Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of α-Synuclein Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Homo-Polyimide Films Derived from Two Isomeric Bis-Benzimidazole Diamines
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Nitroimidazole Radiosensitisers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Promotion of Research Progress of Zinc Manganate Cathode Materials for Zinc-Ion Batteries by Characterization and Analysis Technology

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Industrial Automation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(11), 4459; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114459
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 21 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis and Characterization of Materials in Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) have recently attracted great interest and are regarded as a promising energy storage device due to their low cost, environmental friendliness, and superior safety. However, the development of suitable Zn-ion intercalation cathode materials remains a great challenge, resulting in unsatisfactory ZIBs that cannot meet commercial demands. Considering that spinel-type LiMn2O4 has been shown to be a successful Li intercalation host, spinel-like ZnMn2O4 (ZMO) is expected to be a good candidate for ZIBs cathodes. This paper first introduces the zinc storage mechanism of ZMO and then reviews the promotion of research progress in improving the interlayer spacing, structural stability, and diffusivity of ZMO, including the introduction of different intercalated ions, introduction of defects, and design of different morphologies and in combination with other materials. The development status and future research directions of ZMO-based ZIBs characterization and analysis techniques are summarized.

1. Introduction

The rapid depletion of fossil fuels and their detrimental impact on the environment have led to a strong interest in nonpolluting renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and geothermal energy, which are becoming increasingly important to the vision of global sustainable development [1,2,3,4]. However, these renewable energy power sources are difficult to use directly due to their discontinuous, unstable, and uncontrollable characteristics [5,6]. An energy storage device (ESD) was created to regulate power output and enhance the grid’s resilience to renewable energy sources, thereby providing a reliable energy supply for both personal and industrial applications [7,8,9]. Among the existing EDSs, Li-ion batteries (LIBs) have received the most attention and have become the go-to option in the secondary battery market due to their high energy density [8,10,11,12,13]. The convenience of the commercialization of lithium salts cannot be overlooked, yet their reliance on limited and expensive lithium (and cobalt) resources and the potential fire hazards from organic electrolytes make them inadequate for large-scale usage [6,14,15].
Recently, zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) have been considered a potential candidate for large-scale energy storage applications in the post-LIB era due to the abundant reserves (75 parts per million in Earth’s crust), high theoretical capacity (819 mA·h·g−1), and low redox potential (−0.763 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode) of zinc, and the nonflammable and high ion conductivity (1 S·cm−1) of aqueous electrolytes (Figure 1) [6,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. A ZIB device typically consists of four main components: an anode, a cathode, a separator, and an electrolyte. During the discharge process, Zinc ions are released from the anode, travel through the electrolyte, and eventually combine with the material of the cathode. Electrons traverse an external circuit, generating an external current from the cathode to the anode. Upon charging the battery, the system undergoes a reversal of the process and is restored to its pre-discharged condition. Researchers have formulated a range of materials that would satisfy the requirements of each component, based on the charging and discharging process. Cathode materials are an important research topic in the study of ZIBs. To date, various cathode materials, including vanadium-based materials [24,25], manganese-based materials [26,27], Prussian blue analogs [28,29], carbon-based materials [30,31], organic compounds [32,33], metal chalcogenides [34,35], MXene-based materials [36,37], and copper-based compounds [38,39], have been used as cathodes for ZIBs. Among them, zinc manganate (ZnMn2O4, abbreviated as ZMO), as a new type of bimetallic oxide with a spinel-like structure, is considered as a promising cathode material for aqueous ZIBs due to its abundant sources, large theoretical capacity, environmental friendliness, and high voltage. However, the low intrinsic conductivity, high volume change during charging and discharging, rapid capacity decrease, and inadequate rate performance of ZMO impede its further development. Many effective methods have been used to improve its electrochemical performance and reaction kinetics.
Although reviews of manganese oxides as cathode materials for ZIBs continue to emerge, they mainly focus on synthesis, morphology design, and electrolyte optimization, rarely focusing on ZMO materials alone. The differences in the crystal structure and chemical composition of ZMO lead to differences in their energy storage mechanisms, which result in huge differences in electrochemical performance. This review first introduces the zinc storage mechanism of ZMO and then reviews the recent research progress in improving the interlayer spacing, structural stability, and diffusivity of ZMO, including the introduction of different intercalated ions, introduction of defects, and design of different morphologies and in combination with other materials (Figure 2). The development status and future research directions of ZMO-based ZIBs are summarized. This review expounds the electrochemical reaction mechanism of ZMO-based materials, which is helpful for the discovery of new ZMO-based cathode materials, provides a new perspective for the innovation of ZMO-based cathode materials, and promotes the rapid development and development of ZMO-based cathode materials in large-scale applications.

2. Zinc Storage Mechanism of ZMO

As a binary metal oxide, ZMO is a non-tunnel-type double-cation oxide spinel structure and belongs to the tetragonal crystal system, where Mn3+ occupies an octahedral position to form MnO6 groups, and Zn2+ ions take up tetrahedral positions to form ZnO4 groups (Figure 3a). The Jahn–Teller distortion effect is particularly pronounced in octahedral-coordinated Mn3+. Manganese and zinc in ZMO can act as buffer substrates for each other during charge–discharge cycling due to their different electrode potentials, making the charge–discharge cycling performance of ZMO superior to that of single-base manganese-based metal oxides [39]. Compared with monobasic manganese-based metal oxides, ZMO has higher specific capacity. This characteristic indicates that the synergistic effect of Zn and Mn can achieve a better energy storage effect. Consequently, ZMO has more prominent advantages in electrode material research and has the potential to become a new generation of ZIB electrode materials.
A typical ZMO-based ZIBs consists of a Zn anode, a ZMO cathode, and an electrolyte containing Zn2+. When the battery is charged, Zn2+ is gradually deintercalated from the tetrahedral site of spinel ZMO in a two-step process and dissolved in the electrolyte, releasing two electrons simultaneously. At the same time, zinc ions are deposited on the even surface of the zinc current collector, taking in two electrons from the external circuit. This condition is reversed during the discharge process (Figure 3b). Their overall response is as follows:
ZnMn2O4 ⇔ xZn2+ + 2xe + Zn1−xMn2O4.

3. ZMO Modification Strategies by Characterization and Analysis Technology

ZMO is seen as a potential cathode material for ZIBs, but there are several difficulties that need to be overcome before it can be put into practical use. These challenges are as follows: (1) the dissolution of ZMO during cycling; (2) the formation of byproducts leading to the volume expansion of the cathode material and the deficiency of electrolyte; (3) the electrostatic repulsion between Zn2+ and ZMO crystals, affecting Zn2+. The intercalation/deintercalation and diffusion of ions are adversely affected. Therefore, researchers have developed various strategies, including designing different morphologies of ZMO, constructing ZMO-based composites, enlarging the interlayer spacing of ZMO, introducing oxygen deficiency of ZMO, and doping metal ions of ZMO, to overcome these challenges.

3.1. Design of Different Morphologies

In the past few years, various morphologies of ZMO, including hollow porous spheres, fibers, and rods, have been synthesized and applied to the cathode materials of ZIBs. Their morphology controls the physicochemical properties of cathode materials and determines their electron transport properties.
Wu et al. synthesized hollow porous ZMO using a polyvinyl pyrrolidone-dispersed solvothermal carbon template method with subsequent annealing, and then used it as a cathode for ZIBs [40]. An experiment conducted using galvanostatic charge–discharge showed that, with the inclusion of 0.05 mol·L−1 of MnSO4 in the electrolyte, a reversible discharge capacity of 106.5 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1 could be maintained for 300 cycles with no capacity decay. It maintained a high capacity of 70.2 mA·h·g−1 at a high current density of 3.2 A·g−1 (Figure 4a–c). The hollow porous ZMO spinel structure, combined with the residual carbon distribution, creates a synergistic effect that prevents Mn dissolution during charging and discharging, resulting in its superior cycling and rate performance. Shama et al. synthesized ZMO using a one-step hydrothermal method with zinc aniline, acetate, and potassium permanganate as precursors and used it as a cathode for ZIBs [41]. The specific capacitance, energy density, and power density obtained from galvanostatic charge discharge were 50.02 F·g−1, 140.68 Wh·kg−1, and 5.633 kW·kg−1 respectively. The capacitance of the material was found to be 50 F·g−1, with a 99.26% retention rate after the 25th cycle. Soundharrajan et al. conducted a comparative study of the electrochemical activity of a ZMO microrod cathode produced via a straightforward coprecipitation process in a 0.1 M MnSO4 (MS) solution, as an additive in a 1 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO4 (ZMS) electrolyte, and in a full-time 1 M ZnSO4 (ZS) electrolyte [42]. Utilizing super in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), systematic research has been conducted to explain the remarkable stability and reversibility of ZMO in ZMS electrolyte medium. The electrochemical equilibrium between Zn2+ and Mn2+ ions facilitates this excellent performance by stabilizing the Mn2+ additive in the Zn2+ (de)insertion in the electrolyte to reversibly electrodeposit/dissolve MnOx on the cathode surface and reversibly insert Zn into the undissolved surface MnOx layer (Figure 4d–f). Different morphologies affect the zinc storage properties of ZMO, and current research on ZMO morphologies mainly focuses on hollow porous spheres, fibers, and rods. Therefore, more morphologies of ZMO should be developed in future research to study its zinc storage mechanism.

3.2. Construction of ZMO-Based Composites

ZMO has large volume change, fast capacity attenuation, and poor rate performance during charging and discharging due to its inherent poor conductivity and slow reaction kinetics, which limits the practical application of ZMO in ZIBs. The electrochemical performance of the battery can be remarkably improved by the synergistic effect of complementary advantages among different materials. In this section, the research progress of ZMO composite with carbon-based materials, metal oxides, and MXenes is introduced.

3.2.1. Composite with Carbon Materials

The storage performance of ZMO electrodes for zinc ions is significantly hindered by their low electrical conductivity and the considerable volume change that occurs when ions are inserted and removed. Therefore, the combination of ZMO and carbon-based materials in composite electrodes has been shown to be an effective way of enhancing conductivity and enabling faster electron transfer. The carbon composite provides the dispersion position for active materials, reduces self-accumulation and aggregation, acts as a buffer layer, and stabilizes the crystal structure of ZMO, which greatly improves its electrochemical performance.
Graphene is a 2D form of carbon that is composed of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal honeycomb pattern. It is known for its excellent electrical conductivity and high electron mobility [43]. The graphene-containing nanocomposites form a conductive network and provide a buffer layer that effectively mitigates the volume expansion and self-aggregation of the active material, thereby enhancing cycle life and rate performance [8]. Chen et al. proposed the utilization of ZMO/N-doped graphene nanocomposite as the cathode material, which delivered a maximum discharge capacity of 221 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1 and a long cycle after 2500 cycles at 1 A·g−1 life of 97.4% [44]. The superior performance of this material is accredited to the combined effect of ultrafine ZMO nanoparticles (21 nm) and N-doped graphene dielectric. These components provide a rapid surface capacitive response, a minimal electron/ion transport path length, and a highly conductive dielectric. These features accelerate electron transport and fortify the composite structure to endure the volume increase during charging and discharging. Chen et al. prepared graphene-coated hollow ZMO microspheres (rGO@HM-ZMO) and used them as cathodes for ZIBs [45]. The addition of rGO increases the electronic conductivity and decreases the charge transfer resistance, while the hollow structure ameliorates the alteration of the crystal structure that occurs during successive Zn2+ insertion/extraction. The as-prepared rGO@HM-ZMO electrode demonstrated a remarkable specific discharge capacity of 146.9 mA·h·g−1 after 100 cycles with a current density of 0.3 A·g−1 and an impressive cycling stability with a capacity of 72.7 mA·h·g−1 without fading after 650 cycles at a higher current density of 1 A·g−1. Tao et al. synthesized nickel–cobalt co-substituted spinel ZMO nanoparticles uniformly loaded on N-doped rGO (ZnNixCoyMn2−x−yO4@N-rGO) using a one-step hydrothermal method and used them as a cathode for ZIBs [46]. The as-synthesized ZnNixCoyMn2−x−yO4@N-rGO demonstrated remarkable electrochemical properties, with a reversible capacity of 95.4 mA·h·g−1 when tested at 1 A·g−1, and a capacity retention ratio of 79% after 900 cycles. As the current density increased from 0.01 A·g−1 to 1.5 A·g−1, a high capacity of 200.5 mA·h·g−1 to 93.5 mA·h·g−1 was attained. This good electrochemical performance is accredited to the co-substitution of nickel and cobalt elements, which is an effective way to promote Zn2+ deintercalation and stabilize the spinel structure to suppress the Jahn–Teller distortion of Mn3+. Qiu et al. designed novel nitrogen-doped ZMO oxygen-rich defects (N-ZnMn2O4−x) on 3D vertical graphene (VG) to form N-ZnMn2O4−x@VG core/shell arrays as cathodes for ZIBs [47]. Taking advantage of its high surface area, abundant active sites, swift electron/ion diffusion, and strong structural stability, the constructed device demonstrated a significant specific capacity (222 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1) and good rate performance (maintaining 61.58% from 0.1 to 3 A·g−1) along with remarkable cycle life (retaining 92.6% after 3000 cycles at 1.0 A·g−1). It offered an outstanding energy density of 278 W·h·kg−1 and an impressive power density of 3.62 kW·kg−1. The as-assembled ZIBs demonstrated the ability to be autonomously energized to a voltage of 1.5 V following oxidization in a natural atmosphere for a duration of 30 h and presented an impressive specific capacity of up to 176.8 mA·h·g−1 when tested at 0.2 A·g−1. Yao et al. synthesized composites (ZMO NDs/rGO) of ultrafine ZnMn2O4 nanodots uniformly anchored on rGO with strong interfacial interactions [48]. The as-synthesized ZMO NDs/rGO composite exhibited an excellent discharge capacity of 207.6 mA·h·g−1 at a current density of 0.2 A·g−1, as well as improved rate capability and long cycling stability. The as-assembled aqueous Zn//ZnMO NDs/rGO battery displayed a high energy density of 266 W·h·kg−1 at a power density of 137 W·kg−1 (Figure 5a–c). The material is rich in active sites, which shortens the ion diffusion path, improves the electrical conductivity, and results in good structural stability. Electrochemical analysis showed that the composites have good reaction kinetics, which is conducive to the efficient storage of zinc ions.
ZMO has been compounded with graphene, porous carbon polyhedrons, carbon networks, carbon nanfoam paper, carbon framework, porous carbon nanospheres, and carbon nanotubes to modify the zinc storage properties of ZMO. Yang et al. reported an in situ Raman study that dynamically probed the phase and structural evolution of spinel ZMO-based cathodes during the charge–discharge process, where spinel ZMO nanoparticles were immobilized on porous carbon polyhedrons (PCPs) [49]. Studies conducted in the field suggest that the electrochemical process is due to the reversible phase transition of spinel ZMO and λ-type MnO2 when Zn2+ is inserted or extracted, which is caused by the oxidation and reduction of Mn3+/Mn4+ and the efficient transportation of carriers. The as-prepared ZMO@PCP composite as a cathode exhibits extraordinary long-term cyclic stability with a capacity retention of 90.3% after 2000 cycles and a high reversible capacity of 125.6 mA·h·g−1 at a current density of 1 A·g−1. Wang et al. designed a novel egg waffle-like structure which comprised double-shelled ZnMn2O4 hollow microspheres embedded in a 2D carbon network (ZMO@C), and then used it as a cathode for ZIBs [50]. The ZMO@C electrode exhibits a capacity of 481 mA·h·g−1 at 0.2 A·g−1 after 110 cycles with good cycling stability (Figure 5d–f). The remarkable cycling stability of the ZMO@C electrode was due to the combined effect of the double-shelled ZMO hollow microspheres, which provide enough space to accommodate the volume change caused by the insertion/deinsertion of Zn2+, as well as the 2D continuous conductive interconnected carbon network, which facilitates the rapid electron transfer and ensures a strong structural integrity. Islam et al. prepared manganese-deficient ZMO@C (Mn-d-ZMO@C) nanostructured anode materials prepared using ZnO-MnO@C self-assembly for in situ generation of ZIBs [51]. Results from analytical methods supported the porous and crystalline nature of ZnO-MnO@C, as well as the in situ production of Mn-deficient ZMO@C. The Zn/Mn-d-ZMO@C cell exhibited a promising capacity of 194 mA·h·g−1 at a current density of 0.1 A·g−1, with 84% capacity maintained after 2000 cycles (at 3 A·g−1 rate). Additionally, 86% capacity retention was retained even after 1 year (150 cycles) at 0.1 A·g−1 current density. The performance improvement of this cathode stemmed mainly from the in situ orientation, porosity, and carbon coating. First-principles calculations confirmed the high electronic conductivity of the Mn-d-ZMO@C cathode. Sassin et al. reported the “in situ” conversion of nano-sodalite Na+-MnOx@carbon nanfoam paper (CNF) to crystalline spinel ZMO@CNF, a manganese oxide polymorph that nominally contains Zn2+ insertion sites [52]. ZMO@CNF cathodes were treated in a double-ended cell under electrochemical conditions and characterized in situ using XRD, SEM, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It is evident that the primary discharge mechanism for ZMO is the combination of proton insertion and the formation of Zn4(OH)6SO4·xH2O, despite the presence of specific Zn2+ insertion sites. The protons become dissociated, resulting in the dissolution of Zn4(OH)6SO4 when it is charged. Deng et al. introduced ZMO quantum dots into the porous carbon skeleton using in situ electrochemically induced Mn-MIL-100-derived Mn3O4 quantum dots and carbon composites [53]. The incorporation of a quantum dot structure into a ZMO-carbon composite provided a shorter ion diffusion route and increased the availability of Zn2+ active sites. The conductive carbon skeleton facilitated the fast electron transport. In addition, Mn–O–C bonds were formed at the interface between the ZMO quantum dots and the carbon matrix. This could effectively suppress the Jahn–Teller effect of the discharge products and the dissolution of manganese. Thus, ZMO QD@C displayed enhanced reaction kinetics, high specific capacity of 320.6 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1, and superior cycling stability of 1500 cycles with 86.4% capacity retention at 1 A·g−1. Jia et al. reported ultrafine ZnO-MnO composite nanoparticles embedded in porous carbon nanospheres as the cathode for ZIBs [54]. ZMO-MnOOH/C NSs (ZMO-MOH/C NSs) with ultrafine structure and porous conductive carbon skeleton, which were generated in situ from ZnO-MnO/C NSs, show enhanced electrical conductivity due to the shortened Zn2+ diffusion paths after in situ aging treatment. Moreover, The ZMO·MOH/C NSs experience a gradual enlargement during the electrochemical reaction, which reduces the drastic volume increase and guarantees the overall stability of the particle. Consequently, The ZMO-MOH/C NSs cathode offers a remarkable discharge capacity of 336.7 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1, and its long-term stability is remarkable, with only a 20.9% capacity loss after 1000 cycles at 1 A·g−1. Gao et al. used a one-step hydrothermal method to rationalize the synthesis of ZMO nanoparticles (~20 nm) on carbon nanotube (ZMO/CNTs) heterostructures to achieve stable high-rate storage of Zn2+ [55]. The high electrical conductivity of CNTs and minuscule ZMOs is advantageous for rapid electron transport, thus resulting in the ZMO/CNT composites having a high degree of conductivity. In addition, the combination of the pliable CNT lattice and the powerful Mn–O–C bond between ZMO and CNTs can effectively impede the irreversible structural deterioration. Accordingly, The ZMO/CNT composite exhibited a promising initial capacity of 220.3 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1 and maintained a high capacity retention of 97.01% after 2000 cycles at 3 A·g−1 (Figure 5g–i).
Figure 5. (a) TEM of ZMO NDs/rGO composite. (b) Comparison of the rate performance between this work and other reported cathode materials for ZIBs. (c) Long-term cycling stability of the ZMO NDs/rGO composite, pure ZMO microspheres, and rGO electrodes for 400 cycles at a high rate of 1 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [48], Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (d) SEM of ZMO@C composite. (e) The rate performance at different current densities and cycling performance of ZMO and ZMO@C. (f) Charge and discharge curves at different current densities. Reproduced with permission from [50], Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (g) TEM of ZMO/CNT composite. (h) Cycling performance at 1000 mA·g−1 of ZMO/CNTs and pure ZMO electrodes. (i) Long-life performance of ZMO/CNTs electrode at 3 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [55], Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 5. (a) TEM of ZMO NDs/rGO composite. (b) Comparison of the rate performance between this work and other reported cathode materials for ZIBs. (c) Long-term cycling stability of the ZMO NDs/rGO composite, pure ZMO microspheres, and rGO electrodes for 400 cycles at a high rate of 1 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [48], Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (d) SEM of ZMO@C composite. (e) The rate performance at different current densities and cycling performance of ZMO and ZMO@C. (f) Charge and discharge curves at different current densities. Reproduced with permission from [50], Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (g) TEM of ZMO/CNT composite. (h) Cycling performance at 1000 mA·g−1 of ZMO/CNTs and pure ZMO electrodes. (i) Long-life performance of ZMO/CNTs electrode at 3 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [55], Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 28 04459 g005
In summary, ZMO has been compounded with graphene, various forms of carbon materials, and CNT to enhance its electrical conductivity and, thus, improve its cycling and rate performance. Despite some progress, the complex phase transformation of ZMO during the insertion/extraction of Zn2+ has led to some structural degradation, making the long-term cycling performance of ZMO at high rates still unsatisfactory.

3.2.2. Composite with Metal Oxides

Some metal oxides compounded with ZMO can improve its zinc storage capacity and improve its cyclic stability. Yang et al. prepared ZMO/Mn2O3 composites using a surfactant-assisted solvothermal method and annealed them at 600 °C for 4 h in air [56]. When used as a cathode for ZIBs, the initial discharge capacity of 82.6 mA·h·g−1 at 0.5 A·g−1 could be reached even after 300 cycles using only 1 mol·L−1 ZnSO4 as the electrolyte, and an impressive reversible capacity of 111.9 mA·h·g−1 could still be obtained. It also exhibited a capacity as high as 42.1 mA·h·g−1 when the current density increased to 3.2 A·g−1. The synergistic effect of ZMO and Mn2O3, the ultrafast ion transport properties, and the small self-discharge phenomenon are the primary reasons for the good cyclability and remarkable rate performance of ZMO and Mn2O3. Ma et al. reported ZMO/Mn2O3 bicomponent nanorods obtained on the basis of calcination of metal–organic skeleton-derived 2-methylimidazole zinc salt (ZIF-8)/Mn2O3 nanocomposites as cathodes for ZIBs [57]. The as-prepared ZMO/Mn2O3 demonstrated a reversible discharge capacity of 230 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1 after 120 cycles and a high capacity of 80 mA·h·g−1 at a large current density of 1 A·g−1. The synergistic effect of ZnMn2O4 and Mn2O3 is the main reason for its good zinc storage properties. Qin et al. used hydrothermal reaction and subsequent sintering process to prepare ZMO nanoparticles with a coating of Cu0-doped CuO (ZMO/CuO) [58]. The Cu0-doped CuO coating exhibited the synergistic effect of two-phase composites, which effectively enhanced the conductivity and charge/discharge electrochemical properties of the composites. The ZMO/CuO composite was identified as a suitable cathode material for ZIBs, exhibiting a discharge-specific capacity of 150 mA·h·g−1 after an activation process at 0.3 mA·g−1 and a capacity of 118 mA·h·g−1 at a current density of 2 A·g−1. Additionally, the Coulomb efficiency was maintained at a high level of 96% or above throughout the cycles. Zeng et al. used a two-step metal–organic backbone (MOF) template method to synthesize heterogeneous Mn2O3-ZMO hollow octahedra (MO-ZMO HOs) for the storage of zinc ions [59]. The advantageous combination of distinct chemistry and architecture enabled the MO-ZMO HO electrode to demonstrate a considerable rechargeable capacity of 247.4 mA·h·g−1, resulting in an impressive energy density of 305.4 W·h·kg−1. The MO-ZMO HO electrode exhibited improved rate performance and extended cycle life, with a capacity retention of 93.3% after 2000 cycles (Figure 6a–c). Multiple allosteric characterizations confirmed the reversible insertion and extraction reaction mechanism of Zn2+ in MO-ZMO HOs and verified their good structural stability.
ZMO can also be compounded with MXene to improve its cycling performance. Shi et al. investigated in depth the phase and structural evolution of spinel ZMO through in situ and ex situ studies, which are closely related to the reversible phase transition of spinel ZMO with MnO2 during charging and discharging, and the formation of irreversible ZnO inactive byproducts leads to capacity loss after multiple cycles [60]. They designed and synthesized Ti–Mxene (Ti3C2Tx)-stabilized 3D assemblies of ZMO nanoparticles, in which highly conductive Ti3C2Tx scaffolds effectively inhibited the irreversible structural degradation and side-reactions of spinel ZMO. Thus, the ZMO@Ti3C2Tx composite cathode demonstrated an impressive reversible specific capacity, superior rate capability, and remarkable cyclic stability (with a capacity retention of 92.4% after 5000 cycles) (Figure 6d–f).
Despite some advancements in the combination of ZMO with metal oxides and MXenes, the extended-term cycling performance of ZMO in aqueous solutions has yet to be improved due to certain irreversible electrochemical reactions that occur during the process of Zn2+ insertion/extraction. Therefore, finding the right material to compound is particularly important.

3.3. Enlarging the Interlayer Spacing of ZMO

ZMO is seen as a promising material for cathodes in ZIBs; however, the interfacial charge transfer resistance of divalent Zn2+ is typically high, thus slowing the transfer rate of Zn2+ at the junction between the cathode and electrolyte. Enlarging the layer spacing is considered to be an effective method to solve this challenge. Wu et al. synthesized spinel ZMO with the presence of water between the layers via a scalable low-temperature process, which remarkably overcame the problem of high resistance to interfacial charge transfer [61]. ZMO was found to have outstanding electrochemical performance when used for Zn storage, with a high capacity of 230 mA·h·g−1 at 0.5 A·g−1 and 101 mA·h·g−1 at 8 A·g−1, as well as a high specific energy/specific power of 329 W·h·kg−1/706 W·kg−1 and 134 W·h·kg−1/11,160 W·kg−1, respectively. Furthermore, it was observed to retain 75% of its capacity after 2000 cycles at 4 A·g−1. The ZMO-450 sample, which was created by heat posttreatment of ZMO at 450 °C and which lacked structural water, displayed a restricted discharge capacity of 45 and 15 mA·h·g−1 at 0.5 and 8 A·g−1, respectively (Figure 7a–c). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy revealed that the presence of abundant structural water in ZMO facilitates the insertion of Zn2+, thus reducing the activation energy barrier and accelerating the Zn2+ storage interface dynamics. The Zn2+ participation in the charge–discharge process was highly reversible using the abundant structural water in ZMO, as characterized by XRD and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Wu et al. proposed a strategy design for the preparation of nanostructured MnO/Mn3O4 materials using glucose as an intermediary, which was then converted into lattice-extended ZnxMn2O4 nanoparticles via electrochemical activation [62]. The swollen structure of ZnxMn2O4 can better accommodate Zn2+ and H+ ions and undergo reversible lattice expansion/contraction during charge/discharge. Accordingly, the lattice-expanded ZnxMn2O4 demonstrated improved cycle performance after 2000 cycles at 1 A·g−1, with a capacity of 121 mA·h·g−1; this was significantly higher than the parent MnO2 (63 mA·h·g−1) and crystalline ZMO (58 mA·h·g−1).
Increasing the layer spacing of spinel ZMO is anticipated to be an effective method to create dependable electroactive materials for ZIBs, in accordance with these research findings. However, research work in this area is relatively scarce, which should be enhanced in the subsequent studies of zinc storage in ZMO.

3.4. Introducing Deficiencies into ZMO

The introduction of defects is considered to be a powerful technique for imparting multiple functions to materials. Defect engineering has emerged as an active strategy to improve the inherent electrochemical reactivity and structural stability of ZIBs, where defects in ZMO can improve their electrical conductivity to enhance zinc storage. Zhang et al. reported the utilization of nonstoichiometric ZMO/carbon composite as a novel inserted Zn cathode material in aqueous phase Zn(CF3SO3)2 electrolyte [65]. In 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 solution, 100% galvanization/zinc stripping efficiency could be achieved with long cycle stability and inhibition of Mn dissolution; spinel/carbon hybrids exhibited reversible capacity of 150 mA·g−1 and capacity retention of 94% over 500 cycles at a high rate of 0.5 A·g−1. A comprehensive suite of electrochemical measurements, XRD, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis revealed that the spinel structure is structurally robust with a small particle size and a high concentration of cation vacancies, facilitating efficient charge transfer and zinc insertion, resulting in remarkable electrode performance. Zhang et al. explored the kinetics of Zn2+ insertion/extraction in the OD-ZMO lattice by carefully extracting the oxygen anion from the ZMO cathode (OD-ZMO) [66]. Experimental and computational results showed that the oxygen defect has a well-modulated effect on the electronic conductivity, Zn2+ diffusion kinetics, and the energy barrier of Zn migration. The ZMO cathode, which was constructed with an oxygen-deficient composition and was protected structurally by the conductive poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), displayed a remarkable capacity of 221 mA·h·g−1 when tested at 0.5 mA·cm−2. An all-solid-state ZIBs with great flexibility was presented, exhibiting an energy density of 273.4 W·h·kg−1. Qiu et al. developed a new type of N-doped coupled oxygen vacancy-modulated ZMO nanotube arrays (N-ZMO NTAs) as an effective cathode for ZIBs [67]. Taking advantage of their advantageous properties such as high electrical conductivity, rapid ion diffusion, high surface area, plentiful active sites, and a secure hollow nanotube structure, N-ZMO NTAs displayed an outstanding capacity (223 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1), good rate capability (133.3 mA·h·g−1 at 4 A·g−1), and impressive long-term durability (92.1% after 1500 cycles). A quasi-solid-state zinc-ion battery (ZIBs) was developed using a N-ZMO NTA cathode, offering outstanding energy density (214.6 W·h·kg−1), remarkable power density (4 kW·kg−1), and impressive durability (88.6% after 1500 cycles). Huang et al. prepared mesoporous ZMO nanocages (N-ZMO) containing nitrogen doping and oxygen vacancies as high-performance cathode materials for ZIBs via defect engineering and rational structural design [63]. The presence of oxygen vacancies increased the electrical conductivity of the material, while nitrogen doping reduced the strong electrostatic force of the material, thus preserving its structural integrity. Thus, N-ZMO displayed excellent ability of Zn2+ storage (225.4 mA·h·g−1 at 0.3 A·g−1) with a good rate and stable cycling performance (88.4 mA·h·g−1 after 1000 cycles at 3 A·g−1). The quasi-solid-state devices were highly flexible and possess a remarkable energy density of 261.6 W·h·kg−1, with an impressive capacity retention of 87.5% at 3 A·g−1 after 1000 cycles (Figure 7d–f). Mallick et al. rationally designed and prepared defect-rich ternary spinel Zn0.65Ni0.58Mn1.75O4 with electrochemical activity, in which Mn3+ and Zn2+ were partially replaced by Ni2+/3+ [68]. The increase in ionic vacancies and tunnel size facilitated the smooth diffusion of Zn2+ ions. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations showed that the transformation of semiconductor non-defective ZMO into metallic ZMO ensures enhanced electronic conductivity and facilitates the storage of Zn2+ ions. Thus, the as-prepared Zn0.65Ni0.58Mn1.75O4 delivered a specific capacity as high as 265 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1 and a twofold improvement in the specific capacity after 5000 cycles. A 1 year self-discharge study exhibited that the device retained 63% of its initial performance.
Although the above research work used defective strategies to improve the Zn2+ storage property of ZMO cathode materials, the cycling stability of ZMO materials is limited, and achieving high cycling stability is difficult.

3.5. Doping Metal Ions of ZMO

The doping of heteroions with different valence states can introduce additional defects to effectively modulate the electrochemical properties. Similarly, this strategy can be used to stabilize the ZMO and increase its zinc storage capacity. Shao et al. developed double-doped ZMO (K, Fe-ZMO) as the anode material for ZIBs by modifying the crystal structure with doped Fe and low-valent K [64]. Specifically, the K, Fe-ZMO showed a high specific capacity of 221.2 mA·h·g−1 at 0.1 A·g−1 after 50 cycles and a capacity retention of 88.1% after 500 cycles at 1.0 A·g−1 (Figure 7g–i). DFT analysis revealed that double doping and oxygen defects could catalyze electron redistribution, resulting in increased conductivity and subsequently improved reaction kinetics and electrochemical properties of K, Fe-ZMO. The modification also reduced the formation energy, thereby effectively stabilizing the Mn-O and Fe-O bonds of K and Fe-ZMO and alleviating the dissolution of manganese. The increase in electronic conductivity and the decrease in electrostatic repulsion caused by doping and defects alike played a key role in promoting the reversible insertion/deinsertion of Zn2+ ions in ZMO, providing long-term cycling stability. However, relevant reports in this area are relatively scarce, which should be of interest in subsequent studies.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

In recent years, great progress has been made in the synthesis, characterization, electronic structure, and excellent properties of ZMO-based ZIBs. This review first briefly introduced the zinc storage mechanism of ZMO, and then reviewed the recent research progress in improving the interlayer spacing, structural stability, and diffusivity of ZMO, including the introduction of different intercalated ions, introduction of defects, design of different morphologies, and combination with other materials (Table 1). However, the development of ZMO-based ZIBs is still in its infancy, and many fundamental issues need to be urgently addressed to meet future industrial applications. Therefore, accelerating the development of high-performance ZMO-based ZIBs requires sufficient attention to the following aspects:
1. Energy storage mechanisms play an important role in guiding the design of ZMO-based materials. Many energy storage mechanisms have been proposed, but no consensus has been reached. Therefore, more high-resolution in situ characterization techniques and various electrochemical methods, as well as the development of accurate theoretical calculations, are needed to provide further evidence for the elucidation of the real storage mechanism of ZMO-based materials, which is important for the application of ZMO-based materials in ZIBs cathodes.
2. ZMO-based cathode materials can be continuously dissolved in the electrolyte solution. Therefore, an effective and novel strategy, such as incorporating additives to the electrolyte, altering the pH of the electrolyte, and forming a protective layer on the surface of the ZMO-based cathode, must be developed to prevent manganese dissolution. In aqueous solutions, the capacity of ZMO decreases mainly due to the structural transformation caused by the dissolution of the active material and the disproportionation reaction of Mn3+. This side reaction can be suppressed by adding Mn2+ salt in advance to the electrolyte. The introduction of Mn2+ alters the balance between the dissolution and reoxidation of Mn2+. It aids in the creation of a consistent, non-crystalline protective coating on the cathode electrode, thus preserving its integrity.
3. The low conductivity of ZMO-based cathode materials limits the rate capability of the ZIBs. On the basis of these issues, strategies, such as compounding with conductive carbon-based materials (e.g., CNTs, acetylene black, carbon black, and graphene), surface coating, electrolyte optimization, and combination with conductive polymers (e.g., PANI and PEDOT), can enhance the conductivity and performance of electrodes. In addition to inorganic cathode materials, organic cathode materials, which have abundant precursors and adjustable structures, may be desirable for nonaqueous and aqueous ZIBs systems in the future.
4. The successful fabrication of ZMO-based ZIBs requires the selection of suitable anodes, electrolytes, current collectors, and binders. An appropriate separator design can ensure a consistent flow of Zn2+ ions, while a well-made collector with a good connection to the electrode can significantly enhance the electrode’s stability. However, there are few studies focusing on functional separators and current collectors. It is essential to develop separators with excellent mechanical strength, thermal stability, and electrolyte wettability, and the production methods must be efficient and ecofriendly to satisfy the practical uses of ZIBs. In terms of current collectors, the advancement of polymer-based materials and structures that are both flexible and conductive, enabling the customization of mechanical and electrical properties, is essential for the future progress of flexible ZIBs.
In summary, the progress of ZIBs requires further systematic and scientific research. The ongoing search for and improvement of new cathode and anode materials and electrolytes are of paramount importance. Polymer electrolytes in solid or gel form offer a promising solution to various issues associated with ZIBs, such as cathode dissolution, zinc corrosion, passivation, and dendrite growth. These electrolytes have the potential to be used in the production of flexible and wearable devices in the future. ZIBs offer a number of advantages, such as affordability, ecological sustainability, and safety advantages, making them a potentially attractive option.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, X.M.; writing—review and editing, Z.C.; visualization, L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2021JQ-760 and 2021JQ-756) and the Key R&D program of the Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province (2023-YBNY-115).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2021JQ-760 and 2021JQ-756) and the Key R&D program of Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province (2023-YBNY-115).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Obama, B. The irreversible momentum of clean energy. Science 2017, 355, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Carley, S.; Konisky, D.M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schill, W.P. Electricity storage and the renewable energy transition. Joule 2020, 4, 2059–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, M.; Leng, M.; Pan, W.; Wang, Y.; Tan, S.; Jiao, Y.; Yu, S.; Fan, S.; Xu, T.; Liu, T.; et al. 3D wearable piezoresistive sensor with waterproof and antibacterial activity for multimodal smart sensing. Nano Energy 2023, 112, 108492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, J.; Huang, Z.; Ming, F.; Zeng, Y.; Wei, B.; Jiang, Q.; Qi, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liang, H. Surface and Interface Engineering of Zn Anodes in Aqueous Rechargeable Zn-Ion Batteries. Small 2022, 18, 2200006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Qin, J.; Huang, Y. Strategies of regulating Zn2+ solvation structures for dendrite-free and side reaction-suppressed zinc-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 499–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, D.; Li, L.; Zhang, W.; Cao, M.; Qiu, H.; Ji, X. Research progress on electrolytes for fast-charging lithium-ion batteries. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 34, 107122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, D.; Tan, C.; Ou, T.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Ji, X. Constructing Advanced Electrode Materials for Low-temperature Lithium-ion batteries. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 4525–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, D.; Tan, C.; Zhang, W.; Pan, W.; Wang, Q.; Li, L. Expanded-graphite-based materials for supercapacitors: A review. Molecules 2022, 27, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, L.; Zhang, D.; Deng, J.; Gou, Y.; Fang, J.; Cui, H.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, M. Carbon-based materials for fast charging lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 2021, 183, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, D.; Li, L.; Zhang, W.; Cao, M.; Qiu, H.; Ji, X. Synthesis of expanded graphite-based materials for application in lithium-based batteries. J. Energy Storage 2023, 60, 106678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shahriari, S.; Mollaamin, F.; Monajjemi, M. Increasing the Performance of {[(1-x-y) LiCo0.3Cu0.7] (Al and Mg doped)]O2}, xLi2MnO3, yLiCoO2 Composites as Cathode Material in Lithium-Ion Battery: Synthesis and Characterization. Micromachines 2023, 14, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, L.; Min, X.; Monajjemi, M. A Novel Cathode Material Synthesis and Thermal Characterization of (1-x-y)LiCo1/3Ti1/3Fe1/3PO4, xLi2MnPO4, yLiFePO4 Composites for Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIBs). Molecules 2022, 27, 8486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Y.; Kang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Liang, Z.; He, X.; Li, X.; Tavajohi, N.; et al. A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: The issues, strategies, and testing standards. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 59, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Quilty, C.D.; Wu, D.; Li, W.; Bock, D.C.; Wang, L.; Housel, L.M.; Abraham, A.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, E.S. Electron and Ion Transport in Lithium and Lithium-Ion Battery Negative and Positive Composite Electrodes. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 1327–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Y.; Lu, X.; Lai, F.; Liu, T.; Shearing, P.R.; Parkin, I.P.; He, G.; Brett, D.J.L. Rechargeable aqueous Zn-based energy storage devices. Joule 2021, 5, 2845–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zampardi, G.; Mantia, F.L. Lanthanum nitrate as aqueous electrolyte additive for favourable zinc metal electrodeposition. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Jia, S.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, C. Improved strategies for separators in zinc ion batteries. ChemSusChem 2023, 16, e202202330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, L.; Jia, S.; Cao, M.; Ji, Y.; Qiu, H.; Zhang, D. Research progress of “rocking chair” type zinc-ion batteries with zinc metal-free anodes. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 108307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, L.; Jia, S.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, C. Improved strategies for ammonium vanadate-based zinc ion batteries. Nanoscale 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, L.; Jia, S.; Cao, M.; Ji, Y.; Qiu, H.; Zhang, D. Research progress on transition metal sulfide-based materials as cathode materials for zinc-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2023, 67, 107614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meng, X.; Wang, J.; Li, L. Layered-oxide cathode materials for fast-charging lithium-ion batteries: A review. Molecules 2023, 28, 4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jia, X.; Liu, C.; Neale, Z.G.; Yang, J.; Cao, G. Active Materials for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries: Synthesis, Crystal Structure, Morphology, and Electrochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7795–7866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yi, T.F.; Qiu, L.; Qu, J.P.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhu, Y.R. Towards high-performance cathodes: Design and energy storage mechanism of vanadium oxides-based materials for aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2021, 446, 214124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, X.; Ni, W.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Wu, B.; Xu, G.; Wei, X.; Yang, L. Water-Processable and Multiscale-Designed Vanadium Oxide Cathodes with Predominant Zn2+ Intercalation Pseudocapacitance toward High Gravimetric/Areal/Volumetric Capacity. Small 2022, 18, 2105796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, Y.; Wu, X. Strategies for constructing manganese-based oxide electrode materials for aqueous rechargeable zinc-ion batteries. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, H.; Zhou, W.; Chen, D.; Liu, J.; Yuan, Z.; Lu, M.; Shen, L.; Shulga, V.; Han, W.; Chao, D. The origin of capacity fluctuation and rescue of dead Mn-based Zn-ion batteries: A Mn-based competitive capacity evolution protocol. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zampardi, G.; Mantia, F.L. Prussian blue analogues as aqueous Zn-ion batteries electrodes: Current challenges and future perspectives. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Z.; Liu, T.; Meng, R.; Gao, L.; Zou, Y.; Peng, P.; Shao, Y.; Liang, X. Insights into the Structure Stability of Prussian Blue for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Mater. 2021, 4, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Ma, W.; Zhu, J.; Song, W. Application of Carbon Materials in Aqueous Zinc Ion Energy Storage Devices. Small 2021, 17, 2100219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, L.; Dong, Y. Recent progress of carbon nanomaterials for high-performance cathodes and anodes in aqueous zinc ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 41, 715–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Hong, H.; Li, H.; Huang, Z.; Liang, G.; Yang, Q.; Zhi, C. Insight on Organic Molecules in Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries with an Emphasis on the Zn Anode Regulation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2102707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. He, G.; Liu, Y.; Gray, D.E.; Othon, J. Conductive polymer composites cathodes for rechargeable aqueous Zn-ion batteries: A mini-review. J. Compos. Commun. 2021, 27, 100882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, W.S.V.; Xiong, T.; Wang, X.; Xue, J. Unraveling MoS2 and Transition Metal Dichalcogenides as Functional Zinc-Ion Battery Cathode: A Perspective. Small Methods 2021, 5, 2000815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Boruah, B.D.; Wen, B.; Volder, M.D. Molybdenum Disulfide—Zinc Oxide Photocathodes for Photo-Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 16616–16624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, Y.; Shi, H.; Wu, Z.S. Recent Advances and Promise of MXene-Based Nanostructures for High-Performance Metal Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, P.; Liu, W.; Liu, K. Rational modulation of emerging MXene materials for zinc-ion storage. Carbon Energy 2022, 4, 60–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hao, J.; Yuan, L.; Chao, Y.; Chao, D.; Davey, K.; Guo, Z.; Qiao, S.Z. Boosting Zinc Electrode Reversibility in Aqueous Electrolytes by Using Low-Cost Antisolvents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7366–7375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fenta, F.W.; Olbasa, B.W.; Tsai, M.C.; Weret, M.A.; Zegeye, T.A.; Huang, C.J.; Huang, W.H.; Zeleke, T.S.; Sahalie, N.A.; Pao, C.W.; et al. Electrochemical transformation reaction of Cu-MnO in aqueous rechargeable zinc-ion batteries for high performance and long cycle life. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 17595–17607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, X.; Xiang, Y.; Peng, Q.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Tang, F.; Song, R.; Liu, Z.; He, Z.; Wu, X. Green-low-cost rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries using hollow porous spinel ZnMn2O4 as the cathode material. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 17990–17997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sharma, M.; Sharma, R. Zn-ion batteries: ZnMn2O4 as cathode material. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 3378–3385. [Google Scholar]
  42. Soundharrajan, V.; Sambandam, B.; Kim, S.; Islam, S.; Jo, J.; Kim, S.; Mathew, V.; Sun, Y.K.; Kim, J. The dominant role of Mn2+ additive on the electrochemical reaction in ZnMn2O4 cathode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 28, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, L.; Zhang, D.; Deng, J.; Gou, Y.; Fang, J. Review—Preparation and Application of Graphene-Based Hybrid Materials through Electrochemical Exfoliation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 086511. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen, L.; Yang, Z.; Qin, H.; Zeng, X.; Meng, J. Advanced electrochemical performance of ZnMn2O4/N-doped graphene hybrid as cathode material for zinc ion battery. J. Power Sources 2019, 425, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, L.; Yang, Z.; Qin, H.; Zeng, X.; Meng, J.; Chen, H. Graphene-wrapped hollow ZnMn2O4 microspheres for high-performance cathode materials of aqueous zinc ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 317, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tao, Y.; Li, Z.; Tang, L.; Pu, X.; Cao, T.; Cheng, D.; Xu, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Nickel and cobalt Co-substituted spinel ZnMn2O4@N-rGO for increased capacity and stability as a cathode material for rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion battery. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qiu, W.; Lin, Z.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, G.; Gao, H.; Feng, H.; Lu, X. Construction of chemical self-charging zinc ion batteries based on defect coupled nitrogen modulation of zinc manganite vertical graphene arrays. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 6694–6702. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yao, Z.; Cai, D.; Cui, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhan, H. Strongly coupled zinc manganate nanodots and graphene composite as an advanced cathode material for aqueous zinc ion batteries. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 11237–11245. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang, C.; Han, M.; Yan, H.; Li, F.; Shi, M.; Zhao, L. In-situ probing phase evolution and electrochemical mechanism of ZnMn2O4 nanoparticles anchored on porous carbon polyhedrons in high-performance aqueous Zn-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 452, 227826. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Yuan, G.; Wang, B.; Bai, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, G. Double-shell zinc manganate hollow microspheres embedded in carbon networks as cathode materials for high–performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2020, 580, 528–539. [Google Scholar]
  51. Islam, S.; Alfaruqi, M.H.; Putro, D.Y.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Ahmed, M.S.; Mathew, V.; Sun, Y.K.; Hwang, J.Y.; et al. In Situ Oriented Mn Deficient ZnMn2O4@C Nanoarchitecture for Durable Rechargeable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2002636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sassin, M.B.; Helms, M.E.; Parker, J.F.; Chervin, C.N.; DeBlock, R.H.; Ko, J.S.; Rolison, D.R.; Long, J.W. Elucidating zinc-ion battery mechanisms in freestanding carbon electrode architectures decorated with nanocrystalline ZnMn2O4. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2730–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Deng, S.; Tie, Z.; Yue, F.; Cao, H.; Yao, M.; Niu, Z. Rational Design of ZnMn2O4 Quantum Dots in a Carbon Framework for Durable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 134, e202115877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jia, H.; Li, Y.; Ali, U.; Li, Y.; Hao, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, C.; Li, L.; Wang, H.G. In-situ formation of ultrafine ZnMn2O4-MnOOH composite nanoparticles embedded into porous carbon nanospheres for stable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 592, 153279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gao, F.; Mei, B.; Xu, X.; Ren, J.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y. Rational design of ZnMn2O4 nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes for high-rate and durable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 448, 137742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, S.; Zhang, M.; Wu, X.; Wu, X.; Zeng, F.; Li, Y.; Duan, S.; Fan, D.; Yang, Y.; Wu, X. The excellent electrochemical performances of ZnMn2O4/Mn2O3: The composite cathode material for potential aqueous zinc ion batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 832, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, S.C.; Sun, M.; Wang, S.X.; Li, D.S.; Liu, W.; Liu, M.; Ren, M.; Kong, F.G.; Wang, S.J.; Xia, Y.M. Zinc manganate/manganic oxide bi-component nanorod as excellent cathode for zinc-ion battery. Scr. Mater. 2021, 194, 113707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qin, L.; Zhu, Q.; Li, L.; Fang, G.; Li, S.; Cheng, H.; Guo, W.; Gao, H. Improved electrochemical performance of ZnMn2O4/CuO composite as cathode materials for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Ionics 2021, 27, 4783–4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zeng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Q.; Pei, Z.; Luan, D.; Zhang, X.; Lou, X. Rationally Designed Mn2O3–ZnMn2O4 Hollow Heterostructures from Metal-Organic Frameworks for Stable Zn-Ion Storage. Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 25997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shi, M.; Wang, B.; Shen, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, J.; Su, Y.; Narayanasamy, M.; Angaiah, S.; Yan, C.; Peng, Q. 3D assembly of MXene-stabilized spinel ZnMn2O4 for highly durable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wu, T.H.; Liang, W.Y. Reduced Intercalation Energy Barrier by Rich Structural Water in Spinel ZnMn2O4 for High-Rate Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 23822–23832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wu, T.H.; Huang, C.C.; Cheng, S.L.; Lin, C.C. Expanded spinel ZnxMn2O4 induced by electrochemical activation of glucose-mediated manganese oxide for stable cycle performance in zinc−ion batteries. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2020, 617, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Shen, G. Coupling N-doping and rich oxygen vacancies in mesoporous ZnMn2O4 nanocages toward advanced aqueous zinc ion batteries. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 8118–8127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, T.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Structural Regulation of ZnMn2O4 cathode material by K, Fe-Double doping to improve its rate and cycling stability for rechargeable aqueous zinc-based batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, N.; Cheng, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Lei, K.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, J. Cation-Deficient Spinel ZnMn2O4 Cathode in Zn(CF3SO3)2 Electrolyte for Rechargeable Aqueous Zn-Ion Battery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12894–12901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; He, W.; Lai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yu, M.; Tong, Y.; Lu, X. Extracting oxygen anions from ZnMn2O4: Robust cathode for flexible all-solid-state Zn-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 21, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qiu, W.; Xiao, H.; Feng, H.; Lin, Z.; Gao, H.; He, W.; Lu, X. Defect modulation of ZnMn2O4 nanotube arrays as high-rate and durable cathode for flexible quasi-solid-state zinc ion battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 422, 129890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mallick, S.; Choutipalli, V.S.K.; Bag, S.; Subramanian, V.; Raj, C.R. Defect Engineered Ternary Spinel: An Efficient Cathode for an Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Battery of Long-Term Cyclability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 37577–37586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Ragone plot of some electrochemical energy storage devices. (b) Schematic illustration of the working principle of zinc-ion battery. Reproduced with permission from [23], Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) Comparison of potential and specific capacitance of metal-ion (Li+, Na+, K+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and Al3+) batteries.
Figure 1. (a) Ragone plot of some electrochemical energy storage devices. (b) Schematic illustration of the working principle of zinc-ion battery. Reproduced with permission from [23], Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) Comparison of potential and specific capacitance of metal-ion (Li+, Na+, K+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and Al3+) batteries.
Molecules 28 04459 g001
Figure 2. Summary of the research progress of zinc manganate materials.
Figure 2. Summary of the research progress of zinc manganate materials.
Molecules 28 04459 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of (a) ZMO crystal structure, and (b) the charge−discharge process of ZIBs based on ZMO cathode.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of (a) ZMO crystal structure, and (b) the charge−discharge process of ZIBs based on ZMO cathode.
Molecules 28 04459 g003
Figure 4. (a) TEM of ZMO. (b) The cycling performance of ZMO/Zn at 100 mA·g−1 with different electrolytes. (c) The rate performance of ZMO/Zn at different current densities based on 1 mol·L−1 of ZnSO4 with 0.05 mol·L−1 of MnSO4 in the range of 0.8−1.9 V. Reproduced with permission from [40], Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) SEM of porous ZMO microrods. Cyclability curve for porous ZMO microrods at (e) 1 A·g−1 and (f) 2 A·g−1 rate. Reproduced with permission from [42], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 4. (a) TEM of ZMO. (b) The cycling performance of ZMO/Zn at 100 mA·g−1 with different electrolytes. (c) The rate performance of ZMO/Zn at different current densities based on 1 mol·L−1 of ZnSO4 with 0.05 mol·L−1 of MnSO4 in the range of 0.8−1.9 V. Reproduced with permission from [40], Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) SEM of porous ZMO microrods. Cyclability curve for porous ZMO microrods at (e) 1 A·g−1 and (f) 2 A·g−1 rate. Reproduced with permission from [42], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Molecules 28 04459 g004
Figure 6. (a) TEM of MO-ZMO Hos. (b) Rate performance based on discharging curves. (c) Cycling performance tested at a current density of 3 A·g−1 of the MO-ZMO HOs, MO HOs, and ZMO HOs electrodes. Reproduced with permission from [59], Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. (d) FESEM of ZMO@Ti3C2Tx composite. (e) Galvanostatic charge−discharge curve at a current density of 0.1 A·g−1. (f) Rate capability at various current densities from 0.1 to 4 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [60], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 6. (a) TEM of MO-ZMO Hos. (b) Rate performance based on discharging curves. (c) Cycling performance tested at a current density of 3 A·g−1 of the MO-ZMO HOs, MO HOs, and ZMO HOs electrodes. Reproduced with permission from [59], Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. (d) FESEM of ZMO@Ti3C2Tx composite. (e) Galvanostatic charge−discharge curve at a current density of 0.1 A·g−1. (f) Rate capability at various current densities from 0.1 to 4 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [60], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Molecules 28 04459 g006
Figure 7. (a) SEM of ZMO-450. (b) Charge/discharge profiles of ZMO measured at 0.5 A·g−1 in 1 M ZnSO4 with 0.1 M MnSO4. (c) Cycle performance of ZMO and ZMO-450 measured at 4 A·g−1 in 1 M ZnSO4 with 0.1 M MnSO4 and the corresponding Coulombic efficiency of ZMO. Reproduced with permission from [61] Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (d) SEM of N-ZMO. (e) Discharge/charge profiles at 0.3 A·g−1. (f) Cycling performance of N-ZMO at 0.3 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [63], Copyright 2022, Springer. (g) SEM of K, Fe-ZMO. (h) Comparison of cycling performance for K, Fe-ZMO, and ZMO at 0.1 A·g−1. (i) Long-term cycle performances of K, Fe-ZMO, and ZMO. Reproduced with permission from [64], Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 7. (a) SEM of ZMO-450. (b) Charge/discharge profiles of ZMO measured at 0.5 A·g−1 in 1 M ZnSO4 with 0.1 M MnSO4. (c) Cycle performance of ZMO and ZMO-450 measured at 4 A·g−1 in 1 M ZnSO4 with 0.1 M MnSO4 and the corresponding Coulombic efficiency of ZMO. Reproduced with permission from [61] Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (d) SEM of N-ZMO. (e) Discharge/charge profiles at 0.3 A·g−1. (f) Cycling performance of N-ZMO at 0.3 A·g−1. Reproduced with permission from [63], Copyright 2022, Springer. (g) SEM of K, Fe-ZMO. (h) Comparison of cycling performance for K, Fe-ZMO, and ZMO at 0.1 A·g−1. (i) Long-term cycle performances of K, Fe-ZMO, and ZMO. Reproduced with permission from [64], Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 28 04459 g007
Table 1. Comparison of the reported ZIBs based on ZMO-based materials as the cathode.
Table 1. Comparison of the reported ZIBs based on ZMO-based materials as the cathode.
Devices (Anode//Cathode) Voltage
Window (V)
ElectrolyteCycle PerformanceSpecific
Capacitance
Ref
Zn foil//hollow porous ZMO0.8–1.91 M ZnSO4 + 0.05 M MnSO459.2%, 300 cycles, 0.1 A·g−1137.4 mAh·g−1[40]
Zn foil//ZMO0.1–2.11 M ZnSO499.26%, 25 cycles,
0.5 A·g−1
50.2 F·g−1[41]
Zn foil//ZMO0.6–1.91 M ZnSO4 + 0.05 M MnSO479%, 1000 cycles,
2 A·g−1
172 mAh·g−1[42]
Zn foil//ZMO/NG0.8–1.81 M ZnSO4 + 0.05 M MnSO497.4%, 2500 cycles,
1 A·g−1
221 mAh·g−1[44]
Zn foil//
rGO@HM-ZMO
0.8–1.81 M ZnSO4 + 0.05 M MnSO494.1%, 650 cycles,
1 A·g−1
146.9 mAh·g−1[45]
Zn foil//ZnNixCoy
Mn2−x−yO4@N-rGO
0.7–1.72 M ZnSO4 +
0.2 M MnSO4
79%, 900 cycles,
1 A·g−1
200.5 mAh·g−1[46]
Zn foil//
N-ZnMn2O4-x/VG
0.8–1.84 M Zn(CF3SO3)292.6%, 3000 cycles,
1 A·g−1
222 mAh·g−1[47]
Zn foil//ZMO NDs/rGO1.0–1.81 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO484.1%, 400 cycles,
1 A·g−1
207.6 mAh·g−1[48]
Zn foil//ZMO@PCPs0.8–1.81 M ZnSO4 + 0.5 M MnSO490.3%, 2000 cycles,
1 A·g−1
125.6 mAh·g−1[49]
Zn foil//ZMO@C1.0–1.82 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO4-481 mAh·g−1[50]
Zn foil//Mn-d-ZMO@C0.8–1.92 M ZnSO4 + 0.2 M MnSO484%, 2000 cycles,
0.1 A·g−1
194 mAh·g−1[51]
Zn foil//ZMO@CNF0.9–1.81 M ZnSO450%, 400 cycles,
1 C
139 mAh·g−1[52]
Zn foil//ZMO QD@C0.9–1.81 M ZnSO486.4%, 1500 cycles,
1 A·g−1
320.6 mAh·g−1[53]
Zn foil//
ZMO-MOH/C NSs
0.8–1.82 M ZnSO4 + 0.2 M MnSO479.1%, 1000 cycles,
1 A·g−1
336.7 mAh·g−1[54]
Zn foil//ZMO/CNTs0.4–1.81 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO497.1%, 2000 cycles,
3 A·g−1
220.3 F·g−1[55]
Zn foil//ZMO/Mn2O30.8–1.81 M ZnSO474%, 300 cycles,
0.5 A·g−1
151.9 mAh·g−1[56]
Zn foil//ZMO/Mn2O30.8–1.92 M ZnSO479%, 120 cycles,
0.1 A·g−1
243.6 mAh·g−1[57]
Zn foil//ZMO/CuO0.6–1.82 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO496%, 1000 cycles,
2 A·g−1
150 mAh·g−1[58]
Zn//MO-ZMO HOs0.8–1.82 M ZnSO493.3%, 2000 cycles,
3 A·g−1
247.4 mAh·g−1[59]
Zn foil//
ZMO@Ti3C2Tx
0.8–1.82 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO492.4%, 5000 cycles,
1 A·g−1
172.6 mAh·g−1[60]
Zn foil//ZMO1.0–1.91 M ZnSO475%, 2000 cycles,
4 A·g−1
230 mAh·g−1[61]
Zn foil//ZnxMn2O41.0–1.93 M ZnSO485%, 3000 cycles,
4 A·g−1
170 mAh·g−1[62]
Zn foil//ZMO/carbon0.8–2.03M Zn(CF3SO3)294%, 500 cycles,
0.5 A·g−1
150 mAh·g−1[65]
Zn foil//ZMO0.8–1.91 M ZnSO493.8%, 300 cycles,
0.5 A·g−1
221 mAh·g−1[66]
Zn foil//N-ZMO NTAs0.8–1.82 M ZnSO492.1%, 1500 cycles,
0.5 A·g−1
223 mAh·g−1[67]
Zn foil//N-ZMO0.8–1.82 M ZnSO4 + 0.2 M MnSO488.4%, 1000 cycles,
3 A·g−1
225.4 mAh·g−1[63]
Zn foil//Zn0.65Ni0.58
Mn1.75O4
0.8–2.03 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO494%, 5000 cycles,
2 A·g−1
265 mAh·g−1[68]
Zn foil//
K, Fe-ZMO
0.7–1.72 M ZnSO4 + 0.2 M MnSO488.1%, 500 cycles,
1 A·g−1
221.2 mAh·g−1[64]
Acronym definitions: ZnMn2O4/N-doped graphene nanocomposite (ZMO/NG), graphene-wrapped hollow ZnMn2O4 microspheres (rGO@HM-ZMO), nickel and cobalt co-substituted spinel ZnMn2O4 nanoparticles loaded onto N-doped reduced graphene oxide (ZnNixCoyMn2−x−yO4@N-rGO), nitrogen-modulated zinc manganite vertical graphene array (N-ZnMn2O4−x/VG), ZnMn2O4 nanodots anchored on reduced graphene oxide (ZMO NDs/rGO), ZMO nanoparticles anchored on porous carbon polyhedrons (ZMO@PCPs), double-shell ZnMn2O4 hollow microspheres embedded in 2D carbon networks (ZMO@C), carbon nanofoam paper (CNF), ZnMn2O4-MnOOH/C NSs (ZMO-MOH/C NSs), ZMO nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes (ZMO/CNTs), Mn2O3-ZnMn2O4 hollow octahedrons (MO-ZMO HOs), N-doping coupled oxygen vacancy-modulated ZMO nanotube arrays (N-ZMO NTAs), mesoporous ZnMn2O4 nanocage coupled with nitrogen doping and oxygen vacancies (N-ZMO), K and Fe double-doped ZnMn2O4 (K, Fe-ZMO).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, X.; Cheng, Z.; Li, L. The Promotion of Research Progress of Zinc Manganate Cathode Materials for Zinc-Ion Batteries by Characterization and Analysis Technology. Molecules 2023, 28, 4459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114459

AMA Style

Meng X, Cheng Z, Li L. The Promotion of Research Progress of Zinc Manganate Cathode Materials for Zinc-Ion Batteries by Characterization and Analysis Technology. Molecules. 2023; 28(11):4459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Xin, Ziyi Cheng, and Le Li. 2023. "The Promotion of Research Progress of Zinc Manganate Cathode Materials for Zinc-Ion Batteries by Characterization and Analysis Technology" Molecules 28, no. 11: 4459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114459

APA Style

Meng, X., Cheng, Z., & Li, L. (2023). The Promotion of Research Progress of Zinc Manganate Cathode Materials for Zinc-Ion Batteries by Characterization and Analysis Technology. Molecules, 28(11), 4459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114459

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop