Next Article in Journal
Re(I) Complexes as Backbone Substituents and Cross-Linking Agents for Hybrid Luminescent Polysiloxanes and Silicone Rubbers
Next Article in Special Issue
Iboga Inspired N-Indolylethyl-Substituted Isoquinuclidines as a Bioactive Scaffold: Chemoenzymatic Synthesis and Characterization as GDNF Releasers and Antitrypanosoma Agents
Previous Article in Journal
NHC Polymeric Particles Obtained by Self-Assembly and Click Approach of Calix[4]Arene Amphiphiles as Support for Catalytically Active Pd Nanoclusters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Oxidative Transformations of New Chiral Pinane-Type γ-Ketothiols: Stereochemical Features of Reactions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules26226865
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chiral Aminoalcohols and Squaric Acid Amides as Ligands for Asymmetric Borane Reduction of Ketones: Insight to In Situ Formed Catalytic System by DOSY and Multinuclear NMR Experiments

by
Yana Nikolova
*,
Georgi M. Dobrikov
,
Zhanina Petkova
and
Pavletta Shestakova
*
Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bl. 9, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6865; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226865
Submission received: 12 October 2021 / Revised: 5 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 14 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asymmetric Synthesis of Pharmaceutically Relevant and Natural Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of squaric acid amides (synthesized in 66–99% isolated yields) and a set of chiral aminoalcohols were comparatively studied as ligands in a model reaction of reduction of α-chloroacetophenone with BH3•SMe2. In all cases, the aminoalcohols demonstrated better efficiency (up to 94% ee), while only poor asymmetric induction was achieved with the corresponding squaramides. A mechanistic insight on the in situ formation and stability at room temperature of intermediates generated from ligands and borane as possible precursors of the oxazaborolidine-based catalytic system has been obtained by 1H DOSY and multinuclear 1D and 2D (1H, 10/11B, 13C, 15N) NMR spectroscopy of equimolar mixtures of borane and selected ligands. These results contribute to better understanding the complexity of the processes occurring in the reaction mixture prior to the possible oxazaborolidine formation, which play a crucial role on the degree of enantioselectivity achieved in the borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Asymmetric reduction of ketones still attracts significant interest since it is one of the most efficient ways of generating enantiomerically pure secondary alcohols as important intermediates or chiral building blocks for the synthesis of biologically relevant structures [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Among the various well-known approaches, borane reduction has been demonstrated to allow fine-tuning for attaining a higher degree of selectivity. Remarkable success in this reaction has been achieved using chiral oxazaborolidines prepared from (semi)synthetic aminoalcohols derived from natural amino acids, terpenoids [9,10,11], etc. Commonly, more effective among them are the bicyclic oxazaborolidines incorporating rigid or sterically constrained aminoalcohol moieties [12]. To date, the established synthetic procedures for the preparation of oxazaborolidines usually require excess of boron reagent (BH3•THF or BH3•SMe2), prolonged reaction times, elevated temperatures and dry conditions for the isolation step [10,13,14,15,16,17]. More efficient are protocols for synthesis of alkyl- and aryl-B-substituted oxazaborolidines by refluxing toluene solutions of the corresponding aminoalcohol and boronic acids or boroxines [12,18]. The synthetic procedure requiring the shortest reaction time makes use of bis(trifluoroethyl) boronates as a boron source [19]. To make the catalytic reaction less cumbersome, in another approach, the targeted oxazaborolidine catalytic system is prepared in situ. In this case, however, an experimental proof for the formation of catalytic species as well as their actual structures is often missing.
Interesting results have been reported in which squaric acid is used as a backbone to bind chiral aminoalcohol fragments [20,21,22,23]. The squaramides obtained have been used as ligands in borane reduction of activated ketones, providing high enantioselectivity (up to 99% ee). Based on these results, it can be concluded that the rigid and flat squaric acid skeleton in combination with chiral aminoalcohol fragments provides a structurally well-defined chiral environment for the asymmetric reaction. For explanation of the extraordinarily high asymmetric induction, a transition state model involving the squaramide ligand in the formation of the catalyst complex has been proposed [21,22,23]. Consequently, it is conceivable that novel structures obtained through the combination of squaric acid core as a backbone and suitable chiral amine and/or aminoalcohol moieties might have a positive influence on the borane reductions. The ease of substitution of squaric acid esters with fragments containing chiral amine or aminoalcohol moieties has enabled the synthesis of diverse chiral squaramide derivatives with various applications in asymmetric catalysis, mainly as organocatalysts [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Squaric acid derivatives are able to form complexes with first- and second-row transition metals [32,33,34]. The synthesis and structural elucidation of such complexes were thoroughly described. However, there are no literature data concerning the formation of complexes of squaric acid derivatives with boranes.
Herein, we report the synthesis of a series of squaramides incorporating structurally diverse aminoalcohol fragments and their application as chiral ligands in borane reduction (BH3•SMe2) of α-chloroacetophenone. Further, it is important to compare the obtained efficiency of the squaramides-catalyzed reductions with those of the corresponding free aminoalcohols, thus evaluating the contribution of the squaric acid fragment to the stereochemical outcome of the reaction. Particular attention is directed to study intermediates formed by the reaction between BH3•SMe2 and the chiral ligands (squaramides or the corresponding free aminoalcohols) applying 1H diffusion ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) in combination with multinuclear (1H, 10/11B, 13C, 15N) 1D and 2D NMR experiments. DOSY [35] has proven to be a valuable tool for the investigation of molecular interactions and aggregation phenomena, including complex mixtures [36,37,38,39,40,41], supramolecular aggregates [42,43,44,45] and complexes [46,47,48,49], and to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously used to identify in situ generated intermediate species involved in oxazaborolidine formation in borane reduction of ketones. The technique has a well-established methodology, and during recent years, it has been successfully applied for the investigation of reaction intermediates in different reactions [50,51,52,53,54,55,56].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

Two structural types of squaric acid amides, namely mono- and di-substituted derivatives, were synthesized. The monoamides 3–6 were prepared in high yields (93–99%) from 1 and amines 2a–d with the purpose to use them as starting compounds for the synthesis of the disubstituted derivatives (Scheme 1). These starting compounds were designed to contain non-chiral and chiral amine moieties (3 and 6, respectively) and 2-aminobutanol fragment in the form of both enantiomers (4 and 5). For the synthesis of the disubstituted squaramides 7–10 (77–99% yields), the set of amines and aminoalcohols (2a–j) presented in Scheme 1 was used.
Compounds 2a–d and 2h–j are commercially available and were used directly as purchased. Chiral aminoalcohols 2e [57], 2f [57] and 2g [58] were synthesized according to published procedures. Indeed, starting from enantiomerically pure natural compounds with known configuration, the stereochemistry of the expected products could be readily determined. This was further confirmed by comparing the properties (NMR, specific rotation) of the compounds with the reported data. Next, the preparation of diamides 7–10 was attempted. These compounds were designed to contain at least one chiral aminoalcohol or amine fragment.
In a further reaction sequence, the squaric monoamides 13a,b were synthesized by using amines 11a,b (Scheme 2). Compounds 13a,b were designed to incorporate hydroxy group directly attached to the squaric core.
Next, it was interesting to obtain aminoalcohol 17, which is analogous to 2-aminobutanol (2c) and contains sterically demanding groups next to the hydroxy group (Scheme 3). Amino acid 14 was the suitable starting compound and it was easily transformed into benzyl ester 15, simultaneously protecting the amine nitrogen with benzyl groups [59]. The subsequent addition of PhMgCl afforded 16 in high yield, which was finally transformed into the aminoalcohol 17. Then, 17 reacts with squaric acid to form the corresponding monoamide 18 in high yield.
The synthesized squaric acid derivatives and the corresponding free aminoalcohols applied for their preparation were used as chiral ligands (L) in the borane reduction (BH3•SMe2) of α-chloroacetophenone (19) as a model reaction system (Table 1). The catalyst formation occurred in situ by mixing the corresponding ligand (0.1 equiv.) with BH3•SMe2 (1.2 equiv.) at room temperature in THF (stirring for 2 h) and then heating the mixture for 1 h at 50 °C prior to the addition of the ketone. The reduction was high yielding within very short reaction times (20–30 min). Generally, the enantioselectivities obtained using the squaric acid derivatives were moderate. Only in the case of ligands 4, 8f and 7g did the enantioselectivity exceed 50%. In comparison, the enantioselectivities achieved with the corresponding free aminoalcohols were in all cases significantly higher (Table 1, entries 19–27). Excellent results have been obtained with both enantiomers of 2-aminobutanol and it is surprising that they have not yet been applied as ligands in borane reductions. Even better enantioselectivity (94% ee, determined by GC analysis with a chiral column; configurations were assigned by comparison of the sign of the specific rotation with that reported in the literature) was achieved with the newly synthesized aminoalcohol 17, leading to the conclusion that the steric hindrance near the hydroxy group is important for improving the asymmetric induction. Therefore, considering the squaramides applied as ligands, it seems that only the chiral aminoalcohol fragment is responsible for the level of enantioinduction achieved in the asymmetric reaction.
The possible influence of the squaric acid core was studied with the synthesis and application of ligands 13a and 13b. These two compounds are formally similar to aminoalcohols in which the hydroxy group is directly attached to the squaric skeleton. In both cases, no enantioselectivity was observed (Table 1, entries 16 and 17). Likewise, in the case of ligand 10, there is no asymmetric induction, although it formally possesses the attributes of an aminoalcohol, free hydroxy group and N-atom-bearing chiral fragment (Table 1, entry 15).
The significant role of the chiral aminoalcohol fragment incorporated in the squaramides is best illustrated in compound 9b. In this case, there is a full compensation of the two enantiomeric 2-aminobutanol fragments attached to the squaric core, leading to a complete loss of enantioselectivity. Additionally, comparing the results obtained with squaramides 7f and 8f, and those with the free aminoalcohol 2f, it is clear that the enantioselectivity achieved with 8f is due to the presence of the 2-aminobutanol moiety.
Consequently, we could not obtain arguments about the positive influence of the squaric acid fragment as a backbone of the synthesized ligands on the enantioselectivity. The free aminoalcohols provided better results in all cases. Therefore, additional experiments were performed to study the influence of the reaction conditions on the reduction of 19 by using aminoalcohol 2c (Table 2). The general conclusion is that prolonged time for catalyst system formation (compare entries 1 and 2, Table 2), increased temperature (compare entries 5 and 6, Table 2) and shorter reduction times lead to better enantioselectivities in both cases. The preference towards the S-enantiomer using this catalytic system can be explained by a plausible transition state (see Supplementary Materials), where two possible adducts (cis and trans) regarding the orientation of the ethyl substituent and BH3 are considered.
It is important to note that the applied conditions for the catalyst system formation cannot be considered as sufficient for oxazaborolidine formation, taking into account the prolonged reaction times and higher temperature described in the literature for this process [10,15,16,17,19]. Nevertheless, the species formed by mixing the ligands with BH3•SMe2 are obviously catalytically active (with different efficiency), and it is highly justified to study the occurring in situ processes through NMR experiments in detail.

2.2. NMR Study of the Catalytic Systems

With the aim to better understand the reasons behind the significantly lower enantioselectivity obtained using chiral squaric acid derivatives as ligands compared to the corresponding free chiral aminoalcohols, more detailed studies were performed. According to literature data, different reactive intermediates, as well as monomeric and dimeric oxazaborolidine species, may exist in dynamic equilibrium in the reaction mixture depending on the ligand structure and concentration, type of the solvent and borane reagent [61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. The possible presence of these equilibrating species in situ is a key feature of the catalyst system influencing its performance and activity. Therefore, we suggest that the stability of the intermediate species generated during the first step of the catalytic system formation by mixing the ligand and the borane reagent at room temperature may influence the activity of the oxazaborolidine catalyst presumably generated in the next step upon heating. To clarify the role of the ligand structure on the formation and stability of these intermediate species, a combination of 1D (1H and 10/11B) and 2D (1H COSY, 1H-13C HSQC, 1H-15N HMBC/HSQC and 1H DOSY) NMR techniques was used. The comparative study was performed in situ by mixing BH3•SMe2 with three different types of ligands in a 1:1 molar ratio at room temperature: (i) free 2-aminobutanol 2c (without squaric acid fragment), (ii) structure 5, representing a squaric acid derivative incorporating both the amido fragment and hydroxy group, and (iii) structure 6, representing a squaric acid derivative containing the amido fragment only. The choice of ligands was based on the results for asymmetric borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone (Table 1), demonstrating that among the used ligands, the highest enantioselectivity was achieved with aminoalcohols 2c and 17, while the squaric acid derivatives 5 and 6 are among the ligands providing moderate and very poor enantioselectivity.
The 1H spectra of ligands 2c, 5 and 6 (0.1 M solutions) and the assignment of the signals are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S1–S3). The 1H spectra of all ligands show sharp well-resolved resonances for all structural fragments. In the spectrum of 2c, the NH2 and OH protons have a broad resonance at around 1.68 ppm due to their labile nature, while sharp signals were observed for OH and/or NH protons in the spectra of the two squaramide ligands 5 and 6. The 1H spectra of the two squaramide derivatives 5 and 6 show two sets of signals for each structural fragment of the molecules, indicating the presence of two isomers (Supplementary Figures S2 and S3). Previous studies showed that in squaramide solutions, there is a slow equilibrium between the syn- and anti-isomers due to hindered rotation around the squaramide bond [54]. The signals of syn-N-substituents are shifted downfield relative to those of anti-N-substituents due to the paramagnetic anisotropy of the carbonyl group from the squaramide moiety. Thus, the major conformer of ligands 5 and 6 was assigned to the syn-form, which is in agreement with the literature data for series of squaramides where the syn-rotamer was always found to be favored over the anti-rotamer [68]. The NH signals were assigned by 1H-15N HSQC and 1H-15N HMBC experiments, which allow observation of 1H-15N indirect spin-spin coupling over one, two or three bonds. Examples of the 2D 1H-15N spectra are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S4 and S5).
The results presented in Table 1 clearly demonstrate that all free aminoalcohols used as ligands provided higher enantioselectivity in the studied asymmetric borane reductions as compared to the corresponding squaramide-based ligands. With the aim to clarify the role of the ligand structure on the formation and stability of the intermediates, the interaction of BH3•SMe2 with aminoalcohol 2c was initially investigated. The 1H NMR spectra of ligand 2c in toluene-d8 before and after the addition of BH3•SMe2, measured at different time intervals, are presented in Figure 1.
It is obvious that upon addition of BH3•SMe2, the signals of 2c are broader and shifted compared to the resonances of the pure ligand. This broadening of the ligand signals indicates that there is an interaction between 2c and BH3•SMe2, leading to the formation of new species. The interaction is accompanied by the release of SMe2, as evidenced by the appearance of the singlet at 1.75 ppm having the same chemical shift value as the free SMe2. A small amount of SMe2 was also detected in the solution of pure BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 (Figure 1e). We suggest that the first step of the interaction of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 proceeds with coordination and formation of species of type A, followed by protolysis and evolution of species of type B (Scheme 4). These species most probably exist simultaneously in the reaction mixture; however, their discrimination is not possible based on 1H spectra due to signals overlapping. Clear evidence for their formation is the appearance of the two additional signals at 2.80 and 3.37 ppm. These resonances were assigned to the protons from the NH2 group of the chiral ligand bound through B−N coordination. In the ligand-borane complexes A and B, these protons are less mobile compared to the free ligand, which makes their observation as separate signals possible. In addition, these protons are diastereotopic, hence they have different chemical shifts.
The 1H spectra measured at different time intervals show that with time, the linewidth of all signals decreases, and the signals shift slightly up-field with respect to their chemical shifts in the spectrum measured immediately after mixing (Figure 1b–d). The sharpening of the signals with the increase of the incubation time suggests that the reaction probably proceeds slowly towards the more rigid B species. The formation of intermediates A and B at room temperature, which could be considered as precursors for the oxazaborolidine (C) after heating and subsequent release of H2, was further evidenced by 1H DOSY NMR (Figure 2) and HRMS analysis (see Supplementary Materials) of the mixture of 2c and BH3•SMe2. The DOSY spectrum shows that the diffusion coefficient of A and B (D = 1.12 × 10−9 m2s−1) was lower as compared to the diffusion coefficient of the free ligand (D = 1.35 × 10−9 m2s−1). The diffusion coefficient of 2.24 × 10−9 m2s−1 determined at the chemical shift of the signal at 1.75 ppm was identical to the one of the pure SMe2 in toluene-d8. The same diffusion coefficient was determined at the chemical shift of this signal from the DOSY spectrum of pure BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8.
The release of SMe2 was also observed in previous studies where the equilibrium dissociation of BH3•SMe2 was proposed as a first step of the reaction mechanism in the reduction of nitriles by BH3•SMe2 [69]. The broad hump in the region from 1.5 to 2.3 ppm (Figure 1b) is assigned to the BH3 protons. The fine structure of the signal observed in the 1H spectrum of the pure BH3•SMe2 resulting from 1J(11B-1H) = 107.7 Hz indirect spin–spin coupling (Figure 1e) is lost due to involvement of the borane protons in the formation of the new species with lower symmetry of the boron environment.
To prove the simultaneous presence of species A and B, 11B and 10B spectra of the mixture were acquired. The 11B spectrum (Figure 3a) shows one signal at −19.97 ppm with an unresolved quartet-like structure (1JB-H = 74 Hz) that was assigned to N-BH3 coordinated species A, according to literature data [66]. The second signal at around 7 ppm was assigned to N-B-O complex B [70]. Supplementary Figure S6 shows a comparison of the 11B spectra of the mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 with the spectra of pure BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8. The high-field shift of about 1 ppm and the broadening of the quartet for BH3 due to its involvement in complex A is clearly visible. The application of broadband proton decoupling resulted in collapse of the multiplet structure and narrowing of the signal (Supplementary Figure S6b,d). Unfortunately, the broad background signal due to probe-head components covering the range from −15 to 40 ppm hampered the clear observation of the signal originating from the complex B. Previous studies demonstrated that the unwanted background signal is inherently suppressed in 10B NMR spectra [71]. Figure 3b shows the 10B spectrum of the mixture, where the signal of the complex B at around 7 ppm is now clearly visible.
The drawbacks of 10B spectra (I10B = 3, Q10B = 8.46 fm2, NA = 19.9%) are the lower sensitivity and the generally broader signals as compared with 11B spectra (I11B = 3/2, Q11B = 4.06 fm2, NA = 80.1%) due to the respectively lower natural abundance and higher quadrupolar effect of the 10B isotope. Nevertheless, 10B spectra present a convenient alternative of 11B spectra in situations where the contribution of the background signal cannot be avoided. Importantly, the 10/11B spectra are not quantitative, since the relaxation of the quadrupolar B nuclei strongly depends on the symmetry of the boron environment. For example, the relaxation of the boron in structures with higher symmetry such as BH3•SMe2 is generally slower as compared to the relaxation in species with lower symmetry such as A and B.
In a next step, the mixture of 2c and BH3•SMe2 was heated in situ in the NMR tube at a temperature of 50 °C. The 10B spectrum (Figure 3c) now shows only one signal at 18.82 ppm that is characteristic of monomeric oxazaborolidine C [10,72,73,74]. Therefore, we consider this observation as evidence that upon heating of the reaction mixture, the intermediates A and B are subsequently transformed to oxazaborolidine catalyst (C) after evolution of H2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental proof by NMR for the in situ formation of the oxazaborolidine catalyst.
The influence of the concentration on the nature and stability of the intermediates was studied in a next step. The 1H and 13C spectra of the mixture with 2 M concentration of the ligand at room temperature are presented in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S7a,b. The spectra indicate that at higher ligand concentrations, there is a complex equilibrium between at least three different species involving 2c. This is further indicated by 1H-13C HSQC and 1H COSY spectra of the mixture, which display three separate sets of O-CH2, N-CH and CH2-CH3 spectral patterns (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
The signals of the NH2 protons could be clearly identified from the 1H-13C HSQC spectrum due to the lack of correlation cross-peaks with C-atoms over one bond, thus confirming the formation of complexes with preserved NH2 moiety. The DOSY spectrum of the mixture (Figure 6) shows that two of the complexes have very close diffusion coefficients, with an averaged value of 4.48 × 10−10 m2s−1, while the third complex has a slightly higher diffusion coefficient of 4.68 × 10−10 m2s−1. The diffusion coefficients of the intermediates in the mixture with higher concentration are by a factor of two lower as compared to the value (D = 1.12 × 10−9 m2s−1) measured in the mixture with lower concentration (see above and Figure 2). The diffusion coefficient of the SMe2 was identical in both samples, ruling out any possibility of viscosity-induced differences of the D values measured in the two samples. Therefore, our interpretation is that at higher concentrations, dimeric intermediates with different coordination modes are present in dynamic equilibrium. Different types of dimeric oxazaborolidine-based structures have been proposed in the literature, including the (N,N-adducts), (N,O-adducts) and (O,O-adducts). The small difference between the diffusion coefficients of the dimeric species could be explained by the different shape of the intermediates resulting from the different coordination modes [61,62,72].
Four broad signals at 24, 9.6, 6.7 and −19.8 ppm were observed in the 10B spectrum of the mixture (Supplementary Figure S8). The chemical shifts of the signals are generally consistent with the values reported for some cyclic organoborane Lewis-base adducts and borane chelate complexes with B←N and/or B←O coordinated moieties [75,76].
Further, we investigated the influence of the solvent on the possibility for formation of different intermediates between 2c and BH3•SMe2 in the low-concentration regime (0.1 M), similar to the reaction conditions. For this purpose, the samples were dissolved in THF-d8. Contrary to the sample in toluene-d8 (Figure 1), the 1H NMR spectra show that in THF-d8, several stable intermediates were formed, as demonstrated by the increased numbers of signals (Supplementary Figure S9). By analysis of the correlation cross-peaks observed in the COSY spectrum (Supplementary Figure S9c), we identified at least three main spin systems based on the 2-aminobutanol fragment CH2-CH-CH2. The formation of intermediates with different degrees of association was also confirmed by 1H DOSY. The DOSY spectrum of the mixture in THF-d8 shows the presence of two main components with diffusion coefficients of 1.02 × 10−9 m2s−1 and 0.81 × 10−9 m2s−1 that are significantly lower as compared to the diffusion coefficient of the pure ligand in THF-d8 (1.68 × 10−9 m2s−1). These results imply that in THF, the formation of the dimeric species occurs even at lower concentrations.
With the aim to assess the influence of the squaric acid fragment on the formation and performance of the catalytic system, we investigated ligand 5 containing both the squaric acid skeleton and aminoalcohol function. The 1H spectrum of the mixture of ligand 5 and BH3•SMe2 in THF-d8 shows shifting and broadening of the ligand signals (Figure 7b). The number of signals was also increased, which indicated that the interaction between ligand 5 and BH3•SMe2 resulted in the formation of multiple species. Due to the complexity of the spectrum, it was not possible to draw conclusions about the structure of these adducts.
The 1H NMR spectra of pure ligand 6 in toluene-d8 and of 6 in the presence of BH3•SMe2 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation are presented in Figure 8. The spectra demonstrate that in the presence of BH3•SMe2, the signal of the NH proton of the ligand is shifted up-field by 0.39 ppm and all other signals of the ligand are broader as compared to the spectra of the pure ligand (Figure 8b). The 1H spectra measured several hours after mixing show the appearance of a number of unresolved additional signals. In parallel to that, the intensity of the signals of the ligand gradually decreased with time, indicating the occurrence of degradation reactions simultaneously with the possible formation of intermediates (Figure 8c,d).
The formation of intermediate between the ligand 6 and BH3•SMe2 was also confirmed by 11B NMR spectroscopy. The 11B spectra of the mixture show the presence of a characteristic quartet at −19.17 ppm as well as an additional signal at 2.1 ppm assigned to the complex (Figure 9). The involvement of BH3•SMe2 in side reactions was also confirmed since the intensity of the signal at −19.17 ppm decreased with time (Figure 9b,c). Thus, the NMR data point out that the stability of the possible intermediate formed between squaric acid derivative 6 containing the amido function only and BH3•SMe2 is very poor.
The overall analysis of the comparative NMR data for the three model ligands shows that the highest stability was demonstrated for the intermediates including aminoalcohol ligand 2c, where the squaric acid fragment is missing. The complexes between ligand 5 and borane remained stable within the next 10 h, contrary to the complex with the participation of ligand 6 that also contained the squaric acid fragment, but only the amide function in the side chain.
Therefore, the stability of the intermediates follows the row 2c > 5 > 6, which correlates with the observed trend in the enantioselectivity—83% ee (2c), 31% ee (5) and 0% ee (6)—in catalytic asymmetric borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone by applying these chiral squaric acid amides and aminoalcohols as ligands (see Table 1). Comparison of the results for ligands 5 and 6 implies that the simultaneous presence of hydroxy and amido functionalities in the structure of ligand 5 contributes to the better stability of the intermediates and impedes the process of ligand destruction eventually induced by the squaric moiety.
Considering that under the real reaction conditions the amount of the reducing borane is much higher, we can suggest that the squaramide ligands undergo much faster degradation due to unspecific borane reduction, thus preventing the formation of stable intermediates and their subsequent transformation to catalytic oxazaborolidine species upon heating. Therefore, we can conclude that squaramides are poor ligands for the asymmetric CBS reduction because they degrade under the reaction conditions used in our study, unlike simpler aminoalcohols, which can form competent oxazaborolidines.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of all compounds has been performed using commercially available chemicals and materials (amines 2a and 11a, aminoalcohols 2a–d and 2h–j, 3,4-diethoxycyclobut-3-ene-1,2-dione (1), ketone 19 and BH3•SMe2) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA), Merck (Tokyo, Japan), Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland), Acros (Waltham, MA, USA), Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA) and Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI, Tokyo, Japan). Commercially available chiral amines and aminoalcohols were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich with ee > 98. Aminoalcohols 2e–g and amine 11b were prepared according to known procedures [57,77,78,79]. The catalytic reactions were carried out using α-chloroacetophenone freshly crystalized from heptane.
All compounds were obtained with high chemical purity using column chromatography or crystallization. The structures and configurations of all new compounds were unambiguously determined by 1D and 2D NMR experiments (including detailed descriptions of 1H and 13C chemical shifts and coupling constants), mass spectrometry, optical rotation, elemental analysis and melting point temperatures.
The organometallic reactions were carried out in flame-dried Schlenk flasks under an argon atmosphere. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled over sodium/benzophenone. Toluene was distilled over Na[Et4Al]. For thin-layer chromatography (TLC), aluminum sheets pre-coated with silica gel 60 F254 (Merck) were used. Flash column chromatography was carried out using silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm, 230–400 mesh ASTM, Merck). Commercially available solvents for reactions, TLC and column chromatography were used after distillation—petroleum ether (PE), diethyl ether (Et2O), dichloromethane (DCM), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), tetrahydrofuran (THF), methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), isopropyl alcohol (i-PrOH), ethylacetate (EtOAc), cyclohexane (CH) and acetone. Melting points were determined in capillary tubes on an MPA100 OptiMelt automated melting point system (SRS, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) without corrections. Mass spectra (MS) were recorded on a Thermo Scientific High-Resolution Magnetic Sector MS DFS by chemical ionization (CI), and are reported as fragmentation in m/z with relative intensities (%). Mass analysis of intermediates’ formation was performed on a Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (ESI HRMS), Thermo Scientific, in positive mode. Optical rotation [α] measurements were obtained using Perkin–Elmer 241 and Jasco-P-2000 polarimeters. The ee values were determined on a Shimadzu GC-17A gas chromatograph with an FID detector and chiral column MN-Hydrodex β-TBDAc (0.25 mm × 25 m). The column temperature was 160 °C (isothermal). The injector and detector temperatures were 240 °C. Helium was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, split 1:20. Retention times: tR = 6.0 min, tS = 6.3 min. Elemental analyses were performed by the Microanalytical Laboratory for Elemental Analysis of the Institute of Organic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. The numbering of atoms in formulas is not in conformity with the IUPAC names of the compounds. Chemical shifts assigned with an asterisk (*) are tentative. The assignments of protons as Ha and Hb are tentative.

3.2. NMR Spectroscopy

The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance II+ 600 (600.01 MHz for 1H, 150.87 MHz for 13C, 64.46 MHz for 10B, 192.51 MHz for 11B, 60.81 MHz for 15N NMR) spectrometer. In the case of CDCl3, TMS was used as an internal standard for chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and 1H spectra were calibrated to the signal of TMS (δ = 0.0000). For other deuterated solvents, 1H spectra were calibrated to the residual solvent peaks (DMSO-d6 δ = 2.50). 13C spectra were calibrated in all cases to the residual solvent peaks (CDCl3 δ = 77.00, DMSO-d6 δ = 39.52). The following additional NMR techniques were used for all compounds: DEPT 135, COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY. 1H and 13C NMR data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, br = broad, m = multiplet), integration, identification and coupling constants (in Hz).
The 1H DOSY spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance II+ 600 NMR spectrometer using a 5 mm direct detection dual-broadband probe, with a gradient coil delivering maximum gradient strength of 53 G/cm. All experiments were performed at a temperature of 293 K. The DOSY spectra were measured using a convection compensating double-stimulated echo-based pulse sequence, with monopolar square-shaped gradient pulses. The spectra were acquired with 64 K time domain data points in t2 dimension, 32 gradient strength increments, diffusion delay of 100 ms, gradient pulse length of 2 ms, 16 transients for each gradient step and a relaxation delay of 2 s. The gradient strength was incremented from 4% to typically 70% of the maximum gradient output (from 1.92 to 33.7 G/cm) to achieve optimal signal attenuation. The spectra were processed with exponential window function (line broadening factor 0.2), 64 K data points in F2 and 256 data points in the diffusion dimension. The evaluation of the diffusion coefficients was performed by fitting the diffusion profile (the normalized signal intensity as a function of the gradient strength G) at the chemical shift of selected signals in the DOSY spectrum with an exponential function using the variant of the Stejskal–Tanner equation adapted to the particular pulse sequence used.
The 10/11B spectra were measured using a single-pulse experiment using the following acquisition parameters: spectral width 150 ppm, time domain data points 64 K, 90° pulse length 15.4 us, relaxation delay 0.5 s, number of transients typically 4000. The spectra were referenced to 15% BF3•Et2O (0 ppm) solution in CDCl3 used as an external standard.

4. Conclusions

We synthesized a series of chiral compounds (squaramides containing N- and O-functionality, and some aminoalcohols) in order to study their efficacy as ligands in the model reduction reaction of α-chloroacetophenone with BH3•SMe2. Our results clearly demonstrate that the free aminoalcohols were more efficient ligands to induce enantioselectivity (up to 94% ee) in comparison to the corresponding squaramides. The catalytic system was studied in situ in reaction mixtures modeling the catalyst formation between BH3•SMe2 and compounds 2c, 5 and 6 by means of DOSY and multinuclear 1D and 2D (1H, 10/11B, 13C, 15N) NMR spectroscopy. The results obtained imply that the aminoalcohols form stable intermediates after reacting with BH3•SMe2 at room temperature. Upon heating the reaction mixture at 50 °C, these intermediates are subsequently transformed to oxazaborolidine. It was found that the presence of the squaric acid moiety in the ligand structure contributes to low stability of the intermediates, leading to destabilization of the catalyst system and to its further destruction. Unlike the simple aminoalcohols that remained stable under the reaction conditions used in our study (high excess of the borane source), the squaramide ligands underwent fast nonspecific destruction, which hampered the in situ formation of a stable catalytic system. These results explain the systematically lower enantioselectivities obtained when squaramide derivatives were used as chiral ligands in the reaction of asymmetric borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: Details on the preparation, purification, spectral and analytical data for compounds 3–10, 12, 13, 17 and 18, as well as other general comments and methodologies regarding synthetic procedures and NMR (Figures S1–S9) experiments are introduced in detail in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Y.N. (conceptualization, methodology, synthesis, funding acquisition, writing and revision), P.S. (conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, NMR experiments, writing and revision), G.M.D. (synthesis of aminoalcohols, writing and revision), Z.P. (synthesis of aminoalcohols, MS experiments, writing and revision). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Support for the young scientists in Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (Projects DFNP-144/2016 and DFNP-17-63/2017). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Operational Programme ‘‘Science and Education for Smart Growth”, Bulgaria, project No. BG05M2OP001-1.002-0012.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Research equipment of Distributed Research Infrastructure INFRAMAT, part of the Bulgarian National Roadmap for Research Infrastructures, supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science, was used in this investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Abdul, R.; Taneja, S.C. Synthesis of Single-enantiomer Bioactive Molecules: A Brief Overview. Chirality 2014, 26, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lin, G.; Li, Y.; Chan, A.S.C. Asymmetric Catalytic Hydrogenation and Other Reduction Reactions. In Principles and Applications of Asymmetric Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 331–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haftchenary, S.; Nelson, S.D.; Furst, L.; Dandapani, S.; Ferrara, S.J.; Bošković, Ž.V.; Figueroa Lazú, S.; Guerrero, A.M.; Serrano, J.C.; Crews, D.K.; et al. Efficient Routes to a Diverse Array of Amino Alcohol-Derived Chiral Fragments. ACS Comb. Sci. 2016, 18, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Heravi, M.; Lashaki, T.B.; Fattahi, B.; Zadsirjan, V. Application of asymmetric Sharpless aminohydroxylation in total synthesis of natural products and some synthetic complex bio-active molecules. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 6634–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Listunov, D.; Maraval, V.; Chauvin, R.; Genisson, Y. Chiral alkynylcarbinols from marine sponges: Asymmetric synthesis and biological relevance. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 49–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Prakash, G.K.S.; Mandal, M.; Schweizer, S.; Petasis, N.A.; Olah, G.A. A Facile Stereocontrolled Synthesis of anti-α-(Trifluoromethyl)-β-amino Alcohols. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3173–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, D.-Y.; Han, G.-Y.; Gong, J.-X.; Nay, B.; Li, X.-W.; Guo, Y.-W. Asymmetric Total Synthesis of Distaminolyne A and Revision of Its Absolute Configuration. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tolomelli, A.; Ammazzalorso, A.; Bruno, I.; Amoroso, R. A Review of Strategies for the Development of Alkyl Prolines in Drug Discovery. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2016, 12, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cho, B.T. Recent development and improvement for boron hydride-based catalytic asymmetric reduction of unsymmetrical ketones. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Corey, E.J.; Bakshi, R.K.; Shibata, S. Highly enantioselective borane reduction of ketones catalyzed by chiral oxazaborolidines. Mechanism and synthetic implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5551–5553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hirao, A.; Itsuno, S.; Nakahama, S.; Yamazaki, N. Asymmetric reduction of aromatic ketones with chiral alkoxy-amine-borane complexes. Chem. Commun. 1981, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Corey, E.J.; Helal, C.J. Reduction of Carbonyl Compounds with Chiral Oxazaborolidine Catalysts: A New Paradigm for Enantioselective Catalysis and a Powerful New Synthetic Method. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singh, V.K. Practical and Useful Methods for the Enantioselective Reduction of Unsymmetrical Ketones. Synthesis 1992, 1992, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mathre, D.J.; Shinkai, I.; Zaidlewicz, M.; Krzemiński, M.; Łączkowski, K.; Patti, A.; Pedotti, S. Tetrahydro-1-methyl-3,3-diphenyl-1H, 3H-pyrrolo[1,2-c][1,3,2]oxazaborole. In Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brunel, J.M.; Maffei, M.; Buono, G. Enantioselective reduction of ketones with borane, catalyzed by (S)-(−)-proline or (S)-(+)-prolinol. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1993, 4, 2255–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, J.; Wei, T.; Lin, S.-S.; Zhang, Q. Rationale on the Abnormal Effect of Temperature on the Enantioselectivity in the Asymmetric Borane Reduction of Ketones Catalyzed by L-Prolinol. Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Quallich, G.J.; Woodall, T.M. In Situ Oxazaborolidines, Practical Enantioselective Hydride Reagents. Synlett 1993, 12, 929–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Masui, M.; Shioiri, T. A practical method for preparation of optically pure oxazaborolidines from α-Pinene. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8363–8370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Corey, E.J.; Link, J.O. A new process for the generation of 1,3,2-oxazaborolidines, catalysts for enantioselective synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4141–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, X.F.; Min, C.; Nyamzundui, E.; Zhou, H.B.; Dong, C. A novel C 3-symmetric prolinol-squaramide catalyst for the asymmetric reduction of ketones by borane. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2011, 22, 1640–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.; Zhou, H.B.; Lü, S.M.; Luo, M.M.; Xie, R.G.; Choi, M.C.K.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Chan, A.S.C.; Yang, T.K. Chiral squaric prolinols: A new type of ligand for the asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones by borane. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1907–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, H.B.; Zhang, J.; Lü, S.M.; Xie, R.G.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Choi, M.C.K.; Chan, A.S.C.; Yang, T.K. Design, synthesis and structure of new chiral squaric acid monoaminoalcohols and diaminoalcohols and their use as catalysts in asymmetric reduction of ketones and diketones. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9325–9333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zou, H.-H.; Hu, J.; Zhang, J.; You, J.-S.; Ma, D.; Lü, D.; Xie, R.-G. Asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones with borane using chiral squaric amino alcohols derived from camphor as catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2005, 242, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alegre-Requena, J.V.; Marqués-López, E.; Herrera, R.P. Trifunctional Squaramide Catalyst for Efficient Enantioselective Henry Reaction Activation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 1801–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Alemán, J.; Parra, A.; Jiang, H.; Jørgensen, K.A. Squaramides: Bridging from Molecular Recognition to Bifunctional Organocatalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6890–6899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chauhan, P.; Mahajan, S.; Kaya, U.; Hack, D.; Enders, D. Bifunctional Amine-Squaramides: Powerful Hydrogen-Bonding Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Domino/Cascade Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 253–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guerola, M.; Escolano, M.; Alzuet-Piña, G.; Gómez-Bengoa, E.; Ramírez de Arellano, C.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; del Pozo, C. Synthesis of substituted piperidines by enantioselective desymmetrizing intramolecular aza-Michael reactions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 4650–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Han, J.-L.; Chang, C.-H. An asymmetric assembly of spirooxindole dihydropyranones through a direct enantioselective organocatalytic vinylogous aldol-cyclization cascade reaction of 3-alkylidene oxindoles with isatins. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2322–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jin, X.; Min, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, H.B. Synthesis and structural features of chiral cyclic squaramides and their application in asymmetric catalytic reaction. Arkivoc 2010, 11, 322–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pace, W.H.; Mo, D.L.; Reidl, T.W.; Wink, D.J.; Anderson, L.L. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Dihydropyrido[1,2-a]indoles from Nitrones and Allenoates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9183–9186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, M.-X.; Dong, Z.-W.; Zhu, G.-Y.; Zhao, X.-L.; Shi, M. Diastereo- and enantioselective Mannich/cyclization cascade reaction of isocyanoacetates with cyclic sulfamide ketimines by cinchona alkaloid squaramide/AgOAc cooperative catalysis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 4641–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cortadellas, O.; Galibert, A.M.; Soula, B.; Donnadieu, B.; Fabre, P.L. Palladium(II) complexes obtained from 3,4-bis(cyanamido)cyclobutane-1,2-dione dianion. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2004, 357, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seleem, H.S.; Ramadan, A.A.T.; Taha, A.; Samy, F. Unreported Coordination Behavior of a Squaric Bis (Hydrazone) Ligand. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 2011, 1, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, X.; Zuo, Z.; Tang, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, C.; Chen, W.; Li, C.; Xu, W.; Xiong, X.; Yuntai, K.; et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel estrogen-derived steroid metal complexes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 3793–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Johnson, C.S. Diffusion ordered nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Principles and applications. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1999, 34, 203–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Denkova, P.; Momekova, D.; Rangelov, S.; Lambov, N.; Willem, R. Investigation of sterically stabilized liposomes by diffusion ordered NMR spectroscopy. J. Control. Release 2010, 148, e47–e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Denkova, P.S.; Van Lokeren, L.; Willem, R. Mixed Micelles of Triton X-100, Sodium Dodecyl Dioxyethylene Sulfate, and Synperonic L61 Investigated by NOESY and Diffusion Ordered NMR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6703–6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kowalczuk, A.; Stoyanova, E.; Mitova, V.; Shestakova, P.; Momekov, G.; Momekova, D.; Koseva, N. Star-shaped nano-conjugates of cisplatin with high drug payload. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 404, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ulrich, K.; Sanders, M.; Grinberg, F.; Galvosas, P.; Vasenkov, S. Application of Pulsed Field Gradient NMR with High Gradient Strength for Studies of Self-Diffusion in Lipid Membranes on the Nanoscale. Langmuir 2008, 24, 7365–7370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Valentini, M.; Vaccaro, A.; Rehor, A.; Napoli, A.; Hubbell, J.A.; Tirelli, N. Diffusion NMR Spectroscopy for the Characterization of the Size and Interactions of Colloidal Matter:  The Case of Vesicles and Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2142–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhao, T.; Beckham, H.W. Direct Synthesis of Cyclodextrin-Rotaxanated Poly(ethylene glycol)s and Their Self-Diffusion Behavior in Dilute Solution. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 9859–9865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cohen, Y.; Avram, L.; Frish, L. Diffusions-NMR-Spektroskopie in der Supramolekularen und Kombinatorischen Chemie: Ein alter Parameter—Neue Erkenntnisse. Angew. Chem. 2004, 117, 524–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cohen, Y.; Avram, L.; Frish, L. Diffusion NMR Spectroscopy in Supramolecular and Combinatorial Chemistry: An Old Parameter—New Insights. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 520–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Han, S.; Ma, Z.; Hopson, R.; Wei, Y.; Budil, D.; Gulla, S.; Moulton, B. Postsynthetic modification of a coordination compound with a paddlewheel motif via click reaction: DOSY and ESR studies. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2012, 15, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pastor, A.; Martínez-Viviente, E. NMR spectroscopy in coordination supramolecular chemistry: A unique and powerful methodology. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 2314–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fernández, I.; Martínez-Viviente, E.; Breher, F.; Pregosin Paul, S. 7Li, 31P, and 1H Pulsed Gradient Spin-Echo (PGSE) Diffusion NMR Spectroscopy and Ion Pairing: On the Temperature Dependence of the Ion Pairing in Li(CPh3), Fluorenyllithium, and Li[N(SiMe3)2] amongst Other Salts. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1495–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martínez-Viviente, E.; Rüegger, H.; Pregosin, P.S.; López-Serrano, J. 31P and 35Cl PGSE Diffusion Studies on Phosphine Ligands and Selected Organometallic Complexes. Solvent Dependence of Ion Pairing. Organometallics 2002, 21, 5841–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nama, D.; Anil Kumar, P.G.; Pregosin Paul, S. 195Pt, 1H and 31P PGSE diffusion studies on platinum complexes. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2004, 43, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Subramanian, H.; Jasperse, C.P.; Sibi, M.P. Characterization of Brønsted Acid–Base Complexes by 19F DOSY. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1429–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, D.; Keresztes, I.; Hopson, R.; Williard, P.G. Characterization of Reactive Intermediates by Multinuclear Diffusion-Ordered NMR Spectroscopy (DOSY). Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Luong Thi Kim, N.; Shestakova, P.; Mihaylov Tzvetan, T.; Absillis, G.; Pierloot, K.; Parac-Vogt Tatjana, N. Multinuclear Diffusion NMR Spectroscopy and DFT Modeling: A Powerful Combination for Unraveling the Mechanism of Phosphoester Bond Hydrolysis Catalyzed by Metal-Substituted Polyoxometalates. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 4428–4439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Luong, T.K.N.; Shestakova, P.; Absillis, G.; Parac-Vogt, T.N. Detailed Mechanism of Phosphoanhydride Bond Hydrolysis Promoted by a Binuclear ZrIV-Substituted Keggin Polyoxometalate Elucidated by a Combination of 31P, 31P DOSY, and 31P EXSY NMR Spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 4864–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McArthur, D.; Butts, C.P.; Lindsay, D.M. A dialkylborenium ion via reaction of N-heterocyclic carbene-organoboranes with Bronsted acids-synthesis and DOSY NMR studies. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6650–6652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nakakoshi, M.; Ueda, M.; Sakurai, S.; Miyata, O.; Sugiura, M.; Naito, T. Structure elucidation of the intermediate in triethylborane-mediated radical addition of oxime ethers with 2D- and 3D-DOSY NMR. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2006, 44, 807–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Qiao, Y.; Ge, W.; Jia, L.; Hou, X.; Wang, Y.; Pedersen, C.M. Glycosylation intermediates studied using low temperature 1H- and 19F-DOSY NMR: New insight into the activation of trichloroacetimidates. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11418–11421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Schober, K.; Hartmann, E.; Zhang, H.; Gschwind Ruth, M. 1H DOSY Spectra of Ligands for Highly Enantioselective Reactions—A Fast and Simple NMR Method to Optimize Catalytic Reaction Conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2794–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dimitrov, V.; Dobrikov, G.; Genov, M. Chiral β- and γ-aminoalcohols derived from (+)-camphor and (-)-fenchone as catalysts for the enantioselective addition of diethylzinc to benzaldehyde. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Y.K.; Jeon, S.J.; Walsh, P.J.; Nugent, W.A. (2S)-(-)-3-exo-(morpholino)isoborneol[(-)-MIB]. Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Davies, S.G.; Lee, J.A.; Roberts, P.M.; Thomson, J.E.; Yin, J. Parallel Kinetic Resolution of Acyclic γ-Amino-α,β-unsaturated Esters: Application to the Asymmetric Synthesis of 4-Aminopyrrolidin-2-ones. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Santhi, V.; Rao, J.M. Asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones using in situ generated oxazaborolidines derived from amino alcohols of (1R)-camphor as catalysts. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3553–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nevalainen, V. Quantum chemical modeling of chiral catalysis. Part 6. On the relative stability of dimers of chiral oxazaborolidines used in the catalytic enantioselective reduction of ketones. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1992, 3, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nevalainen, V. Quantum chemical modeling of chiral catalysis. Part 3. On the role of a Lewis basic solvent in the mechanism of catalytic enantioselective reduction of carbonyl compounds by chiral oxazaborolidines. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1991, 2, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kettouche, H.S. A DFT study on the reaction mechanism of enantioselective reduction of ketones with borane catalyzed by a B-methoxy-oxazaborolidine catalyst derived from (–)-β-pinene. J. Mol. Model. 2020, 26, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jones, S.; Atherton, J.C.C. Asymmetric reduction using N-methyl and N-benzyl oxazaborolidines based upon cis-1-amino-2-indanol: A preliminary mechanistic study. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4543–4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gilmore, N.J.; Jones, S. Evaluating the role of solvent and borane on the enantioselectivity of the oxazaborolidine reduction of prochiral ketones using catalysts derived from cis-(1R,2S)-1-amino-indan-2-ol. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2115–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stepanenko, V.; Ortiz-Marciales, M.; Barnes, C.E.; Garcia, C. Studies on the synthesis of borazines from borane and 1,2-aminoalcohols. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7603–7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wei, D.; Tang, M.; Zhao, J.; Sun, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H. A DFT study of the enantioselective reduction of prochiral ketones promoted by pinene-derived amino alcohols. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2009, 20, 1020–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rotger, M.C.; Piña, M.N.; Frontera, A.; Martorell, G.; Ballester, P.; Deyà, P.M.; Costa, A. Conformational Preferences and Self-Template Macrocyclization of Squaramide-Based Foldable Modules. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2302–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jaganyi, D.; Mzinyati, A. An 11B NMR spectroscopy investigation of the mechanism of the reduction of nitriles by BH3·SMe2. Polyhedron 2006, 25, 2730–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Krzemiński, M.P.; Ćwiklińska, M. Chiral terpene auxiliaries II. Spiroborate esters derived from α-pinene—New catalysts for asymmetric borane reduction of prochiral ketones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 3919–3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Király, P. Background-free solution boron NMR spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2012, 50, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Brown, J.M.; Lloyd-Jones, G.C.; Layzell, T.P. Reversible dimerisation of ephedrine-derived oxazaborolidines. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1993, 4, 2151–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Corey, E.J.; Link, J.O. A new chiral catalyst for the enantioselective synthesis of secondary alcohols and deuterated primary alcohols by carbonyl reduction. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 6275–6278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kawanami, Y.; Yanagita, R.C. Practical Enantioselective Reduction of Ketones Using Oxazaborolidine Catalysts Generated In Situ from Chiral Lactam Alcohols. Molecules 2018, 23, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Siedle, A.R. 11B NMR Spectroscopy. In Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Webb, G.A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988; Volume 20, pp. 205–314. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wrackmeyer, B. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Boron. In Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Webb, G.A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988; Volume 20, pp. 61–203. [Google Scholar]
  77. Bosiak, M.J.; Krzemiński, M.P.; Jaisankar, P.; Zaidlewicz, M. Asymmetric synthesis of N-1-(heteroaryl)ethyl-N-hydroxyureas. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2008, 19, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Carman, R.M.; Greenfield, K.L. The endo- and exo-1,7,7-Trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-amines (Bornan-2-amines) and their acetamides. Aust. J. Chem. 1984, 37, 1785–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ipaktschi, J. Reduktion von Oximen mit Natriumboranat in Gegenwart von Übergangsmetallverbindungen. Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 856–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 06865 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of squaramides 3–10 by using chiral and nonchiral amines or aminoalcohols.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of squaramides 3–10 by using chiral and nonchiral amines or aminoalcohols.
Molecules 26 06865 sch001
Molecules 26 06865 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of chiral squaramides 13a,b bearing a hydroxyl group at the squaric core.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of chiral squaramides 13a,b bearing a hydroxyl group at the squaric core.
Molecules 26 06865 sch002
Molecules 26 06865 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of chiral diphenyl-substituted 2-aminobutanol analogue 17 and the corresponding squaric acid amide 18.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of chiral diphenyl-substituted 2-aminobutanol analogue 17 and the corresponding squaric acid amide 18.
Molecules 26 06865 sch003
Molecules 26 06865 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra of: (a) pure ligand 2c (0.1 M) in toluene-d8, and mixture of 0.1 M of 2c and BH3•SMe2 (1:1 molar ratio) in toluene-d8 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation: (b) 15 min, (c) 4 h 30 min and (d) 4 days. The 1H spectrum of BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 is also shown for comparison (e).
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra of: (a) pure ligand 2c (0.1 M) in toluene-d8, and mixture of 0.1 M of 2c and BH3•SMe2 (1:1 molar ratio) in toluene-d8 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation: (b) 15 min, (c) 4 h 30 min and (d) 4 days. The 1H spectrum of BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 is also shown for comparison (e).
Molecules 26 06865 g001
Molecules 26 06865 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Possible intermediates (A and B) generated in situ at room temperature after mixing ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2. In a next step, upon heating the ligand-borane mixture, oxazaborolidine C is formed after the release of H2.
Scheme 4. Possible intermediates (A and B) generated in situ at room temperature after mixing ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2. In a next step, upon heating the ligand-borane mixture, oxazaborolidine C is formed after the release of H2.
Molecules 26 06865 sch004
Molecules 26 06865 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H DOSY spectra of: (a) pure ligand 2c in toluene−d8, (b) 2c in the presence of BH3·SMe2 and (c) BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8.
Figure 2. 1H DOSY spectra of: (a) pure ligand 2c in toluene−d8, (b) 2c in the presence of BH3·SMe2 and (c) BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8.
Molecules 26 06865 g002
Molecules 26 06865 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) 11B NMR spectrum of mixture of 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 at 20 °C, (b) 10B NMR spectrum of mixture of 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 at 20 °C, (c) 10B spectrum of 2c and BH3•SMe2 mixture in toluene-d8 at 50 °C and (d) 11B NMR spectrum of BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8.
Figure 3. (a) 11B NMR spectrum of mixture of 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 at 20 °C, (b) 10B NMR spectrum of mixture of 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 at 20 °C, (c) 10B spectrum of 2c and BH3•SMe2 mixture in toluene-d8 at 50 °C and (d) 11B NMR spectrum of BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8.
Molecules 26 06865 g003
Molecules 26 06865 g004 550
Figure 4. 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum of 2 M mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8. The correlation peaks originating from the three sets of 2-aminobutanol-based structural fragments are indicated as follows: (a) the OCH2 groups (blue dots) and the CH(NH2) groups (black dots), and (b) the CH2 groups (blue dots) and CH3 groups enclosed in the dashed rectangle. The six protons from the three NH2 groups (red dots) were identified due to a lack of cross-peaks with C-atoms over one bond.
Figure 4. 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum of 2 M mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8. The correlation peaks originating from the three sets of 2-aminobutanol-based structural fragments are indicated as follows: (a) the OCH2 groups (blue dots) and the CH(NH2) groups (black dots), and (b) the CH2 groups (blue dots) and CH3 groups enclosed in the dashed rectangle. The six protons from the three NH2 groups (red dots) were identified due to a lack of cross-peaks with C-atoms over one bond.
Molecules 26 06865 g004
Molecules 26 06865 g005 550
Figure 5. COSY NMR spectrum of 2 M mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 showing the presence of three 2-aminobutanol-based spectral patterns. As an example, the dashed lines show the cross-peak connectivities between the structural fragments within one of the 2-aminobutanol-based complexes. The signals of the two diastereotopic protons of the three NH2 groups are shown with red symbols.
Figure 5. COSY NMR spectrum of 2 M mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 showing the presence of three 2-aminobutanol-based spectral patterns. As an example, the dashed lines show the cross-peak connectivities between the structural fragments within one of the 2-aminobutanol-based complexes. The signals of the two diastereotopic protons of the three NH2 groups are shown with red symbols.
Molecules 26 06865 g005
Molecules 26 06865 g006 550
Figure 6. 1H DOSY spectrum of the 2 M mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8: (a) full spectrum, and (b) expanded area with the three sets of CH protons used for determination of the diffusion coefficients of the three complexes. The diffusion coefficients were calculated by fitting the diffusion profile of each signal (the normalized signal intensity as a function of the gradients’ strength) to a variant of the Stejskal–Tanner equation.
Figure 6. 1H DOSY spectrum of the 2 M mixture of ligand 2c and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8: (a) full spectrum, and (b) expanded area with the three sets of CH protons used for determination of the diffusion coefficients of the three complexes. The diffusion coefficients were calculated by fitting the diffusion profile of each signal (the normalized signal intensity as a function of the gradients’ strength) to a variant of the Stejskal–Tanner equation.
Molecules 26 06865 g006
Molecules 26 06865 g007 550
Figure 7. 1H NMR spectra of: (a) pure ligand 5 in THF-d8, and (b) mixture of 5 and BH3•SMe2 in THF-d8.
Figure 7. 1H NMR spectra of: (a) pure ligand 5 in THF-d8, and (b) mixture of 5 and BH3•SMe2 in THF-d8.
Molecules 26 06865 g007
Molecules 26 06865 g008 550
Figure 8. 1H NMR spectra of: (a) pure ligand 6 in toluene-d8, and mixture of 6 and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation: (b) 15 min, (c) 3 h 30 min and (d) 5 h.
Figure 8. 1H NMR spectra of: (a) pure ligand 6 in toluene-d8, and mixture of 6 and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation: (b) 15 min, (c) 3 h 30 min and (d) 5 h.
Molecules 26 06865 g008
Molecules 26 06865 g009 550
Figure 9. 11B NMR spectra of mixture of ligand 6 and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation: (a) 15 min, (b) 3 h 30 min and (c) 5 h. The 11B spectrum of BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 is also shown for comparison (d).
Figure 9. 11B NMR spectra of mixture of ligand 6 and BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 measured at different time intervals after sample preparation: (a) 15 min, (b) 3 h 30 min and (c) 5 h. The 11B spectrum of BH3•SMe2 in toluene-d8 is also shown for comparison (d).
Molecules 26 06865 g009
Table
Table 1. Catalytic asymmetric borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone by applying chiral squaric acid amides and aminoalcohols as ligands.
Table 1. Catalytic asymmetric borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone by applying chiral squaric acid amides and aminoalcohols as ligands.
Molecules 26 06865 i001
Squaric Acid AmidesFree Aminoalcohols
EntryLigandYield (%)eea (Config.)EntryLigandYield (%)eea (Config.)
149953 (R)192b9879 (R)
259931 (S)
37b7239 (R)
48b9942 (R)202c9783 (S)
59b860
69c9919 (S)
77f920212f999 (S)
88f9956 (R)
97e9510 (R)222e9949 (R)
108e9949 (R)
119e9935 (S)
127h8013 (S)232h8061 (S)
137i9937 (S)242i b9844 (R)
147g9956 (R)252gc9479 (S)
1510980266960
1613a990----
1713b930----
18189226 (S)27179994 (S)
a The ee values were determined by capillary GC analysis with a chiral column MN-Hydrodex β-TBDAc (0.25 mm × 25 m). Configurations were assigned by comparison of the sign of the specific rotation with that reported in the literature. b Reference [11]. c Reference [60].
Table
Table 2. Optimization of the reaction conditions for borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone catalyzed by 2c.
Table 2. Optimization of the reaction conditions for borane reduction of α-chloroacetophenone catalyzed by 2c.
EntryLigand (Equiv.) aTemperature (°C)SolventTime (min)Yield (%)eec (Config.)
12c (0.1)50THF209683 (S)
22c (0.1) b50THF59186 (S)
32c (0.1)25THF309273 (S)
42c (0.1)0THF2409922 (S)
52c (0.1)50Toluene209770 (S)
62c (0.1)100Toluene59180 (S)
a Catalyst system was formed by mixing the ligand and BH3•SMe2 in the corresponding solvent and stirring the mixture for 2 h at room temperature and 1 h at the corresponding reaction temperature. b The catalyst system was formed by stirring for 4 h at the reaction temperature. c The ee values were determined by capillary GC analysis with a chiral column MN-Hydrodex β-TBDAc (0.25 mm × 25 m). Configurations were assigned by comparison with the sign of the specific rotation with that reported in the literature.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikolova, Y.; Dobrikov, G.M.; Petkova, Z.; Shestakova, P. Chiral Aminoalcohols and Squaric Acid Amides as Ligands for Asymmetric Borane Reduction of Ketones: Insight to In Situ Formed Catalytic System by DOSY and Multinuclear NMR Experiments. Molecules 2021, 26, 6865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226865

AMA Style

Nikolova Y, Dobrikov GM, Petkova Z, Shestakova P. Chiral Aminoalcohols and Squaric Acid Amides as Ligands for Asymmetric Borane Reduction of Ketones: Insight to In Situ Formed Catalytic System by DOSY and Multinuclear NMR Experiments. Molecules. 2021; 26(22):6865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226865

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolova, Yana, Georgi M. Dobrikov, Zhanina Petkova, and Pavletta Shestakova. 2021. "Chiral Aminoalcohols and Squaric Acid Amides as Ligands for Asymmetric Borane Reduction of Ketones: Insight to In Situ Formed Catalytic System by DOSY and Multinuclear NMR Experiments" Molecules 26, no. 22: 6865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226865

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop