Next Article in Journal
Operando Raman Shift Replaces Current in Electrochemical Analysis of Li-ion Batteries: A Comparative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Intermolecular Forces Driving Hexamethylenetetramine Co-Crystal Formation, a DFT and XRD Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Melatonin in Angiotensin and Aging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Calixarene in Chemotherapy Delivery Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Natural Product-Based Hybrids as Potential Candidates for the Treatment of Cancer: Focus on Curcumin and Resveratrol

Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno D’Alcontres 31, I-98166 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2021, 26(15), 4665; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154665
Submission received: 11 June 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published: 31 July 2021

Abstract

:
One of the main current strategies for cancer treatment is represented by combination chemotherapy. More recently, this strategy shifted to the “hybrid strategy”, namely the designing of a new molecular entity containing two or more biologically active molecules and having superior features compared with the individual components. Moreover, the term “hybrid” has further extended to innovative drug delivery systems based on biocompatible nanomaterials and able to deliver one or more drugs to specific tissues or cells. At the same time, there is an increased interest in plant-derived polyphenols used as antitumoral drugs. The present review reports the most recent and intriguing research advances in the development of hybrids based on the polyphenols curcumin and resveratrol, which are known to act as multifunctional agents. We focused on two issues that are particularly interesting for the innovative chemical strategy involved in their development. On one hand, the pharmacophoric groups of these compounds have been used for the synthesis of new hybrid molecules. On the other hand, these polyphenols have been introduced into hybrid nanomaterials based on gold nanoparticles, which have many potential applications for both drug delivery and theranostics in chemotherapy.

1. Introduction

Despite enormous drug discovery efforts, cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of death worldwide. It currently ranks second in terms of mortality and, according to WHO reports, accounted for nearly 10 million victims in 2020 [1]. The difficulty in treating this disease is due to its multifactorial and polygenic nature, involving multiple organs, tissues, and biochemical pathways [2]. Therefore, as with many other complex diseases, the standard single drug treatment has proven to be ineffective over time. Strategies to overcome the multifactorial nature of this disease include the administration of drug cocktails (complex therapy) or drugs in a fixed dosage ratio (combined therapy) aimed at different targets to obtain a synergistic effect and reduce the spread of drug resistance [3]. Nevertheless, several issues related to this mixed chemotherapy treatment of cancer, such as the possibility of unforeseen drug–drug interactions, poor patient compliance, insurgence of severe side-effects, and non-selectivity toward cancerous cells, remain unresolved [4]. In the last few years, the combination strategy shifted swiftly to the “hybrid strategy”, namely the design of a new molecular entity (the hybrid molecule) containing two or more biologically active molecules [5]. The term “hybrid” has been invariably used as a synonym by the scientific community to identify a codrug (two identical or different pharmacophores/drugs joined by means of a cleavable linker), a fused drug (the same as a codrug but joined without a linker), a conjugate (bioactive compound(s) covalently linked to a functional molecule), a chimeric drug (two or more pharmacophores/drugs merged in a new chemical entity), and a multifunctional/multimodal/multipotential (and so forth) drug [6]. Furthermore, the hybrid strategy (hence the term hybrid) implies that this new therapeutic entity has superior features compared with the individual components (e.g., toxicity and bioavailability). Based on this last (and more important) consideration, the term “hybrid” has been further extended to nanotechnology, with special regard to the development of drug delivery systems in which the bioactive component(s) are embedded or conjugated to biocompatible nanomaterials. The hybrid nanosystems are generally classified on the basis of the structural components (e.g., inorganic/organic building blocks), accessory moieties (e.g., crosslinkers, stimuli-responsive moieties, and antibodies), and the architecture of hybridization (e.g., nanoclusters, nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanoshells, nanorods, nanocrystals, nanocages, etc.) [7]. The hybridization process can take place at the level of the delivery platform, or it can be directly carried out by coating the nanomaterial with bioactive compounds. The use of these smart nanomaterials represents a new trend of pharmaceutical research, as they may offer a plethora of advantages compared with mere drug therapy, including the possibility of achieving targeted chemotherapy with specific release to cancer cells and metastasis sites [8,9].
Naturally occurring products have been used for the treatment and prevention of a variety of chronic pathologies, including cancer, and there is an increased interest in plant-derived compounds due to the necessity to find alternative sources of new drugs with beneficial health properties. In particular, polyphenolic compounds, one of the most diverse groups of plant secondary metabolites, are known for their health-promoting properties and have attracted attention as promising antitumor agents and also because, generally, they are able to act as multifunctional agents. Thus, nanoscale formulations have been developed to ameliorate not only their pharmacodynamic profile but also to improve their solubility, stability, and bioavailability to address and overcome their limitations [10,11,12].
The aim of the present review is to report the most recent and intriguing research advances in the development of hybrids (in the broad sense of the term) encompassing the common feature of containing a plant-derived bioactive component for the potential treatment of various types of cancer. Given the vastness and complexity of this topic, as well as the large number of plant polyphenols that have been considered as potential substrates for the design of hybrid products, we focused our attention on two polyphenols, curcumin (Cur) and resveratrol (Res), which possess unique physicochemical features and are well-known for their wide spectrum of biological activities, including anticancer properties. Polyphenols may be categorized primarily into flavonoids and nonflavonoids. The basic skeleton of flavonoids (flavonols, flavones, flavan-3-ols, anthocyanidins, flavanones, and isoflavones) can have numerous substituents, and the water solubility of flavonoids increases with the presence of sugars and hydroxyl groups as substituents on the skeleton. The nonflavonoids include diverse classes of polyphenols, such as stilbenes and curcuminoids. The curcuminoid Cur and the stilbene Res have been extensively studied for their beneficial properties against human chronic diseases, such as cancer [13], and are representatives of the group of polyphenols with poor bioavailability. In fact, polyphenols can be generally classified into three categories: (1) high solubility and poor cell membrane permeability, (2) low solubility and poor cell membrane permeability, and (3) low solubility and high cell membrane permeability [14,15]. The polyphenols Cur and Res examined in the present study belong to types 2 and 3, respectively. Cur is insoluble in cold water, and Res also shows a very low solubility (about 0.03 g/L). Furthermore, Res is stable at an acidic pH, while its degradation increases exponentially at a pH above 6.8 [15]; Cur is highly susceptible to chemical degradation in alkaline aqueous solutions (pH ≥ 7.0) but can promote crystallization in aqueous systems under acidic conditions [16]. Thus, it is obvious that efforts to outcome their limits and improve their potential applications must be made.
The review is focused on two kinds of hybrid nanoproducts that appear particularly interesting because of the innovative chemical strategy involved in their development. As described in the first part of the paper, Cur and Res have been used for the synthesis of new hybrid compounds characterized by better chemico–physical and pharmacological properties compared with the parent drugs [17]. On the other hand, these two molecules can be introduced in the development of hybrid materials based on gold nanoparticles, a material endowed with extraordinary biocompatibility and physicochemical properties, and they consequently have many potential applications in the pharmaceutical industry for drug delivery in chemotherapy [18,19,20].

2. Chemical Features and Anticancer Effect of Curcumin and Resveratrol

Cur (diferuloylmethane; Figure 1) is one of the bioactive components of Curcuma longa Linn., and has been used for the management of multiple diseases in different cultures. Its application is limited by its low water and plasma solubility, chemical instability under alkaline conditions, poor oral absorption, and rapid metabolism. In addition, the polyphenol Res (3,4′,5-trans-trihydroxystilbene), a phytoalexin produced by several plant species, possesses a wide variety of biological properties that have been extensively studied both in vitro and in vivo. Unfortunately, Res, like Cur, shows low aqueous solubility and poor chemical stability, as well as low bioavailability, all factors limiting its clinical effectiveness. Both Cur and Res are claimed to possess significant anticancer properties due to their capability to act as multifunctional agents.
The imbalance between cell death and cell proliferation is one of the major factors involved in cancer development. First, the antioxidant properties of Cur and Res, because of their capability to modulate antioxidant enzymes activity, can likely contribute to the anticancer effects of these polyphenols. However, in some experimental studies on cancer cells, Cur and Res appeared able to promote massive ROS production, which could lead to cell death [21,22]. Cur and Res can inhibit cell survival signaling [23] and lead to apoptosis, not only activating the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways but also inducing cell-cycle arrest. Interestingly, there is evidence that Cur and Res can activate not just apoptosis but also autophagic cell death [24]. Furthermore, Res was shown able to induce cancer cell death by upregulating sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) [25].
The tumor microenvironment is a complex environment containing various cellular components (e.g., stromal cells, immune cells, and vascular endothelial cells), multitudinous factors (e.g., cytokines), abundant extracellular matrix (ECM), and their various cross-talk networks. Cur and Res can have modulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment [26]. In particular, Cur and Res can inhibit cancer growth through the inhibition of pathways related to epidermal growth factor (EGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), pro-inflammatory cytokines, and pro-inflammatory enzymes [27]. Finally, the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells involve the destruction of the ECM and basement membrane by proteolytic enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), in particular MMP-9, which have been shown to be inhibited by Cur and Res in several experimental models [25,28].
Finally, both Cur and Res were shown to play a significant role in tumor treatment through targeting microRNA (miRNA) acting as tumor suppressors and oncogenes [29], and acting as modulators of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [30].
The chemical features of Cur consist of two symmetrical feruloyl moieties connected through a methylene group. Its overall structure includes a linear seven-carbon chain with a 1,6-heptadiene motif in E-configuration, a central 1,3-diketone component, and two external aryl moieties (Figure 1). However, computational studies have shown that the 1,3-diketone component of Cur is more stable in the 1,3-ketol-enol tautomeric form (as depicted in Figure 1) [31]. This latter feature, coupled with the unsaturated nature of the C7 chain with trans C=C, gives rise to a planar and linear structure for Cur with the methoxy groups pointed out in the opposite direction with respect to the 1,3-keto-enol group, according to prior crystal X-ray diffraction studies [32]. Moreover, the presence of the 1,3-ketol-enol group fosters the formation of stable metal–Cur complexes, which have been recently comprehensibly reviewed elsewhere [33]. As said before and recently reviewed by several authors [21,24,34,35], Cur has been shown to target all the main steps of cancer development, being capable of interfering with several biochemical pathways involved in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells as well as directly and indirectly binding different targets. In this view, essentially all the chemical parts of the structure of Cur are considered vital for the activity. The two feruloyl moieties play a critical role in binding to protein targets (H-bonding and π–π stacking interactions). Successful modifications include a variation of the phenyl substitution pattern, mostly halogens or other H-bond acceptors and, in a few cases, bioisosteric replacement of the phenyl group with equivalent (hetero)aryl rings. Furthermore, the two phenolic -OH groups may be exploited for the development of a wide variety of bioconjugates. The 1,3-keto-enol moiety is also very important for the biological activity of Cur, but it is also responsible for its instability in an alkaline medium (which already occurs at pH above 6.5). In order to overcome such instability problem, fruitful modification of this structural motif includes the development of mono- and di-carbonyl analogs (symmetrical and asymmetrical), heterocyclic analogs (to embed the 1,3-diketo-enol moiety), and the insertion of bulky substituents at the methylene group. The length of the C7 chain is normally kept unchanged, as attempts to shorten or extend it in most cases lead to less biologically active derivatives (Figure 1) [34,36].
In addition, Res, regarding its antitumor activity, is known to affect a variety of cancer stages, from initiation and promotion to progression, by affecting the diverse signal-transduction pathways that control cell growth and division, inflammation, apoptosis, metastasis, and angiogenesis [22,37,38,39,40,41]. In particular, the anticancer properties of Res seem related to its capability to modulate the cell redox status both by acting as an antioxidant and by promoting ROS production. The extraordinary antioxidant potential of Res relies on its unique structural motif that entails the presence of a double-bound C=C united to a p-phenol group and a resorcinol group; both aromatic groups are able to provide several resonance structures upon radicalic hydrogen abstraction of the -OH in the para and meta position, respectively (Figure 2). Therefore, modifications of this small molecule usually lead to compounds with reduced antioxidant properties, although some Res-like derivatives with improved pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters have been developed. The structural changes mostly include alkylation, halogenation, glycosylation, and further hydroxylation [42,43,44].

3. Hybrid Compounds Containing Curcumin and Resveratrol

The synthesis of Cur- and Res-based hybrid compounds represents an innovative approach for drug discovery in the field of anticancer chemotherapy. This strategy is based on the possibility to connect, via covalent chemical bonds, two or more bioactive scaffolds endowed with pharmacological activity [6,45,46,47] so that the fusion of different pharmacophores in a new multifunctional compound is aimed to obtain a better efficacy in comparison with the parent drugs in terms of improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and decreased toxicity [45] (Table 1 and Table 2).
For example, to overcome the negative physicochemical properties of Cur, some Cur-based hybrids have been projected starting from Cur monocarbonyl analogs by deleting the reactive β-diketone moiety, which is an unfavorable feature for the real bioavailability of this polyphenol (e.g., [58,59]). On the other hand, this technique can improve the interaction with specific targets critical for the regulation of a cellular process. For example, tubulin is the globular protein constituting microtubules, which play a key role in cell division. Cur-based hybrids developed by Sharma et al. [59] and Singh et al. [58] are more efficient tubulin polymerization inhibitors, targeting the Cur-binding site close to the vinblastine binding site. Yin et al. [49] developed Res–cinnamoyl derivates as new tubulin polymerization inhibitors able to target the colchicine binding site. Furthermore, the monocarbonyl ligustrazine–Cur hybrids synthesized by Ai et al. [49] are better inhibitors of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), a fundamental enzyme for the regulation of the cell redox balance often overexpressed in cancer cells. The Res–caffeic acid-based hybrids developed by Li et al. [51] can simultaneously target both acetylated and phosphorylated STAT3, a cytoplasmic protein that plays a fundamental role in oncogenic signaling pathways, while Res targets only acetylated STAT3.
A representative and extensive study on the design of hybrid molecules that can be categorized as codrugs was carried out by Wang et al. [63]. The authors synthesized 20 Cur–hybrids containing the flavonoid myricetin or coumarin, two phytochemicals endowed with proven anticancer properties [66,67], as potential anticancer agents targeting the enzyme TrxR, whose overactivity is associated with the development and progression of different types of aggressive cancers [68]. Biological assessments of anticancer activity showed that the myricetin-Cur hybrid compound 5,7-dimethoxy-3-(3-(2-((1E,4E)-3-oxo-5-(pyridin-2-yl)penta-1,4-dien-1-yl)phenoxy)propoxy)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (Figure 3) is able to induce gastric cancer cell (SGC-7901) apoptosis by the accumulation of ROS, repressing mitochondrial function and inhibiting TrxR activity. Moreover, apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation of gastric cells were reversed in the assays wherein cells underwent preincubation with N-acetylcysteine as a result of the decrease in ROS formation and protection of mitochondrial function, underlining the importance of the Trx system for anticancer therapy [63].
A similar approach, which entails the use of the monocarbonyl pharmacophoric framework for the construction of the hybrids, was previously undertaken by Bedi’s research group [58]. In this case, the authors successfully obtained coumarin–Cur hybrids by means of a triazole linker generated by a click chemistry reaction between an alkyne moiety introduced at the -OH phenol group of Cur and an azide group appended to the coumarin scaffold. These so-named C5-curcuminoid–coumarin hybrids showed significant antiproliferative activity in vitro against different cancerous cell lines, such as the THP-1, COLO-205, and HCT-116 cell lines, whereas the PC-3 cell line was resistant. The most active compounds were selected for further testing as tubulin polymerization inhibitors, and the mechanism was validated by docking studies. The structure of the most active compound and structure–activity relationship (SAR) insights are depicted in Figure 4.
The same research group previously designed and synthesized similar hybrids for which they used the indole derivative isatin as an active component to join to Cur and support the binding with tubulin. The hybrids were evaluated toward a wider panel of cancerous cell lines and were found to be active against the THP-1, COLO-205, HCT-116, and PC-3 cancerous cell lines [59]. In the context of the tubulin polymerization inhibitors as potential anticancer agents, a recent study was carried out by Yin et al. [49]. The design of these hybrids consists of the connection of Res with the pharmacophore of chalcone through a flexible acyl ester group [49]. Chalconoids are known to exert anticancer activity targeting tubulin polymerization [69]. The structure and activity of the most potent compound are presented in Figure 5.
Yan et al. reported an example of the design of chimeric hybrids, wherein they combined in the same chemical entity the pharmacophores of Res and ebselen [48], a synthetic organoselenium derivative (which essentially acts by mimicking glutathione peroxidase) endowed with a broad range of biological activities that can be exploited in anticancer therapy [70]. The resulting benzoselenazole–stilbene hybrids exhibited remarkable antiproliferative activities against four human cancer cell lines, namely Bel-7402, A549, HeLa, and MCF-7. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that these hybrids possess good TrxR inhibitory activity (Figure 6). Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis studies were also performed on Bel-7402 cells, indicating a significant increase in intracellular ROS [48].
As the strategy to affect the Trx system turns out to be effective for a selective target-based anticancer drug design, another research group aimed to hybrid molecules aimed at this target. Ai et al. obtained chimeric hybrids by merging the pharmacophore of Cur with ligustrazine (tetramethylpyrazine; Figure 7) [57], the bioactive ingredient of a Chinese herb extract used for the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [71]. These hybrids significantly inhibited the proliferation of drug-sensitive (A549, SPC-A-1, LTEP-G-2) and drug-resistant (A549/DDP) lung cancer cells with negligible effects on non-tumor lung epithelial-like cells (Human Bronchial Epithelial cells, HBE) (Figure 7). Furthermore, they inhibited the Trx system, promoted intracellular ROS accumulation (as expected because of the presence of the ROS promoting agent ligustrazine), and induced apoptosis (assessed for the most potent derivative). Additional in vitro studies showed also that these hybrids inhibit different tumor-related pathways, and in vivo studies (A549/DDP xenografts) confirmed the antitumor efficacy [57].
Res-based chimeric hybrids were also obtained by combining the pharmacophore Res and the abovementioned coumarin. In this regard, Belluti et al. synthesized stilbene–coumarin derivatives with excellent antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity against a panel of tumor cell lines, namely H460, A431, and JR8 [56]. SAR analysis of this set of compounds indicated that the 7-methoxycoumarin nucleus and the 3,5-disubstitution pattern of the trans-vinylbenzene moiety of Res presented the most promising structural features to achieve excellent antitumor and proapoptotic activity (Figure 8).
Aldawsari et al. aimed to develop hybrid molecules by merging the pharmacophores Res and acetylsalicylic acid [50]. The intended targets in this case were DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), key enzymes involved in carcinogenesis whose expression is decreased by Res [72]. These Res–salicylate hybrids showed considerable cytotoxicity against three human cancer cell lines (HT-29, HepG2, and SK-BR-3; Figure 9) compared with Res, and docking studies indicated selective inhibition of the isoforms DNMT3A and DNMT3B.
On this basis, and in the attempt to improve the bioavailability and reduce the catabolism of this type of hybrid, Salla et al. more recently synthesized Res–aspirin hybrid compounds, which showed antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory activities both in vitro (HCT-116 cells) and in vivo (reduction of the intestinal tumor burden in a xenograft murine model with HCT-116 cells). Additionally, the authors provided details on how these hybrids inhibit the activation of several tumor signaling factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), sirtuin, and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [55].
Another tumor target of growing interest is STAT3 [73]. Simultaneously disrupting the acetylation and phosphorylation of this cytoplasmic protein was hypothesized to be particularly effective in treating cancers [74]. Li et al. supported this hypothesis for the first time by obtaining two series of Res–caffeic acid hybrids, aiming to regulate both the acetylation (Res component) and phosphorylation (caffeic acid component) of STAT3. The two bioactive molecules were joined by means of a cleavable amide or ester moiety (an example of a fused drug) with the aim of enhancing the bioavailability of the single components. The most potent compound, (E)-N-(4-(3,5-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylamide (Figure 10), exhibited remarkable antitumor activity against two cancer cell lines (HT29 and MDA-MB-231) and docking studies confirmed the binding with the intended target. Furthermore, this compound was also effective in vivo in a mouse xenograft model bearing breast cancer 4T1 cells [51].
Banuppriya et al. proposed Cur–sulfonamide fused hybrids as inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR [60], another attractive target for the development of novel anticancer agents [75]. These Cur-based hybrids were obtained by introducing the sulfanilamide unit in the active methylene group of Cur and exhibited antiproliferative activity against two cancer cell lines (AGS and A549) with remarkable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects (Figure 11). The molecular docking performed against various EGFR isoforms validated the interaction with the target [60].
The reactivity of the methylene group between the two carbonyls of Cur was also exploited by Liu et al. to connect thalidomide and Cur in a hybrid compound, which showed in vitro antiproliferative activity against three multiple myeloma cell lines (MM1S, RPMI8226, and U266) and inhibitory effects on NF-κB activation in A549 cells [65] (Figure 12). Further studies also demonstrated that this compound induced apoptosis in U266 cells via ROS production and G1/S cell cycle arrest. The authors also synthesized other Cur–thalidomide hybrids, but the abovementioned fused hybrid was the most effective anticancer agent.
The reactivity of the β-diketone moiety of Cur was also exploited by Elmegeed’s research group to achieve a hetero-steroid–Cur hybrid as an anti-breast cancer agent [61]. Specifically, the steroid scaffold was first functionalized at C17 with a pyrimidine nucleus bearing a hydrazine moiety, which in turn was condensed with the dicarbonyl fragment of Cur (Figure 13). The resulting hybrid showed in vitro cytotoxic effects toward MCF-7 cells and downregulated the gene expression levels of CCND1, Survivin, BCL-2, CDC2, P21, and P53 [61].
Chen et al. designed Cur-based chimeric hybrids containing the chromone scaffold, a common pharmacophore for natural polyphenols endowed with anticancer properties, such as the isoflavone genistein and the flavonol quercetin [62]. The work was inspired by the synergistic antiproliferative effects of Cur and isoflavones in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells [76,77]. The chromone unit was connected with the Cur-like framework through an aldol condensation reaction, leading to monocarbonyl hybrids wherein the (1E,4E)-1,4-penta-dien-3-one moiety took the place of the metabolically unstable diketone linker of Cur, and the 1-alkyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl group was used as the bioisostere of the terminal aryl group in Cur (Figure 14). For these chimeric hybrids, antiproliferative activity was assessed against three prostate cancer cell lines (PC-3, DU-145, and LNCaP) with remarkable IC50 values in the low micromolar range [62].
Botta et al. synthesized a library of monomeric and dimeric fused hybrids by coupling the semisynthetic derivatives of artemisinin, i.e., artesunate and dihydroartemisinin, with various phytochemicals, i.e., Cur, eugenol, perillyl alcohol, tyrosol, and α- and δ-tocopherol [64]. Artemisinin, as well as its semisynthetic derivatives with improved pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles compared with the parent compound, is a sesquiterpene lactone from Artemisia annua endowed with remarkable activity against different cancer cell lines exerted by means of the iron-mediated cleavage of its reactive 1,2,4-trioxane ring [78]. Among the hybrids of this series, the dimer artesunate-Cur-artesunate obtained by simple ester linkage between the -OH phenol group of Cur and the -COOH group of artesunate emerged as the most interesting derivative in terms of biological outcomes (Figure 15). Indeed, it exhibited notable antiproliferative (low-micromolar range) activity against HeLa cells and three complementary metastatic melanoma cancer cell lines (SK-MEL3, SK-MEL24, and RPMI-7951) without toxicity against normal cells (human primary fibroblast cell line C3PV). Moreover, assays with the iron-chelating agent deferoxamine surprisingly indicated that this dimeric hybrid does not exert anticancer activity by means of the free radical formation variance exhibited by the other hybrids of this series of derivatives [64].
Ning et al. developed dual targeting conjugates by joining Res and oxabicycloheptene sulfonate (OBHS), a structural motif of estrogen receptor (ER), with the aim of suppressing estrogenic and anti-inflammatory activities in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) [52]. The rationale of this design was inspired by evidence that ER/NF-κB interactions are implicated in the progression of breast cancer [79,80]. The authors synthesized two series of OBSH–Res hybrids via the Diels–Alder reaction of furan derivatives and various dienophiles. The most potent compound was found among the type II series and showed remarkable stereospecific binding to ER, excellent NO inhibition in macrophage RAW 264.7 cells, and cytotoxicity in the low micromolar range against MCF-7 cells (Figure 16). In vivo experiments, performed in xenograft models of nude mice injected with MCF-7 cells, showed that this hybrid is more potent than reference tamoxifen [52].
As both Cur and Res possess a plethora of tumor targets, a logical strategy of drug design has been to combine their pharmacophores in one motif in order to modulate the poor ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) profile of each component and achieve more potent hybrid derivatives. In this context, de Freitas Silva et al. [53] carried out a work in which they joined the two pharmacophores by means of a hydrazone moiety. These Cur–Res hybrids inhibited mitosis progression in estrogen-positive MCF-7 cells inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis without significant toxicity toward normal cells (human normal control fibroblast, CCD-1059Sk) (Figure 17). The anticancer activity of this type of hybrid was also validated in vivo, in which the hydrazone moiety played a role in increasing the coefficient of solubility and absorption of these derivatives [53].
The same type of Cur–Res hybrids without the hydrazone junction were obtained more recently by Hernández et al. in a study wherein they assembled the two pharmacophores of the bioactive molecules by means of cross-coupling reactions between various styrenes and a Br-substituted chalcone (obtained via Claisen–Schmidt condensation) under palladium catalysis (Figure 18). This set of derivatives was evaluated against colorectal cancer cells (SW480 and its metastatic derivative SW620), for which they exhibited IC50 values in the micromolar range [54].

4. Gold-Based Hybrid Nanosystems

The design of nanomaterials based on metals may be a successful approach to overcome the poor stability and solubility of Cur and Res.
First, a traditional approach is represented by the design of metal–polyphenol complexes. This is easily evident for Cur, which bears an α,β-unsaturated β-diketo moiety with keto–enol isomerization in its chemical structure and thus can readily form a complex with many transition and nontransition metal ions, rare earth ions, and metal oxides, which may help increase its solubility and stability [33]. Metals usually bind to the keto–enol group of Cur by chelation, generally in the ratio 1:1 or 1:2 metal/Cur (although the binding of three Cur molecules has also been reported). One must mention that Cur–metal complexes may affect the biological properties of Cur but may also change those of metals (particularly their toxicity). Metal–Cur complexes are known to have multiple capabilities and have been investigated in cancer applications (copper, zinc, ruthenium, palladium, gallium, nickel, platinum, iron oxide, etc.) [81]. Because of the properties of metals, some of these complexes may be employed not only in cancer treatment but also in diagnosis, and they can improve Cur’s capability to act as a photosensitizer under visible light [82].
However, given the vastness of the topic relating to innovative hybrid materials based on metals and Cur/Res, we chose to limit the discussion to a specific topic that brings together the possibility of pursuing different goals: (1) the design of new hybrid nanosystems for delivery of one or more drugs, which are useful for improving their bioavailability but also actively target a specific tumor cell/tissue and/or respond to the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment; (2) the possibility of exploiting the same system to attack tumor cells not only through chemotherapy but also with other therapeutic strategies, such as photodynamic therapy (PDT); and (3) the preparation of the pharmaceutical system by environmentally friendly (green) routes. As described below in more detail, all these properties can be found in hybrid nanosystems based on gold.
Metallic nanoparticles have been of significant interest in the past two decades as a result of their possible use in the pharmacological treatment of several diseases. Particular attention was devoted to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) which, because of their unique optical, physical, and surface properties, together with their safety and biocompatibility, are emerging tools for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, particularly for drug delivery (as drug delivery systems, DDSs), PDT, and photothermal therapy (PTT), as well as for biological optical imaging, and are thus promising candidates for the diagnosis and treatment of different types of cancer [83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90].
AuNPs typically enter cells via endocytosis, and their cellular uptake can be affected by modifying their size, shape, and surface chemistry. Concerning the employment of DDSs, AuNPs can increase the cellular uptake of some drugs and, especially in the case of nanomaterial, are functionalized to target specific cells or tissues (Table 3 and Table 4).
For example, the Cur and lipoic acid (LA) loaded gold–iron oxide nanocomposite developed by Ghorbani et al. [102] has been functionalized with GSH to increase cellular uptake of the system in GSH receptor-positive astrocyte cells, thus ameliorating its ability to bypass the blood–brain barrier. Mahalunkar et al. [105] and Mathew et al. [103] employed folic acid (FA) in Cur-loaded systems projected to target cancer cells that overexpress membrane-associated FA receptors in comparison with normal tissues. Conjugation with the MUC-1 (mucin-1) aptamer has allowed the Cur-loaded system described by Alibolandi et al. [101] to target colorectal adenocarcinoma cells since MUC-1 is overexpressed on several tumor cells and can modulate their invasive and metastatic potential.
In addition, the acidic tumor microenvironment is an important target for the delivery of drugs to a wide variety of malignant tumors. The pH value is more acidic in tumoral tissue (approximately 6.5–6.8) than in normal tissue, and an even lower pH (approximately 5) can be found in tumor cells. The natural polysaccharide chitosan (CTS) has been used by Wang et al. [98] and Rao et al. [107] for the development of AuNP-based DDSs to provide a pH-responsive Cur or Res drug release since its amino groups can be protonated under acidic conditions.
Generally, tumor cells are more thermally sensitive than normal cells because of poor blood supply and irregular vasculature, so moderate hyperthermia can significantly inhibit their growth without damaging healthy cells. As mentioned before, AuNPs are very effective in PTT and PDT. In fact, their tunable surface plasmon resonance (SPR) property allows AuNPs to absorb near-infrared (NIR) light and convert light into heat, further inducing local hyperthermia and cell destruction. It is evident that the employment of AuNPs has several advantages since the treatment can be efficiently targeted to specific tissues and tumors in deep tissues and may be combined with drug therapy using AuNPs as DDSs. Several NIR-responsive AuNP-based nanosystems were developed to deliver Cur or Res to cancer cells for the treatment of malignant melanoma [97,98,108,109,110,111,112,113] and breast and cervical cancer [105,107] (Table 3 and Table 4).
Another alternative for cancer therapy is represented by ultrasound therapy (UST), in which ROS generated by ultrasonic activation of a sonosensitizer are employed to kill cancer cells. Nanomaterials such as AuNPs can work as novel sonosensitizers upon exposure to ultrasound waves. The NIR responsive and sonosensitive system developed by Kayani et al. [110] takes advantage of the sonosensitizer properties of AuNPs as well as of Cur.
Beyond this, another important factor to consider is that several synthetic approaches have recently been carried out to obtain AuNPs by environmentally friendly (green) routes and economical large-scale methods allowing reduced use of hazardous chemicals and improved material/energy efficiency [19,114,115,116,117]. These eco-friendly synthetic approaches essentially entail the use of phytochemicals (plant extracts or plant-derived compounds) to reduce auric compounds into elemental gold atoms, which bind together to form nanoparticles. The byproducts of the redox reaction or the natural reducing agent itself eventually stabilize the newly formed AuNPs by adsorption on their surfaces [118] (Figure 19).
An application example of a green and cost-effective synthesis of AuNPs functionalized with a natural anticancer agent was reported by Sindhu et al. [119]. To achieve the hybrid system, the authors used Cur both as a reducing agent and a capping agent in a one-step synthesis. The standard procedure for the synthesis AuNPs (Turkevich method) [120] entails the employment of sodium citrate (alone or with the addition of another reducing agent) [121] to afford the reduction Au3+ to Au0 starting from chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) and to stabilize the newly formed AuNPs. Additionally, this method often entails the use of surfactants and, in the case of the preparation of Cur-containing AuNPs (also indicated as Cur@AuNPs), the use of solubilizing agents to favor the incorporation of the bioactive component. However, it is known that citrate-coated AuNPs exert some degree of toxicity attributable to citrate [122,123] and the use of surfactants such as quaternary ammonium salts (e.g., cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)) for AuNP synthesis may result in toxic responses by cellular systems [124]. The authors solubilized Cur at an alkaline pH (9.2–9.6) and exploited the reducing properties of the three -OH groups (transformed in two phenolate groups and one enolate group by adding K2CO3; Cur3−) of Cur to achieve in sequence the reduction of HAuCl4, the nucleation of the Au0 atoms, the growth and cleavage of the clusters, and the maturation of the stabilized form aided by ionic interaction Cur3−/Au3+ at the surface of the resulting AuNPs. The pH range of 9.2–9.6 played a key role in the achievement of the final Cur@AuNPs hybrid, as at higher pH values, Cur might degrade to condensed products, whereas at lower pH values, it is not efficiently solubilized. This Cur-conjugated AuNPs hybrid system showed good biocompatibility in vitro toward human blood cells (RBCs and PBMN cells) and interesting prospects for application in anticancer therapy [119].
Another noteworthy approach that omits the use of both chemical reducing agents and surfactants to obtain a Cur-conjugated hybrid nanosystem was carried out by Govindaraju et al. [99]. This research group used bovine serum albumin (BSA) and Cur as reducing and stabilizing agents. The synthetic procedure is similar to the one described above; the alkaline medium to solubilize Cur and improve its reducing power was adjusted by adding NaOH, and the presence of BSA promoted the formation of quantum-sized Au nanoclusters during the nucleation and growth process [125]. Since clusters consist of a small number of atoms compared with NPs and exhibit a strong fluorescence under irradiation, this Au-based hybrid nanosystem (particle size of 1–3 nm) is suitable for both bioimaging applications and anticancer therapy. As a matter of fact, the obtained results evidenced that these Cur–Au nanoclusters exhibited a strong red fluorescence and high toxicity in HeLa cancer cells and negligible toxicity toward COS-7 normal kidney cells [99].
Similarly to Cur, other (poly)phenolic phytochemicals can be employed as reducing and capping agents for the green synthesis of AuNPs, leading to hybrid nanoformulations with excellent bioavailability, anticancer activity, and cellular uptake properties [126]. For instance, Park et al. [93] used Res to obtain Res-conjugated AuNPs with a remarkable ability to suppress migration and invasion in breast cancer (MCF-7cells treated with the tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) compared with treatment with Res alone. Furthermore, these Res@AuNPs turned out to be effective in downregulating the enzymatic activity and/or expression of a panel of signaling targets involved in tumor progression and metastasis, such as MMP-9, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), NF-κB, AP-1 (activator protein-1), PI3K/Akt (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B), and ERK, as well as in upregulating heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression [93].
Wang et al. [98] proposed a surfactant-free synthesis of Res-conjugated hollow AuNPs for anticancer theranostic applications by exploiting the unique plasmonic properties of these Au-based nanocomposites and the synergistic effects of AuNPs and Res in this type of application [127]. The authors prepared these multifunctional nanocomposites through the galvanic replacement reaction between HAuCl4 and preformed sacrificial citrate-stabilized Ag seeds in the presence of Res as a reducing and coating agent. The obtained Res@Au hollow NPs showed high photothermal performance in NIR (specifically after 808 nm laser irradiation), good stability, biocompatibility, and a notable cytotoxicity profile in malignant melanoma cancer cells (A375) [98]. Comparable outcomes in terms of photothermal responsivity were obtained by Rahimi-Moghaddam et al. [112], who employed the Cur@AuNPs hybrid system with an average hydrodynamic particle size of 25.8 nm as a photo–thermo conversion agent using diode lasers emitting at 808 nm and 650 nm as light sources. Their hybrid system proved to be much more efficacious in vitro against 4T1 breast cancer cells after laser irradiation at 808 nm than after irradiation at 650 nm [112]. Previously, the same research group used a refined version of this hybrid system for the PTT of melanoma tumors [111]. Specifically, they employed PEG as a coating agent for the Cur@AuNPs because of its ability to improve biocompatibility, stability, blood retention time, and tumor tissue accumulation of the delivery system, along with its ability to positively affect the surface plasmon resonance properties of the AuNPs (e.g., shift to NIR wavelengths, particularly suitable in PTT) [128,129]. Upon laser irradiation at 808 nm, PEG–Cur@AuNPs showed in vitro efficacy against mouse malignant melanoma cell lines C540 (B16/F10) and in vivo efficacy against implanted melanoma tumors in C57/inbred mice [111]. More recently, Kayani et al. [110] optimized their own PEG–Cur@AuNPs hybrid system for both the PTT and sonodynamic treatment (SDT) of melanoma cancer, whose in vitro and in vivo efficacy was assessed using the same melanoma cell lines and animal models. New PEG–Cur@AuNPs caused localized hyperthermia and apoptosis of tumor cells upon PTT (laser irradiation 808 nm) and ROS production upon SDT (ultrasound exposure at 1.0 MHz) with tangible synergistic effects [110].
In order to increase the corona of Res on AuNPs (and thus the therapeutic efficacy of the Res@AuNPs hybrid system), Thipe et al. carried out a green nanotechnology synthetic approach in which they used gum arabic as an encapsulating agent to increase the conjugation of Res onto the surface of AuNPs and the overall stability of the resulting hybrid system [94]. Gum arabic, being a complex polysaccharide with a highly branched structure, provided an ideal support matrix for the loading and delivery of Res. This enriched hybrid system was obtained by the simple addition of NaAuCl4 (in place of the classic HAuCl4) to an aqueous solution of Res (the reducing and capping agent) and gum arabic under vigorous stirring, and provided superior in vitro anti-tumor activity against human breast (MDAMB-231), pancreatic (PANC-1), and prostate (PC-3) cancer cells with respect to the parent Res@AuNPs system [94]. The therapeutic potential of the Res@AuNPs system can be considerably increased by adding the non-ionic (and relatively non-toxic) surfactant Tween-20 as a loading enhancer, as was recently demonstrated by Fadel et al. [91]. Tween-20 binds to the hydrophilic surface of the AuNPs, then undergoes self-assembly in a bilayer coating structure that functions as a reservoir for Res. The cytotoxicity of these Res-loaded Au-based hybrid nanosystems toward HepG2 cell lines turned out to be ~nine times more potent compared with free Res at the same concentration [91]. The large anti-hepatoma effects of the Res@AuNPs compared to Res alone were further confirmed by Zhang et al., who enabled the transfer of these exceptional outcomes in vivo by means of xenograft models of nude mice injected with HepG2 cells [92]. These xenografts studies evidenced that Res@AuNPs inhibit tumor growth, promote apoptosis, and decrease the expression of VEGF in tumor tissue without substantially affecting (as determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining) vital organs such as the liver, heart, spleen, and kidney. The in vitro antiproliferative activity of Res@AuNPs (synthesized without the use of surfactants) was ~6.5 times higher compared with Res (IC50 = 3.84 µg/mL vs. IC50 = 24.74 µg/mL in HepG2 cells), with negligible toxicity toward healthy cells (L02). Additionally, the authors demonstrated that Res@AuNPs upregulate the expression of the proapoptotic regulators caspase-8 and Bax and downregulate the expression of procaspase-3, procaspase-9, and the PI3K/Akt survival signaling pathways both in HepG2 cells and a xenograft model [92].
A topical trend of nanomedicine is that of conjugating AuNPs with the antitumor drug doxorubicin (Dox) to enhance its bioavailability and limit its side effects. Dox self-assembles in an aqueous medium or PBS on the surface of AuNPs (colloidal solution) by means of supramolecular interactions [130]. On the other hand, Res is known to exert synergistic anticancer activity with Dox, reduce its toxicity, and reverse its multidrug resistance in different cancerous cell lines [131,132,133]. In this regard, Tomoaia et al. prepared nanocomplexes of Dox and Res@AuNPs, which were highly effective in vitro against two human cervical cancer cell lines, namely HeLa (HPV-18 positive) and CaSki (HPV-16) cells. The authors also proved that the Dox effects on cell viability were mediated by both Dox@AuNPs and Dox-Res@AuNPs through an apoptotic mechanism [96]. Similar results were obtained earlier by Mohanty et al. in research (which was likely inspired by the Tomoaia group’s work) in which they obtained Res@AuNPs with high stability in various aqueous media mimicking physiological conditions and biocompatibility (assessed in fibroblast cells by MTT assay). These Res@AuNPs were eventually loaded with Dox by the simple addition of the latter to the hybrid system and sonication, and the resulting nanocomplexes Dox-Res@AuNPs were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against a human glioma carcinoma cell line (LN 229), showing clear efficacy [95].
The drug delivery and therapeutic potential of AuNPs can be greatly enhanced by joining to these platforms another excellent drug delivery vehicle, liposomes (Lips) [134,135,136], which can be triggered by various chemical/physical stimuli [137,138]. The resulting hybrid systems are multifunctional, as both AuNPs and Lips can be widely decorated on their surface to achieve active/passive targeting delivery systems and/or stimuli-responsive systems. An explanatory example of this is the multifunctional platform developed by Wang et al. [97]. Starting from Res-loaded Lips, the authors first coated these amphipathic and sphere-shaped vesicles using CTS, a positively charged and pH-responsive polysaccharide that can adsorb on the negatively charged surface of Lips by electrostatic interactions and reverse their surface charge [139]. CTS@Res–Lips were then added to Au seeds (negatively charged) and incubated to present AuNPs on the surface of Lips (CTS@Res-Lips@AuNPs). The AuNPs underwent nanoshell formation (AuNSs) by means of a method known as the seed-growth method, which entails the use of AuCl3 (the growth component) and ascorbic acid (the reducing agent). The final hybrid system (CTS@Res–Lips@AuNSs) was thermo-pH dual responsive (on-demand drug release) and suitable for chemotherapy and PTT (synergistic effect) assessed in Hela cells [97].
Singh et al. reported the synthesis of Cur–Lips@AuNPs as in situ adjuvant for PTT of skin cancer assessed in B16/F10 melanoma cell lines [109]. The authors employed Lips made up of hydrogenated soya phosphatidyl choline (HSPC) (which shows superior targeting properties compared with other classic phospholipids) [140] to load the bioactive molecule. Then, Cur–Lips were coated with AuNPs by the simple and sequential addition of HAuCl4 and ascorbic acid. The latter compound, a weak reducing agent, determines the change of the surface charge of Lips because of the partial conversion of Au3+ to Au1+, leading to enhanced stability and intracellular uptake of the final hybrid system. Cur–Lips@AuNPs showed photothermal efficacy and triggered the release of Cur in NIR (780 nm) [109]. The same research group elaborated this system and implemented it in in vivo PTT studies performed in a murine model (C57BL/6 female mice) of induced melanoma (B16 cells), obtaining a depot version of the drug delivery platform with sustained and prolonged (>10 days) release of Cur in situ upon laser irradiation. This is because of the occurrence of an in situ crystalline state transition of Cur, from nano (within Lips) to micro (release of Cur from Lips and in situ coalescence of the nanocrystals), upon photothermal triggering. The in vitro studies confirmed also the requirement of the adjuvant (i.e., Cur) for an efficient therapeutic coverage (>1.5-fold) [108] (Figure 20).
Since cancerous cells overexpress specific receptors on their surfaces [141], another widely exploited strategy of nanomedicine to further functionalize the extraordinary Au-based hybrid delivery platforms discussed so far with appropriate ligands to achieve systems for targeted therapy and/or diagnostics. FA, which has two free -COOH groups and is a tumor-targeting ligand, is particularly suited for this type of functionalization [142]. Mathew et al. combined the targeting properties of FA and the excellent optical and delivery properties of Au quantum clusters (AuQCs) in a Cur-containing multifunctional hybrid system for anticancer therapy and bioimaging [103]. First, Au clusters of an average size of ~2 nm were coated with gliadin, a class of Pro- and Gln-rich proteins present in the wheat gluten with a high capability of binding hydrophobic molecules also due to the high content of nonpolar amino acids in its primary structure [143]. Then, AuQCs@gliadin was loaded with Cur, and the resulting hybrid AuQCs@gliadin@Cur was functionalized with FA and conjugated with additional Cur by coupling reaction (EDC/NHS). The final hybrid system AuQCs@gliadin–FA–Cur showed an encapsulation efficiency of Cur of 98%, pH-stability (up to pH = 8.5), and pH-sensitivity (sustained and prolonged release of Cur up to 60 h). Moreover, it was effective in vitro against breast cancer cells (MDA-MB239) with the lowest toxicity against normal L929 cells (as they also express FA receptors). Cellular uptake studies also showed high efficacy toward cancerous cell lines (MDA-MB239 and C6 glioma cells) with respect to normal L929-normal cells [103].
Mahalunkar et al. obtained a comparable tumor-targeting and pH-responsive (80% drug release at a pH of 5.3) system by using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as a coating agent for AuNPs [105]. PVP forms a thin layer around the AuNPs that can be activated to produce free -NH2 groups on the surface. Activated AuNPs@PVP undergo conjugation in sequence with Cur and FA (in turn separately activated at the -COOH groups with EDC/NHS) by standard coupling chemistry. The resulting hybrid system AuNPs@PVP–Cur–FA showed remarkable antiproliferative activity in vitro against different types of breast cancer cell lines, namely human breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB231 and MCF-7 cells and mouse mammary carcinoma 4T1 cells, without harming normal cell lines (L929 and MCF 10A). The antiproliferative activity was more pronounced toward estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR)-negative cells (MDA-MB231 and 4T1) than toward ER/PR-positive cells (MCF-7). The anticancer efficacy of this hybrid system was also assessed in vivo by means of a breast cancer orthotopic mouse model (tumors induced by 4T1 cells in Balb/c female mice) [105].
Inorganic–organic hybrid materials that can self-assemble into defined multifunctional templates are also topical in the development of drug delivery nanosystems [144]. In regard to AuNPs, a strategy often undertaken is to combine them with proteins because of the fine characteristics of the latter. Dai et al. proposed hybrid templates composed of protein diblock copolymers, namely EC and CE (E: Elastin-like peptide; C: Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein), and AuNPs. The two diblock copolymers EC and CE were each genetically engineered with a His6-tag at an N-terminus to allow the in situ synthesis of these hybrid biomaterials via AuNPs template with the aid of the reducing agent NaBH4. The hybrid nanocomposites were eventually loaded with Cur to afford systems with increased drug loading capacity (> sevenfold), slower drug release profile (~50%), and enhanced cellular uptake of Cur (>twofold) compared with protein polymers alone, as assessed in MCF-7 cells [104]. Alibolandi et al. developed multifunctional inorganic–organic hybrid platforms for theranostic applications in anticancer therapy by encapsulating AuNPs and Cur in poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers [101], spherical and highly branched macromolecules with an extraordinary capacity of loading hydrophobic molecules and stabilized metal NPs. PAMAM first underwent PEGylation (EDC/NHS coupling chemistry) to further enhance the drug loading capacity of organic polymer; the PEG–PAMAM conjugate was then added to HAuCl4 and NaBH4 (one-pot reduction chemistry as described above), and the resulting hybrid PEG–PAMAM–AuNPs were eventually loaded with Cur. Additionally, to impart tumor-targeting properties to the hybrid platforms, the authors conjugated MUC-1 DNA aptamer to them via a thiolate–maleimide (aptamer–PEG) reaction. The in vitro and in vivo biological assessments proved that these Cur-containing multifunctional hybrid systems accumulate in two colon adenocarcinoma cell lines (human HT29 and mouse C26 cells) and may serve as probes for CT imaging and versatile vehicles for anticancer therapy (C26 tumor-bearing mice) [101].
Inorganic materials may also serve on their own as structural templates for substantial upload of AuNPs and bioactive molecules to afford nanocomposites that combine different moieties, producing hybrid systems for the anticancer therapy with superior features and enhanced performance. In this regard, graphene (G) is one of the most renowned materials because of its high planar surface area (suitable for a high rate of functionalization and drug loading), hydrophobicity, and safe profile of G-cell interaction and cellular uptake (particularly required in the design of passive targeting drug delivery platforms) [145,146]. However, the use of G as a raw material presents some limitations, e.g., excessive hydrophobicity and self-aggregation, which can be overcome by the functionalization of G into graphene oxide (GO), which in turn may be further and more easily functionalized and/or hybridized [147,148]. Al-Ani et al. developed a GO-based hybrid nanocomposite containing AuNPs and Cur by a green one-pot synthetic method [100]. The -COOH groups of GO ensured the initial ionic interactions with Au3+ (from HAuCl4) on the surface of the material; the subsequent addition of alkaline Cur provided the concurrent reduction of the auric salt (Au3+ to Au1+ and then AuNPs) and GO (GO to rGO) as well as the stabilization of the newly formed hybrid system. The reduction of GO to rGO is an important step to avoid uncontrolled oxidative stress and cellular damaging effects by GO [146,149]. The rGO@AuNPs@Cur hybrid nanocomposites showed high antioxidant and anticancer efficacy in vitro against two human colon cancer cell lines (HT-29 and SW-948), coupled with a high biocompatibility profile assessed in normal human colon (CCD-841) and liver (WRL-68) cells [100]. A similar GO-based hybrid nanocomposite, obtained in a two-step synthesis with the use of a CTS to achieve first the GO-Au nanocomposite using a surfactant (Tween-80) to later enhance the loading of Cur, was obtained by Ramazani et al. [150]. The authors provided a hybrid nanocomposite with notable cancer-specific toxicity evaluated in vitro against breast cancer cells (MCF-7), with no detectable toxicity toward normal healthy cells, namely HEK293 and RBC (hemolysis assay), or brine shrimp (Artemia salina nauplii) larva [150]. Another outstanding GO-based hybrid nanocomposite with remarkable anticancer activity in vitro against breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and carcinoma lung cells (A549) was developed by Malekmohammadi et. al. [106]. This smart hybrid system consists of a substrate of rGO nanosheets which underwent functionalization via an oil-in-water stratification method with dendritic mesoporous silica (dMS) nanosheets using a surfactant (cetylpyridinium bromide (CPB)), a silica source (tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS)), and a catalyst (triethylamine (TEA)), to produce the sandwich-like hybrid platforms rGO@dMS. The latter were in turn functionalized by 3-(trimethoxysilylpropyl) diethylenetriamine (Si-DETA) at reflux in order to achieve free -NH2 groups on the surface (rGO@dAMS), which allowed conjugation with the active targeting agent FA by simple coupling chemistry (DCC/NHS). The intermediate nanocomposites rGO@dAMS-FA were eventually loaded with Cur and doped with AuNPs, which were separately prepared by a method known as pulsed-laser ablation of an Au plate in water [151]. The final nanocomposite rGO@dAMS–FA@AuNPs–Cur showed a sustained release of Cur at a low pH under NIR laser irradiation and enhanced tumor-specific cellular uptake, thereby acting as an extraordinary stimuli-responsive and targeting platform [106].
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) NPs also represent a valid inorganic substrate to build up DDSs for theranostic applications in anticancer therapy. When combined with AuNPs, the resulting nanocomposites usually possess more promising properties in terms of biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy compared with the pristine nanosystems [152]. A representative study in this respect was carried out by Ghorbani et al. [102]. The authors developed a multifunctional hybrid platform based on Fe3O4@Au NPs as a targeted and stimuli-responsive DDS for brain cancer theranostics using GSH as a targeting agent and Cur as a bioactive component. Fe3O4 NPs were obtained by a standard method and functionalized at their surface with (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES) to present free -NH2 groups (Fe3O4-NH2). AuNPs were obtained by classic procedures (citrate method plus NaBH4) as well. Then, Fe3O4-NH2 NPs and AuNPs were combined to obtain the nanocomposite, with Fe3O4 as the central core and the citrate-stabilized AuNPs as the coating layer. Then, the hybrid Fe3O4@Au NPs underwent simultaneous conjugation with GSH and Cur through ligand exchange of the thiol groups with citrate of AuNPs. To achieve this, Cur was first conjugated with LA, another bioactive component endowed with antioxidant and neuroprotective properties [153], bearing a disulfide functional group. The efficacy of the Fe3O4@AuNPs–GSH–LA–Cur nanocomposites was evaluated against cancerous and normal astrocytes (U87MG) showing an approximately twofold increased cellular uptake in GSH receptor-positive astrocytes, an approximately ninefold lower IC50 values compared with Cur treatment, high drug loading capacity (~70%) and release, and applicability as a negative magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent [102].
Rao et al. proposed halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) as a delivery platform for the development of Au-based hybrid systems containing Cur for the treatment of breast cancer [107]. HNTs are naturally occurring and biocompatible aluminosilicates with a hollow tubular structure that ensures a high surface of functionalization and loading capacity [154]. The hybrid systems were prepared using a biofriendly method that avoided the employment of reducing agents. HNTS were simply dispersed in water and supplemented with Cur and HAuCl4 to promote the in situ formation of AuNPs (hexagonal and rod-shaped structures) loaded with Cur both in the lumen and the surface cage of HNTs. The hybrid systems were eventually coated with bio-adhesive CTS as a polysaccharide. The HNTs@AuNPs@Cur/CTS hybrids showed notable anticancer activity in vitro against MCF-7 cells (IC50 = 14.1 μM), much higher than that of Cur (IC50 = 47.8 μM). Moreover, they were stimuli-responsive under an acidic environment (with greater Cur release at pH = 5.5) and NIR irradiation, making them suitable for both targeted delivery of drugs and NIR-imaging [107].
A unique, multifunctional, water-dispersible smart hybrid nanosystem was developed by Wu et al. [113]. It consists of Ag/Au bimetallic NPs with a core-shell structure in which the NPs were coated with a gel layer polystyrene (PS; inner shell) to enhance the loading capacity of hydrophobic drugs as Cur and subsequently coated with a gel layer of hydrophilic nonlinear PEG (outer shell) to trigger the release of the pre-loaded Cur after internal (temperature) or external (NIR) stimuli and enhance stability in aqueous media and biocompatibility. The synthetic strategy to achieve these systems first entails obtaining citrate-stabilized AgNPs by a standard reduction method (NaBH4); then, the sequential coating of AgNPs with PS (via radical polymerization of styrene, divinylbenzene, and radical initiator AAPH), and PEG (via cross-linking chemistry of the PEG-precursor MEO2MA-co-MEO5MA and the linker PEGDMA) to produce Ag@PS–PEG hybrid nanogels, which were converted into Ag/Au@PS–PEG hybrid nanogels by galvanic replacement reaction between Ag and Au(III) (from HAuCl4). Finally, Cur was loaded to these hybrid nanogels by the complexation method, and the resulting systems were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against B16F10 mouse melanoma cells, showing good drug release and responsivity to NIR. Therefore, these hybrids might be particularly suitable for combined chemo–photothermal treatment compared with chemothermal or photothermal treatment alone [113].

5. Perspectives and Conclusions

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the development of hybrid products based on plant-derived bioactive polyphenols, which are useful for the treatment of human cancer. Cur and Res are gaining considerable attention because of their great therapeutic potential, specifically their capability to act as multifunctional antitumoral agents, but their use as drugs is still hampered by their poor bioavailability due to low water solubility, stability, and bioavailability.
Taking this into account, this review systematically described two hybrid strategies (hybrid molecules and hybrid AuNPs), which seem to be among the most promising strategies to overcome the limitations of these polyphenols and at the same time offer additional advantages. In fact, because of the extraordinary variability of the chemical composition and the technologies employed, there is a possibility to obtain Cur- and Res-compounds able to interact simultaneously with more than one cellular target, and this is particularly important for the treatment of complex multigenic and multifactorial diseases such as cancer. On the other hand, there is increased development of Cur- and Res-loaded nanosystems targeted at specific tissues/cells and responsive to particular environmental conditions, such as pH, and external stimuli, such as NIR, thus avoiding damage to healthy cells and obtaining a synergic effect between chemotherapy and PTT/PTD, which is useful in limiting the toxicity resulting from high dose chemotherapy. The present review displayed the most recent innovative research on the design of Cur- and Res-based hyd=brid products as potential candidates for employment in oncology.
These results are very promising, highlighting that rationally designed hybrid products based on plant polyphenols may have extraordinary potential in the treatment of cancer (as well as of other multifactorial diseases), both used alone or in combination with traditional therapeutic approaches. On this basis, we can suppose that the research on hybrid nanoproducts based on Cur and Res, as well as other natural polyphenols, will continue to increase in the coming years, especially for combined therapies.
However, it is also evident that the road that leads to the translation of these data from the laboratory to the clinic is still very long.
First, one must point out that the efficacy of all the hybrid nanoproducts reported in this review was demonstrated only in vitro; just a few of these studies were carried out in vivo, but only in experimental animals. Thus, great caution should be taken in extrapolating this experimental evidence from the cancer cell lines to complex biological systems and then to humans, and further accurate studies are needed to understand the action mechanisms of the innovative products and to verify their potential clinical employment.
Another aspect on which it is necessary to focus is that of safety and biocompatibility. Cur and Res, as well as other natural polyphenols, are generally recognized as safe for humans. However, they might have side effects if introduced at particularly high doses or through formulations able to increase their bioavailability [155,156]. The problem of their possible side effects might be reduced by using them as a component of new hybrid compounds or, especially, in new active targeted delivery systems since this may allow therapeutic effects to be reached at lower doses. On the other hand, it is also true that when bioavailability is modified, the risk/benefit ratio has to be carefully re-evaluated to avoid toxicity related to the drug and/or the entire delivery system. In particular, hybrid compounds are new entities, with pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic features different from the drugs on which they are based, and thus not only their efficiency but also their safety must be accurately investigated.
Finally, the increased intricacy of methodologies required to obtain the described hybrid products can also introduce challenges in reproducibility, scale-up/out, and quality control, as well as a significant rise in their cost that can be justified only by producing clinically significant improvements.
In conclusion, hybrid products based on Cur and Res, and more generally on plant-derived polyphenols, offer great promise for the development of new therapeutic approaches for cancer treatment, but further accurate studies are needed to demonstrate their efficacy and safety as well as to optimize their formulation and process.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AuNPgold nanoparticle
CTSchitosan
Curcurcumin
Cur@AuNPCur-containing AuNP
DDSdrug delivery system
DNMTDNA methyltransferase
Doxdoxorubicin
DSSdextran sodium sulfate
ECMextracellular matrix
EGFR TKepidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase
ERestrogen receptor
FAfolic acid
Ggraphene
GOgraphene oxide
GSHreduced glutathione
HSPChydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine
LAlipoic acid
Lipliposome
MMPmatrix metalloproteinase
MRImagnetic resonance imaging
MUC-1mucin-1
NF-κBnuclear factor-κB
NIRnear-infrared
NPnanoparticle
PAMAMpoly(amidoamine)
PDTphotodynamic therapy
PEGpolyethylene glycol
PSpolystyrene
PTTphotothermal therapy
PVPpolyvinylpyrrolidone
Resresveratrol
rGOreduced graphene oxide
ROSreactive oxygen species
SARstructure-activity relationship
SDTsonodynamic treatment
STAT3 proteinsignal transducer and activator of transcription 3 protein
TDDtargeted drug delivery
TPA12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate
TrxRthioredoxin reductase
VEGFvascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed on 6 February 2021).
  2. Bredberg, A. Cancer: More of polygenic disease and less of multiple mutations? A quantitative viewpoint. Cancer 2011, 117, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bayat Mokhtari, R.; Homayouni, T.S.; Baluch, N.; Morgatskaya, E.; Kumar, S.; Das, B.; Yeger, H. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 38022–38043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Piccolo, M.T.; Menale, C.; Crispi, S. Combined anticancer therapies: An overview of the latest applications. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 408–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choudhary, S.; Singh, P.K.; Verma, H.; Singh, H.; Silakari, O. Success stories of natural product-based hybrid molecules for multi-factorial diseases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 151, 62–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sampath Kumar, H.M.; Herrmann, L.; Tsogoeva, S.B. Structural hybridization as a facile approach to new drug candidates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seaberg, J.; Montazerian, H.; Hossen, M.N.; Bhattacharya, R.; Khademhosseini, A.; Mukherjee, P. Hybrid Nanosystems for Biomedical Applications. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 2099–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, C.; Lu, J.; Lin, W. Hybrid nanoparticles for combination therapy of cancer. J. Control. Release 2015, 219, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Schroeder, A.; Heller, D.A.; Winslow, M.M.; Dahlman, J.E.; Pratt, G.W.; Langer, R.; Jacks, T.; Anderson, D.G. Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 12, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davatgaran-Taghipour, Y.; Masoomzadeh, S.; Farzaei, M.H.; Bahramsoltani, R.; Karimi-Soureh, Z.; Rahimi, R.; Abdollahi, M. Polyphenol nanoformulations for cancer therapy: Experimental evidence and clinical perspective. Int J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2689–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Micale, N.; Citarella, A.; Molonia, M.S.; Speciale, A.; Cimino, F.; Saija, A.; Cristani, M. Hydrogels for the Delivery of Plant-Derived (Poly)Phenols. Molecules 2020, 25, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.; Wang, C.; Zou, Y.; Hu, J.; Li, Y.; Cheng, Y. Natural polyphenols in drug delivery systems: Current status and future challenges. Giant 2020, 3, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pavan, A.R.; Silva, G.D.; Jornada, D.H.; Chiba, D.E.; Fernandes, G.F.; Man Chin, C.; Dos Santos, J.L. Unraveling the Anticancer Effect of Curcumin and Resveratrol. Nutrients 2016, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Amidon, G.L.; Lennernäs, H.; Shah, V.P.; Crison, J.R. A Theoretical Basis for a Biopharmaceutic Drug Classification: The Correlation of in Vitro Drug Product Dissolution and in Vivo Bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 1995, 12, 413–420. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu, B.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zeng, X. Food macromolecule based nanodelivery systems for enhancing the bioavailability of polyphenols. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zheng, B.; McClements, D.J. Formulation of More Efficacious Curcumin Delivery Systems Using Colloid Science: Enhanced Solubility, Stability, and Bioavailability. Molecules 2020, 25, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bhosale, P.B.; Ha, S.E.; Vetrivel, P.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, G.S. Functions of polyphenols and its anticancer properties in biomedical research: A narrative review. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 7619–7631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bai, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.; Feng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Feng, L. The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Lee, K.X.; Shameli, K.; Yew, Y.P.; Teow, S.Y.; Jahangirian, H.; Rafiee-Moghaddam, R.; Webster, T.J. Recent Developments in the Facile Bio-Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) and Their Biomedical Applications. Int J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 275–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kalimuthu, K.; Cha, B.S.; Kim, S.; Park, K.S. Eco-friendly synthesis and biomedical applications of gold nanoparticles: A review. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, N.; Verma, K.; Nalla, S.; Kulshreshtha, A.; Lall, R.; Prasad, S. Free Radicals as a Double-Edged Sword: The Cancer Preventive and Therapeutic Roles of Curcumin. Molecules 2020, 25, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ko, J.H.; Sethi, G.; Um, J.Y.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Arfuso, F.; Kumar, A.P.; Bishayee, A.; Ahn, K.S. The Role of Resveratrol in Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Fulda, S.; Debatin, K.M. Resveratrol modulation of signal transduction in apoptosis and cell survival: A mini-review. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2006, 30, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. D’Arcy, M.S. A review of the chemopreventative and chemotherapeutic properties of the phytochemicals berberine, resveratrol and curcumin, and their influence on cell death via the pathways of apoptosis and autophagy. Cell Biol. Int. 2020, 44, 1781–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Han, G.; Xia, J.; Gao, J.; Inagaki, Y.; Tang, W.; Kokudo, N. Anti-tumor effects and cellular mechanisms of resveratrol. Drug Discov. Ther. 2015, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rana, P.; Shrama, A.; Mandal, C.C. Molecular insights into phytochemicals-driven break function in tumor microenvironment. J. Food Biochem. 2021, e13824. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gupta, S.C.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Aggarwal, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Inflammation, a Double-Edge Sword for Cancer and Other Age-Related Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, D.; Kumar, M.; Saravanan, C.; Singh, S.K. Curcumin: A potential candidate for matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2012, 16, 959–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, B.; Tian, L.; Xie, J.; Chen, G.; Wang, F. Targeting miRNAs by natural products: A new way for cancer therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 130, 110546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Avila-Carrasco, L.; Majano, P.; Sánchez-Toméro, J.A.; Selgas, R.; López-Cabrera, M.; Aguilera, A.; González Mateo, G. Natural Plants Compounds as Modulators of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Benassi, R.; Ferrari, E.; Lazzari, S.; Spagnolo, F.; Saladini, M. Theoretical study on Curcumin: A comparison of calculated spectroscopic properties with NMR, UV–vis and IR experimental data. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 892, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tonnesen, H.; Karlsen, J.; Mostad, A. Structural Studies of Curcuminoids. I. The Crystal Structure of Curcumin. Acta Chem. Scand. 1982, 36b, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Prasad, S.; DuBourdieu, D.; Srivastava, A.; Kumar, P.; Lall, R. Metal-Curcumin Complexes in Therapeutics: An Approach to Enhance Pharmacological Effects of Curcumin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Salem, M.; Rohani, S.; Gillies, E.R. Curcumin, a promising anti-cancer therapeutic: A review of its chemical properties, bioactivity and approaches to cancer cell delivery. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 10815–10829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sultana, S.; Munir, N.; Mahmood, Z.; Riaz, M.; Akram, M.; Rebezov, M.; Kuderinova, N.; Moldabayeva, Z.; Shariati, M.A.; Rauf, A.; et al. Molecular targets for the management of cancer using Curcuma longa Linn. phytoconstituents: A Review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 135, 111078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bairwa, K.; Grover, J.; Kania, M.; Jachak, S.M. Recent developments in chemistry and biology of curcumin analogues. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 13946–13978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, Z.; Chen, K.; Cheng, L.; Yan, B.; Qian, W.; Cao, J.; Li, J.; Wu, E.; Ma, Q.; Yang, W. Resveratrol and cancer treatment: Updates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1403, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Elshaer, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Tang, X. Resveratrol: An overview of its anti-cancer mechanisms. Life Sci. 2018, 207, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Farooqi, A.A.; Khalid, S.; Ahmad, A. Regulation of Cell Signaling Pathways and miRNAs by Resveratrol in Different Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Han, Y.; Jo, H.; Cho, J.H.; Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Song, Y.S. Resveratrol as a Tumor-Suppressive Nutraceutical Modulating Tumor Microenvironment and Malignant Behaviors of Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Xiao, Q.; Zhu, W.; Feng, W.; Lee, S.S.; Leung, A.W.; Shen, J.; Gao, L.; Xu, C. A Review of Resveratrol as a Potent Chemoprotective and Synergistic Agent in Cancer Chemotherapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, S.; Yan, X. From resveratrol to its derivatives: New sources of natural antioxidant. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 1005–1017. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Nawaz, W.; Zhou, Z.; Deng, S.; Ma, X.; Ma, X.; Li, C.; Shu, X. Therapeutic Versatility of Resveratrol Derivatives. Nutrients 2017, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Arbo, B.D.; André-Miral, C.; Nasre-Nasser, R.G.; Schimith, L.E.; Santos, M.G.; Costa-Silva, D.; Muccillo-Baisch, A.L.; Hort, M.A. Resveratrol Derivatives as Potential Treatments for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bansal, Y.; Silakari, O. Multifunctional compounds: Smart molecules for multifactorial diseases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 76, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ivasiv, V.; Albertini, C.; Gonçalves, A.E.; Rossi, M.; Bolognesi, M.L. Molecular Hybridization as a Tool for Designing Multitarget Drug Candidates for Complex Diseases. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1694–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Szumilak, M.; Wiktorowska-Owczarek, A.; Stanczak, A. Hybrid Drugs-A Strategy for Overcoming Anticancer Drug Resistance? Molecules 2021, 26, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yan, J.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mao, F.; Huang, L.; Li, X. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of benzoselenazole-stilbene hybrids as multi-target-directed anti-cancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 95, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yin, Y.; Lian, B.P.; Xia, Y.Z.; Shao, Y.Y.; Kong, L.Y. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of resveratrol-cinnamoyl derivates as tubulin polymerization inhibitors targeting the colchicine binding site. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 93, 103319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aldawsari, F.S.; Aguayo-Ortiz, R.; Kapilashrami, K.; Yoo, J.; Luo, M.; Medina-Franco, J.L.; Velázquez-Martínez, C.A. Resveratrol-salicylate derivatives as selective DNMT3 inhibitors and anticancer agents. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y.; Ma, T.; Guo, J.; Wang, S.; Yu, W.; Kong, L. Discovery of oral-available resveratrol-caffeic acid based hybrids inhibiting acetylated and phosphorylated STAT3 protein. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 124, 1006–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ning, W.; Hu, Z.; Tang, C.; Yang, L.; Zhang, S.; Dong, C.; Huang, J.; Zhou, H.B. Novel Hybrid Conjugates with Dual Suppression of Estrogenic and Inflammatory Activities Display Significantly Improved Potency against Breast Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 8155–8173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. de Freitas Silva, M.; Coelho, L.F.; Guirelli, I.M.; Pereira, R.M.; Ferreira-Silva, G.; Graravelli, G.Y.; Horvath, R.O.; Caixeta, E.S.; Ionta, M.; Viegas, C. Synthetic resveratrol-curcumin hybrid derivative inhibits mitosis progression in estrogen positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2018, 50, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hernández, C.; Moreno, G.; Herrera-R, A.; Cardona-G, W. New Hybrids Based on Curcumin and Resveratrol: Synthesis, Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Activity against Colorectal Cancer Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Salla, M.; Pandya, V.; Bhullar, K.S.; Kerek, E.; Wong, Y.F.; Losch, R.; Ou, J.; Aldawsari, F.S.; Velazquez-Martinez, C.; Thiesen, A.; et al. Resveratrol and Resveratrol-Aspirin Hybrid Compounds as Potent Intestinal Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Tumor Drugs. Molecules 2020, 25, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Belluti, F.; Fontana, G.; Dal Bo, L.; Carenini, N.; Giommarelli, C.; Zunino, F. Design, synthesis and anticancer activities of stilbene-coumarin hybrid compounds: Identification of novel proapoptotic agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3543–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ai, Y.; Zhu, B.; Ren, C.; Kang, F.; Li, J.; Huang, Z.; Lai, Y.; Peng, S.; Ding, K.; Tian, J.; et al. Discovery of New Monocarbonyl Ligustrazine-Curcumin Hybrids for Intervention of Drug-Sensitive and Drug-Resistant Lung Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1747–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Singh, H.; Kumar, M.; Nepali, K.; Gupta, M.K.; Saxena, A.K.; Sharma, S.; Bedi, P.M.S. Triazole tethered C5-curcuminoid-coumarin based molecular hybrids as novel antitubulin agents: Design, synthesis, biological investigation and docking studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 116, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sharma, S.; Gupta, M.K.; Saxena, A.K.; Bedi, P.M. Triazole linked mono carbonyl curcumin-isatin bifunctional hybrids as novel anti tubulin agents: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 7165–7180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Banuppriya, G.; Sribalan, R.; Padmini, V. Synthesis and characterization of curcumin-sulfonamide hybrids: Biological evaluation and molecular docking studies. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1155, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Elmegeed, G.A.; Yahya, S.M.; Abd-Elhalim, M.M.; Mohamed, M.S.; Mohareb, R.M.; Elsayed, G.H. Evaluation of heterocyclic steroids and curcumin derivatives as anti-breast cancer agents: Studying the effect on apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Steroids 2016, 115, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chen, Q.H.; Yu, K.; Zhang, X.; Chen, G.; Hoover, A.; Leon, F.; Wang, R.; Subrahmanyam, N.; Addo Mekuria, E.; Harinantenaina Rakotondraibe, L. A new class of hybrid anticancer agents inspired by the synergistic effects of curcumin and genistein: Design, synthesis, and anti-proliferative evaluation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 4553–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, J.Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Tang, W.J.; Shi, J.B.; Liu, X.H. Novel curcumin analogue hybrids: Synthesis and anticancer activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 156, 493–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Botta, L.; Filippi, S.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Zippilli, C.; Meschini, R.; Pogni, R.; Baratto, M.C.; Villanova, L.; Saladino, R. Synthesis and Evaluation of Artemisinin-Based Hybrid and Dimer Derivatives as Antimelanoma Agents. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Liu, K.; Zhang, D.; Chojnacki, J.; Du, Y.; Fu, H.; Grant, S.; Zhang, S. Design and biological characterization of hybrid compounds of curcumin and thalidomide for multiple myeloma. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 4757–4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xue, W.; Song, B.A.; Zhao, H.J.; Qi, X.B.; Huang, Y.J.; Liu, X.H. Novel myricetin derivatives: Design, synthesis and anticancer activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dandriyal, J.; Singla, R.; Kumar, M.; Jaitak, V. Recent developments of C-4 substituted coumarin derivatives as anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 119, 141–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Han, X.; Liu, R.; Fang, J. Targeting the Thioredoxin System for Cancer Therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mirzaei, H.; Emami, S. Recent advances of cytotoxic chalconoids targeting tubulin polymerization: Synthesis and biological activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 121, 610–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bijian, K.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, B.; Jie, S.; Chen, B.; Wan, S.; Wu, J.; Jiang, T.; Alaoui-Jamali, M.A. Synthesis and biological activity of novel organoselenium derivatives targeting multiple kinases and capable of inhibiting cancer progression to metastases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 48, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Guo, S.K.; Chen, K.J.; Qian, Z.H.; Weng, W.L.; Qian, M.Y. Tetramethylpyrazine in the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Planta Med. 1983, 47, 89. [Google Scholar]
  72. Fernandes, G.F.S.; Silva, G.D.B.; Pavan, A.R.; Chiba, D.E.; Chin, C.M.; Dos Santos, J.L. Epigenetic Regulatory Mechanisms Induced by Resveratrol. Nutrients 2017, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yu, H.; Pardoll, D.; Jove, R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: A leading role for STAT3. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 798–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Laudisi, F.; Cherubini, F.; Monteleone, G.; Stolfi, C. STAT3 Interactors as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Mendelsohn, J.; Baselga, J. The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy. Oncogene 2000, 19, 6550–6565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Ide, H.; Tokiwa, S.; Sakamaki, K.; Nishio, K.; Isotani, S.; Muto, S.; Hama, T.; Masuda, H.; Horie, S. Combined inhibitory effects of soy isoflavones and curcumin on the production of prostate-specific antigen. Prostate 2010, 70, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ide, H.; Yu, J.; Lu, Y.; China, T.; Kumamoto, T.; Koseki, T.; Muto, S.; Horie, S. Testosterone augments polyphenol-induced DNA damage response in prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 468–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lai, H.C.; Singh, N.P.; Sasaki, T. Development of artemisinin compounds for cancer treatment. Investig. New Drugs 2013, 31, 230–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Biswas, D.K.; Singh, S.; Shi, Q.; Pardee, A.B.; Iglehart, J.D. Crossroads of estrogen receptor and NF-kappaB signaling. Sci. STKE 2005, 2005, pe27. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kalaitzidis, D.; Gilmore, T.D. Transcription factor cross-talk: The estrogen receptor and NF-kappaB. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 16, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Shakeri, A.; Panahi, Y.; Johnston, T.P.; Sahebkar, A. Biological properties of metal complexes of curcumin. Biofactors 2019, 45, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wanninger, S.; Lorenz, V.; Subhan, A.; Edelmann, F.T. Metal complexes of curcumin--synthetic strategies, structures and medicinal applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4986–5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Capek, I. Polymer decorated gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine conjugates. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gupta, N.; Malviya, R. Understanding and advancement in gold nanoparticle targeted photothermal therapy of cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2021, 1875, 188532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, X.Y.; Wang, J.Q.; Ashby, C.R., Jr.; Zeng, L.; Fan, Y.F.; Chen, Z.S. Gold nanoparticles: Synthesis, physiochemical properties and therapeutic applications in cancer. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Siddique, S.; Chow, J.C.L. Gold Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mahato, K.; Nagpal, S.; Shah, M.A.; Srivastava, A.; Maurya, P.K.; Roy, S.; Jaiswal, A.; Singh, R.; Chandra, P. Gold nanoparticle surface engineering strategies and their applications in biomedicine and diagnostics. 3 Biotech. 2019, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, T.; Liu, J.; Zhao, H. Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles: A Novel Nanomaterial for Various Medical Applications and Biological Activities. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, W.; Cao, Z.; Liu, R.; Liu, L.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Lu, C.; Liu, Y. AuNPs as an important inorganic nanoparticle applied in drug carrier systems. Artif Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 4222–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Ashraf, R.; Amna, T.; Sheikh, F.A. Unique Properties of the Gold Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Functionalization and Applications. In Application of Nanotechnology in Biomedical Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 75–98. [Google Scholar]
  91. Fadel, M.; Kassab, K.; Youssef, T.; El-Kholy, A.I. One-step synthesis of phyto-polymer coated gold nanospheres as a delivery system to enhance resveratrol cytotoxicity. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2019, 45, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, J.; Li, Z.; Zuo, H.; Huang, C.; Zhao, X. Nano-Gold Loaded with Resveratrol Enhance the Anti-Hepatoma Effect of Resveratrol In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2019, 15, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Park, S.Y.; Chae, S.Y.; Park, J.O.; Lee, K.J.; Park, G. Gold-conjugated resveratrol nanoparticles attenuate the invasion and MMP-9 and COX-2 expression in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 3248–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Thipe, V.C.; Panjtan Amiri, K.; Bloebaum, P.; Raphael Karikachery, A.; Khoobchandani, M.; Katti, K.K.; Jurisson, S.S.; Katti, K.V. Development of resveratrol-conjugated gold nanoparticles: Interrelationship of increased resveratrol corona on anti-tumor efficacy against breast, pancreatic and prostate cancers. Int J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 4413–4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Mohanty, R.K.; Thennarasu, S.; Mandal, A.B. Resveratrol stabilized gold nanoparticles enable surface loading of doxorubicin and anticancer activity. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2014, 114, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tomoaia, G.; Horovitz, O.; Mocanu, A.; Nita, A.; Avram, A.; Racz, C.P.; Soritau, O.; Cenariu, M.; Tomoaia-Cotisel, M. Effects of doxorubicin mediated by gold nanoparticles and resveratrol in two human cervical tumor cell lines. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, L.; Li, L.; Xing, S.; He, Y.; Cao, W.; Zhu, R.; Gao, D. Gold nanoshell coated thermo-pH dual responsive liposomes for resveratrol delivery and chemo-photothermal synergistic cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem B 2017, 5, 2161–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, W.; Tang, Q.; Yu, T.; Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Rong, L.; Wang, Z.; Sun, H.; et al. Surfactant-Free Preparation of Au@Resveratrol Hollow Nanoparticles with Photothermal Performance and Antioxidant Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3376–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Govindaraju, S.; Rengaraj, A.; Arivazhagan, R.; Huh, Y.S.; Yun, K. Curcumin-Conjugated Gold Clusters for Bioimaging and Anticancer Applications. Bioconjug. Chem. 2018, 29, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Al-Ani, L.A.; Yehye, W.A.; Kadir, F.A.; Hashim, N.M.; AlSaadi, M.A.; Julkapli, N.M.; Hsiao, V.K.S. Hybrid nanocomposite curcumin-capped gold nanoparticle-reduced graphene oxide: Anti-oxidant potency and selective cancer cytotoxicity. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Alibolandi, M.; Hoseini, F.; Mohammadi, M.; Ramezani, P.; Einafshar, E.; Taghdisi, S.M.; Ramezani, M.; Abnous, K. Curcumin-entrapped MUC-1 aptamer targeted dendrimer-gold hybrid nanostructure as a theranostic system for colon adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 549, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ghorbani, M.; Bigdeli, B.; Jalili-Baleh, L.; Baharifar, H.; Akrami, M.; Dehghani, S.; Goliaei, B.; Amani, A.; Lotfabadi, A.; Rashedi, H.; et al. Curcumin-lipoic acid conjugate as a promising anticancer agent on the surface of gold-iron oxide nanocomposites: A pH-sensitive targeted drug delivery system for brain cancer theranostics. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 114, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mathew, M.S.; Vinod, K.; Jayaram, P.S.; Jayasree, R.S.; Joseph, K. Improved Bioavailability of Curcumin in Gliadin-Protected Gold Quantum Cluster for Targeted Delivery. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 14169–14178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dai, M.; Frezzo, J.A.; Sharma, E.; Chen, R.; Singh, N.; Yuvienco, C.; Caglar, E.; Xiao, S.; Saxena, A.; Montclare, J.K. Engineered Protein Polymer-Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid Materials for Small Molecule Delivery. J. Nanomed Nanotechnol 2016, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Mahalunkar, S.; Yadav, A.S.; Gorain, M.; Pawar, V.; Braathen, R.; Weiss, S.; Bogen, B.; Gosavi, S.W.; Kundu, G.C. Functional design of pH-responsive folate-targeted polymer-coated gold nanoparticles for drug delivery and in vivo therapy in breast cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 8285–8302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Malekmohammadi, S.; Hadadzadeh, H.; Farrokhpour, H.; Amirghofran, Z. Immobilization of gold nanoparticles on folate-conjugated dendritic mesoporous silica-coated reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: A new nanoplatform for curcumin pH-controlled and targeted delivery. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 2400–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rao, K.M.; Kumar, A.; Suneetha, M.; Han, S.S. pH and near-infrared active; chitosan-coated halloysite nanotubes loaded with curcumin-Au hybrid nanoparticles for cancer drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alvi, S.B.; Appidi, T.; Deepak, B.P.; Rajalakshmi, P.S.; Minhas, G.; Singh, S.P.; Begum, A.; Bantal, V.; Srivastava, R.; Khan, N.; et al. The “nano to micro” transition of hydrophobic curcumin crystals leading to in situ adjuvant depots for Au-liposome nanoparticle mediated enhanced photothermal therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 3866–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Singh, S.P.; Alvi, S.B.; Pemmaraju, D.B.; Singh, A.D.; Manda, S.V.; Srivastava, R.; Rengan, A.K. NIR triggered liposome gold nanoparticles entrapping curcumin as in situ adjuvant for photothermal treatment of skin cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 110, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kayani, Z.; Dehdari Vais, R.; Soratijahromi, E.; Mohammadi, S.; Sattarahmady, N. Curcumin-gold-polyethylene glycol nanoparticles as a nanosensitizer for photothermal and sonodynamic therapies: In vitro and animal model studies. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2021, 33, 102139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rahimi-Moghaddam, F.; Azarpira, N.; Sattarahmady, N. Evaluation of a nanocomposite of PEG-curcumin-gold nanoparticles as a near-infrared photothermal agent: An in vitro and animal model investigation. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 1769–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rahimi-Moghaddam, F.; Sattarahmady, N.; Azarpira, N. Gold-Curcumin Nanostructure in Photo-thermal Therapy on Breast Cancer Cell Line: 650 and 808 nm Diode Lasers as Light Sources. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 2019, 9, 473–482. [Google Scholar]
  113. Wu, W.; Shen, J.; Banerjee, P.; Zhou, S. Water-dispersible multifunctional hybrid nanogels for combined curcumin and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 598–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Amina, S.J.; Guo, B. A Review on the Synthesis and Functionalization of Gold Nanoparticles as a Drug Delivery Vehicle. Int J. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 9823–9857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Wang, B.; Yang, G.; Chen, J.; Fang, G. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles Using Lignin Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Menon, S.; Rajeshkumar, S.; Kumar, V. A review on biogenic synthesis of gold nanoparticles, characterization, and its applications. Resour. Effic. Technol. 2017, 3, 516–527. [Google Scholar]
  117. Teimuri-mofrad, R.; Hadi, R.; Tahmasebi, B.; Farhoudian, S.; Mehravar, M.; Nasiri, R. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plant extract: Mini-review. Nanochem. Res. 2017, 2, 8–19. [Google Scholar]
  118. Polte, J. Fundamental growth principles of colloidal metal nanoparticles—A new perspective. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 6809–6830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Sindhu, K.; Rajaram, A.; Sreeram, K.J.; Rajaram, R. Curcumin conjugated gold nanoparticle synthesis and its biocompatibility. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 1808–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Turkevich, J.; Stevenson, P.C.; Hillier, J. A study of the nucleation and growth processes in the synthesis of colloidal gold. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1951, 11, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kimling, J.; Maier, M.; Okenve, B.; Kotaidis, V.; Ballot, H.; Plech, A. Turkevich method for gold nanoparticle synthesis revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 15700–15707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Uboldi, C.; Bonacchi, D.; Lorenzi, G.; Hermanns, M.I.; Pohl, C.; Baldi, G.; Unger, R.E.; Kirkpatrick, C.J. Gold nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity in the alveolar type-II cell lines A549 and NCIH441. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2009, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Freese, C.; Uboldi, C.; Gibson, M.I.; Unger, R.E.; Weksler, B.B.; Romero, I.A.; Couraud, P.O.; Kirkpatrick, C.J. Uptake and cytotoxicity of citrate-coated gold nanospheres: Comparative studies on human endothelial and epithelial cells. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2012, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Connor, E.E.; Mwamuka, J.; Gole, A.; Murphy, C.J.; Wyatt, M.D. Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small 2005, 1, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Xie, J.; Zheng, Y.; Ying, J.Y. Protein-directed synthesis of highly fluorescent gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 888–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sanna, V.; Pala, N.; Dessì, G.; Manconi, P.; Mariani, A.; Dedola, S.; Rassu, M.; Crosio, C.; Iaccarino, C.; Sechi, M. Single-step green synthesis and characterization of gold-conjugated polyphenol nanoparticles with antioxidant and biological activities. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 4935–4951. [Google Scholar]
  127. Annaji, M.; Poudel, I.; Boddu, S.H.S.; Arnold, R.D.; Tiwari, A.K.; Babu, R.J. Resveratrol-loaded nanomedicines for cancer applications. Cancer Rep. (Hoboken) 2021, e1353. [Google Scholar]
  128. Huang, X.; Jain, P.K.; El-Sayed, I.H.; El-Sayed, M.A. Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) using gold nanoparticles. Lasers Med. Sci. 2008, 23, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Nakamura, T.; Tamura, A.; Murotani, H.; Oishi, M.; Jinji, Y.; Matsuishi, K.; Nagasaki, Y. Large payloads of gold nanoparticles into the polyamine network core of stimuli-responsive PEGylated nanogels for selective and noninvasive cancer photothermal therapy. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Seo, J.M.; Kim, E.B.; Hyun, M.S.; Kim, B.B.; Park, T.J. Self-assembly of biogenic gold nanoparticles and their use to enhance drug delivery into cells. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Huang, F.; Wu, X.N.; Chen, J.; Wang, W.X.; Lu, Z.F. Resveratrol reverses multidrug resistance in human breast cancer doxorubicin-resistant cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 2014, 7, 1611–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gu, J.; Hu, W.; Zhang, D.D. Resveratrol, a polyphenol phytoalexin, protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 2324–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Rai, G.; Mishra, S.; Suman, S.; Shukla, Y. Resveratrol improves the anticancer effects of doxorubicin in vitro and in vivo models: A mechanistic insight. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Song, J.; Huang, P.; Duan, H.; Chen, X. Plasmonic Vesicles of Amphiphilic Nanocrystals: Optically Active Multifunctional Platform for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2506–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.D.P.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Yang, Z.; Malinick, A.S.; Yang, T.; Cheng, W.; Cheng, Q. Gold nanoparticle-coupled liposomes for enhanced plasmonic biosensing. Sens. Actuators Rep. 2020, 2, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Huo, M.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J. Triggered-release drug delivery nanosystems for cancer therapy by intravenous injection: Where are we now? Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 1195–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Moussa, H.G.; Martins, A.M.; Husseini, G.A. Review on triggered liposomal drug delivery with a focus on ultrasound. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2015, 15, 282–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Butt, A.M.; Amin, M.C.; Katas, H.; Abdul Murad, N.A.; Jamal, R.; Kesharwani, P. Doxorubicin and siRNA Codelivery via Chitosan-Coated pH-Responsive Mixed Micellar Polyplexes for Enhanced Cancer Therapy in Multidrug-Resistant Tumors. Mol. Pharm. 2016, 13, 4179–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Xu, H.; Ye, F.; Hu, M.; Yin, P.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Yu, X.; Deng, Y. Influence of phospholipid types and animal models on the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon of PEGylated liposomes upon repeated injection. Drug Deliv. 2015, 22, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Large, D.E.; Soucy, J.R.; Hebert, J.; Auguste, D.T. Advances in Receptor-Mediated, Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery. Adv. Ther. 2019, 2, 1800091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Das, M.; Mohanty, C.; Sahoo, S.K. Ligand-based targeted therapy for cancer tissue. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2009, 6, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Joye, I.J.; Davidov-Pardo, G.; Ludescher, R.D.; McClements, D.J. Fluorescence quenching study of resveratrol binding to zein and gliadin: Towards a more rational approach to resveratrol encapsulation using water-insoluble proteins. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Yadav, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Kumar, P. Nanoscale Self-Assembly for Therapeutic Delivery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Novoselov, K.S.; Fal’ko, V.I.; Colombo, L.; Gellert, P.R.; Schwab, M.G.; Kim, K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012, 490, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhang, B.; Wei, P.; Zhou, Z.; Wei, T. Interactions of graphene with mammalian cells: Molecular mechanisms and biomedical insights. Adv. Drug Deliv Rev. 2016, 105 Pt B, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Neri, G.; Micale, N.; Scala, A.; Fazio, E.; Mazzaglia, A.; Mineo, P.G.; Montesi, M.; Panseri, S.; Tampieri, A.; Grassi, G.; et al. Silibinin-conjugated graphene nanoplatform: Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation. FlatChem 2017, 1, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Choi, Y.-J.; Gurunathan, S.; Kim, J.-H. Graphene Oxide–Silver Nanocomposite Enhances Cytotoxic and Apoptotic Potential of Salinomycin in Human Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells (OvCSCs): A Novel Approach for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Guo, X.; Mei, N. Assessment of the toxic potential of graphene family nanomaterials. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Ramazani, A.; Abrvash, M.; Sadighian, S.; Rostamizadeh, K.; Fathi, M. Preparation and characterization of curcumin loaded gold/graphene oxide nanocomposite for potential breast cancer therapy. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2018, 44, 7891–7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Binaymotlagh, R.; Hadadzadeh, H.; Farrokhpour, H.; Haghighi, F.H.; Abyar, F.; Mirahmadi-Zare, S.Z. In situ generation of the gold nanoparticles–bovine serum albumin (AuNPs–BSA) bioconjugated system using pulsed-laser ablation (PLA). Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 177, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Leung, K.C.; Xuan, S.; Zhu, X.; Wang, D.; Chak, C.P.; Lee, S.F.; Ho, W.K.; Chung, B.C. Gold and iron oxide hybrid nanocomposite materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1911–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Maczurek, A.; Hager, K.; Kenklies, M.; Sharman, M.; Martins, R.; Engel, J.; Carlson, D.A.; Münch, G. Lipoic acid as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1463–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Lvov, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Fakhrullin, R. Halloysite Clay Nanotubes for Loading and Sustained Release of Functional Compounds. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Shaito, A.; Posadino, A.M.; Younes, N.; Hasan, H.; Halabi, S.; Alhababi, D.; Al-Mohannadi, A.; Abdel-Rahman, W.M.; Eid, A.H.; Nasrallah, G.K.; et al. Potential Adverse Effects of Resveratrol: A Literature Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Donelli, D.; Antonelli, M.; Firenzuoli, F. Considerations about turmeric-associated hepatotoxicity following a series of cases occurred in Italy: Is turmeric really a new hepatotoxic substance? Intern. Emerg. Med. 2020, 15, 725–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical features and SAR insights of Cur.
Figure 1. Chemical features and SAR insights of Cur.
Molecules 26 04665 g001
Figure 2. Resonance structures of the semiquinone form of Res after hydrogen abstraction of the catechol -OH (green) and phenol -OH (red).
Figure 2. Resonance structures of the semiquinone form of Res after hydrogen abstraction of the catechol -OH (green) and phenol -OH (red).
Molecules 26 04665 g002
Figure 3. Myricetin–Cur hybrids developed by Wang et al. [63]. For the most active compound, n = 3.
Figure 3. Myricetin–Cur hybrids developed by Wang et al. [63]. For the most active compound, n = 3.
Molecules 26 04665 g003
Figure 4. Coumarin–Cur hybrids developed by Bedi’s research group [58].
Figure 4. Coumarin–Cur hybrids developed by Bedi’s research group [58].
Molecules 26 04665 g004
Figure 5. Structure and anticancer activity of the most potent chalcone–Res hybrid developed by Yin et al. [49].
Figure 5. Structure and anticancer activity of the most potent chalcone–Res hybrid developed by Yin et al. [49].
Molecules 26 04665 g005
Figure 6. Structure and activity of the most potent chimeric compound developed by Yan et al. [48].
Figure 6. Structure and activity of the most potent chimeric compound developed by Yan et al. [48].
Molecules 26 04665 g006
Figure 7. Structure and activity of the most potent chimeric compound developed by Ai et al. [57].
Figure 7. Structure and activity of the most potent chimeric compound developed by Ai et al. [57].
Molecules 26 04665 g007
Figure 8. Structure and activity of the two most potent compounds developed by Belluti et al. [56].
Figure 8. Structure and activity of the two most potent compounds developed by Belluti et al. [56].
Molecules 26 04665 g008
Figure 9. Structure, activity, and SAR insights of the most potent chimeric compound developed by Aldawsari et al. [50].
Figure 9. Structure, activity, and SAR insights of the most potent chimeric compound developed by Aldawsari et al. [50].
Molecules 26 04665 g009
Figure 10. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Li et al. [51].
Figure 10. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Li et al. [51].
Molecules 26 04665 g010
Figure 11. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Banuppriya et al. [60].
Figure 11. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Banuppriya et al. [60].
Molecules 26 04665 g011
Figure 12. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Liu et al. [65].
Figure 12. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Liu et al. [65].
Molecules 26 04665 g012
Figure 13. Structure and activity of the hetero-steroid–Cur hybrid developed by Elmegeed’s research group [61].
Figure 13. Structure and activity of the hetero-steroid–Cur hybrid developed by Elmegeed’s research group [61].
Molecules 26 04665 g013
Figure 14. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Chen et al. [62].
Figure 14. Structure and activity of the most potent hybrid compound developed by Chen et al. [62].
Molecules 26 04665 g014
Figure 15. Structure and activity of the most potent dimeric hybrid derivative developed by Botta et al. [64].
Figure 15. Structure and activity of the most potent dimeric hybrid derivative developed by Botta et al. [64].
Molecules 26 04665 g015
Figure 16. Structure, activity, and SAR insights of the most potent conjugated hybrid derivative developed by Ning et al. [52].
Figure 16. Structure, activity, and SAR insights of the most potent conjugated hybrid derivative developed by Ning et al. [52].
Molecules 26 04665 g016
Figure 17. Structure and activity of the most potent Cur–Res hybrid derivative developed by de Freitas Silva et al. [53].
Figure 17. Structure and activity of the most potent Cur–Res hybrid derivative developed by de Freitas Silva et al. [53].
Molecules 26 04665 g017
Figure 18. Structure of the Cur–Res hybrid derivatives developed by Hernández et al. [54].
Figure 18. Structure of the Cur–Res hybrid derivatives developed by Hernández et al. [54].
Molecules 26 04665 g018
Figure 19. Schematic description of the green synthesis of AuNPs starting from chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) and using Cur or Res as reducing and stabilizing agents.
Figure 19. Schematic description of the green synthesis of AuNPs starting from chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) and using Cur or Res as reducing and stabilizing agents.
Molecules 26 04665 g019
Figure 20. AuNPs may be employed as active targeted, NIR- and pH-responsive drug delivery systems, allowing a synergic effect between drug chemotherapy and PTT/PTD in cancer cells.
Figure 20. AuNPs may be employed as active targeted, NIR- and pH-responsive drug delivery systems, allowing a synergic effect between drug chemotherapy and PTT/PTD in cancer cells.
Molecules 26 04665 g020
Table 1. Hybrid molecules derived from Res and designed for potential employment in human cancer.
Table 1. Hybrid molecules derived from Res and designed for potential employment in human cancer.
Pharmacophore 1Pharmacophore 2HybridsPathologyIn Vitro Cell-Free or In Silico ModelIn Vitro Cell-Based ModelIn Vivo ModelRef.
ResebselenBenzoselenazole–stilbene hybridscancerinhibition of TrxRhuman liver carcinoma Bel-7402 [48]
Rescinnamic acidRes linked to cinnamic acid through an acyl ester groupcancertubulin polymerization assay;
molecular docking with tubulin
lung cancer A549, MCF-7, hepatoma HepG2, cervical cancer HeLa, and breast cancer MDA-231 cells [49]
Ressalicylateaddition of a carboxylic acid or its methyl ester attached ortho to one of the phenol groups present in hydroxystilbenecancermolecular docking with human DNMThuman colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29, hepatoma HepG2 cells, and mammary gland/breast SK-BR-3 cells [50]
Rescaffeic acidRes-caffeic acid hybrids possessing an amide linker or an ester linkagebreast cancermolecular docking with STAT3 proteinhuman breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells and colonic carcinoma HT29 cellsfemale Kunming mice bearing breast cancer 4T1 cells[51]
Resobhsconjugation of Res with OBHSbreast cancerestrogen receptor ERα antagonistic activityhuman breast cancer
MCF-7 cells
female Balb/c nude mice inoculated with MCF-7 breast cancer cells[52]
ResCuran o-substituted conjugated-phenyl system from Res linked to a 3-methoxy-4-hydroxycynamoil subunit, with a hydrazone functionality as a spacerbreast cancer estrogen-positive human breast cancer MCF-7 cells [53]
ResCurRes linked to a 3-methoxy-4-hydroxycynamoil subunit from Curcolonic cancer human colon adenocarcinoma SW480 and SW620 cells [54]
ResAspirinaddition of a carboxylic acid group adjacently to one of the phenols in the Res structurecolonic cancer and
intestinal inflammation
normal mouse intestinal ModeK cells and human colon cancer HCT116 cellsC57BL/6 mice bearing HCT116 colon cancer cells;
DSS-induced colitis in male C57BL/6 mice
[55]
Rescoumarina substituted trans-vinylbenzene moiety on a coumarin backbonecancer human lung carcinoma H460, squamous carcinoma A431, and melanoma JR8 cells [56]
Res: resveratrol; Cur: curcumin; OBHS: oxabicycloheptene sulfonate; TrxR: thioredoxin reductase; DNMT: DNA methyltransferase; STAT3 protein: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 protein; DSS: dextran sodium sulfate.
Table 2. Hybrid molecules derived from Cur and designed for potential employment in human cancer.
Table 2. Hybrid molecules derived from Cur and designed for potential employment in human cancer.
Pharmacophore 1Pharmacophore 2HybridsPathologyIn Vitro Cell-Free or In Silico ModelIn Vitro Cell-Based ModelIn Vivo ModelRef.
Curligustrazinesubstituting one of the two aromatic rings of Cur
analogs with ligustrazine
lung cancerinhibition of
TrxR
human lung cancer A549, drug-resistant human lung cancer A549/DDP cellsathymic BALB/c nude mice inoculated with A549/DDP cells[57]
Curcoumarinmonocarbonyl Cur linked to coumarin with a
trizole as spacer
cancermolecular docking with tubulinhuman leukemia THP-1, colon adenocarcinoma COLO-205, colorectal cancer HCT-116 cells [58]
CurIsatinmonocarbonyl Cur linked to isatin with a trizole as a spacercancertubulin polymerization assay;
molecular docking with tubulin
human leukemia THP-1, colon adenocarcinoma COLO-205, colorectal cancer HCT-116, prostate cancer PC-3 cells [59]
Cursulfonamideintroduction of sulfanilamide unit into the methylene part of Curcancermolecular docking with EGFR TKhuman gastric adenocarcinoma AGS and lung cancer A549 cells [60]
Cursteroidspyrazolocurcumin-pyrimidinyl androstane derivativebreast cancer human breast cancer MCF-7 cells [61]
Curquercetin or genisteinester of (1E,4E)-1,4-penta-dien-3-one (from Cur) and chromone (from quercetin or genistein)prostate cancer human prostate cancer androgen-independent PC-3b and DU-145 cells, and androgen-dependent LNCaP cells [62]
Curmyricetinmonocarbonyl analogs of curcumin linked to myricetingastric cancer human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells [63]
Curartesunatelinkage of Cur with two artesunate moleculesmelanoma melanoma SK-MEL3, SK-MEL24, and RPMI-7951 cells [64]
Curthalidomidethalidomide linked at the methylene position between the two carbonyls of Cur;
monoketone Cur linked to thalidomide
multiple myeloma human multiple myeloma MM1S, RPMI8226, U266 cells [65]
Cur: curcumin; TrxR: thioredoxin reductase; EGFR TK: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor tyrosine kina.
Table 3. Hybrid systems based on AuNPs and Res and projected as potential candidates for the treatment of human cancer.
Table 3. Hybrid systems based on AuNPs and Res and projected as potential candidates for the treatment of human cancer.
Cytotoxic DrugHybrid MaterialsAimFunctionalizationPathologyIn Vitro ModelIn Vivo ModelRef.
ResRes-loaded Au nanospheresDD liver cancerHuman liver HepG2 cells [91]
ResRes-loaded AuNPsDD liver cancerHuman liver HepG2 cells15 BALC/c nude mice bearing HepG2 cells[92]
ResRes-conjugated AuNPsDD breast cancerTPA-induced migration and invasion in breast cancer MCF-7 cells [93]
ResRes-conjugated AuNPs stabilized by gum arabicDD cancerbreast cancer MDAMB-231, pancreatic cancer PANC-1, and prostate cancer PC-3 cells [94]
Res
Dox
Res-stabilized AuNPsDD brain cancerhuman glioma LN 229 cells [95]
Res
Dox
AuNPs capped with ResDD cervical cancerhuman cervical cancer (HeLa, HPV-18 positive, and CaSki, HPV-16 positive) cells [96]
ResRes-loaded in chitosan modified liposomes coated by gold nanoshellsNIR- and pH-responsive systemAuNPs
Chitosan
cervical cancerhuman epithelioid cervix carcinoma HeLa cells [97]
ResHollow NPs based on Au-Res complexesNIR responsive systemAuNPsmelanomamalignant melanoma A375 cells [98]
Res: Resveratrol; Au: gold; NPs: nanoparticles; AuNPs: gold nanoparticles; DD: drug delivery; Dox: doxorubicin; NIR: near infra-red; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; TPA: 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.
Table 4. Hybrid systems based on AuNPs and Cur and projected as potential candidates for the treatment of human cancer.
Table 4. Hybrid systems based on AuNPs and Cur and projected as potential candidates for the treatment of human cancer.
Cytotoxic DrugHybrid MaterialsAimFunctionalizationPathologyIn Vitro ModelIn Vivo ModelReferences
CurCur-conjugated AuNPsDD cervical cancercervical cancer HeLa cells [99]
CurCur-capped AuNP-reduced graphene oxide nanocompositeDD colon and liver cancerhuman colon cancer HT-29 and SW-948 cells [100]
CurMUC-1 aptamer conjugated and Cur-loaded PEGylated amine-terminated generation 5 poly(amidoamine) dendrimers/gold hybrid structuresactive TDDMUC-1 aptamercolon adenocarcinomacolon cancer HT29 and C26 cellsC26 tumor-bearing BALB/c female mice[101]
Cur
Lipoic acid
Lipoic acid-Cur and GSH attached to gold-iron oxide nanocompositesactive targeted and
pH-responsive DD
MRI
GSH
Lipoic acid
Iron NPs
Brain cancerfetal human astrocyte and U87MG cell lines [102]
CurCur-loaded gliadin-stabilized folic acid-functionalized Au quantum clustersactive targeted and pH-responsive DDFolic acid
Gliadin
Cancerbrain cancer C6 glioma cells and breast cancer MDA-MB231 cells [103]
CurCur-loaded in protein polymer-Au NPs (protein polymer based on
elastin-like peptide and the coiled-coil region of Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix protein, both bearing an N-terminal hexahistidine group)
Breast cancerhuman breast cancer MCF7 cells [104]
CurFolate-Cur-loaded Au-polyvinylpyrrolidone NPsactive targeted DDFolic acidbreast cancerhuman breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, epithelial MCF 10A cells;
mouse mammary carcinoma 4T1 cells
female Balb/c mice bearing 4T1 cancer[105]
CurAuNPs immobilized on folate-conjugated dendritic mesoporous silica-coated reduced graphene oxide nanosheets loaded with Curactive targeted DD
NIR- and pH-responsive system
AuNPs
Folic acid
breast cancerhuman breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cells [106]
Curchitosan-coated halloysite nanotubes loaded with Cur-Au NPsNIR- and pH-responsive systemsAuNPs
Chitosan
breast cancerhuman breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cells [107]
CurCur-loaded in gold-coated liposome NPsNIR-responsive systemAuNPsmelanomamouse melanoma B16 cellsC57BL/6 female mice bearing B16 cells[108]
CurCur-loaded HSPC liposomes coated with goldNIR-responsive systemAuNPsmelanomamouse melanoma B16 F10 cells [109]
CurCur-Au-PEG-NPsNIR-responsive and sonosensitive systemAuNPs Ultrasoundsmelanomamouse melanoma C540 (B16/F10) cellsinbred male BALB/c mice bearing B16/F10 cells[110]
CurPEG-Cur-AuNPsNIR-responsive systemAuNPsmelanomamouse melanoma C540 (B16/F10) cells [111]
CurPEG-Cur-AuNPsNIR-responsive systemAuNPsmelanomamouse melanoma C540 (B16/F10) cellsmale C57/inbred mice implanted with B16/F10 cells[112]
CurCur-loaded Ag/Au bimetallic NPs coated with polystyrene- and PEG-based gel layersNI- responsive systemAuNPsmelanomamouse melanoma B16F10 cells [113]
Cur: curcumin; Au: gold; NPs: nanoparticles; AuNPs: gold nanoparticles; DD: drug delivery; TDD: targeted drug delivery; NIR: near infra-red; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; HSPC: hydrogenated soya phosphatidyl choline; PEG: polyethylene glycol; GSH: reduced glutathione.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Micale, N.; Molonia, M.S.; Citarella, A.; Cimino, F.; Saija, A.; Cristani, M.; Speciale, A. Natural Product-Based Hybrids as Potential Candidates for the Treatment of Cancer: Focus on Curcumin and Resveratrol. Molecules 2021, 26, 4665. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154665

AMA Style

Micale N, Molonia MS, Citarella A, Cimino F, Saija A, Cristani M, Speciale A. Natural Product-Based Hybrids as Potential Candidates for the Treatment of Cancer: Focus on Curcumin and Resveratrol. Molecules. 2021; 26(15):4665. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Micale, Nicola, Maria Sofia Molonia, Andrea Citarella, Francesco Cimino, Antonina Saija, Mariateresa Cristani, and Antonio Speciale. 2021. "Natural Product-Based Hybrids as Potential Candidates for the Treatment of Cancer: Focus on Curcumin and Resveratrol" Molecules 26, no. 15: 4665. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154665

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop