Next Article in Journal
Ginger, a Possible Candidate for the Treatment of Dementias?
Next Article in Special Issue
A Universal Cassette-Based System for the Dissolution of Solid Targets
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Basis of Artemisinin Derivatives Inhibition of Myeloid Differentiation Protein 2 by Combined in Silico and Experimental Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Conversion of Hardly Ionizable Rhenium Aryl Chlorocomplexes with p-Substituted Anilines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Efficient Micro-Scale Liquid-Liquid In-Flow Extraction of 99mTc from Molybdenum

1
Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 70 c/o viale Eliporto, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
2
Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari, 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
3
Legnaro National Laboratories, National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Viale dell’Università, 2, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(18), 5699; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185699
Submission received: 7 September 2021 / Revised: 16 September 2021 / Accepted: 17 September 2021 / Published: 21 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-Based Radiopharmaceuticals in Inorganic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The trend to achieve even more compact-sized systems is leading to the development of micro-scale reactors (lab-on-chip) in the field of radiochemical separation and radiopharmaceutical production. Technetium-99m extraction from both high and low specific activity molybdenum could be simply performed by MEK-driven solvent extraction if it were not for unpractical automation. The aim of this work is to develop a solvent extraction and separation process of technetium from molybdenum in a micro-scale in-flow chemistry regime with the aid of a capillary loop and a membrane-based separator, respectively. The developed system is able to extract and separate quantitatively and selectively (91.0 ± 1.8% decay corrected) the [99mTc]TcO4Na in about 20 min, by using a ZAIPUT separator device. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time in our knowledge the high efficiency of a MEK-based solvent extraction process of 99mTc from a molybdenum-based liquid phased in an in-flow micro-scale regime.

1. Introduction

Liver, kidney, brain, thyroid scans, imaging of bone lesions, and localization of myocardial infarctions are just some of the basic diagnostic tests performed daily with technetium-99m (99mTc), a gamma ray emitting radioisotope (Eγ = 140 keV, t1/2 = 6 h) which covers over 85% of diagnostic applications in Nuclear Medicine. Technetium-99m is an everlasting radionuclide which has seen the birth of Nuclear Medicine, and the recent advances in technetium chemistry and detector technologies make it still modern and competitive with trendy PET radionuclides [1]. In the late 2000s, a recurrent lack of availability of 99mTc in the hospitals due to a global shortage of molybdenum-99 (99Mo) because of frequent shutdowns of the ageing reactor-based 235U fission production chain, revealed the fragility of the traditional supply chain and, consequently, prompted the research community to look for alternative production routes.
Strong commitment has been devoted to the cyclotron-based direct production of 99mTc, through the 100Mo(p, 2n)99mTc nuclear reaction, as a valuable alternative [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Accurate studies on the cross section of this reaction and of collateral nuclear reactions have determined the optimal energy range (15–24 MeV) to maximize the production of 99mTc, ensuring a radionuclidic purity level suitable for clinical applications [13]. This energy range is covered by most of the conventional medical cyclotrons already in operation in many hospital radiopharmacies, which can therefore be used for the production of 99mTc on site ensuring a constant and on demand supply, without the aid of nuclear reactors.
Other reactor-based routes have been investigated based on the indirect production of 99mTc induced by thermal or fast neutron beams, respectively through the 98Mo(n,γ)99Mo and 100Mo(n,2n)99Mo nuclear reactions, or gamma-ray beam 100Mo(γ,n)99Mo [11,14,15]. These routes are all affected by low specific activity molybdenum, being products and targets made of the same element material, thus complicating the generator-like extraction and separation process required for the isolation of high purity 99mTc, since it would require large columns to adsorb molybdenum, decreasing the radioactive concentration of 99mTc obtained to unacceptably low levels [16,17,18].
The extraction and purification of 99mTc from the irradiated metal target is a key step in the production cycle, necessary to make the radioisotope suitable for further radiopharmaceutical processing and patient injection. This process must be simple, reproducible, and efficient, in order to rapidly supply a radioisotope with high purity. The automation of this process is essential to ensure these requirements and to minimize operators’ radiation exposure.
In this regard and in the framework of the LARAMED project of the Legnaro National Laboratories of the INFN, we developed an automatic module for the extraction, separation, and purification of cyclotron-produced 99mTc from the molybdenum metal target, based on the solvent extraction technique [8,9,19]. This system exploits a helium-bubbling into a separation column to boost solvent extraction of technetium into a biphasic system, composed of an alkaline aqueous solution (containing Tc, Mo and contaminants) and an organic phase of methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). The developed system, although very efficient, may however be improved in terms of processing times and costs. Indeed, both dissolution and extraction-separation are the time-consuming steps of all procedures (about 20 and 30 min respectively, over 60 min total). Moreover, the developed module consists of an assembly of commercially-available modular units which are overall quite expensive (i.e., in the range 50–80 k€).
The current trend in technology aiming to achieve even more compact systems is leading to the development of micro-scale reactors (lab-on-chip) in the field of radiochemical separation and radiopharmaceutical production, in order to improve performance and minimize chemical and radiological risks [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. In this view, a latest generation device, the membrane-based Liquid–Liquid separator, 10 September (Figure 1), patented and produced by ZAIPUT Flow Technologies company (Cambridge, MA, USA), has been recently used for the radiochemical separation of radioisotopes of nuclear medical interest [23,29,30,32], for the miniaturization of liquid–liquid extraction processes in an in-flow chemistry regime. This device allows two immiscible phases to be effectively separated by exploiting interfacial tension and the affinity of one of the two phases for a microporous hydrophilic or hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (PTFE). Finally, thanks to a self-regulating differential pressure applied inside the device by a diaphragm, the separation can take place continuously [32].
The in-flow extraction process carried out at the micro-scale level creates some advantages when compared to similar processes performed on a macro-scale, including: shorter extraction times, an increase in the mass transfer coefficient, a better surface-volume interface ratio (S/V), etc. [31,33,34,35,36].
The aim of this work is to test the efficiency of the solvent extraction and separation process of technetium from molybdenum in an in-flow chemistry regime with the aid of the Zaiput separator. A versatile separation system that would allow for minimization of costs, times, dimensions, and volumes involved in the process, as well as being applicable also to 99mTc indirect production methods, such as from low specific activity reactor-produced 99Mo, where the solvent extraction remains the best extraction-separation method [16,37].

2. Results and Discussion

In the production of radioisotopes for nuclear medicine, automation of the radiochemical separation process of the radioisotope of interest from the target and contaminants is necessary to make the results reproducible, minimize losses of radioactive material, decrease process times, and maximize recovery yields. Not least, automation allows for drastic reduction of radiation exposure to the operator conducting the separation.
Recently, we developed a separation and purification module based on the liquid–liquid extraction method applied to the cyclotron-production of 99mTc from target of metallic molybdenum. Despite this system being extremely efficient, it requires rather long process times for the extraction of technetium with MEK with gas bubbling (helium or argon) within a glass separation column, and subsequent separation of the phases.
The purpose of this work was to develop a different, more compact, and efficient, automatic system for the extraction of 99mTc from molybdenum, based on the liquid–liquid in-flow extraction process and separation with a membrane separator device, which would allow for minimization of costs, times, dimensions and involved volumes, while keeping high yield and quality.
The Zaiput device (Figure 1), a membrane separator, was therefore selected as the heart of the automatic system that allows two immiscible phases to be separated, taking advantage of the interfacial tension between them and the affinity of one of the two phases for a microporous membrane. Thanks to a differential pressure applied inside the device from a simple diaphragm, the separation can take place continuously [32]. This system allows the macro process of solvent extraction to be reduced to a micro scale, and therefore follows flow chemistry laws.
While the device takes care of the phase’s separation, the liquid–liquid extraction, in which the two phases are put in intimate contact allowing for solute transfer, takes place inside a capillary according to flow chemistry [38,39,40,41]. The capillary, optimized in terms of length and diameter and wrapped in a loop to minimize space, allows the two co-injected phases to alternate, forming a sort of train technically called the slug-flow regime. This typical micro-arrangement of phases is optimal for liquid–liquid extraction, as it allows the surface/volume ratio of the phases to be maximized, and therefore the ability to transfer solutes according to the chemical affinities involved [34,36,40].
In a preliminary phase, a prototype of the automatic system was assembled and tested with the aim of optimizing the flow rates of the biphasic system (NaOH 6 M/MEK) to achieve a proper separation. Subsequently, “cold” tests (without radioactivity) were performed to optimize the process conditions (volumes, transfer speed, slug-flow regime, loop dimensions, residence times of the sample in the loop, speed, and separation times). Capillary dimensions (ETFE capillary loop 1/8 inch, length = 106 cm; internal diameter 1.59 mm; internal volume about 2.1 mL) and flow rate (0.5 mL/min) are calibrated to maximize the contact between the two phases by achieving a slug-flow regime), the most suitable regime for liquid–liquid extraction on a micro-scale [40]. A schematic diagram of the overall system as it was assembled and installed is reported in Figure 2.
In order to assess how the efficiency of the extraction and separation system concerned, three “hot” tests (with radioactivity) were performed. The separation tests were carried out by adding 99mTc-sodium pertechnetate eluted by a 99Mo/99mTc generator in order to trace the activity in the process phases and to determine its efficiency. The collected results, summarized in Table 1, show that the system is able to quantitatively and selectively extract and separate (91.0 ± 1.8% decay corrected) the [99mTc]TcO4Na in about 20 min.
After the phase separation, the 99mTcO4 contained in the organic solution was purified through a silica and an alumina column, in order to remove molybdate traces and the MEK solvent, respectively. Finally, [99mTc]TcO4 was collected from the alumina column with saline. In Table 2, chemical (CP) and radiochemical (RCP) purity values of the [99mTc]TcO4 solution obtained at the end of the overall procedure is reported. Post-separation purification with column cartridges allows a pharmaceutical product compliant with the Pharmacopoeia standards to be obtained.
Given the high 99mTc extraction yield and purity achieved, this system can be efficiently involved in the separation of technetium from both low and high specific activity molybdenum. In the case of indirect technetium production, the generator-like extraction of 99mTc from low specific activity 99Mo can be performed running the protocol described here. Moreover, following further decay of 99Mo into 99mTc, the molybdenum-rich aqueous phase coming out from the separator system, can be recirculated to the capillary loop and to the separator with fresh organic solvent for the extraction and separation of 99mTc in continuous. Finally, the extraction process, starting with an alkaline aqueous solution of molybdenum, allows extension of the application of the system to not only the treatment of molybdenum metal targets, but also to oxides.

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Materials

The automatic system for the technetium/molybdenum liquid–liquid flow extraction on a microscale is composed of:
  • a Zaiput SEP-10 device (purchased by ZAIPUT Flow Technologies company, Cambridge, MA, USA) mounting an OB-100 hydrophobic membrane, supplied with the device;
  • two WPX1-U1/16S2-J8-CP peristaltic pumps (WELCO, Tokyo, Japan), flow rate of 0.5 mL/min at 6 V;
  • two power supplies;
  • a teflon T-junction;
  • an ETFE capillary loop (1/8 “, length = 106 cm; internal diameter 1.59 mm; internal volume about 2.1 mL);
  • ETFE tubes (1/8 “, internal diameter = 1.59 mm) and connectors.
Other materials involved in the process are: H2O2 30% w/w (Titolchimica, Rovigo, Italy), methyl ethyl ketone (Carlo Erba, Milano, Italy), NaOH and sodium chloride 0.9% (Fresenius Kabi, Verona, Italy); [99mTc]NaTcO4, in physiological solution eluted by a 99Mo/99mTc generator (UTK, Curium, London). Silica and acidic alumina SepPak Cartridges were purchased from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA). Natural molybdenum metal target (natMo, 99.95% purity, 150 mg) were produced by Spark Plasma Sintering technique (SPS) [46].

3.2. Procedure

A molybdenum metal target, not irradiated, was dissolved in hot concentrated H2O2 2 mL, and subsequently 3.5 mL of NaOH 6 M was added to convert MoO3 into Na2MoO4.
In order to “mimic” the irradiated target conditions, a few microliters of generator eluted [99mTc]-sodium pertechnetate were added to the target solution. Subsequently, the sample containing the mixture of Mo and Tc (about 5 mL), together with the organic phase MEK (5 mL), was pumped through the extraction-separation system, previously conditioned with the biphasic NaOH/MEK system (5 mL/phase).
The two phases converge, by means of a Teflon T-junction, in the capillary loop by forming a kind of train technically called the “slug-flow” regime (Figure 3b). The residence time in the loop is approximately 2.5 min and, at this stage, the transfer of [99mTc]TcO4, from the aqueous to the organic phase occurs. Exiting from the loop, the two phases enter the ZAIPUT separator device, from which the technetium-rich organic and molybdenum-rich aqueous phases come out separated (ORG/AQ OUT 1 for the preconditioning, ORG/AQ OUT 2 for the sample).
Once drained of all the sample, a washing with the biphasic NaOH/MEK system (5 mL/phase) was performed to collect any residual sample in the system (ORG/AQ OUT 3). Between one experiment and another, the system was washed with water and MEK. All the samples collected at the output of the ZAIPUT device were then measured with an activity calibrator to detect the amount of 99mTc activity present in each sample, thus determining the extraction yield. The technetium was then extracted and purified from the 99mTc-rich organic phase with a silica and alumina column in series, preconditioned with 5 mL of MEK and 10 mL of deionized water, respectively. The technetium was then eluted from the alumina column with 3 mL of saline solution.

3.3. Quality Controls

Paper chromatography was carried out on Whatman 1 strips using methanol/water (8:2) and Physiological solution as mobile phases, Chromatograph Cyclone Plus Storage Phosphor System and Software Optiquant ™.
Kit Merckoquant Molibdeno 5–250 MG/L was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and Kit Tec-Control Aluminium Breakthru from Biodex (Shirley, NY, USA).
Dose Calibrator Capintec CRC-15R (Ramsey, NJ, USA) was used for activity measurements.
Gas-chromatography (GC) was performed using Agilent-Pal H6500-CTC injector, gas-chromatograph Agilent Gc 6850 Series II Network, mass spectrometry detector (MS) Agilent Mass Selective Detector 5973 Network and column Agilent J&W DB-624 UI (20 m, 0.18 mm, 1.00 u) was used for chromatographic separation.
The operating conditions of the headspace were: incubation time: 50 min; incubation temperature: 80 °C; magnetic stirring speed: 250 rpm. The column oven temperature was set at 35 °C and remained constant for 4 min. After this time, the temperature was raised up to 240 °C at 15 °C/min. A constant column flow of 0.7 mL/min of helium was used.

4. Conclusions

In this work we demonstrated for the first time the efficiency of the MEK-based solvent extraction process of 99mTc from a molybdenum-based liquid phased in an in-flow micro-scale regime, using a compact ZAIPUT separator device. Further developments will be carried out aimed at completing automation of the system thereof, including the dissolution and post-separation purification phases.
This system allows the extraction time and separation of technetium from the organic phase to be drastically reduced and can be used both to purify technetium from molybdenum metal targets in the direct cyclotron 99mTc production, as well as in indirect 99mTc production such as the 99Mo production, by irradiating a natural molybdenum using a 14-MeV accelerator-driven neutron source.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.M. and A.B.; data curation, P.M.; methodology, P.M.; investigation, P.M., L.U., L.M. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M.; writing—review and editing, A.B.; supervision, A.D.; funding acquisition, J.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institute for Nuclear Physics, grant number METRICS-CSN5.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Boschi, A.; Uccelli, L.; Martini, P. A Picture of Modern Tc-99m Radiopharmaceuticals: Production, Chemistry, and Applications in Molecular Imaging. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Qaim, S.M. Nuclear data for medical radionuclides. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 305, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scholten, B.; Lambrecht, R.M.; Cogneau, M.; Ruiz, H.V.; Qaim, S.M. Excitation functions for the cyclotron production of 99mTc and 99Mo. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 51, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Uzunov, N.M.; Melendez-Alafort, L.; Bello, M.; Cicoria, G.; Zagni, F.; De Nardo, L.; Selva, A.; Mou, L.; Rossi-Alvarez, C.; Pupillo, G.; et al. Radioisotopic purity and imaging properties of cyclotron-produced 99mTc using direct 100Mo(p,2n) reaction. Phys. Med. Biol. 2018, 63, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bénard, F.; Buckley, K.R.; Ruth, T.J.; Zeisler, S.K.; Klug, J.; Hanemaayer, V.; Vuckovic, M.; Hou, X.; Celler, A.; Appiah, J.-P.; et al. Implementation of Multi-Curie Production of (99m)Tc by Conventional Medical Cyclotrons. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schaffer, P.; Buckley, K.; Celler, A.; Klug, J.; Kovacs, M.; Prato, F.; Valliant, J.; Zeisler, S.; Ruth, T.; Benard, F. A tale of three targets: Direct, multi-Curie production of 99mTc on three different cyclotrons. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 164. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schaffer, P.; Bénard, F.; Bernstein, A.; Buckley, K.; Celler, A.; Cockburn, N.; Corsaut, J.; Dodd, M.; Economou, C.; Eriksson, T.; et al. Direct Production of 99mTc via 100Mo(p,2n) on Small Medical Cyclotrons. Phys. Procedia 2015, 66, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Martini, P.; Boschi, A.; Cicoria, G.; Uccelli, L.; Pasquali, M.; Duatti, A.; Pupillo, G.; Marengo, M.; Loriggiola, M.; Esposito, J. A solvent-extraction module for cyclotron production of high-purity technetium-99m. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2016, 118, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martini, P.; Boschi, A.; Cicoria, G.; Zagni, F.; Corazza, A.; Uccelli, L.; Pasquali, M.; Pupillo, G.; Marengo, M.; Loriggiola, M.; et al. In-house cyclotron production of high-purity Tc-99m and Tc-99m radiopharmaceuticals. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2018, 139, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Beaver, J.E.; Hupf, H.B. Production of 99mTc on a medical cyclotron: A feasibility study. J. Nucl. Med. 1971, 12, 739–741. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pillai, M.R.A.; Dash, A.; Knapp, F.F.R.J. Sustained availability of 99mTc: Possible paths forward. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Boschi, A.; Martini, P.; Pasquali, M.; Uccelli, L. Recent achievements in Tc-99m radiopharmaceutical direct production by medical cyclotrons. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2017, 43, 1402–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esposito, J.; Vecchi, G.; Pupillo, G.; Taibi, A.; Uccelli, L.; Boschi, A.; Gambaccini, M. Evaluation of 99Mo and 99m Tc productions based on a high-performance cyclotron. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. IAEA. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Non-HEU Production Technologies for Molybdenum-99 and Technetium-99m. IAEA Nucl. Energy Ser. 2013, 1–75. Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1589_web.pdf (accessed on 19 September 2021).
  15. Capogni, M.; Pietropaolo, A.; Quintieri, L.; Angelone, M.; Boschi, A.; Capone, M.; Cherubini, N.; De Felice, P.; Dodaro, A.; Duatti, A.; et al. 14 MeV neutrons for 99Mo/99mTc production: Experiments, simulations and perspectives. Molecules 2018, 23, 1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chattopadhyay, S.; Saha Das, S.; Barua, L.; Pal, A.K.; Kumar, U.; Madhusmita; Alam, M.N.; Hudait, A.K.; Banerjee, S. A compact solvent extraction based 99Mo/99mTc generator for hospital radiopharmacy. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2019, 143, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chattopadhyay, S.; Das, S.S.; Das, M.K.; Goomer, N.C. Recovery of 99mTc from Na2[99Mo]MoO4 solution obtained from reactor-produced (n,γ) 99Mo using a tiny Dowex-1 column in tandem with a small alumina column. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2008, 66, 1814–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Uccelli, L.; Boschi, A.; Pasquali, M.; Duatti, A.; Di Domenico, G.; Pupillo, G.; Esposito, J.; Giganti, M.; Taibi, A.; Gambaccini, M. Influence of the generator in-growth time on the final radiochemical purity and stability of 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Esposito, J.; Bettoni, D.; Boschi, A.; Calderolla, M.; Cisternino, S.; Fiorentini, G.; Keppel, G.; Martini, P.; Maggiore, M.; Mou, L.; et al. Laramed: A laboratory for radioisotopes of medical interest. Molecules 2019, 24, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kralj, J.G.; Sahoo, H.R.; Jensen, K.F. Integrated continuous microfluidic liquid–liquid extraction. Lab. Chip 2007, 7, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mariet, C.; Vansteene, A.; Losno, M.; Pellé, J.; Jasmin, J.P.; Bruchet, A.; Hellé, G. Microfluidics devices applied to radionuclides separation in acidic media for the nuclear fuel cycle. Micro Nano Eng. 2019, 3, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; van Dam, R.M. High-Efficiency Production of Radiopharmaceuticals via Droplet Radiochemistry: A Review of Recent Progress. Mol. Imaging 2020, 19, 1536012120973099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pedersen, K.S.; Imbrogno, J.; Fonslet, J.; Lusardi, M.; Jensen, K.F.; Zhuravlev, F. Liquid–liquid extraction in flow of the radioisotope titanium-45 for positron emission tomography applications. React. Chem. Eng. 2018, 3, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rensch, C.; Jackson, A.; Lindner, S.; Salvamoser, R.; Samper, V.; Riese, S.; Bartenstein, P.; Wängler, C.; Wängler, B. Microfluidics: A groundbreaking technology for PET tracer production? Molecules 2013, 18, 7930–7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maurice, A.; Theisen, J.; Gabriel, J.C.P. Microfluidic lab-on-chip advances for liquid–liquid extraction process studies. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 46, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Farahani, A.; Rahbar-Kelishami, A.; Shayesteh, H. Microfluidic solvent extraction of Cd(II) in parallel flow pattern: Optimization, ion exchange, and mass transfer study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 258, 118031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Priest, C.; Zhou, J.; Sedev, R.; Ralston, J.; Aota, A.; Mawatari, K.; Kitamori, T. Microfluidic extraction of copper from particle-laden solutions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2011, 98, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Hessel, V.; Peng, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L. Co and Ni extraction and separation in segmented micro-flow using a coiled flow inverter. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hellé, G.; Mariet, C.; Cote, G. Microfluidic Tools for the Liquid-liquid Extraction of Radionuclides in Analytical Procedures. Procedia Chem. 2012, 7, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ban, Y.; Kikutani, Y.; Tokeshi, M.; Morita, Y. Extraction of Am(III) at the Interface of Organic-Aqueous Two-Layer Flow in a Microchannel. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2011, 48, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martini, P.; Adamo, A.; Syna, N.; Boschi, A.; Uccelli, L.; Weeranoppanant, N.; Markham, J.; Pascali, G. Perspectives on the use of liquid extraction for radioisotope purification. Molecules 2019, 24, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Adamo, A.; Heider, P.L.; Weeranoppanant, N.; Jensen, K.F. Membrane-based, liquid-liquid separator with integrated pressure control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 10802–10808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kashid, M.N.; Harshe, Y.M.; Agar, D.W. Liquid-liquid slug flow in a capillary: An alternative to suspended drop or film contactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 8420–8430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghaini, A.; Kashid, M.N.; Agar, D.W. Effective interfacial area for mass transfer in the liquid–liquid slug flow capillary microreactors. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 2010, 49, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Woitalka, A.; Kuhn, S.; Jensen, K.F. Scalability of mass transfer in liquid–liquid flow. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 116, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Holbach, A.; Kockmann, N. Counter-current arrangement of microfluidic liquid-liquid droplet flow contactors. Green Process. Synth. 2013, 2, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chattopadhyay, S.; Das, S.S.; Barua, L. A simple and rapid technique for recovery of 99mTc from low specific activity (n,γ)99Mo based on solvent extraction and column chromatography. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2010, 68, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dessimoz, A.-L.; Cavin, L.; Renken, A.; Kiwi-Minsker, L. Liquid–liquid two-phase flow patterns and mass transfer characteristics in rectangular glass microreactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 4035–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Jovanović, J.; Rebrov, E.V.; Nijhuis, T.A.; Kreutzer, M.T.; Hessel, V.; Schouten, J.C. Liquid-liquid flow in a capillary microreactor: Hydrodynamic flow patterns and extraction performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kashid, M.N.; Gerlach, I.; Goetz, S.; Franzke, J.; Acker, J.F.; Platte, F.; Agar, D.W.; Turek, S. Internal circulation within the liquid slugs of a liquid-liquid slug-flow capillary microreactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 5003–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tsaoulidis, D.; Angeli, P. Effect of channel size on mass transfer during liquid–liquid plug flow in small scale extractors. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 262, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sodium pertechnetate (99mTc) injection (Accelator- Produced). In EU Pharmacopoeia 9.3; EDQM (Ed.) European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2018; pp. 4801–4803. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sodium pertechnetate (99mTc) injection (FISSION). In EU Pharmacopoeia 8.0; EDQM (Ed.) European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2014; pp. 1090–1091. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sodium pertechnetate (99mTc) injection (NON-FISSION). In EU Pharmacopoeia 8.0; EDQM (Ed.) European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Solvents with low toxic potential. In EU Pharmacopoeia 8.0; EDQM (Ed.) European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2014; p. 642. [Google Scholar]
  46. Skliarova, H.; Cisternino, S.; Cicoria, G.; Cazzola, E.; Gorgoni, G.; Marengo, M.; Esposito, J. Cyclotron solid targets preparation for medical radionuclides production in the framework of LARAMED project. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1548, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Picture (a) and scheme (b) of the ZAIPUT separation device.
Figure 1. Picture (a) and scheme (b) of the ZAIPUT separation device.
Molecules 26 05699 g001
Figure 2. Diagram of the extraction and separation system.
Figure 2. Diagram of the extraction and separation system.
Molecules 26 05699 g002
Figure 3. (a) Operating principle with schematic representation of internal circulation within the two phases and (b) photo of a slug-flow regime in the loop in which the organic phase has been colored red by adding a dye.
Figure 3. (a) Operating principle with schematic representation of internal circulation within the two phases and (b) photo of a slug-flow regime in the loop in which the organic phase has been colored red by adding a dye.
Molecules 26 05699 g003
Table 1. Average percentage of extraction 99mTc (n = 3). (ORG/AQ OUT 1: preconditioning, ORG/AQ OUT 2: sample collection, ORG/AQ OUT 3: residual washing).
Table 1. Average percentage of extraction 99mTc (n = 3). (ORG/AQ OUT 1: preconditioning, ORG/AQ OUT 2: sample collection, ORG/AQ OUT 3: residual washing).
SampleVolume [mL]99mTc %
Sample vialempty3.3 ± 0.7
ORG OUT 14-
AQ OUT 15-
ORG OUT 28.591.0 ± 1.8
AQ OUT 272.1 ± 0.6
ORG OUT 32.52.2 ± 1.4
AQ OUT 331.5 ± 2.1
H2O washing5-
MEK washing5-
Table 2. CP and RCP of [99mTc]TcO4 obtained at the end of the overall procedure of this work compared with the European pharmacopeia requirements for injection, other solvent-extraction-based techniques from the literature, and the quality of [99mTc]TcO4 eluted from a UTK generator (Curium). * EU Phar. = European Pharmacopoeia.
Table 2. CP and RCP of [99mTc]TcO4 obtained at the end of the overall procedure of this work compared with the European pharmacopeia requirements for injection, other solvent-extraction-based techniques from the literature, and the quality of [99mTc]TcO4 eluted from a UTK generator (Curium). * EU Phar. = European Pharmacopoeia.
ParametersThis WorkEU Phar. *
[42,43,44,45]
Other SE-Based Techniques [16,37]Generator Eluate
CPpH54–86–76
Mo<5 ppm <10 ppm-
Al<5 ppm<5 ppm<10 ppm<5 ppm
MEK<0.0006% (v/v)<0.5% (v/v)<0.1% (v/v)-
RCP99mTcO4>98%≥95%>99%>99%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martini, P.; Uccelli, L.; Duatti, A.; Marvelli, L.; Esposito, J.; Boschi, A. Highly Efficient Micro-Scale Liquid-Liquid In-Flow Extraction of 99mTc from Molybdenum. Molecules 2021, 26, 5699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185699

AMA Style

Martini P, Uccelli L, Duatti A, Marvelli L, Esposito J, Boschi A. Highly Efficient Micro-Scale Liquid-Liquid In-Flow Extraction of 99mTc from Molybdenum. Molecules. 2021; 26(18):5699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martini, Petra, Licia Uccelli, Adriano Duatti, Lorenza Marvelli, Juan Esposito, and Alessandra Boschi. 2021. "Highly Efficient Micro-Scale Liquid-Liquid In-Flow Extraction of 99mTc from Molybdenum" Molecules 26, no. 18: 5699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185699

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop