Next Article in Journal
Biodegradation of Poly (Butylene Succinate) (PBS)/Stearate Modified Magnesium-Aluminium Layered Double Hydroxide Composites under Marine Conditions Prepared via Melt Compounding
Next Article in Special Issue
Treatment with Uncaria tomentosa Promotes Apoptosis in B16-BL6 Mouse Melanoma Cells and Inhibits the Growth of B16-BL6 Tumours
Previous Article in Journal
Developing a Library of Mannose-Based Mono- and Disaccharides: A General Chemoenzymatic Approach to Monohydroxylated Building Blocks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 23
10.3390/molecules25235760
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Euodia pasteuriana Methanol Extract Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 Signaling Pathway

by
Jianmei Zhang
1,
Mi-Yeon Kim
2,* and
Jae Youl Cho
1,*
1
Department of Integrative Biotechnology, and Biomedical Institute for Convergence at SKKU (BICS), Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
2
School of Systems Biomedical Science, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(23), 5760; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235760
Submission received: 6 November 2020 / Revised: 29 November 2020 / Accepted: 5 December 2020 / Published: 7 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts: Immunomodulatory and Anti-cancer Properties)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Euodia pasteuriana A. Chev. ex Guillaumin, also known as Melicope accedens (Blume) T.G. Hartley, is a herbal medicinal plant native to Vietnam. Although Euodia pasteuriana is used as a traditional medicine to treat a variety of inflammatory diseases, the pharmacological mechanisms related to this plant are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of a methanol extract of Euodia pasteuriana leaves (Ep-ME) on the production of inflammatory mediators, the mRNA expression of proinflammatory genes, and inflammatory signaling activities in macrophage cell lines. The results showed that Ep-ME strongly suppressed the release of nitric oxide (NO) in RAW264.7 cells induced with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK), and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) without cytotoxicity. A reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction further confirmed that Ep-ME suppressed the expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6), matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP1), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) at the transcriptional level and reduced the luciferase activities of activator protein 1 (AP-1) reporter promoters. In addition, immunoblotting analyses of the whole lysate and nuclear fraction, as well as overexpression assays demonstrated that Ep-ME decreased the translocation of c-Jun and suppressed the activation of transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) in the AP-1 signaling pathways. These results imply that Ep-ME could be developed as an anti-inflammatory agent that targets TAK1 in the AP-1 signaling pathway.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is a fast, complex biological response in mammals that aids in the elimination of harmful stimuli and the repair of damaged tissue [1]. Immune cells, such as neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages, can be quickly recruited to sites of injury and inflammation, where they identify foreign invaders and release chemokines, cytokines, and eicosanoids to regulate immunity and restore the body’s physiological balance [2,3].
Among immune cells, macrophages have been most extensively investigated. Numerous studies have attempted to explain the potential molecular mechanism by which various proinflammatory stimuli in macrophages cause an inflammatory response [4,5]. The pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) is a complex formed through pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) in cells and the conserved structure of pathogens, which can be recognized by the related receptor and induce the expression of inflammatory factors and cytokines through a signal cascade of stimulation [6,7]. Once macrophages are triggered by PRRs, these molecules induce an inflammatory response.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are transmembrane signal transmission receptors discovered in macrophages as one of the most important PRRs. These receptors mediate the secretion of host-related cytokines and the production of natural immune responses via a variety of PAMPs such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK), and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) [8,9,10]. Different TLRs have different responses to different pathogens. In particular, LPS can activate TLR4 expressed through macrophages and facilitate inflammatory responses by triggering a signaling cascade [11].
TLRs form dimers and transform their structure after recognizing the corresponding factors. Simultaneously, they recruit and induce TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon-β (TRIF) and TLR adaptor molecule myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88). TRIF and MyD88 transduce the signal to downstream cascades and ultimately activate inflammatory transcriptional factors such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and activating protein-1 (AP-1) [12]. With regard to AP-1, the activated signals from TLRs are transmitted by the interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK)/transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [13,14]. Interestingly, MAPKs can phosphorylate AP-1 subunits such as c-Fos, c-Jun, and ATF [15]. Furthermore, activated macrophages trigger inflammation through the release of inflammatory cytokines and mediators such as nitric oxide (NO), cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [16,17,18]. However, prolonged inflammation could lead to severe chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, cancer, asthma, and atherosclerosis [19,20]. Natural products with pharmacological activities extracted or isolated from plants produce anti-inflammatory activities by targeting specific signaling cascades [21]. Nevertheless, the anti-inflammatory potential of numerous plants related to ethnic pharmacology remains to be studied.
Euodia pasteuriana A. Chev. ex Guillaumin, also known as Melicope accedens (Blume) T.G. Hartley, is a species of Euodia, a genus in the family Rutaceae, and is mainly distributed in Vietnam. Although Euodia pasteuriana is used in traditional medicine to treat a variety of inflammatory diseases, the pharmacological mechanism related to this plant remains unclear. Accordingly, in this study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory effects and molecular mechanisms of a methanol extract of Euodia pasteuriana leaves (Ep-ME) using LPS-induced macrophages and determined a pharmacological target of the extract through an overexpression strategy.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of Ep-ME on Production of NO and Cytotoxicity

To evaluate the inhibitory activities of Ep-ME on NO production, RAW264.7 cells, a murine macrophage cell line, were pretreated with various concentrations of Ep-ME (0, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) for 30 min before adding LPS, Pam3CSK, or Poly I:C, and the NO release levels were examined. As shown in Figure 1a–c, Ep-ME dramatically dose-dependently inhibits the NO production in LPS-, Pam3CSK-, or poly I:C-induced RAW264.7 cells. Specifically, the generation of NO was decreased by up to 22.93%, 26.19%, and 29.70% after treatment with 100 μg/mL of Ep-ME in LPS-, poly I:C-, and Pam3CSK-treated RAW264.7 cells, respectively. In addition, there was no obvious cytotoxicity in RAW264.7 or HEK293T cells after 24 h of incubation with a pharmacologically effective dose of Ep-ME (Figure 1d).

2.2. Effect of Ep-ME on Expression of Inflammatory Genes in LPS-Stimulated RAW264.7 Cells

To demonstrate whether the Ep-ME-mediated suppression of inflammation was involved in the regulation of IL-6, TNF-α, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 gene expression, RAW264.7 cells were pretreated with Ep-ME for 30 min; induced with LPS, Poly I:C, or Pam3csk for 6 h; and analyzed by RT-PCR. As shown in Figure 2a–c, the mRNA levels of genes related to the AP-1 pathway were upregulated through LPS, poly I:C, or Pam3CSK. In contrast, Ep-ME dramatically dose-dependently downregulated the mRNA expression of MMP1, MMP2, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP3, and MMP9 in LPS-, Pam3CSK-, or poly I:C-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Because Ep-ME affects the transcriptional levels of inflammatory genes, the effects of Ep-ME on the activation of the inflammatory transcription factor AP-1 were determined by a luciferase reporter gene assay in HEK293T cells. Ep-ME had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on MyD88- or TRIF-induced AP-1 luciferase gene activities (Figure 2d,e). Furthermore, the nuclear translocation levels of AP-1 subunits (c-Jun and c-Fos) were investigated using nuclear fractionation and immunoblotting analysis. As shown in Figure 2f, the nuclear level of c-Jun was strongly suppressed by Ep-ME at 15, 30, and 60 min after LPS stimulation; however, the level of c-Fos was not inhibited by Ep-ME, which indicated that Ep-ME could diminish the activity of AP-1 by inhibiting the dimerization of AP-1 via the reduction of the nuclear level of c-Jun.

2.3. Effect of Ep-ME on Activation of the AP-1 Upstream Signaling Pathway

To investigate the modulation of the signaling cascade involved in the AP-1 activity of Ep-ME, the AP-1 upstream signaling cascade was assessed in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells using immunoblotting analysis. As shown in Figure 3a, the phosphorylation of JNK was inhibited at 15 and 30 min by Ep-ME (100 μg/mL) when compared with cells treated with LPS alone. Similarly, Ep-ME downregulated the phosphorylation of MKK4 and MKK7 (upstream proteins of JNK) at all time points (Figure 3b). Moreover, the expression of phospho-TAK1 (upstream kinase of MAPKKs) was blocked by Ep-ME at earlier time points (2, 3, and 5 min) in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the induction of LPS reduced the protein level of IRAK1 and IRAK4, whereas Ep-ME treatment did not restore the reduced level to a normal state under the same conditions (Figure 3c,d), implying that IRAK-1/4 are not targeted by Ep-ME. This also indicates that TAK1 could be a putative target of Ep-ME in AP-1 inhibitory activities.

2.4. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Ep-ME by Targeting TAK1 Kinase

To validate the assumption that TAK1 is targeted by Ep-ME, an overexpression strategy was used with an HA-TAK1 plasmid. As expected, Ep-ME significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of TAK1 and dramatically downregulated the mRNA expression of MMP1, MMP2, and MMP9 in HEK293T cells overexpressing TAK1 (Figure 4a,b). Subsequently, we tested the effect of the resorcyclic acid lactone TAK1 inhibitor 5Z-7-oxozeaenol on inflammation [22]. The 5Z-7-Oxozeaenol decreased the NO production of LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner and had no significant cytotoxicity in the concentration range from 20 nM to 80 nM (Figure 4c,d). Intriguingly, 5Z-7-oxozeaenol dramatically suppressed the mRNA expression of MMP1 at 80 nM in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Figure 4e). Finally, the luciferase reporter gene showed that Ep-ME dose-dependently reduced the luciferase activity of TAK1, indicating that it could control TAK1 signaling (Figure 4f). Based on these findings, we confirmed that TAK1 played a crucial role in inflammatory responses.

3. Discussion

The aim of this research was to demonstrate the anti-inflammatory effects of Euodia pasteuriana and its molecular mechanisms in the AP-1 signaling pathway. A methanol extract of Euodia pasteuriana (Ep-ME) was administered in macrophage models of LPS-induced inflammation, and its pharmacological target in the treatment of inflammation was confirmed. We first investigated whether Ep-ME regulated the production of inflammatory mediators. NO is not only a signaling molecule that plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of inflammation but also a proinflammation mediator that causes inflammation due to excessive production under abnormal conditions [23]. Therefore, we detected NO secretion in RAW264.7 cells induced with LPS (a TLR4 ligand), pam3CSK (a TLR2 ligand), and poly I:C (a TLR3 ligand). Ep-ME strongly suppressed NO production in LPS-, pam3CSK-, and poly I:C-treated RAW264.7 cells dose-dependently without an obvious cytotoxicity up to 100 μg/mL (Figure 1a–d), indicating that it has the ability to block the production of NO in macrophages.
Proinflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) are mainly produced through activated macrophages and participate in the upregulation of inflammatory responses [24]. Recently, several studies have identified that the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family regulates the immune response, suppressing inflammation as soluble factors, and that its different members play a critical role in the remission phase of acute inflammation and in regulating inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factor receptors [25,26,27]. For instance, some MMPs, such as MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9, influence the inflammatory process positively through the activation of pro-IL-1β [28]. Since MMP9 is secreted through inflammatory cells, it could increase arthritis by degrading anti-inflammatory factors, activating inflammatory factors, or promoting the migration of inflammatory cells [29]. Because immune regulation is correlated to post-transcriptional control, we next investigated the mRNA expression of MMP1, MMP2, IL-6, MMP3, TNF-α, and MMP9 genes in LPS-, pam3CSK-, or poly I:C-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. The results of the semiquantitative RT-PCR showed that Ep-ME dramatically downregulated the gene expression of TNF-α, IL-6, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2a–c), suggesting that Ep-ME exhibits anti-inflammatory properties.
TLRs are type I transmembrane molecules that play an instructive role in immune responses. TLRs can interact with different combinations of adaptor proteins and transduce downstream signaling via the TRIF-dependent pathway or the MyD88-dependent pathway, before activating the AP-1 and NF-κB signaling pathway to stimulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines [30]. To better understand the anti-inflammatory response of Ep-ME at the molecular level, the AP-1 luciferase reporter gene assay was used in Ep-ME-treated HEK293T cells that were cotransfected with TRIF and MyD88. As shown in Figure 2d,e, the AP-1-driven luciferase activities induced through MyD88 or TRIF transfection were dose-dependently dampened by Ep-ME. The results indicate that Ep-ME exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by targeting the MyD88- or TRIF-mediated AP-1 pathway. Based on the above results, we examined the nuclear translocation level of AP-1 in LPS-induced macrophages using a western blot assay. Surprisingly, the nuclear translocation level of c-Jun of AP-1 subunits was attenuated by Ep-ME treatment at a concentration of 100 μg/mL, although the treatment had no effect on the nuclear translocation level of c-Fos (Figure 2f). Consequently, the present results demonstrate that the suppressive effects of Ep-ME on the mRNA expression of proinflammatory genes and the production of inflammation regulatory molecules were attributed to the inhibition of the nuclear translocation and activation of AP-1.
AP-1, composed of various members such as c-Fos and c-Jun, is a transcription factor that plays a key role in regulating the expression of inflammation-related genes in response to multiple stimuli [31]. Abnormally activated AP-1 is responsible for many inflammatory diseases (including rheumatoid arthritis, sepsis, asthma, and psoriasis) [32]. Hence, the suppression of the AP-1 pathway has become one of the potential methods for the treatment of inflammatory diseases [13,33]. To identify the pharmacological target molecules of Ep-ME in the AP-1 pathway, we analyzed the effect of Ep-ME on intracellular molecules in the AP-1 pathway using western blotting. The AP-1 upstream signaling molecules of JNK, ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, MKK4/7, TAK1, IRAK1, and IRAK4 were assessed in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. Ep-ME notably suppressed the level of p-JNK at 15 and 30 min and that of p-MKK4/7 at all times (5–60 min) (Figure 3a,b). As TAK1 is reported to regulate p-MMK4/7 at earlier time points [34], we assessed TAK1, IRAK1, and IRAK4 at 2, 3, and 5 min. As shown in Figure 3c,d, the phosphorylated level of TAK1 was downregulated at 2, 3, and 5 min after LPS induction in RAW264.7 cells, and there was a dose-dependent inhibitory manner at 5 min. However, IRAK1 and IRAK4 were not affected by the Ep-ME treatment. Together, these results demonstrate that TAK1 could be a specific target protein of Ep-ME.
TAK1 is considered a momentous therapeutic target for various types of inflammatory diseases [35,36]. Several studies previously reported that TAK1 could enhance the activities of the downstream molecules MEK1/2, MKK3/6, and MKK4/7 during overexpression [37,38]. These findings imply that TAK1 is immediately regulated through Ep-ME, which was confirmed using the overexpression strategy. The level of p-TAK1 was highly decreased when HEK293T cells were treated with 100 μg/mL (Figure 4a); a similar suppression was obtained at the mRNA level (Figure 4b). Additionally, we further validated the functional effect of the selective TAK1 inhibitor 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, which irreversibly inhibits TAK1 by forming a covalent complex [39,40]. Interestingly, the chemical suppression of TAK1 by 5Z-7-oxozeaenol diminished the activation of AP-1 related to the inhibition of inflammatory responses (Figure 4c–e). The luciferase reporter gene result showed that Ep-ME dose-dependently reduced the luciferase activities of TAK1 (Figure 4f). In addition, these results indicate that Ep-ME can target TAK1 during its anti-inflammatory activity of the AP-1 regulation cascade.
Based on our previous liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry results (LC-MS) (Kim et al., 2020, submitted), Ep-ME contains several biologically active ingredients, such as euxanthone, daidzein, dracorhodin, nevadensin, 5-hydroxyauranetin, 6-hydroxy-7-methoxy-2-(2-phenylethyl) chromone, and so on. It has been reported that euxanthone exerts anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in sevoflurane-induced neonatal mice [41]. Peng et al. reported that daidzein dramatically repressed the TNF-α-induced phosphorylation of JNK [42]. Furthermore, daidzein suppressed the production of NO and IL-6 in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells [43]. Consequently, we speculate that the daidzein and euxanthone in Ep-ME could be responsible for its anti-inflammatory activity.
In summary, this study demonstrates the potent anti-inflammatory effects of Ep-ME, a methanol extract of Euodia pasteuriana, and the abilities of Ep-ME to dampen the production of inflammatory mediators (NO) and the transcription of IL-6, TNF-α, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9, following LPS, pam3CSK, or poly I: C challenges. Furthermore, our findings imply that the mechanism underlying the activities of Ep-ME on inflammatory mediators involves blocking AP-1 nuclear translocation via the downregulation of JNK, MKK4, MKK7, and TAK1 in the LPS-activated AP-1 signaling pathway of macrophages. Hence, the anti-inflammatory activity of Ep-ME could be achieved through the direct suppression of TAK1, an upstream kinase in the AP-1 signaling pathway, as summarized in Figure 5. These data indicate that Ep-ME is a potential herbal medicine candidate for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, and that it could be exploited as a therapeutic agent for the resolution of inflammatory symptoms. This study also provides a better understanding of the inflammatory disease pathway and paves the road for the discovery of new targets for therapeutic applications.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

A methanol extract of the leaves of Euodia pasteuriana (Ep-ME) was obtained from the International Biological Material Research Center (Daejeon, Korea). Briefly, dried and refined leaves of Euodia pasteuriana (100 g) were extracted with 1 L of 95% methanol for 2 h, twice. The extract was percolated with filter paper (3 mm; Whatman PLC, Kent, UK), condensed using a Buchi rotary evaporator (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and lypophilized using a laboratory freeze dryer (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Harz, Germany) with a 17% yield. Ep-ME was dissolved in 100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to make stock solution (100 mg/mL) and then diluted with medium. Lipopolysaccharide, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), Pam3CSK, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), poly I:C sodium salt, 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, and polyethylene imidazole (PEI) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin solution, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 were obtained from HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) was obtained from Corning (Manassas, VA, USA). The antibodies for Lamin A/C, ERK, p-ERK, β-actin, p38, c-Fos, p-p38, MKK7, Jun, p-MKK7, JNK, p-JNK, MKK4, p-MKK4, TAK1, p-TAK1, IRAK4, IRAK1, and HA were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).

4.2. Cell Line and Cell Culture

RAW264.7 and HEK293T cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). The two cell lines were cultured in RPMI and DMEM containing 10% (or 5%) FBS, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin at 37 °C under 5% CO2.

4.3. Determination of NO Production

RAW264.7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well and cultured overnight. The cells were pretreated with Ep-ME (0, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) for 30 min and incubated with LPS (1 μg/mL), poly I:C (200 μg/mL), and Pam3CSK (10 μg/mL) for 24 h. The NO production was measured by Griess reaction, as reported previously [44].

4.4. In Vitro Cell Viability Assay

The effects of Ep-ME on the cytotoxicity were assessed through a conventional MTT assay. Briefly, RAW264.7 and HEK293T cells were incubated for 16–20 h and then treated with Ep-ME at concentrations of 0, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL for 24 h. Subsequently, 10 μL of MTT solution was added to each well and incubated for an additional 3 h, and the purple formazan crystals were solubilized by adding 100 μL of 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm by a Synergy HT Multi-Mode (Winooski, VT, USA).

4.5. mRNA Expression Analysis Using Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

To estimate cytokine mRNA expression levels, such as MMP1, MMP3, IL-6, MMP2, TNF-α, and MMP9, the total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, from RAW264.7 cells that had been pretreated with Ep-ME at different concentrations for 30 min before being stimulated with LPS, Pam3CSK, or poly I:C for 6 h. RT-PCR reactions were performed as described in our previous study [45]. The primers used in this experiment were from Bioneer (Seoul, Korea) and are listed in Table 1.

4.6. Luciferase Reporter Gene Activity Assay

HEK293T cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were transfected with 1 µg/mL of plasmid including β-gal and AP-1-Luc with or without inducing molecules (MyD88 and TRIF) by a polyethyleneimine (PEI) assay in 24-well plates for 24 h. Then, the cells were treated with Ep-ME (0, 50, and 100 μg/mL) for an additional 24 h. Subsequently, luciferase activities were detected through the luciferase assay system (Promega, WI, USA). To assess the anti-inflammatory activity of Ep-ME on the overexpression of a specific molecule, HEK293T cells were transfected with HA-TAK1 plasmids diluted in Opti-MEM for 24 h.

4.7. Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and Whole-Cell Lysates

RAW264.7 or HEK 293T cells were seeded in 60 × 60 mm plates (5 × 106 cells/well) and incubated overnight. Following treatment with Ep-ME (100 µg/mL), the cells were collected in PBS. Whole-cell lysates were extracted by lysing with ice-cold lysis buffer (2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM glycerol phosphate, 2 µg/mL aprotinin, 1 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT), 50 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 mM benzamide, 1 µg/mL pepstatin A, 10% glycerol, 20 mM sodium fluoride, 1.6 mM pervanadate, 2% Triton X-100, 2 µg/mL leupeptin, and 0.1 mM of sodium vanadate) and were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Nuclear extracts were acquired with lysis buffer A (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 1 mM DTT, 2 µg/mL aprotinin, 10 mM potassium chloride (KCl), 0.1 µM PMSF, 2 µg/mL leupeptin, 0.1 mM EDTA) and sonicated to lyse the cells. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min. The pellet was suspended in extraction buffer (0.1 mM EDTA, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM PMSF, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 300 mM sodium chloride) and incubated on ice for 25 min. Finally, the supernatant was collected as a nuclear extract by centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 rpm.

4.8. Western Blot Analysis

The protein concentrations of nuclear or whole-cell lysates were quantified with the Bradford assay with BSA as the standard. Proteins were size-dependently resolved through 8–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. After blocking PVDF membranes with 3% BSA for 1 h, the membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4 °C, washed three times with Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST), and incubated for 1 h with a secondary antibody. The protein bands were detected using an ECL western blotting kit and photographed by a Tanon-5200 multi-imaging system.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The significance was analyzed between the control and treatment groups using Student’s t-test. p values under 0.05 or 0.01 were considered significant.

Author Contributions

J.Z., M.-Y.K. and J.Y.C. conceived and designed the experiments; J.Z. performed the experiments; J.Z., M.-Y.K. and J.Y.C. analyzed the data; J.Z., M.-Y.K. and J.Y.C. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (2017R1A6A1A03015642 and 2016R1D1A1B01011371) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Korea.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge International Biological Material Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) for providing Ep-ME.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Ep-ME: Euodia pasteuriana methanol extract; NO, nitric oxide; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; PRR, pathogen recognition receptor; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MMP1, matrix metalloproteinase-1; Pam3CSK4, Pam3-Cys-Ser-Lys4; MMP2, matrix metalloproteinase-2; Poly I:C, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid; MMP3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; TLR, Toll-like receptor; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; MMP9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; MTT, (3-4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; AP-1, activator protein 1; IL-6, interleukin 6; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; FBS, fetal bovine serum; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; TRIF, TIR domain-containing adaptor including interferon-β; TAK1, transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phophate dehydrogenase.

References

  1. Takeuchi, O.; Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010, 140, 805–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bagaitkar, J. Cellular dynamics of resolving inflammation. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2014, 124, 1701–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Helming, L. Inflammation: Cell recruitment versus local proliferation. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 548–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lund, M.E.; To, J.; O’Brien, B.A.; Donnelly, S. The choice of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate differentiation protocol influences the response of THP-1 macrophages to a pro-inflammatory stimulus. J. Immunol. Methods 2016, 430, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kobayashi, E.H.; Suzuki, T.; Funayama, R.; Nagashima, T.; Hayashi, M.; Sekine, H.; Tanaka, N.; Moriguchi, T.; Motohashi, H.; Nakayama, K. Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory response by blocking proinflammatory cytokine transcription. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mogensen, T.H. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 240–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. Int. Immunol. 2009, 21, 317–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vidya, M.K.; Kumar, V.G.; Sejian, V.; Bagath, M.; Krishnan, G.; Bhatta, R. Toll-like receptors: Significance, ligands, signaling pathways, and functions in mammals. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 37, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schmitz, F.; Mages, J.; Heit, A.; Lang, R.; Wagner, H. Transcriptional activation induced in macrophages by Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands: From expression profiling to a model of TLR signaling. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 2863–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thompson, M.R.; Kaminski, J.J.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Fitzgerald, K.A. Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses 2011, 3, 920–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lu, Y.-C.; Yeh, W.-C.; Ohashi, P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 2008, 42, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ivashkiv, L.B. Inflammatory signaling in macrophages: Transitions from acute to tolerant and alternative activation states. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 2477–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yang, W.S.; Jeong, D.; Nam, G.; Yi, Y.-S.; Yoon, D.H.; Kim, T.W.; Park, Y.C.; Hwang, H.; Rhee, M.H.; Hong, S.; et al. AP-1 pathway-targeted inhibition of inflammatory responses in LPS-treated macrophages and EtOH/HCl-treated stomach by Archidendron clypearia methanol extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 146, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Newton, K.; Dixit, V.M. Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a006049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hess, J.; Angel, P.; Schorpp-Kistner, M. AP-1 subunits: Quarrel and harmony among siblings. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 5965–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, E.; Kang, Y.-G.; Kim, Y.-J.; Lee, T.R.; Yoo, B.C.; Jo, M.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, D.; Cho, J.Y. Dehydroabietic acid suppresses inflammatory response via suppression of Src-, Syk-, and TAK1-mediated pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kim, E.; Yi, Y.-S.; Son, Y.-J.; Han, S.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Nam, G.; Hossain, M.A.; Kim, J.-H.; Park, J.; Cho, J.Y. BIOGF1K, a compound K-rich fraction of ginseng, plays an antiinflammatory role by targeting an activator protein-1 signaling pathway in RAW264. 7 macrophage-like cells. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 42, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, T.; Yang, Y.; Kwak, Y.-S.; Song, G.G.; Kim, M.-Y.; Rhee, M.H.; Cho, J.Y. Ginsenoside Rc from Panax ginseng exerts anti-inflammatory activity by targeting TANK-binding kinase 1/interferon regulatory factor-3 and p38/ATF-2. J. Ginseng Res. 2017, 41, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Franks, A.L.; Slansky, J.E. Multiple associations between a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 1119–1136. [Google Scholar]
  20. Barnes, P.J.; Karin, M. Nuclear factor-κB—A pivotal transcription factor in chronic inflammatory diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yi, Y.-S.; Cho, J.Y.; Kim, D. Cerbera manghas methanol extract exerts anti-inflammatory activity by targeting c-Jun N-terminal kinase in the AP-1 pathway. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 193, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, P.; Zhao, Q.-L.; Jawaid, P.; Rehman, M.U.; Sakurai, H.; Kondo, T. Enhancement of hyperthermia-induced apoptosis by 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, a TAK1 inhibitor, in A549 cells. Cell Stress Chaperones 2016, 21, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sharma, J.; Al-Omran, A.; Parvathy, S.J.I. Role of nitric oxide in inflammatory diseases. Inflammopharmacology 2007, 15, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, J.-M.; An, J. Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2007, 45, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Fingleton, B. Matrix metalloproteinases as regulators of inflammatory processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 2036–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Lint, P.; Libert, C. Chemokine and cytokine processing by matrix metalloproteinases and its effect on leukocyte migration and inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 82, 1375–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Parks, W.C.; Wilson, C.L.; López-Boado, Y.S. Matrix metalloproteinases as modulators of inflammation and innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schönbeck, U.; Mach, F.; Libby, P. Generation of Biologically Active IL-1β by Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Novel Caspase-1-Independent Pathway of IL-1β Processing. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 3340–3346. [Google Scholar]
  29. Itoh, T.; Matsuda, H.; Tanioka, M.; Kuwabara, K.; Itohara, S.; Suzuki, R. The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Antibody-Induced Arthritis. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 2643–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, J.; Cao, X. Cellular and molecular regulation of innate inflammatory responses. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2016, 13, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garces de los Fayos Alonso, I.; Liang, H.-C.; Turner, S.D.; Lagger, S.; Merkel, O.; Kenner, L. The Role of Activator Protein-1 (AP-1) Family Members in CD30-Positive Lymphomas. Cancers 2018, 10, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Zenz, R.; Eferl, R.; Scheinecker, C.; Redlich, K.; Smolen, J.; Schonthaler, H.B.; Kenner, L.; Tschachler, E.; Wagner, E.F. Activator protein 1 (Fos/Jun) functions in inflammatory bone and skin disease. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2008, 10, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wagner, E.F. Bone development and inflammatory disease is regulated by AP-1 (Fos/Jun). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010, 69 (Suppl. 1), i86–i88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shin, K.K.; Park, J.G.; Hong, Y.H.; Aziz, N.; Park, S.H.; Kim, S.; Kim, E.; Cho, J.Y. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Licania macrocarpa Cuatrec Methanol Extract Target Src-and TAK1-Mediated Pathways. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 4873870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Aashaq, S.; Batool, A.; Andrabi, K.I. TAK1 mediates convergence of cellular signals for death and survival. Apoptosis 2019, 24, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, H.; Ou, G.; He, Y.; Ren, L.; Yang, X.; Zeng, M. Resveratrol attenuates the MSU crystal-induced inflammatory response through the inhibition of TAK1 activity. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 67, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, H.G.; Kim, M.-Y.; Cho, J.Y. Alisma canaliculatum ethanol extract suppresses inflammatory responses in LPS-stimulated macrophages, HCl/EtOH-induced gastritis, and DSS-triggered colitis by targeting Src/Syk and TAK1 activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 219, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, E.; Kang, Y.-G.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.-J.; Lee, T.R.; Lee, J.; Kim, D.; Cho, J.Y. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of 8-hydroxydaidzein (8-HD) in activated macrophage-like RAW264. 7 cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wu, J.; Powell, F.; Larsen, N.A.; Lai, Z.; Byth, K.F.; Read, J.; Gu, R.-F.; Roth, M.; Toader, D.; Saeh, J.C. Mechanism and in vitro pharmacology of TAK1 inhibition by (5 Z)-7-oxozeaenol. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.; Kajino, T.; Ono, K.; Ohtomo, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Shiina, M.; Mihara, M.; Tsuchiya, M.; Matsumoto, K. A resorcylic acid lactone, 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, prevents inflammation by inhibiting the catalytic activity of TAK1 MAPK kinase kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 18485–18490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhou, H.; Li, S.; Wang, G. Euxanthone Ameliorates Sevoflurane-Induced Neurotoxicity in Neonatal Mice. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 68, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Peng, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Mine, Y.; Tsao, R. Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative activities of daidzein and its sulfonic acid ester derivatives. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 35, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Choi, E.Y.; Jin, J.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Choi, J.I.; Choi, I.S.; Kim, S.J. Anti-inflammatory effects and the underlying mechanisms of action of daidzein in murine macrophages stimulated with Prevotella intermedia lipopolysaccharide. J. Periodontal Res. 2012, 47, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Han, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, E.; Kim, S.H.; Seo, D.B.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, S.S.; Cho, J.Y. AKT-targeted anti-inflammatory activity of Panax ginseng calyx ethanolic extract. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 42, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, E.; Kim, D.; Yoo, S.; Hong, Y.H.; Han, S.Y.; Jeong, S.; Jeong, D.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, J.Y.; Park, J. The skin protective effects of compound K, a metabolite of ginsenoside Rb1 from Panax ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 42, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 25 05760 g001 550
Figure 1. The effects of Euodia pasteuriana methanol extract (Ep-ME) on the production of nitric oxide (NO). The level of NO production in the culture supernatant of RAW264.7 cells treated with (a) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 μg/mL), (b) polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C, 200 μg/mL), or (c) Pam3CSK (10 μg/mL) with or without Ep-ME for 24 h. (d) The cytotoxic effects of Ep-ME against RAW264.7 cells and HEK293T cells after incubation for 24 h. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. untreated control group, * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01 vs. LPS group.
Figure 1. The effects of Euodia pasteuriana methanol extract (Ep-ME) on the production of nitric oxide (NO). The level of NO production in the culture supernatant of RAW264.7 cells treated with (a) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 μg/mL), (b) polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C, 200 μg/mL), or (c) Pam3CSK (10 μg/mL) with or without Ep-ME for 24 h. (d) The cytotoxic effects of Ep-ME against RAW264.7 cells and HEK293T cells after incubation for 24 h. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. untreated control group, * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01 vs. LPS group.
Molecules 25 05760 g001
Molecules 25 05760 g002 550
Figure 2. The effects of Ep-ME on the expression of inflammatory genes and transcription factor activation. The mRNA expression levels of MMP1, IL-6, MMP2, TNF-α, MMP3, and MMP9 in (a) LPS (1 μg/mL)-, (b) poly I:C (200 μg/mL)-, or (c) Pam3CSK (10 μg/mL)-induced macrophages treated with Ep-ME were measured by semiquantitative RT-PCR. The relative intensity is quantified through ImageJ. HEK293T cells transfected with (d) MyD88 or (e) TRIF were transfected with plasmid constructs of AP-1-Luc for 24 h, followed by treatment with Ep-ME for an additional 24 h. (f) The nuclear fraction of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells was analyzed using immunoblotting to determine the nuclear translocation levels of the AP-1 subunit (c-Jun and c-Fos) and Lamin A/C. The data presented in (a–f) are a representative of three independent experiments. ## p < 0.01 vs. untreated control group, and * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Figure 2. The effects of Ep-ME on the expression of inflammatory genes and transcription factor activation. The mRNA expression levels of MMP1, IL-6, MMP2, TNF-α, MMP3, and MMP9 in (a) LPS (1 μg/mL)-, (b) poly I:C (200 μg/mL)-, or (c) Pam3CSK (10 μg/mL)-induced macrophages treated with Ep-ME were measured by semiquantitative RT-PCR. The relative intensity is quantified through ImageJ. HEK293T cells transfected with (d) MyD88 or (e) TRIF were transfected with plasmid constructs of AP-1-Luc for 24 h, followed by treatment with Ep-ME for an additional 24 h. (f) The nuclear fraction of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells was analyzed using immunoblotting to determine the nuclear translocation levels of the AP-1 subunit (c-Jun and c-Fos) and Lamin A/C. The data presented in (a–f) are a representative of three independent experiments. ## p < 0.01 vs. untreated control group, and * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Molecules 25 05760 g002
Molecules 25 05760 g003 550
Figure 3. The effects of Ep-ME on the activation of the AP-1 signaling pathway. (a–d) The levels of the phosphorylated and total forms of JNK, ERK, p38, MKK7, TAK1, MKK4, IRAK1, IRAK4, and β-actin were identified by immunoblotting analyses. The relative intensity is quantified through ImageJ. The data presented in (a–d) are a representative of three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Figure 3. The effects of Ep-ME on the activation of the AP-1 signaling pathway. (a–d) The levels of the phosphorylated and total forms of JNK, ERK, p38, MKK7, TAK1, MKK4, IRAK1, IRAK4, and β-actin were identified by immunoblotting analyses. The relative intensity is quantified through ImageJ. The data presented in (a–d) are a representative of three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Molecules 25 05760 g003
Molecules 25 05760 g004 550
Figure 4. Anti-inflammatory effects of Ep-ME by targeting TAK1 kinases. HEK293T cells were transfected with HA-TAK1, followed by treatment with Ep-ME for an additional 24 h. (a) HA, β-actin, and phosphorylated and total forms of TAK1 were examined by immunoblotting. (b) The mRNA expression levels of MMP1, GAPDH, MMP2, and MMP9 were assessed by RT-PCR in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells after treatment with Ep-ME. (c) Cytotoxic effects of 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, a TAK1 inhibitor, against RAW264.7 cells after incubation for 24 h. (d) NO production was determined through the Griess assay in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells after treatment with 5Z-7-oxozeaenol. (e) The mRNA expression levels of MMP1 and GAPDH were assessed through RT-PCR. (f) HEK293T cells transfected with HA-TAK1 plasmid were transfected with AP-1-Luc for 24 h, followed by treatment with Ep-ME for an additional 24 h. The data presented in (a,b,e) are representative of three independent experiments. ## p < 0.01 vs. untreated control group, * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Figure 4. Anti-inflammatory effects of Ep-ME by targeting TAK1 kinases. HEK293T cells were transfected with HA-TAK1, followed by treatment with Ep-ME for an additional 24 h. (a) HA, β-actin, and phosphorylated and total forms of TAK1 were examined by immunoblotting. (b) The mRNA expression levels of MMP1, GAPDH, MMP2, and MMP9 were assessed by RT-PCR in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells after treatment with Ep-ME. (c) Cytotoxic effects of 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, a TAK1 inhibitor, against RAW264.7 cells after incubation for 24 h. (d) NO production was determined through the Griess assay in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells after treatment with 5Z-7-oxozeaenol. (e) The mRNA expression levels of MMP1 and GAPDH were assessed through RT-PCR. (f) HEK293T cells transfected with HA-TAK1 plasmid were transfected with AP-1-Luc for 24 h, followed by treatment with Ep-ME for an additional 24 h. The data presented in (a,b,e) are representative of three independent experiments. ## p < 0.01 vs. untreated control group, * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Molecules 25 05760 g004
Molecules 25 05760 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the anti-inflammatory activity of Ep-ME when targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 signaling pathway.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the anti-inflammatory activity of Ep-ME when targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 signaling pathway.
Molecules 25 05760 g005
Table
Table 1. The primer sequences for the RT-PCR analysis.
Table 1. The primer sequences for the RT-PCR analysis.
Gene NameDirectionSequences (5′ to 3′)
MMP1 (Mouse)ForwardACAACGGAGACCGGCAAAAT
ReverseGCTGGAAAGTGTGAGCAAGC
MMP2 (Mouse)ForwardGCCCCCATGAAGCCTTGTTT
ReverseGTCAGTATCAGCATCGGGGG
MMP3 (Mouse)ForwardACTCCCTGGGACTCTACCAC
ReverseTTCTTCACGGTTGCAGGGAG
MMP9 (Mouse)ForwardTCTTCCCCAAAGACCTGAAA
ReverseTGATGTTATGATGGTCCCAC
TNF-α (Mouse)ForwardTAGCCCACGTCGTAGCAAAC
ReverseACCCTGAGCCATAATCCCCT
IL-6 (Mouse)ForwardGCCTTCTTGGGACTGATGCT
ReverseTGGAAATTGGGGTAGGAAGGAC
GAPDH (Mouse)ForwardACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC
ReverseCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG
MMP1 (Human)ForwardCACAGCTTCCCAGCGACTC
ReverseGTCCCGATGATCTCCCCTGA
MMP2 (Human)ForwardCCCACTGAGGAGTCCAACAT
ReverseCATTTACACGTCTGCGGATCT
MMP3 (Human)ForwardATCCTACTGTTGCTGTGCGT
ReverseCATCACCTCCAGAGTGTCGG
GAPDH (Human)ForwardGGTCACCAGGGCTGCTTTTA
ReverseGATGGCATGGACTGTGGTCA
Sample Availability: Samples of the compound, Euodia pasteuriana methanol extract is available from the authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Kim, M.-Y.; Cho, J.Y. Euodia pasteuriana Methanol Extract Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 Signaling Pathway. Molecules 2020, 25, 5760. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235760

AMA Style

Zhang J, Kim M-Y, Cho JY. Euodia pasteuriana Methanol Extract Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 Signaling Pathway. Molecules. 2020; 25(23):5760. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235760

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jianmei, Mi-Yeon Kim, and Jae Youl Cho. 2020. "Euodia pasteuriana Methanol Extract Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 Signaling Pathway" Molecules 25, no. 23: 5760. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235760

APA Style

Zhang, J., Kim, M.-Y., & Cho, J. Y. (2020). Euodia pasteuriana Methanol Extract Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Targeting TAK1 in the AP-1 Signaling Pathway. Molecules, 25(23), 5760. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235760

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop