Next Article in Journal
The Potential Mechanisms of the Neuroprotective Actions of Oil Palm Phenolics: Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanochemical and Size Reduction Machines for Biorefining
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous LC-MS/MS-Based Quantification of Free 3-Nitro-l-tyrosine, 3-Chloro-l-tyrosine, and 3-Bromo-l-tyrosine in Plasma of Colorectal Cancer Patients during Early Postoperative Period
Previous Article in Special Issue
Techno-Economic Analysis of Producing Glacial Acetic Acid from Poplar Biomass via Bioconversion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modified Spruce Sawdust for Sorption of Hexavalent Chromium in Batch Systems and Fixed-Bed Columns

by
Dororthea Politi
and
Dimitrios Sidiras
*
Laboratory of Simulation of Industrial Processes, Department of Industrial Management and Technology, School of Maritime and Industrial Studies, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou, GR 18534 Piraeus, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(21), 5156; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215156
Submission received: 30 August 2020 / Revised: 31 October 2020 / Accepted: 3 November 2020 / Published: 5 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lignocellulosic Biomass to Biofuels and Biochemicals)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the potential use of spruce sawdust that was pretreated with diethylene glycol and sulfuric acid for the removal of hexavalent chromium from wastewater. The sawdust pretreatment process was conducted at different temperatures and times. The adsorbent was characterized by quantitative saccharification, scanning electron microscopy, and Brunauer–Emmet–Teller surface area analysis. Adsorption capacity was studied for both batch and column processes. The experimental adsorption isotherms were simulated using seven isotherm models, including Freundlich and Langmuir models. By using the Langmuir isotherm model, the maximal Cr(VI) adsorption capacity of organosolv-pretreated spruce sawdust (qm) was 318.3 mg g−1. Furthermore, the kinetic data were fitted to Lagergren, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion models, revealing that the adsorption of Cr(VI) onto spruce sawdust pretreated with diethylene glycol and sulfuric acid is best represented by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Three kinetic models, namely, the Bohart–Adams model, Thomas model, and modified dose–response (MDR) model, were used to fit the experimental data obtained from the column experiments and to resolve the characteristic parameters. The Thomas adsorption column capacity of the sawdust was increased from 2.44 to 31.1 mg g−1 upon pretreatment, thus, demonstrating that organosolv treatment enhances the adsorption capability of the material.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The increased magnitude of industrial processes has led to overwhelming environmental pollution and enormous damage to specific ecosystems. Specifically, the high toxicity of heavy metals makes them significant environmental and public health threats. Heavy metals speak to a significant issue for the environment and for all the life forms, since they are not biodegradable and can gather in living tissues, reaching human organisms as well through the chain food [1]. The use of chromium is particularly worrying because it is being increasingly utilized in developing countries in a number of industries, such as leather tanning, electroplating, textile dyeing, and metal finishing [2].
The International Agency for Research on Cancer has concluded that the sixth oxidation state of chromium, namely Cr(VI), is carcinogenic to human beings. The World Health Organization has dictated that the highest allowable level for Cr(VI) in drinking water is 0.05 mg L−1 [3,4]. Furthermore, a number of countries are facing issues in relation to the presence of hexavalent chromium in natural ecosystems. For instance, in Greece, the Asopos River has been considered a “processed industrial waste receiver” since 1969. It was recently discovered that the Asopos and Thiva Basins are massively contaminated with Cr(VI) because of the excessive industrial activity around the area and unregulated discharge even though a Cr(VI) limit in industrial discharge is mandatory to acquire licensing [5]. Therefore, owing to its high toxicity, it is important to minimize Cr(VI) to tolerable levels prior to its discharge in aquatic environments. Cr(VI) forms several species, the relative proportions of which depend on both pH and total Cr(VI) concentration. Within the normal pH range in natural waters, Cr(VI) exists mainly as CrO4−2, HCrO−4, and Cr2O72− [6].
There are a number of processes used for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. The most commonly utilized techniques for the removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater incorporate reduction, precipitation, membrane filtration [7], biological method, ion exchange, and adsorption [8]. The initial five ordinary separation methods have numerous hindrances such as the high capital and operational cost, the creation of measurable chromium sludge, and potential production of secondary pollution bringing about high removal costs even though adsorption has been generally utilized for the removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater because of its straightforward operation, high removal efficiency, and low treatment cost [9].
Adsorption by using activated carbon has been demonstrated to be highly effective for decontaminating wastewater but is very expensive to perform [10]. Consequently, there is a great need to develop low-cost absorbents for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous environments [11]. Biomass provides a low-cost and renewable source of adsorbents and can be utilized in their original form, modified, or transformed to activated carbon. These waste materials have some to no financial value and often pose a disposal problem. Several naturally available biomasses, including sawdust [12], pistachio hull powder [13], Brazilian-pine fruit coat [14], orange peels and corncob [15], and Melaleuca diosmifolia leaf [16] have been evaluated as adsorbents for Cr(VI). Moreover, numerous modified lignocellulosic biomasses including cobalt-coated bamboo charcoal [17], walnut shells [18], nano-sized cellulose fibers obtained from rice husk [19], a lignin-based composite [20], biochar [21], formaldehyde created sawdust and sulfuric acid created sawdust [22], ammoniated rice straw [23], olive stones coated by iron-based nanoparticles [24], sulfuric acid and heat-treated oil palm fiber [25], activated carbon from longan seed [26], and lignin [27] have been examined as adsorbents for Cr(VI).
Numerous pretreatments on lignocellulosic biomass exist, such as autohydrolysis [28,29], alkaline pretreatment [30], acid hydrolysis [31,32], organosolv pretreatment [33,34], and many others. Organosolv pretreatment is considered promising, along with many different techniques, because of its unique potential benefits, such as separation of high purity cellulose, production of high quality lignin, higher efficiency of hemicellulose fractionation in contrast with customary treatments and organic solvent recovery [33,34].
In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of organosolv-pretreated spruce sawdust as a biosorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Different biosorbents were prepared by pretreating spruce sawdust with diethylene glycol and sulfuric acid at four different temperatures (160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C) and two different isothermal hydrolysis times (0 and 50 min [preheating period not included]). The physicochemical and sorption properties of the pretreated and untreated spruce sawdust were assessed by quantitative saccharification, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) surface area analysis. The possible adsorption mechanism for Cr(VI) was also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Organosolv Pretreatment

Table 1 displays the results of pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O and pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4. The percentage of lignin in the materials increases with the intensity of the pretreatment. By changing the isothermal pretreatment time, the percentage of lignin in the materials increases.
For the pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O, there is a relative stability for the percentage of cellulose at 200 °C and 220 °C for an isothermal reaction time of 50 min. Additionally, for pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4, the percentage of cellulose following isothermal reaction for 50 min at 220 °C is low.
Table 1 shows that, for pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O, more extreme pretreatment conditions lead to smaller percentages of xylan and mannan. Conversely, for pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4, a steep decrease in mannan is observed, particularly for an isothermal reaction time of 0 min.
The solid residue yield (SRY) decreases with pretreatment temperature for both systems. The temperatures used were 160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C, which were reached after 42, 50, 62, and 80 min preheating, respectively. The SRY is lower for an isothermal reaction time of 50 min in relation to an isothermal reaction time of 0 min.

2.2. BET Surface Area

Table 2 displays the specific surface areas of the materials for all pretreatment conditions. There is an increase in the specific surface area upon increasing the pretreatment temperature. For the pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O, the largest specific surface area appears to be 4.078 m2g−1, which is achieved by pretreatment at 220 °C for 50 min. For the pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4, the largest specific surface area appears to be 11.335 m2g−1, which was achieved by pretreatment at 220 °C for 50 min.

2.3. Microstructure

Figure 1 shows the SEM micrographs of untreated spruce sawdust and those treated under acid-catalyzed organosolv conditions at 180 °C for 50 min at two different magnifications (×7500 and ×30,000). The surface of the pretreated material exhibits greater roughness than the untreated material. This is particularly evident at ×30,000 magnification.

2.4. Adsorption Isotherms

Therefore, in this study, seven isotherm models were applied to fit the experimental results (Figure 2). The Freundlich [35] isotherm is given by the following equation.
q = K F ( C e ) 1 n
where q is the amount adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent (mg g−1), Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate (mg L−1), and KF, n is the Freundlich constants related to adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively. Equation (1) in logarithmic form gives the following.
l o g q = l o g K F + 1 n l o g C e
The Langmuir isotherm [36] is given by the following equation.
q = K L q m C e 1 + K L C e
or
1 q = 1 q m + 1 K L q m 1 C e
where KL is the Langmuir constant related to the energy of adsorption (L mg−1) and qm is the amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed (mg g−1) when saturation is attained. The parameters KL and qm can be obtained either by plotting 1/q versus 1/Ce or by non-linear regression analysis. The characteristics of the Langmuir isotherm can be described by a dimensionless constant called the ‘equilibrium parameter’ or ‘separation factor’ RL.
R L = 1 1 + K L C 0
where C0 is the initial concentration (mg L−1) and KL is the Langmuir constant (L mg−1). The value of RL indicates whether the type of the proposed isotherm is either unfavorable (RL > 1), linear (RL = 1), favorable (0 < RL < 1), or irreversible (RL = 0).
The Sips (Langmuir-Freundlich) [37] isotherm equation is shown below.
q = q m K L C e 1 / n 1 + K L C e 1 / n   or   1 q = 1 q m + 1 K L 1 / n q m 1 C e 1 / n
where KL and qm are the Langmuir constants, and n is the Freundlich constant.
The Radke-Prausnitz [38,39] isotherm equation is shown below.
q = K L q m C e 1 + K L C e 1 / n
The Modified Radke-Prausnitz [39] isotherm equation is below.
q = K L q m C e 1 + K L C e 1 / n
The Tóth [40] isotherm equation is below.
q = q m C e 1 / K L + C e n 1 / n
The Unilan [39] isotherm equation is shown below.
q = q m 2 s ln 1 + K L C e e s 1 + K L C e e s
where s is a new constant.
Table 3 presents all the parameters of the Freundlich and Langmuir models using nonlinear regression analysis (NLRA) for all the samples with different pretreatment conditions (temperature, isothermal treatment time, and added acid). The standard error of estimate (SEE) was calculated in each case by the following expression.
S E E = i = 1 n y i y i , t h e o r 2 n p
where yi is the experimental value of the depended variable, yi,theor is the theoretical or estimated value of the depended variable, n′ is the number of experimental measurements, and p′ is the number of parameters (the difference [n’p′] being the number of degrees of freedom). The fitting of the Freundlich adsorption model to the experimental data is very satisfactory (see Table 3 and Figure 2a,b).
Figure 2a,b shows the Freundlich isotherms for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated spruce sawdust and those pretreated with (a) 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 180 °C for 50 min and (b) 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O at 220 °C for 50 min.
Table 3 shows the Freundlich isotherm capacity coefficient KF of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust. According to the same table with the KF measurement for Cr(VI) removal, it can be observed that pretreatment at 160 °C provides insufficient improvements to the adsorption capacity of the material. By contrast, more intense pretreatment, such as pretreatment at 220 °C for 0 min and pretreatment at 180 °C for 50 min, yield significant improvements in KF adsorption capacity.
In relation to industrial applications, the adsorption capacity qm is given in Table 3 according to the Langmuir model. On this basis, pretreatment with an organic solvent catalyzed by acid significantly improves qm. Pretreatment at 160 °C does not improve the adsorption capacity of our material for time 0. By contrast, for the more intense pretreatment temperatures of 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C, we see a significant improvement with a maximum temperature of 220 °C for 0 min (qm = 257.2 mg g−1). Conversely, for pretreatment with organic solvent catalyzed by acid for an isothermal time of 50 min, improvement is observed for the two lowest pretreatment temperatures (160 °C and 180 °C) with maximum temperatures of 180 °C for 50 min, as shown in Table 3, where qm = 318.3 mg g−1 for the Langmuir model.
In the current study, the RL values were calculated in the range of zero to one for all initial Cr(VI) concentrations (C0) and for all adsorbents considered. This indicates a sympathetic adsorption. By contrast, RL > 1 represents an adverse adsorption, and RL = 1 represents a linear adsorption. Furthermore, the adsorption is permanent if RL = 0.
Table 4 presents the parameters of seven isothermal models in their nonlinear form, which is similar to previous pretreatments. The materials for which the parameters of the seven isothermal models are presented are untreated spruce sawdust, sawdust pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O at 220 °C for 50 min, and sawdust pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 180 °C for 50 min, which has the optimum adsorption capability. The fitting of the Sips model was better when compared to other six isotherms models but also Freundlich and Langmuir models were very satisfactory using only two parameters.
In Table 5, we compare the Cr(VI) adsorption parameters KF, n, qm, and KL for pretreated and untreated spruce sawdust with other adsorbents derived from agricultural or waste materials, according to available literature data. The optimal qm value found in this work was higher than the corresponding values of most of the other materials in Table 5, while the KF was the highest.

2.5. Adsorption Kinetics

Various kinetic models have been used to identify the reasonable mechanisms for solid/liquid adsorption frameworks. Among them, Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order [47] and pseudo-second-order kinetic models [48] as well as the intraparticle diffusion kinetic model [49] are the three most common models. Thus, these three kinetic models were utilized to fit the experimental data for the adsorption of Cr(VI) on pretreated spruce sawdust.
The widely used Lagergren equation [47] or the pseudo-first order kinetic model is shown below.
q q t = q e k t
where q and qt are the amounts of Cr(VI) adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent (in mg g−1) at equilibrium time ( t ) and adsorption time t, respectively, while k is the pseudo-first order rate constant for the adsorption process (in min−1).
q = C 0 C e V / m   and   q t = C 0 C V / m
where C, C0, and Ce are the concentrations of Cr(VI) in the bulk solution at time t, 0, and , respectively, while m is the weight of the adsorbent used (in g), and V is the solution volume (in mL). Further modification of Equation (12) in logarithmic form gives the following.
ln ( q q t ) = ln q k t
The pseudo second order kinetic model [48] is as follows.
q t = q q 1 + k 2 t 1   or   q t = q 1 1 q + k 2 t
where k2 (min−1) is the rate constant of second order adsorption.
The possibility of intra-particle diffusion was explored by using the intra-particle diffusion model [49].
q t = c + k p t
where qt is the amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed at time t, kp (mg g−1 min−0.5) is the intra-particle diffusion rate constant, and c (mg g−1) is a constant related to the thickness of boundary. A value of c close to zero indicates that diffusion is the only controlling step of the adsorption process.
The most appropriate model was chosen in terms of both SEE and qe values. Table 6 and Table 7 show the kinetic results.
Figure 3 shows the second-order kinetics of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust. Pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at a medium temperature (180 °C) leads to the highest adsorbance.
The SEE values for the second-order kinetic models are 0.133 for untreated spruce sawdust and 0.150 for spruce sawdust pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 180 °C for 50 min.
For pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O, the NLRA estimates for k2 of the second-order kinetic model return values from 0.0003–0.0008 g mg−1min−1, and the range of SEE error values is 0.079–0.181. However, for pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4, the NLRA estimates for the k2 of the second-order kinetic model return values from 0.0003–0.0021 g mg−1min−1, and the range of SEE error values is 0.106–0.178. Therefore, these SEE values are lower than those of the first-order kinetic model. According to the above, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model demonstrates that the equilibrium amount of adsorbed absorbate controls the number of binding sites [50].
Finally, the NLRA estimates for the kp of the intraparticle diffusion model for the pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O, for 0 min, at 160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C, are 0.1133, 0.1011, 0.1203 and 0.1655, respectively. Therefore, according to the intraparticle diffusion model, a higher pretreatment temperature corresponds to higher values of kp. The SEE values of the intraparticle diffusion model are 0.122–0.203. The minimum value is for untreated spruce sawdust, and the maximum value is for spruce sawdust pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 180 °C for 50 min (see Figure 4). The intraparticle diffusion model involves a multistage adsorption process that includes the mass transfer of adsorbate molecules to the external surface of the adsorbent, their mass transfer to the internal surface of the adsorbent, and their sorption on the active sites of the adsorbent [51].
Assessing these three kinetics models demonstrated that the material improves substantially when it is pretreated with sulfuric acid, diethylene glycol, and water.
All SEE error values for the second-order kinetic model were found to be somewhat lower than those of the Lagergren and intraparticle diffusion models, indicating the marginally higher suitability of second-order kinetics in the adsorption of Cr(VI) by spruce sawdust pretreated with organic solvent.
According to the findings presented in Figure 5, the simulated q-values obtained via pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic models were decreased by 31% and 13%, respectively (as an average), when compared to the experimental equilibrium uptakes achieved by isothermal experiments (equilibrium reached after seven days).

2.6. Adsorption Columns

For the adsorption column experiments, the ‘bed depth service model’ developed by Bohart and Adams [52] is commonly used as follows.
ln C i C 1 = K N x u K C i t
where C = effluent concentration (mg L−1), Ci = influent concentration (mg L−1), K = adsorption rate coefficient (L mg−1 min−1), N = adsorption capacity coefficient (mg L−1), x = bed depth (cm), u = linear velocity (cm min−1), and t = adsorption time (min).
The Thomas [53] model is one of the most widely used models in the column performance theory. The main difference between the Bohart-Adams and the Thomas model is the form of the sorption isotherm assumed. The latter assumes a Langmuir (favorable) isotherm. It has been shown that, when the sorption isotherm is highly favorable, the actual Thomas model reduces to the Bohart-Adams model. The expression by Thomas for an adsorption column is:
ln C i C 1 = k T q 0 M Q k T C i t
where kT is the Thomas rate constant, q0 is the sorption capacity of the adsorbent per unit mass of the adsorbent, M is the mass of adsorbent, and Q is the flow rate. It is evident that Equations (17) and (18) look strikingly similar even at first glance. They are mathematically identical and have interchangeable parameters [54,55].
The Modified Dose–Response (MDR) model was proposed by Yan et al. [55] because it minimizes the error resulting from the use of the Thomas model, especially at lower and higher time periods of the breakthrough curve. The MDR model is expressed as:
C C i = 1 1 1 + V / b m d r a m d r   or   C C i = 1 1 1 + C i V / q 0 M a m d r
where bmdr = (q0M)/Ci and αmdr are the modified dose–response constants, and V = Q.t.
Table 8 shows the parameters of the Bohart–Adams, Thomas, and MDR models for untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust for Cr(VI) removal. The pretreatment conditions of spruce sawdust are 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 for 160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C, and the isothermal reaction time is 50 min. The experiments were performed at a flow rate of 2 mL min−1, the mass of the material was 18 g, and the Cr(VI) concentration was 60 mg L−1.
According to Table 8, the Bohar-Adams capacity N (mg L−1) for the untreated spruce sawdust is 662 mg L−1 for the material pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 180 °C for 50 min is 7814 mg L−1, which is the maximum value of N. However, for the most severe pretreatment conditions (50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 220 °C for 50 min), the value of N decreases at 998 mg L−1.
Furthermore, we observe that, according to the Thomas model, the adsorption capacity q0 (mg g−1) for the untreated material is equal to 2.437 mg g−1, while that for the material pretreated at 180 °C for 50 min is 31.08 mg g−1. Consequently, the pretreated material at the optimal conditions has an adsorption capacity that is 13 times that of the untreated material. However, for the most severe pretreatment conditions, it is reduced to 4.452 mg g−1.
Similarly, the MRD model shows that the material pretreated at 180 °C for an isothermal reaction time of 50 min has an adsorption capacity that is 14 times that of the untreated material. For the extreme pretreatment at 220 °C for 50 min, the adsorption capacity of the material is greater than that of the unprocessed material but was not optimal, as we expected. In general, the adsorption capacity q0 (mg g−1) values estimated, according to the MDR model, are very similar to those of the Thomas model, resulting in the same conclusion with regard to the process optimization.
Figure 6 shows the theoretical curves from the Thomas model for untreated and pretreated with the acid-catalyzed organic solvent spruce. The fitting of the Thomas (or the Bohart–Adams) model to the experimental data is not always better than that of the MDR model but it fits better than the high C/Ci experimental values while the MDR model fits the very low initial C/Ci values better.
The Cr(VI) adsorption capacity according to the Thomas capacity parameter q0 (mg L−1) of organosolv-pretreated spruce sawdust was compared with those of other adsorbents reported in the literature (Table 9). According to the Thomas model, spruce sawdust pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 at 180 °C for an isothermal reaction time of 50 min was q0 = 31.08 mg g−1. The Cr(VI) adsorption capacity for the organosolv-pretreated spruce sawdust is comparable than the reported values of some previously studied adsorbents. Therefore, it can be concluded that organosolv-pretreated spruce sawdust is competitive to other modified adsorbents lignocellulosic adsorbents.

2.7. Chemical-Physical Mechanisms of the Process

Adsorption on sawdust can be physical, ion exchange, and chemical [12]. Generally, three types of mechanisms are involved in an adsorption process: (i) film diffusion, which involves the movement of adsorbate molecules from the bulk of the solution toward the external surface of the adsorbent, (ii) particle diffusion, where the adsorbate molecules move in the interior of the adsorbent particles, and (iii) adsorption of the adsorbate molecules on the interior of the porous adsorbent [61,62].
The Thomas kinetic model satisfactorily described the column adsorption. This model is based on the mass transfer model, which postulates that adsorbate emigrates from the solution to a film around the particle and expands through the liquid film to the surface of the adsorbent. Subsequently, this step is followed by intraparticle diffusion and adsorption on the active site, assuming Langmuir isotherm for equilibrium, plug flow performance in the bed, and second-order reaction kinetics [12,63].
Moreover, to predict the rate determining the diffusion mechanism within the biosorption system above, applied an intraparticle diffusion model that proved to be very effective. Webber’s pore diffusion model was applied on the kinetic data with the pore diffusion factor described by Equation (16), where kp is the intra-particle diffusion rate constant. In the case that intraparticle diffusion is the rate limiting step, the q versus t0.5 will be linear with slope kp and the plot will pass through the origin, i.e., intercept c = 0. Otherwise, some other mechanism along with intraparticle diffusion is involved in the biosorption process, such as film diffusion. Based on the kinetics constants presented in Table 7 and the interpretation of the pretreated sawdust data in Figure 4, the sorption process consists of two steps. The linearization did not pass through the origin, indicating that intraparticle diffusion is not the rate-limiting step and implying that the biosorption is affected by more than one process. Additionally, in the same figure, the first part refers to the film diffusion and the second part correlates with the diffusion within the adsorbent. The initial segment in the plot specified an external mass transfer while the second segment is caused by intraparticle diffusion or pore diffusion [64,65]. With regard to the untreated sawdust, the second part does not appear within 24 h of our experiment (see Figure 4).
According to the literature, Cr(VI) can be adsorbed either by cellulose (modified or not, activated or not) [19,66] either by lignin (obtained from lignocellulosic biomass in combination with some modification and/or activation) [20,27,67,68]. According to the present experiments, there are optimal conditions for achieving maximum Cr(IV) adsorption capacity by material containing both cellulose and lignin. According to the presented data, there is no need to achieve maximum cellulose concentration or maximum lignin concentration (Table 1). Even the BET surface area (Table 2), maximization is not necessary or desired to obtain optimized adsorption material.
Studying the mechanism of Cr(VI) biosorption on the untreated and pretreated sawdust surface is important for understanding the enhanced removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using pretreated sawdust. FTIR was used as a qualitative technique for assessing the chemical structure of sawdust [65].
The FTIR spectrum of the untreated spruce and of the pretreated (50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50 min) spruce sawdust is provided in Figure 7. The comparison of these FTIR spectrums shows that some peaks were shifted. Moreover, the transmittance was significantly increased with regard to the pretreated sawdust compared to the untreated material. The major peaks, the shift of the peaks, the assignment, and the corresponding component are presented in Table 10. In the case of the pretreated material, there is a peak shift at wavenumber 3347 cm−1 (decreased by 117 cm−1 compared to the peak at 3464 cm−1 for the untreated sawdust) representing the O-H stretching existing in cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. Moreover, a peak shift at 2942 cm−1 (increased by 33 cm−1 compared to the 2909 cm−1 for the untreated material) indicates the presence of C-H stretching and a peak shift at 1700 cm−1 (decreased by 35 cm−1 compared to the 1735 cm−1 for untreated) indicates the C=O stretching. In addition, a peak shift at 1457 cm−1 (increased by 22 cm−1 compared to the 1435 cm−1 for the untreated) can be assigned to C-H deformation existing in lignin. The peak shift at 1043 cm−1 (increased by 25 cm−1 compared to the 1068cm−1 for the untreated) can be attributed to C-OH stretching vibration and C-O deformation. The appearance of a new peak at 1039 cm−1 can be attributed to the C-O stretching and aromatic C-H in plane deformation. Finally, the peak shifts at 855 and 851 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of pretreated spruce sawdust may be due to the C-O-C stretching and aromatic C-H out of plane bending, respectively. These peaks exist in cellulose/hemicelluloses and in lignin, respectively.
In Figure 8, the transmittance of the FTIR spectra of the pretreated (50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50 min) spruce sawdust before and after Cr(VI) adsorption are given. The adsorption conditions were C0 = 7 mg L−1, t = 1450 min, and adsorbent = 1 g L−1. The Transmittance was significantly increased after Cr(VI) adsorption on pretreated sawdust. The major peaks are given in Table 11. There is a peak shift at a wavenumber of 3410 cm−1 (increased by 63 cm−1 compared to the 3347 cm−1 before adsorption) representing the O-H stretching existing in cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. Furthermore, a peak shift at 1684 cm−1 (decreased by 16 cm−1 compared to the 1700 cm−1 before adsorption) indicates the C=O stretching. In addition, a peak shift at 1076 cm−1 (increased by 8 cm−1 compared to the 1068 cm−1 before adsorption) can be attributed to the C-OH stretching vibration and C-O deformation. Finally, the peak shift at 850 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of pretreated spruce sawdust after Cr(VI) adsorption may be due to the C-O-C stretching. Shifts or changes of these peaks would indicate interactions between the Cr(VI) with functional groups on the solid surface as a result of biosorption or a chemical reaction. Consequently, the increases in the transmittance of these peaks indicated the oxidation of cellulose/lignin in the occurrence of the adsorbed Cr(VI). In addition, it can be seen that the whole region of different functional group bands on the sawdust surface were involved in the biosorption of Cr(VI).
The FTIR spectrum confirms the changes in the functional groups and surface properties of spruce sawdust, as shown by the shift of some functional groups. Table 10 and Table 11 show a number of major Transmittance peaks indicating the characteristic structure of the lignocellulosic complex before and after biosorption of Cr(VI), which is in agreement with those reported in the literature [65,69,70,71,72,73].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

As an example, the source for industrial applications, which was a local furniture construction company, was used to acquire the spruce sawdust. At the point when the material was obtained, the moisture content was 8.3% (w/w). The portion with particle sizes of 0.2–1 mm was isolated. Table 1 shows the contents of the raw material.

3.2. Organosolv Pretreatment

The organosolv pretreatment processes were performed in a 3.75 L batch reactor (PARR 4843, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). The isothermal treatment time was 0 or 50 min (excluding the nonisothermal preheating and the cooling periods). The reaction was either (i) autocatalyzed (i.e., catalyzed by the organic acids generated by the spruce sawdust itself due to autohydrolysis during treatment) or (ii) catalyzed by 0.045 N H2SO4 at a liquid-solid ratio of 10:1. The liquid phase volume was 1000 mL diethylene glycol and 1000 mL water. The spruce sawdust loading was 200 g, and the stirring speed was 150 rpm. The temperatures used were 160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C, which were reached after the preheating periods of 42, 50, 62, and 80 min, respectively.

3.3. Characterization

For the quantitative saccharification of the untreated spruce sawdust and the organosolv reaction solid residues, the technique of Saeman et al. (1945) [74] was used. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an Aminex HPX-87H Column as well as a refractive index detector and 5 mM H2SO4 in water as the mobile phase was utilized for the glucose, xylose, and arabinose analyses of the filtrates from the quantitative saccharification. Cellulose was evaluated as glucan, and Hemicellulosess were assessed as xylan and arabinan [75]. Lastly, according to the Tappi T222 om-88 method (Tappi 1997) [76], the acid-insoluble lignin (Klason lignin) was established.
BET theory rationalizes the physical adsorption of gas molecules on a solid surface and serves as a basis for measuring the specific surface area of a material. Our measurements were made according to DIN 66,132 (DIN 66132, 1975) [77] by using liquid nitrogen (N2) with a Nova® Surface Area Analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) for approximately 20 h at 105 °C.
The SEM apparatus used was a JEOL JSM-6700F field-emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The magnifications used were ×7500 and ×30,000.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained using a spectroscope (MAGNA-IR 750 Spectrometer, Serrie II, Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA). The sampling technique used herein was diffuse reflectance. The powder samples were scanned for a wavenumber of 650–3500 cm−1.
Hexavalent chromium was monitored by the 1,5-diphenylcarbohydrazide strategy by utilizing solitary dry powder detailing. This reagent contains an acidic buffer joined with 1,5-diphenylcarbohydrazide, which provides a purple color when hexavalent chromium is present. The test outcomes were measured at 540 nm by using a HACH DR4000U UV-visible spectrophotometer (Loveland, CO, USA), i.e., HACH Method 8023. The highest concentration that can be estimated with this technique is 0.7 mg L−1. Thus, we used a dilution factor of 10–1000. Each sample was measured in triplicate to eliminate dilution error.
pH measurements were performed using a WTW MultiLab model 540 (Weilheim, Germany) computerized pH meter.

3.4. Adsorption Isotherm Studies

Adsorption isotherms were obtained from batch tests conducted in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask using a JULABO’s digital SW22 Shaking Water Bath (JULABO GmbH, Seelbach, Germany). The sorbent weight was 2 g (i.e., m/V = 4 g L−1), the temperature was 23 °C, and the initial Cr(VI) concentration varied from 15 to 700 mg L−1. K2Cr2O7 was used as the Cr(VI) source.
The pH of the solutions was set to two by utilizing diluted H2SO4. The jugs were fixed and mechanically tumbled for seven days. This timeframe was chosen following the initial investigations to accomplish the equilibrium conditions.
The utilization of adsorption isotherms is extremely helpful in investigating the interaction between the adsorbate and adsorbent in any framework. The parameters received from diverse models provide vital information on the surface properties and affinities of the adsorbent. There are several conditions for breaking down exploratory adsorption equilibrium information, and the best known surface adsorption models for single solute frameworks are the Langmuir and Freundlich models.

3.5. Kinetic Adsorption Studies

Batch adsorption rate tests were performed in a 4-L totally blended glass reactor fitted with a bent cutting-edge compost stirrer working at 600 rpm to maintain the lignocellulosic material in suspension. The sorbent weight was 4 g (i.e., m/V = 1 g L−1), and the underlying Cr(VI) fixation was 7 mg L−1. The effect of contact time on the uptake of Cr(VI) was evaluated in batch tests. Furthermore, the pH was adjusted equal to 2 (the pH of the solutions was balanced utilizing diluted H2SO4).

3.6. Adsorption Column Studies

Experiments with adsorption columns were performed on a 15 × 2.5 cm diameter column that contained 18 g of sorbent. The flow rate was set equal to 2 mL min−1 by using an HPLC pump (LaPrep P110, VWR International, Dublin, Ireland). The column experiments were conducted at 23 °C, the initial Cr(VI) concentration of the solution was 60 mg L−1, and the pH of the solution was two. Frequently, a sample was collected, and the concentration of Cr(VI) was determined.

4. Conclusions

Spruce sawdust is a low-cost and efficient absorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. The maximum Cr(VI) adsorption capacity of organosolv-pretreated spruce sawdust using the Langmuir isotherm model is 318.3 mg g−1. The rate of adsorption was found to follow the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. It was observed that pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O improves the adsorption capacity of sawdust by 84%, whereas pretreatment with 50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4 enhances the adsorption capacity of sawdust by 89%.
According to adsorption kinetics, the material pretreated with organic solvent and acid catalyst (50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4) at the optimal conditions, which were a temperature of 180 °C and pretreatment time of 50 min, adsorbed 3.7 times faster than the raw material (according to the intraparticle diffusion model).
Furthermore, our Thomas model showed that the material pretreated with organic solvent and acid catalyst (50% diethylene glycol/50% H2O/0.045 N H2SO4) at a temperature of 180 °C and an isothermal reaction time of 50 min has an adsorption capacity that is 13 times that of the untreated material. Overall, our results prove that the organosolv pretreatment of spruce sawdust produces a promising adsorbent candidate for the removal of Cr(VI).
Adsorption columns are widely used in water/wastewater treatment systems and their reliability makes these systems suitable for all types of facilities, e.g., large industrial-scale treatment plants with a high capacity. Furthermore, some pilot scale experiments are necessary to check the industrial reliability of the presented process.

Author Contributions

D.P. Investigation, Methodology, Software; Supervision, D.S. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Research Centre of the University of Piraeus.

Acknowledgments

Financial support provided by the Research Centre of the University of Piraeus is kindly acknowledged. The authors would like to thanks (a) Nikos Boukos (NCSR Demokritos, Greece) and (b) Michael Tsapatsis (Bloomberg, Johns Hopkins University, USA), for their contribution to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: Environmental Persistence, Toxicity, and Bioaccumulation. J. Chem. N. Y. 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Junaid, M.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Malik, R.N.; Pei, D.-S. Toxicity and oxidative stress induced by chromium in workers exposed from different occupational settings around the globe: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 20, 20151–20167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mojdeh, O.; Mohamed, K.A.; Wan, A.W.D.; Saeid, B. Removal of Hexavalent Chromium-Contaminated Water and Wastewater: A Review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009, 200, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmed, M.F.; Mokhtar, M.B. Assessing Cadmium and Chromium Concentrations in Drinking Water to Predict Health Risk in Malaysia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Megremi, I.; Vasilatos, C. Factors controlling the heterogeneous distribution of Cr(VI) in soil, plants and groundwater: Evidence from the Assopos basin, Greece. Geochemistry 2011, 71, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oliveira, H. Chromium as an Environmental Pollutant: Insights on Induced Plant Toxicity. J. Bot. 2012, 375843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khulbe, K.C.; Matsuura, T. Removal of heavy metals and pollutants by membrane adsorption techniques. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Barakat, M.A. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E. Wastewater treatment: An overview. In Book Green Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E.; Wilson, L.D.; Morin-Crini, N. Adsorption-Oriented Processes Using Conventional and Non-conventional Adsorbents for Wastewater Treatment. In Book Green Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 23–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Namasivayam, C.; Sureshkumar, M.V. Removal of chromium(VI) from water and wastewater using surfactant modified coconut coir pith as a biosorbent. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 2218–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tsamo, C.; Bachirou, I.; Samomssa, I.; Fouogoung, T.B. Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution Using Unmodified SawDust: Batch and Column Studies. Curr. J. Appl. 2019, 32, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moussavi, G.; Barikbin, B. Biosorption of chromium(VI) from industrial wastewater onto pistachio hull waste biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vaghetti, J.C.P.; Lima, E.C.; Royer, B.; Brasil, J.L.; Da Cunha, B.M.; Simon, N.M.; Cardoso, N.F.; Zapata-Norena, C.P. Application of Brazilian-pine fruit coat as a biosorbent to removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution -Kinetics and equilibrium study. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 42, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tejada-Tovar, C.; Herrera-Barros, A.; Villabona-Ortíz, A. Assessment of Chemically Modified Lignocellulose Waste for the Adsorption of Cr(VI). Rev. Fac. Ing. 2020, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saranya, K.; Palanisami, T.; Mallavarapu, M.; Kadiyala, V.; Yong, B.L.; Ravi, N. Potential of Melaleuca diosmifolia leaf as a low-cost adsorbent for hexavalent chromium removal from contaminated water bodies. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2016, 100, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Wu, Z.; Yang, L.Z.; Xia, S.Q.; Zhao, J.F. Cr(VI) removal from water using cobalt-coated bamboo charcoal prepared with microwave heating. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 39, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Altun, T.; Pehlivan, E. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by modified walnut shells. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pourfadaraki, S.; Jorfi, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Takdastan, A. Experimental data on adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using nanosized cellulose fibers obtained from rice husk. Data Brief 2017, 15, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, C.; Qiao, Y.; An, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, H. High-capacity adsorption of Cr(VI) by lignin-based composite: Characterization, performance and mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mohan, D.; Rajput, S.; Singh, V.K.; Steele, P.H.; Pittman, C.U., Jr. Modeling and evaluation of chromium remediation from water using low cost bio-char, a green adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 188, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garg, V.K.; Gupta, R.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, R.K. Adsorption of chromium from aqueous solution on treated sawdust. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 92, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, C.; Luo, W.; Luo, T.; Zhou, Q.; Li, H.; Jing, L. A study on adsorption of Cr(VI) by modified rice straw: Characteristics, performances and mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vilardi, G.; Ochando-Pulido, J.M.; Verdone, N.; Stoller, M.; Di Palma, L. On the removal of hexavalent chromium by olive stones coated by iron-based nanoparticles: Equilibrium study and chromium recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohamed, H.I.; Naimah, I.; Hamidi, A.A.; Mohd, N.A.; Nor Habsah, Md.S.; Ali, A.L.Z.; Shamsul, R.M.K. Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using treated oil palm fibre. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, J.; Yu, M.; Chen, W. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from longan seed: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 21, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, B.; Sun, Y.-C.; Sun, R.-C. Fractionational and structural characterization of lignin and its modification as biosorbents for efficient removal of chromium from wastewater: A review. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2019, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sidiras, D.; Politi, D.; Batzias, F.; Boukos, N. Efficient removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions using autohydrolyzed Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris) sawdust as adsorbent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 10, 1337–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sidiras, D.; Batzias, F.; Ranjan, R.; Tsapatsis, M. Simulation and optimization of batch autohydrolysis of wheat straw to monosaccharides and oligosaccharides. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 10486–10492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, Y.C.; Kim, J.S. Comparison of various alkaline pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy 2012, 47, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Batzias, F.; Sidiras, D.; Schroeder, E.; Weber, C. Simulation of dye adsorption on hydrolyzed wheat straw in batch and fixed-bed systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maarten, A.; Kootstra, J.; Beeftink, H.H.; Scott, E.L.; Sanders, J.P.M. Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 46, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, K.; Pei, Z.; Wang, D. Organic solvent pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and biochemicals: A review. Bioresour. Techno. 2016, 199, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Salapa, I.; Topakas, E.; Sidiras, D. Simulation and optimization of barley straw organosolv pretreatment. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 133, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Freundlich, H.M.F. Über die adsorption in lösungen, Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. Phys. Chem. 1906, 57, 385–471. [Google Scholar]
  36. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sips, R. Structure of a catalyst surface. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Radke, C.J.; Prausnitz, J.M. Adsorption of Organic Solutes from Dilute Aqueous Solution on Activated Carbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1972, 11, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chern, J.M.; Wu, C.Y. Desorption of dye from activated carbon beds: Effects of temperature, pH, and alcohol. Wat. Res. 2001, 35, 4159–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Toth, J. Calculation of the BET-compatible surface area from any Type I isotherms measured above the critical temperature. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 225, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Lv, L.; Qin, Y.; Xu, M.; Jia, X.; Chen, Z. Removal of aqueous Cr(VI) by a magnetic biochar derived from Melia azedarach wood. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 256, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rai, M.K.; Shahi, G.; Meena, V.; Meena, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Singh, R.S.; Rai, B.N. Removal of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) using activated carbon prepared from mango kernel activated with H3PO4. Resour. Effic. Technol. 2016, 2, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gupta, A.; Balomajumder, C. Simultaneous adsorption of Cr(VI) and phenol onto tea waste biomass from binary mixture: Multicomponent adsorption, thermodynamic and kinetic study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.S.; Chen, L.F.; Li, F.Y.; Chen, K.L.; Wan, W.Y.; Tang, Y.J. Removal of Cr(VI) with wheat-residue derived black carbon: Reaction mechanism and adsorption performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 816–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Danish, M.; Hashim, R.; Ibrahim, M.N.M.; Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O. Surface characterization and comparative adsorption properties of Cr(VI) on pyrolysed adsorbents of Acacia mangium wood and Phoenix dactylifera L. stone carbon. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2012, 97, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, X.; Gao, B.-Y.; Tang, X.; Yue, Q.-Y.; Zhong, Q.-Q.; Li, Q. Characteristics of cellulosic amine-crosslinked copolymer and its sorption properties for Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lagergren, S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelöster stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ho, Y.S.; Ng, J.C.Y.; McKay, G. Kinetics of pollutants sorption by biosorbents: Review. Sep. Purif. Methods. 2000, 29, 189–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Weber, W.J.; Morris, J.C. Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1963, 89, 31–60. [Google Scholar]
  50. Norouzi, S.; Heidari, M.; Alipour, V.; Rahmanian, O.; Fazlzadeh, M.; Mohammadi-moghadam, F.; Nourmoradi, H.; Goudarzi, B.; Dindarloo, K. Preparation, characterization and Cr(VI) adsorption evaluation of NaOH—activated carbon produced from Date Press Cake; an agro-industrial waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 258, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bouaziz, F.; Koubaa, M.; Kallel, F.; Chaari, F.; Driss, D.; Ghorbel, R.E.; Chaabouni, S.E. Efficiency of almond gum as a low-cost adsorbent for methylene blue dye removal from aqueous solutions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bohart, G.; Adams, E.N. Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1920, 42, 523–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Thomas, H.C. Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1664–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chu, K.H. Fixed bed sorption: Setting the record straight on the Bohart–Adams and Thomas models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yan, G.; Viraraghavan, T.; Chen, M. A new model for heavy metal removal in a biosorption column. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2001, 19, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gokhale, S.V.; Jyoti, K.K.; Lele, S.S. Modeling of chromium(VI) biosorption by immobilized Spirulina platensis in packed column. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nakkeeran, E.; Patra, C.; Shahnaz, T.; Rangabhashiyam, S.; Selvaraju, N. Continuous biosorption assessment for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions using Strychnos nux vomica fruit shell. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2018, 3, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sidiras, D.; Politi, D. Simulation and optimization of hexavalent chromium adsorption on autohydrolyzed Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris) sawdust in batch and fixed-bed systems. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Bio-Informatics, Bio-Technology and Environmental Engineering-ABBE, Birmingham, UK, 16–17 November 2014; pp. 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, S.; Yue, Q.; Gao, B.; Li, Q.; Xu, X.; Fu, K. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by modified corn stalk: A fixed-bed column study. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Srivastava, S.; Agrawal, S.B.; Mondal, M.K. Fixed Bed Column Adsorption of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution Using Nanosorbents Derived from Magnetite Impregnated Phaseolus vulgaris Husk. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2018, 38, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, C.; Zhao, P.; Li, Z.; Tong, Z. Adsorption behavior of chromium(VI) on activated carbon from eucalyptus sawdust prepared by microwave-assisted activation with ZnCl2. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 12572–12584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gupta, S.; Babu, B.V. Removal of toxic metal Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using sawdust as adsorbent: Equilibrium, kinetics and regeneration studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 150, 352–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pan, S.Y.; Syu, W.J.; Chang, T.K.; Lee, C.H. A multiple model approach for evaluating the performance of time-lapse capsules in trapping heavy metals from water bodies. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 16490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Karthikeyan, T.; Rajgopal, S.; Miranda, L.R. Chromium(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution by Hevea Brasilinesis sawdust activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 124, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Albadarina, A.B.; Al-Muhtasebb, A.H.; Al-laqtaha, N.A.; Walker, G.M.; Allena, S.J.; Ahmada, M.N.M. Biosorption of toxic chromium from aqueous phase by lignin: Mechanism, effect of other metal ions and salts. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 169, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gurgel, L.V.; Perin de Melo, J.C.; de Lena, J.C.; Gil, L.F. Adsorption of chromium (VI) ion from aqueous solution by succinylated mercerized cellulose functionalized with quaternary ammonium groups. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3214–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Demirbaş, A. Adsorption of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) Ions from Aqueous Solutions on to Modified Lignin. Energy Sources 2005, 27, 1449–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tazrouti, N.; Amrani, M. Chromium (Vi) Adsorption onto Activated Kraft Lignin Produced from Alfa Grass (Stipa Tenacissima). Bioresources 2009, 4, 740–755. [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhuang, J.; Li, M.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Yoo, C.G. Observation of Potential Contaminants in Processed Biomass Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ahmad, A.; Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Hashim, R. Scavenging behaviour of meranti sawdust in the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Hashim, R.; Ahmad, A. Removal of cadmium (II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption using meranti wood. Wood. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 221–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. González-Peña, M.M.; Hale, M.D.C. Rapid assessment of physical properties and chemical composition of thermally modified wood by mid-infrared spectroscopy. Wood Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fackler, K.; Stevanic, J.S.; Ters, T.; Hinterstoisser, B.; Schwanninger, M.; Salmen, L. Localisation and characterisation of incipient brown-rot decay within spruce wood cell walls using FT-IR imaging microscopy. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2010, 47, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Saeman, J.F.; Bubl, J.F.; Harris, E.E. Quantitative saccharification of wood and cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 1945, 17, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Salapa, I.; Katsimpouras, C.; Topakas, E.; Sidiras, D. Organosolv pretreatment of wheat straw for efficient ethanol production using various solvents. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 100, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tappi Standards. Tappi Tests Methods, T222 om-88 Atlanta. 1997. Available online: https://www.tappi.org/content/SARG/T222.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
  77. DIN 66132: Determination of Specific Surface Area of Solids by Adsorption of Nitrogen; Single Point Differential Method According to Haul and Dümbgen; German Institute for Standardisation: Berlin, Germany, 1975.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs for untreated, (a,b), diethylene glycol (180 °C, 50 min) pretreated, (c,d) and diethylene glycol/0.045 N H2SO4 (180 °C, 50 min) pretreated spruce, (e,f). Magnification (a,c,e) ×7500 and (b,d,f) ×30,000.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs for untreated, (a,b), diethylene glycol (180 °C, 50 min) pretreated, (c,d) and diethylene glycol/0.045 N H2SO4 (180 °C, 50 min) pretreated spruce, (e,f). Magnification (a,c,e) ×7500 and (b,d,f) ×30,000.
Molecules 25 05156 g001
Figure 2. The Freundlich isotherms of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated (a) with diethylene glycol/sulfuric acid (180 °C, 50 min) and (b) with diethylene glycol (220 °C, 50 min) spruce sawdust.
Figure 2. The Freundlich isotherms of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated (a) with diethylene glycol/sulfuric acid (180 °C, 50 min) and (b) with diethylene glycol (220 °C, 50 min) spruce sawdust.
Molecules 25 05156 g002
Figure 3. The second-order kinetics of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50-min spruce sawdust. Adsorption: 23 °C, initial concentration C0 = 7 mg L−1 for Cr(VI), m/V = 1 g L−1 pH = 2.
Figure 3. The second-order kinetics of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50-min spruce sawdust. Adsorption: 23 °C, initial concentration C0 = 7 mg L−1 for Cr(VI), m/V = 1 g L−1 pH = 2.
Molecules 25 05156 g003
Figure 4. The Intraparticle kinetics of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50 min spruce sawdust. Adsorption: 23 °C, initial concentration C0 = 7 mg L−1 for Cr(VI), m/V = 1 g L−1 pH = 2.
Figure 4. The Intraparticle kinetics of Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and pretreated with 50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50 min spruce sawdust. Adsorption: 23 °C, initial concentration C0 = 7 mg L−1 for Cr(VI), m/V = 1 g L−1 pH = 2.
Molecules 25 05156 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the experimental equilibrium uptakes to the simulated q-values obtained via pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic models.
Figure 5. Comparison of the experimental equilibrium uptakes to the simulated q-values obtained via pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic models.
Molecules 25 05156 g005
Figure 6. Breakthrough curves of Cr(VI) adsorption, C/Ci versus t (min) according to the Thomas model, on untreated and pretreated (with 50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50 min) spruce sawdust. Adsorption: Q = 2 mL min−1, initial concentration C0 = 60 mg L−1 for Cr(VI), M = 18 g, pH = 2.
Figure 6. Breakthrough curves of Cr(VI) adsorption, C/Ci versus t (min) according to the Thomas model, on untreated and pretreated (with 50% diethylene glycol/50% water/0.045 N H2SO4, 180 °C, 50 min) spruce sawdust. Adsorption: Q = 2 mL min−1, initial concentration C0 = 60 mg L−1 for Cr(VI), M = 18 g, pH = 2.
Molecules 25 05156 g006
Figure 7. FTIR for untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust.
Figure 7. FTIR for untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust.
Molecules 25 05156 g007
Figure 8. FTIR for pretreated spruce sawdust before and after Cr(VI) adsorption.
Figure 8. FTIR for pretreated spruce sawdust before and after Cr(VI) adsorption.
Molecules 25 05156 g008
Table 1. Composition of the organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 1. Composition of the organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
NoTemperature Tp (°C)Time tp (min)H2SO4 (N)Cellulose (%)Hemicelluloses (%)Xylan (%)Arabinan (%)Mannan (%)Lignin (%)Other Components (%)SRY (%)
1Untreated 38.1016.964.740.8611.3729.4415.19100
21600-40.8816.713.420.7612.9126.8715.5492.13
31800-41.4515.862.800.1912.9127.0115.3886.72
42000-44.3311.872.47-9.4028.5914.9180.17
52200-50.477.791.90-5.8930.1611.2870.18
616050-44.7214.433.040.1910.8228.3412.5185.85
718050-45.8711.582.47-9.1231.2710.9775.18
820050-54.707.031.52-5.5132.245.7367.24
922050-54.891.71--1.7138.874.2361.76
1016000.04548.086.671.99-4.6731.0513.9168.54
1118000.04554.561.940.55-1.3934.129.0860.10
1220000.04554.740.55--0.5537.766.6648.00
1322000.04532.000.72--0.7261.624.9428.40
14160500.04556.830.99--0.9933.748.1560.08
15180500.04554.730.65--0.6538.835.5057.30
16200500.04552.620.61--0.6143.922.5535.00
17220500.04525.000.72--0.7270.713.3825.69
Table 2. BET surface area of the organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 2. BET surface area of the organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Temperature Tp (°C)Time tp (min)H2SO4 (N)BET Surface Area (m2/g)
Untreated 0.703
1600-0.812
1800-1.567
2000-2.600
2200-2.849
16050-2.893
18050-2.594
20050-2.968
22050-4.078
16000.0450.517
18000.0452.323
20000.0458.613
22000.0459.392
160500.0451.248
180500.0452.026
200500.0458.700
220500.04511.335
Table 3. Freundlich isotherm model and Langmuir isotherm model parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 3. Freundlich isotherm model and Langmuir isotherm model parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
FreundlichLangmuir
Temperature Tp (°C)Time tp (min)H2SO4 (N)KF [(mg g−1)(L mg−1)1/n]nSEEqm (mg g−1)KL (L mg−1)SEE
Untreated 3.701.818.02168.450.00436.16
1600-4.802.146.44110.680.00697.75
1800-4.231.9510.75201.190.002211.84
2000-7.482.323.97120.950.01098.01
2200-7.882.178.34161.380.00895.78
16050-6.212.269.38113.640.00928.33
18050-7.772.325.95129.310.01017.08
20050-4.781.708.17265.310.003910.36
22050-2.881.4911.73308.510.002710.30
16000.0455.972.096.18142.830.00728.66
18000.04510.802.2619.50200.950.008219.62
20000.04514.252.317.78225.200.011312.32
22000.04547.093.3516.00257.180.070520.82
160500.0456.211.888.10216.420.00585.05
180500.04543.612.9417.53318.310.033318.01
200500.04519.112.8117.58170.350.024511.64
220500.04510.072.4311.36139.320.01436.82
Table 4. Estimated parameter values for the various isotherm models for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 4. Estimated parameter values for the various isotherm models for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
KL (L mg−1)qm
(mg g−1)
KF
[(mg g−1)(L mg−1)1/n]
nSEE
Untreated Spruce Sawdust
Freundlich 3.7021.8078.017
Langmuir0.00426168.45 6.157
Sips0.00367179.37 1.0606.4541
Radle-Prausniz0.00110563.44 0.8466.408
ModifiedRadle-Prausniz0.00425168.51 0.9956.489
Toth0.00430168.00 1.00066.491
UNILAN0.00425168.45 −0.00166.489
Pretreated Spruce Sawdust with 50% Diethylene Glycol, 50% Water, 220 °C, 50 min
Freundlich 2.8841.49411.725
Langmuir0.00272308.52 10.301
Sips0.00272308.22 1.00310.857
Radle-Prausniz0.00561159.55 1.11110.855
ModifiedRadle-Prausniz0.00272308.51 1.00110.858
Toth0.00293311.04 1.01310.856
UNILAN0.00272308.47 0.21210.857
Pretreated Spruce Sawdust with 50% Diethylene Glycol, 50% Water, 0.045 N Sulfuric Acid, 180 °C, 50 min
Freundlich 43.6082.94317.5321
Langmuir0.0333318.31 18.010
Sips0.01161436.48 1.65110.8906
Radle-Prausniz0.24487101.65 1.24214.175
ModifiedRadle-Prausniz0.15610131.80 1.27414.848
Toth0.47094565.35 2.37412.414
UNILAN0.01251432.44 3.23813.880
Table 5. Cr(VI) adsorption capacity for various lignocellulosic materials.
Table 5. Cr(VI) adsorption capacity for various lignocellulosic materials.
FreundlichLangmuir
MaterialsKF
[(mg g−1)(L mg−1)1/n]
nqm
(mg g−1)
KL
(L mg−1)
pHT
(oC)
References
Magnetic biochar prepared from Melia azedarach wood 3.382.4725.270.0473-[41]
Mango kernel activated carbon 1.1980.767.960.2634235[42]
Tea waste biomass 9.832562133.330.0653830[43]
Wheat-residue black carbon2.352.4021.340.0288130[44]
Physically activated wood carbon5.4361.43546.950.118220[45]
Physically activated date stone carbon6.8442.00843.100.132 20[45]
Virgin bamboo charcoal1.5241.2587.580.013225[17]
Bamboo charcoal-based, cobalt-coated adsorbent1.9282.36938.460.080225[17]
Cotton stalk peel2.92.9913.80.0145.1220[46]
Cotton stalk peel (amine-cross linked)0.363.74117.90.0245.1220[46]
Oak bark chars 0.5232.0164.6190.073225[21]
Oak wood char0.4362.4753.0310.051225[21]
Pine sawdust (Autohydrolyzed)8.9284.776345.90.00696223[28]
Spruce sawdust (diethylene glycol, water)2.881.49308.510.0027223In this work
Spruce sawdust (diethylene glycol, water, sulfuric acid)43.612.94318.310.0333223In this work
Table 6. Pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic models parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 6. Pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic models parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Pseudo-First-Order ModelPseudo-Second-Order Model
Temperature
Tp (oC)
Time
tp (min)
H2SO4
(N)
k
(min−1)
q
(mg g−1)
SEEk2
(g mg−1min−1)
q
(mg g−1)
SEE
Untreated 0.00183.7830.1560.00035.2250.133
1600 0.00203.9120.1090.00035.4380.100
1800-0.00243.5390.1570.00054.6860.131
2000-0.00244.1140.1160.00045.4000.079
2200-0.00384.3960.1920.00075.3760.139
16050-0.00224.0420.1520.00035.4190.136
18050-0.00314.5510.1770.00055.7680.144
20050-0.00363.9780.2110.00074.9140.139
22050-0.00343.5880.2440.00084.4430.181
16000.0450.00193.9260.1960.00035.3760.175
18000.0450.00234.4540.1370.00035.9870.106
20000.0450.00494.5000.2850.00105.3180.178
22000.0450.00324.0090.1910.00065.0960.141
160500.0450.00493.6050.1820.00134.2730.109
180500.0450.00975.8920.2160.00216.4860.150
200500.0450.00344.2730.2440.00065.3210.163
220500.0450.00214.1880.1490.00035.7130.126
Table 7. Inta-particle diffusion kinetic model parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 7. Inta-particle diffusion kinetic model parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Intra-Particle Diffusion Model
Temperature Tp (oC)Time tp (min)H2SO4 (N)kp (mg g−1min−1/2)c (mg g−1)SEE
Untreated 0.1021−0.18310.091
1600 0.1133−0.2810.160
1800-0.1011−0.0710.128
2000-0.1203−0.1410.147
2200-0.1655−0.1280.163
16050-0.1147−0.1460.151
18050-0.1541−0.1550.185
20050-0.1527−0.1820.166
22050-0.1198−0.0020.190
16000.0450.1069−0.1420.144
18000.0450.1399−0.3240.149
20000.0450.1721−0.1480.203
22000.0450.1563−0.3560.200
160500.0450.1662−0.1500.122
180500.0450.3768−0.1800.139
200500.0450.1837−0.3880.166
220500.0450.1233−0.2870.178
Table 8. Bohart-Adams, Thomas, and Modified Dose-Response column models parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 8. Bohart-Adams, Thomas, and Modified Dose-Response column models parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption on untreated and organosolv pretreated spruce sawdust.
Untreated160 °C, 50 min180 °C, 50 min200 °C, 50 min220 °C, 50 min
Bohart-Adams Model
N (mg L−1)662115478141665998
K (L mg−1 min−1)0.000120.0000330.0000160.0000500.000053
SEE3.5934.5301.1232.9474.063
Thomas Model
q0 (mg g−1)2.4375.14831.087.4254.452
kT (L mg−1 min−1)0.000120.0000330.0000160.0000500.000053
SEE3.5934.5301.1232.9474.063
Modified Dose-Response Model
q0 (mg g−1)2.2224.37730.136.8953.988
amdr2.4841.4254.0292.3151.487
SEE1.9763.1381.6822.6612.942
Table 9. Comparison with other adsorbents/biosorbents in a column study.
Table 9. Comparison with other adsorbents/biosorbents in a column study.
MaterialskT
(L mg−1 min−1)
q0
(mg g−1)
Reference
Spirulina platensis0.001786.087[56]
Strychnos nux vomica tree fruit shell0.00018101.8[57]
Auto-hydrolyzed pine sawdust0.0002418.87[58]
Modified corn stalk0.00095152.3[59]
Nanosorbents from magnetite Impregnated Phaseolus vulgaris husk0.0001853.01[60]
Spruce sawdust (diethylene glycol, water, sulfuric acid)0.00001631.08In this work
Table 10. FTIR peaks for untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust.
Table 10. FTIR peaks for untreated and pretreated spruce sawdust.
Wavenumber [cm−1]AssignmentComponents
UntreatedPretreatedDifferences
34643347117O-H stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
29092942−33C-H stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
23622364−2N-H stretching Cellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
1735170035C=O stretchingHemicelluloses, Lignin
165416531Aromatic skeletal vibration, C=O stretching, adsorbed O-HHemicelluloses, Lignin
-1616-C=C stretching of phenol groupCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
15071509−2C=C-C aromatic ring stretching and vibrationLignin
14351457−22C-H deformation (in methyl and methylene)Lignin
13741376−2C-H bending, C-H stretching in CH3Cellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
1335132015CH2 wagging, C-O stretching of C5 substituted aromatic unitsCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
12681281−13C-O stretching of guaiacyl unitLignin
113411322C-O-C stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses
10431068−25C-OH stretching vibration, C-O deformationCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
-1039-C-O stretching, aromatic C-H in plane deformationCellulose, Lignin
90285547C-O-C stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses
805851−46Aromatic C-H out of plane bendingLignin
Table 11. FTIR peaks for spruce sawdust: before and after Cr(VI) adsorption on pretreated material.
Table 11. FTIR peaks for spruce sawdust: before and after Cr(VI) adsorption on pretreated material.
Wavenumber [cm−1]AssignmentComponents
UntreatedPretreated Differences
33473410−63O-H stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
294229393C-H stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
23642365−1N-H stretching Cellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
1700168416C=O stretchingHemicelluloses, Lignin
165316512Aromatic skeletal vibration, C=O stretching, adsorbed O-HHemicelluloses, Lignin
16161617−1C=C stretching of phenol groupCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
150915081C=C-C aromatic ring stretching and vibrationLignin
145714552C-H deformation (in methyl and methylene)Lignin
137613751C-H bending, C-H stretching in CH3Cellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
132013146CH2 wagging, C-O stretching of C5 substituted aromatic unitsCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
12811283−2C-O stretching of guaiacyl unitLignin
11321133−1C-O-C stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses
10681076−8C-OH stretching vibration, C-O deformationCellulose, Hemicelluloses, Lignin
103910381C-O stretching, aromatic C-H in plane deformationCellulose, Lignin
855899−44C-O-C stretchingCellulose, Hemicelluloses
8518501Aromatic C-H out of the plane bendingLignin
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Politi, D.; Sidiras, D. Modified Spruce Sawdust for Sorption of Hexavalent Chromium in Batch Systems and Fixed-Bed Columns. Molecules 2020, 25, 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215156

AMA Style

Politi D, Sidiras D. Modified Spruce Sawdust for Sorption of Hexavalent Chromium in Batch Systems and Fixed-Bed Columns. Molecules. 2020; 25(21):5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Politi, Dororthea, and Dimitrios Sidiras. 2020. "Modified Spruce Sawdust for Sorption of Hexavalent Chromium in Batch Systems and Fixed-Bed Columns" Molecules 25, no. 21: 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215156

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop