Next Article in Journal
Various Energetic Metabolism of Microglia in Response to Different Stimulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Is Micellar Catalysis Green Chemistry?
Previous Article in Journal
The Benzothiazine Core as a Novel Motif for DNA-Binding Small Molecules
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Hydrostatic Pressure in the Modulation of Enzymatic and Organocatalysis and Life under Pressure: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules28114500
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in the Integration of CO2 Capture and Utilization

by
Huanghao Ning
1,2,
Yongdan Li
1,2,3 and
Cuijuan Zhang
1,2,*
1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Applied Catalysis Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, China
3
Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Kemistintie 1, P.O. Box 16100, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(11), 4500; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114500
Submission received: 30 April 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 31 May 2023 / Published: 1 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Review Papers in Green Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

CO2 emission is deemed to be mainly responsible for global warming. To reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere and to use it as a carbon source, CO2 capture and its conversion into valuable chemicals is greatly desirable. To reduce the transportation cost, the integration of the capture and utilization processes is a feasible option. Here, the recent progress in the integration of CO2 capture and conversion is reviewed. The absorption, adsorption, and electrochemical separation capture processes integrated with several utilization processes, such as CO2 hydrogenation, reverse water–gas shift reaction, or dry methane reforming, is discussed in detail. The integration of capture and conversion over dual functional materials is also discussed. This review is aimed to encourage more efforts devoted to the integration of CO2 capture and utilization, and thus contribute to carbon neutrality around the world.

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) are increasingly gaining global attention. The challenge is to meet the energy demand while balancing CO2 emissions. Several solutions have been proposed to reduce the CO2 emission, namely, increasing the utilization of eco-friendly energy sources, such as wind and solar energy, to improve the energy efficiency. However, the advancement of such technologies is currently still limited and can be an optimal option in the long-term. At present times, the CCUS technology is more effective and can be a short-term alternative.
CO2 can be captured using various technologies, such as amine absorption, porous materials adsorption and membrane separation. Since CO2 itself is a carbon source, it can be converted into valuable chemicals via dry methane reforming (DMR), CO2 hydrogenation, reverse water–gas shift reaction, etc. There are excellent reviews on both the technologies [1,2,3]. However, the traditional CO2 capture and utilization processes are separated, which inevitably increases the transportation cost. To reduce or even eliminate such cost, the integration of CO2 capture and utilization is greatly desirable. This review focuses on the integration of CO2 capture and utilization. The relevant processes and the materials involved will be discussed.

2. Integration of CO2 Capture and Utilization

Integrated CO2 capture and utilization aims to capture CO2 from gas streams and other emission sources and convert it into valuable chemicals or energy sources. The key is to find the match between the CO2 separation process and the CO2 utilization process, including the temperature and pressure, etc.

2.1. Integration of CO2 Absorption and Conversion

CO2 can be captured via physical or chemical absorption depending on the interaction between CO2 and the absorbent. The former mainly utilizes the solubility of each gas component in the solvent whereas the latter involves chemical reactions between CO2 and the absorbent. Chemical absorption is mostly employed with organic amine, hot potash, and liquid ammonia solvents considering its easy operation and mild working conditions [4]. Accordingly, it can be integrated with CO2 hydrogenation for the production of formic acid or methanol.
Amine-based CO2 capture and conversion integrated reactors consist of a series of amine sorbents and metal ions that form a pincer complex, such as pincerpentaethylenehexamine (PEHA), pyrrolizidine, N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDTA) and polyethyleneimine (PEI). These are coupled with metal pincer-based homogeneous catalysts [5,6,7,8]. Due to the presence of multiple amine sites [9], PEI can be used as a superior CO2 absorber [10], which can absorb both high and low concentrations of CO2 [11]. Li et al. [12] used PEI/RhCl3·3H2O/CyPPh2 to capture CO2 and convert it in situ (Figure 1a). PEI absorbs CO2 from air in an ethylene glycol solution containing PEI and converts it into amino formate esters and alkyl carbonate esters. CO2 is hydrogenated in situ to form formate salts (TON = 260) in the presence of RhCl3-3H2O/CyPPh2, demonstrating the first in situ CO2 capture and conversion to formate. Multifunctional materials can be synthesized by modifying the PEI backbone with iminophosphine ligand functionality and subsequently metallizing it with Ir precursors. About 65% of the available primary amines on PEI can be modified to form iminophosphine/Ir (PN/Ir) for balanced CO2 capture and conversion, resulting in higher formic acid yields. PEI with relatively lower molecular weight has better CO2 capture ability and catalytic activity (Figure 1b) [13]. Kothandaraman et al. [14] reported, for the first time, a green and simplified method for in situ conversion of captured CO2 to formate in aqueous media in the presence of Ru- and Fe-based pincer complexes without excess alkali, with yields of up to 95% of the formate.
In addition to formate, the captured CO2 can be converted into methanol. In 2015, Rezayee et al. [15] prepared methanol by tandem CO2 capture and in situ conversion of dimethylamine with homogeneous ruthenium complexes under basic conditions. Dimethylamine can react with CO2 and inhibit the formation of formic acid. The conversion of CO2 is >95% (Figure 1c). Moreover, Kothandaraman et al. [5] first proposed and demonstrated a system for capturing CO2 from air (~400 ppm) and converting it in situ (Figure 1d), which consisted of PEHA and Ru–PNP complex, with a methanol yield of 79%. Integrated systems for CO2 capture and conversion into methanol are still uncommon. The major obstacle is the harsh reaction conditions to produce methanol, which involves a high-pressure gas-phase catalyst reactor at relatively low temperatures of 200–300 °C and high pressures of 50–100 atm.
The amine-based materials offer the potential to capture and convert CO2 under mild conditions. Due to the relatively high CO2 capture capacity of PEI, it can directly capture CO2 from the air, which also removes the limitation of constructing CO2 capture equipment. However, the high selectivity of some materials to carbon dioxide poses a challenge for the regeneration of amines. Furthermore, the toxicity and corrosiveness of amine solvents limit their industrial application. To drive future research, it is essential to explore systems that are highly efficient and recyclable, enabling CCU to establish a reliable foundation for industrial applications.

2.2. CO2 Adsorption and Conversion Integration

Similar to absorption, adsorption separation can also be divided into chemisorption and physisorption according to the interaction between CO2 and the adsorbate, with the former forming covalent bonds whilst the latter forms bond with electrostatic attraction and van der Waals forces. Here, we mainly focus on the physisorption and the subsequent utilization of CO2.
Porous organic polymers (POPs) are a series of new two- or three-dimensional networked polymeric materials formed by covalent bonding of organic small molecule substrates through specific chemical reactions, usually with microporous, mesoporous or multistage pore structures. They have promising applications in separation, sensor and catalysis [16]. The ionic porous organic polymers (IPOPs) are generally classified as porous organic materials, whose backbone typically includes anions or cations. They can be divided into IPOPs with cationic moieties, IPOPs with anionic moieties, and IPOPs with zwitterionic moieties. Common cationic moieties include imidazolium, pyridinium, viologen, and quaternary phosphonium, whereas more common anionic moieties include tetrakis(phenyl)borate and tris(catecholate) phosphate. The inclusion of these ionic moieties in porous materials can enhance their CO2 capture capacity and catalyze the in situ CO2 conversion.
In 2011, tetrakis(4-ethynylphenyl)methane and diiodoimidazolium salts were used to prepare tubular microporous organic via Sonogashira coupling reaction networks bearing imidazolium salts (T-IM) (Figure 2a). The material, with a microporous structure of specific surface area (620 m2 g−1), shows good catalytic activity towards the conversion of CO2 to cyclic carbonates [17]. Wang et al. [18] utilized the Friedel–Crafts reaction to synthesize imidazole-based IPOPs. The specific surface area can reach up to 926 m2 g−1; however, its CO2 capture capacity is only 14.2 wt%. Nevertheless, the polymer exhibits good stability and repeatability. Sun et al. [19] demonstrated, for the first time, the capture and in situ conversion of CO2 into cyclic carbonates under relatively mild room temperature conditions using a metal-free solvent followed by a heterogeneous catalytic system. The effect of halogen anions (Cl, Br, and I) and quaternary phosphonium cations on the catalytic activity was investigated. The catalytic activity follows the order Cl− > Br− > I− (Figure 2b), because the rate-controlling step of the reaction is ring opening by anion attack on the epoxide [20].
In addition to IPOP, the porphyrin-based organic polymer (POP-TPP) can also be used. Xiao et al. [21] synthesized a hierarchically porous organic polymer (POP-TPP) by polymerizing vinyl-functionalized tetraphenylporphyrin monomer, and then metalated it with different metals (Co3+, Zn2+, and Mg2+). The resulting heterogeneous catalysts have rich active sites and exhibit higher activity than the homogenous Co/TPP catalyst at relatively low CO2 concentrations, primarily due to the favorable enrichment of CO2 in the porous structure (micropores and nanochannels) of Co/POP-TPP. The TOF of the catalysts decreases in the following order: Co/POP-TPP (436 h−1) > Zn/POP-TPP (326 h−1) > Mg/POP-TPP (171 h−1) (Table 1). Later, a series of high surface area hollow tubular metal (Al, Co, Fe, and Mn) porphyrin-based hypercrosslinked polymers (HCP) were synthesized via Friedel–Crafts alkylation reactions. Al-HCP can catalyze the formation of propylene carbonate with a selectivity of approximately 99% after only 1 h with 2.0 mol% TBAB catalyst [22].
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous crystalline materials formed by coordination between metal ions or metal clusters and organic ligands, which are characterized by high porosity, high surface area, tunable pore size and geometric configuration, and functionalizable pore surface [23]. Consequently, they can be employed for CO2 capture and utilization. The imidazolium-based poly(ionic liquid)s (denoted as polyILs) and ortho-divinylbenzene were used as cross-linking agents to polymerize in the pores of MIL-101 (Figure 3a), resulting in polyILs@MIL-101 materials with dual functions of CO2 capture and conversion [24]. For MOFs materials, ordered nanochannels can effectively promote the enrichment of CO2 at the active sites and accelerate the CO2 conversion; Lewis basic sites (LBSs) can supply electrons to activate CO2 [25,26]. In order to restore the real CO2 capture process, a CO2 capture and in situ conversion system was designed by simulating the flue gas feed, where the lanthanide (III) complex of 1-vinylimidazole (Vim) was immobilized with DUT-5 by a combination of ligand and in situ polymerization (Figure 3b). This work opens up a general pathway for future research and validates the effectiveness of MOFs for practical applications in CO2 capture and conversion [27].
Although the integrated materials have demonstrated good CO2 capture and enrichment capabilities, their performance under the real industrial exhaust emissions that contain acidic gases, such as SOx, NOx, and steam, remain to be explored.

2.3. CO2 Electrochemical Membrane Separation and Conversion Integration

Electrochemical membrane separation is a technology that achieves gas separation through electrochemical reaction. The membrane can be mixed oxide ion-carbonate conductor (MOCC), such as Y0.16Zr0.84O2-δ-molten carbonate (YSZ-MC), Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9-MC (SDC-MC), Ce0.9Gd0.2O1.9-MC (GDC-MC), and Bi1.5Y0.3Sm0.2O3-δ-MC (BYS-MC); mixed electron-carbonate conductor (MECC), such as stainless steel-MC (SS-MC), Ag-MC, and Ni-MC; or mixed oxide ion-electron-carbonate conductor (MOECC), such as La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ-MC (LSCF-MC), La0.5Sr0.5Fe0.8Cu0.2O3-δ-MC (LSFCu-MC) and NiO-SDC-MC based on the charge carriers [2]. Generally, the carbonates (Li-Na-K-based) show high electrical conductivity and low viscosity only at relatively high temperature, e.g., >600 °C. Accordingly, it can be well integrated with the high temperature CO2 utilization processes, such as DMR and reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) (Table 2).
Lin and co-workers first modeled the high temperature tube shell membrane reactor for separation and utilization of CO2 from the flue gas and for simultaneous production of syngas using DMR. The membrane reactor is highly efficient for CCUS. The CH4 conversion of 48.1% and an average CO2 permeation flux of 1.52 mL cm−2 min−1 can be obtained at 800 °C with a 75 µm thick membrane and CH4 space velocity of 3265 h−1 [28]. Later, Anderson et al. [29] experimentally studied the integration of CO2 separation and DMR with LSCF-MC membrane and Ni/γ-alumina catalyst. The CO2 permeation rate above 750 °C matches the reaction rate of DMR catalyst, and the order of syngas production activity is blank system < LSCF combustion catalyst < Ni/γ-alumina reforming catalyst. The conversion of CO2 and CH4 is 88.5 and 8.1%, respectively, generating a syngas H2:CO ratio of about 1 [30]. To improve the performance, Zhang et al. [31] employed MOCC membrane (GDC-MC) (Figure 4a), and NMP (Ni-MgO-1 wt% Pt) and LNF (LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3-δ) catalysts. The yield of H2 and CO and the conversion of CH4 in the reactor with NMP catalyst is higher than that with LNF catalyst (Figure 4b,c), while the reactor with LNF catalyst shows better anti-coking performance and no significant degradation within 200 h. In addition, Zhang et al. [32] investigated the MECC membrane reactor (Ag-MC) coupled with dry-oxy methane reforming (DOMR) over an NMP catalyst. The CH4 conversion is >82% and is stable over 115 h at 800 °C (Figure 4d). Similar reactor models can be applied to integrate CO2 separation and oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane (ODHE) to prepare ethylene [33]. CO2 can react with H2 to make the reaction of ethane dehydrogenation forward, which can increase the selectivity of O2-ODHE to produce ethylene [33].
The coupling of a dual-phase membrane reactor with a RWGS reaction was first reported by Chen et al. [34] to capture CO2 and produce CO. Under a sweep gas condition of 1% H2/He, the CO selectivity over LaNiO3 (LNO) catalyst is >96% at 550–750 °C. Additionally, La0.9Ce0.1NiO3-δ (LCNO) catalyst displays almost 100% CO selectivity and good thermal stability. The introduction of H2 during the purge test enhances the permeation of CO2. H2O in dual-phase membrane systems can reduce the activation energy, possibly due to the conduction of hydroxide ions through the membrane [35].
The dual-phase membrane reactor can also increase the H2 yield by removing CO2. The concept of CO2 removal was first applied to the steam reforming of methane reaction (SMR) to produce high concentration of H2 by Wu et al. [36]. The asymmetric BYS-SDC-MC membrane reactor can convert methane into hydrogen via SMR reaction while simultaneously removing CO2 to achieve a high concentration of hydrogen, with 84% CO2 recovery (Figure 5a). The results of the mathematical model (Figure 5b) demonstrate that CO2 recovery from SMR in the CO2 permeated membrane reactor exceeds 99% and a pure H2 gas stream without CO gas can be achieved [37].
The dual-phase membrane reactors can also be utilized for the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) reaction. The high oxygen partial pressure in conventional OCM reactors often results in low C2 selectivity. Li et al. [38] combined CO2/O2 transport membrane (CTM) and OCM reaction to build a new membrane reactor model (Figure 5c), which shows higher conversion of CH4 than the traditional fixed-bed reactor model and better coking resistance. Based on this, Zhang et al. [39] developed a membrane reactor combining SDC-NiO-MC and 2%Mn–5%Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst. The co-captured CO2/O2 mixture converts CH4 into C2H6 over the 2%Mn–5%Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst, followed by thermal cracking into C2H4 and H2. In the presence of CO2, the O2 partial pressure is reduced, thereby reducing the possibility of re-oxidation of C2 products, which leads to a higher C2 selectivity.
Table 2. Summary of electrochemical membrane materials integrated reactors.
Table 2. Summary of electrochemical membrane materials integrated reactors.
MembraneCatalystReactionRef.
La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ
Li-Na-K		10 wt%Ni-/γ-Al2O3DMR[29]
Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9
Li-Na		Ni-MgO-1 wt% Pt LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3-δDMR[31]
Ag
Li-Na		Ni-MgO-1 wt% PtDOMR[32]
NiO-SDC
Li-Na		Ni-MgO-1 wt% PtDOMR[40]
Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9
Li-Na		5 wt% Cr2O3- ZSM-5Ethane-to-Ethylene[33]
Ce0.9Pr0.1O2-δ-Pr0.6Sr0.4Fe0.5Co0.5O3-δ
Li-Na-K		10 wt%Ni-/γ-Al2O3DOMR[41]
LNO/SDC
Li-Na		LNO/LCNORWGS[34]
BYS-SDC
Li-Na-K		Ni-based catalyst (HiFUEL R110)SMR[36]
γ-LiAlO2-Ag
Li-Na-K		γ-LiAlO2-AgSyngas production[42]
NiO-SDC
Li-Na		2%Mn-5%Na2WO4/SiO2OCM[39]
Note: Li-Na-K = Li2CO3: Na2CO3:K2CO3 with ratio of 42.5:32.5:25 mol%; Li-Na = Li2CO3: Na2CO3 with ratio of 52:48 mol%.

2.4. CO2 Capture and Conversion over Dual-Function Materials (DFMs)

Inorganic metal dual-functional materials (DFMs) combine the capture and conversion of CO2 into organic compounds. DFMs consist of the CO2 absorption component and the catalytic CO2 conversion component. The former is usually composed of alkali metal oxides or carbonates whilst the latter comprises metal-based catalysts, such as Ru, Rh, and Ni for DMR, dry ethane reforming (DER), RWGS reaction, and CO2 methanation [43,44,45]. Those processes can be well integrated with CO2 absorption considering their similar operating temperatures.
In 2018, Kim et al. [46] proposed and demonstrated the feasibility of using DFM to capture CO2 and convert it in situ with renewable CaO as an absorber of CO2 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 as a catalyst for DMR. The concentration of CO2 in the exhaust gas is less than 0.08%, and the ratio of H2 to CO is 1.06. Tian et al. [47] synthesized CaO-Ni DFM using a sol–gel method. The ratio of H2 to CO is 1.1, which is similar to Kim’s results [46]. Methane decomposition can occur simultaneously during the reaction. The deposited carbon facilitates the reaction of CO2 with CaO-Ni; the CH4 conversion rate can reach 86%. Compared to other processes for DMR, the in situ consumption of CO2 on the catalyst surface promotes a positive shift of equilibrium in favor of CaCO3 decomposition, which allows the otherwise energy-intensive calcium cycling process to proceed at lower temperatures, thus further alleviating the deactivation problem during calcination. The energy consumed is 22% lower than the conventional consumption. In order to improve the activity and stability of Ni-CaO in the DMR reaction [48], CeO2 was added to the support, with a Ca:Ce molar ratio of 85:15. The resultant catalyst demonstrates good stability and maintains ≈ 80–90% activity over nine cycles at 650 °C, which is over two times better than the material without CeO2 modification (Figure 6a). The dispersion of Ni and the reducibility of NiO are improved, enhancing the DMR activity. Due to the high mobility of lattice oxygen in CeO2, the CeO2 modification can inhibit the accumulation of non-active carbon on Ni.
In addition to DMR, the captured CO2 can be also converted into methane over DFM (Table 3). The Farrauto group is a pioneer in the study of CO2-Met DFM. They prepared DFM using Ru as the metal catalyst, CaO as the CO2 absorbent, and γ-Al2O3 as a carrier [51]. At 320 °C and 10% CO2/N2, CO2 capture was carried out followed by methane production reaction for 2 h with 4% H2/N2. The 5% Ru-10% CaO/γ-Al2O3 exhibits the highest activity. In the CO2 capture cycle test with presence of steam, the purity of obtained methane can reach up to 99%. Duyar et al. [52,53] synthesized Ru- and Rh-based DFM from the nitrates of Ru and Rh, respectively, via impregnation. The Rh-based DFMs show better activity. However, their high cost limits large-scale application. In order to reduce the cost, Bermejo-Lopez et al. studied DFMs using Ni as the catalyst [54,55]. Ni-CaO/γ-Al2O3 and Ni-Na2CO3/γ-Al2O3 with different Ni loadings were synthesized via impregnation. The methane yield of 10% Ni-Na2CO3/γ-Al2O3 is 186 μmol CH4 g−1 at 400 °C and it is 142 μmol CH4 g−1 at 520 °C for 15% Ni-CaO/γ-Al2O3. In addition, Al-Mamoori et al. [56] prepared DFMs using Ni-impregnated CaO- and MgO-based double salts as CO2 absorber and catalyst, respectively, and γ-Al2O3 as the carrier. The CO2 absorption was first saturated in a 10% CO2/N2 atmosphere at 650 °C and 1 bar, and then a 5% C2H6/N2 mixture was passed into the reactor to react with CO2. The Ni@(K-Ca)/γ-Al2O3 system exhibits the highest CO2 absorption and 100% C2H6 conversion. Nevertheless, Ni usually requires high reduction temperature and is very sensitive to O2 in the feed gas, and its long-term stability remains to be improved for the CO2-Met reaction.
DFMs can also convert the captured CO2 into valuable chemicals via RWGS reactions and ethane reforming. To investigate the effect of preparation methods on the performance of DFMs, Wang et al. [49] synthesized DFMs using three different methods, namely wet-mixing, acidification/impregnation, and acidification/impregnation combined with citric acid complexation. The Ni/CS-P30-C, prepared via acid pretreatment of carbide slag followed by citric acid complex, exhibits a high CO2 sorption capacity (13.28 mmol g−1 DFMs) and a great CO productivity (5.12 mmol g−1 DFMs) at 650 °C, and also demonstrates better CO2 capture and in situ conversion (Figure 6b). Sun et al. [50] investigated the effect of Ce loading onto the Ca-Ni-based DFM on the performance of CO2 capture and RWGS. The DFM with Ca:Ni:Ce = 1:0.1:0.033 (molar ratio) exhibits high cycling stability, and 100% CO selectivity (Figure 6c,d). The addition of CeO2 effectively prevents the growth and aggregation of NiO and CaO species.
The primary concerns are catalyst deactivation during the reaction, carbon deposition, and matching capture and conversion rates, along with the requirement of evaluating the life cycle and economics of the integrated system. Therefore, further research is necessary in the future on aspects, such as reaction atmosphere, temperature, life cycle, economic analysis, and industrial applications.

3. Conclusions, Challenges and Opportunities

In summary, the integration of CO2 capture and utilization is reviewed, namely the absorption, adsorption, and electrochemical separation capture processes integrated with several utilization processes. Initially, it is imperative to ensure that the operational conditions of the CO2 capture process and the subsequent reaction process are fundamentally congruent, encompassing factors, such as temperature, pressure, pH, and other relevant parameters. Subsequently, the CO2 absorption materials can be more effectively combined with the catalyst without impeding their respective performances. The point is to find the match between the operating temperature of both processes. To improve the performance of the integration system, one of the key factors is to achieve the match between the capture rate and the conversion rate. For example, in the MOCC and DMR system, matching the CO2 separation rate of the MOCC membrane and the conversion rate over DMR catalyst is crucial. Unfortunately, such studies are very limited. Of course, improving the performance (activity, and stability) of the single process, either the capture or the conversion process, is desirable.
Although the integration of CO2 capture and conversion is very promising to lower the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, there are still many challenges ahead. The amine-based absorption is currently employed by the industry, however, their toxicity, corrosiveness and high cost limit their further market applications. Suitable amine-based or solid amine-based materials with low-energy, low-cost integrated CO2 capture and conversion capabilities remain to be developed. For POP-based materials, their long-term and cycling stability, the impact of SOx, NOx, and other gases remain unclear. The production cost and complexity should be evaluated for future commercial promotion. The electrochemical membrane reactors integrated with catalysts is very promising for high-temperature CO2 capture and conversion, but the CO2 permeation flux and long-term stability are still needed to be improved. For the DFM-based materials, researching how to achieve the match between CO2 capture and conversion is critical. The issues related with catalyst deactivation and operational life also remain to be solved.
To expedite innovation in the chemical industry, an integrated approach combining chemical experimentation with machine learning algorithms can be pursued. This paradigm shift will enable researchers to identify optimal materials faster and more efficiently, ultimately accelerating the pace of innovation in the global chemical industry.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation and Writing—Original Draft, H.N.; Supervision and Resource, Y.L.; Conceptualization, Supervision and Writing—Review and Editing, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Song, K.S.; Fritz, P.W.; Coskun, A. Porous organic polymers for CO2 capture, separation and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 9831–9852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, P.; Tong, J.; Huang, K.; Zhu, X.; Yang, W. The current status of high temperature electrochemistry-based CO2 transport membranes and reactors for direct CO2 capture and conversion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021, 82, 100888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamada, H. Amine-based capture of CO2 for utilization and storage. Polym. J. 2021, 53, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maina, J.W.; Pringle, J.M.; Razal, J.M.; Nunes, S.; Vega, L.; Gallucci, F.; Dumée, L.F. Strategies for integrated capture and conversion of CO2 from dilute flue gases and the atmosphere. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 1805–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kothandaraman, J.; Goeppert, A.; Czaun, M.; Olah, G.A.; Prakash, G.S. Conversion of CO2 from air into methanol using a polyamine and a homogeneous ruthenium catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 778–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kar, S.; Goeppert, A.; Prakash, G.S. Combined CO2 capture and hydrogenation to methanol: Amine immobilization enables easy recycling of active elements. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 3172–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hanusch, J.M.; Kerschgens, I.P.; Huber, F.; Neuburger, M.; Gademann, K. Pyrrolizidines for direct air capture and CO2 conversion. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 949–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guan, C.; Pan, Y.; Ang, E.P.L.; Hu, J.; Yao, C.; Huang, M.-H.; Li, H.; Lai, Z.; Huang, K.-W. Conversion of CO2 from air into formate using amines and phosphorus-nitrogen PN 3P-Ru (ii) pincer complexes. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4201–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tailor, R.; Abboud, M.; Sayari, A. Supported polytertiary amines: Highly efficient and selective SO2 adsorbents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 2025–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, S.; Zhan, L.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Ling, L.; Feng, X. Graphene-based porous silica sheets impregnated with polyethyleneimine for superior CO2 capture. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2130–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goeppert, A.; Czaun, M.; May, R.B.; Prakash, G.S.; Olah, G.A.; Narayanan, S. Carbon dioxide capture from the air using a polyamine based regenerable solid adsorbent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20164–20167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.-N.; He, L.-N.; Liu, A.-H.; Lang, X.-D.; Yang, Z.-Z.; Yu, B.; Luan, C.-R. In situ hydrogenation of captured CO2 to formate with polyethyleneimine and Rh/monophosphine system. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2825–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McNamara, N.D.; Hicks, J.C. CO2 capture and conversion with a multifunctional polyethyleneimine-tethered iminophosphine iridium catalyst/adsorbent. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kothandaraman, J.; Goeppert, A.; Czaun, M.; Olah, G.A.; Prakash, G.S. CO2 capture by amines in aqueous media and its subsequent conversion to formate with reusable ruthenium and iron catalysts. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 5831–5838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rezayee, N.M.; Huff, C.A.; Sanford, M.S. Tandem amine and ruthenium-catalyzed hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1028–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, T.; Xing, G.; Chen, W.; Chen, L. Porous organic polymers: A promising platform for efficient photocatalysis. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 332–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cho, H.C.; Lee, H.S.; Chun, J.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.J.; Son, S.U. Tubular microporous organic networks bearing imidazolium salts and their catalytic CO2 conversion to cyclic carbonates. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 917–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.; Sng, W.; Yi, G.; Zhang, Y. Imidazolium salt-modified porous hypercrosslinked polymers for synergistic CO2 capture and conversion. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12076–12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Q.; Jin, Y.; Aguila, B.; Meng, X.; Ma, S.; Xiao, F.S. Porous ionic polymers as a robust and efficient platform for capture and chemical fixation of atmospheric CO2. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1160–1165. [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, J.G. Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: Singapore, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dai, Z.; Sun, Q.; Liu, X.; Bian, C.; Wu, Q.; Pan, S.; Wang, L.; Meng, X.; Deng, F.; Xiao, F.-S. Metalated porous porphyrin polymers as efficient heterogeneous catalysts for cycloaddition of epoxides with CO2 under ambient conditions. J. Catal. 2016, 338, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Luo, R.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; Ji, H. State-of-the-art aluminum porphyrin-based heterogeneous catalysts for the chemical fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates at ambient conditions. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhai, G.; Liu, Y.; Lei, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, P.; Cheng, H.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. Light-promoted CO2 conversion from epoxides to cyclic carbonates at ambient conditions over a Bi-based metal–organic framework. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 1988–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ding, M.; Jiang, H.-L. Incorporation of imidazolium-based poly (ionic liquid)s into a metal–organic framework for CO2 capture and conversion. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 3194–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dai, W.; Li, Q.; Long, J.; Mao, P.; Xu, Y.; Yang, L.; Zou, J.; Luo, X. Hierarchically mesoporous imidazole-functionalized covalent triazine framework: An efficient metal-and halogen-free heterogeneous catalyst towards the cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 62, 102101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, F.; Duan, X.; Dai, X.; Du, S.; Ma, J.; Liu, F.; Liu, M. Metal-decorated porous organic frameworks with cross-linked pyridyl and triazinyl as efficient platforms for CO2 activation and conversion under mild conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 445, 136687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, P.; Ding, M.; Zhang, Y.; Rong, W.; Yao, J. Integration of lanthanide-imidazole containing polymer with metal-organic frameworks for efficient cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 313, 123498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rui, Z.; Ji, H.; Lin, Y.S. Modeling and analysis of ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane reactor for carbon dioxide reforming with methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 8292–8300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anderson, M.; Lin, Y.S. Carbon dioxide separation and dry reforming of methane for synthesis of syngas by a dual-phase membrane reactor. AlChE J. 2013, 59, 2207–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pakhare, D.; Spivey, J. A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7813–7837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, P.; Tong, J.; Huang, K. Combining electrochemical CO2 capture with catalytic dry methane reforming in a single reactor for low-cost syngas production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 7056–7065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, P.; Tong, J.; Huang, K. Dry-oxy methane reforming with mixed e(-)/CO32- conducting membranes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5432–5439. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, P.; Tong, J.; Huang, K. Role of CO2 in catalytic ethane-to-ethylene conversion using a high-temperature CO2 transport membrane reactor. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 6889–6897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, T.J.; Wang, Z.G.; Liu, L.N.; Pati, S.; Wai, M.H.; Kawi, S. Coupling CO2 separation with catalytic reverse water-gas shift reaction via ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xing, W.; Peters, T.; Fontaine, M.-L.; Evans, A.; Henriksen, P.P.; Norby, T.; Bredesen, R. Steam-promoted CO2 flux in dual-phase CO2 separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 482, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, H.C.; Rui, Z.B.; Lin, J.Y.S. Hydrogen production with carbon dioxide capture by dual-phase ceramic-carbonate membrane reactor via steam reforming of methane. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 598, 117780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ovalle-Encinia, O.; Wu, H.C.; Chen, T.J.; Lin, J.Y.S. CO2-permselective membrane reactor for steam reforming of methane. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 641, 119914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Huang, K.; Van Dam, N.; Jin, X. Performance projection of a high-temperature CO2 transport membrane reactor for combined CO2 capture and methane-to-ethylene conversion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 053501. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, K.; Sun, S.; Huang, K. Oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) conversion into C2 products through a CO2/O2 co-transport membrane reactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 661, 120915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, P.; Tong, J.; Huang, K. Self-formed, mixed-conducting, triple-phase membrane for efficient CO2/O2 capture from flue gas and in situ dry-oxy methane reforming. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 14162–14169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fabian-Anguiano, J.A.; Mendoza-Serrato, C.G.; Gomez-Yanez, C.; Zeifert, B.; Ma, X.; Ortiz-Landeros, J. Simultaneous CO2 and O2 separation coupled to oxy-dry reforming of CH4 by means of a ceramic-carbonate membrane reactor for in situ syngas production. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 210, 115250. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fabian-Anguiano, J.A.; Ramirez-Moreno, M.J.; Balmori-Ramirez, H.; Romero-Serrano, J.A.; Romero-Ibarra, I.C.; Ma, X.; Ortiz-Landeros, J. Syngas production with CO2 utilization through the oxidative reforming of methane in a new cermet-carbonate packed-bed membrane reactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 637, 119607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shao, B.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Gao, Z.; Xie, Z.; Hu, J.; Liu, H. CO2 capture and in-situ conversion: Recent progresses and perspectives. Green Chem. Eng. 2022, 3, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, S.; Sun, H.; Williams, P.T.; Wu, C. Recent advances in integrated CO2 capture and utilization: A review. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2021, 5, 4546–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, W.; Ma, D.; Pérez-Ramírez, J.; Chen, Z. Recent progress in materials exploration for thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, and integrated photothermocatalytic CO2-to-fuel conversion. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2022, 3, 2100169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, S.M.; Abdala, P.M.; Broda, M.; Hosseini, D.; Copéret, C.; Müller, C. Integrated CO2 capture and conversion as an efficient process for fuels from greenhouse gases. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2815–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tian, S.; Yan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, J. Calcium-looping reforming of methane realizes in situ CO2 utilization with improved energy efficiency. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  48. Hu, J.; Hongmanorom, P.; Chirawatkul, P.; Kawi, S. Efficient integration of CO2 capture and conversion over a Ni supported CeO2-modified CaO microsphere at moderate temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, G.; Guo, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, F.; Sun, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, T.; Zhao, C. Ni-CaO dual function materials prepared by different synthetic modes for integrated CO2 capture and conversion. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 132110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sun, H.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Shen, B.; Shi, J.; Huang, J.; Wu, C. Dual functional catalytic materials of Ni over Ce-modified CaO sorbents for integrated CO2 capture and conversion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 244, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Duyar, M.S.; Trevino, M.A.A.; Farrauto, R.J. Dual function materials for CO2 capture and conversion using renewable H2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 168, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; He, Z.; Libby, M.C.; Farrauto, R.J. Catalysts and adsorbents for CO2 capture and conversion with dual function materials: Limitations of Ni-containing DFMs for flue gas applications. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 31, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Porta, A.; Visconti, C.G.; Castoldi, L.; Matarrese, R.; Jeong-Potter, C.; Farrauto, R.; Lietti, L. Ru-Ba synergistic effect in dual functioning materials for cyclic CO2 capture and methanation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 283, 119654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bermejo-López, A.; Pereda-Ayo, B.; González-Marcos, J.; González-Velasco, J. Mechanism of the CO2 storage and in situ hydrogenation to CH4. Temperature and adsorbent loading effects over Ru-CaO/Al2O3 and Ru-Na2CO3/Al2O3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 256, 117845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bermejo-López, A.; Pereda-Ayo, B.; González-Marcos, J.; González-Velasco, J. Ni loading effects on dual function materials for capture and in-situ conversion of CO2 to CH4 using CaO or Na2CO3. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 34, 576–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Al-Mamoori, A.; Rownaghi, A.A.; Rezaei, F. Combined capture and utilization of CO2 for syngas production over dual-function materials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 13551–13561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Duyar, M.S.; Wang, S.; Arellano-Trevino, M.A.; Farrauto, R.J. CO2 utilization with a novel dual function material (DFM) for capture and catalytic conversion to synthetic natural gas: An update. J. CO2 Util. 2016, 15, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Garbarino, G.; Bellotti, D.; Riani, P.; Magistri, L.; Busca, G. Methanation of carbon dioxide on Ru/Al2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts at atmospheric pressure: Catalysts activation, behaviour and stability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 9171–9182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, S.; Schrunk, E.T.; Mahajan, H.; Farrauto, R.J. The role of ruthenium in CO2 capture and catalytic conversion to fuel by dual function materials (DFM). Catalysts 2017, 7, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  60. Wang, S.; Farrauto, R.J.; Karp, S.; Jeon, J.H.; Schrunk, E.T. Parametric, cyclic aging and characterization studies for CO2 capture from flue gas and catalytic conversion to synthetic natural gas using a dual functional material (DFM). J. CO2 Util. 2018, 27, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 04500 g001
Figure 1. (a) Proposed pathways of carbon capture and subsequent hydrogenation of the captured CO2 [12]; (b) Formic acid yields in the hydrogenation of CO2 catalyzed by the PEI–PN/Ir materials as a function of temperature and MW of PEI for PEI600–PN/Ir (▪), PEI1800–PN/Ir (•), and PEI25 000–PN/Ir (▴) [13]. (c) Multiple recycling of the catalyst in biphasic reaction mixture. Yield (%) of formate is relative to the amount of CO2 captured. Ru–PNP 1: Cat 1 = 10 μmol, T = 55 °C, H2 = 50 bar, 17.2 mmol diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) + 3 mL H2O (CO2 captured each cycle = 15 mmol), 3 mL additional H2O–4 mL 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (2–MeTHF) added for hydrogenation study. Fe–PNP 4: Cat 4 = 20 μmol, T = 55 °C, H2 = 50 bar, 17.2 mmol DABCO + 3 mL H2O (CO2 captured each cycle = 15 mmol), 3 mL additional H2O–4 mL 2–MeTHF added for hydrogenation study [14]. (d) Proposed reaction sequence for CO2 capture and in situ hydrogenation to CH3OH using a polyamine [5].
Figure 1. (a) Proposed pathways of carbon capture and subsequent hydrogenation of the captured CO2 [12]; (b) Formic acid yields in the hydrogenation of CO2 catalyzed by the PEI–PN/Ir materials as a function of temperature and MW of PEI for PEI600–PN/Ir (▪), PEI1800–PN/Ir (•), and PEI25 000–PN/Ir (▴) [13]. (c) Multiple recycling of the catalyst in biphasic reaction mixture. Yield (%) of formate is relative to the amount of CO2 captured. Ru–PNP 1: Cat 1 = 10 μmol, T = 55 °C, H2 = 50 bar, 17.2 mmol diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) + 3 mL H2O (CO2 captured each cycle = 15 mmol), 3 mL additional H2O–4 mL 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (2–MeTHF) added for hydrogenation study. Fe–PNP 4: Cat 4 = 20 μmol, T = 55 °C, H2 = 50 bar, 17.2 mmol DABCO + 3 mL H2O (CO2 captured each cycle = 15 mmol), 3 mL additional H2O–4 mL 2–MeTHF added for hydrogenation study [14]. (d) Proposed reaction sequence for CO2 capture and in situ hydrogenation to CH3OH using a polyamine [5].
Molecules 28 04500 g001
Molecules 28 04500 g002
Figure 2. (a) Preparation of porous organic networks bearing imidazolium salts [17]; (b) Yields of chloropropene carbonate from the cycloaddition of epichlorohydrin and CO2 catalyzed by PIPs with corresponding QPs and PIP-Me-X, PIP-Et-X, and PIP-Bn-X (X = Cl, Br, and I). Reaction conditions: epichlorohydrin (1.0 g, 10.9 mmol), catalyst (0.05 mmol, based upon the quaternary phosphonium salt), 323 K, CO2 (ambient pressure), and 24 h [19].
Figure 2. (a) Preparation of porous organic networks bearing imidazolium salts [17]; (b) Yields of chloropropene carbonate from the cycloaddition of epichlorohydrin and CO2 catalyzed by PIPs with corresponding QPs and PIP-Me-X, PIP-Et-X, and PIP-Bn-X (X = Cl, Br, and I). Reaction conditions: epichlorohydrin (1.0 g, 10.9 mmol), catalyst (0.05 mmol, based upon the quaternary phosphonium salt), 323 K, CO2 (ambient pressure), and 24 h [19].
Molecules 28 04500 g002
Molecules 28 04500 g003
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the preparation of (a) polyILs@MIL–101 [24] and (b) La–Vim/DUT–5 [27]. The “*” represents the monomer in the polymer.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the preparation of (a) polyILs@MIL–101 [24] and (b) La–Vim/DUT–5 [27]. The “*” represents the monomer in the polymer.
Molecules 28 04500 g003
Molecules 28 04500 g004
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of a MOCC membrane reactor with a catalyst bed for electrochemical CO2 capture and catalytic DMR. TPB: triple phase boundary [31]. (b) Effect of temperature on the DMR performance of a GDC–MC membrane reactor with an NMP catalyst [31]. (c) Effect of temperature on the DMR performance of a GDC–MC membrane reactor with an NMP catalyst and an LNF catalyst [31]. (d) Stability of DOMR performance of the Ag–MC MECC membrane reactor at 800 °C with NMP catalyst. Feed gas: 75 mL min−1 N2, 15 mL min−1 CO2, and 10 mL min−1 O2; sweep gas: 0.94 mL min−1 CH4 and 50 mL min−1 Ar [32]. The dotted circles and arrows in the figure represent the axes corresponding to the curve.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of a MOCC membrane reactor with a catalyst bed for electrochemical CO2 capture and catalytic DMR. TPB: triple phase boundary [31]. (b) Effect of temperature on the DMR performance of a GDC–MC membrane reactor with an NMP catalyst [31]. (c) Effect of temperature on the DMR performance of a GDC–MC membrane reactor with an NMP catalyst and an LNF catalyst [31]. (d) Stability of DOMR performance of the Ag–MC MECC membrane reactor at 800 °C with NMP catalyst. Feed gas: 75 mL min−1 N2, 15 mL min−1 CO2, and 10 mL min−1 O2; sweep gas: 0.94 mL min−1 CH4 and 50 mL min−1 Ar [32]. The dotted circles and arrows in the figure represent the axes corresponding to the curve.
Molecules 28 04500 g004
Molecules 28 04500 g005
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of membrane reactor [37]. (b) Comparison of CO2 flux and recovery of the membrane reactor between experimental results and modeling results. Conditions: sweep: He = 200 mL min−1; feed: CH4 = 5 mL min−1; S/C = 3; both sides of the membrane were at 1 atm [37]. (c) Schematic illustration of (c1) Membrane reactor; (c2) Co-fed fixed bed reactor; (c3) Charge species transport and surface reactions in the membrane reactor; (c4) Reaction pathway diagram. 2D axial symmetric computational domain of (c5) Membrane reactor; (c6) Co-fed fixed bed reactor [38].
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of membrane reactor [37]. (b) Comparison of CO2 flux and recovery of the membrane reactor between experimental results and modeling results. Conditions: sweep: He = 200 mL min−1; feed: CH4 = 5 mL min−1; S/C = 3; both sides of the membrane were at 1 atm [37]. (c) Schematic illustration of (c1) Membrane reactor; (c2) Co-fed fixed bed reactor; (c3) Charge species transport and surface reactions in the membrane reactor; (c4) Reaction pathway diagram. 2D axial symmetric computational domain of (c5) Membrane reactor; (c6) Co-fed fixed bed reactor [38].
Molecules 28 04500 g005
Molecules 28 04500 g006
Figure 6. (a) Comparison of cyclic CO2 capture-release stability of the as-prepared bifunctional materials at 650 °C [48]. (b) CO2 sorption capacities and CO productivities of Ni/CS, Ni/CS–P30–C and Ni/CS–P30–C–P at 650 °C within 17 cycles [49] (The symbols indicate different preparation methods. The yellow and blue lines represent CO2 sorption capacities and CO productivities, respectively). Cyclic CO2 capture and conversion reactions of (c) Ca1Ni0.1; and (d) Ca1Ni0.1Ce0.033 [50].
Figure 6. (a) Comparison of cyclic CO2 capture-release stability of the as-prepared bifunctional materials at 650 °C [48]. (b) CO2 sorption capacities and CO productivities of Ni/CS, Ni/CS–P30–C and Ni/CS–P30–C–P at 650 °C within 17 cycles [49] (The symbols indicate different preparation methods. The yellow and blue lines represent CO2 sorption capacities and CO productivities, respectively). Cyclic CO2 capture and conversion reactions of (c) Ca1Ni0.1; and (d) Ca1Ni0.1Ce0.033 [50].
Molecules 28 04500 g006
Table 1. Cycloaddition of epichlorohydrin with CO2 to form cyclic carbonate over various catalysts at 29 °C [21].
Table 1. Cycloaddition of epichlorohydrin with CO2 to form cyclic carbonate over various catalysts at 29 °C [21].
EntryCatalystsAdditivesTime (h)Conv. (%) aSelect. (%) a
1 bPOP-TPPn-Bu4NBr2452.1>99.0
2 cCo/POP-TPPn-Bu4NBr2495.699
3 cCo/TPPn-Bu4NBr2497.599
4Co/POP-TPPNone249.799
5Co/TPPNone2418.599
6Nonen-Bu4NBr243499
7 dCo/POP-TPPn-Bu4NBr9696.199
8 eCo/POP-TPPn-Bu4NBr2488.999
9 fZn/POP-TPPn-Bu4NBr2493.2>99.0
10 fZn/TPPn-Bu4NBr2493.5>99.0
11 gMg/POP-TPPn-Bu4NBr2480.5>99.0
12 gMg/TPPn-Bu4NBr2499.3>99.0
13 hCo/POP-TPPn-Bu4NBr2493.699
Note: a Determined using GC analysis. b 48 mg of POP-TPP was used. c 50 mg of Co/POP-TPP (1.6 mg Co) or 19 mg of Co/TPP (1.6 mg Co) was used. d Co/POP-TPP catalyst (12.5 mg, 0.4 mg Co). e 50 mg of n-Bu4NBr. f 50 mg of Zn/POP-TPP (2.3 mg Zn) or 23.5 mg of Zn/TPP (2.3 mg Zn) was used. g 50 mg of Mg/POP-TPP (1.4 mg Mg) or 37.0 mg of Mg/TPP (1.4 mg Mg) was used. h Recycled for 18 times.
Table 3. Carbon dioxide methanation dual-functional materials summary.
Table 3. Carbon dioxide methanation dual-functional materials summary.
DFMCondition (°C)Ref.
AbsorptionReaction
Ni-CaO/Al2O3280–520 10% CO2/Ar280–520 10% H2/Ar[55]
Ni-Na2CO3/Al2O3280–520 10% CO2/Ar280–520 10% H2/Ar
Ni-Na2O/Al2O3320 7.5% CO2/N2 and 7.5% CO2, 4.5% O2, 15% H2O/N2320 15% H2/N2[52]
Ru-Na2O/γ-Al2O3320 15% CO2/N2320 20% H2/N2[57]
Rh-CaO/γ-Al2O3320 10% CO2/N2320 2% H2/N2
Ru-CaO/γ-Al2O3280–400 1.4% CO2/Ar and 11% CO2/Ar280–400 10% H2/Ar[54]
Ru-Na2CO3/γ-Al2O3280–400 1.4% CO2/Ar and 11% CO2/A280–400 10% H2/Ar
Ru-CaO/γ-Al2O3320 10% CO2/air and 8% CO2/21% H2O/air320 5% H2/N2[51]
Ru-CaO/γ-Al2O3320 10% CO2/N2320 4% H2/N2[57]
Ru-CaO/γ-Al2O3320 7.5% CO2, 4.5% O2, 15% H2O/N2320 5% H2/N2[58]
Ru-Na2CO3/γ-Al2O3320 7.5% CO2/N2 and 7.5% CO2, 4.5% O2, 15%
H2O/N2		320 5% H2/N2[59]
Ru-Na2O/γ-Al2O3250–350 7.5% CO2, 4.5% O2, 15% H2O/N2250–350 15% H2/N2[60]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ning, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C. Recent Progress in the Integration of CO2 Capture and Utilization. Molecules 2023, 28, 4500. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114500

AMA Style

Ning H, Li Y, Zhang C. Recent Progress in the Integration of CO2 Capture and Utilization. Molecules. 2023; 28(11):4500. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ning, Huanghao, Yongdan Li, and Cuijuan Zhang. 2023. "Recent Progress in the Integration of CO2 Capture and Utilization" Molecules 28, no. 11: 4500. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114500

APA Style

Ning, H., Li, Y., & Zhang, C. (2023). Recent Progress in the Integration of CO2 Capture and Utilization. Molecules, 28(11), 4500. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114500

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop