Next Article in Journal
Determination of Eight Coccidiostats in Eggs by Liquid–Liquid Extraction–Solid-Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Evaluation of Hydroxybenzimidazole-Donepezil Analogues as Multitarget-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules25040986
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Antiproliferative Evaluation of Novel Longifolene-Derived Tetralone Derivatives Bearing 1,2,4-Triazole Moiety

by
Xia-Ping Zhu
1,
Gui-Shan Lin
1,*,
Wen-Gui Duan
1,*,
Qing-Min Li
1,
Fang-Yao Li
2 and
Shun-Zhong Lu
3
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2
College of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541100, China
3
Guangxi Academy of Forestry, Nanning 530002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(4), 986; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040986
Submission received: 5 February 2020 / Revised: 20 February 2020 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published: 22 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis of Drug Intermediates)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seventeen novel 2-(5-amino-1-(substituted sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylthio)-6- isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one compounds were synthesized from the abundant and naturally renewable longifolene and their structures were confirmed by FT-IR, NMR, and ESI-MS. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the synthesized compounds was evaluated by standard MTT assay against five human cancer cell lines, i.e., T-24, MCF-7, HepG2, A549, and HT-29. As a result, compounds 6d, 6g, and 6h exhibited better and more broad-spectrum anticancer activity against almost all the tested cancer cell lines than that of the positive control, 5-FU. Some intriguing structure–activity relationships were found and are discussed herein by theoretical calculation.

1. Introduction

Tetralin (tetrahydronaphthalene) is a valuable ring for the construction of drugs. This ring structure is found in many naturally occurring plant-derived podophyllotoxin. The chemotherapeutic medications etoposide and teniposide are semisynthetic derivatives of podophyllotoxin, and are used as topoisomerase II inhibitor anticancer drugs [1]. Due to their high toxicity, drug resistance, and the gastrointestinal discomfort associated with their use, lots of structural modifications have been carried out; consequently, some derivatives with better performance, such as NK611, NPF, GL-331, and TOP53, have been discovered and tested in clinical trials [2]. The tetralin ring also exists in the structures of some clinically used anticancer drugs, for example, the anthracycline antibiotics doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, and idarubicin [3], and so on. Many studies have been performed on tetralin derivatives for use as efficient antitumor agents [4,5,6,7,8,9].
Due to their diverse pharmacological properties, 1,2,4-triazole derivatives have been extensively studied for application in the fields of medicine and agrochemicals. Besides antimicrobial [10,11], anti-inflammatory [10,12], antituberculosis [13], antifungal [14], and herbicidal properties [15], antitumor activity has been reported [16], e.g., in the anticancer drugs letrozole, anastrozole, and vorozole [17]. Meanwhile, more and more new 1,2,4-triazole anticancer compounds are being studied [18,19]. In addition, many sulfonamide compounds with antitumor activity have been reported in recent years [20,21,22].
A tetralin derivative 7-isopropyl-1,1-dimethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene can be readily prepared from longifolene, which is a major constituent of the abundant and naturally renewable heavy turpentine oil, a by-product in the production of rosin and turpentine from living Pinus. In view of the factors mentioned above, and in continuation of our interest in seeking bioactive compounds from the biological source of natural products [23,24,25,26], a series of novel 2-(5-amino-1- (substituted sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylthio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1 (2H)-one compounds were designed and synthesized. Additionally, structural characterization and antiproliferative evaluation in vitro against T-24, MCF-7, HepG2, A549, and HT-29 human cancer cell lines for all the target compounds were carried out.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The synthetic route of compounds 6a–6q is illustrated in Scheme 1. First, 7-Isopropyl-1,1-dimethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (2) was prepared by isomerization and aromatization of longifolene, and further oxidized and brominated to give 4,4-dimethyl-2-bromo-6-isopropyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1-one (4). Then, compound 4 was reacted with 5-amino-3-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole to obtain compound 2-(5-amino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3ylthio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (5). Finally, 17 target compounds, i.e., 6a–6q, were synthesized by the N-sulfonylation reaction of compound 5 with a series of substituted sulfonyl chlorides.
According to [27], compound 5 can exist in three tautomeric forms, namely, 1H-, 2H-, and 4H-forms; the 1H-form was preferred. The N-sulfonylation reaction process was monitored by HPLC, and only one new peak was observed, leading us to speculate that compound 5 is in the 1H-form. Then, a N-sulfonylation reaction may occur on the nitrogen atoms of the 1H-site and the amino group. Comparing the 1H-NMR spectra of compound 5 with the those of the target compounds, it was found that the signals of the amino groups were preserved, meaning that a N-sulfonylation reaction took place on the nitrogen atom of the 1H-site. The result was further confirmed by a nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) experiment of the target compound 6a. As shown in Figure 1, the hydrogen atoms of the amino group showed a stronger correlation with the hydrogen atoms of the methyl group on the phenylsulfonyl moiety than that of the methyl groups on the tetralone moiety, indicating that the amino group was closer to the phenylsulfonyl group than the methyl groups on the tetralone moiety.
The structures of the target compounds were confirmed by means of FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and ESI-MS. In the FT-IR spectra, the target compounds exhibited absorption bands at 3100–3465 cm−1, which were assigned to the N–H stretching vibration. The two strong absorption bands at 3000–2850 cm−1 and 1675 cm−1 were attributed to the stretching vibrations of the saturated C–H and C=O in the tetralone moiety, respectively. The absorption bands at about 1640 cm−1 were due to the vibrations of C=N in the 1,2,4-triazole moiety. The two absorption bands around 1160–1190 cm−1 and 1300–1360 cm−1, respectively, confirmed the presence of a sulfonyl group. In the 1H-NMR spectra of 6a–6q, the signals shown at δ 6.0–8.5 ppm were assigned to the aromatic protons in the benzene rings and amino protons in the 1,2,4-triazole moiety. The other protons bonded to the saturated carbons of the tetralone moiety displayed signals in the range of δ 1.2–5.0 ppm. The 13C-NMR spectra of all the target compounds showed peaks for the carbons of C=O in tetralone moiety at about δ 193.2 ppm, and the other saturated carbons displayed signals in the region of δ 22–50 ppm. For the 1,2,4-triazole moiety, the signals at about δ 170.8 ppm and δ 151.7 ppm were assigned to the carbons of C=N. In addition, the molecular weights of the compounds 2–5 and target compounds 6a–6q were confirmed by the ESI-MS (see Supplementary).

2.2. In Vitro Assay of Antiproliferative Activity

The in vitro antiproliferative activity of compounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and all 17 target compounds, i.e., 6a–6q, against five human cancer cell lines (T-24 human bladder cancer cell, MCF-7 human breast cancer cell, HepG2 human liver cancer cell, A549 human lung adenocarcinoma drug-resistant cell line, and HT-29 human colon cancer cell line) were evaluated by MTT (methylthiazolytetrazolium) assay. In addition, the potent anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was used as a positive control in each panel. The in vitro antiproliferative activity test results of compounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and all 17 target compounds 6a–6q are shown in Table 2.
The target compounds presented obviously different antineoplastic activity against the five tested cancer cell lines. As shown in Table 2, compounds 6g, 6h, and 6d exhibited excellent and broad-spectrum antitumor activity against almost all the tested cancer cell lines, and compounds 6b, 6c, and 6f showed good activity against A549 and HT-29. All these compounds displayed better or comparable antitumor activity than that of the positive control, 5-FU. Notably, compound 6g had the best antineoplastic activity against MCF-7, with IC50 values of 4.42 ± 2.93 µM, and compound 6h against A549 with IC50 values of 9.89 ± 1.77 µM.
Some intriguing bioactive differences can be found. For example, compound 6h (R = 3′-NO2-4′-Cl) exhibited obviously better antitumor activity than compound 6k (R = 3′-NO2) and 6j (R = 4′-Cl). Additionally, compound 6d (R = 3′-Br) showed better antitumor activity than compound 6o (R = 4′-Br). Compound 6c (R = 2′-NO2) was better than compounds 6k (R = 3′-NO2) and 6l (R = 4′-NO2). Furthermore, compound 6g (R = 2′, 3′, 4′, 5′, 6′-F) displayed better antineoplastic activity than compound 6p (R = 2′, 4′-F). All these indicated that the position, type, and number of substituted groups significantly affects antitumor activity.

2.3. Theoretical Calculation and Analysis

The obvious contrast on antitumor activity between disubstituted compound 6h (R = 3′-NO2-4′-Cl) and its corresponding monosubstituted compounds 6k (R = 3′-NO2) and 6j (R = 4′-Cl) attracted our attention. According to the frontier molecular orbital theory, HOMO has the ability to provide electrons, while LUMO readily accepts electrons; these two frontier orbitals affect the bioactivity of compounds [28]. Therefore, the frontier molecular orbitals of compounds 6h (R = 3′-NO2-4′-Cl), 6k (R = 3′-NO2), and 6j (R = 4′-Cl) were calculated by means of DFT/B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) [28] in the Gaussian 09 package [29] on the Computer Supercomputing Platform at Guangxi University, and the result was viewed using the GaussView 5 software [30].
As shown in Figure 2a,d,g, a large portion of the HOMO was located on the 1,2,4-triazole ring, the amino group, the sulfur atom of thioether group, and the oxygen atom of carbonyl group for three compounds. However, the LUMO for compounds 6h (R = 3′-NO2-4′-Cl) and 6k (R = 3′-NO2) was located on the substituted phenylsulfonyl group moieties (Figure 2b,e), and showed phase reversal. The compound 6j (R = 4′-Cl) had LUMO on the tetralone moiety, showing an obvious difference with compounds 6h and 6k. In addition, molecule charge distribution was also one of the influential factors concerning activity. So, the electrostatic potentials (ESPs) and dipole moments for three compounds were calculated by means described above (Figure 2c,f,i). In comparison to compounds 6k and 6j, 6h showed higher negative electrostatic potential on the end of the R group, and possessed higher dipole moment, i.e., 9.48 D, than compounds 6k, i.e., 9.01 D, and 6j, 5.23 D. Overall, these differences were potentially responsible for the contrast of compounds 6h, 6k, and 6j in terms of antitumor activity. It would be useful to further investigate these compounds.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

The structures of the synthesized derivatives of tetralin were confirmed by means of 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, FT-IR, and ESI-MS. NMR spectra were recorded in a CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solvent on a Bruker Avance III HD 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Co., Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland). FT-IR spectra were recorded as KBr pellets on Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Co., Ltd., Madison, WI., USA). MS spectra were obtained by means of the electrospray ionization (ESI) method on TSQ Quantum Access MAX HPLC-MS instrument (Thermo Scientific Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). Melting points were determined using a MP420 automatic melting point apparatus (Hanon Instruments Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) and were uncorrected. The GC analysis was conducted on an Agilent 6890 GC (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA., USA) equipped with column HP-1 (30 m, 0.530 mm, 0.88 µm) and FID. The HPLC analysis was performed on a Waters 1525 instrument (Waters Co., Ltd., USA) equipped with column SunFire C18 5 µm (4.6 mm × 150 mm). Longifolene (GC purity 65%) was provided by Wuzhou Pine Chemicals Co., Ltd. Wuzhou, Guangxi, China. Other reagents were provided by commercial suppliers, and were used as received.

3.2. Preparation of Catalyst

A catalyst was prepared according to a method described in the literature [31]. After diluting with n-propanol (30% by weight), zirconium was used as the precursor. Sulfuric acid (1.02 mL) was added to the zirconium precursor, and water was then added dropwise under continuous stirring until the formation of gel occurred (4.2 mL, water to propoxide molar ratio = 2.7). The resulting gel was dried at 110 °C for 12 h, followed by calcination at 600 °C for 2 h in a static air atmosphere to yield the sulfated zirconia catalyst.

3.3. Synthesis of 7-isopropyl-1,1-dimethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (2)

Compound 2 was prepared according to a method described in the literature [32]. Longifolene (10 g, 49 mmol) and the catalyst (1 g) were mixed and stirred for 1h at 180 °C. The reaction mixture was then filtered to separate the catalyst. The filtrate was separated by column chromatography using silica gel and petroleum ether to obtain a colorless liquid, compound 2, at a 54.6% yield. The characterization data of compound 2 was consistent with that reported in the literature.

3.4. Synthesis of 6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (3)

Compound 2 (10 g, 46 mmol), CuCl2 (0.62 g, 4.6 mmol), and CH3CN (20 mL) were mixed and stirred for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the mixed solution of 25 mL TBHP (70% in water, wt%) (185 mmol) and CH3CN (25 mL) was added to the reaction system. Afterwards, the reaction mixture was heated to 42 °C and stirred for 24 h. The reaction process was monitored by TLC. When the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. The unreacted TBHP was destroyed with an appropriate amount of Na2S2O3. Then, the reaction mixture was extracted three times with ethyl acetate. The combined organic phase was washed with saturated sodium chloride and deionized water, respectively. Finally, the organic layer was concentrated and further purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/petroleum ether (1:60, v/v) as an eluent to obtain a colorless liquid, compound 3. Yield: 69.2%. The characterization data of compound 3 was consistent with that reported in the literature [33].

3.5. Synthesis of 2-bromo-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (4)

Compound 3 (2.96 g, 10 mmol), NBS (1.87 g, 10.50 mmol), and NH4OAc (8 mg, 1 mmol) was added into dry Et2O (15 mL), respectively [34]. After stirring at room temperature for 30 min, the mixture was filtered. The filtrate was washed with water, dried, and evaporated to remove the Et2O. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/petroleum ether (1:40, v/v) as an eluent to give a white solid, i.e., compound 4. Yield: 88.5%; m.p. 112.3–113.9 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3067 (Ar–H), 1694 (C=O), 1602, 1459 (Ar); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.03 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 2H, C7–H, C5–H), 5.10 (dd, J = 13.5, 5.4 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.97 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.64–2.51 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.50 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.43 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.29 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 190.63, 156.17, 151.46, 128.89, 127.55, 125.28, 123.90, 50.61, 48.97, 36.89, 34.65, 30.35, 29.92, 23.63; MS (ESI) m/z = 297.01 ([M + H+]).

3.6. Synthesis of 2-(5-amino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylthio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1 (2H)-one (5)

First, 5-Amino-3-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole (0.50 g, 4.30 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of KOH (0.29 g, 0.66 mmol) in EtOH (20 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Subsequently, the solution of compound 4 (1.18 g, 3.60 mmol) in EtOH (20 mL) was added slowly. Then, the reaction mixture was refluxed at 80 °C for 4 h under stirring. The reaction process was monitored by TLC. When the reaction was complete, the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. Afterwards, the residual mixture was neutralized with dilute acetic acid and extracted three times with EtOAc. Finally, the combined organic phase was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/petroleum ether (1:1, v/v) as an eluent to afford a white solid, i.e., compound 5. Yield: 87.3%; m.p. 195.2-195.7 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3417, 3336, 3292, 3179 (N–H), 1682 (C=O), 1636 (C=N), 1602, 1486 (Ar); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 11.94 (s, 1H,-NH), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.39 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 6.05 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.85 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.02–2.90 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.38–2.23 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.38 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.87, 157.73, 155.69, 154.14, 152,13, 128.85, 127.71, 125.07, 124.81, 49.75, 45.40, 35.72, 34.29, 30.62, 29.65, 23.96, 23.94; MS (ESI) m/z = 331.08 ([M + H+]).

3.7. General Procedure for the Synthesis of the Target Compounds (6a–6q)

Compound 5 (0.40 g, 1.20 mmol) and NaHCO3 (0.13 g, 1.50 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (10 mL) were mixed and stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then, a solution of sulfonyl chloride (1.5 mmol) in acetonitrile (10 mL) was slowly added dropwise. Afterwards, the reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at 40 °C. The reaction was quenched with water (20 mL), and the reaction mixture was extracted three times with CH2Cl2. The combined organic phase was washed three times with deionized water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and distilled to remove the CH2Cl2. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/petroleum ether (1:5, v/v) as an eluent to afford the target products 6a–6q. Yield: 85%–90%.
2-((5-Amino-1-((2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6a): White solid, m.p. 193.8–194.2 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3463, 3280, 3201, 3102 (N–H), 1674 (C=O), 1639 (C=N), 1602, 1554, 1492 (Ar), 1358, 1170 (O=S=O), 606 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.90 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.19 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.18–7.15 (m, 1H, C7–H), 6.96 (s, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 6.33 (d, J = 27.6 Hz, 2H, -NH2), 4.76 (dd, J = 13.6, 5.0 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.99–2.90 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.55 (s, 6H, C19–CH3, C23–CH3), 2.32 (s, 3H, C21–CH3), 2.29-2.19 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.34 (s, 3H, C4–CH3),), 1.27 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3, C4–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 193.17, 160.25, 156.04, 155.81, 151.66, 145.02, 141.29, 132.30, 131.02, 128.51, 128.19, 124.86, 123.91, 50.12, 45.01, 35.48, 34.63, 30.35, 29.18, 23.68, 23.66, 22.76, 21.15; MS (ESI) m/z = 513.14 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((2,5-dimethylphenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6b): White solid, m.p. 182.1–182.3 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3457, 3297, 3212, 3138 (N–H), 3028 (Ar–H), 1678 (C=O), 1649 (C=N), 1601, 1557, 1486 (Ar), 1364, 1180 (O=S=O), 620 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.86 (s, 1H, C23–H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, C20–H), 7.45 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.37 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H, C5–H, C21–H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.86 (dd, J = 13.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.95 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.40 (s, 3H, C22–CH3), 2.35 (s, 3H, C19–CH3), 2.20-2.10 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.27 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.24 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.21 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.15, 160.87, 157.53, 155.89, 152.04, 137.12, 136.29, 135.46, 135.21, 133.48, 130.53, 128.54, 127.69, 125.09, 124.82, 49.96, 44.70, 35.78, 34.30, 30.44, 28.96, 23.91, 20.73, 19.38; MS (ESI) m/z = 501.18 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((2-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6c): White solid, m.p. 182.2–183.9 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3453, 3324, 3236, 3101 (N–H), 1681 (C=O), 1665 (C=N), 1602, 1571, 1481 (Ar), 1548,1263 (-NO2), 1372, 1190 (O=S=O), 615 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.17 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H, C20–H), 8.07 (m, 1H, C22–H), 7.98 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, C23–H), 7.93 (m, 1H, C21–H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.49 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.38 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, C5–H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.89 (dd, J = 13.6, 5.1 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.97 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.25–2.13 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.29 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.27 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.16, 162.06, 157.80, 155.89, 152.00, 147.68, 137.50, 133.88, 131.97, 129.31, 128.64, 127.72, 126.08, 125.12, 124.80, 49.96, 44.70, 35.82, 34.30, 30.51, 29.23, 23.93; MS (ESI) m/z = 516.17 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((3-bromophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6d): White solid, m.p. 185.6–186.0 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3457, 3293, 3212, 3100 (N–H), 1679 (C=O), 1649 (C=N), 1602, 1561, 1487 (Ar), 1374, 1185 (O=S=O), 617 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.11 (s, 1H, C19–H), 8.05 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, C23–H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, C21–H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.67 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, C22–H), 7.59 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.40 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.94 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.8 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.02-2.90 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.29-2.16 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.41 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.37 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (dd, J = 6.0, 5.1 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.14, 162.38, 158.12, 155.93, 152.00, 138.68, 138.33, 132.68, 130.04, 128.64, 127.72, 127.01, 125.13, 124.90, 123.07, 49.97, 44.80, 35.91, 34.31, 30.71, 29.28, 23.94; MS (ESI) m/z = 551.07 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6e): White solid, m.p. 185.5–189.7 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3472, 3306, 3216, 3101 (N–H), 1677 (C=O), 1654 (C=N), 1603, 1563, 1490 (Ar), 1385, 1192 (O=S=O), 1322 (–CF3), 624 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.06 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 7.25 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, C5–H), 7.21 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 6.31 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.82 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.7 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.97 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.38–2.23 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.46 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.41 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.28 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 193.02, 162.34, 156.68, 156.05, 151.54, 140.04, 136.72, 136.50, 136.28, 136.08, 128.72, 128.54, 128.19, 126.66, 125.04, 124.07, 123.76, 121.95, 50.04, 44.83, 35.67, 34.65, 30.56, 29.39, 23.67, 23.65; MS (ESI) m/z = 539.15 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6f): White solid, m.p. 184.8–185.5 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3485, 3302, 3232, 3171, 3171 (N–H), 1679 (C=O), 1628 (C=N), 1604, 1591, 1500, 1469 (Ar), 1363, 1155 (O=S=O), 605 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.85 (dd, J = 6.9, 2.0 Hz, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.43 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.41 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 7.18 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 4.92 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.3 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.87 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 2.96 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.20 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.40 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.36 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.24-1.20 (m, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.25, 164.82, 161.41, 157.90, 155.90, 152.06, 130.47, 128.69, 127.81, 127.73, 125.12, 124.84, 115.57, 56.47, 49.95, 44.80, 35.87, 34.32, 30.59, 29.31, 23.94; MS (ESI) m/z = 501.18 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((perfluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6g): White solid, m.p. 189.3–190.6 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3455, 3304, 3226, 3154 (N–H), 1689 (C=O), 1651 (C=N), 1606, 1570, 1522, 1508 (Ar), 1278, 1200 (O=S=O), 618 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.90 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.25 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, C5–H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 6.34 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.87 (dd, J = 14.1, 4.6 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.04-2.91 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.48-2.27 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.45 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.29 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 192.92, 163.53, 156.52, 156.08, 151.63, 146.34, 144.53, 144.45, 138.89, 137.18, 128.36, 128.00, 124.97, 124.13, 50.20, 44.86, 35.75, 34.64, 30.59, 29.07, 23.64, 23.61; MS (ESI) m/z = 561.03 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-chloro-3-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6h): White solid, m.p. 176.9–178.6 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm-1): 3443, 3316, 3232, 3106 (N–H), 1684 (C=O), 1658 (C=N), 1604, 1573, 1500, 1489 (Ar), 1387 (O=S=O), 1533, 1342 (-NO2), 1189 (O=S=O), 614 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.68 - 8.59 (m, 1H, C19–H), 8.19-8.13 (m, 1H, C23–H), 8.12 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H, C22–H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.64 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.41 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.94 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.7 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.04–2.90 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.34-2.14 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.38 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.23 (dd, J = 6.9, 2.0 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.10, 162.89, 158.07, 155.97, 152.04, 148.04, 136.22, 134.40, 133.03, 132.58, 128.61, 127.67, 125.54, 125.14, 124.95, 49.98, 44.82, 35.91, 34.31, 30.64, 29.24, 23.93; MS (ESI) m/z = 551.07 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6i): White solid, m.p. 217.0–217.5 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3454, 3291, 3238.74, 3174 (N–H), 3065 (Ar–H), 1674 (C=O), 1627 (C=N), 1603, 1560, 1464 (Ar), 1375, 1187 (O=S=O), 614 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.91 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.84 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, C21–H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.70 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 7.51 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.41 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.92 (dd, J = 13.7, 4.8 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.03-2.93 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.25-2.11 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.40 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.35 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.23, 161.86, 158.11, 155.92, 152.05, 136.60, 135.80, 130.41, 128.70, 127.90, 127.74, 125.13, 124.86, 49.91, 44.71, 35.89, 34.32, 30.62, 29.31, 23.95; MS (ESI) m/z = 470.07 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-chlorophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6j): White solid, m.p. 205.5–207.1 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3468, 3300, 3216, 3097 (N–H), 1677 (C=O), 1652 (C=N), 1602, 1561, 1488 (Ar), 1383, 1182 (O=S=O), 632 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.91 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.82-7.73 (m, 3H, C20–H, C22–H, C8–H), 7.55 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.41 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.91 (dd, J = 13.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.97 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.19 (t, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H, C3–CH), 1.36 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.14, 162.18, 158.11, 155.92, 152.03, 140.91, 135.30, 130.61, 129.86, 128.67, 127.72, 125.14, 124.87, 49.94, 44.73, 35.87, 34.31, 30.59, 29.29, 23.94; MS (ESI) m/z = 505.05 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((3-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6k): White solid, m.p. 196.4–197.9 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3454, 3313, 3226, 3103 (N–H), 1685 (C=O), 1658 (C=N), 1606, 1569, 1488 (Ar), 1533, 1351 (-NO2), 1378, 1189 (O=S=O), 615 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.64 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, C21–H, C23–H), 8.32 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, C19–H), 8.01 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, C22–H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.67 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.41 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.25 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.95 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.97 (t, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, C11–H), 2.22 (dd, J = 40.3, 26.8 Hz, 2H, C3–H), 1.43 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.36 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.11, 162.82, 158.13, 155.96, 152.03, 148.55, 137.84, 133.76, 132.59, 130.28, 128.61, 127.66, 125.12, 124.93, 122.84, 49.99, 44.81, 35.92, 34.31, 30.64, 29.21, 23.93; MS (ESI) m/z = 516.16 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6l): White solid, m.p. 199.7–200.3 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3475, 3300, 3214, 3105 (N–H), 1677 (C=O), 1651 (C=N), 1603, 1563, 1486 (Ar), 1530, 1346 (-NO2), 1391, 1189 (O=S=O), 627 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.39–8.35 (m, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 8.14–8.10 (m, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.26 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, C5–H), 7.22 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 6.22 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.79 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.9 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.98 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.41–2.25 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.48 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.43 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.29 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 192.84, 162.88, 156.63, 156.14, 151.50, 151.25, 141.87, 129.57, 128.50, 128.19, 125.10, 124.64, 124.10, 49.85, 44.70, 35.74, 34.66, 30.60, 29.47, 23.66; MS (ESI) m/z = 516.08 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-methyphenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6m): White solid, m.p. 196.9–198.3 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3457, 3300, 3218, 3100 (N–H), 1682 (C=O), 1649 (C=N), 1603, 1561, 1486 (Ar), 1367, 1183 (O=S=O), 604 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.79 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H, C8–H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 4H, C20–H, C22–H, -NH2), 7.41 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 4.91 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.7 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.01–2.94 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.41 (s, 3H, C21–CH3), 2.19 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.37 (d, J = 23.2 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.21, 161.63, 158.02, 155.90, 152.05, 146.75, 133.71, 130.80, 128.69, 127.97, 127.73, 125.12, 124.84, 49.93, 44.74, 35.86, 34.31, 30.56, 29.28, 23.94, 23.93, 21.66; MS (ESI) m/z = 485.17 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((2-chlorophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6n): White solid, m.p. 195.1–194.5 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3445, 3304, 3222, 3148 (N–H), 1682 (C=O), 1649 (C=N), 1603, 1565, 1485 (Ar), 1368, 1188 (O=S=O), 614 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.24 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H, C23–H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.63 (m, 1H, C21–H), 7.57 (dd, J = 7.9, 0.9 Hz, 1H, C20–H), 7.51-7.45 (m, 1H, C22–H), 7.20 (s,1H, C5–H), 7.18 (dd, J = 8.1,1.4Hz,1H, C7–H), 6.31 (d, J = 25.6 Hz, 2H, -NH2), 4.81 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.00-2.90 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.30-2.18 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.33 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.28 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.27 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 193.34, 161.55, 157.27, 155.84, 151.59, 135.77, 134.42, 133.25, 132.81, 132.21, 128.50, 128.06, 127.34, 124.87, 124.01, 50.47, 45.04, 35.67, 34.61, 30.56, 29.03, 23.66, 23.63; MS (ESI) m/z = 505.12 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-bromophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6o): White solid, m.p. 203.8–204.9 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3467, 3306, 3212, 3095 (N–H), 1676 (C=O), 1652 (C=N), 1603, 1573, 1487 (Ar), 1382, 1186 (O=S=O), 619 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.91 (dd, J = 5.2, 3.4 Hz, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.82 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.55 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.40 (s, 1H, C5–H), 7.31-7.24 (m, 1H, C7–H), 4.91 (dd, J = 13.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.03-2.93 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.19 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H, C3–H), 1.36 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.22 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.14, 162.18, 158.11, 155.91, 152.03, 135.72, 133.55, 130.12, 129.82, 128.67, 127.73, 125.14, 124.86, 49.93, 44.73, 35.86, 34.31, 30.59, 29.29, 23.94; MS (ESI) m/z = 548.07 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((2,4-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6p): White solid, m.p. 177.0–177.7 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3434, 3306, 3224, 3157 (N–H), 1682 (C=O), 1650 (C=N), 1603, 1565, 1488 (Ar), 1385, 1191 (O=S=O), 622 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.02 (m, 1H, C23–H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.22 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H, C5–H), 7.18 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 7.08–7.02 (m, 1H, C22–H), 6.98 (m, 1H, C20–H), 6.25 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.83 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 2.95 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.40-2.19 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.38 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 6H, C4–CH3), 1.27 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 193.18, 168.21, 168.13, 166.47, 166.40, 162.20, 161.38, 161.29, 159.64, 159.5, 156.80, 155.91, 151.57, 133.46, 133.39, 128.51, 128.10, 124.91, 124.05, 121.34, 121.31, 121.25, 121.23, 112.64, 112.62, 112.49, 112.47, 106.46, 106.30, 106.29, 106.13, 50.27, 45.01, 35.71, 34.63, 30.59, 29.17, 23.67, 23.64; MS (ESI) m/z = 507.07 ([M + H+]).
2-((5-Amino-1-((4-nitrilephenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-6-isopropyl-4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one (6q): White solid, m.p. 184.8–185.5 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3464, 3306, 3226, 3106 (N–H), 2236 (w, –CN), 1674 (C=O), 1654 (C=N), 1602, 1567, 1493 (Ar), 1389, 1190 (O=S=O), 644 (C–S–C); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C19–H, C23–H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, C8–H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C20–H, C22–H), 7.26 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H, C5–H), 7.22 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H, C7–H), 6.31 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.80 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.8 Hz, 1H, C2–H), 3.02-2.93 (m, 1H, C11–H), 2.39-2.25 (m, 2H, C3–H), 1.47 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.44 (s, 3H, C4–CH3), 1.29 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, C11–CH3); 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 192.90, 162.67, 156.71, 156.14, 151.52, 140.47, 133.16, 128.75, 128.49, 128.19, 125.09, 124.11, 118.57, 116.76, 49.91, 44.74, 35.74, 34.66, 30.64, 29.45, 23.68, 23.67; MS (ESI) m/z = 496.17 ([M + H+]).

3.8. In Vitro Antiproliferative Evaluation

All the synthesized compounds were evaluated for their in vitro cytotoxicity against the human cancer cell lines T-24, MCF-7, HepG2, A549, and HT-29, by MTT assay. The cell lines were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well and maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The synthesized compounds were dissolved in DMSO, and further dilutions were made with DMEM, with 5-FU as the positive control. The concentrations of the compounds used were 0.8, 4, 20, 100 µM. After treatment for another 48 h and 72 h with different concentrations of the samples (0.8, 4, 20, 100 µM), 20 µL of MTT (5 mg/mL) was added and incubated for about 4 h. The medium was thrown away and the purple formazan precipitations were dissolved in 150 µL DMSO. The O. D. value was measured at 490 nm using an enzyme labeling instrument [24].

4. Conclusions

Seventeen novel longifolene-derived tetralone derivatives bearing 1,2,4-triazole heterocycle were designed and synthesized from longifolene. Their structures were confirmed by multiple techniques. The synthesized compounds were screened for cytotoxic activity against a panel of five human cancer cell lines using MTT assay. Some compounds exhibited better anticancer activity against the tested cancer cell lines compared to positive control 5-FU. Some intriguing structure–activity relationships were found and discussed by theoretical calculation. Compounds 6g, 6h, and 6d, with excellent and broad-spectrum antitumor activity against almost all the tested cancer cell lines, were leading compounds for further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1–S3, S5–S20, S22–S85: FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and ESI-MS spectra of compounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6a–6q. Figure S4: HMBC spectrum of compound 2. Figure S21: NOESY spectrum of compound 6a.

Author Contributions

X.-P.Z. carried out the experimental work, participated in the discussion of biological activities, and wrote the paper; G.-S.L. and W.-G.D. constructed the target compound structure, designed the experimental scheme, directed and supervised the whole experimentation and discussed the biological activities, and revised the paper; Q.-M.L., F.-Y.L. and S.-Z.L. participated in the synthesis of target compounds and the discussion of biological activities. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFD0600401) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31870556).

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFD0600401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31870556). The authors are grateful to the College of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, China, for the bioassay test.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liang, X.X.; Wu, Q.; Luan, S.X.; Yin, Z.Q.; He, C.L.; Yin, L.Z.; Zou, Y.F.; Yuan, Z.X.; Li, L.X.; Song, X.; et al. A comprehensive review of topoisomerase inhibitors as anticancer agents in the past decade. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 171, 129–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guerram, M.; Jiang, Z.Z.; Zhang, L.Y. Podophyllotoxin, a medicinal agent of plant origin: Past, present and future. Chin. J. Nat. Medicines 2012, 10, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guichard, N.; Guillarme, D.; Bonnabry, P. Fleury–Souverain, S. Antineoplastic drugs and their analysis: A state of the art review. Analyst 2017, 142, 2273–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Abd El–Karim, S.; Anwar, M.; Syam, Y. Rational design and synthesis of new tetralin–sulfonamide derivatives as potent anti–diabetics and DPP–4 inhibitors: 2D & 3D QSAR, in vivo radiolabeling and bio distribution studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 81, 481–493. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gamal–Eldeen, A.M.; Hamdy, N.A.; Abdel–Aziz, H.A.; El–Hussieny, E.A.; Fakhr, I.M. Induction of intrinsic apoptosis pathway in colon cancer HCT–116 cells by novel 2–substituted–5,6,7,8–tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 77, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gouhar, R.S. Synthesis of (3–(naphthalen–1–yl)oxiran–2–yl)(5,6,7,8–tetrahydronaphthalen–2–yl) methanone and reaction with some nucleophiles for anticancer evaluation. Res. Chem. Intermediat. 2015, 41, 5529–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hamdy, N.A.; Anwar, M.M.; Abu–Zied, K.M.; Awad, H.M. Synthesis, tumor inhibitory and antioxidant activity of new polyfunctionally 2–substituted 5,6,7,8–tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives containing pyridine, thioxopyridine and pyrazolopyridine moieties. Acta. Pol. Pharm. Drug Res. 2013, 70, 987–1001. [Google Scholar]
  8. Özgeriş, B.; Akbaba, Y.; Özdemir, Ö.; Türkez, H.; Göksu, S. Synthesis and anticancer activity of novel ureas and sulfamides incorporating 1–aminotetralins. Arch. Med. Res. 2017, 48, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Turan–Zitouni, G.; Yurttaş, L.; Tabbi, A.; Akalın, Ç.G.; Temel, H.; Kaplancıkli, Z. New thiazoline–tetralin derivatives and biological activity evaluation. Molecules 2018, 23, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Al–Omar, M.A.; Al–Abdullah, E.S.; Shehata, I.A.; Habib, E.E.; Ibrahim, T.M.; El–Emam, A.A. Synthesis, antimicrobial, and anti–inflammatory activities of novel 5–(1–adamantyl)–4–arylideneamino–3–mercapto–1,2,4–triazoles and related derivatives. Molecules 2010, 15, 2526–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Barbuceanu, S.F.; Saramet, G.; Almajan, G.L.; Draghici, C.; Barbuceanu, F.; Bancescu, G. Cheminform abstract: New heterocyclic compounds from 1,2,4–triazole and 1,3,4–thiadiazole class bearing diphenylsulfone moieties. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity evaluation. J. Cheminformatics 2012, 43, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Uzgoren–Baran, A.; Tel, B.C.; Sarigo, D.; Ozturk, E.I.; Kazkayasi, I.; Okay, G.; Ertan, M.; Tozkoparan, B. Thiazolo [3,2–b]–1,2,4–triazole–5(6H)–one substituted with ibuprofen: Novel non–steroidal anti–inflammatory agents with favorable gastrointestinal tolerance. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 57, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tatar, E.; Küçükgüzel, S.G.; Karaku, S.S.; Clercq, E.D.; Andrei, G.; Snoeck, R.; Pannecouque, C.; Öktem, O.S.; Ünübol, N.; Kocagöz, T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of some new 1,3,4–thiadiazole and 1,2,4–triazole derivatives from L–methionine as antituberculosis and antiviral agents. Marmara. Pharm. J. 2015, 2, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, G.S.; Duan, W.G.; Yang, L.X.; Huang, M.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel myrtenal–based 4–methyl–1,2,4–triazole–thioethers. Molecules 2017, 22, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, G.S.; Duan, W.G.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis and bioactivity of N–(4–(N′–substituted sulfamoyl)phenyl) myrtenamides containing a heterocycle. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bhat, K.S.; Poojary, B.; Prasad, D.J.; Naik, P.; Holla, B.S. Synthesis and antitumor activity studies of some new fused 1,2,4–triazole derivatives carrying 2,4–dichloro–5–fluorophenyl moiety. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 5066–5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kaur, R.; Ranjan, D.A.; Kumar, B.; Kumar, V. Recent developments on 1,2,4–triazole nucleus in anticancer compounds: A review. Anti Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 465–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El–Sherief, H.A.M.; Youssif, B.G.M.; Bukhari, S.N.A.; Abdel–Aziz, M.; Abdel–Rahman, H.M. Novel 1,2,4–triazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents: Design, synthesis, molecular docking and mechanistic studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 76, 314–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, M.; Bekci, H.; Cumaoğlu, A.; Küçükgüzel, Ş. Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,4–triazole containing hydrazide–hydrazones derived from (S)–naproxen as anticancer agents. Marmara. Pharm. J. 2018, 22, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Irfan, A.; Batool, F.; Irum, S.; Ullah, S.; Umer, M.; Shaheen, R.; Chand, A.J. A therapeutic journey of sulfonamid derivatives as potent anticancer agents: A review. WJPR 2018, 7, 257–270. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ghorab, M.M.; Alsaid, M.S.; El–Gaby, M.S.A.; Elaasser, M.M.; Nissan, Y.M. Antimicrobial and anticancer activity of some novel fluorinated thiourea derivatives carrying sulfonamide moieties: Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Oksuzoglu, E.; Ertan–Bolelli, T.; Can, H.; Tarhan, M.; Ozturk, K.; Yildiz, I. Antitumor activities on HL–60 human leukemia cell line, molecular docking, and quantum–chemical calculations of some sulfonamide–benzoxazoles. Artif. Cell. Nanomed. B 2017, 45, 1388–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, N.Y.; Duan, W.G.; Lin, G.S.; Liu, L.Z.; Zhang, R.; Li, D.P. Synthesis and antifungal activity of dehydroabietic acid–based 1,3,4–thiadiazole–thiazolidinone compounds. Mol. Divers 2015, 20, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, F.Y.; Huang, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Ma, X.L.; Jiang, C.N.; Zhou, X.Q.; Duan, W.G.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of novel hybrids of dehydroabietic acid bearing 1,2,3–triazole moiety. Molecules 2019, 24, 4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lin, G.S.; Bai, X.; Duan, W.G.; Cen, B.; Huang, M.; Lu, S.Z. High value–added application of sustainable natural forest product α–pinene: Synthesis of myrtenal oxime esters as potential KARI inhibitors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 7862–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, G.S.; Chen, Z.C.; Duan, W.G.; Wang, X.Y.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis and biological activity of novel myrtenal–merived 2–acyl–1,2,4–triazole–3–thione compounds. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 2085–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dolzhenko, A.V.; Pastorin, G.; Chui, W.K. An aqueous medium synthesis and tautomerism study of 3 (5)–amino–1,2,4–triazoles. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2009, 50, 2124–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, B.L.; Shi, Y.X.; Zhang, S.J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, H.X.; Zhang, L.Y.; Wei, W.; Liu, X.H.; Li, Y.H.; Li, Z.M.; et al. Syntheses, biological activities and SAR studies of novel carboxamide compounds. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 117, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dennington, R.; Keith, T.; Millam, J. GaussView, Version 5; Semichem, Inc.: Shawnee Mission, KS, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tyagi, B.; Mishra, M.K.; Jasra, R.V. Synthesis of 7-substituted 4-methyl coumarins by pechmann reaction using nano-crystalline sulfated-zirconia. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2007, 276, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tyagi, B.; Mishra, M.K.; Jasra, R.V. Solvent free synthesis of 7–isopropyl–1,1–dimethyltetralin by the rearrangement of longifolene using nano–crystalline sulfated zirconia catalyst. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2009, 301, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, C.G. Process for Preparing a Floral Odorous Perfume and Perfume Obtained Thereform. U.S. Patent 5,817,616, 6 October 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tanemura, K.; Suzuki, T.; Nishida, Y.; Satsumabayashi, K.; Horaguchi, T. A mild and efficient procedure for α-bromination of ketones using N-bromosuccinimide catalysed by ammonium acetate. Chem. Commun. 2004, 4, 470–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 2–5 and 6a–6q are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 00986 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The synthetic route of 6a–6q (Table 1). Reagents and conditions: (a) Nano-crystalline sulfated zirconia catalyst, 180 °C, reflux 1 h; (b) TBHP, CH3CN, CuCl2, 42 °C; (c) NBS, Et2O, NH4OAc, rt; (d) 5-amino-3-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole, KOH, EtOH, 80 °C, reflux 4 h; (e) NaHCO3, CH3CN, a series of different sulfonyl chlorides, 40 °C.
Scheme 1. The synthetic route of 6a–6q (Table 1). Reagents and conditions: (a) Nano-crystalline sulfated zirconia catalyst, 180 °C, reflux 1 h; (b) TBHP, CH3CN, CuCl2, 42 °C; (c) NBS, Et2O, NH4OAc, rt; (d) 5-amino-3-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole, KOH, EtOH, 80 °C, reflux 4 h; (e) NaHCO3, CH3CN, a series of different sulfonyl chlorides, 40 °C.
Molecules 25 00986 sch001
Molecules 25 00986 g001 550
Figure 1. Expanded NOESY spectrum of the target compound 6a.
Figure 1. Expanded NOESY spectrum of the target compound 6a.
Molecules 25 00986 g001
Molecules 25 00986 g002 550
Figure 2. Frontier molecular orbitals and ESPs of compounds 6h: HOMO (a), LUMO (b), and ESP (c); 6k: HOMO (d), LUMO (e), and ESP (f); 6j: HOMO (g), LUMO (h), and ESP (i).
Figure 2. Frontier molecular orbitals and ESPs of compounds 6h: HOMO (a), LUMO (b), and ESP (c); 6k: HOMO (d), LUMO (e), and ESP (f); 6j: HOMO (g), LUMO (h), and ESP (i).
Molecules 25 00986 g002
Table
Table 1. The R groups of the compounds 6a–6q.
Table 1. The R groups of the compounds 6a–6q.
Comp.RComp.RComp.R
6a2′,4′,6′-Me6g2′,3′,4′′,5′,6′-F6m4′-Me
6b2′,5′-Me6h3′-NO2-4′-Cl6n2′-Cl
6c2′-NO26iH6o4′-Br
6d3′-Br6j4′-Cl6p2′,4′-F
6e4′-CF36k3′-NO26q4′-CN
6f4′-OMe6l4′-NO2
Table
Table 2. Antiproliferative activity of the compounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6a–6q a.
Table 2. Antiproliferative activity of the compounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6a–6q a.
CompoundIC50 (µM)
A549HT-29T-24MCF-7HepG2
6a (R = 2′,4′,6′-Me)>100>10072.46±2.02>100>100
6b (R = 2′,5′-Me)48.73 ± 3.4341.52 ± 1.45>100>100>100
6c (R = 2′-NO2)29.73 ± 3.0737.27 ± 1.67>100>100>100
6d (R = 3′-Br)30.21 ± 0.0225.86 ± 2.5945.51 ± 0.95>10044.31 ± 1.29
6e (R = 4′-CF3)82.36 ± 3.49>100>100>100>100
6f (R = 4′-OMe)84.61 ± 3.9025.35 ± 3.30>100>100>100
6g (R = 2′,3′,4 ′,5′,6′-F)13.28 ± 1.5523.49 ± 3.4817.09 ± 0.024.42 ± 0.9315.51 ± 2.39
6h (R = 3′-NO2-4′-Cl)9.89 ± 1.7722.22 ± 2.4226.91 ± 1.1928.86 ± 1.7321.43 ± 2.36
6i–6q and 2–5>100>100>100>100>100
5-FU>100>10042.81 ± 0.5952.54 ± 0.6720.71 ± 0.52
a IC50 values are expressed as the mean ± SD (standard deviation) from three independent experiments. The results indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, X.-P.; Lin, G.-S.; Duan, W.-G.; Li, Q.-M.; Li, F.-Y.; Lu, S.-Z. Synthesis and Antiproliferative Evaluation of Novel Longifolene-Derived Tetralone Derivatives Bearing 1,2,4-Triazole Moiety. Molecules 2020, 25, 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040986

AMA Style

Zhu X-P, Lin G-S, Duan W-G, Li Q-M, Li F-Y, Lu S-Z. Synthesis and Antiproliferative Evaluation of Novel Longifolene-Derived Tetralone Derivatives Bearing 1,2,4-Triazole Moiety. Molecules. 2020; 25(4):986. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040986

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Xia-Ping, Gui-Shan Lin, Wen-Gui Duan, Qing-Min Li, Fang-Yao Li, and Shun-Zhong Lu. 2020. "Synthesis and Antiproliferative Evaluation of Novel Longifolene-Derived Tetralone Derivatives Bearing 1,2,4-Triazole Moiety" Molecules 25, no. 4: 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040986

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop