Next Article in Journal
Magnetic CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 Induced Self-Assembled Graphene Nanoribbon Framework with Excellent Properties for Li-Ion Battery
Next Article in Special Issue
Light-Driven Energy and Charge Transfer Processes between Additives within Electrospun Nanofibres
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Application of a New Polymer with Imprinted Ions for the Preconcentration of Uranium in Natural Water Samples and Determination by Digital Imaging
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules28104068
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Photocatalysis in Water-Soluble Supramolecular Metal Organic Complex

by
Dongfeng Hong
1,
Linlin Shi
2,*,
Xianghui Liu
1,
Huiyuan Ya
1,* and
Xin Han
2,*
1
College of Food and Drug, Henan Functional Cosmetics Engineering & Technology Research Center, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China
2
College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(10), 4068; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104068
Submission received: 20 March 2023 / Revised: 28 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Featured Reviews in Applied Chemistry 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As an emerging subset of organic complexes, metal complexes have garnered considerable attention owing to their outstanding structures, properties, and applications. In this content, metal-organic cages (MOCs) with defined shapes and sizes provide internal spaces to isolate water for guest molecules, which can be selectively captured, isolated, and released to achieve control over chemical reactions. Complex supramolecules are constructed by simulating the self-assembly behavior of the molecules or structures in nature. For this purpose, massive amounts of cavity-containing supramolecules, such as metal-organic cages (MOCs), have been extensively explored for a large variety of reactions with a high degree of reactivity and selectivity. Because sunlight and water are necessary for the process of photosynthesis, water-soluble metal-organic cages (WSMOCs) are ideal platforms for photo-responsive stimulation and photo-mediated transformation by simulating photosynthesis due to their defined sizes, shapes, and high modularization of metal centers and ligands. Therefore, the design and synthesis of WSMOCs with uncommon geometries embedded with functional building units is of immense importance for artificial photo-responsive stimulation and photo-mediated transformation. In this review, we introduce the general synthetic strategies of WSMOCs and their applications in this sparking field.

1. Introduction

Photosynthesis is a process of harvesting solar light and converting it into chemical energy. It can turn inorganic matter into organic matter and is the most important chemical reaction on earth [1,2,3]. In this process, the excitation energy migrates from sunlight-absorbing chlorophyll, which is embedded in light-harvesting complexes known as antenna proteins, to the reaction center and then converts into chemical energy [4,5]. In the chemistry world, photoredox catalysis is widely used in the field of organic synthesis because of its ability to construct new species by mimicking photosynthesis. In particular, as an ecological and environmental protection technology [6,7], photocatalysis has been widely used in water oxidation [8,9,10,11], CO2 reduction [12,13,14], H2S oxidation [15,16], etc. It is worth noting that initiating photocatalysis generally requires organic dyes as photocatalysts to convert visible light into chemical energy under mild conditions. The organic dye molecules irradiated with visible light can absorb light and transfer energy to substrates by various mechanisms, leading to activation of the reactions [17,18,19,20].
Similar to the nano-environments in natural systems, the hydrophobic cavities of water-soluble metal-organic cages (WSMOCs) with defined shapes and sizes provide internal spaces to isolate water for guest molecules, which can be selectively captured, isolated, and released to achieve control over chemical reactions [21,22]. WSMOCs are known to provide various bond geometries, orientations, and strengths and show excellent catalytic performance due to the diversity of ligands, mental centers, coordination sites, and configurations [23,24,25]. To date, the reported mediated reactions include the Diels-Alder reaction [26,27,28], Kemp elimination [29,30], Knoevenagel condensation [31,32,33], pericyclic reactions (e.g., [2 + 2]/[4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions) [34,35,36], etc., wherein most of these reactions were mediated by the tail-anchored functional group and/or the confined space for enhancing the local concentration and pre-organizing the substrates [37,38,39]. As a result, the design and synthesis of WSMOC architectures have emerged as one of the most dynamic fields within supramolecular chemistry, not only because of their charming structures for mediating chemical reactions [40,41,42,43] but also as a result of their various applications in molecular recognition [44,45,46,47], biomimetics [48,49,50], guest sequestration [51,52], reactive species stabilization [53,54,55,56,57], drug delivery [58,59,60], membrane transportation [61,62,63], and so forth.
Recently, great progress has been achieved for photochemical reactions by using WSMOCs as photocatalysts, in which the photosensitizers are covalently incorporated into the cages as part of the backbones or as tail-anchored functional groups [64,65,66]. However, the reactions of photochemical molecules are difficult to control due to their essentially low reaction barriers and high activity intermediates upon excitation [67]. Additionally, implementing such a strategy would need to fulfill the following two criteria: (1) sufficiently large inner space to accommodate structurally complicated catalysts and substrates; (2) sufficiently strong driving force to ensure the encapsulation; (3) possession of light-absorbing functionalities; (4) consideration that the readily prepared organic dyes could be decorated to stable metallacage skeletons and their optical characteristics can be enhanced [68,69,70,71,72]. As a result, the design and construction of WSMOCs or WSMOC-based light-harvesting systems as nanoreactors to enable photocatalytic reactions in aqueous media have recently attracted increasing attention.
Although some successful approaches have been adopted for photocatalytic reactions in supramolecular architectures based on covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [73,74,75] and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [76,77], such systems are easy to synthesize, but their poor solubility and stability in common solvents restrict their processability for further application. Supramolecular coordination complexes (SCCs) formed by ligand-driven self-assembly have the advantages of facile one-pot synthesis, good stability, and high solubility in common solvents, which provide an alternative hope in this regard. In similar fashion to the nanometer-scale compartments in living systems, WSCCs can isolate guest molecules and host chemical transformations. Therefore, these cages have a wide range of applications in biological, medical, environmental, and industrial fields, and this conforms to the development concept of green chemistry. In this review, we first briefly introduce synthetic methods for the construction of WSMOCs. Then, the WSMOCs with application in photocatalysis in recent years are also summarized. The unique microenvironments in the cavities of WSMOCs have been extensively used to encapsulate various guests by means of electrostatic, hydrophobic, and van der Waals interactions in the aqueous phase [78,79,80]. Therefore, we introduce the application of several different types of WSMOCs in photocatalytic reactions. It is worthy to note that the MOCs discussed in this review are only prepared and dissolved in mixed solvents containing at least 50% water. At the end, the development prospects of WSCCs in supramolecular photocatalysis are summarized and prospected.

2. Strategies to Prepare Water-Soluble Metal-Organic Cages

Despite key early work by the Fujita and Raymond groups on water-soluble cages, most cage work since has been in organic solutions. Some of the early coordination assemblies turned out to be soluble and stable in water due to the combination of charge and polar functional groups within their structures. In recent years, strategies for the synthesis of WSMOCs have been developed, which are depicted in Figure 1.

2.1. Metal Centers

A series of water-soluble metal-organic cages have been constructed in recent years since the first water-soluble quadrilateral metal ring was reported by the group of Fujita [81]. For example, in 1995, Fujita and co-workers successfully synthesized a water-soluble octahedral cage 5 by self-assembly based on pyridine ligands 4 and [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2] 3 (Figure 2) [82]. Significantly, the [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2] unit, prepared from starting materials ethylenediamine 1 and PdCl2, was crucial for successful self-assembly (Figure 2). The authors indicated that the cationic charge carried by the palladium (II) centers of the octahedron 5 is the key to enhanced hydrophilicity, although the cage has a large hydrophobic cavity. On the other hand, the multiple [(en)Pd]2+ corners may be regarded as solubilizing groups due to ethylenediamine being highly soluble in water. In addition, the nitrate counterions also enhance the hydrophilicity of octahedron 5 compared to chloride ions [83,84]. So, the [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2] units could provide structural stability and water solubility. As shown in Figure 2, various WSMOCs have been synthesized by self-assembly of the water-soluble [(en)Pd]2+ or [(en)Pt]2+ corners with different pyridine-based ligands 6–11 in recent years [85,86].

2.2. Charged Ligands

As shown in Figure 3a, the Nitschke group reported a new type of water-soluble tetrahedral cage 14, which was constructed by a charged ligand through sub-component self-assembly in water [87]. The subcomponents 2-formylpyridine 12 and 4,4’-diaminobiphenyl-2,2’-disulfonic acid 13 containing two solubilizing sulfonate groups were assembled with iron(II) in an aqueous solution of tetramethylammonium hydroxide to afford tetrahedral cage 14 in nearly quantitative yields. Cage 14 has high hydrophilicity, mainly because 12 highly hydrophilic sulfonate groups extend out of the cavity and are arranged symmetrically through the crystal structure analysis. It is noted that the hydrophobic internal cavity (141 Å3) can encapsulate a wide range of guests [88,89,90,91]. This method has been shown to be useful for the construction of water-soluble cages with charged properties. For example, cages 16, 19, and 21 were prepared from ligands that are anchored with ammonium 15 and pyridinium 17 and assembled from ligand 20 after dehydrogenation under alkali conditions, respectively (Figure 3b–d) [92,93,94].

2.3. Hydrophilic Groups

The construction of WSMOCs could rely on the synthetic modification of water-insoluble metallocages with neutral hydrophilic groups on the skeletons (Figure 4). For example, Nitschke and co-workers reported chiral WSMOC ΔΔΔΔ-23/ΛΛΛΛ-23 assembled from iron(II) sulfate with a chiral ligand 22 containing two chiral glyceryl groups and 2-formylpyridine 12 in water [95]. It is noteworthy that the glycerol groups not only enhance the water solubility of the cage ΔΔΔΔ-23/ΛΛΛΛ-23 but also determine the handedness of the iron(II) stereocenters. In addition to this, to enhance hydrophilicity of metallo-supramolecular cages, other neutral hydrophilic groups can also be introduced into the skeletons, such as methoxyethoxy, glucose, polyethylene glycol (PEG), etc. (Figure 4b–d) [96,97,98,99,100,101,102].

2.4. Anion Exchange

Sometimes it is difficult to directly form a WSMOC through the methods above. In 2017, Nitschke and co-workers established another method for constructing WSMOC 31 (Figure 5) [103]. First, they attempted to prepare cube 31 by direct self-assembly of subcomponents zinc(II)-porphyrin 30 and 2-formylpyridine 12 with ferrous (II) sulfate in different solvents and were unsuccessful, as the results were suspensions that were insoluble in the assembled solvents. Then, they used Fe(OTf)2 instead of FeSO4 assembled with other components to successfully obtain cube 32, which is basically insoluble in water. Finally, the anion exchange of cage 32 with tetrabutylammonium (TBA) sulfate in MeCN induces the spontaneous precipitation of the sulfate salt of cube 31, which can be easily dissolved in water. The anion-exchange strategy is an effective way to synthesize WSMOCs from highly hydrophobic ligands [104,105].

3. Photocatalysis in WSMOCs

The WSCCs with controlled size, shape, and hydrophobic cavities have been further used in catalysis [98,106], guest encapsulation [107,108], drug delivery [109], light harvesting [110], sensing [111,112,113], and photoswitching [114,115,116]. In recent years, the application of metal-organic cages in light-driven catalysis has been very fruitful. The photosensitizer (PS) generally has two different productive mechanisms after excitation (Figure 6a). Firstly, the excited state (PS*) transfers energy to the energy acceptor ([A]) and then forms a new excited state ([A]*). Another productive mechanism is that an oxidized (PS+) or reduced (PS−) species is first formed by a photoinduced electron transfer (PET) process, followed by single electron transfer (SET) back to the original state. Crucially, both significantly rely on the distance between the energy donor and acceptor, which can be controlled by the preorganization of metal-organic cages. The photosensitizer can achieve different types of photocatalytic reactions in water by binding to different positions of the metal-organic cages (Figure 6b).
Since the first host–guest binding was reported, one of these applications is the ability of WSMOCs to catalyze photoreactions, which can mimic artificial photosynthesis [117,118]. Great strides have been made toward achieving this goal, although photochemical ones are notoriously difficult to control due to their intrinsically low reaction barriers upon excitation and highly reactive intermediates. In recent years, REDOX reactions and C-H activation reactions under mild conditions have been frequently reported, but it is not easy to realize these reactions in the water phase [119,120,121,122]. Herein, we focus on the application of WSMOCs for photocatalysis in artificial photosynthesis and in organic photo(redox) catalysis. It is worth noting that the hydrophobic cavity of WSMOCs realizes the preorganization of the reaction substrate by the hydrophobic effect, which is the key to promote the reactions in water (Figure 7). In our discussion, depending on the different ways by which WSMOCs can mediate photocatalytic reactions, this will be covered in the following four sections: (1) photoredox catalysis mediated by the cavity of WSMOCs; (2) photoredox catalysis mediated by the ligand or metal of WSMOCs; (3) photoredox catalysis mediated by the WSMOC-based light-harvesting system.

3.1. Photoredox Catalysis Mediated by the Cavity of WSMOCs

Various guests were inserted into the unique cavities of WSMOCs by means of hydrophobic effects, π-π interactions, electrostatic interaction, and van der Waals interactions [123,124,125]. Therefore, the substrates can be encapsulated in the microenvironments of WSMOCs and undergo photoredox reactions inside the cavities.
In 2002, the group of Fujita reported that the structurally well-defined coordination cages act as nano-reactors to promote intermolecular [2 + 2] photodimerization of large olefins in a surprisingly efficient fashion and control the stereo- and regiochemistry in a stringent geometrical environment (Figure 8a) [126]. It was found that the internal cavity of cage 5b can bind two molecules of acenaphthylene 33, and then the syn-dimer was obtained at a near quantitative yield in water under light irradiation, without any other regions or stereoisomers being produced. However, in the absence of 5b, the yield of the mixture of multiple dimer isomers obtained was very low, and even the concentrations of substrate 33 were very high. The cages were readily obtained, and their unique cavities make it possible to create new chemical reactions within the localized microenvironment of discrete molecules. For example, under visible light, cage 5 can selectively encapsulate two different reaction substrates and then convert them into corresponding dimer products in quantitative yields. Among the reactions, most of them focused on [2 + 4] or [2 + 2] cycloadditions of arenes and inert aromatics 34–38 (Figure 8b–e) [127,128,129,130], cyclization of α-diketones 39 (Figure 8f) [131], and 1,4-radical addition of compounds 40 and 41 (Figure 8g) [132]. However, in these photoreactions, cages 5a or 5b only provide defined microenvironments to control the photo-reactions and do not take part in the photocatalytic process.
Moreover, the host–guest complexation is essential to the photooxidation [133,134]. The cage and guest are often stably bound together by non-covalent interactions, which may result in a charge transfer (CT) process that leads to new absorption bands that lie within the visible light energy. These absorption bands may undergo a single electron transfer (SET) process from donor to acceptor upon photoirradiation, creating a radical pair. However, these radical pairs are extremely unstable, hampering their use in diffusion-dependent chemistry [135]. Therefore, photochemical ones are difficult to control due to their intrinsically low reaction barriers upon excitation and highly reactive intermediates. As a result, it is critical to develop a host–guest complex for stabilizing reactive intermediates.
The group of Sun reported a series of water-soluble redox-active WSMOCs [136,137]. Cage 43 can be easily synthesized by self-assembly of ligand 42 and palladium salts without guests; however, cage 44 is formed in the presence of a guest. It is worth noting that the transformation between the two structures can be effectively controlled through the addition and release of guests (Figure 9a). Compared to the cage designed by Fujita, this cage also provides reversible redox-activities, and it is bigger with bigger internal cavities that can accommodate more guests, such as aromatic molecules and polyoxometalates (POMs). Moreover, POMs@Pd4L2 host–guest complexes can enhance the conversion and product selectivity in the desulfurization reaction of aryl sulfide. Control experiments showed that the cage, air, and light were essential for the reaction. As shown in Figure 9b, they proposed the mechanism for the desulfurization reaction. Firstly, cage 43 is transformed into bowl cage 44 after encapsulation of aryl sulfide 45. The resulting host–guest complex undergoes effective electron transfer after excitation by visible light to produce superoxide anion, thus oxidizing sulfide to sulfoxide. Finally, sulfoxide 46 is released by the cage due to it being highly hydrophilic, causing cage 43 to regain it. In conclusion, they designed a guest-controlled enzyme simulation photocatalytic system for the oxidation of aryl sulfide.
Recently, the same group developed a new WSMOC 48, which was prepared from pyridinium-bonded macrocyclic ligand 47 and [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2] (Figure 10) [138]. Under the same assembly conditions, the host−guest complex [49⊂48] can be synthesized in the absence of decatungstate 49. The host–guest complex [49⊂48] formed by the installation of the electron-rich guest 49 was encapsulated by the cationic host with REDOX activity via electrostatic interaction and is an ideal platform for green catalysis because it can efficiently promote the C−H photooxidation of toluene derivatives 50 to aldehyde products 51 with good yields and selectivity in water. Compared to adding a photocatalyst alone, such a host−guest complex [49⊂48] showed enhanced catalytic activity in catalyzing the C−H photooxidation. It is noteworthy that the co-encapsulation of catalyst and substrate by electrostatic interaction and hydrophobic action in the hydrophobic cavity of WSMOC 48 is the key to promoting the reaction.

3.2. Photoredox Catalysis Mediated by the Ligand or Metal of WSMOC

The design of WSMOCs, which possess light-absorbing functionalities, is interesting for molecular sensing and photocatalysis. The key to obtain a light-absorbing WSMOC is to select the desired organic ligand. The group of Fujita reported the first example of a photocatalytic reaction driven by a self-assembled cage 5a as a photosensitizer [139]. The cage 5a showed strong absorption at <370 nm, and the ligand should behave as a strong electron acceptor due to electron donation to Pd2+ centers at three pyridine coordination sites. In 2019, they found that the demethylenation reactions of cyclopropanes 53 can be mediated within the cavity of cage 5a under visible light irradiation (Figure 11a) [140]. They suggest a plausible mechanism for this reaction: (a) The reaction proceeds via a guest-to-host electron transfer (ET) because of cage 5a being a strong electron acceptor, and then gives a radical cation of a cyclopropane substrate; (b) under the nucleophilic addition of a nitrate anion, the ring of the radical cationic cyclopropane opens to form a radical intermediate; (c) the radical intermediate is broken to form the demethylenated product and nitrite radical; and (d) the nitrate gets one electron from the anion radical of cage 5a to complete the reaction. Therefore, the reactions were highly chemo-selective and enabled late-stage derivatization of a steroid molecule, which led to a totally new unnatural steroid. Similarly, cage 5a can also be used for mediating anti-Markovnikov hydration of aryl alkynes 55 (Figure 11b) [141] and photo-oxidation reaction of triquinacene 56 (Figure 11c) [142].
The water-soluble tetrahedral cage 57, designed by the group of Raymond, also has visible light absorption (Figure 12) [143]. Fortunately, WSMOC 57 can act as a photosensitizer and photosensitizes an allylic 1,3-rearrangement of encapsulated cinnamyl ammonium substrate 58. They suggest a plausible mechanism for this reaction by UV/vis absorption, fluorescence, ultrafast transient absorption, and electrochemical experiments: (a) This cage easily encapsulates a cinnamyl ammonium substrate 58 to generate the excited charge-transfer state 58⊂57*, in which an electron has been donated to 58 after absorbing the energy of visible light; (b) After gaining an electron from the cage, the C−N bond of the substrate is broken to form a tertiary amine and a geminal radical ion pair; (c) The electron of the allyl or tertiary amine back transfers to the ligand-based radical cation and then forms a stable allyl cation or tertiary amine radical cation and reestablishes the original charge on the ligand; (d) The encapsulated tertiary amine recombines with the allyl cation within the cavity to form the 1,3-rearrangement product. In summary, this process is a photoinduced electron transfer (PET) mechanism proven by photochemical and photophysical processes.
The Su’s group designed a WSMOC 60 prepared from Ru(II)-based photoactive ligand and palladium(II) salt in a quantitative yield (Figure 13) [144]. The octahedral cage 58 can easily provide ET processes and electron collection pathways, including intra-ligand charge transfer (ILCT); ligand-to-metal charge transfer (IMCT); and metal-ligand charge transfer (MLCT). They found that the homochiral ΔΔΔΔ-60/ΛΛΛΛ-60 can encapsulate naphthol substrates and undergo an asymmetric 1,4-coupling reaction of 61 to form dimerization product 62 with high stereoselectivity under visible light. The homochiral 58 could control the stereoselectivity of the product (Figure 13a, left). They give a radical reaction mechanism by various techniques, including ESR spectroscopy, CV, and UV/vis absorption and emission spectroscopy, as well as various control experiments (Figure 13b). The photoredox RuII centers are irradiated by visible light to produce a *[60]2+ excited state, which is quenched by O2 to give [60]3+. The [60]3+ may then oxidize the naphthol substrate 61 by single-electron transfer to produce radical species A, which reacts with a hydroxyl radical to produce the intermediate B. Afterwards, egioselective 1,4-coupling occurs exclusively to produce 62 without detectable amounts of 1,1’-bi-2-naphthol. Recently, the same group reported that the [2 + 2] photocycloaddition of acenaphthylene 63 can also be asymmetrically photo-catalyzed by homochiral cage 60 (Figure 13a, right) [145]. At about the same time, they also reported that 60 can achieve the intermolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds with high selectivity under blue light irradiation (Figure 13b) [146]. This intermolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction can also be mediated by the anthraquinone-based metal–organic cages, which was reported by the group of Cui [147]. This WSMOC has high stability and catalytic performance and can catalyze various substituent substrates with excellent yields. In addition, the host–guest complexation of this cage and tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) guests can improve the catalytic efficiency of visible-light-driven H2 evolution [148]. In these reactions, the ligands with photoactive centers and catalytic Pd metal centers play decisive roles in photooxidation and ET processes.

3.3. Photoredox Catalysis Mediated by the WSMOC-Based Light-Harvesting System

There is great potential to design artificial light-harvesting systems (LHSs), which can simulate enzyme catalysis in a water medium for effective application [149,150]. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is commonly used in the development of artificial light-harvesting systems (LHSs) and is essential for simulating natural photosynthesis processes [151,152,153]. Compared to the supramolecular complexes that rely on host–guest or hydrogen bond interaction, the FRET process is easier to perform in MOCs that are based on metal-ligand interaction, because it often needs to occur at very low concentrations of solution. However, the interactions of the former supramolecular complexes can easily disappear in a dilute solution, which makes them difficult to be used in the development of a light collection system [154,155,156].
In 2019, the group of Zhang developed a new WSMOC 68, which was prepared from tetraphenylethene (TPE) skeleton 65 and polyethylene glycol (PEG) unit 66 [157]. The high-emission cage can be further self-assembled in water to form nanoaggregates. Then, the cage acts as an energy donor to combine with eosin Y to construct an LHS through the FRET process. More importantly, under visible light, this LHS can effectively mediate the cross-coupling reaction of benzothiazole 69 and diphenylphosphine oxide 70 in water (Figure 14a). Compared to eosin Y alone, this system showed enhanced catalytic activity in catalyzing the cross-coupling reaction because the FRET process increases the number of excited photocatalysts (eosin Y*), which undergo the catalytic cycle to increase the catalytic activity (Figure 14b).
Recently, Mukherjee and co-workers designed and constructed a series of tetragonal prismatic metallacages based on the modification of tetraphenylethene (TPE) unit 72 [158]. Compared with the dilute solution state, cage 74 has higher emissivity in both aggregate and solid states, which is due to the presence of the TPE skeleton with AIE activity and the increased quantum yield (Figure 15). Cage 74 can aggregate in 90% H2O/MeCN (9/1, v/v) to form a spherical nanoaggregate, which can act as an LHS to transfer energy to photosensitizer rhodamine B (RhB). It is worth noting that the light-harvesting material (74 + RhB) can promote the cross-coupling cyclization of N,N-dimethylaniline 75 and N-alkyl/aryl maleimides 76 more effectively than the addition of RhB or cage 74 alone. The FRET process increases the number of excited photocatalysts (RhB*) and is the key to increasing the catalytic activity (Figure 15).

4. Conclusions and Outlook

As described above, WSMOCs have great potential applications in light-driven catalysis due to the defined size and shape of their hydrophobic cavities. They can also be used as green nanoreactors and are suitable for substrate preorganization, thus improving the region-selective and stereo-selective aspects of the products. Supramolecular self-assembly is a powerful strategy to build similarly complex and well-organized structures from simple building blocks, thus mimicking nature’s principles. To enhance the hydrophilicity of metallo-supramolecular cages, several synthetic strategies have been applied: (1) self-assembly based on small pyridyl panels with end-capped [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2]; (2) self-assembly based on ligands that are anchored with anions or cations; (3) self-assembly based on ligands with hydrophilic groups; and (4) changing the counteranions to more water-soluble ones. We believe that the design strategies of WSMOCs can be extended to the construction of other water-soluble coordination supramolecules and stimulate the development of more and more new water-soluble coordination supramolecules, such as water-soluble metal rings, coordination polymers, chorohydrocarbons, rotane, etc.
Subsequently, we have shown that WSMOCs can be used as green nanoreactors to mediate photocatalytic reactions. Based on literature reports, we reasoned that encapsulating more types of catalytic species with various sizes and functional groups could further advance supramolecular photo-catalysis. However, implementing such a strategy would need to fulfill the following three criteria: (1) sufficiently large inner space of the WSMOC to accommodate structurally complicated catalysts and substrates, (2) sufficiently strong driving force to ensure encapsulation, and (3) a WSMOC with light absorption function, as it is more conducive to its application in the field of molecular sensing and photocatalysis.
Although great progress has been made in the design and synthesis of WSMOCs, the application of these cages in photocatalysis still needs to be further explored. For one thing, the types of WSMOCs used for photocatalysis are still scarce. New WSMOCs with two or more catalytically active sites need to be properly designed for a wider range of substrates. On the other hand, the photo-catalytic function of WSMOCs and the types of catalytic reactions still need to be developed. Furthermore, most WSMOCs have only one type of ligand. More types of catalytic reactions can be achieved by developing WSMOCs constructed with different ligands. This review provides inspiration for the future design of photocatalytic WSMOCs host-guest systems and their application in producing visible light and complex organic molecules and contributes to the development of green chemistry. A combination of photocatalytic metallacycles or metallacages with appropriate materials such as mesoporous carbon and some supramolecular hydrogels to construct robust hybrid materials is a feasible way to address this issue. Then the prepared hybrid materials can be immobilized to enable asymmetric catalysis with enhanced catalytic performance and better stability. Finally, the immobilization of supramolecular cages on a heterogeneous support like alumina or polymers may lead to recyclable and long-term stable photocatalysts based on coordination cages. In conclusion, the field of WSCCs as a sustainable development research area will continue to promote the development of host−guest chemistry; biological, environmental, and industrial applications; drug synthesis, etc. The synthesis of multifunctional WSMOCs will offer more pathways for using the output energy from the light-harvesting system to mimic the whole photosynthetic process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S. and X.H.; writing—original draft preparation, D.H., H.Y. and X.L.; writing—review and editing, D.H., H.Y. and X.L.; supervision, L.S. and X.H.; project administration, L.S.; funding acquisition, L.S. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 22101267) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M692905).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Barber, J. Photosynthetic Energy Conversion: Natural and Artificial. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, B.; Sun, L. Artificial Photosynthesis: Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2216–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mora, S.J.; Odella, E.; Moore, G.F.; Gust, D.; Moore, T.A.; Moore, A.L. Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Artificial Photosynthetic Systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McDermott, G.; Prince, S.; Freer, A.; Hawthornthwaite-Lawless, A.; Papiz, M.; Cogdell, R.; Isaacs, N. Crystal Structure of an Integral Membrane Light-Harvesting Complex from Photosynthetic Bacteria. Nature 1995, 374, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scholes, G.D.; Fleming, G.R.; Olaya-Castro, A.; van Grondelle, R. Lessons from Nature about Solar Light Harvesting. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hak, C.H.; Sim, L.C.; Leong, K.H.; Lim, P.F.; Chin, Y.H.; Saravanan, P. M/g-C3N4 (M=Ag, Au, and Pd) Composite: Synthesis via Sunlight Photodeposition and Application towards the Degradation of Bisphenol A. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 25401–25412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Millet, A.; Cesana, P.T.; Sedillo, K.; Bird, M.J.; Schlau-Cohen, G.S.; Doyle, A.G.; MacMillan, D.W.C.; Scholes, G.D. Bioinspired Supercharging of Photoredox Catalysis for Applications in Energy and Chemical Manufacturing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1423–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shaffer, D.W.; Xie, Y.; Concepcion, J.J. O-O Bond Formation in Ruthenium-Catalyzed Water Oxidation: Single-Site Nucleophilic Attack vs. O-O Radical Coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6170–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Z.Y.; Long, Z.H.; Wang, X.Z.; Zhou, J.Y.; Wang, X.S.; Zhou, X.P.; Li, D. Cobalt-Based Metal-Organic Cages for Visible Light-Driven Water Oxidation. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 10380–10386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Noll, N.; Würthner, F. A Calix[4]Arene-Based Cyclic Dinuclear Ruthenium Complex for Light-Driven Catalytic Water Oxidation. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ji, C.; Wang, W.; El-Sayed, E.S.M.; Liu, G.; Si, Y.; Su, K.; Ju, Z.; Wu, F.; Yuan, D. A High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Pt(II) Decorated Metal-Organic Cage for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Production. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 285, 119782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kalamaras, E.; Maroto-Valer, M.M.; Andresen, J.M.; Wang, H.; Xuan, J. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Efficiency of Photo electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Ethanol. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, H.S.; Jee, S.; Kim, R.; Bui, H.T.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.K.; Park, K.S.; Kim, W.; Choi, K.M. A Highly Active, Robust Photocatalyst Heterogenized in Discrete Cages of Metal-Organic Polyhedra for CO2 Reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghosh, A.C.; Legrand, A.; Rajapaksha, R.; Craig, G.A.; Sassoye, C.; Balázs, G.; Farrusseng, D.; Furukawa, S.; Canivet, J.; Wisser, F.M. Rhodium-Based Metal-Organic Polyhedra Assemblies for Selective CO2 Photoreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 3626–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, G.; Yan, H.; Zong, X.; Ma, B.; Jiang, H.; Wen, F.; Li, C. Photocatalytic Splitting of H2S to Produce Hydrogen by Gas-Solid Phase Reaction. Chin. J. Catal. 2008, 29, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oladipo, H.; Yusuf, A.; Al Jitan, S.; Palmisano, G. Overview and Challenges of the Photolytic and Photocatalytic Splitting of H2S. Catal. Today 2021, 380, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, J.Z.; Xu, K.J.; Yang, W.B.; Wang, Z.J.; Zhong, F.F. The Triplet Excited State of Bodipy: Formation, Modulation and Application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8904–8939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ravetz, B.D.; Tay, N.E.S.; Joe, C.L.; Sezen-Edmonds, M.; Schmidt, M.A.; Tan, Y.; Janey, J.M.; Eastgate, M.D.; Rovis, T. Development of a Platform for Near-Infrared Photoredox Catalysis. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 2053–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, Z.; Han, X.; Hu, W.; Bai, H.; Peng, B.; Ji, L.; Fan, Q.; Li, L.; Huang, W. Bioapplications of Small Molecule Aza-BODIPY: From Rational Structural Design to In Vivo Investigations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 7533–7567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rana, P.; Singh, N.; Majumdar, P.; Singh, S.P. Evolution of BODIPY/Aza-BODIPY Dyes for Organic Photoredox/Energy Transfer Catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 470, 214698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Percástegui, E.G.; Ronson, T.K.; Nitschke, J.R. Design and Applications of Water-Soluble Coordination Cages. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 13480–13544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xue, Y.; Hang, X.; Ding, J.; Li, B.; Zhu, R.; Pang, H.; Xu, Q. Catalysis within Coordination Cages. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 430, 213656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miao, L.; Zhu, X.; Liu, G.; Han, X.; Xie, W.; Lu, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, K.; Shi, L.; Lu, S.; et al. Tunable aggregation-induced fluorescent and pressure-responsive luminescence supramolecular cages achieved by subcomponent self-assembly. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 107921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, L.; Das, R.; Li, C.-T.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Hahn, F.E.; Hua, K.; Sun, L.-Y.; Han, Y.-F. C3-Symmetric Assemblies from Trigonal Polycarbene Ligands and MI Ions for the Synthesis of Three-Dimensional Polyimidazolium Cations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 13360–13364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, G.; Zhou, Z.; Yuan, C.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Liu, K.; Zhao, J.; Tan, H.; Yan, X. Trackable Supramolecular Fusion: Cage to Cage Transformation of Tetraphenylethylene-Based Metalloassemblies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10013–10017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Ma, D.; Huang, F. Three-dimensional organic cage with aggregation-induced delayed fluorescence. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 1017–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martí-Centelles, V.; Lawrence, A.L.; Lusby, P.J. High Activity and Efficient Turnover by a Simple, Self-Assembled “Artificial Diels–Alderase”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2862–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, T.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; He, C.; Duan, C. Cavity-directed nitroaromatics sensing within a carbazole-based luminescent supramolecular M2L3 cage. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 34, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cullen, W.; Misuraca, M.C.; Hunter, C.A.; Williams, N.H.; Ward, M.D. Highly Efficient Catalysis of the Kemp Elimination in the Cavity of a Cubic Coordination Cage. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cullen, W.; Metherell, A.J.; Wragg, A.B.; Taylor, C.G.P.; Williams, N.H.; Ward, M.D. Catalysis in a Cationic Coordination Cage Using a Cavity-Bound Guest and Surface-Bound Anions: Inhibition, Activation, and Autocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2821–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murase, T.; Nishijima, Y.; Fujita, M. Cage-Catalyzed Knoevenagel Condensation under Neutral Conditions in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sheng, T.-P.; He, C.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, G.-Z.; Dai, F.-R.; Chen, Z.-N. Precise Assembly and Supramolecular Catalysis of Tetragonal- and Trigonal-Elongated Octahedral Coordination Containers. CCS Chem. 2022, 4, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, S.-C.; Cai, L.-X.; Hong, M.; Chen, Q.; Sun, Q.-F. Combinatorial Self-Assembly of Coordination Cages with Systematically Fine-Tuned Cavities for Efficient Co-Encapsulation and Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202204732. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoshizawa, M.; Tamura, M.; Fujita, M. Diels-Alder in Aqueous Molecular Hosts: Unusual Regioselectivity and Efficient Catalysis. Science 2006, 312, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaphan, D.M.; Toste, F.D.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N. Enabling New Modes of Reactivity via Constrictive Binding in a Supramolecular-Assembly-Catalyzed Aza-Prins Cyclization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9202–9205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Horiuchi, S.; Murase, T.; Fujita, M. Diels-Alder Reactions of Inert Aromatic Compounds within a Self-Assembled Coordination Cage. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 1839–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brown, C.J.; Toste, F.D.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N. Supramolecular Catalysis in Metal-Ligand Cluster Hosts. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3012–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, L.; Jing, X.; Li, X.; Guo, X.; Zeng, L.; He, C.; Duan, C. Catalytic Properties of Chemical Transformation within the Confined Pockets of Werner-Type Capsules. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 378, 151–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takezawa, H.; Shitozawa, K.; Fujita, M. Enhanced Reactivity of Twisted Amides inside a Molecular Cage. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fiedler, D.; Leung, D.H.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N. Selective Molecular Recognition, C-H Bond Activation, and Catalysis in Nanoscale Reaction Vessels. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koblenz, T.S.; Wassenaar, J.; Reek, J.N.H. Reactivity within a Confined Self-Assembled Nanospace. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kaphan, D.M.; Levin, M.D.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. A Supramolecular Microenvironment Strategy for Transition Metal Catalysis. Science 2015, 350, 1235–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fang, Y.; Powell, J.A.; Li, E.; Wang, Q.; Perry, Z.; Kirchon, A.; Yang, X.; Xiao, Z.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, L.; et al. Catalytic Reactions within the Cavity of Coordination Cages. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4707–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, D.; Ronson, T.K.; Nitschke, J.R. Functional Capsules via Subcomponent Self-Assembly. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2423–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jansze, S.; Cecot, M.G.; Severin, K. Reversible Disassembly of Metallasupramolecular Structures Mediated by a Metastable-State Photoacid. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 4253–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Percastegui, E.G.; Mosquera, J.; Ronson, T.K.; Plajer, A.J.; Kieffer, M.; Nitschke, J.R. Waterproof Architectures through Subcomponent Self-Assembly. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 2006–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Regeni, I.; Chen, B.; Frank, M.; Baksi, A.; Holstein, J.J.; Clever, G.H. Coal-Tar Dye-based Coordination Cages and Helicates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 5673–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yi, J.W.; Barry, N.P.E.; Furrer, M.A.; Zava, O.; Dyson, P.J.; Therrien, B.; Kim, B.H. Delivery of Floxuridine Derivatives to Cancer Cells by Water-Soluble Organometallic Cages. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, J.; Yu, G.; Huang, F. Supramolecular Chemotherapy Based on Host-Guest Molecular Recognition: A Novel Strategy in the Battle against Cancer with a Bright Future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7021–7053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sepehrpour, H.; Fu, W.; Sun, Y.; Stang, P.J. Biomedically Relevant Self-Assembled Metallacycles and Metallacages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14005–14020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Howlader, P.; Mondal, S.; Ahmed, S.; Mukherjee, P.S. Guest-Induced Enantioselective Self-Assembly of a Pd6 Homochiral Octahedral Cage with a C3-Symmetric Pyridyl Donor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 20968–20972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, K.; Zhang, B.; Drechsler, C.; Holstein, J.J.; Clever, G.H. Backbone-Bridging Promotes Diversity in Heteroleptic Cages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 6403–6407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mal, P.; Breiner, B.; Rissanen, K.; Nitschke, J.R. White Phosphorus Is Air-Stable within a Self-Assembled Tetrahedral Capsule. Science 2009, 324, 1697–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Horiuchi, S.; Murase, T.; Fujita, M. Noncovalent Trapping and Stabilization of Dinuclear Ruthenium Complexes within a Coordination Cage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12445–12447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Takezawa, H.; Akiba, S.; Murase, T.; Fujita, M. Cavity Directed Chromism of Phthalein Dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7043–7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Howlader, P.; Mondal, B.; Purba, P.C.; Zangrando, E.; Mukherjee, P.S. Self-Assembled Pd(II) Barrels as Containers for Transient Merocyanine Form and Reverse Thermochromism of Spiropyran. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7952–7960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, K.; Zhang, L.Y.; Yan, C.; Wei, S.C.; Pan, M.; Zhang, L.; Su, C.Y. Stepwise Assembly of Pd6(RuL3)8 Nanoscale Rhombododecahedral Metal-Organic Cages via Metalloligand Strategy for Guest Trapping and Protection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4456–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zheng, Y.-R.; Suntharalingam, K.; Johnstone, T.C.; Lippard, S.J. Encapsulation of Pt(IV) Prodrugs within a Pt(II) Cage for Drug Delivery. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Samanta, S.K.; Moncelet, D.; Briken, V.; Isaacs, L. Metal–Organic Polyhedron Capped with Cucurbit[8]uril Delivers Doxorubicin to Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14488–14496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Samanta, S.K.; Quigley, J.; Vinciguerra, B.; Briken, V.; Isaacs, L. Cucurbit[7]uril Enables Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Release from the Self-Assembled Hydrophobic Phase of a Metal Organic Polyhedron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9066–9074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Haynes, C.J.E.; Zhu, J.; Chimerel, C.; Hernández-Ainsa, S.; Riddell, I.A.; Ronson, T.K.; Keyser, U.F.; Nitschke, J.R. Blockable Zn10L15 Ion Channels through Subcomponent Self-Assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15388–15392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kawano, R.; Horike, N.; Hijikata, Y.; Kondo, M.; Carné-Sánchez, A.; Larpent, P.; Ikemura, S.; Osaki, T.; Kamiya, K.; Kitagawa, S.; et al. Metal-Organic Cuboctahedra for Synthetic Ion Channels with Multiple Conductance States. Chem 2017, 2, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, Y.; Dong, J.; Gong, W.; Tang, X.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Y.; Liu, Y. Artificial Biomolecular Channels: Enantioselective Transmembrane Transport of Amino Acids Mediated by Homochiral Zirconium Metal−Organic Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 20939–20951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Salles, J.A.G.; Zarra, S.; Turner, R.M.; Nitschke, J.R. A Self-Organizing Chemical Assembly Line. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 19143–19146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kumar, K.S.; Mane, V.S.; Yadav, A.; Kumbhar, A.S.; Boomishankar, R. Photochemical Hydrogen Evolution from Water by a 1D-Network of Octahedral Ni6L8 Cages. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 13156–13159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lin, H.-Y.; Zhou, L.-Y.; Xu, L. Photocatalysis in Supramolecular Fluorescent Metallacycles and Metallacages. Chem. Asian J. 2021, 16, 3805–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Morimoto, M.; Bierschenk, S.M.; Xia1, K.T.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. Advances in Supramolecular Host-Mediated Reactivity. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, L.; Wang, Y.-X.; Chen, L.-J.; Yang, H.-B. Construction of Multiferrocenyl Metallacycles and Metallacages via Coordination-Driven Self-Assembly: From Structure to Functions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2148–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, Y.; Chen, C.; Liuc, J.; Stang, P.J. Recent Developments in the Construction and Applications of Platinum-Based Metallacycles and Metallacages via Coordination. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3889–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lin, H.-Y.; Wang, Y.-T.; Shi, X.; Yang, H.-B.; Xu, L. Switchable Metallacycles and Metallacages. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 1129–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shi, L.; Wang, B.; Lu, S. Efficient bottom-up synthesis of graphene quantum dots at an atomically precise level. Matter 2023, 6, 728–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tuo, W.; Xu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Li, J.; Qiu, M.; Xiong, X.; Li, X.; Sun, Y. Biomedical Applications of Pt(II) Metallacycle/Metallacage-based Agents: From Mono-Chemotherapy to Versatile Imaging Contrasts and Theranostic Platforms. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 443, 214017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, Y.; Yang, L.; He, H.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Fang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, D.; Qi, Y.; Li, Z.; et al. In Situ Photodeposition of Platinum Clusters on a Covalent Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Weng, W.; Guo, J. The Effect of Enantioselective Chiral Covalent Organic Frameworks and Cysteine Sacrificial Donors on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ma, S.; Deng, T.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Jia, J.; Li, Q.; Wu, G.; Xia, H.; Yang, S.-W.; Liu, X. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production on a sp2-Carbon-Linked Covalent Organic Framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202208919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kondo, Y.; Kuwahara, Y.; Mori, K.; Yamashita, H. Design of Metal-Organic Framework Catalysts for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Peroxide Production. Chem 2022, 8, 2924–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guo, M.; Zhang, M.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X.; Li, G. State-of-the-Art Advancements in Photocatalytic Hydrogenation: Reaction Mechanism and Recent Progressin Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Catalysts. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2103361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rizzuto, F.J.; von Krbek, L.K.S.; Nitschke, J.R. Strategies for Binding Multiple Guests in Metal-Organic Cages. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2019, 3, 204–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Busschaert, N.; Caltagirone, C.; van Rossom, W.; Gale, P.A. Applications of Supramolecular Anion Recognition. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 8038–8155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ma, X.; Zhao, Y. Biomedical Applications of Supramolecular Systems Based on Host-Guest Interactions. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 7794–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fujita, M.; Yazaki, J.; Ogura, K. Preparation of a Macrocyclic Polynuclear Complex, [(en)Pd(4,4,-bpy)]4(NO3)8, Which Recognizes an Organic Molecule in Aqueous Media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5645–5647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fujita, M.; Oguro, D.; Miyazawa, M.; Oka, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Ogura, K. Self-Assembly of Ten Molecules into Nanometer-Sized Host Frameworks. Nature 1995, 378, 469–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hayes, R.; Bernard, S.A.; Imberti, S.; Warr, G.G.; Atkin, R. Solvation of Inorganic Nitrate Salts in Protic Ionic Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21215–21225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thøgersen, J.; Réhault, J.; Odelius, M.; Ogden, T.; Jena, N.K.; Jensen, S.J.K.; Keiding, S.R.; Helbing, J. Hydration Dynamics of Aqueous Nitrate. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 3376–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Fujita, M.; Tominaga, M.; Hori, A.; Therrien, B. Coordination Assemblies from a Pd(II)-Cornered Square Complex. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tian, C.-B.; Sun, Q.-F. Combinatorial Coordination Self-Assembly for Organopalladium Cages with Fine-Tuned Structure and Function. Chem. Eur. J. 2023, e202300195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mal, P.; Schultz, D.; Beyeh, K.; Rissanen, K.; Nitschke, J.R. An Unlockable-Relockable Iron Cage by Subcomponent Self-Assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8297–8301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ronson, T.K.; Giri, C.; Kodiah Beyeh, N.; Minkkinen, A.; Topic, F.; Holstein, J.J.; Rissanen, K.; Nitschke, J.R. Size-Selective Encapsulation of Hydrophobic Guests by Self-Assembled M4L6 Cobalt and Nickel Cages. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 3374–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Smulders, M.M.J.; Zarra, S.; Nitschke, J.R. Quantitative Understanding of Guest Binding Enables the Design of Complex Host-Guest Behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7039–7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Roukala, J.; Zhu, J.; Giri, C.; Rissanen, K.; Lantto, P.; Telkki, V.V. Encapsulation of Xenon by a Self-Assembled Fe4L6 Metallosupramolecular Cage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2464–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Du, K.; Zemerov, S.D.; Hurtado Parra, S.; Kikkawa, J.M.; Dmochowski, I.J. Paramagnetic Organocobalt Capsule Revealing Xenon Host-Guest Chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 13831–13844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lu, Z.; Ronson, T.K.; Nitschke, J.R. Reversible Reduction Drives Anion Ejection and C60 Binding within an FeII4L6 Cage. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 1097–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cai, L.-X.; Li, S.-C.; Yan, D.-N.; Zhou, L.-P.; Guo, F.; Sun, Q.-F. Water-Soluble Redox-Active Cage Hosting Polyoxometalates for Selective Desulfurization Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 4869–4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Saalfrank, R.W.; Stark, A.; Peters, K.; von Schnering, H.G. The First “Adamantoid” Alkaline Earth Metal Chelate Complex: Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 851–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bolliger, J.L.; Belenguer, A.M.; Nitschke, J.R. Enantiopure Water-Soluble [Fe4L6] Cages: Host-Guest Chemistry and Catalytic Activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7958–7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kishi, N.; Li, Z.; Yoza, K.; Akita, M.; Yoshizawa, M. An M2L4 Molecular Capsule with an Anthracene Shell: Encapsulation of Large Guests up to 1 nm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11438–11441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yamashina, M.; Sei, Y.; Akita, M.; Yoshizawa, M. Safe Storage of Radical Initiators within a Polyaromatic Nanocapsule. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, L.-J.; Bai, S.; Han, Y.-F. Water-Soluble Self-Assembled Cage with Triangular Metal−Metal Bonded Units Enabling the Sequential Selective Separation of Alkanes and Isomeric Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 16191–16198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lewis, J.E.M.; Crowley, J.D. Exo-and Endo-hedral Interactions of Counteranions with Tetracationic Pd2L4 Metallosupramolecular Architectures. Supramol. Chem. 2014, 26, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Preston, D.; McNeill, S.M.; Lewis, J.E.M.; Giles, G.I.; Crowley, J.D. Enhanced Kinetic Stability of [Pd2L4]4+ Cages through Ligand Substitution. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 8050–8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lewis, J.E.M.; Elliott, A.B.S.; McAdam, C.J.; Gordon, K.C.; Crowley, J.D. “Click” to Functionalise: Synthesis, Characterisation and Enhancement of the Physical Properties of a Series of Exo- and Endo-Functionalised Pd2L4 Nanocages. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Han, X.; Guo, C.; Xu, C.; Shi, L.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Q.; Song, B.; Pan, F.; Lu, S.; et al. Water-Soluble Metallo-Supramolecular Nanoreactors for Mediating Visible-Light Promoted Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reactions. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 3723–3736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Percástegui, E.G.; Mosquera, J.; Nitschke, J.R. Anion Exchange Renders Hydrophobic Capsules and Cargoes Water Soluble. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9136–9140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Grommet, A.B.; Hoffman, J.B.; Percástegui, E.G.; Mosquera, J.; Howe, D.J.; Bolliger, J.L.; Nitschke, J.R. Anion Exchange Drives Reversible Phase Transfer of Coordination Cages and Their Cargoes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14770–14776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zhang, D.; Ronson, T.K.; Lavendomme, R.; Nitschke, J.R. Selective Separation of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by Phase Transfer of Coordination Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 18949–18953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sinha, I.; Mukherjee, P.S. Chemical Transformations in Confined Space of Coordination Architectures. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tang, J.-H.; Li, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Hou, S.; Tang, K.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Lu, C.; et al. Single-Molecule Level Control of Host-Guest Interactions in Metallocycle-C60 Complexes. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yoshizawa, M.; Catti, L. Bent Anthracene Dimers as Versatile Building Blocks for Supramolecular Capsules. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Roy, B.; Ghosh, A.K.; Srivastava, S.; D’Silva, P.; Mukherjee, P.S. A Pd8 Tetrafacial Molecular Barrel as Carrier for Water Insoluble Fluorophore. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Acharyya, K.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Sepehrpour, H.; Chakraborty, S.; Lu, S.; Shi, B.; Li, X.; Mukherjee, P.S.; Stang, P.J. Self-Assembled Fluorescent Pt(II) Metallacycles as Artificial Light-Harvesting Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, Z.; Yan, X.; Huang, F.; Sepehrpour, H.; Stang, P.J. NearInfrared Emissive Discrete Platinum (II) Metallacycles: Synthesis and Application in Ammonia Detection. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, M.; Saha, M.L.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Song, B.; Lu, C.; Yan, X.; Li, X.; Huang, F.; Yin, S.; et al. Multicomponent Platinum(II) Cages with Tunable Emission and Amino Acid Sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, L.; Lu, S.; Ling, S.; Li, G.; Xu, L.; Ma, L.; Hou, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Emissive Platinum(II) Cages with Reverse Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer for Multiple Sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chen, L.-J.; Yang, H.-B. Construction of Stimuli-Responsive Functional Materials via Hierarchical Self-Assembly Involving Coordination Interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bhattacharyya, S.; Chowdhury, A.; Saha, R.; Mukherjee, P.S. Multifunctional Self-Assembled Macrocycles with Enhanced Emission and Reversible Photochromic Behavior. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bhattacharyya, S.; Maity, M.; Chowdhury, A.; Saha, M.L.; Panja, S.K.; Stang, P.J.; Mukherjee, P.S. Coordination-Assisted Reversible Photoswitching of Spiropyran-Based Platinum Macrocycles. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yoshizawa, M.; Klosterman, J.K.; Fujita, M. Functional Molecular Flasks: New Properties and Reactions within Discrete, Self-Assembled Hosts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3418–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Raynal, M.; Ballester, P.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; Van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M. Supramolecular Catalysis. Part 2: Artificial Enzyme Mimics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1734–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yao, W.; Wang, J.; Zhong, A.; Wang, S.; Shao, Y. Transition-Metal-Free Catalytic Hydroboration Reduction of Amides to Amines. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 3515–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, Y.-F.; Wang, C.-J.; Feng, Q.-Z.; Zhai, J.-J.; Qi, S.-S.; Zhong, A.-G.; Chu, M.-M.; Xu, D.-Q. Copper-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,6-Conjugate Addition of in Situ Generated Para-Quinone Methides with β-Ketoesters. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 6653–6656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, H.; Zhang, X.-F.; Cheng, J.-Z.; Zhong, A.-G.; Wen, H.-R.; Liu, S.-Y. Novel Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Based π-Conjugated Molecules Synthesized Via One-Pot Direct Arylation Reaction. Molecules 2019, 24, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yao, W.; He, L.; Han, D.; Zhong, A. Sodium Triethylborohydride-Catalyzed Controlled Reduction of Unactivated Amides to Secondary or Tertiary Amines. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 14627–14635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mozaceanu, C.; Taylor, C.G.P.; Piper, J.R.; Argent, S.P.; Ward, M.D. Catalysis of an Aldol Condensation Using a Coordination Cage. Chemistry 2020, 2, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bender, T.A.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. A Supramolecular Strategy for Selective Catalytic Hydrogenation Independent of Remote Chain Length. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11806–11810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Bierschenk, S.M.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. A Nanovessel-Catalyzed Three-Component Aza-Darzens Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 733–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Yoshizawa, M.; Takeyama, Y.; Kusukawa, T.; Fujita, M. Cavity-Directed, Highly Stereoselective [2 + 2] Photodimerization of Olefins within Self-Assembled Coordination Cages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1347–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Yoshizawa, M.; Takeyama, Y.; Okano, T.; Fujita, M. Cavity Directed Synthesis within a Self-Assembled Coordination Cage: Highly Selective [2 + 2] Cross-Photodimerization of Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3243–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Nishioka, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yoshizawa, M.; Fujita, M. Unusual [2 + 4] and [2 + 2] Cycloadditions of Arenes in the Confined Cavity of Self-Assembled Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7000–7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nishioka, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Kawano, M.; Fujita, M. Asymmetric [2 + 2] Olefin Cross Photoaddition in a Self-Assembled Host with Remote Chiral Auxiliaries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8160–8161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Horiuchi, S.; Nishioka, Y.; Murase, T.; Fujita, M. Both [2 + 2] and [2 + 4] Additions of Inert Aromatics via Identical Ternary Host Guest Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3460–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Furusawa, T.; Kawano, M.; Fujita, M. The Confined Cavity of a Coordination Cage Suppresses the Photocleavage of α-Diketones to Give Cyclization Products through Kinetically Unfavorable Pathways. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5717–5719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yamaguchi, T.; Fujita, M. Highly Selective Photomediated 1,4-Radical Addition to o-Quinones Controlled by a Self-Assembled Cage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2067–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gera, R.; Das, A.; Jha, A.; Dasgupta, J. Light-Induced Proton Coupled Electron Transfer is idea Nanocage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15909–15912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Das, A.; Mandal, I.; Venkatramani, R.; Dasgupta, J. Ultrafast Photoactivation of C-H Bonds inside Water-Soluble Nanocages. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav4806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Gera, R.; Dasgupta, J. Photochemistry Using a Host-Guest Charge Transfer Paradigm: DMABN as a Dynamical Probe of Ground and Excited States. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 9280–9284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Guo, X.-Q.; Zhou, L.-P.; Hu, S.-J.; Cai, L.-X.; Cheng, P.-M.; Sun, Q.-F. Hexameric Lanthanide–Organic Capsules with Tertiary Structure and Emergent Functions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6202–6210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yan, D.N.; Cai, L.X.; Cheng, P.M.; Hu, S.J.; Zhou, L.P.; Sun, Q.F. Photooxidase Mimicking with Adaptive Coordination Molecular Capsules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 16087–16094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yan, D.N.; Cai, L.X.; Hu, S.J.; Zhou, Y.F.; Zhou, L.P.; Sun, Q.F. An Organo-Palladium Host Built from a Dynamic Macrocyclic Ligand: Adaptive Self-Assembly, Induce-Fit Guest Binding, and Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202209879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yoshizawa, M.; Miyagi, S.; Kawano, M.; Ishiguro, K.; Fujita, M. Alkane Oxidation via Photochemical Excitation of a Self-Assembled Molecular Cage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9172–9173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Cullen, W.; Takezawa, H.; Fujita, M. Demethylenation of Cyclopropanes via Photoinduced Guest-to-Host Electron Transfer in an M6L4 Cage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 9171–9173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Murase, T.; Takezawa, H.; Fujita, M. Photo-Driven Anti Markovnikov Alkyne Hydration in Self-Assembled Hollow Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10960–10962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Murase, T.; Nishijima, Y.; Fujita, M. Unusual Photoreaction of Triquinacene within Self-Assembled Hosts. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 826–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Dalton, D.M.; Ellis, S.R.; Nichols, E.M.; Mathies, R.A.; Toste, F.D.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N. Supramolecular Ga4L612− Cage Photosensitizes 1,3-Rearrangement of Encapsulated Guest via Photoinduced Electron Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10128–10131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Guo, J.; Xu, Y.W.; Li, K.; Xiao, L.M.; Chen, S.; Wu, K.; Chen, X.D.; Fan, Y.Z.; Liu, J.M.; Su, C.-Y. Regio- and Enantioselective Photodimerization within the Confined Space of a Homochiral Ruthenium/Palladium Heterometallic Coordination Cage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3852–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Guo, J.; Fan, Y.Z.; Lu, Y.L.; Zheng, S.P.; Su, C.-Y. VisibleLight Photocatalysis of Asymmetric [2 + 2] Cycloaddition in Cage Confined Nanospace Merging Chirality with Triplet-State Photosensitization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8661–8669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Wang, J.S.; Wu, K.; Yin, C.; Li, K.; Huang, Y.; Ruan, J.; Feng, X.; Hu, P.; Su, C.-Y. Cage-Confined Photocatalysis for Wide-Scope Unusually Selective [2 + 2] Cycloaddition through Visible-Light Triplet Sensitization. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jin, Y.; Jiang, H.; Tang, X.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Y. Coordination-Driven Self-Assembly of Anthraquinone-Based MetalOrganic Cages for Photocatalytic Selective [2 + 2] Cycloaddition. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 8533–8539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wu, K.; Li, K.; Chen, S.; Hou, Y.-J.; Lu, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-S.; Wei, M.-J.; Su, C.-Y. The Redox Coupling Effect in a Photocatalytic RuII-PdII Cage with TTF Guest as Electron Relay Mediator for Visible-Light Hydrogen-Evolving Promotion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2639–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Jing, Y.; Li, S.; Su, M.; Bao, H.; Wan, W. Barbier Hyperbranching Polymerization-Induced Emission toward Facile Fabrication of White Light-Emitting Diode and Light-Harvesting Film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16839–16848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lee, S.H.; Matula, A.J.; Hu, G.; Troiano, J.L.; Karpovich, C.J.; Crabtree, R.H.; Batista, V.S.; Brudvig, G.W. Strongly Coupled Phenazine-Porphyrin Dyads: Light-Harvesting Molecular Assemblies with Broad Absorption Coverage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 8000–8008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Closs, G.L.; Miller, J.R. Intramolecular Long-Distance Electron Transfer in Organic Molecules. Science 1988, 240, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Qin, Y.; Chen, L.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.-X.; Jiang, W.-L.; Yin, G.-Q.; Tan, H.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Yang, H.-B. Photoswitchable Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) within a heterometallic Ir–Pt macrocycle. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 11119–11122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Catti, L.; Kishida, N.; Kai, T.; Akita, M.; Yoshizawa, M. Polyaromatic Nanocapsules as Photoresponsive Hosts in Water. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Jiang, N.; Yuan, Z.; Li, T.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, Y.-S.; Lin, L.; Zhang, J.; Chan, Y.-T.; Wang, J. Synthesis and Characterization of Ferrocene Based Hemicages. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 4824–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Huo, G.-F.; Shi, X.; Tu, Q.; Hu, Y.-X.; Wu, G.-Y.; Yin, G.-Q.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Ding, H.-M.; Yang, H.-B. Radical-Induced Hierarchical Self-Assembly Involving Supramolecular Coordination Complexes in Both Solution and Solid States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16014–16023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. He, Y.-Q.; Fudickar, W.; Tang, J.-H.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Han, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, M.; Zhong, Y.-W.; Linker, T.; et al. Capture and Release of Singlet Oxygen in Coordination-Driven Self-Assembled Organoplatinum(II) Metallacycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2601–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; He, G.; Zhang, M. Aqueous Platinum(II)-Cage-Based Light-Harvesting System for Photocatalytic Cross-Coupling Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8862–8866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kumar, A.; Saha, R.; Mukherjee, P.S. Self-Assembled Metallasupramolecular Cages towards Light Harvesting Systems for Oxidative Cyclization. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 5319–5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 04068 g001 550
Figure 1. The scheme on the synthetic strategies of WSMOCs.
Figure 1. The scheme on the synthetic strategies of WSMOCs.
Molecules 28 04068 g001
Molecules 28 04068 g002 550
Figure 2. The synthesis of (a) [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2]; (b) WSMOC 1; (c) different ligands used to synthesize WSMOCs.
Figure 2. The synthesis of (a) [cis-(en)Pd(NO3)2]; (b) WSMOC 1; (c) different ligands used to synthesize WSMOCs.
Molecules 28 04068 g002
Molecules 28 04068 g003 550
Figure 3. The reported water-soluble metallo-supramolecular cages assembled from ligands that are anchored with (a) sulfonate, (b) ammonium, and (c) pyridinium and (d) assembled from ligands after dehydrogenation under alkali conditions.
Figure 3. The reported water-soluble metallo-supramolecular cages assembled from ligands that are anchored with (a) sulfonate, (b) ammonium, and (c) pyridinium and (d) assembled from ligands after dehydrogenation under alkali conditions.
Molecules 28 04068 g003
Molecules 28 04068 g004 550
Figure 4. The reported water-soluble metallo-supramolecular cages assembled from ligands that are anchored with (a) chiral glyceryl, (b) methoxyethoxy, (c) glucose, and (d) polyethylene glycol.
Figure 4. The reported water-soluble metallo-supramolecular cages assembled from ligands that are anchored with (a) chiral glyceryl, (b) methoxyethoxy, (c) glucose, and (d) polyethylene glycol.
Molecules 28 04068 g004
Molecules 28 04068 g005 550
Figure 5. Preparation of water-insoluble cube 32 and water-soluble cube 31.
Figure 5. Preparation of water-insoluble cube 32 and water-soluble cube 31.
Molecules 28 04068 g005
Molecules 28 04068 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) General mechanisms of photo(redox)catalysis (Ent = energy transfer); (b) Schematic representation of metal-organic cages with the photosensitizer (PS) at different positions.
Figure 6. (a) General mechanisms of photo(redox)catalysis (Ent = energy transfer); (b) Schematic representation of metal-organic cages with the photosensitizer (PS) at different positions.
Molecules 28 04068 g006
Molecules 28 04068 g007 550
Figure 7. Schematic representation of a supramolecular coordination cage with different positions that are available for the introduction of (photo)catalytic functions.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of a supramolecular coordination cage with different positions that are available for the introduction of (photo)catalytic functions.
Molecules 28 04068 g007
Molecules 28 04068 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) The synthesis of ligand L-A; (b) The synthesis of ligand L-B; (c) The crystal structure of ligand L-A. (d–g) The synthetic applications.
Figure 8. (a) The synthesis of ligand L-A; (b) The synthesis of ligand L-B; (c) The crystal structure of ligand L-A. (d–g) The synthetic applications.
Molecules 28 04068 g008
Molecules 28 04068 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Self-assembly of cages 43 and 44; (b) Proposed mechanism of the photoinduced oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides catalyzed by 43 and 44 hosts.
Figure 9. (a) Self-assembly of cages 43 and 44; (b) Proposed mechanism of the photoinduced oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides catalyzed by 43 and 44 hosts.
Molecules 28 04068 g009
Molecules 28 04068 g010 550
Figure 10. Self-assembly of cage 48 and host−guest complex [49⊂48]. Photocatalyzed aerobic oxidation of toluene derivatives with [49⊂48] under blue LED irradiation.
Figure 10. Self-assembly of cage 48 and host−guest complex [49⊂48]. Photocatalyzed aerobic oxidation of toluene derivatives with [49⊂48] under blue LED irradiation.
Molecules 28 04068 g010
Molecules 28 04068 g011 550
Figure 11. Examples showing (a) reaction mechanism of the demethylenation of 53, (b) anti-Markovnikov hydration of aryl alkynes 55, and (c) photo-oxidation reaction of triquinacene 56 via photoinduced guest-to-host electron transfer in cage 5a under UV radiation.
Figure 11. Examples showing (a) reaction mechanism of the demethylenation of 53, (b) anti-Markovnikov hydration of aryl alkynes 55, and (c) photo-oxidation reaction of triquinacene 56 via photoinduced guest-to-host electron transfer in cage 5a under UV radiation.
Molecules 28 04068 g011
Molecules 28 04068 g012 550
Figure 12. Example showing 1,3-rearrangment of 58 via photoinduced guest-to-host electron transfer in cage 57 under UV radiation.
Figure 12. Example showing 1,3-rearrangment of 58 via photoinduced guest-to-host electron transfer in cage 57 under UV radiation.
Molecules 28 04068 g012
Molecules 28 04068 g013 550
Figure 13. Examples showing (a) 1,4-coupling reaction of 61 and [2 + 2] photocycloaddition of acenaphthylene 63; (b) possible reaction pathway of the oxidative 1,4-coupling; (c) [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds via photoinduced guest-to-host electron transfer in cage 60 under UV radiation.
Figure 13. Examples showing (a) 1,4-coupling reaction of 61 and [2 + 2] photocycloaddition of acenaphthylene 63; (b) possible reaction pathway of the oxidative 1,4-coupling; (c) [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds via photoinduced guest-to-host electron transfer in cage 60 under UV radiation.
Molecules 28 04068 g013
Molecules 28 04068 g014 550
Figure 14. (a) Self-assembly of the WSMOC 68 and cartoon representations of the light-harvesting system and its application in a photocatalytic reaction; (b) Plausible mechanism of cross-coupling hydrogen evolution reaction using LHS as a photocatalyst.
Figure 14. (a) Self-assembly of the WSMOC 68 and cartoon representations of the light-harvesting system and its application in a photocatalytic reaction; (b) Plausible mechanism of cross-coupling hydrogen evolution reaction using LHS as a photocatalyst.
Molecules 28 04068 g014
Molecules 28 04068 g015 550
Figure 15. Self-assembly of the WSMOC 74 and cartoon representations of the light-harvesting system and its application in a photocatalytic reaction.
Figure 15. Self-assembly of the WSMOC 74 and cartoon representations of the light-harvesting system and its application in a photocatalytic reaction.
Molecules 28 04068 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, D.; Shi, L.; Liu, X.; Ya, H.; Han, X. Photocatalysis in Water-Soluble Supramolecular Metal Organic Complex. Molecules 2023, 28, 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104068

AMA Style

Hong D, Shi L, Liu X, Ya H, Han X. Photocatalysis in Water-Soluble Supramolecular Metal Organic Complex. Molecules. 2023; 28(10):4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Dongfeng, Linlin Shi, Xianghui Liu, Huiyuan Ya, and Xin Han. 2023. "Photocatalysis in Water-Soluble Supramolecular Metal Organic Complex" Molecules 28, no. 10: 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104068

APA Style

Hong, D., Shi, L., Liu, X., Ya, H., & Han, X. (2023). Photocatalysis in Water-Soluble Supramolecular Metal Organic Complex. Molecules, 28(10), 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104068

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop