Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Novel Chalcone-Based Phenothiazine Derivatives as Antioxidant and Anticancer Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Method for Simultaneous Determination of Three Cationic Dyes in Environmental Samples
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 19
10.3390/molecules25194565
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clean Grinding Technique: A Facile Synthesis and In Silico Antiviral Activity of Hydrazones, Pyrazoles, and Pyrazines Bearing Thiazole Moiety against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro)

by
Sraa Abu-Melha
1,
Mastoura M. Edrees
1,2,*,
Sayed M. Riyadh
3,4,
Mohamad R. Abdelaziz
5,
Abdo A. Elfiky
6 and
Sobhi M. Gomha
3,7,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Organic Chemistry, National Organization for Drug Control and Research (NODCAR), Giza 12311, Egypt
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 30002, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, MIU University, Cairo 19648, Egypt
6
Biophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
7
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Islamic University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 42351, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(19), 4565; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194565
Submission received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 2 October 2020 / Accepted: 4 October 2020 / Published: 6 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel series of some hydrazones bearing thiazole moiety were generated via solvent-drop grinding of thiazole carbohydrazide 2 with various carbonyl compounds. Also, dehydrative-cyclocondensation of 2 with active methylene compounds or anhydrides gave the respective pyarzole or pyrazine derivatives. The structures of the newly synthesized compounds were established based on spectroscopic evidences and their alternative syntheses. Additionally, the anti-viral activity of all the products was tested against SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) using molecular docking combined with molecular dynamics simulation (MDS). The average binding affinities of the compounds 3a, 3b, and 3c (−8.1 ± 0.33 kcal/mol, −8.0 ± 0.35 kcal/mol, and −8.2 ± 0.21 kcal/mol, respectively) are better than that of the positive control Nelfinavir (−6.9 ± 0.51 kcal/mol). This shows the possibility of these three compounds to effectively bind to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and hence, contradict the virus lifecycle.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Clean chemistry is a multidisciplinary concept for the judicious use of chemical reactions and prevents its pollution. It involves the designing of chemical products by using environmentally safe procedures that reduce the generation of hazardous substances, as well as the cost [1]. Grinding methods are appealing eco-friendly techniques for efficient organic synthesis with many advantages, such as: mild reaction conditions, easy separation and purifications [2,3], high efficiency and selectivity [4], and environmental acceptability [5]. In the meantime, hydrazone is an effective nucleus because hydrazine-containing compounds (R1R2C=NNH-R3) offer a wide range of biological activities, including anticholinesterase [6], antimycobacterial [7], anti-cancer [8], antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, antifungal, anti-tubercular, analgesic, muscle relaxants, and antihistamines [9,10,11,12]. Hydrazones possessing an azometine -NHN=CH- proton constitute an important class of compounds for new drug development. Both nitrogen atoms of the hydrazone group are nucleophilic and the carbon atom of the hydrazone group has both electrophilic and nucleophilic properties (Figure 1). These structural fragments are principally responsible for the physical and chemical properties of hydrazones. Therefore, many researchers have synthesized these compounds as target structures and evaluated their biological activities. These observations have been guiding the development of new hydrazones that possess varied biological activities [13,14,15].
Likewise, pyrazoline derivatives widely occur in nature in the form of alkaloids, vitamins, animal cells, and pigments. The unique structural array and pronounced pharmacological activities [16,17] of pyrazolines have made them attractive synthetic targets for many researchers. In continuation of our interest in green synthesis of heterocycles [2,18,19,20,21,22,23], herein, we propose an easy, efficient, solid-state grinding method for the preparation of hydrazones. This method can also be extended to the reactions of hyrazide with active methylene and anhydride compounds.
SARS-CoV-2 represents the century challenge to human beings. It represents the primary agent for the novel, deadly, pandemic of COVID-19 worldwide [24]. The main viral protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2 sheds drug designers due to its vital role in keeping the virus alive [25]. Mpro is a crucial enzyme for the viral polypeptide processing into the different enzymes that maintain the life cycle of the SARS-CoV-2. Hence, blocking Mpro activity is vital in combating COVID-19. Different compounds (natural and synthetic) are used as possible potential therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. In this study, we tested some hydrazones, pyarzoles, and pyrazines derivatives synthesized using a clean grinding technique.
Molecular modeling represents an excellent method used to judge the chemical reactivity in silico [26]. The fast improvement in the last two decades makes molecular modeling the second hand for drug designers. It helps reduce time, money, and effort in the journey of drug design [27]. It was successful in helping find potent anti-viral agents against many viruses, like Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) [28,29,30]. Additionally, computer-aided drug design is used to find the potency of drugs and natural products against SARS-CoV-2 proteins during the last few months [31,32,33,34]. In this study, molecular docking combined with molecular dynamics simulation is used to test the different compounds against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

An initial endeavor was to investigate the condensation reactions under solid-state conditions. Thus, grinding of 3-acetyl-7-amino-1-aryl-[1,2,4]triazolo [4,3-a]pyrimidin-5(1H)-one (1) [35] and 4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole -5-carbohydrazide (2) [36], in the presence of a few drops of acetic acid at room temperature, gave the condensation products N’-[1-(7-amino-5-oxo-1-aryl-1,5-dihydro-[1,2,4] triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)ethylidene]-4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazides (3a–c) (Scheme 1).
The spectral data are in accordance with the isolated products 3a–c (see the Supplementary Figure S1). 1H-NMR revealed two singlet signals at δ = (2.37–2.45) and (2.58–2.64) ppm due to (CH3-C=N) and (CH3-thiazole) [34], respectively. Another three singlet signals at δ = (5.30–5.36), (6.92–6.98), and (9.42–9.59) ppm were revealed, attributed to (CH-pyrimidine), (NH2) [32], and (NH-CO) [34], respectively. The molecular ion peaks and microanalysis results for the synthesized products were also in accordance with the theoretical calculation.
To verify the assigned structure of the products 3a–c, we have synthesized these compounds by alternative methods. Thus, treatment of aminothiouracil (4) with 2-[2-(4-methyl-2- phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl) hydrazono]-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides (5a–c) [37] in dioxane, in the presence of a catalytic amount of triethylamine, under thermal conditions, gave the authentic products identical in all respects (mp, mixed mp, IR) with the isolated products 3a–c via Smiles rearrangement [38] and elimination of H2S (Scheme 2).
Next, we investigated the derivatization of acylhydrazide group with thiazole moiety to generate the novel hydrazone templets. Thus, the reaction of 4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole- 5-carbohydrazide (2) with 2-phenyl-4-methyl-5-acetylthiazole (8) [39] or cyclic ketones 10a–c under solid-state conditions furnished the corresponding acylhydrazones 9 or 11a–c, respectively (Scheme 3). Microanalyses and spectral data (IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and MS) are compatible with the structures of hydazones (see the Supplementary Figure S2).
To generalize the grinding technique, the cyclo-condensation reactions were examined. As a consequence, treatment of acid hydrazide 2 with active methylene compounds, such as 2,4-pentanedione (12), ethyl 3-oxobutanoate (14), diethylmalonate (16), and ethyl cyanoacetate (18), under grinding conditions led to the formation of (3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)(4-methyl- 2-phenylthiazol-5-yl)methanone (13), (3-methyl-5-oxo-1,4-dihydro-pyrazol-1- yl)(4-methyl-2-phenyl thiazol-5-yl)methanone (15), 1-(4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl) pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (17), and 3-amino-1-(4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5- carbonyl)-1,4-dihydropyrazol-5-one (19), respectively (Scheme 4). 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 13 showed that the characteristic singlet at δ = 6.05 ppm corresponds to pyrazole-CH [40]. Also, the characteristic (CH2) protons of pyrazole ring appeared as a singlet at δ = 5.25 ppm [41] to confirm the structure of compound 15. Furthermore, the presence of a singlet at δ = 5.94 ppm corresponding to the (NH2) protons proved the formation of the compound 19. In the IR spectra, all pyrazole and pyrazoline compounds displayed a characteristic band near 1690 cm−1 attributed to C=O bridge stretching vibration (see the Supplementary Figure S3).
Additionally, the reaction of acid hydrazide 2 with maleic anhydride (20) or phthalic anhydride (22) resulted in ring-opening and ring closure to give the corresponding 1-(4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl)-1,2-dihydropyridazine-3,6-dione (21) or 2-(4-methyl-2-phenyl-thiazole-5-carbonyl)-2,3-dihydro phthalazine-1,4-dione (23), respectively (Scheme 5). Spectral data (IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and MS) and elemental analyses are in accordance with the structures of the isolated products (see the Supplementary Figure S4).

2.2. Molecular Simulations

The structures are tested for their anti-viral activity against SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) using molecular docking combined with molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) for up to 100 nanoseconds (see the Supplementary Figures S5 and S6). Figure 2 shows the average binding affinities of the compounds calculated using AutoDock Vina [42]. The anti-viral Nelfinavir (red column) is tested as a positive control. The error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) from all the docking trials using the different conformations of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. As reflected from Figure 2, the average binding affinities of the compounds 3a, 3b, and 3c (green columns) (−8.1 ± 0.33 kcal/mol, −8.0 ± 0.35 kcal/mol, and −8.2 ± 0.21 kcal/mol, respectively) are better (less) than that of the positive control Nelfinavir (−6.9 ± 0.51 kcal/mol). This shows the possibility of these three compounds to effectively bind to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and hence, contradict the virus lifecycle. Additionally, the compounds 9, 11a, 11b, 11c, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23 have average binding affinities comparable to Nelfinavir (−6.4 ± 0.09 kcal/mol for compound 13 down to −7.4 ± 0.13 kcal/mol for compound 23); hence, it may bind to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and stop the viral infection as well.
To further analyze the binding mode, the docking complexes are analyzed by the aid of the Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler (PLIP) software [43]. Table 1 shows the interaction profiles of the compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 9, 11a, 11b, 11c, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23 docked into the active site residues of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro. The most reported types of interaction were the H-bonds and hydrophobic contacts. Noticeably, the most reported interacting residue in almost all complexes is E166. For the best three compounds (3a, 3b, and 3c), the interaction is almost identical with 7 H-bonds (N142, G143, S144, E166, D187, and Q189) and one hydrophobic contact (E166). These three compounds have the lowest binding energy values (–8.1 to –8.3 kcal/mol). For the other compounds, the number of formed interactions is fewer. This is reflected in the binding energy values (–6.4 to –7.3 kcal/mol). The interaction pattern for the best three thiazole compounds, 3a, 3b, and 3c, are depicted in Figure 3. These three compounds can interact with the same binding site pocket of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro as reflected in the superposition (Figure 4) of the compounds after docking. The compounds 3a, 3b, and 3c proved their ability to bind firmly to the active site of the protein, and hence could be successful candidates against COVID-19. Experimental validation of the binding potency of the three compounds against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro is suggested as a future recommendation. Further in-depth MDS analysis of the best three compounds is suggested as future work. Additionally, we suggest testing these compounds against other enzymes for SARS-CoV-2, such as the papain-like protease (PLpro) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). It may bind firmly to these targets and may help inactivate SARS-CoV-2.

3. Experimental

3.1. Chemistry

An electrothermal Gallenkamp apparatus was operated to measure the melting points for the newly synthesized compounds (Bibby Sci. Lim. Stone, Staffordshire, UK). Pye-Unicam SP300 instrument in potassium bromide discs was used to measure Infra-Red, IR spectra (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). A Varian Mercury VXR-300 spectrometer (300 MHz for 1H-NMR and 75 MHz for 13C-NMR) (Varian, Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany) was manipulated to measure the 1H NMR, and 13C-NMR spectra and the chemical shifts were related to that of the solvent. GCMS-Q1000-EX Shimadzu spectrometers (Tokyo, Japan) were conducted to record the mass spectra of the samples on the ionizing voltage at 70 eV. Elemental analyses were carried out at the Microanalytical Centre of Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 3a–c, 9, 11a–c, 16–19, 22, and 23

A mixture of 4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (2) (0.233 g, 1 mmol) and appropriate carbonyl compounds (1 mmol) was ground in a mortar at room temperature in the presence of a few drops of acetic acid for 10–20 min (monitored through Thin Layer Chromatography, TLC). The reaction mixture was poured into water, filtered, and washed with water and ethanol. The crude products were recrystallized from the appropriate solvent.
Alternative Synthesis of Compounds 3a–c:
Equimolecular amounts of aminothiouracil (4) (0.143 g, 1 mmol) and 2-[2-(4-methyl-2-phenyl thiazole-5-carbonyl)hydrazono]-N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides (5a–c) (1 mmol) were dissolved in dioxane (15 mL), containing a few drops of triethylamine. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 2 h and poured into ice/HCl. The precipitate formed was collected by filtration, dried, and recrystallized from appropriate solvent to give the respective products identical in all respects (mp and mixed mp) with 3a–c.
N′-[1-(7-Amino-5-oxo-1-phenyl-1,5-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)ethylidene]-4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (3a). Brown powder (88%); mp = 168–170 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr) v = 3485, 3300 (NH2), 3224 (NH), 1683 (C=O), 1601 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.37 (3H, s, CH3–C=N–NH), 2.58 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 5.32 (1H, s, pyrimidine-CH), 6.92 (2H, s, NH2), 7.22-7.39 (10H, m, Ar–H), 9.42 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 13.8 (CH3-C=N-NH), 15.2 (CH3-thiazole), 81.8, 121.4, 125.6, 127.8, 128.3, 128.4, 129.0, 129.2, 129.6, 138.6, 142.8, 143.4, 147.8, 158.0, 159.8, 163.7, 165.7, 171.5; EIMS m/z (%): 484 [M+] (51), 461 (37), 272 (70), 180 (59), 59 (100). Anal. calcd for C24H20N8O2S (484.14): C, 59.49; H, 4.16; N, 23.13; S, 6.62. Found: C, 59.66; H, 4.28; N, 23.32; S, 6.65.
N′-[1-(7-Amino-5-oxo-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1,5-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)ethylidene]-4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (3b). Brown powder (89%); mp = 148–150 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr) v = 3477, 3310 (NH2), 3220 (NH), 1687 (C=O), 1602 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.23 (3H, s, Ar-CH3), 2.42 (3H, s, CH3–C=N–NH), 2.61 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 5.30 (1H, s, pyrimidine-CH), 6.93 (2H, s, NH2), 7.39-8.05 (9H, m, Ar–H), 9.50 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 15.2 (CH3-C=N-NH), 17.8 (CH3-thiazole), 21.2 (Ar-CH3), 81.1, 122.9, 126.8, 127.9, 128.1, 130.5, 131.9, 132.2, 135.4, 138.9, 140.8, 142.1, 145.5, 148.1, 153.3, 158.9, 162.8, 169.6; EIMS m/z (%): 498 [M+] (30), 472 (60), 407 (80), 64 (100). Anal. calcd for C25H22N8O2S (498.16): C, 60.23; H, 4.45; N, 22.48; S, 6.43. Found: C, 60.44; H, 4.38; N, 22.32; S, 6.52.
N′-[1-(7-Amino-5-oxo-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,5-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)ethylidene]-4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (3c). Brown powder (92%); mp = 155–157 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr) v = 3440, 3340 (NH2), 3235 (NH), 1689 (C=O), 1602 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.45 (3H, s, CH3–C=N–NH), 2.64 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 5.36 (1H, s, pyrimidine-CH), 6.98 (2H, s, NH2), 7.41-8.26 (9H, m, Ar–H), 9.59 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 16.4 (CH3-C=N-NH), 18.1 (CH3-thiazole), 82.1, 121.9, 123.1, 126.8, 127.9, 128.8, 130.6, 131.3, 132.8, 136.4, 137.8, 141.9, 142.8, 145.5, 153.3, 159.6, 162.8, 169.9; EIMS m/z (%): 520 [M+ + 2] (6), 518 [M+] (15), 456 (41), 272 (46), 200 (100). Anal. calcd for C24H19ClN8O2S (518.10): C, 55.54; H, 3.69; N, 21.59; S, 6.18. Found: C, 55.46; H, 3.71; N, 21.42; S, 6.23.
N′-[1-(4-Methyl-2-phenylthiazol-5-yl)ethylidene]-2-phenyl-4-methylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (9). Yellow powder (94%); mp = 242–244 °C (Dioxane); IR (KBr) v = 3158 (NH), 1668 (C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.44 (3H, s, CH3–C=N–NH), 2.63 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 2.75 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 7.51-8.01 (10H, m, Ar–H), 11.01 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 13.5 (CH3-C=N-NH), 14.0 (CH3-thiazole), 16.2 (CH3-thiazole), 125.5, 125.6, 127.8, 128.3, 128.6, 128.8, 128.9, 129.5, 129.6, 130.9, 138.5, 142.5, 144.1, 148.2, 164.7, 170.3; EIMS m/z (%): 432 [M+] (70), 202 (100), 71 (30). Anal. calcd for C23H20N4OS2 (432.11): C, 63.86; H, 4.66; N, 12.95; S, 14.82. Found: C, 63.65; H, 4.48; N, 13.02; S, 14.95.
N′-Cyclohexylidene-4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (11a). Yellowish-white powder (88%); mp = 186–188 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr) v = 3187 (NH), 1675 (C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 1.92 (6H, m, 3 CH2), 2.49 (4H, m, 2 CH2), 2.64 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 7.52-7.96 (5H, m, Ar–H), 10.12 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 18.2 (CH3-thiazole), 24.9 (CH2), 27.8 (CH2), 34.9 (CH2), 125.3, 128.7, 130.8, 132.4, 142.3, 143.8, 144.5, 158.3, 168.3; EIMS m/z (%): 313 [M+] (10), 257 (100), 80 (90). Anal. calcd for C17H19N3OS (313.12): C, 65.15; H, 6.11; N, 13.41; S, 10.23. Found: C, 65.25; H, 6.18; N, 13.32; S, 10.35.
N′-Cycloheptylidene-4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbohydrazide (11b). Yellowish-white powder (87%); mp = 211–213 °C (Dioxane); IR (KBr) v = 3157 (NH), 1675 (C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 1.62 (4H, m, 2 CH2), 1.89 (4H, m, 2 CH2), 2.49 (4H, m, 2 CH2), 2.65 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 7.53-7.98 (5H, m, Ar–H), 10.18 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 18.2 (CH3-thiazole), 25.9 (CH2), 27.8 (CH2), 35.9 (CH2), 124.8, 128.9, 130.5, 132.4, 142.3, 143.5, 144.4, 158.3, 161.9, 168.8; EIMS m/z (%): 327 [M+] (60), 202 (100), 71 (40). Anal. calcd for C18H21N3OS (327.14): C, 66.03; H, 6.46; N, 12.83; S, 9.79. Found: C, 65.95; H, 6.48; N, 13.02; S, 9.85.
N′-(1-Methylpiperidin-4-ylidene)-2-phenyl-4-methyl-thiazole-5-carbohydrazide (11c). White powder (84%); mp = 172–174 °C (EtOH/dioxane); IR (KBr) v = 3188 (NH), 1681 (C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 1.91 (4H, m, 2 CH2), 2.49 (4H, m, 2 CH2), 2.66 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 3.31 (3H, s, N-CH3), 7.52-7.97 (5H, m, Ar–H), 9.93 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 18.6 (CH3-thiazole), 24.9 (CH2), 47.8 (N-CH3), 54.9 (CH2), 123.9, 127.8, 131.8, 133.4, 142.3, 143.8, 146.5, 160.3, 168.8; EIMS m/z (%): 328 [M+] (30), 257 (100), 154 (80), 80 (50). Anal. calcd for C17H20N4OS (328.14): C, 62.17; H, 6.14; N, 17.06; S, 9.76. Found: C, 62.25; H, 6.11; N, 17.12; S, 9.55.
(3,5-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)(4-methyl-2-phenylthiazol-5-yl)methanone (13). Yellow powder (87%); mp = 200–202 °C (Dioxane); IR (KBr) v = 1685 (C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.18 (3H, s, pyrazole-CH3), 2.38 (3H, s, pyrazole-CH3), 2.64 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 6.05 (1H, s, pyrazole-CH), 7.52-8.02 (5H, m, Ar–H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 14.8 (CH3-pyrazole), 15.2 (CH3-pyrazole), 18.4 (CH3-thiazole), 127.8, 128.3, 130.8, 132.4, 142.3, 143.8, 146.5, 148.9, 150.3, 160.8, 168.8. EIMS m/z (%): 297 [M+] (10), 257 (30), 202 (100), 71 (60). Anal. calcd for C16H15N3OS (297.09): C, 64.62; H, 5.08; N, 14.13; S, 10.78. Found: C, 64.55; H, 5.11; N, 14.18; S, 10.58.
(3-Methyl-5-oxo-1,4-dihydro-pyrazol-1-yl)(4-methyl-2-phenylthiazol-5-yl)methanone (15). Brown powder (89%); mp = 136–138 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr) v = 1685 (2C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.64 (3H, s, pyrazole-CH3), 2.68 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 5.25 (2H, s, pyrazole-CH2), 7.53-7.98 (5H, m, Ar–H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 15.8 (CH3-pyrazole), 18.4 (CH3-thiazole), 46.2 (CH2-pyrazole), 125.8, 127.3, 130.8, 132.4, 141.9, 143.2, 146.4, 148.9, 162.8, 169.8. EIMS m/z (%): 299 [M+] (40), 257 (30), 202 (100), 71 (60). Anal. calcd for C15H13N3O2S (299.07): C, 60.19; H, 4.38; N, 14.04; S, 10.71. Found: C, 60.25; H, 4.21; N, 14.19; S, 10.88.
1-(4-Methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl)pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (17). Yellowish-white powder (86%); mp = 306–308 °C (DMF); IR (KBr) v = 3208 (NH), 1691, 1680 (3C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.68 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 3.42 (2H, s, pyrazole-CH2), 7.53-7.99 (5H, m, Ar–H), 10.96 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 18.9 (CH3-thiazole), 46.2 (CH2-pyrazole), 125.8, 127.8, 131.1, 132.6, 141.9, 146.9, 148.9, 162.8, 165.6, 169.8. EIMS m/z (%): 301 [M+] (60), 257 (60), 202 (80), 80 (100). Anal. calcd for C14H11N3O3S (301.05): C, 55.81; H, 3.68; N, 13.95; S, 10.64. Found: C, 55.65; H, 3.41; N, 14.09; S, 10.83.
3-Amino-1-(4-methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl)-1,4-dihydropyrazol-5-one (19). White powder (85%); mp = 175–177 °C; IR (KBr) v = 3268, 3166 (NH2), 1683 (2C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.66 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 3.45 (2H, s, pyrazole-CH2), 5.94 (2H, s, NH2), 7.55-8.01 (5H, m, Ar–H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 17.9 (CH3-thiazole), 51.2 (CH2-pyrazole), 124.8, 128.8, 130.1, 134.6, 141.9, 145.9, 148.3, 160.7, 165.6, 168.8. EIMS m/z (%): 300 [M+] (70), 275 (30), 202 (20), 80 (100). Anal. calcd for C14H12N4O2S (300.07): C, 55.99; H, 4.03; N, 18.66; S, 10.67. Found: C, 55.85; H, 3.91; N, 18.59; S, 10.80.
1-(4-Methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl)-1,2-dihydropyridazine-3,6-dione (21). White crystals (83%); mp = 112–114 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr) v = 3228 (NH), 1693, 1677 (3C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.63 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 6.42 (1H, d, CH=), 6.84 (1H, d, CH=), 7.53-8.03 (5H, m, Ar–H), 11.36 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 17.9 (CH3-thiazole), 127.8, 128.8, 129.8, 130.5, 131.1, 132.6, 133.6, 143.9, 146.9, 158.9, 161.8, 167.6. EIMS m/z (%): 313 [M+] (80), 202 (100), 71 (50). Anal. calcd for C15H11N3O3S (313.05): C, 57.50; H, 3.54; N, 13.41; S, 10.23. Found: C, 57.63; H, 3.45; N, 13.29; S, 10.32.
2-(4-Methyl-2-phenylthiazole-5-carbonyl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (23). Yellowish-white crystals (84%); mp = 270–272 °C (AcOH); IR (KBr) v = 3231 (NH), 1691, 1671 (3C=O) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ = 2.70 (3H, s, thiazole–CH3), 7.55-8.04 (9H, m, Ar–H), 11.22 (1H, s, NH); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ = 18.2 (CH3-thiazole), 125.9, 126.8, 127.4, 128.8, 129.8, 130.4, 131.3, 132.5, 133.7, 142.9, 143.7, 145.9, 158.9, 160.8, 161.8, 167.6. EIMS m/z (%): 363 [M+] (50), 202 (100), 71 (40). Anal. calcd for C19H13N3O3S (363.07): C, 62.80; H, 3.61; N, 11.56; S, 8.82. Found: C, 62.63; H, 3.52; N, 11.49; S, 8.73.

3.2. The In Silico Studies

3.2.1. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Nanoscale Molecular Dynamics (NAMD) and Visualizing Molecular Dynamics (VMD) software were used in the molecular dynamics study (MDS) using the standard CHARMM 36 forcefield, and the proteins were solvated with the TIP3P water model [44,45,46,47]. The temperature of 310 K and the 154 mM NaCl concentration were adjusted during the simulation period to simulate the protein at its physiological conditions. The MDS calculations were done on the Bibliotheca Alexandrina supercomputer, Alexandria, Egypt. Chimera software was used to cluster the trajectories after MDS using default parameters [48]. Five representative structures of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro were used in the docking study after clustering the trajectories of the MDS of the Mpro (PDB ID: 6Y84).

3.2.2. Molecular Docking

AutoDock Vina 1.1.2 software was used to test the thiazole compounds against SARS-CoV-2 main protease different conformations, while Nelfinavir was used as a positive control. The ligands were prepared using the PyMOL 2.4 and AutoDock Tools 1.5.6 software [49]. Any missed hydrogen atoms were added, followed by charges addition before input files generation. The docking utilizes flexible active site (H41 and C145) and flexible ligand protocol. The AutoDock Vina grid box size used in the docking experiments is 40 × 40 × 40 Å3, while the box centers were set to be at the dyads H41 and C145 (−3.9, 19.7, −5.0) Å, (−4.6, 18.9, −15.5) Å, (−8.2, 37.0, −8.4) Å, (4.7, 38.8, −3.3) Å, and (22.1, 32.0, −2.4) Å, for the different conformations of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. Docking calculations were performed on a local workstation (Intel core i7/12 GB RAM). After docking, the complexes were investigated using both PyMOL and the Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler (PLIP) 2.1.4 software [42].

4. Conclusions

In this context, a series of novel hydrazones (3a–c, 9, 11a–c), pyarzoles (13, 15, 17, 19), and pyrazines (21, 23) were synthesized using a solvent-drop, eco-friendly, environmental grinding method. The structure of the newly prepared compounds was established based on both elemental analysis and spectroscopic data and by an alternative method wherever possible. Also, the anti-viral activity of all the products was tested against SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) using molecular docking combined with molecular dynamics simulation (MDS). The average binding affinities of the compounds 3a, 3b, and 3c were better than that of the positive control Nelfinavir. So, these compounds can bind effectively to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and hence, contradict the virus lifecycle.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and Mass spectra of compound 3a, Figure S2: 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and IR spectra of compound 9, Figure S3: 1H-NMR and IR spectra of compound 15, Figure S4: 1H-NMR and IR spectra of compound 23, Figure S5: Molecular Simulations, Figure S6: Molecular Simulations (RMSF).

Author Contributions

S.A.-M., S.M.G., S.M.R. and A.A.E. conceived and designed the experiments; S.M.G., M.M.E. and M.R.A. carried out the experiments; S.M.G., A.A.E. and S.M.R. analyzed and interpreted the data; S.M.G. and S.M.R. prepared the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through a General Research Project under grant number (R.G.P.1/205/41).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Horvath, I.T.; Anastas, P.T. Innovations and green chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2169–2173. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gomha, S.M.; Riyadh, S.M.; Abdalla, M.M. Solvent-drop grinding method: Efficient synthesis, dpph radical scavenging and anti-diabetic activities of chalcones, bis-chalcones, azolines, and bis-azolines. Cur. Org. Synth. 2015, 12, 220–228. [Google Scholar]
  3. Amirnejad, M.; Naimi-Jamal, M.R.; Tourani, H.; Ghafuri, H. A facile solvent-free one-pot three-component method for the synthesis of 2-amino-4H-pyrans and tetrahydro-4H-chromenes at ambient temperature. Monatsh. Chem. 2013, 144, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mashkouri, S.; Naimi-Jamal, M.R. Mechanochemical solvent-free and catalyst-free one-pot synthesis of pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-diones with quantitative yields. Molecules 2009, 14, 474–479. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vibhute, A.; Mokle, S.; Karamunge, K.; Gurav, V.; Vibhute, Y. A simple and efficient method for solvent-free iodination of hydroxylated aromatic aldehydes and ketones using iodine and iodic acid by grinding method. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010, 21, 914–918. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bingul, M.; Ercan, S.; Boga, M. The design of novel 4,6-dimethoxyindole based hydrazide-hydrazones: Molecular modeling, synthesis and anticholinesterase activity. J. Mol. Str. 2020, 1213, 128202. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rohane, S.H.; Chauhan, A.J.; Fuloria, N.K.; Fuloria, S. Synthesis and in vitro antimycobacterial potential of novel hydrazones of eugenol. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 4495–4504. [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Sodies, S.A.; Aouad, M.R.; Ihmaid, S.; Aljuhani, A.; Messali, M.; Ali, I.; Rezki, N. Microwave and conventional synthesis of ester based dicationic pyridinium ionic liquids carrying hydrazone linkage: DNA binding, anticancer and docking studies. J. Mol. Str. 2020, 1207, 127756. [Google Scholar]
  9. Saidugari, S.; Rao, L.; Vidya, K.; Ram, B.; Balram, B. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of (E)-4-((3-methyl-4-(methylsulfonyl)pyridin-2-yl)methoxy)-N′-(substituted-benzylidene)benzohydrazide derivatives. Indian J. Chem. 2017, 56, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abdelrazek, F.M.; Gomha, S.M.; Abdel-aziz, H.M.; Farghaly, M.S.; Metz, P.; Abdel-Shafy, A. Efficient Synthesis and In-Silico study of some novel pyrido[2,3-d][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidine derivatives. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2020, 57, 1759–1769. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gomha, S.M.; Muhammad, Z.A.; Abdel-aziz, H.M.; Matar, I.K.; El-Sayed, A.A. Green synthesis, molecular docking and anticancer activity of novel 1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbohydrazones under grind-stone chemistry. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2020, 13, 6–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Belskaya, N.P.; Dehaen, W.; Bakulev, V.A. Synthesis and properties of hydrazones bearing amide, thioamide and amidine functions. Arch. Org. Chem. 2010, 1, 75–332. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xavier, A.J.; Thakur, M.; Marie, J.M. Synthesis and spectral characterisation of hydrazone based 14-membered octaaza macrocyclic Ni (II) complexes. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2012, 4, 986–990. [Google Scholar]
  14. Banerjee, S.; Mondal, S.; Chakraborty, W.; Sen, S.; Gachhui, R.; Butcher, R.J.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Mandal, C.; Mitra, S. Syntheses, X-ray crystal structures, DNA binding, oxidative cleavage and antimicrobial studies of two Cu (II) hydrazone complees. Polyhedron 2009, 28, 2785–2793. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zheng, L.W.; Wu, L.L.; Zhao, B.X.; Dong, W.L.; Miao, J.Y. Synthesis of novel substituted pyrazole-5-carbohydrazide hydrazone derivatives and discovery of a potent apoptosis inducer in A549 lung cancer cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 1957–1962. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ozdemir, Z.; Kandilici, H.B.; Gumusel, B.; Calis, U.; Bilgin, A.A. Synthesis and studies on antidepressant and anticonvulsant activities of some 3-(2-furyl)-pyrazoline derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 373–379. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rajendra, P.Y.; Lakshmana, R.A.; Prasoona, L.; Murali, K.; Ravi, K.P. Synthesis and antidepressant activity of some 1,3,5-triphenyl-2-pyrazolines and 3-(2″-hydroxy naphthalen-1″-yl)-1,5-diphenyl-2- pyrazolines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 5030–5034. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gomha, S.M.; Riyadh, S.M. Synthesis of triazolo[4,3-b][1,2,4,5]tetrazines and triazolo[3,4-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazines using chitosan as ecofriendly catalyst under microwave irradiation. Arkivoc 2009, XI, 58–68. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gomha, S.M.; Riyadh, S.M.; Mahmmoud, E.A.; Elaasser, M.M. Synthesis and anticancer activity of arylazothiazoles and 1,3,4-thiadiazoles using chitosan-grafted-poly(4-vinylpyridine) as a novel copolymer basic catalyst. Chem. Heterocycl. Compds. 2015, 51, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gomha, S.M.; Abdel-aziz, H.M.; Abolibda, T.Z.; Hassan, S.A.; Abdalla, M.M. Green synthesis, molecular docking and pharmacological evaluation of new triazolo-thiadiazepinylcoumarine derivatives as sedative-hypnotic scaffold. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2020, 57, 1034–1043. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gomha, S.M.; Badrey, M.G.; Arafa, W.A.A. DABCO-catalyzed green synthesis of thiazole and 1,3-thiazine derivatives linked to benzofuran. Heterocycles 2016, 92, 1450–1461. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gomha, S.M.; Khalil, K.D.; El-Zanate, A.M.; Riyadh, S.M. A Facile green synthesis and anti-cancer activity of bis-arylhydrazononitriles, triazolo[5,1-c][1,2,4]triazine, and 1,3,4-thiadiazoline. Heterocycles 2013, 87, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gomha, S.M.; Eldebss, T.M.A.; Badrey, M.G.; Abdulla, M.M.; Mayhoub, A.S. Novel 4-heteroaryl- antipyrines as DPP-IV Inhibitors. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 86, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar]
  24. World Health Organization Situation Report 72. April 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200401-sitrep-72-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=3dd8971b_2 (accessed on 5 October 2020).
  25. Jin, Z.; Du, X.; Xu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, C.; et al. Structure of M pro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 2020, 582, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Leach, A. Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper New Jersey River, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  27. Elfiky, A.A. Reply to a letter to the editor. Life Sci. 2020, 252, 117715. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ganesan, A.; Barakat, K. Applications of computer-aided approaches in the development of hepatitis c antiviral agents. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Saleh, N.A.; Elhaes, H.; Ibrahim, M. Design and Development of Some Viral Protease Inhibitors by QSAR and Molecular Modeling Studies, in Viral Proteases and Their Inhibitors; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 25–58. [Google Scholar]
  30. Saleh, N.A.; Ezat, A.A.; ElFiky, A.A.; Elshemey, W.M.; Bayoumy, A.M. Theoretical Study on Modified Boceprevir Compounds as NS3 Protease Inhibitors. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2015, 12, 371–375. [Google Scholar]
  31. Elfiky, A.A. SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) targeting: An in silico perspective. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elfiky, A.A. Ribavirin, Remdesivir, Sofosbuvir, Galidesivir, and Tenofovir against SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp): A molecular docking study. Life Sci. 2020, 253, 117592. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Elfiky, A.A. Anti-HCV, nucleotide inhibitors, repurposing against COVID-19. Life Sci. 2020, 248, 117477. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Elfiky, A.A. Natural products may interfere with SARS-CoV-2 attachment to the host cell. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mosselhi, M.A.M. A convenient synthesis of novel derivatives of pyrido[2,3-d][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a] pyrimidine-5,6-dione. Monatsh. Chem. 2002, 133, 1297–1304. [Google Scholar]
  36. Araniciu, C.; Oniga, S.D.; Benedec, D.; Crisan, O.; Vlase, L.; Palage, M.; Oniga, O. New 5-thiazolyl- carbohydrazon-n-allyl-thiazolines. Synthesis, characterization and antioxidant activity. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 2340–2343. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gomha, S.M.; Abdelaziz, M.R.; Kheder, N.A.; Abdelaziz, H.M.; Alterary, S.; Mabkhot, Y.N. A facile access and evaluation of some novel thiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives incorporating thiazole moiety as potent anticancer agents. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 105. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shawali, A.S.; Abdallah, M.A.; Mosselhi, M.A.N.; Farghaly, T.A. A Facile one-pot regioselective synthesis of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]5(1H)-pyrimidinones via tandem Japp–Klingemann, Smiles rearrangement, and cyclization reactions. Heteroatom Chem. 2002, 13, 136–140. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tazoo, D.; Oniga, O.; Bohle, D.S.; Chua, Z.; Dongo, E. General two--step preparation of chalcones containing thiazole. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2012, 49, 768–773. [Google Scholar]
  40. Min, Z.-L.; Zhang, Q.; Hong, X.; Cao, X.-L.; Hu, X.-M. A Green protocol for catalyst-free synthesis of pyrazole in glycerol-water solution. Asian J. Chem. 2015, 27, 3205–3207. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ailawadi, S.; Jyoti, A.S.; Yadav, M.; Pathak, D. Synthesis and characterization of some substituted pyrazoles as analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents. Der Pharm. Chem. 2011, 3, 215–222. [Google Scholar]
  42. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar]
  43. Salentin, S.; Schreiber, S.; Haupt, V.J.; Adasme, M.F.; Schroeder, M. PLIP: Fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W443–W447. [Google Scholar]
  44. van Dijk, A.D.; Bonvin, A.M. Solvated docking: Introducing water into the modelling of biomolecular complexes. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2340–2347. [Google Scholar]
  45. Mark, P.; Nilsson, L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9954–9960. [Google Scholar]
  46. Phillips, J.C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R.D.; Kalé, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781–1802. [Google Scholar]
  47. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schrödinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System; Version 1.7.6; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, USA.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 04565 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure and reactivity of hydrazones.
Figure 1. Structure and reactivity of hydrazones.
Molecules 25 04565 g001
Molecules 25 04565 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of triazolopyrimidine derivatives 3a–c.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of triazolopyrimidine derivatives 3a–c.
Molecules 25 04565 sch001
Molecules 25 04565 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Alternative synthesis of triazolopyrimidine derivatives 3a–c.
Scheme 2. Alternative synthesis of triazolopyrimidine derivatives 3a–c.
Molecules 25 04565 sch002
Molecules 25 04565 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of thiazoles 9 and 11a–c.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of thiazoles 9 and 11a–c.
Molecules 25 04565 sch003
Molecules 25 04565 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis of pyrazoles 13, 15, 17, and 19.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of pyrazoles 13, 15, 17, and 19.
Molecules 25 04565 sch004
Molecules 25 04565 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Synthesis of pyridazines 21 and 23.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of pyridazines 21 and 23.
Molecules 25 04565 sch005
Molecules 25 04565 g002 550
Figure 2. Average binding energies (in kcal/mol) of the compounds of Nelfinavir (red) 3a, 3b, and 3c (green), and 9, 11a, 11b, 11c, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23 (blue) docked into the active site residues of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro. Error bars represent the standard deviations.
Figure 2. Average binding energies (in kcal/mol) of the compounds of Nelfinavir (red) 3a, 3b, and 3c (green), and 9, 11a, 11b, 11c, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23 (blue) docked into the active site residues of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro. Error bars represent the standard deviations.
Molecules 25 04565 g002
Molecules 25 04565 g003 550
Figure 3. The interaction pattern (after docking) for the best three thiazole compounds, 3a, 3b, and 3c, depicted using PyMOL software. The compounds are shown in yellow sticks, while the interacting residues form SARS-CoV-2 Mpro are depicted in blue sticks labeled with its one-letter codes. The formed H-bonds and hydrophobic contacts are shown in blue and dashed-gray lines, respectively.
Figure 3. The interaction pattern (after docking) for the best three thiazole compounds, 3a, 3b, and 3c, depicted using PyMOL software. The compounds are shown in yellow sticks, while the interacting residues form SARS-CoV-2 Mpro are depicted in blue sticks labeled with its one-letter codes. The formed H-bonds and hydrophobic contacts are shown in blue and dashed-gray lines, respectively.
Molecules 25 04565 g003
Molecules 25 04565 g004 550
Figure 4. The superposition of the positive control (Nelfinavir) and the best three compounds, 3a, 3b, and 3c, depicted using PyMOL software. The compounds are shown in colored sticks, and Mpro in colored cartoons.
Figure 4. The superposition of the positive control (Nelfinavir) and the best three compounds, 3a, 3b, and 3c, depicted using PyMOL software. The compounds are shown in colored sticks, and Mpro in colored cartoons.
Molecules 25 04565 g004
Table
Table 1. The interaction pattern of the thiazole compounds (3a, 3b, 3c, 9, 11a, 11b, 11c, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23) and Nelfinavir against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The AutoDock Vina scores are listed among the number of H-bonds and hydrophobic contacts and the residues that interact. Bold residues are the most interacting residue E166.
Table 1. The interaction pattern of the thiazole compounds (3a, 3b, 3c, 9, 11a, 11b, 11c, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23) and Nelfinavir against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The AutoDock Vina scores are listed among the number of H-bonds and hydrophobic contacts and the residues that interact. Bold residues are the most interacting residue E166.
CompoundAutoDock Vina ScoreH-BondingHydrophobic Interaction
NumberResidues from SARS-CoV-2 Mpro
Take Part in the Interaction		NumberResidues from SARS-CoV-2 Mpro
Take Part in the Interaction
Nelfinavir−6.71E1663T25, L27, and M165
3a−8.17N142, G143, S144(2), E166, D187, Q1891E166
3b−8.37N142, G143, S144(2), E166, D187, Q1891E166
3c−8.37L141, N142, G143, S144, E166, D187, Q1891E166
9−7.31D1873T25, L27, Q189
11a−6.61E1664L27, N142, M165, E166
11b−6.71E1663T25, L27, E166
11c−6.41G1432L27, E166
13−6.41Q1890N/A
15−6.93G143, S144, C1452E166, Q189
17−7.00N/A2T25, Q189
19−7.06N142, G143, S144, C145, E166, Q1891Q189
21−7.03G143, S144, E1664T25, L27(2), E166
23−7.33G143, S144, C1451E166
N/A: Not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abu-Melha, S.; Edrees, M.M.; Riyadh, S.M.; Abdelaziz, M.R.; Elfiky, A.A.; Gomha, S.M. Clean Grinding Technique: A Facile Synthesis and In Silico Antiviral Activity of Hydrazones, Pyrazoles, and Pyrazines Bearing Thiazole Moiety against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro). Molecules 2020, 25, 4565. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194565

AMA Style

Abu-Melha S, Edrees MM, Riyadh SM, Abdelaziz MR, Elfiky AA, Gomha SM. Clean Grinding Technique: A Facile Synthesis and In Silico Antiviral Activity of Hydrazones, Pyrazoles, and Pyrazines Bearing Thiazole Moiety against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro). Molecules. 2020; 25(19):4565. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194565

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abu-Melha, Sraa, Mastoura M. Edrees, Sayed M. Riyadh, Mohamad R. Abdelaziz, Abdo A. Elfiky, and Sobhi M. Gomha. 2020. "Clean Grinding Technique: A Facile Synthesis and In Silico Antiviral Activity of Hydrazones, Pyrazoles, and Pyrazines Bearing Thiazole Moiety against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro)" Molecules 25, no. 19: 4565. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194565

APA Style

Abu-Melha, S., Edrees, M. M., Riyadh, S. M., Abdelaziz, M. R., Elfiky, A. A., & Gomha, S. M. (2020). Clean Grinding Technique: A Facile Synthesis and In Silico Antiviral Activity of Hydrazones, Pyrazoles, and Pyrazines Bearing Thiazole Moiety against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro). Molecules, 25(19), 4565. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194565

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop