Next Article in Journal
Asymmetric Synthesis of Tetrahydroisoquinoline Derivatives through 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of C,N-Cyclic Azomethine Imines with Allyl Alkyl Ketones
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydration Kinetics for Alkaline Activation of Slag from Color Variation Data
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanism of Producing Metallic Nanoparticles, with an Emphasis on Silver and Gold Nanoparticles, Using Bottom-Up Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Properties of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement Mortar Modified by Hydroxyethyl Methyl Celluloses with Different Degrees of Substitution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of a Novel CaCO3-Forming Alkali-Tolerant Rhodococcus erythreus S26 as a Filling Agent for Repairing Concrete Cracks

1
Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
2
Avian Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(10), 2967; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102967
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 9 May 2021 / Accepted: 11 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Cementitious Materials)

Abstract

:
Biomineralization, a well-known natural phenomenon associated with various microbial species, is being studied to protect and strengthen building materials such as concrete. We characterized Rhodococcus erythreus S26, a novel urease-producing bacterium exhibiting CaCO3-forming activity, and investigated its ability in repairing concrete cracks for the development of environment-friendly sealants. Strain S26 grown in solid medium formed spherical and polygonal CaCO3 crystals. The S26 cells grown in a urea-containing liquid medium caused culture fluid alkalinization and increased CaCO3 levels, indicating that ureolysis was responsible for CaCO3 formation. Urease activity and CaCO3 formation increased with incubation time, reaching a maximum of 2054 U/min/mL and 3.83 g/L, respectively, at day four. The maximum CaCO3 formation was achieved when calcium lactate was used as the calcium source, followed by calcium gluconate. Although cell growth was observed after the induction period at pH 10.5, strain S26 could grow at a wide range of pH 4–10.5, showing its high alkali tolerance. FESEM showed rhombohedral crystals of 20–60 µm in size. EDX analysis indicated the presence of calcium, carbon, and oxygen in the crystals. XRD confirmed these crystals as CaCO3 containing calcite and vaterite. Furthermore, R. erythreus S26 successfully repaired the artificially induced large cracks of 0.4–0.6 mm width.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) formation is a representative example of bacterial mineralization occurring because of the involvement of various bacterial genera in a wide range of natural environments; this process is known as bacterially induced CaCO3 precipitation (BICP) [1]. Recent studies on BICP cover a variety of fields with important implications for geobiotechnology, civil engineering, and the environment, such as biocement, concrete reinforcement, soil stabilization, carbon dioxide sequestration, wastewater treatment, heavy metal bioremediation, and oil recovery [2,3]. The most promising among them is the use of BICP to repair damaged concrete structures and historically important stone cultural heritages [4].
Various processes, such as physicochemical weathering, biological corrosion, ground subsidence, and human activity, cause cracks in concrete and stone structures. If not treated properly and quickly, cracks will expand further, eventually requiring costly repairs. Currently, resin mortar and epoxy are used to repair cracks, but they react with nitrogen oxides to create ozone, a highly toxic air pollutant which is harmful to humans and the environment [5]. Therefore, from the viewpoint of eco-friendliness and cost reduction, new cementitious materials for repairing structural cracks such as BICP, which is known as the self-healing technique, have gained attention. Self-healing materials refer to substances that can restore themselves to their original state. In particular, bacterially induced self-healing is described as the process of autonomously sealing cracks generated on the surface of concrete structures by chemical changes (i.e., CaCO3 formation) owing to the metabolic activity of bacteria [5,6].
Several processes have been found in which CaCO3 is formed by bacteria, including urea hydrolysis, denitrification, sulfate reduction, photosynthesis, and methane oxidation [6,7]. Among them, urea hydrolysis is the most studied and widely applied because of its excellent CaCO3 formation efficiency [8,9]. To date, most investigations on BICP by ureolytic bacteria have been conducted using the urease-producing strain of Sporosarcina pasteurii [10,11,12]. This strain can increase the pH by hydrolyzing urea to produce ammonium and bicarbonate ions, thereby accelerating CaCO3 formation [8]. However, because concrete is a harsh environment with a high pH, crack repair requires microorganisms that can survive and grow in such an environment. Therefore, the isolation and characterization of other extreme microorganisms are important tasks with regard to securing new biological resources for broader industrial applications.
As part of a project on the isolation of extreme microorganisms, we previously isolated a new strain capable of forming CaCO3 from alkaline soil (pH 9) [13]. In this study, the BICP characteristics of the isolated strain and the morphological characteristics of the formed CaCO3 were investigated. Furthermore, the rapid crack-repairing ability of this strain was confirmed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Urease Activities in Solid and Liquid Media

Rhodococcus erythreus S26 was inoculated on a urea agar base plate to investigate whether the color change of the medium was caused by a pH increase due to urease activity. As shown in Figure 1, the color of the medium changed from yellow to pink at 24 h, after which the color change of the medium continued to expand, indicating a quick and widespread increase in pH was apparent in strain S26. In contrast, the urease-negative bacterium, E. coli, did not change the color of the medium.
Figure 2A shows the change in urease activity according to the incubation time in NB-urea broth. After urease of 285 U/min/mL was produced at 24 h, it increased proportionally over time, showing maximum activity (2054 U/min/mL) at 4 d. Culture pH increased from 7.0 to 9.1 after 3 d of incubation.

2.2. CaCO3 Formation in Solid and Liquid Media

CaCO3 formation by strain S26 was investigated using a urea-CaCl2 plate. As shown in Figure 3, CaCO3 crystals of various sizes were observed in the colony and the surrounding medium. In particular, glossy crystals were densely distributed covering the colony surface. Most of these crystals were spherical; however, some polygons were also observed. Only spherical crystals were observed in the medium without cell growth around the colonies. No mineral crystals were observed in urease-negative E. coli. The shape and size of CaCO3 crystals depend on the molecular properties of exopolysaccharides secreted by bacterial cells, as well as on the colony form [14]. Furthermore, spherical CaCO3 crystals, vaterites, are primarily formed in solid medium containing agar [15].
Figure 2B shows typical time courses for pH, cell growth, and CaCO3 formation in the urea-CaCl2 broth. The CaCO3 was formed (3.83 g/L) at 4 d of cultivation when the cell growth reached the late logarithmic growth phase. Cell growth showed the same tendency as observed for CaCO3 formation. The pH of the culture gradually changed from neutral to alkaline due to urea degradation and showed a pattern similar to that of NB-urea broth. In addition, CaCO3 formation was found to be proportional to urease activity (Figure 2A). From the data shown in Figure 2, the CaCO3 formation process can be explained as follows. In the urea-CaCl2 medium, bacterial urease broke urea into ammonium ions, thereby increasing the pH of the medium. The negatively charged site of the bacterial cell wall was a nucleation site where calcium ions bound, and carbonate ions bound to calcium ions sequentially, forming CaCO3 crystals [16].
CO(NH2)2 + 2H2O → 2NH4+ + CO32−
Ca2+ + Cell → Cell-Ca2+
Cell-Ca2+ + CO32− → Cell-CaCO3

2.3. Influence of Calcium Source on CaCO3 Formation

The CaCO3 formation by microorganisms is greatly influenced by the type of calcium salt [17,18]. Therefore, CaCO3 formation by strain S26 was investigated using different calcium sources. In all experimental groups, the amount of CaCO3 formed increased in proportion to the incubation time, with the maximum values being observed at 3–4 days. CaCO3 formation was in the following order: calcium lactate, calcium gluconate, calcium nitrate, CaCl2 (Figure 4).
One of the main issues in applying CaCO3-forming microorganisms to concrete crack repair is in exploring the biochemical process of carbonate mineral formation. This process involves converting the soluble calcium source into insoluble CaCO3; therefore, the influence of the calcium source type is important. Most previous studies have used CaCl2 as the calcium source [17,18,19]. Seifan et al. [20] examined the effects of various calcium sources on CaCO3 formation using Bacillus species and found that CaCl2 was the best source of calcium for the formation of CaCO3. Lee [21] reported that the maximum CaCO3 yield by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CMB01 was achieved using calcium acetate. Hence, in the present study, we suggest that the optimal calcium source for CaCO3 formation varies depending on the microorganism used.

2.4. Influence of pH on Cell Growth

Many microorganisms cannot grow in concrete, which is a highly alkaline environment. To repair cracks in concrete using microorganisms, they must survive and grow in extreme environments [22]. Therefore, the effect of pH on the growth of strain S26 was investigated. As shown in Figure 5, strain S26 showed high growth at pH 4–7, followed by pH 8–10. The cells were able to grow after a lag period of 24 h at pH 10.5, but not at pH 11. Additionally, concrete is strongly alkaline with a pH 11, but the pH decreases to pH 8–10 when moisture penetrates inside it through the cracks created [22]. Considering this, strain S26 can form CaCO3 after the adaptation period in strongly alkaline concrete and has the potential for in situ applications.

2.5. Structural Characterization of CaCO3 Crystals

Morphology of CaCO3 formed in the urea-calcium lactate broth was investigated using FESEM. FESEM images showed that the formed CaCO3 crystals were mostly rectangular or rhombohedral with an irregular structure, with a size of 0.15–0.25 µm (Figure 6A). A few spherical crystals with particle sizes of 0.35–1.1 µm were also observed (Figure 6B). The elemental composition of the CaCO3 crystals was investigated using EDX and elemental mapping. The EDX spectrum showed that the sample contained Ca (25.2 atomic %), C (16.5% atomic %), and O (45.0 atomic %), indicating the presence of CaCO3 crystals (Figure 6C). Further elemental mapping confirmed that the crystals consisted of CaCO3 (Figure 6D,E).
As shown in Figure 7, XRD analysis of the crystals showed that two CaCO3 polymorphs were formed during the growth in urea-calcium lactate broth; the primary crystal component was rhombohedral calcite, but a small amount of spherical vaterite was also detected, which confirmed the results of FESEM imaging. Thermodynamically, calcite is the most stable CaCO3 polymorph and is a major product of many microbial CaCO3 formation processes [23]. In contrast, Proteus mirabilis [24] and Delia halophila [25] form vaterite and aragonite, respectively. Park et al. [26] reported that proteins or minerals produced during metabolism by CaCO3-forming microorganisms were adsorbed on specific crystallographic planes, thereby changing the shape of the crystals. These results suggest that the morphological specificity of the crystals formed is due to differences in the bacterial genera.

2.6. Concrete Crack-Repairing Effect

In order to repair concrete cracks using microbial CaCO3 formation, artificial cracks (0.4–0.6 mm) were made and cells were inoculated. As shown in Figure 8A,B, CaCO3 precipitates were found in cracks treated with the S26 strain; these cracks were gradually repaired over time and sealed tightly after 6 d. To confirm the microstructure of CaCO3 formed in the cracks, the repaired sample was crushed by hand, and then small pieces of CaCO3 were observed with FESEM. The formed CaCO3 crystal was a compact layered structure composed of polygonal and spherical particles, and rod-shaped cells were observed on its surface (Figure 8C). Some cells appeared to be fossilized by being covered with CaCO3 crystals (Figure 8D). De Muynck et al. [27] reported that this dense structure increased the strength of the concrete by giving it stronger adhesion and more tightness. Furthermore, the presence of cells is evidence that strain S26 was directly involved in crack repair, indicating that bacteria act as nucleation sites in the calcium carbonation process. On the other hand, the treatment of a wide crack with CaCO3-forming bacteria does not provide the nucleation site required for CaCO3 crystal formation because the cells flow down without attaching to the inner surface of the crack [27]. For example, unlike the results of this study, Park et al. [28] reported that there was no repair effect when Raoultella ornithinolytica, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacillus thuringiensis were tested on cracks with widths of 0.22–0.57 mm. Exceptionally, it was reported that Bacillus sphaericus LMG25557 completely repaired cracks up to 0.97 mm wide in 21 days [28]. These results indicate that the repairing effect of concrete cracks depend on the microbial species, and strain S26 can be applied to relatively large cracks. Meanwhile, van Titelboom et al. [29] reported that the crack-repairing effect was increased by using resin as a binder that increased the microbial adhesion to cracks with large widths.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Strain and Culture Conditions

R. erythreus S26 isolated from alkaline soil in Korea was used in this study [13]. It can form CaCO3 in a urea- and CaCl2-containing medium. Nutrient broth was used for the preservation and pre-culture of the strain. For pre-culture, a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of nutrient broth was inoculated with a colony from a culture plate, followed by incubation at 30 °C and 200 rpm for 18 h. Unless otherwise noted, 2% (v/v) of the pre-culture was inoculated into the main medium and incubated under the conditions mentioned above.

3.2. Urease Activities in Solid and Liquid Media

The S26 strain was inoculated on a urea agar base plate (0.1% gelatin, 0.1% glucose, 0.5% NaCl, 0.2% K2HPO4, 2% urea, and 0.0012% phenol red, pH 7.0) and incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h. This medium also contained phenol red, which indicates pH change associated with ammonia production due to urea hydrolysis. A color change from orange to pink indicated urea hydrolysis. A negative control was prepared using Escherichia coli KCCM 40880, a known non-ureolytic bacterium.
In addition, strain S26 was inoculated into NB-urea broth (0.3% nutrient broth and 2% urea, pH 8.0) and incubated at 30 °C, and time-dependent urease activity was investigated. Urease activity was determined using the method described by Natarajan [30] with some modifications. Briefly, 250 µL of sample was added to a previously mixed 250 µL of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and 500 µL of 0.1 M urea solution. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min, after which 500 µL of phenol nitroprusside solution was added, followed by 500 µL of alkaline hypochlorite solution. The mixture was then incubated at 37 °C for 25 min, followed by absorbance measurement at 626 nm, using ammonium chloride (0–100 μM) as the standard. One unit of urease activity is defined as the amount of enzyme hydrolyzing 1 μmol urea/min/mL.

3.3. CaCO3 Formations in Solid and Liquid Media

To investigate the formation of CaCO3 by strain S26, cells were inoculated on a urea-CaCl2 plate (0.3% nutrient broth, 2% urea, 0.212% NaHCO3, 1% NH4Cl, 25 mM CaCl2, and 1.5% agar, pH 7) and incubated at 30 °C. CaCO3 crystals formed around the colonies were observed using a stereoscopic microscope (Laica S6 D, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
To quantify CaCO3 formation, cells were inoculated into urea-CaCl2 broth and incubated at 30 °C and 200 rpm, and the amount of CaCO3 was measured over time. The culture was centrifuged at 500× g for 3 min to remove the supernatant, and the precipitated CaCO3 was collected. CaCO3 was washed with distilled water to remove residual cells and culture components and was dried at 105 °C for 2 h to measure the dry weight [31].

3.4. Influence of Calcium Source on CaCO3 Formation

Urea-CaCl2 broth was used as a basic medium to study the effect of various calcium salts on the formation of CaCO3 by strain S26. Calcium sources (calcium acetate, calcium gluconate, calcium lactate, calcium nitrate, and CaCl2) at 25 mM were separately added to the medium. Cultivation was performed at 30 °C and 200 rpm, and CaCO3 formation was measured at each incubation time.

3.5. Influence of pH on Cell Growth

To investigate the pH tolerance of strain S26, cells were inoculated into tryptic soy broth adjusted to pH 4–11, respectively, and incubated at 30 °C and 200 rpm. Cell growth was measured at 660 nm in a time-dependent manner.

3.6. Crystal Analysis

The morphology of the CaCO3 crystals was studied using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Carl Zeiss, SUPRA 40VP, Oberkochen, Germany). Prior to analysis, the dried CaCO3 crystals were mounted on specimen stubs with double adhesive tape, sputter-coated with platinum, and examined at 40 kV. Elemental analysis was then conducted using an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector connected to the FESEM. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the CaCO3 crystals was performed using a Panalytical diffractometer (Empyrean series 2, Almelo, Netherlands) at 40 kV and 30 mA using CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). Data were collected in the 2θ range of 20°–80° at a scan rate of 10°/min.

3.7. Repairing Test of Concrete Crack

A concrete paste was prepared by mixing cement (ordinary Portland cement type 1), sand, and water at a ratio of 6:3:4 (w/w), and the pH of the finished concrete paste was 10.6. Artificial cracks were induced by casting concrete paste on a Petri dish, inserting a 150 μm thick polyester film up to a depth of 5 mm, and placing it at room temperature for 1 d. After removing the film, the cracked concrete was cured for 20 d in tap water.
The crack repair effect of strain S26 was investigated using a cured concrete specimen. Strain S26 was cultured in nutrient broth (30 °C, 200 rpm, 24 h), and then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 5 min to collect the cells. The cell suspension (100 µL) diluted to A660 = 1 in urea-calcium lactate medium was injected into the crack every 12 h (repeated for 3 d), and the crack repair was observed using the stereoscopic microscope while incubating at 30 °C.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, we described an environment-friendly and efficient microbiological method for sealing cracks using R. erythreus S26 as a concrete healing agent. This method does not require the use of hazardous chemicals to repair concrete cracks. Strain S26 was able to produce the urease required for CaCO3 formation. When calcium lactate was supplied as a calcium source, the CaCO3 formation was the highest, and the formed CaCO3 crystals were a mixture of calcite and vaterite. In addition, strain S26 was able to grow in a strongly alkaline environment with a pH of 10.5. These results imply that R. erythreus S26 is not only useful for in situ repair of concrete cracks, but also to improve the compressive strength of mortar. To explore these possibilities, detailed studies on the reinforcement and durability of concrete are currently being conducted. In addition, research on the development of an economical medium capable of maximizing CaCO3 formation for the efficient repair of wider cracks within a shorter time should be carried out.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-J.S.; investigation, S.C., S.P. and M.P.; methodology, S.C. and S.P.; project administration, Y.K.; visualization, M.P. and Y.K.; supervision, H.-J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.L. and O.-M.L.; writing—review and editing, K.M.L. and H.-J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1F1A1053994).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Stocks-Fischer, S.; Galinat, J.K.; Bang, S.S. Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1999, 31, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, Y.S.; Park, W. Current challenges and future directions for bacterial self-healing concrete. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 3059–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, X.; Jiang, J. Mineralization and cementing properties of bio-carbonate cement, bio-phosphate cement, and bio-carbonate/phosphate cement: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 21483–21497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chuo, S.C.; Mohamed, S.F.; Setapar, S.H.M.; Ahmad, A.; Jawaid, M.; Wani, W.A.; Yaqoo, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.N.M. Insights into the current trends in the utilization of bacteria for microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Materials 2020, 13, 4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shamsuddoha, M.; Hüsken, G.; Schmidt, W.; Kühne, H.C.; Baeßler, M. Ternary mix design of grout material for structural repair using statistical tools. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 189, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seifan, M.; Samani, K.; Berenjian, A. Bioconcrete: Next generation of self-healing concrete. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2591–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hammes, F.; Verstraete, W. Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial carbonate precipitation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2002, 1, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carmona, J.P.S.F.; Oliveira, P.J.V.; Lemos, L.J.L. Biostabilization of a sandy soil using enzymatic calcium carbonate precipitation. Procedia Eng. 2016, 143, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Li, H.; Song, Y.; Li, Q.; He, J.; Song, Y. Effective microbial calcite precipitation by a new mutant and precipitating regulation of extracellular urease. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 167, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Joshi, S.; Goyal, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Reddy, M.S. Microbial healing of cracks in concrete: A review. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 1511–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seifan, M.; Berenjian, A. Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation: A widespread phenomenon in the biological world. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 4693–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Achal, V.; Mukherjee, A.; Basu, P.C.; Reddy, M.S. Strain improvement of Sporosarcina pasteurii for enhanced urease and calcite production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, H.Y.; Ko, M.K.; Son, H.J. Calcite-forming bacteria as eco-friendly concrete crack repair agent. Proc. Korean Environ. Sci. Soc. Conf. 2014, 23, 485–489. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dikshit, R.; Jain, A.; Dey, A.; Kumar, A. Microbially induced calcite precipitation using Bacillus velezensis with guar gum. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ghashghaei, S.; Emtiazi, G. Production of calcite nanocrystal by a urease-positive strain of Enterobacter ludwigii and study of its structure by SEM. Curr. Microbiol. 2013, 67, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cuthbert, M.O.; Riley, M.S.; Handley-Sidhu, S.; Renshaw, J.C.; Tobler, D.J.; Phoenix, V.R.; Mackay, R. Controls on the rate of ureolysis and the morphology of carbonate precipitated by S. Pasteurii biofilms and limits due to bacterial encapsulation. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 41, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stabnikov, V.; Jian, C.; Ivanov, V.; Li, Y. Halotolerant, alkaliphilic urease-producing bacteria from different climate zones and their application for biocementation of sand. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Achal, V.; Pan, X. Influence of calcium sources on microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation by Bacillus sp. CR2. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Daskalakis, M.I.; Magoulas, A.; Kotoulas, G.; Catsikis, I.; Bakolas, A.; Karageorgis, A.P.; Mavridou, A.; Doulia, D.; Rigas, F. Pseudomonas, Pantoea and Cupriavidus isolates induce calcium carbonate precipitation for biorestoration of ornamental stone. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 115, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seifan, M.; Samani, A.K.; Berenjian, A. Induced calcium carbonate precipitation using Bacillus species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9895–9906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lee, Y.N. Calcite production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CMB01. J. Microbiol. 2013, 41, 345–348. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jonkers, H.M.; Thijssen, A.; Muyzer, G.; Copuroglu, O.; Schlangen, E. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanchez-Roman, M.; Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Vasconcelos, C.; McKenzie, J.A. Biomineralization of carbonate and phosphate by moderately halophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 61, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, L.; Shen, Y.; Xie, A.; Huang, B.; Jia, R.; Guo, R.; Tang, W. Bacteria-mediated synthesis of metal carbonate minerals with unusual morphologies and structures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Ramoss-Cormenzana, A.; Delgado, G.; Delgado, R. Process of carbonate precipitation by Deleya halophila. Curr. Microbiol. 1996, 36, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Park, S.; Park, Y.; Chun, W.; Kim, W.; Ghim, S. Calcite-forming bacteria for compressive strength improvement in mortar. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 782–788. [Google Scholar]
  27. De Muynck, W.; De Belie, N.; Verstraete, W. Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 118–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.Y.; Soens, H.; Verstraete, W.; De Belie, N. Self-healing concrete by use of microencapsulated bacterial spores. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Tittelboom, K.; De Belie, N.; De Muynck, W.; Verstraete, W. Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Natarajan, K.R. Kinetic study of the enzyme ureas from Dolichos biflorus. J. Chem. Educ. 1995, 72, 556–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yoshida, N.; Higashimura, E.; Saeki, Y. Catalytic biomineralization of fluorescent calcite by the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7322–7327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Photographs showing urease activity of R. erythreus S26 and E. coli (urease-negative strain) on a urea agar base plate.
Figure 1. Photographs showing urease activity of R. erythreus S26 and E. coli (urease-negative strain) on a urea agar base plate.
Molecules 26 02967 g001
Figure 2. Urease activity (A) and CaCO3 formation (B) of R. erythreus S26 in a liquid medium containing CaCl2. Error bars (±SDs) are shown when larger than the symbol.
Figure 2. Urease activity (A) and CaCO3 formation (B) of R. erythreus S26 in a liquid medium containing CaCl2. Error bars (±SDs) are shown when larger than the symbol.
Molecules 26 02967 g002
Figure 3. Photographs of crystals formed by R. erythreus S26 on a urea-CaCl2 agar plate (A), E. coli (urease-negative strain) (BD), R. erythreus S26.
Figure 3. Photographs of crystals formed by R. erythreus S26 on a urea-CaCl2 agar plate (A), E. coli (urease-negative strain) (BD), R. erythreus S26.
Molecules 26 02967 g003
Figure 4. Influence of the calcium source on CaCO3 formation by R. erythreus S26. Error bars (±SDs) are shown when larger than the symbol.
Figure 4. Influence of the calcium source on CaCO3 formation by R. erythreus S26. Error bars (±SDs) are shown when larger than the symbol.
Molecules 26 02967 g004
Figure 5. Influence of culture pH on cell growth of R. erythreus S26. Error bars (±SDs) are shown when larger than the symbol.
Figure 5. Influence of culture pH on cell growth of R. erythreus S26. Error bars (±SDs) are shown when larger than the symbol.
Molecules 26 02967 g005
Figure 6. FESEM images (A,B), elemental mapping (C,D), and EDX spectrum (E) of CaCO3 crystals formed by R. erythreus S26.
Figure 6. FESEM images (A,B), elemental mapping (C,D), and EDX spectrum (E) of CaCO3 crystals formed by R. erythreus S26.
Molecules 26 02967 g006
Figure 7. XRD pattern of CaCO3 crystals formed by R. erythreus S26.
Figure 7. XRD pattern of CaCO3 crystals formed by R. erythreus S26.
Molecules 26 02967 g007
Figure 8. Repair of a concrete crack by R. erythreus S26-induced CaCO3 before (A) and after (B) incubation. B is a photograph showing that the crack was sealed when the cells were cultured for 6 d. (C,D) are FESEM images showing CaCO3 crystals and CaCO3-forming cells in the crushed sample after crack repairing.
Figure 8. Repair of a concrete crack by R. erythreus S26-induced CaCO3 before (A) and after (B) incubation. B is a photograph showing that the crack was sealed when the cells were cultured for 6 d. (C,D) are FESEM images showing CaCO3 crystals and CaCO3-forming cells in the crushed sample after crack repairing.
Molecules 26 02967 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, S.; Park, S.; Park, M.; Kim, Y.; Lee, K.M.; Lee, O.-M.; Son, H.-J. Characterization of a Novel CaCO3-Forming Alkali-Tolerant Rhodococcus erythreus S26 as a Filling Agent for Repairing Concrete Cracks. Molecules 2021, 26, 2967. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102967

AMA Style

Choi S, Park S, Park M, Kim Y, Lee KM, Lee O-M, Son H-J. Characterization of a Novel CaCO3-Forming Alkali-Tolerant Rhodococcus erythreus S26 as a Filling Agent for Repairing Concrete Cracks. Molecules. 2021; 26(10):2967. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102967

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Seunghoon, Sungjin Park, Minjoo Park, Yerin Kim, Kwang Min Lee, O-Mi Lee, and Hong-Joo Son. 2021. "Characterization of a Novel CaCO3-Forming Alkali-Tolerant Rhodococcus erythreus S26 as a Filling Agent for Repairing Concrete Cracks" Molecules 26, no. 10: 2967. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102967

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop