Next Article in Journal
Multitargeting Compounds: A Promising Strategy to Overcome Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Cellulose as a Delivery System of Raspberry Juice Volatiles and Their Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Oak and Cherry Wood Chips during Alcoholic Fermentation and the Maturation Process of Rosé Wines: Impact on Phenolic Composition and Sensory Profile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation Patterns of the Volatiles during Germination of the Foxtail Millet (Setaria Italic): The Relationship between the Volatiles and Fatty Acids in Model Experiments

1
Institute of millet crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, 162 Hengshan Street, Shijiazhuang 050035, China
2
Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 9 Meiling South Road, Hangzhou 310008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2020, 25(5), 1238; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051238
Submission received: 13 February 2020 / Revised: 7 March 2020 / Accepted: 7 March 2020 / Published: 9 March 2020

Abstract

:
Functional and nutritional compounds are increased during foxtail millet germination while bad smell is produced due to the fatty acid oxidation. To eliminate the unpleasant aroma, the origins of the volatiles must be known. A comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry showed forty-nine volatiles containing 8 ketones, 10 aldehydes, 20 alkanes, 4 alcohols, 5 alkenes, and 2 furans were tentatively identified, and they increased during the germination of the foxtail millet. To identify the origin of some volatiles, model experiments by adding 6 fatty acids to the crude enzymes of the foxtail millet was designed, and 17 volatiles could be detected. The saturated fatty acids (palmitic acid and stearic acid) had no contributions to the formation of the volatiles, whereas the unsaturated fatty acid played important roles in the formation of volatiles. Among the unsaturated fatty acids, palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid produced most aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones, while linolenic acid produced the most alkanes and alkenes. This study will be helpful for controlling the smell of germinated seeds from the raw material selection.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Seed germination is considered an efficient method for improving the nutritional components of cereals [1,2]. Amino acids, fatty acids, and some vitamins are increased during the germination of Brassica juncea [1], foxtail millet [3], and peanut kernel [4]. In addition, functional components such as flavonoids [5,6], phenolic acids [6], and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [7,8] are also improved during seed germination. It shows the germinated seed is a potential source of functional food.
However, smell is produced in germinated seed and the hydroperoxidation of the fatty acids plays important role in its production. A seed contains a high level of lipid for energy storage. During its germination, the lipid is hydrolyzed to free fatty acid by the lipase, and the unsaturated fatty acid is oxidized to hydroperoxide by lipoxygenase (LOX) [4,9]. The hydroperoxide can be degraded to the volatiles of alkanes, aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols by hydroperoxide lyase (HPL) and alcohol oxidoreductase [10,11]. Furthermore, the activities of lipase, LOX, and HPL become higher during seed germination [9,12,13].
Though these volatiles have been detected in many plants and have been known produced by the fatty acid oxidation [14,15], there is hardly any documentary evidence clearly described the correlations between the volatiles and the corresponding fatty acid. Moreover, it is difficult to use a mono-enzyme to contact the volatiles to the individual fatty acid because there are isomers of HPL existed in plants and they have different substrate specificities [10,11]. Thus, using the crude enzyme can conveniently correlate the fatty acid and volatiles. With the crude enzyme extract from leeks, linoleic acid can produce the hexanal, heptanal, (E)-2-heptenal, 1-octen-3-ol, (E)-2-octenal, (E, E)-2,4-decadienal, and pentanol, whereas linolenic acid can produce the hexenal, (E)-2-pentenal, (E, Z)-2,4-heptadienal, (E, E)-2,4-heptadienal, butanol, and (E)-2-hexenal [10]. However, diverse fatty acids exist in seeds, and diverse volatiles are produced during germination. A comprehensive study that relates volatiles with other individual fatty acid precursor is still needed.
Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) is one of the important food crops with high nutrition in China. During its germination, functional components were significantly improved [7]. However, unpleasant smell produced by fatty acids influences consumer acceptance. To eliminate the bad smell, the precursors must be known. The aim of this study is to identify the origins of the volatiles from germinated foxtail millet, and the relationship between the volatiles and the fatty acid was analyzed by a model experiment.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Variations of the Volatiles during the Germination of Foxtail Millet

To comprehensively understand the variation of volatiles during millet germination, a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOF/MS) was applied to detect the volatiles in the samples of brown millet, soaked millet, and germinated millet. After the peak alignment, a total of 449 ions were obtained for statistical analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) divided the samples into two groups (Figure 1A), and the first two principal components explained 40.6% of the total variance (29.6% and 11.0%, respectively). The group contained jg (raw brown millet) was below the group contained jgs, jg12, jg24, jg36, jg48, jg60, jg72, jg84, and jg96 (jgs and jg12–96 represented the soaked brown millet and germinated millet for 12–96 h, respectively), and the samples in the latter group aligned from the left to right. This indicated that some different volatiles were produced during soaking and germination of the foxtail millet. A supervised partial least squares-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) was then performed in the two groups (Figure 1B), and the model was no overfitting by cross-validation (Figure 1C). The loading plot of the PLS-DA model was used to screen the main differential volatiles in the two groups (Figure 1D). Finally, 49 volatiles which contained 8 ketones, 10 aldehydes, 20 alkanes, 4 alcohols, 5 alkenes, and 2 furans were tentatively identified by comparing with the in-line database and retention index (RI). Among them, 24 volatiles were accurately identified by the authentic standards (Table 1). Some of the volatiles were similar to the volatiles produced by the germinated brown rice and bean sprout in previous studies [2,16,17], which showed the accuracy of volatile identification in our experiment.
A heatmap was applied to show the variation content of the differential volatiles during millet germination. Green indicated that the volatile level was less than the mean level in all samples, whereas red indicated that the volatile level was higher than the mean level (Figure 2). The volatiles were clustered into two groups named group A and group B during millet germination. Interestingly, group A mainly containing ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, and furans began to accumulate at the 24-h germination stage, whereas group B mainly containing the alkanes and alkenes began to accumulate at the soaking stage. The variation patterns were agreed to a previous study that the volatiles were also increased in germinated brown rice [2]. The volatiles during millet germination are produced from the oxidation of the fatty acid [18]. At the soaking stage, the main volatile compounds were alkanes and alkenes. The reason might be due to the anaerobic environment of the soaking stage because both the alkanes and alkenes are do not have the oxygen atom. The alkanes and alkenes have gasoline-like odors with high thresholds. Therefore, these compounds might not be contributors to the smells of the germinated millet. After 24-h germination, the millet had a stronger odor than the soaked millet, which was due to the increase of the volatiles of ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, and furans. These volatiles have more diverse odors than alkanes and alkenes and are mainly produced from unsaturated fatty acids.

2.2. Variations of the Fatty Acid during Germination of the Foxtail Millet

To investigate the relationship between the volatiles and fatty acids, six fatty acids were determined during the foxtail millet germination. Among them, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid are the main compositions of the foxtail millet [19,20]. The contents of all the fatty acids (except palmitic acid) changed non-significantly after soaking, whereas they dramatically increased after 36-h germination and reached the maximum at 60-h germination (Figure 3). The same variation trend also takes place in the germination of peanut [4] and flaxseed [9]. The increase of the fatty acid might be due to the hydrolysis of the glyceride. The activity of lipase was increased during the seed germination (Figure S1), and results in the glyceride decreased [9]. However, after 60-h germination, the contents of the fatty acids began to decrease. The decrease of the fatty acid might be due to the β-oxidation, which can provide adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for millet germination.

2.3. Relationships between the Volatiles and Fatty Acid during Millet Germination

The increase of fatty acids may promote the increase of the volatiles. To further investigate the correlation of the volatiles and fatty acids during millet germination, a model experiment, which added the fatty acids (palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid) to the crude enzymes, was designed to analyze the different volatiles based on a previous method with modifications [10].
Firstly, the volatiles produced by non-enzyme reactions must be excluded because the standard of unsaturated fatty acid is unstable during its storage and easily autooxidized. Treatment 1, which added the fatty acids to the phosphate buffer with heating 24 h at 37 °C, was used to estimate whether the volatiles were produced by the autooxidation of the fatty acids, or originally presented in the standard of fatty acid. Three fatty acids, linoleic acid, oleic acid, and palmitoleic acid, could be detected the volatiles in treatment 1 (Figure S2). It meant other fatty acids (palmitic acid, stearic acid, and linolenic acid) were stable during 24 h water bath. However, linolenic acid is also easily autooxidized. Thus, the volatiles detected in treatment 1 might be due to the autooxidation during long-time storage of the linoleic acid, oleic acid, and palmitoleic acid rather than 24 h water bath.
In the treatment 1 of linoleic acid, 1-hexanol, 2-pentyl-furan, and 3-octen-2-one were detected and were higher in contents than the treatment 2 and 3, respectively. It meant that the three volatiles originally existed in the linoleic acid rather than the enzymatic oxidation. In contrast, in palmitoleic acid, heptanal, (E)-2-octenal, and (E)-2-nonenal in treatment 1 were higher than those in treatment 2 but less than those in treatment 3. This indicated that the three volatiles not only existed in palmitoleic acid but also could be generated by enzymatic oxidation. In oleic acid, (E)-2-octenal in treatment 2 was higher in content than treatment 1 and 3. It meant something could produce the (E)-2-octenal in crude enzymes while a high concentration of oleic acid could inhibit its produce.
Higher volatiles in treatment 3 than treatment 2 indicated that these volatiles were produced by the corresponding fatty acid. Treatment 3 was performed by adding the fatty acids to the crude enzymes while treatment 2 was the crude enzyme only. After 24 h reaction at 37 °C, only trace of volatiles could be detected from palmitic acid and stearic acid in treatment 3 compared to treatment 2 (Figure S3). This phenomenon might be due to the inhibition effect of the palmitic acid and stearic acid on the generation of the volatiles. Meanwhile, the results showed that the saturated fatty acid did not produce the volatiles during the foxtail millet germination.
In contrast, most volatiles were produced by unsaturated fatty acids (Figure 4). Six volatiles (2-heptanone, nonane, 2-pentyl-furan, 3-octen-2-one, hexanal, (E)-2-octenal) were significantly higher in linoleic acid in treatment 3 than in treatment 2, which indicated these volatiles could be produced by the linoleic acid. However, the formation of 2-pentyl-furan and 3-octen-2-one had been proved coming from the standard of linoleic acid according to the description above. Three volatiles, 1-octen-3-ol, benzeneacetaldehyde and 1-hexanol, were almost equally between the treatment 2 and treatment 3, which meant these volatiles did not come from the enzymatic oxidation of linoleic acid. In contrast, two volatiles (3-methyl-1-butanol and 2,3-butanediol) were at higher levels in treatment 2 than the treatment 3 of linoleic acid (Figure S4). The reason might be due to the inhibition effect of hydroperoxide on the generation of these two volatiles [21]. Similarly, 1-hexanol, heptanal, 2-pentyl-furan, (E)-nonenal, benzeneacetaldehyde, (E)-2-octenal, and undecane could be produced from the palmitoleic acid. (E)-nonenal, 2-pentyl-furan, undecane, and dodecane could be produced from the oleic acid. Nonane, decane, limonene, undecane, dodecane, and (E)-2-hexenal could be produced from the linolenic acid (Figure 4). The results also agreed to the previous study that hexanal, (E)-2-octenal, and 2-pentyl-furan are derived from linoleic acid, and (E)-2-hexenal is produced by the linolenic acid [10,22,23]. However, a previous study shows that the heptanal and 2-heptanone are produced from oleic acid [24], which is different from our results that these compounds were produced from palmitoleic acid. As the aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols present odors, and they are mainly produced by the palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid, choosing the cultivar containing a low level of these fatty acids for germination might weak the bad odor of the germinated millet.
The hydroperoxides of unsaturated fatty acids were important intermediates to the formation of the volatiles. The hydroperoxide is formed through introducing dioxygen to the unsaturated fatty acids by lipoxygenase, and the 9- or 13-hydroperoxides are the most common compounds [10]. However, other hydroperoxides such as 8-, 10-, 12-, and 14-hydroperoxide also can be detected in minor components [25]. The cleavage position of the hydroperoxide decides the formation of the compounds. Two kinds of cleavage mechanism, heterolytic and homolytic, are involved in the degradation of the hydroperoxide [26]. The heterolytic is the cleavage between the carbon bearing the hydroperoxide group and the unsaturated carbon, and the formation of hexanal, 2-heptanone, hepatanal, and (E)-hexenal were proposed belonging to this kind of cleavage mode according to the previous descriptions (Figure 5) [26,27]. The formation of (E)-2-octenal, 3-octen-2-one, and 1-hexanol belonged to the hemolytic, which is the cleavage of the hydroperoxide between the carbon bearing the hydroperoxide group and the saturated carbon [26].
It was noteworthy that 2-pentyl-furan was increased in the palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid in treatment 3. The 2-pentyl-furan has been widely detected in the oils with fruity, green, and earthy odor [28,29]. Previous studies report its formation is attributed to the oxidation of the unsaturated aldehydes that usually generated from the polyunsaturated fatty acid [28,30]. However, in our research, the 2-pentyl-furan also could be detected from monounsaturated fatty acids (palmitoleic acid and oleic acid) as well as the monounsaturated aldehydes ((E)-nonenal and (E)-2-octenal). Thus, their formations from the monounsaturated fatty acid need further investigations. Moreover, the alkanes and alkenes were also increased in treatment 3, especially in the linoleinic acid. Though these compounds are almost no contribution to the aroma of the germinated foxtail millet, they are commonly produced by the fatty acids [2,31]. However, to our best knowledge, the formation of the alkanes and alkenes from the unsaturated fatty acid is still unclear and need a further investigation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

Fatty acid methyl esters of palmitic acid (C16:0), palmitoleic acid (C16:1), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic acid (C18:2) and linolenic acid (C18:3), C3-C25 of n-alkanes, 2,3-butanedione, hexanal, (E)-2-hexenal, 1-octen-3-ol, 1-octen-3-one, 2-heptanone, (E)-2-octenal, and 1-hexanol were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). 3-Octen-2-one, 2-n-butyl furan, heptanal, and (E)-2-nonenal were purchased from TCI (Tokyo, Japan). Benzeneacetaldehyde, 2,3-butanediol, 3-methyl-2-butanone, and benzaldehyde were obtained from RHAWN reagent corporation (Shanghai, China). 1-Penten-3-one and 3-methyl-1-butanol were purchased from Aladdin reagent corporation (Shanghai, China). 2-Pentyl-furan was purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China). Heptenal was purchased from Accustandard (New Haven, CT, USA). Diethyl ether, n-hexane, and petroleum ether were purchased from Yongda chemical reagent co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Boron trifluoride-methanol solution (14% BF3·methanol) was purchased from CNW technologies (Dusseldorf, Germany). Milli-Q water was used in this study (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

3.2. Sample of Foxtail Millet

The seed of the foxtail millet (cultivar of Jigu 19) was harvested in Gaocheng district, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei, China, on 18 September 2018. The brown millet was made by removing the bran of the millet with the germ being reserved using a rice mill (SY88-TH, Ssang Yong Machinery industry co. Ltd., Incheon, Korea). The method of brown millet germination was according to a previous study with some modifications [7]. Briefly, 500 g brown millet was soaked in water for 12 h to absorb enough water, and germinated in a biochemical incubator (SPX, Linmaokeji co. Ltd., Beijing, China) at 25 °C with 60% humidity for 96 h. Every 12 h, the germinated millet was sampled. Finally, the total samples were divided into three batches: raw brown millet, soaked millet, and germinated millet for 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 h. All samples were immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen and then freeze-dried using vacuum freeze-drying equipment (D37520, Martin Christ, Osterode, Lower Saxony, Germany). The obtained samples were pulverized into powders with a pulverizer (IKA, Staufen, Germany) and stored at −20 °C for future use.

3.3. Determination of Volatiles Using HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOF/MS

The volatiles were measured using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)-GC×GC-TOF/MS. Before volatile extraction, the SPME fiber was preconditioned at 250 °C for 1 h in the injection port of the GC×GC-TOF/MS to activate the absorption ability. The SPME of the volatiles of the millet was performed according to the method described in a previous study [32]. Briefly, 1 g of sample was infused with 0.1 mL of pure water in a 20 mL vial with a screw cap, and the solution was heated in a water bath at 50 °C for 30 min. Accompanying with heating, the volatiles were absorbed by HS-SPME with a 50/30 μm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber (Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA) in an automatic headspace sampling system (CTC analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). The SPME fiber was then introduced into the injector port of GC and kept for 5 min to allow thermal desorption of the volatiles. Each sample was tested in triplicate.
The parameters of the GC×GC-TOF/MS instrument (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA) were according to a previous study with slight modifications [33]. In brief, the injector temperature was 250 °C with splitless injection. A DB-5MS column (30m × 0.25mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for the first-dimension analysis. The initial temperature of the column oven was 35 °C for 2 min, and then it was heated at 8 °C/min to 220 °C and held for 5 min. The second-dimensional column was DB-17ht (1.9 m × 0.1 mm i.d., 0.10 μm film thickness, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and + 10 °C above the first-dimension column. The flow rate of carrier gas (Helium, purity > 99.999%) was 1 mL/min. The ionization voltage was 70 eV (EI), and the ion source temperature was 230 °C. The interface temperature was 250 °C. The electron multiplier was at 1800 V and the mass scan range was m/z 33–600. After sample injection, the acquisition delay was 180 s.

3.4. Determination of Fatty Acid Using GC-FID

Fatty acid extraction and derivatization were conducted by a previous study with some modifications [34]. Briefly, 1 g of millet powder with 30 mL of diethyl ether and petroleum ether (1:1, v/v) were sufficiently mixed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube and shook for 2 h at 250 r/min using a shaker (MAXQ 4000, Thermo Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 min (centrifuge 3SR+, Thermo Scientific, CA, USA), and the supernatants were dried in a rotavapor at 35 °C (Buchi R215, Flawil, Switzerland). The dried residuals were re-dissolved in 1 mL of 14% BF3-methanol solution and water-bathed at 80 °C for 2 min. The derivative reaction was terminated by placing it in the ice, and the fatty acid methyl ester was extracted by 2 mL n-hexane.
The fatty acid methyl esters of palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid were determined by the method described in a previous study with slight modifications [34]. Briefly, it was performed with a GC-flame ionization detector (FID) (7820A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The injector temperature was 260 °C with splitless. A HP-INNOWAX column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for analysis. The initial temperature of the column oven was 50 °C, and then it was heated at 10 °C/min to 150 °C and held for 3 min. The oven was then heated at 4 °C/min to 205 °C for 1 min and at the rate of 8 °C/min to the final temperature of 235 °C for 2 min. The carrier gas (Nitrogen, purity > 99.999%) was at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The detector temperature was 260 °C. The airflow and hydrogen flow were 400 and 30 mL/min, respectively. Finally, a total of six external standard calibration curves were generated to quantify fatty acids (Table S1).

3.5. Determination of the Activity of Lipase

The determination of the activity of lipase was according to a previous study with some modifications [35]. Briefly, 1.00 g brown millet powder was infused with 5 mL Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) for 1 h at 4 °C for extracting the crude enzymes, and then the mixture was centrifuged at 8000 r/min for 10 min (centrifuge 3SR+, Thermo Scientific, CA, USA). 1.5 mL supernatant was mixed with 1 mL KCl (0.5 mol/L), 1 mL CaCl2 (5 mmol/L), 0.5 mL Tris-HCl, and 1 mL glycerol triacetate, and water-bathed at 37 °C for 1 h. Acetic acid would be produced through the catalysis of glycerol triacetate by lipase and was titrated with 0.05 mol/L NaOH solution using the phenolphthalein as indicator. 1 U of lipase was defined as the amounts of 0.01 mL NaOH (0.05 mol/L) was consumed by 1 g brown millet powder at 1 min.

3.6. Model Experiments to Explain the Relationship between the Volatiles and the Fatty Acids with Crude Enzymes

The crude enzymes were prepared according to the method described in a previous study with slight modifications [10]. Ten grams of each sample were mixed with 300 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 mol/L, pH 6.0 added 0.3 mL Triton X-100). The mixture was homogenized for 30 min (homogenizer, IKA T-25, Staufen, Germany), and the homogenate was centrifuged at 8000 r/min for 10 min (centrifuge 3SR+, Thermo Scientific, CA, USA). The supernatant containing the crude enzymes was stored at 4 °C for experiment use.
Palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid were used as precursors of volatiles in the model experiments. The model experiment was performed in two parts in a 20 mL sealed vial (Figure 6). One part was used to exclude the volatiles originally existed in the fatty acid or produced by autooxidation of each fatty acid during 24 h water bath (treatment 1), and the other part was the enzymatic oxidation of each fatty acid (treatment 2 and 3). All treatments were water-bathed at 37 °C for 24 h and then stored at −20 °C for detecting the volatiles.
The volatile of the model experiment was detected using HS-SPME-GC-MS (7890A GC, 5975C MS, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The parameters were the same as the method of HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOF/MS above, but only a DB-5MS column was used for analysis.

3.7. Data Treatment and Statistical Analysis

The data obtained by GC×GC-TOF/MS were processed using the LECO ChromaTOF software. The peak width of the 1st D and 2nd D was set to 25 and 0.1, respectively. The minimum S/N was set to 20 with mass range of 33–600 m/z, and the minimum similarity, reverse, and probability were set to 750, 750, and 1000, respectively. Total processing time was set to 33.875 min. The chemical structure was tentatively identified through comparison with database of “mainlib”, “replib”, and “nist_ri”. After data preprocessing, the statistical comparison function in the ChromaTOF software was used to compare and integrate the obtained data to establish a peak list.
The principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) were performed with Simca-P software (version 11.5, Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden) with Pareto-scaling (mean-centered and divided by the square root of SD). The PLS-DA was carried out by labeling the sample of jg as class 1, and other samples as class 2. The ions with variable importance in projection (VIP > 1) were used to screen the differential volatiles. A cluster analysis was conducted with a Pearson correlation after auto-scaling using MultiExperiment Viewer 4.9.0 software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze the significant difference in the contents of the fatty acids during millet germination using Duncan’s multiple range tests at the level of p < 0.05 using the SPSS 21.0 software (IBM, Worcester, MA, USA).

4. Conclusions

Forty-nine volatiles containing 8 ketones, 10 aldehydes, 20 alkanes, 4 alcohols, 5 alkenes, and 2 furans were tentatively identified during germination of the foxtail millet and divided into two groups according to the period of germination. The alkanes and alkenes were mainly produced at the soaking stage, whereas the aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones were mainly produced at the germinating stage. The relationship between the volatiles and fatty acids was also analyzed by model experiments, and 17 volatiles were detected. The palmitic acid and stearic acid had no contribution to the formation of the volatiles, whereas the unsaturated fatty acid played important roles in the formation of volatiles. Among the unsaturated fatty acids, palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid produced most aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones, while linolenic acid produced the most alkanes and alkenes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Variation pattern of the lipase activity during foxtail millet germination. Figure S2: Volatiles are produced by the autoxidation of palmitoleic acid, linoleic acid, and oleic acid. Figure S3: Volatiles are produced by the enzymatic oxidation of palmitic acid and stearic acid. Figure S4: 3-Methyl-butanol and 2,3-Butanediol are not produced by the enzymatic oxidation of the palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid. Table S1: Calibration curves for quantification of the fatty acids.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W. and J.L.; methodology, P.L., Y.Z., Q.C., and S.L.; software, Y.Z.; formal analysis, A.Z.; investigation, P.L.; data curation, W.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, P.L.; writing—review and editing, J.Z. and S.R.; supervision, J.L. and A.Z.; project administration, W.Z.; funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31771902), the Earmarked Fund for China Agricultural Research System (grant number CARS-06-13.5-A29), Hebei Province Science and Technology Support Program (grant number 17227108D), and the Postdoctoral Sustentation Fund of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Songyan Liu (Shijiazhuang animal product quality inspection center, China) for the help of volatile detection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.; Kim, Y.B.; Uddin, M.R.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.J.; Park, S.U. Influence of light on the free amino acid content and γ-aminobutyric acid synthesis in Brassica juncea seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8624–8631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xia, Q.; Mei, J.; Yu, W.; Li, Y. High hydrostatic pressure treatments enhance volatile components of pre-germinated brown rice revealed by aromatic fingerprinting based on HS-SPME/GC–MS and chemometric methods. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 91, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Coulibaly, A.; Chen, J. Evolution of energetic compounds, antioxidant capacity, some vitamins and minerals, phytase and amylase activity during the germination of foxtail millet. Am. J. Food Technol. 2011, 6, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chiou, R.Y.Y.; And, K.L.K.; Chen, W.L. Compositional characterization of peanut kernels after subjection to various germination times. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 45, 3060–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guardado-Felix, D.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O.; Cuevas-Rodriguez, E.O.; Jacobo-Velazquez, D.A.; Gutierrez-Uribe, J.A. Effect of sodium selenite on isoflavonoid contents and antioxidant capacity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) sprouts. Food Chem. 2017, 226, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, S.; Saxena, D.C.; Riar, C.S. Antioxidant activity, total phenolics, flavonoids and antinutritional characteristics of germinated foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Cogent Food Agric. 2015, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, X.; Hao, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Ning, Y.; Cheng, R.; Tan, B.; Jia, Y. Effect of the treatment by slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the accumulation of γ-aminobutyric acid in germinated brown millet. Food Chem. 2015, 186, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bai, Q.; Fan, G.; Gu, Z.; Cao, X.; Gu, F. Effects of culture conditions on γ-aminobutyric acid accumulation during germination of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 228, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wanasundara, P.K.J.P.D.; Wanasundara, U.N.; Shahidi, F. Changes in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seed lipids during germination. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ghita Studsgaard, N.; Lone Melchior, L.; Leif, P. Formation of volatile compounds in model experiments with crude leek (Allium ampeloprasum Var. Lancelot) enzyme extract and linoleic acid or linolenic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2315–2321. [Google Scholar]
  11. Matsui, K.; Toyota, H.; Kajiwara, T.; Kakuno, T.; Hatanaka, A. Fatty acid hydroperoxide cleaving enzyme, hydroperoxide lyase, from tea leaves. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2109–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ohta, H.; Ida, S.; Mikami, B.; Morita, Y. Changes in lipoxygenase components of rice seedlings during germination. Plant. Cell Physiol. 1986, 27, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hisao, K.; Hidetoshi, K.; Hirotaka, K.; Masachika, T. Characterization of 9-fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase-like activity in germinating barley seeds that transforms 9(S)-hydroperoxy-10(E),12(Z)-octadecadienoic acid into (E)-nonenal. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 1661–1668. [Google Scholar]
  14. Salas, J.J.; García-Gonzalez, D.L.; Ramón, A. Volatile compound biosynthesis by green leaves from an Arabidopsis thaliana hydroperoxide lyase knockout mutant. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8199–8205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qin, G.; Tao, S.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, S. Evolution of the aroma volatiles of pear fruits supplemented with fatty acid metabolic precursors. Molecules 2014, 19, 20183–20196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, K.; Zhao, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, F. Analysis of volatiles in brown rice, germinated brown rice, and selenized germinated brown rice during storage at different vacuum levels. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 2295–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zuo, Y.; Ju, S.; Liu, L.P.; Li, Y.; Xie, H. Analysis of volatile compounds in bean sprout by simultaneous distillation extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 396–398, 1570–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Horiuchi, M.; Umano, K.; Shibamoto, T. Analysis of volatile compounds formed from fish oil heated with cysteine and trimethylamine oxide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 5232–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Antony, U.; Sripriya, G.; Chandra, T.S. The effect of fermentation on the primary nutrients in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Food Chem. 1996, 56, 381–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, A.; Liu, X.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y. Crude fat content and fatty acid profile and their correlations in foxtail millet. Cereal Chem. 2015, 92, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sekiya, J.; Kajiwara, T.; Hatanaka, A. Volatile C6-aldehyde formation via hydroperoxides from C18-unsaturated fatty acids in etiolated alfalfa and cucumber seedlings. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 43, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Yang, N.; Fray, R.G.; Fisk, I.; Liu, C.; Li, H.; Han, Y. Characterization of volatile aroma compounds after in-vial cooking of foxtail millet porridge with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 82, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sekiya, J.; Kamiuchi, H.; Hatanaka, A. Lipoxygenase, hydroperoxide lyase and volatile C6-aldehyde formation from C18-fatty acids during development of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant. Cell Physiol. 1982, 23, 631–638. [Google Scholar]
  24. Monsoor, M.A.; Proctor, A. Volatile component analysis of commercially milled head and broken rice. J. Food Sci. 2010, 69, C632–C636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Haslbeck, F.; Grosch, W. HPLC analysis of all positional isomers of the monohydroperoxides formed by soybean lipoxygenases during oxidation of linoleic acid. J. Food Biochem. 2010, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Combet, E.; Eastwood, D.C.; Burton, K.S.; Combet, E.; Henderson, J.; Henderson, J.; Combet, E. Eight-carbon volatiles in mushrooms and fungi: Properties, analysis, and biosynthesis. Mycoscience 2006, 47, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schieberle, P.; Grosch, W. Model experiments about the formation of volatile carbonyl compounds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1981, 58, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Min, D.B.; Callison, A.L.; Lee, H.O. Singlet oxygen oxidation for 2-pentylfuran and 2-pentenyfuran formation in soybean oil. J. Food Sci. 2010, 68, 1175–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krishnamurthy, R.G.; Smouse, T.H.; Mookherjee, B.D.; Reddy, B.R.; Chang, S.S. Identification of 2-pentyl furan in fats and oils and its relationship to the reversion flavor of soybean oil. J. Food Sci. 2010, 32, 372–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. An, A.; Capucine, B.; Fien, V.L.; Bruno, D.M.; Norbert, D.K. Amino acid catalysis of 2-alkylfuran formation from lipid oxidation-derived α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 11058–11062. [Google Scholar]
  31. Giogios, I.; Grigorakis, K.; Nengas, I.; Papasolomontos, S.; Papaioannou, N.; Alexis, M.N. Fatty acid composition and volatile compounds of selected marine oils and meals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 89, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Klensporf, D.; Jelen’, H.H. Analysis of volatile aldehydes in oat flakes by SPME-GC/MS. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2005, 55, 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhao, F.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Li, P.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Q. Detection of adulteration of sesame and peanut oils via volatiles by GC × GC–TOF/MS coupled with principal components analysis and cluster analysis. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ivanova-Petropulos, V.; Mitrev, S.; Stafilov, T.; Markova, N.; Leitner, E.; Lankmayr, E.; Siegmund, B. Characterisation of traditional Macedonian edible oils by their fatty acid composition and their volatile compounds. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 77, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, Y.; Zhu, X.; Fang, F.; Hong, X.; Wu, H.; Chen, D.; Huang, X. Immobilization of Enzymes on a Phospholipid Bionically Modified Polysulfone Gradient-Pore Membrane for the Enhanced Performance of Enzymatic Membrane Bioreactors. Molecules 2018, 23, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. Multivariate statistical analysis of the volatiles during foxtail millet germination: (A) principal component analysis (PCA) score plot; (B) Partial least squares-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) score plot, R2X = 0.523, R2Y = 0.827, Q2 = 0.778; (C) Cross-validation plot of the PLS-DA model with 100 permutation tests (intercepts of R2 and Q2 are 0.306 and −0.268, respectively); (D) PLS-DA loading plot (black triangles with boxes represented most differential metabolites). jg, jgs, and jg12–96 represented the raw brown millet, soaked brown millet, and germinated millet, respectively.
Figure 1. Multivariate statistical analysis of the volatiles during foxtail millet germination: (A) principal component analysis (PCA) score plot; (B) Partial least squares-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) score plot, R2X = 0.523, R2Y = 0.827, Q2 = 0.778; (C) Cross-validation plot of the PLS-DA model with 100 permutation tests (intercepts of R2 and Q2 are 0.306 and −0.268, respectively); (D) PLS-DA loading plot (black triangles with boxes represented most differential metabolites). jg, jgs, and jg12–96 represented the raw brown millet, soaked brown millet, and germinated millet, respectively.
Molecules 25 01238 g001
Figure 2. A heatmap of the contents of volatiles during germination of foxtail millet. The data were auto-scaled and clustered according to the Pearson correlation coefficients. Green colors indicated that the volatile level was less than its mean level during millet germination, while red colors indicated that the volatile level was higher than its mean level. Group A mainly contained ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, and furans, whereas group B mainly contained alkanes and alkenes. jg, jgs, and jg12–96 represented the raw brown millet, soaked brown millet, and germinated millet, respectively.
Figure 2. A heatmap of the contents of volatiles during germination of foxtail millet. The data were auto-scaled and clustered according to the Pearson correlation coefficients. Green colors indicated that the volatile level was less than its mean level during millet germination, while red colors indicated that the volatile level was higher than its mean level. Group A mainly contained ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, and furans, whereas group B mainly contained alkanes and alkenes. jg, jgs, and jg12–96 represented the raw brown millet, soaked brown millet, and germinated millet, respectively.
Molecules 25 01238 g002
Figure 3. Variations in the contents of the fatty acids (mg kg−1) during millet germination. The significance of the differences (different letters) was determined at p < 0.05. Data were shown as the mean ± SD values (n = 3). jg, jgs, and jg 12–96 represented raw brown millet, soaked brown millet, and germinated millet for 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 h, respectively.
Figure 3. Variations in the contents of the fatty acids (mg kg−1) during millet germination. The significance of the differences (different letters) was determined at p < 0.05. Data were shown as the mean ± SD values (n = 3). jg, jgs, and jg 12–96 represented raw brown millet, soaked brown millet, and germinated millet for 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 h, respectively.
Molecules 25 01238 g003
Figure 4. Model experiment to explain the generation of the volatiles from palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid. tr2 and tr3 represented treatment 2 and treatment 3, respectively. C16:1, C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 represented palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid, respectively. The significance of the differences (different letters) was determined at p < 0.05. Data were shown as the mean ± SD values (n = 3).
Figure 4. Model experiment to explain the generation of the volatiles from palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid. tr2 and tr3 represented treatment 2 and treatment 3, respectively. C16:1, C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 represented palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid, respectively. The significance of the differences (different letters) was determined at p < 0.05. Data were shown as the mean ± SD values (n = 3).
Molecules 25 01238 g004
Figure 5. Proposed formation pathways of the volatiles produced from linoleic acid (A) and palmitoleic acid (B).
Figure 5. Proposed formation pathways of the volatiles produced from linoleic acid (A) and palmitoleic acid (B).
Molecules 25 01238 g005
Figure 6. Experimental design to elucidate the relationships between the volatiles and fatty acids.
Figure 6. Experimental design to elucidate the relationships between the volatiles and fatty acids.
Molecules 25 01238 g006
Table 1. Differential volatile compounds putatively identified during germination of the foxtail millet.
Table 1. Differential volatile compounds putatively identified during germination of the foxtail millet.
IDVolatile Compound1st Rt2nd RtRIcal aRIref bProbabilityOdor Description c
Ketones
12,3-Butanedione d3.401.795665951225fruity
21-Penten-3-one d4.602.076446817650pungent
33-Methyl-2-butanone d4.602.016446571443camphor
42-Heptanone d8.732.188808918707fruity, floral
5Cyclohexanone8.872.778878947841minty acetone
64-Methyl-2-heptanone9.802.129329438771NF
71-Octen-3-one d10.672.259729796443mushroom, earthy
83-Octen-2-one d11.932.34103510334690nutty, fruity
Aldehydes
92-Butenal4.072.116106293657flower
103-Methyl-butanal4.732.046536521162peach
11Hexanal d6.732.197768008959grass
12(E)-2-hexenal d8.002.338448545388green banana, cheesy
13Heptanal d9.002.208949018838herbal
14(Z)-2-Heptenal10.202.369509584277pungent, vegetable
15Benzaldehyde d10.332.949579628697bitter almond
16Benzeneacetaldehyde d12.073.00104210458017green sweet, floral
17(E)-2-octenal d12.332.35105610607333fresh cucumber
18(E)-2-nonenal d14.332.31116111626268green cucumber
Alkanes
192,3-Dimethyl-pentane4.731.606526722381NF
203-Methyl-hexane5.331.61691676859NF
212,5-Dimethyl-hexane6.001.65733729967NF
22Octane d6.731.687768005265gasoline
232,3,5-Trimethyl-hexane7.071.677968122323NF
242,4-Dimethyl-heptane7.201.688038211831NF
252,3-Dimethyl-heptane7.931.708408553634NF
264-Methyl-octane8.131.708508635801NF
272,4,6-trimethyl-heptane8.331.688608702161NF
28Nonane d8.931.718909003280gasoline
292,7-Dimethyl-octane9.531.699199285752NF
302-Methyl-nonane10.331.7195699643699NF
312,4,6-trimethyl-octane10.601.689699591045NF
322,2,4,6,6-Pentamethyl-heptane10.931.7098499916719NF
33Decane d11.071.7699110005144alkane
342,6-Dimethyl-nonane11.531.72101410181208NF
35Undecane d13.131.74109711001821alkane
362-Methyl-undecane14.331.76116111644077NF
37Dodecane d15.001.79119612003576alkane
382,6-Dimethyl-undecane15.271.76121212102783NF
Alcohols
393-Methyl-1-butanol d6.072.057367361758fusel oil, whiskey
402,3-Butanediol d6.532.387657889524fruity, creamy
411-Hexanol d8.272.138578685363ethereal fusel oil
421-Octen-3-ol d10.672.119729804162mushroom, earthy
Alkenes
432,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene7.671.738278366350NF
44Ethylbenzene8.132.238508554960NF
451,3-dimethyl-l-benzene8.332.198608663038plastic
46Limonene11.732.06102410306216citrus
473-Ethyl-2-methyl-1,3-hexadiene11.802.5710281031912NF
Furans
482-n-Butyl furan d8.802.048848939053mild fruity wine
492-Pentyl-furan d10.932.089859938130fruity, green, earthy
a Retention index (RI) is calculated in this study. b RI is referred from the NIST database. c odor description is adopted from the database (http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/index.html). d confirmed by authentic standards. NF means not found in references and databases.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, P.; Zhu, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, A.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; Ren, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, H. Variation Patterns of the Volatiles during Germination of the Foxtail Millet (Setaria Italic): The Relationship between the Volatiles and Fatty Acids in Model Experiments. Molecules 2020, 25, 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051238

AMA Style

Li P, Zhu Y, Li S, Zhang A, Zhao W, Zhang J, Chen Q, Ren S, Liu J, Wang H. Variation Patterns of the Volatiles during Germination of the Foxtail Millet (Setaria Italic): The Relationship between the Volatiles and Fatty Acids in Model Experiments. Molecules. 2020; 25(5):1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051238

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, PengLiang, Yin Zhu, ShaoHui Li, AiXia Zhang, Wei Zhao, JiaLi Zhang, QinCao Chen, SuFen Ren, JingKe Liu, and HuiJun Wang. 2020. "Variation Patterns of the Volatiles during Germination of the Foxtail Millet (Setaria Italic): The Relationship between the Volatiles and Fatty Acids in Model Experiments" Molecules 25, no. 5: 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051238

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop