Next Article in Journal
Direct Flavonoid-Focused Chemical Comparison among Three Epimedium Plants by Online Liquid Extraction–High Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Nutritional Value of Hibiscus sabdariffa Calyces as Revealed by NMR Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption and Desorption Properties of Polyethylenimine/Polyvinyl Chloride Cross-Linked Fiber for the Treatment of Azo Dye Reactive Yellow 2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selenium Biofortification: Roles, Mechanisms, Responses and Prospects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Characterization of Mung Bean Meal Protein-Derived Antioxidant Peptides

1
Department of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 1518 Pracharat 1 Rd., Wongsawang, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
2
Department of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
3
School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 49 Tein-talay 25 Rd., Tha-kam, Bangkhuntein, Bangkok 10150, Thailand
4
Richardson Centre for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(6), 1515; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061515
Submission received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 2 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021

Abstract

The aim of this work was to characterize the antioxidant properties of some of the peptides present in bromelain mung bean meal protein hydrolysate (MMPH). The MMPH was subjected to two rounds of bioassay-guided reversed-phase HPLC separation followed by peptide identification in the most potent fractions using tandem mass spectrometry. Twelve antioxidant peptides, namely, HC, CGN, LAN, CTN, LAF, CSGD, MMGW, QFAAD, ERF, EYW, FLQL, and QFAW were identified and assayed for antioxidant properties. CTN, HC, CGN, and CSGD were the most potent (p < 0.05) DPPH radical scavengers with EC50 values of 0.30, 0.29, 0.28, and 0.30 mg/mL, respectively, which are lower than the 0.03 mg/mL obtained for reduced glutathione (GSH). CTN, HC, CGN, and CSGD exhibited the most potent (p < 0.05) scavenging activities against hydroxyl and superoxide radicals with EC50 values that are similar to those of GSH. The cysteine-containing peptides also had stronger ferric reducing antioxidant power and metal chelation activity than peptides devoid of cysteine. In contrast, MMGW, ERF, and EYW had poor radical scavenging and metal chelation activities. We conclude that the availability of the sulfhydryl group may have enhanced antioxidant potency while the presence of bulky groups such phenylalanine and tryptophan had an opposite effect.
Keywords: mung bean; bromelain; membrane ultrafiltration; protein hydrolysate; antioxidant; peptide sequencing; RP-HPLC mung bean; bromelain; membrane ultrafiltration; protein hydrolysate; antioxidant; peptide sequencing; RP-HPLC

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sonklin, C.; Alashi, A.M.; Laohakunjit, N.; Aluko, R.E. Functional Characterization of Mung Bean Meal Protein-Derived Antioxidant Peptides. Molecules 2021, 26, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061515

AMA Style

Sonklin C, Alashi AM, Laohakunjit N, Aluko RE. Functional Characterization of Mung Bean Meal Protein-Derived Antioxidant Peptides. Molecules. 2021; 26(6):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sonklin, Chanikan, Adeola M. Alashi, Natta Laohakunjit, and Rotimi E. Aluko. 2021. "Functional Characterization of Mung Bean Meal Protein-Derived Antioxidant Peptides" Molecules 26, no. 6: 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061515

APA Style

Sonklin, C., Alashi, A. M., Laohakunjit, N., & Aluko, R. E. (2021). Functional Characterization of Mung Bean Meal Protein-Derived Antioxidant Peptides. Molecules, 26(6), 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061515

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop