Next Article in Journal
Towards a Synthetic Biology Toolset for Metallocluster Enzymes in Biosynthetic Pathways: What We Know and What We Need
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on Synthesis and Upscaling of 2′-O-AECM-5-methyl Pyrimidine Phosphoramidites for Oligonucleotide Synthesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Occurrence and Contamination Level of Ochratoxin A in Plant and Animal-Derived Food Commodities

1
Food Safety Laboratory, Division of Metrology in Chemistry, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
3
Beijing State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Xianjiang Li and Wen Ma contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6928; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226928
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Food Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a highly toxic mycotoxin and poses great threat to human health. Due to its serious toxicity and widespread contamination, great efforts have been made to evaluate its human exposure. This review focuses on the OTA occurrence and contamination level in nine plant and animal derived food commodities: cereal, wine, coffee, beer, cocoa, dried fruit, spice, meat, and milk. The occurrence and contamination level varied greatly in food commodities and were affected by many factors, including spices, geography, climate, and storage conditions. Therefore, risk monitoring must be routinely implemented to ensure minimal OTA intake and food safety.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by some fungal species [1]. As reported, more than hundreds of mycotoxins have been discovered so far [2]. Isolated in South Africa in 1965 [3], ochratoxins are one of the most common mycotoxins, produced by many kinds of Aspergillus and Penicillium fungi. In the family of ochratoxins, ochratoxin A (OTA) is the most well-known member for its high occurrence and good stability. OTA tends to survive during storage and processing, and high cooking temperatures cannot completely destroy it. Therefore, once foodstuffs are contaminated with OTA, it is very difficult to totally remove it. Therefore, pre-harvest prevention is the most effective strategy to get rid of OTA contamination and therefore lower human exposure [4].
Studies have shown that OTA may lead to multiple health issues because of its toxicological effects, such as teratogenicity, immunotoxicity, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity [5]. The kidney is believed to be the primary target organ, and OTA is suspected to be the main reason for Balkan Endemic Nephropathy [6]. In addition to being toxic to humans, OTA is poisonous to livestock, such as pigs, cows, goats, poultry, and so on. Especially, pigs are quite susceptible to it because OTA was proved to be a causal agent of mycotoxic porcine nephropathy reported in Denmark during the 1960–1970s [7]. OTA has a strong affinity towards proteins, which leads to bio-accumulation and carry-over effects in animal-derived products that further endanger human health. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, OTA has been classified in class 2B as a possible human carcinogen.
The occurrence of OTA in food commodities has been reported worldwide, and total avoidance of OTA consumption is almost impossible. There is consensus that these OTA contaminated foods are a severe risk source to public health [8]. Estimation of the occurrence level and the main contribution of contaminated food commodities to human exposure is the first step to improve the level of OTA surveillance and risk management. From a worldwide view, cereals are considered as the major food commodity for human exposure. There are also reports in a myriad of other commodities, including fruit, cocoa, spice, coffee, etc. These OTA contaminated foods can further contaminate processed food through the food chain, such as beer, wine, juice, ham, salami, cheese, and so on [9]. Reports also showed that OTA was even found in human breast milk [10]. In these surveys, OTA occurrence could be monitored by several techniques [11] like liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector (LC-FLD) [12], liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [13,14], capillary electrophoresis laser induced fluorescence [15], electrochemical biosensor [16], and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [17]. There have been several reviews focusing on OTA occurrence in specific commodities, including cereal derived food [18], cereal based baby food [19], wine [20], beer [21], and so on. However, there is no review covering all these food commodities in high risk of contamination.
A recent report from the European Food Safety Authority estimated the contributions of OTA exposure from dietary intake [5]. This result was in basic accordance with a former risk assessment performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Experts Committee on Food Additives that cereals ranked first, followed by wine, grape juice, roasted coffee, and pork [22]. OTA occurrence in food has been described worldwide. The aim of this review is to provide a broad overview of the OTA occurrence and contamination level in widespread plant and animal derived food commodities. This will benefit the estimation of the main contribution of contaminated foodstuffs in human exposure and improve OTA risk management. Moreover, possible factors affecting OTA contamination are summarized to address concern about food quality control during processing and storage.

2. Occurrence of OTA in Plant-Derived Food Commodities

2.1. OTA in Cereals

Cereals (rice, wheat, corn, rye, barley, oats, millet, etc.) and their products are staple food in human diets around the world. Due to climatic conditions and storage practices, they easily suffer from fungal growth and OTA contamination, and are therefore the main sources of human exposure [18]. As shown in Table 1, OTA was detected in the regions of Asia, North America, Africa, and Europe. The environmental conditions of humidity, temperature, and water activity are essential factors for the production of OTA during the time of harvest, drying, and storage of crops. A ten-year global survey showed that 15% of the tested feed samples were positive [23]. In this survey, a total of 74,821 samples were collected from 100 nations in the period from 2008 to 2017. The highest contamination occurred in South Asia, where 60.4% samples were positive. Surprisingly, the highest contamination concentration was 2000 μg/kg. China has the biggest rice production yield in the world. An analysis of 370 rice samples from six provinces in China showed 4.9% of the samples were contaminated with OTA, and only 1 sample was above 3 μg/kg, which is the maximum residue limit (MRL) of the European Commission (EC) [24]. However, the contamination was severe in some other areas. In Pakistan, researchers found that 75% of corn and wheat products were contaminated with levels over the MRL of EC [25]. The highest level even reached 360 μg/kg in one biscuit sample, which was far beyond MRL and very dangerous to health. In the last year, 46 maize samples had detected concentrations from 2.14 to 214 μg/kg [26]. The occurrence even reached 71%, and the highest level was found on Ayub-2/27 grains. This result indicated that maize varieties had significant impact on OTA occurrence. The other two studies collected samples from the Punjab region of Pakistan. The former report collected rice, corn, and corn products during 2011–2012 [27]. The contamination rate was 32%, and rice had higher occurrence than corn. The latter report focused on 208 rice samples [28]. The maximum level was 24.9 μg/kg, which was above the MRL of EC. Another survey from Iran indicated that 41% of the analyzed cereal-based baby foods were contaminated with OTA, and 7.8% were higher than the MRL of EC [29]. Moreover, rice was usually more contaminated than wheat in Iran [30].
In the United States, a survey showed that OTA was detected in 12.2% of tested barley, durum, and hard red spring wheat samples [31]. Among them, one barley and four wheat samples exceeded 5 μg/kg. None of the positive samples were from any specific region. Another survey analyzed 144 corn, oat, wheat, and rice samples [32]. More than half (52%) of the samples were contaminated in the range from 0.10 to 7.43 μg/kg. Moreover, organic samples exhibited higher contamination than conventional samples. However, other reports had inconsistent results for infant foods [33] and breakfast cereals [34] from the USA. No significant difference was observed in the tested 155 infant cereal products and 489 breakfast cereals. However, oat-based cereal had the highest frequency and contamination levels compared with corn-, rice-, and wheat-based cereal.
From a survey in Canada, five wheat samples (2.2%) were detected with OTA and OTB, and only three samples exceeded 5 μg/kg [35]. For Algeria, the situation was worse, with 62 of 81 wheat samples contaminated with OTA ranging from 0.84 to 34.75 μg/kg [36]. Researchers also found the flour manufacturing process had little impact on OTA elimination. In Portugal, 50% of the processed cereal-based foods were contaminated with OTA [37]. However, the maximum level was only 0.23 μg/kg, and all samples were below the MRL of EC. Notably, more OTA may be introduced to wheat flour during the scouring process [18]. A total of 114 samples (wheat, buckwheat, rye, oat, barley, rice, millet, and corn flour) were collected in a Serbian market from 2012 to 2016 [38]. OTA was found in 75.0% rye and 20.0% wheat, but there was none in rice and millet flours. In Poland, only 3% of rye samples were contaminated with concentrations below 2.75 μg/kg [39]. Above all, the levels of OTA in cereals vary greatly in countries and cereal commodities.

2.2. OTA in Wine

After cereals, wine is the second most important source of OTA in total dietary intake in Europe [40]. Damaged grapes are susceptible to be infected with ochratoxigenic fungal, and the high sugar matrix provides a perfect medium for OTA production. Contamination seems to occur in the vineyard, and many factors have been reported to affect OTA levels in wine, including geographical and climate factors. Europe is a big market for wine production and consumption. Therefore, the EC has set maximum OTA levels in wine at 2 μg/L in Regulation 1881/2006 [41]. The frequency of OTA in wines is quite extensive, but rarely exceeds this MRL, as seen in Table 2.
As the largest wine producing country, Italy cares much about OTA in its wine products and collected three continuous survey samples from Sicily. In the first survey, 96.6% of wines produced in 2007–2011 and were contaminated by OTA, with an average concentration of 0.246 μg/L [42]. In the second survey, 72.7% of wines produced in 2012–2013 and were contaminated, with the average concentration of 0.255 μg/L [43]. The third survey collected 470 wine samples, and only one positive sample was found positive by immunoenzymatic assay [44]. However, none of the tested samples exceeded the MRL of EC. Possible reasons were the warmer climate and long drying time before fermentation. These results confirmed the good quality of Sicilian wine. In the Rioja Alavesa region of Spain, 100 wine samples produced between 2005 and 2008 were tested in a survey [45]. Among them, 57 positive samples were found with OTA concentrations in the range of 0.004–0.179 μg/L. All samples were also below the MRL of EC. In Portugal, OTA was detected in 12 samples from 60 wines, and only one white wine exceeded 2 μg/L [46]. Another recent investigation showed that 3 of 92 wine samples were contaminated with OTA with concentrations below 1 μg/L in Portugal [47]. These samples covered the time period from 1984 to 2017, and two positive samples were home produced. A recent survey focused on Madeira wines [48]. None of the analyzed 30 samples exceeded the MRL of EC, with the highest concentration being 0.45 μg/kg. From the above results, OTA contamination was quite low in Portugal. Greece carried out an OTA contamination survey covering 80% of the total wine producing area [49]. Among the tested 150 samples (123 dry wines and 27 dessert wines), 69% of samples were reported with positive results. For the contaminated samples, 91% were below 1 μg/L, 9% were between 1 and 2 μg/L, and only one sample exceeded the legal level. In addition, there was no significant difference in production years from 1999 to 2006. Nevertheless, higher frequency and contamination were found in dessert wines than dry wines. More serious contamination was found in Croatia [50]. From 110 collected red wines, 98.2% were contaminated, with an average concentration of 0.040 μg/L. Wine from the southern Dalmatian islands, where it was believed to more favorable for ochratoxigenic species growth, had higher OTA content. A report from Fruška Gora of Serbia collected 113 dry wines from 2011 to 2016 [51]. Trace OTA was found in 64% of red wines, 42.6% of white wines, and 36.4% of rosé wines. The highest occurrence rate (88.9%) was in 2014 wine, produced when there was an extreme number of rainy days. In a recent report from Spain, 47% of wine samples were contaminated in the range of 0.77–2.44 μg/L [52]. OTA and OTB were screened in 59 archived Tokaj wines by on-line extraction coupled liquid chromatography [53]. Only four samples were positive for OTA, with a maximum of 1.2 μg/L.
In the United States, OTA contamination was found in more than 85% of the 41 wines evaluated [54]. Among them, 68% of samples were above 1 μg/L and only two wines were above 2 μg/L. In South America, Chile did a survey with 1188 samples covering 1000 km distance [55]. Only in 2.9% of all tested samples were OTA levels positive, with the highest concentration being 0.35 μg/L. Furthermore, the frequency of OTA in red wine (3.5%) was twice that in white wine (1.7%) due to the longer maceration time that favored the OTA transfer from grape skin to wine during the wine manufacturing process. All in all, the contamination in Chile was quite lower than other reported areas in view of this report. Another study was carried out in China for exposure assessment. From the results of 223 wine samples from 7 provinces, the concentrations varied from 0.01 to 0.98 μg/L, with an average of 0.15 μg/L [56]. Specifically, wine from Jilin province had the lowest mean value for its high latitude and low temperature. Another survey covered four provinces in China. OTA detection rate was slightly higher than in a former report: 66% for red wine and 55% for white wine [57]. The average content was 0.61 μg/L. Another survey collected 42 samples from the Hexi Corridor Region of China [58]. Results showed good quality of these samples, with a maximum of 1.27 μg/L. Researchers also found OTA coexisted with other mycotoxins, including cyclopiazonic acid, mycophenolic acid, and zearalenone.

2.3. OTA in Coffee

Coffee, as the third largest source of exposure, accounts for approximately 9% of the total intake of OTA in Europe [59]. The EC has set an MRL for OTA in coffee at 5 μg/kg. Coffee trees are planted in tropical areas, but coffees are roasted worldwide. Both the plant environment and processing conditions have a significant effect on the OTA concentration. Most surveys were carried out in consumer markets other than in the areas where the coffee originated. In a survey of Portuguese markets, 40 soluble coffee and coffee substitute samples were collected and analyzed by LC-FLD [60]. The maximum concentration was found in a soluble coffee, with 11.8 μg/kg. Researchers also found brand effects such that own-brand coffee samples had higher OTA concentrations than the branded ones. In a later survey in Portugal, 3 of 11 roasted coffee samples were positive [61]. The mean concentrations were 1.84 and 1.45 μg/kg for roasted and ground roasted coffee. From another report, the situation was better in Spain. The frequency was of OTA was 49% (35 of 72) in tested ground roasted coffee, but all tested samples were below the MRL of EC. [62]. Average content was 2.17 μg/kg in the range of 1.21–4.21 μg/kg. From another report concerning French roasted coffee, all 30 samples were contaminated [63]. OTA concentration ranged from trace to 11.9 μg/kg. One sample even exceeded the MRL of EC. In Italy, a survey covered 44 soluble coffees and 6 coffee products, in which 48 positive samples were found with OTA ranging from 0.32 to 6.40 μg/kg, with a mean of 1.27 μg/kg [64]. This survey also reported that no significant difference was found between normal and decaffeinated instant coffee. Subsequently, 103 coffee samples were collected from Czech markets [65]. The results showed that 71% of roasted coffee samples were positive in the range of 0.2–2.5 μg/kg, and all the instant coffee samples were positive with concentrations between 0.6 and 12.8 μg/kg. The above reports show that OTA frequently contaminated coffee in Europe. Similar situations were found in South America. In Argentina, 69% of tested coffees were contaminated with OTA [66]. The median value was 2.7 μg/kg for green coffee, 0.24 mg/kg for ground roasted coffee, and 0.43 mg/kg for soluble coffee. This indicated that the roasting process reduced OTA content in coffee. Chile carried out a survey that found all of the coffee samples positive for OTA, and 3 of 63 samples were over the MRL of EC [67]. The mean concentration for roasted coffee was 0.47 μg/kg and for instant coffee was 1.8 μg/kg. Fermented coffee was collected and analyzed in Brazil [68]. Three out of fourteen samples were positive with a maximum of 0.87 μg/kg. This indicated that the fermentation process should not be a concern for OTA exposure. Green coffee was collected from nine countries in 2015 and 2016 for analysis of 31 mycotoxins, including Vietnam (n = 24), Brazil (n = 19), Colombia (n = 7), Ethiopia (n = 5), Ivory Coast (n = 4), China (n = 4), Indonesia (n = 4), Mexico (n = 2), and Guatemala (n = 2) [69]. Results from LC-MS showed that OTA occurrence was 28%, with an average concentration of 1.3 μg/kg. Co-occurrence of OTA with other mycotoxins was rare.

2.4. OTA in Beer

Beer is widely consumed around the world. As a beverage derived from cereals, OTA may be transferred from contaminated cereals (Table 3). In Italy, a survey covered 30 brands of beer [70]. The contamination percentage was 16.7%, with an average of 0.35 μg/kg. All positive samples were below 2 μg/kg. In the Czech Republic, 44 lager beers (90%) were contaminated by OTA [71]. Among the positive beer samples, most of the OTA concentrations were below 0.1 μg/L, with only one special pepper beer exceeding 1.2 μg/L. It is possible that contaminated pepper was used in the beer production. In the Coimbra region of Portugal, 84 homemade, craft, and industrial beers were bought from market [72]. The overall occurrence of OTA was 10.6% with concentrations below 11.25 μg/L. Results showed that homemade beers presented higher contamination levels and industrial beers showed higher occurrence. Whereas in a report from China, no occurrence was found in 20 tested beer samples [73]. The detection limit of the method was 0.006 μg/L. Another survey collected 40 beer samples from 2017 to 2018 in Spain, and 20% were contaminated with 1.83 μg/L [52].

2.5. OTA in Cocoa

Cocoa is an important ingredient in several kinds of foods, especially chocolate. OTA is a major mycotoxin occurring in cocoa. Cocoa is produced in tropical areas. During the processing and storage stages, the beans become susceptible to contamination by fungi and OTA. As a result, the EC has set an MRL for OTA in cocoa at 2 μg/kg. Western Africa is the most important production area, but there are only a few reports about OTA occurrence in cocoa. In 2008, a survey focused on the OTA in cocoa beans from Nigeria [74]. More than 90% of the analyzed samples were positive, with concentrations ranging from trace to 0.28 μg/kg. Latin America is the third biggest production area of cocoa, and there are two reports concerning Brazilian cocoa beans. From a report in 2011, 54 samples were collected [75]. Only four samples were above the MRL of EC, and the rest (92.5%) were below the limit. The other report was published in 2019 and the frequency was similar [76]. OTA was present in 28 of 123 analyzed samples ranging from 0.25 to 7.2 μg/kg. The mean level of OTA was 1.2 μg/kg. From the Italian markets, 60% of the collected cocoa and chocolate products were positive for OTA [77]. All of the 40 cocoa powder samples were contaminated, with the concentration ranging from 0.18 to 1.82 μg/kg below the MRL of EC. A total of 130 chocolate products in Turkey were tested for OTA, with an occurrence of 24.6% [78]. OTA was more frequently found in bitter chocolate than in milk chocolate and chocolate wafers, perhaps due to the high amount of cocoa in it. In Canadian market, the frequency of occurrence was quite high. One survey reported 100% for all 32 cocoa powder and chocolate samples [79]. Another reported 89.4% for cocoa products analyzed in 2011–2012 [80]. On the basis of the risk assessment, the exposure to OTA due to the consumption of cocoa and chocolate products is not a major concern.

2.6. OTA in Fruits and Nuts

Fruits are one of the more nutritious and consumed foods around the world, yet OTA contamination is not a negligible issue in them. Grapes are the raw material in wine, and OTA contamination in dried wine fruit is usually much higher than that in wine [81]. In Iran, 66 samples were collected during 2012 and 2013, and LC-FLD results showed that 23 (57.5%) currant, 10 (62.5%) sultana, and 6 (60%) raisin samples were contaminated with OTA [82]. All samples were below 8.4 μg/kg, with a mean value of 2.98 μg/kg. In Pakistan, 72 fruit and dried fruit samples were bought from Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, including fig, apricot, dried apricot, plum, and raisin [83]. The average frequency of OTA occurrence was 25%, with a mean concentration of 3.58 μg/kg. In addition, four samples were above the recommended limit of 10 μg/kg. Usually, dried fruits were more contaminated with OTA because of water loss and lengthy storage. The highest contamination concentration discussed in this paper happened in Egypt [84]. The OTA level of tested dried date palm reached 6070 μg/kg, with a median value of 58.7 μg/kg, which was far above the MRL. This may have been caused by improper storage conditions. In contrast, only one of 19 collected palm dates from Tunisia and Algeria was positive, with a concentration of 0.75 μg/kg [85]. The nation of production may have a significant effect on OTA residual. OTA was detected in 93% (37/40) raisin samples from the United States [86]. The detected concentrations ranged from 0.06 to 11.4 μg/kg, and one sample surpassed the MRL of EC. In China, the occurrence was a little lower. A survey covered 253 samples including walnuts (35), chestnuts (33), hazelnuts (20), pine nuts (20), almonds (25), dried figs (20), dried longans (15), dried jujubes (35), raisins (30), and dried persimmons (20) [87]. Only two dried persimmons and two raisins were positive, with an average concentration of 6.23 μg/kg. Another survey collected 195 raisins from 9 provinces, and only 3 samples were contaminated, with levels of 0.18–10.14 μg/kg [88]. The situation was worse for dried jujube [89]. All 20 collected samples were contaminated, with a maximum concentration of 0.18 μg/kg.

2.7. OTA in Spices

Various spices are commonly consumed as food. Even though their consumption quantity is not comparable with the previously discussed foods, the OTA contamination is more serious because of their processing and storage conditions. The MRLs of OTA in spices were 15–20 μg/kg according to Regulation 1881/2006 of EC. It is well-known that chili is widely used for imparting pungency and creating aroma in cooked food. Pakistan, as the third major producer, carried out a survey for natural occurrence of OTA in 2013 [90]. Among 170 chili samples, OTA was positive with the ratio of 34.7%, including 9 chili sauce, 25 crushed chili, and 25 chili powder samples, with a highest concentration of 64.5 μg/kg. A recent survey by the same lab provided worse results for chili sauce from Pakistan [91]. A total of 252 samples were collected, including red chili sauce, green chili sauce, and garlic red chili sauce samples. The frequency was two times higher than found in the former report. The highest OTA concentration detected was 114 μg/kg. Eighty dried chili samples were collected from the open markets in Malaysia and 81.25% were found to be contaminated with a mean concentration of 7.15 μg/kg [92]. In 15% of samples, OTA exceeded 10 μg/kg, with a maximum concentration of 101.2 μg/kg. In an Italian market, 31 of 130 (23.8%) samples were contaminated with OTA. Additionally, a higher frequency of OTA was found in chili than in pepper [93]. In Lebanon, the occurrence was a little higher, 30%, in allspice, pepper, chili, cinnamon, ginger, and mixture samples [94]. This result highlighted the problem of OTA contamination in this country. From a Turkish market, 105 spice samples were checked in 2012 (24 red chili flake, 22 red chili powder, 23 black pepper powder, 19 cumin, and 17 cinnamon powder samples) [95]. The frequency of OTA occurrence was 75% for red chili flake, 54.5% for red chili powder, 17.4% for black pepper powder, and 5.3% for cumin. Another recent Turkish survey showed a worse result that 87.1% of the packed and 100% of the unpacked red pepper flake samples were positive [96]. Approximately 480 kinds of Chinese spice products, including chili, pepper, prickly, cinnamon, aniseed, fennel, curry, and cumin, were collected for OTA screening in 2014 [97]. In the final report, the contamination rate was 9.6%, with concentrations in the range 0.31–30.73 μg/kg. Ginger is a root crop and widely used as a spice. A total of 120 ginger samples were collected in Nigeria, of which 89 were collected in the dry season and 31 in the rainy season [98]. Higher contamination was found during the rainy season (77%, 3.94 μg/kg) than the dry season (37%, 1.02 μg/kg). Astragalus propinquus root is a kind of herbal food supplement and easily contaminated by OTA. All 40 samples from a Czech market were positive with a mean concentration of 451.0 μg/kg [99]. The maximum concentration even reached 1700 μg/kg.

3. Occurrence of OTA in Animal-Derived Food Commodities

3.1. OTA in Meat and Meat Products

Animal feeds contain cereal ingredients, and OTA may transfer to and accumulate in these animals through the food chain (Table 4). Health concern always exist from consumption of animal-derived food products, especially pork [9]. However, the MRLs of OTA in meat and derivative products were not set in Regulation 1881/2006 of EC and GB 2761 of China. According to a study of OTA distribution in pig tissues, its concentration followed the order: blood plasma > lung > kidney > heart > bile > liver > fat > muscle [100]. From 2014 to 2016, Poland executed an official monitoring of OTA in pig tissues (muscle, liver, and kidney) [101]. Results showed that approximately 23.5% of the animal tissue samples were contaminated, with a mean of 2.0 μg/kg. A French survey tested muscle and liver samples from 70 pigs [102]. In this survey, OTA was quantified in 36% (n = 25) of the collected liver samples. Moreover, good agreement was found that OTA levels in liver were 2.9 times higher than those in muscle. In 2018, muscle, liver, and kidney samples were collected from 48 wild boars in Italy [103]. The highest concentrations of OTA were found in the kidneys. In 10 kidney and 6 liver samples, the concentrations of OTA were higher than 1 μg/kg, but all of the muscle samples were below this concentration. OTA appeared to be stable in pork-derived products. Among 110 dry-cured hams from the Italian market, OTA was found to be much lower in the inner core, with a median value below 0.1 μg/kg, than in the surface portion, with a median value of 0.53 μg/kg [104]. Salami is a typical Italian sausage made with pig muscle. A survey showed that 5 of 50 salami samples from Veneto were positive [105]. A recent study collected 172 different salamis from four Italian regions [106]. OTA was reported in 22 salamis, and 3 samples exceeded 1 μg/kg. In particular, occurrence was higher in spicy salamis, but that may be ascribed to OTA contaminated red chili pepper.

3.2. OTA in Milk and Milk Products

OTA was also reported in milk products as a consequence of intake of dietary OTA by livestock. The MRLs for OTA in infant formulae was 0.025 μg/kg in Regulation 1881/2006 of EC. In a report, 83 bovine, goat, and sheep milk samples (63 organic and 20 conventional milk) from Italy were tested and three samples were positive, with concentrations ranging from 0.07 to 0.11 μg/kg [107]. All three positive samples were organic milk products. In Teramo, Italy, a survey collected 33 jenny milk samples to evaluate OTA exposure in 2020 [108]. The frequency was 36.4%, with a median concentration of 7.5 ng/L. Cheese is a typical dairy product and is very popular in western world. Forty cheese samples were collected from Italy [109]. Results showed the contamination was related with the production area of cheese. Higher frequency was found in Italian cheese and no contamination was from German cheese. The overall concentration was in the range of 0.1 to 3.0 μg/kg.
Breast milk is considered as an essential food for infants, who are more susceptible to OTA adverse effects. Biasucci and coworkers collected 57 breast milk in “G. da Saliceto” Hospital in Piacenza [110]. No significant difference was found between Italian and non-Italian pregnant women. The OTA occurrence was 78.8%, with an average concentration of 10 ng/L. Additionally, 90 breast milk samples were collected in Iran and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [17]. All samples were below the detection limit (5 ng/L). OTA was detectable in 79% of the breast milk samples from Chilean mothers, with average of 52 ng/L [111]. Researchers also found that OTA in first milk was 2.5 times higher than in mature milk, and OTA in plasma was four times higher than that in breast milk. The contamination was severe in Morocco. The occurrence was 55% among 82 breast milk samples with a maximum concentration of 10.04 μg/L [112].
All in all, the contribution of milk to the intake of OTA in humans is negligible compared to other food commodities such as cereals, dried fruits, wine, cocoa, and coffee.

4. Conclusions

As one of the most important mycotoxins, OTA contamination has been a global problem because of high toxicity, widespread existence, and lengthy persistence. This manuscript provides a view of OTA occurrence in various food commodities throughout the world. Geography and climate environment have an effect on OTA occurrence in different spices, especially in tropical areas where high temperature and moisture favor the growth of ochratoxigenic fungi. Improper storage will magnify the OTA contamination level by even thousands of times. Brand effect is obvious for some samples, maybe due to more rigorous quality control.
Therefore, monitoring programs and surveillance strategies must be routinely implemented to ensure minimal OTA exposure and guarantee food safety. In this review, the OTA occurrence and contamination levels were summarized according to the food commodities in order of exposure risk. These data will provide evidence to estimate the OTA daily intake and evaluate the exposure risk. Scientific evidence has proved the significance of combined exposure and the importance of co-occurrence of multiple mycotoxins. Hence, greater effort should be made to investigate the combined risk of multiple mycotoxin exposure following accurate dose-response relationships.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; investigation, W.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L. and W.M.; writing—review and editing, Z.M.; project administration, Q.Z.; funding acquisition, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant (2019YFC1604801) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (21804123 and 22004004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ECEuropean Commission
MRLMaximum residue limit
OTAOchratoxin A

References

  1. Li, X.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Determination of trace patulin in apple-based food matrices. Food Chem. 2017, 233, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Silva, L.J.G.; Pereira, A.M.P.T.; Pena, A.; Lino, C.M. Citrinin in Foods and Supplements: A Review of Occurrence and Analytical Methodologies. Foods 2021, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vanderme, K.J.; Steyn, P.S.; Fourie, L.; Scott, D.B.; Theron, J.J. Ochratoxin A, a Toxic Metabolite produced by Aspergillus ochraceus Wilh. Nature 1965, 205, 1112–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amézqueta, S.; González-Peñas, E.; Murillo-Arbizu, M.; López de Cerain, A. Ochratoxin A decontamination: A review. Food Control 2009, 20, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. European Food Safety Authority, Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain; Schrenk, D.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.-C.; Nebbia, C.S.; et al. Risk assessment of ochratoxin A in food. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e06113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Manderville, R.A. Ochratoxin A: An overview on toxicity and carcinogenicity in animals and humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 61–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krogh, P.; Hald, B.; Pedersen, E.J. Occurrence of ochratoxin A and citrinin in cereals associated with mycotoxic porcine nephropathy. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. B Microbiol. Immunol. 1973, 81, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Klingelhöfer, D.; Braun, M.; Schöffel, N.; Oremek, G.M.; Brüggmann, D.; Groneberg, D.A. Ochratoxin–Characteristics, influences and challenges of global research. Food Control 2020, 114, 107230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duarte, S.C.; Lino, C.M.; Pena, A. Food safety implications of ochratoxin A in animal-derived food products. Vet. J. 2012, 192, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soto, J.B.; Ruiz, M.-J.; Manyes, L.; Juan-Garcia, A. Blood, breast milk and urine: Potential biomarkers of exposure and estimated daily intake of ochratoxin A: A review. Food Addit. Contam. A 2016, 33, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Ma, W.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H. Recent progress in determination of ochratoxin A in foods by chromatographic and mass spectrometry methods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ye, J.; Xuan, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, S.; Xie, G.; Wang, S. Automated analysis of ochratoxin A in cereals and oil by immunoaffinity magnetic beads coupled to UPLC-FLD. Food Control 2019, 104, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, X.; Li, H.; Ma, W.; Guo, Z.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Determination of patulin in apple juice by single-drop liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018, 257, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, X.; Ma, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H.; Liu, H. Determination of patulin in apple juice by amine-functionalized solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 1767–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marechal, A.; Jarrosson, F.; Randon, J.; Dugas, V.; Demesmay, C. In-line coupling of an aptamer based miniaturized monolithic affinity preconcentration unit with capillary electrophoresis and Laser Induced Fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1406, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Geleta, G.S.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Z. Electrochemical Biosensors for Detecting Microbial Toxins by Graphene-Based Nanocomposites. J. Anal. Test. 2018, 2, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Samiee, F.; Kharazi, A.; Elaridi, J.; Taravati Javad, M.; Leili, M. An assessment of the occurrence and nutritional factors associated with aflatoxin M1, ochratoxin A, and zearalenone in the breast milk of nursing mothers in Hamadan, Iran. Toxicon 2020, 187, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duarte, S.C.; Pena, A.; Lino, C.M. A review on ochratoxin A occurrence and effects of processing of cereal and cereal derived food products. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Piacentini, K.C.; Ferranti, L.S.; Pinheiro, M.; Bertozzi, B.G.; Rocha, L.O. Mycotoxin contamination in cereal-based baby foods. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 30, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gil-Serna, J.; Vázquez, C.; González-Jaén, M.T.; Patiño, B. Wine Contamination with Ochratoxins: A Review. Beverages 2018, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mateo, R.; Medina, Á.; Mateo, E.M.; Mateo, F.; Jiménez, M. An overview of ochratoxin A in beer and wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43870/9789241209472_eng.pdf;sequence=1 (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  23. Gruber-Dorninger, C.; Jenkins, T.; Schatzmayr, G. Global Mycotoxin Occurrence in Feed: A Ten-Year Survey. Toxins 2019, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lai, X.; Liu, R.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, C. Occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in rice samples from six provinces in China. Food Control 2015, 50, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Majeed, M.; Khaneghah, A.M.; Kadmic, Y.; Khan, M.U. Assessment of Ochratoxin A in Commercial Corn and Wheat Products. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hassan, S.W.u.; Sadef, Y.; Hussain, S.; Asi, M.R.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Anwar, S.; Malik, A. Unusual pattern of aflatoxins and ochratoxin in commercially grown maize varieties of Pakistan. Toxicon 2020, 182, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Majeed, S.; Iqbal, M.; Asi, M.R.; Iqbal, S.Z. Aflatoxins and ochratoxin A contamination in rice, corn and corn products from Punjab, Pakistan. J. Ceral Sci. 2013, 58, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Iqbal, S.Z.; Asi, M.R.; Hanif, U.; Zuber, M.; Jinap, S. The presence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in rice and rice products; and evaluation of dietary intake. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Khoshnamvand, Z.; Nazari, F.; Mehrasebi, M.R.; Hosseini, M.-J. Occurrence and Safety Evaluation of Ochratoxin A in Cereal-based Baby Foods Collected from Iranian Retail Market. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Taghizadeh, S.F.; Rezaee, R.; Badiebostan, H.; Giesy, J.P.; Karimi, G. Occurrence of mycotoxins in rice consumed by Iranians: A probabilistic assessment of risk to health. Food Addit. Contam. A 2020, 37, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kuruc, J.A.; Schwarz, P.; Wolf-Hall, C. Ochratoxin A in Stored U.S. Barley and Wheat. J. Food Protect. 2015, 78, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nguyen, K.T.N.; Ryu, D. Concentration of ochratoxin A in breakfast cereals and snacks consumed in the United States. Food Control 2014, 40, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cappozzo, J.; Jackson, L.; Lee, H.J.; Zhou, W.; Al-Taher, F.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Ryu, D. Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Infant Foods in the United States. J. Food Protect. 2017, 80, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, H.J.; Ryu, D. Significance of Ochratoxin A in Breakfast Cereals from the United States. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 9404–9409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Limay-Rios, V.; Miller, J.D.; Schaafsma, A.W. Occurrence of Penicillium verrucosum, ochratoxin A, ochratoxin B and citrinin in on-farm stored winter wheat from the Canadian Great Lakes Region. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zebiri, S.; Mokrane, S.; Verheecke-Vaessen, C.; Choque, E.; Reghioui, H.; Sabaou, N.; Mathieu, F.; Riba, A. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in Algerian wheat and its milling derivatives. Toxin Rev. 2019, 38, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Assunção, R.; Martins, C.; Dupont, D.; Alvito, P. Patulin and ochratoxin A co-occurrence and their bioaccessibility in processed cereal-based foods: A contribution for Portuguese children risk assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Torovic, L. Aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in flour: A survey of the Serbian retail market. Food Addit. Contam. B 2018, 11, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kosicki, R.; Twarużek, M.; Dopierała, P.; Rudzki, B.; Grajewski, J. Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Winter Rye Varieties Cultivated in Poland (2017–2019). Toxins 2020, 12, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to ochratoxin A in food. EFSA J. 2006, 4, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2006, l364. [Google Scholar]
  42. Di Stefano, V.; Pitonzo, R.; Avellone, G.; Di Fiore, A.; Monte, L.; Ogorka, A.Z.T. Determination of Aflatoxins and Ochratoxins in Sicilian Sweet Wines by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorometric Detection and Immunoaffinity Cleanup. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 8, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gentile, F.; La Torre, G.L.; Potorti, A.G.; Saitta, M.; Alfa, M.; Dugo, G. Organic wine safety: UPLC-FLD determination of Ochratoxin A in Southern Italy wines from organic, farming and winemaking. Food Control 2016, 59, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vella, A.; Graci, G.; Olibrio, F.; Cumbo, V.; Cicero, A.; Di Salvo, D.; Caracappa, G.; Ferrantelli, V. Presence of Ocratoxin (OTA) in wine produced in Sicily (Italy). Biodivers. J. 2019, 10, 479–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Quintela, S.; Villarán, M.C.; Armentia, I.L.d.; Elejalde, E. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in Rioja Alavesa wines. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pena, A.; Cerejo, F.; Silva, L.J.G.; Lino, C.M. Ochratoxin A survey in Portuguese wine by LC–FD with direct injection. Talanta 2010, 82, 1556–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Silva, L.J.G.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Pereira, A.M.P.T.; Lino, C.M.; Pena, A. Ochratoxin A in the Portuguese Wine Market, Occurrence and Risk Assessment. Food Addit. Contam. B 2019, 12, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fernandes, P.J.; Barros, N.; Camara, J.S. A survey of the occurrence of ochratoxin A in Madeira wines based on a modified QuEChERS extraction procedure combined with liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Labrinea, E.P.; Natskoulis, P.I.; Spiropoulos, A.E.; Magan, N.; Tassou, C.C. A survey of ochratoxin A occurence in Greek wines. Food Addit. Contam. B 2011, 4, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zurga, P.; Vahcic, N.; Paskovic, I.; Banovic, M.; Staver, M.M. Occurence of Ochratoxin A and Biogenic Amines in Croatian Commercial Red Wines. Foods 2019, 8, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Torovic, L.; Lakatos, I.; Majkic, T.; Beara, I. Risk to public health related to the presence of ochratoxin A in wines from Fruska Gora. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 129, 109537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carballo, D.; Fernández-Franzón, M.; Ferrer, E.; Pallarés, N.; Berrada, H. Dietary Exposure to Mycotoxins through Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Beverages in Valencia, Spain. Toxins 2021, 13, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kholová, A.; Lhotská, I.; Uhrová, A.; Špánik, I.; Machyňáková, A.; Solich, P.; Švec, F.; Šatínský, D. Determination of Ochratoxin A and Ochratoxin B in Archived Tokaj Wines (Vintage 1959–2017) Using On-Line Solid Phase Extraction Coupled to Liquid Chromatography. Toxins 2020, 12, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. De Jesus, C.L.; Bartley, A.; Welch, A.Z.; Berry, J.P. High Incidence and Levels of Ochratoxin A in Wines Sourced from the United States. Toxins 2018, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Vega, M.; Ríos, G.; von Baer, D.; Mardones, C.; Tessini, C.; Herlitz, E.; Saelzer, R.; Ruiz, M.A. Ochratoxin A occurrence in wines produced in Chile. Food Control 2012, 28, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhong, Q.D.; Li, G.H.; Wang, D.B.; Shao, Y.; Li, J.G.; Xiong, Z.H.; Wu, Y.N. Exposure Assessment to Ochratoxin A in Chinese Wine. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2014, 62, 8908–8913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, X.; Niu, Y.; Ma, T.; Xu, P.; Huang, W.; Zhan, J. Determination, content analysis and removal efficiency of fining agents on ochratoxin A in Chinese wines. Food Control 2017, 73, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, B.; Chen, X.; Han, S.-Y.; Li, M.; Ma, T.-Z.; Sheng, W.-J.; Zhu, X. Simultaneous Analysis of 20 Mycotoxins in Grapes and Wines from Hexi Corridor Region (China): Based on a QuEChERS–UHPLC–MS/MS Method. Molecules 2018, 23, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Miraglia, M.; Brera, C. Assessment of Dietary Intake of Ochratoxin A by the Population of EU Member States; Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission: Rome, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  60. Casal, S.; Vieira, T.; Cruz, R.; Cunha, S.C. Ochratoxin A in commercial soluble coffee and coffee substitutes. Food Res. Int. 2014, 61, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Benites, A.J.; Fernandes, M.; Boleto, A.R.; Azevedo, S.; Silva, S.; Leitão, A.L. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in roasted coffee samples commercialized in Portugal. Food Control 2017, 73, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Coronel, M.B.; Marin, S.; Cano, G.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V. Ochratoxin A in Spanish retail ground roasted coffee: Occurrence and assessment of the exposure in Catalonia. Food Control 2011, 22, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tozlovanu, M.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A. Ochratoxin A in Roasted Coffee from French Supermarkets and Transfer in Coffee Beverages: Comparison of Analysis Methods. Toxins 2010, 2, 1928–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Vecchio, A.; Mineo, V.; Planeta, D. Ochratoxin A in instant coffee in Italy. Food Control 2012, 28, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jonatova, P.; Dzuman, Z.; Prusova, N.; Hajslova, J.; Stranska-Zachariasova, M. Occurrence of ochratoxin A and its stereoisomeric degradation product in various types of coffee available in the Czech market. World Mycotoxin J. 2020, 13, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vanesa, D.; Ana, P. Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in coffee beans, ground roasted coffee and soluble coffee and method validation. Food Control 2013, 30, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Galarce-Bustos, O.; Alvarado, M.; Vega, M.; Aranda, M. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in roasted and instant coffees in Chilean market. Food Control 2014, 46, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Costa da Silva, M.; da Silva, G.; de Castro, E.; Barreto, J.d.N.; Vitor de Oliveira Martins, P.; Lopes da Silva, G.; Ferreira da Silva, R.; Gomes dos Santo, D.; Freitas-Silva, O.; Batista Pavesi Simao, J.; et al. Ochratoxin a levels in fermented specialty coffees from Caparao, Brazil: Is it a cause of concern for coffee drinkers? Food Addit. Contam. A 2021, 38, 1948–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bessaire, T.; Perrin, I.; Tarres, A.; Bebius, A.; Reding, F.; Theurillat, V. Mycotoxins in green coffee: Occurrence and risk assessment. Food Control 2019, 96, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Prelle, A.; Spadaro, D.; Denca, A.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy. Toxins 2013, 5, 1827–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Lhotska, I.; Satinsky, D.; Havlikova, L.; Solich, P. A fully automated and fast method using direct sample injection combined with fused-core column on-line SPE-HPLC for determination of ochratoxin A and citrinin in lager beers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 3319–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Silva, L.J.G.; Teixeira, A.C.; Pereira, A.M.P.T.; Pena, A.; Lino, C.M. Ochratoxin A in Beers Marketed in Portugal: Occurrence and Human Risk Assessment. Toxins 2020, 12, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wu, J.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, R. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in wine and beer samples from China. Food Addit. Contam. B 2011, 4, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dongo, L.; Bandyopadhyay, R.; Kumar, M.; Ojiambo, P.S. Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Nigeria ready for sale cocoa beans. Agric. J. 2008, 3, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  75. de Magalhães, J.T.; Sodré, G.A.; Viscogliosi, H.; Grenier-Loustalot, M.-F. Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Brazilian cocoa beans. Food Control 2011, 22, 744–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pires, P.N.; Vargas, E.A.; Gomes, M.B.; Vieira, C.B.M.; Santos, E.A.d.; Bicalho, A.A.C.; Silva, S.d.C.; Rezende, R.P.; Oliveira, I.S.D.; Luz, E.D.M.N.; et al. Aflatoxins and ochratoxin A: Occurrence and contamination levels in cocoa beans from Brazil. Food Addit. Contam. A 2019, 36, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Brera, C.; Debegnach, F.; De Santis, B.; Iafrate, E.; Pannunzi, E.; Berdini, C.; Prantera, E.; Gregori, E.; Miraglia, M. Ochratoxin A in cocoa and chocolate products from the Italian market: Occurrence and exposure assessment. Food Control 2011, 22, 1663–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kabak, B. Aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in chocolate products in Turkey. Food Addit. Contam. B 2019, 12, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Turcotte, A.M.; Scott, P.M. Ochratoxin A in cocoa and chocolate sampled in Canada. Food Addit. Contam. A 2011, 28, 762–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Turcotte, A.-M.; Scott, P.M.; Tague, B. Analysis of cocoa products for ochratoxin A and aflatoxins. Mycotoxin Res. 2013, 29, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Covarelli, L.; Beccari, G.; Marini, A.; Tosi, L. A review on the occurrence and control of ochratoxigenic fungal species and ochratoxin A in dehydrated grapes, non-fortified dessert wines and dried vine fruit in the Mediterranean area. Food Control 2012, 26, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heshmati, A.; Mozaffari Nejad, A.S. Ochratoxin A in dried grapes in Hamadan province, Iran. Food Addit. Contam. B 2015, 8, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Iqbal, S.Z.; Mehmood, Z.; Asi, M.R.; Shahid, M.; Sehar, M.; Malik, N. Co-occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in nuts, dry fruits, and nuty products. J. Food Saf. 2018, 38, e12462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Abdallah, M.F.; Krska, R.; Sulyok, M. Occurrence of Ochratoxins, Fumonisin B-2, Aflatoxins (B-1 and B-2), and Other Secondary Fungal Metabolites in Dried Date Palm Fruits from Egypt: A Mini-Survey. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nikolchina, I.; Rodrigues, P. A preliminary study on mycobiota and ochratoxin a contamination in commercial palm dates (Phoenix dactylifera). Mycotoxin Res. 2021, 37, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Palumbo, J.D.; O’Keeffe, T.L.; Vasquez, S.J.; Mahoney, N.E. Isolation and identification of ochratoxin A-producing Aspergillus section Nigri strains from California raisins. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 52, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, Y.; Nie, J.; Yan, Z.; Li, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Chang, W. Occurrence and co-occurrence of mycotoxins in nuts and dried fruits from China. Food Control 2018, 88, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wei, D.; Wu, X.; Xu, J.; Dong, F.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Ji, M. Determination of Ochratoxin A contamination in grapes, processed grape products and animal-derived products using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy system. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, X.; Ou, X.; Zhou, Z.; Ma, L. Ochratoxin A in Chinese dried jujube: Method development and survey. Food Addit. Contam. A 2015, 32, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Iqbal, S.Z.; Asi, M.R.; Zuber, M.; Akhtar, J.; Jawwad Saif, M. Natural occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in commercial chilli and chilli sauce samples. Food Control 2013, 30, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Iqbal, S.Z.; Mumtaz, A.; Mahmood, Z.; Waqas, M.; Ghaffar, A.; Ismail, A.; Pervaiz, W. Assessment of aflatoxins and ochratoxin a in chili sauce samples and estimation of dietary intake. Food Control 2021, 121, 107621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jalili, M.; Jinap, S. Natural occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in commercial dried chili. Food Control 2012, 24, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Prelle, A.; Spadaro, D.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Co-occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in spices commercialized in Italy. Food Control 2014, 39, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. El Darra, N.; Gambacorta, L.; Solfrizzo, M. Multimycotoxins occurrence in spices and herbs commercialized in Lebanon. Food Control 2019, 95, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ozbey, F.; Kabak, B. Natural co-occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in spices. Food Control 2012, 28, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tosun, A.; Ozden, S. Ochratoxin A in red pepper flakes commercialised in Turkey. Food Addit. Contam. B 2016, 9, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhao, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yue, T. Identification of ochratoxin A in Chinese spices using HPLC fluorescent detectors with immunoaffinity column cleanup. Food Control 2014, 46, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lippolis, V.; Irurhe, O.; Porricelli, A.C.R.; Cortese, M.; Schena, R.; Imafidon, T.; Oluwadun, A.; Pascale, M. Natural co-occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in ginger (Zingiber officinale) from Nigeria. Food Control 2017, 73, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Toman, J.; Ostry, V.; Grosse, Y.; Roubal, T.; Malir, F. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in Astragalus propinquus root and its transfer to decoction. Mycotoxin Res. 2018, 34, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Altafini, A.; Armorini, S.; Zaghini, A.; Sardi, L.; Roncada, P. Tissue distribution of ochratoxin A in pigs after administration of two-levels contaminated diets. World Mycotoxin J. 2017, 10, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pietruszka, K.; Piatkowska, M.; Jedziniak, P. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in animal tissues and feeds in Poland in 2014–2016. J. Vet. Res. 2017, 61, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Hort, V.; Nicolas, M.; Minvielle, B.; Maleix, C.; Desbourdes, C.; Hommet, F.; Dragacci, S.; Dervilly-Pinel, G.; Engel, E.; Guérin, T. Ochratoxin A determination in swine muscle and liver from French conventional or organic farming production systems. J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1092, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Luci, G.; Intorre, L.; Ferruzzi, G.; Mani, D.; Giuliotti, L.; Pretti, C.; Tognetti, R.; Bertini, S.; Meucci, V. Determination of ochratoxin A in tissues of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) by enzymatic digestion (ED) coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD). Mycotoxin Res. 2018, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dall’Asta, C.; Galaverna, G.; Bertuzzi, T.; Moseriti, A.; Pietri, A.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in raw ham muscle, salami and dry-cured ham from pigs fed with contaminated diet. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 978–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Armorini, S.; Altafini, A.; Zaghini, A.; Roncada, P. Ochratoxin A in artisan salami produced in Veneto (Italy). Food Addit. Contam. B 2016, 9, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Altafini, A.; Fedrizzi, G.; Roncada, P. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in typical salami produced in different regions of Italy. Mycotoxin Res. 2019, 35, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pattono, D.; Gallo, P.F.; Civera, T. Detection and quantification of Ochratoxin A in milk produced in organic farms. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lippolis, V.; Asif, S.; Pascale, M.; Cervellieri, S.; Mancini, E.; Peli, A.; De Amicis, I.; Robbe, D.; Minervini, F. Natural Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Blood and Milk Samples from Jennies and Their Foals after Delivery. Toxins 2020, 12, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Biancardi, A.; Piro, R.; Galaverna, G.; Dall’Asta, C. A simple and reliable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of ochratoxin A in hard cheese. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Biasucci, G.; Calabrese, G.; Di Giuseppe, R.; Carrara, G.; Colombo, F.; Mandelli, B.; Maj, M.; Bertuzzi, T.; Pietri, A.; Rossi, F. The presence of ochratoxin A in cord serum and in human milk and its correspondence with maternal dietary habits. Eur. J. Nutr. 2011, 50, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Muñoz, K.; Blaszkewicz, M.; Campos, V.; Vega, M.; Degen, G.H. Exposure of infants to ochratoxin A with breast milk. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Cherkani-Hassani, A.; Ghanname, I.; Zinedine, A.; Sefrioui, H.; Qmichou, Z.; Mouane, N. Ochratoxin a in breast milk in Morocco: The affecting dietary habits of the lactating mothers and the degree of exposure of newborns “CONTAMILK study”. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. OTA occurrence and contamination level in cereals.
Table 1. OTA occurrence and contamination level in cereals.
MatrixNationYear of ProductionNo. of SamplesOccurrence (%)Maximum (μg/kg)Mean (μg/kg)Reference
Wheat100 nations2008–201774,821152000/[23]
RiceChina2009–20113704.93.20.85[24]
Corn, wheatPakistan20154027.5360/[25]
MaizePakistan2016–20174671218.25/[26]
Rice, corn, and corn productPakistan2011–201227532//[27]
RicePakistan/2081924.9/[28]
Cereal based baby foodsIran2017–201864411.10.42[29]
RiceIran/3089.411.4/[30]
Barley and wheatUSA2011–201226212.2185.24/[31]
Corn, oat, wheat, and riceUSA2012–2013144537.430.61[32]
Infant cerealUSA2012–20141553022.1/[33]
Corn-, rice-, wheat-, and oat-based breakfast cerealUSA2012–2014489419.3/[34]
WheatCanada2011–20142322.2/14.7[35]
Wheat and derived samplesAlgeria2012–20138176.6534.75/[36]
Cereal based foodsPortugal201520500.2630.061[37]
FlourSerbia2012–20161142923.040.46[38]
RyePoland2017–20196032.75/[39]
Table 2. OTA occurrence and contamination levels in wine.
Table 2. OTA occurrence and contamination levels in wine.
MatrixNationYear of ProductionNo. of SampleOccurrence (%)Maximum (μg/L)Mean (μg/L)Reference
Sweet wineItaly2007–20113096.61.56 0.246 [42]
Red and white wineItaly2012–201310072.70.711 0.255 [43]
WineItaly/4700.2//[44]
Red wineSpain1995–2008100570.179 0.035 [45]
Red and white winePortugal/60202.4 /[46]
Red and white winePortugal1984–2017923.2//[47]
WinePortugal2010306.70.450.42[48]
Red, rosé, and white wine mustGreece1999–200615069.42 0.26[49]
Red wineCroatia2011–201511098.20.163 0.040 [50]
Red, rosé, and white wineSerbia2011–201611352.20.134 0.026 [51]
WineSpain2017–201840472.281.13[52]
Tokaj winesSlovak1959–2017596.81.2/[53]
Red and white wineUSA2010–20154185.48.6 1.3 [54]
Red and white wineChile2007–200911882.90.35 /[55]
Red, rosé, and white wineChina/22345.20.98 0.15 [56]
Red and white wineChina/7062.8/0.61 [57]
WineChina2007–2016424.81.271.27[58]
Table 3. OTA occurrence and contamination level in other plant-derived food.
Table 3. OTA occurrence and contamination level in other plant-derived food.
MatrixNationYear of ProductionNo. of SampleOccurrence (%)Maximum (μg/kg) *Mean (μg/kg) *Reference
Soluble coffee and coffee substitutesPortugal20124087.511.8/[60]
Roasted coffeePortugal/1127.310.311.13[61]
Roasted coffeeSpain20087248.64.212.17[62]
Roasted coffeeFrance/3010011.9/[63]
Coffee and coffee productsItaly201150966.4/[64]
Roasted and instant coffeeCzech2016–201810380.612.8/[65]
Coffee bean roasted coffee and soluble coffeeArgentina/516920.3/[66]
Roasted and instant coffeeChile/63337.251.3[67]
Fermented coffeesBrazil20171421.40.870.18[68]
Green coffee9 countries2015–2016712812.21.3[69]
BeerItaly/3016.6/0.35[70]
Lager beerCzech/49901.2 μg/L0.06 μg/L[71]
Lager and ale beerPortugal20188410.611.253.14[72]
BeerChina2008–200920000[73]
BeerSpain2017–201840203.381.83[52]
Cocoa beanNigeria/59900.28/[74]
Cocoa beanBrazil20065492.540.45[75]
Cocoa beanBrazil2015–201712322.87.21.2[76]
Cocoa and chocolateItaly/30059.71.82/[77]
Chocolate productsTurkey201713024.60.75/[78]
Cocoa and chocolateCanada/601007.80.95[79]
Cocoa productsCanada2011–20128589.44.720.66[80]
Dried grapesIran2012–20136640.98.42.98[81]
Fruit and dried fruitPakistan2016–2017721818.53.58[82]
Palm datesEgypt201628116070/[83]
Palm datesTunisia and Algeria2018195.30.750.75[84]
RaisinUSA/409311.40.7[85]
Dried fruit and nutsChina/2531.69.396.23[86]
Grapes, juice, and raisinChina20165568.410.14/[87]
Dried jujubeChina2013201000.180.14[88]
ChiliPakistan/17034.764.5/[89]
Chili saucePakistan201825271114/[90]
Dried chiliMalaysia20098081.25101.27.15[91]
Chili and pepperItaly2011–201213023.819.066.18[92]
Allspice, pepper, chili, cinnamon, ginger, and mixtureItaly/9430347.1[93]
Chili flake, chili powder, black pepper powder, cumin, and cinnamonTurkey2010–201110524.798.25.7[94]
Red pepper flakesTurkey2012–20137594.631.73.5[95]
Pepper, chili, prickly ash, cinnamon, aniseed, fennel, curry powder, and cuminChina20094809.630.73/[96]
GingerNigeria201412047.512.021.77[97]
Astragalus propinquusCzech2015–2016401001700451[98]
* The default unit is μg/kg except for some values with units.
Table 4. OTA occurrence and contamination level in animal-derived food.
Table 4. OTA occurrence and contamination level in animal-derived food.
MatrixNationYear of ProductionNo. of SampleOccurrence (%)Maximum (μg/kg) *Mean (μg/kg) *Reference
Swine kidney liver and musclePoland2014–201643023.5/2[101]
Swine liver and muscleFrance20147064.33.650.15[102]
Wild boarsItaly2014–201548/3.23/[103]
Dry-cured hamsItaly/11076.45.64/[104]
SalamiItaly20135010103.69/[105]
SalamiItaly2015–201617212.85.660.51[106]
Bovine, goat, and sheep milkItaly/833.60.11/[107]
Jenny milkItaly20203336.482 ng/L/[108]
Hard cheeseItaly2011401554.0714.94[109]
Breast milkItaly20075778.875.1 ng/L10 ng/L[110]
Breast milkIran201990000[17]
Breast milkChile2008–20105079186 ng/L52 ng/L[111]
Breast milkMorocco2017825510.04 μg/L2.17[112]
* The default unit is μg/kg except for some values with units.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Ma, W.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H. The Occurrence and Contamination Level of Ochratoxin A in Plant and Animal-Derived Food Commodities. Molecules 2021, 26, 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226928

AMA Style

Li X, Ma W, Ma Z, Zhang Q, Li H. The Occurrence and Contamination Level of Ochratoxin A in Plant and Animal-Derived Food Commodities. Molecules. 2021; 26(22):6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226928

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xianjiang, Wen Ma, Zhiyong Ma, Qinghe Zhang, and Hongmei Li. 2021. "The Occurrence and Contamination Level of Ochratoxin A in Plant and Animal-Derived Food Commodities" Molecules 26, no. 22: 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226928

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop