Next Article in Journal
Extremophilic Microorganisms for the Treatment of Toxic Pollutants in the Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation and Characterization of Phenylpropanoid and Lignan Compounds from Peperomia pellucida [L.] Kunth with Estrogenic Activities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ionic Liquids as Antifungal Agents for Wood Preservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Ionic Liquids for Chemical Demulsification: A Review

1
Environmental Engineering Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
2
School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(21), 4915; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214915
Submission received: 1 October 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 19 October 2020 / Published: 23 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ionic Liquids for Materials and Energy)

Abstract

:
In recent years, ionic liquids have received increasing interests as an effective demulsifier due to their characteristics of non-flammability, thermal stability, recyclability, and low vapor pressure. In this study, emulsion formation and types, chemical demulsification system, the application of ionic liquids as a chemical demulsifier, and key factors affecting their performance were comprehensively reviewed. Future challenges and opportunities of ionic liquids application for chemical demulsification were also discussed. The review indicted that the demulsification performance was affected by the type, molecular weight, and concentration of ionic liquids. Moreover, other factors, including the salinity of aqueous phase, temperature, and oil types, could affect the demulsification process. It can be concluded that ionic liquids can be used as a suitable substitute for commercial demulsifiers, but future efforts should be required to develop non-toxic and less expensive ionic liquids with low viscosity, and the demulsification efficiency could be improved through the application of ionic liquids with other methods such as organic solvents.

1. Introduction

The presence of emulsion in oil or in water has undesired consequences for industries and the environment [1]. It may result in the corrosion of pumps, pipes, and related facilities. It increases the viscosity of oil, which leads to the increment of pumping and transporting costs, and the emulsion also reduces the quality of oil [2]. Discharging produced oily wastewater from oil and gas industries and the spill of oil through ship accidents and offshore wells (e.g., Exxon Valdez and Deepwater Horizon) [3,4] into waters cause adverse consequences to the environment, human health, and the economy [5,6,7]. The oil spill cleanup usually involves the collection of a large volume of oily wastewater for treatment. Strict limitations are regulated for discharging oily wastewater (e.g., based on USEPA, oil and grease discharge limits are 29 mg/L monthly average and 42 mg/L daily maximum) which induce industries to efficiently treat their oily wastewater [8]. However, the presence of emulsion in oily wastewater essentially requires a demulsification for its effective treatment. There are several technologies that have been used for separating oil and water, such as various physical (e.g., gravitational settling, thermal treatment, membrane separation, flotation, ultrasonic), biological (bioaugmentation, biostimulation), and chemical (e.g., solidifiers, demulsifiers, sorbents) processes [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Chemical demulsification using various demulsifiers is one of the reliable methods which has been widely used in industries for breaking emulsions [15,18].
Many research studies have been conducted for the application of ionic liquids in chemical demulsification processes, and it was reported that ionic liquids are reliable demulsifiers with high stability, even under harsh conditions (high temperature and high salinity) [19]. Ionic liquids are produced by a combination of different organic cations and organic or inorganic anions [20]. They are associated with unique characteristics such as thermal stability, non-flammability, recyclability, and low vapor pressure [21,22,23]. These properties make ionic liquids a suitable substitute for organic solvents and commercial demulsifiers [23,24]. Ionic liquids have been used by different researchers to evaluate their efficiency in demulsification processes, mostly at the laboratory scales. There is a need for a comprehensive discussion of current ionic liquids demulsification method to identify its advantages and limitations. In this study, a review on the application of ionic liquids for demulsification was conducted, and the impacting parameters on the demulsification performance were discussed to identify challenges and opportunities for future applications. This review is organized into a few sections, including emulsion formation mechanisms and types, chemical demulsification system and ionic liquids application, the effects of influential parameters (concentration, cation type, and the structure of ionic liquids, anion types, molecular weight, salinity, temperature, and oil types), as well as challenges and opportunities for future applications.

2. Emulsions

2.1. Emulsion Formation

Emulsion is produced when two or more immiscible liquids mix vigorously together which results in two phases (a dispersed phase and a continuous phase) [25,26]. The phase that has smaller volume is usually identified as the dispersed phase and the larger one is the continuous phase. If the volume of both phases are the same, other factors would be considered to recognize the dispersed and continuous phases [27,28]. Based on the Bancroft rule, a continuous phase would be the phase that emulsifying agents are more soluble in it [29]. Commonly investigated emulsions have a water phase and an oil phase. Fine solids and surface active compounds of crude oils, such as saturates, asphaltenes, resins, and aromatics, can act as natural emulsifying agents [30,31]. Under intensive mixing, natural emulsifying agents could adsorb at the oil–water (O-W) interface, creating a rigid interfacial film around dispersed droplets and hinder the coalescence of droplets [32,33,34]. The strong tension between water and oil phases is called interfacial tension (IFT), and the stronger the IFT, the more stable the emulsion [35].

2.2. Emulsion Types

According to the nature of the dispersed phase, emulsions are categorized into oil in water (O/W), water in oil (W/O) and multiple (W/O/W or O/W/O) types (Figure 1). O/W emulsions occur when oil droplets are the dispersed phase (inner phase) in the continuous water phase (outer phase), which is also called reverse emulsion. W/O emulsions are generated when water droplets are the dispersed phase in the continuous oil phase. Multiple emulsion is a mixture of W/O and O/W emulsions. O/W/O emulsions are formed when oil droplets are the dispersed phase in water droplets that are dispersed in the continuous oil phase, while W/O/W emulsions are formed vice versa. The occurrence of multiple emulsions is more common in food, cosmetics, pharmaceutics, and wastewater treatment industries [36,37,38,39]. It should be noted that these emulsions are thermodynamically unstable but are kinetically stable. Emulsions are thermodynamically unstable because they are produced from the mixture of two or more immiscible liquids which naturally tend to separate. However, the kinetic stability of emulsions means that emulsions are stable for weeks to years due to the formation of strict films around them by emulsifiers [40,41].
The aforementioned emulsions can be categorized into stable, mesostable, entrained water, and unstable, depending on the time that one phase can be kept dispersed in the other phase [15,30,42]. In general, stable W/O emulsions can hold most of the water in the oil phase for more than five days [43]. Mesostable emulsions are stable within only one to three days, while entrained water and unstable W/O emulsions are not regarded as stable emulsions because both would only remain water in oil for less than one day [26,42]. Emulsion type is an important factor in selecting demulsifiers which are soluble in the continuous phase and could reach the O-W interface easily [36]. Emulsion type depends on the affinity of natural emulsifying agents to the oil (or water) phase. If natural emulsifying agents have tendency to the oil phase (i.e., hydrophobic natural emulsifying agents), W/O emulsions would form, while the hydrophilic natural emulsifying agents would produce O/W emulsions. The same propensity of natural emulsifying agents to both oil and water phases would lead to the formation of unstable emulsions. The factors determining the affinity of natural emulsifying agents include hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), hydrophilic–lipophilic deviation (HLD), relative solubility number (RSN), and R ratio [44,45,46,47]. Highly affinity of natural emulsifying agents to a lipophilic or a hydrophilic phase leads to the formation of less stable emulsions because natural emulsifying agents tend to stay in a medium rather than migrate to the O-W interface [48].

3. Ionic Liquid Demulsification

3.1. Chemical Demulsification System

Surface-active chemicals (i.e., demulsifiers) are used to destabilize emulsions [25,49]. Some examples of common chemical demulsifiers include sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, and polyethylene oxide (Figure 2). The surface activity of demulsifiers should be higher than that of natural emulsifying agents to destabilize the emulsion [36]. Surface activity features of demulsifiers can be evaluated by surface tension, electrical conductance, fluorescence, proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H NMR) and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) methods [50]. Chemical demulsification is implemented by adding a desired amount of demulsifier to emulsions and mixing them vigorously. After mixing, sufficient time is required to allow Ostwald ripening, flocculation, coalescence, and phase separation (creaming/sedimentation) to occur. Ostwald ripening occurs when a dispersed phase can diffuse easily in a continuous phase to reach together for coalescence. Flocculation is formed when oil or water droplets flock together in a continuous phase while they keep their identity. Coalescence is an irreversible process which water or oil droplets join together and make bigger droplets. Creaming or sedimentation processes occur based on the density of a dispersed phase [31,51]. The general chemical demulsification mechanism is shown in Figure 3.

3.2. Applicaion of Ionic Liquids and Their Characteristics

Ionic liquids were first introduced by Paul Walden in 1914 when he discovered a special chemical-ethyl ammonium nitrate ([EtNH3] [NO3]) with a melting point of 12 °C [52]. Ionic liquids have been widely used in different fields like pharmaceutical, oil and gas, and chemical industries [53,54,55,56,57,58], such as in pharmaceutical products manufacturing [59,60,61,62], viscosity modifiers [63], desulfurization of liquid fuels [64], and liquid-liquid extraction [65,66,67]. Several types of ionic liquids, such as polymeric ionic liquids [68,69,70], double salt ionic liquids [71], dicationic ionic liquids [72,73,74,75], deep eutectic solvents [76,77,78,79], chiral ionic liquids [80], and solvate ionic liquids [81,82], have been synthesized for different aforementioned purposes.
Around ten18 ionic liquids can be synthesized by combining organic cations and organic or inorganic anions which are non-flammable liquid salts with melting point below 100 °C [21,83]. Ionic liquids with melting point below room temperature (∼25 °C) are called room temperature ionic liquids (RTIL) [84]. Table 1 lists some common ionic liquids with their melting points [85]. Ionic liquids have lower vapor pressure than conventional volatile organic solvents, and thus present less risk to the environment. They have been applied in many industries as a replacement of conventional volatile organic solvents and significantly reduced the generation volume of hazardous wastes [86,87]. Ionic liquids are used successfully in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Pillai et al. [88] investigated the effect of C8mim BF4, C10mim BF4, and C12mim BF4 on EOR and IFT reduction of O-W solution at the temperature of 30 °C. The results indicated that C8mim BF4, C10mim BF4 and C12mim BF4 reduced IFT to 14.57 mN/m, 4 mN/m, and 2.1 mN/m at the concentration of 12,000 ppm, 5000 ppm, and 2000 ppm, respectively. C12mim BF4 was applied for EOR which recovered 32.28% of oil additionally in ionic liquid (1.2 × concentration (2000 ppm), 0.5 pore volume), PHPA polymer (2000 ppm, 0.5 pore volume), and organic alkali triethylamine (1%, 0.5 pore volume) flooding setup [88].
The properties of ionic liquids are essential for the health and safety concerns in industries. Ionic liquids can remain structural stable even at high temperatures (e.g., 300 °C), but other conventional surfactants may degrade at those temperatures. Such characteristics make ionic liquids to be unique compared to other demulsifiers [86]. Most researchers prefer to design and synthesize RTIL. RTIL can be achieved by synthesizing nitrogen or phosphorous organic cations with different organic anions, dicyanamide, acetate, trifluoromethylsulfate or inorganic anions, bromide, chloride, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate [84]. Figure 4 shows a few common cations of ionic liquids, including imidazolium, pyridinium, pyrrolidinium, ammonium, and phosphonium. Table 2 lists some anions that are used for synthesizing ionic liquids.
Some ionic liquids possess amphiphilic structure which enables them to have affinity to both water and oil phases [15,18,20]. The amphiphilic character may be in cation or anion part of ionic liquids structure. Depending on the location of amphiphilic structure, ionic liquids can be classified into cationic or anionic ionic liquids [15]. Figure 5 shows the common structure of ionic liquids and the structure of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride.
The characteristics of ionic liquids such as melting point, thermal stability, and viscosity can be modified by using different combinations of cations and anions to achieve different desirable purposes [92,93]. The water solubility (i.e., hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity), viscosity, and melting points of ionic liquids are dependent on the type, size, and structure of the anions, respectively. Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide, bis(pentafluoroethanesulfonyl)amide, and tris(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)methanide are examples of anions that can be used to produce hydrophobic ionic liquids in combination of cations, such as 1,3-dialkylimidazolium and N-alkylpyridinium, tetraalkylammonium. Tosylate, trifluoroacetate, and dicyanamide are common anions that can be used to produce hydrophilic ionic liquids [93].
The hydrophobicity (or hydrophilicity) of anions affects the thermal stability of ionic liquids: the more hydrophilic the anions, the less thermally stable the ionic liquid [90,94,95]. Ionic liquids with a small anion size tend to have a low viscosity due to the low tendency to participate in hydrogen bonding as well as the diffusive negative charge [93]. The symmetry of anion and cation of ionic liquids affect their melting points: the less symmetry of anions and cations, the lower melting point of ionic liquids [90,96]. Increasing the cation alkyl chain length (e.g., 3–5 carbon atoms) could result in a decreased melting point of ionic liquids [93]. Nevertheless, increasing the alkyl chain length of ionic liquids could increase the thermal stability, hydrophobicity, and surface active area of ionic liquids [34,55,97].

3.3. Demulsification Mechanism of Ionic Liquids

The demulsification mechanism of ionic liquids involves two main steps, including diffusion and adsorption. The diffusion process is the distribution of ionic liquid molecules in the continuous phase before arriving at the O-W interface, while the adsorption process means that the diffused ionic liquid molecules pass through the continuous phase and reach the O-W interface [92,98,99,100]. The ionic liquid molecules then substitute natural emulsifying agents at the interface and change the viscoelastic properties of the interfacial films. This leads to breaking the strong film around O-W droplets and enhancing the coalescence of the dispersed droplets [15,33,34].
Recent investigations have found that hydrophobic surface-active ionic liquids can be used for effective demulsification of W/O emulsions in the oil and gas industries [24,93]. A research conducted by Hazrati et al. [101] indicated that hydrophobic ionic liquids (e.g., Cnmim PF6) demulsified emulsions better than hydrophilic ionic liquids (e.g., Cnmim Cl) [101]. To facilitate the dissolution of ionic liquids in oil phase, organic solvents such as xylene and methanol can be used along with hydrophobic and hydrophilic ionic liquids, respectively [36]. Dichloromethane, chloroform, isopropanol, ethanol, benzene, and toluene can also be used individually or in mixtures to achieve the same purpose [102]. Tian et al. [103] used C2mim BF4 with cyclohexane for enhancing oil recovery from tank bottom oily sludge (a stable emulsion), and they found that more than 95% of total petroleum hydrocarbons recovery can be achieved at 0.1 mL/g of ionic liquid/sludge ratio, a time of 10 min, solvent/sludge of 4:5 mL/g, and a shaking speed of 100 rpm [103]. Table 3 categorizes the common solvents which are used for synthesizing as well as for facilitating the dissolution of ionic liquids in oil phase into three groups, including preferred, usable, and undesirable, based on their physical and chemical properties, toxicity, environmental and safety aspects, operational concerns, and costs [104,105].
To evaluate the demulsification efficiency of ionic liquids, bottle test is commonly used in laboratories [15,18,34]. In a bottle test, an ionic liquid is added dropwise to a graduated settling tube containing emulsions. Then their mixture is shaken for 1–5 min, followed by the measurement of the height of the separated water and oil at different time [18]. The demulsification efficiency is calculated using Equation (1) [14]:
DE = C i C f C i × 100
where DE is demulsification efficiency, Ci is the initial oil (water) concentration of emulsion, and Cf is the final oil (water) concentration of emulsion.

4. Factors Affecting Ionic Liquids Demulsification

Many researchers applied different types of ionic liquids to investigate their effects on demulsification processes. A number of factors were found to affect the demulsification performance of ionic liquids, and they are described below.

4.1. Concentration

The concentration of ionic liquids could affect the demulsification efficiency. Generally, increasing ionic liquid concentration up to reaching micellization would increase the demulsification efficiency. When water at the O-W interface saturates with the hydrophilic parts of an ionic liquid, micellization happens. The concentration of ionic liquids that can initiate micellization is called critical micelle concentration (CMC). The CMC of ionic liquids is identified by measuring the IFT of a solution at different concentrations of ionic liquids: when the IFT is the minimum, the concentration is identified as the CMC [106]. However, using ionic liquids at concentrations higher than CMC will not lead to any significant change in IFT [100], and a demulsifier concentration higher than the CMC could lead to adverse effects on a demulsification process because ionic liquid molecules aggregate and become an emulsifier agent [106,107]. Moreover, the relationship between IFT reduction and demulsification efficiency is still not well understood [18]. Bin-Dahbag et al. [106] investigated the effect of tetraalkylammonium sulfate and its concentration (100–1000 ppm) on the efficiency of IFT reduction in saline W/O emulsions (10% and 20% w/w salinity), and they observed that by increasing ionic liquid concentration to CMC (250 ppm), the IFT reduced from 18 to 3.36 mN/m and from 14.5 to 1.65 mN/m for 10% and 20% salinity of solutions, respectively, while increasing ionic liquids concentration above CMC had no significant changes on IFT reduction [106]. In a research conducted by Hezave et al. [98], the effect of C12mim Cl on IFT reduction in O/W emulsion at different ionic liquid concentration (0–5000 ppm) and water salinity (10,000–100,000 ppm) was investigated, and they found that by increasing concentration of ionic liquid to CMC (100 ppm), IFT reduced noticeably (from 38.02 to 0.81 mN/m), but no significant change in IFT was observed by increasing the concentration of ionic liquids beyond CMC [98].

4.2. Cation Type and Structure of Ionic Liquids

In addition to the applied concentration, the effectiveness of ionic liquids in demulsification processes depends on the cation type and cation alkyl chain length [18,50]. Ionic liquids and their cations must have a high molecular volume (e.g., 1000–1500 Å3) to function effectively as a demulsifier. Larger cation volume (e.g., 900–1400 Å3) increases the polarizability of the cation which leads to higher demulsification efficiency [108]. Sakthivel et al. [109] used lactam and imidazolium based ionic liquids for EOR and IFT reduction, and they evaluated the effectiveness of ionic liquids at the concentration of 5000 ppm under zero and high salinity (100,000 ppm) conditions [109]. They observed that both ionic liquids performed better at high salinity than zero salinity condition because of the interaction of ionic liquids and salt ions at the O-W interface, and they demonstrated that the lactam-based ionic liquid was better than the imidazolium-based ionic liquid in IFT reduction and EOR because the former one had more polar moieties in the structure [109].
Cation alkyl chain length and its structure (e.g., straight or branched) could change the properties of ionic liquids. Molecular polar-polar interactions between the polar fractions of oil and the polar moieties of ionic liquid would increase by increasing the cation alkyl chain length [109]. Saien et al. [110,111,112] indicated that increasing alkyl chain length of Cnmim Cl ionic liquid from 6 to 16 significantly decreased the IFT of n-butyl acetate-water at 25 °C [110,111,112]. Ionic liquids with branched and long alkyl chain are more hydrophobic and have lower CMC than those with short and straight alkyl chain [34,92,99]. However, it should be noted that very long alkyl chain might impede ionic liquids to reach the O-W interface of W/O emulsions. Guzman-Lucero et al. [113] synthesized ionic liquids with different alkyl chain length (5–18 carbon atoms) to demulsify W/O emulsions at the ionic liquid concentration of 1000 ppm and the temperature of 80 °C, and they indicated that the ionic liquid with 18 carbon atoms had lower efficiency in demulsification of W/O emulsions than ionic liquids with 12 and 14 carbon atoms [113]. The surface activity of ionic liquids varies based on their cation types and cation alkyl chain length. Sastry et al. [50] evaluated the surface activity of ionic liquids with different cation type (methylimidazolium, methylpiperidine, methylpyrrolidine) and alkyl chain length (10, 12, 14, 16, 18 carbon atoms) by measuring surface tension and solution conductivity, and they observed that the surface activity of ionic liquids increased by increasing the alkyl chain length. The surface activity of methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids was higher than methylpiperidine and methylpyrrolidine-based ionic liquids with the same carbon alkyl chain (octadecyl) and anion type (chloride) [50].

4.3. Anion Type of Ionic Liquids

Investigations indicated that hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of anions as well as the size of anions are important factors influencing demulsification efficiency [101,114]. Hydrophobic ionic liquids with a large anion size, such as C8mim PF6, can reduce the chance of aggregation formation of ionic liquid molecules in a solution, which leads to an enhanced demulsification process and IFT reduction [114]. These ionic liquids can obtain a high demulsification efficiency even at low concentrations [92,101,115]. In other words, anions that have weaker hydration (i.e., high polarizability) would adsorb greatly at the O-W interface, break the strict films around droplets, and enhance the demulsification efficiency. For example, ionic liquids containing bromide anions in their structure performed better than those with chloride anions because bromide has weaker hydration than chloride [50]. Saien et al. [110] compared different halide anions (I, Br, Cl) based ionic liquids and found that ionic liquids with bigger anion size (I > Br > Cl) were more polarizable and adsorbed better at the O-W interface. Based on the results, C16mim I, C16mim Br, and C16mim Cl reduced IFT from 13.4–14.0 mN/m to 3.7, 3.9, and 4.0 mN/m at the concentration of 2.5 × 10−3 mole/L and the temperature of 25 °C, respectively [110]. Abdullah et al. [116] investigated the effect of anion type of GEB-Cl and GEB-TFA ionic liquids on the demulsification efficiency and IFT reduction of sea W/O emulsions (oil:seawater of 50:50, 70:30, 90:10 volume %) at different ionic liquids concentration (250, 500, 1000 ppm), and they found that increasing concentration to 1000 ppm increased the demulsification efficiency (100%) and reduced the IFT of emulsions from 33.5 mN/m to 8.4 mN/m and 7.2 mN/m for GEB-Cl and GEB-TFA, respectively. Based on their result, the greater hydrophobicity of trifluoroacetate anion compared to chloride anion led to better IFT reduction by GEB-TFA than GEB-Cl [116]. Some of the recent studies are summarized in Table 4.

4.4. Molecular Weight

The molecular weight of ionic liquids could affect their molecules movability and diffusion through a continuous phase [34,87]. Demulsifiers with a molecular weight > 10,000 Daltons (Da) are known as high molecular weight demulsifiers. These demulsifiers have low diffusion ability and require relatively long time to function [119]. However, high molecular weight demulsifiers were reported capable of flocculating small water droplets in the continuous oil phase and destabilizing them [119,120]. Low molecular weight demulsifiers (i.e., <3000 Da) diffuse quickly in a continuous phase, and they possess high interfacial activity which can easily absorb onto the O-W interface and weaken the rigid films around droplets [34,119,120]. However, a high dosage of low molecular weight demulsifiers may be required for successful demulsification. Wu et al. [121] evaluated the effect of 52 nonionic demulsifiers on demulsification of W/O emulsions at the temperature of 80 °C, and they observed that commercial demulsifiers from four families (Span, Brij, Tween, and Igepol) were ineffective at low applied concentrations (300–400 ppm). They concluded that using demulsifiers with a molecular weight between 7500 to 15,000 Da could lead to a higher demulsification efficiency than using a demulsifier with a molecular weight of 4000 Da [121]. Commonly used demulsifying ionic liquids usually have a molecular weight < 1000 Da [19,49,115,122]. Balsamo et al. [19] in their research investigated the effect of TOMAC and C8mim PF6 ionic liquids on the demulsification efficiency at different concentrations (2.5 × 10‒3, 1.2 × 10‒2 and 2.9 × 10‒2 mole/L), and their results indicated that TOMAC separated the water from the oil effectively (74%) at the concentration of 2.9 × 10‒2 mole/L because it was more hydrophobic and had higher molecular weight (404 Da) than C8mim PF6 (340 Da) [19].

4.5. Salinity

The presence of salt in the water phase can help to improve the demulsification performance of ionic liquids by two means. First, salt anions in the solution (e.g., Cl) can reduce the electrical repulsions between positive homonymous charges of ionic liquids at the O-W interface. This enables ionic liquids to saturate the interface completely, leading to the reduction of IFT and thus enhancement of the demulsification process [24,98,99,100]. Second, the cations of salts (e.g., Na+) have a smaller molecule size and a higher surface charge density than the cations of ionic liquids. Therefore, cations of salts tend to adsorb the water and induce the ionic liquids molecules to accumulate at the O-W interface [92]. This phenomenon is known as salting out which enhances the demulsification process and IFT reduction [48]. For example, Bin-Dahbag et al. [106] found that salinity (10% w/w) contributed to the reduction of IFT noticeably by improving the distribution of ionic liquid molecules at the oil-brine interfaces [106].
Salinity has more significant effects on imidazolium-based ionic liquids than on pyridinium-based ionic liquids. Imidazolium cation is more hydrophilic than pyridinium cation, which leads to better adsorption of imidazolium-based ionic liquids onto the water film at the O-W interface. The presence of salt anions in the water reduces the repulsions among imidazolium cations and results in better saturation of ionic liquids at the interface. However, as pyridinium cations are more hydrophobic than imidazolium cations, they tend to immerse to the oil phase where the anions of water have less effect on them. To confirm this, Hezave et al. [98,99] used pyridinium and imidazolium based ionic liquids to investigate their efficiency on IFT reduction of W/O emulsions with and without salt ions in the water, and they found that the IFT and CMC of ionic liquids for emulsions containing salt ions (~100,000 ppm) reduced noticeably, while no research has indicated that conventional surfactants are effective to reduce IFT at high salinity [98,99]. They also indicated that the CMC of C12mim Cl reduced from 2000 ppm to 100 ppm in the presence of salt ions, while that of C12Py Cl reduced from 500 ppm to 250 ppm [99]. Sakthivel et al. [109] investigated the effect of salinity on reducing IFT of O-W using CP C6H13COO ionic liquid, and they observed that the IFT of solution reduced from 39 to 15 mN/m and 10 mN/m at distilled water and saline water (100,000 ppm) conditions, respectively. They also concluded that the selected ionic liquid was stable and effective in high salinity compared to the other conventional surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate [109].
Salinity would also affect the duration of demulsification process when using ionic liquids. Borges et al. [48] found that salinity influenced the demulsification process by reducing the O-W separation time. Adewunmi et al. [49] indicated that, when using three types of ionic liquids (trihexyltetradecylphosphonium chloride, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium decanoate, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium dicyanamide) at 80 °C, the demulsification time of W/O emulsions reduced from 10 to 5 min when saline W/O substituted distilled W/O [49]. In contrast, Lemos et al. [114] observed that increasing the salinity of aqueous phase from 0 to 50,000 ppm reduced the demulsification efficiency of C8mim PF6 from 54.7% to 27.1%, but no salinity-caused effect was observed for the demulsification process with the use of C8mim BF4 [114].

4.6. Temperature

Temperature can affect the physical properties of emulsion such as viscosity. The viscosity of a continuous phase reduces at high temperatures (e.g., 70 °C) [98], which facilitates the dissolution of ionic liquids in the continuous phase [25,27,107]. Temperature should be increased up to the phase inversion temperature (PIT), at which emulsion alteration occurs (e.g., W/O turns into O/W) [123]. A temperature higher than PIT enables the saturation of O-W interface by ionic liquid molecules, and facilitates the distribution of ionic liquid molecules in the continuous phase [92,100]. Hezave et al. [98,100] found that by increasing the temperature of W/O emulsion higher than the PIT (e.g., 20 °C in their research), the IFT of the emulsion increased due to the distribution of C12mim Cl in the continuous oil phase [98,100]. However, Bin-Dahbag et al. [106] indicated that increasing the temperature from 22 °C to 90 °C had negligible effect on the IFT reduction using tetraalkylammonium sulfate as a demulsifier [106].
Increasing the temperature of emulsion can significantly reduce its viscosity. However, it is difficult to differentiate the demulsification enhancement effects brought by reduced viscosity and by ionic liquids [19]. Balsamo et al. [19] investigated the effect of temperature (30, 45, and 60 °C) on the demulsification process using TOMAC and C8mim PF6, and they concluded that by increasing temperature from 30 °C to 45 °C, the demulsification efficiency increased for samples containing the two ionic liquids. However, increasing temperature to 60 °C resulted in a high demulsification efficiency for all the samples (with and without ionic liquids), and the reason was that great reduction in the viscosity of oil phase occurred at the temperature of 60 °C, which facilitated the coalescence of water droplets for increased settling [19].

4.7. Oil Types

Since the physiochemical properties of oil (e.g., density, viscosity, and natural emulsifying agents) vary greatly from field to field [33,124], the demulsification performance of the same ionic liquid on emulsions containing different types of oil might not be consistent [113]. Crude oil is categorized into different groups based on API rating, including light, medium, heavy, and ultra-heavy. Guzman-Lucero et al. [113] investigated the demulsification efficiency of different ionic liquids for medium, heavy, and ultra-heavy crude oils, and they observed that all of the ionic liquids effectively destabilized emulsions of medium crude oil, but their efficiency was reduced for the ultra-heavy crude oil. High amount of natural emulsifying agents in the ultra-heavy crude oil led to the production of highly stable emulsions and the increment of oil viscosity, which would reduce the diffusion of ionic liquids. Ionic liquids with imidazolium, pyridinium, and ammonium cations with long alkyl chain length would be suitable for demulsifying heavy crude oils [113]. Similar results were obtained from the application of trioctylmethyl ammonium ethyl sulfate for demulsifying heavy and ultra-heavy crude oils, and a lower demulsification efficiency (50%) was observed for ultra-heavy crude oil than for heavy crude oil (70%) when 1500 ppm of trioctylmethyl ammonium ethyl sulfate was applied [102]. However, no significant changes were observed when TOMAC was used for medium, heavy, and ultra-heavy crude oils, and around 95% demulsification efficiency was achieved for all types of crude oils at an ionic liquid concentration of 1500 ppm and a treatment time of 6 h [102].

5. Challenges and Opportunities

In this review, the application of ionic liquids in demulsification processes and the influential factors are discussed. Along with the advantages of ionic liquids, there are still some challenges and opportunities regarding their demulsification applications.

5.1. Toxicity of Ionic Liquids

Generally, the toxicity of ionic liquids is some order of magnitude lower than conventional solvents such as acetone and methanol [125]. However, not all of the ionic liquids are environmentally friendly [126]. Toxicity of ionic liquids mainly depends on the cation type (e.g., imidazolium) and the cation alkyl chain length (e.g., >10 carbon atoms) [125,127]. Romero et al. [128] examined the toxicity of imidazolium-based ionic liquids with different alkyl chain length (1–8 carbon atoms), and they observed that toxicity of ionic liquids increased by increasing the alkyl chain length while anion type had less effect on the toxicity of ionic liquids [128]. It is reported that some of the ionic liquids containing fluoride and/or chloride ([BF4]-, [PF6]-) might generate hydrofluoric acid and/or hydrochloric acid in the presence of water [18,54,55]. The hydrolysis stability of anion should be high to prevent the formation of hydrofluoric acid and hydrochloric acid. Quijano [129] conducted a research to investigate the amount of the remained fluoride anion in the aqueous phase and evaluate its toxicity to microorganisms, and they applied C4mim PF6 and C4mim NTf2 ionic liquids at the concentration of 5 and 25% (volume/volume) in the mineral salt aqueous phase at the pH of 7 and the temperature of 25 °C. Their results indicated that fluoride anion in the aqueous phase was at very low concentration (0.73 to 2.98 ppm) which did not change the pH of mineral salt aqueous phase and was not toxic for microorganisms, and they also claimed that any changes in experimental conditions such as lower pH and higher temperatures (more than 25 °C) might have effects on the toxicity of fluoride anion [129]. Consequently, the toxicity of ionic liquids should be taken into consideration in their application for demulsification [54].
Bio-based ionic liquids (e.g., fatty acid ionic liquids) are considered as biodegradable ionic liquids with less or without significant toxicity [130,131]. They are made of natural-derived compounds, and their physical properties can be changed by manipulating their anion alkyl chain length. Longer anion alkyl chain length of fatty acid ionic liquids results in lower viscosity, density, water solubility (C18-stearate ionic liquid are not soluble in water), and corrosiveness as well as higher thermal stability [132,133,134]. Investigations indicated that the presence of hydroxyl group in the imidazolium cation part of fatty acid ionic liquids increased their thermal stability [132]. Biodegradability and toxicity of fatty acid ionic liquids are proportional to their physical properties (e.g., kinematic viscosity and water solubility) with linear relationships. Increased kinematic viscosity and water solubility would increase the biodegradability of fatty acid ionic liquids. Also, the toxicity of fatty acid ionic liquids decreased slightly by increasing the kinematic viscosity [135]. Also, fatty acid ionic liquids are non-fluoride-based hydrophobic ionic liquids, which can prevent the formation of acids in aqueous solutions.
Fatty acid ionic liquids were used successfully in various industries for different purposes, such as pharmaceutical [136], biorefining processes [137], solvents and co-solvents [138,139,140], dissolution and levulination of cellulose [141], formation of aqueous biphasic systems [142], CO2 capture [143,144], catalyst [145], lubricant additives [146], plant protection products [147], and extraction agents [148]. Therefore, the demulsification potential of bio-based ionic liquids, as well as their human health effects, are worthy of further investigations in future.

5.2. Viscosity of Ionic Liquids

Ionic liquids often have high viscosity which is undesired for their diffusion in a continuous phase. Viscosity of ionic liquids depends on the types of cation and anion. Selecting some types of anions (e.g., dicyanamide or bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) in synthesizing ionic liquids can significantly reduce their viscosity [149]. However, these anions may not be effective for a variety of applications. Ionic liquids can be used with solvents (e.g., ethanol, methanol, and xylene) to reduce their viscosity. A research was conducted by Li et al. [150] to evaluate the effect of different solvents (e.g., chloroform, and acetonitrile, dichloromethane) on the properties of ionic liquids (C4mim PF6, C4mim BF4, C4mim CF3CO2) such as viscosity, and the results indicated that mixing ionic liquids in solvents noticeably reduced their viscosity. For example, the viscosity of C4mim PF6 reduced by 64% (from 261 mPa s to 92.9 mPa s) with addition of 0.2 mole fraction of acetonitrile [150]. Different solvents were reported to be applied with ionic liquids in many demulsification processes to increase the solubility of ionic liquids in oil phase. Xylene, methanol, 2-propanol, and ethanol are some of the solvents that were used to facilitate the dissolution of ionic liquids in oil phase [49,107,116,117]. It was reported that solvents with high dielectric constant (e.g., acetone, acetonitrile) can have a better effect in reducing the viscosity of ionic liquids than solvents with low dielectric constant (e.g., chloroform). Solvents with high dielectric constant have good miscibility with ionic liquids which can effectively reduce the electrostatic attraction between ions of ionic liquids and thus lowering the viscosity [150]. Therefore, the combination of ionic liquids with different solvents may be required prior to chemical demulsification to reduce the viscosity of ionic liquids. However, this might increase the costs of the entire demulsification treatment.

5.3. Recovery of Ionic Liquids

Although many commercial ionic liquids are available at a low cost, some of the best performers are still expensive for large-scale application compared to other commercial demulsifiers. Recovery and reuse of ionic liquids without compromising the demulsification efficiency becomes essential for their field-scale application because this can greatly reduce the cost [55,126]. There are many different methods to recover ionic liquids, such as liquid-liquid extraction, distillation, adsorption, crystallization, force field separation, and membrane processes [55,126,151]. The purity of ionic liquids is another important factor which should be considered in recycling or synthesizing ionic liquids. On one hand, impurities may lead to the production of unintentional by-products in the demulsification system; on the other hand, the impurities can change the expected characteristics of ionic liquids [54]. Among the aforementioned recovery methods, adsorption by activated carbons (ACs) is one of the common methods to separate ionic liquids from water streams. Lemus et al. [152] evaluated the efficiency of ACs with different structures in removing and recovering several imidazolium-based ionic liquids (e.g., C8mim PF6) from aqueous solution at the temperature of 34.85 °C, and their results indicated that most of the applying commercial ACs could separate at least 340 mgC8mim PF6/gACs from aqueous solution. The exhausted ACs could be regenerated using acetone extraction because the volatility and solvent capacity of acetone is high, and C8mim PF6 was recovered from regenerating acetone by atmospheric distillation at the temperature of 59.85 °C as characterized by H NMR spectroscopy. Based on their H NMR results, there was no difference in properties of the fresh and the recovered C8mim PF6, which indicated the successful recovery of C8mim PF6 [152].

5.4. Combination of Ionic Liquids with Nanoparticles

Recent investigations demonstrated that the presence of nanoparticles with ionic liquids or other demulsifiers in a system could enhance the interfacial properties and the demulsification process. The enhancement may be because demulsifier molecules adsorb on the surface of nanoparticles and create large particles which push them to move towards the O-W interface and break the interfacial film [153,154]. Another method was reported to coat ionic liquids onto the surface of nanoparticles to achieve promising results [155,156]. Atta et al. [155] in their research investigated the effect of 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium oleate (AMO) coated magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4) at different concentrations (magnetic to oil ratio 1:10, 1:20, 1:25, 1:50) to remove oil from water, and found that 90% of oil was removed from water at the lowest concentration of magnetic nanoparticles capped with AMO (1:50). The magnetic nanoparticles were recycled for five times with a less reduction in their efficiency (efficiency reduced from 90% to 80% in the fifth cycle), and they concluded that magnetic nanoparticles can remove oil from water selectively without collecting water. These magnetic nanoparticles are easy to synthesize, cheap and reusable which could be applied in industrial scales [155]. Therefore, more efforts are needed to investigate the combinational demulsification effect of nanoparticles and ionic liquids to develop their applications in field-scales.

5.5. Poly Ionic Liquids

Synthesizing poly ionic liquids (PILs) has recently attracted research attention in oil field-related practices (e.g., EOR). PILs are polyelectrolytes consisting of polymeric backbone and an ionic liquid. In comparison with ionic liquids, PILs possess high activity at low concentrations as well as they are stable at high salinity and temperature [55,117,122]. Ezzat et al. [117] used ionic liquids and PILs based on 1,3-dialkylimidazolium to evaluate their efficiency on demulsification of W/O emulsions at different concentrations (50, 100, 250 ppm) and water contents (10%, 20%, 30%) at the temperature of 60 °C. Based on their results, PILs demulsified W/O emulsions better than their monomeric ionic liquids under the same experimental conditions (e.g., demulsification efficiency was 90% versus 70% at the concentration of 50 ppm and water content of 30% for EPDIB and EDDI, respectively) [117]. However, more investigations of PILs for demulsification under harsh environmental conditions are desired.

6. Conclusions

This review summarizes the recent advances in the application of ionic liquids as a chemical demulsifier for oil and water separation. Ionic liquids are promising demulsifiers, especially for applying under harsh environmental conditions characterized by high salinity and temperature as well as high viscosity (e.g., ultra-heavy crude oils). The main characteristics of ionic liquids that have attracted researchers’ attention are their thermal stability, non-flammability, recyclability, low vapor pressure, and low toxicity. Factors affecting their demulsification efficiency include ionic liquids types and concentrations, molecular weight, salinity, temperature, and types of oil in emulsions. The demulsification efficiency would be enhanced by selecting appropriate ionic liquids and dosage for specific types of emulsions as well as identifying optimal treatment conditions. Along with the advantages of ionic liquids, there are still some limitations which require further investigations to make them suitable for a wide application.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, N.H.; writing—review and editing, G.H. and J.L.; Supervision, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Multi-Partner Oil Spill Research Initiative (MPRI).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which greatly helped the improvement of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

  Ionic liquids Acronyms
C4mim CF3CO21-butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate
C6mim Cl1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
C8mim Cl1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
C10mim Cl1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
C12mim Cl1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
C14mim Cl1-tetradecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
C16mim Cl1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
C16mim I1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide
C16mim Br1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide
C2mim BF41-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium tetrafluoroborate
C4mim BF41-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
C8mim BF41-octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
C10mim BF41-decyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
C12mim BF41-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
C2mim TfO1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonates
C8mim OTf1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium triflate bis(trifluoromethylsulfonil)
C4mim NTf21-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
C8mim NTf21-methyl-3-octylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
C10mim NTf21-decyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
C12mim NTf21-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
C14mim NTf21-tetradecyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
C4mim PF6-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
C6mim PF61-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
C8mim PF61-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
C10mim PF61-decyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
C12mim PF61-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
C14mim PF61-tetradecyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate
C4py NTf21-butylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
C8Py Cl1-octylpyridinium chloride
C12Py Cl1-dodecylpyridinium chloride
HEOD-TSN,N-bis-hexaoxyethlene octadecylamine tosylate
P666,14 N(CN)2Trihexyltetradecylphosphonium dicyanamide
P666,14 PhosTrihexyltetradecylphosphonium bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinate
P666,14 NTf2Trihexyltetradecylphosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
P666,14 ClTrihexyltetradecylphosphonium chloride
P666,14 BrTrihexyltetradecylphosphonium bromide
N2224 N(CN)2Triethylbutylammonium dicyanamide
N6222 NTf2Triethylhexyaammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imides
TOMACTrioctylmethylammonium chloride
TOMABTrioctylmethylammonium bromide
CTAB1-Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide
AMPS/AA-TEThe quaternized octadecyl amine diethoxylate with tetraethylene glycol ith copolymers of 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid (AMPS) nd acrylic acid (AA)
AMPS/AA-OAThe quaternized octadecylamine with copolymers of 2-acrylamido-2-ethylpropane sulfonic acid (AMPS) and acrylic acid (AA)
GEBReaction of the epoxy ring of glycidyl 4-nonylphenyl ether using ethanol mine, followed by quaternization using bis(2-chloroethyl) ether resulted n corresponding ionic liquid; GEB
EDHIEtherified di-heptyl imidazolium acetate
EPHIBPolymer of EDHI
EDDIEtherified di-dodecyl imidazolium acetate
EPDIBPolymer of EDDI
CP C6H13COOCaprolactam hexanoate

References

  1. Langevin, D.; Poteau, S.; Hénaut, I.; Argillier, J.F. Crude oil emulsion properties and their application to heavy oil transportation. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2004, 59, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thompson, D.G.; Taylor, A.S.; Graham, D.E. Emulsification and demulsification related to crude oil production. Colloids Surf. 1985, 15, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prabowo, A.R.; Bae, D.M. Environmental risk of maritime territory subjected to accidental phenomena: Correlation of oil spill and ship grounding in the Exxon Valdez’s case. Results Eng. 2019, 4, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Beland, L.P.; Oloomi, S. Environmental disaster, pollution and infant health: Evidence from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 98, 102265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Adzigbli, L.; Yuewen, D. Assessing the impact of oil spills on marine organisms. J. Oceanogr Mar. Res. 2018, 6, 2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuppusamy, S.; Maddela, N.R.; Megharaj, M.; Venkateswarlu, K. Impact of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons on Human Health. In Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 139–165. [Google Scholar]
  7. Taleghani, N.D.; Tyagi, M. Impacts of major offshore oil spill incidents on petroleum industry and regional economy. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rawlins, C.H. Flotation of fine oil droplets in petroleum production circuits. Recent Adv. Miner. Process. Plant. Des. 2009, 232. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohayeji, M.; Farsi, M.; Rahimpour, M.R.; Shariati, A. Modeling and operability analysis of water separation from crude oil in an industrial gravitational coalescer. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 60, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ismail, N.H.; Salleh, W.N.W.; Ismail, A.F.; Hasbullah, H.; Yusof, N.; Aziz, F.; Jaafar, J. Hydrophilic polymer-based membrane for oily wastewater treatment: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 233, 116007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saththasivam, J.; Loganathan, K.; Sarp, S. An overview of oil–water separation using gas flotation systems. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hassanshahian, M.; Emtiazi, G.; Caruso, G.; Cappello, S. Bioremediation (bioaugmentation/biostimulation) trials of oil polluted seawater: A mesocosm simulation study. Mar. Environ. Res. 2014, 95, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Luo, X.; Gong, H.; Cao, J.; Yin, H.; Yan, Y.; He, L. Enhanced separation of water-in-oil emulsions using ultrasonic standing waves. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 203, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santos, D.; da Rocha, E.C.; Santos, R.L.; Cancelas, A.J.; Franceschi, E.; Santos, A.F.; Dariva, C. Demulsification of water-in-crude oil emulsions using single mode and multimode microwave irradiation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 189, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Martínez-Palou, R.; Aburto, J. Ionic liquids as surfactants–applications as demulsifiers of petroleum emulsions. Ion. Liq. State Art 2015, 305–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Doshi, B.; Sillanpää, M.; Kalliola, S. A review of bio-based materials for oil spill treatment. Water Res. 2018, 135, 262–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Motta, F.L.; Stoyanov, S.R.; Soares, J.B. Application of solidifiers for oil spill containment: A review. Chemosphere 2018, 194, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shehzad, F.; Hussein, I.A.; Kamal, M.S.; Ahmad, W.; Sultan, A.S.; Nasser, M.S. Polymeric surfactants and emerging alternatives used in the demulsification of produced water: A review. Polym. Rev. 2018, 58, 63–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Balsamo, M.; Erto, A.; Lancia, A. Chemical demulsification of model water-in-oil emulsions with low water content by means of ionic liquids. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Alves, D.; Lourenço, E.; Franceschi, E.; Santos, A.F.; Santana, C.C.; Borges, G.; Dariva, C. Influence of ionic liquids on the viscoelastic properties of crude oil emulsions. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 9132–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, P.; Armstrong, D.W. Ionic liquids in analytical chemistry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 661, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kunz, W.; Häckl, K. The hype with ionic liquids as solvents. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 661, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Han, D.; Row, K.H. Recent applications of ionic liquids in separation technology. Molecules 2010, 5, 2405–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Atta, A.M.; Al-Lohedan, H.A.; Abdullah, M.M.; ElSaeed, S.M. Application of new amphiphilic ionic liquid based on ethoxylated octadecylammonium tosylate as demulsifier and petroleum crude oil spill dispersant. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 33, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saad, M.A.; Kamil, M.; Abdurahman, N.H.; Yunus, R.M.; Awad, O.I. An Overview of Recent Advances in State-of-the-Art Techniques in the Demulsification of Crude Oil Emulsions. Processes 2019, 7, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Raya, S.A.; Saaid, I.M.; Ahmed, A.A.; Umar, A.A. A critical review of development and demulsification mechanisms of crude oil emulsion in the petroleum industry. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2020, 10, 1711–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kokal, S.L. Crude oil emulsions: A state-of-the-art review. SPE Prod. Facil. 2005, 20, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goodarzi, F.; Zendehboudi, S. A comprehensive review on emulsions and emulsion stability in chemical and energy industries. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 97, 281–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bancroft, W.D. The theory of emulsification, V. J. Phys. Chem. 2002, 17, 501–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wong, S.F.; Lim, J.S.; Dol, S.S. Crude oil emulsion: A review on formation, classification and stability of water-in-oil emulsions. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2015, 135, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdulredha, M.M.; Aslina, H.S.; Luqman, C.A. Overview on petroleum emulsions, formation, influence and demulsification treatment techniques. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 3403–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, R.F. Agents which promote and stabilize water-in-oil emulsions. Spill Sci. Technol. Bull. 1999, 5, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Canevari, G.P. The formulation of an effective demulsifier for oil spill emulsions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1982, 13, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grenoble, Z.; Trabelsi, S. Mechanisms, performance optimization and new developments in demulsification processes for oil and gas applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 260, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kumar, N.; Mandal, A. Surfactant stabilized oil-in-water nanoemulsion: Stability, interfacial tension, and rheology study for enhanced oil recovery application. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 6452–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abullah, M.M.; Al-Lohedan, H.A.; Attah, A.M. Synthesis and application of amphiphilic ionic liquid based on acrylate copolymers as demulsifier and oil spill dispersant. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 219, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muschiolik, G.; Dickinson, E. Double emulsions relevant to food systems: Preparation, stability, and applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 532–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kovács, A.; Erős, I.; Csóka, I. Optimization and development of stable w/o/w cosmetic multiple emulsions by means of the Quality by Design approach. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2016, 38, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iqbal, M.; Zafar, N.; Fessi, H.; Elaissari, A. Double emulsion solvent evaporation techniques used for drug encapsulation. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 496, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Capek, I. Preparation of metal nanoparticles in water-in-oil (w/o) microemulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 110, 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zolfaghari, R.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Abdullah, L.C.; Elnashaie, S.S.; Pendashteh, A. Demulsification techniques of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions in petroleum industry. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 170, 377–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fingas, M.; Fieldhouse, B. Formation of water-in-oil emulsions and application to oil spill modelling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 107, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fingas, M.; Fieldhouse, B.; Mullin, J. Studies of water-in-oil emulsions and techniques to measure emulsion treating agents. In Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar; Ministry of Supply and Services: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1994; p. 213. [Google Scholar]
  44. Griffin, W.C. Classification of surface-active agents by “HLB”. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1949, 1, 311–326. [Google Scholar]
  45. Salager, J.L.; Morgan, J.C.; Schechter, R.S.; Wade, W.H.; Vasquez, E. Optimum formulation of surfactant/water/oil systems for minimum interfacial tension or phase behavior. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 1979, 19, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Dabros, T.; Hamza, H. Development of a method for measurement of relative solubility of nonionic surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2004, 232, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Winsor, P.A. Solvent Properties of Amphiphilic Compounds; Butterworths Scientific Publications: London, UK, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  48. Borges, B.; Rondón, M.; Sereno, O.; Asuaje, J. Breaking of water-in-crude-oil emulsions. 3. Influence of salinity and water− oil ratio on demulsifier action. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adewunmi, A.A.; Kamal, M.S. Demulsification of water-in-oil emulsions using ionic liquids: Effects of counterion and water type. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 279, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sastry, N.V.; Vaghela, N.M.; Aswal, V.K. Effect of alkyl chain length and head group on surface active and aggregation behavior of ionic liquids in water. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2012, 327, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moradi, M.; Alvarado, V.; Huzurbazar, S. Effect of salinity on water-in-crude oil emulsion: Evaluation through drop-size distribution proxy. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Walden, P. Molecular weights and electrical conductivity of several fused salts. Bull. Acad. Imper. Sci. 1914, 1800. [Google Scholar]
  53. Huang, W.; Wu, X.; Qi, J.; Zhu, Q.; Wu, W.; Lu, Y.; Chen, Z. Ionic liquids: Green and tailor-made solvents in drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 25, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dharaskar Swapnil, A. Ionic liquids (a review): The green solvents for petroleum and hydrocarbon industries. Res. J. Chem. Sci. ISSN 2012, 2231, 606X. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bera, A.; Agarwal, J.; Shah, M.; Shah, S.; Vij, R.K. Recent advances in ionic liquids as alternative to surfactants/chemicals for application in upstream oil industry. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 82, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pernak, J.; Rzemieniecki, T.; Klejdysz, T.; Qu, F.; Rogers, R.D. Conversion of quinine derivatives into biologically active ionic liquids: Advantages, multifunctionality and perspectives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 9263–9267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Berton, P.; Manouchehr, S.; Wong, K.; Ahmadi, Z.; Abdelfatah, E.; Rogers, R.D.; Bryant, S.L. Ionic Liquids-Based Bitumen Extraction: Enabling Recovery with Environmental Footprint Comparable to Conventional Oil. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 8, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kore, R.; Uppara, P.V.; Rogers, R.D. Replacing HF or AlCl3 in the Acylation of Isobutylbenzene with Chloroaluminate Ionic Liquids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 10330–10334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moshikur, R.M.; Chowdhury, M.R.; Wakabayashi, R.; Tahara, Y.; Kamiya, N.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Goto, M. Ionic liquids with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidonium cation as an enhancer for topical drug delivery: Synthesis, characterization, and skin-penetration evaluation. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 299, 112166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chowdhury, M.R.; Moshikur, R.M.; Wakabayashi, R.; Tahara, Y.; Kamiya, N.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Goto, M. Development of a novel ionic liquid–curcumin complex to enhance its solubility, stability, and activity. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 7737–7740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chantereau, G.; Sharma, M.; Abednejad, A.; Vilela, C.; Costa, E.M.; Veiga, M.; Freire, M.G. Bacterial nanocellulose membranes loaded with vitamin B-based ionic liquids for dermal care applications. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 302, 112547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Santos, M.M.; Branco, L.C. Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents for Application in Pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Subramanian, D.; Wu, K.; Firoozabadi, A. Ionic liquids as viscosity modifiers for heavy and extra-heavy crude oils. Fuel 2015, 143, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhao, H.; Baker, G.A. Oxidative desulfurization of fuels using ionic liquids: A review. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2015, 9, 262–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, D.X.; OuYang, X.K.; Wang, Y.G.; Yang, L.Y.; He, C.H. Liquid–liquid extraction of caprolactam from water using room temperature ionic liquids. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 104, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Florindo, C.; Monteiro, N.V.; Ribeiro, B.D.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for purification of water contaminated with Bisphenol-A. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 297, 111841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dimitrijević, A.; Tavares, A.P.; Almeida, M.R.; Vraneš, M.; Sousa, A.C.; Cristóvão, A.C.; Freire, M.G. Valorization of Expired Energy Drinks by Designed and Integrated Ionic Liquid-Based Aqueous Biphasic Systems. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 5683–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ardakani, E.K.; Kowsari, E.; Ehsani, A. Imidazolium-derived polymeric ionic liquid as a green inhibitor for corrosion inhibition of mild steel in 1.0 M HCl: Experimental and computational study. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 586, 124195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kammakakam, I.; Bara, J.E.; Jackson, E.M.; Lertxundi, J.; Mecerreyes, D.; Tomé, L.C. Tailored CO2-Philic Anionic Poly (ionic liquid) Composite Membranes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Gas Transport Properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 5954–5965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Patinha, D.J.; Wang, H.; Yuan, J.; Rocha, S.M.; Silvestre, A.J.; Marrucho, I.M. Thin Porous Poly (ionic liquid) Coatings for Enhanced Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction. Polymers 2020, 12, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pereira, J.F.; Barber, P.S.; Kelley, S.P.; Berton, P.; Rogers, R.D. Double salt ionic liquids based on 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and hydroxyl-functionalized ammonium acetates: Strong effects of weak interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 26934–26943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yao, C.; Hou, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, W.; Ren, S.; Liu, H. Extraction of aromatics from aliphatics using a hydrophobic dicationic ionic liquid adjusted with small-content water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 236, 116287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guglielmero, L.; Mezzetta, A.; Pomelli, C.S.; Chiappe, C.; Guazzelli, L. Evaluation of the effect of the dicationic ionic liquid structure on the cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides. J. Co2 Util. 2019, 34, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kuhn, B.L.; Osmari, B.F.; Heinen, T.M.; Bonacorso, H.G.; Zanatta, N.; Nielsen, S.O.; Frizzo, C.P. Dicationic imidazolium-based dicarboxylate ionic liquids: Thermophysical properties and solubility. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 308, 112983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Clarke, C.J.; Bui-Le, L.; Hallett, J.P.; Licence, P. Thermally Stable Imidazolium Dicationic Ionic Liquids with Pyridine Functional Groups. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 8762–8772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Khezeli, T.; Ghaedi, M.; Bahrani, S.; Daneshfar, A.; Soylak, M. Deep eutectic solvent in separation and preconcentration of organic and inorganic species. In New Generation Green Solvents for Separation and Preconcentration of Organic and Inorganic Species; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 381–423. [Google Scholar]
  77. Abranches, D.O.; Silva, L.P.; Martins, M.A.; Pinho, S.P.; Coutinho, J.A. Understanding the Formation of Deep Eutectic Solvents: Betaine as a Universal Hydrogen Bond Acceptor. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 4916–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schaeffer, N.; Conceição, J.H.; Martins, M.A.; Neves, M.C.; Pérez-Sánchez, G.; Gomes, J.R.; Coutinho, J.A. Non-ionic hydrophobic eutectics–versatile solvents for tailored metal separation and valorisation. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2810–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Florindo, C.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Quest for Green-Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gondal, H.Y.; Mumtaz, S.; Abbaskhan, A.; Mumtaz, N.; Cano, I. New alkoxymethyl-functionalized pyridinium-based chiral ionic liquids: Synthesis, characterization and properties. Chem. Pap. 2020, 74, 2951–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Schmidt, F.; Schönhoff, M. Solvate Cation Migration and Ion Correlations in Solvate Ionic Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Mandai, T.; Yoshida, K.; Ueno, K.; Dokko, K.; Watanabe, M. Criteria for solvate ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 8761–8772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ratti, R. Ionic liquids: Synthesis and applications in catalysis. Adv. Chem. 2014, 2014, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Berthod, A.; Ruiz-Angel, M.J.; Carda-Broch, S. Ionic liquids in separation techniques. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1184, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, S.; Sun, N.; He, X.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X. Physical properties of ionic liquids: Database and evaluation. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2006, 35, 1475–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Patel, D.D.; Lee, J.M. Applications of ionic liquids. Chem. Rec. 2012, 12, 329–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ghandi, K. A review of ionic liquids, their limits and applications. Green Sustain. Chem. 2014, 4, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Pillai, P.; Kumar, A.; Mandal, A. Mechanistic studies of enhanced oil recovery by imidazolium-based ionic liquids as novel surfactants. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 63, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bin Dahbag, M.S.; Hossain, M.E.; AlQuraishi, A.A. Efficiency of ionic liquids as an enhanced oil recovery chemical: Simulation approach. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 9260–9265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Irge, D.D. Ionic liquids: A review on greener chemistry applications, quality ionic liquid synthesis and economical viability in a chemical processes. Am. J. Phys. Chem. 2016, 5, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Usuki, T.; Onda, S.; Yoshizawa-Fujita, M.; Rikukawa, M. Use of [C 4 mim] Cl for efficient extraction of caffeoylquinic acids from sweet potato leaves. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Hanamertani, A.S.; Pilus, R.M.; Irawan, S.A.S.; Pilus, R.M.; Irawan, S. A Review on the Application of Ionic Liquids for Enhanced Oil Recovery. In ICIPEG 2016; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 133–147. [Google Scholar]
  93. Forsyth, S.A.; Pringle, J.M.; MacFarlane, D.R. Ionic liquids—An overview. Aust. J. Chem. 2004, 57, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cao, Y.; Mu, T. Comprehensive investigation on the thermal stability of 66 ionic liquids by thermogravimetric analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 8651–8664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Maton, C.; De Vos, N.; Stevens, C.V. Ionic liquid thermal stabilities: Decomposition mechanisms and analysis tools. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5963–5977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhao, H. Current studies on some physical properties of ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2003, 41, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yahya, M.S.; Sangapalaarachchi, D.T.; Lau, E.V. Effects of carbon chain length of imidazolium-based ionic liquid in the interactions between heavy crude oil and sand particles for enhanced oil recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 274, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hezave, A.Z.; Dorostkar, S.; Ayatollahi, S.; Nabipour, M.; Hemmateenejad, B. Investigating the effect of ionic liquid (1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C12mim][Cl])) on the water/oil interfacial tension as a novel surfactant. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 421, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hezave, A.Z.; Dorostkar, S.; Ayatollahi, S.; Nabipour, M.; Hemmateenejad, B. Effect of different families (imidazolium and pyridinium) of ionic liquids-based surfactants on interfacial tension of water/crude oil system. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2013, 360, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hezave, A.Z.; Dorostkar, S.; Ayatollahi, S.; Nabipour, M.; Hemmateenejad, B. Dynamic interfacial tension behavior between heavy crude oil and ionic liquid solution (1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C12mim][Cl]+ distilled or saline water/heavy crude oil)) as a new surfactant. J. Mol. Liq. 2013, 187, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hazrati, N.; Beigi, A.A.M.; Abdouss, M. Demulsification of water in crude oil emulsion using long chain imidazolium ionic liquids and optimization of parameters. Fuel 2018, 229, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oropeza, E.A.F.; Sotelo, L.V.C.; Ortega, A.L.; Cortez, J.G.H.; Ramírez, F.A.; Moreno, F.S.V.; Cassou, M.L. Dehydrating and Desalting Median, Heavy and Extra-Heavy Oils Using Ionic Liquids and Their Formulations. U.S. Patent 9,404,052, 2 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  103. Tian, Y.; McGill, W.B.; Whitcombe, T.W.; Li, J. Ionic Liquid-Enhanced Solvent Extraction for Oil Recovery from Oily Sludge. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 3429–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Slater, C.S.; Savelski, M. A method to characterize the greenness of solvents used in pharmaceutical manufacture. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2007, 42, 1595–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Capello, C.; Fischer, U.; Hungerbühler, K. What is a green solvent? A comprehensive framework for the environmental assessment of solvents. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bin-Dahbag, M.S.; Al Quraishi, A.A.; Benzagouta, M.S.; Kinawy, M.M.; Al Nashef, I.M.; Al Mushaegeh, E. Experimental study of use of ionic liquids in enhanced oil recovery. J. Pet. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  107. Biniaz, P.; Farsi, M.; Rahimpour, M.R. Demulsification of water in oil emulsion using ionic liquids: Statistical modeling and optimization. Fuel 2016, 184, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Flores, C.A.; Flores, E.A.; Hernández, E.; Castro, L.V.; García, A.; Alvarez, F.; Vázquez, F.S. Anion and cation effects of ionic liquids and ammonium salts evaluated as dehydrating agents for super-heavy crude oil: Experimental and theoretical points of view. J. Mol. Liq. 2014, 196, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sakthivel, S.; Velusamy, S.; Nair, V.C.; Sharma, T.; Sangwai, J.S. Interfacial tension of crude oil-water system with imidazolium and lactam-based ionic liquids and their evaluation for enhanced oil recovery under high saline environment. Fuel 2017, 191, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Saien, J.; Kharazi, M. A comparative study on the interface behavior of different counter anion long chain imidazolium ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 220, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Saien, J.; Kharazi, M.; Asadabadi, S. Adsorption Behavior of Short Alkyl Chain Imidazolium Ionic Liquidsat N-Butyl Acetate+ Water Interface: Experiments and Modeling. Iran. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 12, 59–74. [Google Scholar]
  112. Saien, J.; Kharazi, M.; Asadabadi, S. Adsorption behavior of long alkyl chain imidazolium ionic liquids at the n-butyl acetate+ water interface. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 212, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Guzman-Lucero, D.; Flores, P.; Rojo, T.; Martínez-Palou, R. Ionic liquids as demulsifiers of water-in-crude oil emulsions: Study of the microwave effect. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 3610–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lemos, R.C.; da Silva, E.B.; dos Santos, A.; Guimaraes, R.C.; Ferreira, B.M.; Guarnieri, R.A.; Fortuny, M. Demulsification of water-in-crude oil emulsions using ionic liquids and microwave irradiation. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 4439–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Silva, E.B.; Santos, D.; Alves, D.R.; Barbosa, M.S.; Guimarães, R.C.; Ferreira, B.M.; Fortuny, M. Demulsification of heavy crude oil emulsions using ionic liquids. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 6311–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Abdullah, M.M.; Al-Lohedan, H.A. Demulsification of Arabian Heavy Crude Oil Emulsions Using Novel Amphiphilic Ionic Liquids Based on Glycidyl 4-Nonylphenyl Ether. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 12916–12923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ezzat, A.O.; Atta, A.M.; Al-Lohedan, H.A.; Hashem, A.I. Synthesis and application of new surface active poly (ionic liquids) based on 1, 3-dialkylimidazolium as demulsifiers for heavy petroleum crude oil emulsions. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 251, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Li, X.; Kersten, S.R.; Schuur, B. Efficiency and mechanism of demulsification of oil-in-water emulsions using ionic liquids. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 7622–7628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Peña, A.A.; Hirasaki, G.J.; Miller, C.A. Chemically induced destabilization of water-in-crude oil emulsions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 1139–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hao, L.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B.; Yang, N. Efficient demulsification of diesel-in-water emulsions by different structural dendrimer-based demulsifiers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 1748–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Dabros, T.; Hamza, H. Effect of demulsifier properties on destabilization of water-in-oil emulsion. Energy Fuels 2003, 17, 1554–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Abdullah, M.M.; AlQuraishi, A.A.; Allohedan, H.A.; AlMansour, A.O.; Atta, A.M. Synthesis of novel water soluble poly (ionic liquids) based on quaternary ammonium acrylamidomethyl propane sulfonate for enhanced oil recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 233, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Shinoda, K. The correlation between the dissolution state of nonionic surfactant and the type of dispersion stabilized with the surfactant. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1967, 24, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Adilbekova, A.O.; Omarova, K.I.; Karakulova, A.; Musabekov, K.B. Nonionic surfactants based on polyoxyalkylated copolymers used as demulsifying agents. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 480, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gathergood, N.; Garcia, M.T.; Scammells, P.J. Biodegradable ionic liquids: Part I. Concept, preliminary targets and evaluation. Green Chem. 2004, 6, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Zhou, J.; Sui, H.; Jia, Z.; Yang, Z.; He, L.; Li, X. Recovery and purification of ionic liquids from solutions: A review. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 32832–32864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Gathergood, N.; Scammells, P.J.; Garcia, M.T. Biodegradable ionic liquids Part III. The first readily biodegradable ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Romero, A.; Santos, A.; Tojo, J.; Rodriguez, A. Toxicity and biodegradability of imidazolium ionic liquids. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Quijano, G.; Couvert, A.; Amrane, A.; Darracq, G.; Couriol, C.; Le Cloirec, P.; Carrié, D. Toxicity and biodegradability of ionic liquids: New perspectives towards whole-cell biotechnological applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 174, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Gundolf, T.; Weyhing-Zerrer, N.; Sommer, J.; Kalb, R.; Schoder, D.; Rossmanith, P.; Mester, P. Biological Impact of Ionic Liquids Based on Sustainable Fatty Acid Anions Examined with a Tripartite Test System. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15865–15873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hijo, A.A.T.; Barros, H.D.; Maximo, G.J.; Cazarin, C.B.; da Costa, L.B.; Pereira, J.F.; Meirelles, A.J. Subacute Toxicity Assessment of Biobased Ionic Liquids in Rats. Food Res. Int. 2020, 134, 109125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mezzetta, A.; Łuczak, J.; Woch, J.; Chiappe, C.; Nowicki, J.; Guazzelli, L. Surface active fatty acid ILs: Influence of the hydrophobic tail and/or the imidazolium hydroxyl functionalization on aggregates formation. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 289, 111155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sernaglia, M.; Blanco, D.; Battez, A.H.; Viesca, J.L.; González, R.; Bartolomé, M. Two fatty acid anion-based ionic liquids-part I: Physicochemical properties and tribological behavior as neat lubricants. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 305, 112827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lu, B.; Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, J. Novel bio-renewable matrinium-based ionic liquids derived from Chinese herb medicine: Synthesis, physicochemical properties and biological activity. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 296, 111822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Oulego, P.; Faes, J.; González, R.; Viesca, J.L.; Blanco, D.; Battez, A.H. Relationships between the physical properties and biodegradability and bacteria toxicity of fatty acid-based ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 292, 111451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mondal, D.; Sharma, M.; Quental, M.V.; Tavares, A.P.; Prasad, K.; Freire, M.G. Suitability of bio-based ionic liquids for the extraction and purification of IgG antibodies. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 6071–6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Huet, G.; Araya-Farias, M.; Alayoubi, R.; Laclef, S.; Bouvier, B.; Gosselin, I.; Husson, E. New biobased-zwitterionic ionic liquids: Efficiency and biocompatibility for the development of sustainable biorefinery processes. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2935–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hulsbosch, J.; De Vos, D.E.; Binnemans, K.; Ameloot, R. Biobased ionic liquids: Solvents for a green processing industry? ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2917–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhang, Z.; Kang, N.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; He, L.; Sui, H. Novel Synthesis of Choline-Based Amino Acid Ionic Liquids and Their Applications for Separating Asphalt from Carbonate Rocks. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Duan, S.; Jiang, Y.; Geng, T.; Ju, H.; Wang, Y. Wetting, foaming, and emulsification properties of novel methyltriphenylphosphonium carboxylate ionic liquid surfactants. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Becherini, S.; Mezzetta, A.; Chiappe, C.; Guazzelli, L. Levulinate amidinium protic ionic liquids (PILs) as suitable media for the dissolution and levulination of cellulose. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 4554–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Pereira, M.M.; Pedro, S.N.; Gomes, J.; Sintra, T.E.; Ventura, S.P.; Coutinho, J.A.; Mohamadou, A. Synthesis and characterization of analogues of glycine-betaine ionic liquids and their use in the formation of aqueous biphasic systems. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2019, 494, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Silva, L.P.; Moya, C.; Sousa, M.; Santiago, R.; Sintra, T.E.; Carreira, A.R.; Carvalho, P.J. Encapsulated Amino-Acid-Based Ionic Liquids for CO2 Capture. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2020, 3158–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kirchhecker, S.; Esposito, D. Amino acid based ionic liquids: A green and sustainable perspective. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2016, 2, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Szepiński, E.; Smolarek, P.; Milewska, M.J.; Łuczak, J. Application of surface active amino acid ionic liquids as phase-transfer catalyst. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 303, 112607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Khan, A.; Gusain, R.; Sahai, M.; Khatri, O.P. Fatty acids-derived protic ionic liquids as lubricant additive to synthetic lube base oil for enhancement of tribological properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 293, 111444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Turguła, A.; Stęsik, K.; Materna, K.; Klejdysz, T.; Praczyk, T.; Pernak, J. Third-generation ionic liquids with N-alkylated 1, 4-diazabicyclo [2.2. 2] octane cations and pelargonate anions. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 8653–8663. [Google Scholar]
  148. Patsos, N.; Lewis, K.; Picchioni, F.; Kobrak, M.N. Extraction of acids and bases from aqueous phase to a pseudoprotic ionic liquid. Molecules 2019, 24, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Shirota, H.; Castner, E.W. Why are viscosities lower for ionic liquids with− CH2Si (CH3) 3 vs− CH2C (CH3) 3 substitutions on the imidazolium cations? J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21576–21585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Li, W.; Zhang, Z.; Han, B.; Hu, S.; Xie, Y.; Yang, G. Effect of water and organic solvents on the ionic dissociation of ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 6452–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Abu-Eishah, S.I. Ionic liquids recycling for reuse. Ion. Liq. Cl. Prop. 2011, 239–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Lemus, J.; Palomar, J.; Heras, F.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Developing criteria for the recovery of ionic liquids from aqueous phase by adsorption with activated carbon. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 97, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Saien, J.; Hashemi, S. Long chain imidazolium ionic liquid and magnetite nanoparticle interactions at the oil/water interface. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 160, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Hassan, S.A.; Abdalla, B.K.; Mustafa, M.A. Addition of silica nano-particles for the enhancement of crude oil demulsification process. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2019, 37, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Atta, A.M.; Ezzat, A.O.; Hashem, A.I. Synthesis and application of monodisperse hydrophobic magnetite nanoparticles as an oil spill collector using an ionic liquid. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 16524–16530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Mi, T.; Cai, Y.; Wang, Q.; Habibul, N.; Ma, X.; Su, Z.; Wu, W. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanocomposites for efficient separation of ultra-small oil droplets from hexadecane–water emulsions. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 10309–10314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Different types of emulsions [25].
Figure 1. Different types of emulsions [25].
Molecules 25 04915 g001
Figure 2. Structure of some common demulsifiers.
Figure 2. Structure of some common demulsifiers.
Molecules 25 04915 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of chemical demulsification mechanism [31].
Figure 3. Schematic of chemical demulsification mechanism [31].
Molecules 25 04915 g003
Figure 4. Common cations used for synthesizing ionic liquids.
Figure 4. Common cations used for synthesizing ionic liquids.
Molecules 25 04915 g004
Figure 5. Structure of ionic liquids, (a) common structure, (b) structure of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride [91].
Figure 5. Structure of ionic liquids, (a) common structure, (b) structure of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride [91].
Molecules 25 04915 g005
Table 1. Melting point of common ionic liquids [85].
Table 1. Melting point of common ionic liquids [85].
Ionic LiquidMelting Point (°C)
C2mim BF415
C2mim TfO−10.15
C6mim PF6−61
C8mim BF4−80
N6222 NTf220
Table 2. Different types of anions existing in ionic liquids [89,90].
Table 2. Different types of anions existing in ionic liquids [89,90].
AnionAbbreviationTypes (Organic/Inorganic)
Alkyl sulfateR-O-SO3Organic
Methane sulfonateR3C-S-O3Organic
TosylateC7H7O3SOrganic
TrifluoroacetateCF3CO2Organic
ChlorideClInorganic
FluorideFInorganic
BromideBrInorganic
IodideIInorganic
TetrachloroaluminateAlCl4Inorganic
HexafluorophosphatePF6Inorganic
TetrafluoroborateBF4Inorganic
Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide[(CF3SO2)2N]Inorganic
Table 3. Guide for solvent selection for synthesizing as well as facilitating the dissolution of ionic liquids in oil phase [87].
Table 3. Guide for solvent selection for synthesizing as well as facilitating the dissolution of ionic liquids in oil phase [87].
PreferredUsableUndesirable
AcetoneCyclohexanePentane
Ethyl acetateHeptaneHexane(s)
WaterTolueneDi isopropyl ether
EthanolMethyl cyclohexaneDiethyl ether
MethanolIsooctaneDichloromethane
2-propanolAcetonitrileDichloromethane
1-propanol2-MethyltetrahydrofuranChloroform
IsopropylacetateTetrahydrofuranPyridine
1-butanolXylenesDioxane
Tert-butyl alcoholDimethyl sulfoxideDimethoxyethane
Acetic acidBenzene
Ethylene glycolCarbon tetrachloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Table 4. List of application of ionic liquids as demulsifier.
Table 4. List of application of ionic liquids as demulsifier.
Ionic LiquidCation TypeAnion TypeEmulsion TypeDose (ppm)CMC (ppm)DE (%)IFT Reduction (%)Key FindingsRef.
Cnmim NTf2
n = 10, 12, 14
Imidazoliumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideSW/O100–3500N.A.93.6–10077–95Demulsification experiments were conducted at the temperature of 60 °C. Increasing the dose and alkyl cation chain of hydrophobic ionic liquids improved the demulsification process (100% demulsification) as well as reduced the IFT (95% reduction). Higher hydrophobicity of NTf2 results in improving demulsification efficiency even with shorter alkyl chain length (e.g., demulsification efficiency was in the range of 93.6–100%). By contrast, for hydrophilic ionic liquid, increasing the dose and alkyl cation chain length of ionic liquid led to aggregation and caused poor demulsification as well as increased IFT.[101]
Cnmim PF6
n = 10, 12, 14
Hexafluoro phosphate500–350071.25–86.2554–81
Cnmim Cl
n = 10, 12, 14
Chloride500–350076.25–93.7564–80
TOMACAmmoniumChlorideW/O1000–2000N.A.100N.A.The efficiency of three ionic liquids (TOMAC, TOMAB, CTAB) with different hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity were evaluated for demulsification of W/O emulsions. Response surface methodology was applied to investigate the effect of temperature (50 °C–80 °C), pH (5–9), and water of aqueous phase (3–10%) on the demulsification efficiency. They observed that increasing ionic liquids concentration to 1039.2 ppm, 1480 ppm, 332.09 ppm for TOMAC, TOMAB, and CTAB, respectively led to the maximum demulsification efficiency (100, 90.29, and 64.9% for TOMAC, TOMAB, and CTAB, respectively). Demulsification efficiency increased at the pH of 7 and the temperature of 80 °C. Increasing water of emulsion (up to 10%) increased the demulsification efficiency of system to 64.88% and 90.29% using hydrophilic TOMAB and CTAB ionic liquids, respectively. Among three ionic liquids, TOMAC had the highest efficiency (100%) because it was more hydrophobic than other ionic liquids.[107]
TOMABBromide1000–2000N.A.64.9
CTABBromide300–700N.A.90.29
Trihexyltetra decylphosphonium [Y]PhosphoniumChlorideW/O50–4000N.A.71.42–99N.A.Experiments were conducted at different temperatures (60 °C and 80 °C) to investigate the efficiency of phosphonium based ionic liquids at different concentration of 50 to 4000 ppm on demulsifying W/O emulsions. Different hydrophobicity of anions led to different demulsification efficiency (e.g., varying from 14.29 to 99%).[49]
Decanoate14.29–92.86
Dicyanamide50–99
AMPS/AA-TEOxyethylene ammoniumSulfonate and carboxylateW/O100–5000.00027 *8–100N.A.Experiments were conducted at the temperature of 65 °C and different water content of emulsions (10, 20, 30, 50%). AMPS/AA-TE poly ionic liquid has oxyethylene in its structure which increased the polarity of AMPS/AA-TE. This led to AMPS/AA-TE having lower CMC than AMPS/AA-OA.[36]
AMPS/AA-OAAmmonium0.00053 *10–100
TOMACAmmoniumChlorideW/O1500N.A.90N.A.Experiments were conducted at the temperature of 80 °C. TOMAC removed water from an extra heavy crude oil in less than an hour while two hours were required for trioctylmethyl ammonium ethyl sulfate and trioctylmethyl ammonium methyl sulfate to remove the same amount of water.[102]
Trioctyl methyl ammonium [Y]Ethyl sulfateN.A.
Methyl sulfateN.A.
C12 mim NTf2Imidazoliumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideW/O5–125100N.A.33.3Applying ionic liquids with long alkyl chain length (12 carbon atoms) was more capable to displace the natural emulsifying agents of the crude oil which resulted in enhancing the IFT reduction (33%). Increasing ionic liquid concentration to CMC (100 ppm) reduced IFT, while no significant change was observed with concentration more than CMC.[20]
HEOD-TSAmmoniumTosylateSW/O100–500N.A.30–10095–99.5Demulsification experiments were conducted at 65 °C. Increasing the concentration of hydrophobic HEOD-TS ionic liquid (e.g., from 100 to 500 ppm) for demulsifying SW/O emulsions at different water contents (10, 30, 50%) resulted in demulsifying emulsions completely (100%) as well as decreasing the IFT.[24]
TOMACAmmoniumChlorideW/O1000 and 1500N.A.100N.A.Demulsification experiments were conducted at 80 °C using a water bath to remove water of two extra-heavy crude oils (with the water content of 56 and 60%). Increasing the concentration of ionic liquids from 1000 to 1500 ppm resulted in 100% demulsification efficiency. Ionic liquids with smaller anion size have lower anion polarizability which result in dehydration of extra-heavy crude oils effectively.[108]
Trioctylmethylammonium [Y]Bisulfate
Dihydrogenphosphate
C8mim PF6ImidazoliumHexafluorophosphateW/O600–6200N.A.54.7–95.692High dosage of ionic liquids resulted in 95.6% and 87.4% of demulsifying W/O emulsions using C8mim PF6 and C8mim BF4, respectively that were implemented under microwave heating (90 °C) and different water content of emulsions (~ 30 to 50%). C8mim PF6 decreased the IFT and separated water from oil more effective than C8mim BF4 (95.6 and 87.4% for C8mim PF6 and C8mim BF4, respectively). The reason is that C8mim PF6 has bigger anion size and lower solubility in water which prevents the aggregation of ionic liquid in the medium in comparison with C8mim BF4.[114]
C8mim BF4Tetrafluoroborate1000–72000–87.485
C4mim NTf2Imidazoliumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideSW/O0.74–8.9 **N.A.101Imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids were used to demulsify W/O emulsion (water content of 40 wt%) at the temperature of 120 °C. There was no significant difference in the demulsification efficiency between the imidazolium and the pyridinium ionic liquids with the same alkyl chain length and anion type. Ionic liquids with longer alkyl chain (e.g., 8 and 12 carbon atoms) were more capable to displace the natural emulsifying agents of the crude oil which resulted in enhancing the demulsification process (74% and 90% for C8mim NTf2 and C12mim NTf2, respectively) as well as IFT reduction. Higher hydrophobicity of NTf2 results in improving demulsification efficiency (e.g., 74% and 40% for C8mim NTf2 and C8mim OTf, respectively).[115]
C8mim NTf2744
C12mim NTf29034
C8mim OTftriflate~40N.A.
C4py NTf2Pyridiniumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide10>N.A.
EDHIImidazoliumAcetateW/O50–250N.A.0–70N.A.Demulsification process using imidazolium-based ionic liquids were conducted at 60 °C and different water contents (10, 20, 30%). Increasing ionic liquids concentration from 50 to 250 ppm increased the demulsification efficiency to 70, 85, 100, and 100 for EDHI, EPHIB, EDDI, and EDPIB, respectively at different experimental conditions. Using 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylborate anion increased the hydrophobicity of EPHIB compared to EDHI which resulted in enhancing the demulsification process (e.g., demulsification efficiency increased from 70 to 85%). Based on the results, the efficiency of polymeric ionic liquids was better than that of their monomeric ionic liquids.[117]
EPHIB4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylborate10–85
EDDIAcetate70–100
EPDIB4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylborate85–100
P666,14 (CN)2PhosphoniumDicyanamideO/W***N.A.100N.A.In this research, different ionic liquids with hydrophobic cation and hydrophilic anions were used to demulsify O/W emulsions at room temperature. P666,14[N(CN)2] had high surface active area and removed oil from water completely. However, stable emulsions still existed in the systems that P666,14[Phos], P666,14[NTf2] and N2224[N(CN)2] were used because surface active area would not achieve in too hydrophobic (P666,14[Phos], P666,14[NTf2]) and too hydrophilic (N2224[N(CN)2]) ionic liquids.Halogenide ionic liquids, P666,14[Cl] and P666,14[Br] separated oil from water in a very short time (20 min) compared to non-halogenide ionic liquid P666,14[N(CN)2] (24 h).[118]
P666,14 Phosbis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinate0
P666,14 NTf2bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide0
P666,14 ClChloride>90
P666,14 BrBromide
N2224 N(CN)2AmmoniumDicyanamide0
C8mim ClImidazoliumChlorideW/O100–100001000N.A.3–73In this research, imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids were used at different concentration (100–1000 ppm) and different temperatures (20 °C to 60 °C) to evaluate their efficiency on IFT reduction. Pyridinium cation is more hydrophobic than imidazolium cation, therefore pyridinium based ionic liquids can remain at the O-W interface better than imidazolium based ionic liquids, which enable them to reduce the IFT of crude oil-distilled water effectively at lower CMC.[99]
C12mim Cl20006–84
C8Py ClPyridiniumN.A.4–45
C12Py Cl5007–93
Note: DE: Demulsification efficiency. SW: Saline water. N.A.: Not available. [Y]: Refer to anion type. * Mole/Liter. ** μmole/gram of emulsion. *** Mole ratio of ionic liquid:sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate is 1.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassanshahi, N.; Hu, G.; Li, J. Application of Ionic Liquids for Chemical Demulsification: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 4915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214915

AMA Style

Hassanshahi N, Hu G, Li J. Application of Ionic Liquids for Chemical Demulsification: A Review. Molecules. 2020; 25(21):4915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214915

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassanshahi, Nahid, Guangji Hu, and Jianbing Li. 2020. "Application of Ionic Liquids for Chemical Demulsification: A Review" Molecules 25, no. 21: 4915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214915

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop