Next Article in Journal
A QM/MM Study on the Initiation Reaction of Firefly Bioluminescence—Enzymatic Oxidation of Luciferin
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome Mining and Molecular Networking-Based Metabolomics of the Marine Facultative Aspergillus sp. MEXU 27854
Previous Article in Journal
Preclinical Testing of Radiopharmaceuticals for the Detection and Characterization of Osteomyelitis: Experiences from a Porcine Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Total Synthesis of Pagoamide A

1
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Oncogenomics, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China
2
School of Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2021, 26(14), 4224; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144224
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 27 June 2021 / Accepted: 30 June 2021 / Published: 12 July 2021

Abstract

:
The first total synthesis of the thiazole-containing cyclic depsipeptide pagoamide A, is detailed. The longest linear sequence of the liquid-phase synthesis comprises 9 long linear steps from simple known starting materials, which led to the unambiguous structural confirmation of pagoamide A.

1. Introduction

Very recently, Gerwick and co-workers described the structure of pagoamide A [1], a thiazole-containing cyclic depsipeptide isolated from the metabolites of a marine Chlorphyte, Derbesia sp., which was collected from the shallow coastal waters near American Samoa and cultured in the laboratory. Preliminary biological tests revealed that pagoamide A had no cytotoxicity against H-460 human lung cancer cells. The isolation of this novel compound was guided by MS/MS-based molecular networking and the structure of pagoamide A (1) was elucidated through a combination of detailed 1D and 2D NMR analyses, UV, high-resolution mass spectrometry and advanced Marfey’s method. Noticeably, two phenylalanine residues with opposite stereochemistry were carefully established by chemical methods, whereas the absolute configuration of the serine in the macrocyclic ring and side-chain had only been tentatively assigned by density functional theory (DFT) calculations in combination with ROESY results. As depicted in Figure 1, its unique structure comprises a 19-membered macrolactam and a pendant thiazole-bearing side chain. In total 11 amino acid moieties are incorporated in this depsipeptide with three of them possessing d configurations (d-Val, d-Ala, d-Ser). Motivated by our previous studies of 5-membered heterocycle-containing marine natural products [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], we hoped to accomplish the first total synthesis of pagoamide A and in turn, elucidate its relative and absolute stereochemistry.
As DFT calculations for structural assignments can sometimes be error-prone [10,11,12,13], at the outset of this project, we opted for the synthesis of structure of pagoamide A (1) and one of its diastereomers 1a, where the two serine residues switched positions. The success of this investigation would allow us to further resolve the structure of this natural product. Our retrosynthetic analysis for pagoamide A (1) is presented in Scheme 1. The final step involves the connection of both the side chain 3 and the macrocycle 2. Literature precedents suggested that the ring disconnection of macrocycles, especially macrocyclic peptides, is so strategically important that it can ultimately determine the success of a synthesis [14]. We thus elected to conduct the synthesis of macrocycle 2 via two distinct routes which included macrocyclization performed by lactamization of the amino acid derived from 5 or lactonization of a seco-acid derived from 4, respectively. We envisioned the precursor 4 would be rapidly assembled through solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) and the linear depsipeptide 5 should be available through a more convergent solution-phase synthesis.

2. Results

The synthetic campaign towards pagoamide A was initiated with 2-chlorotrityl chloride (CTC) resin-bound Fmoc-l-phenylalanine (6). Iterative peptide elongation was carried out under solid phase peptide synthesis conditions (Scheme 2). Fmoc-d-Val, Fmoc-d-Phe, Fmoc-d-Ala, Fmoc-O-Bn-l-Ser, Fmoc-O-tBu-l-Thr and Fmoc-O-Bn-d-Ser were consecutively loaded onto the resin to provide the resin-immobilized heptapeptide 4. Cleavage of the resin with concomitant deprotection of the tert-butyl ether was achieved in trifluoroacetic acid−triisopropylsilane−water (95:2.5:2.5). Thus, the seco-acid was obtained in an overall 30% yield starting from CTC resin and we were thus poised to investigate the pivotal macrolactonization.
As summarized in Table 1, an exhaustive screening of conditions was conducted. Thus, seco-acid 7 was treated with the Shiina reagent (2-methyl-6-nitrobenzoic anhydride, MNBA) [15] to effect the intramolecular esterification, giving rise to the macrocycle 8 but in a very low yield (20%, entry 1).
Disappointedly, macrolactonization with MNBA in different solvent systems (entries 2–3) only resulted in diminished yields. Other conditions (entries 4–10) employing 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride (TCBC, Yamaguchi Reagent) [16], 2-bromo-1-ethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (BEP) [17], N-ethyl-N’-dimethylaminopropylcarbodiimide (EDCI), N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) [18], and N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylchloroformamidinium hexafluorophosphate (TCFH) [19] all provided intractable mixtures with little or no desired products. These unsatisfactory results prompted us to explore a new approach wherein the difficult ester bond is installed at an earlier stage, and macrocyclization is performed by lactamization rather than lactonization.
Thus, condensation of Fmoc-l-Val-OH 9 and O-tBu-l-Phe 10, mediated by (1-[bis (dimethylamino)-methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxide hexafluorophosphate) (HATU), 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole (HOAt) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) proceeded smoothly to afford dipeptide 11 in 88% yield (Scheme 3). Removal of Fmoc protecting group from the dipeptide 11 with 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) followed by coupling of the resulting amines with Fmoc-d-Phe-OH under HATU/HOAt conditions furnished tripeptide 12 in 84% yield [20]. Subsequently, functional group manipulations afforded the two desired tripeptidic acids 14 and 15 without incident. In parallel, coupling of O-All-l-Ala 16 with Fmoc-O-Bn-l-Ser-OH 17 was achieved through carboxyl activation with HATU/HOAt and provided dipeptide 18 in 98% yield. Then, applying the same sequence that was used for the synthesis of dipeptide 18, tetrapeptide 20 was prepared uneventfully from 18 through incorporation of Fmoc-O-tBu-l-Thr and Fmoc-O-Bn-d-Ser (Scheme 3).
With the tetrapeptide 20 in hand, the stage was set for the assembly of the macrocycle (Scheme 4). Esterification of the alcohol 20 with acid 14 or 15 turned out to be much more challenging than expected. A plethora of reagents was examined to mediate the coupling between alcohol 20 and acids 14 or 15. As monitored by TLC and LCMS, tetrapeptidic alcohol 20 remained intact and the acid 14/15 readily decomposed under the reaction conditions. We suspected that the formation of oxazolone upon activation of the acid might be one of the detrimental pathways. Therefore, esterification of alcohol 20 with Fmoc-l-Phe was attempted. To our delight, under Shiina conditions, ester 21 was obtained in 90% yield. Further condensation of dipeptide 22 with the free amine derived from fragment 21, mediated by HATU/HOAt gave rise to macrocyclization precursor 5 in 80% yield. Simultaneous deprotection of the allyl ester and alloc protecting groups by using Pd(PPh3)4/ZnCl2/polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS) [21], and subsequent macrocyclization of the resulting amino acid produced macrocycle 2 in 60% yield over two steps.
The final stage was set for the incorporation of bis-thiazole fragment 3 (Scheme 5), which was prepared from the known valine-derived thiazole 24 [22] via a three-step sequence including: (1) reductive amination to install the N,N-dimethyl moiety; (2) saponification in THF/H2O with lithium hydroxide to release the corresponding acid; (3) amidation with the other thiazole subunit 25 [23]. Trifluoroacetic acid-promoted removal of the Boc group in 2 followed by coupling of the resulting amine with the acid derived from ethyl ester 3 in the presence of EDCI/HOAt/TEA/DMAP in DMF delivered the corresponding depsipeptide 26 in 85% yield. Global deprotection was achieved by employing boron trichloride in DCM at −78 °C and furnished pagoamide A (1) in 60% yield. With many building blocks already in hand, the next step was to prepare the diastereoisomer 1a, and this was readily achieved by following the same synthetic procedure as for pagoamide A (1). The synthesis proceeded smoothly under the previous conditions through cyclization and attachment of the thiazole-containing side chain (See Supplementary Materials for details). The optical rotation of the synthetic product 1  [ α ]   D 25   = +8.0 (c 0.1, MeOH), was in close agreement with the value reported in the literature for natural pagoamide A [ α ]   D 25   = +5.5 (c 0.1, MeOH). Spectral data, including 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, were collected for both the natural and synthetic sample (1) and found to be in full agreement (Table 2) [1], while the synthetic 1a showed remarkable discrepancies in spectral data as compared to natural pagoamide A, which unambiguously confirmed the original assignments of natural pagoamide A.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All reactions were conducted in flame-dried or oven-dried glassware under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen or argon. Oxygen and/or moisture-sensitive solids and liquids were transferred appropriately. The concentration of solutions in vacuo was accomplished using a rotary evaporator fitted with a water aspirator. Residual solvents were removed under a high vacuum (0.1–0.2 mm Hg). All reaction solvents were purified before use: tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled from Na/benzophenone. Toluene was distilled over molten sodium metal. Dichloromethane (DCM), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) and trimethylamine (Et3N) were distilled from CaH2. Methanol (MeOH) was distilled from Mg/I2. The reagents were purchased at the highest commercial quality and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. Flash column chromatography was performed using the indicated solvents on silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh ASTM E. Qingdao, Tsingtao, China). Reactions were monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC), which was carried out using pre-coated sheets (Qingdao silica gel 60-F250, 0.2 mm). Compounds were visualised with UV light, iodine and ceric ammonium molybdate stainer phosphomolybdic acid in EtOH. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on Avance 300 MHz, Avance 400 MHz or Avance 500 MHz spectrometers (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm), relative to either a tetramethylsilane (TMS) internal standard or the signals due to the solvent. The following abbreviations are used to describe the spin multiplicity: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, qn = quintet, m = multiplet, br = broad, dd = doublet of doublets, dt = doublet of triplets, dq = doublet of quartets, ddd = doublet of doublet of doublets; other combinations are derived from those listed above. Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hertz (Hz) for corresponding solutions, and chemical shifts are reported as parts per million (ppm) relative to residual CHCl3 δH (7.26 ppm). 13C-NMR nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were recorded at 75 MHz, 100 MHz or 125 MHz for corresponding solutions, and chemical shifts are reported as parts per million (ppm) relative to residual CDCl3 δC (77.16 ppm). High-resolution mass spectra were measured on an ABI Q-star Elite (Beijing, China). Optical rotations were recorded on a Rudolph AutoPol-I polarimeter (Shanghai, China) at 589 nm with a 50 mm cell. Data are reported as follows: specific rotation (c (g/100 mL), solvent).

3.2. General Experimental Procedures

3.2.1. N-N-(((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-O-benzyl-d-seryl-l-threonyl-O-benzyl-l-seryl-d-alanyl-d-phenylalanyl-l-valyl-l-phenylalanine (7)

(A)
Fmoc-based Solid-phase Peptide Synthesis (SPPS)
The linear peptides were prepared by manual SPPS using 2-chlorotrityl resin (GL Biochem, loading: ca. 1.0 mmol/g) and the general procedure was stated as follows: Anhydrous DCM was employed to swell the resin in a suitable syringe for half an hour. Subsequently, the swollen resin was washed with DCM (3 × 30 mL), and a solution of Fmoc-l-Phe (5.0 equiv. to the resin capacity) and DIPEA (10.0 equiv. to the resin capacity) in DMF was added to this reaction vessel. The reaction mixture was shaken at room temperature for 8 h. After that, the resin was washed with DCM (3 × 30 mL) and DMF (3 × 30 mL), respectively. Next, the resin underwent iterative peptide assembly (Fmoc-SPPS). A solution of Fmoc-protected amino acid (4.0 equiv. according to the resin capacity), HATU (4.0 equiv.) and DIPEA (8.0 equiv.) in DMF was gently agitated with the resin at room temperature for 2 h. Subsequently, the resin was washed with DCM (3 × 30 mL) and DMF (3 × 30 mL). After Kaiser test showed complete coupling, the deprotection of Fmoc group at N-terminus was achieved by 30 min treatment of 50% morpholine in DMF at room temperature. As followed, the resin was washed thoroughly with DCM (3 × 30 mL) and DMF (3 × 30 mL). The coupling and deprotecting procedures were repeated for coupling each amino acid until the desired linear peptide sequence 4 was obtained.
(B)
Removal of the C-terminal protecting group
The on-resin fully protected peptidyl acid 4, obtained as described in the previous procedure A, was subjected to TFA/TIPSH/H2O (95/2.5/2.5, v/v/v) for 2 h. Following filtration, the resulting solutions were combined and concentrated to give the crude protected peptide bearing the free carboxylic acid at the C-terminus. The crude acid was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/20) to afford 7 as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.6 (MeOH/DCM = 1/10), UV & PMA stain, α D 23 = +2.0 (c 0.7, DMSO). 1H- NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.31 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.03–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.32–7.25 (m, 10H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.20–7.16 (m, 4H), 7.16–7.10 (m, 2H), 4.62–4.48 (m, 2H), 4.51–4.33 (m, 10H), 4.30–4.20 (m, 3H), 4.24–4.10 (m, 4H), 3.03 (dd, J = 13.9, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.98–2.92 (m, 1H), 2.92–2.84 (m, 1H), 2.82–2.67 (m, 1H), 2.09–1.78 (m, 1H), 1.09 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.70 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.66 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.0, 172.0, 171.2, 170.9, 170.2, 170.0, 169.2, 158.9, 158.4, 156.3, 144.1, 143.9, 140.9, 138.3, 138.3, 137.7, 129.4, 129.3, 128.4, 128.3, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 127.4, 126.7, 126.5, 125.5, 120.3, 72.3, 69.7, 66.8, 66.2, 57.8, 57.4, 55.1, 54.9, 54.4, 53.8, 53.2, 48.5, 46.8, 36.8, 30.9, 19.4, 19.3, 18.4, 17.8. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C65H73N7O13Na+ [M + Na]+ 1182.5159, found 1182.5153.

3.2.2. (9H-Fluoren-9-yl)methyl ((R)-3-(benzyloxy)-1-(((3S,6S,9R,12R,15S,18S,19R)-3,9-dibenzyl-15-((benzyloxy)methyl)-6-isopropyl-12,19-dimethyl-2,5,8,11,14,17-hexaoxo-1-oxa-4,7,10,13,16-pentaazacyclononadecan-18-yl)amino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)carbamate (8)

Compound 7 was treated with different macrolactonization conditions, as showed in Supplementary Materials. The experimental procedure (entry 1) was as follows: To a solution of 7 (50 mg, 0.043 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and DMAP (27 mg, 0.22 mmol, 5.0 eq.) in anhydrous DCM (50 mL, ca. 0.001 M) was added MNBA (45 mg, 0.13 mmol, 3.0 eq.) under an argon atmosphere at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 12 h and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue which was redissolved in EtOAc (5 mL) and quenched with saturated aqueous solution of NH4Cl (2 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (5 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 2/1-1/1) to afford 8 (10 mg, 20%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.4 (hexanes/EtOAc = 1/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 24 = +18.2 (c 8.4, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.31 (m, 4H), 7.33–7.25 (m, 7H), 7.28–7.20 (m, 6H), 7.20–7.16 (m, 4H), 7.15–7.11 (m, 4H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66–6.54 (m, 2H), 6.11 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.67–5.57 (m, 1H), 5.28 (td, J = 10.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (ddd, J = 13.3, 8.9, 3.7 Hz, 2H), 4.75–4.55 (m, 3H), 4.52–4.47 (m, 2H), 4.29–4.16 (m, 2H), 4.20–4.11 (m, 2H), 4.13–4.03 (m, 2H), 3.97 (dd, J = 10.0, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.85–3.74 (m, 1H), 3.74–3.50 (m, 2H), 3.40 (dd, J = 14.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.32 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (dd, J = 14.2, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 2.12–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.17 (dd, J = 6.8, 4.3 Hz, 6H), 0.73 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.32 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C- NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 173.4, 172.0, 171.5, 170.8, 170.7, 169.8, 156.0, 144.3, 143.8, 141.3, 141.3, 137.8, 137.6, 136.9, 129.5, 129.1, 128.8, 128.5, 128.5, 128.4, 128.4, 128.0, 128.0, 127.8, 127.7, 127.1, 126.5, 126.5, 125.4, 125.3, 120.0, 73.8, 73.2, 71.0, 70.2, 68.0, 67.2, 59.8, 55.9, 55.4, 54.8, 52.5, 52.3, 51.5, 47.2, 36.5, 33.9, 29.6, 19.7, 16.9, 16.7, 16.3. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C65H72N7O12+ [M + H]+ 1142.5233, found 1142.5228.

3.2.3. tert-Butyl (((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-l-valyl-l-phenylalaninate (11)

To a solution of amine 10 (3.0 g, 13.6 mmol, 1.0 eq.), Fmoc-l-Val 9 (6.9 g, 20.3 mmol, 1.5 eq.), HOAt (3.7 g, 27.2 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and DIPEA (9.0 mL, 54.2 mmol, 4.0 eq.) in dry DCM (100 mL, 0.14 M) under argon atmosphere, was added HATU (10.3 g, 27.2 mmol, 2.0 eq.) at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. The solid residue was redissolved in EtOAc (100 mL) and quenched with 4% citric acid aqueous solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (100 mL), brine (100 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica (hexanes/EtOAc = 5/1) to afford 11 (6.5 g, 88%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.4 (hexanes/EtOAc = 4/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 25 = +6.2 (c 2.0, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.44–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.16–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.21 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (dt, J = 7.8, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd, J = 10.5, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (dd, J = 10.6, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.05–3.89 (m, 1H), 3.08 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.31–2.03 (m, 1H), 0.94 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.7, 170.4, 156.4, 144.0, 144.0, 141.5, 136.0, 129.6, 128.6, 127.9, 127.2, 127.2, 125.3, 125.2, 120.1, 82.6, 67.2, 60.4, 53.7, 47.4, 38.3, 31.4, 28.1, 19.2, 17.9. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C33H38N2O5Na+ [M + Na]+ 565.2673, found 565.2671.

3.2.4. tert-Butyl (((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-d-phenylalanyl-l-valyl-l-phenylalaninate (12)

To a solution of 11 (1.5 g, 2.8 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in dry DCM (50 mL, 0.05 M) was added DBU (2.8 mL, 2.8 mmol, 1.0 eq., 1.0 M in DCM) at 0 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C. After full conversion of the starting material as determined by TLC, HOAt (750 mg, 5.5 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and Fmoc-d-Phe (1.1 g, 2.8 mmol, 1.0 eq.) were added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min at the same temperature. Then, HATU (2.1 g, 5.5 mmol, 2.0 eq.) was added at 0 °C and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then quenched by the addition of H2O (20 mL). Layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (50 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexanes/EtOAc = 3/1-2/1) to afford 12 (1.6 g, 84%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.6 (hexanes/EtOAc = 2/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 26 = +10.0 (c 1.3, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (dd, J = 13.4, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.24 (m, 5H), 7.24–7.20 (m, 4H), 7.17 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.10 (m, 2H), 6.50 (s, 1H), 6.43 (s, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 4.70 (dt, J = 8.2, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.49–4.35 (m, 2H), 4.31–4.26 (m, 1H), 4.25–4.13 (m, 2H), 3.04 (dd, J = 6.5, 2.6 Hz, 2H), 2.03–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 0.74 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.67 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.9, 170.3, 170.2, 156.1, 143.8, 143.7, 141.3, 136.3, 136.1, 129.5, 129.3, 128.8, 128.4, 127.7, 127.2, 127.1, 127.0, 125.1, 125.1, 120.0, 82.4, 67.3, 58.5, 56.7, 53.7, 47.1, 38.6, 38.1, 30.7, 27.9, 18.9, 17.7. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C42H47N3O6Na+ [M + Na]+ 712.3357, found 712.3355.

3.2.5. tert-Butyl ((allyloxy)carbonyl)-d-phenylalanyl-l-valyl-l-phenylalaninate (13)

To a solution of 12 (690 mg, 1.0 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in dry DCM (10 mL, 0.09 M) was added DBU (1.0 mL, 1.0 mmol, 1.0 eq., 1.0 M in DCM) at 0 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C. After full conversion of the starting material as determined by TLC, AllocCl (0.1 mL 1.0 mmol, 1.0 eq.) was added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of H2O (10 mL). Layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexanes/EtOAc = 4/1) to afford 13 (369 mg, 67%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.6 (hexanes/EtOAc = 10/1), iodine and PMA stain. α D 25   = +9.6 (c 1.0, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.28–7.17 (m, 8H), 7.16–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.07–6.92 (m, 1H), 6.82–6.67 (m, 1H), 5.94–5.74 (m, 1H), 5.27–5.19 (m, 1H), 5.17–5.12 (m, 1H), 4.80–4.68 (m, 1H), 4.56–4.44 (m, 3H), 4.39–4.31 (m, 1H), 3.10 (dd, J = 13.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 2.00–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.68 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.2, 170.5, 170.5, 156.0, 136.5, 136.3, 132.7, 129.5, 129.4, 128.7, 128.4, 127.1, 127.0, 117.9, 82.3, 66.0, 58.4, 56.7, 53.9, 38.9, 38.3, 30.9, 28.0, 19.0, 17.9. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C31H41N3O6Na+ [M + Na]+ 574.2888, found 574.2888.

3.2.6. (((9H-Fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-d-phenylalanyl-l-valyl-l-phenylalanine (14)

To a solution of 12 (1.0 g, 1.5 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in DCM (15 mL, 0.075 M) was added TFA (5 mL) dropwise at 0 °C. After being stirred at room temperature for 10 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/20) to afford 14 (855 mg, 90%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.6 (MeOH/DCM = 1/10), UV & PMA stain. α D 26   = +6.3 (c 1.0, DMSO). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.17 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.13 (m, 9H), 7.12–7.01 (m, 1H), 4.46–4.33 (m, 2H), 4.19 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (s, 3H), 3.07 (dd, J = 13.9, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.01–2.89 (m, 2H), 2.86–2.75 (m, 1H), 2.07–1.83 (m, 1H), 0.78–0.59 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.1, 171.5, 170.7, 155.9, 143.8, 143.7, 140.7, 138.0, 137.9, 129.4, 129.2, 128.1, 128.1, 127.7, 127.1, 126.3, 126.2, 125.4, 125.4, 120.1, 65.0, 57.5, 56.5, 54.0, 46.6, 37.9, 36.9, 30.7, 19.2, 17.8. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C38H39N3O6Na+ [M + Na]+ 656.2731, found 656.2730.

3.2.7. ((Allyloxy)carbonyl)-d-phenylalanyl-l-valyl-l-phenylalanine (15)

Compound 15 was synthesized according to the procedures for the synthesis of 14 from 13 (369 mg, 0.67 mmol, 1.0 eq.). Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/40) to afford 15 (298 mg, 90%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.5 (MeOH/DCM = 1/20), UV & PMA stain. α D 27 = −3.7 (c 4.38, DMSO). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.20 (m, 6H), 7.20–7.13 (m, 2H), 5.82 (ddt, J = 16.0, 10.4, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 5.26–5.16 (m, 1H), 5.11 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.46–4.39 (m, 1H), 4.39–4.31 (m, 3H), 4.29–4.17 (m, 1H), 3.05 (dd, J = 14.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.98–2.87 (m, 2H), 2.73 (dd, J = 13.6, 10.4 Hz, 1H), 2.06–1.86 (m, 1H), 0.76 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C- NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.8, 171.5, 170.9, 155.7, 137.9, 137.5, 133.5, 129.3, 129.1, 128.2, 128.0, 126.4, 126.3, 116.9, 64.4, 57.1, 56.2, 53.5, 37.8, 36.6, 30.8, 19.1, 17.6. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C27H33N3O6Na+ [M + Na]+ 518.2262, found 518.2258.

3.2.8. Allyl N-(((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-O-benzyl-l-seryl-d-alaninate (18)

To a solution of amine 16 (6.4 g, 49.4 mmol, 2.0 eq.), acid 17 (10.0 g, 24.7 mmol, 1.0 eq.), HOAt (6.8 g, 49.4 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and DIPEA (17.0 mL, 98.8 mmol, 4.0 eq.) in dry DCM (300 mL, 0.08 M) under argon atmosphere, was added HATU (18.8 g, 49.4 mmol, 2.0 eq.) at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. The solid residue was redissolved in EtOAc (300 mL) and quenched with 4% citric acid aqueous solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 300 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (300 mL), brine (300 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 4/1) to afford 18 (12.8 g, 98%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.5 (hexanes/EtOAc = 3/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 24 = +6.7 (c 2.0, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.26 (m, 6H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.89 (ddt, J = 16.5, 11.0, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.77–5.59 (m, 1H), 5.37–5.28 (m, 1H), 5.29–5.22 (m, 1H), 4.71–4.56 (m, 4H), 4.53 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 1H), 4.46–4.36 (m, 3H), 4.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 1H), 3.69–3.49 (m, 1H), 1.40 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.3, 169.5, 156.3, 143.9, 143.8, 141.4, 137.4, 131.6, 128.6, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 127.2, 125.2, 120.1, 118.9, 73.6, 69.7, 67.4, 66.1, 54.3, 48.5, 47.3, 18.4. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C31H32N2O6Na+ [M + Na]+ 551.2153, found 551.2150.

3.2.9. Allyl N-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-l-threonyl)-O-benzyl-l-seryl-d-alaninate (19)

To a solution of 18 (3.0 g, 5.8 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in dry DCM (100 mL, 0.05 M) was added DBU (5.8 mL, 5.8 mmol, 1.0 eq., 1.0 M in DCM) at 0 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C. After full conversion of the starting material as determined by TLC, HOAt (1.6 g, 11.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and Fmoc-l-Thr (2.0 g, 11.6mmol, 1.0 eq.) were added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min at the same temperature. Then, EDCI (2.2 g, 11.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.) was added at 0 °C and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then quenched by the addition of H2O (100 mL). Layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (100 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/60) to afford 19 (3.1 g, 85%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.7 (MeOH/DCM = 1/20), UV & PMA stain.   α D 26   = +2.6 (c 1.3, DMSO). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.6, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 7.43–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.32–7.29 (m, 3H), 7.29–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.94–5.76 (m, 2H), 5.29 (dd, J = 17.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.22 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.73–4.66 (m, 1H), 4.63–4.56 (m, 3H), 4.54 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (dd, J = 10.6, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (dd, J = 10.6, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 4.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (dd, J = 9.6, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 9.6, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (s, 1H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.7, 170.4, 169.3, 156.7, 143.9, 143.7, 141.4, 137.4, 131.6, 128.6, 128.1, 127.9, 127.9, 127.2 , 125.2, 125.2, 120.1, 118.9, 73.6, 69.2, 67.5, 67.4, 66.1, 59.0, 53.0, 48.5, 47.2, 18.3, 18.3. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C35H39N3O8Na+ [M + Na]+ 652.2629, found 652.2633.

3.2.10. Allyl O-benzyl-N-O-benzyl-N-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-d-seryl-l-threonyl-l-seryl-d-alaninate (20)

To a solution of 19 (1.5 g, 2.4 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in dry DCM (24 mL, 0.09 M) was added DBU (2.4 mL, 2.4 mmol, 1.0 eq., 1.0 M in DCM) at 0 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C. After full conversion of the starting material as determined by TLC, HOAt (500 mg, 3.6 mmol, 1.5 eq.) and Boc-O-Bn-d-Ser (370 mg, 3.36 mmol, 2.0 eq.) were added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min at the same temperature. Then, HATU (1.4 g, 3.6mmol, 1.5 eq.) was added at 0 °C and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of H2O (30 mL). Layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (50 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 3/1-1/1) to afford 20 (1.3 g, 78%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.3 (hexanes/EtOAc = 1/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 26 = +2.3 (c 2.3, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 4H), 7.28–7.23 (m, 6H), 5.87 (ddt, J = 16.5, 11.0, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 5.39–5.26 (m, 1H), 5.22 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.68–4.61 (m, 1H), 4.61–4.57 (m, 2H), 4.56–4.48 (m, 4H), 4.47–4.44 (m, 2H), 4.35–4.26 (m, 2H), 3.85 (dd, J = 9.3, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.84–3.79 (m, 1H), 3.65 (dd, J = 9.9, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (dd, J = 9.4, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 1.42 (s, 9H), 1.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.11 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H). 13C- NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.6, 171.3, 170.2, 169.4, 155.6, 137.5, 137.4, 131.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.0, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 118.7, 80.6, 73.5, 73.4, 69.7, 69.3, 66.9, 66.0, 57.9, 54.9, 53.2, 48.5, 28.4, 18.3, 18.1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C35H48N4O10Na+ [M + Na]+ 707.3263, found 707.3260.

3.2.11. (2.R,3S)-4-(((S)-1-(((R)-1-(Allyloxy)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)amino)-3-(benzyloxy)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)amino)-3-((R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)propanamido)-4-oxobutan-2-yl (((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-l-phenylalaninate (21)

To a solution of 20 (1.64 g, 2.4 mmol, 1.0 eq.), Fmoc-l-Phe (1.86 g, 4.8 mmol, 2.0 eq.), Et3N (1.7 mL, 12.0 mmol, 5.0 eq.) and DMAP (29 mg, 0.24 mmol, 0.1 eq.) in anhydrous PhMe (15 mL, 0.12 M) was added MNBA (2.0 g, 6 mmol, 2.5 eq.) in anhydrous PhMe (5 mL) at 0 °C under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous solution of NH4Cl (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous solution of brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 2/1) to afford 21 (2.3 g, 90%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.5 (hexanes/EtOAc = 1/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 26 = +6.1 (c 2.1, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (dd, J = 10.2, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (td, J = 7.5, 2.9 Hz, 3H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.28 (s, 2H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 4H), 7.26–7.19 (m, 3H), 7.20–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (ddt, J = 16.5, 10.9, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.44–5.33 (m, 1H), 5.30–5.21 (m, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.62–4.54 (m, 6H), 4.52 (s, 1H), 4.48 (s, 1H), 4.49–4.40 (m, 2H), 4.42–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.34 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (dd, J = 10.6, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (dd, J = 9.4, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (dd, J = 9.6, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.63–3.53 (m, 2H), 3.09 (dd, J = 13.7, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (dd, J = 13.7, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.32 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.3, 170.7, 170.6, 169.0, 168.2, 156.1, 155.7, 143.9, 143.8, 141.4, 137.4, 135.8, 131.6, 129.5, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 128.0, 127.9, 127.8, 127.8, 127.3, 127.2, 127.2, 125.2, 125.2, 120.1, 118.8, 80.6, 73.5, 73.4, 70.1, 69.7, 69.1, 67.3, 66.0, 56.1, 55.5, 54.7, 53.1, 48.4, 47.1, 37.8, 28.4, 18.3, 15.5. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C59H67N5O13Na+ [M + Na]+ 1076.4628, found 1076.4622.

3.2.12. ((Allyloxy)carbonyl)-d-phenylalanyl-l-valine (22)

  • Step A: To a solution of Alloc-d-Phe (7.5 g, 30.3 mmol, 1.0 eq.), l-valine methyl ester hydrochloride (10.2 g, 60.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.), HOAt (8.2 g, 60.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and DIPEA (20 mL, 121.2 mmol, 4.0 eq.) in dry DCM (200 mL, 0.15 M) under an argon atmosphere, was added EDCI (11.6 mg, 60.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.) at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. The solid residue was redissolved in EtOAc (5 mL) and quenched with 4% citric acid aqueous solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (100 mL), brine (100 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 3/1) to afford S1 (9.9 g, 90%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.5 (Hexanes/EtOAc = 2/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 27 = +8.7 (c 2.2, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.14 (m, 3H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.95–5.72 (m, 1H), 5.62 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.31–5.15 (m, 1H), 5.21–5.10 (m, 1H), 4.61–4.53 (m, 1H), 4.51 (t, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (dd, J = 8.6, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.21–2.94 (m, 2H), 2.19–1.85 (m, 1H), 0.74 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.1, 171.1, 155.9, 136.5, 132.6, 129.3, 128.7, 127.0, 117.8, 65.9, 57.3, 56.2, 52.2, 38.8, 31.1, 18.8, 17.7. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H26N2O5Na+ [M + Na]+ 385.1734, found 385.1730.
  • Step B: To a solution of S1 (5.0 g, 13.8 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in THF/H2O (20 mL/10 mL, 0.46 M) was added LiOH⋅H2O (1.7 g, 41.4 mmol, 3.0 eq.) at 0 °C. after being stirred for 2 h at room temperature, the organic solvents were evaporated. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (10 mL), acidified to pH = 2 with HCl (1.0 M in water), and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous solution brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexanes/EtOAc = 3/1) to afford 22 (4.4 g, 91%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.6 (hexanes/EtOAc = 1/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 26   = +9.6 (c 7.3, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.08 (s, 1H), 7.34–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.15 (m, 3H), 7.08 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (t, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (ddt, J = 16.4, 10.9, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 5.26–5.18 (m, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.80–4.70 (m, 1H), 4.50–4.46 (m, 3H), 3.14–2.89 (m, 2H), 2.13–1.94 (m, 1H), 0.79 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.74 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.1, 171.8, 156.4, 136.4, 132.4, 129.4, 128.7, 127.0, 117.9, 66.1, 57.4, 56.1, 39.3, 31.1, 18.6, 17.7. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C18H24N2O5Na+ [M + Na]+ 371.1577, found 371.1577.

3.2.13. (2R,3S)-4- (((S)-1- (((R)-1- (allyloxy)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)amino)-3- (benzyloxy)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)amino)-3- ((R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2- ((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)propanamido)-4-oxobutan-2-yl ((allyloxy)carbonyl)-d-phenylalanyl-l-valyl-l-phenylalaninate (5)

To a solution of 21 (1.5 g, 1.4 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in dry DCM (15 mL, 0.09 M) was added DBU (1.4 mL, 1.4 mmol, 1.0 eq., 1.0 M in DCM) at 0 °C under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 0 °C. After full conversion of the starting material as determined by TLC, HOAt (380 mg, 2.8 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and 22 (550 mg, 1.6 mmol, 1.1 eq.) were added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min at the same temperature. Then, HATU (1.1 g, 2.8 mmol, 2.0 eq.) was added at 0 °C and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of H2O (30 mL). Layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 2/3) to afford 5 (1.3 g, 80%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.3 (hexanes/EtOAc = 2/3), UV & PMA stain.   α D 27   = −2.6 (c 1.0, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65 (s, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (s, 4H), 7.28 (s, 4H), 7.25–7.24 (m, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 3H), 7.19 (s, 2H), 7.18–7.15 (m, 4H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.49 (s, 1H), 5.92–5.86 (m, 1H), 5.85–5.79 (m, 1H), 5.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.35–5.25 (m, 1H), 5.28–5.20 (m, 1H), 5.24–5.18 (m, 1H), 5.19–5.10 (m, 1H), 4.82 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.77–4.69 (m, 1H), 4.65–4.60 (m, 3H), 4.59–4.57 (m, 2H), 4.57–4.56 (m, 01H), 4.53 (s, 3H), 4.48 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 2H), 4.41–4.30 (m, 1H), 4.09–3.99 (m, 1H), 3.95–3.88 (m, 1H), 3.83 (dd, J = 9.6, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.74–3.56 (m, 1H), 3.21 (dd, J = 14.1, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J = 13.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (dd, J = 14.1, 8.9 Hz, 2H), 1.95–1.85 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.60–0.51 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.6, 172.5, 171.2, 171.0, 170.2, 169.3, 168.6, 157.0, 155.8, 137.7, 137.6, 136.9, 136.6, 132.7, 131.7, 129.3, 129.3, 128.7, 128.5, 127.9, 127.8, 127.0, 126.9, 118.7, 117.8, 80.4, 73.4, 73.3, 70.7, 70.1, 69.3, 66.3, 66.0, 59.4, 57.2, 55.7, 54.4, 53.9, 48.5, 38.0, 36.7, 29.7, 28.4, 19.1, 18.2, 17.6, 15.6. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C62H79N7O15Na+ [M + Na]+ 1184.5526, found 1184.5530.

3.2.14. Ethyl (S)-2-((2-(1-(dimethylamino)-2-methylpropyl)thiazole-4-carboxamido)methyl)thiazole-4-carboxylate (3)

  • Step A: A solution of 24 [22] (5.0 g, 18.9 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and formaldehyde solution (37% in H2O, 10.3 mL, 375 mmol) in formic acid (10 mL, 1.89 M) was stirred for 12 h at 80 °C. After cooling to room temperature, concentrated HCl (3 mL) was slowly added to the reaction mixture. All volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the resulting residue was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The aqueous layer was added saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo providing S2 (3.15 g, 65%) as a colorless oil. TLC: Rf = 0.5 (hexanes/EtOAc = 1/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 22   = +1.6 (c 1.0, MeOH). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 4.28 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.51 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (s, 6H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.69 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.6, 161.3, 146.2, 127.1, 72.9, 61.1, 41.6, 30.1, 20.0, 18.9, 14.2. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C12H20N2O2SNa+ [M + Na]+ 279.1138, found 279.1140.
  • Step B: To a solution of S2 (3.15 g, 12.3 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in THF/H2O (10 mL/5 mL, 0.8 M) was added LiOH⋅H2O (1.55 g, 36.9 mmol, 3.0 eq.) at 0 °C. After being stirred for 2 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with concentrated HCl (5 mL) and all solvents were removed in vacuo providing crude product S3 which was used directly in the next step without further purification.
    Step C: To a solution of the crude S3 in DCM (20 mL, 0.6 M) at 0 °C was added DIPEA (10.1 mL, 61.5 mmol, 5.0 eq.), followed by consecutive addition of 25 [23] (4.6 g, 24.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.), HOAt (3.4 g, 24.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and HATU (9.4 g, 24.6 mmol, 2.0 eq.). The mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/40) to afford 3 (3.8 g, 84% for 2 steps) as a colorless oil. TLC: Rf = 0.4 (MeOH/DCM = 1/20), UV & PMA stain. α D 27   = +0.5 (c 0.75, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 4.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.37 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (s, 2H), 2.17 (s, 6H), 1.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.76 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.3, 168.5, 161.5, 161.3, 148.4, 146.8, 128.4, 123.7, 73.0, 61.6, 41.8, 40.8, 38.6, 30.1, 20.2, 19.3, 14.4. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H24N4O3S2Na+ [M + Na]+ 419.1182, found 419.1187.

3.2.15. tert-Butyl ((R)-3-(benzyloxy)-1- (3S,6S,9R,12R,15S,18S,19R)-3,9-dibenzyl-15-((benzyloxy)methyl)-6-isopropyl-12,19-dimethyl-2,5,8,11,14,17-hexaoxo-1-oxa-4,7,10,13,16-pentaazacyclononadecan-18-yl)amino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)carbamate (2))

To a stirred solution of 5 (750 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in THF (10 mL, 0.04 M) were added PMHS (1.5 mL, 6.5 mmol, 10.0 eq.), Pd(PPh3)4 (75 mg, 0.065 mmol, 0.1 eq.) and ZnCl2 (6.5 mL, 6.5 mmol, 10.0 eq., 1 M in THF) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at the same temperature. The mixture was diluted with saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (10 mL), brine (10 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/40-1/20) to afford the crude amino acid as a white solid. To a solution of the above crude amino acid in dry DCM (700 mL, 0.001 M) were added HOAt (177 mg, 1.3 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and DIPEA (0.5 mL, 2.6 mmol, 4.0 eq.) and HATU (494 mg, 1.3 mmol, 2.0 eq.) under argon atmosphere at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at room temperature and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. The solid residue was redissolved in EtOAc (20 mL) and quenched with 4% citric acid aqueous solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL), brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 2/1) to afford 2 (397 mg, 60% for 2 steps) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.5 (hexanes/EtOAc = 1/1), UV & PMA stain. α D 27   = +17.9 (c 7.9, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (dd, J = 8.0, 6.2 Hz, 4H), 7.28–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.25 (s, 3H), 7.24–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.20–7.18 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.11 (m, 5H), 7.03–6.95 (m, 1H), 6.85 (dd, J = 10.1, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.79–6.72 (m, 1H), 6.02 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.64–5.53 (m, 1H), 5.25 (ddd, J = 11.6, 9.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.92–4.82 (m, 1H), 4.71–4.62 (m, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.55–4.48 (m, 2H), 4.46 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J = 7.9, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.17 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (qd, J = 7.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (dd, J = 10.0, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (dd, J = 9.4, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (dd, J = 9.5, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (dd, J = 14.1, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.31–3.25 (m, 2H), 3.00 (dd, J = 14.2, 11.8 Hz, 1H), 2.20–2.09 (m, 1H), 1.35 (s, 9H), 1.18 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 0.77 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.30 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.7, 173.3, 172.0, 171.8, 170.8, 170.5, 169.7, 155.5, 137.8, 137.6, 136.9, 129.6, 129.4, 129.1, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 127.9, 127.9, 127.7, 126.4, 126.1, 125.8, 79.7, 73.7, 73.1, 70.8, 70.3, 68.0, 59.4, 55.8, 55.2, 54.8, 52.6, 52.3, 51.4, 36.5, 34.1, 29.4, 28.2, 19.7, 16.9, 16.6, 16.0. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C55H70N7O12+ [M + H]+ 1020.5077, found 1020.5078.

3.2.16. Pagoamide A (1)

  • Step A: To a solution of 2 (180 mg, 0.18 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in DCM (3 mL, 0.05 M) was added TFA (1 mL) dropwise at 0 °C. After being stirred at room temperature for 3 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude amine 3, which was used directly in the next step without further purification. To a solution of 3 (285.0 mg, 0.72 mmol, 4.0 eq.) in THF/H2O (4 mL/2 mL, 0.12 M) was added LiOH⋅H2O (92.0 mg, 2.2 mmol, 12.0 eq.) at 0 °C. After being stirred for 3 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with concentrated HCl (1 mL), and all solvent was removed in vacuo providing the crude acid which was used directly in the next step without further purification. To a solution of the above crude amine (0.18 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and the crude acid (0.72 mmol, 4.0 eq.) in DMF (5 mL, 0.09 M) were added HOAt (98 mg, 0.72 mmol, 4.0 eq.), Et3N (0.2 mL, 1.4 mmol, 8.0 eq.), DMAP (11.0 mg, 0.04 mmol, 0.5 eq.) and EDCI (138.0 mg, 0.72 mmol, 4.0 eq.) under argon atmosphere at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to stir for 36 h at room temperature and then concentrated in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. The solid residue was redissolved in EtOAc (10 mL) and quenched with saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/40-1/20) to afford 26 (194 mg, 85%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.4 (MeOH/DCM = 1/10), UV & PMA stain. α D 31 = +9.7 (c 1.0, CHCl3). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (dd, J = 7.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.98 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 6H), 7.27–7.23 (m, 5H), 7.23–7.19 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.13 (m, 5H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (s, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (qd, J = 6.3, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 5.41–5.33 (m, 1H), 5.25 (ddd, J = 11.7, 9.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (dd, J = 16.1, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (ddd, J = 16.1, 8.0, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.69–4.58 (m, 2H), 4.52 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 2H), 4.43 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (dd, J = 6.7, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J = 7.3, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (dd, J = 7.3, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.06 (ddd, J = 9.9, 4.3, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 12H), 3.46 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.41–3.32 (m, 2H), 3.28–3.21 (m, 1H), 3.03 (dd, J = 14.2, 11.7 Hz, 1H), 2.29–2.21 (m, 1H), 2.22 (s, 6H), 2.13–2.02 (m, 1H), 1.20 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.32 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 173.5, 172.0, 171.3, 171.1, 170.8, 169.8, 168.1, 161.7, 160.7, 149.5, 148.4, 137.9, 137.8, 137.8, 137.1, 129.5, 129.2, 128.7, 128.5, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.8, 127.7, 126.5, 126.2, 124.3, 124.0, 73.5, 73.2, 73.2, 70.6, 70.4, 68.1, 59.8, 55.8, 55.5, 53.3, 52.6, 52.4, 51.4, 41.8, 41.0, 36.5, 33.8, 30.2, 29.8, 29.6, 20.3, 19.7, 19.4, 16.9, 16.7, 16.3. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C65H80N11O12S2+ [M + Na]+ 1270.5424, found 1270.5429.
  • Step B: To a solution of 26 (32 mg, 0.025 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in anhydrous DCM (3 mL, 0.008 M) was added BCl3 (0.25 mL, 0.25 mmol, 10.0 eq.,1 M in DCM) at −78 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 4 h. Then, MeOH was added while the temperature was still at −78 °C, and the mixture was allowed to reach room temperature. The solvent was removed in vacuo furnishing a solid residue. The solid residue redissolved in DCM (5 mL) and saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (10 mL) was added. The aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product was performed by flash chromatography on silica gel (MeOH/DCM = 1/40-1/20) to afford pagoamide A (1) (16.3 mg, 60%) as a white solid. TLC: Rf = 0.2 (MeOH/DCM = 1/10), UV & PMA stain. α D 26   = +8.0 (c 0.1, MeOH). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.24 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 9.14–8.99 (m, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 8.31 (s, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 4H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.19–7.13 (m, 3H), 7.16–7.10 (m, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.70–5.61 (m, 1H), 4.91–4.85 (m, 1H), 4.85 (dt, J = 10.2, 2.8 Hz, 2H), 4.74 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.60 (td, J = 9.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.09–4.00 (m, 1H), 3.94 (dt, J = 10.4, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (dd, J = 7.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (dt, J = 10.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.64–3.54 (m, 3H), 3.27–3.17 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.10 (m, 2H), 2.31–2.22 (m, 1H), 2.17 (s, 6H), 1.93–1.81 (m, 1H), 1.15 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.59 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.28 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.5, 172.5, 171.3, 170.4, 170.2, 170.0, 169.9, 169.1, 168.4, 161.2, 159.7, 148.8, 148.5, 138.0, 137.8, 129.2, 129.1, 128.1, 128.0, 126.2, 126.1, 124.4, 124.3, 71.9, 71.3, 62.3, 60.7, 58.7, 57.3, 54.6, 54.1, 52.9, 52.4, 50.1, 41.3, 40.8, 36.1, 34.2, 29.5, 29.3, 20.1, 19.4, 19.0, 16.6, 16.4, 15.9. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C51H67N11O12S2Na+ [M + Na]+ 1112.4304, found 1112.4300.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the first total synthesis of the depsipeptide pagoamide A (1), was accomplished efficiently. Obstacles were circumvented by judicious synthetic design that featured a sequence-dependent esterification via Shiina conditions. The route entails a longest sequence of nine linear steps to access pagoamide A (1) starting from 17, which served to support the unequivocal structural elucidation of this natural product.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. detailed procedures for the synthesis of 1a and 1H- and 13C-NMR charts of all the compounds.

Author Contributions

F.W., J.Y., Y.G. and T.Y. conceived and designed this research; F.W., J.Y. and J.M. prepared the compounds and collected their spectral data; F.W. and J.Y. analyzed the experimental data; J.Y., Y.G. and T.Y. prepared the manuscript; all authors reviewed and approved the published version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21772009 and 21901013), the Shenzhen Peacock Plan (KQTD2015071714043444), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20170818090017617), the GDNSF (2014B030301003 and 2021A1515010344).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not available.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Yu, H.B.; Zhang, Y.; Leao, T.; Glukhov, E.; Pierce, M.L.; Zhang, C.; Kim, H.; Mao, H.H.; Fang, F.; et al. Pagoamide A, a Cyclic Depsipeptide Isolated from a Cultured Marine Chlorophyte, Derbesia sp. Using MS/MS-Based Molecular Networking. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, M.; Xiao, Y.; Otsuka, S.; Nakao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Kakeromamide A and Its Analogues. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Y.; Zhou, J.; Gao, B.; Zhao, M.; Yan, J.L.; Xu, Z.; Choi, S.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis of Hoiamide A Using an Evans-Tishchenko Reaction As a Key Step. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5471–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xing, X.; Maguire, R.A.; Luesch, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Grassypeptolide A. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 6774–6784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, L.; Xu, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis of Hoiamide C. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2506–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xing, X.; Xu, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis of Grassypeptolide. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 7486–7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, X.; Liu, Y.; Kwong, S.; Xu, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis and Stereochemical Reassignment of Bisebromoamide. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3018–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, Q.; Dai, L.; Zhang, H.; Tan, W.; Xu, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis of Largazole. Synlett 2008, 2008, 2379–2383. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pan, H.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis of Lyngbyabellin A. Lett. Org. Chem. 2005, 2, 699–702. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao, J.C.; Yu, S.M.; Liu, Y.; Yao, Z.J. Biomimetic Synthesis of ent-(-)-Azonazine and Stereochemical Reassignment of Natural Product. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 4300–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Q.X.; Crews, M.S.; Draskovic, M.; Sohn, J.; Johnson, T.A.; Tenney, K.; Valeriote, F.A.; Yao, X.J.; Bjeldanes, L.F.; Crews, P. Azonazine, a Novel Dipeptide from a Hawaiian Marine Sediment-Derived Fungus, Aspergillus insulicola. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4458–4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kashinath, K.; Jachak, G.R.; Athawale, P.R.; Marelli, U.K.; Gonnade, R.G.; Reddy, D.S. Total Synthesis of the Marine Natural Product Solomonamide B Necessitates Stereochemical Revision. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3178–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Festa, C.; Marino, S.D.; Sepe, V.; Auria, M.V.; Bifulco, G.; Debitus, C.; Bucci, M.; Vellecco, V.; Zampella, A. Solomonamides A and B, New Anti-inflammatory Peptides from Theonella swinhoe. Org. Lett. 2005, 2, 699–702. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rodriquez, M.; Terracciano, S.; Cini, E.; Settembrini, G.; Bruno, I.; Bifulco, G.; Taddei, M.; Gomez-Paloma, L. Total Synthesis, NMR Solution Structure, and Binding Model of the Potent Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor FR235222. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shiina, I.; Kubota, M.; Oshiumi, H.; Hashizume, M. An Effective Use of Benzoic Anhydride and Its Derivatives for the Synthesis of Carboxylic Esters and Lactones: A Powerful and Convenient Mixed Anhydride Method Promoted by Basic Catalysts. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1822–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. A Rapid Esterification by Means of Mixed Anhydride and Its Application to Large-Ring Lactonization. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, P.; Xu, J.-C. 1-Ethyl 2-Halopyridinium Salts, Highly Efficient Coupling Reagents for Hindered Peptide Synthesis both in Solution and the Solid-Phase. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8119–8131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boden, E.P.; Keck, G.E. Proton-Transfer Steps in Steglich Esterification: A very Practical New Method for Macrolactonization. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2394–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beutner, G.L.; Young, I.S.; Davies, M.L.; Hickey, M.R.; Park, H.; Stevens, J.M.; Ye, Q. TCFH-NMI: Direct Access to N-Acyl Imidazoliums for Challenging Amide Bond Formations. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 4218–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Isley, N.A.; Endo, Y.; Wu, Z.C.; Covington, B.C.; Bushin, L.B.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R.; Boger, D.L. Total Synthesis and Stereochemical Assignment of Streptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17361–17369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chandrasekhar, S.; Raji Reddy, C.; Jagadeeshwar Rao, R. Facile and Selective Cleavage of Allyl Ethers, Amines and Esters Using Polymethylhydrosiloxane-ZnCl2/Pd(PPh3)4. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 3435–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aguilar, E.; Meyers, A.I. Reinvestigation of a Modified Hantzsch Thiazole Synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2473–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peña, S.; Scarone, L.; Manta, E.; Serra, G. First Total Synthesis of Aerucyclamide B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 2806–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of Pagoamide A (1) and its diastereomer (1a).
Figure 1. Structure of Pagoamide A (1) and its diastereomer (1a).
Molecules 26 04224 g001
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic analysis of pagoamide A (1) and key intermediates 25.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic analysis of pagoamide A (1) and key intermediates 25.
Molecules 26 04224 sch001
Scheme 2. Solid-phase synthesis of intermediates 4, 7 and 8 from resin-bound Fmoc-l-phenylalanine (6).
Scheme 2. Solid-phase synthesis of intermediates 4, 7 and 8 from resin-bound Fmoc-l-phenylalanine (6).
Molecules 26 04224 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of intermediates 1115 and 1820 from amino acids 9, 10, 16 and 17.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of intermediates 1115 and 1820 from amino acids 9, 10, 16 and 17.
Molecules 26 04224 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of intermediates 21 and 2 from tetrapeptide 20.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of intermediates 21 and 2 from tetrapeptide 20.
Molecules 26 04224 sch004
Scheme 5. Total synthesis of pagoamide A (1).
Scheme 5. Total synthesis of pagoamide A (1).
Molecules 26 04224 sch005
Table 1. Optimization of macrolactonization.
Table 1. Optimization of macrolactonization.
EntryConditionsYield
1MNBA, DMAP, DCM, r.t.20%
2MNBA, DMAP, DCM/THF (1:1), r.t.10%
3MNBA, DMAP, CH3CN, r.t.5%
4TCBC, Et3N, DCM; then DMAP, PhMe, r.t.5%
5TCBC, Et3N, PhMe; then DMAP, PhMe, r.t.trace
6BEP, DMAP, DCM/DMF (10:1), r.t. to 40 °C5%
7EDCI, DMAP, DCM/DMF (10:1), 60 °C5%
8DCC, DMAP, DMAP⋅HCl, CHCl3, 65 °C5%
9TCFH, NMI, CH3CN, r.t. to 40 °Ctrace
10TCFH, NMI, DMF, r.t. to 40 °Ctrace
Table 2. Comparison of the 13C-NMR data of 1 with literature data [1].
Table 2. Comparison of the 13C-NMR data of 1 with literature data [1].
No.Natural (δ1)Sample 1 (δ2)δ = δ1−δ2No.Natural (δ1)Sample 1 (δ2)δ = δ1−δ2
1170.4170.30.12960.760.70
252.452.4030169.11690.1
336.136.103154.154.10
4137.9137.80.13271.371.4−0.1
5,9128.1128.10331615.90.1
6,8129.2129.2034169.9169.90
7126.2126.203554.554.6−0.1
1017017003662.462.30.1
1158.758.7037159.7159.8−0.1
1229.329.3038148.8148.80
1319.1190.139124.2124.3−0.1
1416.416.30.140170.3170.20.1
15172.5172.504140.840.80
165353042161.1161.2−0.1
1734.134.1043148.5148.40.1
18138.11380.144124.4124.40
19,23128128045168.4168.40
20,22129.1129.104671.971.90
21126.1126.104729.529.50
24173.5173.504819.419.30.1
2550.150.104920.120.10
2616.716.60.15041.341.30
27171.4171.30.15141.341.30
2857.457.5−0.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, F.; Yu, J.; Meng, J.; Guo, Y.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis of Pagoamide A. Molecules 2021, 26, 4224. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144224

AMA Style

Wu F, Yu J, Meng J, Guo Y, Ye T. Total Synthesis of Pagoamide A. Molecules. 2021; 26(14):4224. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Fusong, Jie Yu, Jiawei Meng, Yian Guo, and Tao Ye. 2021. "Total Synthesis of Pagoamide A" Molecules 26, no. 14: 4224. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144224

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop