Next Article in Journal
Novel 1,3-Thiazole Analogues with Potent Activity against Breast Cancer: A Design, Synthesis, In Vitro, and In Silico Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Diversity of Essential Oils from Korean Native Populations of Agastache rugosa (Korean Mint)
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antibiofilm Activities of Backhousia citriodora Essential Oil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Study on Phytochemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Myriactis nepalensis Less.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 15
10.3390/molecules27154897
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neutrophil Immunomodulatory Activity of (−)-Borneol, a Major Component of Essential Oils Extracted from Grindelia squarrosa

by
Igor A. Schepetkin
1,
Gulmira Özek
2,
Temel Özek
2,
Liliya N. Kirpotina
1,
Andrei I. Khlebnikov
3 and
Mark T. Quinn
1,*
1
Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Anadolu University, Eskisehir 26470, Turkey
3
Kizhner Research Center, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(15), 4897; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154897
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Composition and Bioactivities of Essential Oils)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal is used in traditional medicine for treating various diseases; however, little is known about the immunomodulatory activity of essential oils from this plant. Thus, we isolated essential oils from the flowers (GEOFl) and leaves (GEOLv) of G. squarrosa and evaluated the chemical composition and innate immunomodulatory activity of these essential oils. Compositional analysis of these essential oils revealed that the main components were α-pinene (24.7 and 23.2% in GEOFl and GEOLv, respectively), limonene (10.0 and 14.7%), borneol (23.4 and 16.6%), p-cymen-8-ol (6.1 and 5.8%), β-pinene (4.0 and 3.8%), bornyl acetate (3.0 and 5.1%), trans-pinocarveol (4.2 and 3.7%), spathulenol (3.0 and 2.0%), myrtenol (2.5 and 1.7%), and terpinolene (1.7 and 2.0%). Enantiomer analysis showed that α-pinene, β-pinene, and borneol were present primarily as (−)-enantiomers (100% enantiomeric excess (ee) for (−)-α-pinene and (−)-borneol in both GEOFl and GEOLv; 82 and 78% ee for (−)-β-pinene in GEOFl and GEOLv), while limonene was present primarily as the (+)-enantiomer (94 and 96 ee in GEOFl and GEOLv). Grindelia essential oils activated human neutrophils, resulting in increased [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 22.3 µg/mL for GEOFl and 19.4 µg/mL for GEOLv). In addition, one of the major enantiomeric components, (−)-borneol, activated human neutrophil [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 28.7 ± 2.6), whereas (+)-borneol was inactive. Since these treatments activated neutrophils, we also evaluated if they were able to down-regulate neutrophil responses to subsequent agonist activation and found that treatment with Grindelia essential oils inhibited activation of these cells by the N-formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) agonist fMLF and the FPR2 agonist WKYMVM. Likewise, (−)-borneol inhibited FPR-agonist-induced Ca2+ influx in neutrophils. Grindelia leaf and flower essential oils, as well as (−)-borneol, also inhibited fMLF-induced chemotaxis of human neutrophils (IC50 = 4.1 ± 0.8 µg/mL, 5.0 ± 1.6 µg/mL, and 5.8 ± 1.4 µM, respectively). Thus, we identified (−)-borneol as a novel modulator of human neutrophil function.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Grindelia was established by Willdenow in 1807 and is recognized as one of the most distinct and homogeneous genera in the Compositae family [1]. The genus Grindelia Willd. comprises about 68 species [2], and the following four species have been used medicinally: Grindelia robusta Nutt. (syn. G. camporum Greene, California gumdrop), G. hirsutula Hook. & Arn. (syn. G. humilis Hook. & Arn., Hairy Gumweed), G. lanceolata Nutt. (Narrow-leaved gumdrop), and G. squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal (gumweed, bulky rubber weed) [3]. For example, grindelic acid isolated from G. squarrosa was reported to have anti-inflammatory activity [4], and previous pharmacological studies emphasized the possibility of the application of G. robusta and G. squarrosa in diseases of the upper respiratory tract [5]. Likewise, Gumweed herb (G. camporum) was indicated for cough and bronchitis [6]. Due to its antispasmodic, expectorant, and hypotensive effects, G. squarrosa was suggested for the treatment of asthmatic and bronchial conditions, especially when these are associated with rapid heartbeat and nervous responses [7].
Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal is a biennial or a short-lived perennial plant that is native to North America [1]. Its range comprises the central prairie and plains regions of southern Minnesota and South Dakota, Wyoming, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Texas [8]. American Indians have used Grindelia flowers and leaves for treating colds, coughs, bronchitis, and asthma (Crow, Flathead, Paiute, Shoshoni, and Ute). In addition, the Cheyenne people used a decoction of this plant as a disinfectant to wash sores and other skin lesions. Likewise, a decoction of Grindelia roots was used for liver problems by the Blackfoot tribe [9].
Grindelia species contain valuable secondary metabolites that have pharmacological importance, including essential oils [10,11,12,13,14,15,16], labdane type diterpenes [17,18], triterpene saponins [19], flavonoids [19,20], tannins [21], and phenolic acids [22]. Previous analyses of the biological activity of extracts from Grindelia species resulted in the identification of cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory [4,19,23,24], antimicrobial [12], and free radical scavenging [25] properties.
Essential oils from various plant species have been reported to exhibit anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects (reviewed in [26,27,28]). The most important immunopharmacological mechanisms of essential oils reported were the regulation of cytokine production, inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and inactivation of eosinophil migration [27]. In addition, we recently found that essential oils from Artemisia kotuchovii Kupr., Ferula akitschkensis B.Fedtsch. ex Koso-Pol., Ferula iliensis Krasn. ex Korovin, Hypericum perforatum L., Rhododendron albiflorum Hook., and Juniperus and Artemisia spp. can modulate human neutrophil functions [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Moreover, essential oils and some of their component compounds (monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes) have been reported to modulate humoral and cellular immune responses [35,36,37,38].
In the present study, we isolated essential oils from the leaves and flowers of G. squarrosa collected in Montana and analyzed their chemical compositions and innate immunomodulatory activities. We showed that essential oils isolated from G. squarrosa leaves and flowers potently inhibited intracellular Ca2+ mobilization [Ca2+]i in human neutrophils. Furthermore, we demonstrated that (−)-borneol, which is present at high levels in G. squarrosa essential oils, inhibited human neutrophil functional responses and that this compound is likely one of the main active components in these essential oils. Given the critical role of neutrophils in inflammation, our data support the possibility that (−)-borneol could be considered in the development of anti-inflammatory agents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Plant material was collected from wild plants in August 2019 along the Madison River, approximately 10 miles east of Norris, MT, USA (45.611323° N, 111.564253° E). Flowers and leaves were air-dried for 7–10 days at room temperature away from direct sunlight before hydrodistillation. Botanical identification of the plant material was performed by botanist Robyn A. Klein from Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

2.2. Materials

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLF), Trp-Lys-Tyr-Val-Met (WKYMVM), and Histopaque 1077 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). (−)-Borneol and (+)-borneol were from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). n-Hexane was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Fluo-4AM was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium was purchased from HyClone Laboratories (Logan, UT, USA). Fetal calf serum and fetal bovine serum were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS; 0.137 M NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.25 mM Na2HPO4, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 4.2 mM NaHCO3, 5.56 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) was purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). HBSS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ was designated as HBSS–; HBSS containing 1.3 mM CaCl2 and 1.0 mM MgSO4 was designated as HBSS+.

2.3. Essential Oil Extraction

Essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation of air-dried plant material (leaves, flowers) using a Clevenger-type apparatus, as previously described [34]. We used conditions accepted by the European Pharmacopoeia (European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France, 2014) to avoid artifacts. Yields of the essential oils were calculated based on the amount of air-dried plant material used. Stock solutions of the essential oils were prepared in DMSO (10 mg/mL) for biological evaluation and in n-hexane (10% w/v) for gas chromatographic analysis.

2.4. Gas Chromatography–Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID) and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC-MS analysis was performed with an Agilent 5975 GC-MSD system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), as reported previously [39]. An Agilent Innowax FSC column (60 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) was used with He as the carrier gas (0.8 mL/min). The GC oven temperature was kept at 60 °C for 10 min, increased to 220 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min, kept constant at 220 °C for 10 min and then increased to 240 °C at a rate of 1 °C/min. The split ratio was adjusted to 40:1, and the injector temperature was 250 °C. MS spectra were monitored at 70 eV with a mass range of 35 to 450 m/z. GC analysis was performed on an Agilent 6890N GC system. To obtain the same elution order as with GC-MS, the line was split for FID and MS detectors, and a single injection was performed using the same column and appropriate operational conditions. FID temperature was 300 °C. The essential oil components were identified by co-injection with standards (whenever possible), which were purchased commercially or isolated from natural sources. In addition, compound identities were confirmed by comparison of their mass spectra with those in the Wiley GC/MS Library (Wiley, NY, USA), MassFinder software 4.0 (Dr. Hochmuth Scientific Consulting, Hamburg, Germany), Adams Library, and NIST Library. Confirmation was also achieved using the in-house “Başer Library of Essential Oil Constituents” database obtained from chromatographic runs of pure compounds performed with the same equipment and conditions. A C8–C40 n-alkane standard solution (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) was used to spike the samples for the determination of relative retention indices (RRI). Relative percentage amounts of the separated compounds were calculated from the FID chromatograms.

2.5. Analysis of Enantiomer Composition on Chiral Columns

Distributions of enantiomeric compounds in G. squarrosa essential oils were analyzed by using two different chiral columns, which were appropriate for each enantiomer, and an Agilent 5973 Network Mass Selective Detector on a 6890N GC system that also had an FID detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (see further GC system details above). The chiral columns were Rt-βDEXse (2,3-di-O-ethyl-6-O-tert-butyl dimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin added into 14% cyanopropylphenyl/86% dimethyl polysiloxane, 30 m × 0.32 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness, USA) and Lipodex G (6-methyl-2,3-pentyl-γ-cyclodextrin added into 60% polysiloxane, 25 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.125 µm film thickness, Germany). For separation of α-pinene, the Lipodex G chiral column was used, while separation of borneol, camphor, and limonene was performed on the Rt-βDEXse column. Samples were injected (10% prepared in hexane) with a 10:1 split ratio. Injection port and detector temperatures were 250 °C. Detailed analysis parameters are provided in Supplementary Materials.

2.6. Isolation of Human Neutrophils

For isolation of human neutrophils, blood was collected from healthy donors in accordance with a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board at Montana State University (protocol #MQ041017). Neutrophils were purified from the blood using dextran sedimentation, followed by Histopaque 1077 gradient separation and hypotonic lysis of red blood cells, as described previously [40]. Isolated neutrophils were washed twice and resuspended in HBSS–. Neutrophil preparations were routinely >95% pure, as determined by light microscopy, and >98% viable, as determined by trypan blue exclusion. Neutrophils were obtained from multiple different donors; however, the cells from different donors were never pooled during experiments.

2.7. Cell Culture

Human THP-1 monocytic cells obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Mediatech Inc., Herndon, VA, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin.

2.8. Ca2+ Mobilization Assay

Changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i) were measured with a FlexStation 3 scanning fluorometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Briefly, human neutrophils were suspended in HBSS-, loaded with Fluo-4AM at a final concentration of 1.25 μg/mL, and incubated for 30 min in the dark at 37 °C. After dye loading, the cells were washed with HBSS-, resuspended in HBSS+, separated into aliquots, and loaded into the wells of flat-bottom, half-area-well black microtiter plates (2 × 105 cells/well). To assess the direct effects of a test compound or pure essential oils on Ca2+ influx, the compound/oil was added to the wells (final concentration of DMSO was 1%), and changes in fluorescence were monitored (λex = 485 nm, λem = 538 nm) every 5 s for 240 s at room temperature after addition of the test compound. To evaluate inhibitory effects of the compounds on FPR1/FPR2-dependent Ca2+ influx, the compound/oil was added to the wells (final concentration of DMSO was 1%) with human neutrophils. The samples were preincubated for 10 min, followed by addition of 5 nM fMLF or 5 nM WKYMVM. The maximum change in fluorescence, expressed in arbitrary units over baseline, was used to determine the agonist response. Responses were normalized to the response induced by 5 nM fMLF or 5 nM WKYMVM, which were assigned as 100%. Curve fitting (at least five or six points) and calculation of median effective concentration values (EC50 or IC50) were performed by nonlinear regression analysis of the dose–response curves generated using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.9. Chemotaxis Assay

Human neutrophils were resuspended in HBSS+ containing 2% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (2 × 106 cells/mL), and chemotaxis was analyzed in 96-well ChemoTx chemotaxis chambers (Neuroprobe, Gaithersburg, MD). In brief, neutrophils were preincubated with the indicated concentrations of the test sample (essential oil or pure compound) or DMSO (1% final concentration) for 30 min at room temperature and added to the upper wells of the ChemoTx chemotaxis chambers. The lower wells were loaded with 30 µL of HBSS+ containing 2% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and the indicated concentrations of test sample, DMSO (negative control), or 1 nM fMLF as a positive control. Neutrophils were added to the upper wells and allowed to migrate through the 5.0 µm pore polycarbonate membrane filter for 60 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The number of migrated cells was determined by measuring ATP in lysates of transmigrated cells using a luminescence-based assay (CellTiter-Glo; Promega, Madison, WI), and luminescence measurements were converted to absolute cell numbers by comparison of the values with standard curves obtained with known numbers of neutrophils. Curve fitting (at least eight to nine points) and calculation of median effective concentration values (IC50) were performed by nonlinear regression analysis of the dose–response curves generated using GraphPad Prism 9.

2.10. Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxicity of essential oils and pure compounds in human neutrophils or THP-1 monocytic was analyzed with a CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, human neutrophils or THP-1 cells were cultured at a density of 104 cells/well with different concentrations of essential oil or compound (final concentration of DMSO was 1%) for 90 min (for neutrophils) or 24 h (for THP-1 cells) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Following treatment, substrate was added to the cells, and the samples were analyzed with a Fluoroscan Ascent FL microplate reader.

2.11. Physiochemical Properties of Compounds

The physicochemical properties of borneol were computed using SwissADME (http://www.swissadme.ch; accessed on 20 March 2022).

2.12. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the data sets, followed by Tukey’s pair-wise comparisons. Pair-wise comparisons with differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Composition of Essential Oils from G. squarrosa

Essential oils were extracted from G. squarrosa flowers (designated as GEOFl) and leaves (designated as GEOLv). The distillation yield (v/w) for both essential oil samples was 0.5%. The chemical composition of these essential oils was evaluated using simultaneous GC-FID and GC/MS techniques. A total of 71 compounds, accounting for 97.4% and 96.2% of the flower and leaf essential oils, respectively, were identified and quantified (Table 1 and Table 2). The major classes of compounds in both essential oil samples were monoterpenes (89.7% and 88.6%) and sesquiterpenes (5.6% and 5.3%). The flower essential oils were enriched with oxygenated monoterpenes (46.5%), while the leaf essential oils were enriched in monoterpene hydrocarbons (47.2%). Major representatives of the monoterpene hydrocarbons (indicated as % GEOFl/GEOLv) were α-pinene (24.7/23.2), limonene (10.0/14.7), β-pinene (4.0/3.8), and terpinolene (1.7/2.0). The main oxygenated monoterpenes were (−)-borneol (23.4/16.6), p-cymen-8-ol (6.1/5.8), bornyl acetate (3.0/5.1), trans-pinocarveol (4.2/3.7), and myrtenol (2.5/1.7). The oxygenated sesquiterpene, spathulenol (3.0/2.0), was also present. Although the major components present in essential oils from G. squarrosa flowers and leaves were similar, there were differences found between GEOFl and GEOLv for 12 of the minor components present (Table 1).
Comparison of our results with those reported previously for essential oils isolated from G. squarrosa collected in different countries showed that our samples generally had higher percentages of monoterpenes, namely α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, and borneol. Essential oils from G. squarrosa grown in Romania were obtained from flowering shoots and had lower percentages of these monoterpenes, although they contained a higher amount of bornyl acetate (10.8%) [15,16]. Essential oils from G. squarrosa grown in Germany were obtained from flowers, leaves, and stems and contained similar levels of α-pinene (35.3, 10.4, and 4.4%), limonene (9.3, 16.2, and 27.1%), and β-pinene (5.2, 1.7, and 1.9%) but also had a unique, oxygenated monoterpene, (iso)-bornyl-C5-ester (6.9, 4.3, and 1.9%, respectively), and much higher levels of the sesquiterpene germacrene B (6.8, 13.2, and 3.0%, respectively) [13]. Notably, borneol was either not present or only present as a minor component in these other G. squarrosa essential oil samples [10,13,14]. Regarding other Grindelia species, essential oils isolated from G. robusta Nutt. grown in Germany were rich in oxygenated terpenes (57.4%), of which borneol (14.8%) was the largest constituent [10]. Essential oils from G. humilis Hook & Arn grown in Egypt had a completely different composition dominated by polyacetylenes (46.2%), such as (E)-lachnophyllol acetate, (2E,8E)-tridecadien-4,6-diyn-10-ol, 1-sencionyloxy-decadiyn-(4,6)-diene-(2E,8E), and their stereoisomers, as well a significant amount of the sesquiterpene hydrocarbon germacrene D (11.9%) [10]. The flower essential oils from G. integrifolia DC contained monoterpenes, such as α-pinene (34.9%) and limonene (13.1%), while the leaf essential oils contained myrcene (16.9%) and limonene (10.1%), as well as the sesquiterpenes spathulenol (12.3%) and β-eudesmol (11.9%) [12]. Finally, essential oils of G. discoidea Hook & Arn contained sesquiterpene alcohols, such as (E,E)-farnesol (˃9.0%) and (E,Z)-farnesol (15.7%) [11].
We report here the first enantioselective analysis of constituents in G. squarrosa essential oils, as all previous studies on Grindelia essential oils included identification of the essential oil constituents but not characterization of enantiomeric distribution. The enantiomeric distribution of monoterpenes in the flower and leaf essential oils of G. squarrosa was obtained using enantioselective GC analyses on chiral columns. As shown in Table 2, α-pinene, β-pinene, borneol, and camphor were present primarily or exclusively as (−)-enantiomers, while limonene was present primarily as the (+)-enantiomer. Differentiation of the enantiomeric composition of constituents is important for consideration of biological activity. Indeed, there are several examples of chiral compounds where the enantiomers had different immunomodulatory activity. For example, in vivo experiments showed that carvone enantiomers differentially modulated IgE-mediated airway inflammation in mice [52]. Likewise, the R isomer of hydroxychloroquine was found to exhibit higher antiviral activity and lower toxicity in vivo compared to the S isomer [53]. In additon, Murai et al. [54] used in silico analysis of enantioselective binding to characterize binding of immunomodulatory imide drugs to cereblon. Thus, it is clear that enantiomeric conformation of compounds has to be taken into consideration when evaluating biological effects.

3.2. Effect of the Essential Oils from G. squarrosa and (−)-Borneol on Neutrophil Ca2+ Influx

Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocyte and are vital for innate immunity [55]. These cells are the first responders to infection and injury in various tissues, establishing the first line of defense through multiple mechanisms such as phagocytosis, cytokine secretion, and reactive oxygen species production [56,57]. Thus, neutrophils represent an ideal pharmacological target for therapeutic development, and numerous natural products, including essential oils, have been shown to exhibit neutrophil immunomodulatory activity [29,30,31,32,33].
Grindelia essential oils were evaluated for their immunomodulatory effects on human neutrophils. Specifically, we evaluated their effects on [Ca2+]i, which is a key component of neutrophil activation and function [58]. We found that treatment of neutrophils with Grindelia essential oils activated human neutrophils, resulting in increased [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 22.3 µg/mL for GEOFl and 19.4 µg/mL for GEOLv). Previously, we found that several of the compounds that are also present in G. squarrosa essential oils (i.e., α-pinene, limonene, p-cymen-8-ol, β-pinene, terpinolene, spathulenol, and myrtenol) had no effect on human neutrophil Ca2+ influx [33,34], whereas (±)-bornyl acetate activated human neutrophils [59]. Analysis of the individual enantiomers (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol here showed that (−)-borneol activated human neutrophil [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 28.7 ± 2.6), whereas (+)-borneol was inactive (Table 3), and representative kinetic curves for neutrophil [Ca2+]i induced by (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol are shown in Figure 1. These results are consistent with our finding that only (−)-borneol was present in G. squarrosa essential oils (Table 2), confirming that (−)-borneol is responsible for at least part of the neutrophil activation observed here for G. squarrosa and suggesting that (−)-borneol may also be responsible for part of the neutrophil activation reported previously for Artemisia dracunculus L. essential oils [59].
Since Grindelia essential oils and several component compounds stimulated human neutrophil [Ca2+]i, and it is well recognized that agonists can down-regulate neutrophil responses to subsequent treatment with heterologous or homologous agonists [60], we evaluated whether Grindelia essential oils and/or pure components could inhibit agonist-induced [Ca2+]i in human neutrophils. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2A, Grindelia essential oils inhibited [Ca2+]i in fMLF- and WKYMVM-stimulated neutrophils with IC50 values in the micromolar range. We also evaluated the effect of (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol and found that only (−)-borneol inhibited fMLF- and WKYMVM-stimulated neutrophils (Table 3). A representative, concentration-dependent response for the inhibition of fMLF-induced neutrophil [Ca2+]i by (−)-borneol is shown in Figure 2B. These results are also consistent with our data showing neutrophils were only activated by (−)-borneol (Table 3).

3.3. Effect of Essential Oils from G. squarrosa and Borneol on Neutrophil Chemotaxis

Various essential oils and their components have been reported previously to inhibit neutrophil migration, including (±)-bornyl acetate, which is one of the major component compounds we found in G. squarrosa essential oils [29,30,31,33,34]. In the present study, we evaluated effects of G. squarrosa essential oils and pure (−)- or (+)-borneol on human neutrophil chemotaxis and found that pretreatment with GEOFl or GEOLv dose-dependently inhibited fMLF-induced human neutrophil chemotaxis (IC50 = 5.0 ± 1.6 and 4.1 ± 0.8 µg/mL, respectively) (Figure 3A). Likewise, pretreatment with (−)-borneol also inhibited fMLF-induced human neutrophil chemotaxis (IC50 = 5.8 ± 1.4 µM), whereas (+)-borneol had no effect (Figure 3B).
To ensure that the effects of the essential oils from G. squarrosa or (−)-borneol on neutrophil functional activity were not influenced by possible toxicity, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of the essential oil samples (up to 55 µg/mL) and (−)-borneol at various concentrations (up to 50 µM) in human neutrophils. We found that the G. squarrosa essential oils were non-cytotoxic up to 55 µg/mL during a 90 min incubation period, which covers the times used to measure Ca2+ influx (up to 30 min) and cell migration (up to 90 min) (data not shown). Likewise, (−)-borneol was non-cytotoxic in human neutrophils treated for 90 min and THP-1 monocytic cells treated for 24 h (Figure 4), confirming previous reports on the low cytotoxicity of borneol [61]. Thus, we conclude that (−)-borneol is a novel, non-cytotoxic, innate immunomodulator.
In addition to the immunomodulatory activity reported here, borneol was previously reported to exhibit a number of biological activities. For example, borneol attenuated brain neuronal and microglial inflammation in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis mice with suppression of p-p65 and p38 signaling that was initially activated by LPS in the brain [62]. Borneol treatment also inhibited transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), a proinflammatory and noxious pain-sensing cation channel [63], and suppressed inflammatory responses in LPS-induced acute lung injury through inhibition of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways [64]. Likewise, borneol-treated mice had reduced carrageenan-induced leukocyte migration to the peritoneal cavity [65], and borneol treatment suppressed proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in colonic inflammation [66]. Borneol attenuated asthma in mice by decreasing the CD4+ T cells’ infiltration [67]. Moreover, borneol specifically induced the activation of M2 macrophages in a signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-dependent manner [68].
The biological activity of (−)-borneol was also reported previously. For example, (−)-borneol was recently reported to exhibit antibacterial activity [69]. (−)-Borneol was also reported to have neuroprotective effects in a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model [70,71], as well as vasorelaxant properties, which may be attributed to Ca2+ influx blockade through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, Ca2+ mobilization from intracellular stores, and activation of K+ channels [72,73,74]. Store-independent Ca2+ channels that exist in various hematopoietic cells, including neutrophils, are pharmacologically and/or immunologically similar to voltage-gated Ca2+ channels [75]. Thus, these store-independent Ca2+ channels could be potential targets of (−)-borneol in human neutrophils. Indeed, we showed previously that some essential oil compounds can modulate activity of transient receptor potential Ca2+ channels [33,76].
We also calculated the most important physicochemical parameters for borneol using SwissADME [77]. The logP values estimated using ALOGPS 2.1 program [78] and tPSA values allowed us to predict that borneol can permeate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) (Table 4). It should be noted that (−)-borneol itself can also increase blood–brain barrier permeability [73,79].
In previous research on essential oils from various plant species, we found that most essential oil compounds that inhibited fMLF-induced Ca2+ influx were sesquiterpenes, although one was an oxygenated monoterpene (bornyl acetate) (Table 5). In the present study, we showed that another oxygenated monoterpene, (−)-borneol, has neutrophil inhibitory activity. Grindelia essential oils also contained 2–3% spathulenol, an active, oxygenated sesquiterpene (Table 1 and Table 5). Thus, this compound may also be involved in the inhibitory effect of these essential oils, although we did not evaluate this compound here.

4. Conclusions

We analyzed the composition of essential oils extracted from G. squarrosa leaves and flowers and report here the first determination of the enantiomeric distribution of major monoterpenes in G. squarrosa essential oils. Borneol, α-pinene, β-pinene, and camphor were primarily present as (−)-enantiomers, whereas limonene was primarily present as the (+)-enantiomer. Further analysis of the immunomodulatory activity of G. squarrosa essential oils showed that they activated human neutrophils and were able to inhibit agonist-induced neutrophil activation and chemotaxis, which might contribute to the reported anti-inflammatory activity and other pharmacological properties of extracts from this plant. The effects of essential oils from G. squarrosa might be attributable to (−)-borneol, bornyl acetate, some of the minor components, or synergetic effects among these constituents. However, to verify the key targets responsible for the immunomodulatory effects of (−)-borneol, further experimental investigation is needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27154897/s1. Table S1: Chiral Separation Parameters for Enantiomeric Compounds from Grindelia squarrosa Essential Oils. Figure S1: α-Pinene Enantiomers from Grindelia squarrosa Essential Oils. Figure S2: α-Pinene Enantiomers from Grindelia squarrosa Flower Essential Oils. Figure S3: Camphor Enantiomers of the Grindelia squarrosa Leaf Essential Oils. Figure S4: Borneol Enantiomers of the Grindelia squarrosa Flower Essential Oils. Figure S5: Limonene Enantiomers of the Grindelia squarrosa Essential Oils.

Author Contributions

I.A.S. and M.T.Q. conceived and designed the project. I.A.S. and L.N.K. collected the plant material. I.A.S., G.Ö., T.Ö. and L.N.K. performed the experiments. A.I.K. conducted molecular modeling study. I.A.S., G.Ö., T.Ö., L.N.K. and A.I.K. analyzed and interpreted the data. I.A.S., G.Ö., A.I.K. and M.T.Q. drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health IDeA Program grants GM115371 and GM103474; USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project 1009546; the Montana State University Agricultural Experiment Station; and the Tomsk Polytechnic University Development Program (Project Priority-2030-NIP/IZ-009-0000-2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Montana State University Institutional Review Board (protocol 2022-168, approved 23 March 2022).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of essential oils are available from the authors.

References

  1. Steyermark, J.A. Studies in Grindelia. II. A monograph of the North American species of the genus Grindelia. Ann. Missouri Botan Gard. 1934, 21, 433–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. The Plant List. Version 1.1. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org (accessed on 21 April 2022).
  3. Gehrmann, B. Grindelia sp. Willd—Grindelie, Gummikraut, Teerkraut. Z. Phytother. 2020, 41, 218–224. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gierlikowska, B.; Gierlikowski, W.; Bekier, K.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Czerwińska, M.E.; Kiss, A.K. Inula helenium and Grindelia squarrosa as a source of compounds with anti-inflammatory activity in human neutrophils and cultured human respiratory epithelium. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 249, 112311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nowak, S.; Magiera, A.; Kopka, K.; Kicel, A.; Olszewska, M.A. Rodzaj Grindelia Willd. źródłem cennych roślin leczniczych. Farm. Pol. 2018, 74, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gruenwald, J.; Brendler, T.; Jaenicke, C. (Eds.) PDR for Herbal Medicines, 2nd ed.; Medical Economics Company: Montvale, NJ, USA, 2000; p. 1108. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoffmann, D. Medical Herbalism: The Science and Practice of Herbal Medicine; Healing Arts Press: Rochester, VT, USA, 2003; p. 675. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pliszko, A.; Górecki, A. First observation of true vivipary in Grindelia squarrosa (Asteraceae). Biologia 2021, 76, 1147–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moerman, D.E. Native American Medicinal Plants. An Ethnobotanical Dictionary; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 2009; p. 799. [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Shamy, A.; El-Hawary, S.; El-Shabrawy, A.; El-Hefnawy, H.; Glasl, H. Essential oil composition of three Grindelia species. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Newton, M.N.; Espinar, L.A.; Grosso, N.R.; Zunino, M.P.; Maestri, D.M.; Zygadlo, J.A. Analysis of the essential oil of Grindelia discoidea. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nowak, S.; Lisiecki, P.; Tomaszczak-Nowak, A.; Grudzińska, E.; Olszewska, M.A.; Kicel, A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils from flowers and leaves of Grindelia integrifolia DC. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 1535–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schaefer, M.; Schimmer, O.; Schultze, W. Relative amounts of essential oil components in the flowers, leaves, and stems of four Grindelia species. Planta Med. 1993, 59, A634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schäfer, M.; Schimmer, O. Composition of the essential oils from flowers, leaves and stems of Grindelia robusta and G. squarrosa. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Veres, K.; Roza, O.; Laczkó-Zöld, E.; Hohmann, J. Chemical composition of essential oils of Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal and Grindelia oregana A. Gray. Planta Med. 2013, 79, PI45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Veres, K.; Roza, O.; Laczkó-Zöld, E.; Hohmann, J. Chemical composition of essential oils of Grindelia squarrosa and G. hirsutula. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 573–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Timmermann, B.N.; Hoffmann, J.J.; Jolad, S.D.; Bates, R.B.; Siahaan, T.J. Diterpenoids and flavonoids from Grindelia discoidea. Phytochem 1986, 25, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, L. Bioactive Agents from Grindelia tarapacana Phil. (Asteraceae); The University of Arizona Graduate College: Tucson, AZ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  19. Alza, N.P.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E.M.; Ortmann, S.; Kretschmer, N.; Kunert, O.; Rechberger, G.N.; Bauer, R.; Murray, A.P. Inhibition of NO production by Grindelia Argentina and isolation of three new cytotoxic saponins. Chem. Biodiver 2014, 11, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Krenn, L.; Wollenweber, E.; Steyrleuthner, K.; Görick, C.; Melzig, M.F. Contribution of methylated exudate flavonoids to the anti-inflammatory activity of Grindelia robusta. Fitoterapia 2009, 80, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Blaschek, W.; Hänsel, R.; Keller, K.; Reichling, J.; Rimpler, H.; Schneider, G. (Eds.) Hagers Handbuch der Pharmazeutischen Praxis. Folgeband 2: Drogen, 5th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 812–821. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nowak, S.; Rychlińska, I. Phenolic acids in the flowers and leaves of Grindelia robusta Nutt. and Grindelia squarrosa Dun. (Asteraceae). Acta Pol. Pharm. 2012, 69, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. La, V.D.; Lazzarin, F.; Ricci, D.; Fraternale, D.; Genovese, S.; Epifano, F.; Grenier, D. Active principles of Grindelia robusta exert antiinflammatory properties in a macrophage model. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 1687–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gierlikowska, B.; Filipek, A.; Gierlikowski, W.; Kania, D.; Stefanska, J.; Demkow, U.; Kiss, A.K. Grindelia squarrosa extract and grindelic acid modulate pro-inflammatory functions of respiratory epithelium and human macrophages. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 534111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Malburet, P.; Ragažinskienė, O.; Maruška, A. Introduction and chemical analysis of Grindelia squarrosa (Purch) Dunal in Vytautas Magnus univesity. In Proceedings of the Vital Nature Sign [Elektroninis Išteklius]: 10th International Scientific Conference, Vilnius, Lithuania, 19–20 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sandner, G.; Heckmann, M.; Weghuber, J. Immunomodulatory activities of selected essential oils. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gandhi, G.R.; Vasconcelos, A.B.S.; Haran, G.H.; Calisto, V.; Jothi, G.; Quintans, J.S.S.; Cuevas, L.E.; Narain, N.; Junior, L.J.Q.; Cipolotti, R.; et al. Essential oils and its bioactive compounds modulating cytokines: A systematic review on anti-asthmatic and immunomodulatory properties. Phytomedicine 2020, 73, 152854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Valdivieso-Ugarte, M.; Gomez-Llorente, C.; Plaza-Diaz, J.; Gil, A. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties of essential oils: A systematic review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ozek, G.; Schepetkin, I.A.; Yermagambetova, M.; Ozek, T.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Almerekova, S.S.; Abugalieva, S.I.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Quinn, M.T. Innate Immunomodulatory activity of cedrol, a component of essential oils isolated from Juniperus species. Molecules 2021, 26, 7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schepetkin, I.A.; Ozek, G.; Ozek, T.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Quinn, M.T. Chemical composition and immunomodulatory activity of essential oils from Rhododendron albiflorum. Molecules 2021, 26, 3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Schepetkin, I.A.; Ozek, G.; Ozek, T.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Quinn, M.T. Chemical composition and immunomodulatory activity of Hypericum perforatum essential oils. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ozek, G.; Schepetkin, I.A.; Utegenova, G.A.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Andrei, S.R.; Ozek, T.; Baser, K.H.C.; Abidkulova, K.T.; Kushnarenko, S.V.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; et al. Chemical composition and phagocyte immunomodulatory activity of Ferula iliensis essential oils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2017, 101, 1361–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Schepetkin, I.A.; Kushnarenko, S.V.; Ozek, G.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Sinharoy, P.; Utegenova, G.A.; Abidkulova, K.T.; Ozek, T.; Baser, K.H.; Kovrizhina, A.R.; et al. Modulation of human neutrophil responses by the essential oils from Ferula akitschkensis and their constituents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7156–7170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Schepetkin, I.A.; Kushnarenko, S.V.; Ozek, G.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Utegenova, G.A.; Kotukhov, Y.A.; Danilova, A.N.; Ozek, T.; Baser, K.H.; Quinn, M.T. Inhibition of human neutrophil responses by the essential oil of Artemisia kotuchovii and its constituents. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 4999–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Campra, N.A.; Montironi, I.D.; Reinoso, E.B.; Raviolo, J.; Moreno, F.R.; Maletto, B.; Cariddi, L.N. A natural oil increases specific anti-OVA IgG levels and induces a cellular immune response combined with aluminum hydroxide. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021, 109, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Siveen, K.S.; Kuttan, G. Augmentation of humoral and cell mediated immune responses by Thujone. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11, 1967–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khlebnikov, A.I.; Schepetkin, I.A.; Kishkentaeva, A.S.; Shaimerdenova, Z.R.; Atazhanova, G.A.; Adekenov, S.M.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Quinn, M.T. Inhibition of T cell receptor activation by semi-synthetic sesquiterpene lactone derivatives and molecular modeling of their interaction with glutathione and tyrosine kinase ZAP-70. Molecules 2019, 24, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Schepetkin, I.A.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Mitchell, P.T.; Kishkentaeva capital, A.C.; Shaimerdenova, Z.R.; Atazhanova, G.A.; Adekenov, S.M.; Quinn, M.T. The natural sesquiterpene lactones arglabin, grosheimin, agracin, parthenolide, and estafiatin inhibit T cell receptor (TCR) activation. Phytochem 2018, 146, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ozek, G.; Ishmuratova, M.; Tabanca, N.; Radwan, M.M.; Goger, F.; Ozek, T.; Wedge, D.E.; Becnel, J.J.; Cutler, S.J.; Can Baser, K.H. One-step multiple component isolation from the oil of Crinitaria tatarica (Less.) Sojak by preparative capillary gas chromatography with characterization by spectroscopic and spectrometric techniques and evaluation of biological activity. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Schepetkin, I.A.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Quinn, M.T. High-throughput screening for small-molecule activators of neutrophils: Identification of novel N-formyl peptide receptor agonists. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007, 71, 1061–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Babushok, V.I.; Linstrom, P.J.; Zenkevich, I.G. Retention indices for frequently reported compounds of plant essential oils. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2011, 40, 043101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pala-Paul, J.; García-Jiménez, R.; Pérez-Alonso, M.J.; Velasco-Negueruela, A.; Sanz, J. Essential oil composition of the leaves and stems of Meum athamanticum Jacq., from Spain. J. Chromatog. A 2004, 1036, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wedge, D.E.; Klun, J.A.; Tabanca, N.; Demirci, B.; Ozek, T.; Baser, K.H.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Cantrell, C.L.; Zhang, J. Bioactivity-guided fractionation and GC/MS fingerprinting of Angelica sinensis and Angelica archangelica root components for antifungal and mosquito deterrent activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gonny, M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.; Casanova, J. Analysis of Juniperus communis subsp alpina needle, berry, wood and root oils by combination of GC, GC/MS and 13C-NMR. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bonikowski, R.; Paoli, M.; Szymczak, K.; Krajewska, A.; Wajs‐Bonikowska, A.; Tomi, F.; Kalemba, D. Chromatographic and spectral characteristic of some esters of a common monoterpene alcohols. Flavour Fragr. J. 2016, 31, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Castioni, P.; Kapetanidis, I. Volatile constituents from Brunfelsia grandiflora ssp. grandiflora: Qualitative analysis by GC-MS. Sci. Pharm. 1996, 64, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hazzit, M.; Baaliouamer, A.; Faleiro, M.L.; Miguel, M.G. Composition of the essential oils of Thymus and Origanum species from Algeria and their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 6314–6321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Suleimenov, E.M.; Ozek, T.; Demirci, F.; Demirci, B.; Baser, K.H.C.; Adekenov, S.M. Component composition of essential oils of Artemisia lercheana and A. sieversiana of the flora of Kazakhstan. Antimicrobial activity of A. sieversiana essential oil. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2009, 45, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Weyerstahl, P.; Marschall, H.; Son, P.T.; Giang, P.M. Constituents of the flower essential oil of Aglaia odorata Lour. from Vietnam. Flavour Fragr. J. 1999, 14, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baser, K.H.C.; Özek, G.; Özek, T.; Duran, A.; Duman, H. Composition of the essential oils of Rhabdosciadium oligocarpum (Post ex Boiss.) Hedge et Lamond and Rhabdosciadium microcalycinum Hand.-Mazz. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cavaleiro, C.; Pinto, E.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Salgueiro, L. Antifungal activity of Juniperus essential oils against dermatophyte, Aspergillus and Candida strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 1333–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ribeiro-Filho, J.; da Silva Brandi, J.; Ferreira Costa, H.; Carla de Paula Medeiros, K.; Alves Leite, J.; Pergentino de Sousa, D.; Regina Piuvezam, M. Carvone enantiomers differentially modulate IgE-mediated airway inflammation in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ni, Y.; Liao, J.; Qian, Z.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, S. Synthesis and evaluation of enantiomers of hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2022, 53, 116523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Murai, T.; Kawashita, N.; Tian, Y.-S.; Takagi, T. In silico analysis of enantioselective binding of immunomodulatory imide drugs to cereblon. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Malech, H.L.; DeLeo, F.R.; Quinn, M.T. The Role of Neutrophils in the Immune System: An Overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2087, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Keir, H.R.; Chalmers, J.D. Neutrophil extracellular traps in chronic lung disease: Implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2022, 31, 210241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stojkov, D.; Gigon, L.; Peng, S.; Lukowski, R.; Ruth, P.; Karaulov, A.; Rizvanov, A.; Barlev, N.A.; Yousefi, S.; Simon, H.U. Physiological and Pathophysiological Roles of Metabolic Pathways for NET Formation and Other Neutrophil Functions. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 826515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dixit, N.; Kim, M.H.; Rossaint, J.; Yamayoshi, I.; Zarbock, A.; Simon, S.I. Leukocyte function antigen-1, kindlin-3, and calcium flux orchestrate neutrophil recruitment during inflammation. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 5954–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Schepetkin, I.A.; Ozek, G.; Ozek, T.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Klein, R.A.; Quinn, M.T. Neutrophil immunomodulatory activity of farnesene, a component of Artemisia dracunculus essential oils. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ali, H.; Richardson, R.M.; Haribabu, B.; Snyderman, R. Chemoattractant receptor cross-desensitization. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 6027–6030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Cherneva, E.; Pavlovic, V.; Smelcerovic, A.; Yancheva, D. The effect of camphor and borneol on rat thymocyte viability and oxidative stress. Molecules 2012, 17, 10258–10266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, L.; Liang, Q.; Lin, A.; Wu, Y.; Min, H.; Song, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yi, L.; Gao, Q. Borneol alleviates brain injury in sepsis mice by blocking neuronal effect of endotoxin. Life Sci. 2019, 232, 116647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sherkheli, M.A.; Schreiner, B.; Haq, R.; Werner, M.; Hatt, H. Borneol inhibits TRPA1, a proinflammatory and noxious pain-sensing cation channel. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 28, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhong, W.; Cui, Y.; Yu, Q.; Xie, X.; Liu, Y.; Wei, M.; Ci, X.; Peng, L. Modulation of LPS-stimulated pulmonary inflammation by Borneol in murine acute lung injury model. Inflammation 2014, 37, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Almeida, J.R.; Souza, G.R.; Silva, J.C.; Saraiva, S.R.; Junior, R.G.; Quintans Jde, S.; Barreto Rde, S.; Bonjardim, L.R.; Cavalcanti, S.C.; Quintans, L.J., Jr. Borneol, a bicyclic monoterpene alcohol, reduces nociceptive behavior and inflammatory response in mice. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 808460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Juhas, S.; Cikos, S.; Czikkova, S.; Vesela, J.; Il’kova, G.; Hajek, T.; Domaracka, K.; Domaracky, M.; Bujnakova, D.; Rehak, P.; et al. Effects of borneol and thymoquinone on TNBS-induced colitis in mice. Folia Biol. 2008, 54, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang, J.Y.; Dong, X.; Yu, Z.; Ge, L.; Lu, L.; Ding, L.; Gan, W. Borneol inhibits CD4 + T cells proliferation by down-regulating miR-26a and miR-142-3p to attenuate asthma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 90, 107223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, X.; Xu, F.; Liu, L.; Feng, L.; Wu, X.; Shen, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, X.; Xu, Q. (+)-Borneol improves the efficacy of edaravone against DSS-induced colitis by promoting M2 macrophages polarization via JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 53, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Leite-Sampaio, N.F.; Gondim, C.; Martins, R.A.A.; Siyadatpanah, A.; Norouzi, R.; Kim, B.; Sobral-Souza, C.E.; Gondim, G.E.C.; Ribeiro-Filho, J.; Coutinho, H.D.M. Potentiation of the activity of antibiotics against ATCC and MDR bacterial strains with (+)-α-pinene and (−)-borneol. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 8217380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ma, R.; Xie, Q.; Li, H.; Guo, X.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Ren, M.; Gong, D.; Gao, T. l-Borneol exerted the neuroprotective effect by promoting angiogenesis coupled with neurogenesis via Ang1-VEGF-BDNF Pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 641894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhang, W.; Wen, J.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Wang, J.; Wei, S.; Li, H.; Ma, X. l-Borneol ameliorates cerebral ischaemia by downregulating the mitochondrial calcium uniporter-induced apoptosis cascade in pMCAO rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2021, 73, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Santos, S.E.; Ribeiro, F.; Menezes, P.M.N.; Duarte-Filho, L.A.M.; Quintans, J.S.S.; Quintans-Junior, L.J.; Silva, F.S.; Ribeiro, L.A.A. New insights on relaxant effects of (−)-borneol monoterpene in rat aortic rings. Fundam Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 33, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Luz, M.S.; Gadelha, D.D.A.; Andrade, K.J.S.; Travassos, R.A.; Ribeiro, J.D.; Carvalho-Galvao, A.; Cruz, J.C.; Balarini, C.M.; Braga, V.A.; Franca-Falcao, M.S. Borneol reduces sympathetic vasomotor hyperactivity and restores depressed baroreflex sensitivity in rats with renovascular hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2022, 45, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Silva-Filho, J.C.; Oliveira, N.N.; Arcanjo, D.D.; Quintans-Junior, L.J.; Cavalcanti, S.C.; Santos, M.R.; Oliveira Rde, C.; Oliveira, A.P. Investigation of mechanisms involved in (−)-borneol-induced vasorelaxant response on rat thoracic aorta. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2012, 110, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Suzuki, Y.; Yoshimaru, T.; Inoue, T.; Ra, C. Ca v 1.2 L-type Ca2+ channel protects mast cells against activation-induced cell death by preventing mitochondrial integrity disruption. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 46, 2370–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ghosh, M.; Schepetkin, I.A.; Ozek, G.; Ozek, T.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Damron, D.S.; Quinn, M.T. Essential Oils from Monarda fistulosa: Chemical Composition and Activation of Transient Receptor Potential A1 (TRPA1) Channels. Molecules 2020, 25, 4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Tetko, I.V.; Tanchuk, V.Y. Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2002, 42, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Yin, Y.; Cao, L.; Ge, H.; Duanmu, W.; Tan, L.; Yuan, J.; Tunan, C.; Li, F.; Hu, R.; Gao, F.; et al. L-Borneol induces transient opening of the blood-brain barrier and enhances the therapeutic effect of cisplatin. Neuroreport 2017, 28, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 04897 g001 550
Figure 1. Direct effect of (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol on neutrophil [Ca2+]i. Human neutrophils were treated with 25 µM (−)-borneol, 25 µM (+)-borneol, 5 nM fMLF (positive control), or 1% DMSO (negative control), and [Ca2+]i was monitored for the indicated times (arrow indicates when treatment was added). Data are from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 1. Direct effect of (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol on neutrophil [Ca2+]i. Human neutrophils were treated with 25 µM (−)-borneol, 25 µM (+)-borneol, 5 nM fMLF (positive control), or 1% DMSO (negative control), and [Ca2+]i was monitored for the indicated times (arrow indicates when treatment was added). Data are from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments.
Molecules 27 04897 g001
Molecules 27 04897 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Grindelia essential oils or borneol on fMLF-induced neutrophil [Ca2+]i. Human neutrophils were treated with the indicated concentrations of GEOFl and GEOLv (A), (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol (B), or 1% DMSO (negative control) for 10 min. The cells were then activated by 5 nM fMLF, and [Ca2+]i was monitored as described. The data shown are presented as the mean ± SD from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 2. Effect of Grindelia essential oils or borneol on fMLF-induced neutrophil [Ca2+]i. Human neutrophils were treated with the indicated concentrations of GEOFl and GEOLv (A), (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol (B), or 1% DMSO (negative control) for 10 min. The cells were then activated by 5 nM fMLF, and [Ca2+]i was monitored as described. The data shown are presented as the mean ± SD from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments with similar results.
Molecules 27 04897 g002
Molecules 27 04897 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of Grindelia essential oils or borneol on human neutrophil chemotaxis. Neutrophils were pretreated with the indicated concentrations of GEOFl and GEOLv (A) or (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol (B), and neutrophil migration toward 1 nM fMLF was measured, as described. The data are from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 3. Effect of Grindelia essential oils or borneol on human neutrophil chemotaxis. Neutrophils were pretreated with the indicated concentrations of GEOFl and GEOLv (A) or (−)-borneol and (+)-borneol (B), and neutrophil migration toward 1 nM fMLF was measured, as described. The data are from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments.
Molecules 27 04897 g003
Molecules 27 04897 g004 550
Figure 4. Cytotoxicity of (−)-borneol. Human neutrophils or human THP-1 monocytic cells were preincubated with indicated concentrations of (−)-borneol for 90 min or 24 h, and cell viability was analyzed, as described. Values are the mean ± SD of triplicate samples from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 4. Cytotoxicity of (−)-borneol. Human neutrophils or human THP-1 monocytic cells were preincubated with indicated concentrations of (−)-borneol for 90 min or 24 h, and cell viability was analyzed, as described. Values are the mean ± SD of triplicate samples from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments with similar results.
Molecules 27 04897 g004
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of essential oils (%) isolated from flowers (GEOFl) and leaves (GEOLv) of G. squarrosa.
Table 1. Chemical composition of essential oils (%) isolated from flowers (GEOFl) and leaves (GEOLv) of G. squarrosa.
NoRRIPub RRICompoundGEOFlGEOLvNoRRIPub RRICompoundGEOFlGEOLv
110321008–1039 aα-Pinene24.723.23716481597–1648 aMyrtenal0.81.0
210761043–1086 aCamphene1.21.53816501612–1654 aδ-Elemenet0.1
311181085–1130 aβ-Pinene4.03.83916701643–1671 atrans-Pinocarveol4.23.7
411321098–1140 aSabinenet0.14016741670–1740 ap-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-olt0.1
511501140 bThuja-2,4(10)-dienett4116831665–1691 atrans-Verbenol1.92.0
611591122–1169 aδ-3-Carene t4217001681 dp-Mentha-1,8-dien-4-ol0.20.1
711741140–1175 aMyrcene0.30.44317061659–1724 aα-Terpineol1.70.5
811761148–1186 aα-Phellandrenett4417191653–1728 aBorneol23.416.6
911881154–1195 aα-Terpinenett4517261676–1726 aGermacrene D0.20.3
1011951167–1197 aDehydro-1,8-cineolett4617511699–1751 aCarvone 0.4
1112031178–1219 aLimonened10.014.74717631771 eIsobornyl isovalerate 0.3
1212131186–1231 a1,8-Cineolett4817731722–1774 aδ-Cadinene0.3
1312181188–1233 aβ-Phellandrene 0.20.24917961750–1800 a Selina-3,7(11)-diene0.30.3
1412461211–1251 a(Z)-β-Ocimene0.30.15017971739–1797 ap-Methyl acetophenone0.20.3
1512551222–1266 aγ-Terpinene0.1 5118041743–1808 aMyrtenol2.51.7
1612661232–1267 a(E)-β-Ocimene0.20.65218541778–1854 aGermacrene B0.40.5
1712801246–1291 ap-Cymene0.50.65318641813–1865 ap-Cymen-8-ol6.15.8
1812901260–1300 aTerpinolene1.72.05418821818–1882 acis-Carveolt
1913281328 f2,2,6-Trimethylcyclohexanone t5519491840–1949 aPiperitenonet
2013841331–1384 aα-Pinene oxide t5619921954–1992 a2-Phenylethyl-3-methylbutyratet
2114521452 gα,p-Dimethylstyrene 0.15720882026–2090 a1-epi-Cubenoltt
2214771477 c4,8-Epoxyterpinolene0.30.55820952033–2097 aHexyl benzoatet
2314941494 h(Z)-3-Hexenyl 3-methylbutyrate0.2t5920982049–2104 aGlobulol0.30.3
2414951471–1495 aBicycloelemene 0.16021152115 i4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-cyclohex-2-enone0.90.7
2514991477–1511 aα-Campholene aldehyde 0.26121442074–2150 aSpathulenol3.02.0
2615221482–1522 aChrysanthenone 0.16221642154 jMuurola-4,10(14)dien-1-ol 0.3
2715321481–1537 aCamphor0.50.96321872135–2219 aτ-Cadinol 0.2
2815491518–1560 aβ-Cubebenet 6422472247 htrans-α-Bergamotol0.20.3
2915531507–1564 aLinalool0.10.16522552180–2255 aα-Cadinolt0.2
3015621511–1562 aIsopinocamphone0.71.66622572196–2272 aβ-Eudesmolt0.4
3115711557–1625 atrans-p-Menth-2-en-1-olt 6722602262 kAlismol 0.50.3
3215861545–1590 aPinocarvone t 6823002300Tricosanet
3315901549–1597 aBornyl acetate3.05.16923082339 l13-epi-Manoyl oxide0.80.9
3416111564–1630 aTerpinen-4-ol0.90.5702320-Guaia-6,10(14)-dien-4-ol isomer #0.4
3516281583–1668 aAromadendrenet 7125002500Pentacosane 0.3
3616391611–1688 atrans-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol0.20.2
Summary of the Oil Composition
Major ComponentsGEOFlGEOLv
Monoterpene hydrocarbons43.247.2
Oxygenated monoterpenes46.541.4
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons1.21.3
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes4.44.0
Miscellaneous compounds2.12.3
Total97.496.2
Legend: The data are presented as relative % for each component that was identified in the essential oils. %, calculated from flame ionization detector data. Trace amounts (t) were present at <0.1%. RRI, relative retention index calculated on the basis of retention of n-alkanes; Pub RRI, relative retention index published in a [41], b [42], c [43], d [44], e [45], f [46], g [47], h [48], i [31], j [49], k [50], and l [51]. # Tentatively identified using Wiley and MassFinder mass spectra libraries and published RRI. All other compounds were identified by comparison with co-injected standards.
Table
Table 2. Enantiomeric distribution of G. squarrosa essential oils.
Table 2. Enantiomeric distribution of G. squarrosa essential oils.
CompoundGEOFlGEOLv
(%)ee (%)(%)ee (%)
α-Pinene(1S,5S)-(−)100100100100
(1R,5R)-(+)0 0
β-Pinene(1S,5S)-(−)
(1R,5R)-(+)		91
9		8289
11		78
Borneol (1S,2R,4S)-(−)100100100100
(1R,2S,4R)-(+)0 0
Camphor(1S,4S)-(−)95909794
(1R,4R)-(+)5 3
Limonene(4S)-(−)3 2
(4R)-(+)97949896
Legend: ee: enantiomeric excess.
Table
Table 3. Effect of essential oils from G. squarrosa and pure major component compounds on [Ca2+]i, chemotaxis, and cytotoxicity in human neutrophils.
Table 3. Effect of essential oils from G. squarrosa and pure major component compounds on [Ca2+]i, chemotaxis, and cytotoxicity in human neutrophils.
Essential OilActivation of [Ca2+]iInhibition of [Ca2+]i
fMLF-InducedWKYMVM-Induced
EC50 (μg/mL)IC50 (μg/mL)
GEOFl22.3 ± 5.716.4 ± 3.91.6 ± 0.7
GEOLv19.4 ± 5.3 16.9 ± 2.03.4 ± 1.2
Pure CompoundEC50 (μM)IC50 (μM)
(−)-Borneol28.7 ± 2.636.1 ± 1.554.2 ± 11.2
(+)-BorneolN.A.N.A.N.A.
(±)-Bornyl acetate *50.1 ± 11.542.6 ± 9.7 19.1 ± 0.1
Legend: EC50 and IC50 values were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the dose–response curves as described under Section 2. For cytotoxicity study, human neutrophils were incubated with indicated concentrations of the compounds for 90 min, and cell viability was analyzed. N.A. indicates the samples had essentially no activity (EC50 or IC50 >55 µM for pure compounds or >55 µg/mL for the oils). The data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * reported in [59].
Table
Table 4. Physicochemical properties of borneol, according to SwissADME results and binary classification tree model.
Table 4. Physicochemical properties of borneol, according to SwissADME results and binary classification tree model.
PropertyBorneol
FormulaC10H18O
M.W.154.25
Heavy atoms11
Fraction Csp31.00
Rotatable bonds0
H-bond acceptors1
H-bond donors1
MR46.60
tPSA20.23
LogP2.83
BBB permeationYes
Abbreviations: M.W., molecular weight (g/mol); MR, molar refractivity; tPSA, topological polar surface area (Å2); LogP, lipophilicity; BBB, blood–brain barrier.
Table
Table 5. Inhibitory effect of pure component compounds of essential oils on [Ca2+]i in human neutrophils.
Table 5. Inhibitory effect of pure component compounds of essential oils on [Ca2+]i in human neutrophils.
CompoundChemical ClassIC50 (uM)Reference
(−)-BorneolOxygenated monoterpene36.1 ± 1.5Present work
Bornyl AcetateOxygenated monoterpene42.6 ± 9.7[59]
CedrolOxygenated sesquiterpene15.4 ± 4.3[29]
CurzereneOxygenated sesquiterpene11.0 ± 3.8[30]
FarneseneSesquiterpene hydrocarbone1.1 ± 0.2[59]
Germacrene DSesquiterpene hydrocarbone0.5 ± 0.1[31]
GermacroneOxygenated sesquiterpene27.9 ± 8.9[30]
6-Methyl-3,5-heptadien-2-oneEnone8.2 ± 2.5[34]
SpathulenolOxygenated sesquiterpene36.2 ± 8.2[30]
ViridiflorolOxygenated sesquiterpene7.8 ± 2.3[30]
XanthoxylinAlkyl-phenylketone27.2 ± 6.6[59]
α-HumuleneSesquiterpene hydrocarbone0.3 ± 0.1[31]
β-CaryophylleneSesquiterpene hydrocarbone0.33 ± 0.02[31]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schepetkin, I.A.; Özek, G.; Özek, T.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Quinn, M.T. Neutrophil Immunomodulatory Activity of (−)-Borneol, a Major Component of Essential Oils Extracted from Grindelia squarrosa. Molecules 2022, 27, 4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154897

AMA Style

Schepetkin IA, Özek G, Özek T, Kirpotina LN, Khlebnikov AI, Quinn MT. Neutrophil Immunomodulatory Activity of (−)-Borneol, a Major Component of Essential Oils Extracted from Grindelia squarrosa. Molecules. 2022; 27(15):4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schepetkin, Igor A., Gulmira Özek, Temel Özek, Liliya N. Kirpotina, Andrei I. Khlebnikov, and Mark T. Quinn. 2022. "Neutrophil Immunomodulatory Activity of (−)-Borneol, a Major Component of Essential Oils Extracted from Grindelia squarrosa" Molecules 27, no. 15: 4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154897

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop