Next Article in Journal
Key Factor Study for Generic Long-Acting PLGA Microspheres Based on a Reverse Engineering of Vivitrol®
Previous Article in Journal
Broadband Visible Light-Absorbing [70]Fullerene-BODIPY-Triphenylamine Triad: Synthesis and Application as Heavy Atom-Free Organic Triplet Photosensitizer for Photooxidation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Simple Turn-off Schiff Base Fluorescent Sensor for Copper (II) Ion and Its Application in Water Analysis

1
The key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, School of Public Health, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
2
School of Basic Medical Science, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, Yorkshire HU6 7RX, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(5), 1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051233
Submission received: 1 February 2021 / Revised: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 20 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021

Abstract

:
An aniline-functionalized naphthalene dialdehyde Schiff base fluorescent probe L with aggregation-induced enhanced emission (AIEE) characteristics was synthesized via a simple one-step condensation reaction and exhibited excellent sensitivity and selectivity towards copper(II) ions in aqueous media with a fluorescence “ turn-off ” phenomenon. The detection limit of the probe is 1.64 × 10−8 mol·L−1. Furthermore, according to the results of the UV-vis/fluorescence titrations, Job’s plot method and 1H-NMR titrations, a 1:2 stoichiometry was identified. The binding constant between L and Cu2+ was calculated to be Ka = 1.222 × 103. In addition, the AIEE fluorescent probe L could be applied to detection in real water samples with satisfactory recoveries in the range 99.10–102.90% in lake water and 98.49–102.37% in tap water.

1. Introduction

In recent years, fluorescent probes have been widely used in the field of rapid detection (food, metal ion, anion, biomarker, etc.) due to advantages such as ease of operation, low cost, high selectivity, and sensitivity [1,2,3,4]. Copper is an earth abundant element which plays an important role in many domains like industrial material, [5] bactericide, and herbicide [6,7], etc. On the other hand, copper ions are important environmental pollutants. It not only produces toxic effects on the growth of animals and plants, but also lead to risks to human health via the food chain [8,9,10]. Lack or excess of copper will cause health damage.
In order to protect human health, the WHO stipulates that the limit of copper ions in drinking water should not exceed 31.4 μM [7]. Thus, the development of technologies for copper ion detection has become an important focus in environmental and food nutritional fields. Traditional methods such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have been widely utilized for detection copper ion [3,11], but these systems also have their limitations, e.g., large and expensive instruments, complex modes of operation and high detection costs. In recent years, methods based on fluorescent probes have emerged as the more cutting-edge technology in the field of metal ion detection due to convenient procedures, super sensitivity, and fast response times [12,13]. Many copper(II) probes have been reported due to their low detection limit and remarkable optical changes [14,15].
However, most traditional fluorescent materials exhibit an aggregation caused quenching (ACQ) effect, which means they are highly emissive in solution, but a quenching affect exists in the aggregation state. In the case of dyes, the ACQ effect can greatly limit their practical applications in material science [16]. In contrast, an abnormal photophysical phenomenon was observed by Tang’s group in 2001 [2,17], namely, aggregation induced emission (AIE) and aggregation-induced emission enhancement (AIEE), whereby the fluorescent molecules show non-/weak emission in solution but enhanced fluorescence in the aggregation state. Molecules emit energy through intramolecular rotation and vibrational motions in the solution, while in the aggregation state the non-radiative transition is blocked, and, in turn, energy is lost through the radiative transition channel [18].
Naphthalene and its derivatives have been extensively applied in the assembly of light-emitting devices and chemical sensors due to their excellent optical properties and unique chemical stability [19,20,21]. In this research, we have developed a small molecular probe L possessing AIEE characteristics via a simple one-step reaction, which has good recognition performance and anti-interference ability for copper ion detection under aqueous conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

A new Schiff base probe L was obtained from 2,6-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,5-dialdehyde and aniline by a simple one-step reaction. The molecular structure was characterized by 1H-NMR spectroscopy, HRMS, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. The Schiff base probe L exhibited excellent solubility in common solvents (such as dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, DMSO, etc.) and possessed good acid and alkali-resistance over the pH range 3–11 within 1440 min (Table S2). This work provides a new strategy for extending the practical applications of small molecular probes in the heavy metal detection field. (Scheme 1).

2.2. AIEE Properties

The probe L emits glaring red light in the solid state but the emission decreases dramatically in the dissolved state, so we propose that this probe may exhibit AIEE properties. To investigate our hypothesis, a good solvent tetrahydrofuran (THF) and a bad solvent water were selected as the testing systems. As shown in Figure 1, the compound L emitted orange mission with λmax em = 565 nm in pure THF solution. As the water fraction (fw) gradually increased from 0% to 50%, the fluorescence intensity barely changed. Subsequently, when the water fraction (fw) reached 60%, some particles could be observed in the mixture, and the mixture exhibited bright orange light under 365 nm UV irradiation. The fluorescence spectrum also corresponded with this phenomenon: the fluorescence intensity at 60% was much higher than that of fw = 0–50%. When the water fraction reached 70%, the fluorescence intensity of the solution attained the maximum value (807 a.u.) with an approximate 40.31-fold increase versus that in the pure solution. In addition, we also tested the quantum yield of L in the solid state and in pure THF solvent. The quantum yield in the solid state (Φ f = 18.4%) is higher than that in THF solution (Φ f = 0.5%). Thus, the Schiff-base L is a chromophore with aggregation-induced enhanced emission characteristics. As the probe polymerizes at fw = 60%, referring to the experimental conditions of similar probes [20,22], we choose the mixture of THF/water (VTHF/VH2O = 4:1) as the recognition environment.

2.3. Stability of Detection

The luminescent and recognition behavior of Schiff base compounds are often affected by many factors (such as pH, time, etc.). If the recognition environment tends to acidic/alkaline, this can induce C=N fracture, which may affect the optical properties and recognition ability of these compounds [23,24]. In order to test the luminescent stability of probe L, the pH 3–11 range was selected as the detection environment. In addition, the pre-experimental results showed that the probe L had the ability to recognize Cu2+, so the mixed solution of probe L-Cu2+ was also selected for determination at the same time.
As shown in Figure 2A, the emission intensity of probe L at 565 nm barely changed, which indicated that this probe possessed good acid and alkali-resistance over the pH range 3–11. When adding Cu2+ to the mixture, a significant fluorescent quenching phenomenon was observed over the pH range from 8 to 11, whilst little fluorescence change was found over the pH range 3 to 7. The acidic conditions can induce dissociation of the L-Cu2+ complex because of the protonation of probe, and excessive H+ in the solution may push the coordination equilibrium to the left [25]. As for higher pH conditions, the alkaline recognition environment can provide sufficient hydroxyl ions to consume H+, and the ionized phenolic groups interacted more easily with copper ions to form L-Cu2+ complex [26,27]. These may be the reasons why probe L exhibited better recognition ability under alkaline conditions. We also tested the time-dependent optical stability of probe L and the L-Cu2+ mixture, and the results showed that L and the L-Cu2+ complex were stable over a certain period of time.

2.4. Cation Sensing Study

Schiff base compounds are widely used in the recognition of rare-earth metals, transition metals and alkali metals as a result of their high binding affinity [28,29,30]. To test the detecting ability toward metal ions, probe L (40 μM) was exposed to many metal ions (such as Cd2+, Cu2+, K+, Pb2+, Li+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Co2+, Cr3+, Al3+, Ba2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Ag+, Na+, Hg+, [M]n+ = 200 μM) and anions (such as AcO, ClO4, Br, NO2, CO32−, I, F, SO42−, Cl, PO43−, C2O42−, SO32−, HSO3, HCO3, [A]n− = 200 μM) in mixtures of THF and water (VTHF/VH2O = 4/1, pH = 8.00).
As shown in Figure 3, on adding the metal ions to the solvent containing L, only Cu2+ cause the solution colour to change via naked-eye observation (Figure S3). The absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra of L–cation mixture indicated that probe L exhibits good selectivity toward Cu2+, while other cations or anions (Figure S4) had little impact on the optical behavior of probe L. On other hand, under a 365 nm UV lamp, only the L-Cu2+ mixture led to the emission light quenching dramatically (Figure S3). Furthermore, competitive experiments were also performed to investigate the selectivity of the probe toward Cu2+. When Cu2+ was present in the solution, the emission of the mixture at λem = 565 nm was quenched, while without Cu2+, the emission barely changed (Figure 4), which suggested that the coexisting ions/anions had a limited impact on the detection of Cu2+. Thus, the interference experiments indicated that the probe displays a high specificity and selectivity for detecting Cu2+ ions.

2.5. Job’s Plot and Binding Constant

Based on the above experimental conditions, the fluorescence titration experiments were performed with progressive addition of Cu2+ and are presented in Figure 5. As the figure demonstrates, the fluorescence intensity of probe L at λmax em = 565 nm gradually decreased as the Cu2+ ions were added. In addition, when the concentration of probe L change from 0 to 72μM (Figure S5), there exist a good linear relationship between the probe and the copper(II) ions (y = 432.59482 − 218.198x, R2 = 0.99276). Herein, the detection limit was calculated by utilizing the data of the fluorescence titration experiments following the IUPAC method (IUPAC Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature): 10 groups of blank samples were tested in the absence of copper under the same conditions, and then the standard deviation (SD) was calculated from the emission peak at 565 nm. After that, following the formula: the detection limit = 3SD/S, where S is the slope of the linear relationship during the fluorescence titration, the detection limit of probe L for Cu2+ is calculated to be 16.4 nM. Comparing with other Cu2+ probes (Table S3), the probe L has the advantages of lower detection limit and simpler synthetic route.
Further, the binding mode of probe L and Cu2+ was investigated by a Job’s plot by controlling the total concentration of the probe and Cu2+ at 40 μM in a mixture of THF/H2O (VTHF:VH2O = 4/1). The results indicated that the binding stoichiometry between the probe and Cu2+ was 1:2. On the other hand, a Benesi–Hildebrand (Figure 6) curve based on the above experiments could been obtained and the binding constant calculated. According to the formula [31]:
F − F0 = △F = [Cu2+](Fmax − F0)/(1/Ka + [Cu2+])
Here, F and F0 are the corresponding fluorescence intensity at 598 nm in the presence and absence of Cu2+, and Fmax is the fluorescence intensity when the probe has completely complexed with cations. Based on the data of fluorescence titration and the slop of the correlation curve, the binding constant (Ka) was calculated to be Ka = 1.222 × 103.

2.6. A Possible Mechanism for Detection Cu2+

To better understand the recognition mechanism of L for detecting copper ions, 1H-NMR spectroscopic titration experiments in d-DMSO: D2O solution were performed. As shown in Figure 7, when there did not exist any copper ions in the solution, one single peak (δ = 9.69 ppm) and one doublet (δ = 8.66–8.68 ppm) were observed corresponding to the -OH and -CH=N, respectively. The proton peaks at δ = 7.16–7.59 ppm were from the naphthalene ring and aniline ring of the probe L. When copper ions were added into the mixture, the proton signals at 9.69 ppm and 8.66 ppm were weakened and split, and new proton peaks at 10.72–10.74 ppm, 9.00–9.03 ppm, and 9.12–9.14 ppm could be observed at the same time. This indicated that in the presence of Cu2+, the O atom from the hydroxyl and the N atom from the -CH=N bond coordinated with Cu2+ firstly. On the other hand, as the initial content of probe L exceeded that of the Cu2+ in the mixture, there existed two coordination sites in one L molecule, and the probe molecule adopted a pattern with partially complexed with Cu2+. Thus, the proton environment of the -OH and -CH=N exhibited differences at different ratios of L and Cu2+, respectively. Similarly, the proton signals from the naphthalene and benzene rings also undergo a high field shift from 7.16–7.59 ppm to 7.09–7.57 ppm, indicating that the probe L does interact with Cu2+. On further increasing the amount of Cu2+ (1eq–2.5eq), the proton signals of -OH and -CH=N became much weaker and tend to be stable after the content of Cu2+ reached 2.0 eq, suggested that the probe L and Cu2+ may adopt a 1:2 coordination mode, consistent with the results obtained via the Job’s plot method.
The data from the single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis verify that two benzene rings at the ends of the probe are parallel to each other, but the naphthalene ring is not parallel to the benzene rings. As shown in Figure 8, the dihedral angle between the N1/N# (connecting with the plane of benzene) and the double bond C (connecting with the plane of naphthalene) is 167.14°, so probe L is a nonplanar molecule. Furthermore, the hydrogen atoms on two hydroxyl groups form a stable six membered ring structure with the N atoms from imine groups via the O-H···N intramolecular hydrogen bonds. As the 2,6-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,5-dialdehyde reacts with aniline to form the -CH=N bond, this functional group bridges the naphthalene and benzene ring leading to the probes conjugated structure. When probe molecules are excited by light, an electron flow from the naphthalene ring to the imine group can easily occur; on the other hand, in the THF/H2O solution, there exist a fast structure convert from enol form to keto form in the molecule [32], the intramolecular hydrogen bonds limit the nonradiative transition; thus, the probe L in the dissolved state emits orange light [33,34,35]. According to the 1H-NMR spectroscopic titration experiments, the probe coordinates with Cu2+ via the N atom of imine and the O atom of -OH to form a stable complex. At this time, the lone pair electrons on the N and O atoms will transfer to the empty orbitals of the copper ion, which blocks the initial excited electron transfer process (Figure 9) [36], resulting in fluorescence quenching of the probe solution.

2.7. Applications

In order to further evaluate the potential application of probe L for the detection of Cu2+ in real specimens, water samples from an artificial lake (at Guizhou Medical University) and running water (at our laboratory) have been collected for testing. The specific experimental process is as follows: 7.6 mL THF solution, 400 μL probe stock solution (40 μM), 1 mL buffer solution, and 1 mL water sample (had been filtered) were added into one volumetric flask and the mixture shaken well. At the same time, another water sample was processed with the same steps and an appropriate amount of standard substance (Cu(NO3)2) was added in it. After standing for 30 min, the fluorescence intensity of the sample at 565 nm had been recorded for further calculations. As shown in Table 1, the recoveries of the probe were calculated in the range of 99.10–102.90% in lake water and 98.49–102.37% in tap water. These results suggest that L is a sensitive and selective probe for Cu2+ monitoring in environmental water samples.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Characterization

Unless otherwise stated, all of the starting materials were commercially available and used without further purification. The solution of the metal ions and anions were prepared from their nitrate and sodium salts, respectively. 1H-NMR spectra (400 MHz) were recorded on a Inova-400 Bruker AV 400 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using d-DMSO solvent and tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. J-values are given in Hz. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a GCT premier CAB048 mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) operating in a MALDI-TOF mode. UV-vis absorption spectra were obtained on a UV-2600 Milton Ray Spectrofluorometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). PL spectra were recorded on a Cary Eclipse Hitachi 4500 spectrofluorometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The crystal structure was determined by Bruker Smart Apex single crystal diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).

3.2. Synthesis of the Compound L

Firstly, 43.2 mg (0.2 mmol) 2,6-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,5-dialdehyde was dissolved in 30 mL methanol, and then 50 μL (95%, 5.44 mmol) aniline was added into the mixture and stirred for 10 min in room temperature. After that, adding 10 μL H2SO4 into the mixture and stirring for another 5 h. The precipitate was filtered and washed with hot methanol for three times, and dried in vacuum to obtain the target red compound (63 mg, 0.17 mmol, yield 86.12%). An appropriate amount of precipitate was dissolved in a mixture of tetrahydrofuran and methanol (2:1), and then evaporated. After 4 days, red acicular crystals suitable for single crystal diffraction analysis were obtained. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO, TMS) δ 9.69 (s, 2H), 8.67 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 2H),. HRMS calculated: 398.11, found 398.15.

3.3. X-ray Crystallography

Crystallographic data for ligand L was collected on a Bruker APEX 2 CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) in the ω scan mode [37]. The structure was solved by a charge flipping algorithm and refined by full-matrix least-squares methods on F2 [38]. All relative standard deviation were estimated using the full covariance matrix. Further details are presented in Table S1. CCDC: 2059923, L.

3.4. General Methods for Optical Tests

Firstly, 3.7 mg (10μM) of probe L was dissolved in 10.00 mL THF solution to prepare 1mM stock solution. Then the nitrate of metal ions and the sodium salt of anions (Ag+, Al3+, Ba2+, Cd2+, CO2+, Cr3+, Na+, Cu2+, K+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Zn2+, Hg2+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Li+, AcO, ClO4, Br, NO2−, CO32−, I, F, SO42−, Cl, H2PO4, PO43−, HPO42−, C2O42−, SO32−, HSO3, HCO3) were accurately weighed and dissolved in 10.00 mL Tris-HCl buffer to form 10 mM ion stock solution. The preparation method of Tris-HCl buffer solution (2 mM) was as follows: 121.20 mg of trimethylol aminomethane was dissolved in 1.00 L ultrapure water, then its pH was adjusted to 8.00 with 0.10 M HCl solution and 0.10 M NaOH solution.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a new simple AIEE fluorescent probe based on two aniline units attached to a naphthalene dialdehyde core. The fluorescence intensity of the probe in good solvents and poor solvents can differ by 40.31 times. Furthermore, in the presence of copper(II) ions, the probe solution showed an obvious colour change from yellow to brown under daylight and from bright to dark under UV lamp irradiation with a detection limit as low as 1.64 × 10−8 mol·L−1. This indicates that the probe L has the potential to be used for the detection of Cu2+ by naked eye and via instrumentation. Based on the titration experiments, a good linear relationship was found which may apply the probe to the quantitative and qualitative detection of Cu2+ in real samples. We believe this work not only provides a new example of a small molecular probe for ion detection, but these results may inform research in broader fields such as biometrics and photodynamic therapy, and such research is going-on in our laboratory.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: 1H-NMR of probe L title, Figure S2: HRMS spectrum of L, Figure S3: Photographs of probe L-cation complex under natural light and 365 nm UV lamp, Figure S4: UV-vis and Fluorescence spectra of the fluorescence probe L interacting with different anions; Photograph of probe L-anions complex in THF/water (VTHF/Vwater = 4/1, pH = 8.00) solution under 365 nm UV lamp, Figure S5: The absorbance and fluorescence spectra on addition of Cu2+ to the probe (40 μM, VTHF:VH2O = 4/1, λex = 428 nm, slit: 5/5 nm, voltage: 900 v). The fluorescence intensity change plots at 565 nm on addition of Cu2+. Insert: when [Cu2+]/[probe] is in the range of 0–1.8 ratio, the fluorescence intensity of the probe has a good linear relationship with Cu2+ (y = 432.59482 − 218.198x, R2 = 0.99276), Table S1: Summary of crystal data of probe L, Table S2: The fluorescence intensity(a.u.) of probe L and L-Cu2+ complex versus different pH value within 1440 min (565 nm), Table S3: Comparison data with reported Cu2+ sensors.

Author Contributions

X.Z. and L.-Y.S. carried out the experiments; H.X. and Y.-L.H. analyzed the experiment data; L.-Y.S. and X.-J.Y. analyzed the X-ray structure; and C.R. and Q.-L.Z. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22065009, 22066007), the Guizhou Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant number [2019] 2792, grant number [2018] 5779-14). CR thanks the EPSRC for an Overseas Travel Grant (EP/R023816/1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duan, N.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Tian, H.; Sun, B. The research progress of organic fluorescent probe applied in food and drinking water detection. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 427, 213557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chowdhury, S.; Rooj, B.; Dutta, A.; Mandal, U. Review on recent advances in metal ions sensing using different fluorescent probes. J. Fluoresc. 2018, 28, 999–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gumpu, M.B.; Sethuraman, S.; Krishnan, U.M.; Rayappan, J.B.B. A review on detection of heavy metal ions in water—An electrochemical approach. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 213, 515–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yue, D.; Wang, M.; Deng, F.; Yin, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, X.; Xu, Z. Biomarker-targeted fluorescent probes for breast cancer imaging. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. O’gorman, J.; Humphreys, H. Application of copper to prevent and control infection. Where are we now? J. Hosp. Infect. 2012, 81, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lamichhane, J.R.; Osdaghi, E.; Behlau, F.; Köhl, J.; Jones, J.B.; Aubertot, J.-N. Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Uriu-Adams, J.Y.; Keen, C.L. Copper, oxidative stress, and human health. Mol. Asp. Med. 2005, 26, 268–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Araya, M.; Olivares, M.; Pizarro, F. Copper in human health. Int. J. Environ. Health 2007, 1, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hadjipanagiotou, C.; Christou, A.; Zissimos, A.M.; Chatzitheodoridis, E.; Varnavas, S.P. Contamination of stream waters, sediments, and agricultural soil in the surroundings of an abandoned copper mine by potentially toxic elements and associated environmental and potential human health–derived risks: A case study from Agrokipia, Cyprus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 41279–41298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Loland, J.; Singh, B. Copper contamination of soil and vegetation in coffee orchards after long-term use of Cu fungicides. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2004, 69, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moghaddam, M.R.; Carrara, S.; Hogan, C.F. Multi-colour bipolar electrochemiluminescence for heavy metal ion detection. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1024–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaur, B.; Kaur, N.; Kumar, S. Colorimetric metal ion sensors—A comprehensive review of the years 2011–2016. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 358, 13–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Walekar, L.; Dutta, T.; Kumar, P.; Ok, Y.S.; Pawar, S.; Deep, A.; Kim, K.-H. Functionalized fluorescent nanomaterials for sensing pollutants in the environment: A critical review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 97, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qing, T.; Zhang, K.; Qing, Z.; Wang, X.; Long, C.; Zhang, P.; Hu, H.; Feng, B. Recent progress in copper nanocluster-based fluorescent probing: A review. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cotruvo Jr, J.A.; Aron, A.T.; Ramos-Torres, K.M.; Chang, C.J. Synthetic fluorescent probes for studying copper in biological systems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4400–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Islam, M.M.; Hu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Redshaw, C.; Feng, X. Pyrene-based aggregation-induced emission luminogens and their applications. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 762–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, J.; Liu, W.; Ge, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P. New sensing mechanisms for design of fluorescent chemosensors emerging in recent years. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3483–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. La, D.D.; Bhosale, S.V.; Jones, L.A.; Bhosale, S.V. Tetraphenylethylene-based AIE-active probes for sensing applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 10, 12189–12216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sahana, A.; Banerjee, A.; Lohar, S.; Panja, S.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K.; Matalobos, J.S.; Das, D. Fluorescence sensing of arsenate at nanomolar level in a greener way: Naphthalene based probe for living cell imaging. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7231–7233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zong, L.; Song, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, Z. A “turn-on” fluorescence probe towards copper ions based on core-substitued naphthalene diimide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 226, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chaichana, K.; Phutlaprungrueang, N.; Chaicharoenwimolkul, L.; Promkatkaew, M.; Kongsriprapan, S. A selective fluorescence probe based on naphthalene for the detection of barium (ii). Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 207, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Long, L.; Yuan, X.; Cao, S.; Han, Y.; Liu, W.; Chen, Q.; Han, Z.; Wang, K. Determination of Cyanide in Water and Food Samples Using an Efficient Naphthalene-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 10784–10790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Halder, S.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Roy, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Roy, P. Chromogenic and fluorescence sensing of pH with a Schiff-base molecule. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 39118–39124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gupta, V.K.; Singh, A.K.; Kumawat, L.K. Thiazole Schiff base turn-on fluorescent chemosensor for Al3+ ion. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 195, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, H.; Liu, T.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Song, J.; Qu, J.; Wong, W.-Y. A simple Schiff base as dual-responsive fluorescent sensor for bioimaging recognition of Zn 2+ and Al 3+ in living cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 5435–5442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Soliman, E.M.; Saleh, M.B.; Ahmed, S.A. New solid phase extractors for selective separation and preconcentration of mercury (II) based on silica gel immobilized aliphatic amines 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde Schiff’s bases. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 523, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghaedi, M.; Montazerozohori, M.; Rahimi, N.; Biysreh, M.N. Chemically modified carbon nanotubes as efficient and selective sorbent for enrichment of trace amount of some metal ions. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 19, 1477–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, R.; Semwal, S.; Choudhury, J.; Srivastava, A. Heli (aza) cene: A Helical Molecular Tweezer with Tunable Intraand Inter-molecular Charge Transfer. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 15012–15016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Faridbod, F.; Ganjali, M.R.; Dinarvand, R.; Norouzi, P. Ion recognition: Application of symmetric and asymmetric Schiff bases and their complexes for the fabrication of cationic and anionic membrane sensors to determine ions in real samples. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2007, 10, 527–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saleh, S.M.; Ali, R.; Ali, I.A. A novel, highly sensitive, selective, reversible and turn-on chemi-sensor based on Schiff base for rapid detection of Cu (II). Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 183, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thordarson, P. Determining association constants from titration experiments in supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1305–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Elsegood, M.R.; Teat, S.J.; Feng, X.; Islam, M.M.; Wu, F.; Tang, B.Z. Tetraphenylethylene-based color-tunable AIE-ESIPT chromophores. Dyes Pigment. 2020, 175, 108175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sun, T.; Tang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Ma, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M. A Schiff base fluorescence probe for highly selective turn-on recognition of Zn2+. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ganguly, A.; Ghosh, S.; Kar, S.; Guchhait, N. Selective fluorescence sensing of Cu (II) and Zn (II) using a simple Schiff base ligand: Naked eye detection and elucidation of photoinduced electron transfer (PET) mechanism. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 143, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, T.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Ma, D.; Yang, Q.; Tang, Y. A simple turn-on Schiff base fluorescence sensor for aluminum ion. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 3535–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feng, H.-T.; Song, S.; Chen, Y.-C.; Shen, C.-H.; Zheng, Y.-S. Self-assembled tetraphenylethylene macrocycle nanofibrous materials for the visual detection of copper (II) in water. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 2353–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Krause, L.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Stalke, D. Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT–Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Scheme 1. Synthetic route to Schiff-base L.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route to Schiff-base L.
Molecules 26 01233 sch001
Figure 1. (A) Fluorescence spectra of L (40 μM) in tetrahydrofuran (THF)/water mixtures with different water fractions (λexem = 428 nm/565 nm, slit: 5/5 nm, voltage: 660 v). (B) Plots of fluorescence intensity at 565 nm. (C) photographs in THF/water mixtures with different water fractions taken under 365 nm UV irradiation.
Figure 1. (A) Fluorescence spectra of L (40 μM) in tetrahydrofuran (THF)/water mixtures with different water fractions (λexem = 428 nm/565 nm, slit: 5/5 nm, voltage: 660 v). (B) Plots of fluorescence intensity at 565 nm. (C) photographs in THF/water mixtures with different water fractions taken under 365 nm UV irradiation.
Molecules 26 01233 g001
Figure 2. The fluorescence intensity stability of the L and L-Cu2+ systems versus different (A) pH values and (B) reaction time.
Figure 2. The fluorescence intensity stability of the L and L-Cu2+ systems versus different (A) pH values and (B) reaction time.
Molecules 26 01233 g002
Figure 3. (A) The UV–vis and (B) Fluorescence spectra of the fluorescence probe L interacting with different metal ions (λexem = 428/565 nm, slit: 5/5 nm, voltage: 900 v).
Figure 3. (A) The UV–vis and (B) Fluorescence spectra of the fluorescence probe L interacting with different metal ions (λexem = 428/565 nm, slit: 5/5 nm, voltage: 900 v).
Molecules 26 01233 g003
Figure 4. Bar diagram of the competitive experiments of various metal cations (A) and anions (B) on the fluorescence intensity of the probe/Cu2+ complex in buffer solution.
Figure 4. Bar diagram of the competitive experiments of various metal cations (A) and anions (B) on the fluorescence intensity of the probe/Cu2+ complex in buffer solution.
Molecules 26 01233 g004
Figure 5. (A) Fluorescence spectra on addition of Cu2+ to the probe; (B) Job’s plot for the determination of the stoichiometry of L and Cu2+ in the mixture of THF/H2O (VTHF:VH2O = 4/1), the total concentration of L and Cu2+ was 40 μM.
Figure 5. (A) Fluorescence spectra on addition of Cu2+ to the probe; (B) Job’s plot for the determination of the stoichiometry of L and Cu2+ in the mixture of THF/H2O (VTHF:VH2O = 4/1), the total concentration of L and Cu2+ was 40 μM.
Molecules 26 01233 g005
Figure 6. The Benesi–Hildebrand plot of 1/(F − F0) versus 1/[Cu2+].
Figure 6. The Benesi–Hildebrand plot of 1/(F − F0) versus 1/[Cu2+].
Molecules 26 01233 g006
Figure 7. 1H-NMR spectroscopic titration spectra of L-Cu2+ on increasing concentrations of Cu2+ in d-DMSO/D2O solution.
Figure 7. 1H-NMR spectroscopic titration spectra of L-Cu2+ on increasing concentrations of Cu2+ in d-DMSO/D2O solution.
Molecules 26 01233 g007
Figure 8. The X-ray single crystal diffraction image of probe L (Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds, Symmetry code:# = −x, 1 − y, 1 − z).
Figure 8. The X-ray single crystal diffraction image of probe L (Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds, Symmetry code:# = −x, 1 − y, 1 − z).
Molecules 26 01233 g008
Figure 9. The possible recognition mechanism process for detection of copper ions.
Figure 9. The possible recognition mechanism process for detection of copper ions.
Molecules 26 01233 g009
Table 1. The detail data for Cu2+ detection in real water samples.
Table 1. The detail data for Cu2+ detection in real water samples.
SampleMeasuredAddedDetectedRecoveryRSD
(μmol·L−1)(μmol·L−1)(μmol·L−1)(n = 3, %)(n = 3, %)
Running water8.995.0014.0399.710.93
10.0019.2898.492.01
20.0028.32102.371.15
Artificial lake15.925.0021.1199.101.48
10.0025.19102.901.72
20.0035.9999.812.07
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Shen, L.-Y.; Zhang, Q.-L.; Yang, X.-J.; Huang, Y.-L.; Redshaw, C.; Xu, H. A Simple Turn-off Schiff Base Fluorescent Sensor for Copper (II) Ion and Its Application in Water Analysis. Molecules 2021, 26, 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051233

AMA Style

Zhang X, Shen L-Y, Zhang Q-L, Yang X-J, Huang Y-L, Redshaw C, Xu H. A Simple Turn-off Schiff Base Fluorescent Sensor for Copper (II) Ion and Its Application in Water Analysis. Molecules. 2021; 26(5):1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xing, Ling-Yi Shen, Qi-Long Zhang, Xian-Jiong Yang, Ya-Li Huang, Carl Redshaw, and Hong Xu. 2021. "A Simple Turn-off Schiff Base Fluorescent Sensor for Copper (II) Ion and Its Application in Water Analysis" Molecules 26, no. 5: 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051233

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop