and lycopene, torulene, and torularhodin by up to 2.30, 1.60, and 1.63 times, respectively, as compared with the control. Fluconazole (8) did not induce phytoene accumulation to the same extent as phthalide 1, causing only a threefold increase.
By analyzing the data on β-carotene content in the samples determined using HPLC-DAD, it can be concluded that, similar to the previous experiment, the smallest dose of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) caused an increase in β-carotene content in comparison with the control (Table 3). In addition, fluconazole (8) greatly increased pigment production. This enhancement of β-carotene production using a medium containing compound 8 is consistent with the findings of Li et al. [49]. Interestingly, the application of phthalide 1 at a higher concentration of 75 µg/mL caused a twofold decline, whereas, at a dose of 100 µg/mL, carotenoids were not detected using the HPLC-DAD method.

2.8. The Influence of the 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) on the Production of FAME

Lipid biosynthesis occurs in the cytoplasm of yeast cells through enzyme-derived sequences that form biosynthetic substrates of saccharides, glycerol, or acetyl-CoA to long-chain fatty acids. This process is closely related to glycolysis and the Krebs cycle [50,51].
R. mucilaginosa and other members of this genus are considered oleaginous yeasts [52]. Lipids, with special emphasis on sterols, amphipathic phospholipids, and fatty acids (FAs) as their components, are essential for membrane creation [53]. Rhodotorula strains store up to 40% of lipids in dry matter, of which triglycerides constitute 65–90% of their content [2].
The efficiency and effectiveness of lipid biosynthesis in R. mucilaginosa are determined by several factors. First, a high molar C/N ratio in the culture medium is a key factor in the development of lipid-accumulating yeasts. R. mucilaginosa LP-2 has been observed to produce 46.7% lipid levels at a C/N ratio of 65 and 35.7% at a ratio of 25 [54]. In this study, we used a C/N ratio of 23, which was constant in all experiments. In addition, carbon sources play an important role [55]. The third important parameter influencing the fatty acid profile was the yeast incubation temperature. In Adel et al. [56], a study conducted at three temperatures of 7 °C, 15 °C, and 26 °C, it was shown that the most unsaturated acids 63.4% are obtained at 15 °C, compared with 57.4% at 7 °C and 43.5% at 26 °C. All our experiments regarding FAME analyses were carried out at the temperature of 25 °C.
The key parameter that affects lipid biosynthesis is pH. Karatay and Donmez [57] conducted various experiments at pH values ranging from 4 to 7. The maximum content of lipids in Rhodotorula biomass was obtained at pH = 5, equaling 69.5%, while the pH 4, 6, and 7 resulted in the obtainment of 50.8%, 51.7%, and 64.5%, respectively. In this study, the pH of the control sample was 4.75 and changed with increasing concentrations of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) up to 25 µg/mL. In the concentration range of 25–100 µg/mL, the pH remained relatively stable near the value of 5.5 ± 0.1 (Figure 11a).
Another crucial factor is the increase in ROS inside the cell and mitochondria under the influence of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1). ROS are responsible for lipid peroxidation, changing the quantitative and qualitative composition and contributing to the disintegration of cell membranes [36].
The addition of azoles may cause a shift in the desaturation and elongation of FAs, impacting membrane function and growth [58]. To determine the concentration and change in the FA profile between the tested samples, the dry biomass of R. mucilaginosa was subjected to alkaline hydrolysis and methylation to obtain FAMEs. The use of glucose-rich Sabouraud medium resulted in a total FAME yield of 75.65 mg/g dry biomass in the control sample (Figure 11b). Khot [52] reported maximum FAMEs content in R. mucilaginosa IIPL32 at 97.23 mg/g dry biomass; however, it has been stated that lipid composition varies depending on aeration, medium composition, and incubation time [59]. During the experiment, no considerable difference was noted for 3-n-butylidenophthalide (1) dosed at 25 μg/mL in the medium as compared with the control. Nevertheless, there was a decline in FAME content by nearly 57% with compound 1 addition in the concentration of 50 μg/mL. The reference antimycotic fluconazole (8) at this dose caused a smaller decrease. The concentrations of 75 and 100 μg/mL of 3-n-butylidenophthalide (1) caused a similar effect in FAME reduction, up to 66% in relation to the control (Figure 11b).
The vast majority (79.49%) of the control sample consisted of monounsaturated fatty acid esters, while the polyunsaturated accounted only for 1.49%. The predominant FAME detected included oleic acid (cis C18:1) ester with a concentration of 77.15; next, in descending order of proportion, were palmitic (C16:0), lignocerate (C24:0), stearic (C18:0), and linoleic (C18:2 n-6) methyl esters (Figure 12).
Other detected FAMEs did not exceed 1% separately. Among these, only negligible amounts of the odd-chain fatty acids C15:0, C17:0, and C17:1 were formed. Their microbial production is very limited; nevertheless, attempts to increase their yield have been made through propionate addition or genetic engineering [60].
Similarly, Ayadi et al. [61] noted that cis C18:1 and C16:0 were dominant in R. mucilaginosa Y-MG1 biomass with 58.30% and 15.20%, respectively, of overall FAMEs content, using a synthetic medium with glucose as the carbon source. Other FAMEs previously reported in the literature in various R. mucilaginosa strains included palmitoleic (C16:1), linoleic (C18:2), and other C10-18 esters present in a minority [52,59,61].
As the distribution of saturated and unsaturated lipids is crucial for membrane fluidity, we examined the proportions of these components [62]. Considering the impact of the dose of the compounds on the profile of FAMEs, the control sample contained 19.02% of saturated FAs, but the highest percentage of saturated fatty acids (20.31%) was recorded for the addition of compound 1 at a concentration of 25 µg/mL. The proportion further decreased with increasing levels of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1), except 75 µg/mL, which showed no considerable difference compared with 50 µg/mL. A reduction in the saturated FAs content was noted at a dose of 100 µg/mL, resulting in a content of 14.12%. The addition of fluconazole (8) also notably declined their share to 15.27%. As unsaturation increased, the proportion of polyunsaturated FAs increased when using compound 1 compared with the control, although there was no straightforward dose dependency. Fluconazole (8) did not cause notable shifts in the polyunsaturated FAs content between the control and tested groups (Table 4).
The rising proportion of unsaturated FAs suggests an increase in membrane fluidity, as phospholipids with these FAs have relatively lower melting points [63]. An explanation for the increased share of unsaturated FAs with increasing concentration of added compound 1 may be the influence on the expression of genes encoding fatty acid desaturases. These enzymes catalyze the formation of unsaturated acids from their saturated analogues, and their expression in the OLE pathway may be affected by nutrient and environmental factors [64]. For instance, Δ9-fatty acid desaturase is responsible for the formation of palmitoleic acid (C16:1) and oleic acid (cis C18:1) [65]. The increase in the percentage of cis C18:1 acid with the simultaneous decline of saturated analogue C18:0 (Figure 12) suggests the involvement of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) in the OLE pathway.

2.9. The Influence of the 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) on the Ergosterol Content

The main antifungal mechanism of action of azoles includes blocking the sterol pathway by lowering lanosterol 14α-demethylase activity (Erg11p). Consequently, another toxic sterol is created by other enzymes in this pathway, which leads to the inhibition of cell growth or death [66,67].
However, 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) did not notably change ergosterol content (Figure 13). This indicates that the observed fungistatic activity of lactones 17 is not related to the disintegration of the cell membrane associated with the lack of ergosterol.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

Solvents used in this study were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). 3-n-Propylidenephthalide (3) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fluconazole (8) was purchased from TCI (Tokyo, Japan). Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix, β-carotene (European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard), Calcofluor White, 2ʹ,7ʹ-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (H2DCFDA), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.2, and boron trifluoride in diethyl ether (48%) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Preparative column chromatography of the lactones after synthesis was performed using Silica Gel (Kieselgel 60, 230–400 mesh, 40–63 µm, Merck).
The following microbiological media were used: RPMI 1640 medium buffered with 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS): 10.4 g RPMI 1640 with l-glutamine, without sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 34.53 g MOPS (Pol-Aura, Dywity, Poland), 1 L distilled water; pH adjusted to 7.0, medium was sterile-filtered; Sabouraud medium: 30 g glucose (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland), 10 g peptone and 2 g bacteriological LAB-AGAR™ (Biomaxima, Lublin, Poland), and 1 L of distilled water; pH was adjusted to 5.6.
The strain used for the study was R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 derived from Belgian Coordinated Collections of Microorganisms (BCCM).
Centrifugation of samples was carried out using an Eppendorf centrifuge 5810 R (Hamburg, Germany). The yeast biomass was lyophilized using a LYO SRK GT2 Basic (Riedstadt, Germany). Incubation of microtiter plates for the broth microdilution test took place in a Biosan PST-60 HL ThermoShaker (Riga, Latvia), while their analysis was performed using a BioTek TS-800 microplate reader (Riga, Latvia). Carotenoids were extracted from the biomass using a Vortex Mixer (VELP SCIENTIFICA, Usmate Velate, Italy). Fluorometric measure for the ROS determination was taken using a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).
Gas chromatography analyses (GC, FID, carrier gas H2) were performed on an Agilent Technologies 8860 (GC System, Santa Clara, CA, USA). For the FAME determination, column Zebron ZB-FAME, 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.2 µm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), while for tests of the purity of compounds 17, HP-5 column, 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used.
β-carotene content and microbial transformations of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) were analyzed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 instrument with a diode array detector (Thermo Fisher Scientfic, Waltham, MA, USA) with column Agilent Zorbax Bonus-RP 3.5 µm 150 × 3 mm.
HR-APCI–MS/MS analyses of the carotenoids were performed with RSLC UltiMate 3000 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled with mass spectrometer APCI-Q-TOF, maXis impact (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Luna Omega 1.6 µm C18, 50 mm × 2.1 (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was the column used for the pigments determination and quantitative comparative analysis.
The staining of the yeast cells was performed in Millicell® EZ SLIDE (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), assembled with the microscope Epredia X1000 Coverslip 24 × 50 mm #1.5 (0.16–0.19 mm) slides (Epredia, Kalamazoo, MI, USA). The confocal microscopy imaging was performed using a STEDyCON superconfocal microscope (Abberrior Intruments, Göttingen, Germany) installed on a Nikon Ti2E microscope body with a 100× objective lens (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
A Cintra 101 spectrophotometer (GBC Scientific, Braeside, Australia) was used to analyze the ergosterol content of the samples.
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a Bruker Avance 500 (500 MHz, Billerica, MA, USA) spectrometer.

3.2. Synthesis of Phthalide Lactones

Compounds 12 and 47 were synthesized using the method described below:
Step 1: We used the method we described in a previous article [68]. Briefly, synthesis was carried out in a multinecked flask equipped with a dropping funnel, magnetic stirrer core, and reflux condenser. Diethyl ether or THF, freshly distilled from LiAlH4, was used as the solvent. Magnesium chips (0.05 M) were activated by heating with a few iodine crystals, and 0.055 mM of the appropriate alkyl bromide was added dropwise. Anhydrous cadmium chloride (0.025 M) was added to the obtained Grignard compound, and the mixture was heated for 1 h. After cooling, 0.05 M of an appropriate anhydride was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was heated for 6 h. A 10% HCl solution was added to the cooled reaction mixture for acidification. The solvents were evaporated on a rotary evaporator, and the reaction residue was extracted using a separatory funnel with methylene chloride. The collected organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered through a filter paper, and evaporated.
Step 2a (compounds 2; 47): The concentrated mixture was dissolved in 100 mL of THF, followed by the addition of 6 mM NaBH4. The mixture was stirred under reflux for 8 h. The mixture was acidified with 10% HCl and stirring was continued. The solvent was then evaporated and the residue was extracted using a separatory funnel with methylene chloride. The residue was purified using liquid column chromatography.
Step 2b (compound 1): The mixture was dissolved in 300 mL of toluene in a round-bottomed flask equipped with an azeotropic cap, after which 1 mM p-toluenesulfonic acid was added and heated with a heating mantle until the substrate has completely reacted, that is, until the water stopped evaporating.
The obtained compounds were purified via liquid column chromatography using hexane/isopropanol/acetone/ethyl acetate (60:3:1:1) as the eluent.
For the HR-ESI–MS/MS analyses of lactones 17, the major operating parameters were as follows: flow rate of the sample: 180 µL/min; nebulizer pressure: 0.4 bar, heating gas flow: 3.0 L/min, heating gas temperature: 180/200 °C; data acquisition range: m/z 50–1300/1400 m/z; ionization mode: positive and negative; and ion source energy: 5 eV.
The additional spectral data are presented in the attached Supplementary Materials.
3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) was prepared according to the procedure (steps 1 and 2b), and C4H9Br and phthalic anhydride (7.5 g, 0.05 mole) were used as the substrate. An amount of 3.57 g (yield 38%) of phthalide was obtained as a mixture of two diastereoisomers. Bioactivity of compound 1 was tested for the mixture of isomers E and Z, of percentage composition 8 and 92%, correspondingly.
Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 0.98 (t, 3, J = 7.4, CH3-11), 1.54 (m, 2, CH2-10), 2.45 (q, 2, J = 15.0, 7.5, CH2-9), 5.63 (t, 1, J = 7.8, CH-8), 7.49 (t, 1, J = 7.3, CH-5), 7.62–7.69 (m, 2, CH-4), 7.62–7.69 (m, 2, CH-6), 7.88 (d, 1, J = 7.7, CH-7). 13C NMR (151 MHz), δ (ppm): 13.9 (C-11), 22.6 (C-10), 28.0 (C-9), 109.6 (CH-8), 119.8 (CH-4), 124.6 (C-7a), 125.4 (C-7), 129.5 (CH-6), 134.3 (CH-5), 139.7 (C-3a), 145.9 (C-3), 167.3 (C-1). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ 189.0908 (experimental), 189.0910 (calculated); formula: C12H12O2.
3-n-butylphthalide (2) was prepared according to the procedure (steps 1 and 2a), and C4H9Br and phthalic anhydride (7.5 g, 0.05 mole) were used as the substrate. An amount of 4.65 g (yield 48.8%) of phthalide was obtained. Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 0.91 (t, 3, J = 7.2, CH3-11), 1.31–1.44 (m, 2, CH2-10), 1.44–1.54 (m, 2, CH2-9), 1.65–1.80 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 1.99–2.12 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 5.47 (dd, 1, J = 7.9, 3.7, CH-3), 7.44 (d, 1, J = 7.7, CH-4), 7.52 (t, 1, J = 7.5, CH-6), 7.66 (t, 1, J = 7.5, CH-5), 7.89 (d, 1, J = 7.7, CH-7). 13C NMR (151 MHz), δ (ppm): 14.0 (C-11), 22.6 (C-10), 27.0 (C-9), 34.6 (C-8), 81.6 (CH-3), 121.8 (CH-4), 125.8 (CH-7), 126.3 (C-7a) 129.1 (CH-6), 134.1 (CH-5), 150.3 (C–3a), 170.8 (C-1). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ 191.1065 (exp.), 191.1067 (calc.); formula: C12H14O2.
3-n-propylphthalide (4) was prepared according to the procedure (steps 1 and 2a), and C3H7Br and phthalic anhydride (7.5 g, 0.05 mole) were used as the substrate. An amount of 3.61 g (yield 42%) of phthalide was obtained. Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 0.98 (t, 3, J = 7.4, CH3-10), 1.46–1.58 (m, 2, CH2-9), 1.72–1.78 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 1.98–2.04 (m,1, one of CH2-8), 5.48 (dd, 1, J = 8.0, 4.0, CH-3), 7.44 (d, 1, J = 7.7, CH-4), 7.52 (t, 1, J = 7.5, CH-6), 7.66 (t, 1, J = 7.5, CH-5), 7.89 (d, 1, J = 7.7, CH-7). 13C NMR (151 MHz), δ (ppm): 13.97 (CH3-10), 18.41 (CH2-9), 36.99 (CH2-8), 81.42 (CH-3), 121.87 (CH-4), 125.88 (CH-7), 126.32 (C-7a), 129.18 (CH-6), 134.08 (CH-5), 150.31 (C-3a), 170.86 (C-1). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ 177.0908 (exp.), 177.0910 (calc.); formula: C11H12O2.
3-n-butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (5) was prepared according to the procedure (steps 1 and 2a), and C4H9Br and 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride (7.7 g, 0.05 mole) were used as the substrate. An amount of 4.37 g (yield 45.1%) of phthalide was obtained. Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 0.88 (t, 3, J = 7.1, CH3-11), 1.22–1.40 (m, 4, CH2-10, CH2-9), 1.41–1.50 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 1.59–1.77 (m, 4, CH2-5, CH2-6), 1.79–1.87 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 2.13–2.24 (m, 4, CH2-4, CH2-7), 4.74–4.79 (m, 1, CH-3). 13C NMR (151 MHz), δ (ppm): 13.77 (CH3-11), 19.77 (CH2-7), 21.66 (CH2-5), 21.69 (CH2-6), 22.52 (CH2-10), 23.25 (CH2-4), 26.66 (CH-9), 32.08 (CH-8), 83.01 (C-3), 126.49 (C-7a), 163.84 (C-3a), 173.85 (C-1). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ 195.1376 (exp.), 195.1380 (calc.); formula: C12H18O2.
3-n-butyl-hexahydrophthalide (6) was prepared according to the procedure (steps 1 and 2a), and C4H9Br and hexahydrophthalic anhydride (7.8 g, 0.05 mole) were used as the substrates. An amount of 4.70 g (yield 48%) of phthalide was obtained. Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 0.90 (t, 3, J = 7.1 Hz, CH3-11), 1.07–1.10 (m, 2, CH2-10), 1.29–1.36 (m, 2, CH2-7), 1.37–1.65 (m, 8, CH2-4, CH2-5, CH2-6, CH2-9), 1.70–1.77 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 2.15–2.18 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 2.29–2.31 (m, 1, CH-3a), 2.72 (t, 1, J = 6.2, CH-7a), 4.20–4.26 (m, 1, CH-3). 13C NMR (151 MHz) δ (ppm): 13.91. (CH3-11), 22.48 (CH2-10, CH2-9), 22.55 (CH2-5), 22.88 (CH2-8), 23.58 (CH2-6, CH2-4), 27.96 (CH2-7), 38.95 (CH-3a), 42.08 (CH-7a), 82.03 (C-3), 178.10 (C-1). HRMS (m/z): [M + Na]+ 219.1367 (exp.), 219.1434 (cal.); formula: C12H20O2.
3-n-butyl-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydrophthalide (7) was prepared according to the procedure (steps 1 and 2a), and C4H9Br and 1,2,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride (7.7 g, 0.05 mole) were used as the substrate. An amount of 4.85 g (yield 50%) of phthalide was obtained. Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 0.91 (t, 3, J = 7.1 Hz, CH3-11), 1.30–1.40 (m, 3, one of CH2-9, CH2-10), 1.42–1.50 (m, 1, one of CH2-9), 1.52–1.61 (m, 2, one of CH2-9, one of CH2-8), 1.72–1.79 (m, 1, one of CH2-8), 1.80–1.88 (m, 1, one of CH2-4), 2.01 (dt, 1, J = 17.3, 5.8, one of CH2-4), 2.30–2.38 (m, 1, one of CH2-7), 2.38–2.46 (m, 1, one of CH2-7), 2.49–2.59 (m, 1, CH-3a), 2.79–2.87 (m, 1, CH-7a), 4.32–4.38 (m, 1, CH-3), 5.63–5.75 (m, 2, CH-5, CH-6). 13C NMR (151 MHz) δ (ppm): 14.0 (CH3-11), 19.72 (CH2-10), 22.07 (CH2-4), 22.65 (CH2-7), 28.09 (CH-7a), 29.00 (CH2-9), 35.40 (CH2-8), 40.03 (CH-3a), 82.69 (CH-3), 124.45 (CH-5), 125.30 (CH-6), 178.74 (C-1). HRMS (m/z): [M + Na]+ 217.1202 (exp.), 217.1277 (cal.); formula: C12H18O2.

3.3. Fungistatic Activity against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 and Correlation with Structure and In Silico Data

3.3.1. Broth Microdilution Method

The compounds 18 were screened for their antimicrobial activity using the microdilution method with modified CLSI guidelines [69]. The broth used for the tests included RPMI 1640 medium buffered with MOPS.
Different concentrations of compounds 18 were prepared in DMSO and then diluted 50 times in the medium. An amount of 100 microliters of each concentration was placed into the wells of 96-well microplates. R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 was cultivated on Sabouraud agar. The inoculum was made from a 24 h culture by a dilution to 0.5 McFarland and then further diluted to obtain a density of 1 × 103–5 × 103 CFU/mL. The inoculum volume pipetted into the previously placed antifungals was 100 µL. All the compounds were tested in triplicate. The plates were then incubated separately at 25 °C and 30 °C for 48 h using 1200 RPM. The activity was determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 595 nm and determined as the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50).

3.3.2. In Silico ADME Studies

The prediction of lipophilicity (Log P), solubility (log S), and CYP isoenzyme inhibition for compounds 18 was performed using the tool designed by the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics at the University of Lausanne (http://www.swissadme.ch/index.php (accessed on 25 February 2023)), reported by Daina et al. [23].
The toxicity of rat cells was tested using the computational tool GUSAR (General Unrestricted Structure-Activity Relationships: http://www.way2drug.com/gusar/index.html (accessed on 25 February 2023)) as part of the Way2Drug platform, as reported by Druzhilovskiy et al. [22].

3.4. Determination of Fungistatic Activity for 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) against R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 In Vitro and Food Matrices

3.4.1. Dry Biomass Determination

Compound 1 dissolved in DMSO (0.5 mL) was added to four 2 L Erlenmeyer flasks containing Sabouraud medium, resulting in final concentrations of 25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/mL. Fluconazole (8) was tested in the flask at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. The positive control contained medium with the addition of DMSO (0.5 mL) without antifungals. The inoculum of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 with an OD600 = 0.180 and an amount equal to 10% was added to the Sabouraud medium, resulting in a total volume of 500 mL. After 7 days of incubation at 25 °C, the biomass was washed three times with distilled water to remove the medium and centrifuged at 3220 RCF for 15 min at 8 °C. The biomass was then frozen and lyophilized to a constant weight.

3.4.2. Plate Count Method

The fungicidal activity of 3-n-butylphthalide (1) was visualized using the plate count method. Preincubation cultures of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 were prepared in flasks with Sabouraud medium. First, various concentrations of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) were added to DMSO (0.5 mL) in each flask. Fluconazole (8) was administered as a single dose. Subsequently, 1 mL of the inoculum at a density of 1 × 103–5 × 103 CFU/mL was added to the samples. Flasks were incubated on a rotary shaker at 30 °C for 48 h. Serial dilutions of each sample were then prepared, and 100 µL of cultures were transferred to agar plates and spread on the surface. After further incubation for 48 h at 30 °C, the yeast colonies were counted.
Antimicrobial activity assessed in food matrices: 25 g of commercially available yogurt was placed in sterile Nasco Whirl-Pak bags. 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) was tested at the final concentrations of 50, 150, 250, 350, 450, and 550 µg/mL in DMSO (0.5 mL). The control involved only solvent addition. Subsequently, 1 mL of inoculum of R. mucilaginosa at a density of 1 × 103–5 × 103 CFU/mL was added to each bag. After their incubation at 30 °C for 48 h, serial dilutions of each sample were performed. Selected dilutions (100 µL) were spread onto the surface of Sabouraud agar using a cell spreader. The tests were performed in triplicate. After 48 h incubation at 30 °C, the yeast colonies were counted.

3.5. Microbial Transformation of 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) by R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459

First, 1 mL of 0.5 McFarland inoculum of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 was added to the Sabouraud medium, resulting in a total volume of 75 mL. After eight days of incubation on a rotary shaker at 25 °C, 20 mg of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) in 0.5 mL of acetone was added. Transformations were continued for an additional 8 days. The culture was then centrifuged at 3220 RCF for 15 min, and the yeast cells were separated from the supernatant. Mycelia and supernatants were extracted separately using 25 mL of ethyl acetate. The extracts were subjected to analysis using HPLC-DAD. The mobile phase was 0.5% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). Gradient elution conditions were as follows: 0–3 min, 65% A/35% B; 3–12 min, 35% A/65% B; 12–13 min, 10% A/90% B; 13–14 min, 0% A/100% B; 14–16 min 0% A/100% B; 16–19 min, 65% A/35% B; and 19–23 min, 65% A/35% B. The following parameters were selected: flow rate, 0.4 mL/min; column incubation temperature, 30 °C; and detection wavelength, 275 nm.

3.6. The Influence of 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) on the ROS Level

The level of oxidative stress was assessed using the adherent cell microplate assay. Briefly, 100 µL of R. mucilaginosa inoculum (OD600 = 0.1) in PBS was added to the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. After overnight incubation at 25 °C and adhesion of the cells, PBS was collected from above the cell sediment. Then, 100 µL of 40 µM H2DCFDA was added to each well of the first four rows, and 100 µL of PB buffer was added to the next four rows (unstained background control). After incubation of the plate at 37 °C for 45 min, the dye and PBS were removed from the wells. The cells were washed with 10× diluted PBS, followed by the addition of 100 µL of the same buffer. Next, 100 µL of compound 1 at 25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/mL and fluconazole (8) at a concentration of 50 µg/mL were loaded into wells and mixed. The positive control contained 3% H2O2, whereas the negative control did not contain the inhibitor. After 4 h of incubation at 25 °C, fluorometric measure was taken at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 385 nm, respectively.

3.7. Confocal Microscopy

The 24 h yeast inoculum was standardized in Sabouraud medium to obtain a density of 0.5 McFarland and transferred to a sterile tube. After centrifugation, the medium was discarded, and the precipitate was suspended in PBS. The sample was then transferred to a Millicell® EZ SLIDE chamber and assembled on a microscope slide. Next, 20 µL of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1), at a final concentration of 100 µg/mL, was added to the wells and mixed. After 20 min, the slide was dismounted, and the cells were stained with Calcofluor White, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

3.8. Synergistic Effect—Determination of Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC)

To test the synergistic effect of the compounds, a checkerboard method was performed based on the methods described by Pillai et al. [42] and Krężel et al. [15]. Sabouraud medium was used for all tests. First, 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8) were prepared in a DMSO solution and then diluted directly in the medium in a 96-well microtiter plate to obtain final concentrations of 1–528 μg/mL for fluconazole (8) and 0.5–32 μg/mL for 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1). The reference sample was diluted in DMSO with Sabouraud medium without the inoculum. Samples containing only one of the tested compounds served as controls. All the samples were tested in triplicate. The plates were then incubated separately in a thermoshaker at 25 °C, using 1000 RPM agitation. The absorbance was read at a wavelength of 595 nm to determine the antifungal activity. A synergistic effect was recorded when the inhibition caused by the mixture of both compounds was higher than that of the separately tested agents. FIC was calculated as follows:
F I C = M I C   o f   a g e n t   A   i n   c o m b i n a t i o n M I C   o f   a g e n t   A   t e s t e d   s e p a r a t e l y + M I C   o f   a g e n t   B   i n   c o m b i n a t i o n M I C   o f   a g e n t   B   t e s t e d   s e p a r a t e l y

3.9. The Determination of Carotenoids in Biomass

3.9.1. Samples Preparation

Because of carotenoid instability, the subsequent cultures were grown to obtain fresh samples. The growth conditions were analogous to those of the previous experiment with the determination of dry biomass; however, at a low scale, the total volume was 50 mL. After seven days of incubation at 25 °C, the biomass was washed three times with distilled water and frozen.
Subsequently, washed yeast cells (0.5 g) were defrosted, dissolved in 3 mL PBS, pH 7.2, and disintegrated using an ultrasonic homogenizer for 1200 s (using an 80 s:20 s work–rest cycle). The lysates were centrifuged for 3 min and the supernatants were discarded. Samples were extracted three times (two times with DMSO and once with Folch solution) using the following procedure: vortexing for 5 min at 1600 RPM with 2 mL of the solvent and centrifugation for 3 min. The fractions were collected, and the Folch solution was evaporated using a rotary evaporator. Subsequently, 1 mL of the remaining mixture was evaporated under a stream of nitrogen. The residue was dissolved in gradient-grade acetonitrile and subjected to HPLC and HR-APCI–MS/MS analyses.

3.9.2. HR-APCI–MS/MS Analyses

Pigments determination and quantitative comparative analysis: The pigments were eluted with A-water with 0.1% formic acid, B-acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, and C-isopropanol with 0.1% formic acid in gradient mode: 0 min, 25% A/25% B/50% C; 0–45 min, 2.5% A/2.5% B/95% C; 45–50 min, 2.5% A/2.5% B/95% C; and 51–60 min, 25% A/25% B/50% C.
The flow rate was 200 µL/min. The operating parameters were as follows: nebulizer pressure: 0.3 bar, heating gas flow: 3.0 L/min, heating gas temperature, 250 °C; data acquisition range, m/z 50–2000 m/z; ionization mode, positive; and ion source energy, 10 eV.

3.9.3. HPLC-DAD Analyses of β-Carotene Content

To determine the β-carotene calibration curve, the results were calculated according to the dry mass. The mobile phase comprised water (A) and acetonitrile (B). Gradient elution conditions were as follows: 0–2 min, 10% A/0% B; 2–10 min, 0% A/100% B; 10–20 min, 0%A/100% B; 20–22 min, 10% A/90% B; and 22–27 min, 10% A/90% B. The following parameters were selected: flow rate, 0.9 mL/min; column incubation temperature, 30 °C; and detection wavelength, 450 nm.

3.10. FAME Content

FAME content was determined using 50 mg of dry yeast biomass. The biomass was heated under reflux using 5 mL of 0.5 M KOH in methanol for 15 min. Next, 2 mL of boron trifluoride in diethyl ether was added, and the mixture was heated for 5 min. After cooling, the mixture was extracted with hexane (1 mL). Samples were analyzed using the following temperature program: 100 °C (hold for 3 min), 240 °C (2.5 °C/min; hold for 4 min), 260 °C (15 °C/min; hold for 1 min). FAMEs were detected by comparing their retention times with those of the standard.

3.11. Ergosterol Content

Ergosterol was determined using the method described by Arthington-Skaggs et al. [70] with minor modifications, using wet biomass previously obtained for carotenoid determination. Briefly, wet biomass samples were weighted and subjected to saponification with 25% potassium hydroxide in ethanol. After 1 h incubation at 85 °C and cooling, samples were extracted with hexane using a vortex, and the upper layer was collected, diluted 5× in ethanol, and measured using a spectrophotometer scanning between 200 and 300 nm. The ergosterol content was calculated as the percentage of the dry biomass.

4. Conclusions

Synthetic phthalide lactones limit the growth of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 cells. Lactone 1 demonstrated a synergistic effect with fluconazole (8), which reduced the amount of this drug required for yeast inhibition.
In this study, we performed various experiments to determine the effects of phthalide lactone on R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 cells. We have shown that 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) is not metabolized to other compounds and accumulates in yeast cells, which contributes to an increase in ROS. The effect of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) on R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 cells was similar to that of C. albicans ATCC 10231, C. albicans ATCC 2091, and C. guilliermondii KKP 3390 cells, confirming the mechanism proposed in the literature.
The data show the strong influence of phthalide 1 on the quantitative composition of FAME, where, for example, at a concentration of 75 mg/mL, it decreased three times. The increasing proportion of unsaturated fatty acids suggested that the fluidity of the cell membrane increased. This effect may be related to the expression of the genes encoding fatty acid desaturases. 3-n-Butylidenephthalide (1) did not notably change the amount of ergosterol. This means that the observed fungistatic activity of lactones 17 and fluconazole (8) is not related to cell membrane damage associated with the lack of ergosterol.
Cultures of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 grown in the presence of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) changed color from orange/red to light yellow, which was related to the inhibition of torulene and torularhodin.
In some experiments, we observed a surprising effect of fluconazole (8): an increase in the production of β-carotene, torulene, and torularhodin, or an increase in ROS. The high value of IC50 and IC90 and the lack of substantial effect on ergosterol content may be related to the fluconazole resistance of R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28145423/s1, Figure S1a: 1H NMR of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1); Figure S1b: 13C NMR of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1); Figure S1c: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1); Figure S2a: 1H NMR of 3-n-butylphthalide (2); Figure S2b: 13C NMR of 3-n-butylphthalide (2); Figure S2c: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-n-butylphthalide (2); Figure S3: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-n-propylidenephthalide (3); Figure S4a: 1H NMR of 3-n-propylphthalide (4); Figure S4b: 13C NMR of 3-n-propylphthalide (4); Figure S4c: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-n-propylphthalide (4); Figure S5a: 1H NMR of 3-butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (5); Figure S5b: 13C NMR of 3-Butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (5); Figure S5c: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-Butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (5); Figure S6a: 1H NMR of 3-n-butyl-hexahydrophthalide (6); Figure S6b: 13C NMR of 3-n-butyl-hexahydrophthalide (6); Figure S6c: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-n-butyl-hexahydrophthalide (6); Figure S7a: 1H NMR of 3-n-butyl-1,2,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (7); Figure S7b: b 13C NMR of 3-n-butyl-1,2,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (7); Figure S7c: HR-ESI-MS/MS of 3-n-Butyl-1,2,6,7-tetrahydrophthalide (7).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. and T.O.; methodology, J.G., T.O., J.P. and F.B.; formal analysis, J.G., T.O. and F.B.; investigation, J.G. and J.P.; resources, J.G., T.O. and F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G. and T.O.; writing—review and editing, F.B. and J.P.; supervision, T.O. and F.B.; funding acquisition, J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the project “UPWR 2.0: international and interdisciplinary program of development of Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences”, cofinanced by the European Social Fund under the Operational Program Knowledge Education Development, under contract No. POWR.03.05.00-00-Z062/18 of June 4, 2019 and project “Innowacyjny Doktorat” N070/0013/20. The APC was financed by POWR.03.05.00-00-Z062/18 of 4 June 2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The analytical part of this work was conducted under POWR.03.05.00-00-Z062. The research tasks regarding fungistatic activity were financed by the project “Innowacyjny Doktorat” N070/0013/20.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors upon request.

References

  1. Lyman, M.; Urbin, S.; Strout, C.; Rubinfeld, B. The Oleaginous Red Yeast Rhodotorula/Rhodosporidium: A Factory for Industrial Bioproducts. In Yeasts in Biotechnology; Peixoto Basso, T., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, Z.; Li, C.; Cheng, P.; Yu, G. Rhodotorula mucilaginosa—Alternative Sources of Natural Carotenoids, Lipids, and Enzymes for Industrial Use. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geronikou, A.; Larsen, N.; Lillevang, S.K.; Jespersen, L. Occurrence and Identification of Yeasts in Production of White-Brined Cheese. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fleet, G.H. Yeasts in fruit and fruit products. In Yeasts in Food. Beneficial and Detrimental Aspects; Boekhout, T., Robert, V., Eds.; CRC Press Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2003; Volume 28, pp. 219–316. [Google Scholar]
  5. Koutsoumanis, K.P.; Lianou, A.; Sofos, J.N. Food Safety: Emerging Pathogens. In Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 250–272. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tomsíková, A. Risk of fungal infection from foods, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. Cas. Spol. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Ceske Lek. Spol. JE Purkyne 2002, 51, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sanna, C.; Marras, L.; Desogus, A.; Marras, B.; Montero, N.; Bertolino, G.; Schintu, M.; Coroneo, V. Evaluation of Rhodotorula spp. Contamination in Hospital Environments. Environ. Monit. Assess 2021, 193, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wirth, F.; Goldani, L.Z. Epidemiology of Rhodotorula: An Emerging Pathogen. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2012, 2012, 465717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Spiliopoulou, A.; Anastassiou, E.D.; Christofidou, M. Rhodotorula Fungemia of an Intensive Care Unit Patient and Review of Published Cases. Mycopathologia 2012, 174, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Neofytos, D.; Horn, D.; De Simone, J.A. Rhodotorula mucilaginosa catheter-related fungemia in a patient with sickle cell disease: Case presentation and literature review. South. Med. J. 2007, 100, 198–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Low, C.-Y.; Rotstein, C. Emerging Fungal Infections in Immunocompromised Patients. F1000 Med. Rep. 2011, 3, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Catalano, A.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Scumaci, D.; Giuzio, F.; Saturnino, C.; Aquaro, S.; Rosano, C.; Sinicropi, M.S. Multidrug Resistance (MDR): A Widespread Phenomenon in Pharmacological Therapies. Molecules 2022, 27, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, Y.; Liu, W.; Huang, X.; Hao, L.; Li, Y.; Sun, S. Antifungal Activity and Potential Mechanism of N-Butylphthalide Alone and in Combination with Fluconazole Against Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, D.K.; Tóth, R.; Gácser, A. Mechanisms of Pathogenic Candida Species to Evade the Host Complement Attack. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Krężel, P.; Olejniczak, T.; Tołoczko, A.; Gach, J.; Weselski, M.; Bronisz, R. Synergic Effect of Phthalide Lactones and Fluconazole and Its New Analogues as a Factor Limiting the Use of Azole Drugs against Candidiasis. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. León, A.; Del-Ángel, M.; Ávila, J.L.; Delgado, G. Phthalides: Distribution in Nature, Chemical Reactivity, Synthesis, and Biological Activity. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products; Kinghorn, A.D., Falk, H., Gibbons, S., Kobayashi, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 104, pp. 127–246. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pannek, J.; Gach, J.; Boratyński, F.; Olejniczak, T. Antimicrobial Activity of Extracts and Phthalides Occurring in Apiaceae Plants: Antimicrobial Activity of Phthalides. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 1459–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miran, M.; Monsef Esfahani, H.R.; Jung, J.H.; Aliahmadi, A.; Skropeta, D.; Abbas-Mohammadi, M.; Ebrahimi, S.; Moridi Farimani, M. Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Phthalides from the Roots of the Medicinal Herb Levisticum officinale WDJ Koch. IJPR 2020, 19, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dyaa, A.; Soliman, H.; Abdelrazak, A.; Samra, B.N.; Khojah, E.; Ahmed, A.F.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Elsayed, A. Optimization of Carotenoids Production from Rhodotorula Sp. Strain ATL72 for Enhancing Its Biotechnological Applications. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zadorozhnii, P.V.; Kiselev, V.V.; Kharchenko, A.V. In Silico ADME Profiling of Salubrinal and Its Analogues. Future Pharmacol. 2022, 2, 160–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chmiel, T.; Mieszkowska, A.; Kempińska-Kupczyk, D.; Kot-Wasik, A.; Namieśnik, J.; Mazerska, Z. The Impact of Lipophilicity on Environmental Processes, Drug Delivery and Bioavailability of Food Components. Microchem. J. 2019, 146, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Druzhilovskiy, D.S.; Rudik, A.V.; Filimonov, D.A.; Gloriozova, T.A.; Lagunin, A.A.; Dmitriev, A.V.; Pogodin, P.V.; Dubovskaya, V.I.; Ivanov, S.M.; Tarasova, O.A.; et al. Computational Platform Way2Drug: From the Prediction of Biological Activity to Drug Repurposing. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2017, 66, 1832–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A Free Web Tool to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Drug-Likeness and Medicinal Chemistry Friendliness of Small Molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, M.; Feng, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Gui, L.; Wang, J.; Gao, P.; Qin, B.; Sima, D.; Wang, Q.; Pan, W. Use of L-3-n-Butylphthalide within 24 h after Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Cerebral Infarction. Complement. Ther. Med. 2020, 52, 102442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, C.; Zhao, S.; Zang, Y.; Gu, F.; Mao, S.; Feng, S.; Hu, L.; Zhang, C. The Efficacy and Safety of Dl-3n-Butylphthalide on Progressive Cerebral Infarction: A Randomized Controlled STROBE Study. Medicine 2017, 96, e7257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bhatt, S.; Dhiman, S.; Kumar, V.; Gour, A.; Manhas, D.; Sharma, K.; Ojha, P.K.; Nandi, U. Assessment of the CYP1A2 Inhibition-Mediated Drug Interaction Potential for Pinocembrin Using In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Approaches. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 20321–20331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, S.-J. Clinical Application of CYP2C19 Pharmacogenetics toward More Personalized Medicine. Front. Gene 2013, 3, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Benkova, M.; Soukup, O.; Marek, J. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Currently Used Methods and Devices and the near Future in Clinical Practice. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 806–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cruz, R.C.; Werneck, S.M.C.; Oliveira, C.S.; Santos, P.C.; Soares, B.M.; Santos, D.A.; Cisalpino, P.S. Influence of Different Media, Incubation Times, and Temperatures for Determining the MICs of Seven Antifungal Agents against Paracoccidioides Brasiliensis by Microdilution. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Smith, K.P.; Kirby, J.E. The Inoculum Effect in the Era of Multidrug Resistance: Minor Differences in Inoculum Have Dramatic Effect on MIC Determination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00433-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Afzali, S.; Edalatian Dovom, M.R.; Habibi Najafi, M.B.; Mazaheri Tehrani, M. Determination of the Anti-Yeast Activity of Lactobacillus Spp. Isolated from Traditional Iranian Cheeses in Vitro and in Yogurt Drink (Doogh). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lima, R.C.; de Carvalho, A.P.A.; Vieira, C.P.; Moreira, R.V.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Green and Healthier Alternatives to Chemical Additives as Cheese Preservative: Natural Antimicrobials in Active Nanopackaging/Coatings. Polymers 2021, 13, 2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gach, J.; Olejniczak, T.; Krężel, P.; Boratyński, F. Microbial Synthesis and Evaluation of Fungistatic Activity of 3-Butyl-3-Hydroxyphthalide, the Mammalian Metabolite of 3-n-Butylidenephthalide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Blanco-Padilla, A.; Soto, K.M.; Hernández Iturriaga, M.; Mendoza, S. Food Antimicrobials Nanocarriers. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 837215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sena, L.A.; Chandel, N.S. Physiological Roles of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Yadav, D.K.; Kumar, S.; Choi, E.-H.; Chaudhary, S.; Kim, M.-H. Molecular Dynamic Simulations of Oxidized Skin Lipid Bilayer and Permeability of Reactive Oxygen Species. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kumar, S.; Saxena, J.; Srivastava, V.K.; Kaushik, S.; Singh, H.; Abo-EL-Sooud, K.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Jyoti, A.; Saluja, R. The Interplay of Oxidative Stress and ROS Scavenging: Antioxidants as a Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dbouk, N.H.; Covington, M.B.; Nguyen, K.; Chandrasekaran, S. Increase of Reactive Oxygen Species Contributes to Growth Inhibition by Fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peng, C.A.; Gaertner, A.A.E.; Henriquez, S.A.; Fang, D.; Colon-Reyes, R.J.; Brumaghim, J.L.; Kozubowski, L. Fluconazole Induces ROS in Cryptococcus neoformans and Contributes to DNA Damage in Vitro. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dagher, Z.; Xu, S.; Negoro, P.E.; Khan, N.S.; Feldman, M.B.; Reedy, J.L.; Tam, J.M.; Sykes, D.B.; Mansour, M.K. Fluorescent Tracking of Yeast Division Clarifies the Essential Role of Spleen Tyrosine Kinase in the Intracellular Control of Candida glabrata in Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Suchodolski, J.; Feder-Kubis, J.; Krasowska, A. Antiadhesive Properties of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids Based on (−)-Menthol Against Candida spp. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pillai, S.K.; Moellering, R.C.; Eliopoulos, G.M. Antimicrobial Combinations. In Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine; Lorian, V., Ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005; pp. 365–440. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sharma, R.; Ghoshal, G. Optimization of Carotenoids Production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MTCC-1403) Using Agro-Industrial Waste in Bioreactor: A Statistical Approach. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Irazusta, V.; Nieto-Peñalver, C.G.; Cabral, M.E.; Amoroso, M.J.; de Figueroa, L.I.C. Relationship among Carotenoid Production, Copper Bioremediation and Oxidative Stress in Rhodotorula mucilaginosa RCL-11. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kot, A.M.; Błażejak, S.; Kurcz, A.; Gientka, I.; Kieliszek, M. Rhodotorula Glutinis—Potential Source of Lipids, Carotenoids, and Enzymes for Use in Industries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 6103–6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Moliné, M.; Libkind, D.; van Broock, M. Production of Torularhodin, Torulene, and β-Carotene by Rhodotorula Yeasts. In Microbial Carotenoids from Fungi; Barredo, J.-L., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2012; Volume 898, pp. 275–283. ISBN 9781617799174. [Google Scholar]
  47. Moț, A.C.; Pârvu, M.; Pârvu, A.E.; Roşca-Casian, O.; Dina, N.E.; Leopold, N.; Silaghi-Dumitrescu, R.; Mircea, C. Reversible Naftifine-Induced Carotenoid Depigmentation in Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (A. Jörg.) F.C. Harrison Causing Onychomycosis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, Q.; Liu, D.; Yang, Q.; Wang, P. Enhancing Carotenoid Production in Rhodotorula mucilaginosa KC8 by Combining Mutation and Metabolic Engineering. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, J.; Zhou, H.; Pan, X.; Li, Z.; Lu, Y.; He, N.; Meng, T.; Yao, C.; Chen, C.; Ling, X. The Role of Fluconazole in the Regulation of Fatty Acid and Unsaponifiable Matter Biosynthesis in Schizochytrium sp. MYA 1381. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Beopoulos, A.; Nicaud, J.-M.; Gaillardin, C. An Overview of Lipid Metabolism in Yeasts and Its Impact on Biotechnological Processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1193–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dourou, M.; Aggeli, D.; Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Critical Steps in Carbon Metabolism Affecting Lipid Accumulation and Their Regulation in Oleaginous Microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 2509–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khot, M.; Ghosh, D. Lipids of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa IIPL32 with Biodiesel Potential: Oil Yield, Fatty Acid Profile, Fuel Properties. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Klug, L.; Daum, G. Yeast Lipid Metabolism at a Glance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Liang, C.-M.; Yang, C.-F.; Du, J.-S. Lipid Production and Waste Reutilization Combination Using Yeast Isolate Rhodotorula mucilaginosa LP-2. Bioenerg. Res. 2021, 14, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chaturvedi, S.; Bhattacharya, A.; Nain, L.; Prasanna, R.; Khare, S.K. Valorization of Agro-Starchy Wastes as Substrates for Oleaginous Microbes. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 127, 105294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Adel, A.; El-Baz, A.; Shetaia, Y.; Sorour, N.M. Biosynthesis of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids by Two Newly Cold-Adapted Egyptian Marine Yeast. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Karatay, S.E.; Dönmez, G. Improving the Lipid Accumulation Properties of the Yeast Cells for Biodiesel Production Using Molasses. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7988–7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sorgo, A.G.; Heilmann, C.J.; Dekker, H.L.; Bekker, M.; Brul, S.; de Koster, C.G.; de Koning, L.J.; Klis, F.M. Effects of Fluconazole on the Secretome, the Wall Proteome, and Wall Integrity of the Clinical Fungus Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Dasgupta, D.; Sharma, T.; Bhatt, A.; Bandhu, S.; Ghosh, D. Cultivation of Oleaginous Yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa IIPL32 in Split Column Airlift Reactor and Its Influence on Fuel Properties. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Park, Y.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Nicaud, J.-M. De Novo Biosynthesis of Odd-Chain Fatty Acids in Yarrowia lipolytica Enabled by Modular Pathway Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 7, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ayadi, I.; Belghith, H.; Gargouri, A.; Guerfali, M. Utilization of Wheat Bran Acid Hydrolysate by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Y-MG1 for Microbial Lipid Production as Feedstock for Biodiesel Synthesis. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 3213521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ballweg, S.; Ernst, R. Control of Membrane Fluidity: The OLE Pathway in Focus. Biol. Chem. 2017, 398, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rodríguez-Vargas, S.; Sánchez-García, A.; Martínez-Rivas, J.M.; Prieto, J.A.; Randez-Gil, F. Fluidization of Membrane Lipids Enhances the Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Freezing and Salt Stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Liu, Y.; Koh, C.M.J.; Yap, S.A.; Cai, L.; Ji, L. Understanding and Exploiting the Fatty Acid Desaturation System in Rhodotorula toruloides. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tsai, Y.-Y.; Ohashi, T.; Wu, C.-C.; Bataa, D.; Misaki, R.; Limtong, S.; Fujiyama, K. Delta-9 Fatty Acid Desaturase Overexpression Enhanced Lipid Production and Oleic Acid Content in Rhodosporidium toruloides for Preferable Yeast Lipid Production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2019, 127, 430–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bhattacharya, S.; Sae-Tia, S.; Fries, B.C. Candidiasis and Mechanisms of Antifungal Resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Delattin, N.; Cammue, B.P.; Thevissen, K. Reactive Oxygen Species-Inducing Antifungal Agents and Their Activity against Fungal Biofilms. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Walczak, P.; Pannek, J.; Boratyński, F.; Janik-Polanowicz, A.; Olejniczak, T. Synthesis and Fungistatic Activity of Bicyclic Lactones and Lactams against Botrytis Cinerea, Penicillium Citrinum, and Aspergillus glaucus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8571–8578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard—Second Edition; NCCLS Document M27-A2; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  70. Arthington-Skaggs, B.A.; Lee-Yang, W.; Ciblak, M.A.; Frade, J.P.; Brandt, M.E.; Hajjeh, R.A.; Harrison, L.H.; Sofair, A.N.; Warnock, D.W. Comparison of Visual and Spectrophotometric Methods of Broth Microdilution MIC End Point Determination and Evaluation of a Sterol Quantitation Method for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Fluconazole and Itraconazole against Trailing and Nontrailing Candida Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2477–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of 3-n-butylphthalide on C. albicans (figure created in BioRender https://www.biorender.com/, accessed on 14 February 2023).
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of 3-n-butylphthalide on C. albicans (figure created in BioRender https://www.biorender.com/, accessed on 14 February 2023).
Molecules 28 05423 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the experiments.
Figure 2. Schematic of the experiments.
Molecules 28 05423 g002
Figure 3. Structures of lactones 17 used to test fungistatic activity.
Figure 3. Structures of lactones 17 used to test fungistatic activity.
Molecules 28 05423 g003
Figure 4. Synthetic route for the obtainment of phthalide lactones. R = H or Me; i-Et2O, Mg, n-C4H9Br or C3H7Br, CdCl2; ii-THF, NaBH4; iii-toluene, TsOH.
Figure 4. Synthetic route for the obtainment of phthalide lactones. R = H or Me; i-Et2O, Mg, n-C4H9Br or C3H7Br, CdCl2; ii-THF, NaBH4; iii-toluene, TsOH.
Molecules 28 05423 g004
Figure 5. Biomass weight depending on the concentration of compound 1 used, cultivation of R. mucilaginosa using different inoculum (% volume medium): (a) 0.5% and (b) 10%.
Figure 5. Biomass weight depending on the concentration of compound 1 used, cultivation of R. mucilaginosa using different inoculum (% volume medium): (a) 0.5% and (b) 10%.
Molecules 28 05423 g005
Figure 6. Total yeast cell counts (CFU/mL) depending on the concentration of compound 1 using plate count method (a) in vitro and (b) in three types of yogurts. The corresponding data represent the mean  ±  standard deviation.
Figure 6. Total yeast cell counts (CFU/mL) depending on the concentration of compound 1 using plate count method (a) in vitro and (b) in three types of yogurts. The corresponding data represent the mean  ±  standard deviation.
Molecules 28 05423 g006
Figure 7. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels with different concentrations of added compounds. Control levels of ROS are marked by the dark blue color. F means fluconazole. Data represent the mean  ±  standard deviation.
Figure 7. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels with different concentrations of added compounds. Control levels of ROS are marked by the dark blue color. F means fluconazole. Data represent the mean  ±  standard deviation.
Molecules 28 05423 g007
Figure 8. Calcofluor staining of the R. mucilaginosa cells: (a) the control, and (b) sample with the addition of 100 µg/mL 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1).
Figure 8. Calcofluor staining of the R. mucilaginosa cells: (a) the control, and (b) sample with the addition of 100 µg/mL 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1).
Molecules 28 05423 g008
Figure 9. Synergistic effect of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8); MIC90—the lowest concentration of agent at which 90% of the yeasts were inhibited; and FIC—fractional inhibitory concentration.
Figure 9. Synergistic effect of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8); MIC90—the lowest concentration of agent at which 90% of the yeasts were inhibited; and FIC—fractional inhibitory concentration.
Molecules 28 05423 g009
Figure 10. The structures of carotenoids detected in R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 biomass: (a) phytoene, (b) neurosporene, (c) lycopene, (d) β-carotene, (e) torulene, and (f) torularhodin.
Figure 10. The structures of carotenoids detected in R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 biomass: (a) phytoene, (b) neurosporene, (c) lycopene, (d) β-carotene, (e) torulene, and (f) torularhodin.
Molecules 28 05423 g010
Figure 11. (a) The change in pH values of R. mucilaginosa cultures with different concentrations of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1), and (b) FAME content depending on different doses of the compounds (F means fluconazole). The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 11. (a) The change in pH values of R. mucilaginosa cultures with different concentrations of 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1), and (b) FAME content depending on different doses of the compounds (F means fluconazole). The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Molecules 28 05423 g011
Figure 12. FAME percentage depending on the addition of compounds to the culture (F means fluconazole).
Figure 12. FAME percentage depending on the addition of compounds to the culture (F means fluconazole).
Molecules 28 05423 g012
Figure 13. Ergosterol content [% of dry biomass] depending on the concentration of the added compound. The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 13. Ergosterol content [% of dry biomass] depending on the concentration of the added compound. The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Molecules 28 05423 g013
Table 1. Fungistatic activity (IC50) using microdilution method, in silico prediction of lipophilicity (Log P), solubility (log S), and oral toxicity to rat cells (LC50). Prediction of CYP isoenzymes inhibition: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4, based on chemical structures of compounds 18.
Table 1. Fungistatic activity (IC50) using microdilution method, in silico prediction of lipophilicity (Log P), solubility (log S), and oral toxicity to rat cells (LC50). Prediction of CYP isoenzymes inhibition: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4, based on chemical structures of compounds 18.
CompoundIC50
at 25 °C [µg/mL]
IC50
at 30 °C [µg/mL]
Log PLog SLC50 [mg/kg]Inhibition of:
113132.93−3.301865CYP1A2
220232.81−3.014872CYP1A2
CYP2C9
338322.78−2.431895CYP1A2
41301092.44−2.454061CYP1A2
565662.93−3.205184-
642432.96−3.794702CYP2C9
754572.93−3.204186CYP2C9
81992070.88−1.63584CYP2C19
Table 2. R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 pigments detected using APCI-LC-HR-MS and their relative composition depending on the different concentrations of the 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8) [µg/mL].
Table 2. R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 pigments detected using APCI-LC-HR-MS and their relative composition depending on the different concentrations of the 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8) [µg/mL].
CarotenoidAPCI-LC-HR-MS [M + H]+0255075100F50
Phytoene545.5081150.9270.6195.8335.333.52
Neurosporene539.4611n.d.n.d.n.d.d.n.d.n.d.
β-carotene
+ lycopene
537.444514.45 a1.10 a1.72 a0.202.30 a
Torulene535.428010.880.210.350.071.66
Torularhodin565.406310.410.010.05n.d.1.63
F means fluconazole; a the identification of these pigments was confirmed by the compounds’ standards using HPLC-DAD; n.d.—not detected; and d.—detected.
Table 3. β-Carotene content in the R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 biomass depending on the different concentrations of the 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8); data represent the mean  ±  standard deviation.
Table 3. β-Carotene content in the R. mucilaginosa IHEM 18459 biomass depending on the different concentrations of the 3-n-butylidenephthalide (1) and fluconazole (8); data represent the mean  ±  standard deviation.
Concentration of Compounds [µg/mL]β-Carotene Content [mg/g d.m.]
00.2108 ± 0.0055
250.4433 ± 0.0282
500.2305 ± 0.0108
750.0262 ± 0.0042
100n.d.
F500.4792 ± 0.0055
F means fluconazole.
Table 4. The impact of the dose of the compounds on the profile of all detected FAMEs; the data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Table 4. The impact of the dose of the compounds on the profile of all detected FAMEs; the data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Concentration of a Compound [µg/mL]Saturated [%]Unsaturated [%]Unsaturated Including:
Monounsaturated (MUFA) [%]Polyunsaturated (PUFA) [%]
019.02 ± 0.0880.98 ± 0.0898.16 ± 0.141.84 ± 0.14
2520.31 ± 0.0579.69 ± 0.0595.06 ± 0.024.94 ± 0.02
5016.77 ± 0.0183.23 ± 0.0195.74 ± 0.024.26 ± 0.02
7516.54 ± 0.0483.46 ± 0.0496.43 ± 0.093.57 ± 0.09
10014.12 ± 0.1885.88 ± 0.1895.82 ± 0.054.18 ± 0.05
F5015.27 ± 0.1484.73 ± 0.1498.00 ± 0.122.00 ± 0.12
F means fluconazole.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gach, J.; Olejniczak, T.; Pannek, J.; Boratyński, F. Fungistatic Effect of Phthalide Lactones on Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Molecules 2023, 28, 5423. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145423

AMA Style

Gach J, Olejniczak T, Pannek J, Boratyński F. Fungistatic Effect of Phthalide Lactones on Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Molecules. 2023; 28(14):5423. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gach, Joanna, Teresa Olejniczak, Jakub Pannek, and Filip Boratyński. 2023. "Fungistatic Effect of Phthalide Lactones on Rhodotorula mucilaginosa" Molecules 28, no. 14: 5423. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145423

APA Style

Gach, J., Olejniczak, T., Pannek, J., & Boratyński, F. (2023). Fungistatic Effect of Phthalide Lactones on Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Molecules, 28(14), 5423. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145423

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop