Next Article in Journal
Recovery of Gallium-68 and Zinc from HNO3-Based Solution by Liquid–Liquid Extraction with Arylamino Phosphonates
Next Article in Special Issue
Deep Eutectic Solvents as à-la-Carte Medium for Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Organic Processes
Previous Article in Journal
The Biosynthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles’ Antiviral Activity in Combination with Pelargonium zonale Extract against the Human Corona 229E Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review on the Synthesis and Chemical Transformation of Quinazoline 3-Oxides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 23
10.3390/molecules27238376
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and the Crystal Structure of a New Chiral 1D Metal–Organic Coordination Polymer Based on L-Prolineamide-Substituted Diarylacetylenedicarboxylic Acid Derivative

by
Vladimir V. Veselovsky
1,
Vera I. Isaeva
1,
Vera D. Nissenbaum
1,
Leonid M. Kustov
1,2 and
Vladimir V. Chernyshev
3,4,*
1
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospect 47, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Laboratory of Nanochemistry and Ecology, National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Leninsky prospect 4, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Chemistry, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1–3 Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
4
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Building 4, 31 Leninsky prospect, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8376; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238376
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Organic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The new homochiral 1D metal–organic coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n was synthesized starting from the original 3,3′-ethyne-1,2-diylbis[6-(L-prolylamino)benzoic acid] (H4EDPB). The unique crystal structure of the new compound was established by powder X-ray diffraction. The [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n system shows catalytic activity and enantioselectivity in a Henry reaction of p-nitrobenzaldehyde with nitromethane.

1. Introduction

For the last thirty years, investigations related to metal–organic coordination polymers (MOCPs) of different dimensionality (one- (1D), two- (2D) and three- (3D) dimensional networks), composed of metal ions bridged by polytopic organic ligands (linkers), have been extremely popular [1]. The reason for this relates to the unusual physico-chemical properties of these highly ordered crystalline materials, which are common in some aspects, and differ in relation to their topology or architecture. One-dimensional MOCPs are linear polymers, which crystallize as chains [2]. Two-dimensional MOCPs exist mostly as layers. Three-dimensional MOCPs, or metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), are extensively studied, due to their extremely high porosity and specific surface area, which provide their potential as multifunctional materials with diverse applications [3].
Despite their structural simplicity, compared to MOFs, 1D MOCPs are also attractive objects for investigation, because they can serve as models for investigation of the correlations between synthesis variables and formed MOCP dimensionality [4,5], and thereby for developing a strategy for the preparation of coordination compounds of desirable dimensionality [6]. Another correlation, which can be studied using 1D MOCPs as models, is the relationship between MOCP dimensionality and its functional properties [7,8,9]: for instance, 1D and 2D MOCPs are rather promising as components of heterogeneous catalysts, because their architectures provide accessibility to the active sites of the substrates [10,11].
It is well known that 1D, 2D and 3D MOCPs can be obtained from the same organic (linkers) and inorganic (metal ions) building blocks, by spatially changing the synthesis variables. Understanding the possibility of self-assembly of the specific coordination network in a predictable way is important for the functional material design. For the construction of MOCPs of different dimensionality, including 1D networks, the most popular organic building blocks are arenedicarboxylic [12,13] and diarylacetylenedicarboxylic [14,15] acid derivatives in combination with transition metal ions (Zn2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Fe2+, etc.): the chiral derivatives of these acids have particular potential, because they pave the way to the enanthioselective functional materials including 1D MOCPs with specific properties [13,16].
We have previously reported the synthesis of diarylacetylenedicarboxylic acid [3,3′-ethyne-1,2-diylbis[6-(L-prolylamino)benzoic acid, (EDPBA) (1)], which can form the homochiral Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework ZIOC-1 by self-assembly [17]. The ZIOC-1 material was studied as an enantioselective heterogeneous catalyst with Lewis basicity in the aldol reaction and Michael condensation. In this context, the next step of our investigations was to study the possibility of dicarboxylic acid 1 utilization as an organic linker for the self-assembly of the chiral MOCPs with Lewis active sites for enantioselective catalytic reactions involving the C–C bond formation.
Herein, we present the results of our study to determine the possibility of synthesizing MOCPs based on building block 1. It was found that the reaction of EDPBA (1) with Cu(OAc)2•H2O smoothly proceeded in diluted aqueous ammonia at 80 °C, affording the novel 1D MOCP with formula [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, where H4EDPB=EDPBA, along with NH3 removal from the reaction medium. The crystal structure of this novel 1D MOCP was established by the powder XRD analysis, its thermal stability was studied by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and its morphology was determined by FE-SEM measurements. It is well known that a number of Cu(II) complexes are effective as homogeneous [18,19,20] or heterogeneous catalysts [21] in Henry reactions (nitroaldol condensation). We intended to check the assumption that the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n material would operate as a catalyst in this process, due to Lewis base sites in amide moiety and Lewis acid sites as Cu2+ ions. These bifunctional properties were observed by Pombeiro et al. [22] for Zn, Cd and Co MOCPs of different dimensionality; therefore, an evaluation of the catalytic activity and enantioselectivity of the novel chiral 1D MOCP was carried out on the enantioselective Henry reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and nitromethane.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Crystal Structure

The crystal data, data collection and refinement parameters for new polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n are given in Table 1, and diffraction profiles after the final bond-restrained Rietveld refinement are shown in Figure 1 (see also Supplementary Materials Figure S1).
The asymmetric unit of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n contains half of the chiral ligand EDPB, one Cu(II) ion and one water molecule situated on a 2-fold symmetry axis. Each copper center is coordinated by one O and two N atoms from one EDPB and one O atom from another EDPB, and these four atoms form a basal plane with Cu-(O,N) bond lengths covering the range 1.935(6)–2.053(6) Å. Two O atoms are also involved in the coordination of the close symmetry related Cu(II) ion, thus participating in the formation of the binuclear core (see Figure 2 prepared with Mercury [23]) with Cu…Cu separation of 3.050(3) Å. The water molecule (O4) situated on a 2-fold axis weakly coordinates both the symmetry-related copper centers [Cu1…O4 2.481(7) Å], thus complementing the coordination environment of each center with the heavily distorted square-base pyramid (see Figure S2).
In the chiral ligand EDPB, two amide groups (N1) and two hydroxy groups (O1) are deprotonated, so the EDPB has negative charge −4. All bond lengths and angles in the EDPB lie within normal ranges, comparable with those found in the Cambridge Structural Database (ConQuest version 2.0.2 with updates) [24] for close compounds. Two benzene rings make a dihedral angle of 24.7(9)°. In the crystal, each L-proline fragment of L coordinates is in a tridentate mode, thus providing a polymeric chain formation, extended in 101 (Figure 3), and consisting of alternating [2Cu.H2O]4+ binuclear fragments and L4− bridging ligands. The N2–H2 group is involved in the hydrogen bonding with the O2 atom within this linear polymeric chain (Table 2), while the water molecule participates in hydrogen bonding between the polymeric chains (Table 2), thus consolidating the crystal packing along with the weak C—H…O interactions (Table 2, see also Figures S3 and S4).

2.2. Morphology of the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n Material

The morphology of the new polymer was studied by the SEM method. SEM micrographs (Figure 4) show that the Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n material crystallized in the form of thin plates (“petals”, Figure 4 left) with the sizes of ~ 300–400 nm, which were combined in distorted spherical agglomerates (“rose flowers”, Figure 4 right) of 3–5 μm in size. This morphology is rather unusual for 1D coordination polymers. For instance, 1D MOCP with Zn2+ ions and pyrazine-2,5-dicarboxylate ligands, as described in [7], crystallizes as large rectangular plastins or prisms with sizes 4–7 μm. On the other hand, the hydrogen-bonded framework ZIOC-1, based on the same linker EDPBA, crystallizes as separate thin plates in almost the same shape, but with much bigger sizes of 1–5 μm [17].

2.3. Investigation of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n Thermal Stability

The thermal stability of the novel coordination polymer was studied by the TGA method. Figure 5 presents a mass loss and, thereby, the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n sample thermal stability during programmed heating. In the low temperature field (up to 130 °C), the mass change, which is around 1.9 %, is associated with water loss. In the temperature range 130–240 °C, remarkable mass change is not observed (0.8%). The next stages of the mass changes (38.5%) and (35%), in the temperature ranges 240–325 °C and 240–325 °C, respectively, can be attributed to decomposition beginning. The rapid mass decrease indicates the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n structure collapses at temperatures as high as 450 °C.

2.4. FTIR Studies of the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n Polymer

In the IR spectrum of the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n polymer, there are characteristic adsorption bands at 1606 cm−1 and 1401 cm−1, belonging to the vibrations νas(COO−) and νs(COO−) of the carboxylate groups coordinated with Cu(II) [25], respectively (Figure S5). In the IR spectrum of the EDPBA linker, there is a characteristic adsorption band at 1686 cm−1, belonging to the carboxylic group of the aromatic acid, and the bands belonging to the carboxylate anion are absent (Figure S6).

2.5. Evaluation of the Catalytic Activity of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n Polymer

Nitroaldol condensation is one of the main important processes in organic synthesis, as a rather simple route for C–C bond formation. The homochiral nature of a new coordination polymer motivated us to explore it as the catalyst in an enantioselective Henry reaction between chiral p-nitrobenzaldehyde and nitromethane in a propanol-2 medium.
The catalysis mechanism suggested for the Henry reaction involved the coordination of benzaldehyde and Cu(II) center, which is an initial step for the C–C bond coupling reaction between carbonyl compounds and nitroalkanes [26].
In this test reaction, the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n material did not show high activity. The scalemic (non-racemic) product ((4-nitrophenyl)-2-nitroethanol) was isolated with the yield ~15%, after keeping the reaction mixture for 48 h at 50 °C: this low activity was probably attributable to the low acidity of Lewis Cu(II) active sites; a high coordination number (5) participated in the coordination, with two oxygen atoms of carboxylic groups, two nitrogen atoms of amide, and amino groups and a water molecule; therefore, there were almost no vacant sites for the substrate coordination.
It is noteworthy that the 3D MOCP (MOF) material with Cu2+-ions studied by us, i.e., the HKUST-1 material based on benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate linkers [21], showed almost no activity in the Henry reaction. The lower activity of the porous HKUST-1 material in this process, as compared to the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n polymer, could also be explained by the rather high coordination number of the Cu(II) center, and the missing Lewis sites that naturally disliked the 1D counterpart additional-amide Lewis basic sites.
The enantiomeric excess of the reaction product was ~26% ee. The comparison of values of the retention times of the components of the mixture, measured by HPLC in related conditions [27], allowed us to assign (1S)- absolute configuration for a main enantiomer (see Figure S7).
Similarly low enantioselectivity of the 2D MOCPs with Zn2+, Cd2+ and Co2+ ions in the Henry reaction was observed in [11]; it is probable that effective enantioselective recognition may only be provided by 3D MOCP material (MOF) with pores containing appropriate functional chiral groups.
This study may help to provide a certain insight into the different impacts of the porous structures of MOCPs on their catalytic activity and enantioselectivity.

3. Materials and Methods

All solvents and reagents were purchased from Acros Organics, and were used without further purification. The homochiral acid EDPBA (1) was obtained as previously reported [17]. Elemental analysis was performed on a Perkin Elmer 2400 C,H,N analyzer. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed using the Derivatograph-C instrument (MOM Company). FE-SEM measurements with samples coating were carried out using a Hitachi SU8000 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). A target-oriented approach was utilized for the optimization of the analytic measurements [28]. Before measurement, the samples were mounted on a 25 mm aluminum specimen stub, and fixed by conductive silver paint. Metal coating, with a thin film (10 nm) of gold/palladium alloy (60/40), was performed, using a magnetron sputtering method, by a high-resolution sputter coater Cressington 208HR. Images were acquired in secondary electron mode at 2−10 kV accelerating voltage, and at a working distance of 8–10 mm. The morphology of the samples was studied, taking into account the possible influence of metal coating on the surface [29]. FTIR spectra were recorded with a Bruker ALPHA-T instrument.

3.1. Synthesis of Coordination Polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n

The formation of the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n is realized according to the Scheme 1. Cu(OAc)2•H2O in 70 mL of water 25% aq. NH3 (4.0 mL) was added to a stirred suspension of 330 mg (0.67 mmol) acid 1 and 270 mg (1.35 mmol, ~2.0 equiv.), in order to solubilize it. The resultant solution was stirred in air at 80 °C in an open vial for 2 h, until its pH changed from ~10 to almost neutral, due to NH3 removal, by evaporation, from the solution. The resultant powder was separated by centrifugation, and washed with water (4 × 5 mL). Drying of the crude product for 20 h in vacuo under P2O5 (2 Torr, 20 °C) gave coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n with a yield of 380 mg (78%). Elemental analysis calculated (%) for C26H24Cu2N4O7: C 49.44; H 3.83; N 8.87. Found: C 48.82; H 3.69; N 8.74.

3.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The dried sample (9.4 mg) of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n was placed in a platinum crucible, and heated in air from 20 to 500 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C min−1.

3.3. X-ray Powder Diffraction

The crystal structure of the coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n was determined by the use of SDPD (structure determination from powder diffraction) methods [30,31,32,33,34]. The X-ray powder pattern was measured at room temperature on a Panalytical EMPYREAN diffractometer with a linear Xcelerator detector, using non-monochromated Cu Kα radiation. All observed peaks were indexed in a monoclinic C-centered unit cell with a volume of 1239 Ǻ3. The Pawley fitting [35] performed with the program MRIA [36] confirmed the space group C2. The crystal structure was solved in this space group with the use of the simulated annealing technique [37], assuming location of the chiral ligand on a 2-fold symmetry axis. The solution obtained in simulated annealing runs was refined with the program MRIA, following the known procedures described by us previously [17,38,39]. A careful inspection of the Fourier difference map allowed us to find, on a 2-fold symmetry axis, the position of the water molecule coordinating the two neighboring Cu atoms. In the refinement, only three isotropic displacement parameters were refined: two parameters for Cu and water’s oxygen, respectively; one common Uiso parameter was used for the rest of the non-H atoms. All the H atoms were placed in calculated positions, and not refined. The strong anisotropy of diffraction-line broadening was approximated by a quartic form in hkl [40].

3.4. Evaluation of the Catalytic Performance of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n Material in a Henry Reaction

The Henry of p-nitrobenzaldehyde with nitromethane proceeds according to the Scheme 2. A mixture of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n (40 mg, 0.063 mmol, 0.1 equiv.), p-nitrobenzaldehyde (95 mg, 0.63 mmol) and nitromethane (390 mg, 6.39 mmol) in i-PrOH (1.5 mL) was stirred at 50 °C in an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 48 h, and was then diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The catalyst was separated by centrifugation, and was washed with EtOAc (3 × 5 mL). The combined supernatant was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2. Elution with a mixture of CHCl3 gave, in order of elution, unreacted p-nitrobenzaldehyde (60 mg) and the non-racemic product of nitroaldol reaction (1-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-nitroethane-1-ol) with a yield of 20 mg (15%) as viscous oil (1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 3.47 (br.s, 1H, OH); 4.58–4.62 (m, 2H, CH2O); 5.61 (dd, 1H, CHO, J = 7.4, 5.0 Hz); 7.62 (d, 2H, 2 HAr, J = 8.7 Hz); 8.23 (d, 2H, 2HAr, J = 8.7 Hz, cf. [25] (SI). HPLC analysis (Figure S1) of chiral phase Kromasil 3 CelluCoat (column 4.6 × 150 mm), hexane/i-PrOH 90:10: flow rate 1.0 mL/min. The retention times of the enantiomers were 22.80 min for minor and 27.03 min for major (~26% ee).

4. Conclusions

A new chiral metal–organic coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n was constructed in a “green” way by the self-assembly of L-prolineamide-substituted diarylacetylenedicarboxylic acid derivative (EDPB) and Cu2+ ions in a water medium, under rather mild synthesis conditions (80 °C, 2 h, air): its crystal structure was established with the use of X-ray powder diffraction. The [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n material was thermally stable until 240 °C, as well as chemically stable in common solvents, such as chloroform and acetone. The [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n material showed a certain catalytic activity in a Henry reaction between p-nitrobenzalehyde and nitromethane, affording a non-racemic product (4-nitrophenyl)-2-nitroethanol), which was higher than the catalytic activity of the 3D metal–organic framework HKUST-1. It is probable that the catalytic activity of the new 1D MOCP could be ascribed to the presence of the Cu2+ ions as Lewis active sites, and to amide functionalities in EDPB linkers as Lewis base sites.
Further adjustment of 1D MOCP structures, for improved catalytic performance in condensation reactions, will be the focus of our future investigations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27238376/s1: CIF for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n; Figures S1–S4 showing powder patterns; coordination polyhedron and hydrogen bonds in [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n; Figures S5 and S6—IR spectra of the [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n polymer and EDPBA linker, respectively; Figure S7—HPLC analysis of the product of a 4-nitrobenzaldehyde and nitromethane Henry reaction. Ref. [41] is cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

All the authors equally participated in the experimental work and the writing of the article. Conceptualization, V.V.V. and V.V.C.; methodology, V.V.V., V.I.I. and V.V.C.; software, V.V.C.; validation, V.I.I. and V.V.C.; formal analysis, V.V.C.; investigation, V.V.V., V.D.N. and V.V.C.; resources, L.M.K.; data curation, L.M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, V.V.V., V.I.I. and V.V.C.; writing—review and editing, V.V.V., V.I.I. and V.V.C.; visualization, V.V.C.; supervision, V.V.C.; project administration, L.M.K.; funding acquisition, L.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

X-ray measurements were performed using the equipment of CKP FMI A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Moscow, and electron microscopy characterization was performed in the Department of Structural Studies of Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Moscow.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compound [Cu2(EDPBA)•H2O]n are available from the authors.

References

  1. Loukopoulos, E.; Kostakis, G.E. Review: Recent advances of one-dimensional coordination polymers as catalysts. J. Coord. Chem. 2018, 71, 371–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Isaeva, V.I.; Belyaeva, E.V.; Fitch, A.N.; Chernyshev, V.V.; Klyamkin, S.N.; Kustov, L.M. Synthesis and Structural Characterization of a Series of Novel Zn(II)-based MOFs with Pyridine-2,5-dicarboxylate Linkers. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 5305–5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Masoomi, M.Y.; Morsali, A. Morphological study and potential applications of nano metal-organic coordination polymers. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 19191–19218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lustig, W.P.; Li, J. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks and coordination polymers as alternative phosphors for energy efficient lighting devices. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 373, 116–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diercks, C.S.; Kalmutzki, M.J.; Diercks, N.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Conceptual Advances from Werner Complexes to Metal-Organic Frameworks. ACS Centr. Sci. 2018, 4, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ghosh, S.K.; Azhakar, R.; Kitagawa, S. Control of Structure Dimensionality and Functional Studies of Flexible CuII. Coord. Polym. Chem. Asian J. 2009, 4, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Isaeva, V.; Chernyshev, V.; Afonina, E.; Tkachenko, O.; Klementiev, K.; Nissenbaum, V.; Grünert, W.; Kustov, L. Novel metal-organic 1-D coordination polymer based on pyrazine-2,5-dicarboxylate ligands: Synthesis and structure investigation. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2011, 376, 367–37251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stoica, A.-C.; Damoc, M.; Zaltariov, M.-F.; Racles, C.; Cazacu, M. Two-dimensional coordination polymers containing permethylated motifs-promising candidates for 2D emerging materials. Structural, behavioral and functional particularities. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 168, 105039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, X.; Ranford, J.D.; Vittal, J.J. Isomerism in 1D Coordination Polymers of Cu(II) Complexes of N-(2-Hydroxybenzyl)-L-valine: Influence of Solvent and Coordination Sphere on the Conformation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2004, 4, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Isaeva, V.; Tkachenko, O.; Afonina, E.; Kozlova, L.M.; Grünert, W.; Solov’eva, S.E.; Antipin, I.S.; Kustov, L. 2-Butyne-l,4-diol hydrogenation over palladium supported on Zn2+-based MOF and host-guest MOF/calix[4]arene materials. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2013, 166, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, Y.-H.; Ye, H.-T.; Hou, G.-F.; Ren, C.-Y.; Gao, J.-S.; Yan, P.-F. Synthesis, Structure, and Properties of a Series of Chiral Coordination Polymers Based on (R)4-(4-(1-Carboxyethoxy)phenoxy)-3-chlorobenzoic Acid. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 5669–5677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gu, J.; Wen, M.; Liang, X.; Shi, Z.; Kirillova, M.V.; Kirillov, A.M. Multifunctional aromatic carboxylic acids as versatile building blocks for hydrothermal design of coordination polymers. Crystals 2018, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Veselovsky, V.V.; Lozanova, A.V.; Isaeva, V.I.; Chernyshev, V.V. Synthesis and the crystal structure of a new chiral metal-organic coordination polymer based on L-proline-substituted 2-aminobenzene-1,4-dicarboxylic acid derivative. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2021, 70, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tranchemontagne, D.J.; Park, K.S.; Furukawa, H.; Eckert, J.; Knobler, C.B.; Yaghi, O.M. Hydrogen Storage in New Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 13143–13151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Matemb Ma Ntep, T.J.; Gramm, V.K.; Ruschewitz, U.; Janiak, C. Acetylenedicarboxylate as a linker in the engineering of coordination polymers and metal-organic frameworks: Challenges and potential. Chem. Comm. 2022, 58, 8900–8933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jouaiti, A.; Grosshans, P.; Kyritsakas, N.; Ferlay, S.; Henry, M.; Hosseini, M.W. Crystal formation of 1D coordination polymers based on chiral, achiral and racemic 1,2-cyclohexane scaffolds. CrystEngComm 2020, 22, 1746–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Veselovsky, V.V.; Lozanova, A.V.; Isaeva, V.I.; Lobova, A.A.; Chernyshev, V.V. New Chiral Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Based on Substituted Diarylacetylene Dicarboxylic Acid. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 3713–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koz, G.; Astley, D.; Astley, S.T. Enantioselective Henry reaction catalyzed by a novel L-(+)-aspartic acid-derived Schiff base ligand and Cu(II) ion. Turk. J. Chem. 2011, 35, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ni, B.; He, J. Highly asymmetric Henry reaction catalyzed by chiral copper(II) complexes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 462–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Veselovsky, V.V.; Stepanov, A.V. Novel catalysts for the enantioselective Henry reaction. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014, 63, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Isaeva, V.I.; Chernyshev, V.V.; Fomkin, A.A.; Shkolin, A.V.; Veselovsky, V.V.; Kapustin, G.I.; Sokolova, N.A.; Kustov, L.M. Preparation of novel hybrid catalyst with an hierarchical micro-/mesoporous structure by direct growth of the HKUST-1 nanoparticles inside mesoporous silica matrix (MMS). Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2020, 300, 110136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karmakar, A.; Rfflbio, D.M.; Guedes da Silva, M.F.C.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Synthesis of Metallomacrocycle and Coordination Polymers with Pyridine-Based Amidocarboxylate Ligands and Their Catalytic Activities towards the Henry and Knoevenagel Reactions. ChemistryOpen 2018, 7, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Macrae, C.F.; Bruno, I.J.; Chisholm, J.A.; Edgington, P.R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Rodriguez-Monge, L.; Taylor, R.; van de Streek, J.; Wood, P.A. Mercury CSD 2.0–new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008, 41, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Groom, C.R.; Allen, F.H. The Cambridge Structural Database in Retrospect and Prospect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hadjiivanov, K.I.; Panayotov, D.A.; Mihaylov, M.Y.; Ivanova, E.Z.; Chakarova, K.K.; Andonova, S.M.; Drenchev, N.L. Power of Infrared and Raman Spectroscopies to Characterize Metal-Organic Frameworks and Investigate Their Interaction with Guest Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1286–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, Z.-N.; Wang, K.; Cui, D.; Wu, A. The new chemical insight for understanding the mechanism of Henry reaction over Cu(II) catalyst. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017, 673, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choudary, B.M.; Ranganath, K.V.S.; Pal, U.; Kantam, M.L.; Sreedhar, B. Nanocrystalline MgO for Asymmetric Henry and Michael Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13167–13171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kachala, V.V.; Khemchyan, L.L.; Kashin, A.S.; Orlov, N.V.; Grachev, A.A.; Zalesskiy, S.S.; Ananikov, V.P. Target-oriented analysis of gaseous, liquid and solid chemical systems by mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and electron microscopy. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2013, 82, 648–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kashin, A.S.; Ananikov, V.P. A SEM study of nanosized metal films and metal nanoparticles obtained by magnetron sputtering. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2011, 60, 2602–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harris, K.D.M.; Tremayne, M.; Kariuki, B.M. Contemporary advances in the use of powder X-ray diffraction for structure determination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1626–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chernyshev, V.V. Structure determination from powder diffraction. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001, 50, 2273–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. David, W.I.F.; Shankland, K. Structure determination from powder diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Harris, K.D.M. Powder diffraction crystallography of molecular solids. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012, 315, 133–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cerny, R. Crystal Structures from Powder Diffraction: Principles, Difficulties and Progress. Crystals 2017, 7, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pawley, G.S. Unit-cell refinement from powder diffraction scans. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1981, 14, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zlokazov, V.B.; Chernyshev, V.V. MRIA-a program for a full profile analysis of powder multiphase neutron-diffraction time-of-flight (direct and Fourier) spectra. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1992, 25, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhukov, S.G.; Chernyshev, V.V.; Babaev, E.V.; Sonneveld, E.J.; Schenk, H. Application of simulated annealing approach for structure solution of molecular crystals from X-ray laboratory powder data. Z. Kristallogr-Cryst. Mater. 2001, 216, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Veselovsky, V.V.; Lozanova, A.V.; Isaeva, V.I.; Lobova, A.A.; Fitch, A.N.; Chernyshev, V.V. Optically active derivatives of terephthalic acid: Four crystal structures from two powder patterns. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2018, C74, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Veselovsky, V.V.; Isaeva, V.I.; Kustov, L.M.; Kapustin, G.I.; Nissenbaum, V.D.; Dejoie, C.; Fitch, A.N.; Chernyshev, V.V. Synthesis and crystal structure of a new chiral hydrogen-bonded organic framework ZIOC-2. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22, 2547–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Popa, N.C. The (hkl) dependence of diffraction-line broadening caused by strain and size for all Laue groups in Rietveld refinement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1998, 31, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brandenburg, K.; Berndt, M. Diamond; Crystal impact Gb R: Bonn, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 08376 g001 550
Figure 1. The Rietveld plot for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, showing the experimental (black) and difference (experimental minus calculated, in red) curves after the final bond-restrained Rietveld refinement. The vertical blue bars denote the calculated positions of the diffraction peaks.
Figure 1. The Rietveld plot for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, showing the experimental (black) and difference (experimental minus calculated, in red) curves after the final bond-restrained Rietveld refinement. The vertical blue bars denote the calculated positions of the diffraction peaks.
Molecules 27 08376 g001
Molecules 27 08376 g002 550
Figure 2. A portion of the crystal structure of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, showing the atomic numbering of the Cu, O and N atoms.
Figure 2. A portion of the crystal structure of [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, showing the atomic numbering of the Cu, O and N atoms.
Molecules 27 08376 g002
Molecules 27 08376 g003 550
Figure 3. A polymeric 1D chain in [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, extended in 101. H atoms omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: (a) 2 − x, y, 1 − z; (b) 1 − x, y, −z; (c) 1 + x, y, 1 + z.
Figure 3. A polymeric 1D chain in [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n, extended in 101. H atoms omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: (a) 2 − x, y, 1 − z; (b) 1 − x, y, −z; (c) 1 + x, y, 1 + z.
Molecules 27 08376 g003
Molecules 27 08376 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of new [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n polymer at different resolutions.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of new [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n polymer at different resolutions.
Molecules 27 08376 g004
Molecules 27 08376 g005 550
Figure 5. TG, DTG and DTA curves for the sample [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Figure 5. TG, DTG and DTA curves for the sample [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Molecules 27 08376 g005
Molecules 27 08376 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Formation of the coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Scheme 1. Formation of the coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Molecules 27 08376 sch001
Molecules 27 08376 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Henry reaction of p-nitrobenzaldehyde with nitromethane over coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Scheme 2. Henry reaction of p-nitrobenzaldehyde with nitromethane over coordination polymer [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Molecules 27 08376 sch002
Table
Table 1. Crystal data for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Table 1. Crystal data for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
[Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n
CCDC number2204678
empirical formulaC26H24Cu2N4O7
Mr631.60
crystal systemMonoclinic
space groupC2
unit cell dimensions
a, Å13.4022(17)
b, Å8.6154(11)
c, Å10.9367(15)
β,o101.167(19)
volume, Å31238.9(3)
Z2
Dx (Mg m−3)1.693
μ, mm−12.601
2Θmin–2Θmax, ∆2Θ (o)6.004–70.009, 0.017
no. params/restraints95/86
Rp, Rwp, Rexp 0.014, 0.021, 0.008
GooF2.686
Table
Table 2. Hydrogen bond geometry (Å, o) for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
Table 2. Hydrogen bond geometry (Å, o) for [Cu2(EDPB)•H2O]n.
D-H…AD-HH…AD…AD-H…A
N2–H2…O2 i0.912.142.784(8)127
O4–H4…O3 ii0.851.782.628(9)178
C11–H11A…O2 iii0.972.433.309(11)151
Symmetry codes: i 1 − x, y, −z; ii 3/2 − x, 1/2 + y, −z; iii x, y, −1 + z.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Veselovsky, V.V.; Isaeva, V.I.; Nissenbaum, V.D.; Kustov, L.M.; Chernyshev, V.V. Synthesis and the Crystal Structure of a New Chiral 1D Metal–Organic Coordination Polymer Based on L-Prolineamide-Substituted Diarylacetylenedicarboxylic Acid Derivative. Molecules 2022, 27, 8376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238376

AMA Style

Veselovsky VV, Isaeva VI, Nissenbaum VD, Kustov LM, Chernyshev VV. Synthesis and the Crystal Structure of a New Chiral 1D Metal–Organic Coordination Polymer Based on L-Prolineamide-Substituted Diarylacetylenedicarboxylic Acid Derivative. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Veselovsky, Vladimir V., Vera I. Isaeva, Vera D. Nissenbaum, Leonid M. Kustov, and Vladimir V. Chernyshev. 2022. "Synthesis and the Crystal Structure of a New Chiral 1D Metal–Organic Coordination Polymer Based on L-Prolineamide-Substituted Diarylacetylenedicarboxylic Acid Derivative" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238376

APA Style

Veselovsky, V. V., Isaeva, V. I., Nissenbaum, V. D., Kustov, L. M., & Chernyshev, V. V. (2022). Synthesis and the Crystal Structure of a New Chiral 1D Metal–Organic Coordination Polymer Based on L-Prolineamide-Substituted Diarylacetylenedicarboxylic Acid Derivative. Molecules, 27(23), 8376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238376

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop